Click o this text to watch "The Beast As Saint: The Truth About Martin Luther King Jr."....




Click on this text to examine the book titled "NEGROES WITH GUNS" with forewards written by Martin Luther King Jr.....

                                                                                         The Black Dilemma
"For almost 150 years the United States has been conducting an interesting experiment.
The subjects of the experiment: black people and working-class whites.
The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into
slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?
The whites were descendants of Europeans who had created a majestic civilization. The former
slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements.
Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black
people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord
ever since.
Decade after decade the problems persisted but the experimenters never gave up. They
insisted that if they could find the right formula the experiment would work, and concocted
program after program to get the result they wanted. They created the Freedman’s Bureau,
passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered
race preferences, built housing projects, and tried midnight basketball. Their new laws
intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable.
They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom
of association. Over the protests of parents, they put white children on buses and sent them
to black schools and vice-versa. They tried with money, special programs, relaxed standards,
and endless hand wringing to close the achievement gap. To keep white backlash in check
they began punishing public and even private statements on race. They hung up Orwellian
public banners that commanded whites to Celebrate Diversity! and Say No to Racism.
Nothing was off limits if it might salvage the experiment.
Some thought that what W.E.B. DuBois called the Talented Tenth would lead the way for
black people. A group of elite, educated blacks would knock down doors of opportunity
and show the world what blacks were capable of.
There is a Talented Tenth. They are the black Americans who have become entrepreneurs,
lawyers, doctors and scientists. But ten percent is not enough. For the experiment to work,
the ten percent has to be followed by a critical mass of people who can hold middle-class
jobs and promote social stability. That is what is missing.
Through the years, too many black people continue to show an inability to function and prosper
in a culture unsuited to them. Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and
the vast majority of black cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And
blacks never take responsibility for their failures. Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment.
Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark,
Los Angeles, Cincinnati, and Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away.
The white elite would tell us that this doesn't mean the experiment has failed. We just have
to try harder. We need more money, more time, more understanding, more programs, and
more opportunities.
But nothing changes no matter how much money is spent, no matter how many laws are
passed, no matter how many black geniuses are portrayed on TV, and no matter who is
president. Some argue its a problem of culture, as if culture creates people’s behavior
instead of the other way around. Others blame white privilege.
But since 1965, when the JEWS opened Americas doors to the Third World, immigrants
from Asia and India people who are not white, not rich, and not connected have quietly
succeeded. While the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top
scores on the SAT, black youths are committing half the country's violent crime, which
includes viciously punching random white people on the street for the thrill of it that has
nothing to do with poverty.
The experiment has failed. Not because of white culture, or white privilege, or white racism.
The fundamental problem is that American black culture has evolved into an un-fixable and
crime ridden mess. They do not want to change their culture or society, and expect others
to tolerate their violence and amoral behavior. They have become socially incompatible with
other races by their own design, not because of the racism of others - but by their own
hatred of non-blacks.
Our leaders don't seem to understand just how tired their white subjects are with this experiment.
They don't understand that white people aren't out to get black people; they are just exhausted
with them. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints,
and the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive
animosity. The elites explain everything with racism, and refuse to believe that white
frustration could soon reach the boiling point."
Anthony Bryan, a contributor to American Renaissance.
National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People

It was Jews who were behind America’s civil rights
groups that were assumed to be founded and steered by
African Americans. Most of the founders of the NAACP
were Jews such as Henry Moskowitz, Jacob Schiff,
Jacob Billikoph, and Rabbi Stephen Wise. The NAACP
Chairman for decades was a Jew named Joel Spingarn.
Jewish guy Kivie Kaplan was the NAACP President
from 1966 to 1975.

Above photo from the April 23, 1967, edition of the Portland Press Herald (page 20A) alongside a story about the

NAACP’s regional conference, held at the Eastland Hotel. Original caption: “NAACP leaders lead off in a march down

Congress Street Saturday afternoon. From the left are Kivie Kaplan, Newton, Mass., national president;

Donald Fisher, Portland, president of the local area branch; Boston attorney Keesler H. Montgomery, regional conference

president, and Gerald Talbot, Portland, chairman of the regional conference. (By Staff Photographer Merrill)”


Kivie Kaplan was born on April 1, 1904 in Boston, Massachusetts. He was the youngest

of three sons of Benjamin and Celia (Solomont) Kaplan. He attended English High School

and Bryant and Stratton School in Boston. In 1924, Kivie Kaplan and his brothers, Joseph

and Archie, took over their father's leather businesses. The businesses

run by the Kaplans were models of

management-labor cooperation. The


employees participated in a profit-sharing program which paid out several

million dollars over the years. Suggestions from employees were encouraged

and rewarded. Everyone in the plants, including the executives, ate in the

same dining room and was provided free lunches. Kaplan successfully

helped run the tanneries until 1962 when he

retired to devote all of his time to philanthropic work.


He had joined the N.A.A.C.P. in 1932 and was elected to the National Board in 1954.

He was also the National Chairman of the N.A.A.C.P. Life Membership Committee and

active on life memberships dramatically increased from a few hundred to several hundred

thousand. In 1966, he was elected as President of the N.A.A.C.P. and held that post

until his death. As President of the N.A.A.C.P., Kaplan actively worked to make the

organization successful. He spoke throughout the United States on its behalf and sought

financial contributions wherever he could. Kaplan was trustee of two black colleges:

Lincoln University in Pennsylvania and Tougaloo College in Mississippi.


Kivie Kaplan was also involved in Jewish affairs and was a member of the Board of Trustees

of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations (U.A.H.C.). He was a member of the U.A.H.C.'s

Executive Committee as well as its Social Action Commission. He contributed large sums

of money to the Jewish Memorial Hospital in Boston and Brandeis University. The Religious

Action Center of U.A.H.C. in Washington, DC was built with money donated by Kaplan and

his wife, Emily.


Kaplan received numerous awards and honorary degrees. Among these were the Amistad

Award of the American Missionary Association, the Men of Vision Award from the Bonds

for Israel Committee, and honorary degrees from Wilberforce University,

Wilberforce, Ohio, Hebrew Union College, and Lincoln University in Pennsylvania.



In 1925, Kivie Kaplan married Emily Rogers. They had three children,

Sylvia (Grossman), Jean (Green), and Edward. Kivie Kaplan died on May 5, 1975.


Martin Luther King’s chief advisor was a Jew, Stanley David Levison,
who of course, was kept well hidden from public view.
Levison was active in the
American Jewish Congress and was a Communist from
1935 until 1956. Levison, like many American
Communists, became “disillusioned” with communism
after the Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956 that focused
a spotlight directed at domestic communists.
Stanley David Levison was an attorney, communist Jew
and handler to Martin Luther King, Jr...
and was he primary author of King’s famous I Have A Dream
speech that was delivered from the steps of the Lincoln
memorial on August 28th, 1963.
Major civil rights groups were funded mainly by Jewish
donations. Important civil rights court cases were argued
and won by Jewish lawyers such as Jack Greenberg who
was the key attorney in the Brown vs. Board of Education
decision of 1954.
Nathan Margold produced an in depth
report that became the NAACP’s blueprint for the
strategy to outlaw racial segregation; which may seem
like a noble cause until you realize that Jews were just
using African Americans as a front for the actual Jewish
agenda of total dominance and control of America by
racially watering down the culture and dividing the
power structure and they knocked down cultural
barriers in place against Jewish inclusion by using
African Americans as the front-line punching bags.

Globalist Jews had learned that subjugating homogenous
European countries such as Spain and Germany was
nearly impossible; divide and conquer was a better tactic.

Americans now all use the same drinking fountains but
maintain separate neighborhoods, cultures, and vote
along separate lines of interest.

The First Legal Slave-owner in America was a Black Man


According to colonial records, the first slave owner in the United States was a black man.


Prior to 1655 there were no legal chattel slaves in the colonies, only indentured servants. All masters were required

to free their servants after their time was up. Seven years was the limit that an indentured servant could be held. 


Upon their release they were granted 50 acres of land. This included any black African

purchased from slave traders. Blacks were also granted 50 acres upon their release.


Anthony Johnson was a Negro from modern-day Angola. He was brought to the US to work on a tobacco farm in 1619.

In 1622 he was almost killed when Powhatan Indians attacked the farm. 52 out of 57 people on

the farm perished in the attack. He married a female black servant while working on the farm.


When Anthony was released he was legally recognized as a “free Negro” and ran a successful farm. In 1651 he held 250

acres and five black indentured servants. In 1654, it was time for Anthony to release John Casor, a black indentured servant.

Instead Anthony told Casor he was extending his time. Casor left and became employed by the free white man Robert Parker.


Anthony Johnson sued Robert Parker in the Northampton Court in 1654. In 1655, the court ruled that Anthony Johnson

could hold John Casor indefinitely. The court gave judicial sanction for blacks to own members of their own

race as chattel slaves. Thus Casor became the first permanent slave and Johnson the first slave owner.


Whites still could not legally hold a black servant as a chattel slave until 1670. In that year, the colonial

assembly passed legislation permitting free whites, blacks, and Indians the right to own blacks as slaves.


By 1699, the number of free blacks prompted fears of a “Negro insurrection.” Virginia Colonial ordered the repatriation

of freed blacks back to Africa. Many blacks sold themselves to white masters so they would not have to go to Africa.

This was the first effort to gently repatriate free blacks back to Africa. The modern nations

of Sierra Leone and Liberia both originated as colonies of repatriated former black slaves.


However, black slave owners continued to thrive in the United States.


By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. By 1860

there were about 3,000 slaves owned by black households in the city of New Orleans alone.





List of Jews who founded, work(ed) for, or are otherwise associated
with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP):

Joel Spingarn
Arthur Spingarn (brother)
Julius Rosenthal
Henry Malkewitz
Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch
Lillian Wald
Kivie Kaplan
Nathan Margold
Jack Greenberg
Julian Mack
Henry Moskowitz
Herbert Hill
Louis Marshall
Rabbi David Saperstein
Rabbi Stephen Wise
Herbert Lehman
Arthur Sachs
Herbert Seligmann
Martha Gruening
Felix Frankfurter
Herman Lehman
June Shagaloff (birthname, not married name) Special Counsel

Milton R. Konvitz Assistant Special Counsel; aid to Thurgood Marshall at NAACP

Helen (Lehman) Buttenwieser on NAACP's Legal Defense Fund (LDF, aka LDEF) board

Michael Meltsner first assistant counsel in NAACP's LDF

Louis H. Pollack vice president of NAACP's LDF

Andrew D. Weinberger NAACP lawyer

Paul Bender lawyers' training instructor in NAACP's LDF

Michael Sovern lawyer's training director in LDF/LDF board member

Albert Sachs lawyers' training instructor in LDF

James Vorenberg LDF board member

Norman Redlich LDF board member

Lani Guinier (halfBlack, w/ Jewish mother) lawyer in LDF

James Liebman assistant counsel in LDF

Peter Zimroth a law student intern at LDF Bernard Segal LDF board
member; he was key in urging President Kennedy to aid Black civil rights
(and he cochaired a committee set up by Kennedy the Lawyers' Committee for Civil
Rights Under Law to aid Black civil rights. Significantly, Segal recommended many of the
attorneys on the committee; that committee still exists today); Segal was also a
key player in the opposition to Alabama governor George Wallace's racial policies.

Dorothy Rosenman LDF board member
Dave Pinsky NAACP staff lawyer

Henry Aronson NAACP staff lawyer in Mississippi


Should Your ‘Best Friends’ SPY on You? 
The NAACP and Joel E. Spingarn

Abraham Foxman’s (and now Jonathan Greenblatt’s) Anti-Defamation League of

B’nai B’rith (ADL) was not the first Jewish organization to spy on Black people and

Black organizations. Joel E. Spingarn (1875-1939) was the first chairman of the board

of directors of the NAACP and he held that position for many years. The coveted

Spingarn Medal,  given yearly by the NAACP, was established by him in 1914.


The last four “winners”:


  • 2012 Harry Belafonte
  • 2013 Jessye Norman
  • 2014 Quincy Jones
  • 2015 Sidney Poitier

But Blacks may wish to rethink accepting the Spingarn Medal from now on. Spingarn was

a spy for the United States Army, which was focused on destroying Black progress in

America. Spingarn was hired in May of 1918 and given the rank of major in the Military

  Intelligence Division (MID). Spingarn ran “a small unit of undercover agents” who were

looking for “proof of  subversion.” The MID opened 100,000 pieces of mail a week and

monitored Black publications. According to the Memphis Commercial Appeal: “The documents

  show Spingarn, who remained NAACP chairman during his tenure at MID, used his post to

obtain critical information for MID, such as a list of the organization’s 32,000 members.”


With this knowledge it is much easier to see how under Spingarn the NAACP became the

greatest enemy of progressive Black organizations. Spingarn’s NAACP actually mounted

a vicious attack against the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) led by

the Hon. Marcus M. Garvey. At the time, the UNIA was the largest and strongest Black

organization in American history. The NAACP campaigned using the slogan “GARVEY MUST GO

through the pages of its CRISIS magazine, and it petitioned the US government to prosecute

and deport Garvey! 


Of course, the real reason behind the attack was that Garvey’s strong stance on

BLACK ECONOMIC INDEPENDENCE interfered with the Jewish control over the

Black dollar. Jewish merchants were ubiquitous in ALL the Black neighborhoods of

the major Northern cities, and they had a network of stores throughout the cotton

South (like Neiman-Marcus, Sears-Roebuck, Zales, Rich’s, and thousands of smaller

stores). Garvey was attacked for his “anti-Semitism” for simply wanting to establish an

economic foundation for Black progress.


SOUND FAMILIAR? It should. FARRAKHAN has been targeted

by Jews for the last 30 years for THE VERY SAME REASON.


Joel Spingarn, a Jew, successfully engineered this black-on-black fratricide from the

chairmanship of a “Black organization” set up by Jews. And THIS Jewish economic

interest is why Jews like Joel Spingarn (and the ADL) get involved and manipulate simple-minded,

frightened negro leaders and push them to target ECONOMICALLY FOCUSED organizations

like the Nation of Islam.


We shall overcome—as soon as we wake up!




US “Civil Rights” hero and darling of anti-white causes worldwide Martin Luther King

was personally directed and controlled by a Jewish US Communist Party leader,

and engaged in drunken sex orgies involving homosexuals, a newly-released

top-secret Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) file has revealed.


(New Observer Online)


The FBI file, titled “Martin Luther King, Jr. A Current Analysis” and dated March 12, 1968

was part of 553 files relating to the assassination of former president John F. Kennedy,

released by the US National Archives this week.


Under the heading “Strong Communist Influence,” the FBI report discussed

how King’s “principal advisor” was a Jew named Stanley David Levison.


The FBI report said:


Another complicating factor in the picture is the degree of communist influence on King.

One of King’s principal advisors is Stanley David Levison. Ostensibly only a New York City

attorney and businessman, Levison is, in fact, a shrewd, dedicated communist.

Levison has spent the major part of his life advancing communist interests.


He has actively involved himself in fund-raising drives for King, served as his legal

counsel in certain-matters, suggested speech material for him, discussed with King

demonstrations in which King was involved, guided him in regard to acceptance or rejection

of various public appearances and speaking, and helped him with mattets related to

articles and books King has prepared.


Levison edited most of the chapters of King’s new ‘book entitled “Where Do We Go

From Here; Chaos Or Community?” Levison wrote one chapter of this book and the

publisher’s representative complained to King and Levison that it was

obvious certain sections of the book were written by different, individuals.



The FBI report also makes it clear that Levison was the one

who effectively controlled all of King’s public utterances.


Stanley Levison has told Clarence Jones, another advisor to King, that under no circumstances

should King be permitted to say anything without their approving it. Levison also informed

Jones that King is such a slow thinker he is usually not prepared to make statements without

help from someone.


Under the heading “Subversives Attracted,” the FBI report provided further background to

Levison, dealing with his formal position within the Communist Party, USA (CPUSA):


Stanley Levison was attracted to King and SCLC when King gained national attention.

Levison soon developed a close relationship with King and was known in King’s group

as “Assistant Chief.” In 1961, he was assistant treasurer of SCLC [Southern Christian

Leadership Conference].


Prior to joining forces with King, Levison led a double like for the Communist Party,

USA (CPUSA). Outwardly he was a successful businessman but he was also the clandestine

fundraiser for the CPUSA. He was entrusted with raising and handling secret

funds for the Party and used some of these funds to finance his own activities.


The reason King enjoyed this close relationship with communists is best explained by

the fact that Levison, in February, 1962, passed the word to Gus Hall, General Secretary,

CPUSA, “King is a whole-hearted Marxist who has studied it (Marxism), believes in it and

agrees with it, but because of hi being a minister of religion, does not dare to espouse it publicly.”


The FBI report then goes on to detail the full extent of the CPUSA’s involvement in the

“Civil Rights” movement, and of how it was part of their plan to destroy America.


In this regard, the FBI report shows that almost all of King’s advisors, speech writers,

organizers, and personal assistants, were specifically recruited from within the ranks

of the CPUSA, often by Levison himself.


The last section of the report deals with King’s deviant sexual behavior.


Under the title “King’s Personal Conduct,” the report says:


With the funds that he had received from the Ford Foundation, King held the first of

two workshops in Miami, Florida in February 1968, to train Negro ministers in urban leadership.

One Negro minister in attendance later expressed his disgust with the behind-the-scene

drinking, fornication, and homosexuality that went on at the conference. Several Negro

and white prostitutes were brought in from the Miami area. An all-night sex orgy

was held with these prostitutes and some of the delegates in attendance.


One room had a large table in it which was filled with whiskey. The two Negro prostitutes

were paid $50.00 to put on a sex show for the entertainment of guests.

A variety of sex acts deviating from the normal were observed.



Previous Sexual Experiences


This activity is not new to King and his associates. As early as January.1964, King engaged

in another, two-day, drunken sex orgy in Washington, D. C. Many of those—present

engaged in sexual acts, natural as well as unnatural, for the entertainment of onlookers.

When one of the females shied away from engaging in an unnatural act, King and other

of the males present discussed how she was to be taught and initiated in this respect.


Throughout the ensuing years and until this date King has continued to carry on his

sexual aberrations secretly, while holding himself out to public view as a moral

leader of religious conviction.






Biographer Garrow Pens Explosive Report on Martin Luther King, Jr.


Martin Luther King Jr. allegedly had sexual relations with at least 40 women, from prostitutes to people within his inner circle, according
to explosive new research published Thursday by David J. Garrow, one of the civil rights leader's foremost biographers. The most
shocking allegation, culled from decades-old FBI files, details a 1964 incident in which King reportedly "looked on, laughed and offered
advice" to a fellow preacher who was raping a woman in a hotel room. Garrow recounts other allegations from formerly sealed FBI
documents ... in an eight-page essay he wrote for Standpoint, a British cultural and political magazine ... The FBI allegations chronicled
by Garrow could trigger a new examination of the civil rights hero's personal life. Garrow is a prominent civil rights academic who won a
Pulitzer Prize in 1987 for his King biography ...

The Troubling Legacy of Martin Luther King 

Newly-released documents reveal the full extent of the FBI's surveillance of the civil rights leader Dr Martin Luther King

in the mid-1960s. They expose in graphic detail the FBI's intense focus on King's extensive extramarital sexual

relationships with dozens of women, and also his presence in a Washington hotel room when a friend, a Baptist

minister, allegedly raped one of his "parishioners", while King "looked on, laughed and offered advice". The FBI's tape

recording of that criminal assault still exists today, resting under court seal in a National Archives vault ... The complete

transcripts and surviving recordings are not due to be released until 2027  ...

There is no question that a profoundly painful historical reckoning and reconsideration inescapably awaits. 






Not enough Americans know that in 1999 a jury in a civil suit brought by the family of
the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., ruled that a retired Memphis cafe owner was part
of a conspiracy in his 1968 assassination. On December 8 a jury in Memphis, Tennessee
returned a verdict that civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. was the victim
of an assassination conspiracy and did not die at the hands of a lone gunman.
  1. Memphis Jury Sees Conspiracy in Martin Luther King's Killing

    A jury in a civil suit brought by the family of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. decided

  2.  today that a retired Memphis cafe owner was part of a conspiracy in the 1968 killing of Dr. King.

  3. Dr. King's Slaying Finally Draws A Jury Verdict, but to ...

    The jury in Memphis declared Mr. Jowers liable in Dr. King's death for having purportedly

  4.  hired a now-dead Memphis police officer, as part of a vast conspiracy, to kill Dr. King.

  5. Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. - Simple English ...

    Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. assassination Martin Luther King, Jr. , a

  6.  prominent American leader of the civil rights movement and Nobel Peace Prize winner,

  7. was fatally shot at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee , on April 4, 1968, at the age of 39.

  8. Time for Nation to Accept that King’s Death Was a Conspiracy

    Americans should know that in 1999 a jury in a civil suit brought by the family of the

  9.  Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., ruled that a retired Memphis

  10. cafe owner was part of a conspiracy in his 1968 assassination.

  11. Martin Luther King assassination conspiracies - RationalWiki

    A jury in a 1999 civil suit brought by the family of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

  12.  decided that a retired Memphis cafe owner was part of a conspiracy in the 1968

  13.  killing of Dr. King. The family was awarded $100 which was donated to charity.

  14. Republicans more likely to subscribe to conspiracy theories ...

    Memphis Jury Sees Conspiracy in Martin Luther King's Killing A jury in a civil suit

  15. brought by the family of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. decided today that a

  16. retired Memphis cafe owner was part of a conspiracy in the 1968 killing of Dr. King.

  17. A Cover Up Turns 50: Unpopular Reflections on the MLK ...

    Not enough Americans know that in 1999 a jury in a civil suit brought by the family of

  18. the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., ruled that a retired Memphis

  19. cafe owner was part of a conspiracy in his 1968 assassination.

  20. Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. - Simple English ...

    Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. ... to the United States and charged with

  21.  killing King. ... to arrange King's assassination. The jury of six whites and ...

  22. MLK/Assassination - Wikispooks

    "Memphis Jury Sees Conspiracy in Martin Luther King's Killing - New York Times."

  23. The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. N.p., 9 Dec. 1999.

  24. Memphis jury finds that a conspiracy led to Martin Luther ...

    By Helen Halyard. 17 December 1999. On December 8 a jury in Memphis, Tennessee

  25.  returned a verdict that civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. was the victim

  26. of an assassination conspiracy and did not die at the hands of a lone gunman.





Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Should Be Ended

In the early evening of April 4, 1968, a gunshot rang-out in the Memphis sky. It immediately shattered the peace

and quiet of an otherwise uneventful day at the Lorraine Motel, and soon after, the peace of an entire country.

The death of Martin Luther King Jr., at the hands of James Earl Ray, brought about a period of unrest and Black violence

that has been matched only occasionally since. Worse, it engendered more than half-a-century of anti-White discrimination

and public policy which has transformed America from a peaceful, prosperous land into a country wherein almost one-in-four

working-age people are forced to accept some form of government assistance[1] (the numbers are much worse when

non-working-age seniors and children are factored-in). Black-on-White crime is rampant; more than 650,000 Whites are

beaten, robbed, raped, or murdered by Blacks every year[2]–and that number is steadily rising. Yet, for more than a quarter

of a century, the federal government and all 50 states have officially declared the third Monday in

January, “Martin Luther King Jr. Day.” Here’s why you shouldn’t celebrate such an anti-American holiday.




Thirty-nine years prior to Mr. Ray’s fateful rifle-shot, Martin Luther King Jr. was born Michael King Jr., the eldest of

three children to Michael and Alberta King, on January 15, 1929. Michael Sr. was a Southern Baptist preacher with

a traditional fire-and-brimstone temperament who believed that dancing and

playing cards were evil and regularly “whipped” little Mike for bad behavior.[3]


In 1934, after a tour of Palestine at his congregation’s expense, Michael Sr. (perhaps believing the prestige of Martin Luther

among Southern Baptists would lend him more cachet) declared that, henceforth, he would be called Martin Luther King,

and that little Mike would be known as Martin Luther King Jr. The names stuck; both men used them for the rest of their lives.[4]


The Canonization of Martin Luther King Jr.


Besides the inherent dishonesty of using Martin Luther’s name to convey credibility, there is not much untoward thus far;

the enigma of who was the real Martin Luther King Jr., begins in college. (See “The Fundamental Dishonesty of the Man” below.)

However, after his death, the establishment undertook a campaign to lionize King. Using their control over the institutions

of power (particularly the media, academy, and government), they created a carefully crafted image that portrays him

as a saint, who only ever exuded love and concern for humanity — an image that relies heavily on the fact that King’s

FBI surveillance records have been sealed until 2027. However, quite a bit of information is available, and if one

ignores the hagiography and considers original sources, a much darker, even sinister figure emerges. Mr. King (no one

should address him as “doctor” or “reverend” for reasons revealed below) was a profoundly dishonest charlatan who

regularly associated with criminals, traitors, and other deviants, both for reasons of personal gratification and as part of

a quest to destroy White America and all other White nations in order to institute global governance.[5] Many non-Whites

believe globalist institutions like the UN will favor them over Whites, if not in the language of their policies, then certainly,

in their enforcement.


The Fundamental Dishonesty of the Man


King became a leading “civil rights” advocate, in part, because of his bombastic speeches. Speeches in which he often

quoted the Bible and talked about the “truth setting us free.” But the man was fundamentally dishonest “abode not in

the truth, because there [was] no truth in him.” His near-constant paltering led J. Edgar Hoover to call him “the most

notorious liar in the country.”[6] And Hoover would know. As the director of the FBI and its predecessor (the Bureau of

Investigation), for almost 50 years, Hoover investigated thousands of the country’s most notorious criminals. And he had

direct experience with King.


For instance, Hoover once informed the House Appropriations Committee that the “civil rights” movement was rife with

communists, King denied this indisputable fact (read more about this in “His Communist Associations” below) and

said that Hoover “has allowed himself to aid and abet the fallacious claim of southern racists and extreme right wing

elements.”[7] King, like Cultural Marxists everywhere, was fond of claiming that any and all Whites, with a healthy

concern for the legitimate collective interests of their people, are extreme right-wingers who suffer from a pathology

known as “racism.”[8]


King’s duplicity goes far beyond merely lying about his communist associations and his deceptive methods. It permeates

the fabric of his life. As part of Operation SOLO – a long-running campaign to discover the depths of communist control

of important government and cultural institutions – the FBI kept Martin Luther King, Jr. and many of his associates under

surveillance, for years. This scrutiny exposed a large number of dark secrets King tried to keep hidden. Not the least of

which was hours of recorded sexual liaisons with women (many of whom were prostitutes), revealing his penchant for adultery.


Specifically, they discovered that King “had violated the Mann Act”[11] of 1910 which made it illegal to transport women

across state lines for “prostitution, debauchery, or any other immoral purpose.” King’s sexual appetites were well-known

by his friends and associations. His philandering was legendary as he ceaselessly cheated on his wife. During one such

liaison, after spending time with several different women on the same night, King, the advocate of non-violence, quarreled

with one of them and struck her, knocking “her across the bed,” according to good friend and fellow “reverend,” Ralph Abernathy.[12]


On another occasion, officials who have listened to Operation SOLO tapes of King recorded on January 6, 1964

(less than three months before he died) say he betrayed his wife that night by engaging in sexual congress with a

White woman and can be heard shouting such witticisms as “I’m not a Negro tonight!” and “I’m f*****g for God!”[13]


Further, most of King’s acclaimed speeches were written by others, including his much ballyhooed “I Have a Dream”

speech, which was written largely by Jewish leftist activist Stanley Levison.[14] Although this deceptive practice of

making presentations as if they are one’s own, without attribution, is widely accepted today, the similar practice of

plagiarism is not. King frequently copied the works of others without attribution.[15][16][17] Many of his ghost-written

speeches and his writings have parts that are plagiarized, but perhaps most conspicuous was his doctoral dissertation.

After years of rumors and hearsay about King’s doctoral plagiarism, Boston University finally commissioned a committee

to look into it. It found that as much as 45 percent of the first part of his thesis and 21 percent of the second, was copied

from the works of others, without proper attribution.[18] Despite this, the intrepid institution determined that “no thought should be

given to the revocation of Dr. King’s doctoral degree.”[19]


Most would agree that it’s difficult, if not impossible, to assess what’s in a man’s heart, that is, what he sincerely believes

to be true, but it’s equally difficult to believe that someone who is recorded by the FBI screaming “I’m f*****g for God!”

is truly Christian. It’s perhaps even more difficult to believe that such a man is a sincere believer

when he spent his professional life parading around as a Christian minister while openly (at least)


His Sexually Aberrant Behavior


The section above on King’s fundamental dishonesty concerning his serial philandering briefly mentioned his fondness

for group sexual intercourse. The Black syndicated columnist Carl Rowan uncovered more. Rowan was initially a

fan of King. He was willing to blame the “racial” biases of the FBI and, in particular, J. Edgar Hoover for any and all

revelations of King’s true nature.[22] Later, he developed a more realistic opinion of King after discovering that

Attorney General Robert Kennedy ordered the wiretapping of King, and not Hoover.[23] He further learned, during

a conversation with an FBI agent, that the wiretap recordings showed that there were regular

occurrences of “sexual intercourse” involving the two men, including at least one “orgy.”[24]


Also, he discovered that Hoover had “at least 15 reels of tape” involving the sexual exploits of King and Abernathy that

revealed a homosexual relationship between the two “Christian” ministers.[25] Black newspaper writer and television talk

show host Tony Brown mentioned the recordings of King and Abernathy behind closed doors and quoted

King saying to Abernathy, “Come on over here, you big, Black motherf*****, and let me s*** your d***.”[26]


The Frequently Violent Results of His “Non-Violent” Activism


For a man dedicated to “non-violence” and promoting peace and understanding between the races, King was involved

in a considerably large number of riots. One could be excused for thinking that he just happened to be victim of circumstances

over and over again, but those who have studied his campaigns present a vision that contravenes his image as a man of peace.


The Louisiana Legislative Committee once observed that King was responsible for “leading the Negroes in the South

down the road to bloodshed and violence.”[32] And the prominent Black labor-lawyer, Louis Waldman, disclosed that:


The philosophy and purpose of Dr. King’s program … is to produce ‘crisis-packed’ situations and ‘tension.’

Such a purpose is the very opposite of nonviolence, for the atmosphere-of-crisis policy leads to violence

by provoking violence. And the provocation of violence is violence. To describe such provocation as ‘nonviolent’

is to trifle with the plain meaning of words.[33]


This echoes the discussion above about King’s methods, which are, to sum:


  1. Put rabble-rousers on the street;
  2. Create a tension packed situation;
  3. Bait the police and any counter-protesters to get them to act-out physically;
  4. Scream “racism” and police brutality.

This program served him well in initiating dozens of confrontations that culminated in thousands of injuries to protesters,

counter-protesters, police, and even innocent bystanders, including the death of another preacher. As fellow Black

“civil rights” leader J. H. Jackson, the former president of the National Baptist Convention, recounts it, King caused

violence in every region of the country by encouraging riots, including “designing the tactics that led to a fatal riot,” which caused

the death of Reverend A. O. Wright in Detroit.[34]



Such a tactic works only when the cause has strong support in the media and other sectors of the establishment,

as King’s did. There is a huge difference in establishment response to King’s confrontations compared, say, to Charlottesville.

Claims by Alt Right participants that they were victims of leftist violence and that police

collaborated with the leftists fall on deaf ears. The media has no interest.


Many other leaders of the Black community felt as Jackson did, namely, that King was doing more harm than good and

asked him to leave their cities. After the violence and chaos that followed in the wake of King’s many disruptive “civil rights”

marches and demonstrations in 1966, Reverend Henry Mitchell, the leader of a group of Black ministers in Chicago

(representing approximately 50,000 congregants), said that King “brought hate” and asked that he “get the hell out of here.

[35] And added that Blacks in Chicago wanted “peace, love, and harmony,” not the violence that came to town with King.[36]


His Communist Identity


Although Martin Luther King Jr. repeatedly denied he was a communist and the establishment used their control ove

r the institutions of power in this country (and the world) to keep his communist leanings hidden, the “duck test”

applies: if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. King’s associations,

actions, and argot mark him as a particularly virulent communist. Reams have been written on this topic and it is outside

the scope of this article to document all of King’s communist behaviors, so I’ll just mention a few salient facts.


Scores of King’s close friends and top associates have been linked to communism.


For example, The Washington Observer Newsletter, reporting on an

FBI document about King’s ties to noted communist, Stanley Levison, said:


. . .[W]hen the F.B.I. agents had King under surveillance, they observed him meet a well-identified Soviet

espionage agent at the Kennedy Airport in New York. They also secured evidence that King was receiving

large sums of money from a well-known American Communist agent who gives King instructions

that he implicitly obeys.[40]


Levison’s Wikipedia page notes that he was treasurer for the American Jewish Congress, a defender of Ethel and

Julius Rosenberg, and was considered by the FBI to be a major funder of the Communist Party USA in the 1950s.


Although they’ve done everything in their power to prevent people from becoming aware of King’s vast network of

connections to communists and communist organizations, whenever someone does expose those connections, his

apologists go into damage-control mode and say that he was not a communist but was merely duped and used by

them. However, Michael Laski, the founder of the Communist Party USA (Marxist-Leninist), a splinter group of the Communist

Party USA., expounded on King’s commitment to communism when during a press conference held on April 13, 1967, he revealed:


King knows what’s going on. He is allowing himself to be utilized by the Communist Party . . . King willingly

enters into an alliance with the Communist Party . . . Mr. King receives support from organizations

and individuals that are tied to the Communist Party. He knows what is happening . . .[41]



King’s Hatred for White America


When one comes to understand that the true purpose of communism, as Karl Marx envisioned it, is not to control the

means of production in such as way as to redistribute wealth from a few undeserving rich to the masses, but rather to

redistribute the wealth of the nations to the Jews, then one can see that communism is globalism and globalism is treason

to humanity. Because, historically, the vast majority of the world’s wealth was produced by White working-class men

and, in fact, still is produced by Whites (although more and more of it is produced by the technocracy rather than the

working-class) it’s easy to see why the sharp spear-point of that treasonous agenda is aimed directly at White nations.


As has been established above, Martin Luther King Jr. was a willing participant in that agenda. One has to ask, Why?

The answer is simple, King had an atavistic hatred of White America. It’s already been shown that many Black leaders

in the “civil rights” movement, including Henry Mitchell, felt that King “brought hate” with him everywhere he went and

Senator James Eastland revealed that one of King’s major financial backers, CORE, is the “war department for those who sell hate.”


But King was closely allied with another group: the Southern Conference Education Fund (SCEF). The forerunner of the

SCEF was the Southern Conference on Human Welfare (SCHW), which, after being outed as a communist front, changed

its name, but kept just about everything else, including its address (808 Perdido Street, New Orleans, Louisiana), it’s official

periodical (The Southern Patriot), at least 11 of its officers, including both its President and Executive Director,[42] and

most importantly its mission. Which, according to one of its founders, Paul Crouch, “was intended

to lead to class hatred and race hatred, dividing class against class and race against race.”[43]


But we don’t have to rely solely on the testimony of others to learn

about Kings hatred of White America. We have King’s own words.


When King was a child, he, like many children before and since, became alienated from a friend. This other child happened

to be White. Because of this, King felt that the child rejected him and resolved to “hate every White person.”[44] He

kept that promise until he met communist revolutionaries in college who, although

they had strong anti-White identities were deemed White, because of their skin-color.


In another example, King demonstrated a strong willingness to see institutional favoritism for Blacks. While leading the

Montgomery bus boycott (which made him famous), King made several demands for the special treatment of Blacks,

including the mandatory “employment of Negro bus drivers for predominantly Negro routes.”[45] One has to wonder

how he – or anyone, for that matter — would feel if the reverse were suggested. In fact, its highly unlikely King would

have accepted concessions on this demand if it came with the equalizing condition

of mandatory employment for White bus drivers for predominantly White routes.


Finally, we have the government’s own determination of King as a virulent racist. In 1967, when the FBI’s

Counter-Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) began targeting Black “hate groups” as well as White nationalist groups,

King’s Southern Christian Leadership Conference was added to the list of organizations to be investigated.[46] Almost

certainly it was added not just because of King’s personal history of ranting against Whites, but also because of his

association with Blacks who commonly expressed hatred of Whites and their desire to cause them harm or even kill

them: men like Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm X, Stokely Carmichael[47], and even

Muhammad Ali[48] (the latter, seemed to, at least partially, recant in his later years).




Martin Luther King Jr. was an unmitigated liar, an unconscionable plagiarist, and a philanderer, who engaged in countless

affairs where he expressed his particular brand of polymorphous perversity, occasionally violently. He engaged in any

number of unlawful acts and most of his “nonviolent” demonstrations ended in savage riots during which property was

destroyed and people were hurt — sometimes even killed. And finally, he spent his entire life promoting communism

and anything else he deemed destructive (or as he liked to call it “disruptive”) to the traditional American way of life.


So, you have to ask yourself, why would any sane American celebrate this swindler? Or allow their children to? Real

America/forgotten America/White America must reclaim political power in order to control our destiny, until then we

can’t even do simple things like prevent our government(s) from declaring this monster a saint and forcing us to

celebrate him, but we do have the power to say, “no more” and to ensure that we don’t personally recognize

Martin Luther King Jr. or his “holy day” and to teach our children the truth, not only about the man, but also

about his hostile agenda.


(Author’s Note: Most of the above was gleaned from Mark Farrell’s Why the Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday Should

Be Repealed: M.L.K. Jr.’s Life and the Aftereffects, consequently most of the citations are his. The exceptions are

citations: 1, 2, 8, 13, and 14 which are this author’s.)



End Notes


[1] “21.3 Percent of U.S. Population Participates in Government Assistance Programs Each Month,” United States Census Bureau, May 28, 2015. URL

[2] Russell James, “Hate Crime Stats,” Black-on-White Crime Blog. URL

[3] Louise Quayle et al., Martin Luther King, Jr.: Dreams for a Nation (New York: Fawcett Columbine, 1989), 14.

[4] Ibid., 16.

[5] Congressional Record (May 29, 1968), E4784-4785.

[6] Congressional Record (April 23, 1968), E3205.

[7] Congressional Record (May 29, 1968), E4784.

[8] Craig Bodeker, A Conversations about Race, YouTube, January 6, 2013 URL

[9] Congressional Record (May 28, 1968), E4750, citing the Saturday Review (April 3, 1965).

[10] Congressional Record (September 13, 1965), [S]22708.

[11] Congressional Record (April 11, 1968), E3005.

[12] Ralph Abernathy, And the Walls Came Tumbling Down (New York: Harper & Row, 1989).

[13] David Greenberg, “All King’s Men: Taylor Branch’s civil-rights epic is more than a mere biography,” Slate, February 4, 1988, citing Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years, 1963-64. URL

[14] Clarence B. Jones, “The first draft of ‘I have a dream.’” The Washington Post, January 16, 2011 URL

[15] Edgar S. Brightman, The Finding of God.

[16] Martin Luther King, Jr., The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God.

[17] Theodore Pappas, “A Houdini of Time,” Chronicles, (November 1992), 26-30.

[18] Theodore Pappas, “Redefining Plagiarism,” Chronicles (September 1993), 42.

[19] Ibid.

[20] Congressional Record (May 16, 1968), E4307; citing John Milton, “Black Power Joins ‘Poor’ Ranks,” Columbus Citizen-Journal.

[21] Carl Rowan, Breaking Barriers: A Memoir (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1991), 255.

[22] Ralph de Toledano, J. Edgar Hoover: The Man in His Time (New Rochelle, New York: Arlington House, 1973), 331.

[23] Ibid., 332

[24] Carl Rowan, Breaking Barriers, 255.

[25] Ibid.

[26] Tony Brown, “The Worst Kind of Uncle Tom,” Birmingham Times (February 21, 1991).

[27] Congressional Record (October 4, 1967), H13008.

[28] Ibid., H13007.

[29] Ibid., H13008.

[30] Ibid.

[31] Congressional Record (June 15, 1967), S8277.

[32] Congressional Record (May 29, 1968), E4786, E4788; citing Louisiana Legislative Committee Hearings, Part II (March 6-9, 1957), 203-208.

[33] Congressional Record, October 4, 1967, H13007.

[34] Congressional Record (May 29, 1968), E4786.

[35] Congressional Record (May 16, 1968), E4311.

[36] Congressional Record (October 4, 1967), H13009.

[37] Congressional Record (May 25, 1961), 8349-8350.

[38] Congressional Record (April 11, 1968), E3005.

[39] Karl Prussion, Documentary Report on Martin Luther King

[40] Congressional Record (April 11, 1968), E3005, citing the Washington Observer Newsletter (February 15, 1966).

[41] Congressional Record (May 16, 1968), E4311.

[42] Congressional Record, (October 3, 1983), S13455.

[43] Congressional Record (May 16, 1968), E4309.

[44] Clayborne Carson, Malcolm X: The F.B.I. File (New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers, Inc., 1991), 22.

[45] Chronicle of the 20th Century (Prentice Hall Trade, 1987), 780.

[46] Carson, Malcolm X, 26.

[47] Congressional Record (May 29, 1968), E4786.

[48] Congressional Record (October 4, 1967), H13005.