|
THE
TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE
BEGIN DEPROGRAMMING HERE:
1. What
proof exists that the Nazis killed six million Jews? None. All we have is postwar testimony, mostly of individual "survivors."
This testimony is contradictory, and very
few claim to have actually witnessed any "gassing." There are no contemporaneous documents or hard evidence: no mounds
of ashes, no crematories capable of disposing of millions of corpses, no "human soap," no lamp shades made of
human skin, and no credible demographic statistics. 2. What evidence exists that six million Jews were not killed by the Nazis? Extensive forensic, demographic,
analytical and comparative evidence demonstrates
the impossibility of such a figure. The widely repeated "six million" figure is an irresponsible exaggeration. 3. Did Simon Wiesenthal state in writing that "there
were no extermination camps on German soil"? Yes. The famous "Nazi hunter" wrote this in Stars and Stripes, Jan. 24,
1993. He also claimed that "gassings" of Jews took place only in Poland. 4. If Dachau was in Germany, and even Wiesenthal says that it was not an extermination
camp, why do many American veterans say it was an extermination camp? After the Allies captured Dachau, many GIs and others were led through the camp and shown a building alleged to have been a "gas chamber." The mass media widely,
but falsely, continues to assert that Dachau was a "gassing" camp. 5. What about Auschwitz? Is there any proof that gas chambers were used
to kill people there? No. Auschwitz, captured by the Soviets, was modified after the war, and a room was reconstructed to look like a large "gas chamber." After America's leading expert
on gas chamber construction and design, Fred Leuchter, examined this and other alleged Auschwitz gassing facilities, he stated that it was an "absurdity" to claim that they were, or could
have been, used for executions. 6. If Auschwitz wasn't a "death camp," what was its true purpose? It was an internment center and part of a large-scale manufacturing complex. Synthetic fuel was produced there, and its inmates were used as a workforce. 7. Who set up the first concentration camps? During the Boer War (1899-1902),
the British set up what they called "concentration camps" in South Africa to hold Afrikaner women and children. Approximately 30,000 died in these hell-holes, which were as terrible
as German concentration camps of World War II. 8. How did German concentration camps differ from American "relocation" camps
in which Japanese-Americans were interned during WWII? The only significant difference was that the Germans interned persons on the
basis of being real or suspected security threats to the German war effort, whereas the Roosevelt administration interned persons on
the basis of race alone. 9. Why did the German government intern Jews in camps? It considered Jews a direct threat to national security. (Jews
were overwhelmingly represented in Communist subversion.) However, all suspected security risks -- not just Jews -- were in danger of internment. 10. What hostile measure did world Jewry undertake against
Germany as early as 1933? In March 1933, international Jewish organizations declared an international boycott of German goods. 11. Did the Jews of the world "declare war on Germany"? Yes. Newspapers around the world
reported this. A front-page headline in the London
Daily Express (March 24, 1933), for example,
announced "Judea Declares War on Germany." 12. Was this before or after the "death camp" stories began? This was years before the "death
camp" stories, which began in 1941-1942. 13. What nation is credited with being the first to practice mass civilian bombing? Britain -- on May 11, 1940. 14. How many "gas chambers" to kill people were
there at Auschwitz? 15. How
many Jews were living in the areas that came under German control during the war? 16. If the Jews of Europe were not exterminated by the Nazis,
what happened to them? After the war millions of Jews were still alive in Europe. Hundreds of thousands (perhaps as many as one and a half million) had died of all causes during the war. Others
had emigrated to Palestine, the United States, and other countries. Still more Jews left Europe after the war. 17. How many Jews fled or were evacuated to deep within the Soviet Union? More than two million fled or were
evacuated by the Soviets in 1941-1942. These Jews thus never came under German control. 18. How many Jews emigrated from Europe prior to the war, thus
putting them outside of German reach? Perhaps a million (not including those absorbed by the USSR). 19. If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did the
commandant, Rudolf Hoess, confess that it was? He was tortured by British military police, as one of his interrogators later
admitted. 20. Is there any evidence of American, British and Soviet policy to torture German prisoners in order to exact "confessions"
for use at the trials at Nuremberg and elsewhere? Yes. Torture was extensively used to produce fraudulent "evidence" for the
infamous
Nuremberg trials, and in other postwar "war
crimes" trials. 21. How does the Holocaust story benefit Jews today? It helps protect Jews as a group from criticism. As a kind of
secular religion, it provides an emotional bond between Jews and their leaders. It is a powerful tool in Jewish money-raising campaigns, and is used to justify US aid to Israel. 22. How does it benefit the State of Israel? It justifies the billions of dollars in "reparations"
Germany has paid to Israel and many individual "survivors."
It is used by the Zionist/Israeli lobby to dictate a pro-Israel American foreign policy in the Middle East, and to force American taxpayer aid to Israel, totaling billions of dollars per year. 23. How is it used by many Christian clergymen? The Holocaust story is cited to
justify the Old Testament notion of Jews as a holy and eternally persecuted "Chosen People." 24. How did it benefit the Communists? It diverted attention from Soviet war mongering and atrocities before, during and after the Second World War. 25. How does it benefit Britain? In much the same way it benefitted the Soviet Union. 26. Is there any evidence that Hitler ordered mass extermination
of Jews? 27. What kind of gas was used in German wartime concentration camps? Hydrocyanic gas from "Zyklon B," a commercial
pesticide
that was widely used throughout Europe. 28. For what purpose was "Zyklon B" manufactured? It was a pesticide used to fumigate clothing and quarters to kill typhus-bearing
lice and other pests. 29. Was this product suitable for mass extermination? No. If the Nazis had intended to
use poison gas to exterminate people, far more efficient products were available. Zyklon is a slow-acting fumigation agent. 30. How long does it take to ventilate an area after fumigation
with Zyklon B? Normally about 20 hours. The whole procedure is very complicated and dangerous. Gas masks must be used, and only trained technicians are employed. 31. Auschwitz commandant Hoess said that his men would enter the "gas chambers" to remove
bodies ten minutes after the victims had died. How do you explain this? It can't be explained because had they done so they
would have suffered the same fate as the "gassing" victims. 32. Hoess said in his "confession" that his men would smoke cigarettes as they pulled bodies
out of gas chambers, ten minutes after gassing. Isn't Zyklon B explosive? Yes. The Hoess confession is obviously false. 33. What was the exact procedure the Nazis allegedly used
to exterminate Jews? The stories range from dropping gas canisters into a crowded room from a hole in the ceiling, to piping gas through shower heads,
to "steam chambers," to "electrocution" machinery. Millions are alleged to have been killed in these
ways. 34. How
could a mass extermination program have been kept secret from those who were scheduled to be killed? It couldn't have been kept secret.
The fact is that there were no mass gassings. The extermination stories originated as wartime atrocity propaganda. 35. If Jews scheduled for execution knew the fate in store
for them, why did they go along with the Germans without resisting? They didn't fight back because they did not believe
there was any intention to kill them. 36. About how many Jews died in the concentration camps? Competent estimates range from about 300,000 to 500,000. Mainly from recurring typhus epidemics that ravaged war-torn
Europe during the war, as well as from starvation and lack of medical attention during the final months of the conflict, when virtually all road and rail transportation had been bombed out by the Allies. This disease always appears when many people are jammed
together under unsanitary conditions. It is carried by lice that infest hair and clothes. Ironically, if the Germans had used more Zyklon B, more Jews might have survived the camps. 39. What is the difference if six million or 300,000 Jews
died during the Second World War? 40. Some Jewish "death camp" survivors say they saw bodies being dumped into
pits and burned.
How much fuel would have been required for this? A great deal more than the Germans had access to, as there was a substantial fuel
shortage during the war. 41. Can bodies be burned in pits? No. It is impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because
of lack of oxygen. 42. Holocaust historians claim that the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in about ten minutes. How
long does it take to incinerate one body, according to professional crematory operators? About an hour and a half, although the larger bones require further processing afterwards. 43. Why did the German concentration camps have crematory
ovens? To dispose efficiently and sanitarily
of the corpses of those who had died. 44. Given a 100 percent duty cycle of all the crematories in all the camps in German-controlled territory,
what is the maximum number of corpses it would have been possible to incinerate during the entire period such crematories
were in operation? 45. Can a crematory oven be operated 100 percent of the time? No. Fifty percent of the time is a generous estimate
(12 hours per day). Crematory ovens have to be cleaned thoroughly and regularly when in heavy operation. 46. How much ash is left from a cremated corpse? After the bone is all ground down, about a shoe box
full. 47.If
six million people had been incinerated by the Nazis, what happened to the ashes? That remains to be "explained."
Six million bodies would have produced many tons of ashes, yet there is no evidence of any large ash depositories. 48. Do Allied wartime aerial reconnaissance photos of Auschwitz
(taken during the period when the "gas chambers" and crematoria were supposedly in full operation) show evidence of extermination? No. In fact, these photographs
do not even reveal a trace of the enormous amount of smoke that supposedly was constantly over the camp, nor do they show
evidence of the "open pits" in which bodies were allegedly burned. 49. What was the main provision of the German "Nuremberg Laws"
of 1935? They forbid marriage and sexual
relations between Germans and Jews, similar to laws existing
in Israel today. 50. Were there any American precedents for the Nuremberg Laws? Years before Hitler's Third Reich, most states in the
USA had enacted laws prohibiting marriage between persons of different races. 51. What did the International Red Cross have to report with
regard to the "Holocaust" question? An official report on the visit of an IRC delegation to Auschwitz in September
1944 pointed out that internees were permitted to receive packages, and that rumors of gas chambers could not be verified. 52. What was the role of the Vatican during the time six million Jews were allegedly
being exterminated? If there had been an extermination plan, the Vatican would most certainly have been in a position to know about it. But
because there was none, the Vatican had no reason to speak out against it, and didn't. 53. What evidence is there that Hitler knew of an on-going Jewish extermination program? 54. Did the Nazis and the Zionists collaborate? As early as 1933, Hitler's government
signed an agreement with the Zionists permitting Jews to emigrate from Germany to Palestine, taking large amounts of capital
with them. 55. How did Anne Frank die? After surviving internment in Auschwitz, she succumbed to typhus in the Bergen-Belsen
camp, just a few weeks before the end of the war. She was not gassed. 56. Is the Anne Frank Diary genuine? No. Evidence compiled by Dr. Robert Faurisson of France establishes
that the famous diary is a literary hoax. 57. What about the familiar photographs and film footage taken in the liberated German camps showing piles of emaciated corpses?
Are these faked? Photographs can be faked, but it's far easier merely to add a misleading caption to a photo or commentary to a piece of footage.
Piles of emaciated corpses do not mean that these people were "gassed" or deliberately starved to death. Actually, these were
tragic victims of raging epidemics or of starvation due to a lack of food in the camps toward the end of the war. 58. Who originated the term "genocide"? Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew, in
a book published in 1944. 59. Are films such as "Schindler's List" or "The Winds of War" documentaries? No. Such films are fictional dramatizations
loosely based on history. Unfortunately, all too many people accept them as accurate historical representations. 60. How many books have been published that refute some
aspect of the standard "Holocaust" story? Dozens. More are in production. 61. What happened when the Institute for Historical Review offered $50,000 to
anyone who could prove that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz? No proof was submitted as a claim on the reward, but the Institute
was sued for $17 million by former Auschwitz inmate Mel Mermelstein, who claimed that the reward offer caused him to lose sleep and his business to suffer, and represented "injurious denial of established fact." 62. What about the charge that those who question the Holocaust
story are merely anti-Semitic or neo-Nazi? This is a smear designed to draw attention away from facts and honest arguments. Scholars who refute Holocaust story claims are of all persuasions and ethnic-religious backgrounds (including Jewish). There is no
correlation between "Holocaust" refutation and anti-Semitism or neo-Nazism. Increasing numbers of Jewish scholars openly admit the lack of evidence for key Holocaust claims. 63. What has happened to "revisionist" historians who
have challenged the Holocaust story? They have been subjected to smear campaigns, loss of academic positions, loss of pensions,
destruction of their property and physical
violence. 64. Has the Institute for Historical Review suffered any retaliation for its efforts to uphold the right
of freedom of speech and academic freedom? The IHR had been bombed three times, and was completely destroyed on July 4, 1984, in a criminal arson attack. Numerous death threats by telephone
have been received. Media coverage of the IHR has been overwhelmingly hostile. 65. Why is there so little publicity for the revisionist view? Because for political reasons the
Establishment does not want any in-depth discussion about the facts surrounding the Holocaust story. 66. Where can I get more information about the "other side" of
the Holocaust story, as well as facts concerning other aspects of World War II historical revisionism?
THE
JEW'S HOLOCAUST NARRATIVE IS THE MOST MASSIVE CYNICAL EXPLOITIVE FRAUD IN HISTORY
The alleged genocide of European Jewry has been used to justify the Allied war
effort, to establish the State of Israel, to justify Israeli violence
against its neighbors, to induce guilt in both Germans and the Allied nations,
to cover up and ignore Allied crimes against Germans, to allow Jews
to receive massive reparations from Germany, and to create solidarity
in the Jewish community. The extreme importance of the Holocaust story in
advancing Zionist/Jewish interests ensures that this falsification
of history will continue in the future. No one can deny that Jews were rounded up and imprisoned by Germans in German occupied territories after the suspension of the HAAVARA TRANSFER AGREEMENT during WWII. Nor can anyone deny that Japanese Americans were rounded up and imprisoned in America for the same reasons, those reasons being primarily security issues, and in the same fashion during WWII. And, after examining the facts, the German prisons built for Jews were far more humanely accommodating than the American prisons built for Japanese. (See World
War II West Coast Camps for Japanese-Americans here: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v02/v02p-45_Weber.html ) What is staunchly denied is the existence, much less the
use, of homicidal
gas chambers, the manufacture
of human skin lampshades, the manufacture of human
derived soap, institutionalized torture all conducted at "death factories" where 6,000,000 Jews were gassed and cremated and other outright lies disseminated by vindictive and vengeful Jews. In all of German occupied Europe there were 2.4 million Jews. After
World War II, 3.8 million Jews applied for holocaust reparations. Indeed tens of thousands of imprisoned Jews died during the
last months of WWII due to disease, especially
typhus, and starvation (The International Committee of the Red Cross reported: 272,000 concentration camp inmates died
in German custody,
about half of them Jews). After all, as the fortunes of war
turn against the losing side, food and medicine
become extremely scarce... and deadly scarce for those
imprisoned by the losing side due to the ruination of food production, medicine manufacturing, and transportation supply lines. Germany was carpet bombed and firebombed into the stone age during the last year of WWII (a totally merciless war conducted by three Jewish controlled empires against a country the size of Montana). Indeed there were crematoriums working overtime
as a means of sanitarily disposing
of disease ridden
corpses, but these were built during the last year of the war and never was a living person burned alive in one as JEWS would have you believe. As a matter of fairness, try to imagine what would
have become of all the Japanese
incarcerated in
American prison camps during WWII had the fortunes of war turned against an America that was bombed into the stone age. I'll wager that they would have been massacred by furious Americans before they had starved to death. Once you fully realize that there were no "gas chambers"
or such things as
human skin lampshades,
most of the Jewish narrative regarding the so called "holocaust"
becomes a self-serving fabrication disseminated by the lowest sort of scammers. Only lies need laws for protection.
There are many individuals who have been
imprisoned in
occupied Germany for merely telling the truth about the holocaust scam. These people are imprisoned for "inciting hatred for the Jews" whereas it's actually the JEWS incessantly inciting hatred for Germans with their holocaust LIES. Free yourself from the power of a lie designed to render you impotent.
By instilling unwarranted guilt and shame upon humanity
via the "holocaust", humanity is rendered
incapable, or at least very hesitant, to criticize, much less interfere with, any of the designs of Jews or their nation of Israel. The "holocaust"
is also an ongoing cash cow for Jewish "holocaust
survivors" through the collection of hundreds
of billions of euros from Germany, and elsewhere, as WWII reparations that continues to this day. Jews
have made questioning the details of the so-called Holocaust a criminal offense, with fines and imprisonment,
and doing this has only hurt their credibility and soured many against their official narrative.
The truth does not need laws to enforce it, only lies do, and the stupidest thing the Jews could ever
have done — and want to do in America — is criminalize not believing their improbable
narrative. It is their “education” that has created doubters, which is
why it continues to fail. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ It's a Crime
Against Humanity It is a crime because it not only justifies innumerable other crimes, but because
it creates a huge mass of hatred, which in turn contains the potential for new crimes. People whose souls have been drenched in the hatred of the Holocaust Lie must be counted among its victims. This includes the millions of twelve to fifteen-year old school
children dragged through the memorials of former concentration camps, often weeping uncontrollably
at the atrocity stories and lies vomited up at them. How
much suffering, how much heartbreak, how many tragedies are due to the so called “Holocaust”,
this hair-raising Lie of the Century, which the jews invented, crammed down our throats, and
have defended tooth and nail, with fines, with abuse, with imprisonment, for over half a century? It is painful to think of the thousands, indeed tens of thousands, of people who have
been humiliated, persecuted, imprisoned, or even executed in the name of this shameless swindle. It is pathetic to see the once-great German people, having lost its pride, its sense
of direction, its self-respect, to such an extent that it no longer dares to defend itself against a flood of slander and is too ashamed to look itself in the face.
One single mention of the “gas chambers”, the extermination of the jews, was enough
to justify purging entire cities and provinces of their German population. Almost 17 million people were driven from their homes between 1944 and 1948 in an unbroken series of atrocities
during which over two million died. “After what
they did to the jews, they had it coming to them,” is the classical justification. It is truly disgusting to think of the millions of people all over the world watching
Marvin Chomsky, Claude Lanzmann, Steven Spielberg and all the others — Holocaust, Shoa, Schindler’s List, etc. — in the cinemas, on television — and taking it all seriously. The jews invented a story which they’ve called the Shoa or the Holocaust, and which they now claim is the history of their people. The Holocaust money-making machine has brought them such tremendous advantages, that
they can no longer live without it. But they made one fatal error: the Holocaust swindle is
so endlessly absurd that its inventors can only take refuge in a suicide charge; having lost all
sense of proportion, they have gone too far and will soon come crashing down.
To suppress all open debate on the subject appears an impossibility
in the long run, despite all manner of repression. From
minor explanations to wholesale re-writing, including whole new “Revised Versions”,
the profiteers of the myth continue to entangle themselves in increasingly greater numbers of
contradictions; the fables of today contradict the fables told yesterday; the defenders of the
official version of history are being compelled to make so many concessions that more and more
people are starting to wonder about it all. Doubts
expressed in private conversation no longer shock as much as they did a few years ago; it is
getting easier for revisionists to gain a hearing. In
brief: for the exterminationists, the time is running out. Increasingly hysterical repression
is an unmistakable sign of growing panic. It is also a sign of
weakness. Instead of listening to the discussion, they
simply grab for a truncheon. But how long can they get away with it? The revisionists must not hope for quick victory; it will not come overnight. They should remember the wisdom expressed in the phrase from the Czech philosopher, Karel Capek, who said: “Truth must be smuggled. It must be distributed in small doses. A drop here, a drop there — until people get used to it. Not all at once.” At a time when the Lie appears to be triumphing without hindrance, we would like to close with an optimistic message. We wish to make the following appeal:
All of you, all friends of the truth, both known and unknown, from many European countries, those who, like Günter Deckert and Gottfried Küssel, sit in German and Austrian prisons for “denying the existence of the gas chambers,” or who have been compelled to go into exile like Remer and Rudolf, all persecuted revisionists and nationalists — do not lose your
courage, since your struggle against state-ordained lies is not in vain. Your courage, the sacrifice of a few, will help to free entire nations and peoples, including the German and Russian peoples — from the darkness which has so long covered them. Originally appeared at: Renegade Tribune Jürgen Graf (Renegade Tribune)
I DENY NO HOLOCAUST
Many
ignorant, brainwashed people have contemptuously called me a “Holocaust Denier”. The following
is the response I give, to those who will listen: Excuse me, but I don’t “deny”
ANY “Holocaust”… Do you? I fully accept the account of the brave and famous Russian writer
and historian, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who was often called “The Conscience
of the 20th Century”; who served eight long years in the Soviet Gulag prison system,
when he reports in the book he published in the year 2000 entitled “Together For Two Hundred
Years” that, in the Soviet Holocaust, 66 million innocent Gentiles, mostly Christians (and
it being a full ELEVEN TIMES the number of Jews claimed to have been killed by the Germans
in WWII), were kidnapped, tortured, raped, and murdered in a wide variety of cruel,
wanton, and horribly inhuman ways in the thousands of monstrously evil Gulag concentration
camps at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevik “Ivan the Terrible” Cheka corps. I freely
acknowledge the fact that on February 13 & 14, 1945, in the quintessential Holocaust of the non-military
city of Dresden, more than 700,000 phosphorus bombs were dropped on 1.2 million helpless
people, which produced a firestorm that was called a “Single Column of Flame”,
where the temperature in the center of the city reached 1600 degrees centigrade, and in which approximately
500,000 German women, children, elderly, wounded soldiers, random citizens, and even all of the
animals in the city zoo were slaughtered by concussion and fire in a single night. I absolutely recognize that
more people died there in Dresden, in that one big flame, than the estimated total
of 246,000 helpless people who died in two other quintessential Holocausts, the senseless,
wantonly murderous, abominable, and unnecessary atomic attacks upon the Japanese
cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. I openly avow the virtually forgotten
Holocaust endured by the passengers and crew of the Wilhelm Gustloff, an unarmed
German passenger liner which was torpedoed and sunk in the freezing waters of the Baltic
Sea, 13 miles off the coast of Pomerania on January 30, 1945, as it carried,
besides it’s men and crew, some 73 wounded soldiers, 373 members of the Womens’
Naval Auxilliary, and some 9,000 German civilian refugees – mostly women and children
– who were all fleeing in terror from East Prussia in the advance of the Red Army, and
where only a few hundred lived to tell the tale, making it the deadliest disaster in maritime
history, killing nearly ten times the number who died on the Titanic. And I fully admit that, as tallied and
reported by the International Red Cross, a grand total of 271,304 people – not
all of them Jews – died in all of the German concentration camps, combined, by the end of World War
II – a Holocaust which was solely the result of typhus epidemics and starvation caused
by the Zionist controlled, allied carpet bombings of supply routes and centers all over Germany
that made it impossible to transport food and medical supplies to prisoners, soldiers, and
civilians alike. I certainly do not deny the Holocaust of the over 1,000,000 German post-war, non-combatants
who were rounded up, detained without any food, water, shelter, or medical care, and
purposely, and systematically killed through starvation and exposure in 1945-46 under the supervision
of the allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, in the largest outdoor concentration camp this side
of modern-day Palestine, or the concurrent Holocaust of the wholesale cold-blooded rape and murder
of untold hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of women and children as the communist
Red Army of the Soviets also took its “revenge” upon the defeated Germans. I do not deny the Holocaust
suffered by the good men and crew of the practically unarmed USS Liberty surveillance
ship, which was deliberately attacked by air and sea, with machine gun, cannon, and torpedo fire by Israeli
forces on June 8, 1967, killing 34 and wounding 174, in an attempted false flag operation
which was intended to sink the ship, and murder all aboard, in order to draw the United States
into the Middle East conflict on the side of Israel, and was only foiled by the
ingenuity and resourcefulness of the crew in aiding the radio operator to successfully get off a call for
help. And I do not deny the Holocaust of the some 3,000 people who died in a single day as
a result of the false flag attack on the World Trade Center in New York which was engineered
and perpetrated by leaders of Israel in order to kick off their pre-planned “Clash
of Civilizations” which they hope will eventually cause their two sworn enemies, the
Christians, and the Muslims, to forget their historical religious commonalities, and
annihilate one another in the yet to be the greatest Holocaust in history – a third world
war – as the “Chosen Ones” sit on the sidelines… and direct…
and watch… and profit… while gleefully rubbing their hands as even more untold
millions of innocents die. I also do not deny the Holocaust of the Jenin Refugee Camp, on April 13, 2002,
where Israeli forces attacked the camp using bulldozers, tanks, and Apache helicopters, in
a cruel, indiscriminate, blood-lust slaughter, which was said to be “Horrific
beyond belief”, and which lasted for 13 days, flattening large areas of the town,
and killing unknown hundreds of innocent men, women, and children, many of whom were buried
alive; or the earlier, similar, Holocausts at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps
in Lebanon in 1982, in which it is known that at least 800 Palestinians were killed. Nor do I deny the wholesale
slaughter and destruction perpetrated upon the sovereign nation of Iraq, in the Holocaust that
was the illegal, and unjustified war of aggression that, from 2003 to the present, has resulted
in the murder of over 1,000,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and children, and brought their
country to ruin, as one of the first steps in Israel’s ongoing war of terror, which they have
the unmitigated gall to present to the world as a war “ON” terror…
for which the final tally of victims is yet to be seen. And while I’m
at it, let me just note here that I fully acknowledge the fact that the perpetrators of the
above mentioned, and relatively recent Holocausts have a very long history of either directly, or indirectly
committing numerous other such atrocities against many peoples over many millenia,
even since ancient Biblical times – from the slaughter of the Midianites to the African slave trade
– a number of which being the basis of, and celebrated during various Jewish holidays.
And though I do not particularly describe them here, I don’t deny any of them either. What I do deny is the ridiculous and
exaggerated claim that there is ANY evidence at all that ANY Jews at all – much less
“six million” of them – died from ANY intentional gassings, or as
a result of ANY kind of organized or systematic program of genocide perpetrated against Jews by
Germany’s Nazi regime… and I challenge you to produce ANY evidence or “proof”
that is not merely made up of either pre-war, wartime, or post-war anti-German propaganda…
because none, from either then or now, actually exists. So, if you want to talk about a “Holocaust”…
and I mean a REAL, genuine, genocidal “Holocaust”, and not only the ones
from the past, but one that is happening right NOW, in the present, all you need to do is
to pull your brain-dead/brainwashed heads out of your collectively ignorant rear ends, and
look into the current goings-on in Gaza, The West Bank, Syria, and the Middle East
in general, where the racist, supremacist, Zionist, Talmudic Jews are feverishly working day and
night to exterminate anyone, either Gentile or Jew, who stands in their way in their
quest to build their racist, supremacist, “Kingdom of the World”… a.k.a., Eretz
Israel. And if any of you sanctimonious accusers deny any of these realities, and merely cling to
the all too common view that the only “Holocaust” that really matters
is one that is purported to have been suffered by the Jews, then for people like you
to call anyone else a “Holocaust Denier” is one of the most laughable,
and hypocritical examples of psychopathic projection I have yet seen anywhere… even
as you continue to stupidly, and unashamedly, prove your ignorance and psychopathy
with every ridiculous charge you make.
Finally Putting The
“HOLOCAUST” To Bed.
A LETTER TO STEVEN SPIELBERG,FROM JEWISH FRENCH DR. ROGER DOMMERGUE POLACCO de MENASCE: ___________________________________________ Dear
Mr. Spielberg, I wish your honesty to be equal to your very great talent. I saw you on TV in France. You declared that you would pour out Shoa propaganda in German schools. You mentioned
that witnesses would be convinced for good, as to the
reality of the Shoah (6-million-gas-chambers). I feel
it my duty as a Jew and after 20 years of study of the historical
problem of the holocaust, to call your attention to the facts. Facts are very stubborn and as no one can gainsay them, our congeners have been compelled to make disgusting politicians enact Stalino – Orwellian laws which
forbid to mention anything concerning the dogma of the
“six-million-gas-chambers”, definitively
reduced to perpetual worship of this alchemy. In case of no respect of silence and worship of the myth, you suffer the penalty
of fines or prison or both. Professor Faurisson, who
has been studying the subject for 20 years, has been practically
massacred. This is utterly ridiculous, but give the Police and the Justice
of all countries to Mr Lévy, he will not be ridiculous any more: here is the XXth century! These laws are, accordingly,
the absolute proof of the fake before we study its arithmetical
and technical ineptitude. No Sir, you will not find ONE witness who saw 6 million Jews slaughtered. You will not find ONE witness of Zyclon-B – gas chamber’s to exterminate
1000 or 2000 people at a time, close to the crematoria.
See my “Shoa Sherlockholmized” herewith:
it is the summary of 20 years study on the subject. The “6-million-gas-chambers myth “is an arithmetic and technical nonsense. As a matter of fact
the howling, snivelling, Shoah business, 50 years after the war, is disgusting, debasing: it is a disgraceful shame. No people in History has ever been wailing about its losses 50 years after a war, even its true and real losses. Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would be a dishonour to make such din and pump up so much money everywhere: who were the usurers of the Weimar Republic? You know it as well as I do. It is all the more
so as we know that 6.000.000 is gross exaggeration and that the Zyclon-B gas chambers are a technical impossibility. (See Degesh Trial in 1949). In fact 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in the German camps of typhus or starvation. Many others died but
as fighters against Germany to which we, the Jews, had declared
war in 1933! (Herr. Hitler was allergic to the hegemony
of gold and of the dollar: so he could give work to six
million unemployed, before the functioning of German armament factories!). Do you know the book published at this
period and written by our congener Kaufmann: GERMANY MUST PERISH?
We know that 80,000,000 Goyim were slaughtered in the USSR,
in a political regime which was entirely Jewish, from Marx and Warburg, to Kaganovitch, Frenkel, Yagoda, the executioners. We know that after 1945 Americans and Russians killed and raped German communities all over Europe from Lithuania
to Albania. We know that 1,500,000 German war prisoners
were starved to death after the war (a quite famous
book was published a few years ago, but is ignored to day). You will
find there included in French the text of a rabbi: “A rabbi pleads guilty”: unfortunately I possess neither the German original nor an English translation. You should have it translated. The Rabbi condemns the Jewish behaviour in Germany 50 years before Nazism and vindicates the emergence of Hitler. As for the harm we have done to Humanity absolutely not redeemed by your excellent films or the virtuosity of Yehudi Menuhin, or the neutron bomb of S.T. Cohen, I wrote a book about it from texts written by important Jews which are much above the most anti-Semitic text written by Goyim. Simone Weil drew
a tragic summary: “The Jews, this handful of uprooted people, have been the cause of the uprooting of the whole mankind”. And George Steiner:“For 5000 years we have been talking too much: words of death for us and for the others”. We know that all
the German towns of more than 100,000 people have been destroyed
during the last war, with women and children: silence about this real holocaust. If we consider the turn taken by the Shoah business, what you intend to do in Germany is actually the safest way to a heaping up of a huge amount of anti-Jewism the explosion
of which will be unique in History. Discretion and
moderation must be our behaviour: all the rest is suicide. Neither “mondialism”
nor Orwellian laws for “crime of thought” can prevent antisemitism to explode: only OUR behaviour can. What you do and all the whining and money pumping can only egg it on. It will increase out of reasonable proportions, if there can be
a reasonable proportion to antisemitism. I know that
it is practically impossible to check our propensity
to speculation and that only the abolition of circumcision, the 8th day could (our particularism derives from the disturbance of the 21 days of the 1st puberty, which starts
precisely at the 8th day) but we must, at least, try to avoid
such blunders as the one you intend to perform in Germany and
which would be appalling. I am a great admirer of your films (except the Shindler list: ask his wife and the historical real reality, but this is a minor blunder). I hope
you will scrutinize what I send you and escape the
folly of the majority of our congeners. I will always
answer you if you have the integrity to write to me. Cordialement à vous. Signed
by: Dr. Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . The «Shoa» Sherlockholmised – By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce. 1.
Do we know, in the course of History, of an ethnic group which would not rejoice when learning that, in a war ended fifty years before, it had suffered many less
losses than it thought? Would
the discoverer of such good piece of news, not be rewarded, celebrated? Would he be overwhelmed with heavy fines, would he escape attempted murder, as such was the case with Professor Faurisson? Do
such reactions not belong to
a heavy case of psychopathy? 2. Have the live skeletons which can be seen in such films
as “ Night and Fog” (by Alain Resnais), have anything to do with gassing? Are they not the result of famine in the camps because of the systematic bombing of German towns containing
more than 100,000 people, “holocausting” hundreds of thousands of women and children who are never mentioned? 3.
Where would have been the 4 million Jews ( if we consider that 2 millions were killed in battlefields), when it is well known that one camp could not contain
more than 60,000 thousand people,
and that except in Auschwitz, there was no Zyclon- B gas-chambers? ( there never was any proof of mass gasing with any other gas). 4.
Are the witnesses worth anything, when you know that torture was the way to squeeze out evidence. Such was the case of Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous
declaration has become a legend .
What about the 100 witnesses of gassing in Dachau, when it is official that there was no gas chamber in that camp? 5.
130 kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of one dead body. We are told that the Germans cremated 1300 corpses a day. U.S.A aircraft took hundreds
of pictures of Auschwitz, during the
supposed period of the holocaust. (1943-44). Why is there not a single gigantic heap of the necessary coal? Why not a single black coil of smoke? 6. Why do radio, films, press, T.V., continue daily to inflict upon us the myth of the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never ending whining and
moaning? Why is the Jewish lobby chasing,
50 years after the end of the war, nonagenarians who attempted to rescue Germany from the iniquity of the Versailles treaty, from the rot of
the Weimar Republic, from the collapse
of German youth, from the unemployment of 6 million people, who, back to work could give bread to the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent
on them? 7. Why does the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, issue 43, page
666, inform us that in 1941,
there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe? 8. How is
it possible that the gas chambers could be just near the crematoria, when any chemist will tell you that Zyclon-B is hyperflammable? 9. Why are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the Shoa? A scientific dialogue, a court ordered appraisal
have been demanded since 1980 about a
problem specifically arithmetic and technical. It would seal truth for ever. It would definitively shut the mouths. Such was the case for Katyn, thanks to
the revisionist Gorbatchev. 10. How could Zyclon-B gas 1000 people at one time,
when it is well known that the USA
gas chamber for one ( maximum 2) persons sentenced to death, are of an unheard of complexity and cost? Why, at the trial of the Degesh, which fabricated
the Zyclon-B, was it declared
in 1949, that gassing in such conditions is impossible and unthinkable? 11.
Why did Leuchter, who was in charge of the maintenance of the USA gas chambers, give the firm evidence that there was no gassing in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian
and Polish reports confirmed
the Leuchter report? Why is the Rudolf report, which analyses all results, forbidden? Why are those who divulge the Rudolf report, heavily sentenced by the law? And yet the slightest care of the quality and
accuracy of the report is not taken. 12. Why was, for the first time in History, the doctors
degree of Mr Roques, on the
“Gerstein report” cancelled? And still, this report was not accepted at the Nuremberg trial! Besides the well known historian, a socialist minister, Alain
Decaux, mentioned in the
press that ” nobody could have access to the Gerstein report, without passing first through the excellent thesis of M. Roques” Alain Decaux
said: “I admired the skill and perfection
of a “chartist” performed by M.Roques in his doctors degree on the Gerstein report” (in his book: “la guerre absolue” 1998).
13. Why did Raymond Aron and François Furet at a Sorbonne seminar,
(to which no revisionist was invited),
(state) that there was not the slightest trace
of a written or oral order for the extermination of the Jews? 14. Why is
it never spoken of the planning of the extermination of the Germans as expressed in a book written by the Jew Kaufmann (“Germany must
perish”), by sterilisation of
German men.? It is undoubtedly a small detail? 15. Why Zyclon-B, used by the Germans for hygiene
since 1920, could be used in the concentration
camps for other purposes than delousing and protection against typhus? Why large quantities of Zyclon-B could be found in camps where it is official that there never was any gasings??? 16. Why do they harp on the “six-million-gas-chamber” and never on the 80 million
Goyim exterminated in the
USSR, by an entirely Jewish political regime, the executioners of which bore the names of Kaganovitch, Yagoda, Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport,
and fifty other Jews? 17. Why, during the Zundel trial in Canada, the famous exterminationist Jews disgraced themselves by talking of “poetic licence” in
their holocaust assertions,
and never came back when summoned by the judges? 18. Why the Fabius-Gayssot law ? (the man of the contaminated
blood and another man, a Communist
dragging along 200,000,000 corpses). 19. Is it not the supreme proof of the fake? Is it not casting
out nines? There is no need of
Stalino-Orwellian law “to be put in prison because of ones beliefs” (thought crime of ” 1984 “)
as stated M. Toubon, before he became
a minister of Justice in France, to set up truth. This law is anti constitutional, anti democratic, against the rights of men. Facts, proofs, pros and cons, are only what we need. Professor Faurisson
besought for the granting of
a forum with an unlimited number of contradictors: he never obtained it. L’abbé Pierre did ask for it: they pretended to grant it but refused
it almost immediately. The forum did
take place at the television of Lugano. It was a complete success for the Revisionists and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows it as the media at the beck and
call of the Jewish lobby, move their
little finger only when authorized. 20. Why is it that when a professor declares that
the holocaust is an arithmetic and technical
ineptitude, he is forthwith dismissed! This, for the first time in History, sets up the insane concept of religious historical dogma, which in case of
non perennial worship, is doomed to
be struck by the lightning of the inquisition of a secular state. 21. Why did
the EXPRESS, a famous French newspaper, in January 1995, assert that the gas-chamber shown for decades in Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after the war, and that all
that concerns it, is false? 22. There was actually a holocaust of 60 million people in a war declared in 1933 by the Jews against Hitler. Hitler had given bread
to 6 million unemployed, he had rejected
the dictatorship of the dollar and the Jewish totalitarianism which pollute man and the planet and which is called “democracy” by semantic mystification.
Only two parties are left: the totalitarian
Judeopathy, exterminating man and the planet, and Nationalism for the Goyim not yet cankered by Capitalisto-Marxist Jewish influence. In
“Marianne” Jean François Kahn expresses anger against the bureaucrats of the Jewish World Congress about the despoilment of Jewish property, which ended on the 3rd of
March 1998 in Washington. He writes: “They have
reduced the Shoah to a financial market. So the typical
victim of Nazi barbarity, the archetype of the most frightful genocide of this time, is not the exploited worker in Cracovie, the humble artisan of Lodz, the small civil servant of Kiev, the modest shopkeeper of la rue des Rosiers, or the unknown craftsman of Riga, but the cosmopolitan billionaire who collected Rembrandt and Rubens, slept
on a heap of gold signed here and there comfortable
insurance policies, sent his children to the U.S.A
in order that they should make a brilliant career. This mighty lobby of American oligarchs is not ashamed of reducing the holocaust to a Shoa-business.” If
Faurisson had written what J.F. Kahn wrote he would have had one more
trial on his shoulders ! There is not the shadow of a doubt! By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce. (A Jew who strongly takes issue with the totalitarian Judeopathy) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Why Hitler Put Jews in Camps
and Ghettos Many people question why Adolf Hitler put Jewish
civilians into camps and ghettos during World War II. People often assign false reasons for
why Jews were interned in these camps. For example, Dr. Christiane Northrup, a highly intelligent
and ethical medical doctor, says that Hitler interned Jews because he claimed they were infecting
other people with typhus.[1] Jewish “Holocaust” historian Yehuda Bauer writes:[2] “Part of the Nazi propaganda effort was to persuade non-Jews
that the ghettoes were necessary to protect them from the Jews. Jews were said to be carriers of epidemic illnesses while non-Jews were immune to them.” In reality, Jews were interned in camps and ghettos during World War II because Jews
were generally hostile toward Germany, and many Jewish partisans were actively killing German
troops. In addition to ghetto fighters, Jewish civilians fled to the forests and enlisted in
partisan units, carrying out sabotage and intelligence missions.[3] The authorities of the Third Reich reasoned that Jews had to be interned to protect against
these sabotage and intelligence operations. This article
documents some of the Jewish civilians and groups who actively fought against the Third Reich
during World War II. Jewish Female Assassins Jewish historian Dr. Judy Batalion, in her book The Light of Days, states that
Jewish women who resisted the Third Reich were far more numerous than she had ever imagined.
She writes:[4] “At first, I imagined that the several
dozen resistance operatives mentioned in Freuen comprised the total amount.
But as soon as I touched on the topic, extraordinary tales of female fighters crawled out from
every corner: archives, catalogues, strangers who emailed me their family stories. I found
dozens of women’s memoirs published by small presses, and hundreds of testimonies in Polish,
Russian, Hebrew, Yiddish, German, French, Dutch, Danish, Greek, Italian, and English, from the
1940s to today.” Many Jewish women used
stealth and disguises to murder Germans. For example, 24-year-old Niuta Teitelbaum, from the
Communist group Spartacus, wore her flaxen hair in braids, appearing like a young 16-year-old—an
innocent disguise that hid her role as an assassin. She walked into the office of a high-ranking
Gestapo officer, and shot him in cold blood at his desk. Teitelbaum pulled the trigger on yet
another German officer while he was in bed in his own home. In another operation, she killed
two Gestapo agents and wounded a third who was taken to a hospital. Disguising herself as a
doctor, Teitelbaum entered the wounded Gestapo agent’s room, and murdered both him and
his guard.[5] In another instance, Teitelbaum dressed like a Polish farm
girl with a kerchief in her blond hair. She walked into a German command post, smiled, and
then shot an SS soldier with her pistol. Another time, Teitelbaum strolled up to the guards
outside Szucha, and said she needed to speak to a certain officer about a “personal matter.”
The guards showed her the way to her “boyfriend’s office,” where she pulled
out a concealed pistol with a silencer and shot him in the head. She smiled meekly at the guards
on her way out.[6] For these and other acts of lethal resistance, the Gestapo
nicknamed Teitelbaum “Little Wanda with the Braids,” and put her on all of its
most-wanted lists. She survived the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, but was eventually hunted down and
executed a few months later.[7] The lethal nature of the Jewish female assassins caused the
Germans to take extreme measures against them. German SS commander Jürgen Stroop wrote:[8] “They were not human, perhaps devils or
goddesses. Calm. As nimble as circus performers. They often fired simultaneously with pistols
in both hands. Fierce in combat, right to the end. Approaching them was dangerous. One captured
Haluzzenmädel looked timid. Completely resigned. And then suddenly, when a group of our
men got within a few steps of her, she pulls a hand grenade out from under her skirt or her breeches and slaughters the SS while showering them with curses to the 10th generation—your
hair stands on end! We suffered losses in those situations, and so I gave orders not to take
girls prisoner, not to let them get too close, but to finish them off with submachine guns from
a distance.” Other Jewish Female Resistance
Activities Because of their gender and ability to camouflage
their Jewishness, women were uniquely suited to engage in important and life-threatening tasks
such as couriers. As fighter Chaika Grossman said:[9] “The Jewish girls were the nerve-centers
of the movement.” Historian Emanuel Ringelblum,
a Warsaw Ghetto chronicler, wrote about the Jewish courier girls at the time:[10] “Without a murmur, without a second’s
hesitation, they accept and carry out the most dangerous missions. […] How many
times have they looked death in the eyes? […] The story of the Jewish woman will
be a glorious page in the history of Jewry during the present war.”
The courier girls’ psychological skills were especially important in the most dangerous task of smuggling weapons and ammunition to ghettos and camps. For example, Jewish courier
Bronka Klibanski was smuggling a revolver and two hand grenades inside a loaf of country bread
in her suitcase. A German policeman at the train station asked her what she was carrying. She
managed to avoid having to open her bag by “confessing” that she was smuggling food.
Klibanski’s “honest confession” evoked a protective response from the policeman,
who instructed the train conductor to make sure no one bothered her or her suitcase.[11] Jewish courier Hela Schüpper, who was sent to Warsaw
to buy guns, knew she would be spending 20 hours undercover on trains. She dressed stylishly
so that she looked like she was on her way to an afternoon at the theater. Schüpper flirted
shamelessly on the train, flashing her provocative smile, giving the impression that she might
be going on a vacation. Instead, she met a People’s Army contact at the gate of a clinic.
Schüpper received five weapons, four pounds of explosives, and clips of cartridges. These
weapons were later used against German forces.[12] Jewish courier Chasia Bielicka worked with 18 other Jewish
girls in Bialystok to arm the local resistance. They leased rooms from Polish peasants and
held day jobs in German homes, hotels and restaurants. While working as a maid for an SS man
who had an armoire filled with handguns, Bielicka periodically grabbed a few bullets and dropped
them into her coat pocket. The courier girls passed machine-gun bullets and other ammo to the
ghetto through the window of a latrine that bordered the ghetto wall. This courier ring continued to supply intelligence and arms to numerous partisans after the Bialystok Ghetto’s liquidation.[13] Soviet Jewish Partisans
Partisan warfare has traditionally been considered illegal, since it undermines the convention of uniformed armies directing violence against each other rather than against civilian
populations. Soviet partisan warfare was extremely brutal and capable of severely disrupting
German military planning. Because German forces were always limited and always in demand at
the front, German military and civilian authorities were all the more fearful of the disruption
partisans could bring. Consequently, German army officers were trained to take a severe line
against partisan activity in the Soviet Union.[14] The combat of Soviet partisans in forests and swamps was
regarded by German troops as the most dangerous of all types of warfare—favoring the
hunted rather than the hunter. The partisans almost always killed captured German soldiers,
frequently after inflicting brutal torture. The German anti-partisan forces operated in an extremely
unpleasant environment that made the German units resent the partisans whose activities had
caused them to be there. In summer huge swarms of flies and mosquitos made life miserable; in winter frostbite and trench foot were rampant.[15] Letters from German soldiers reveal the danger of partisan
warfare. A letter from German Cpl. Hans Brüning illustrates how the wooded areas of the
Soviet Union were especially effective locations for partisan warfare:[16] “(The forests are teeming with danger.)
Any snipers who fall into our hands are of course shot; their bodies lie everywhere. Sadly,
though, many of our own comrades have been lost to their dirty methods. We’re losing more
men to the bandits than in the fighting itself. Hardly any sleep to be had. We’re
awake and alert almost every night; you have to be in case they attack suddenly. If the sentry
drops his guard just once it could be over for all of us. Traveling alone is out of the question.” German Cpl. Erich Stahl wrote:[17] “These are dangerous swine, and no soldier
is safe from them. The danger is there wherever you go and wherever you stay…and you
only breathe out when you’ve come back from your post unhurt. […] If the
moon’s not out, you stay awake at your post like an ox.” German Pvt. Hans Schröder described how Soviet partisan activity killed two Germans
on June 19, 1942:[18] “Two of our comrades in first company tragically
lost their lives. […] Though we kept watch, a partisan still was able to
creep up to one of our houses. A grenade chucked in through the window, and it was done. […]
We took revenge straight away, and rightly. I used to think one should act humanely, but this
subhumanity just isn’t worth it.” Germany
established numerous ghettos in an effort to contain or eliminate Soviet partisan activities.
In Belorussia alone, hundreds of thousands of Jews were imprisoned in more than 100 ghettos
and camps. The largest ghetto was in Minsk (100,000 people); other ghettos were in Brest (34,000
people), Bobruisk (20,000 people), Vitebsk (20,000 people), Borisov (10,000 people), Slonim
(24,000 people), Novogrodek (6,500 people) and so on.[19] Specifically Jewish partisan units were usually frowned upon.
The Soviet command preferred to mix nationalities in so-called territorial (e.g., Belorussian,
Ukrainian, etc.) units. However, a few entirely Jewish units nevertheless survived. These include
those of the brothers Tuvia, Zusia, and Asael Belski in the Naliboki forests; the unit of Misha
Gildenman near Korzec in western Belorussia; Dr. Yehezkel Atlas’s unit in the same general
area; and the large unit commanded by Abba Kovner in the Rudniki forests in Lithuania.[20] Soviet partisan warfare against Germany became increasingly
barbaric and murderous. I n February 1943, 596 German prisoners were killed and many of them
mutilated by Soviet partisans at Grischino. A German judge who interrogated witnesses and survivors
of this atrocity remembers:[21] “You have no idea how much trouble the
commanders and company chiefs had […] to restrain the German soldiers from killing
every Russian prisoner of war of the Popov Army. The troop was very bitter and angry. You cannot
imagine the vehemence of the soldiers after they had seen what had happened.” German anti-partisan activity resulted in a horrific loss of civilian and partisan lives
as well as the destruction of many Russian villages. However, the Soviet partisans’ sabotage operations effectively tied up increasing numbers of German troops and prevented the
Germans from ever feeling secure on Russian soil. By the time the bulk of Russian territory
had been liberated in early 1944, a large and effective Soviet guerilla movement had emerged. Stalin’s
support had allowed the Soviet partisans to survive the German anti-partisan reprisals and grow
into an effective fighting force that helped the Soviet Union win the war.[22] European Jewish Partisans Jews actively participated in the anti-German underground movement in France. After Germany attacked Russia in June 1941, French Jewish communists discovered their anti-German
patriotism. Numerous French Jews joined underground resistance organizations, or Jewish groups
that actively maintained links with such organizations.[23] French resistance activity began to increase toward the end
of the war. Since Allied leaders planned to invade Europe on the coast of France, French partisans
received substantial weaponry and supplies to aid the Allied invasion. By June 6, 1944, French
partisans had received enough arms through airdrops to fully equip 20,000 resisters, and partially
equip another 50,000. Large stocks of guns, ammunition and explosives were in the hands of the partisans for a do-or-die effort to assist the Allied invasion.[24] Italian partisan activity also assumed impressive proportions
in the northern part of Italy after Mussolini’s collapse in 1943. However, this Italian
partisan activity, which included many Jews, developed at a time and place where the Germans
were well positioned to contest its growth. In March 1944, for example, a partisan attack on
a German column marching through Rome caused many German casualties. The Germans shot 335 hostages in a nearby abandoned quarry—the so-called Fosse Ardeatine—in a massacre that still provokes heated debates today.[25] Germans were confronted by armed resistance groups in at
least 24 ghettoes in western and central Poland: Warsaw, Krakow, Czestochowa, Wlodawa, Sosnowice,
Tomaszow Lubelski, Kielce, Iwaniska, Chmielnik, Sandomierz, Jozefow, Opatow, Kalwaria, Ozialoszica,
Markuszew, Rzeszow, Miedzyrzec Podlaski, Opoczno, Tarnow, Pilica, Radom, Radzyn, Sokolow Podlaski, and Zelechow. In northeastern Poland, there were 63 armed underground groups
in 110 ghettoes or other Jewish concentrations. The existence of some form of organization is
also indicated by armed actions in another 30 ghettoes.[26] In August 1944, an estimated 2,500 Jewish fighters participated
in a national uprising in Slovakia. After the defeat of this uprising, some 2,000 Jewish fighters
joined 15,000 partisans in the Tatra mountains. Jews participated in underground activities
in Bulgaria, in the Greek partisan movement, and about 6,000 Jews also fought with the Tito
partisans in Yugoslavia.[27] German anti-partisan reprisals were usually effective in
reducing partisan activity in Western Europe during the war. German reprisals against partisan
activity frequently prevented opposition from surfacing over much of occupied Europe, and broke
up opposition when it became visible. There were few places in Western Europe where the Germans
were overwhelmed by partisan activities for very long. Only in the Soviet Union did German
anti-partisan reprisals fail.[28] Conclusion Judy Batalion writes concerning the extensive involvement of Jewish women in resistance
efforts against Germany during World War II:[29] “Despite years of Jewish education, I’d
never read accounts like these, astonishing in their details of the quotidian and extraordinary
work of woman’s combat. I had no idea how many Jewish women were involved in the resistance
effort, nor to what degree. […] Why, I kept asking myself, had I
never heard these stories? Why had I not heard about the hundreds, even thousands, of Jewish
women who were involved in every aspect of this rebellion, often at its helm?” It is this author’s opinion that Judy Batalion had never heard of the extensive
involvement of Jewish women in resistance efforts against Germany because such involvement has intentionally been kept quiet. If the extensive murderous female participation in these
resistance organizations were widely known, then people would get closer to understanding one
reason why Hitler interned Jews in camps and ghettos. Jews were not interned because Hitler
hated Jews. Rather, Jews were interned in camps and ghettoes to a large degree because the German
authorities considered Jewish civilians, both male and female, a serious threat to German military
operations during World War II. Endnotes [1] | https://rumble.com/vmcalv-critically-thinking-with-dr.-m-and-dr.-n-episode-61-sept-9-2021.html. Critically thinking Northrup Madej September 2021. | [2] | Bauer, Yehuda, A History of the Holocaust, New York: Franklin Watts, 1982, p. 153. |
[3] | Batalion, Judy, The Light of Days: The Untold Story of Women Resistance Fighters in Hitler’s
Ghettos, New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2020, p. 5. | [4] | Ibid., p. 4. | [5] | Ibid., p. 219. | [6] | Ibid. | [7] | Ibid., p. 220. | [8] | Ibid., p. 161. | [9] | Ibid., p. 8. | [10] | Ibid. | [11] | Ibid., pp. 226-227. | [12] | Ibid., pp. 227-228. | [13] | Ibid., p. 229. | [14] | Snyder, Timothy, Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin, New York: Basic Books,
2010, pp. 233-234. | [15] | MacLean, French L., The Cruel Hunters: SS-Sonderkommando Dirlewanger Hitler’s Most
Notorious Anti-Partisan Unit, Atglen, Pa.: Schiffer Military History, 1998, pp. 69-70. | [16] | Shepherd, Ben, War in the Wild East: The German Army and Soviet Partisans, Cambridge,
Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, 2004, pp. 77-78. | [17] | Ibid., pp. 188-189. | [18] | Ibid., p. 189. | [19] | Kagan, Jack and Cohen, Dov, Surviving the Holocaust with the Russian Jewish Partisans,
Portland, Ore.: Vallentine Mitchell, 1998, p. xi. | [20] | Bauer, Yehuda, A History of the Holocaust, New York: Franklin Watts, 1982, p. 271. |
[21] | De Zayas, Alfred M., The Wehrmacht War Crimes Bureau, 1939-1945, Lincoln, Neb.: University
of Nebraska Press, 1989, p. 106. | [22] | Mazower, Mark, Hitler’s Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe, New York: The Penguin
Press, 2008, pp. 490-491. | [23] | Bauer, Yehuda, A History of the Holocaust, New York: Franklin Watts, 1982, p. 275. |
[24] | Lande, D. A., Resistance!: Occupied Europe and Its Defiance of Hitler, Osceola, Wis.:
MBI Publishing Company, 2000, pp. 154-155. | [25] | Mazower, Mark, Hitler’s Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe, New York: The Penguin
Press, 2008, p. 500. | [26] | Bauer, Yehuda, A History of the Holocaust, New York: Franklin Watts, 1982, p. 270. |
[27] | Ibid., p. 272. | [28] | Mazower, Mark, Hitler’s Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe, New York: The Penguin
Press, 2008, pp. 485, 516. | [29] | Batalion, Judy, The Light of Days: The Untold Story of Women Resistance Fighters in Hitler’s
Ghettos, New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2020, pp. 3, 7. |
THE FOLLOWING IS TAKEN FROM THE BOOK
TITLED, IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA (Published 1952
By COLONEL JOHN BEATY):
It
appears also that the world‘s troubles from little blood-born Israel are not over. An official Israeliview of Germany was expressed in Dallas, Texas, on March 18, 1951, when Abba S. Eban
was talking in Dallas about Israel to the United States and Israel‘s representative at the United Nations,
stated that Israel resents the rehabilitation of Germany. Ambassador Eban visited the Texas city in the interest
of raising funds for taking 200,000 immigrants this year, 600,000 within the next three years (Dallas Morning
News, March 13, 1951) to the small state of Palestine, or Israel. The same day that Ambassador Eban was talking
in Dallas about Israel‘s resentment at the rehabilitation of Germany, a Reuters dis- patch of March 13,
1951 from Tel Aviv (Washington Times-Herald) stated that notes delivered yesterday [March 12] in Washington, London,
and Paris and to the Soviet Minister at Tel Aviv urge the occupying powers of Germany not to hand over full
powers to any German government without express reserva- tions for the payment of reparations to Israel in the
sum of $1,500,000,000. This compensation was said to be for
6,000,000 Jews killed by Hitler. This figure has been used repeated- ly (as late as January, 1952 Israeli broadcast
heard by the author), but one who consults statistics and ponders the known facts of recent history cannot do
other than wonder how it is arrived at. According to Appendix VII, Statistics on Religious Affiliation, of The
Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States (A Report of the Committee on the Judiciary of the
United States Senate, 1950), the number of Jews in the world is 15,713,638. The World Almanac, 1949, p. 289, is cited
as the source of the statistical table reproduced on p. 842 of the government document. The article in the World
Almanac is headed Re- ligious Population of the World. A corresponding item, with the title, Population, Worldwide,
by Reli- gious Beliefs is found in the World Almanac for 1940 (p. 129), and in it the world Jewish population
is given as 15,319,359. If the World Almanac figures are correct, the world‘s Jewish population did not
de- crease in the war decade, but showed a small increase.
Assuming,
however, that the figures of the U.S. document and the World Almanac are in error, let us make an examination
of the known facts. In the first place, the number of Jews in Germany in 1939 was about 600,000, by some estimates considerably
fewer, and of these, as shown elsewhere in this book, many came to the United States, some went to Palestine,
and some are still in Germany. As to the Jews in East- ern European lands temporarily overrun by Hitler‘s
troops, the great majority retreated ahead of the Ger- man armies into Soviet Russia. Of these, many came later
to the U.S., some moved to Palestine, some un- questionably remained in Soviet Russia and may be a part of the
Jewish force on the Iranian frontier, and enough remained in Eastern Europe or have returned from Soviet Russia
to form the hard core of the new ruling bureaucracy in satellite countries (Chapter II ). It is hard to see how all
these migrations and all these power accomplishments can have come about with a Jewish population much less
than that which existed in Eastern Europe before World War II. Thus the known facts on Jewish migration and Jewish power in Eastern Europe tend, like the World Almanac figures accepted by the Senate Judiciary Committee, to
raise a question as to where Hitler got the 6,000,000 Jews he is said to have killed. This question should be
settled once and for all before the United States backs any Israeli claims against Germany. In this connection,
it is well to recall also that the average German had no more to do with Hitl- ler‘s policies; than the
average American had to do with Franklin Roosevelt‘s policies; that 5,000,000 Germans are unaccounted
for, 4,000,000 civilians (pp. 70, 71, above) and 1,000,000 soldiers who never returned from Soviet labor camps
(p. 137); and that a permanent hostile attitude toward Germany on our part is the highest hope of the Communist
masters of Russia.
In spite of its absurdity, however, the Israeli
claim for reparations from a not yet created country, whose territory has been nothing but an occupied land
through the entire life of the state of Israel, may well de- lay reconciliation in Western Europe; and the claim,
even though assumed under duress by a West Ger- man government, would almost certainly be paid, directly or
indirectly, by the United States.
As to Ambassador Eban‘s 600,000 more immigrants
to Israel: Where will these people go unless more Arab lands are taken and more
Christians and Moslems are driven from their homes? And of equal
significance: Whence will Ambassador Eban‘s Jewish immigrants to Israel come? As stated above,
a large portion of pre-war Germany‘s 600,000 Jews came, with other European Jews, to the United States on the return trips of vessels which took American soldiers to Europe. Few of them will
leave the United States, for statistics dhow that of all immigrants to this country, the Jew is least
likely to leave. The Jews now in West Germany will probably contribute few immigrants to Israel, for
these Jews enjoy a preferred status under U.S. protection. It thus appears that Ambassador Eban‘s 600,000
reinforcments to Israel apart from stragglers from the Arab world and a possible mere handful from
elsewhere can come only from Soviet and satellite lands. Ifso, they will come on permission of and
by arrangement with some Communist dictator (Chapter II, above). Can it be that many of the 600,000 will be
young men with Soviet military training? Can it be that such permission will be related to the Soviet‘s
great concentration of Jews in 1951 inside the Soviet borders adjacent to the Soviet-Iranian frontier?
___________________________________________
Why the Holocaust Story
Was Invented Historian John Wear has been asked the questions: “Why was the Holocaust story invented?
Who benefits
from this falsification of history?” This article will answer these questions. By John Wear The first reason
the Holocaust was invented was for justification for the war with Germany. World War II was by far the bloodiest and most destructive war in human history.
Many people wondered whether all of the death and destruction caused by the war had been necessary. The so-called Holocaust (alleged genocide of Jews) was
used by the Allies to demonize Germany and prove that their war effort was necessary to defeat
such an evil nation. With the liberation of Ohrdruf, Buchenwald and Dachau by the American
Army and the liberation of Bergen-Belsen by British troops, large groups of Western observers
confronted the horrors of the German camps for the first time. The gruesome scenes of huge piles of dead bodies and emaciated and diseased
surviving inmates were filmed and photographed for posterity by the U.S. Army Signal Corps. Prominent
newsmen and politicians were flown in to formerly German-occupied territory to see the harrowing evidence
at the camps for themselves. The horrific scenes in the German-run camps were used by the Allies to justify their
participation in the war.1 Jewish historian Robert Jan van Pelt writes: To the Allies, the discovery of the camps proved a final justification of their war effort. In 1940, Churchill
had proclaimed that a Nazi victory would bring “a new dark age made more sinister by perverted science.” The liberation of the camps proved that Churchill had not
exaggerated the danger. And even though Auschwitz had
been liberated by the Russians, the English and Americans heard many stories about that camp.2 Establishment of Israel
The Holocaust story has also been used to justify the creation of the nation-state of Israel. Simon
Wiesenthal writes: “The creation of Israel was the only possible and the only correct reaction
to Auschwitz. There had to be a country in the world where the Jews were the landlords instead of tolerated
guests, a place of refuge in the truest meaning of the word, even for Jews who live in other countries.”3
David Ben-Gurion stated at the beginning of World War II that the war should end by giving the
Zionists their own state. After the war, Ben-Gurion and other Israeli leaders said that th e Holocaust had proven
once again that the only solution to the Jewish problem was an independent state in Palestine. Ben-Gurion
again mentioned during Adolf Eichmann’s trial that the Holocaust happened because Jews did not
live in their own country.4 Israeli historian Tom Segev explains why the Holocaust story
is so important to Israel: Israel differs from other countries
in its need to justify—to the rest of the world, and to itself—its very right to exist. Most countries need no
such ideological justifications. But Israel does—because
most of its Arab neighbors have not recognized it and because most of the Jews of the world prefer to live in other countries.
So long as these factors remain true, Zionism will be
on the defensive. As a justification for the state of Israel, the Holocaust is comparable only to the divine promise contained
in the Bible: It seems to be definitive proof of the
Zionist argument that Jews can live in security and with full equal rights only in their own country and that they therefore must have an autonomous and sovereign state, strong
enough to defend its existence.5
Tom Segev further writes, “The demonization of Nazism and its mythologizing, in general, were
also necessary since the Holocaust served as the main justification for the creation and existence of the
state of Israel.”6 Justification of Israeli Violence There were
at least 33 massacres of Palestinian villages during Israel’s “war of independence.”
Zionist forces were larger and better equipped than their opponents, and by the end of the war
over 750,000 Palestinians were ruthlessly expelled from their homes.7 As Segev writes,
“Israel was born of terror, war, and revolution, and its creation required a measure of
fanaticism and of cruelty.”8 Entire cities and hundreds of villages in Israel were left empty
and repopulated with new Jewish immigrants. The Jewish immigrants numbered 100,000 in April 1949, most of
them survivors of the so-called Holocaust. The Palestinians lost everything they had
and became destitute refugees, while the Jewish immigrants to Israel stole the Palestinians’
property and confiscated everything they needed.9 The Holocaust story has been repeatedly used to justify
Israel’s aggression against its neighbors. Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin justified the demolition
of an alleged Iraqi nuclear facility in June 1981 with the words, “We must protect our nation,
a million and a half of whose children were murdered by the Nazis in the gas chambers.”10
Before Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in June 1982, Begin told his cabinet: “You know what I have
done and what we have all done to prevent war and loss of life. But such is our fate in Israel. There is no way
other than to fight selflessly. Believe me, the alternative is Treblinka, and we have decided that
there will be no more Treblinkas.”11 A few weeks after Israel’s invasion of Lebanon, Begin
stated that after the Holocaust the international community had lost its right to demand
that Israel answer for its actions. Begin declared in the Knesset, “No one, anywhere
in the world, can preach morality to our people.” A similar statement was included in the
resolution adopted by Begin’s cabinet after the massacres in Palestinian refugee camps on
the outskirts of Beirut.12 By the late 1980s there was hardly a day when the Holocaust story was not
mentioned in one of the Israeli newspapers. Such constant exposure encouraged many Israeli
soldiers to plan ways to exterminate the Arabs. According to Israeli education-corps officer
Ehud Praver, “too many soldiers were deducing that the Holocaust justifies every kind of disgraceful
action.”13 German Guilt The so-called
Holocaust has also been effectively used to induce guilt in the German people. As British historian
Ian Kershaw writes: “Decades would not fully erase the simple but compelling sentiment: ‘I am
ashamed to be German.’ ”14 Friedrich Grimm, a renowned German authority on international
law, was shown samples of new leaflets printed in German soon after the war to be distributed by
the Allies throughout Germany. Describing alleged German war crimes, the leaflets were the first step
in the reeducation program designed for Germany. Grimm suggested to an Allied officer that
since the war was over, it was time to stop the libel. The Allied officer replied: Why
no, we’re just getting started. We’ll continue this atrocity campaign, we’ll increase it till no one will
want to hear a good word about the Germans anymore,
till whatever sympathy there is for you in other countries is completely destroyed, and until the Germans themselves become
so mixed up they won’t know what they’re doing!15 The Allied campaign to make Germans feel guilty concerning the
so-called Holocaust has been highly successful.
German guilt feeling is so powerful it has caused the German government to make enormous reparations and
offer humble apologies to the Allies, while ignoring the atrocities committed by the Allies against the
German people during and after the war. Millions of German expellees have paid reparations to survivors of the
German concentration camps even though these German expellees had their land and personal possessions
stolen from them. James Bacque
writes in regard to German feelings of guilt: Guilt pervades Germany
like a religion. It is the “Canossa Republic,” penitent in pain before its judges. Guilt is so powerful that
it has caused the Canossa Republic repeatedly to deny any
intention of reclaiming sovereignty over the eastern lands, although it is a well-established UN principle that no government has the right to waive the claims of individuals to their property. Nor
may it impede their right of return to their former homeland.16 Allied Guilt and Apathy The Allies
have also been declared guilty of not doing more to prevent the alleged genocide of European Jewry. Jewish
historian Deborah Lipstadt writes: A real antipathy
toward Jews certainly affected the Allied response. While no one among the Allies or in the press wanted to see Jews killed,
virtually no one was willing to advocate that
steps be taken to try to stop the carnage. Many Allied officials in positions of power in London and Washington
were tired of hearing about Jews and even
more tired of being asked to do something about them even though there were steps that could have been taken.17 Elie Wiesel writes in regard to the Allies’ failure to
rescue European Jewry, “It almost seems as if both diplomats and statesmen spent more time inventing
reasons not to save the Jews than trying to find a way to save them.”18
U.S. presidents Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush have all made statements that the United
States will never again fail to act to stop something as evil as the genocide of European Jewry.
At the dedication of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, President Bill Clinton spoke
in a similar vein: “For those of us here today representing the nations of the West, we must live forever
with this knowledge: Even as our fragmentary awareness of crimes grew into indisputable facts, far too little
was done.”19 Michael Goldberg says in regard to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum: “The
museum stands as a grim reminder that for all its purported ideals, America nevertheless turned its back
on Jews fleeing Hitler. . . . Hence, the museum’s recalling what happened to Jews in the past may move
Americans and their national policymakers in Washington to support Israel in the present, lest in the future,
the same fate lie in store for Jews again— and the same moral failure await Americans once more.”20
President Barack Obama affirmed on the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Dachau: “. . . we fervently vow that such atrocities will never happen again,” and,
“History will not repeat itself.”21 Of course, Obama forgot to tell his audience that most of the inmates at Dachau died of natural
causes. Obama also conveniently failed to mention that the single biggest atrocity that occurred at Dachau
was the mass murder by American troops of 520 German guards on the day Dachau was liberated.22
Reparations to Jews German guilt for the so-called Holocaust has resulted in
massive reparations being paid to Holocaust survivors and the state of Israel. German reparations
to Jews were discussed from the beginning of World War II. Segev writes: The idea
[of reparations] seems to have been in the air from the time the war started, apparently sparked by the punitive reparations
payments imposed on Germany at the end of World War
I. Ben-Gurion received a memorandum on the subject as early as 1940. Berl Katznelson spoke of it publicly toward
the end of that year. By December 1942, there
was already a private organization in Tel Aviv called Justicia that offered to help Nazi victims draft compensation
demands.23 Hatred of Germans in Israel was intense after the war. Many
advocated a special law barring Israelis from all social contacts with German citizens. However, since most
Israelis felt that the Germans owed them massive paybacks for the so-called Holocaust, Germany and
Israel began negotiating reparations on March 20, 1952. The Luxembourg Agreement was reached six months later
and committed the German government to paying massive reparations to Holocaust survivors.24
Nahum Goldmann said in a 1976 interview that the Luxembourg Agreement “constituted an
extraordinary innovation in the matter of international rights.” Goldmann also boasted that he had obtained
10 to 14 times more from the Bonn government than he had originally expected.25 Millions of Jews eventually received personal compensation for their pain and
suffering in the so-called Holocaust. The German federal government as of 1998 had paid reparations to Israel and
Third Reich victims of about $61.8 billion. In addition, Germans had paid many additional billions in private
and other public funds to wartime forced laborers.26 German reparations to Israel and Jews continue to this day.27
Jewish Solidarity The Holocaust story is described by many Jewish leaders
as a uniquely evil event. An example of this view was expressed by Abraham H. Foxman when he
was the national director of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith:
The Holocaust is something different. It is a singular event. It is not simply
one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God’s chosen children and, thus, on God Himself. It is an event that is the antithesis of Creation as recorded
in the Bible; and like its direct opposite,
which is relived weekly with the Sabbath and yearly with the Torah, it must be remembered from generation to generation.28 Michael Goldberg confirms that the Holocaust story has
become a religion [sometimes called Holocaustianity—Ed.] to many Jews: “As the
Holocaust has become many contemporary Jews’ master story, so, too, its perpetual observance has become
their paramount Jewish practice, its veneration their religion. And as with any organized church,
this Holocaust cult has its own tenets of faith, rites, and shrines.”29
Israelis are obsessed with the history and heritage of the Holocaust. A 1992 study of Israeli college
students found that close to 80% of those asked identified with the statement, “We are all Holocaust survivors.”
The so-called Holocaust has become a way for secular Jews to feel connected to their Jewish heritage.30
The Holocaust, commemorated ritually through the observance of Holocaust Remembrance Day, is a major means
of creating solidarity among Jews. While some Jewish communities experience conflicts among Orthodox,
Conservative and Reform Jews, they set aside their differences and join together to mourn the so-called
Holocaust. Any truth in Judaism’s slogan of “Jews Are One” manifests itself ritually
on Holocaust Remembrance Day.31 Conclusion The
alleged genocide of European Jewry has been used to justify the Allied war effort, to establish the state of Israel, to justify Israel’s violence against its neighbors, to induce guilt in both Germans and the Allied nations, to allow Jews to receive massive reparations from Germany and to create solidarity in the Jewish community. The extreme importance of the Holocaust story in advancing Zionist/Jewish interests ensures that this falsification of history will continue in the future. ENDNOTES Van Pelt, Robert
Jan, The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2002,
p. 165. 2 Ibid. 3 Wiesenthal, Simon, Justice
Not Vengeance: New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1989, p. 224. 4 Segev,
Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, New York: Hill and Wang, pp. 82, 185, 330.
5 Ibid., p. 514. 6 Ibid., p. 480.
7 Weir, Alison, Against Our Better Judgement: The Hidden History of How the U.S. was Used to Create
Israel, 2014, p. 58. 8 Segev, Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, New
York: Hill and Wang, p. 63. 9 Ibid., pp. 161-162. 10 Ibid.,
p. 399. 11 Ibid. 12 Ibid.
13 Ibid., pp. 407, 412. 14 Kershaw, Ian, Hitler 1936-45:
Nemesis, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000, p. 840. 15 Tedor,
Richard, Hitler’s Revolution, Chicago: 2013, p. 263. 16 Bacque,
James, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, 2nd edition,
Vancouver, British Columbia: Talonbooks, 2007, pp. 175-176. 17 Lippstadt, Deborah E., Beyond
Belief: The American Press & the Coming of the Holocaust 1933-1945, New York: The Free Press, 1986, p. 277.
18 Wyman, David S., The Abandonment of the Jews: America and the Holocaust, 1941-1945,
New York: The New Press, 2007, p. x. 19 Ibid., pp. 342-343.
20 Goldberg, Michael, Why Should Jews Survive?: Looking Past the Holocaust Toward a Jewish Future,
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 55. 21 http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Obama-vows-never-again-on-70th-anniversary-of-liberation-of-Nazis-Dachau-camp-400570.
22 Buechner, Howard A., Dachau: The Hour of the Avenger, Metairie, LA: Thunderbird Press,
Inc., 1986, pp. 5, 29, 96-97. 23 Segev, Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, New
York: Hill and Wang, p. 104. 24 Ibid., pp. 190-191, 227, 233.
25 “West Germany’s Holocaust Payoff to Israel and World Jewry,” The Journal of
Historical Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, Summer 1988, p. 245. 26 “Germany Has Paid Out
More Than $61.8 Billion in Third Reich Reparations,” The Journal of Historical Review,
Vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1998, p. 19. 27 See http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/world/europe/for-60th-year-germany-honors-duty-to-pay-holocaust-victims.html
and http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Germany-to-pay-250-Million-to-child-Holocaust-survivors-374596.
28 ADL on the Frontline, January 1994, p. 2. 29 Goldberg,
Michael, Why Should Jews Survive? Looking Past the Holocaust Toward a Jewish Future, Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 1995, p. 41. 30 Segev, Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust New
York: Hill and Wang, pp. 513, 515-516. 31 Goldberg, Michael, Why Should Jews
Survive? Looking Past the Holocaust Toward a Jewish Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 50. ____________________________________________________________
Click on this text to watch HOLOCAUST: Shifting the Blame, Part 1
Click on this text to watch The Holocaust Shifting The Blame Part 2
Click on this text to visit the JAN. 27 Committee website for the truth about Auschwitz etc.
Click on this text to examine Holocaust Skepticism a "Beginners Guide to Revisionism"
__________________________________________________________________________
THE
OPEN LETTER SPIELBERG COULDN’T REPLY TO Posted on October 30, 2018 by Mike Walsh PENNED BY R. Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce, a
noted Jewish holocaust researcher: “Dear Mr. Spielberg, I wish your honesty to be equal to your talent. I saw you on TV
in France.You declared that you would pour out Shoah
(holocaust) propaganda in German schools.I feel it my
duty as a Jew and after 20 years of study of the historical
problem of the holocaust, to call your attention to the facts.Facts are very stubborn and as no one can contradict them, zealots have been forced to make disgusting politicians enact Orwellian
laws which forbid to mentionanything concerning the dogma of the ‘six-million-gas-chambers’.
Professor Faurisson, who has been studying
the subject for 20 years, has been massacred. These
laws are, accordingly, the absolute proof of the fake
before we study its arithmetical and technical ineptitude.
No Sir, you will not find a single witness who saw six
million Jews slaughtered. You will not find one witness
of gas chambers to exterminate 1000 or 2000 people at a time, close to the crematoria. The 6-million-gas-chambers myth is an arithmetic and technical nonsense.
As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah business is disgusting, debasing: it is a disgraceful shame. No people in history have ever been wailing about its losses 50 – 70 years after a war, even its true and real losses.
Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would
be a dishonour to make such din and pump up so much
money everywhere. We know that 6 million is a gross exaggeration and that the gas chambers are a technical impossibility. (Degesh Trial in 1949). In fact, 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in the German camps of typhus or starvation. Many
others died but as fighters against Germany to which
we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933. We know that after 1945 Americans and Russians killed and raped German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to Albania. We know that 1,500,000 German war prisoners were starved to death after the war (a quite famous book was published but is
ignored (Other Losses, James Bacque). We know that all German towns of more than
100,000 people have been destroyed during the last war,
with women and children: yet silence about this real
holocaust. If we consider the turn taken by the Shoah
business, what you intend to do in Germany is actually
the safest way to a heaping up of a huge amount of anti-Semitism
the explosion of which will be unique in history. Discretion
and moderation must be our behaviour: all the rest is
suicide. Orwellian laws for ‘crime of thought’ cannot prevent anti-Semitism to explode: only our behaviour can. What you do and all the whining and money pumping can only egg it on and it will increase out
of reasonable proportions. We must, at least, try to
avoid such blunders as the one you intend to perform
in Germany and which would be appalling. POINT 1: Do we know, in the course of History, of any ethnic group which would not rejoice when learning that, in a war ended fifty years
before, it had suffered many less losses than it thought?
Would the discovery of such good piece of news, not
be rewarded, and celebrated? Would he be overwhelmed
with heavy fines, would he escape attempted murder, as
such was the case with Professor Faurisson? Do such
reactions not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy? POINT 2: Have the living corpses which can be seen in such films as Night and Fog (by Alain Resnais), have anything to do with gassing? Are they not instead of the result of
famine in the camps because of the systematic bombing
of German towns containing more than 100,000 people,
bringing a real holocaust to hundreds of thousands of
women and children who are never mentioned? POINT 3: Where would have been the 4 million Jews (if we consider that 2 million were killed in battlefields), when it is well known
that one camp could not contain more than 60,000 thousand
people and that except in Auschwitz, there was no Zyclon-
B gas-chambers? POINT 4: Are witnesses worth anything, when
you know that torture was the only way to squeeze out evidence. Such was the case of Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration has become a legend. What about the 100 witnesses
of gassing in Dachau, when it is officially recognised
that there were no gas chambers situated in that camp
either? POINT 5: 130 kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of just one corpse. We are told that the Germans cremated 1,300 corpses a day. The USAAF took hundreds of pictures of
Auschwitz, during the supposed period of the holocaust.
(1943-44). Why is there not a single heap of the essential
coal? Why not a single column of smoke? POINT 6: Why do media continue daily to inflict upon us the myth of the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never-ending whining and moaning? Why are the Jewish lobby chasing, nonagenarians who
attempted to rescue Germany from the iniquity of the
Versailles treaty, from the joblessness of 6 million
people, who, back to work could give bread to the 21,500,000
persons who were dependent on them? POINT 7: Why does
the American Jewish Year Book, issue 43, page 666, inform us that in 1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe? POINT 8: How
is it possible that the gas chambers could be just near
the crematoria, when any chemist will tell you that Zyclon-B is hyper flammable? POINT 9: Why are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the holocaust?
A scientific dialogue, a court-ordered appraisal have
been demanded since 1980 about a problem specifically
arithmetic and technical. It would seal the truth for
ever. POINT 10: How could Zyclon-B gas 1,000 people at one time, when it is well known that American gas chambers made for just one person, are of an unheard of complexity and cost?
Why, at the trial of the Degesh, which fabricated the
Zyclon-B, was it declared in 1949, that gassing in such conditions is impossible and unthinkable? POINT 11: Why did Leuchter, who was in charge of the maintenance of the US gas chambers, give
the firm evidence that there was no gassing in Auschwitz?
Why have Austrian and Polish reports confirmed the Leuchter
report? Why is the Rudolf report, which analyses all
results, forbidden? Why are those who divulge the Rudolf report, heavily sentenced by the law? And yet the slightest care of the quality and accuracy of the report is not taken. POINT 12: Why was,
for the first time in history, the doctor’s degree
of Mr Roques, on the Gerstein report cancelled? And
still, this report was not accepted at the Nuremberg
trial! POINT 13: Why did Raymond Aron and François
Furet at a Sorbonne seminar, to which no revisionist was invited, (state) that there was not the slightest trace of
a written or oral order for the extermination of the
Jews? POINT 14: Why is it never spoken of the planning of the extermination of the Germans as expressed in a book written by the Jew Kaufmann
(Germany must perish), by sterilisation of German men? It is undoubtedly a small detail? POINT 15: How could Zyclon-B, used by the Germans for hygiene since 1920, be used in
the concentration camps for other purposes than delousing
and protection against typhus?
POINT 16: Why do they harp on
about the six-million and never mention 80 million non-Jews exterminated in the USSR, by an entirely Jewish political regime, the executioners of which bore the names of Kaganovich, Yagoda, Frenkel,
Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport, and fifty other
Jews? POINT 17: Why, during the Zundel trial in Canada, did the famous pro-holocaust Jews disgrace themselves by talking of ‘poetic licence’ in their holocaust assertions, and who never returned when summoned to do so
by the judges?
POINT
18: Why the Fabius-Gayssot law; the ludicrous fable of one illness stricken man dragging along 200,000,000 corpses? POINT 19: Is
it not the supreme proof of the fake? There is no need
of Stalinist-Orwellian laws imposing prison sentences
because of one’s beliefs (thought crime of 1984)
as stated by M. Toubon, before he became a Minister of Justice in France, to set up the truth. This law is anti-constitutional, anti-democratic, against
the rights of men. Facts, proofs, pros and cons, are
only what we need. Professor Faurisson besought for
the granting of a forum with an unlimited number of contradictors: he never obtained it. L’abbé Pierre did ask for it: they pretended to grant it but refused it almost immediately. The forum did take place
at the Lugarno television studios. It was a complete
success for the revisionists and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows it as the media, at the beck and call of the Jewish lobby, move their little finger only when authorised by the
Jewish lobby to do so.
POINT 20: Why is it that when
a professor declares that the holocaust is an arithmetic
and technical impossibility, he is dismissed? This, for the first time in history, sets up the insane concept of religious historical dogma, which in case of non-perennial worship, is doomed
to be struck by the lightning of the inquisition of
a secular state. POINT 21: Why did the ‘Express’,
a famous French newspaper, in January 1995, assert that the gas-chamber shown for decades in Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after the war, and that all that concerns it, is false? POINT 22: There was
actually a holocaust of 60 million people in a war declared
in 1933 by the Jews against Hitler. Hitler had given bread to six million unemployed, he had rejected the dictatorship of the dollar and Jewish totalitarianism which pollute man and the planet and
which is called democracy by semantic mystification.
Only two parties are left: the totalitarian Judeopathy,
exterminating man and the planet, and Nationalism for
the non-Jews not yet poisoned by Capitalist-Marxist Jewish influence.” NOTE: For
reasons of space this open letter to movie producer
Steven Spielberg has been abridged from the French language original penned by R. Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce, a Jew who strongly takes issue with the totalitarian Judeopathy. ___________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________ The Facts About the Origins of the Concentration Camps and Their Administration
Here’s a fascinating look at the concentration camp
system inside Germany, devoid of the jewish hysteria often associated with the subject in jewish Hollywood films and in
the “mainstream” jewish media and academia. The Barnes Review and The Scriptorium are pleased to present what
may be the first-ever detailed examination of the concentration camp system, presenting a far different picture from what
we’ve been told by the jews. In propagating a politicized view
of German history many in the jewish media and jewish academia have attempted to portray the German system of imprisonment
in concentration camps as some sort of precursor to genocide, as a living hell where it was official German policy to make
life miserable and to victimize, beat, torture, rape and murder innocent civilians simply because of religious or political
persuasion or sexual orientation. Is this sensational jewish
view of history correct? No, the role of German concentration camps was much different and probably better in many ways
than the American prison system today. German concentration camps had a much more positive role to play in Hitler’s
new and progressive National Socialist state. The facts will bear out that the jewish Establishment historians have purveyed
a view of concentration camp life that cannot be substantiated. The daily life
in a concentration camp was much different than most historians will admit. In 1948, Paul Rassinier, a former Socialist and critic of National Socialist Germany who had himself been interned
in the concentration camps of Buchenwald and Dora, published Crossing the Line (Le Passage de la Ligne). In
this work, Rassinier claimed that the Germans had been benign, if not positive, in their motives for putting enemies of
Hitler’s National Socialist state in concentration camps. Rassinier claimed that the concentration camps were a “gesture
of compassion” since inmates had been placed where they could “not hurt the new regime and where they could
be protected from the public anger.” Not only did the concentration camps protect anti-social elements in Rassinier’s
view, but they were also designed to “rehabilitate the strayed sheep and to bring them back to a healthier concept
of the German community.”1 According to Rassinier, the German government was helping those
whom it committed to concentration camps by putting them in a setting so that they could be rehabilitated into more productive
members of the German community. Those who fell into the categories of persons assigned to concentration
camps included any person condemned for treasonable activities, as well as judeo-Communist Party officials and anyone who
incited a German citizen to refuse military service.2 Persons who were considered by the authorities of the Third
Reich as being an anti-social malefactor were also sent to the camps.
Anti-social malefactors consisted of professional and habitual
criminals, that is, those people who had been sentenced to a minimum of six months imprisonment or hard labor on at least
three separate occasions. Anti-social malefactors also specifically included beggars, prostitutes, homosexuals, drunkards,
psychopaths and lunatics.3 Persons who were “work shy” were also sent to concentration
camps. According to Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS, work shy meant unemployed men who “could be proved to have
refused without adequate reason employment offered to them on two occasions.”4 The first persons arrested and sent to concentration camps were communists who had taken part in efforts to undermine
the fabric of the German state. Most of these communists arrested were denounced to local authorities by fellow workers
and neighbors who were concerned about their activities. During
March and April 1933, the German people reported the activities of over 10,000 communists in Germany. Given the large membership
and well-organized activities of the German Communist Party (KPD), the local jails were soon filled, and the National Socialist
government in Berlin was forced to decide where to house these persons, who were a clear and present danger to the continuation
of Germany as an independent and sovereign nation. With the jails and prisons filled to capacity, local officials began
to take over abandoned warehouses and factories to hold the communists. These makeshift holding facilities have since become
known as “wild concentration camps” since they were spur-of-the-moment inventions. The name “concentration camp” simply means an area where dangerous elements are concentrated.
Hitler once said the idea for concentration camps came from his studies of the Boer War in South Africa.5 During that war, the British built camps and concentrated women and children
of Dutch ancestry. During their confinement in British concentration camps, over 26,000 died mainly of starvation, since
the British made no effort to feed the unarmed and helpless women, nor did they allow them to leave and go back to their
farmsteads. This action of the British against unarmed women and children mainly goes overlooked by jewish Establishment
historians, who instead accuse the German concentration camps of being death camps whose sole purpose was killing unarmed
civilians. But this is not the case. The first official concentration camp set up in Germany was established
about 12 miles from Munich in the town of Dachau, inside a former gunpowder factory, on March 22, 1933. Unlike what judeo-Allied
propaganda would have us believe, the Germans were not ashamed of this camp. In fact, Heinrich Himmler held a press conference
to announce its opening two days before the first inmates were scheduled to arrive. His announcement was carried in German
newspapers,6 and the camp was opened with the arrival of 200 communists.
But the camp was built to hold 5,000 and was mainly established to act as a deterrent to further communist activity. Himmler stated that
it was his promise not to wait until crimes were committed before arresting criminals, and pledged that, in order to protect
the populace, professional criminals who had been sentenced many times would be pursued more ruthlessly than before and
isolated away from the German people by being incarcerated in concentration camps. Himmler also added that his camps were
to be models of cleanliness, order and instruction. It was through this instruction that Himmler hoped to re-educate minor criminals
as well as communists. Himmler had ordered strong disciplinary measures to be employed, but the treatment inmates
received was just, and they learned trades through their work and training. In the concentration camps, the motto was: “There
is one way to freedom. Its milestones are: obedience, zeal, honesty, order, cleanliness, temperance, truth, sense of sacrifice
and love for the Fatherland.”7 In the Soviet Union’s “model” of socialism, the German communists found what they were looking
for: liberalism, urbanism, and modernism – all of which rejected the traditional Aryan-German way of life.
For this reason, the German communists looked at Hitler’s appointment
to the chancellorship by President Paul von Hindenburg as a signal for an uprising aimed at creating a German soviet state,
closely modeled on the Soviet Union and taking its orders from the Comintern in Moscow. But Hitler saw the threat the communists
posed to German society, and after the burning of the Reichstag by a communist, he reacted swiftly to take them into custody.
Hitler now decided to build the first concentration camps. However, instead
of being vindictive or out to do harm to the communists, the concentration camp at Dachau was designed to reform them and
make them into citizens that the Germans could be proud of – citizens who could return to German society at large
and live out their lives as peaceful and proper German men and women. Instead of being an institution aimed at punishment,
the German system of concentration camps was designed to reform and to reeducate enemies of the new German state. A correspondent for The Jew York Times was allowed to visit Dachau shortly after
it was opened and came away with the impression that the commandant of the camp, Theodor Eicke, and the men under his command
took their job of reeducation seriously. “They honestly and sincerely believed that their task was pedagogic
rather than punitive…. They felt sincerely sorry for the misguided non-Nazis who had not yet found the true faith.”8 Not only had the inmates not yet found faith in the leadership
of Adolf Hitler, but they also took part in or supported subversive activities aimed at overthrowing the state. An internal document written in 1934 and circulated at Gestapo headquarters stated that National
Socialist Germany would not be complete until its opponents learned to support it and identify with the goals of the German
community at large. The writer of the document reiterated the educational value and ideological indoctrination that the
camps were to instill in the inmates, and suggested imbuing the inmates with the knowledge that upon their release they would
be able to become full members of German society.9 Just a short time later, another Gestapo document warned all state authorities not to harass released inmates so as
not to make their complete re-integration into German society difficult.10 The Germans themselves often referred to these camps as “education camps.” In the summer of 1942, three years after World War II began, Himmler was still emphasizing the
re-educational aspects of the camps when he wrote a letter to Oswald Pohl.11 The language that he used in this letter was also given as part of official instructions to guards at the camps. Himmler instructed
each guard to make his behavior a personal example to the prisoners, in order to imbue them with respect for the National
Socialist state and to teach them how to behave properly.12 This re-education at the camps was to stress traditional
Aryan virtues, such as hard work, strict discipline, a belief in law and order, support for the complete family and respect
for traditional German society, as well as encouraging them to respect the National Socialist state and the National Socialist
movement in general.
Over the years, tens of thousands of inmates were released from the camps once they had shown that
they had chosen to reform themselves. On many occasions the commandants
of the camps had determined that inmates had abandoned their old ways and had chosen to become loyal members of German society.
As late as October 1944, inmates were being released, and many of these were communists who had abandoned their previous
beliefs.13 Of the persons sent to the concentration camps, many were sent there by court order for fixed terms. Other persons
were arrested because of the danger they presented to German society. Some prisoners, who had been convicted during the
Weimar era, were sent to the concentration camps after their release from prison. Since some of these prisoners were murderers,
rapists and pedophiles, the National Socialist state refused to allow them to return to German society until the authorities
were sure that they had abandoned their old ways. Contrary to modern political myth, German newspapers frequently carried
stories on the concentration camps and often reported on the internment of dangerous persons.
Many of the
camps were open to inspection by foreign diplomats and even by German civilians.
Often the curious persons would travel to the camps only to be met by friendly guards and escorted through the
camps on a personal tour. Of the tens of thousands of prisoners who were released, most probably told their relatives, friends
and neighbors of the conditions present in the camps. Over the years, judges, lawyers, members of the clergy, social workers
and repairmen were allowed into the camps for official business. Merchants often visited the camps to bring new stocks of supplies, and
local civilians were often employed in the camps. If conditions in the camps had been deplorable, German society would have
learned of it and would have been outraged. The Germans were and still are a decent people whose only crime in establishing
the camps was showing leniency to persons who wanted to do them harm. In
a book written on the camp established at Oranienburg, Werner Schafer claimed that some citizens in the local communities
asked permission to send some of their rebelling children to the camps to learn self-discipline. Schafer also said that there were
some prisoners who were offered release who refused since they could not remember doing work since the beginning of the Great
Depression.14 Schafer listed the types of food eaten by the prisoners and computed how much weight
they had gained during their internment in the camp. Citizens of National Socialist Germany therefore had good reason to
support the officials who administered the camps. The nature of
imprisonment in concentration camps can best be guessed by a document signed by Himmler, in which the principles of internment
in a concentration camp were clarified. The document was not meant for public distribution and was classified “secret”
before being sent to senior officers of the Gestapo on 27 May 1942. It reads: Recently, various officials in the party and
the government have begun threatening to lodge complaints with the police against citizens, or to have them imprisoned in
concentration camps, in order to give greater force to various orders and decrees. In
this manner, for instance, one officer threatened a citizen that he would be sent to a camp for “police interrogation”
if he did not produce within five days a certain form, as he had been told to do by one of the officials.
I request in all seriousness that the parties involved be instructed to cease this practice immediately,
and if this is not done I will take upon myself to declare publicly that citizens are not liable in such instances to either
police investigation or imprisonment in a concentration camp. The most severe punishments
lose their deterrent ability when they are threatened at every opportunity, or when the impression is given that every official,
in every office, is authorized to make use of it. Imprisonment in a concentration camp, involving
as it does separation from one’s family, isolation from the outside world, and the hard labor assigned to the prisoner,
is the most severe of punishments. Its use is reserved exclusively for the secret
police, in accordance with precise regulations which specify the form of imprisonment and its term. In this matter I have
retained for myself a large measure of authority and exclusive discretion. All in all
the German people are uniquely fair-minded. Most Germans obey the instructions of the authorities of their own free will
and desire. Instructions accompanied by threats will, however, be received with disrespect and will be obeyed only unwillingly,
not to mention that the multiplication of threats of this type will give a completely false impression, both here and abroad.15 Not only does this document illuminate the fact that the
concentration camp system was not vindictive or there to terrorize the civilian population, but it also shows that the leaders
of the state had concern for the prisoners. Himmler recognized that imprisonment involved isolation and separation from
loved ones and was determined to allow the German people to know that the only persons imprisoned in the camps were extreme
cases. But
more importantly, as the value of hindsight allows us to [see], the document also allows us to understand where some of
the judeo-Allied propaganda came from; minor officials were eager to add threats to their orders in an attempt to give the
impression that they were more powerful than they actually were. Because of the actions of these minor officials, the judeo-Allies
had the propaganda to claim that the concentration camps were there to terrorize the civilian population and to force them
to become subservient to a state that only cared about itself. This was exactly what Himmler was afraid would happen: that
the concentration camps would be seen to be a punitive punishment and not the center of re-education that they really were. To meet the needs of re-education, the camp command in each camp was divided into several departments,
which dealt with matters of administration, personnel, transport, communications, mail, equipment, kitchen work, supplies,
health and sanitation and so forth. The camp commandants were assisted by a deputy, an adjutant, a master sergeant, a medical
officer and education officer, a legal officer, a fire officer and others. The
commandants were held personally responsible for the re-education of those prisoners who were not considered to be “lost
cases.” Because the camps were often open for public inspections, the commandants were also required to have some
amount of political sensitivity. Starting in 1942, the commandants were also responsible for the work of the camp doctor
and the medical staff. The camp commandants had full responsibility for almost
everything that happened in the camps, except for the work of the political departments. The political department operated
in the camp as an extension of the Gestapo, and a plainclothes officer of the secret police headed it. This department dealt
with the reception and registration of inmates, and was also in charge of their release. This department: - Kept files on each inmate that included personal
details about the inmate, the inmate’s picture and fingerprints;
- Was responsible for filing
death notices and was responsible for passing this information on to government authorities;
- Corresponded
with the relatives of the inmates in cases where there was a need for guardianship of underage children, insurance claims
and so forth;
- Had the authority to decree special conditions of imprisonment;
- Was
responsible for all interrogation that went on in the camps; and,
- Supervised prisoner informers,
censorship, field security, and the prevention of rebellion.
Not all members
of the command had direct and daily contact with the inmates. The inmates were kept in a special compound within the camps,
overseen by their own commanding officer and his staff. Some staff officers were responsible for head counts, others for
work arrangements; others actually accompanied prisoners when they went out to work, while other officers were responsible
for each of the living quarters, which were themselves referred to as a block. The personal deputy of the camp commandant
usually oversaw the prisoner division of the camp. The camp commandants were also required to prevent cruelty to inmates.
A training manual for camp guards asked the following question: “What is completely prohibited
a camp guard? Answer: Under all circumstances he is forbidden to strike prisoners at his own initiative, outside the framework
of the disciplinary regulations.” In 1935 Reinhard Heydrich
wrote to the camp guards stating that “it is not becoming an interrogator to insult a prisoner, demean him, or behave
with rudeness and brutalize or torture him when there is no need to do so.” Heydrich went on and warned the camp men
that if they beat prisoners they would be court-martialed.16 Eicke himself wrote in 1937 that “the guards should be instructed to abstain from mistreating prisoners….
Even if a guard had done no more than slap a prisoner’s face, the slap will be considered an act of brutality and
the guard will be punished.”17 The SS actually punished a number of its own men for their conduct while serving
in the concentration camps. Two concentration camp commandants, Adam Gruenwald and Karl Chmielewshi, were placed on trial
and found guilty of the deaths of prisoners as a result of brutality in their camps. The SS tried over 700 staff members
throughout the course of the Third Reich for their conduct toward inmates. This was because the SS and the National Socialist
state always considered concentration camps to be re-education camps first and foremost. It is true that persons who were considered to be hopeless cases such as habitual offenders were sent to the camps,
but most prisoners always could earn their release by conforming to traditional Aryan-German standards of conduct. Unfortunately,
many guards could not tell the difference between the habitual criminals and those who were there to be re-educated. This
problem plagued the camp administration throughout the history of the Third Reich. Oswald Pohl complained that “As a result of my personal attention to the matter, and the repeated irregularities
recently noted, I have learned that many of the guards at the camps are aware only in the faintest way of the obligations
imposed upon them.”18 But historians must take into consideration the fact that tens of thousands
of individuals served in the camps. If 700 committed crimes and were punished for it, it only highlights the fact that the
other tens of thousands of Germans serving in the camps took their responsibilities seriously.
Most camp men understood that their personal behavior was a way of encouraging inmates to aspire to be upstanding
and proud citizens of Germany According to an SS booklet: “The prisoner must know that the guard represents a philosophy superior
to his, an unblemished political approach and a higher moral level, and the prisoner must take these as a personal example
as part of his efforts to correct himself so that he may once again be a loyal citizen in his community.”19 In April 1939, Adolf Hitler celebrated his 50th birthday.
To celebrate this occasion, plans were drawn up for a pardon for several thousand prisoners in the camps. The instructions
that determined who was to be freed and who would remain as an inmate reveal the different kinds of prisoners in the camps
as well as revealing Hitler’s generosity and good will. The intention of the pardon was to free inmates who were brought
to the camps in 1933, six years before. It was determined to at least consider
releasing repeat offenders who were arrested in the years 1933 to 1934 for short sentences and who had at least served a
year in the camps; political and white-collar offenders who had been convicted on minor offenses and who had served at least
six months; prisoners of 60 or more years of age, including Jehovah’s Witnesses whose faith would not allow them to
swear loyalty to the German state; first-time homosexuals who had not been convicted of sexual relations with minors; as
well as prisoners who had in the past been members of the National Socialist Party.20 Then in 1941 the camps were classified into four groups, in accordance with
the severity of the discipline and conditions of imprisonment imposed upon the inmates. Those prisoners who had been imprisoned
for minor offenses and whom the SS considered to be possible to re-educate had the conditions of their imprisonment eased. The workdays
in the camps were formalized in 1938. On weekdays, the inmates worked from 0730 to 1200 and from 1230 to 1700, for a total
of nine hours a day. On Saturdays work was from 0730-1200, for a total of four and one-half hours. Not only were Saturday afternoons free, but Christian inmates had all of Sunday to attend their
own services within the camp and to contemplate the reasons for their imprisonment.21 Inside the camp, the barracks were segregated by sex, but in many cases prisoners were allowed to marry, even other prisoners.
Registration in such cases was carried out by SS officers.22 The heirs of any prisoner who died while being held at one of the camps were eligible to collect their life insurance.
Since the life insurance policies would expire if the premiums were not paid, and the inmates were incarcerated and without
any substantial income, the SS came up with a solution that jewish Establishment historians will not give them credit for.
The SS set up its own fund to pay the insurance premiums of prisoners until the day they died.23 In this way, the loved ones of incarcerated inmates would not be overly burdened if their relative died while in custody. In 1936, the question was raised for the first time as to who would take care of the children when
both parents were prisoners in concentration camps. Instead of taking the children away from their loving parents as is
now done in countries such as the U.S. and Great Britain, the National Socialist authorities in Germany decided it would
be better for the children if the parents were released on a rotating monthly basis so at least one parent would always
be there to care for their needs. This rotating release continued until one of the parents was released for good.24 Needless to say, this program did pose a slight security risk to Germany, but
Hitler apparently was more concerned about the welfare of young German children than he was with anything else. Even though judeo-Allied war-time propaganda concerning the German concentration camps paints a
bleak picture with ritual murder, rape, assault and other crimes, the facts of the period do not support this view. The efforts of the National Socialist authorities to rehabilitate and re-educate incarcerated criminals
and communists show a dedication and a firm belief in their convictions that, in comparison, the United States and Great
Britain are sorely lacking in their own prison administrations. Those Germans, tens of thousands of patriotic citizens,
who served in the camps as doctors, nurses, cooks, clerks, bookkeepers, and guards, were much maligned and viciously attacked
by judeo-Allied authorities in post-war Germany. Notes: 1See Pierre Hofstetter, Introduction to Paul Rassinier, Debunking the Genocide Myth: A Study of the Nazi Concentration
Camps and the Alleged Extermination of European Jewry (Torrance, California, 1978), p. x. …back… 2Heiniz Hoehne, The Order of the Death’s Head (New York, 1966), p. 225. …back… 4Ibid., quoted in, p. 226. …back… 5Max Domarus, Hitler Reden, v. 3 (Wiesbaden: R. Loweit, 1973), p. 58. …back… 6Becker, Hitlers Machtergreifung, pp. 149-50. …back… 8“Nazi Prison Camps to be Permanent,” The New York Times, July 27, 1933, p. 7. …back… 9BAKO R 58/264 fol. 1309 u. 198a. …back… 11BAKO NS 19 320, May 29, 1942. …back… 12BAKO NS 3 426, July 27, 1943. …back… 14Schafer, Konzentrationslager Oranienburg, p. 247. …back… 15BAKO R 58 1027 fol. 1-291. …back… 16BAKO R 58 264 fol. 309 u. 198a RSHA, January 8, 1935. …back… 17TV Befehlsblätter 1937, no. 5, p. 12, TV file, Berlin Document Center. …back… 18BAKO NS 3 442, November 7, 1944. …back… 19Aufgaben und Pflichten der Wachposten, July 27, 1943, BAKO NS 3 426. …back… 20BAKO R 58/1027 fold. 1-291. …back… 21Natzweiler Routine Orders, February 25, 1943, American Historical Association, Captured German Documents, Microfiled at
the Berlin Document Center, 7. 75 R. 216 2/755081. …back… 22BAKO NS 3 Vol. 426, May 1943. …back… 23Weiterversicherung von Häftlingen, BAKO NS 3 405. …back… 24BAKO R 58 246 fol. 1 309 u. 198a. (RSHA), April 21, 1936. __________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
NEIN Click on any of the text below
to hear the truth spoken by accused "NAZIS" who
knew nothing of the holocaust lie because there was no intentional "holocaust"
NICHT SCHULDIG! - NOT GUILTY!
REINHARD HEYDRICH ON THE MEANING OF THE "FINAL SOLUTION"
ADOLF HITLER DENYING THE HOLOCAUST
HERMANN GOERING DENYING THE HOLOCAUST
HEINRICH HIMMLER AND HIS FAMILY DENYING THE HOLOCAUST
HEINRICH HIMMLER DENIED THE 'HOLOCAUST'
ALFRED JODL DENYING HIS GUILT
ALBERT SPEER DENYING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST
SECRETARIES OF NAZI LEADERS DENYING KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST
JOSEF MENGELE DENYING HIS EXPERIMENTS
DENIAL IN JOSEF MENGELE'S FAMILY
OSWALD POHL DENYING KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST
ALFRED ROSENBERG DENYING HIS GUILT
OTTO OHLENDORF DENYING HIS GUILT
HANS FRANK DENYING HIS PERSONAL GUILT
FRITZ SAUCKEL DENYING HIS GUILT
WALTER RAUFF DENYING HIS GUILT
KARL WOLFF DENYING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST
HANS LAMMERS DENYING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST
DAUGHTER OF AUSCHWITZ KOMMANDANT - "THERE WAS NO SMOKE, THERE WAS NO SMELL"
ROBERT MULKA DENIES KNOWLEDGE OF GASSINGS AT AUSCHWITZ (FRANKFURT AUSCHWITZ TRIAL 1963)
DENIAL IN THE FAMILIES OF "EVIL NAZIS"
____________________________________________________________
Die Auschwitz-Lüge: A Personal Account
By Thies Christophersen Published: 1973-01-01
I was in Auschwitz from January to December 1944. After the war I heard about the alleged mass murders
of jews and I was quite taken aback. Despite all the testimony submitted and all the reports in the media, I know such atrocities
were never committed. I have said so repeatedly, everywhere and at all times, but it has always been useless for no one
has wanted to believe me. The evidence, I am told, is unequivocal and confirmed without contradiction.
Court cases have clearly established that gas chambers existed in Auschwitz and the Camp Commander Hoss,
has himself said so. Whoever dares to deny this, makes himself suspect of perhaps, having personally participated in the
murders of these jews. I have been warned to take care because war crimes have
not yet come under the Statute of Limitation (as applicable in any civilized nation) and so I can still be tried and be
prosecuted and it would be best to keep silent. Friends and acquaintances have
said: “What would you serve were you still to try to correct history?”
“You cannot change a thing!” “Acknowledgement of our guilt has brought us back into the community of nations.”
“Remember, you have a family“. “No one will believe your reports . . . Keep silent, that’s the smartest
thing you can do.“ Quite honestly, I began to have doubts myself. When
one continually hears the same stories from all sides, it is only reasonable that finally one begins to believe them. “But
what happened to all those jews if they were not gassed?” I do not know, but I wonder where so many jews come
from if six million of them are supposed to have been killed during the war. In my area of the country there hardly ever
were any jews even before the war. So-called “cattle-jews” simply did not exist in rural areas. Spiteful
people have remarked that the only reason for this was that the peasants in these northern lands were smarter than the jews.
Very many jews were able to emigrate before the war, some escaped during the war and many of them have survived the concentration
camps … and of course many jews today live in our midst again. My doubts
were first roused when I read a flyer distributed by Einar Aberg of Norrviken (Sweden). He compared official statistics of
the jewish world population before the war with those after the war. He concluded their numbers had increased to the extent
where every woman must have given birth to a child every year of her productive life, if the number of 6 million murdered
jews could be judged to be correct. In 1938 there were supposed to be 15,688,259 jews in the world.
This figure is derived from the “World Almanac” of the American Jewish Committee. In
1948, according to an article in the New York Times by W. Baldwin, there were supposed
to be 18,700,000 jews in the world. Baldwin is a well-known population expert, entirely neutral,
and even the most far-fetched imagination could not describe him as “anti-Semitic.” Thus the story of
the 6 million murdered jews cannot be true, for it is impossible for a nation’s population to increase by 50% in just
ten years. The losses of the jewish people during WW II, certainly regrettable,
were not 6 million, but approximately 200,000, according to facts compiled by the UNO, which body surely has no reason to
grant special protection to any one nation in particular. A book published in
Brazil contains the following statement: “… These facts were used
by the Canadian Anti-Defamation Committee of Christian Laymen in ascertaining that 200,000 jews died in the twelve years
of Hitler’s rule (1933-45), regardless of how they died, i.e. whether they were killed, sentenced and shot as guerillas
or saboteurs, or in air raids on camps, or through other circumstances due to war, including sickness and old age.“
The leading Austrian Social Democrat, Dr. Benedikt Kautsky — himself a jew — who spent the
years from 1938 to 1945 in concentration camps, three of these in Auschwitz, said: “I
was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might
have resembled gas chambers.“ Richard Baer, the last commander at Auschwitz
(from 1943) and therefore the most important witness, of whom the Parisian weekly “Rivarol”
reported that he could not be dissuaded from his insistence that; ”during
all the time he was in Auschwitz, he had never seen gas chambers, nor had he known that any existed.“
Commander Baer died suddenly on June 17th, 1963 whilst being held under investigation, although two weeks
previous to this he had been given a clean bill of health. I never made a secret
of my having been at Auschwitz. When asked about the destruction of jews, I answered that I knew nothing about that. I simply
marvelled at how quickly the populace was willing to accept and believe the stories about these mass gassings, without any
apparent resistance. As a result of a war injury in 1940 I developed a severe
case of chronic sinus. The slightest cold put me back in hospital. The Autumn of 1942 brought an official medical finding:
service on the home front. I filed a request for furlough to attend a higher agricultural school and did so in 1942/43.
In the spring of 1943 a commander of Army Headquarters came to our school to solicit agrarians willing to go to the Ukraine
to raise india rubber plants. I applied and was accepted. Kok-Sagis
A mobile war needs vehicles, and vehicles need tires, and tires are made from rubber. Of course there
is synthetic rubber, made from carbon, lime and sulphur, called “buna.” But without the addition of
natural India rubber to the mixture, it cannot be produced as there is then no cohesion. The Russians, in their attempt
to become self-sufficient (in our case this was called preparation for war), had systematically searched their whole flora
for plants that contained India rubber . . . and found some — among others, one called Kok Sagis, a close relation
of the dandelion. The white latex in its roots contains India rubber. This became very important to carrying on the war.
The motorized vehicles branch at HQ had organized departments for the cultivation, utilization and research of plants with
India rubber content. After a short training period I was sent to the Ukraine to supervise the planting and cultivation
of India rubber bearing plants. I had never seen a Kok Sagis plant, but practical work and assistance from some Russian
agrarians soon provided the necessary knowledge. In 1943 we lost the Ukraine, and
early In 1944 I was transferred to the department of plant cultivation at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute. This institute had
established a branch at Auschwitz, so I went there, and only on my way did I learn that it was a concentration camp. When
relating my experiences at Auschwitz, I have some doubts as to whether I should mention names of former colleagues who today
are still alive and with whom I still maintain contact. I know that I myself must be prepared for reprisals for breaking
the silence. I am now ready to accept these … and in part already have had to do so. Life In the Camp It was cold and windy when I arrived
at the railroad station of Auschwitz on January 15, 1944. I wondered whether to go by horse and carriage, but decided to
walk. Leaving my baggage at the station, I asked my way to the camp. Actually the camp, consisting of barracks, that were
ugly but massively built, was very near. The first thing I noticed was the inscription over the gate “ARBEIT MACHT
FREI“, (“Work will set us Free“). I was surprised to see so many inmates of the camp walk
around unguarded. Later I learned that the camp, surrounded with an electrified barbed wire fence was under guard only at
night. There were guards posted outside the grounds, however, who were pulled in at night after roll call.
I reported to my superior, Dr. A., a fine-looking man with steel-blue eyes and reddish hair. He greeted
me warmly. I was curious about the camp and asked about the inmates. He said, “The Germans who are here belong
here . . . apart from that it is the European elite that is here.” Later I discovered there was some truth to
that statement. I was introduced to his co-workers. There was a former Czarist officer, an exile, who also spoke German
and French, and he offered to drive me to my quarters. The officers had no cars but they did have a carriage and a
driver at their disposal to travel on the extensive lands that were under cultivation. However, I found this somewhat pompous.
I also found it embarrassing that inmates whom we passed on the way, took off their caps and stood at attention as we went
by, but we were officers and the SS-men also gave us the military salute. My quarters
were in Raisko, about 3 km from the main camp. This was where a women’s camp, the botany buildings with their hot houses,
and the laboratories for our research work were located. I was given a room in an unattached dwelling; I shared the house
with a colleague who was the supervisor of the department of plant cultivation. He was a man with a happy disposition. There
was something heartwarming about his laughter and he was well liked by the inmates and he still corresponds with some
of them today. Later on he had his wife and two young children join him. I then
moved to an apartment in a botanic building that had just been completed. This I shared with a scientist whose name I can
mention; it was Dr. Boehme. He was shot and killed by Polish civilians who went wild after the capitulation. He had never
harmed anyone and had been kindness and courtesy personified. The first inmate
I met was “Agnes.” She was a member of the Jehovah’s Witnesses and was our cleaning lady. I questioned
her about conditions at the camp but she would not speak about them. Not so Mrs. Pohl who was in control of the kitchen.
She also was a student of the Bible and made up flyers which she distributed to the inmates. Actually, this was against
the regulations, but it wasn’t my job to watch the inmates. Apart from that, her publications seemed harmless to me,
and I had always been tolerant in matters of religion. Even now I cannot deny Jehovah’s Witnesses a certain measure
of respect, for they were willing to have themselves locked up and suffer for their faith simply because they wanted to
suffer. There was no need to watch them and they were free to move even beyond the line of posted guards.
In our camp about 300 women were housed in three barracks. They were made up of a select type of worker
who worked almost exclusively for the department of plants. For the most part they were jewish and Polish with a sprinkling
of French. All spoke German quite well and many had an academic degree. Their work was of a scientific nature and they were
quite self-sufficient. In fact, it was not I who was training the inmates, they were training me, and they did so with a
certain pride, in fact, I might almost say, with an air of self-importance. At any rate, I had the impression that the inmates
performed their research tasks gladly and with enthusiasm. The cultivation of
plants proceeded on a basis of selectivity. The roots of the plants were examined as to their India rubber content and reproduced
through seedlings. Their seeds were carefully gathered and re-sown. Sabotage could easily have been committed but we never
learned of even a single instance. It must be mentioned, however, that the inmates did not trust each other. There was that
ancient feeling of hate between jews and Poles. Compared to this hate, so-called National Socialist hatred of the jews was
quite harmless. The results in increased India rubber production were quite satisfactory.
One of our superiors went to Russia, and returned with a number of scientists. They came with their families and worked for
us as civilians, enjoying their work. A sort of drama developed with the arrival
of one Russian agronomist, J. Sassmoshek. He found a former sweetheart among the inmates and this re-union had its natural
effects. Sassmoshek married the woman and she was released from her internment. After the evacuation from Auschwitz, I saw
them again at Halle and both were radiantly happy. I myself was not so happy at the time, I had just been through that terrible
air raid of February 13th on Dresden, which had been declared an open, undefended city, and from which I had escaped
unharmed, as if by some miracle. I believe on this one day in Dresden more people died than had supposedly died in Auschwitz
throughout all the years of the war. But the war crimes of the Allies are not debatable, even to this day.
Just what was the daily routine at Auschwitz? Rising at 7 a.m.. washing, showering, breakfast and roll
call, on the job at 8. Lunch from 12-1, and work again until 5 p.m. Roll call once more at 7 p.m., following which the guards
posted outside the camp were pulled in and the camp put under guard. Mail was delivered daily. Packages were opened at roll
call and examined by the camp supervisor. Only rarely had some of the contents to be withheld, such as for instance, certain
medical preparations, books and pamphlets, cameras, radios and technical instruments. These things, however, remained the
property of the inmates and were stored in a huge warehouse called “Kanada“, where also all possessions
of jews interned at Auschwitz, were kept. “Kanada” was kept
under guard at all times to prevent looting from the outside. In our weather station we had a female SS-worker who, on one
occasion, “organized” a pair of stockings for herself from “Kanada“. She was court-martialed
for “plundering“. However, the inmates themselves, who worked there, stole constantly.
Surprising to me was the elegance of the inmates’ wearing apparel. Their outer garments did, of
course, consist of uniforms, but all other apparel, including shoes, was of the finest quality, nor was there any lack in
beauty care, and make-up was all part of the female dress. Every Saturday our women were sent to the main camp for an exchange
of laundry and they brought back alluring bits of booty, which were then distributed among the inmates. It was a type of
theft that I think was being quietly tolerated. Olga
In May my wife, for the first time, came to visit me. She was a teacher in agricultural home economics
and was curious about my work at the concentration camp. This fact alone, that we were able to have our relatives visit
us at any time, should prove that the camp administration had nothing to hide. Had Auschwitz been the death factory it is
reputed to have been, such visits would certainly not have been permitted. Formalities, such as even today are required for
a visit to that prison camp, otherwise known as East Germany, were not required at Auschwitz. We were a young married couple
and had not seen too much of each other in our marriage. I met my wife at the railway station. She wore wooden sandals without
stockings and a kerchief over her hair. It was war time and elegance was a luxury we could not afford.
At that time I had a new cleaning lady — personal maid would have been a more fitting title. Olga!
Olga was Polish. She was a factotum. But there was something touching about the solicitous care with which she took my affairs
in hand. There were always flowers in my room; always a clean tablecloth and clean curtains, and somehow she always managed
to have a surprise for me. She had taken special pains in getting my room ready
for my wife’s visit. Above my bed she had attached a praying angel to the wall — Lord only knows where she got
that! Actually, her care was a bit overpowering, but I had to accept since I didn’t want to hurt the concerned soul
that she was. During my wife’s visit, work was commenced on the india
rubber fields and I did not have too much time for my visitor, but she had the best possible companion in Olga, who could
talk like a waterfall. My wife felt she should compensate Olga for her thoughtfulness and bought her a small gift. The result
was that when I took my wife to the railway station for her trip back home, I hardly recognized her. She was dressed in
new clothes from head to toe. Olga had “obtained” everything for her, even a brand new suitcase. My wife had
brought me a few delicate morsels saved from her own meager rations, among other things, a piece of butter. Olga managed
to make fried potatoes for me evenings and strangely enough there was no end to the butter. Care packages arrived daily
and Olga felt duty-bound to include me in the distribution of this bounty. The inmates at Raisko never went hungry, and any
new arrival looking somewhat undernourished, after only a few days seemed to have a “smooth fur.”
The Death Camp “The death camp was
not in Auschwitz, it was at Birkenau.” This is what I heard and read after the war. Well. I was also in Birkenau.
This camp I did not like. It was overcrowded and the people there did not make a good impression on me. Everything looked
neglected and grubby. I also saw families with children. It hurt to see them, but I was told that the authorities felt it
kinder not to separate children from their parents when the latter were interned. Some children played ball merrily enough.
Still, I felt children did not belong there and the fact that the English had done likewise — in the Boer War, for
instance, was a poor excuse, I said so to my superior. His answer: “I agree with you, but I can’t change
it.“ I had been commissioned to pick 100 workers for hoeing the Kok-Sagis
plants. At roll call the inmates were asked if they were interested in this kind of work and if they had done it before.
Then followed the “selection” of the workers. This “selection” was later completely misinterpreted.
The purpose was to give the inmates something to do and they themselves wanted to be occupied. Selecting them meant no more
than to inquire about their inclinations, their capabilities, and their physical state of health with regard to the work
they were to do. The fact was, however, that in Auschwitz there were more people
than were jobs. Naturally, I was concerned with getting workers who had experience on farms. Jews, of course, were not experienced
for any kind of farm work, whilst on the other hand, Poles were excellent farm workers. Gypsies were entirely useless. Detachment
11 — that was the name of our female workers from Birkenau — came every day to work in the fields that lay beyond
the outer line of posted guards. I dealt with these people almost daily and listened to their complaints. On one occasion
I saw an SS guard kick a woman. I confronted him about this. He claimed that the
woman had called him a “Nazi” pig, but the fact was that he had first insulted her. I reported this case and
the SS-guard was sent to “Strafbataillon” in Danzig. From this day on, my favor with the inmates rose
significantly, especially with those in Detachment 11. They often came to me with requests or complaints and I did whatever
I could for them, because to me they were not enemies, they were simply interned. Often, I did favours for them that were
against the regulations. Their greatest joy was for me to take them for a walk down to the river Sula, where on those hot
summer days of 1944 I allowed them to go bathing. Apart from all else, the hoeing-detachment
from Birkenau was a merry bunch. They sang their Polish folk songs while working and the gypsies danced to the melodies.
In the beginning, I was quite upset and worried about the undernourished appearance of some of the inmates. Then I learned
that they had arrived in rather poor physical shape and it took some time before they had padded themselves with some extra
poundage. Often I shared their common noonday meals and fared well doing so. But
Detachment 11 also had a secret supply source. The most wonderful things were found by them in unknown hiding places. In
the night these were replenished by friends of the inmates. Sometimes these friends even donned inmate attire and marched
into the camp, allowing an inmate to take a few days off. Auschwitz was located in Poland and the population helped the
inmates as much as possible, though this was officially not permitted. The occupation
troops, but especially the so-called civil administration, often roused the antagonism of the population, as was well-known.
One measure I decidedly disapproved of was the expropriation of land from small farmers. They had to give it up for agricultural
use by the concentration camp. I was told, however, that they were compensated for their property on the same basis as land
expropriated from Germans for the construction of autobahns. I also did not like the re-settlement measures that were carried
out, but I was told repeatedly that these were never forced on anyone. Curtailment of freedom is hard, but war is tough
and it became increasingly tougher for us too. In the fall of 1944, for the first time, the camp at Auschwitz was bombed
by American planes. There were about 20 victims among the inmates. I myself had lost faith in victory after the successful
landing at the English Channel. Reports from the front became more and more ominous, and the inmates too were well informed
— the devil knows through whom. In our area the inmates were looked after
now just as well as they had been before. Once a week a film was shown. Camp supervisors and inmates jointly saw, among
others, the film “Muenchhausen” and the “Golden City.” Church services were held
in community halls. I attended several myself and found them to be quite solemn, especially those of the Russian Orthodox
Community, to which our Russian civilian workers also belonged. A theater group had been organized by the inmates and one
evening they invited us to a performance of “Faust.” Professional actors could not have produced a better
show. As for myself, I would have liked to take some more time off for studies
but the war situation was serious and chances were poor. It was suggested that I take a correspondence course, and I sent
away for books. An inmate, a jewish female doctor from Prague offered to help me cram, and she did so every afternoon. This
was possible in Raisko. The jews were intelligent and so far as I got to know them
in Auschwitz, quite nice too. In the summer my mother came for a visit and stayed several days. Of course, a fat friendship
developed between her and Olga. One evening my mother asked about the crematorium where corpses were supposed to be burned.
I knew nothing about this, so I asked Olga. She could not tell me anything definite either. She did intimate, however, that
around Bielitz there always was what seemed to be a reflection against the sky, as if from a fire.
So I went in the direction of Bielitz and there found a mining camp in which some inmates also worked.
I travelled around the entire camp and examined all fire grates and all smoke stacks, but found nothing. I asked my colleagues;
the answer … a shrug of the shoulder and “don’t pay any attention to those rumors.” Actually,
there was a crematorium in Auschwitz, I was told, for there were 20,000 people there and any city of that size has a crematorium.
Of course people died here as they did elsewhere, but not only inmates at the camp. The wife of one of our supervisors had
also died here. As far as I was concerned, that was enough of an answer. During
all the time I was in Auschwitz I never in the least observed anything that even indicated mass killings in gas chambers.
Also the story of a smell of burned flesh that allegedly hovered over the camp at times was an infamous lie. In the vicinity
of the main camp there was a smithy where horses’ hooves were shod. The burning of the horses’ hooves when fitting
them with shoes naturally caused an unpleasant smell. Incidentally, the man who was in charge of this particular smithy
at the time, now lives in a neighboring village. As a matter of fact, camp regulations
became more generous all the time. In the main camp there was now a brothel for the men. Love and sex, is something human
after all, and was not withheld from those who were interned. Of course there were also love relationships among the inmates.
I doubt that the so-called “house of pleasure” was a deterrent. The fact that such houses did exist for the inmates
in Auschwitz was completely ignored in all post-war reports. An admission to such a brothel was a kind of reward for good
behaviour. There were also some inmates who flung their ticket into the Kapo’s face. Hats off to them, I say, for
that to me was a special show of good behaviour. Olga loved to constantly chatter and her continual gossiping, rumouring
and wondering as to whether or not corpses were being burned (whilst I knew for sure there was no such happening) finally
got on my nerves. This, plus her almost slavish servitude, brought us to a parting of the ways. She was given a new job,
one I did not begrudge her. She was made “overseer” in the women’s camp and it was her job to keep
out men who had no business there. Olga had a gift for “raising hell” and could scold so beautifully
that it was a joy to see her eject males from the female camp. Her fellow inmates called her “Zerberus“,
(hound of hell). Good old Olga, sometimes I wonder what became of her. She didn’t
want to return to a Communist Poland — almost none of the inmates wanted that, not even the jews. Many of them even
prayed for a German victory. From a colleague, whom I visited recently, I learned that quite a number of them are in the
U.S. He still corresponds with some. Some were also willing to testify on behalf of SS Officers at their trials but were
denied this privilege by Allied and especially by West German authorities. These reports were publicized by the “right
wing” press at the time. There were no secrets in Auschwitz. In September
1944 a Commission of the Red Cross came to inspect the camp, but it was more interested in the camp at Birkenau.
Publishers note:— Having read the 156-page Report put out by the International Red Cross, it seems
strange that Auschwitz, one of the largest camps of its kind and much publicized as being a “death camp,”
should warrant only a few paragraphs in the Red Cross reporting, and this would seem to add verity to the statements of
Thies Christophersen. We also had a great many inspections at Raisko, but the
people who came were largely interested in plant cultivation. I was often involved in these tours. Although it was actually
not permitted that inmates converse with visitors, they did explain their work to them. At the time we experimented with colchezin. This is a poison of the Autumn Crocus (colchium autumnale). With the
aid of this poison we developed a plant with twice its number of chromosomes. Such plants tended to grow into giants, but
at the cost of fertility. The collection of plant seed therefore still played an important role, but the harvesting of the
seed was not exactly simple, because the reproduction device of this plant was similar to that of the dandelion. With the
aid of some talented mechanics and Russian agronomists, I had begun to construct a harvesting machine. Some Russian agronomists
worked with a so-called “longalvanization” method. For this purpose, the inmates built tools that worked
with ultra short waves. The material for these I picked up at a shop where planes that had been brought down were dismembered.
The inmates also found material there with which they could build small radios. These of course they could not take into
the camp. I myself learned to build radios at Auschwitz. My teachers were the inmates and they supplied me with everything
I needed for a small receiving set. At Auschwitz we did not of course only cultivate
plants. Innumerable research tasks were carried out. Because of the availability of workers there, more and more research
work was being delegated to Auschwitz. At that time the place was also fairly safe from air attacks. About every two weeks
the SS officers met for a casino night. On these occasions, department leaders spoke about their particular field of work.
I heard many interesting lectures there and I do not recall anything that might have been offensive. Later on I heard that
experiments were supposed to have been carried out on living human beings. I remember having listened to a lecture on the
development of the embryo in the womb of the mother under various kinds of diet. Whether these women had to carry and give
birth to a child while subjected to starvation diets, I cannot say. We were told, however, that these experiments produced
valuable insights into the dietary care of pregnancies. Reports on experiments of newly developed medicines carried out
on inmates do not appear plausible to me. A medical doctor at Auschwitz told me that new medicines were given to people
only when experiments on animals were concluded. This practise is still carried on in all civilized countries.
After the war I saw a TV film about Auschwitz that showed a building with huge smoke stacks. I am very
sorry, but when I left the camp at Auschwitz in December 1944, I did not see this building. I cannot imagine that these
smoke stacks were built in the cold winter of 1944/45, but 1 suspect that these structures were erected after the war. It
also seems implausible that, if they should have existed, the SS did not destroy them. During the past few days I have heard
a report on the radio according to which 4 million people are supposed to have been shot at Auschwitz. It is an absolute
certainty that no people were shot at Auschwitz, because this we would have heard. I do, however, recall one occasion when
there was great excitement in the camp. A rumour was being spread that hostages were to be shot. This type of revenge is
the most despicable I can think of because it hits innocent people. That it did take place — on either side —
is quite likely. If for every bombing victim an inmate should have been killed, none of the 200,000 inmates would have left
a concentration camp alive. On this basis, considering that Auschwitz was in operation only four years, one million people
a year or 3,000 per day would have had to die. Just what would a crematorium look like in which 3,000 corpses were burned
every day? Even mass graves on this order could not be kept secret. Yet the German
people continue to believe in these mass murders. Why? We who know the truth, have we not burdened ourselves with an awful
responsibility? Why did we keep silent for so long? I shall try to answer these questions. - We have not kept silent at all. There was no one who wanted to hear our reports, no paper wanted to publish them,
no publisher print them.
- Even today there are still enough witnesses alive who could verify
my statements and make similar ones of their own. What we need, however, is an unbiased constitutional state. To tell the
truth is tantamount to social ostracism and financial suicide.
- I cannot say that I am tired of life, but my life’s task lies behind me; my children are taken care of, and
my wife should receive her well-earned pension at 65. At least, I hope it will not be withheld from her if something should
happen to me.
- During the long years that I have worked
as a journalist and publisher, I have created a small circle of readers and with the aid of the German Citizenship initiative
I can publish my reports independently.
- It is being maintained
and regretfully also by members and voters of the main German political parties, that “only recognition of our guilt
in starting the war and destroying 6 million jews will make it possible for us to re-enter the community of nations and
that whoever denies that, brings great harm to the German people.”
- However, to disprove the mass murders in concentration camps would not only prove the entire thrust of post-war
German politics to be a mistake, but the post-war politicians still in power would have to admit their political concepts
to be entirely. This must not be allowed.
- Of course there
were also cowards, liars and paid witnesses. Some of the accused who must have known that the testimony against them was
false, still made a confession because they thought — and of this they were no doubt assured — that they would
gain advantages for themselves if they adjusted their statements to the testimony of the accusers. However, it must also
be stated here, that confessions were obtained through torture.
What changes will take place when the disclosure of my own personal experience is made public? Most likely none.
Some sort of decree may be issued against me and an attempt might be made to confiscate this pamphlet.
Our people, especially our children, must be freed from the feeling of guilt being forced upon them by
the victors of the last war — and it is only the truth that will make them free. I have recorded the memories of my experiences as I recall them. I have stated the truth, so help me God. If these
my statements contribute to our youth having more respect for their fathers, who as soldiers fought for Germany, and who
were definitely not criminals, then I shall be very happy. Kaelberhagen,
January 3, 1973. 2341 Mohrkirch/Kalberhagen. Tel. (0 48 46) 8 88.
EPILOGUE The publication of THE AUSCHWITZ-LIE (Die
Auschwitz-Luege) in March 1973 hit the pseudo-democratic establishment like a bombshell. For almost 30 years the world
has been flooded with the official version of so-called ‘Nazi atrocities.‘ All documents and reports
of a different truth had been destroyed or suppressed, all witnesses who dared to give the real story were hanged, imprisoned
or intimidated so that the Inquisition of the 15th century looked pale in comparison. All historians who dared to publish
different facts, came under attack or ridicule and usually lost their contracts for teaching at universities.
Some were even murdered. The general public therefore had hardly
any access to truthful information and — to a large extent — began to believe that the Germans were brutal monsters
who had gassed six million innocent jews, simply because they were jews, all of them, of course, nice and good-natured people,
the crown of humanity. According to general belief, no jew was ever killed legally for being a criminal or executed rightfully
under martial-law. The death of a jew is always an illegal act — no questions or doubts allowed.
Manfred Roeder, himself having gone through all the methods of re-education, believed for many years that
six million jews had been killed or gassed. He, like so many others, believed that concentration camps were extermination
camps. Until he met Thies Christophersen, who told him the real story from his own experience. Christophersen is one of the very few unbiased witnesses who has no ax to grind. He was neither a guard at Auschwitz
who may have reason to hide something, nor was he a prisoner who may be inclined to exaggerate his sufferings. Christophersen
was a totally neutral person. He had to work with the inmates of the camp, but had no executive power over them nor the
right to guard or punish them. His report is so simple and convincing, so un-dramatic,
so contrary to everything anybody has heard about Auschwitz, that it puts to shame all other ‘witnesses’ and
especially the judges who based their judgments on those dramatic stories of ‘professional witnesses’ even if
these stories had to be changed seven times before the court! The publication
of this report with the introduction by a lawyer caused a sensation. This was incredible! After 30 years the whole edifice
of lies and distortions began to crack. There was an outcry of madness by the jews. In Tel Aviv the jewish papers attacked
this book as ferociously as they did in all the Western countries. The Jewish Weekly in West Germany dedicated a front page
article by chief editor Galinski under the banner headline ‘Liars at Work,’ and he called Christophersen and
Roeder the two biggest liars since Goebbels. A flattering compliment because Goebbels was probably the greatest genius of
propaganda that ever lived — and his propaganda was based on facts, not lies! Simon
Wiesenthal urged the courts and the bar association to take ‘proper action.’
“Especially in Mr. Roeder’s preface there are remarks worth investigating.“
At first, the court and bar association refused to do anything. But under growing pressure, finally Roeder
was disbarred for his ‘improper radical political views and actions,‘ and another court in Darmstadt
sentenced him to seven months imprisonment as well as a $2,000 fine plus court and lawyer costs. Only Roeder was taken to
court for his introduction, not Christophersen for his report, because — as the judge sneeringly said to Mr. Roeder
— “We have freedom of speech, and anybody can write as he pleases,
but your interpretation of Christophersen’s report sounds anti-semitic, and for this criminal attitude you are punished.“
The court found Roeder guilty of ‘willfully inciting race hatred against a minority‘
(the jews). Denying the existence of gas chambers may include the assumption that all jews, who have testified to the contrary,
are liars. (Which indeed it does!) The merits of the case contain the following statement: “Even if there had been no extermination program and no persecution of jews at all (which means that all
jews are liars), it is anti-Semitism to suggest that the jews are lying, because it would stir up racial hatred! It would
endanger the public peace!“ The Supreme Court of West Germany declared
this sentence to be invalid, not because it was ridiculous, arbitrary and contradicting any logic, but because it was too
lenient. Another lower court was directed to re-try Mr. Roeder and to increase the punishment to several years, at least,
because; “a responsible citizen like a lawyer cannot neglect the well-established
facts of recent history. Otherwise he would prove his ill-will against a minority and his criminal intentions.“
Mr. Roeder is now living in exile since January 1978. Literally dozens of similar ‘charges‘
by kangaroo courts are pending. If he returned to Germany under the present political system and occupation regime he would
be immediately arrested and put in jail for ‘defaming democracy’ (as Plato has done) or for ‘unconstitutional
propaganda.‘ By demanding the re-unification of Germany and the withdrawal of all occupation forces, Roeder has
become the most ardent regime critic of pseudo-democracy, which he calls mobocracy. For his ‘thought-crimes,‘
as described in the classic study of tyranny by George Orwell in 1984, he is now persecuted by Interpol, and several warrants
of arrest have been issued. THE AUSCHWITZ-LIE has
become a secret best-seller with youngsters in Germany, as well as the ‘proof of dangerous neo-Nazi activity,‘
which has to be wiped out once and for all. There is hardly any other book that has caused such public controversy and uproar.
Thies Christophersen by Mark Weber
Thies Christophersen — pioneer revisionist writer and courageous fighter for truth in history —
died February 13, 1997, at Molfsee, Kiel, in north Germany. He was 79. In a memoir
first published in Germany in 1973, he related his wartime experiences as a German army officer in the Auschwitz camp complex.
“During the time I was in Auschwitz, I did not notice the slightest evidence of mass gassings,” he wrote in Die
Auschwitz-Lüge (“The Auschwitz Lie”). As one of the first important works squarely to confront
the Auschwitz extermination legend, Christophersen’s first-hand account was a major factor in the growth and development
of Holocaust revisionism. “The Auschwitz Lie” caused an immediate
sensation in Germany, where it was soon banned. This did not stop publication of German-language editions in Switzerland
and Denmark, however, and before long editions appeared in all the major European languages, including several in English.
Christophersen predictably came under hostile and mendacious media attack. Numerous newspaper reports, for example, inaccurately
referred to him as a former “SS officer.” Wartime Experiences
Born in 1918, Christophersen worked as a farmer in Schleswig, northern Germany, until the outbreak of
war in Europe. Called to military service, he was badly wounded in 1940 while serving in the western campaign. After recuperating
and undergoing some specialized agricultural training, he was assigned to a research center in German-occupied Ukraine which
experimentally cultivated a variety of dandelion (kok saghyz) as an alternative source of natural rubber, to be
produced from the plant’s latex. In the face of Soviet military advances,
and the withdrawal of German forces from Ukraine, the center was transferred to the labor camp of Raisko, a satellite of
Auschwitz. During the period he lived and worked there — January to December 1944 — Christophersen was responsible
for the daily work of inmate laborers. The young second lieutenant supervised about 300 workers, many of them jewish, of
whom 200 were women from the Raisko camp, and 100 were men from the nearby Auschwitz-Birkenau camp. On a number of occasions
he visited Birkenau where, it is alleged, hundreds of thousands of jews were systematically gassed to death in May-July
1944. Although he knew of Birkenau’s crematories, it wasn’t until after the war that he first heard anything
of “gas chamber” killings or mass exterminations. A Prolific Writer
After the war he returned to farming. A ardent and life-long defender of the interests of German farmers,
he also turned his considerable talents as a writer to this cause. For years he edited and published the quarterly magazine Die
Bauernschaft (“The Farming Community”), which served as a forum for his straight-forward reporting
and forthright and often witty commentary on farming, cultural, historical and current social-political issues. He also
ran the Nordwind book service, which distributed a range of works, including revisionist titles.
In March 1988 he testified in the “Holocaust trial” in Toronto of German-Canadian Ernst Zündel.
Under oath, he detailed his wartime experiences at Auschwitz, and answered numerous pointed questions by the prosecuting
attorney. (His testimony is related in the remarkable record of the trial compiled by Barbara Kulaszka, Did Six
Million Really Die?, and in Robert Lenski’s book, The Holocaust on Trial.)
Persecution and Exile Although he was never prosecuted for
his “Auschwitz Lie” booklet, he was put on trial for other outspoken writings. In the 1980s he served a year
in prison on charges of “insulting the state” (“Verunglimpfung des Staates“) and “insulting
the memory of the dead.” Driven from his beloved homeland, he was forced
to live in exile in Denmark, Belgium and Switzerland. (To its credit, Denmark rejected German requests to extradite him,
pointing out that he had a valid residency permit and had not broken any Danish law.) While Danish police stood by, hundreds
of “anti-fascist” thugs attacked his modest home in the small town of Kollund, pelting it with stones and defacing
it with spray paint. They also severely damaged his book warehouse and, using corrosive acid, ravaged his car and expensive
copy equipment. After months of such abuse, in 1995 Christophersen was forced to leave Denmark. Ill with cancer, he sought
treatment in Switzerland, but in December 1995 was forced to leave that country. He next found temporary refuge in Spain.
Meanwhile, the German printer of his Bauernschaft magazine was fined 50,000 marks.
During his final months, German officials treated him as a virtual “enemy of the state.” His
bank account in Germany was closed down, and in early 1996 a German court rejected his application to return to his homeland
for a brief visit to attend the burial of a son who had died in a car crash. On the grounds that he had no permanent place
of residence, in 1996 German authorities cancelled his state medical insurance coverage and stopped payment of his modest
state retirement pension (into which he had paid for 45 years), as well as his military service pension. Christophersen
was arrested for the last time a few weeks before his death, but a German judge declared him too ill to be jailed. Released
to a son’s custody, he died a few days later. _______________________________________________________________________________
Click on this text to watch David Cole in Auschwitz (Full Documentary) The Holohoax aka Shoah
David Cole's 1992 visit to Auschwitz and his
interview with Auschwitz museum curator Dr. Francicek Piper. During that interview Piper
admits that the alleged homicidal gas chamber was reconstructed from a bomb shelter by the
Soviets after the war and that the number of deaths at Auschwitz during the years when the
supposed gassings occurred was 69,000 according to released Soviet documents after the war.
Most of those deaths were from natural causes and only a minority were Jews.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. This film has everything in it. Since Cole was an orthodox Jew, the museum authorities thought he was onside and freely admitted everything.
As you will see in the Cole video, the holy gas chamber is a fake. Which makes the entire Holocaust story a fake. You can study it for a day or for a lifetime and your conclusion will be the same. There was never a plan for exterminating Jews and there was never an instrument.
As Professor Robert Faurisson has asked for years, “Show me a gas chamber. Draw for
me a gas chamber.” It can’t be done because there was never such a thing. OTHER JEWISH 'HOLOCAUST' CONCESSIONS
C.L. Sulzberger The "gas chambers" claim originated in a report issued by a Soviet Committee
just hours after Germany had unconditionally surrendered (and
thus, could not rebut). (here)
Deborah
Lipstadt German documents never specifically refer to
a genocide campaign.
Haretz News (Israel) The story of
Jews being used to make soap is a hoax. (here)
Simon Weisenthal Contrary to Eisenhower's propaganda films, there was no "gas chamber" at the Dachau Concentration Camp. (here)
Elan
Steinberg, Peter Novick and others The testimony of Holocaust
survivors is often unreliable. (here)
The Jewish Virtual Library The International
Red Cross inspected the German POW and concentration camps and
gave passing grades (but, of course, remained silent about the Jews). (here)
The New York Times The '6 Million Dead' was proclaimed before
a single camp had been liberated. (here)
The
Forward (A Jewish Daily) 3000 babies born at Auschwitz
(here)
The
most effective ammunition one can use to blow-up the official fairy tale of the Holocaust ™
consists of the many inadvertent admissions that the enemies of truth let slip out from time
to time. Indeed, one can
wreck the entire Holohoax tale just by using such admissions, and nothing else. Some examples -- the Holohoaxers themselves admit
that: - Forensic
tests on the "gas chambers" ™ do not reveal any trace of "gas"
or "poison."
- Millions of corpses or remains were never discovered.
- There
is no German documentation of any mass killings.
- Tales of Jews being
made into bars of soap and lamp shades were invented.
- Zyklon
B ™ was a pesticide developed to kill typhus-lice, not people.
- The
Holocaust story relies heavily upon Soviet reports.
- Football
/ Soccer games and other forms of entertainment took place in the camps.
- The
International Red Cross had access to all camps and never mentioned any mass killings.
- Some
Jewish "survivors" claimed they knew nothing about "gas chambers" ™ in
Auschwitz.
Of course, after being forced to make these huge concessions, the hoaxsters always
return with the quintessentially Jewish and truly
psychopathic "yeah but" -- that goes something like this:
"Yes, it is indeed true that (insert any of the above), but blah, blah, blah
-- the Holocaust still happened." String
enough of these "yeah buts" together and the silly story begins to take on ridiculous proportions. "Yeah buts" are the ignoramus's way of
defending his ego, or his lies. Nonetheless,
they can be quite useful for turning the argument against him. One of the strongest "yeah buts" to support us "Holocaust
Deniers" comes from an article published in The Forward
-- a New York based Jewish-Marxist publication that dates back more than 100 years. Just how left-wing is 'The Forward' -- you ask? Well, there are images
of Karl Marx and his buddy Friedrich Engels carved into the facade of
the building. Just how Jewish is The Forward -- you ask?
Well, both the newspaper and the website also publish
an edition in Yiddish. So when 'The Forward' makes what lawyers refer to as "an admission against
interest" (putting foot in mouth) about the Holocaust ™,
it makes for powerful contradicting testimony
for us truthers to seize upon and disseminate. Marx & Engels immortalized in
the stone of The Forward. We'll let the "yeah buts" of the Yiddish-Marxist Forward make our case for "Holocaust Denial."
Have
a look at this shocking admission and "yeah but" that 'The Forward' published just this
past July, 2015, and judge for yourself. Excerpts below -- analysis and wise-cracks added. Barbara Puc This Baby Was Born in Auschwitz — and Survived Sergiusz Scheller, July
30, 2015 Full story -- (here) The
Forward: Germans treated pregnant women and newborns living in this section of the camp less harshly than in the other ones. They were given a little bit more food,
sometimes even milk. Analysis:
If the Germans were running an extermination camp, why were they expending resources, during wartime no less, to feed pregnant women and newborns? Why didn't
they "gas" these "worthless
eaters" as soon as they showed signs of having been knocked up? If life was so brutal, and death was always pending, then how did these young ladies
and their husbands / boyfriends manage to get intimate?
* (It is unclear how many women arrived
at the camp pregnant vs how many became pregnant while incarcerated. There were cases of both.) The Forward: Infants
were registered in a registry book.... Analysis:
Germans are famous for meticulous record-keeping, so this is no surprise. Oddly enough, there are no such German records of the numbers of prisoners "gassed."
Interesting. The Forward: These
privileges, however, were very short-term; the vast majority of these mothers, and those of their children who were not murdered soon after birth, perished not long after
in the gas chambers. Analysis:
So, the big bad Germans allowed couples to have relations (there were private quarters for
this); provided extra
rations to pregnant women; waited until the babies were born; and then, finally killed both the mothers and babies? Makes perfect sense! (rolling eyes
sarcastically) The Forward:
In fact, thousands of babies were born
in Auschwitz ... Analysis: Wait
a second! "Thousands of babies" --
you say? Analysis:
Mein Gott! Were the big bad "Nazis" running an extermination
operation or a frickin' maternity ward?!
No further response is necessary. The Forward: ... the vast majority of whom the Nazis killed
virtually upon their emergence from the womb. Analysis:
"Killed virtually upon their emergence
from the womb," eh? The mushy story goes on about a Polish woman named Barbara Puc,
who was born at Auschwitz in
November, 1944 -- just two months before the camp was liberated by the Soviets. (here) She tells of how "lucky"
she was and gives credit to God and blah, blah, blah. Again -- from the Forward article: "thousands of babies
were born in Auschwitz" There are more such "miracle" tales that can be found from
Jewish and/or "mainstream media" sources. There is the "miracle"
of Miriam Rosenthal and her baby, Leslie, a son. From the National Post
(Canada): "An SS officer
in big black boots and a crisp uniform appeared before the barracks in Auschwitz with a loudspeaker in
hand.
All pregnant women line up, he barked.
Line up, line up — your food portions are being doubled. "Can
you imagine?" Miriam asks. "Even women who were not pregnant stepped forward. I was standing with my younger cousin, but I wouldn't go. She
says, 'Miriam, what are you doing?' "
"Something was holding me
back. Someone was watching over me. I feel maybe my mother, maybe God. Two hundred women stepped forward and 200 women went to the gas
chamber. And I don't know why I didn't step forward."
(here)
Miriam
Rosenthal spins a tale of miraculous quick-thinking which saved her and her unborn baby from the non-existent "gas
chambers". The Daily Mail (UK) informs us of how
Jewish inmates Anka Nathanova and Priska Lowenbeinova, also
"miraculously" cheated death at Auschwitz by hiding their pregnancies from the clueless "Nazis" who then, for
some strange reason, allowed them and their babies to live after they were born. (here) Rachel Friedman,
we are told, saved her baby boy's life by taking the advice of an SS Guard by claiming that the child was born on Hitler's birthday -- April 20. (here)
A
Wedding and a Honeymoon Suite too? This photo of an Auschwitz marriage announcement congratulating newlywed communist
guerilla fighters
Rudolf Friemel (from Austria) and Margarita Ferrer Rey (from Spain) was circulated on March
18th, 1944. (here) An SS
officer performed the ceremony. The bride
was given flowers and the couple and their son (evidently born before Friemel and Ferrer Rey were incarcerated)
were also photographed by the camp photographer!
The communist couple spent their wedding night in the camp brothel where they found some solitude, peace and quiet. (here) In closing, let us repeat, from 'The Jewish Daily Forward': "thousands of babies were born in Auschwitz" --- again, "thousands of babies were
born in Auschwitz" --- encore,"thousands of babies
were born in Auschwitz".
Let that
reality sink in -- and please share this important piece. ___________________________________________ Multi-Media 'Liberators' Project Exposed As A Fraud
Institute for Historical Review
Exposing historical and media fraud sometimes takes years or even decades. In the case of a recent heavily promoted and widely praised multi-media project –
designed to promote the Holocaust story, condemn
official racism against blacks in America during the
Second World War, and encourage racial tolerance – debunking has come much more quickly. Liberators: Fighting on
Two Fronts in World War II – a lavishly financed project that claims to tell the story of how black troops liberated Buchenwald and Dachau
– was exposed as an error-packed fraud within
weeks of its debut. Producers Nina Rosenblum and
William Miles collaborated with author Lou Potter, on the slickly promoted project that includes a much-touted “documentary” film, a book, a high school workbook,
a screenplay and a theatrical version. ______________________________________________
We are all familiar with the pictures and film footage of piles of dead “Jews” discovered at the liberated “death camps” Dachau and Buchenwald at the end of World War II, but what we were never told is that most of those corpses were actually dead German soldiers that were
dumped there as part of an elaborate psy-op by British Intelligence, and many of those ghastly
images were filmed by none other than horror film master, Alfred Hitchcock. The following is an excerpt from the corroborated eye witness testimony of a captured German soldier: In 1977, during a visit
to New York and Cape May, I recounted the story of the trainload of dying German prisoners to
two former US officers. They had both been stationed in Heidelberg shortly after the
war and they knew all about it. They agreed that the cattle cars
were filled with captured German soldiers who were infected with typhus and dysentery. …On a sunny day in mid-June 1945, I hopped on a freight train and went to Erfurt.
The train stopped about a kilometer and a half before the station, so I shouldered my rucksack
and began walking toward the station. I soon noticed a freight train of about 20 cattle cars
sitting on a side track. A bad odor was coming from that direction.
As I came closer I saw hands protruding from ventilation holes and heard sounds
of moaning, so I crossed several tracks and approached the cattle cars. The people
inside noticed me and began crying “Water, comrade, water!” Then I reached the train and recognized the terrible stench of feces and rotting corpses. The sliding doors and ventilation holes were crisscrossed with barbed wire securely nailed.
Urine and partially dried feces oozed from under the sliding doors and between the boards. …They
were in fact unwitting extras in a movie being made by Alfred Hitchcock, the Hollywood horror-film
specialist. He had been awarded a contract to make a movie about concentration camps for the
Nuremberg tribunal. At night the dead prisoners would be unloaded at Buchenwald,
Dachau and other concentration camps by those who were still alive.
Hitchcock would then film them, depicting the heaps of corpses as victims of German atrocities. A
large number of corpses were dumped at Buchenwald at night, and next day the
citizens of Weimar were forced to walk past the heaps of rotting corpses and
smell the sickening stench. Some
of them actually believed the American propaganda, that the corpses had been
concentration-camp inmates. It was all filmed as part of Hitchcock’s movie. Afterwards
the corpses were shoved into mass graves in the vicinity. That too was part
of the script. This is the explanation that the two former officers of the US Army
gave me concerning the trainload of dying German prisoners that I witnessed on June 16, 1945. I certify that my testimony is a true account of what I myself have personally seen
and experienced. [Note: Alfred Hitchcock was persuaded by his
friend and movie producer the British Jew, Sidney Bernstein, to leave Hollywood to assist on project “F3080.” F3080 was the name British Intelligence
gave to a project to compile a documentary film on German atrocities. The project
originated in February 1945 in the Psychological Warfare Division of SHAEF (Supreme Headquarters
Allied Expeditionary Force). Hitchcock was recorded expressing his primary concern that “we
should try to prevent people thinking that any of this was faked.”] The testimony of the German soldier can be verified by multiple other witnesses, including British Ministry Of Information, which admitted that the British Broadcasting Company (BBC)
would be involved in an ongoing anti-German propaganda campaign to distract the public from
the horrifying atrocities committed by the Soviet army. And Victor Cavendish-Bentick, the Head of British Psychological
Warfare Executive (Propaganda), in a handwritten note, written on Aug 27th, 1943, confirmed
that the alleged mass murder of Jews in the so-called ‘death camps’ was indeed a
psy-op: “We have had a good run
for our money with this gas chamber story we have been putting about, but don’t
we run the risk eventually we are going to be found out and when we are found
out the collapse of that lie is going to bring the whole of our psychological
warfare down with it? So isn’t it rather time now to let it drift off by itself
and concentrate on other lines that we are running.” [Public Record Office Document F0371/34551
revealed by Stephen Mitford Goodson, Inside the South African Reserve Bank]
Of course, it would be very easy to confirm the ethnicity of the bodies
in the mass graves at Dachau and Buchenwald simply by exhuming some of the bodies and running
DNA tests on them. Any simple DNA test could confirm that the remains were Jewish or German. But as we know from all over Europe, Jewish groups have absolutely forbidden any of these
“Jewish mass graves” to be disturbed because to do so would allegedly violate their
“religious” beliefs, except where it’s convenient to them. And now governments in America and Europe are spending tens of millions of dollars every year to make sure each and every impressionable school-age child is shown these faked images for one simple purpose: to transform the victimizers of World War II into the victims, to essentially
illicit sympathy for the devil.
Click on this text to watch "Nuremberg Executions 1946 - What Happened to the Bodies?" At 5:13 the fact that it took all day
to cremate 11 bodies at a modern mortuary facility is mentioned. We are required to believe millions were cremated at Auschwitz
alone during the last year of the war.
FINALLY . . PUTTING THE “HOLOCAUST” TO BED.A LETTER TO STEVEN SPIELBERG,FROM JEWISH FRENCH DR. ROGER
DOMMERGUE POLACCO de MENASCE. Dear Mr. Spielberg, I wish your honesty to be equal to your very great talent.
I saw you on TV in France. You declared that you would pour out Shoa propaganda
in German schools. You mentioned that witnesses would be convinced for good, as to the reality of the Shoah (6-million-gas-chambers). I feel it my duty as a Jew and after 20 years of study of the historical problem of the holocaust, to call your attention to the facts. Facts are very stubborn and as no one can gainsay them,
our congeners have been compelled to make disgusting politicians enact Stalino
– Orwellian laws which forbid to mention anything concerning the dogma
of the “six-million-gas-chambers”, definitively reduced to perpetual worship of this alchemy. In case of no respect of silence and worship of the myth,
you suffer the penalty of fines or prison or both. Professor Faurisson, who
has been studying the subject for 20 years, has been practically massacred. This is utterly ridiculous, but give the Police and the Justice of all countries to Mr Lévy, he will not
be ridiculous any more: here is the XXth century! These
laws are, accordingly, the absolute proof of the fake before we study its arithmetical and technical ineptitude.
No Sir, you will not find ONE witness who saw 6 million Jews slaughtered. You
will not find ONE witness of Zyclon-B – gas chamber’s to
exterminate 1000 or 2000 people at a time, close to the crematoria. See
my “Shoa Sherlockholmized” herewith: it is the summary of 20 years study on the subject. The “6-million-gas-chambers myth “is an arithmetic and technical nonsense. As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah business, 50
years after the war, is disgusting, debasing: it is a disgraceful shame.
No people in History has ever been wailing about its losses 50 years after a war, even its true and real losses. Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would be a dishonour to make such din
and pump up so much money everywhere: who were the usurers of the Weimar Republic?
You know it as well as I do. It is all the
more so as we know that 6.000.000 is gross exaggeration and that the Zyclon-B gas chambers are a technical impossibility. (See Degesh Trial in 1949). In fact 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in
the German camps of typhus or starvation. Many others died but as fighters against
Germany to which we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933! (Herr. Hitler was
allergic to the hegemony of gold and of the dollar: so he could give work to six million unemployed, before the functioning of German armament factories!). Do you know the book published at this period and written by our congener Kaufmann: GERMANY
MUST PERISH? We know that 80,000,000 Goyim were slaughtered in the
USSR, in a political regime which was entirely Jewish, from Marx and
Warburg, to Kaganovitch, Frenkel, Yagoda, the executioners. We know that after 1945 Americans and Russians killed and raped German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to Albania. We know that
1,500,000 German war prisoners were starved to death after the war (a
quite famous book was published a few years ago, but is ignored to day). You
will find there included in French the text of a rabbi: “A rabbi pleads guilty”: unfortunately I possess neither the German original nor an English translation. You should have it translated. The Rabbi condemns the Jewish behaviour in Germany 50 years before
Nazism and vindicates the emergence of Hitler. As for the harm we have
done to Humanity absolutely not redeemed by your excellent films or the virtuosity of Yehudi Menuhin, or the neutron bomb of S.T. Cohen, I wrote a book about it from texts written by important
Jews which are much above the most anti-Semitic text written by Goyim. Simone Weil drew a tragic summary: “The Jews, this handful of uprooted people, have
been the cause of the uprooting of the whole mankind”. And George Steiner:“For
5000 years we have been talking too much: words of death for us and for the others”. We know that all the German towns of more than 100,000 people have been destroyed during
the last war, with women and children: silence about this real holocaust.
If we consider the turn taken by the Shoah business, what you intend to
do in Germany is actually the safest way to a heaping up of a huge amount of anti-Jewism the explosion of which will be unique in History. Discretion and moderation must be our behaviour: all the rest is
suicide. Neither “mondialism” nor Orwellian
laws for “crime of thought” can prevent antisemitism to explode: only OUR behaviour can. What you do and all the whining and money pumping can only egg it on. It will increase out
of reasonable proportions, if there can be a reasonable proportion to antisemitism.
I know that it is practically impossible to check our propensity to
speculation and that only the abolition of circumcision, the 8th day could (our particularism derives from the disturbance of the 21 days of the 1st puberty, which starts precisely at the
8th day) but we must, at least, try to avoid such blunders as the one you intend
to perform in Germany and which would be appalling. I am a great admirer of your films (except the Shindler list: ask his wife and the historical real reality, but this is a minor blunder).
I hope you will scrutinize what I send you and escape the folly of the majority
of our congeners. I will always answer you if you have the integrity
to write to me. Cordialement à vous. Signed by: Dr. Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . The
«Shoa» Sherlockholmised – By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce. 1. Do we know, in the course of History, of an ethnic group which
would not rejoice when learning that, in a war
ended fifty years before, it had suffered many less losses than it thought? Would the discoverer of such good
piece of news, not be rewarded, celebrated? Would
he be overwhelmed with heavy fines, would he escape attempted murder, as such was the case with Professor Faurisson? Do such reactions not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy? 2. Have
the live skeletons which can be seen in such films as “ Night and Fog” (by Alain Resnais), have anything
to do with gassing? Are they not the result
of famine in the camps because of the systematic bombing of German towns containing more than 100,000 people, “holocausting” hundreds of thousands of women and
children who are never mentioned? 3. Where would have been the
4 million Jews ( if we consider that 2 millions were killed in battlefields), when it is well known that one camp could not contain more than 60,000 thousand people,
and that except in Auschwitz, there was no Zyclon-
B gas-chambers? ( there never was any proof of mass gasing with any other gas). 4. Are the witnesses worth anything,
when you know that torture was the way to squeeze out evidence. Such was the case of Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration has become a legend . What about the 100 witnesses of gassing in Dachau, when it is official
that there was no gas chamber in that camp? 5. 130 kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of one dead body. We are
told that the Germans cremated 1300 corpses a day.
U.S.A aircraft took hundreds of pictures of Auschwitz, during the supposed period of the holocaust. (1943-44). Why is there not a single gigantic heap of the necessary
coal? Why not a single black coil of smoke? 6. Why do radio, films, press, T.V., continue daily to inflict upon us the
myth of the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never ending
whining and moaning? Why is the Jewish lobby chasing, 50 years after the end of the war, nonagenarians who attempted to rescue Germany from the iniquity of the Versailles
treaty, from the rot of the Weimar Republic,
from the collapse of German youth, from the unemployment of 6 million people, who, back to work could give bread to the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent on them? 7. Why does
the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, issue 43, page 666, inform us that in 1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe? 8. How is it possible that the gas chambers could be just
near the crematoria, when any chemist will tell you
that Zyclon-B is hyperflammable? 9. Why are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax
of the Shoa? A scientific dialogue, a court ordered
appraisal have been demanded since 1980 about a problem specifically arithmetic and technical. It would seal truth for ever. It would definitively shut the mouths. Such was
the case for Katyn, thanks to the revisionist Gorbatchev. 10. How
could Zyclon-B gas 1000 people at one time, when it is well known that the USA gas chamber for one ( maximum 2) persons sentenced to death, are of an unheard
of complexity and cost? Why, at the trial of the Degesh,
which fabricated the Zyclon-B, was it declared in 1949, that gassing in such conditions is impossible and unthinkable? 11. Why
did Leuchter, who was in charge of the maintenance of the USA gas chambers, give the firm evidence that there was no gassing in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian and Polish
reports confirmed the Leuchter report? Why is the
Rudolf report, which analyses all results, forbidden? Why are those who divulge the Rudolf report, heavily sentenced by the law? And yet the slightest care of the quality and
accuracy of the report is not taken. 12. Why was, for the first time in History, the doctors degree of Mr Roques,
on the “Gerstein report” cancelled? And
still, this report was not accepted at the Nuremberg trial! Besides the well known historian, a socialist minister, Alain Decaux, mentioned in the press that ” nobody
could have access to the Gerstein report, without passing
first through the excellent thesis of M. Roques” Alain Decaux said: “I admired the skill and perfection
of a “chartist” performed by M.Roques
in his doctors degree on the Gerstein report” (in his book: “la guerre absolue” 1998).
13.
Why did Raymond Aron and François Furet at a Sorbonne seminar, (to which no revisionist was invited),
(state) that there was not the slightest trace of
a written or oral order for the extermination of the Jews? 14. Why is it never spoken of the planning of the extermination
of the Germans as expressed in a book written
by the Jew Kaufmann (“Germany must perish”), by sterilisation of German men.? It is undoubtedly a small
detail? 15. Why Zyclon-B, used by the Germans for hygiene since 1920, could be used in the concentration camps
for other purposes than delousing and protection against
typhus? Why large quantities of Zyclon-B could be
found in camps where it is official that there never was any gasings??? 16. Why do they harp on the “six-million-gas-chamber”
and never on the 80 million Goyim exterminated in the USSR, by an entirely Jewish political regime, the executioners of which bore the names of Kaganovitch, Yagoda, Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport, and fifty other Jews? 17. Why,
during the Zundel trial in Canada, the famous exterminationist Jews disgraced themselves by talking of “poetic licence” in their holocaust assertions, and never
came back when summoned by the judges? 18. Why
the Fabius-Gayssot law ? (the man of the contaminated blood
and another man, a Communist dragging along 200,000,000 corpses). 19. Is it not the supreme proof of the fake? Is it not
casting out nines? There is no need of Stalino-Orwellian law “to be put in prison because of ones beliefs” (thought crime of ” 1984 “) as stated
M. Toubon, before he became a minister of Justice
in France, to set up truth. This law is anti constitutional, anti democratic, against the rights of men. Facts, proofs, pros and cons, are only what we need. Professor
Faurisson besought for the granting of a forum with
an unlimited number of contradictors: he never obtained it. L’abbé Pierre did ask for it: they pretended
to grant it but refused it almost immediately.
The forum did take place at the television of Lugano. It was a complete success for the Revisionists and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows it as the media at the beck
and call of the Jewish lobby, move their little finger
only when authorized. 20. Why is it that when a professor declares that the holocaust is an arithmetic and technical ineptitude,
he is forthwith dismissed! This, for the first
time in History, sets up the insane concept of religious historical dogma, which in case of non perennial worship, is doomed to be struck by the lightning of the inquisition of
a secular state. 21. Why did the EXPRESS, a famous French newspaper, in January 1995, assert that the gas-chamber shown for decades in Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after
the war, and that all that concerns it, is false? 22. There was actually a holocaust of 60 million people in a war
declared in 1933 by the Jews against Hitler. Hitler had given bread to 6 million unemployed, he had rejected the dictatorship of the dollar and the Jewish
totalitarianism which pollute man and the planet and
which is called “democracy” by semantic mystification. Only two parties are left: the totalitarian Judeopathy, exterminating man and the planet, and Nationalism for
the Goyim not yet cankered by Capitalisto-Marxist
Jewish influence. In “Marianne”
Jean François Kahn expresses anger against the bureaucrats of the Jewish World Congress about the despoilment of Jewish property, which ended on the 3rd of March 1998 in Washington.
He writes: “They have reduced the Shoah to a financial market. So
the typical victim of Nazi barbarity, the archetype of the most frightful genocide of this time, is not the exploited worker in Cracovie, the humble artisan of Lodz, the small civil servant
of Kiev, the modest shopkeeper of la rue des Rosiers, or the unknown craftsman
of Riga, but the cosmopolitan billionaire who collected Rembrandt and
Rubens, slept on a heap of gold signed here and there comfortable insurance policies, sent his children to the U.S.A in order that they should make a brilliant career. This mighty lobby of American
oligarchs is not ashamed of reducing the holocaust to a Shoa-business.”
If Faurisson had written what J.F. Kahn wrote he would have had one more trial on his shoulders ! There is not the shadow of a doubt! By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce. (A Jew who strongly
takes issue with the totalitarian Judeopathy)
Click on this text to read TELL THE TRUTH AND SHAME THE DEVIL... by GERARD MENUHIN
Click on this text to watch a Holocaust Quiz
_________________________________________________________________________________ Stutthof An Important But Little-Known Wartime Camp By
Mark Weber While Stutthof is not as well-known as other
wartime German camps, a close look at the history of this important internment center is revealing. The patterns of deportations
to and from the camp, and the treatment of inmates, both Jewish and non-Jewish, disclose some surprising features. Stutthof (Sztutowo in Polish) was located 36 kilometers east of the city of Danzig (now
the Polish city of Gdansk) in a wooded clearing near the Baltic coast at the mouth of the Vistula river. Hastily set up
as an emergency internment center in September 1939, as German forces were subduing Poland, it was soon established on a
more permanent basis, and in 1942 was officially designated as a concentration camp. (1). In 1943 and 1944 it was considerably enlarged until it included
three large sections encompassing an area 2.5 by 1.2 kilometers. The Stutthof camp complex eventually embraced several dozen
smaller satellite camps spread across a large part of East and West Prussia. In addition to administration and general upkeep
work in the camp itself, inmates were employed in nearby workshops and factories that turned out equipment and clothing
for the German armed forces. Other internees worked in a camp brick factory and greenhouse, and on nearby agricultural projects,
quarries, ports and airfields. Inmates could send letters and receive parcels. At the end of 1943, a new regulation prohibited
punishment by beating. (2). Until 1944 there were relatively few Jewish internees. Most
of the prisoners were Poles. In the fall of 1943 several hundred Jews found in hiding in the Bialystok ghetto (after the
suppression of the uprising there) were transferred to Stutthof. (3). Beginning in June 1944, large numbers of Jews began arriving at Stutthof from Auschwitz. The first shipment of 2,500 Jewish
women from Auschwitz-Birkenau was soon sent on to several hundred factories in the Baltic region. Between June and October
1944, 20,000 to 30,000 Jewish women, originally from Hungary, arrived at Stutthof from Auschwitz. In addition, Jewish women
originally from the Lodz ghetto also arrived at Stutthof from Auschwitz. (4). During the summer and fall of 1944, as Soviet forces advanced
toward the Baltic region, thousands of Jews, including Jewish mothers and their children, were evacuated to Stutthof from
more than a dozen camps and remnant ghettos in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. In particular, Jews were transferred from
the camps at Riga (Latvia) and Kaunas (Lithuania), and the ghetto of Siauliai (Lithuania) in July 1944. Most were evacuated
by sea on scarce ships. (5). During the second half of 1944, as Soviet forces continued
their westward advance, the Germans transferred large numbers of Jews, including hundreds of Jewish children, from Lithuania
and Estonia through Stutthof to Auschwitz. (6). Many of these evacuees were Jews who had earlier been deported to the Baltic region from Germany as part of the "final
solution" policy of mass deportation to occupied Soviet territories in the "East." (7). These transfers to Stutthof are difficult to reconcile with
a German policy to annihilate Europe's Jews. If there had been such an extermination policy, it is particularly difficult
to understand why Jews from the Baltic region -- all of whom were supposedly doomed -- were evacuated on Germany's overtaxed
transportation system instead of being killed on the spot. The fact that many of the Jews evacuated by the Germans from
the Baltic area to Stutthof were unemployable children is particularly difficult to reconcile with a general extermination
policy. (8). This new influx dramatically changed the camp's character.
By late 1944, Jews made up about 70 percent of the inmate population. Russians constituted about 20 percent, and other nationalities
made up the remaining ten percent. (9). The camp was divided into separate male and female compounds. Most of the inmates were reportedly young, above all Jewish
girls and young women between the ages of 13 and 22. There was a separate barracks block for Jewish boys below the age of
17. As a rule, Jews did not have to work, although some were occasionally assigned to farm work on the outside. (10). As a result of the chaos and tremendous overcrowding brought
about by the worsening military situation, conditions in the camp deteriorated badly during 1944. Although new arrivals
were routinely subjected to a quarantine period of two to four weeks, an epidemic of typhus broke out in the second half
of the year. The death rate rose dramatically and reached a high point at the end of that year, when nine percent of the
total inmate population reportedly died during December 1944. Besides typhus, inmates fell victim to enteric fever and hunger. (11). Camp administrators did what they could under the almost
impossible conditions to save lives. Hospital facilities for inmates were greatly expanded, and eventually took up a whole
complex of barracks. Inmate physicians and nurses, as well as SS medical personnel, worked in these facilities, which were
divided into 12 departments. Unfortunately, care for sick internees was severely limited by a serious lack of medicines
and proper instruments. (12). In mid-January 1945, there were about 50,000 Stutthof inmates, about half of whom were in the main camp. There were 29,000
Jewish internees, including nearly 26,000 women. (13). On January 25, 1945, with Soviet forces only a few kilometers
away and the sound of gunfire audible in the distance, camp commandant SS Major Paul-Werner Hoppe, acting on higher instructions,
ordered a general evacuation of internees to the interior of the Reich. Sick inmates, as well as a group needed to dissolve
the camp, were to remain behind, he added. (14). Israeli Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer has acknowledged the difficulty of reconciling this evacuation order with an extermination
policy. At a 1981 conference, he asked rhetorically: "What was their [the Germans'] intention? Why did the SS march
these people away? ... Why did the commander of the camp in Stutthof give an order in January 1945 that everybody was to
march except for the sick?" (15). Coming as it did in the middle of winter, this mass evacuation
in groups of fifteen hundred each was a terrible ordeal that claimed many thousands of lives. The ten-day march was carried
out in snow and freezing temperatures, with very little food or adequate shelter. One Polish historian has estimated that
30,000 died during this evacuation trek. (16). One group of evacuees was rescued by Soviet forces in February 1945, but many in this group died after their liberation. (17). Stutthof's prisoners were not the only ones to endure this
terrible calamity. During this same period, hundreds of thousands of German civilians, most of them women and children,
as well civilians of other nationalities, were slowly making their way westward in the snow and freezing weather. Many of
these people also died during the winter trek. (18). In March and April 1945, Soviet war planes repeatedly attacked
the Stutthof camp. A bomb that hit the Jewish hospital on March 26, 1945, killed 28 and wounded 35. (19). During the following weeks, Soviet air and artillery strikes became more frequent. By April 20, 1945, a former Jewish inmate
later recalled (20). Stutthof was bombarded from the
air and ground. The bombing went on day and night.... The Stutthof camp was enormous and from one end to the other it was
burning down from the air attacks. Countless numbers of Katzetler [inmates] were killed by the bombs. I myself was lucky,
because a bomb hit our ward and three-quarters of the sick were killed or wounded. Evacuation by Sea In late April 1945, with Stutthof now cut off from unoccupied Germany except by sea, it was finally decided to evacuate
the 3,000 or so Jewish women still remaining in the camp. One inmate who was evacuated on a cargo ship later recalled her
terrible ordeal: (21). We sailed and sailed and went into
ports many times. Which, I can't remember. But no port would let us stay because there was a yellow flag flying from the
top, meaning the ship was supposed to be carrying people with contagious diseases on board. ...At every port, the captain
declared that he was carrying women refugees and asked permission to unload them. But time and time again they were turned away, although at one port some German soldiers
gave them some bread. With almost no water or food, the ship drifted for eleven days from one port to another. During this
terrible period, Allied planes twice attacked the unarmed vessel, killing many of the Jews on board. During a third bombing
attack, which came while the ship was anchored outside of Kiel harbor and only a day before the arrival of British troops
there, the vessel caught fire and sank. Many died in the flames or during the mad scramble to get on deck, and others drowned.
One survivor recalls that all but 33 of the 2,000 Jewish women on board perished.(22) The final evacuation from Stutthof took place on April 27,
1945. Under attack from Soviet warplanes, the prisoners were loaded onto several barges at nearby Hela harbor, which were
then towed westward to territory still under German control. One barge, packed with sick inmates, was destined for Kiel.
Others were taken to the port town of Neustadt near Lübeck.(23) One Polish historian has estimated that 3,000 of the Stutthof internees who were evacuated by sea lost their lives in the
ordeal.(24) Not all of Stutthof's inmates were evacuated. Hundreds who
were not able to move were left behind in the camp, which remained in German hands as part of the fiercely defended Danzig
enclave until it was surrendered to Soviet forces on May 10, 1945.(25) Gas Chamber Allegations Some historians have insisted that prisoners were killed at Stutthof in a camp gas chamber.(26) According to a 1985 statement by Munich's Institute for Contemporary History "more than one thousand" people
were killed in a Stutthof gas chamber.(27) However, the evidence cited for homicidal gassings at Stutthof is meager and not very credible. The camp's "gas chamber"
building, which is still intact, is a small brick structure about two and a half meters high, five meters in length, three
meters wide. American historian Konnilyn Feig has written that it looks "almost like a toy." Polish officials
have seriously claimed that the Germans gassed one hundred persons at a time in the chamber (that is, six or seven persons
per square meter). Homicidal gassings with Zyklon were supposedly carried out intermittently between June and December 1944
in this chamber.(28) Polish historian Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz believes that this
building was neither designed nor built as a homicidal gassing facility. In an essay published in a semi-official work about
the alleged homicidal "gas chambers," he writes that this building was built as a (non-homicidal) gas chamber
for treating clothes. However, he goes on to claim that this it was sometimes also improvisationally used to kill people.
("Originally the gas chamber was built as a room for delousing clothing, and it continued to be used for this purpose,
too, for as long as it existed.")(29) Interestingly, the "gas chamber" building is not
at all hidden or camouflaged, nor is it disguised as a shower. Therefore, if it had actually been used as a homicidal gassing
facility, prospective victims apparently would have been under no illusion about the fate that awaited them. It is worth
noting that the Germans in charge of the camp never made any effort to destroy or dismantle Stutthof's supposed "extermination
facility," which is difficult to believe if, in fact, it had been a execution gas chamber. (30). A West German court that heard "eyewitness testimony"
about homicidal gassings at Stutthof declared in its 1964 verdict that "with regard to the gassings a positive determination
was likewise not possible." Evidence given by several supposed witnesses of gassings was found to be dubious or not
credible.(31) Raul Hilberg makes no mention of homicidal gassings at Stutthof in his detailed three-volume Holocaust work. Two other
prominent Holocaust historians, Lucy Dawidowicz and Nora Levin, likewise said nothing about the camp's alleged extermination
facility. Estimates of Victims According to Polish historian Czeslaw Pilichowski, director of Poland's "Central
Commission for the Investigation of German Crimes," of the 120,000 people (Jews and non-Jews) who were ever interned
in Stutthof or its satellite camps, 85,000 died. (32). Polish historian Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz has estimated that of the camp's 120,000 inmates, "about 80,000 of them
either died or were murdered." (33). Another Polish historian gives a "conservative" estimate of 65,000 Stutthof victims. (34) Altogether more than 52,000 Jews were interned in Stutthof
and its satellite camps, according to Jewish historian Martin Gilbert and the Encyclopaedia Judaica. Only about
3,000 survived, they estimate, and add that perhaps 26,000 of the Jewish victims died or drowned during the evacuation in
1945. (35). Although it is difficult to determine the actual number of
deaths with any precision, in this regard it is important to keep in mind that the great majority of Stutthof's victims
were direct and indirect victims of war, including thousands who lost their lives in Allied air attacks during the final
weeks of fighting. As was also the case at Dachau, Buchenwald and other German camps, a considerable portion of those who
died in the Stutthof main camp were victims of typhus and other diseases who succumbed during the final months of the war. As we have seen, most Stutthof victims apparently lost their lives in the grim and hastily
organized evacuations by foot or sea. As harsh as they were, these evacuations were not part of any killing policy. In spite
of its high death rate, Stutthof was not organized or operated as an extermination center, and the many deaths there were
not the result of any systematic policy or program.
Notes - Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz, "Stutthof," in: I. Gutman, ed., Encyclopedia of the Holocaust (New York: Macmillan,
1990), pp. 1421, 1423.
- Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (Gdynia: 1966), pp. 253-254 (English-language abstract);
"Stutthof," Gedenkbuch (Koblenz: Bundesarchiv, 1986), p. 1772.
- "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: Macmillan and Keter, 1971), vol. 15, p. 464;
Martin Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (New York: William Morrow, 1993), pp. 194-195.
- Jean-Claude Pressac, Die Krematorien von Auschwitz: Die Technik des Massenmordes (München: Piper, 1994), p.
199. (In the earlier, French edition of this book, Pressac writes of the deportation of 40,000-50,000 Hungarian Jewish women
from Auschwitz to Stutthof and surrounding area. Jean-Claude Pressac, Les Crémetoires d'Auschwitz: La Machinerie
du Meurtre de Masse [CNRS Editions, 1993], p. 147.); "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol.
15, p. 464; Martin Gilbert, The Holocaust (New York: 1986), p. 686; M. Gilbert, Atlas of the Holocaust (1993),
p. 194.
- "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 15, p. 464; Roman Hrabar, et al, The Fate of Polish
Children During the Last War (Warsaw: 1981), p. 72; M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), pp. 705, 722; Encyclopaedia
Judaica (1971), vol. 6, p. 917; M. Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (1993), pp. 200, 207, 208, 209; Benjamin
B. Ferencz, Less Than Slaves (Harvard, 1979), p. 107; "Stutthof," Less Than Slaves (1986), p.
1772; Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1985), p. 985.
- Y. Gutman and M. Berenbaum, eds., Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp (1994), pp. 417, 420.
- Justiz und NS-Verbrechen (Amsterdam: Univ. Press Amsterdam, 1968 ff.), vol. 20, p. 600, or p. 585-6 (Verdict in 1964
Tübingen case Ks 5/63).
- R. Hrabar, et al, The Fate of Polish Children During the Last War (1981), p. 72.
- Olga M. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation of the Stutthof Concentration Camp, Yad Vashem Bulletin (Israel),
No. 17, Dec. 1965, p. 37.
- Olga M. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation," Yad Vashem Bulletin, Dec. 1965, p. 36.
- K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), pp. 252, 255; Olga M. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation,"
Yad Vashem Bulletin, Dec. 1965, p. 37; Justiz und NS-Verbrechen, vol. 20, p. 600; Central Commission for Investigation
of German Crimes in Poland, German Crimes in Poland (Warsaw: 1946-1947), vol. 2, p. 112.
- K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), p. 252.
- K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (Gdynia: 1966), pp. 253-254; "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia
Judaica, vol. 15, p. 464.
- Hoppe order, Jan. 25, 1945. Nuremberg document NO-3796.
- Brewster Chamberlain and M. Feldman, eds., The Liberation of the Nazi Concentration Camps 1945 (Washington, DC: USHMC,
1987), p. 92.
- K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), p. 257; Konnilyn Feig, Hitler's Death Camps (New
York: Holmes & Meier, 1981), p. 202; "Stutthof," Less Than Slaves (1986), p. 1772; M. Gilbert, Atlas
of The Holocaust (1993), pp. 216-217.
- M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), p. 783.
- See: Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, Nemesis at Potsdam: The Expulsion of the Germans From the East (Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska,
1989; 3rd rev. ed.), and, Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, The German Expellees: Victims in War and Peace (New York: St.
Martin's Press, 1993).
- M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), p. 786.
- Isaiah Trunk, Jewish Responses to Nazi Persecution (New York: Stein and Day, 1982), pp. 322-323.
- I. Trunk, Jewish Responses (1982), pp. 323-326.
- I. Trunk, Jewish Responses (1982), pp. 323-326.
- R. Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews (1985), p. 985; O. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation,"
Yad Vashem Bulletin, Dec. 1965, p. 37; M. Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (1993), pp. 228-229.
- R. Hrabar, et al, Fate of Polish Children (1981), p. 74. See also: M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), p.
806.
- "Stutthof," Less Than Slaves (1986), p. 1772; K. Feig, Hitler's Death Camps (1981), p. 203.
- Eugen Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass Murder (New Haven, Conn.: 1994), pp. 190-193, and, in the original German-language
edition, Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen durch Giftgas (Frankfurt: S. Fischer, 1986), pp. 263-266; The
entry by K. Dunin-Wasowicz in the Encyclopedia of The Holocaust (New York: 1990), p. 1423, refers to "the camp's
gas chambers" (plural).
- Statement by the Institut für Zeitgeschichte (Hellmuth Auerbach), March 6, 1985. Facsimile in: I. Weckert, "Massentötungen"
oder Desinformation, "Historische Tatsachen Nr. 24" (published by U. Walendy in 1985), p. 21.
- E. Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass Murder (1994), p. 191 (in the 1986 German edition, Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen
durch Giftgas, this is p. 263); Justiz und NS-Verbrechen (Amsterdam), vol. 20, p. 600 or p. 585-6 (Verdict in
1964 Tübingen case Ks 5/63.); K. Feig, Hitler's Death Camps (1981), pp. 192-193, 200; Central Commission...,
German Crimes in Poland (Warsaw: 1946-1947), vol. 2, pp. 118-119.
- E. Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass Murder (1994), p. 191 (in the 1986 German edition, Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen
durch Giftgas, this is p. 263).
- It has also been claimed that Jews were gassed at Stutthof with Zyklon in a rail car. See: E. Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass
Murder (1994), pp. 192-193; Central Commission..., German Crimes in Poland (Warsaw: 1946-1947), vol. 2, p. 119.
- Justiz und NS-Verbrechen (Amsterdam), vol. 20, p. 615.
- Czeslaw Pilichowski, No Time Limit for These Crimes (Warsaw: Interpress, 1980), pp. 156-157.
- K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), p. 255.
- Szymon Datner, et al, Le Genocide Nazi 1939-1945 (Warsaw: 1962), p. 218.
- "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica, vol. 15, p. 464; M. Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (1993),
pp. 195, 217.; According to Polish historian K. Dunin-Wasowicz, "Of the fifty thousand Jews who were brought to Stutthof,
nearly all died." Source: Encyclopedia of The Holocaust (New York: 1990), p. 1423.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
How
the “Holocaust” Was Faked “The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the
alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic
political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international
Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.” – Robert Faurisson,
internationally renowned historical revisionist[1] The alleged “Holocaust”
of “6 million Jews” at the hands of Adolf Hitler and National Socialist
Germany during WWII is perhaps the greatest deception ever perpetuated against humanity. National Socialist Germany and her allies were fighting a multi-front
war – physically and ideologically – against some of the most powerful
nations in the world at the time, including the United States, the British Empire,
and the Soviet Union. The idea that they would divert their precious and scarce
resources and manpower towards implementing a systematic campaign of mass murder
designed to “exterminate” European Jewry is simply absurd, and indeed
has no basis in reality, as we will see in the pages that follow. Simply put, there was no German conspiracy to systematically genocide
and destroy European Jewry during WWII, a fact which Jewish “Holocaust”
historians and scholars have been forced to concede. Aryeh Leon Kubovy of the
Israeli Center for Jewish Documentation has frankly admitted: “There exists
no document signed by Hitler, Himmler, or Heydrich speaking of exterminating
Jews… and, the word ‘extermination’ does not appear in the
letter from Herman Goering to Heydrich concerning the Final Solution to the Jewish
Question.”[2]
There were no “homicidal
gas chambers” utilized to murder Jews and other “undesirables,”
as official “Holocaust” propaganda and countless Hollywood movies allege and depict. Fred Leuchter, an expert in execution procedures who was commissioned by revisionist Ernst Zundel to investigate the viability of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at the various German-administered concentration camps, particularly Auschwitz, published his findings in 1988. The now notorious Leuchter Reports[3] concluded in part: The author finds no evidence that any of the facilities normally alleged to be execution
gas chambers were ever used as such and find, further, that because of the design and fabrication
of these facilities, they could not have been utilized for execution gas chambers.
We have produced definitive proof that there were no execution gas chambers utilized for genocidal purposes by the Germans at these wartime camps. The simple fact of the matter
is that the holocaust story is not true. Many people erroneously believe that Zyklon B, a pesticide invented and manufactured with the support of the German industrial and chemical firm IG Farben, was used for extermination purposes. In reality, Zyklon B was used to save Jewish lives, not end them,
as it was utilized to kill disease-spreading insects and to delouse clothing
and bedding materials in the German-administered camps. Zyklon B was used to
help stop the spread of typhus and other diseases that were present at the time
in the various concentration camps.[4] German chemists, including Bruno Tesch, Gerhard Peters and Walter Heerdt, developed
Zyklon B, with the assistance and support of IG Farben, specifically for fumigation
purposes in the 1920s. Tesch was later brutally interrogated and eventually hanged by the British after WWII for his alleged involvement in the “Holocaust,” which amounted to him supplying the SS with Zyklon B in order to fumigate and sanitize inmates’ clothing and
bedding. The
system of concentration camps throughout much of Europe developed and administered
by the Germans and their allies during WWII were simply a network of labor, transit, industrial,
and detention facilities – not “death camps”. Jews, political prisoners and Communist subversives, homosexuals, and criminals were detained and either put to work or imprisoned in German-administered concentration camps and industrial facilities throughout Europe. These forced laborers and prisoners were generally
well cared for, at least until the end of the war when Germany’s supply
lines broke down and chaos ensued as a result of a deliberate Allied bombing
campaign of German roads, railways, cities, and industrial facilities, followed
by the combined Soviet and Anglo-American invasion of German territory. Throughout
the war, prisoners and workers in the concentration camps received medical treatment
and were even compensated for their labor. They were allowed to attend concerts, organize
plays, make music, and play sports. If the Germans were determined to murder
these people, why would they provide medical care and entertainment for them? Why would
they set up hospitals and ensure sanitary working and living quarters for people
they planned to “genocide”? The simple fact of the matter is that the alleged “death camps” were in reality
labor camps, where individuals detained by the Germans were sent to live and
work, providing much needed and valuable labor and man power for the German war
effort. The United States, Britain and other nations had similar concentration
camps for their internal enemies and dangerous political subversives. The entire
WWII narrative, especially the alleged “Holocaust” narrative, is
basically the exact opposite of what truly transpired. The Jewish
Bolshevik terrorists who overthrew the Russian monarchy during WWI and established
the Soviet Union and their Western allies – namely, the United States and
British Empire – committed the real atrocities during and after WWII. National Socialist Germany and her allies were targeted for extermination and were systematically destroyed, a fact largely hidden and unknown in the Western world. The Western Allies and
the Soviet Union were the real war criminals – not “the evil Nazis.” During WWII, the British and Americans engaged
in a systematic fire-bombing campaign specifically targeting German industrial
and civilian centers for destruction. Major cities all throughout Germany were
fire-bombed, resulting in the horrific death of millions of innocent German civilians
– men, women, and children. Sir Arthur Harris, head of Bomber Command of
the British Royal Air Force, openly described the barbaric, ruthless nature of
Allied fire-bombing policy in October 1943: “The aim of Bomber Command should be… publicly stated: the destruction of German cities and the killing of German workers.”[5] The Western Allies engaged in a vicious firebombing
campaign of Germany during WWII at the behest of organized Jewry. The Allies also sunk German civilian ships escaping the rampaging Soviet Red Army towards the end of the war, ending the lives of countless civilians including, ironically enough,
many Eastern European Jews fleeing the advancing Red Army. In one particularly
egregious example, the MV Wilhelm Gustloff, which was
carrying thousands of civilians, was sunk by a Soviet submarine, resulting in
the tragic death of roughly 9,400 civilians.[6] The barbaric, out-of-control Red Army was encouraged to rape, pillage, torture, and
murder German soldiers and civilians alike as they advanced into German territory,
and they did. Over one million German POWs and civilians were starved and murdered
after the war, often suffering gruesome deaths from exposure, thirst, and torture
at the hands of the victorious and ruthless Allies.[7] The National Socialist political, cultural, and educational establishment was
systematically dismantled and destroyed, with many top officials and leaders
imprisoned, robbed, tortured, and even murdered.
Jewish propagandists have entirely reversed the reality of the situation using
their control of the media and Hollywood, and their influence upon the Western
political and educational establishment. Officially, the Germans are blamed for
initiating WWII and committing all of the atrocities, when in actual fact the
last thing Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany wanted was yet another
World War. Hitler was determined to diplomatically resolve the various disputes
and conflicts with his neighbors, and even sought an alliance with the British
against the Jewish dominated Soviet Union. The Germans and their allies were
the most disciplined, honorable, and righteous force fighting in the fratricidal
Jewish-instigated war, while the Allied armies and military forces were simply
ruthless barbarians and vicious murderers. The German people and their allies
were the ones who experienced a genuine holocaust – a real genocide – during
and after WWII, not the Jewish population of Europe.[8] In
the late Willis Carto’s essential pamphlet “A Straight Look at the Second World War,” originally published in the January/February 2012 edition of The Barnes Review,
the legendary American nationalist and publisher clearly explains that WWII
was not the “Good War” Americans and the rest of the world have been
led to believe. WWII was not about checking “Nazi” aggression and
designs on world conquest, or “liberating” Europe from fascism and
tyranny, or even a war of self-defense against a war-mongering, imperial German-Japanese
alliance – it was a fratricidal, Jewish-instigated genocidal campaign whose
only beneficiaries were the clique of Jewish bankers, plutocrats, propagandists, and
Communists largely controlling the United States, United Kingdom, and Soviet Union.
It was, as Carto correctly points
out, the suicide of the West: [WWI and WWII] must be seen as a civil war in the West; 8.5 million American, British,
and continental European troops were killed during WWI and 43 million during WWII. The civilian
count in WWI is about 13 million and 38 million in WWII… Regardless of persons
like Tom Brokaw (who refer to WWII as “the good war,”) it was unnecessary, and all
belligerents – Great Britain, America and Russia included – lost. American Francis
Parker Yockey pointed out that to win a war, a power must gain resources, strength and prosperity.
Since 1939, all three major powers who started and fought it have declined into a pit of escalating
inflation, unpayable debt, national bankruptcy, loss of national character, the immigration
of millions of aliens and a highly questionable future.[9] To state it bluntly, the
entire “Holocaust” narrative – 6 million Jews persecuted, abused, and
systematically exterminated by “those evil Nazis” during WWII – endlessly promoted and perpetuated by the Jewish-owned and controlled mass media, Hollywood, and educational and political establishment is completely bogus in virtually all respects. The Germans simply wanted the Jews out of Germany, clearly and correctly recognizing them as an alien, hostile, and treacherous force operating in German society, working to subvert, pollute, and destroy the German nation specifically and Western civilization
generally. Jews were encouraged to leave Germany, and many did. Others were imprisoned or detained in the various labor and concentration camps established and administered by National Socialist Germany. Incredibly, some were even permitted to serve in the German armed forces and live as German citizens, as Jewish historian Bryan Mark Rigg has detailed.[10] Jews were certainly not killed using “homicidal gas chambers” and
other sadistic forms of murder in a systematic campaign to eliminate European
Jewry, as official “Holocaust” and WWII historiography would have
you believe. But how exactly was such a monstrous hoax manufactured and presented to the public as if it actually occurred? What follows is a general overview identifying the primary means by which the alleged Jewish “Holocaust” during WWII was fabricated and presented to the public as if it were a genuine aspect of our collective history in order to advance certain geopolitical, cultural, and economic agendas beneficial to the organized Jewish community. The role of Allied propaganda before, during, and after WWII The false Jewish “Holocaust” narrative
is really just an extension of an elaborate and on-going anti-German propaganda
campaign going all the way back to WWI, and arguably even prior to it. During
WWI, Western (often Jewish) propagandists targeted Germany and her armed forces
with ridiculous “atrocity propaganda,” alleging in their newspapers and
other media outlets that the Germans were engaged in barbaric, ruthless behavior, including raping, mutilating, and murdering innocent civilians. The Germans, especially their military and political leaders, were depicted as savage monsters, and were blamed for starting the war – which is exactly what happened prior to and after WWII. Typical anti-German propaganda. In
reality, the Germans were the most honorable and righteous fighting force during WWI and WWII. The Germans were depicted as savage, violent
monsters that murdered innocent civilians. The entirely fabricated idea that “millions
of Jews” in Europe were being exterminated by the Germans and other “fascists”
was systematically promoted by Jewish propagandists and their lackeys in the
West beginning in 1915 during WWI. This slanderous, false accusation has been
and continues to be endlessly promoted to the often gullible and susceptible
Western public, resulting in extremely negative anti-German sentiment, not to
mention the widespread belief that the Germans did in fact commit these outrageous
(although quite ridiculous) atrocities.
In
his book The First Holocaust: Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns With Holocaust Claims During and After World War One, historian Don Heddesheimer details the fact that
organized Jewry and the mainstream mass media were propagandizing the Western
public during WWI with outrageous “atrocity propaganda” leveled against
Germany and her allies, laying the groundwork for the official “6 million”
figure and the general narrative of the Jewish “Holocaust” later
institutionalized by the victorious Allies and international Jewry following
WWII. According to the description of The First Holocaust provided by The Barnes Review, Heddesheimer: … documents post-WWI propaganda that claimed East European Jewry was
on the brink of annihilation, regularly invoking nowadays well-known buzzwords like ‘extermination,’ ‘holocaust,’ and the now famous and almost talismanic six million figure. It gives details how that propaganda was used prior to WWI in order to agitate for minority rights
for Jews in Poland, and for Zionism and Bolshevism in Poland and Russia; and demonstrates how
Jewish fundraising operations in America raised vast sums in the name of feeding Polish and
Russian Jews, then funneled much of the money to Zionist and Communist constructive undertakings
– including banks, unions, and kibbutzes – rather than to starving Jews. The
First Holocaust also includes eye-opening testimony from American diplomats and military
attaches stationed in Poland and Russia that contradicted Jewish persecution claims between
the two world wars. Although this exaggerated propaganda of Jewish suffering slowed down during the 1930s,
it never completely ceased and received new momentum in the 1940s during the Second World War. As we all know today, this propaganda skyrocketed after Germany’s
total defeat, as the victorious nations of the Second World War seized upon the opportunity
to take advantage of such propaganda and to increase its scope and impact. Heddesheimer’s
book clearly shows that the “six million” figure, together with “extermination” and “holocaust” claims, are Jewish-Zionist in nature and part of a propaganda pattern which started at the very dawn of the 20th century in order to promote Jewish political and financial goals.[11] To document just two brazen
examples of this deceitful propaganda prior to WWII even beginning, first consider
an article written by Martin H. Glynn, former governor of the state of New York,
entitled, “The Crucifixion of the Jews Must Stop!” published
in The American Hebrew on October 31, 1919. “From across the sea six million men and women call to us for
help, and eight hundred thousand little children cry for bread,” Glynn
begins the article. He continues: These children, these men and women are our fellow-members of the human family, with
the same claim on life as we, the same susceptibility to the winter’s cold, the same propensity
to death before the fangs of hunger. Within them reside the illimitable possibilities for the
advancement of the human race as naturally would reside in six million human beings. We
may not be their keepers but we ought to be their helpers. (Emphasis in original) Glynn proceeds with his emotional screed, entirely based on Jewish
propaganda designed to demonize the Germans and other White European Christian
peoples, by invoking the six million figure at least three more times. Glynn
even managed to use the word “holocaust” in his essay, and argued: Six million men and women
are dying from lack of necessities of life, eight hundred thousand children cry for bread. And
this fate is upon them through no fault of their own, through no transgression of the laws
of God or man; but through the awful tyranny of war and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood.
In this threatened holocaust of human life, forgotten are the niceties of philosophical distinctions, forgotten are the differences of historical interpretation; and the determination to help the helpless, to shelter the homeless, to clothe the naked and to feed the hungry becomes a religion at whose altar men of every race can worship and women of every creed
can kneel.[12] It must be noted that this
type of rhetoric sounds exactly like what the Jews and their brainwashed liberal followers say about the millions of non-White immigrants, both legal and illegal, flooding Western nations – and only Western nations – today. Shortly after Adolf Hitler’s legal, entirely
democratic rise to power in Germany in 1933, the Jewish-led propaganda assault
against the Germans stepped into high gear. Samuel Untermyer, a wealthy Jewish
lawyer deeply connected to the American political and banking establishment, almost
immediately declared an international boycott of German goods on behalf of international Jewry, which amounted to an act of war. The Friday, March 24, 1933 edition of the Daily Express, a British newspaper at the time, featured this leading headline: “Judea Declares War On Germany: Jews
Of All The World Unite In Action.”[13] Why were facts like this never presented
in high school history class? Untermyer would later broadcast an unhinged, extremely vicious anti-German
screed over the radio in which he decried the Germans as “cruel and savage
beasts,” and advocated a Christian-Jewish alliance to punish Germany. In
the broadcast, Untermyer hysterically claimed the Germans were “annihilating”
European Jewry by “locking them in vile concentration camps, starving and
torturing them, murdering and beating them without cause and resorting to every
other conceivable form of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has
become their only means of escape, and all solely because they are or their remote
ancestors were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them.”[14] This slanderous speech was publicly broadcast in 1933, years before the official
“Holocaust” and “extermination” of European Jews allegedly began. During and immediately following WWII, deceitful
propagandists continued to level this “atrocity propaganda” against
the Germans in order to demonize them and prepare the Western world for the
institutionalization of the myth of “6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis.” Western and Soviet propagandists, including psychological warfare specialists in the United States Army and individuals connected to Hollywood, were involved in manufacturing “evidence” – including fake, altered, or otherwise misrepresented photographs and videos, “human lampshades,” “shrunken heads,” and other absurd props –
which was used to “prove” to the world that the Germans did in fact
commit these outrageous atrocities during the war, particularly at the various
concentration camps and industrial facilities under their administration. Shortly
after the German surrender in 1945, Sefton Delmer, the former British Chief of “Black
Propaganda,” is alleged to have stated: “Atrocity propaganda is how we won
the war. And we’re only really beginning with it now!” He would go on to explain: We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will escalate
it until nobody will accept even a good word from the Germans, until all the sympathy they may
still have aboard will have been destroyed and they themselves will be so confused that they
will no longer know what they are doing. Once that has been achieved, once they begin to run
down their own country and their own people, not reluctantly but with eagerness to please the victors, only then will our victory be complete. It will never be final. Re-education needs careful tending, like an English lawn. Even one moment of negligence,
and the weeds crop up again – those indestructible weeds of historical truth.[15] The propaganda used to
instill the idea of a “Jewish Holocaust” into the minds of the public
is extremely emotionally and psychologically exploitative, resulting in psychological trauma, severe emotional reactions, and a general inability of the broad masses to objectively evaluate the information they are being presented with. This aspect of the false “Holocaust” narrative will be discussed in more detail as we continue. The role of the Nuremberg trials Following Germany’s
defeat in WWII, the Allied countries organized a series of military tribunals
often referred to simply as the Nuremberg Trials. The trials consisted of the
International Military Tribunal and the Nuremberg Military Tribunal. The Nuremberg Trials were a total sham, a disgrace to traditional Western jurisprudence, and a violation of every standard code of military honor and conduct – “show trials” if there ever were any. According to Article 19 establishing the military tribunal, “The Tribunal shall not be
bound by rules of evidence.” Additionally, Article 21 states: “The
Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge, but shall take
judicial notice thereof.” As Robert H. Jackson, chief American prosecutor
at the Nuremberg Tribunal, openly admitted, the Tribunal was “a continuation
of the war effort of the Allied nations” against National Socialist Germany.[16] The
trials were essentially organized to: - Demonize,
vilify, and falsely blame the Germans for initiating
- the war and committing all of the
atrocities and war crimes;
- To whitewash and cover up the very real crimes committed
- by the victorious Allies; and Officially institutionalize the
- false Jewish “Holocaust”
narrative.
Fabricated
evidence and false, oftentimes completely ridiculous and fanciful, testimony was
introduced by the Allies, and many of the German defendants were physically and
psychologically tortured or otherwise coerced into making false confessions during the trials. One noteworthy case are the false confessions made by Rudolf Hoss, which were instrumental in manufacturing the fake “Holocaust” narrative, particularly as it relates to the notorious Auschwitz concentration camp. Robert Faurisson, a leading historical revisionist and expert on the
various aspects of the official “Holocaust” narrative, wrote an essay
entitled, “How the British Obtained the Confessions of Rudolf Höss,”
published by the Institute for Historical Review. Faurisson explains: Rudolf Höss was the first of three successive commandants of Auschwitz
concentration camp. He is often called “the Commandant of Auschwitz,” and the general
public knows of him from a book published under the title Commandant in Auschwitz.
He appeared before the International Military Tribunal as a witness on 15 April 1946, where his deposition caused a sensation. To the amazement of the defendants and in
the presence of journalists from around the world, he confessed to the most frightful crimes
that history had ever known. He said that he had personally received an order from Himmler
to exterminate the Jews. He estimated that at Auschwitz 3,000,000 people had been exterminated,
2,500,000 of them by means of gas chambers. His confessions were false. They had been extorted
from Hoss by torture, but it took until 1983 to learn the identity of the torturers and the
nature of the tortures they inflicted upon him. The
confessions of Rudolf Hoss supply the keystone to the theory which maintains that systematic
extermination of the Jews, especially by means of homicidal gas chambers, was a historical reality. For the full details of Hoss’ case, including the barbaric torture
he was subjected to by British soldiers led by Bernard Clarke, a sergeant of
Jewish extraction, Faurisson’s entire article is a must read.[17] The
recently deceased Hans Krampe, a German translator, writer, and student of history
devoted to debunking the slanders leveled against his nation and people, has written one the most concise and powerful summaries of the Nuremberg Trials that I have come across. Krampe states: The Nuremberg Trials Show (sic), a grand standing, self-righteous performance launched under the label of “International Military Tribunal” (IMT) – none of its members, except for the Russians, having actually fought in the war – was a politically motivated orgy of revenge, malice, hypocrisy, humiliation and lies. The icing on the cake was the simultaneously ongoing Allied mass murder of the German populace, then very much in progress. It was a copycat Stalinist show trial, stage managed by Jewish-controlled media hacks, whose
principal contribution to the war had been the fabrication of anti-German hate propaganda throughout,
performed by mean-spirited lawyers, oozing with malice, principal among them high-ranking Soviet
war criminals; zealously assisted by largely Jewish torturers (interrogators) and sadistic murders
(executioners), often in brand new uniforms.[18] The role of the iconic
imagery associated with the “Holocaust” and alleged
“Nazi death camps” Virtually all of the iconic imagery associated with the alleged Jewish “Holocaust”
turns out to be entirely fabricated, altered, or extremely misrepresented and
taken out of context. The imagery associated with the “Holocaust” – photographs of piles of dead bodies, emaciated prisoners, Jews and other prisoners being “rounded up,” train cars filled with dead bodies, etc. – has been used to psychologically and emotionally traumatize the masses, including vulnerable school children, rendering them easily susceptible to manipulation, and facilitating the false narrative of “6 million Jews sadistically murdered by the Nazis” to be literally implanted in their minds. Horrific images such as this have been deliberately
used to psychologically exploit mass audiences. Photographic and video images depicting piles
of dead, emaciated bodies have been shown to unsuspecting audiences, inducing
psychological trauma and fear in their minds, in order to sell the false notion
that the Germans systematically murdered millions of people, particularly Jews,
in “death camps.” The fact of the matter is that while the war was ending, the German-administered labor and industrial camps were not supplied and many people did in fact perish in horrible conditions. Disease was rampant, especially typhus, and many detainees died from lack of medical care, food, and clean water. The piles of dead bodies photographed in various concentration camps throughout German-administered Europe do not prove that the Germans were systematically murdering the inmates detained there. It simply demonstrates how deceitful, brazen, and ruthless the Western and Soviet propagandists were in their efforts to demonize and slander the Germans with this type of “atrocity propaganda,” an activity they had been engaged in for decades. Additionally,
some of the iconic imagery associated with the Jewish “Holocaust” turns out to be photographs of dead German civilians murdered in Allied fire-bombing campaigns, which were then presented to the masses as “proof” of German atrocities. Again, the shameless, deceitful behavior of the Western Allies and their Soviet Communist partners knows no bounds. The iconic imagery shown repeatedly to mass audiences is never put into context. The images are simply shown, and we are expected to believe that the “Holocaust”
was a real event. The vast majority of people have never objectively investigated
the claims being made about the alleged “Holocaust” simply because
of the psychological trauma and fear induced by the imagery, in addition to the
testimony provided by “Holocaust survivors” and other “eye
witnesses to Nazi atrocities,” a topic we will explore in more detail next. The role of “Holocaust survivors” and other “eye witnesses to Nazi atrocities” Complimenting the psychologically and emotionally
exploitative “Holocaust” imagery, which as we have discussed has
either been deliberately taken out of context, misrepresented, or entirely fabricated,
the testimony of alleged “Holocaust survivors” and other “eye witnesses to Nazi atrocities” has been used to deceive the masses about this purported event. The testimony provided by alleged “Holocaust survivors” has been effectively utilized to psychologically and emotionally exploit the masses, instilling in their minds the entirely
fabricated and deceitfully manufactured narrative of “6 million Jews”
murdered at the hands of “the evil Nazis” during WWII. The courageous
historical revisionist and filmmaker Eric Hunt has done a masterful job of not
only debunking the official historiography of the alleged “Holocaust,” but also of demonstrating how entirely ridiculous and absurd much of the testimony provided by “Holocaust survivors” actually is.
In virtually all cases, the alleged “Holocaust survivors” are either
entirely fabricating or outrageously embellishing their experiences during WWII,
or they are providing testimony that actually discredits and disproves certain
aspects of the official “Holocaust” narrative (particularly as it
relates to the purported “extermination camps” in the East often
referred to as the “Aktion Reinhard death camps” or “death factories”). One particularly brazen “Holocaust survivor”
who was exposed as a liar is a man named Herman Rosenblat. In late 2008, mainstream
news outlets began exposing Rosenblat’s entirely fake “Holocaust”
story, including CNN. A December 30, 2008 CNN article reads in part: Oprah Winfrey once dubbed it the “greatest love story” she had
ever heard: a boy held at a Nazi concentration camp during World War II and a girl on the outside
who tossed him apples to keep him alive. They eventually married and grew old together.
It turns out the story of Herman and Roma Rosenblat isn’t true. The
two had told their love story for years and years, inspiring a book deal, an upcoming movie,
and stories across the globe on television, in papers and on the Internet . A children’s
book, “Angel Girl,” was also based on their love story. When the couple
appeared on “The Oprah Winfrey Show” more than a decade ago, the famed host called
it “the single greatest love story in 22 years of doing this show.” But
over the weekend, Herman Rosenblat issued a statement through his literary agent, Andrea Hurst,
acknowledging the story of how he met his wife was made up. “Why did I do
that and write the story with the girl and the apple, because I wanted to bring happiness to
people, to remind them not to hate, but to love and tolerate all people. I brought good feelings
to a lot of people, and I brought hope to many. My motivation was to make good in this world,”
he said in the statement. “In my dreams, Roma will always throw me an apple,
but I now know it is only a dream.”[19] Rosenblat would later appear
on ABC’s “Good Morning America” television news broadcast to discuss the fake story he told for years, revealing a great deal of insight into the nature of the various “Holocaust survivors” endlessly paraded in front of vulnerable school children and unsuspecting audiences around the world. Rosenblat, referring to his fake story, explained
to ABC: “It wasn’t a lie. It was my imagination, in my mind, I believed
it. Even now, I believe it, that she was there and she threw the apple to me… In
my imagination, it was true.”[20] The
aforementioned Eric Hunt’s powerful films “The Last Days of The Big Lie” and “The Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax” thoroughly expose the fraudulent
nature of many of the most prominent “Holocaust survivors” who have
been utilized to promote and perpetuate the false “Holocaust” narrative
using extremely emotionally and psychologically traumatizing testimony. [21] The
role of Jewish Hollywood and the organized international Jewish
community Since WWII, an entire industry relating to the false “Holocaust” narrative has arisen in the West. Disgusted by the outrageously brazen corruption emanating from the deceitful, unscrupulous leaders and representatives of “Holocaust survivors,” Jewish academic
Norman Finkelstein wrote a book discussing and exposing what he calls The
Holocaust Industry.[22] Organized Jewish interests and their lobbies have successfully
created an extremely lucrative financial and sympathy racket based on their
false, entirely fabricated narrative of “6 million Jews” systematically
murdered by “the evil Nazis” during WWII now known as the “Holocaust.” “At the end
of the twentieth century, the ‘Holocaust’ is being bought and sold,” wrote Tim Cole, a Professor of History specializing in the “Holocaust” at Bristol University, in his book Selling the Holocaust: From Auschwitz to Schindler, How History is Bought, Packaged and Sold. “In short, ‘Shoah [Hebrew word for
Holocaust] business’ is big business.”[23] The
“Holocaust” is indeed an industry at this point – a commodity endlessly pushed and promoted by academia, politicians, government officials, international political organizations such as the United Nations, media moguls, Hollywood producers and directors, organized Jewish groups, the Jewish state of Israel, and others connected to the “Holocaust”
racket. Hollywood
and the “entertainment” complex in the West – which is virtually entirely owned and dominated by Jews with deep ties to the Jewish state of Israel and the “Holocaust” industry – have produced countless propaganda films masquerading as objective depictions of the experiences of European Jews during WWII. These films and documentaries have served to perpetuate, reinforce, and even expand upon the false, entirely fabricated official narrative of the “Holocaust,” which has been manufactured and sold to
the public during and after WWII. There are countless “Holocaust” museums and memorials
all across the world, many of which receive official state funding and endorsement,
including the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. Not a day goes
by without a mention of the false “Holocaust” story in the mass media,
“entertainment” complex, or political establishment. This false narrative
is constantly being reinforced and perpetuated to the public on a daily basis,
often in the most crass, deceptive, and emotionally exploitative ways imaginable. The official
“Holocaust” narrative has advanced a number of important geopolitical, cultural, and economic agendas primarily benefitting international Jewry and Israel – the self-proclaimed Jewish state. These agendas include: - Elevating the alleged “suffering and persecution” of the Jewish people
- during WWII specifically, and throughout history generally, over all others;
- Covering up the crimes committed by Jewish terrorists, Communists, propagandists,
- and the Western Allies prior to, during, and after WWII by projecting those crimes
- (and even fabricating new ones) on to the German armed forces and their allies;
- Creating an extremely lucrative financial and sympathy racket, netting the Jewish state
- of Israel and the organized international Jewish community billions of dollars annually;
- Serving as the basis for the creation of the Jewish state of Israel, while excusing and
- justifying
the genocidal, illegal policies and state-sponsored terrorism the Jewish state
- has pursued
since its founding;
- Instilling a deep sense of ethnocentrism
and strong Jewish identity within the Jewish
- community, while demonizing and delegitimizing
White European ethnocentrism and identity; and
- Demonizing
the one man – Adolf Hitler – and political movement who stood up for their
- country
and race against the Talmudic forces of internationalism and globalism seeking
- the subjugation
and ultimate destruction of the White race and all genuine nationalities,
- ethnicities,
and cultures.
Writing
in Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler described the Jews as having an “unqualified capacity for falsehood,” and would go on to explain the concept of the Big Lie technique of psychological warfare and propaganda, which organized Jewry has used masterfully throughout history and to this very day, especially concerning the false “Holocaust” narrative, in order
to falsify history and psychologically exploit mass audiences: … in the big lie there is always a certain force
of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the
deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive
simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie,
since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort
to large scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths,
and they would not believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.
Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they
will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.
For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the
basest purposes.[24] Keep these profound insights
in mind the next time you are exposed to the endless barrage of “Holocaust”
propaganda emanating from Jewish Hollywood, the mass media, and the educational
and political establishment in America and around the world. The “Holocaust” in a nutshell A comment on my
blog[25] expertly explained everything you need to know about the alleged “Holocaust”
narrative of WWII – a narrative that has been weaponized specifically against
White people. The
“Holocaust” is a mammoth lie, unequaled in its deception. How is it even possible
that, by 1944, the Germans, fighting to defend their fatherland against several enemies who
were numerically superior, would have the resources to carry out a genocide of several million?
We have bombastic, ridiculous numbers of deaths shoved down our throats through every
tentacle of our Jew-owned bureaucracy, and any rational person who questions these absurd figures
is intimidated by the Jewish power structure into shutting up and going along with this gargantuan
lie or is thrown in jail. If one takes the time to read some basic facts, the Jews’ “Holocaust”
lie falls apart rather quickly. The Jews, after millennia of oppressing White peoples,
were intimidated when Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party came along, finally saying “You
Jews control Germany no more!” and sought to fabricate an enormous lie to permanently
dehumanize in the eyes of the gullible masses a movement that in reality was not a brutal satanic
mass of maniacs with a blood lust, but a movement that peaceably stood up to Jewish domination of Germany and the world. The masses have been indoctrinated for decades
about the so-called “Holocaust” by every part of our Western European and North
American Jew-owned infrastructure, public schools, colleges, on TV and the news, on film and
radio, etc. and most people are too gullible to research the other side of the story and form
a balanced opinion on the matter. Because if they did, few people would believe the sheer stupidity
of the “Holocaust” fairy tale. Perhaps
the German infantry shot a Jew or two here and there, but unfortunately in war all sides commit
crimes. There was no systematic extermination of the Jews, and let us not forget the Allies
– the “noble gods of war” as portrayed in Western propaganda – raped
almost every German women (including children) east of Berlin, and fire-bombed entire cities,
burning to death millions of innocent civilians. The Allies were the evil
ones in World War II, ruled by their Jewish masters. The Jews are the biggest liars and troublemakers in history, and let no White person ever forget that. [1] See: http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/2012/02/against-hollywoodism-revisionism.html [2] Quote taken from page 16 of the late Victor Thorn’s excellent book The Holocaust Hoax Exposed: Debunking the 20th Century’s Biggest Lie, available
from The Barnes Review.
[3] See The Leuchter Reports. Critical Edition, available from The Barnes Review. [4] See Thorn’s The Holocaust Hoax Exposed, especially part one Deconstructing Holocaust Mythology, available from The Barnes Review. [5] See: http://www.johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/evil-jew-puppet-sir-arthur-harris-i.html [6] See: https://www.britannica.com/topic/MV-Wilhelm-Gustloff [7] See James Bacque’s Other Losses: An Investigation into Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans after WWII, available
from The Barnes Review.
[8] See Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947, available from The Barnes Review. [9] A PDF version of this article is available online. See: http://barnesreview.org/pdf/TBR2012-no1-4-14.pdf [10] See Rigg’s Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers: The Untold Story of Nazi Racial Laws and Men of Jewish Descent in the German Military, available from The
Barnes Review. [11] See: https://barnesreview.org/product/the-first-holocaust-jewish-fund- raising-campaigns-with-holocaust-claims-during-and-after-world-war-one/ [12] The full article is available online. See: http://jrbooksonline.com/HTML-docs/The%20Crucifixion%20of%20Jews%20Must%20Stop.htm [13] See: https://www.nationalists.org/library/hitler/daily-express/judea-declares-war-on-germany.html [14] Untermyer’s August 1933 speech was broadcast on WABC, and was transcribed and
printed in the August 7, 1933 edition of The New York Times. The speech is available online at: http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/untermeyer.htm [15] See: http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=3562 [16] See the heroic German lawyer Sylvia Stolz’s 2012 speech in Switzerland, which ultimately resulted in her criminal prosecution in Germany for “denying the Holocaust,” available online with English subtitles here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJY5cBxmdw [17] Faurisson’s article was originally published in The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1986-87 (Vol. 7, No. 4), pp. 380-403, and is available online at: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p389_faurisson.html [18] See: Warwolves of the Iron Cross: The Union Jackal, pp. 199 particularly and Chapter 16 generally [19] See: http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/12/30/holocaust.hoax.love.story/ [20] See: http://www.abc30.com/archive/6666467 [21] Both documentary films are available online simply by searching for their titles. [22] Finkelstein’s book is available from Amazon.com. Richard Hoste wrote an excellent review of the book for Counter-Currents Publishing, which can be accessed at: https://www.counter-currents.com/2011/10/norman-finkelsteins-the-holocaust-industry/ [23] See Jonas E. Alexis’ article “The Rise and Fall of the Holocaust Industry,” which can be accessed at: https://justice4poland.com/2015/06/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-holocaust-industry/ [24] See: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/kampf.html [25] See: http://johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-holocaust-in-nutshell.html
Click on this text to view hundreds of videos exposing the HOLOCAUST LIES
Well-nourished
children – in a ‘death camp’?…
Do these JEWS look like they've been starved?…
That's not how they would have looked
like in a Jew-run Soviet
concentration camp, apart
from having been raped and sodomized, as well. Likewise, in the Jew-occupied Palestine,
their fellow Jews could have
had them killed and cannibalized
for their marketable body parts.
Whether in their guise as Judo-communists or in their latter-day incarnation as
Zionists, the last people
on earth the Jews would want
to be imprisoned by is anyone like themselves.
Mr Hitler's 1941 anti-Bolshevik Crusade
made the internment of Jews
unavoidable – clearly
necessitated by the massive recruitment of the Jews by the NKVD (KGB).
The
American FBI and the German
Gestapo had numerous identical
examples of having arrested some
Soviet spies – only to find that they've got Jews in custody. By
contrast, no such hostile
recruitment was ever evidenced in regard of the Japanese-Americans, who were interned on purely racial grounds. (And
how many of them would have
survived in the American
‘death camps’ – had the U.S. lost the war?) As far as
the Third Reich was concerned,
from 1941 on, the Jewish problem suddenly became a matter of security, rather than a racial or political matter.
For example, despite Mr Hitler's 1941 Commissar Order providing for summary executions of all terrorist suspects in a war zone, no measures of any kind were taken against the Mountain Jews of North Caucasus, as their Muslim neighbours vouched that they weren't involved with communism. And the Germans appreciated the friendly disposition on the part of the Muslims, who, of course, were glad to see the back of the Soviets
– and paid a terrible
price when the scumbags returned.
Jews partially invented the "holocaust" to distract people from
what the JEWS actually
did to the Russians/Germans/Ukrainians/Poles etc.. Instead of appearing as criminal oppressors, the JEW planners of all wars and
the real bosses controlling our countries, are
now considered "poor innocent victims" that we should never criticize.
GULAG boss Moishe Berman with his accomplices. Semi-anonymous KGB cutthroats exterminated sixty six million – and not one of those vile Judo-communist mass murderers was ever prosecuted in ‘democratized’
Russia.
Yet the Jew/KGB-suborned Russian
media gloated every time some dying ex-SS-man was being dragged through the courts by the bloodthirsty Jews
in ‘democratic’ West.
Back in
the Soviet times, KGB – this partly Jewish gang of pimps,
mass murderers and bumbling poisoners – was a mere government agency. And
became the government itself.
Offer the FREE HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE to those
who may need it: http://user1252122.sites.myregisteredsite.com/id172.html TIMELINE OF THE PROPAGANDA & LIES OF THE HOLY-COST (HOLOCAUST)!
TIMELINE OF THE PROPAGANDA & LIES OF THE HOLY-COST (HOLOCAUST)! FAKED AND FORGED HOLY-HOAX PHOTOS FOR $BILLION(S) INDUSTRY TO DISTORT HISTORY AND DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZIS & ROTHSCHILDS
CRIME MOB ATROCITIES: RED CROSS RECORDS SHOW
271,301 TOTAL PERSONS DIED IN ALL GERMAN PRISON CAMPS DURING ALL OF WW II. FAKED AND FORGED HOLY-HOAX PHOTOS
FOR $BILLION(S) INDUSTRY TO DISTORT HISTORY AND DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZIS & ROTHSCHILDS CRIME MOB ATROCITIES!
1919 CE-1921 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Americans had
a camp at Auschwitz before the Germans, following WWI the Americans set up a quarantine, disinfection and work camp at Oświęcim (Auschwitz)
in 1919 CE to combat typhus. The
American Polish Typhus Relief Expedition 1919-1921 established the camp(s) because it was less than 50 miles to Krakow, Poland and had excellent railroad connections.
Local gardens producing food at reasonable prices. From there also, the peasants refugees could be spread out over the farms in western Galicia
to help with the harvest,
thereby easing the burden that they were to the country.” The American-Poland Camp “housed some 700 children and about 2,500 prisoners.” A Red Cross
hospital was established there for refugees, some 5,000 to 6,000 persons per day and about 75% were transient military personnel. The American army
used Zyklon, once the typhus
epidemics started to arrive around 1942 CE. A 1921 CE report in the New York Times titled “New Delousing Plant” described how immigrants infected with typhus were treated
on Hoffman’s Island, New York. Their clothing was gassed with cyanide gas using their equivalent of Zyklon, while the immigrants had their
hair cut off and were put through
showers; then their clothes were returned. It was the same process in the German camps. ISRAEL 100 YEARS OF AMERICANS DYING FOR ZIONIST
GOALS = ROBBERY OF PALESTINE OVER 70 YEARS OF MASS MURDER AND OVERWHELMING
FORCE BENJAMIN FREEDMAN – DESCRIBES HOW ZIONIST FORCED USA INTO WW 1! 1919 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX —
THE BALFOUR DECLARATION, WORLD WAR ONE AND 6 MILLION JEWS — During WW I the British Government had agreed with leading Rothschilds Crime
Mob Ashkenazis that they would support
a Ashkenazi homeland in Palestine in exchange for the powerful Ashkenazi lobby in America (ROTHSCHILDS AIPAC) getting the USA into WW II. This led
to the Balfour Declaration being made by the British Government promising the Ashkenazis a homeland in Palestine. After WW I the British Government were
unable, or unwilling, to make good
on this promise. From 1919 onwards the Ashkenazis claimed 6 million Jews in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in
Palestine. This was 14 years
before the Nazis came to power and 24 years before the alleged Holocaust started. 1925 CE-1941 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — HUMAN SOAP LIES & PROPAGANDA —
“the classic lie of war propaganda” Radha Binod Pal (1886 – 1967) was a judge at the International Military Tribunal for the
Far East, the Japanese
version of the Nuremberg Witch Trials. He wrote a 700 page Dissenting Judgement of the trial which was banned in Britain and occupied-Japan. Pal made reference
to the World War I British propaganda lie that the Germans boiled down their dead to make pig food, which later morphed into them making soap. In 1925 the British Foreign Secretary admitted in Parliament,
the story was untrue, in 1941 CE, “there wasn’t a word of truth in it”, but Jews still re-hashed it in World War II. Same Ashkenazi lies about
lampshades. 1933 CE-1948 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS
— Jewish World Almanacs on Jewish Population show 1933 population of 15,315,000 Jews and show in 1948 15,753,000 Jews. 1933 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Haavara Agreement – THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT between HITLER and Zionists Negotiated to send Ashkenazis
to Palestine. 1933 CE-1934 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS
— GOEBBELS HAD A SPECIAL GERMAN COIN MINTED TO CELEBRATE ZIONISM & it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other
side. Mildenstein, SS Office for Jewish Affairs, travelled to Palestine for 6 months accompanied by Zionist officials & spent time at Kibbutz Farms. ZIONISTS THANKED GOEBBELS
FOR THE ‘RACE LAWS’ OF 1935 CE. 1935 CE:
HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germany introduced strict race separation laws and the Head of Germany’s Zionist Movement Mr Georg Kareski gave an interview said
he had been trying for years to find a method to keep the two races (Germans & Jews) separate, and he said the race laws supported the Jewish desires as the Jews had been struggling against assimilation
for nearly 2000 years. 1936 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
A growing enormous opposition to the Haavara Transfer Agreement came from powerful Jewish circles in the USA. Many of European Jews were extremely rich
and powerful and they had started to
use their influence to sabotage the Haavara Agreement. They set up armed resistance and agitator groups to fight against Hitlers idea. They also spread fabricated
‘atrocity’ propaganda about how badly Jews were being treated in Germany. This propaganda was designed to swing world opinion against
Hitlers Haavara Pact. 1938 CE-1949 CE: Mengele (1911 CE-1979 CE) spent three years with a Waffen SS unit, mostly in the East and
in Russia, where, according to SS records, he was wounded and declared medically unfit for combat. He was a German officer and physician in Auschwitz camp supposedly
to perform human experiments on prisoners. Mengele had doctorates in anthropology and medicine and
was a researcher interested in genetics. After the war Mengele sailed to Argentina in 1949 and ended up in Brazil
in 1960. The Ashkenazis were after him all that time, and supposedly he drowned after suffering a stroke while
swimming off the Brazilian coast in 1979 CE. After the war he was intercepted in his travel by British
Intelligence who were interested in Mengele’s supposed work on creating bizarre trauma for breaking
young people and creating a blank slate brain-wiped individual who could be “layered” with “alters”
(Programmed) that would robotically carry out spying or dangerous criminal activities. British thought they most needed the perfect trauma
for programming transnational robotic tools of war. But Mengele may have been a front or
victim of his own work and became a brainwashed and did as he was told – whatever he was told like smile,
chuckle, and he might have become a display or front for the British. The British Ashkenazis were so paranoid that in 1985,
amidst much hoopla, they put on a HOLY-HOAX show trial conducted to quell the MEDIA DEVELOPED
uprisings of hate against Mengele and his fellow escapes. Of course, with NO DEFENSE, he was found “guilty”
in his absence, but it was just for the cameras. The Ashkenazi Brits and Yanks didn’t want
any discussion of brainwashing, and nobody was thought able to believe it was considered so bizarre. Mengele’s
research ideas and efforts likely led to the CIA-Monarch programming program which was designed for brainwashing to
program our children’s futures. Mengele is now fully linked to “Monarch Programming”
on the internet thanks to MEDIA HYPE. 1939 CE-1944 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — British government decided in 1941 CE
that there were not enough dramatic photographs of Nazi atrocities and the BRITISH COVERT OPERATIONS (BSC) arranged for a studio in CANADA to create such photographs using actors, stage-sets,
costumes, and dummies for the manufacture of war scenes in which actors dressed up as Nazi soldiers were shown mass-murdering innocent people. These photos were widely circulated in the United States. –
Desperate Deception: British Covert Operations in the United States, 1939 CE-1944 CE. WWII UK and US PSYOPS Exposed the details of how British and
Americans set up a
fake German Concentration Camp on Staten Island to create “news reel” footage depicting “Nazi atrocities” with which to get the American public to support the war
against Germany. PURE FAKERY IN ENGLAND + CANADA + AMERICA too fake photos to demonize the Germans! And they still teach it in High School & College history classes. The American army used Zyklon for a typhus
epidemic in 1942 CE. A 1921 report in the New York Times titled “New Delousing Plant” described how immigrants infected with typhus were treated
on Hoffman’s Island, New York.
Their clothing was gassed with cyanide gas using their equivalent of Zyklon, while the immigrants had their hair cut off and were put through
showers; then their clothes were returned. It was the same process in the German camps. THE SOVIET, BRITISH, AND AMERICAN DOCUMENTARY FORGERY FACTORIES — Russian forgery experts spent most of their time
in producing material designed to delude, confound and mislead their perceived enemies, both domestic and foreign. Much of this began after the Second
World War with extensive
rewriting, editing and deliberate forgeries of German military and political documents designed to embarrass the United States and its client, as well as to
elevate the image of their own regime. One of the most ambitious Soviet productions concerned the writings of Dr. Josef Goebbels. Because handwritten
documents on the original,
special paper Goebbels used would have been nearly impossible to successfully fake, the new Soviet line was that the documents had actually been typed
and then put onto glass negatives. These were hidden by the Germans in cases where the Soviets were able to “discover” them after
the war. Having altered the Goebbels’
diaries from “several stacked folders” of handwritten material to a box of more easily forged photographs of typed manuscript, the Russians began to offer their rare,
politically incorrect material to sources in Germany for sale and publication. German experts universally rejected these productions as completely
fake.
1939 CE-1945 CE: HOLOCAUST SAD FACTS —
FAKED WAR BUILT ON LIES & PROPAGANDA ABOUT GAS CHAMBERS AND 6 MILLION GENOCIDE REFUTED BY 7,061 PAGES OF WW II ALLIED LEADERS — Churchill’s
Second WW II propaganda never mentions
Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war. Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is
a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Memoirs is
2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages there is no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’
of the Jews, or of ‘six
million’ Jewish victims of the war.”1941 CE: Stalin’s “Torch-men-Order” #0428 confirmed by
Russia – Declares that Russian
partisans in German uniforms, particularly those of the Waffen-SS, were to destroy all settlements within a swathe of about 40 – 60 km depth from the main
battle lines and to ruthlessly kill the civilian population. With these tactics it was important to leave a few survivors, which would report
the supposed German terror attacks. This method of warfare was also confirmed by German soldiers who captured many Russian partisans wearing German uniforms. 4 minute video — MSM AGGRANDIZED
THIS COWARDLY DRUNKEN WARMONGER! CHURCHILL USED TRICKS TO FORCE WW II – NOW SOROS IS! HOW CHURCHILL
TRICKED AND FAKED WW II by David Irving, Famous BRITISH Author CHURCHILL = REFUSE TO EVEN HEAR
GERMANY’S PEACE OFFER CHURCHILL = WANTED LONDON BOMBED BY THE GERMANS TO BEGIN WW
II – MOST LIKELY UNDER ORDERS FROM THE ROTHSCHILDS MAFIA! 1941 CE-1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS
— Hitler had second thoughts about setting up a Jewish Nation State and sending thousands of Jews to that State to create Jewish
forces & money to use against Germany, but the Haavara Agreement continued right on into WW II to at least 1942 CE. Hitler wanted
young and healthy Jews to work for
their food and lodgings in factories and eventually resettle in Western Russia south of Minsk until after the war finished. Arabs were so concerned by the close
co-operation between the Nazis & Zionists that they became convinced that Hitler must be a Jew who was just trying to establish a Jewish
State throughout the Middle
East. “Between January 1 1943 and March 3 1943 CE 113,015 Jews were evacuated from the Reich including Bohemia and Moravia, the new Eastern Territories
and the district of Bialystok to the East and 8,025 Jews were moved to the Ghetto for the Aged in Theresienstadt.” – The Korherr Report. 1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Auschwitz was a major work camp that had forty
different industries. The true reason
for the existence of the Auschwitz camp is as an industrial complex which surrounded the camp – most of it within full view of the interior of
the camp itself. German industry included arms factories, foundries and mines. They used the prisoners for most of the labour. The largest work camp
was Auschwitz III (Monowitz).
It started operations in May 1942 CE and was associated with the synthetic rubber and liquid fuel plant Buna-Werke owned by IG Farben. Eleven thousand laborers
worked at Monowitz. Seven thousand inmates worked at various chemical plants. Eight thousand worked in mines. Approximately 40,000 prisoners worked in labor camps at Auschwitz. Some put the number of prisoners
who worked at Auschwitz at 83,000. It is clear these prisoners worked for the German war effort in the Auschwitz prison complex. The Monowitz industrial complex was where most of Auschwitz’s inmates were put
to work in a variety of heavy industries, ranging from rubber manufacture, medical supplies, armaments and clothing. Auschwitz was the site
of Germany’s newest and
most technologically advanced synthetic rubber plant; and Germany was the world’s leader in this particular field of technology. Shortly after the First World
War the Germans were cut off from their supply of natural rubber. Auschwitz was picked because it was a railway centre. Auschwitz had a hospital next door to treat prisoners. 1942 CE-1948 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Far from being the “death camps”
as you have heard so often, places like Auschwitz, Dachau and Buchenwald were not in the business of extermination. They were work camps, critical to the German war effort. The Jewish workers were
compensated for their labor with scrip printed specifically for their use in stores, canteens and even brothels? The prisoner monetary system was conceived in ghettos such as Lodz, carried to camps such as Auschwitz
and Dachau and still existed in the displaced persons camps that were established by the Allies after World War II. Many thousands of secret German
wartime documents
dealing with Auschwitz were confiscated after the war by the Allies. But not a single one refers to a policy or program of extermination. In fact, the familiar
Auschwitz extermination story cannot be reconciled with the documentary evidence. Evidence shows those unable to work were, a very high percentage
of the Jewish inmates,
and were treated in the hospital or clinic. German telex message dated 1943 CE from the chief of the Labor Allocation department, reported that of 25,000 Jews
held in Auschwitz, only 3,581 or 14% were able to work, and that all of the remaining Jewish inmates — some 21,500, or about 86% were unable
to work. 1944 CE report on
“security measures in Auschwitz” by Oswald Pohl, head of the camp system, to Heinrich Himmler reported that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire
Auschwitz camp complex, of whom 18,000 were hospitalized or disabled and in Auschwitz II camp there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom “approximately 15,000 are unable to work.” This camp II was established
primarily as a camp for Jews who were not able to work, including the sick and elderly. A Jewish scholar Arno Mayer, a professor of history at Princeton
University, acknowledges
in his 1988 CE book about the “final solution” that more Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other “natural” causes than were
executed. Auschwitz had a Swimming Pool, Soccer Field, Post Office, Cinema, Hospital, Art Studio & Classes, Dental Office, Six Camp Orchestras,
and a Library with 45,000 books. The elegant swimming-pool at Auschwitz was built by the inmates, who would sunbathe there on Saturday and Sunday afternoons. 1944 CE there are photos showing a fencing
tournament for prisoners at Auschwitz (note the sign in the background). Postcards written from Auschwitz still exist and the postman would collect the mail twice-weekly. Auschwitz was visited monthly by International
Red Cross inspection teams who were allowed to speak to prisoner representatives alone, in order to hear first-hand of any mistreatment, chicanery, interruption of mail and parcel delivery, health concerns,
food and ration matters etc. 1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
Auschwitz Nurses and Doctors provided Medical Care and Special Treatment to Inmates in sickbays and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured.
The camp authorities, and the garrison physician Dr. Wirths, tried with all conceivable means to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive and healthy. 1943 CE-1968 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — The Office of Strategic Services (OSS)
was the CIA’s “black propaganda” branch during WW II. At its peak in late 1944, the OSS employed almost 13,000 men and women.
OSS agent and propagandist
says 6,000,000 Jews will be obliterated Wallace R. Deuel, a Chicago-born political scientist who worked at the American University in Beirut and wrote anti-German
books and advised Walt Disney on anti-German propaganda cartoons and was OSS special assistant to OSS’s director William J. Donovan. 1954 CE-1968 CE
Deuel held numerous senior positions
in the CIA in which he oversaw propaganda, and he was also the CIA representative at the White House during the Kennedy administration (close
to a future dead president). “The Nazis set out in the beginning to destroy whole peoples. They expected to obliterate from the earth not less than 6,000,000 Jews as a beginning.” Says the propagandist
Wallace R. Deuel. 1943 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
David Irving said, “As late as August 1943 the head of the (British) PWE [Psychological Warfare Executive] minuted the Cabinet secretly
that despite the stories they were putting out, there was not the slightest evidence that such contraptions (tools of genocide) existed.” This attitude
changed in 1944, when
British Intelligence finally came to believe its own atrocity propaganda, as it was recycled back to them through the chaos and fury of war. 1944 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — BRITISH MINISTRY OF INFORMATION SAID IN 1944
THAT HOLOCAUST ATROCITY
PROPAGANDA MUST BE CREATED TO DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZI USSR MASSACRES OF 66+ MILLION RUSSIANS – MOSTLY CHRISTIANS – February
29, 1944 CE letter to the BBC & higher members of the British clergy, from the British Ministry of Information ordered the propaganda buildup
against the Germans. Today, the
BBC has begun to play a major role in recycling these lies and propaganda back to their point of origin in Poland. These broadcasts in effect created a feedback
loop that repeated and gave authority to Polish rumors, which were then re-injected back into Poland. — The Gas Chambers of Sherlock Holmes by Samuel Crowell 1945 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — British Intelligence decrypted German reports
show that 39% of German prisoners were
Jews, 65% Poles and only 3% Russians. 1945 CE:
HOLOCAUST FACTS — Picture of the detainees who were left to be freed by the Soviet Army in January 1945. Again, see for yourself how healthy even
the sick looks. Many children are among 1 minute video
— JEWISH FRENCH PROFESSOR’S VIEWS ON “HOLY-COST! (sic)”
ENDS DEBATE = ONE OF THE BIGGEST
BAMBOOZLES OF ALL TIME! = TRUTH FROM WHAT ASHKENAZIS CALL A SELF-HATING ASHKENAZI ABOUT THE LIES OF THE HOLY-COST 1945 CE: HOLOCAUST FACT WITH HOAX
— Bruno Baum, a former communist inmate in Auschwitz, was allowed to brag in summer 1945 in a Soviet newspaper: “The whole propaganda
which started about Auschwitz
abroad was initiated by us [communist inmates] with the help of our Polish comrades.” (Deutsche Volkszeitung, Soviet paper in occupied East Germany, 31 July
1945). Thus, it is not surprising to learn that during several trials in Germany, it emerged that the testimony of witnesses from eastern Europe had been orchestrated by communist authorities. — THE HOLOCAUST
CONTROVERSY The Case For
Open Debate An Introduction by Germar Rudolf in 1991 CE. 1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “Of course, no physical evidence whatsoever was shown to verify the alleged homicidal gas chambers, despite knowledge of their
existence being denied by every
single defendant.” —Jason Myers, on the Nuremberg trials of 1946 CE. 1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The only thing at Auschwitz resembling a human
gas chamber was constructed in 1946 by Stalin of the Ashkenazi USSR that mass murdered 66+ million Russians, mostly Christians. 1946 CE-Today: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Not a single diagnosis of death by cyanide
poisoning is on record for any German labor camp. No trace whatever remains of the millions of bodies allegedly gassed in the German labor camps. None of the war generals after the war who wrote
their memoirs made any allusion to human gas chambers or indeed to any intention to exterminate an ethnic group. The Red Cross made normal, routine visits to Auschwitz during the war, and its published reports
made no allusion to any ongoing human gassing there. No authentic documents attesting to “The Holocaust” exist anywhere. 1946 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — Report of Council on Foreign Relations –
Funded by Rockefeller-Rothschilds Crime Syndicate — Made up their mind that no “revisionism” was to be encouraged after World
War II: “The
Committee on Studies of the Council on Foreign Relations is concerned that the debunking journalistic campaign following World War I should not be repeated and
believes that the American public deserves a clear and competent statement of our basic aims and activities during the second World War.” 1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Illegal Jewish immigrants were sprayed by British
as a precaution against typhus
carrying lice with large AMOUNTS OF ZYKLON-B USED ALSO AT THE CAMPS. 1948 CE-1949 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume “Report of the International Committee of the
Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War”. In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the German camps.
They were not allowed to interview
prisoners in the Ashkenazi run USSR (Russian) camps. The Official International Red Cross Records of WWII at Arolsen, Germany show Actual prison camp Total
Deaths at 271,301 people. The Bad Arolsen archives list everyone who lived and died in all the German labor camps. The question naturally arises
as to what is the total number recorded
in this tremendous archive. Clearly, the managers of this archive are not at liberty to tell of this or they would be jailed for so awful a crime, but we know
the FACTS! But fortunately, the Red Cross Report was a 1650 page detailed report that never mentioned a gas chamber and showed approximately 271,300
total dead for all the camps. 1950 CE:
HOLOCAUST HOAX — “…most of the memoirs and reports [of ‘Holocaust survivors’] are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic
effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…”
— Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish
Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65. 1968 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — ANTI-GERMAN HATE SPEECH shows where these motives to LIE AND SPREAD HATE PROPAGANDA are focused — “Every Jew, somewhere
in his being, should set apart a zone of hate — healthy, virile hate — for what the German personifies and for what persists in the
German. To do otherwise
would be a betrayal of the dead.” — Elie Wiesel, The Legends of Our Time 1979 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “One should not ask, how this mass
murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There
is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.” — Published in the prominent French daily Le Monde on February
21, 1979 CE. 1980 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX —
Diary of Anne Frank was totally debunked by a lawsuit in a German court. German state forensic bureau examined the original “diary” manuscript
found “significant” portions of the work were written with a ballpoint pen, but ballpoint pens were not available before 1951. They also found that none of the “diary” handwriting matched known
examples of Anne’s handwriting, but all of the writing in the “diary” was by the same hand. Therefore, the entire “diary”
was a postwar fake. The true author of the diary was Jewish novelist Meyer Levin, who demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payment for his work in a court action against Anne’s father, Otto Frank. But
even more weird is the Diary was Co-Authored by Anne Franks Father and controlled by SWISS in Basel, Switzerland. All done years after the war.
1982 CE-2001 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — “Holocaust
denial” laws are the result of a well-organized, long-term Jewish campaign. In 1982 CE, the Institute for Jewish Affairs in London, a
London-based agency of the World Jewish
Congress, announced that it was launching a worldwide campaign to persuade and pressure governments to outlaw “Holocaust denial.” The
anti-revisionist laws that were subsequently enacted in several European countries reflect the success of this initiative. Germany enacted
its “Holocaust denial” statute in 1985 CE (amended in 1994 CE), France in 1990 CE, Austria in 1992 CE, Belgium in 1995 CE, and Slovakia in 2001 CE. Underscoring the organized nature of this campaign,
the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists in June 1998 CE called for new and more severe laws against “Holocaust denial.” 1991 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf (1964 CE-Today) is an author
and chemist who was amazingly convicted of the SILLY CHARGE of Holocaust denier. After his military service with the German Air Force, in 1990 CE he joined the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
at Stuttgart, where he prepared a PhD thesis. In 1991 CE, Rudolf began work on a paper entitled Report on the formation and verifiability of cyanide compounds in the Auschwitz “gas chambers” and in
1993 CE, this work was reported in the media, and Rudolf was told not to enter the Max Planck Institute again without permission. When he did so,
his employment was terminated
without notice. OTHER VICTIMS OF HOLY-COST INSANITY include Ernst Zundel, Sylvia Stolz and Vincent Reynouard. 1985 CE and 1988 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Zundel Trials, a famous court
trial with expert witness Raul Hilberg
was at a loss when asked: “Can you give me one scientific report that shows the existence of gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory?” —
Zundel’s Defense counsel Doug Christie asked Hilberg in a day-long rapid fire of cross-examination. “I am at a loss,” Hilberg replied.
“You are (at a loss) because you can’t,” Christie said. “The witness countered that there are aerial photographs of concentration
camps, examples of
ruined or reconstructed gas chambers, German industrial documents describing the lethal nature of various gases and filters for gas masks were found at the
camps.” During this trial, not a single eyewitness for the plaintiff could be found. Zundel won and they finally stopped harassing him. Ernst Zundel, a Canadian, was denied
entry into the United States and his story is an example of the HOAX EXPOSED
COMPLETELY. $80 BILLION to $100 BILLION “HOLY-COST” SCAM SINCE WW II AND EVEN BACK TO 1915 OR BEFORE! TIME TO GET
THE FACTS OUT AND END THE LIES AND SCAMS! 1995 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS —
Germar Rudolf was sentenced to 14 months in prison for “inciting racial hatred” (TELLING THE TRUTH) by the district court of Stuttgart because
of his dissertation research now known as the “Rudolf Report”. Rudolf avoided prison by fleeing to Spain, England, and finally to the United States. All the while, criminal investigations
continued in Germany. 1995 CE: KABALISTIC ORIGINS OF
THE SIX MILLION FIGURE — Ben Weintraub’s book, Holocaust Dogma Of Judaism, fully explores and explains the Kabalistic occultism
involved in the number. 6,000,000 as the number of perfect souls times ten, and ten is number of the Sephiroth, the divine emanations of G_d as seen in the Kabala.
The 6 million number was published
over and over in newspaper as revealed by Ashkenazi Friedman from 1916 CE-Today! 1996 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — University of Stuttgart asked Rudolf to withdraw
his application for a final PhD examination, or it would be denied, rendering his PhD thesis worthless. The university said Rudolf used his academic credentials or knowledge to commit a crime –
Meaning facts about “HOLY-COST!” Rudolf knew his work would be associated with Holocaust denial, but stated that his findings at Auschwitz
and Birkenau “completely
shattered his world view” when he found only insignificant traces of cyanide compounds can be found in the samples taken from Auschwitz. 1996 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “It is necessary to recognize that
the lack of traces involves the inability to directly establish the reality of the existence of homicidal gas chambers.” — French ‘historian’ Jacques Baynac, Le Nouveau Quotidien
(Lausanne, Switzerland), Sept. 3, 1996 CE, p. 14. 1997 CE-2013 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf began to publish books on Holocaust CHEMICAL FACTS and founded Castle Hill Publishers in 1997 based in Hastings,
England and was linked to Theses & Dissertations Press as its American outlet. In 2000, Rudolf initiated an English language Holocaust Handbooks
Series which, as of 2013, encompassed
25 titles. Until his arrest in late 2005, he published the now defunct “Quarterly journal for free historical research.” 2000 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “Care must be taken not to give a
platform for deniers… or seek to disprove the deniers’ position through normal historical debate and rational argument.” — ‘Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust’
at the Stockholm International Forum, 2000 CE. 2003 CE:
HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Holocaust story has served to create a highly profitable business for large numbers of Jews, something which the honest Jewish
professor Norman Finkelstein described as the “Holocaust Industry” in his book of the same name (The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, Verso Books, 2003). The “Holocaust”
served (and still serves) well in justifying the Zionist seizure of Palestine. Any criticism of the overt human rights violations and atrocities committed by the state of Israel against the Palestinians
is dismissed as “anti- Semitism.” THE OUTRIGHT EMBARRASSMENT OF ISRAELIS AND THEIR EVIL IS TOSSED BACK AT THEM BY NORMAN FINKELSTEIN, A BRAVE AND HONEST LEADER! 2004 CE-2010 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS
— Germar Rudolf, THE TRUTH TELLER, in district court of Mannheim grabbed Rudolf’s bank account to rob 55% of Rudolf’s business turnover
from the years 2001-2004, but at that time the account contained only some €5,000. Rudolf and his associates had earned this money by selling TRUTH TELLING publications banned in Germany, but
Rudolf’s business was in the UK and the US. In 2004, Rudolf married a US citizen and settled in Chicago, and they later had a child.
For some reason he had to apply
for political asylum, or at least for the right not to be expelled, but this was turned down. In 2005 Immigration Services said that Rudolf did not have
a right to stay with his family and was extradited to Germany and on arrival was arrested by the police and transferred to a prison in Rottenburg,
then to another in Stuttgart
in Baden-Württemberg. In 2007, the German Court sentenced him to two years and six months in prison for TELLING THE TRUTH or as the court put it “inciting
hatred, disparaging the dead, and libel.” The German police confiscated copies of his “Lectures on the Holocaust” and destroyed. In
2009 the TRUTH TELLER Rudolf
was released from prison and now lives in the US with his wife and daughter. 2007 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief
even in people who know very little about it. We can see that not only does disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern Jewish identity
as shaped by political Zionism, but
for others it brings into question the credibility of those in authority who told everyone it was true: the state, the churches, the schools,
and media of every kind. These sources are the same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If these trusted authorities are wrong about the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other
dishonesties are they promoting?”
2015 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The
rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism
is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.” – Robert Faurisson, The revisionists’ total victory on the historical
and scientific level – click link: 2016 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “If the Holocaust were
unimportant, we wouldn’t have around 20 countries on this planet outlawing its critical investigation. In fact, this is the only historical topic
that is regulated by penal law. This
is proof for the fact that the powers that be consider this topic to be the most important issue to keep under their strict control. Those censoring, suppressing
powers are the real criminals—not the historical dissidents they send to prison.” – Germar Rudolf, Logic and Reason Can and Will
Destroy the Holocaust Establishment,
2016 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The
rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism
is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.” – Robert Faurisson. When we ask detailed and pointed questions, our
historians fall short.
They don’t really know when, where, or how the Jews died. They have no technical explanation of how it was possible. They cannot find the mass graves that allegedly
held thousands of bodies. And they refuse to even consider a raft of contradictory evidence. The ‘Holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily
debunked narratives ever contrived.
That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted and even put in prison. Truth needs no protection from scrutiny, but lies do. 2017 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The three victor nations, Russia, America
and Britain, collaborated together at Nuremberg to fabricate the horrorillusion, which would enable the US/UK to gain the post-war moral high ground, even after incinerating the German cities with two
million tons of bombs. People were loath to believe that such a thing could have happened – until maybe after Iraq, when we saw how British-American intelligence had fabricated the Weapons of Mass Destruction
(WMD) lie without a tremor of conscience. Only then, I suggest, does it start to dawn upon the world that the notion of big human gas chambers was the original WMD hoax.” – Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom
Breaking the Spell — The Holocaust, Myth & Reality. Today CE: ASHKEANAZI FACTS — We know Ashkenazis are the Masters of Make-Believe to make the world believe in Death Camps. They now infest Hollywood with the
fakery and lies continually spewing out falsehoods to gain sympathy for a group of ROTHSCHILDS CRIME SYNDICATE CRIMINALS attacking Americans
and Europeans with their propaganda
and outright lies. Today’s Hollywood Ashkenazis are the heirs of the original crop of wartime Hollywood producers and directors
who were called into service by the U.S. Army to “document” (PROPAGANDIZE) the concentration camps. _________________________________________________
HOLOHOAX
TRICK: WESTERN LABOR CAMPS vs EASTERN DEATH CAMPS For the past 20 years or so, it has been fun to watch how
the ever-evolving field of "Holocaust Studies" adjusts to new discoveries which contradict the original narrative. For example, when it became
apparent that there wasn't actually any documentation to support
the Holohoax, the Holohoaxers abandoned
their 50 year old mantra of "It's well documented!", and seamlessly transitioned to: "The Germans destroyed the documents" mode. Another addition to Holocaustianity
is the distinction that is now made between "work camps" and "extermination camps." You
see, as pathetic and self-abasing as modern day German guilt-trippers are, they still aren't going to say that a certain German-based camp, Dachau
for example, had homicidal gas chambers when it didn't; or
that "millions" died there when they didn't. The fact that the West, in spite of its intellectual tyranny, was still much more open and free that the old Soviet bloc, began to complicate things for the Holohoaxers. For that reason, all of internment camps which were located in the West are now described as "work camps"
whereas seven of those located
in Poland and Ukraine have been classified as "extermination camps." The chart below was copied from 'The
Jewish Virtual Library " -- which pulled the information from
the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Notice where the seven "annihilation camps" (in
red) are said to have been located:
Auschwitz-Birkenau | Poland |
Annihilation;
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Belzec |
Poland |
Annihilation |
| |
|
Bergen-Belsen |
Germany |
Holding Center |
| |
|
Buchenwald |
Germany |
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Chelmno |
Poland |
Annihilation |
| |
|
Dachau |
Germany |
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Dora-Mittelbau |
Germany |
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Flossenburg |
Germany |
Forced Labor | |
| |
Gross-Rosen |
Poland |
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Janowska |
Ukraine |
Annihilation;
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Kaiserwald |
Latvia |
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Majdanek |
Poland |
Annihilation |
| |
|
Mauthausen |
Austria |
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Natzweiler-Struthof |
France |
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Neuengamme |
Germany |
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Oranienburg |
Germany |
Holding Center |
| |
|
Plaszow |
Poland |
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Ravensbruck |
Germany |
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Sachsenhausen |
Germany |
Forced Labor | |
| |
Sobibor |
Poland |
Annihilation |
| |
|
Stutthof |
Poland |
Forced Labor |
| |
|
Terezin
| Czech Republic |
Holding Center/Transit |
| |
|
Treblinka | Poland | Annihilation |
| |
|
Westerbork |
Netherlands |
Transit |
| |
| You
see that? Six of the "annihilation camps" were based in Poland, one in Ukraine; but zero
in either of the western states Germany, France or the Netherlands.
That's a very weird "anomaly."
Why the east-west divide between "work" and "extermination"? It's elementary
dear reader, elementary. If you know anything at all about World War II and the subsequent birth of "The Iron Curtain", you know that no western researchers, no aid workers, no religious groups, no Red Cross volunteers, no human
rights activists, no investigative researchers and no do-gooders of any stripe ever got a chance to
poke around in Joe Stalin's Communist post-war front yard of Poland or Ukraine. Therein lies the rub! Hence,
the Holohoaxers, both then and now, can make any claim
they want to in regard to what took place in the
air-tight closed east. In 1945, it was essential for the Holohoaxers to keep the "annihilation
camps" mainly in Stalin's Poland & Ukraine.
Seventy years later, it is essential the Holohoaxers
to keep the "annihilation camps" completely in Poland & Ukraine. By
now, the Stalinist tales of "gas chambers" and "millions dead" have become ossified. The modern-day Poles and Russians have no interest in rocking this leaky boat because theyweren't the ones falsely accused. The Bottom Line: Belief in the purely eastern-front "extermination" Holohoax necessarily requires blind faith in the press releases of Joe Stalin and his propaganda henchmen, as well as claims about the eastern camps which could never be verified! "We would never lie to you. Trust us." ___________________________________________________________________
Click on this text to watch HOLOCAUST: Shifting the Blame, Part 1, Jews for Hitler...
. .
View the REAL PLAN for a massive HOLOCAUST perpetrated by JEWS titled EUROPA THE LAST BATTLE (Part 5)...
_______________________________________________________________________________________ . Concentration
Camp Money 'Lagergeld'
used to Pay Prisoners for Their Work Article from
The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 7-9. The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C. 20003, USA.
By Jennifer White, administrative director of TBR; Far from being the "death
camps" as you have heard so often, places like Auschwitz,
Dachau and Buchenwald were not in the business of extermination. They were work camps, critical to the German war effort. But did you know that the Jewish workers were compensated for their labor with scrip printed specifically for their use in stores, canteens and even brothels? The prisoner monetary system was conceived in ghettos such as Lodz, carried to camps such as Auschwitz and Dachau and still existed in the displaced persons camps that were established by the Allies after World War II. Here is the story of the money the court historians do not
want you to even suspect existed. Piles of incinerated corpses were indicting images at Nuremberg,
used to prove that the German-run concentration camps during World War II were
intended for purposes of exterminating the Jews of Europe. However, a plethora
of documentary evidence, long suppressed, shows that prisoners were relatively
well-treated, compensated for their hard work and allowed to purchase luxuries
to which even the German public did not have ready access. This is not the image
of abject deprivation that the Holocaust lobby would like you to entertain. The
irrefutable proof is the existence of a means of exchange for goods and services: Money.
There were at least 134 separate issues, in different denominations and styles, for
such notorious places as Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Dachau, Oranienburg, Ravensbrück, Westerbork and at least 15 other camps. (See Paper Money of the World Part I: Modern Issues of Europe by Arnold Keller, Ph.D., 1956, pp. 23-25 for a complete listing.) A monetary system was also in existence in the ghettos, most
notably Theresienstadt and Lodz, which produced beautiful notes (veritable works
of art) that make U.S. currency look dull. There
are numerous dealers in rare currency and numismatics who specialize in selling
"concentration camp money" or "Holocaust money" as it has been sometimes called. But the very fact of its existence does not seem to have raised questions - as it should have - about what really did (and did not) happen inside the so-called "death
camps" where the Holocaust scrip was circulating in the first place. This scrip was not negotiable outside of the camp for which it was issued. This decreased the chance of a successful escape and made it impossible for the general public to purchase some of the rare luxuries available in the camps. According to Albert Pick in Das Lagergeld der Konzentrations- und D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945: Inmates were not paid for the work but were given "coupons" now
and then to buy things in the "Kantine".... As the war progressed badly and the number of
workers declined, the KZ worker potential became important. Offers of "premiums" and other advantages
were made to the inmates, tobacco was offered and even visits to bordellos.... In order that these scrips could
not be used outside the camps, special money was printed.
Letter from Prisoner No. 11647 Block 28/3 Dachau KIII on September
8, 1940 to his relative in Litzmannstadt (Lodz): I must write you something about myself. I am very well. In the canteen I buy
honey, marmalade,
cookies, fruit and other food. If you worry about me, you'll indeed be committing a sin. I have more reason to worry
about you.... (Letters from the Doomed: Concentration Camp Correspondence 1940-1945, Richard
S. Geehr.)
There was a payment schedule at Theresienstadt
utilizing Th. kr. (Theresienstadt kroner) as the unit of exchange. (The Shekel
Vol. XVI, No. 2, March-April 1983 p. 29). The breakdown looked like this: Working men, according to their jobs: 105-205 Th. kr. Working women, according
to their jobs: 95-205 Th. kr. Part-time workers: 80 Th. kr. Caretakers: 70 Th. kr. War-wounded and holders
of the Iron Cross, First Class degree or higher: 195 Th. kr. Prominente (doctors, professors,
scientists, well-known cultural artists and politicians): 145 Th. kr.
To put this in perspective, a cup of coffee cost 2 Th. kr. The circulation in Theresienstadt
was such that it was necessary to print over 5 million notes. See Papirove
Penize Na Uzemi Ceskoslovenska 1762-1975, Second Edition, 1975,
Hradek Kralove, trans. by Julius Sem, pp. 134-135.
The first worker's camp to have its own scrip was Oranienburg. Before using the camp scrip they used German currency in nearby towns, but the authorities decided to centralize. Currency was exchanged for camp money, less 30%. (The Shekel, Vol XVI, No. 2, March-April 1983, p. 40: "Concentration Camp Money of the Nazi Holocaust" by Steven Feller.) Similarly at Buchenwald: Each prisoner was allowed
up to 10 marks per week to be used for the purchase of cigarettes at the camp canteen, other canteen purchases,
brothel visits, or credit to a savings account. The regulations went on to specify that a visit to a brothel
would cost 2 marks for which 1.5 marks would be kept by the SS and 0.5 marks would be used for "expenses."
(Ibid., p. 41.)
Was there a similar situation
at all of the other camps - at least those that issued currency? As this includes
Auschwitz, it would be shocking indeed to even consider marmalade and cigarettes
being purchased in this "death camp." Even the existence of money in camps gives us a look at what life was really like there, yet this information has yet to make it to the History Channel.
Bibliography: American Israel Numismatic Association
(Temarac, Florida). Pick, Albert. Das Lagergeld der Konzentrations- und
D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945, Munich, Battenberg Publishers, 1976. Schöne,
Michael H., Das Papiergeld im besetzten Deutschland 1945-1949, Regenstauf: Gietl, 1994. Stahl, Zvi, Jewish Ghettos and Concentration Camps' Money, 1933-1945, London: D. Richman Books, 1990.
See also:
Campbell, Lance K., Dachau concentration camp scrip, Margate, Florida: American Israel Numismatic
Association, 1992. The Numismatist, April 1981, by Steven Feller. Numismatic Scrapbook Magazine, 1965, 1996, "POW Money and Medals" by Slabaugh,
R. Arlie. Schultze, Manfred, Unsere Arbeit - unsere Hoffnung: Das Ghetto
in Lodz 1940-1945, Schwalmtal: Phil-Creativ, 1995. Sem, Julius, Standard
Catalog of World Paper Money, 1977 (Theresienstadt notes). Shtarot,
Vol. I, No. 2, Oct. 1976. Yasha L. Beresiner. ___________________________________________________________________
Click on this text to watch a six minute video titled: Hard Facts Of The Holocaust Lies...
. .
Click on this text to examine the enhanced HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE...
___________________________________________________________________________
“New Pages” of Anne Frank Diary Prove that Her Father Wrote Most of the Book Two “newly
discovered” pages from the “Diary of Anne Frank” — which supposedly
contain risqué jokes — are in fact further proof that the book attributed to the Jewish teenager was in fact written by her father — because the “hidden” writing is, like most of the rest of the “diary,” in her father Otto Frank’s handwriting. (The New Observer) The “newly-discovered” pages were announced
at a press conference at the “Anne Frank House” museum in Amsterdam, where researchers
apparently were able to remove two brown paper pasted pages and “read” the obscured
writing underneath using lamps and optical character recognition technology. The compliant Jewish lobby controlled media focused all its attention on the contents
of the “new pages,” but ignored the obvious fact of the difference in handwriting
styles on the new pages, with the “new material” all in her father’s handwriting,
which contrasts obviously and strongly with the juvenile scrawl of Anne herself. In fact, as revealed in 2015, most of the diary was written by her father after the war, and who then passed it off as “real” in order to sell it as a “holocaust memoir.” The scam was revealed in an article in the New York Times that year, when the copyright
holders to the diary admitted Otto Frank’s involvement in an attempt to extend their control of the manuscript. As the New York Times pointed out, when “Otto Frank first published his daughter’s red-checked diary and notebooks, he wrote a prologue assuring readers that the book mostly contained her words, written while hiding from the Nazis in a secret annex of a factory in Amsterdam.” Normal copyright on books extends only 70 years after the author’s death. As Anne
Frank died of typhus in Bergen Belsen in February 1945, the book theoretically entered the public domain in February 2015. But, as the New York Times went on to say, the Anne Frank Fonds has now decided to try to extend copyright on the book past the 70 year cut-off period—by admitting
that Otto Frank, who died in 1980, was indeed a “co-author” after all.
The implications of this admission are obvious. As the New York Times put it: While the foundation, the Anne Frank Fonds, in Basel, signaled
its intentions a year ago, warnings about the change have provoked
a furor as the deadline approaches. Some people opposed to the move
have declared that they would defy the foundation and publish portions
of her text. Foundation officials “should think very carefully about the consequences,” said Agnès Tricoire,
a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights
in France, where critics have been the most vociferous and are organizing
a challenge. “If you follow their arguments, it means that
they have lied for years about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank.” The latest pages confirm once again that much of what is claimed
to be “Anne Frank’s diary” was in fact written by her father after the war—a
fact which also explains the use of ball point pen in the “diary,” a writing device
which only became available after 1945.
Click on this text to examine the Anne Frank Fraud.
_______________________________________________________________________________________ The Secular Religion of the 'HOLOCAUST' The
religion of "the Holocaust" is a secular one: it belongs to the lay world; it is profane;
in actuality, it has at its disposal the secular arm, that is
a temporal authority with dreaded power.
It has its dogma, its commandments, its decrees, its prophets and its high priests. As one revisionist has observed, it has its circle of saints, male and female, amongst whom,
for example, Saint Anne (Frank), Saint
Simon (Wiesenthal) and Saint Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy places, its rituals and its pilgrimages. It has its sacred (and macabre) buildings and its relics
... _________________________________________________________________________________________
Click on this text to meet URSULA HAVERBECK who will spend her 91st Birthday in a German prison for questioning the holocaust
fraud.
Click on this text to examine PEOPLE EXPOSING THE HOLOCAUST LIES...
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Click on this text to watch JIM RIZOLI - HOLO-FACTS
. .
Click on this text to examine an actual holocaust perpetrated by JEWS upon the Ukrainians.
______________________________________ Allied Attacks Killed Thousands
of Camp Inmates: The 1945 'Cap Arcona' and 'Thielbek' Sinkings All
prisoners of German wartime concentration camps who perished while in German custody
are routinely regarded as "victims of Nazism" -- even if they lost their
lives as direct or indirect result of
Allied policy ... Among the German concentration camp prisoners who perished at Allied hands were some 7,000 inmates who were killed during the war's final week
as they were being evacuated in three
large German ships that were attacked by British war planes. This little-known tragedy is one of history's greatest maritime disasters.
____________________________________________________
Auschwitz Chemistry: How Science Proves The ‘Final Solution’ Was
Systematically Gassing Lice Infested Clothing To Save Lives Above:
“Gassing Clothing”. Left: Healthy inmates at work sterilizing clothing. Right: Healthy prisoners at Auschwitz
working in oneof the larger clothing disinfestation chambers in the camp. Above: The Auschwitz camp employed
a number of delousing stations, which used steam and Zyklon-B to kill lice in
prisoner clothing. This picture shows autoclave number 2, seen from the “dirty” clothing side. Infected clothing
was put on hangers attached to a trolley and pushed inside the chamber.
Dirty clothes were put on hangers on a trolley which was pushed into
the chamber on two short rails. The disinfection stations were constructed with double doors so that the infected and cleaned clothes would not be mixed together. This picture was taken while
the camp was operational. Source: Peter Winter, Chapter 10- Auschwitz Source: https://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com/ The Chemistry of Auschwitz/Birkenau Defenders of the Holocaust story have attempted to discredit scientific
reports which disprove the existence of homicidal gas chambers at German camps
during World War II. For example, Deborah Lipstadt’s defense attorney, Richard Rampton, referred in court to The Leuchter Report as “…a piece of so-called research which
is not worth the paper it is written on…”[1] Dr. Richard Green states about
Germar Rudolf: Owing
to the fact that he actually has some understanding of chemistry, many of his deceptions are more sophisticated than other Holocaust deniers…Ultimately, he engages in the same deceptions and specious arguments as [Fred]
Leuchter and [Walter] Lüftl , but the case he makes for those deceptions and arguments
involves more difficult chemistry.”[2]
This article will discuss
attempts by chemists to discredit scientific reports which disprove the existence
of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau during World War II.
Historical Background
In 1988, the Canadian government put Ernst Zündel on trial a second time for
the criminal offense of knowingly disseminating false news about “the Holocaust.”
As part of his defense in this trial, Zündel commissioned the American gas-chamber expert Fred Leuchter to make a scientific examination of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau
and Majdanek. The resulting Leuchter Report is the first scientific
study of the alleged German homicidal gas chambers.[3] In addition to reporting that
the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek were structurally unsuitable for gassing, Leuchter researched the chemical properties of the Zyklon B fumigant. Leuchter found that
Zyklon B is a highly toxic compound that releases deadly hydrogen cyanide gas.
The released hydrogen cyanide gas clings to surfaces and reacts chemically
with materials containing iron, forming ferrocyanide compounds that have a distinctive blue color called Prussian Blue. Since building materials normally contain a certain amount of rust (iron oxide, usually
between one and four percent), repeated exposure to hydrogen cyanide gas would
result in Prussian Blue staining on the walls of the alleged gas chambers.[4] Leuchter took forensic samples
from the alleged gas chambers at the visited sites and a control sample from the delousing facility at Birkenau. The samples were analyzed by an independent laboratory in the United States. The laboratory
found no significant ferrocyanide compound traces in the samples taken from the
alleged homicidal gas chambers, but the sample from a wall of the Birkenau delousing
facility had heavy concentrations of the ferrocyanide compounds. Leuchter concluded
that this result would be impossible if the alleged homicidal gas chambers had been repeatedly exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas.[5] Germar Rudolf, a certified
chemist, expanded on Leuchter’s work by writing the Rudolf Report in the spring of 1992. The Rudolf Report, which has been updated and revised several times, focused
on engineering and chemical aspects of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at
Auschwitz and Birkenau. Rudolf observed in his on-site examinations that all
of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof and Majdanek have one thing in common: their walls are permeated
with Prussian Blue. Not only the inner surfaces, but also the outside walls
and the mortar between the bricks of the delousing facilities have Prussian Blue
staining. Nothing of this sort can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers
at Auschwitz and Birkenau. Rudolf
also took samples from the alleged homicidal gas chambers and the delousing facilities at Auschwitz and Birkenau. Similar to Leuchter’s samples, the alleged homicidal gas chambers exhibit only insignificant
traces of ferrocyanide residue on the same order of magnitude found in any other
building. The samples from the delousing chambers, however, all showed very high
ferrocyanide residues. Rudolf determined that, if mass execution gassings with hydrocyanic acid had taken place in the alleged homicidal gas chambers, the rooms in the alleged homicidal gas chambers would exhibit
similar ferrocyanide residue as the delousing chambers. Therefore, Rudolf concluded
that mass gassings with Zyklon B did not occur in the alleged homicidal gas
chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau.[6] Kraków Institute of Forensic Research The Kraków Institute of Forensic Research published results in 1994
that attempted to refute the Leuchter Report. The team from this
forensic institute led by Dr. Jan Markiewicz claims not to have understood how it was possible for Prussian Blue to have formed in walls as a result of their being exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas. The researchers
therefore excluded Prussian Blue and similar iron cyanide compounds from their
analyses, resulting in much lower cyanide traces for the delousing chambers.
Their analysis made it practically impossible to distinguish between rooms massively exposed to hydrogen cyanide and those which were not: all would have a cyanide residue of close to zero. The Kraków
researchers concluded from their analysis that since the gas chambers and delousing
facilities all had the same amount of cyanide residues, humans were gassed in
the gas chambers. Germar Rudolf
gave the Kraków researchers irrefutable proof that Prussian Blue can be formed in walls exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas, citing a case document in expert literature.[7] The authors of the Kraków report refused to change their report and
admit they made a mistake. Rudolf writes: The only ‘scientific’ attempt to refute Frederick A. Leuchter’s most intriguing thesis turns out
to be one of the biggest scientific frauds of the 20th century. How desperate must they be—those
who try to defend the established version of the Holocaust, i.e., the alleged systematic extermination
of Jews in homicidal ‘gas chambers’, that they resort to such obviously fraudulent
methods?”[8]
British science historian
Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom also refuted the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report, as succinctly summarized by the retired professor of the philosophy of science Dr. James H. Fetzer: When the Auschwitz museum
was confronted with the fact that the innocuous delousing chambers at Auschwitz have
blue walls–due to being saturated with blue iron cyanide compounds–but the alleged homicidal gas chambers have not, they commissioned their own chemical research. Instead of testing wall samples for the
chemicals that had caused the blue stains, the researchers they commissioned simply excluded those
chemicals from their analysis by employing a procedure that could not detect them. They justified
this measure with the claim that they did not understand exactly how these compounds could form
and that they might therefore be mere artifacts. Researchers who don’t understand what
they are investigating have no business becoming involved. In this case, however, it appears
to be deliberate. They have deliberately ignored an obvious explanation–that Zyklon B was only
used for delousing–which would have remedied their lack of comprehension. As a result of this failure to adhere to the principles of science, they produced a report of no scientific value, which they used to arrive at
a predetermined conclusion.[9]
Dr. Arthur Robert Butz
writes in regard to the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report:
The argument, to the extent that it was intelligible enough to be
summarized at all, was that they did not understand how the iron-cyanide compounds got to be
there, so they decided to ignore them in reaching their conclusions. I don’t understand
how the moon got there, so I will ignore all effects associated with it, such as tides. I hope I don’t drown.”[10]
Read Previous Article: Wear’s War Movie Review: “Mr Death” An Epic Propaganda Stuff Up & The Jewish Panic To Remedy It Dr. James Roth Dr. James Roth testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he received
samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity as an Analytical Chemist at Alpha
Analytical Laboratories. The purpose of the tests was to determine the total iron and cyanide content in the samples. Dr. Roth testified that the Prussian Blue produced by a reaction of the iron and hydrogen cyanide could penetrate deeply in porous materials such as brick and iron.[11] Dr. Roth later changed his
testimony in a documentary movie titled Mr. Deathproduced by Errol
Morris. Dr. Roth states in this movie: Cyanide is a surface reaction. It’s probably not going to penetrate more than 10 microns. Human hair is 100
microns in diameter. Crush this sample up, I have just diluted that sample 10,000; 100,000
times. If you’re going to go looking for it, you’re going to look on the surface
only. There’s no reason to go deep, because it’s not going to be there.[12]
Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom
writes that Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death are wrong: The 1999 film about Leuchter features an interview with
the chemist [Dr. James Roth] who had done the analysis of his wall-samples back in 1988. He
had done this “blind,” i.e. with no knowledge of where they had come from, which
was correct scientific procedure. During the second Zündel trial in Toronto in 1988 he testified under oath concerning the method used and what Leuchter had sent him. He said back then that hydrogen cyanide can easily penetrate into brick and mortar. But then, when he was interviewed again by Morris for his documentary, he suddenly stated that the results were quite meaningless, because the cyanide could only have soaked a few microns into the brickwork. Wow, that was quite a whopper. Mortar and brickwork are highly porous to hydrogen cyanide,
obviously so because the delousing chambers were more or less equally blue inside and out, it
had soaked right through. But you can watch him on video explaining this, as if he were confusing
brick and mortar with rock. The latter will only absorb cyanide to a few microns of its surface.[13]
Germar Rudolf writes in
regard to Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death: “It can
be shown that Prof. Dr. James Roth is wrong for the following reasons:
- It is a fact that the walls of the disinfestation chambers in Auschwitz,
Birkenau, Stutthof, and Majdanek are saturated
- with cyanide compounds, and this not only
superficially, but into the depth of the masonry, as I have demonstrated
- by taking samples
from different depths of the wall. Compare in this regard my mortar and plaster Sample Pairs
- 9
& 11, 12 & 13, 19a & b…, which were each taken at the same spot but at different depths, as well as Sample
17,
- taken from below the overlying lime plaster (which is thus similar to 19b). These
values prove that hydrogen cyanide
- can rather easily reach deep layers of plaster and
mortar. But even the other samples taken from the surface prove
- that Prof. Roth’s
allegation is wrong: Provided that most of the cyanide detectable today is present in the form of
- iron
cyanide (Iron Blue and other cyanoferrates), as Prof. Roth assumes himself, his thesis would mean that 10% to
- 75% of the iron content of these samples are located in the upper 10 micrometers thin layer of the samples (0.010
mm),
- i.e., they are located in less than 1% of the entire sample mass. The
rest of the samples, however, would have been
- massively deprived of iron. How this migration
of a major portion of iron to a thin surface
- layer would have happened is inexplicable
to me. Fact is that this simply could not happen.
- Furthermore,
expert literature is detailed about the following:
- Hydrogen cyanide is an extremely mobile chemical compound with physical properties comparable to water…
- Water vapor can quite easily penetrate masonry material, and thus also hydrogen
cyanide…
- Hydrogen cyanide can easily penetrate thick,
porous layers like walls…
- In addition,
it is generally known that cement and lime mortar are highly porous materials, comparable for instance
- to sponges. In such materials, there does not exist anything like a defined layer of 0.01 mm beyond which
hydrogen
- cyanide could not diffuse, as there can also be no reason, why water could
not penetrate a sponge deeper than a millimeter.
- Steam, for example, which behaves physically
comparable to hydrogen cyanide, can very easily penetrate walls.
- Finally, the massive discolorations of the outside of the walls of the disinfestation chambers
in Birkenau and Stutthof,
- as shown in this expert report, are clearly visible and conclusive
evidence for the fact of
- how easily hydrogen cyanide and its soluble derivatives can
and do penetrate such walls.
As a professor of analytical chemistry, Prof. Roth must know this, so one can only wonder why he spreads such outrageous nonsense. That Prof. Roth is indeed a competent chemist can be seen from what he said during
his testimony under oath as an expert witness during the above mentioned Zündel
trial..: ‘In porous materials such as brick or mortar, the Prussian blue [hydrogen cyanide] could go fairly deep as long as the surface stayed open, but as the Prussian blue formed, it was possible that it would seal the porous material and stop the penetration.’ …It is also revealing that Prof. Roth
mentioned during this interview that, if he had known where Leuchter’s samples originated
from, his analytical results would have been different. Does that mean that Prof. Roth manipulates his result according to whether or not he likes the origin of certain samples? Such an attitude is exactly
the reason why one should never tell an ‘independent’ laboratory
about the origin of the samples to be analyzed, simply because ‘independence’ is a very flexible term when it comes to controversial topics. What Prof. Dr. Roth has demonstrated here is only his lack of professional honesty.”[14] Dr. Richard Green
Dr. Richard Green, who has a Ph.D. in Chemistry from Stanford University, agrees
with Germar Rudolf that the Prussian Blue found in the delousing chambers is
the result of gassings with hydrogen cyanide. However, Dr. Green offers a possible alternative
explanation for why the outside walls of the delousing chambers having blue staining. Green writes: “…the discoloration on the outside of walls [of the delousing chambers], ought to make one consider
what possible processes could have taken place outside of the delousing chambers.
For example, is it possible that materials that had been soaked with aqueous
solutions of HCN were leaned against the outside of the buildings? Not enough is known, but it is premature to conclude that the staining on the outside of buildings owes its origins to processes that took place within those buildings.”[15] Dr. Green’s speculation
is absurd. Why would the Germans lean materials that had been soaked with aqueous solutions of HCN against the outside walls of the delousing chambers? Dr. Green is desperate to find an alternative reason for the heavy blue staining on the outside walls of the delousing chambers.[16] Germar Rudolf writes in regard
to Dr. Green’s speculation: One major rule of science is that it is impermissible to immunize a theory against refutation, here in particular
by inventing untenable auxiliary hypotheses to shore up an otherwise shaky thesis…This
is exactly what Dr. Green is doing: coming up with a ludicrous attempt at explaining a fact
which does not fit into his theory. Yet instead of fixing his theory, he tries to bend reality.”[17]
Dr. Green also challenges
the possibility of formation of any noticeable quantities of Prussian Blue in the alleged homicidal gas chambers. Dr. Green writes: “The difference in total cyanides (Prussian blue + non-Prussian blue) owes
to the fact that Prussian blue formed efficiently in the case of the delousing
chambers but not in the homicidal gas chambers, and Prussian blue once formed
is likely to remain.”[18] Dr. Green is not able to provide
any convincing evidence why Prussian Blue would not form efficiently in the homicidal
gas chambers. For example, Dr. Green states that masonry in the alleged homicidal gas chambers has a neutral pH value which does not allow for the formation of cyanide salts. Germar Rudolf writes: “But
if that were true, how come huge amounts of cyanides did accumulate in the walls
of the disinfestation chambers?”[19] Rudolf has documented with
expert literature on the chemistry of building materials that the cement mortars and concretes used in the alleged homicidal gas chambers are noticeably alkaline for many weeks, months, or even years. These
walls would have been very much inclined to accumulate cyanide salts and to form
Prussian Blue, even more so than the lime plaster of the disinfestation chambers.[20] Conclusion The alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau could not have been used to exterminate hundreds of thousands of people as described in pro-Holocaust literature for numerous reasons: 1) they
did not have escape-proof doors and windows; 2) they did not have panic-proof
equipment; 3) they did not have technically gastight doors and shutters; 4) they
had no provision to quickly release and distribute the poison gas; and 5) they had no effective device to ventilate or otherwise render ineffective the poison gas after the execution.[21] By contrast, Germany built
highly sophisticated and expensive disinfestation facilities at Auschwitz/Birkenau to kill lice and save inmate lives. By one estimate, the SS at Auschwitz spent almost $1 billion in today’s values to
bring the typhus epidemics raging there under control.[22] An enormous amount of information exists concerning these German delousing
facilities[23], but no similar information exists regarding the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[24] The roof of the semi-underground
Morgue #1 of Crematorium II at Birkenau, which is said to have been the building’s homicidal gas chamber, remains intact to some degree today. Contrary to eyewitness testimony, that roof has no
Zyklon-B-introduction holes. This has been acknowledged by pro-Holocaust researcher
Robert Jan van Pelt. Since it is impossible to close holes measuring 70 x 70
cm from a concrete roof without leaving clearly visible traces, it is certain that
no Zyklon-B-introduction holes ever existed at Crematorium II. Consequently, Zyklon B could not have been introduced through the roof at this morgue as alleged by pro-Holocaust supporters.[25] As documented in this article,
chemists adhering to the orthodox Holocaust narrative have failed to explain why the walls of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz/ Birkenau are permeated with Prussian Blue, while nothing of this sort
can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers. The only reasonable
explanation is that Zyklon B was never used in the alleged homicidal gas chambers
at Auschwitz/Birkenau. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes: …for any alleged human gas chamber found in a German World War II labour camp
let us merely measure cyanide in the walls: if it’s not there, it didn’thappen.”[26]
[1] Van Pelt, Robert Jan, The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence
From the Irving Trial, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2002, pp. 137, 435. [2] Richard J. Green, “The Chemistry of Auschwitz,” 10 May 1998, http://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/. [3] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz
and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust:
The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and Dissertations
Press, 2000, p. 337. See the currently available edition of Leuchter’s report: Fred A. Leuchter, Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf, The Leuchter Reports: Critical Edition, 4th ed.,
Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, 2015. [4] Rudolf, Germar, “A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, March/April 2001, p. 7. [5] Leuchter, Fred A., “The Leuchter Report: The How and the Why,” The
Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, Summer 1989, pp. 138-139.
[6] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz
and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust:
The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and Dissertations
Press, 2000, pp. 363-371. [7] Rudolf, Germar, “A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, March/April 2001, p. 9. [8] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz
and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust:
The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and Dissertations
Press, 2000, p. 369. [9] Preface to: Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, pp. 12-13.
[10] Butz, Arthur R., “Historical Past vs. Political Present,” The
Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2000, p. 15.
[11] Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in theCanadian “False News” Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers
Ltd., 1992, pp. 362-363. [12] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mr._Death; Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, introduced in evidence
during the libel case before the Queen’s Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, David John Caldwell
Irving vs. (1) Penguin Books Limited, (2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, ref. 1996
I. No. 1113, 2001, p. 16; http://www.phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/irving-david/rudolf/affweb.pdf, [13] Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 66.
[14] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill
Publishers, 2017, pp. 342-345. [15] Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, op. cit. (note 12), pp. 18, 36, 41. [16] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill
Publishers, 2017, pp. 347-349. [17] Ibid., p. 348. [18] Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, op. cit. (note 12), p. 51. [19] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers— A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017,
p. 345. [20] Ibid., pp. 345-346. [21] Ibid., pp. 174-175. [22] Ibid., pp. 175, 293. [23] Berg, Friedrich R., “Zyklon B and the German Delousing Chambers,” Journal of Historical Review,
Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 1986, pp. 73-94; http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p-73_Berg.html. [24] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill
Publishers, 2017, p. 114. [25] Ibid., pp. 143-147. [26] Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 70. Ernst and Ingrid Zündel. Never forgotten, always cherished.
Their contribution to #Justice4Germans is immeasurable: The Desperate Measures To Enforce Belief In One & ONLY One Historical Event Are Escalating In Absurdity: Old Ladies
Get Jail, Rapists Go Free</a
| |
A number of Israeli intellectuals-historians, philosophers and others-use the Holocaust in a systematic way in order to raise anti-Zionist or post-Zionist claims.
A number of Israeli intellectuals-historians, philosophers and others-use
the Holocaust in a systematic way in order to raise anti-Zionist or post-Zionist
claims. of free speech and his new book Being in Time: A Post-Political Manifesto.
Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist tells the story
of how I first became aware of revisionist arguments challenging the orthodox Holocaust story,
how it felt-how it felt was that it made me feel ashamed and made the palms of my hands sweat-and
the first information I had the misfortune (?) to discover that there were serious questions to be
asked about what I had believed all my life, with all my heart, about the unique monstrosity of
the Germans.
A 1997
speech on Internet Free Speech and Revisionism - Rae West. This
video includes Questions-and-Answers. Before the big revolution that the
Internet caused on media, consider the next seven points, taken into
consideration that some of this still happens now: 1. Revisionist criticisms aren't
new, but have been suppressed; 2. There have been and are many hard-working
revisionists; 3. The supposedly heavyweight historians don't debate; 4.
No technical descriptions or investigations of 'gas chambers'; 5.
Damning 'confessions' were extracted under torture; 6. Demographic
figures have been avoided, and mythology substituted; 7. There
are no photos of gas chambers.
|
|
Jewish
‘Auschwitz Survivor’ Admits He Lied About Everything.. Joseph Hirt said he fabricated story of being sent to camp and meeting Nazi doctor Josef Mengele to ‘keep memories alive’ about history of the Holocaust
by Theguardian A Pennsylvania man who claimed for years to have escaped from Auschwitz,
met track and field star Jesse Owens and Nazi doctor Josef Mengele, confessed on Friday that he had fabricated the entire story... of course.
“I am writing today to apologize publicly for harm caused to
anyone because of my inserting myself into the descriptions of life in Auschwitz,”
Joseph Hirt, 86, wrote in a letter sent to his local paper, LNP, this week. “I
was not a prisoner there. I did not intend to lessen or overshadow the events which truly happened there by falsely claiming to have been personally involved.” “I was wrong.
I ask forgiveness,” he added. “I determined at that moment to do everything in my power to prevent the loss of the truth about wartime life (and death) at Auschwitz.” For years, Hirt gave public speeches at schools around the US about his experiences in the
second world war, including his Jewish family’s flight from Poland
to Belgrade. But he also told people that he was arrested by the Nazis, sent to the concentration camp at Auschwitz,
and met
Hirt claimed to have escaped under an
electric fence at the camp. He added an extraordinary prologue and
epilogue to the story, saying that he saw Adolf Hitler turn his back on Jesse Owens at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, and that he
met Eleanor Roosevelt and Owens after his arrival in the United States.
Earlier this year, New York history teacher Andrew Reid became suspicious
of Hirt’s story and wrote a refutation of many of Hirt’s points. The names of concentration camp victims and survivors are publicly available,
and there is no record of Hirt at Auschwitz or elsewhere. Hirt (showing
his fake tattoo in the photo above) admitted in his letter that he had tattooed the camp number of Auschwitz survivor Primo Levi, the acclaimed author and chemist, on his left forearm: “In no way an attempt to take on his identity,
but in an effort to incorporate his symbol as a way of remembering him.” Reid also found that Hirt’s escape story did not fit with camp records, that Mengele
did not arrive at the camp until after the alleged escape, and other lies, errors
and far-fetched claims in Hirt’s account. He was a six-year-old Polish boy and extraordinarily unlikely
to be anywhere near Hitler at the Olympics, for instance, and Owens’ biographer
found the snub was likely a fabrication, possibly conflated with another black sprinter’s story. Hirt
is not the first to fabricate or exaggerate a Holocaust story. Herman Rosenblat ,
a Polish survivor, embellished his 1993 memoir and made up some parts entirely. At the time, historian Ken Waltzer wrote in the New Republic that
he was alarmed by how quickly people accepted the story. Read: Anne Frank — the Jewish Girl That DIDN'T Write the Famous Auschwitz Diary
Click on this text to examine the enormity of Jewish lies regarding the HOLOCAUST HOAX...
. .
Click on this text to examine the truth about AUSCHWITZ.
Click on this text to watch a video titled INSIDE AUSCHWITZ that reveals the truth about the work camp.
______________________________________________________ The Hoax that won’t die
How the World Jewish Congress invented the Holocaust
By Carolyn Yeager
“the
first and continuing reports that Jews were being wiped out by the Nazis in Poland were supplied to newspapers around
the world by the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX “the first authentic information about Hitler’s decision
to ‘exterminate’ European Jewry came from an unnamed German industrialist who visited Switzerland in July 1942
and informed a Jewish friend of the World Jewish Congress … HOAX “the first ‘eyewitness’ account of the
inner working of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Gas Chamber/Crematorium complex came from ‘two escaped
Slovakian Jews’ working with the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX The Holocaust is a
hoax that’s already been unmasked. But the Establishment won’t give it up. Instead of a hoax, we could call it a sleight-of-hand, in the sense of the tricks magicians
use. (‘Hoax’ derives from the magic incantation hocus pocus). We could call it a myth, except that
it was deliberately created to deceive and gain advantage, and continues to be upheld for that purpose. We could call it war propaganda
that got out of control, and indeed it has slipped out of its World War II niche and become a free-standing phenomenon,
fueling the world-wide ‘campaigns against anti-Semitism’ with ever-expanding laws that forbid speaking ill
of Jews and/or Israel. But it is properly called a hoax because
it was deliberately created by a few men in the upper ranks of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) utilizing their tight network of influential, well-placed accomplices throughout Europe,
Britain and the United States. It was inspired by
rumors circulated by Polish and Jewish inmates at the Auschwitz-Birkinau work/concentration/transit camp located in Poland near
the sprawling I.G. Farben ‘Buna’ Rubber Plant.
Some
of these inmates organized into secret underground networks that maintained wireless communication to the Polish Government-in-Exile
in London. All this was told in the book released in 1976 by Arthur R. Butz, Ph.D., The Hoax of the Twentieth Century,
which I quoted extensively from here and will refer to later. This year, as every
year since a resolution was established in 2005 by a voice vote in the United Nations, the World Jewish Congress leads the way in
recognizing and promoting a commemoration popularly known as “International Holocaust Remembrance Day.” The media faithfully
plays up the day, and governments throughout the Western world pay tribute. Amazing
when you think about its reach. THIS YEAR the World Jewish Congress has announced that “social media giants”
are
joining with them in 2019 to create “mass global awareness” ahead of the Israel-initiated commemoration day
(however, it looks like only Twitter came through). Along with the United Nations, the world-wide media, and major government leaders,
the Memorial Museum at Auschwitz-Birkenau also recognizes the day with special events. January 27, 1945 was chosen because it is the day it is claimed the Auschwitz camp was ‘liberated’
by the Red Army. Yes, it’s amazing how much of our
reality is created and developed without our decision, but simply our acquiescence in seemingly harmless (and usually
disguised in moral terms) votes in large bodies such as the UN general assembly or Congressional and parliamentary bodies. In the articles that I have previously published on the WJC (especially here, here and here), drawing on the work of esteemed historians and revisionists, the answer to who, what, why of the Holocaust has already
been presented. In this article I will pull all this information together in an attempt to make the full case as to why
the hoax of the Holocaust can be attributed to the World Jewish Congress far more than to any other single entity. We will see that
the very first unconfirmed reports of mass shootings of Jews came from the World Jewish Congress, and the final unconfirmed reports
of gas chambers and mass cremations came from the WJC, also. The World Jewish Congress is the prime institution devoted to propagating Holocaust belief. Holocaust is part and parcel of
their other main aims of “defending Jews around the world” and “supporting Israel.” We will begin with Udo Walendy, German
historian, author and publisher, and his examination of a very important report published in 1948 on the occasion of the second
plenary assembly of the WJC in Montreux, Switzerland. The title of the report is “Unity in Dispersion, a History of the World Jewish Congress.” It was published, and at the time I write can be read online here. The World Jewish Congress is an openly Zionist organization.
It’s name echos the first World Zionist Congress held in Basle, Switzerland in the year 1897, convened by Dr. Theodore
Herzl, a Hungarian-born Jew. Herzl’s portrait hangs in the office of the president at the WJC headquarters in New
York City. In the same spirit of uniting Jews to define
and defend their interests, the World Jewish Congress was convened for the first time 39 years later in Geneva, Switzerland
by Dr. Stephen S. Wise, another Budapest-born offspring of rabbis who was brought to New York as an
infant. At this Congress, of which they bragged of having 230 delegates representing 32 countries around the world, the vast majority (181) were from the United
States, Poland, Roumania and Great Britain. From seven countries there was only one delegate, and from the rest, between 2 and 10.
The center of worldwide Jewish interests and leadership had moved to the United States after WWI. Nahum Goldmann, left, and Stephen Wise, right, playing on American patriotism
in 1942. Prior to this first Congress in 1936, a
preparative World Jewish Conference was held in August 1932, also in Geneva. It was chaired by Dr. Nahum Goldmann,
a Russia-born Jew who grew up in Germany. Some anti-Zionist German Jewish groups refused to participate. Goldmann defined the
purpose as to establish a legitimate collective representation of all 16 million Jews in the world. At this conference,
Nahum
Goldmann and Stephen Wise were entrusted with the leading positions. At two more preparative conferences in ’33 and ’34,
the rise to power of National Socialism became a main subject. [Also in 1936, Samuel Untermeyer, who had called for a holy war against Germany in 1933, founded a
“World Anti-Nazi Council to Fight for Human Rights.” He partnered with British Unionist Walter Citrine, and the Council served as an Agent for “psychological warfare” and – concealed from the public –
was to be financed by the Jewish Defense Fund. Winston Churchill became one of its activists.] At the 1936 Congress, Nahum Goldmann made the radical announcement that
the existing sovereignty of nations should be considered obsolete! The League of Nations should be reinforced (militarily,
apparently) to safeguard the interests of the weaker groups in the world. By these weaker groups he meant Jews. “Millions of Jews in eastern Europe are being disenfranchised and terrorized in the name of supremacy
of the state and the dominant nation” he said, and “Where the equal rights of a Jewish community are
affected […] it becomes of common, worldwide Jewish interest.” (Surrender of Jewish rights anywhere equals surrender
everywhere.) “We know that we can only succeed
by joining forces with the many others in the world who must fight with us.” Goldmann also said that mankind had to fight against “an aggression which was started
by Germany,” emphasizing that “fighting against Hitlerism is one of the most important tasks”
and that “anti-Semitism must be branded an international crime.” He also stated that “propaganda is at present
one of the main instruments of foreign politics,” with boycotts and international intelligence services required to be
used as weapons. Remember this was in 1936 when Hitler was still being admired for bringing Germany back to economic
health! Goldmann became President of the permanent
Administrative Committee and Wise President of the Executive Committee. In July 1940, the World Jewish Congress moved it’s
headquarters to New York City, with the Geneva office continuing to exist under 29-year old Dr. Gerhart Riegner and Dr. Abraham
Silberschein, maintaining contact with German-occupied countries and the International Red Cross. WJC creates the Institute of Jewish Affairs as a research arm In 1941, another section of the World Jewish Congress was founded as the “Institute of Jewish Affairs.” It was assigned the task of gathering information from all parts of the world concerning Jewish affairs, with
the aim of submitting Jewish demands to the peace conference at the end of hostilities. The Jews were looking to get as
much as they could out of the war – a war in which they knew very well they were not physically fighting! They thus wanted
to emphasize their losses as Hitler’s political victims. In
order to best situate themselves, they decided to consider the period from 1919 to 1939 an “armistice,” not
a peace. They stressed that a basis must be created by which “war crimes” could be punished retroactively from
1933. And of course, they would be the victims of these war crimes. In
June 1942, the Advisory Staff for European Jewish Matters (of the Institute of Jewish Affairs) met in coordination with
the World Jewish Congress. Here, a demand was made for the first time that no peace negotiation should ever be carried
out without representatives of the WJC participating. The
Institute of Jewish Affairs entertained close relations with the Geneva office and the British Section of the WJC in London.
The
British Section had built up a research staff of over thirty experts, allowing the Institute to compile a remarkable amount
of material, including thousands of documents, press reports, papers, projects, drafts and manuscripts ready for printing.
Some of the most important publications are:
- Zorach
Warhaftig, Starvation over Europe (1943);
- Jews in Nazi Europe, Where Shall They Go? no authors named, (1941);
- Hitler’s Ten Year War on the Jews (1943)
(this book made a tremendous impression on the
- Allied governments and served as a basic textbook at the Nuremberg Military Tribunal)
An
important paper transmitted to the American authorities was “The Conspiracy against the Jewish People,” the
main chapters of which were headed: - The Originally
Conceived Plan of Extermination of the Jewish People
- The Different Stages of the Crime Against the Jewish People
- The Responsibility of Individuals and Organizations (translated
from the German original)
In Europe in January 1942, the National committee of ‘Free France’
convened for a discussion on German war crimes. But not one reference was made to the crimes against the Jews. So in February the World
Jewish Congress asked for a specific statement with reference to the “many and special crimes against the Jews.”
It took three months before the President of the Conference on crimes, General Wladyslaw Sikorski, replied that specifically
referencing the Jews “might be equivalent to recognizing racial theories that we all reject.” (Touché! We
can see from this that not everyone was on the same page about who were the victims of the Germans. Since the Poles evidently
did not want to feature the Jews, the Jews went around them.) After
that rejection, the British section of the World Jewish Congress in June organized their own “Conference of
the Press of the Free World” where Facts of a Systematic Extermination
of European Jewry were announced (but not revealed in the conference minutes). This would have been the first suggestion
of a planned extermination of Jews. Immediate reactions occurred in Britain and abroad. The BBC transmitted this type
of news for the first time—and there were mass demonstrations in the US (organized by Jews) addressing war crimes and the need for
the rescue of European Jewry. On 21 July 1942, Prime Minister Winston Churchill sent a message to a meeting held in Madison Square Garden, NYC, which contained the following: The
Jews were Hitler’s first victims, and ever since they have been in the forefront of resistance to Nazi aggression.
The World Jewish Congress jumped on this and announced that “This sentence
rightly characterized the Jews of whatever nationality as an allied people of the United Nations (which is the name the Allies
gave themselves at that time). The WJC said they wanted all Jews to be accepted as “one nation” represented by
the World Jewish Congress. The Riegner Telegram Sensing an opportune time, on 8 Aug 1942,
young Gerhart Riegner, as Secretary of the Geneva WJC office, sent a telegram to the British Foreign Office and the U.S.
State Dept, through secure diplomatic channels the WJC was privy to. The telegram read: Received alarming report stating that, in the Fuehrer’s Headquarters,
a plan has been discussed, and is under consideration, according to which all Jews in countries
occupied or controlled by Germany numbering 3½ to 4 millions should, after deportation
and concentration in the East, be at one blow exterminated, in order to resolve, once and for all the Jewish question in Europe. Action is reported to be planned for the autumn. Ways of execution are still being discussed including
the use of prussic acid. We transmit this information with all the necessary reservation,
as exactitude cannot be confirmed by us. Our informant is reported to have close connexions
with the highest German authorities, and his reports are generally reliable. Please inform
and consult New York. So,
an anonymous report, and supposedly not the first from this ‘source’. The British Foreign Office took its time
forwarding the telegram, calling for it to be investigated first, and the State Dept. was also wary. It wasn’t
until 3 weeks later on 28 August that it reached Stephen Wise, WJC President in New York, who decided not to make it public.
But this telegram is what the WJC and its acolytes use to say the US and UK governments knew from 1942 that Jews
were being exterminated. The informant in this case is the “mysterious German industrialist” that Bradley Smith wrote about and concluded did not exist. And he didn’t, until 40 years later, in October
1983 when it was claimed in the New York Times, without evidence, that he was Eduard Schulte, a mining company executive who died in 1966 in Switzerland. Twenty years after
his death, the death of his first wife and one of his sons, and most who could contradict the story, Schulte is named as the
‘informer.’ Even Gerhart Riegner, a life-long WJC executive, refused to confirm Schulte for the NYTimes, reportedly
using as his excuse that “I have not identified the man for 40 years and I see no reason not to keep the one request he
ever made of me.” The mass of biographical and business information written in the Times article is in no way evidence for the
claim—its only purpose in being there is to make it appear to those who don’t actually read that this is a big
story with a lot information behind it.
There isn’t.
There is none. But the current World Jewish Congress leadership thought it worthwhile to bolster their claim of “inside information”
about extermination plans coming directly from Adolf Hitler in 1942 by supplying the name of a real person 40 years after the
fact. Without a source given for it, the sentence that
Schulte was “the first to tell the world about the extermination of Jews” has been added to Wikipedia pages, such as here, here, here and here. This attempt to fool the public is in itself evidence that there never was an informant, that the story was an invention of Gerhart
Riegner and his WJC confidants. At the WJC website
this article characterizes the worth of the telegram far beyond what it actually was. Note the words “reliable” and “authoritative”
in the first paragraph, neither of which are at all appropriate, since it was hearsay. The Making of the War Refugee Board From 1942 to 1944, the World Jewish Congress continued to send messages to the State Department
with information from anonymous sources about atrocities taking place against Jews in German-occupied Europe. Many were quite similar
to the debunked false stories from WWI, and this was noted by State. A
conflict developed between the State Dept. and the U.S. Treasury Dept. headed by Jew Henry Morgenthau Jr. who was good friends with the
leadership of the World Jewish Congress. A particular disagreement was over a plan to ship 7000 Romanian Jews to Palestine
at a cost of $1200 per person. Apart from who would pay the money and how, there were British objections to admitting Jews to
Palestine. The State Dept. found it problematic, while Treasury and the World Jewish Congress were pressing for the proposed
project, insisting that the only alternative was death for the Jews at the hands of Hitler. From Wikipedia: While the Treasury Department had granted the World Jewish
Congress permission to send the money to Switzerland in July 1943, the State Department used various excuses,
delaying permission until December, a full eight months after the program was first proposed. Jewish newspapers like this one from Omaha, Nebraska, played it up big. Roosevelt
was eventually drawn into this State vs. Treasury friction and, because of his close friendship with Morgenthau, he backed the Treasury
Dept. Just as the WJC had been pushing for, Roosevelt then agreed to assist in the escape of European Jews with the creation
of the War Refugee Board in January 1944. He placed in charge Morgenthau, Sec of State Cordell Hull, and Sec of War Henry Stimson. However,
the executive director was Morgenthau’s fair-haired boy John Pehle, with Josiah DuBois as general counsel, making it Morgenthau’s board. Not
only that, but Morgenthau had delegated all of Treasury’s powers in the areas relevant to the WRB to Harry Dexter White, later
exposed as a Soviet agent. Thus, the Board became an instrument of Rabbi Wise and the Zionists, and as such its main
achievement
was the booklet, German Extermination Camps: Auschwitz and Birkenau, Executive
Office of the President, Washington, Nov. 1944, hereinafter referred to as the WRB report. Rudolf Vrba, born Walter Rosenberg Alfred Wetzler, alias Jozef Lánik According to revisionist Arthur R. Butz, this report constituted the birth of the official
thesis of exterminations via gas chambers at Auschwitz. Once Washington committed to the claim that Auschwitz was an extermination
camp, the way was cleared for newspapers to carry the story. It was placed on the front page of the New York Times on
Nov. 26, 1944 with some excerpts given. It is described as two reports, one written by “two young Slovakian Jews”
and the other by “a Polish major” whom had been inmates at Auschwitz from Spring 1942 until Spring 1944 when
they escaped. All the essentials of the “Holocaust” are found in it. You can read the Vrba-Wetzler Report in full here http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/eng/English45.pdf if you want to. But I doubt you will want to. It’s very boring as is often the case with lies. At the end the author says:
I soon lost my comparatively comfortable
job [October 1942?] with the Aufräumungskommando, and as punishment was transferred to Birkenau, where I spent one and a half
years.
I ask, what did a healthy young man do
at Birkenau for a year and a half? It wasn’t known as a work camp. Of course, that assumes that he was actually there. Examination
shows that the information in the report is the sort of thing that could have been built up from intelligence data. This is exactly
what one should expect, as Germany’s enemies had the means of gathering information about German camps and about events in
Europe. The Communist Party, being “the world’s most efficient intelligence organization,” could transmit any
information desired to any destination without needing “escaped inmates” to supply the facts. Conclusion The
WRB report was put into evidence at the International Military Tribunal on Dec. 14, 1945. There was no objection from the defense and it
was accordingly accepted as evidence. However at the later Farben trial, the defense objected to the report, questioning the “competence
and materiality of each and every document in the book” and the objection was sustained by that court. It was undoubtedly the determined, even dogged efforts of the World Jewish
Congress leaders and friends in pursuing the extermination thesis that paid off in the end for Jews. From the summer of 1942, “Stephen
Wise had continuously campaigned for the Allied governments to take a public position directly condemning the alleged extermination
of Jews in Europe.” It was J. Breckenridge Long of the State Dept. who most strongly resisted the propaganda. Long
never believed the talk of extermination, and wrote that: Wise always assumes such a sanctimonious air and pleads for the ‘intellectuals and brave spirits,
refugees from the tortures of the dictators’ or words to that effect. Of course only an infinitesimal fraction of the immigrants are of
that category – and some are certainly German agents.
What
we can say for sure is that, in the end, the World Jewish Congress has prevailed, and that it continues to work tirelessly
both for the Zionist cause of Israel and the welfare of every Jew in the world. What is one hoax more or less to them
in the face of such a monumental undertaking? _________________________________
Click on this text to examine websites exposing the holocaust lies.
. .
Click on this text to visit the CODOH (Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust) page.
. .
Click in this text to meet holocaust revisionist Germar Rudolf.
. .
Click on this text to examine the HAAVARA Transfer Agreement (The Transfer Agreement between Germany and German Jews prior
to WWII).
________________________________________________________________________________________________ JEWISH
WORLD POPULATION 1938 For over a century, the Jewish World Almanac has been widely
regarded as the most authentic source for the world’s Jewish population
numbers. Academics all over the world, including the editors
of the Encyclopedia Britannica, used to rely on the accuracy
of those numbers. Here is what the World Alamanacs of 1933 and
1948 had to say about the world population of Jews. Jewish
World Population 1948 In other words, according to the World Almanac
the world population of Jews increased (!) between 1933 and 1948 from
15,315,000 to 15,753,000. If the German government under Adolf
Hitler had – as alleged – murdered six million Jews those losses should have been reflected in the Jewish population numbers quoted in the World Almanac. The suspicions raised by above numbers concerning the veracity of the
allegations made against the Hitler government are confirmed by the
official three-volume report by the International Committee of
the Red Cross, released 1948 in Geneva, according to which 272,000 concentration
camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews. The
following article elaborates. A Factual Appraisal
Of The ‘Holocaust’ By The Red Cross The Jews And The Concentration Camps: No Evidence Of Genocide There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during
World War Two and the conditions of Germany’s concentration camps which is almost
unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International Committee
of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948. This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source
incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works: Documents sur l’activité
du CICR en faveur des civils détenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945
(Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frédéric Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report
that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality,
and herein lies its great value.
The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain
access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities.
By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify
the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR, whose conditions
were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision. The Red Cross Report is of value in that it
first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration
camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the second type as “Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, “Schutzhäftlinge”),
who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered
a danger to the State or the occupation forces” (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons,
it continues, “were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security
reasons.” (P.74). The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people
detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained
important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major
concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and “from February 1943 onwards
this concession was extended to all other camps and prisons” (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programme which continued to function
until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from Jewish
internees. Red Cross Recipients Were Jews The Report states that “As many as 9,000
parcels were packed daily. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000
parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps” (Vol. III, p. 80). In
addition to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels
were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg,
Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt,
Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany. The principal
recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III,
p. 83). In the course
of the war, “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout the world, in particular
by the American Joint Distribution Committee of New York” (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter
organisation was permitted by the German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until
the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief operation
for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia. The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions
which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April 1945.
This camp, “where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75). According to the Report, “‘The Committee’s
delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively
for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information gathered by the Committee,
this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration
and possessing almost complete autonomy. . . two delegates were able to visit the camp on April
6th, 1945. They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit”
(Vol. I, p . 642). The ICRC
also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and
the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever
to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after
their “liberation” by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz
until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile.
However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such
camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg. No Evidence Of Genocide One of the most
important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition
of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no
food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed
by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 …
In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was
authorised to stay in each camp …” (Vol. III, p. 83). Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve
the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies
ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests
of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies”
(Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign
Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation
conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable. In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that
the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis
occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report
does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other
wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom
they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges
of genocide which had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortality rate
is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being
used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) – Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions
were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the
Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not only the washing places, but installations
for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to take action
to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged” (Vol. III, p. 594). Not All Were Interned Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population)
deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population,”
and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in
internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”,
and with the claim in the forged Höss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing
“every single Jew he could lay his hands on.” In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge,
the Report states that “A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission
to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative
haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces
took place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment
of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food
and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost
equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646). Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether,
but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary,
Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories
was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France
before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits
to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of
South American countries” (Vol. I, p. 645). As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel
camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular
proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,”
says the. Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary”
(Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following
its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on
German authority, the emigration of Jews continued. The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to
give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S.
Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States …
now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I, p . 649). Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that
“Did Six Million Really Die?” quoted from the Report of the International Committee
of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas (this includes
the above material), it did so accurately. A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the International Committee of
the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross’ International Tracing Service) under
oath at the Zündel Trial (February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988). The above is chapter nine from
the book “Did Six Million Really Die?”.
_____________________________________________________________________ Regarding
the quote below by Gerard Menuhin mentioning the "annihilation of millions of disarmed soldiers and innocent civilains" after the German surrender, it needs to be understood that he was referring to German soldiers and German civillians.
Click on this text to watch Natali Cohen Vaxberg, a radical Israeli political performance artist point out the fact that the
"Holocaust" has been used to justify the Creation of Israel in 1948 and it's immoral army, the brutal and sometimes perverse
persecution of Palestinians without interference from super-powers, and the creation of a nuclear weapons stockpile. BTW:
a dreidel is a four-sided toy top played with during Hannukkah...
. . .
Click on this text to view: Cremation Technology vs the Holocaust...
Click on this text to meet HOLOCAUST REVISIONIST ROBERT FARISSON.
Footage allows the viewer to see more
about Professor Robert Faurisson, who is arguably the one key individual in modern revisionism who opened
the door for many more questions to be asked about the historiography, the narrative of what is now called the Holocaust
and open the way for many more of those who would dare to openly question the Holocaust in a serious,
much more objective manner free of dogma or ideology.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Fake shower heads …
One more reason
why the real gas chambers had to have real shower heads
Like all strong poisons, hydrocyanic acid (HCN) is very good at being water-soluble –
and could have been most effectively dispensed dissolved in boiling water – or, better still, superheated
steam – run through the real shower heads.
Moreover, while a whole can of Zyklon B was required to kill all insects in a relatively small fumigation chamber, hardly more than one scoop of the Zyklon B pellets
should have been needed to dispatch any number of humans in a shower room of any size.
Besides, only the lethal agent HCN was required, Zyklon B as such was unnecessary. This more costly compound was specifically
developed for use in fumigation chambers, where, not unlike any other dry cleaning process, the fumigated clothes
had to be given back dry to the inmates coming out of the shower rooms – as the properly run camp
routine demanded.
What's more, HCN
itself – highly flammable and potentially explosive – was superfluous to the task, as, in an enclosed
space, any volatile noxious substance – such as cheap as rubbish ammonia, for example – is just
as deadly, but reasonably safe to handle.
As the Jews themselves very well know, they murdered numerous Palestinians just by firing ‘harmless’
tear gas into their houses.
The more one reads
the Holohoax literature and the closer one looks at those putative ‘gas chambers’ – the less
sense they make. And the kosher Holo-mongers themselves are keenly aware of this. And hence, those once-obligatory Jewish ‘holes in the roof’ or the later ‘holes in the wall’ – through which the Zyklon B
was supposedly chucked in – are hardly ever heard of anymore.
The Jewish Holohoax is getting assimilated. It's no longer as Jewish and hysterical
as it used to be in the 1970s-80s, in the wake of the October (Yom Kippur) War (1973-4), when little I$rael is
said to have experienced some ‘existential angst’ (enter Madison Avenue).
In their latter-day rendition, the physical details of this ever-apocryphal
Zio narrative get to be more and more like the Holy Ghost – positively invisible – and never again
rendered in graven images. And the ‘venerable’ Anne Frank gets
to be more and more like the Holy Virgin...
(In fact, with HCN
boiling point at 25.6 °C, Zyklon B couldn't have been used
at room temperature in fumigation chambers, either – not without the special pulverizer/blower –
never ever mentioned in the whole of the Holohoax literature in relation to the putative gas chambers.)
In order to deprogram yourself, after an entire lifetime of incessant brainwashing by the JEW owned and controlled media, you can begin almost anywhere... such as learning exactly WHO coined the word "NAZI" - THE Most Misused Word in Any Language... Here is the
facts regarding JEW owned and controlled media ____________Holocaust Revisionism Articles____________
As
Many as 90% of Those Claiming to Be Holocaust Survivors May Be Frauds Australian Man’s
Holocaust Story Labelled a ‘Lie’ Brighton Beach Holocaust
Fund - Scammer Jailed for Neary Two Years Fraudster Gets Eight Years in $57 Million Holocaust Scheme How Britain Tortured
Nazi PoW’s
Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg
. . . by Lasha Darkmoon Confessions at Nuremberg were obtained under torture. The grimmest of these tortures, practiced mostly by Jewish operatives on their German prisoners of war, was testicle crushing.
(Above) German defendants at the Nuremberg War Crimes trials, 1946-1949.
How many of them had their testicles crushed? “The Holocaust legend is built on ‘confessions’
obtained by the use of torture.” So
begins an article that has just been brought to my attention by an unknown emailer. At the same time, by sheer coincidence, another correspondent has just sent me
some stomach-churning details about testicle crushing. He ends
his letter with these words : “This is what Jewish interrogators did to their
German prisoners of war after WWII in order to get them to “sing”—i.e., to confess to crimes they never
committed.” I was a bit
shocked by these words. To tell the truth, testicle crushing is not something I have thought about a great deal, nor do I wish to dwell too much on this distasteful subject. I am aware of course that a lot of testicle crushing
went on at Nuremberg in order to wring confessions out of the prostrate Germans, but I had been unaware that American Jews had been foremost in the ranks of these torturers. Apparently, as many as three out four interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jewish—and
these Jewish interrogators, I was to learn to my horror, had been by far the most sanguinary
and sadistic. There was almost no level of human depravity to which these monsters were not
willing to sink, including forcing their German victims to eat excrement and to have sex with
disinterred corpses. Yes, so this is
something we ought to bear in mind when watching all those Hollywood movies celebrating the heroic
deeds of the Allies in World War Two and lamenting the horrors of the Holocaust : that Jewish interrogators, working for
the Americans, are known to have beaten, tortured, and crushed the testicles of German defendants
before charging them with war crimes at Nuremberg. Without these confessions, obtained under
extreme torture, there is no solid proof that any Jewish Holocaust took place at all. There
is only legend, hearsay and “eyewitness accounts” : like those of Elie Wiesel and
his kind—accounts that have turned out, in retrospect, to be based on pure fantasy, fiction, and grotesque exaggeration. Proponents
of the official storyline say that some of the strongest evidence that “proves” the Holocaust—i.e. the systematic extermination of 6 million Jews in gas chambers on the instructions of Hitler—consists of the
supposed “confessions” of the German officials who were put on trial at Nuremberg.
What they neglect to tell you is that most of these confessions were obtained under extreme
torture. Indeed, according to Jewish investigator John Sack, torture was often practiced for its own sake, even when there was nothing to find out. It was practiced for sheer pleasure: because
it gave the torturers a ‘high’, a feeling of sadistic omnipotence, of orgasmic euphoria. It has since been openly admitted in the memoirs of the top British official, Colonel
Alexander Scotland, who ran the interrogation program, that thousands of Germans were tortured by British Military Intelligence, under the direction of the Prisoner of War Interrogation Section (PWIS). This torture
of German POWs occurred during the war to obtain military intelligence. After the war was over,
it was used again in order to obtain confessions for convictions of “war crimes”. German POWs reported that the torture techniques included deprivation
of sleep, starvation, systematic beatings, ripping hair from the scalp, menacing
with red-hot pokers, threatened use of electrical devices to deliver shocks,
and, finally, the worst torture of all, the slow and systematic mangling of the spermatic
cords of the testicles—a procedure that had their victims thrashing about and screaming like wild animals for hours.
The prosecutors at Nuremberg accused and convicted the Germans of murdering some 4 million people
at Auschwitz. These charges were based largely upon the supposed “confessions” obtained
by the torture of German officers, such as the signed “confession” by Rudolf Höss, the commandant at Auschwitz, giving details of how he had personally
supervised the murder of 2.5 million jews. In
1989, however, the Soviet government reduced the claim of the number killed at Auschwitz from
4 million to 1.5 million. (See picture below). This was later reduced to 1 million. It became apparent at once that if only 1 million Jews had
died at Auschwitz, as was now officially admitted, it no longer became possible to
state that 2.5 million Jews had been killed there under Höss while he was a commandant there. The “confession” by Höss that 2.5 million Jews had been killed at Auschwitz under his
auspices was therefore worthless. It had been a confession clearly extracted under torture. If, moreover, only 1 million Jews perished
at Auschwitz instead of the 4 million originally claimed to have died there,
it’s obvious that there has been an overestimate of three million dead Jews. It is no longer possible to assert that 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust. That becomes a mathematical impossibility. And yet, incredibly, this mathematical impossibility is brazenly asserted to this day in every mainstream media outlet. We are all expected to pretend that 6 million Jews
minus 3 million Jews somehow equals 6 million Jews, just as Winston
Smith (in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four) was expected to believe
that 2 + 2 = 5. Winston Smith, you will remember, managed to
believe this absurdity in the end, with the help of a little extra tuition he received via the famous “rat torture“. § The startling revelation that
almost all the German defendants at Nuremberg had had their testicles crushed
must make us sit up and think. How can testimonies obtained under testicle crushing be regarded in any way as reliable? Following reports that defendants were tortured at the Malmedy massacre trial, the US Army formed the “Simpson Commission” to investigate the alleged misconduct.
Judge Edward L. Van Roden was part of this commission. According to Van Roden’s book, American
Atrocities in Germany, out of 139 cases of treatment of alleged German “war criminals” who were investigated by the commission—and who were subsequently put on trial by the American Military Tribunal in Dachau after World War II—”137 of these Germans were tortured by having their testicles crushed.” Other
methods used by the American interrogators included brutal beatings, placing a hood over prisoners and punching them in the face with brass knuckles, breaking their jaws, knocking out their teeth, putting them on starvation rations, and subjecting them to solitary confinement. The prisoners were then presented with prepared statements to sign. Confess or face more torture! It emerged that Jewish prosecutors and interrogators
had obtained complete control over the US Military tribunal that was to put
German officials on trial for war crimes. This is seldom mentioned, as to do so is regarded
as “anti-Semitic”. To state the unvarnished truth—that 137 Germans had their testicles mangled at Nuremberg by largely Jewish interrogators in order to obtain proof for the Holocaust —is regarded as “hate speech”.
Lt. William Perl (pictured above)
was an Austrian Jew who had emigrated to America in 1940. He was the chief
interrogator of Germans accused of the Malmedy massacre. This was because he could speak fluent German; and indeed many of the interrogators
at Nuremberg were German or Austrian Jews who had emigrated to America before WWII and were
known as the ‘Ritchie Boys’. There were roughly 9000 of these Jews in America and
they specialized in the “interrogation” of German prisoners. (See here). Perl supervised the torture of the
German defendants. He was an ardent and active Zionist and was assisted by other Jews in his
endeavors to extract confessions by the infliction of maximum pain. Jews specalizing in torture
techniques at Nuremberg included Josef Kirschbaum, Harry Thon and Morris Ellowitz. (See here) This is what Wikipedia has to say
about the interrogation of Germans at Malmedy: “The accusations [against the German defendants] were mainly based on the sworn and written statements
provided by the defendants in Schwäbish Hall. To counter the evidence given in the men’s
sworn statements and by prosecution witnesses, the lead defense attorney, Lieutenant Colonel
Willis M. Everett tried to show that the statements had been obtained by inappropriate methods. Note that exquisite
euphemism: “inappropriate methods”. That’s how respectable, politically correct Americans refer to confessions obtained under torture. The methods are not described as horrendously cruel. They are not described as morally indefensible. They are described as “inappropriate”. On Sept. 25, 1945, Thomas Dodd, who was the second in command on the American prosecution
team at Nuremberg, made the following observation in which he claimed that three out of
four interrogators at Nuremberg were Jewish: “You know how I have despised anti-Semitism,” he said. “You know how strongly I feel toward
those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge, you will understand
when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish.” One person
who has made a close study of the Nuremberg trial archives in the original German and knows more about this subject than anyone else I know is the multilingual American scholar Carlos W. Porter who is fluent in German, French, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese. Having renounced
his American citizenship in 1984, and having then relocated to Belgium with his wife and children,
the Holocaust revisionist author of “Not Guilty at Nuremberg” took the trouble to write to me about the Nuremberg trials in a private communication
(July 28, 2015 at 9:55 pm). Porter confirmed what I had always suspected: that most of the American
interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jews, and that torture had been freely practiced against
the helpless Germans on trial in order to force them to confess to non-existent crimes: “You can be absolutely CERTAIN,” Carlos Porter wrote to
me, “that nearly ALL the interrogators and interpreters in ALL the trials
were Jewish, because the Americans stamped out the German language from all American
schools during WWI, so German Jewish refugees were almost the only competent people they had. Of course, other “German-Americans” could not be trusted not to be “Nazis”, so they
were stuck with the German Jews. That
there was a great deal of mistreatment and torture in the minor trials is absolutely certain. I reproduced a couple of accounts of torture at the Dachau trials in “War Crimes Trials and Other Essays”.
But I’m sure it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Minor personnel
could be tortured with impunity, and 99% of them would be afraid even to mention
it. It would be hard to get away with torturing somebody like Goering though.
There’s a lot of literature on the subject, more all the time. The Brits appear to have been surprisingly enthusiastic torturers, whether Jewish or not.” Testicle crushing, incidentally, is a tried
and tested method for obtaining confessions. It was used throughout the Middle Ages and particularly
in France during the French Revolution. That the Jews, a scholarly race noted for their vast
erudition and academic achievements, should have mastered all the techniques of testicle crushing
is therefore not surprising. Their talents for acquiring such outré information must not be underestimated. Though Perl had lots of German blood on his hands, he was
nevertheless allowed by the Americans to serve as a prosecutor at the Nuremberg War trials.
Another Jew of note at the Nuremberg war crimes trials was Richard W. Sonnenfeldt. He was the chief interpreter for American prosecutors such as Perl. He “interrogated” some of the
most notorious Nazi leaders of World War II and died in 2009, age 86, at his home in Port
Washington, N.Y. (See here) The Presiding Judge at Nuremberg was
also—coincidence?—a Jew. His name was A.H. Rosenfeld and he was a colonel in the American army. Col. Rosenfeld cheerfully admitted to torturing German prisoners of war as a matter
of policy. “We couldn’t have made those birds talk otherwise,” he remarked
cynically. “It was a trick, and it worked like a charm.”
In a recent private email to me, in response to some of my queries about torture at Nuremberg, Thomas Goodrich, acclaimed author of Hellstorm : The Death of NaziGermany (1944-1947), mentioned the names of four well-known Jews in the American zone whom he identified
as “torturer-inquisitors” : Harry Thon, William Perl, AH Rosenfeld,
and Shlomo Morel. This last-named individual, Shlomo Morel (pictured right), was a particularly
nasty piece of work whom Goodrich describes as follows: “a vicious
monster who drowned men and women in outdoor latrines, who made them eat excrement, who
personally beat captives to death, and who forced women to kiss and make love with disinterred corpses.” (For more grisly details, confirming all this, see here) After escaping from the killing fields of Germany, where he had taken immense pleasure in dancing over mounds of corpses and shedding rivers of human blood, this cruel psychopath “lived
out his life in comfort and ease in Israel.” Yes, Israel!—the
final bolthole and refuge dump for many a runaway Jew fleeing the long arm of the law, a place described in a prescient comment by Adolf Hitler as early as 1925 as “a haven for convicted scoundrels
and a university for budding crooks.” (Mein Kampf,
chapter 11, excerpt.) § Here now are some grisly details about testicle
crushing that the reader may find of some interest. These distasteful details
are given here only because they are relevant to our discussion. If you are of a queasy disposition and prone to easy vomiting, you are advised to skip the description and stop reading right here. Remember
that all this was done to 137 Germans at Nuremberg in order to extract confessions
from them with a view to establishing the “truth” about the Holocaust.
Without all that testicle crushing, the Holocaust might have been much harder to prove. “Standard
practice [to obtain castration] in France from the Middle Ages to the French Revolution was to crush the condemned’s testicles in a vise, which burst them as mush from the scrotum, then crunch
the spermatic cords with pliers. The condemned was turned upside down in order
to maximize the blood flow to his brain, after which he was unable to pass
out or enter a state of shock until, perhaps, the last few seconds of his ordeal. The condemned was sure to vomit repeatedly with violent convulsions,
even well after he had voided the contents of his stomach, but he rarely screamed
except for an initial shriek, which immediately silenced, because the pain
overwhelmed his ability to breathe. Most men would hang and thrash wildly during and
after the crushing of each testicle, and their thrashing would renew upon the crushing of each spermatic cord. This torture method (accompanied by others) was usually reserved for
the crime of regicide or attempted regicide. The condemned was mercifully put
to death afterwards, but his torture routinely lasted for the better part of a
day, witnessed by large crowds. It is interesting to note that, whereas most crowds were instructed to jeer, mock, and ridicule the condemned, and did so even during a disemboweling, and drawing and quartering,
most crowds remained silent and stared with shocked expressions as a castration
was carried out in this manner. Onlookers,
male and female, are recorded to have vomited at the sight of the spectacle. Yes, they certainly knew what they were doing at Nuremberg!
They were the experts. Money Running Out for Needy Holocaust Survivors Moshe Peer’s
Astounding Holy Shoah Tale
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 1 Article 19 >The Tribunal
shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible extent expeditious and nontechnical procedure, and shall admit any evidence which it deems to
be of probative value. Nuremberg
Trial Proceedings Volume 1 Article 21 >The Tribunal
shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations,
including the acts and documents of the committees set up in the various
allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and of records
and findings military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations. The Origin of the ’6 Million Jews’ Figure
The “Six Million” Myth Test Your Holocaust Knowledge Zyklon-B and the
German Delousing Chambers —————————————————————————————————————————————
____Holocaust Revisionism
Documentaries and Videos___ Buchenwald a Dumb Dumb Portrayal
of Evil David Irving The Holocaust Truth, The Whole Truth ~ And Nothing but the Truth Ernst Zundel –
Holocaust Debunked Zundel vs.
Zionist – Truth vs. Lies Holocaust Faker Explains Himself The Holocaust Lie
by David Irving Holocaust Revisionism:
The Truth by Thomas Dalton, PhD The Holocaust Testimonies
You Didn’t Hear Holocaust Hoax Exposed!
Made in Russia: The Holocaust –
Carlos W. Porter The
Montel Williams Show – David Cole and Mark Weber
One-Third of the Holocaust Six Million Jews
1915-1938 Sylvia Stolz –
Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting Evidence in the Zundel Trial Spielberg’s
Hoax – The Last Days of the Big Lie The
Phil Donahue Show – Holocaust Denial
—————————————————————————————————————————————
Exposing the Holocaust™
Hoax
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ordered To Be Silent Recite the Jews’
version of history or face gag orders and/or jail time The thing to keep in mind is that people are being put in jail for
telling the truth. That makes the idea that you are living in a free country a willful
delusion from which no competent decisions about anything may be made.
By John Kaminski pseudoskylax@gmail.com http://johnkaminski.org You are no longer allowed to tell a story that is not approved
by the Jews, especially if it involves holy Holocaust defamation. Like a spreading stain of darkness
slowly asphyxiating the minds of everyone on Earth, the monstrous judicial invention that “truth
is no defense” has unleashed the worst possible future upon our lemming-like human species.
People are being snatched off the streets for daring to analyze their country’s
provably criminal history. A woman lampooning a well-known ethnic group is ordered to stay
off the Internet for a year. And anyone who dares speak critically about Jews in public, after
first having their character assassinated by a huffy Jewish spokesperson, is likely to be arrested
by a very real thought police. The stain of darkness has spread much further than you may have thought,
but a quick scan of the literature that has not yet been completely erased by Amazon and the other
Jewish mind erasers reveals the public knew more 80 years ago about the problem that has
poisoned all life on this planet than we do today. Those who claim to be involved in the quest
for justice should take this assessment to heart, for the time is running out for humanity’s
best qualities as they are steadily being erased by crazies who know nothing of compassion,
humanity or justice. Revisionists are telling the truth
You know the revisionists are telling the truth, that Holohoax is the proper term for all this Jewish Holocaust hysteria, because you know by now — if you are even remotely conscious — that your government is lying about everything it does, so if it says the Holocaust was real,
you’d automatically know it is lying to you . . . again . . . and still. For instance,
our government says it is fighting ISIS in Syria, and then we learn it is funding ISIS in Syria through such third party operatives as Qatar and Saudi Arabia. This not the first time this has happened. America’s longest war is now Afghanistan, and the same principles are at work. The U.S. trains and funds the very people it is supposed to be fighting. We trained the mujahadeen
and they became al-Qaeda, paid by our Pentagon to be both friend and foe.
The purpose
of all these tragic invasions is the same. In Afghanistan, 17 years of military adventurism and
many thousands of lives were spent to protect the poppy crop, providing fuel for the cycle of depravity
that funnels drugs to the streets, children into prison, and profits from slave labor. In
Syria, it’s the oil in the Golan Heights which Israel is already stealing. The
thing to keep in mind is that people are being put in jail for telling the truth. That makes the idea
that you are living in a free country a willful delusion from which no competent decisions about anything
may be made. The only thing Jews fear is the truth. That’s
why all these white countries that have been taken over by Jews are slamming people into jail for challenging
the bogus Jewish version of history. Unfortunately — due to Jews owning the majority of media
outlets around the world — the majority of the people in the world tend to believe their well-distributed
propaganda. Like the official story of 9/11 that has long since fallen
apart, or the now-debunked lies about the invasion of Libya, which led to the mass invasion
of migrants in Europe. Jew puppets Hillary and Obama were responsible for the tragic debasement
of Europe, which they triggered by their criminal assassination of Libya and its beloved leader.
One hundred years of evidence clearly reveals that the Jews tell the truth about nothing, but nothing they have done matches the lies they have told about what they did to the Germans during World War II.
These lies, and the twisted laws they have spawned, are inexorably strangling every country on Earth, and every person on this planet. These laws prevent the perpetrators from humanity’s greatest crimes from ever being apprehended, charged and convicted — because it would be anti-Semitic.
Zombie Germany No one who knows the real
history of the 20th century dares to travel to Germany — or any European Union nation —
anymore. They will be slammed into prison for harboring unacceptable thoughts. As
we speak Lady Michelle Renouf, attempting to attend the kangaroo court trial of the Schaeffer siblings,
fears suffering the same fate as Monika Schaeffer, the Canadian fiddle player who made a humorous
YouTube about her mother and the Holocaust, went to Germany to visit her brother Alfred, and
then was promptly snatched by the Holohoax police and slammed into prison with no charges for
many months. She and her brother Alfred are in court this week, with their futures not bright and
on the line. This is banana republic garbage. In Germany there is no liberty or justice for those
who understand the worldwide Jewish mind scam. Now that Merkel has set the Africans free in Germany,
one can no longer expect any justice there. Renouf has to skulk around Stuttgart clandestinely lest she be arrested by Jewish thugs and funneled off to jail for yet another trial. And
now for the first time, this mind virus has spread to England, where for the first time a man
has been jailed for daring to insist on the true facts of history. Jew cops in England
Jeremy Bedford-Turner — a.k.a. Jez Turner — was sentenced to 12 months
for a 2015 speech he gave criticizing a Jewish organization known as Shomrim, which is essentially
a Jewish police force that works closely with local police.
Prior to Turner’s
hasty conviction, Andrew Joyce wrote: Bear
in mind that the Crown Prosecution Service has already told Gideon Falter—not once, but several times—that Jez Turner has committed no crime. If
Jez is now found “guilty” on some
trumped-up charge, the Crown Prosecution Service will not only lose all credibility but the world will see for itself that Jez was right all along when
he allegedly said: “All politicians
are nothing but a bunch of puppets dancing to a Jewish tune.” https://www.darkmoon.me/2017/the-trial-of-jez-turner-a-jewish-witch-hunt/ Writer Robert Henderson wrote, But even with
a jury the odds were heavily against a not guilty verdict. In the minds of jurors must be the fear of being called a racist, a fear which has been so successfully inculcated in the general population that it produces an automated reflex of panic and terror when faced with the possibility of the label being stuck on them. Any juror faced with a case such as this must have in the back of their minds that to return a not guilty would be to risk being
called a racist. There is also the sheer shock factor of hearing politically
incorrect views being unashamedly spoken. As it was the
jury was out for less than two hours and returned a unanimous version
of guilty. https://livinginamadhouse.wordpress.com/2018/05/17/the-ever-narrowing-range-of-permitted-opinion-in-england/ Long ago we knew more than we know now Before
World War II started, one observer wrote: The press has degenerated under Jewish control
and influence into lying propaganda agencies whose chief mission appears
to be to deceive and befuddle the people. In Protocol 12
the Elders of Zion say of the Press: “Not
a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them. — George Armstrong, The Rothschild Money Trust,
1940, p.47 This Protocol was written before 1905. Seventy-eight years after this was written, the modern world has much less an idea that Jews control everything, and the laws across Europe that prevent debunking all these obvious Jewish lies are swallowing up people trying to point out the truth of history
one valiant martyr at a time. Jews can’t prove 6 million died, but we can prove 273,000 died, not all of them Jews, in the German labor camps. To think of all the false Jewish stories
about fake Holocaust stories told by pathetic wretches in search of celebrity is to contemplate the
spectrum of human psychological disorders. So, the long and short
of it is, you may not even think about a story that affects Jews negatively, because this has been determined
to be a crime against the state. Perhaps you can think of other things that the Jews appear to be out to take from you, beyond your ability to think for yourself. John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why
we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as
the engine of our demise. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!
British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!
British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history. A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!
British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!
Greetings ladies and gentlemen. A few days ago an article
about your humble author appeared at the Holocaust Controversies blog written by a certain Hans Metzner. Titled Panagiotis Heliotis - The
New Star Shining in the Revisionist Coffin?
This is the last of a series of parts on the same topic. And what
a topic that is! If you have missed the previous parts you can find them here
or on our You Tube Channel.
_____________________________________________________________________ Review of Auschwitz Forensically Examined
Auschwitz—Forensically Examined by Cyrus
Cox summarizes the forensic evidence proving that Auschwitz was not an extermination
camp. This article will review some of the important points mentioned in this book. The Chemistry of Auschwitz Forensic tests show that all of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof and
Majdanek have one thing in common: their walls are permeated with Prussian Blue,
a compound of cyanide and iron readily discernible by a distinctive deep blue
color. Not only the inner surfaces, but also the outside walls and the mortar between the bricks of the delousing facilities have Prussian Blue staining. On the other hand, nothing of this sort can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[1] Cyrus Cox writes: While there is an enormous
presence of cyanide residue in the masonry of the disinfestation chambers, in the alleged homicidal
gas chambers there is no significant presence at all… The simplest explanation for this is that there were no gassings with Zyklon B in the alleged homicidal gas chambers, plain and simple.[2] Proponents of the orthodox
Holocaust story, however, cannot concede that there were no gassings with Zyklon B in the alleged-homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau. They have made the following attempts to explain away the results of forensic tests showing no significant cyanide residues in the
alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau:[3] 1) The Kraków
Institute of Forensic Research published results in 1994 that claimed not to have understood how it was possible for Prussian Blue to have formed in walls as a result of their being exposed to hydrogen-cyanide gas.
The researchers therefore adopted methods that excludedPrussian Blue and similar
iron/cyanide compounds from their analyses. Their assumptions made it practically
impossible to distinguish between rooms massively exposed to hydrogen cyanide
and those which were not: all would have a “cyanide residue” of close to zero. The Kraków researchers
concluded from their deliberately crippled analyses that, since the gas chambers
and delousing facilities all had similar amounts of cyanide residues, humans
were gassed in the gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[4] Cox dismisses this Kraków
Institute of Forensic Research report:
The cockeyed blabber about not understanding or about blue wall paint is egregious
flimflam at best; in reality, however, it is a lie to confuse the audience.[5] 2) Dr. James
Roth testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he received samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity as the laboratory manager of Alpha Analytical Laboratories. The purpose of the tests was to
determine the total iron and cyanide content in the samples. Dr. Roth testified
that the Prussian Blue produced by a reaction of the iron and hydrogen cyanide
could penetrate deeply into porous materials such as brick and iron.[6] Dr. Roth later changed this
testimony in a 1999 movie titled Mr. Death produced by Errol Morris.
Dr. Roth states in this movie:
Cyanide is a surface reaction. It’s probably not going to penetrate more than 10 microns. Human hair
is 100 microns in diameter. Crush this sample up, I have just diluted that sample 10,000; 100,000
times. If you’re going to go looking for it, you’re going to look on the surface
only. There’s no reason to go deep, because it’s not going to be there.[7] Cox writes in regard
to Dr. Roth’s statement in Mr. Death:
That was a lie. To hydrogen-cyanide gas, plaster and mortar are as permeable as a sponge is to water…
Roth knows this, because when he testified under oath at the 1988 Zündel trial, he truthfully
said: ‘In porous materials such as brick and mortar, [hydrogen cyanide] could go fairly
deep as long as the surface stayed open’…[8] 3) Dr. Richard
Green, who says “I am not embarrassed to call Holocaust denial hate speech,” agrees with Germar Rudolf that the Prussian Blue found in the delousing chambers is the result of gassing with hydrogen
cyanide. However, Dr. Green offers a possible alternative explanation for why
the outside walls of the delousing chambers have blue staining. Green writes: [T]he discoloration on the outside of walls
[of the delousing chambers], ought to make one consider what possible processes could
have taken place outside of the delousing chambers. For example, is it possible that materials that
had been soaked with aqueous solutions of HCN were leaned against the outside of the buildings? Not enough is known, but it is premature to conclude that the staining on the outside of buildings owes
its origins to processes that took place within those buildings.[9] Cox writes concerning
Dr. Green’s statement:
Which absurd auxiliary thesis will come next? Maybe the one by Dr. Richard Green, who seriously proposed
that the cyanide residues in the disinfestation chambers did not stem from fumigations, but
were caused by objects leaning against the wall which had been soaked in a “hydrogen-cyanide
solution”? Where then do the cyanide residues close to the ceiling, in the middle and
outside of the wall come from?[10] 4) French
biochemist and Auschwitz veteran Dr. Georges Wellers provides another explanation by stating that humans are considerably more sensitive to hydrogen cyanide than insects. The homicidal gassings at Auschwitz/Birkenau
thus were conducted with smaller amounts of hydrogen cyanide over shorter times.
Wellers says the victims would have inhaled almost all of the hydrogen cyanide,
so there presumably was nothing left to react with the masonry.[11] Cox writes that Wellers’s
explanation overlooks several things: - Executions in U.S. gas chambers took on average around nine minutes before the victims were dead;
- The Zyklon B used in Auschwitz/Birkenau slowly discharges its toxin over a
period of one to two hours,
- in contrast to US methods, in which a cyanide “egg”
virtually “boils” in a pot of pure sulfuric acid;
- None
of the alleged-homicidal gas chambers used in Auschwitz/Birkenau had devices such as warm-air blowers
- to aid evaporation of the hydrogen cyanide. Such devices were part of the standard equipment of the disinfestation
- chambers used in that period (the gas chambers are said to have used
- precisely the same form of Zyklon B as did the disinfestation chambers);
- The concentration of toxic gas in the chambers would have steadily increased for one or
two hours; therefore,
- ventilation of the chamber before the complete evaporation
- of the hydrogen cyanide would have been of no avail; and
- The victims before
dying could have inhaled only an insignificant part of the
- hydrogen-cyanide gas that
would have been in the homicidal gas chambers.[12]
Cox lists several additional factors indicating
that the alleged-homicidal gas chambers had a significantly higher tendency of
forming long-term-stable cyanide residue than the disinfestation buildings. He concludes: In the masonry samples of the underground morgue, we
should find approximately similar residues as in the disinfestation chambers, if not even more,
provided that the stories told by the witnesses are true.[13] The Cremations of Auschwitz Cyrus Cox debunks eyewitness testimony claiming that gigantic flames burst
from the chimneys of the crematories of Auschwitz/Birkenau. The construction
blueprints show that the flues and the chimney of the largest crematories in
Auschwitz/Birkenau each had a length of about 15 meters. The coke and coal used to fuel the furnaces burn with a short flame not exceeding half a meter. This fuel could not even have produced flames that protruded
out of the cremation muffles.[14] Many witnesses also
claim that smoke constantly covered all of Auschwitz/Birkenau. However, none of the aerial photos taken of Birkenau by Allied reconnaissance planes since late May 1944 shows a column of smoke from any of the
crematories. This is so even though these facilities were allegedly cremating
the Jews deported from Hungary at their peak capacity.[15] The capacity of the Auschwitz/Birkenau
crematories has also been exaggerated by proponents of the official Holocaust story. The
crematories of Auschwitz/Birkenau had muffles with doors 1.97 feet in width and height, and were meant to cremate only one corpse at a time without casket. The full incineration of a single corpse took about
an hour.[16] If one considers that the furnace had to be cleaned daily from ash and cinders,
a coke-fired crematory could be operated for a maximum of only about 20 hours
per day.[17] There effectively were never
more than 38 cremation muffles concurrently operating at Auschwitz/Birkenau. Their
theoretical maximum daily capacity on a 20-hour-per-day operational schedule amounts to: 38 muffles x 20 hours x 1 corpse/hour = 760 corpses. Since single furnaces or even complete crematories had to be shut down
on occasion for necessary repairs, and since the furnaces were often operated
by unskilled detainees, one can assume that the actual cremation capacity at Auschwitz/Birkenau was significantly lower.[18] There was never enough capacity at Auschwitz/Birkenau to cremate 4,800 corpses
per day as alleged by pro-Holocaust historians.[19] A set of documents has been
preserved showing the quantities of coke delivered to Auschwitz/Birkenau in the period from February 1942 to October 1943. These documents show that the new crematories at Birkenau weren’t used
as intensively as the old one at the Auschwitz main camp, and that there was
not enough fuel delivered to cremate the additional hundreds of thousands of
corpses claimed to have accrued at Auschwitz/Birkenau. These documents also show
that coke deliveries starting in March 1943 approximately match the numbers of
dead reported in the Auschwitz/Birkenau Death Books. [20] Cox does acknowledge that
approximately 13,000 corpses were buried in mass graves in Birkenau in 1942 because
deaths from a typhus epidemic exceeded the limited cremation capacity in the camp at the time. Most of these bodies were later exhumed, with many bodies probably directly burned on pyres.[21] However, Cox says a photograph taken of Birkenau on May 31, 1944 provides irrefutable
proof that the alleged incineration of Hungarian Jews on enormous outdoor pyres
has been nothing other than a gigantic propaganda lie.[22] Carlo Mattogno agrees with
Cox’s analysis. In his book Auschwitz: The End of a Legend, Mattogno
states in regard to Allied aerial photographs taken at Birkenau on May 31, 1944: It is pointed out also that the aerial photographs taken
by the Allied military on 31 May 1944, at the crucial time of presumed extermination, on the
day of the arrival at Birkenau of about 15,000 deportees, and after 14 days of intense arrivals
(184,000 deportees, averaging 13,000 per day) and with an extermination toll (according to Pressac’s hypothesis) of at least 110,000 homicidally gassed, which would have had to average 7,800 per day, every single
day for 14 consecutive days; after all of that, the photographs do not show the slightest evidence
of this alleged enormous extermination: No trace of smoke, no trace of pits, crematory or otherwise,
burning or not, no sign of dirt extracted from pits, no trace of wood set aside for use in
pits, no sign of vehicles or any other type of activity in the crucial zones of the courtyard
of Crematory V nor in the earth of Bunker 2, nor in Crematories II and III. These photographs
constitute irrefutable proof that the story of extermination of the Hungarian Jews is historically unfounded.[23]
Suppressing Evidence Cox describes the first independent forensic report on Auschwitz: In 1972, the two architects
Walter Dejaco and Fritz Ertl, who were involved in the planning and construction of the crematoria
at Auschwitz-Birkenau, had to stand trial in Vienna for assisting in mass murder. The Auschwitz Museum
had sent the Viennese court the construction plans of these buildings. Because the judges found themselves incompetent to evaluate these plans, they tasked the Viennese architect Gerhard Dubin, a certified engineer, to
examine these designs to ascertain whether the spaces denoted by the Auschwitz Museum as execution
chambers could have been used as such or could have been restructured for such use. Dubin answered
“No” to both questions in his expert report. This was one of the reasons why both
defendants were ultimately acquitted by the jury. Subsequently, an unknown person removed Dubin’s
embarrassing (for the orthodoxy) expert report from the trial records, because today it is not
to be found there. This destruction of evidence is not only grossly anti-scientific, it is also
a criminal act.[24] The Holocaust orthodoxy
continues to suppress evidence to this day. Publicly disputing the official Holocaust narrative is a crime in some 19 countries. Moreover, in Germany it is prohibited by threat of punishment to file a motion
with the court to admit evidence seeking to prove that revisionist statements
are correct. The reason given is that such motions constitute “Holocaust
denial” and would therefore be a criminal act during a public trial. Accordingly, several defense lawyers have been sentenced simply because they filed such a motion.[25] Holocaust revisionist
writings cannot even be read in court in modern-day Germany. Cox writes:
In order to keep the public in the dark about the fact that the
defendants are being sent to the dungeon for entirely harmless and scientifically well-based
statements, their writings for which they are on trial are moreover not read out in the courtroom,
which would normally be obligatory, but the trial participants—judges, prosecution, defense—are
ordered to read the material by themselves at home. Ever since the introduction
of these measures, silence has been once more every citizen’s primary duty in German courtrooms.
Shut up, and don’t you dare protest![26]
Conclusion Auschwitz—Forensically Examined provides an excellent introduction to the forensic evidence proving
that Auschwitz/Birkenau was not an extermination camp. Readers who are interested
in a more detailed analysis of the forensic evidence can read books written by
Germar Rudolf and Carlo Mattogno to gain additional insights.
Cyrus Cox states the primary reason for knowing that there were no homicidal gas
chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau: “While there is an enormous presence of
cyanide residue in the masonry of the disinfestation chambers, in the alleged homicidal
gas chambers there is no significant presence at all.”[27] Pro-Holocaust historians have yet to provide a credible explanation why no
significant presence of cyanide residue has been found in the alleged homicidal
gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau. Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes: “…for any alleged human gas chamber found in a German World War II labour camp let us merely measure cyanide in the walls: if it’s not there, it didn’t
happen.”[28] Endnotes [1] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and
Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw,
Ala.: Theses and Dissertations Press, 2000, pp. 363-371. [2] Cox, Cyrus, Auschwitz—Forensically Examined, Uckfield, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, 2019, pp. 41, 53.
[4] Rudolf, Germar. op. cit., pp. 368-369. [5] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 40. [6] Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in the Canadian “False News”
Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers Ltd., 1992, pp. 362-363.
[7] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mr._Death; Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, introduced in evidence during the libel case before the Queen’s
Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice, The Strand, London, David John Cawdell Irving v. (1) Penguin Books Limited,
(2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, ref. 1996 I. No. 1113, 2001, p. 16; http://www.phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/irving-david/rudolf/affweb.pdf. [8] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 42. [10] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 54. [20] Ibid., pp. 67, 70-71. [23] Mattogno, Carlo. Auschwitz: The End of a Legend, Newport Beach, Cal.: The Institute for Historical Review, 1994,
p. 32. [24] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., pp. 21-22. [28] Kollerstrom, Nicholas. Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfield, UK: Castle Hill Publishers,
2015, p. 70. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
DEBUNKING THE MYTH
OF DR. MENGELE By Mike King Of the many sub-fables
spun off of the grand fable of “Auschwitz ™,” the most shocking
and enduring is the myth of that evil, sadistic, mass-murdering monster whose name ranks
behind only those of Adolf Hitler and SS Chief Heinrich Himmler
on the all-time scary dude list. The notorious camp doctor known for conducting live invasive
experiments on Jewish inmates has long since
been immortalized in articles, books and films. You know the name – none
other than the big bad Dr. Josef Mengele (cue dramatic piano music) -- aka
"The Angel of Death ™."
(cue even more dramatic piano
music) There is, however,
just a wee little problem with this official narrative of the big bad Mengele.. To put it bluntly, just like
those long-since discredited tales of shrunken heads, lamp shades & soap made from dead
Jews, “zee gas chambers ™,”
and babies being tossed into open fire-pits
– the Myth of Mengele is, well, bullshit from start to finish! Mengele-Mania has generated lots of shekels for lots of writers and
film makers.
*
* The Three Biggest Lies About Dr. Mengele 1. He
condemned inmates who could not work to death in the gas chambers 2.
He conducted cruel experiments with twins. 3.
He conducted other cruel medical experiments on random
inmates Let us debunk: 1. Mengele and the Gas Chambers This one is easy because we absolutely know, for certain, that there were
no gas chambers at Bullschwitz or any other internment camp!
If you’re new to “Holocaust Denial ™,”
here are a pair of powerful pieces (to read later)
which will – unless you are in deep denial – forever dispel the silly
notion of “zee gas chambers ™ ” – (here & here). Hence, how could Dr. Mengele have condemned people to die in "gas chambers
™"
that never even existed? The "gas chambers"
lie has been debunked so thoroughly that Amazon had to be pressured by "the usual suspects" into banning many
books about the Holohoax and World War II.
2. Mengele and Experiments on Twins If the alleged
experiments Mengele is alleged to have performed with twins were so cruel and deadly (like
sewing twin babies together in an attempt to artificially create conjoined “Siamese Twins!” --- ha ha ha ha ha -- yeah, right!), then how were most of the twins enrolled in his research able to survive the war and then, in 1984, form an association which still lobbies for their interests?
The organization / museum is named “CANDLES” (Children
of Auschwitz Nazi Deadly Lab Experiment Survivors). In fact,
they, their descendants and their advocates are still raking in shekels off
of Mengele's wrongly tarnished name (cha ching!). (here)
Now just focus
on the name of that organization for a bit and ask yourself: How the frickety-frack can “deadly lab experiments” leave any so many "survivors?"
The evidence – or lack thereof – is very clear: Mengele did not commit any crimes
on the Jewish twins. An anthropologist in addition to being a physician, Mengele's research was
limited to behavioral / observational studies only – nothing surgical. 1. Twins Jiri and Josef Fiser were studied by
Mengele, and "survived"
to tell tales about it. // 2 & 3: Twin Eva Kor gives speeches on how she "survived"
Mengele. 3. Mengele Randomly Conducted Other Cruel Experiments The “eyewitness” testimony
as to the medically senseless and cruel experiments supposedly performed by Mengele
(changing eye colors by dye injections, removing healthy teeth just for the fun of it, transplanting
organs to random places in the body -- ha ha ha ha ha --yeah,
right!) ring as absurd and untrue as stories of shrunken heads
and lamp shades. But because the “survivors ™
” have been sainted, none
dare to question them. Interestingly, the “victims” of these monstrous experiments, never
showed any signs of these cruel procedures. There was never even the slightest bit
of evidence to support the claims of these “survivors” -- no documents,
no autopsies. Nothing!
1. Mengele
also studied dwarfism. Above, the 7 dwarfs of the Ovitz family. // 2. Tales of Mad Mengele torturing Jews by ripping
out healthy teeth just for his amusement are totally without basis, and not even worth rebutting.
Who Really was Josef Mengele? Before the war, the
brilliant Mengele, after studying philosophy, went on to earn doctorates in anthropology and
medicine. His main career focus was as a researcher – hence, the observation of
twins, dwarfs and others at Auschwitz. During the war, Mengele was awarded the Iron Cross 2nd
Class, and then an Iron Cross 1st Class for his bravery in rescuing two men from
a burning tank. After being seriously wounded in action on the eastern front in 1942, he was declared
unfit for active service and then transferred to Auschwitz where he served as a doctor
and researcher. Now, here’s the kicker. Dr. Mengele, as one of the lead physicians in a camp
afflicted from time to time with outbreaks of typhus, worked tirelessly to save lives –
not take them! The Zyklon B “gas” was a pesticide used to kill lice, not people.
Furthermore, under the jurisdiction of Mengele, and other camp doctors, an estimated 3000
Jewish babies were born and cared for at Auschwitz. True story, boys and girls. Read
"The Auschwitz Baby Boom" (here) 1. Drawing depicts Dr. Eduard
Wirths -- an Auschwitz doctor and colleague of Mengele's -- as
a valiant knight waging battle against deadly typhus-carrying lice. // 2. SS officers at Auschwitz.
From left to right: Richard Baer, Josef Mengele, Josef Kramer, Rudolf Höss // 3. Many
of the Jewish babies born at Auschwitz "survived" and lived long lives.
About four years after the end of the war, Mengele, a true-believing SS man, escaped to Argentina
-- where he lived for about 10 years while working as a carpenter. He then fled to
Paraguay in 1959 and Brazil in 1960. Now a most-wanted fugitive, Mengele was being hunted
by the United States, West Germany, Israel, and independently by the hideous “Nazi hunter,”
Simon Wiesenthal of "babies in the bon-fire" fame. He eluded
capture in spite of extradition requests by the West German government and covert operations
by Israel’s Mossad. Headline:
New York Times (May 11, 1985) Three Nations Joining to Hunt Mengele By Ralph Blumenthal
(cough cough) (here)
In time, the
hate-filled psychopaths came to believe their own dirty lies about noble Dr. Mengele -- Image 1: NY Slimes front page story
// Image 2: Lots of shekels were offered to locate Dr. Mengele.
Unbeknown to his hunters at the time -- the good doctor, philosopher, anthropologist,
decorated war hero, gentleman, scholar, humanitarian and carpenter died in 1979, at the
age of 67, after suffering a stroke while swimming off the
coast in Brazil. (Or did Mossad finally get him "on the down
low?") He was buried under a fake name. According to his only child, his son, Rolf, Dr. Mengele maintained his innocence until the end. We totally believe him. And, given
all the other lies we’ve been fed about everything
else related to “The Bad War” -- you should too.
_______________________________________________________________ How Danuta Czech Invented 100,000
Gassing Victims An Analysis of the Auschwitz Chronicle – Part 1: 1942 Abstract Danuta Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle are one of the most
important secondary sources on the history of the Auschwitz Camp.[1] The information found in it is a major basis for a large body of literature dealing with the
Auschwitz Camp. All the more important it is, then, to verify whether the data contained in
it is accurate. The following paper looks into the reliability of data contained in the Chronicle dealing
with mass deportations mainly of Jews[2] from all over Europe to Auschwitz in 1942. It compares the data contained in the primary sources quoted by Czech with what Czech herself claims about them.
Previous Research Already in 1994, the Spanish revisionist Enrique Aynat
published a booklet that contains a critical article on the way Danuta Czech determined the
fate of the Jews deported from France and Belgium to Auschwitz in 1942.[3] He pointed out that the only source Czech relied upon regarding arrivals at Auschwitz were
handwritten lists of registration numbers assigned to the deportees which were clandestinely
compiled by inmates and smuggled out of the camp in 1944. These lists contain the date of an
arriving transport, the registration numbers assigned to male and female deportees, and in
many but not all cases the location whence these transports had come. It is not known how reliable
these lists are. After all, they were compiled by individuals naturally hostile to their captors.
It is important to emphasize, however, that these lists do not contain any information
about inmates arriving at the camp who were not registered, and if such deportees existed,
what their fates were. Extant documents from the German wartime authorities in
France, Belgium and the Netherlands are more detailed about the persons deported to Auschwitz,
since among them are lists containing not only the exact number of deportees sent to Auschwitz
with every transport, but also the deportees’ names, among other things. Hence it is known
that not every person deported on a certain train to Auschwitz was admitted to that camp on
the train’s arrival (the journey usually took two days). The central question is: what
happened to the persons put on a train at the point of origin who were not registered at the
Auschwitz Camp? The (obligatory) mainstream hypothesis is that, by and large, these persons
simply perished “in the gas chambers” at Auschwitz. In his 1994 paper, Aynat put forward a number of arguments disputing that claim, among
them German wartime documents indicating that Jews fit for labor where sent to Auschwitz for
the purpose of labor deployment, whereas those unfit for work were meant to be deported not
to Auschwitz but to the “Government General”, i.e., occupied Poland. Since
during the war Germany had incorporated the area around Auschwitz into its province of Upper
Silesia, in their eyes Auschwitz was a part of Germany, not of occupied Poland. Aynat
discusses in some detail the fact that, for the various resistance movements highly active inside
and outside the camp, Auschwitz was virtually transparent, as information about what was going
on inside the camp was frequently and easily reported to the various headquarters of the resistance.
In other words: nothing could be kept a secret at Auschwitz. However, when analyzing the documents
produced by the Polish government in exile regarding Auschwitz, it becomes clear that the sensational
news of conveyor-belt mass murder in chemical slaughterhouses does not play a major role, and
that the claims (not) made in these documents to a large degree undercut today’s mainstream
narrative. [4] Aynat also discusses several wartime sources and documents pointing to the fact that Jews
sent to Auschwitz were in some cases shipped further east. A year after Aynat’s
initial book on the topic was published, the Auschwitz Museum published a five-volume work on
the so-called Death Books (Sterbebücher) of Auschwitz containing detailed information
on almost 69,000 inmates incarcerated at Auschwitz – meaning officially registered there
– who had died there. Aynat subsequently did the Herculean work of matching, one by one,
the names listed on the deportation lists of transports originating in France with those listed
in the Death Books in order to match them, so the fate of these deportees could be determined.
His results show that many if not most of the French Jews deported to and registered at Auschwitz
tragically died there, probably mainly due to the catastrophic typhus epidemic which raged
in this camp starting in early 1942.[5] The present paper will look in a more-detailed fashion into how Danuta Czech
handled the sources she had at her disposal to come to the claims she made in her Chronicle about the number of Auschwitz deportees allegedly killed in gas chambers. I will focus here
exclusively on deportees sent to the camp with major deportation transports organized by Germany’s
Reichssicherheitshauptamt (RSHA, Reich Security Main Office), the National-Socialist
equivalent to the current U.S. Department of Homeland Security, so to speak. A considerable
number of deportees from these transports are said to have been sent, without registration,
straight from the railway ramp to the gas chambers. I will establish in this paper how Czech
makes that determination based on the evidence adduced. I will not discuss the many claimed
gassings of usually smaller batches of inmates which had been properly admitted to and registered
in the camp but which are said to have met their gruesome end in the gas chambers later due
to some more-or-less-arbitrary decision by the SS administration or some SS physician. The
gassings resulting from these so-called “selections” among regular prisoners have
been thoroughly discussed elsewhere by Carlo Mattogno, where he shows how the extant documentation
in many cases clashes with claims of mass murder.[6] The Data The following
table contains data about all the entries in Czech’s Chronicle referring to
arrivals of deportation transports at Auschwitz which are mentioned either in extant documents
by the German authorities responsible for these deportation trains, and/or in the clandestinely
compiled list of registered arrivals mentioned earlier.[7] The meaning of each column is as follows: Column 1: The train’s date of
arrival at Auschwitz; also the respective entry in Czech’s Chronicle.
Column 2: Number of arriving inmates according to D. Czech. In some case, Czech either gives no number or indicates by the way she expresses herself that she does not know
how many inmates were on that transport (“etwa” in the German edition; “approximately” in the English edition). In these cases, I entered three question marks for cases where Czech
makes no assumptions, followed with a number in parentheses in cases where she speculates about
the total number of deportees. Column 3: point of origin; this derives either from
the clandestine list of assigned registration numbers or from other extant wartime documentation.
In some cases, this is based merely on temporal correlation with an event claimed elsewhere
(Norway, Luxemburg). In that case, I have entered a question mark with Czech’s speculation
given in parentheses. Column 4: number of registered females according to the
clandestinely compiled lists of registration numbers. Column 5: number of registered
males, as above. Column 6: sum of previous two columns.
Column 7: percentage of deported inmates registered at Auschwitz. Column
8: Number of deportees not registered at Auschwitz with unknown fate. Column 9:
fate of claimed unregistered deportees according to Czech. Column 10: proof adduced
by Czech to support here claim about the fate of unregistered deportees. In case the total number
of deportees is unknown/uncertain but she makes a claim in this regard anyhow, her source for
that number is given, if she has any.
Date | arrivals | from | reg. male | reg. female | reg. total |
reg. % | unreg. | unreg. fate |
proof | 3/26/1942 |
999 | Slovakia | |
999 | 999 | 100% | 0 | | | 3/28/1942 | 798 | Slovakia | | 798 | 798 | 100% |
0 | | |
3/30/1942 | 1112 | France | 1112 | | 1112 | 100% | 0 |
| | 4/2/1942 |
965 | Slovakia | |
965 | 965 | 100% | 0 | | | 4/3/1942 | 997 |
Slovakia | | 997 |
997 | 100% | 0 | | | 4/19/1942 | 1000 | Slovakia |
464 | 536 | 1000 | 100% | 0 |
| | 4/23/1942 |
1000 | Slovakia | 543 |
457 | 1000 | 100% | 0 | | | 4/24/1942 | 1000 | Slovakia | 442 | 558 | 1000 | 100% |
0 | | |
4/29/1942 | 723 | Slovakia | 423 | 300 |
723 | 100% | 0 | | | 5/22/1942 | 1000 | Slovakia |
| | 1000 |
100% | 0 | |
| 6/7/1942 | 1000 | France | | |
1000 | 100% | 0 | | | 20/6/1942 | 659 | Slovakia |
404 | 255 | 659 | 100% | 0 |
| | 6/24/1942 |
999 | France | 933 |
66 | 999 | 100% |
0 | | |
6/27/1942 | 1000 | France | 1000 | | 1000 | 100% | 0 |
| | 6/30/1942 |
1038 | France | 1004 |
34 | 1038 | 100% | 0 | | | 7/4/1942 | ??? |
Slovakia | 264 | 108 |
372 | - | “rest” |
gassed | none | 7/8/1942 | 1170* | France |
| | 1170 |
100% | 0 | |
| 7/11/1942 | ??? | Slovakia | 182 | 148 | 330 | - |
“rest” | gassed | none | 7/17/1942 | 2000 |
Netherlands | 1251 | 300 |
1551 | 78% | 449 | gassed | Höss |
7/18/1942 | ??? | Slovakia | 327 | 178 |
505 | - | “rest” |
gassed | none | 7/19/1942 | 928 | France | 809 | 119 | 928 |
100% | 0 | |
| 7/21/1942 | 1000 | France | 504 | 121 | 625 | 63% |
375 | gassed | none |
7/22/1942 | 931 | Netherlands | 479 | 297 |
776 | 83% | 155 | gassed | none |
7/23/1942 | 827 | France | 411 | 390 |
801 | 97% | 26 | gassed | none |
7/24/1942 | 1000 | France | 615 | 385 |
1000 | 100% | 0 | | | 7/25/1942 | ??? | Slovakia |
192 | 93 | 285 |
- | “rest” | gassed | none | 7/25/1942 |
1000 | Netherlands | 516 |
293 | 809 | 81% | 191 | gassed |
none | 7/26/1942 | 1000 | France | 370 | 630 | 1000 | 100% |
0 | | |
7/28/1942 | 1010 | Netherlands | 473 | 315 |
788 | 78% | 222 | gassed | none |
7/29/1942 | 990 | France | 248 | 742 |
990 | 100% | 0 | | | 7/30/1942 | 1000 | France |
270 | 514 | 784 | 78% | 216 |
| | 8/1/1942 |
??? | Slovakia | 165 |
75 | 240 | - |
“rest” | gassed | none | 8/2/1942 | 1052 |
France | 693 | 359 |
1052 | 100% | 0 | | | 8/4/1942 | 1013 | Netherlands |
429 | 268 | 697 | 69% | 316 |
gassed | none | 8/5/1942 | 1034 | France | 22 | 542 | 564 |
55% | 470 | gassed | none | 8/5/1942 |
998 | Belgium | 426 |
318 | 744 | 75% | 254 | - | | 8/7/1942 | 1014 |
France | 214 | 96 |
310 | 31% | 704 | gassed | none |
8/7/1942 | 987 | Netherlands | 315 | 149 |
464 | 47% | 523 | gassed | none |
8/9/1942 | 1069 | France | 63 | 211 |
274 | 26% | 795 | gassed | none |
8/11/1942 | 559 | Netherlands | 164 | 131 |
295 | 53% | 264 | gassed | none |
8/12/1942 | 1006 | France | 140 | 100 |
240 | 24% | 766 | gassed | none |
8/13/1942 | 999 | Belgium | 290 | 228 |
518 | 52% | 481 | gassed | none |
8/14/1942 | 1007 | France | 233 | 62 |
295 | 29% | 712 | gassed | none |
8/15/1942 | 505 | Netherlands | 98 | 79 |
177 | 35% | 328 | gassed | none |
8/16/1942 | 991 | France | 115 | 0 |
115 | 12% | 876 | gassed | none |
8/17/1942 | 1000 | Belgium | 157 | 205 |
362 | 36% | 638 | gassed | none |
8/18/1942 | ??? | Yugoslavia | 87 | 69 |
156 | - | 0 |
- | | 8/18/1942 | 506 | Netherlands |
319 | 40 | 359 |
71% | 147 | gassed | none | 8/19/1942 |
997 | France | 65 |
35 | 100 | 10% |
897 | gassed | none |
8/20/1942 | 998 | Belgium | 104 | 71 |
175 | 18% | 823 | gassed | none |
8/21/1942 | 1000 | France | 138 | 45 |
183 | 18% | 817 | gassed | none |
8/22/1942 | ??? | Yugoslavia | 110 | 86 |
196 | - | 0 |
- | | 8/22/1942 | 1008 | Netherlands |
411 | 217 | 628 | 62% | 380 |
gassed | none | 8/23/1942 | 1000 | France |
90 | 18 | 108 |
11% | 892 | gassed | none | 8/25/1942 |
519 | Netherlands | 231 |
38 | 269 | 52% |
250 | gassed | none |
8/26/1942 | ??? | Yugoslavia | 71 | 88 |
159 | - | 0 |
- | | 8/26/1942 | 1000 | France |
92 | | 92 |
9% | 908 | gassed |
none | 8/27/1942 | ??? | ? (Luxemburg) | 82 | | 82 | - |
0 | - | |
8/27/1942 | 995 | Belgium | 101 | 114 |
215 | 22% | 780 | gassed | none |
8/28/1942 | 1000 | France | 227 | 36 |
263 | 26% | 737 | gassed | none |
8/30/1942 | 608 | Netherlands | 0 | 0 |
0 | 0% | 608 |
- | | 8/30/1942 | ??? | Yugoslavia |
45 | 31 | 76 |
- | unknown | gassed? | none | 8/31/1942 |
1000 | France | 253 |
71 | 324 | 32% |
676 | gassed | none |
8/31/1942 | 1000 | Belgium | 200 | | 200 | 20% | 800 |
gassed | none | 9/1/1942 | 608 | Netherlands |
0 | 0 | 0 |
0% | 608 | - |
| 9/2/1942 | 1000 | France | 212 | 27 | 239 | 24% |
761 | gassed | none |
9/3/1942 | 1000 | Belgium | 210 | 86 |
296 | 30% | 704 | gassed | none |
9/4/1942 | 1000 | France | 210 | 113 |
323 | 32% | 677 | gassed | none |
9/5/1942 | 714 | Netherlands | 53 | 0 |
53 | 7% | 661 |
gassed | none | 9/6/1942 | 1013 | France | 216 | 38 | 254 |
25% | 759 | gassed | none | 9/8/1942 |
930 | Netherlands | 206 |
26 | 232 | 25% |
698 | gassed | none |
9/9/1942 | 1000 | France | 259 | 52 |
311 | 31% | 689 | gassed | none |
9/10/1942 | 1000 | Belgium | 221 | 64 |
285 | 29% | 715 | gassed | none |
9/11/1942 | 1000 | France | 223 | 68 |
291 | 29% | 709 | gassed | none |
9/12/1942 | 874 | Netherlands | 226 | 34 |
260 | 30% | 614 | gassed | none |
9/12/1942 | 1000 | France | 302 | 78 |
380 | 38% | 620 | gassed | none |
9/14/1942 | 1000 | Belgium | 295 | 105 |
400 | 40% | 600 | gassed | none |
9/16/1942 | 902 | Netherlands | 247 | 29 |
276 | 31% | 626 | gassed | none |
9/16/1942 | 1000 | France | 306 | 49 |
355 | 36% | 645 | gassed | none |
9/17/1942 | 1048 | Belgium | 230 | 101 |
331 | 32% | 717 | gassed | none |
9/18/1942 | 1003 | France | 300 | 147 |
447 | 45% | 556 | gassed | none |
9/19/1942 | ??? | Slovakia | 206 | 71 |
277 | - | “rest” |
gassed | none | 9/20/1942 | 1002 | Netherlands |
301 | 111 | 412 | 41% | 590 |
gassed | none | 9/20/1942 | 1000 | France |
231 | 110 | 341 | 34% | 659 |
gassed | none | 9/22/1942 | 713 | Netherlands |
133 | 50 | 183 |
26% | 530 | gassed | none | 9/23/1942 |
??? | Slovakia | 294 |
67 | 361 | - |
“rest” | gassed | none | 9/24/1942 | 1000 |
France | 215 | 144 |
359 | 36% | 641 | gassed | none |
9/25/1942 | 1000 | France | 399 | 126 |
525 | 53% | 475 | gassed | none |
9/26/1942 | 928 | Netherlands | 129 | 50 |
179 | 19% | 749 | gassed | none |
9/27/1942 | 1004 | France | 215 | 91 |
306 | 30% | 698 | gassed | none |
9/28/1942 | 1742 | Belgium | 286 | 58 |
344 | 20% | 1398 | gassed | none |
9/29/1942 | 904 | France | 223 | 48 |
271 | 30% | 633 | gassed | none |
9/30/1942 | 610 | Netherlands | 37 | 119 |
156 | 26% | 454 | gassed | none |
10/2/1942 | 210 | France | 34 | 22 |
56 | 27% | 154 |
gassed | none | 10/3/1942 | 1014 | Netherlands |
329 | 33 | 362 |
36% | 652 | gassed | none | 10/7/1942 |
2012 | Netherlands | 540 |
58 | 598 | 30% |
1414 | gassed | none |
10/11/1942 | 1703 | Netherlands | 344 | 108 |
452 | 27% | 1251 | gassed | none |
10/12/1942 | 1674 | Belgium | 28 | 88 |
116 | 7% | 1558 |
gassed | none | 10/14/1942 | 1711 | Netherlands |
351 | 69 | 420 |
25% | 1291 | gassed | none | 10/18/1942 |
1710 | Netherlands | 0 |
116 | 116 | 7% | 1594 | gassed |
none | 10/21/1942 | ??? | Slovakia | 121 | 78 | 199 | - |
“rest” | gassed | none | 10/21/1942 | 1327 |
Netherlands | 497 | 0 |
497 | 37% | 830 | gassed | none |
10/25/1942 | 988 | Netherlands | 21 | 32 |
53 | 5% | 935 |
gassed | none | 10/26/1942 | 1471 | Belgium |
460 | 116 | 576 | 39% | 895 |
gassed | none | 10/27/1942 | 841 | Netherlands |
224 | 205 | 429 | 51% | 412 |
gassed | none | 10/28/1942 | 1866 | Theresienstadt |
215 | 32 | 247 |
13% | 1619 | gassed | none | 11/1/1942 |
659 | Netherlands | 0 |
0 | 0 | 0% |
659 | gassed | none |
11/1/1942 | 1014 | Germany | 0 | 37 |
37 | 4% | 977 |
gassed | none | 11/3/1942 | 1696 | Belgium |
702 | 75 | 777 |
46% | 919 | gassed | none | 11/4/1942 |
954 | Netherlands | 0 |
50 | 50 | 5% |
904 | gassed | none |
11/6/1942 | 1000 | France | 269 | 92 |
361 | 36% | 639 | gassed | none |
11/7/1942 | ??? (2000) | Zichenau | 465 | 229 |
694 | 35% | 1306 | gassed | none | 11/7/1942 | 465 |
Netherlands | 0 | 0 |
0 | 0% | 465 |
gassed | none | 11/8/1942 | ??? (1000) | Zichenau |
0 | 0 | 0 |
0% | 1000 |
gassed | none | 11/8/1942 | 1000 | France |
145 | 82 | 227 |
23% | 773 | gassed | none | 11/9/1942 |
??? (1000) | Białystok | 190 | 104 | 294 |
29% | 706 |
gassed | none | 11/11/1942 | 1000 | France |
150 | 100 | 250 | 25% | 750 |
gassed | none | 11/12/1942 | 758 | Netherlands |
3 | 48 | 51 |
7% | 707 | gassed |
none | 11/13/1942 | 745 | France | 112 | 34 | 146 | 20% |
599 | gassed | none |
11/14/1942 | ??? (2500) |
Zichenau | 633 | 135 |
768 | 31% | 1732 | gassed | none | 11/14/1942 | ???
(1500) | Białystok | 282 | 379 | 661 | 44% |
839 | gassed | none | 11/18/1942 | ???
(209) | ? (Norway) | 8 | 22 | 30 | - | - | gassed | none |
11/18/1942 | ??? (1000) |
Białystok | 165 | 65 | 230 | 23% |
770 | gassed | none | 11/19/1942 | ???
(1500) | Zichenau | 532 | 361 | 893 | 60% |
607 | gassed | none | 11/21/1942 | 726 |
Netherlands | 47 | 35 |
82 | 11% | 644 |
gassed | none | 11/22/1942 | ??? (1500) | Zichenau |
300 | 132 | 432 | 29% | 1068 |
gassed | none | 11/25/1942 | ??? (2000) | Grodno Ghetto |
305 | 128 | 433 | 22% | 1567 |
gassed | none | 11/26/1942 | 709 | Netherlands |
0 | 42 | 42 |
6% | 667 | gassed |
none | 11/28/1942 | ??? (1000) | Zichenau | 325 |
169 | 494 | 49% | 506 | gassed | none | 11/30/1942 |
??? (1000) | Zichenau | 130 | 37 | 167 |
17% | 833 |
gassed | none | 12/1/1942 | 532 | Norway | 186 | 0 | 186 |
35% | 346 | gassed | none | 12/2/1942 |
826 | Netherlands | 77 |
0 | 77 | 9% |
749 | gassed | none |
12/2/1942 | ??? (1000) |
Grodno Ghetto | 178 | 60 |
238 | 24% | 762 | gassed | none | 12/3/1942 | ???
(1000) | Płonsk Ghetto | 347 | 0 | 347 | 35% |
653 | gassed | none | 12/6/1942 | 811 |
Netherlands | 16 | 0 |
16 | 2% | 795 |
gassed | none | 12/6/1942 | ??? (2500) | Mława Ghetto |
406 | 0 | 406 |
16% | 2094 |
gassed | none | 12/8/1942 | ??? (1000) | Grodno Ghetto |
231 | 60 | 291 |
27% | 769 |
gassed | none | 12/10/1942 | 927 | Netherlands |
39 | 3 | 42 |
5% | 885 | gassed |
none | 12/10/1942 | 1060 | Germany | 137 | 25 | 162 | 15% |
898 | gassed | none |
12/10/1942 | ??? (2500) |
Małkinia | 524 | 0 |
524 | 21% | 1976 | gassed | none | 12/12/1942 | ???
(2000) | Małkinia | 416 | 6 | 422 | 21% |
1578 | gassed | none | 12/14/1942 | 757 |
Netherlands | 121 | 0 |
121 | 16% | 636 | gassed | none |
12/14/1942 | ??? (1500) | N.D. Mazow. | 580 | 0 |
580 | 39% | 920 | gassed | none | 12/17/1942 | ???
(2000) | Płonsk Ghetto | 523 | 257 | 780 | 39% |
1220 | gassed | none | Totals: | 143,209 | | |
| 60,815 | 43% | 82,394 |
| | * Acc. to Czech, this transport actually contained political detainees from France, some of whom may have been Jews. |
Danuta Czech also lists a number of deportations for which no entries exist
in the clandestinely compiled registration lists. They all come from either of two sources:
1. A book by the Polish author Natan E. Szternfinkiel (Zagłada Żydow
Sosnowca, Centralna Żydowska Komisja Historyczna, Katowice 1946).
2. Martin Gilbert’s atlas on the Holocaust (Endlösung: Die Vertreibung und Vernichtung der Juden. Ein Atlas, Rowohlt, Reinbek 1982). The first book is marked by anti-German propaganda and is devoid of any reference to any
sources regarding its claims on deportation of Jews from Ilkenau and Sosnowiec (German Sosnowitz)
to Auschwitz. The second is marked by the total absence of any source references. In other words:
both books back up their claims with – nothing. Here are these claimed deportations backed
up by nothing: Date |
arrivals | from | reg. male |
reg. female | reg. total | reg. % |
unreg. | unreg. fate | proof |
5/5/1942 | 5200 |
??? | 0 | 0 |
0 | 0% | 5,200 |
gassed | Gilbert | 5/12/1942 | 1500 | Sosnowitz |
0 | 0 | 0 |
0% | 1,500 | gassed | Szternfinkiel | 6/2/1942 |
??? | Ilkenau | 0 |
0 | 0 | 0% |
??? | gassed | Szternfinkiel |
6/17/1942 | 2000 | Sosnowitz | 0 | 0 |
0 | 0% | 2,000 |
gassed | Szternfinkiel | 6/20/1942 | 2000 | Sosnowitz |
0 | 0 | 0 |
0% | 2,000 | gassed | Szternfinkiel | 1/8/1942 |
5000 | Bendsburg | 0 |
0 | 0 | 0% |
5,000 | gassed | Gilbert |
8/15/1942 | 2000 | Sosnowitz | 27 | 75 |
102 | 5% | 1,898 |
gassed | Szternfinkiel | 8/16/1942 | 2000 | Sosnowitz |
0 | 0 | 0 |
0% | 2,000 | gassed | Szternfinkiel | 8/17/1942 |
2000 | Sosnowitz | 0 |
0 | 0 | 0% |
2,000 | gassed | Szternfinkiel |
8/18/1942 | 2000 | Sosnowitz | 0 | 0 |
0 | 0% | 2,000 |
gassed | Szternfinkiel | Subtotals: | 23,700 |
| | |
102 | | 23,598 | | | Totals: | 166,909 | | |
| 60,917 | 36% | 105,992 |
| |
All deportees of these transports are said to have been killed in gas chambers,
with only one exception: the entry of August 15, for which Czech gives a number of registered
inmates which she must have derived from the registration lists. However, there is nothing in
these documents confirming that the transport with which these 102 admitted deportees arrived
consisted of 2,000 inmates, let alone that 1898 of them were killed. In fact, Szternfinkiel
insists in all ca ses that the deportees were killed all and sundry, hence Czech’s correction
here is a manipulation of the source. Data Analysis Idle
Bunker 1 The mass murder of the Jews at Auschwitz using gas chambers is said
to have started sometime in early 1942. For this purpose, the interior of an old farmhouse in
the vicinity of the Birkenau Camp is said to have been converted into a set of homicidal gas
chambers. Czech claims that this building was put into operation on March 20. The sources she
quotes for this event (statements by R. Höss and P. Broad), however, do not confirm her
date. In fact, the sources are not specific regarding the exact date and contradict each other
to some degree. A more important question is: who was killed in these gas chambers?
If we look at the first table containing deportation transports for whose existence there is
at least some documentary evidence, we realize that, until early July 1942, every single person
deported to Auschwitz with those transport was properly registered and admitted to the camp.
Czech even says so explicitly in a footnote to her entry of March 26, 1942 about the first transport arriving at Auschwitz (from Slovakia), explaining that only individuals fit for
labor were sent. This proves that at least until early July 1942, deportees were sent to Auschwitz
with the exclusive aim to deploy them as slave laborers. There was no policy of extermination
in place. The only way of supporting the claim that Jews were killed en masse
at Auschwitz during the first half of 1942 is the use of dubious sources full of wild claims
without any support in the extant documentation: Gilbert’s and Szternfinkiel’s wholly
invented mass gassings as listed in the second table, plus a few gassing events among registered
inmates whose reality is confirmed only by self-proclaimed “eyewitnesses” who testified
during the Polish show trials against Rudolf Höss and members of the Auschwitz camp garrison.[8] Since each death of a registered inmate was recorded numerous times and in a number of ways by the various Auschwitz authorities, and because these documents do not reflect these mass
murders, as Mattogno has aptly shown, it is quite safe to say that these events are based merely
on witness fantasies and are simply untrue. In other words, no gassing happened
at Auschwitz before early July 1942. Hence, the so-called Bunker 1 would not have served any
purpose. This jibes well with the results of Carlo Mattogno’s detailed research into
the question of whether or not this “Bunker 1” existed in the first place: it did
not. It, too, is a mere figment of the imagination.[9] In early July, things are said to have changed drastically, though. Czech writes
that on June 30, the second gas-chamber building – Bunker 2 – became operational.
She supports her claim by again quoting Rudolf Höss’s post-war statements, which
are of little value, however, due to the circumstances of coercion under which they were made
and due to their internal inconsistencies and blatant contradictions to external, more-reliable
sources. [10] Since Czech’s claims about Bunker 1 are obviously bogus, how can we take such lore seriously
anymore? The fact of the matter is that, after July 1942, not all deportees sent toward Auschwitz
were being taken into the camp anymore. So what happened in July 1942 that changed things?
There were actually at least two factors that changed the way the deportees were being processed.
Typhus In her entry for April 6, 1941, Danuta Czech mentions
that typhus was introduced to the Auschwitz Camp by inmates transferred from Lublin. However,
she does not support her claim with any contemporaneous documents. Her next entry mentioning
the dreaded disease is more than a year later, on May 10, 1942, where she remarks that the Auschwitz
garrison physician Dr. Siegfried Schwela died of the disease. Hence, not only the inmates,
but also the SS personnel were affected by the epidemic. Dr. Schwela’s successor, Dr.
Kurt Uhlenbrok, got infected as well and, being unable to perform his duties, was relieved of
the post only a month later, on June 9 (although Czech reports about this only in her entry
for August 17). Thus, the pivotal post of garrison physician, responsible for the camp’s
hygiene, was pretty much unoccupied until after the peak of the epidemic. The camp’s
health and sanitary situation started to improve only after Dr. Eduard Wirths, previously posted
as garrison physician of the Dachau Camp, showed up at Auschwitz on September 6 to take over Uhlenbrok’s position.[11] Figure 1: Monthly deaths at Auschwitz.
If we look at the trend of the camp’s mortality in 1942 as reflected in the Death Books, see Figure 1, we clearly recognize the catastrophic rising tide peaking in August of 1942, with
daily deaths reaching a maximum of almost 500 on certain days.[12] The disease was brought somewhat under control in late 1942, but flared up again in early
1943 and then once more, although less pronouncedly, during the winter of 1943/1944.
Considering the crucial role the Auschwitz camp system was supposed to play as a provider of slave labor for the region’s war-related industries, the Auschwitz camp authorities reacted rather sluggishly to this disaster, to put it mildly. As Czech reports, Commandant Höss imposed a partial camp lockdown (Lagersperre) only on July 10. A week later, Heinrich Himmler arrived for a two-days’ visit to inspect the SS’s undertakings in the area. During that visit, it would have been impossible to hide the disastrous situation from him. Although Czech, in her entry for July 17, has Himmler attend a mass gassing of 499 deportees from the Netherlands on that day, an inspection of Himmler’s diary shows that he never went to Birkenau at all. Since that camp was the hotbed of typhus and other infectious diseases – unsurprisingly, since at that time it was still under construction and lacked any proper sanitary facilities – it would have been highly dangerous for him to go there. That he in fact did not go there also results from the fact that Rudolf Höss’s claim of Himmler having attended the entire procedure – from unloading the transport train until the clearing of the victims’ bodies from the gas chambers[13] – cannot be true, because the train from the Netherlands arrived at Auschwitz already
in the evening of July 16, and the newly admitted inmates showed up in the camp’s record
already during the morning roll call of July 17. Himmler, however, arrived at Kattowitz Airport
only at 3:15 pm on July 17, but did not get to the camp itself before late afternoon.[14] Considering that the primary source upon which the tale of Himmler’s attendance of a
gassing rests is none other than Rudolf Höss’s postwar fairy tales, the entire episode
can be dismissed safely as just another myth cooked up by Höss in an attempt to directly
implicate Himmler in what supposedly transpired at Auschwitz under Höss’s command.
Interestingly, this mass gassing of deportees from an incoming transport is the only one of 1942 for which Czech provides a source to back it up – and what a source it is: the
tortured Rudolf Höss facing the noose. This transport of July 17 is also the
very first one arriving at Auschwitz for which we know with some certainty that not all deportees
who boarded the train were registered at Auschwitz, for we know how many were on that train
(2000, 1551 of whom were registered). Although Czech claims that an unspecified (hence unknown)
number of deportees from two earlier transports from Slovakia were gassed in “the bunker”
(July 4 and 11), we have no record of how many deportees were on these trains. I’ll get
back to this later. Crematorium I When
the typhus epidemic struck in the spring of 1942, the only cremation facility operational at
Auschwitz was the old crematorium with its three double-muffle furnaces. Each muffle could cremate
a normal corpse on average within roughly an hour, meaning that, for a 20-hour workday, this
facility could cremate a theoretical maximum of (6×20=) some 120 corpses.[15] In July 1942, the death rate exceeded 4,000, or 130 corpses per day on average. But already
the load put on that facility in the months prior to July led to such massive strain that some
of the refractory lining of the flues had to be replaced in mid-May 1942; a few weeks later,
it was noticed that the chimney was deteriorating to such a degree that it was decided to tear
it down entirely and rebuild it. That work was done between July 12 and August 8, 1942. During
these almost four weeks, the crematorium was by necessity out of operation, meaning that, when
the typhus epidemic approached its cataclysmic peak, Auschwitz had no cremation capacity
at all.[16] After Crematorium I went back into operation in mid-August, the death rate was more than twice
the number of theoretically possible cremations. What happened to all these corpses that could
not be burned? Although the situation improved considerably in November and December, things
got out of hand again in January 1943, with no additional cremation capacity ready to help out
until mid-March of that year (when Crematorium II went operational briefly, was overloaded and
was shut down again a few weeks later for major repairs…). At any rate, witnesses (among
them Höss) state that these “excess corpses” were buried in mass graves but
later exhumed and burned on pyres, because the corpses were lying in the groundwater threatening
to poison the drinking-water supply of the entire region. Considering all the circumstances,
this part of the witnesses’ story is most likely true. In the context of the present study, we need not concern ourselves with the particulars
of this situation. Fact is that, when Himmler visited Auschwitz on July 17 and 18, 1942, he saw
his plans to turn this camp into a main hub of Germany’s exploitation of slave labor for the
war effort seriously threatened. In fact, Himmler saw the camp at its worse, with the typhus
epidemic raging out of control, with no garrison physician in charge, with few, if any sanitary
installations, with no capacity to cremate the victims, with corpses piling up everywhere by
the hundreds. In this situation, it is claimed that at that very time
the mass murder of thousands of deportees in gas chambers started, that in fact a new gassing
facility (Bunker 2) went into operation. In view of the fact that the camp authorities had lost
control of the epidemic and could not even handle the corpses resulting from the disease, how
likely is it that they could have even thought of making this already uncontrollable situation
even worse by adding thousands of additional corpses every month which they wouldn’t have
been able to process in any way either? Himmler’s
reaction to the situation in Auschwitz is not known but may be inferred from the fact that his
subordinate Richard Glücks demanded only five days later, on July 23, that Höss put
the entire Auschwitz Camp on a total camp lockdown.[17] Thus, Auschwitz, at that time a death camp quite literally, had been quarantined.
Deportation of Individuals Unfit for Labor While initially
the German authorities deported only such individuals to Auschwitz they deemed capable of working,
this policy gradually changed in July 1942, first by expanding the age range upward, then by
increasingly including individuals unfit for labor (primarily children), as Aynat has shown
in his 1994 study. The mainstream narrative has it that these individuals were primarily those
who were not registered on their arrival at the Auschwitz camp but were killed in gas chambers.
Cosel In her entry for August 28, 1942, Czech writes that
some 200 deportees fit for work were taken off the deportation train at Cosel in Upper Silesia
(halfway between Gleiwitz and Oppeln, some 50 km northwest of Auschwitz) in order to be deployed
as slave laborers in Upper Silesian industry. There is evidently no direct documentary support
for this claim, but considering that Auschwitz had been put under a camp lockdown, and that
sending even deportees fit for labor there seems rather unwise, it stands to reason that the
German authorities tried to send as many deportees as possible to other places not threatened
by typhus. We know of the Cosel case only indirectly because some of the deportees taken off
there were later admitted to the Auschwitz Camp after all. Czech handles this situation by arbitrarily subtracting invented numbers of deportees from several trains coming from France, Belgium and the Netherlands:
Arrival Date | # of Deportees | from |
detrained at Cosel | 8/28/1942 |
1000 | France | 200 |
9/2/1942 | 1000 | France | 200 | 9/3/1942 |
1000 | Belgium | 200 |
9/4/1942 | 1000 | France | 200 | 9/6/1942 |
1013 | France | 200 |
9/8/1942 | 930 | Netherlands | 200 | 9/9/1942 |
1000 | France | 200 |
9/10/1942 | 1000 | Belgium | 200 | 9/11/1942 |
1000 | France | 200 |
9/12/1942 | 874 | Netherlands | 200 | 9/12/1942 |
1000 | France | 300 |
9/14/1942 | 1000 | Belgium | 250 | 9/16/1942 |
902 | Netherlands | 200 |
9/16/1942 | 1000 | France | 250 | 9/18/1942 |
1003 | France | 300 |
9/20/1942 | 1002 | Netherlands | 200 | 9/22/1942 |
1000 | France | 200 |
9/24/1942 | 1000 | France | 150 | 9/27/1942 |
1004 | France | 175 |
9/29/1942 | 904 | France | 100 | 10/3/1942 |
1014 | Netherlands | 300 |
10/7/1942 | 2012 | Netherlands | 500 | Total: | 4925 |
Hence, in total Czech claims that, during 1942, some 4925 deportees were taken
off the trains travelling through Cosel. This is pure conjecture. For all we know, the number
of inmates taken off at Cosel could have been lower or higher, or could have included even all of the inmates that were not registered at Auschwitz. Although the same could have happened to any train coming from the western Europe, Czech
limits this procedure arbitrarily to only a select few of them, and without foundation denies
it for the rest. It may well be that the trains approaching Auschwitz made other
stops elsewhere as well where deportees were also taken off in order to be employed in local
enterprises – including trains coming from other countries such as Slovakia, Poland, Belarus
(Grodno) etc. And it may well be that some deportees did not finish their journey when arriving
at Auschwitz, but that they left again – without having been registered – on other
trains or by other means of transportation to be sent either to labor-deployment sites around
Auschwitz or farther to the East, or to some ghetto, for instance.
That this is closer to the truth than what Czech conjectures can be demonstrated with the transport of Dutch Jews arriving at Auschwitz on Oct. 18. Here is what Carlo Mattogno
has found out about that particular transport:[18] “According to Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle, a
Jewish transport from Holland arrived on October 18, 1942, with 1,710 deportees, of whom only
116 women were registered, and the remaining 1,594 persons are said to have been gassed. The
‘special operation’ mentioned by [Johann] Kremer allegedly refers to this
claimed gassing. According to a Dutch Red Cross report, the transport in question,
comprising 1,710 persons, departed from Westerbork on October 16 and stopped first in Kosel,
where 570 [sic!] persons were taken off. The rest continued on to the following camps:
‘St. Annaberg or Sakrau – Bobrek or Malapane – Blechhammer
and further some to Bismarckhütte/Monowitz. A separate group
into the Groß-Rosen zone.’ A list of the
transports from Westerbork to the east – probably prepared by Louis de Jong – names
as the destinations of the October 16, 1942, transport ‘Sakrau, Blechhammer, Kosel.’
For its false assertions regarding this transport, Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle again cites the Kremer diary! Thus only a small percentage of the Jews deported from Holland on
October 16, 1942, actually arrived in Auschwitz.” So it wasn’t
just Cosel where the trains stopped and deportees got off; they detrained at many stations.
While it is to some degree speculative to apply this pattern generously to all transports where we don’t know the fates of deportees not arriving at Auschwitz or at least not having been registered there, Czech’s procedure of picking a few transports and taking a few inmates off at Cosel is at least as speculative, and even more so her utterly unsupported claim that the difference between deportees boarding a train and those registered at Auschwitz (plus
those taken off at Cosel) equals the number of deportees gassed on arrival. One
thing is for certain, however: Considering that Auschwitz had turned into a deathtrap due to
the raging typhus epidemic, it would have made perfect sense for the German authorities to send
as many deportees elsewhere rather than to let them perish at Auschwitz. Some
Honesty I mentioned earlier that Czech claims that an unspecified number of deportees
from two transports from Slovakia were gassed in “the bunker” (July 4 and 11). The
only extant document for this transport is the clandestinely compiled list of registration numbers
assigned to deportees on these transports (372 and 330, respectively). These lists tell us
neither how many deportees were on these trains altogether nor what happened to those that were not registered, if any deportees were left unregistered in the first place. Czech repeats this same arbitrary procedure of simply claiming, without any proof or trace,
that there was an unregistered rest subsequently gassed in each instance where the clandestine
lists mention registration numbers assigned to deportees from Slovakia: Date | arrivals | from | registered males | registered females |
registered total | unregistered | unregistered
fate | proof | 7/4/1942 |
??? | Slovakia | 264 | 108 | 372 |
“rest” | gassed | none | 7/11/1942 | ??? | Slovakia | 182 |
148 | 330 | “rest” | gassed | none |
7/18/1942 | ??? | Slovakia | 327 | 178 |
505 | “rest” | gassed | none | 7/25/1942 |
??? | Slovakia | 192 | 93 | 285 |
“rest” | gassed | none | 8/1/1942 | ??? | Slovakia | 165 |
75 | 240 | “rest” |
gassed | none | 9/19/1942 | ??? | Slovakia |
206 | 71 | 277 |
“rest” | gassed | none | 9/23/1942 | ??? | Slovakia | 294 |
67 | 361 | “rest” |
gassed | none | 10/21/1942 | ??? | Slovakia | 121 | 78 |
199 | “rest” | gassed | none |
It would have been much more honest to state right away that we don’t know how many deportees were on these trains, hence that it is unknown how many deportees were gassed,
if any at all. This is the procedure she applies to transports coming from Yugoslavia, of which
we also have merely the range of registration numbers assigned. For the first three instances she
doesn’t even mention any unregistered deportees, let alone their presumed fates, while
her last entry for Yugoslavia states expressly that it is unknown how many perished in the gas chambers:
Date | arrivals |
from | registered males | registered
females | registered total | unregistered | unregistered fate | 8/18/1942 |
??? | Yugoslavia | 87 | 69 | 156 | - | - | 8/22/1942 | ??? | Yugoslavia |
110 | 86 | 196 |
- | - | 8/26/1942 | ??? | Yugoslavia |
71 | 88 | 159 |
- | - | 8/30/1942 | ??? | Yugoslavia |
45 | 31 | 76 |
unknown | gassed? |
She always states, however, that the registered inmates were admitted into
the amp “after a selection,” implying that some inmates might have been selected
not to get registered. These entries are probably the only ones in her entire book which come
close to being honest, together with a few exotic ones about which she evidently didn’t
dare make gassing speculation for lack of any documentary evidence or even anecdotal hints
by self-proclaimed witnesses (Aug. 27: 82 registered deportees from Luxemburg; Nov. 18: 30 registered
deportees of unknown origin).[19] There are many other cases of registration numbers assigned to inmates coming
from eastern Europe where Czech is less prudent and simply speculates wildly as to the numbers of deportees contained in the respective deportation trains. I highlighted them in my first table by rendering the number of alleged unregistered deportees – Czech’s gassing victims – in bold.
Here they are once more:
Arrival date | Claimed deportees | from | registered | registered % | unregistered | 11/7/1942 |
2000 | Zichenau | 694 |
35% | 1306 | 11/8/1942 | 1000 | Zichenau |
0 | 0% | 1000 |
11/9/1942 | 1000 | Białystok | 294 | 29% |
706 | 11/14/1942 | 2500 | Zichenau | 768 |
31% | 1732 | 11/14/1942 | 1500 | Białystok |
661 | 44% | 839 | 11/18/1942 | 1000 |
Białystok | 230 | 23% | 770 | 11/19/1942 |
1500 | Zichenau | 893 |
60% | 607 | 11/22/1942 | 1500 | Zichenau |
432 | 29% | 1068 | 11/25/1942 | 2000 |
Grodno Ghetto | 433 | 22% |
1567 | 11/28/1942 | 1000 | Zichenau | 494 |
49% | 506 | 11/30/1942 | 1000 | Zichenau |
167 | 17% | 833 | 12/2/1942 | 1000 |
Grodno Ghetto | 238 | 24% |
762 | 12/3/1942 | 1000 | Płonsk Ghetto | 347 |
35% | 653 | 12/6/1942 | 2500 | Mława Ghetto |
406 | 16% | 2094 | 12/8/1942 | 1000 |
Grodno Ghetto | 291 | 27% |
769 | 12/10/1942 | 2500 | Małkinia | 524 |
21% | 1976 | 12/12/1942 | 2000 | Małkinia |
422 | 21% | 1578 | 12/14/1942 | 1500 |
Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki Ghetto | 580 | 39% | 920 | 12/17/1942 | 2000 | Płonsk Ghetto |
780 | 39% | 1220 | Total of claimed gassing victims: |
20906 | Note that in lack of any extant document regarding these transports there is no evidence regarding the
number of deportees contained in them. Hence, Czech’s numbers (here in the second column) are arbitrary at best, and,
perforce, so are the numbers of alleged unregistered deportees, all of whom Czech lists as gassing victims with the exact
number, in spite of the fact that she starts out with a made-up estimate. It’s all hocus-pocus.
Małkinia There are two particularly interesting deportation
cases in the above table: those arriving at Auschwitz on December 10 and 12. They came from
Małkinia, which was a transit camp near the infamous Treblinka camp. Here is the question:
if the vast majority of Jews coming from Małkinia (Czech claims that 79% of them were gassed
at Auschwitz) were really slated to perish in gas chambers, why did the German authorities
in charge of shipping Jews around Europe not select them right in Małkinia and send those
unfit for labor – or unworthy of living, whatever the case may be – around the corner
to the claimed highly efficient gassing facilities at the Treblinka extermination camp? Maybe
because there was no such thing as a Treblinka extermination camp?[20] Or maybe because no Jew deported from Małkinia to Auschwitz was killed at Auschwitz? You
decide. Conclusions The number of
Jews killed in the gas chambers of Auschwitz right after arriving at the camp, hence without
any registration, amounted to 105,992 for the entire year of 1942, if we are to take Danuta
Czech’s words as printed in her Auschwitz Chronicle at face value. However,
she has literally nothing in terms of documentation to back up her claims. Where there is a
difference proven by documents between the number of deportees who boarded a train and the number
of those who were registered at Auschwitz, she always claims that all of them were killed in
the gas chambers (except for those who she speculates left the train in Cosel), although there
are plenty of other explanations possible for this numerical difference, be it that more deportees
than she assumes detrained at Cosel, that there were other stations along the journey where
deportees were taken off, or that for some of the deportees arriving at Auschwitz their journey
simply hadn’t come to an end yet, meaning that they were deported farther east, either
to other locations of labor deployment or to places of ghettoization.
Any serious scholar wishing to write history based only on verifiable data must conclude that, for the
year 1942, there is not a shred of evidence for even one single deportee arriving at Auschwitz and being led straight to
the gas chambers without prior registration and admission to the camp. This analysis confirms Mattogno’s conclusion
that there never were any homicidal gassing “bunkers” at Auschwitz.9 There simply was no need for
them, as there is no evidence for any such gassings. Notes
[1] | Danuta Czech, Auschwitz Chronicle 1938-1945, Tauris, London 1990; German original:
Kalendarium der Ereignisse im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz-Birkenau 1939-1945, Rowohlt Verlag, Reinbek 1989; I have
posted OCR-processed scans of Czech’s 172 pages devoted tot he year 1942 here: https://codoh.com/media/files/downloads/CzechChronicle1942-OCR.pdf. | [2] | Czech mentions only one deportation train that contained political prisoners rather than
Jews: on July 8, 1942, 1170 deportees from France arrived at Auschwitz which consisted of Jews and Gentiles alike. All of
them were admitted to the camp and assigned registration numbers. | [3] | Enrique Aynat, Estudios sobre el “Holocausto,” La deportación de
judíos de Francia y Bélgica en 1942, Graficas Hurtado, Valencia 1994, pp. 3-88; https://codoh.com/library/document/6349/. | [4] | Aynat devoted the second part of the above-mentioned book to a detailed translation and
discussion of these reports, ibid., pp. 89-181. It will appear shortly in English translation in a modified form
as part of Jürgen Graf’s Auschwitz: Confessions and Testimonies. A Critical Analysis, Castle Hill Publishers,
Uckfield 2019 (in preparation; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=36). | [5] | Enrique Aynat, “Die Sterbebücher von Auschwitz: Statistische Daten über
die Sterblichkeit der 1942 aus Frankreich nach Auschwitz deportierten Juden,” Vierteljahreshefte für freie
Geschichtsforschung, Vol. 2, No. 3 (1998), pp. 188-198; http://vho.org/VffG/1998/3/Aynat3.html. The Spanish original appeared as a chapter in: Enrique Aynat, Jean-Marie Boisdefeu, Estudios sobre Auschwitz, self-published,
Valencia 1997. | [6] | Carlo Mattogno, Healthcare in Auschwitz: Medical Care and Special Treatment
of Registered Inmates, Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016, pp. 87-216; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=33. | [7] | Czech refers to these lists once only in her entry for June 14, 1940 (for males), indicating
that henceforth all those deportation data without any further source given originate from these lists (for females here
reference can be found in her entry for March 26, 1942). | [8] | Czech mentions this on three dates: on May 4 with an unspecified number of victims during
an unspecified number of events based on the claim that the overfilled Auschwitz sick bay is said to have been reduced repeatedly
this way; June 11, with 320 victims; and June 23, with 566 victims. | [9] | Carlo Mattogno, Debunking the Bunkers of Auschwitz: Black Propaganda versus History,
2nd ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=11. | [10] | For details see Rudolf Höss, Carlo Mattogno, Commandant of Auschwitz: Rudolf Höss,
His Torture and His Forced Confessions, Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2017; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=35. | [11] | On Wirths’s Herculean struggle to get the epidemic under control see Carlo Mattogno’s
book Healthcare in Auschwitz, op. cit. (note 5), especially Part 3 by Christoph Wieland, pp. 219-269. |
[12] | Compiled using data contained in Staatliches Museum Auschwitz-Birkenau (ed.), Die Sterbebücher
von Auschwitz, Saur, Munich 1995. | [13] | Czech quotes Martin Broszat (ed.), Kommandant in Auschwitz, Deutscher Taschenbuch
Verlag, Munich 1963, pp. 161, 181-183. | [14] | For a detailed analysis see Carlo Mattogno, Special Treatment in Auschwitz: Origin
and Meaning of a Term, 2nd ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016, pp. 16-25; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=10. | [15] | On these furnaces see Carlo Mattogno, Franco Deana, The Cremation Furnaces of Auschwitz:
A Technical and Historical Study, Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2015, particularly Vol. 1, pp. 337f.; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=24; as well as Carlo Mattogno, Franco Deana, “The Crematoria Ovens of Auschwitz and Birkenau,” in: Germar Rudolf
(ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of “Truth” and “Memory,” 2nd ed., Theses
& Dissertations Press, Chicago, Ill., 2003, pp. 373-412, esp. pp. 402; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1. | [16] | Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz: Crematorium I and the Alleged Homicidal Gassings, 2nd
ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016, pp. 46-48; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=21. | [17] | See Carlo Mattogno, Special Treatment in Auschwitz, op. cit. (note 13),
p. 45. | [18] | C. Mattogno, Special Treatment in Auschwitz, op. cit. (note 18), p. 94. |
[19] | In one case, Czech probably simply forgot her cookie-cutter claim that all unregistered
deportees were killed in gas chambers: Aug. 5: 998 deportees from Belgium, 744 of which were registered; the difference
(254) is not mentioned by her. | [20] | See Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?,
2nd ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=8. |
Author(s): | Germar Rudolf | Title: | How Danuta Czech Invented 100,000 Gassing Victims | Sources: |
Inconvenient History, Vol. 11, No. 1 (2019) |
Dates: | published:
2019-02-18, first posted: 2019-02-18
12:01:39 _____________________________________________________________________________________________
|
Click on this text to examine THE HOLOCAUST LIES.
_________________________________________________________
Eyewitnesses
to the Treblinka “Gas Chambers”
Traditional Holocaust historians state that Treblinka was a pure extermination camp in which
approximately 870,000 Jews were murdered. The number of Jewish survivors of Treblinka is generally
thought to have been between 40 and 70, and probably closer to the lower figure.This article will examine the credibility of several Jewish survivors of Treblinka. CHIL RAJCHMAN
Chil Rajchman was a Jewish survivor of Treblinka who was interviewed by the US Office of Special
Investigations in 1980. He later traveled to the United States to appear as a witness for the
prosecution in the extradition trial of John Demjanjuk. Rajchman also took the witness stand
in Jerusalem where Demjanjuk was put on trial for allegedly being a murderous guard at Treblinka.[2] The Israeli Supreme Court ruled that Demjanjuk’s guilt had not been proven, and that
the eyewitness testimony of Rajchman and four other witnesses failed to identify Demjanjuk credibly.[3] Rajchman described the gas chambers at Treblinka in his
memoirs: The Schlauch
road is not long. In a few minutes you find yourself in a white structure, on which a Star of
David is painted. On the steps of the structure stands a German, who points to the entrance
and smiles—Bitte, bitte! The steps lead to a corridor lined with flowers and with
long towels hanging on the walls.
The size of the gas chamber is seven by seven meters. In the middle of the chamber there are shower-heads through which the gas is introduced. On one of the walls a thick pipe
serves as an exhaust to remove the air. Thick felt around the doors of the chamber renders them
airtight.
In this building there are some 10 gas chambers. At a short distance from the main structure
there is a smaller one with three gas chambers. By the doors stand several Germans who shove
people inside. Their hands do not rest for a moment as they scream fiendishly—Faster,
faster, keep moving![4] Rajchman wrote
that exhaust gas from a Diesel engine was piped into the gas chambers. [5] However, Austrian engineer Walter Lüftl and American engineer Friedrich Paul Berg h ave
both documented that exhaust from Diesel engines could not have been used for mass executions
at Treblinka. Lüftl concludes in his report that the stories of gas chambers with Diesel
engines and gas vans at places such as Treblinka can only be disinformation.[6] Berg writes: “However,
the story [of mass gassings] becomes even more incredible when one discovers that far better
sources of carbon monoxide, better even than gasoline engines, were readily available to the
Germans. Those other sources did not require either Diesel fuel or gasoline.”[7] Rajchman in his memoirs also
reported the following horrific incident:
It once happened that an oven was brought next to a huge grave, where perhaps
a quarter of a million people were buried. As usual the oven was loaded with the proper number
of bodies and in the evening it was lit. But a strong wind carried the fire over to the huge
grave and engulfed it in flames. The blood of some quarter of a million people began to flare,
and thus burned for a night and a day. The whole camp administration came to look upon this
marvel, gazing with satisfaction at the blaze. The blood came up to the surface and burned as
if it were fuel.[8] Since blood consists
mostly of water and is nonflammable, Rajchman’s story that blood burned as if it were
fuel is totally absurd.[9] Rajchman also reported
other instances when the blood from gassed victims rose to the surface: “I remember that
every morning when we went out to work, we would notice that the surfaces of the pits had burst
in dozens of places. By day the ground was firmly trodden down, but at night the blood pressed
up to the surface…The blood of tens of thousands of victims, unable to rest, thrust itself
up to the surface.”[10] Rajchman’s story
that blood “pressed up to the surface” at night but was trodden down during the
day is ludicrous. Rajchman’s memoirs about his stay in Treblinka are no more credible
than his testimony at the John Demjanjuk trial. RICHARD GLAZAR
Richard Glazar was a Jew sent to Treblinka at the beginning of October 1942. He said he spent
10 months in Treblinka before escaping from the camp.[11] Glazar in his memoirs also stated that exhaust gasses from motors were used in the gas chambers
at Treblinka:
The gas chambers are the only brick buildings in the entire camp. Actually, they comprise two
structures. At first was built—somewhat farther from the entrance—a smaller structure
with three gas chambers, each about five by five meters. Sometime in the fall of 1942 the second
building, containing 10 gas chambers, was completed. This building is located very close to
the Pipeline, at the point where it opens into the second part of the camp. There is a hallway
running all the way down the middle of the new building. One enters the gas chambers, five
on either side, from this hallway. The new gas chambers measure about seven by seven meters.
The motor room is built onto the back wall, where the hallway ends. The exhaust gases from the motors are pumped into the gas chambers through conduits in the ceilings of the chambers. These conduits are disguised as showers.[12] Glazar made
two major errors in his book. First, Glazar wrote that the Germans started to burn the corpses
“one overcast November afternoon” in 1942.[13] This statement contradicts the standard Holocaust literature, which claims the incineration
of corpses did not start until March/April 1943.[14]
Second, Glazar said that he was part of a camouflage unit that performed forestry work in the
vicinity of Treblinka. Glazar wrote:
The camouflage unit is the only one of the old work squads that still has enough real work to
do…Several times a day…some part of the 25-man unit has to go out into the forest,
climb into the trees, harvest large branches, and carry them back into the camp, where they
will be used for repairs. The other part of the unit straightens and firms up the posts, tightens
the barbed wire, and weaves the new pine boughs into the fence until there are no longer any
gaps in the dense green wall.[15] Thus, according
to Glazar, 25 inmates supplied Treblinka with its greenery for concealment. The “camouflage
unit” would have been much larger if wood from the forest had been used to cremate the
870,000 corpses in Treblinka. The camouflage unit would also have chopped down the trees and
then cut off the branches rather than engaging in tree-climbing activities. Yet Glazar apparently
opines that such tree-felling never occurred during his time at Treblinka. This rules out the
cremation of some 870,000 corpses using firewood.[16]
Air-photo evidence also indicates that the massive deforestation necessary to cremate
870,000 bodies never took place around Treblinka. Thomas Kues writes: By comparing a detailed 1936 map of the Treblinka area with air photos taken by the Luftwaffe in May and November 1944 we are able to estimate the scope of contemporary
deforestation in the area. If 870,000 bodies had really been burned at Treblinka, then the procurement
of the required fuel would have denuded the entire wooded area north of the camp site. The
air photos show that this is clearly not the case. Rather, the visible possibly deforested areas—amounting
to less than 10 hectares—indicate the cremation of at most some ten thousands of bodies.[17 The argument
that only a fraction of the corpses were burned is not valid, since the Soviet and Polish forensic
examinations of Treblinka would have discovered hundreds of thousands of corpses. The Allies
would have shown these corpses to the world as proof of German genocide. The only remaining conclusion is that most Jews at Treblinka were
sent somewhere else, most likely to German-occupied Soviet territory. Richard Glazar’s
memoirs inadvertently confirmed the revisionist thesis that Treblinka was a transit camp.[18] JANKIEL WIERNIK
Jankiel Wiernik escaped
from Treblinka and published a document in May 1944 describing his experiences at Treblinka.
Wiernik wrote:
A Jew had been selected by the Germans to function as a supposed “bath attendant.”
He stood at the entrance of the building housing the chambers and urged everyone to hurry inside
before the water got cold. What irony! Amidst shouts and blows, the people were chased into
the chambers. As
I have already indicated, there was not much space in the gas chambers. People were smothered
simply by overcrowding. The motor which generated the gas in the new chambers was defective,
and so the helpless victims had to suffer for hours on end before they died. Satan himself
could not have devised a more fiendish torture. When the chambers were opened again, many of
the victims were only half dead and had to be finished off with rifle butts, bullets or powerful
kicks. Often
people were kept in the gas chambers overnight with the motor not turned on at all. Overcrowding
and lack of air killed many of them in a very painful way. However, many survived the ordeal
of such nights; particularly the children showed a remarkable degree of resistance. They were
still alive when they were dragged out of the chambers in the morning, but revolvers used by
the Germans made short work of them…[19] So according
to Wiernik, the gas chambers at Treblinka were not very efficient. Many victims suffocated or
had to be killed with bullets, rifle butts or powerful kicks.
Jankiel Wiernik wrote: “Between 10,000 and 12,000 people were gassed each day.”[20] Wiernik also wrote: “The number of transports grew daily, and there were periods when
as many as 30,000 people were gassed in one day…”[21] This is an incredibly large number of people killed by a defective motor that took “hours
on end” to kill the victims and which was frequently left off overnight. Wiernik also wrote that handsome Bulgarian Jews were discriminated
against: “These handsome Jews were not permitted an easy death. Only small quantities
of gas were let into the chambers, so that their agony lasted through the night.”[22] This would have made the gassing process at Treblinka even more inefficient. I wonder how 870,000 Jews could have been killed by such inefficient methods. Wiernik described the corpses of the alleged gassing victims: “All were
equal. There was no longer any beauty or ugliness, for they were all yellow from the gas.”[23] Actually, victims of carbon-monoxide poisoning exhibit a cherry-red or rosy red coloring.[24] Wiernik’s statement that the victims were “all yellow from the gas” is obviously
false. Wiernik wrote in regard to the
cremation of corpses: “It turned out that bodies of women burned more easily than those
of men. Accordingly, the bodies of women were used for kindling the fires…When corpses
of pregnant women were cremated, their bellies would burst open. The fetus would be exposed
and could be seen burning inside the mother’s womb.” [25] The absurdities promulgated by Wiernik are really beyond description, yet he is probably the
most prominent witness to the alleged gassings at Treblinka.[26] ABRAHAM GOLDFARB Abraham Goldfarb arrived in Treblinka on August 25, 1942,
and escaped from Treblinka during the revolt in 1943.[27] Goldfarb described the gassings at Treblinka:
On the way to the gas chambers Germans with dogs stood along the fence on both sides. The dogs
had been trained to attack people; they bit the men’s genitals and the women’s breasts,
ripping off pieces of flesh. The Germans hit the people with whips and iron bars to spur them
on, so that they would press forward into the “showers” as quickly as possible.
The screams of the women could be heard far away, even in the other parts of the camp. The Germans
drove the running victims on with shouts of “Faster, faster, the water is getting cold,
and others still have to take a shower!” To escape from the blows, the victims ran to
the gas chambers as quickly as they could, the stronger ones pushing the weaker ones aside.
At the entrance to the gas chambers stood the two Ukrainians, Ivan Demjaniuk and Nikolai, one
of them armed with an iron bar, the other with a sword. Even they drove the people inside with
blows…
As soon as the gas chambers were full, the Ukrainians closed the doors and started the
engine. Some 20 to 25 minutes later an SS man or a Ukrainian looked through a window in the
door. When he had made sure that everyone had been asphyxiated, the Jewish prisoners had to
open the doors and remove the corpses. Because the chambers were overcrowded and the victims
had held onto one another, they were all standing upright and were like one single mass of flesh.[28] Goldfarb stated
that dogs at Treblinka attacked the men’s genitals and the women’s breasts while
the victims ran to the gas chambers. I wonder why the other survivors failed to report these
vicious dog attacks of the gassingvictims. Goldfarb’s story is highly suspicious Goldfarb’s statement that the victims “were all standing
upright and were like one single mass of flesh” is also not credible. Many of the dead
victims would have fallen to the floor no matter how crowded the gas chambers. The dead victims
would not have been “like one single mass of flesh.” CONCLUSION No documentary or credible material trace exists of the alleged gas chambers at Treblinka.
We would know nothing about the Treblinka gas chambers except for the testimony of a small number of eyewitnesses.
A November 15, 1942 report produced by the resistance movement of the Warsaw ghetto originally
stated that steam chambers were used to kill Jews at Treblinka. In 1944, Jankiel Wiernik converted
the embarrassing “steam chambers,” which characterized the first phase of the Treblinka
atrocity propaganda, into “gas chambers.” Official historiography now considers
the gas chambers of Treblinka as established historical fact.[29] However, as discussed in this article,
the eyewitness testimony of the Treblinka gas chambers is not credible. Such testimony cannot
be used to prove that Germany mass murderedJews at Treblinka. Germar Rudolf writes: Thus, if 100 witnesses and 100 confessions
state that the moon is made of green cheese or that 870,000 corpses can be burned within a
few months without fuel and without leaving traces, both assertions being of a similar intellectual
quality, then we have to conclude—in light of all the forensic evidence— that the witnesses and the defendants are wrong. Like it or not![30] ENDNOTES [1] Willenberg, Samuel, Surviving Treblinka, New York: Basil Blackwell Inc., 1989, p. 2.
[2] Kues, Thomas. “Chil Rajchman and His Memoirs.” Inconvenient History, Vol.2, No. 1, Spring 2010. https://inconvenienthistory.com/2/1/1916.
[3] An excellent account of John Demjanjuk’s trial is provided in Sheftel, Yoram, Defending “Ivan the Terrible”:
The Conspiracy to Convict John Demjanjuk, Washington, D.C., Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1996. [4] Rajchman, Chil, The Last Jew of Treblinka: A Survivor’s Memory 1942-1943, New York: Pegasus Books, 2011, pp.
11-12. [6] Lüftl, Walter, “The Lüftl Report,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, Winter
1992-1993, pp. 391-406. [7] Berg, Friedrich Paul, “The Diesel Gas Chamber: Ideal for Torture—Absurd for Murder,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.),
Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, Ala.: Theses and Dissertations Press,
2000, p. 456. [8] Rajchman, Chil, The Last Jew of Treblinka: A Survivor’s Memory 1942-1943, New York: Pegasus Books, 2011, pp.
91-92. [9] https://inconvenienthistory.com/2/1/1916. [11] Glazar, Richard, Trap with a Green Fence: Survival in Treblinka, Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University
Press, 1995, p. VIII. [14] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes
Review, 2010, p. 39. [15] Glazar, Richard, Trap with a Green Fence: Survival in Treblinka: Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press,
1995, pp. 127-128. [16] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes
Review, 2010, pp. 39-40. [17] https://inconvenienthistory.com/1/2/1912. [19] Donat, Alexander (editor), The Death Camp Treblinka: A Documentary, New York: Holocaust Library, 1979, pp. 163-164.
[24] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes
Review, 2010, p. 73. [25] Donat, Alexander (editor), The Death Camp Treblinka: A Documentary, New York: Holocaust Library, 1979, p. 170.
[26] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes
Review, 2010, p. 154. [27] http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/ar/treblinka/treblinkarememberme.html. [28] Kogon, Eugen, Langbein, Hermann, and Rückerl, Adalbert (editors), Nazi Mass Murder: A Documentary History of the
Use of Poison Gas, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1993, pp. 126-127.
[29] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes
Review, 2010, pp. 51-62, 299. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Dachau’s 800-Pound Kangaroo (Court)
The Dachau trial began on November 15, 1945 and ended four weeks later on December 13. All
40 of the defendants were convicted, with 36 being sentenced to death by hanging. [1] This article will examine whether the defendants at the Dachau trial received a fair hearing. Unjustness of the Dachau Trials The
Dachau tribunal was composed of eight senior U.S. military officers with the rank of at least
full colonel. The president of the court, Brig. Gen. John M. Lentz, was the former commanding
general of the 3rd Army’s 87th Infantry Division.[2] These U.S. military officers, with no formal legal training, were not qualified to objectively
review the evidence presented in the trial. William Denson,
the chief prosecuting attorney, used a legal concept called “common design” for
establishing that camp personnel at Dachau were guilty of violating the laws and usages of war.
The Dachau tribunal accepted Denson’s legal concept of common design. In common design,
Denson exploited a legal concept broad enough to apply to everyone who had worked in Dachau.[3] In essence, every Dachau defendant was guilty unless proven innocent (a verdict most-unlikely
to ensue). The rules of evidence used at the Dachau trial were also atrociously lax. For example, hearsay evidence presented by the prosecution was routinely allowed by the “judges.” Such testimony was permitted at the Dachau trials if it seemed “relevant to a reasonable man.” This departure from normal Anglo-Saxon law was intended to compensate for
the fact that some potential eyewitnesses had died in captivity.[4] False witnesses were used at most of the American-run war-crimes
trials at Dachau. Joseph Halow, a young U.S. court reporter at the Dachau trials in 1947, described some of the false witnesses at the Dachau trials:
[T]he major portion of the witnesses for the prosecution in the concentration-camp cases were what came to be known as “professional witnesses,” and everyone working at
Dachau regarded them as such. “Professional,” since they were paid for each day they
testified. In addition, they were provided free housing and food, at a time when these were
often difficult to come by in Germany. Some of them stayed in Dachau for months, testifying
in every one of the concentration-camp cases. In other words, these witnesses made their living
testifying for the prosecution. Usually, they were former inmates from the camps, and their
strong hatred of the Germans should, at the very least, have called their testimony into question.[5] Stephen F. Pinter, an American lawyer who
served as a U.S. Army prosecuting attorney at the American-run trials of Germans at Dachau,
confirmed Halow’s statement. In a 1960 affidavit Pinter said that “notoriously
perjured witnesses” were used to convict Germans of false and unfounded crimes. Pinter
stated, “Unfortunately, as a result of these miscarriages of justice, many innocent persons
were convicted and some were executed.”[6] The use of false witnesses has also been acknowledged by
Johann Neuhäusler, who was an ecclesiastical resistance fighter interned in two German
concentration camps from 1941 to 1945. Neuhäusler stated that in some of the American-run
trials “many of the witnesses, perhaps 90%, were paid professional witnesses with criminal
records ranging from robbery to homosexuality.”[7] Lt. Col. Douglas T. Bates, the chief defense attorney, was
also not permitted to fully cross-examine all of the prosecution witnesses. For example, prosecution
witness Arthur Haulot, a 32-year-old journalist and former lieutenant in the Belgian army, threatened
to leave the trial after being aggressively cross-examined by Bates. An hour later, Bates and
the other defense lawyers met with Haulot outside of the courtroom. Bates put a friendly arm
around Haulot’s shoulder and said: “We just want to thank you. By speaking up, you
got us properly scolded. We were doing what we had to do, and frankly it disgusted us. You won’t be bothered like that again.”[8] Such a concession by the defense counsel could never have occurred if the trial had taken place in a court in America. However, at Dachau the defense attorneys were soldiers who
took seriously reprimands from their superior officers, who were judges in the trial.[9] Signed confessions by the defendants were often used to
obtain convictions at the Dachau trial. Evidence was presented that many of the defendants
in the Dachau trial made their confessions under torture. For example, defendant Johann Kick
testified: I was under arrest here in Dachau from sixth to
15th of May. During this time I was beaten all day and night. I had to stand at attention for
hours. I had to kneel down on pointed objects. I had to stand under a lamp for hours and look
into the light, at which time I was also beaten and kicked. As a result of this treatment my
arm was paralyzed for about 10 weeks.[10] Kick testified that as a result of these beatings,
he signed the confession presented to him by U.S. Lt. Paul Guth.[11] Kick’s report regarding his torture, however, made no difference to the eight U.S. military
officers who presided as judges in the trial. Common Design The prosecution used the legal device of common design to establish that (wartime) camp personnel at Dachau were guilty of violating the laws and usages of war. Defense
attorney Douglas Bates in his closing statement challenged the court’s use of common design. Bates said: The most talked-of phrase
has been “common design.” Let us be honest and admit that common design found its
way into the judgment for the simple expedient of trying 40 defendants in one mass trial instead
of having to try one each in 40 trials. Where is the common design? Conspicuous by its absence,
established for the purpose of trapping some defendants against whom there was a shortage of
proof—by arguing, for example, that if Schoep was a guard in the camp, then he was equally
responsible for everything that went on. There are guards at each gate of this American post
today. Is it not far-fetched to say they are responsible for crimes that may be committed within the confines of this large area? If every one of the defendants is guilty of participating
in that large common design, then it becomes necessary to hold responsible every member of
the Nazi Party and every citizen of Germany who contributed to the waging of total war —and I submit that can’t be done.
I read this in Life magazine today: “Justice cannot be measured quantitatively. If the whole of Germany is guilty of murder, no doubt it would be just to exterminate the
German people. The real problem is to know who is guilty of what.” Perhaps the prosecution
has arrived at a solution as to how an entire people can be indicted as an acting part of a
mythical common design. And a
new definition of murder has been introduced along with common design. This new principle of
law says, “I am given food and told to feed these people. The food is inadequate. I feed
them with it, and they die of starvation. I am guilty of murder.” Germany was fighting
a war she had lost six months before. All internal business had completely broken down. I presume
people like Filleboeck and Wetzel should have reenacted the miracle at Galilee, where five loaves
and fishes fed a multitude. There
has been a lot of impressive law read by the chief counsel, and it is good law —Miller,
Wharton. The sad thing is that little of it is applicable to the facts in this case. Perhaps
we have not been diligent enough in seeking applicable law. Some think the prosecution has found
applicable law in the Rules of Land Warfare on the doctrine of superior orders. We have no
intention of arguing that executions by the German Reich were due process. Nevertheless, we
contend that executions were the result of law of the then recognized regime in Germany
and that members of the firing squad were simple soldiers acting in the same capacity as in
any military organization in the world….
If law cloaks a bloodbath in Germany, the idea of law will be the real victim. Lynch law, of which we have known a good deal in America, often gets the right man. But its aftermath
is a contempt for the law, a contempt that breeds more criminals. It is far, far better that
some guilty men escape than that the idea of law be endangered. In the long run, the idea of
law is our best defense against Nazism in all its forms In closing, I ask permission to paraphrase a great statesman. Never in the history of j udicial
procedure has so much punishment been asked against so many on so little proof.[12] Despite its injustice, William Denson refused
to acknowledge that the legal concept of common design should not apply in this case. Denson
stated: “I do not want the court to feel that it is necessary to establish individual
acts of misconduct to show guilt or innocence. If he participated in this common design, as
evidence has shown, it is sufficient to establish his guilt.”[13] The Case of Dr. Schilling The injustice and hypocrisy of the Dachau trial is illustrated by the case of Dr. Klaus
Karl Schilling (pictured at his execution). Malaria experiments at Dachau were performed by
Dr. Schilling, who was an internationally famous parasitologist. Dr. Schilling was ordered by
Heinrich Himmler in 1936 to conduct medical research at Dachau for the specific purpose of
immunizing individuals against malaria. The medical supervisor at Dachau would select the people to be inoculated and then send this list of people to Berlin to be approved by a higher authority. Those who were chosen were then turned over to Dr. Schilling to conduct the medical experimentation.[14] Dr. Schilling acknowledged in court that he had performed malaria experiments
on inmates in Dachau. When asked why these experiments had not been performed on animals, Dr.
Schilling replied: I have been asked hundreds
of times why I do not work with animals. The simple answer is that malaria of the human being
cannot be transmitted to animals. Even highly developed apes and chimpanzees are not receivers
of malaria. That is a recognized principle of malaria experiments.[15] William Denson stated that Dr. Schilling was “nothing more than a common murderer” whose medical experimentation could
not be compared to that performed in the United States.[16] However, evidence in the later Doctors’ trial in Nuremberg
showed that doctors in the United States performed medical experiments on prison inmates and
conscientious objectors during the war. The evidence showed that large-scale malaria experiments
were performed on 800 American prisoners, many of them black, from federal penitentiaries in Atlanta and state penitentiaries in Illinois and New Jersey. U.S. doctors conducted human
experiments with malaria tropica, one of the most dangerous of the malaria strains,
to aid the U.S. war effort in Southeast Asia.[17] Although Dr. Schilling’s malaria experiments were
no more-dangerous or illegal than the malaria experiments performed by U.S. doctors, Dr. Schilling
had to pay for his malaria experiments by being hanged to death while his wife watched.[18] The U.S. doctors who performed malaria experiments on humans were never charged with any crime.
Verdict It took
the Dachau tribunal only 90 minutes to convict all 40 defendants. Joshua Greene writes: “Even
if history looked back and judged his work charitably, Denson might have imagined one hour and
30 minutes to be a shockingly short time in which to determine the fate of 40 men.”[19] William Denson had no doubt
that the U.S. Army tribunal would find the German defendants guilty of war crimes.[20] The 90 minutes it took to convict the 40 defendants was also probably not a surprise to Denson.
In fact, in the later Mauthausen trial in which Denson was the lead prosecutor, the American
military tribunal took only 90 minutes to find all 61 defendants guilty.[21] Historian Tomaz Jardim writes concerning these verdicts:
“Given the brevity of deliberations, it is clear that the judges spent no significant
amount of time reviewing the evidence, examining legal precedent, or evaluating the issues surrounding
the common-design charge that defense counsel had raised. In all likelihood, the judges had
begun deliberations with their minds made up.”[22] Conclusion Benjamin Ferencz acknowledges the injustice of the Dachau trial:
I was there for the liberation, as a sergeant in the Third Army, General Patton’s Army, and my task was to collect camp records and witness testimony, which became the basis
for prosecutions…But the Dachau trials were utterly contemptible. There was nothing resembling
the rule of law. More like court-martials…It was not my idea of a judicial process.
I mean, I was a young, idealistic Harvard law graduate.[23] Ferencz states that nobody including himself protested
against such procedures in the Dachau trials.[24] The defendants did not receive a fair and impartial hearing in the Dachau trial. The
use of interrogation methods designed to produce false confessions, lax rules of evidence and procedure, the presumption that the defendants were guilty unless proven innocent, American military judges with little or no legal training, unreliable eyewitness testimony, the nonexistence of an appeals process, and the inability of defense counsel to aggressively cross-examine
some of the prosecution witnesses ensured the conviction of all of the defendants in the Dachau trial. Endnotes [1] Jaworski, Leon, Confession and Avoidance: A Memoir, Garden City, N.Y: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1979, p. 115.
[2] Greene, Joshua M., Justice at Dachau: The Trials of an American Prosecutor, New York: Broadway Books, 2003, p. 41.
[5] Halow, Joseph, Innocent at Dachau, Newport Beach, Cal.: Institute for Historical Review, 1992, p. 61.
[6] Sworn and notarized statement by Stephen F. Pinter, Feb. 9, 1960. Facsimile in Erich Kern, ed., Verheimlichte Dokumente,
Munich: 1988, p. 429. [7] Frei, Norbert, Adenauer’s Germany and the Nazi Past: The Politics of Amnesty and Integration, New York: Columbia
University Press, 2002, pp. 110-111. [8] Greene, Joshua M., Justice at Dachau: The Trials of an American Prosecutor, New York: Broadway Books, 2003, pp.
55-57. [14] McCallum, John Dennis, Crime Doctor, Mercer Island, Wash.: The Writing Works, Inc., 1978, pp. 64-65.
[15] Greene, Joshua M., Justice at Dachau: The Trials of an American Prosecutor, New York: Broadway Books, 2003, p. 88.
[17] Schmidt, Ulf, Karl Brandt: The Nazi Doctor, New York: Continuum Books, 2007, p. 376.
[18] McCallum, John Dennis, Crime Doctor, Mercer Island, Wash.: The Writing Works, Inc., 1978, pp. 66-67.
[19] Greene, Joshua M., Justice at Dachau: The Trials of an American Prosecutor, New York: Broadway Books, 2003, p. 115.
[22] Jardim, Tomaz, The Mauthausen Trial, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2012, pp. 180-181. [23] Stuart, Heikelina Verrijn and Simons, Marlise, The Prosecutor and the Judge, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press,
2009, p. 17. [24] Ibid. _______________________________________
“CONFESSIONS” UNDER TORTURE The Allies used extremely brutal torture against their German
prisoners, not just during the war, but afterward,
to force them to provide fraudulent confessions to crimes they never committed—all to get convictions at war crime trials. The subject is well known to Revisionists, but the facts have been suppressed by the mainstream for more than 65 years and few people outside of this circle are aware of it. The American Senator, Joseph McCarthy, in a statement given to
the American Press on May 20th, 1949, drew attention to the following cases of
torture to secure such confessions. In the prison of the Swabisch Hall, he stated,
officers of the S.S. Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler were flogged until they were
soaked in blood, after which their sexual organs were trampled on as they lay
prostrate on the ground. As in the notorious Malmedy Trials of private soldiers,
the prisoners were hoisted in the air and beaten until they signed the confessions demanded of them. On the basis of such “confessions” extorted from S.S. Generals Sepp Dietrich and Joachim Paiper, the Leibstandarte was convicted as a “guilty organisation”.
S.S. General Oswald Pohl, the economic administrator of the concentration camp
system, had his face smeared with faeces and was subsequently beaten until he
supplied his confession. In dealing with these cases,
Senator McCarthy told the Press: “I have heard evidence and read documentary
proofs to the effect that the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and
physically tortured by methods which could only be conceived in sick brains.
They were subjected to mock trials and pretended executions, they were told their families would be deprived of their ration cards. All these things were carried out with the approval of the Public Prosecutor in order to secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the extortion of the required confessions. If the United States lets such acts committed by a few people go unpunished, then the whole world can rightly criticise us severely and forever doubt the correctness of our motives and our moral integrity.” The methods of intimidation described were repeated during trials at Frankfurt-am-Mein and at Dachau, and large numbers of Germans were convicted for atrocities on the basis of their admissions. The American Judge Edward L. van Roden, one of the three members of the Simpson Army Commission which was subsequently appointed to investigate the methods of justice at the Dachau trials, revealed the methods by which these admissions were secured in the Washington Daily News, January 9th, 1949. His account also appeared in the British newspaper, the Sunday Pictorial, January 23rd, 1949. The methods he described were: “Posturing as priests to hear confessions and give absolution; torture with burning
matches driven under the prisoners finger-nails; knocking out of teeth and breaking
jaws; solitary confinement and near starvation rations.” Van Roden explained:
“The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men
who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months
… The investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head
and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with
rubber hoses … All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated,
had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure
with our American investigators.” The American
investigators responsible (and who later functioned as the prosecution in the
trials) were: Lt.-Col. Burton F. Ellis (chief of the War Crimes Committee) and his assistants,
Capt. Raphael Shumacker, Lt. Robert E. Byrne, Lt. William R. Perl, Mr. Morris
Ellowitz, Mr. Harry Thon, and Mr. Kirschbaum. The legal adviser of the court was Col. A. H. Rosenfeld. The reader will immediately appreciate from their names that the majority of these people were “biased on racial grounds” in the words of Justice Wenersturm – that is, were Jewish, and therefore should never have been involved in any such investigation. Despite the fact that “confessions” pertaining to the extermination of the Jews
were extracted under these conditions, Nuremberg statements are still regarded
as conclusive evidence for the Six Million by writers like Reitlinger and others,
and the illusion is maintained that the Trials were both impartial and impeccably
fair. When General Taylor, the Chief Public Prosecutor, was asked where he had
obtained the figure of the Six Million, he replied that it was based on the confession
of S.S. General Otto Ohlendorf. He, too, was tortured and his case is examined
below. But as far as such “confessions” in general are concerned, we can do
no better than quote the British Sunday Pictorial when reviewing the report of Judge van Roden: “Strong men were reduced to broken wrecks ready to mumble
any admission demanded by their prosecutors.” http://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd03.html Reports of widespread torture at the postwar American-run “war
crimes” trials at Dachau leaked out, resulting in so many protests that
a formal investigation was eventually carried out. A US Army Commission of inquiry
consisting of Pennsylvania Judge Edward van Roden and Texas Supreme Court Judge
Gordon Simpson officially confirmed the charges of gross abuse. German defendants,
they found, were routinely tortured at Dachau with savage beatings, burning matches
under fingernails, kicking of testicles, months of solitary confinement, and
threats of family reprisals. Low ranking prisoners were assured that their “confessions”
would be used only against their former superiors in the dock. Later, though,
these hapless men found their own “confessions” used against them when they were tried in turn. High ranking defendants were cynically assured that by “voluntarily” accepting all responsibility themselves they would thereby protect their former subordinates from prosecution. One Dachau trial court reporter was so outraged at what was happening
there in the name of justice that he quit his job. He testified to a US Senate
subcommittee that the “most brutal” interrogators had been three
German-born Jews. Although operating procedures at the Dachau trials were significantly
worse than those used at Nuremberg, they give some idea of the spirit of the
“justice” imposed on the vanquished Germans. Virtually
all of the US investigators who brought cases before American military courts at Dachau
were “Jewish refugees from Germany” who “hated the Germans,” recalled Joseph Halow, a US Army court reporter at the Dachau trials in 1947. “Many of the investigators gave vent to their hated by attempting to force confessions from the
Germans by treating them brutally,” including “severe beatings.” The case of Gustav Petrat, a German who had served as a guard at the Mauthausen, was not unusual. After repeated brutal beatings by US authorities, he broke down and signed a perjured statement. He was also whipped and threatened with immediate shooting. Petrat was prevented from securing exonerating evidence, and even potential defense witnesses were beaten and threatened to keep them from testifying. After a farcical trial by a US military court at Dachau, Petrat was sentenced to death and hanged in late 1948. He was 24 years old. http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_weberb.html James J. Weingartner, the author of A Peculiar Crusade: Willis
M. Everett and the Malmedy Massacre, wrote the story of the Dachau proceedings
from information provided by Everett’s family and gleaned from his letters
and diary. According to Weingartner, shortly before the proceedings were to
begin, defense attorney Lt. Col. Everett interviewed a few of the 73 accused
with the help of an interpreter. Although the accused were being held in solitary
confinement and had not had the opportunity to consult with each other, most
of them told identical stories of misconduct by their Jewish interrogators. Benjamin Ferencz, Jewish lead U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals in 1945 and 1947: “We did not have a regular courtroom where to call witnesses and question them, with a secretary present and someone who did the cross-examination or that would guarantee their rights. We collected statements from witnesses that we considered favorable
and they would write an affidavit. And then they had to swear it in front of
an officer. If it was from a hostile witness we would interrogate him privately
to see if we could determine the truth. And when we reached the point where we
felt we had ascertained the truth, we asked him to write in his own hand and
sign it; then usually brought in an officer to witness that.” – USHMM interview 1994 Washington Post:
Giving Hitler Hell (21 July 2005) Jewish Intelligence
Officer Arnold Weiss: “How did you do it?” I ask Weiss. “The kapos,” he explains, “that’s where we got the idea. We had seen what the DPs (displaced persons) did to the kapos, and we realized they could do us a favor. We studied up a little on military law, and there was nothing on the books preventing us from delivering suspects for additional debriefing to the DPs,” Weiss recalls. He says he’s not sure where
the idea originated, who first put it into motion, or how widespread it was.
“Whoever first came up with this, I honestly don’t know. I don’t
think they’d own up to it anyway.” While
it was perfectly legal under military law to hand over suspects for further questioning to DPs, says Benjamin Ferencz, who was a lead U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals in 1945 and 1947, knowingly delivering suspects for execution was not. And of course the DPs were not interested in extracting information. Benjamin Ferencz: “I once saw DPs (displaced persons) beat an SS man and then strap
him to the steel gurney of a crematorium. They slid him in the oven, turned on
the heat and took him back out. Beat him again, and put him back in until he
was burnt alive. I did nothing to stop it. I suppose I could have brandished
my weapon or shot in the air, but I was not inclined to do so. Does that make
me an accomplice to murder?” Lt. William Perl
was an Austrian Jew who had emigrated to America in 1940. He was the chief interrogator
of Germans accused of the Malmedy massacre. This was because he could speak fluent
German; and indeed many of the interrogators at Nuremberg were German or Austrian
Jews who had emigrated to America before WWII and were known as the ‘Ritchie
Boys’. There were roughly 9000 of these Jews in America and they specialized in the “interrogation” of German prisoners. Perl was an active Zionist who had worked to get European Jews into Palestine illegally before he came to America. Perl was also a good friend and associate of the Zionist Ze’ev Jabotinsky, founder of the murderous Irgun
terrorist organization in Israel. Perl supervised the torture of the German defendants.
Other Jews on the interrogation staff specalizing in torture techniques at Nuremberg
included Josef Kirschbaum, Harry Thon and Morris Ellowitz. British Postwar Torture Centers Col. Robin Stephens (pictured left) was in charge of a sadistic torture program during and after WWII, still largely covered up by the British government. Much of the fabricated “evidence” obtained under duress was used as a pretext to convict National Socialist leaders for war crimes. The London
Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers
and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed
through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians
joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948. Cruel
Britannia: A Secret History of Torture by Ian Cobain https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cruel-Britannia-Secret-History-Torture/dp/184627334X The secrets of the London Cage https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/nov/12/secondworldwar.world How Britain tortured Nazi PoWs http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223831/How-Britain-tortured-Nazi-PoWs-The-horrifying-interrogation-methods-belie-proud-boast-fought-clean-war.html Bad Nenndorf interrogation centre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_Nenndorf_interrogation_centre The interrogation camp that turned prisoners into living skeletons https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/dec/17/secondworldwar.topstories3 The postwar photographs that British authorities tried to keep hidden https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2006/apr/03/uk.freedomofinformation Further reading: Tortured Confessions: How the Allies extracted confessions out of captured
German soldiers after WWII http://wariscrime.com/new/tortured-confessions/ Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg https://www.darkmoon.me/2015/torture-and-testicle-crushing-at-nuremberg/ How the Allied Victors of WWII tortured and killed their German prisoners https://www.darkmoon.me/2015/german-victims-how-the-allied-victors-of-wwii-tortured-and-killed-their-german-prisoners-part-1-of-2/ How Jews tortured innocent Germans to make Holocaust Evidence http://www.nazigassings.com/BernardClarke.html The Holocaust legend is built on “confessions” obtained VIA TORTURE; Jewish interrogators beat, tortured,
and crushed the testicles of German defendants at war crimes trials http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/the-holocaust-legend-is-built-on.html Untrue Confessions: Fabricated Testimony & Circumstantially Prudent Concessions http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-Doc-Jews/+Doc-Jews-Holocaust-DebunkingLies&Liars/FabricationOfTheNurembergTrials.htm Hellstorm — The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 By Thomas Goodrich http://www.amazon.com/Hellstorm-Death-Nazi-Germany-1944-1947/dp/1494775069
Is There Life After Persecution? The Botched Execution of Fred Leuchter Presented at the Eleventh IHR Conference, October 1992. by Fred A. Leuchter, Jr. Many of you, I am sure, know who I am, where I've been, and what I've done. Today I'm here to tell you what has happened to me since I addressed the Tenth International Revisionist Conference in Washington, DC, in October 1990. One of my jobs as an engineer of execution technology has been to
"post mortem" executions from a technical standpoint, that
is, to determine if anything went wrong and, if so, to determine just how the
execution was botched. This normally entails reviewing eyewitness
accounts of how the executees were tortured, mutilated, or otherwise dehumanized in society's name. I will do that
here today, except that, in this case, it is myself that I post mortem -- and the cadaver isn't dead! Much to the dismay of my executioners, the execution was so badly botched that I am able to stand here before you to speak the truth, and to tell the world
that it is not myself, but the Holocaust story that is dead. I repeat for the
record: I was condemned for maintaining that there were no execution
gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Majdanek, Dachau, Mauthausen, or Hartheim
Castle. There's no proof for the charge, only innuendo, lies, and half-truths.
Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zündel and others said this first. They, too, live
as victims of botched executions, but nevertheless free to speak the truth in a strong and growing voice that repeats: No gas chambers, no gas chambers, no damn gas chambers! This address,
then, is not a post mortem on my cadaver but rather a post mortem by my cadaver. As you know, I was sent to Poland in 1988 by
and for Mr. Ernst Zündel to investigate the alleged execution
gas chamber facilities at the three concentration camps of Auschwitz, Birkenau,
and Majdanek. I was chosen for this task from a field of experts numbering one, and recommended by those states in the USA where lethal gas chambers are used to execute convicted criminals. My forensic analysis and subsequent report prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that there were no gas execution facilities operated by the Nazis at
these sites. I also entered these findings (which are also detailed
in my published report) into the court record in sworn testimony in Toronto
as a court-qualified expert. Because I was somewhat naive at the time, I was not aware that by so testifying I
was offending the organized world Jewish community. By providing final, definitive
proof that there were no execution gas chamber utilized for genocidal
purposes by the Germans at these wartime camps, I established the simple
fact that the Holocaust story is not true. What I did not know was that anyone
expressing such beliefs is guilty of a capital crime: that of thinking
and telling the unspeakable truth about the greatest lie of the age. I would have to pay for this crime. While I innocently told the truth
in Toronto, plans were made, and subsequently implemented, for a major
effort to destroy me. If I could be destroyed and discredited -- so
the reasoning went -- no one would accept my professional findings, no matter
how truthful. Overview Since April 1988, when I testified in the second Zündel trial in Toronto about my inspection of the alleged gas chambers in Poland, my life has been turned upside down. I have been vilified
both privately and publicly in all forms of the media. My clients have been
cajoled and threatened into not dealing with me. High-level law enforcement officials, acting for personal reasons, have lied about me and have prevented clients from dealing with me. My person and reputation have been defiled by lies and innuendo. My family and I have been repeatedly threatened. Behind this campaign to punish me and suppress the truth about the
gas chambers, have been several Jewish organizations, which have publicly
vowed to silence me by destroying my ability to make a living. At the forefront
of this effort has been Beate Klarsfeld of the Paris-based Klarsfeld Foundation. In the United States, the campaign has been orchestrated through the US-based "Holocaust Survivors and Friends in Pursuit of Justice." Associated with these two organizations have been the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith and the Jewish Defense League. Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.
At Klarsfeld's initiative, these groups first carried out an extensive one year investigation. After they were unable to turn up any impropriety or wrongdoing on my part, they began
to threaten prison wardens with political consequences if they dealt with me.
This first came to light when the ABC television news program, "Prime
Time," decided to do a network television piece on myself and
my work. This involved filming at various prisons. Prison wardens advised the
"Prime Time" personnel of the threats and problems that resulted from my presence at the prisons for the filming. ABC news was told not to air the program. It refused to succumb to the pressure, and consequently suffered vilification by the organizations involved. To sum up here, this campaign has consisted of the following: - Threats against prison officials
who dealt with me.
- False and slanderous vilification through private channels,
- as well as publicly in newspapers and magazines.
- Legislation to prevent me from
working at my profession.
- Criminal prosecution for working at my profession.
- Lies by public officials spread both officially and privately.
- Restriction of my personal freedom and right to travel by effecting my
- illegal
arrest and imprisonment in England, from where I was finally deported.
- Interference
with my right as an American citizen to help and protection from the US
- State
Department, which refused to assist me during my illegal imprisonment in England.
As a result of this campaign, my livelihood has been destroyed, and
my career has been ruined. All this for telling the truth under oath. The organizations cited above also
interfered with the execution in Illinois of a certain Mr. Walker by threatening
to pass legislation to prevent that state from allowing me to complete
an ongoing contract. As a result, Director McGinnis ultimately yielded to this pressure
and proceeded with the execution using equipment known to be defective. Under
pressure from these groups, and through the efforts of Alabama Deputy Attorney General, Ed Carnes, the State of Alabama did not purchase a new electric chair. Carnes wrote a lying memorandum to all Departments of Corrections around the United States claiming that I was dangerous and held unorthodox views on execution. He caused the State
to breach its contract. According to his office, this means I support only
humane and painless executions. Carnes actually lied to me to get me
to testify that a prior execution was humane.
As a direct result of interference by these groups, at least one man was
tortured to death in Virginia. Purchasing agents and wardens have been
mendaciously told that my equipment failed during an execution, which
is not true. It has never failed. Delaware Deputy Attorney General Silverman
breached my contract, which was already underway, because I wrote the
Zündel trial Leuchter Report. This contract was for maintenance on their lethal injection machine and gallows, previously fabricated by me, and for training of their execution personnel. Delaware has refused to pay me for the work I completed, and has instructed me to
keep the control module of their lethal injection machine. However,
the protocol I wrote for execution by hanging was submitted by them and approved
by the court system. In Massachusetts, legislation specifically designed
to put me out of business has been filed for four years running. Finally, and also at the insistence of these same Jewish groups,
a spurious criminal complaint was filed against me in the Massachusetts
court system with the intent of destroying my reputation by putting me in prison
for three months. I was charged with practicing as an engineer without a license. In point of fact, a license is not required in Massachusetts, or any other state, unless the engineer is involved
in construction of buildings, and is certifying compliance with specifications.
There is also a statutory exemption for engineers who do not deal with
the general public. As confirmation of the spurious nature of this charge, it should be pointed out there are more than fifty thousand practicing engineers in Massachusetts, of whom only five thousand
are licensed. Although the state's licensing law has been in effect
since 1940, there has been no record of any prosecution for this offense. The charge was
improperly brought. Nevertheless, if it had been successful, and I had been convicted,
I would have been imprisoned for three months.
The Massachusetts state Engineering Board, under pressure from Klarsfeld
and her "Holocaust Survivors and Friends in Pursuit of Justice,"
filed this criminal complaint in Middlesex County. The name of the complainant
was denied me, and was not made available until the matter was brought
before the court. Before the complaint was issued, and several times thereafter,
I was given the chance to recant in return for non-issuance or dismissal
of the complaint. I also would have been obliged to give up my profession, in order to discredit my Report. I refused, and responded to the Board's threat with a denial that any law had been violated. The original clerk magistrate who issued the complaint
apologized for bowing to Jewish pressure in prosecuting me under a statute
that was being mis-applied. A representative of the ADL tried to force her testimony
on the hearing, but was denied access because she had no evidence to
offer that was pertinent to the matter. The District Court judge, in
an excellent imitation of Pontius Pilate, summarily dismissed our motions for
dismissal, allowed my court-appointed attorney to withdraw, and instructed Kirk Lyons, Director of the Cause Foundation and my out-of-state attorney, to re-file our motions for dismissal, because they all had merit. After it became clear that there would be no justice for us in the Malden District Court, we moved the case to Superior Court for a jury
trial. With
this charge hanging over my head, it was impossible for me to consult, supply equipment,
or even act as an expert witness in American courts, as I had often done. The district attorney's office, under
heavy pressure from various Jewish organizations, selected its best prosecuting
attorney to handle my case. In the belief that he would be the person
most likely to bring about a conviction, he was pulled from a murder trial. In June, just prior to the trial, our motions for dismissal were heard. The judge, also under heavy pressure from Jewish groups, told the district attorney that this case was not properly a criminal matter, and strongly suggested that the case be resolved short of a trial.
With the ever-present possibility of conviction and jail (faced by most political
prisoners) we negotiated a settlement. A very special consent agreement was
signed [on June 11, 1991] that made legal history in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
The agreement was not a promise by the defendant to the court, as is
normally the case, but an agreement between the State Engineering Board
and myself. The board which, on two previous occasions, had refused to
accept my application for registration because they do not register people who practice my discipline, was required to become a party to the agreement. [For
more on this agreement, see the IHR Newsletter, July-August 1991, p. 3.] The consent agreement requires the board
to accept my application and process it with "due diligence." Until
the application is approved, or until two years are up, I have agreed
not to use the title "engineer" or issue an engineering opinion in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This is, in effect, a temporary gag order imposed to satisfy the interested Jewish groups. By removing the case from consideration by criminal courts,
the possibility of my imprisonment has been eliminated. If the Engineering
Board fails to process and issue a license to me within a reasonable
period, and in due course, the matter should then move to the civil courts.
Attorney Lyons is presently preparing the necessary application. However, a new problem has arisen. All applications must be accompanied by the recommendations of three state-licensed engineers, but none is willing to risk the wrath of the Jews in my behalf. The de facto
gag order, imposed by the settlement, applies only within the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts, and I am free to pursue my profession anywhere else. Most of the execution equipment in the United
States is either worn out, obsolete, or improperly fabricated, and
is in need of repair or replacement. I am the only person who does this work,
and states are being denied the right to deal with me. Although wardens and commissioners are afraid to even speak with me, they often do so anyway through intermediaries. One state has a leaking gas chamber, but will use it, endangering the lives of guards and witnesses, rather than risk discovery in dealing with me. How many more inmates will
be tortured, or lives lost, through the callous interference of these Jewish
groups? Owing to the successful conspiracy of these Jewish groups, I am completely out of business, unable to find work to feed my family. In spite of everything, though, I am still
here, and I am still telling the truth. Furthermore, I intend to continue to
tell the truth. If the organized Jewish community wants to stop me,
it will have to try much harder. Moreover, attempts to discredit the Leuchter Report have failed, most notably
with Pressac's inept analysis. Since the release of the Leuchter
Report [in 1988], independent evidence has shown that the six million death
figure has been grossly exaggerated, and an investigation by the Polish
state forensic institute [among others] has corroborated that no gas was
utilized in the alleged execution chambers at Auschwitz. England In the spring of 1991, David Irving asked me if I would consider
a speaking engagement in England later that year. I said that I would,
and I was advised in mid-summer that this would take place during the second
week of November. Irving apparently announced the speech sometime later. This apparently enraged Jewish groups in London which protested to UK Home Secretary Mr. Kenneth Baker in an effort to prevent me from traveling to London. This is a clear infringement of the rights of British people to hear me speak. This certainly also curtails my right to travel to England
as any other American citizen. As a result of pressure by these Jewish groups, Mr. Baker
apparently promised to take action. The Jewish Chronicle, a
London weekly paper, reported in its issue of October 4, 1991, that Home Secretary
Baker had banned my travel to the United Kingdom. This was the only
mention of the ban in the British media,and was not a particularly reliable source. A week or so later, my father, Fred A. Leuchter,
Sr., received a letter, ostensibly from the Immigration and Naturalization
Department of Her Majesty's government, informing him that, by direction
of the Home Secretary, he was not permitted to travel to the United Kingdom.
My father communicated this letter to me.
Because my father had no such travel plans, my first assumption was
that this letter was meant for me. However, a closer reading of it suggested
that it might be a fraud. The signatory, Mr. "G.P.J. Catt,"
had no title, and part of the date was written by hand. Certainly, the
Home Secretary and Her Majesty's Immigration Office would not be so sloppy and
unbusinesslike as to send off an amateurishly prepared letter to the wrong
person. My address is publicly known, and is easy to ascertain. I turned the questionable document over to my attorney, Kirk Lyons,
to authenticate. He, in turn, formally protested the letter to the
UK Consulates in both Houston and Boston. In each case, the Consulate advised
him that his protest was unfounded because there was no ban on travel
to the UK by me (or my father, for that matter). He was informed that the
letter must be fraudulent, and that it did not prohibit my travel to Britain in any way. Lyons was also informed that all Home Office documents must contain a reference number, which this did not. Based on all this, I confirmed my travel plans to London. Because I also had also arranged to
visit Germany, I combined that trip with my visit to London. Accordingly, my
wife Carol and I left for Germany on November 2, 1991. We planned to
drive to Calais and take the ferry to Dover from there on or about November 11, 1991. We also planned to return to Germany on or about November 15, immediately following my scheduled speech in London. Because our visit in Germany would be very hectic, we intended to arrive in England several days prior to my speech, giving
us a few days to relax and see some of that country. As planned, we arrived in Dover on the ferry from Calais
late on November 11, and spent the night in Dover. The next morning we drove
to London, where we met with Irving. We then left to see the country,
leisurely driving south to Salisbury to see Stonehenge. We returned
to London by way of Wimbledon on November 15.
On Friday evening, November 15, we arrived at the Town Hall in Chelsea
where I was to give my speech. After Irving opened the program, Dr.
Robert Faurisson spoke. I was then called to the podium, and began my presentation.
At approximately 9:15 p.m., some five minutes into my speech, I was
interrupted by Irving, who told me that a "gentleman" wished to speak
to me in the anteroom to the stage. I did not know it then, but I would
remain in illegal police custody, without interruption, until I was expelled from England, and would not see my host, Dr. Faurisson, or the audience again. In the anteroom I was greeted by Chief Inspector
Philip Selwood and three metro police officers. I was asked to identify
myself, which I did by presenting my passport (which Selwood kept) and my driver's
license (which he returned). I was told that two male technicians with
the Thames television news team had quietly spoken with him outside, and had insisted (as citizens) that I be arrested as an illegal alien because I had sneaked into the country contrary to a ban by the Home Secretary. I responded by pointing out that my passport was properly stamped, and that, as the two British Consulates in the United States had indicated, there was no such ban. I further informed Selwood that if it was indeed determined that
was in the country illegally, I would leave immediately. I told him
that I had no wish to stay where I was not wanted, and that did not want to
violate the law. Selwood told me that Thames television was trying to
make news instead of reporting it, and that my cooperation would be very much appreciated. He asked me to accompany him to the Chelsea police station, without talking to the media, whilst he made an investigation. If I refused, I would be arrested on suspicion of illegal entry. I agreed. After he spirited me out of the building and into an unmarked van, away
we went. Selwood was also afraid of violent Jews, who might attempt to break
up the speech, and that was the reason for the presence of himself and
his large contingent of men. I asked him to bring my wife, who was at
the back of the hall. He stopped the van, ordered his men to take me to the
station, and personally returned to collect my wife. I arrived at the
station, and he soon followed with Carol. We were placed in a visitors' room. Selwood advised me that I was not under arrest,
and that if the Home Office determined that I was in the country illegally
I would be permitted to leave. I was told that I was free to call the American
consul, if I wished. I did not. At this point I asked to leave. I was informed that I would have to wait for my status
to be determined, because it would be necessary to escort me out of
the country if I was there illegally. Selwood further told me that persons
who were in the country illegally must be permitted to leave, if they
so wished, providing they had the means. (In fact, we had ferry tickets.) Chief
Inspector Selwood and the other police personnel were cordial and accommodating,
providing us with a toilet and refreshment. We advised the police that
Carol was diabetic. After first introducing us to his second-incommand, and
leaving instructions as to our treatment, Selwood left before midnight. At approximately 12:05 a.m., early
Saturday morning, November 16, the Deputy Chief Inspector received a call, apparently
from the Home Office. We could not hear very much, but we did hear him
say that we should leave by way of Dover. A few minutes later, shortly before
12:15 a.m., he again received a call, to which he replied "Yes sir." He then came to speak to me. "I'm sorry," he said. "I have been ordered to arrest you." He informed
me of my rights, and told me that I could talk with the US Consul,
or the Duty Solicitor (Public Defender), or both. When I asked if it had been
determined that I was in the country illegally, he said that he did
not know for sure. I then asked to leave, and he told me that this was not possible.
At this point I asked to speak with the US Consul, and was told that this
would be arranged. I was then searched, booked, and locked in a detention room with someone else, also under arrest.
About an hour later I was removed from the detention room, and told that the
American Consulate was on the telephone. I spoke with Under Consul
Christopher Randall who informed me that the Consular Corps was not there to
help US citizens. He totally refused to help. I asked to talk with the
Duty Solicitor, and was told he would be called. I was taken to a cell
(instead of a detention room) for lock-up. When I asked why I was being moved to a cell, I was told that the other occupant of the detention room was there for assault, and that I was being moved for my own protection. I now found myself in an isolation cell with
one other occupant who turned out to be there for theft. Because I
make execution equipment (and criminals know this), I should never have been
put in a cell with others. To do so might put my life in danger. Moreover, the cell was freezing, and I had no coat. The
other inmate had a blanket and mattress. In an effort to keep warm, I wrapped
my arms around myself, but this didn't work. I was unable to sleep. Some time
later I was let out to accept a phone call from the Duty solicitor, who told me
he was unable to help because I had not committed a crime. He told me that I should call my Consul, who ought to be able to help. When I told him that my consul had refused to help, he urged me to call back and insist, because he was obliged by law to help. I was returned to my cell. At approximately 3:00 a.m., I was removed from my cell for interrogation by two Immigration Department personnel. I was taken to an interrogation room with recording equipment, and advised that my statement would be taped. I was also advised that I did not have
to make a statement if I chose not to. I agreed to speak with them, but
they first had to give me time to warm up so that my teeth would stop
chattering and I would be able to speak normally. I gave them the same
information that I had given hours earlier to Chief Inspector Selwood. I affirmed
that I was a legal entrant, and once again requested permission to leave.
I was refused. I was told that I should call the American Consul and/or the Duty Solicitor. I was also informed that charges might be brought. At this point I was served with Immigration form IS 151-A. I was also told that I would not be allowed to leave by way of Dover, but would instead be sent out though Heathrow airport (where they were from), and that my wife and our rental car would have to stay behind. I asked about my
wife, concerned that she had not eaten in over twelve hours, which could
be a problem because of her diabetes. I was told that they would make a decision later about my legal status, and that in the meantime I would have to remain in the cold cell. I asked to be allowed to warm up, and to see my wife. They agreed to this. Carol had also asked
to see me. I met with Carol. After talking with her, I once again asked to talk with my Consul. The Consulate official again gave me a hard time, but after I told him of my discussion with the Duty Solicitor he said he would at least inquire into the matter. The guard rushed me
to complete my phone conversation. Carol subsequently found out that
the Under Consul had inquired late that morning. Carol had been removed
while I was on the telephone, and I was rushed back to my cell. I froze again,
but at about 4:30 a.m. I was given a blanket.
The day shift personnel who arrived at about seven o'clock proved
more difficult to deal with. At 7:00 a.m., the other inmates were awakened
to be taken to court. They were given coffee; I was not. My cellmate
asked the guard to give me some coffee, which he did. By 7:45 a.m., all the
inmates were gone, and new inmates began to arrive. I repeatedly asked about my wife to make sure that she was
well. I inquired at 7:00, 8:00, 9:00, 10:00, 11:00, 12:00, and 1:00 o'clock,
but no one would tell me how she was. Later I found out that just one
officer had checked on her. She likewise had been asking about me, and
was told nothing. At noon I was given a breakfast that consisted of cold eggs, sausage, and toast left over from hours earlier. It was inedible. It certainly would have made my ulcer worse. Carol had been given nothing to eat, even though she had been required to stay there by the Immigration officers who knew of her medical problem. At about 1:20 p.m., I was again taken from my
cell, this time to see Mr. Phillips of the Immigration Department.
He met with Carol and me together. Phillips told us that it had been determined
that I was in the country illegally, because I had entered in violation of the ban by the Home Secretary. I was told that I would be held until I was deported. He acknowledged that he could not understand
why I had been arrested and imprisoned after I had asked on three occasions
to leave. Once again I asked to leave, but Mr. Phillips told me that
this was now not possible because I had been formally arrested. This should not have
happened, he said, but, because it did, I would now have to be deported. Carol asked how it was possible for me to be in the country illegally if I had entered legally at Dover and had a valid passport stamp. Phillips replied that I was not actually in the country illegally,
but that an official determination had been made that I was, and that was the
law. I asked why those immigration officials who had interviewed me
had made this determination, and Phillips responded that they had not. He further
said that the "decision has been made very high up in the Home
Office," higher than he would ever reach in his career. He added that I could legally be held for up to five days after my arrest, even though
I wanted (and should have been allowed) to leave earlier. Phillips also told us that the Immigration Department had
contacted French immigration about my possible deportation to France, but that
I had been refused entry there. I responded by commenting that this
is not surprising, because no country would want a deportee unless it is one
of its own citizens. Phillips agreed.
He said that his next step would be to ask Belgium, and, if I was
refused there, Germany. He did not expect Belgium to accept, but if Germany
did, I would be sent on the Hamburg Ferry that ran only twice a week,
the next time being on Tuesday [three days hence]. If I were to go this
way, I would have to remain incarcerated until that time. However, I was asked, in view of my desire to leave, would I consider
going to the United States? Phillips informed me that if I officially
told him that I wished to return to the United States, he could not stop me,
and would put me on a flight that very evening. I then formally asked
to be returned to the United States, and Phillips said that he would begin making the necessary arrangements. We would have to leave the rental car in England and make some arrangement for its return to Germany (other than by our driving it). Furthermore, we would have to forego our remaining commitments in Germany because time would not permit
our return. After taking our airline tickets, he contacted Lufthansa to reschedule our flight. The only available fight that day was at 3:30 p.m., which was too soon for us to get to the
airport. He returned our tickets, and promised to make arrangements at the UK
government's expense. He booked us on a British Airways flight to New
York (not Boston) that departed at 6:30 p.m. We were escorted in two
cars. Phillips' car went first, and we followed in another police car, under
guard. We stopped for our luggage at our car which was parked behind
Selfridge's [in London], at a parking meter, and proceeded to the airport in rush-hour
traffic. If we did not make it on time, they would have to return me to my cell. After a stop at the Immigration office to pick
up the necessary forms, we arrived at the airport, passed through security,
and reached the gate just as the plane was being loaded. The police officer
had left us at the entrance to the terminal. After returning my passport (which
noted my detention on form IS 151 A), Mr. Phillips watched us enplane. The
people at the ticket counter had been told that I was being deported, as were the gate attendants. We took our seats,
flew to New York, and arrived at about 9:45 p.m. We had to purchase
air tickets to Boston at our own expense. After barely making this flight, we
arrived in Boston at approximately 11:45 p.m., exhausted and hungry. In summary, I was detained and held
in custody for some twenty one and three-quarters hours, fourteen of them in
an unheated cell. I was given a breakfast at noon, and was given one cup
of coffee only at my cellmate's insistence. I was given no water, and there was none in the cell. My ulcer did not fare well under these circumstances,
particularly because of my anxious concern for Carol.
For her part, Carol fared even less well that I did. After my arrest, she
was given no food or water, even though she was not free to leave,
and the police knew that she was a diabetic. After my arrest, she was
allowed to see me only once. By the time we left, we were both cold and ill.
The conduct of both Chief Inspector Selwood and Mr. Phillips, as well
as that of the police personnel on the evening shift, was exemplary. By contrast,
the conduct of the day shift personnel was poor and careless. During the time that I was being held, Dr. Robert Faurisson
went to the US Embassy in London to see if he could obtain help for
me. He was informed that neither I, nor any other American, had been arrested
that evening. That the US Embassy would lie about the illegal arrest
and imprisonment of an American citizen is inexcusable. Faurisson also went to the police
station where I was being held. He was told there I had been arrested and was being held in a cell in the station, but that I was not permitted any visitors. The police later told Faurisson that I had been deported on Saturday at 6:30 p.m. As shown by the statements of the two British
consular officials in the United States, and the fact that my name
was not on any list and was legally permitted to enter at Dover, it is clear
that no order barring me from entering the UK was ever officially given. It is likewise clear that the difficulty
started only when the Thames television people lied about me to Chief Inspector
Selwood, apparently in order to make a "better" news story. It is also clear that the Home Secretary
(or someone acting for him) illegally ordered my arrest, imprisonment and deportation,
knowing full well that I had entered the country legally and should
have been left alone or, if later determined to be there illegally, at least permitted to leave. This plain violation of international law by the Home Secretary's Office was undoubtedly done to please the complaining Jewish groups which bear the ultimate responsibility. By failing
to uphold one of the prime responsibilities of the Consular Corps -- that is, to protect the rights of Americans abroad -- the United States Embassy in London, and Under Consul Christopher Randall in particular, clearly failed in their responsibility to me as an American citizen, as well as their responsibility to the nation as a whole. It is
a shameful disgrace that the British duty solicitor and UK Immigration Officer Phillips cared more for my rights than my own embassy. A formal protest to State Department,
and requests for help from our Senators and Representatives, have resulted
in nothing but lip service. Conclusion Unfortunately, my clients -- the state governments -- are still intimidated by my Jewish persecutors. This continues to deprive me of my income, and it is not at all clear whether this
will ever end. I have been unable to apply for my state engineering license because no engineers have been willing to sign papers recommending me (which is a requirement), out of fear of retaliation. Without some official change in my status, such as a license, even the friendly state governments are afraid to deal with me. The major lawsuit we had planned against my persecutors is stalled, perhaps permanently, because of a lack of funds. And, although
my findings will ultimately be accepted by all, I still have no contracts, have been unable to find work and have no income. It does not seem that this will improve in the near future. From The Journal of Historical Review, Winter
1992 (Vol. 12, No. 4), pages 429-444.
___________________________________________________________________________________________ Censored History: Britain
put Jews in Concentration Camp During WWII The Balfour Declaration of 1917 was a letter from Britain’s
Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Walter Rothschild
to be read before the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. It announced British support for Jewish immigration into the
Palestinian Mandate. The Zionist Federation had promised the British government
they could mobilize Hollywood and other assets to push America into WWI on the side of the Axis . America entered WWI on April 6, 1917. The Balfour Declaration was made on November 2, 1917. It was widely viewed in Europe as a thank you for American Jewish support for America’s
entry into WWI. The Balfour Declaration was considered a major step towards the creation of the Jewish state of Israel. The fallout however,
was not good for European Jews. Germany had been a safe haven for Jews for hundreds of years. Jews were thriving so much so, that the average Jewish income was significantly higher than that of
the average German. Germans felt the Jewish community as a whole had betrayed
them. German Jews quickly became stigmatized as disloyal, draft dodgers,
war profiteers, and more. If that wasn’t enough, European Jews soon felt the sting of betrayal from Britain.
In the 1930′s the German government offered to move European Jews
to the Palestinian Mandate. The National Socialist regime encouraged Jews to obtain Palestinian passports and argued that Jews would be much happier living in a country of their own in the
Middle East. The German government promised the Arabs in the Palestinian Mandate
free Volkwagon trucks and construction supplies to pacify them. Ideological
Zionists living in the Mandate embraced the idea and some even openly supported the National Socialist regime. Britain
immediately capped the number of Jews who could move to the Palestinian Mandate
to only 15,000 a year, so they would not change the balance of power. In 1940, the National Socialist regime sent the first wave of Jews to
the Palestinian Mandate. The first convoy was three ships full of Jews
from Prague, Danzig, Vienna, and Tulcea, Romania. The British immediately blockaded the ports and declared that the Jews were illegal immigrants. The Jews were all arrested by the British
army and placed in quickly erected concentration camps. Once WWII started
many Jews tried to reach the territory to avoid being sent to Nazi run concentration
camps. Britain captured tens of thousands and imprisoned them in concentration camps in the Palestinian Mandate,
Cyprus, and Mauritius. The British concentration camps looked the same
as the dreaded camps run by Germany, Croatia, and Romania. When inmates
arrived at the British camps they were forced to strip naked and then sprayed with DDT. In 1944, the government of Hungary collapsed. The arrow cross
party seized control of Hungary to keep the Hungarian army fighting
on the Eastern front. To pay for the Hungarian army, Jewish owned property in Hungary was seized. The National Socialist regime made another major attempt to send Jews to the Palestinian Mandate.
They had Turkish cooperation to transport Jews to the territory by train.
One train was even filled up with Hungarian Jews and ready to leave,
but the British said the Hungarian Jews would be refused. The passengers were ordered to switch trains to be sent to concentration camps in Poland. At that time Britain knew full well that the IRC
was the sole provider of food and supplies to the camps and it was only
a matter of time until access would be cut off due to the advancing red army. What is even more shocking is that after the Allies and the IRC began
liberating the concentration camps, Britain continued to imprison Jewish
refugees who tried to enter the Palestinian Mandate. Many survived
WWII in concentration camps, only to be imprisoned by the British. The main British concentration camp was in Atlit, north of Haifa.
Many Jews were imprisoned in Atlit before being transported to Cyprus
or Mauritius. Over 70,000 Jews were imprisoned there between 1940 and 1945. The camp was shut down when it was attacked by Zionist guerrillas in 1945. Yitzhak Rabin allegedly masterminded
the operation, but he did not lead it. It took a very violent guerrilla war and major acts of terrorism to convince the British to give up the Palestinian Mandate after WWII was over. by Jason Swartz
____________________AN ACTUAL PURPOSEFUL HOLOCAUST____________________________
The Rhine meadow camps in summer 1945
| Liberation of Bergen Belsen, well nourished Jewish detainees with German striped detainee suits and
caps on a cold day in wet and cold April 1945, April 15, 1945 [5]; other web sites state that this photo would be from Dachau.
| In 1945 and 1946 London Satanist Zionist Committee
of 300 presented German dead bodies as Jewish dead bodies - dead body plays
are typical for Satanist behavior: The Rhine meadow camps in summer 1945 (part 4) Part 4: German bodies shown as Jewish bodies for Hitchcock's films about German concentration camps:
wrong bodies from Rhine meadow camps, wrong lorries,
showers and crematories etc.
Hitchcock, portrait 1956, he likes betraying and laughing
at Germans | | Liberation of Bergen Belsen, well nourished
Jewish detainees with German striped detainee suits and caps on a cold day in wet and cold April 1945, April 15,
1945 ; other web sites state that this photo would be from Dachau. | Dead bodies torn by SS men on the way to the mass
grave 01, the clothes are NO striped uniforms of detainees in German ccs, and there are NO tattooed numbers, and there are
NO remnants of earth on the bodies |
Part 4: German bodies shown as Jewish bodies for Hitchcock's
films about German concentration camps: wrong bodies from Rhine meadow camps, wrong lorries, showers and crematories etc. Master liar Hitchcock was in Germany together with mass murderer and Zionist Eisenhower.
Mass murderer Eisenhower had
organized the Rhine meadow camps with 5 million German prisoners of war, and within 6 months 1 million died (750,000 on the "American" side and 250,000
on the French side). Since 1942 Zionists made propaganda on and on in the whole world that Jews would be "gassed" in German concentration camps.
Well, but all this was a big lie because the German concentration camps were under control of the Red Cross AND of the Zionists themselves who could move freely everywhere! But Eisenhower wanted a "confirmation"
for the propaganda. Eisenhower gave the order to Hitchcock: Make some films thus people will believe that the rumors about the German mass murder against
the Jews are right. They should
believe it really. This was simple: Hitchcock was filming in the Rhine meadow camps and simply said in the films that the emaciated Germans and the German bodies would
be Jewish bodies - and the film was ready. They were also driving piles of German bodies from the Rhine meadow camps through Germany showing the bodies in German
concentration camps stating
that these would be Jewish bodies. And these lies were established by force of arms and were spread in the whole world. Well, the principle faults one can detect these lies of Eisenhower and Hitchcock are the following ones: -- German dead bodies from the Rhine meadow
camps - when they wear clothes - are NOT wearing the German striped
"zebra" prison uniforms but are mostly wearing remnants of the German gray
soldier uniforms of the German army "Wehrmacht" -- German bodies have no tattooed number of detainees -- and there are no remnants of earth on the bodies and thus these bodies never were excavated before but these bodies are "fresh" bodies. Journalists were never watching precisely and since 1945 they mean that the
NS regime had murdered millions of Jews. But it was just the other way round: Criminal allied murdered 1 million German soldiers in the Rhine meadow camps
and then were presenting the
dead bodies as Jewish dead bodies. And for making the lie even more perfect the allies also invented epidemics in the German concentration camps having
been the "cause" for the bodies. Point
1: Rhine meadow camps with emaciated German soldiers and with piles of German bodies The Rhine meadow camps of 1945 with 5 million detained German soldiers in Germany were deliberately concealed. Eisenhower - a hater of the Germans - had not enough
having murdered in Dresden over 230,000 Germans. In the Rhine meadow camps Eisenhower let die deliberately 750,000 German soldiers, and 250,000 more were
murdered by hunger in the
French zone which was installed in July 1945 taking over Eisenhower's death camps there. But this was not published because there were no newspapers
in Germany in 1945 and the Red Cross had no good press spokesman as it seems. Even "U.S." president Truman was not informed what was going on in
Germany in the "American"
zone but the Morgenthau plan was fulfilled killing as many Germans as possible after the war - and the Rhine meadow camps were only the beginning because the deliberately
installed starvation which was installed by Zionist Eisenhower was killing even 5 million more Germans in remaining Germany from 1945 to 1950. During
1945 "American" soldiers
had a paradise life and were making holidays in criminal Nazi Switzerland and Swiss press - whereas the International Red Cross has it's seat in Switzerland
in Geneva - is concealing until today (2013) the mass murder in the Rhine meadow camps under mass murderer Eisenhower... Point 2: Hitchcock presenting emaciated German soldiers and piles with German bodies as Jewish
victims Eisenhower was a racist Zionist and Bible Jehova racist.
His bosses were the Zionists Baruch (financier and stock exchange guru) and Zionist Morgenthau. Morgenthau wanted to have all Germans killed having a powerless
or even a Germany without
population. Zionist Eisenhower wanted to kill as many Germans as possible, and he had a "friend" with him, film maker Hitchcock. There should be films
made supporting the claim "Germans" had gassed "6 million Jews". Now German dead bodies in the Rhine meadow camps were filmed and the German
dead bodies were driven around in
whole Germany and they were presented in the German concentration camps claiming that the dead bodies would be dead Jews. Analysis of Hitchcock's films: some
fakes and some proofs Controlling the Hitchcock films one can
detect the fake, see the following details. German helmets had an ear protection and a neck protection, but "American" helmets were round
like a circle without protection of ear and neck.
Different forms of helmets of the Wehrmacht and the "U.S." Army |
| Helmets of the Wehrmacht with the protection of ears and neck, example during Barbarossa campaign [1]
| |
German helmets of the Wehrmacht with the protection of ears and neck, example of a hand grenade course [2] | |
"American" soldiers with round "American" helmets and with rows of German bodies in a
Rhine meadow camp [3] | |
"American" soldiers with round "American" helmets piling German bodies on
a trailer in a Rhine meadow camp [4] | Eisenhower and Hitchcock were bringing the fake to a head. German
bodies were partly driven around in whole Germany, were shown on the trailers or piled on the ground and presented to the population as "Jewish bodies".
But the mass fraud was clear -- there were no tattooed numbers of detainees
on the bodies -- when the bodies had clothes on then these were German uniforms and not striped zebra uniforms from German concentration camps which had Jewish
detainees -- and the bodies could not be digged out either because the bodies were so clean and new that there were no rests of earth on them. "American" occupation forces claimed that Auschwitz had been the "center"
of the murder of the Jews whereas NEVER ANY
"American" soldier was in Auschwitz in the concentration camp. Well, Eisenhower just copied the cc of Auschwitz
in a Rhine meadow camp and thus Hitchcock
made his Auschwitz films. But all these fakes can be detected easily with the "American" helmets. Examples of fakes from Bergen Belsen Liberation of Bergen Belsen, well nourished Jewish detainees
with German striped detainee suits and caps on a cold day in wet and cold April 1945, April 15, 1945 [5]; other web sites
state that this photo would be from Dachau. Photos from the faked cc film by Hitchcock: "An Alfred Hitchcock Documentary
On The Nazi Holocaust" (53min.1sec.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0wA4rDuG58 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRr6P0d6r9I http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaR3qud2-e8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIZ2KPZhDUs When the links are not working, go to http://www.youtube.com looking for the title "An Alfred Hitchcock Documentary On The Nazi Holocaust", so you get the
actual links of the film. Always look for the film of 53 min. 1 sec. Let's see the fakes about Bergen-Belsen | Hitchcock made some little mistakes: In the film he is saying himself that the prisoners are
"soldiers". And there are also women greeting the detainees -
thus German women greeting German soldiers - and these are not women greeting Jews. And there are allied lorries with a five
pointed star of the "American" army on the hood. And all detainees have dark gray clothes.
Thus these are GERMAN PRISONERS OF WAR, above all those with a white "turban" on the head. These are white massive head
bandages after having suffered head injuries in the fight. In Bergen Belsen there were allegedly dead
bodies by typhus and these bodies are said having been buried only 9 days after the liberation,
and these dead bodies of typhus only partly show irregular dark spots, but often no one. In the film
is also a medical doctor presented without medical white coat calling himself
Mr. Little (Mr. Klein). And at the end the English are claiming that there had been typhus in Bergen Belsen concentration
camp installing a warning sign in English "Typhus" and the film is inventing
a laboratory of "London students". Hitchcock is inventing that typhus came from getting
too less soup and too less water - word by word. Well, when there had been a typhus epidemic in Bergen Belsen then the German
camp leadership had installed an own warning sign - in German - and in coordination with the Red Cross! According to the Baron of the Lies Hitchcock even Jewish children survived Bergen-Belsen in
a good estate of health, even a new born baby.: <There were more than
200 children under 12 years old still alive in Belsen camp.> | | | | | Children in
Bergen-Belsen (22min.37sek.) [6] | | |
New born baby
in Bergen-Belsen (22min.5sek.) [7] Some children were born in the camp. | | |
| |
Bergen-Belsen
camp (11min.1sek.) [8] Here the mass murderer Eisenhower and film maker Hitchcock were organizing a huge fraud and calumny
against Germany. | | |
"American" lorries with a five pointed star on the hood coming with German prisoners of war
(1min. 49sec.) [9] Thus this is not a German lorry but an "American" or British lorry. And here do not come Jews but here
come German detainees being greeted by German women and children. | |
Such people are NOT Jewish detainees but GERMAN soldiers in gray coats and with head injuries with
white head bandages. Here they are standing allegedly around a "water lorry". (2min. 9sec.) [10]
| | |
This is NO Jew but this is a German soldier in his gray army uniform of the Wehrmacht. He is eating
bread at a barbed wire fence (2min. 23sec.) [11] German soldiers under the
allied command had to "arrange" themselves on a meadow. | |
Women sector, women meadow (4min. 22sec.) [12]
Also these women are NOT wearing the striped German zebra uniform
for detainees in German ccs as Jewish detainees had, but these are German assistant staff members from the camp being forced
under allied command to arrange on the meadow. Additionally there were no "women's meadows" in German concentrations
camps but there were "women's camps". "Women's meadows" only existed under mass murderer Eisenhower from
1945 to 1946... | | |
German prisoners of war in a queue (11min. 6sec.), many have white bandages
on their head because of head injuries [13]. Jews in German concentration camps had NO head bandages for sure.
Thus here are NO Jews but
GERMAN soldiers - in the concentration camp of Bergen-Belsen under allied English administration. |
|
Water
pipes and in the back ground a car of the Red Cross can be seen (11min. 50sec.) [14] | | |
A car of the Red Cross is closed (18min. 37sec.) [15]
| When
pictures with a car from the Red Cross are shown then it can be admitted that the camp was well managed and there were no
or hardly any epidemics, but all cases of illnesses were brought to hospitals as long it was possible. | |
Water
supply in the camp (11min. 33sec.) [16] When films are claiming that German administration had blocked the water supply leaving Jewish detainees
suffering without water then this is just a normal propaganda fake to destroy the reputation of the Germans. | | |
Water supply in the camp 03 with washing possibility (11min. 39sec.) [17] Additionally
there cannot be seen any striped Jewish zebra detainee's uniform in this film, but these detainees are women from SS. | |
Here is a
German prisoner of war topless in summer 1945 searching clothes on the ground, and in the background there is a dead German
detainee in a gray uniform (3min. 7sec.) [18] This scenery cannot be from
April 145 because April 1945 was cold and wet with much rain and even snow. Nobody was walking topless in April 1945. But
liar Hitchcock claims this would be a Jewish detainee during the liberation of the camp in April 1945... |
| |
The ground is full of German bodies or full of helpless dying German prisoners of war in gray uniforms starving
and suffering in their own excrements (3min. 23sec.) [19] There CANNOT BE
SEEN ANY striped zebra uniform of German concentration camps. All clothes come from dead German soldiers. These are NO Jews
FOR SURE. | |
|
Male emaciated dead bodies without clothes and without spots and without tattooed numbers of detainees
(4min. 54sec.) [20]. These dead bodies are German bodies from the Rhine meadow camps. | | |
Woman's
dead body with big breast and with irregular spots on her body with an open mouth (4min. 8sec.) [21] The irregular spots are never explained.
Some bodies have spots, others not. Nothing is clear about it. Thus there is the suspicion that the spots are painted. | |
Region
of Bergen-Belsen: SS has to dig out a mass grave and allies are helping with a bulldozer (6min. 48sec.) [22]
When a mass grave is digged out
with sun shine and dry earth this scenery cannot be from cold and wet April 1945 but this scene was taken more at the end
of May or in June 1945. | | |
Faked board in English with the claim "Typhus" at the concentration camp of Bergen-Belsen
AFTER the liberation (18min. 4sec.) [23] When an "occupation power" claims that there had been an epidemic in a German concentration
camp this is mostly a lie. In the case of Bergen-Belsen a board in English was installed. But when Bergen-Belsen had had
typhus then the German administration had installed an own board with a warning in German. Thus the English occupation power
has invented this epidemic justifying the masses of dead bodies which were brought to the camp later. Inventing an epidemic
concealing the own crimes is a standard maneuver of the Anglo-Saxon psychological warfare... |
|
Bergen-Belsen: task force with an alleged action on April 24, 1945, dead bodies arriving in a trailer
(12min. 33sec.) [24] German bodies from a Rhine meadow camp were brought to Bergen-Belsen in a trailer and German SS men have to push
the trailer. | | |
Bergen-Belsen, hips of dead bodies on a trailer (12min. 54sec.) [25]
The dead bodies
on the trailer have NO tattooed numbers of detainees and the bodies are absolutely clean and have NO remnants of earth or
other contamination by earth. Thus these are German bodies from Rhine meadow camps. But the British occupation power with
it's weapons is ordering here in Bergen-Belsen that these would be Jews... | |
Corpse pit in the region of Bergen-Belsen (13min. 30sec.) [26] The bodies in the mass grave have - when they have
clothes yet - no striped German detainee's uniform as Jews had in German concentration camps but they mostly have remnants
of German gray Wehrmacht uniforms. And not one single body has a detainee's number which would have been shown at once
by the journalists. Thus these bodies are German bodies from the Rhine meadow camps being buried here in Bergen-Belsen. | | |
Public with emotions watching the lorry full of emaciated dead bodies coming probably from the Rhine
meadow camps (12min. 48sec.) [27] British occupation power organized a public
booing SS men. By force of arms SS men were ordered to believe that these bodies would be Jewish bodies. And the local German
public cannot detect the lie that these are German bodies because they don't know that the Rhine meadow camps exist... | |
A cameraman filming SS men how they take dead bodies to the pit (15min. 12sec.) [28]
When there had been tattooed numbers
then the media staff had shown these tattoos with zooms at once. | | |
SS men have to take the dead bodies from the trailer to the pit, the bodies have no spots (14min. 30sec.)
[29] Not one single dead body has got a tattooed number as Jewish captives had in German concentration camps. These dead bodies are totally clean and there is no earth on them, thus these
bodies NEVER were buried and NEVER have been digged out | Not one single body has got a tattooed number as Jewish detainees
had in German concentration camps. There is no striped German zebra uniform for detainees in German concentration camps
as Jews had. And the dead bodies show no remnants of earth or other contamination by earth. Thus these bodies were not buried
and not digged out. These bodies mostly have dark clothes and remnants of German army uniforms. Thus these are German dead
bodies in Bergen-Belsen being taken to the mass grave by force of arms of the criminal occupation forces. Hitchcock simply
indicates that these would be Jewish bodies. And the stupid journalists are not aware of the fraud spreading it in the whole
world, also in "neutral" Switzerland where the Red Cross has got it's seat and where the documents show how the
German concentration camps really were... | |
Dead bodies torn by SS men on the way to the mass grave 01, the clothes are NO striped uniforms of
detainees in German ccs, and there are NO tattooed numbers, and there are NO remnants of earth on the bodies (23min. 14sec.)
[30] Thus these dead bodies are NOT Jewish detainees but very probably German
victims from Eisenhower's Rhine meadow camps. | | |
Dead bodies torn by SS men on the way to the mass grave 02, the clothes are NO striped uniforms of
detainees in German ccs, and there are NO tattooed numbers, and there are NO remnants of earth on the bodies (23min.21sec.)
[31] Thus these dead bodies are NOT Jewish detainees but very probably German
victims from Eisenhower's Rhine meadow camps. |
| | |
|
An SS group in a mass grave under the order of British machine guns (23min. 55sec.) [32] The machine gun of the criminal allies is dictating the allied
meaning here. In Germany there is developing a submissive mentality concerning the persecution of the Jews and at the end
any free research is prohibited. | |
SS men
with a medical doctor in white (5min. 31sec.) [33] Medical doctors of the allies also have got the white dress as one can see here in this scene.
| | |
Here a person is speaking presenting himself as a medical doctor Mister Fed Little (Fritz Klein),
and he says that this day would be April 24, 1945 standing before the mass grave (15min. 54sec.) [34]
This person is speaking German perfectly claiming to be a "medical doctor" from
Romania being working in concentration camps since 1 1/2 years already. But he does not even have a doctor's white dress
on and he is not stating any cause of death in his speech. Thus this is probably no doctor but is is a background artist
making a statement in this film for a pocket money stating being a medical doctor and stating that this day would be April
24, 1945 (but April 1945 was very cold and wet... | |
| | |
German
mayors and pastors have to see the piles of bodies (13min. 9sec.) [35] Also these mayors are going into the trap that these would be
Jewish bodies. British occupation force is operating with force of arms and personal meanings contradicting the official
one is punished by shooting. | | |
Wrong
telling-off at the mass grave with wards with machine guns (17min. 35sec.) [36] With the constant extortion of being shot the criminal occupation
forces (here the British) are asserting the meaning that the bodies would be Jews... |
|
The commander of Bergen-Belsen, Josef Kramer, portrait (6min. 19sec.) [37] He was the victim
of the criminal Western Allies - in his case by the British occupation forces - they made the calumny blaming Mr. Kramer
for being responsible for 70,000 Jewish deads which have never been... | | |
Women
wards in Bergen-Belsen (6min. 5sec.) [38] They were also victims of the criminal Western allies, in this case of the British occupation forces.
They were blamed for having caused the death of 70,000 Jews... | |
An English operations manager speaking with revolver to the camera "We
actually don't know what has been going on in these camps" (24min. 6sec.) [39] At the end of his speech he is confessing that he
did not know what was going on precisely in this camp. He only knew what he was fighting for: <We actually don't know,
what has been going on in these camps. I know personally what I am fighting for.> (24min.28-35sek.) |
| |
An English reporter with Hebrew accent
is installed before the mass grave from allegedly April 24, 1945 filled with dead bodies (24min. 44sec.) - stating he "does
not know where the dead bodies are coming from"... [40] Thus the reporter
does not know where the bodies are coming from, and there is no medical investigation either!!!
| Here is the statement of the English Hebrew reporter:
<I am T. D. Tredges, attached as partway to controlling this camp. [...] I have been here 8 days. And never in my life
I have seen such damnable gustiness. This morning they brought about 5,000 bodies. We don't know from where they are. Behind
me you can see the pit which contain another 5,000. There were two others like it in preparation. All these deaths have
been caused by systematic starvation and typhus and disease - it has been splead - because of the treatment meeted out for
this poor people by the SS guards and their SS chief.> (24min.35sek.-25min.23sek.) |
| | | Hitchcock also lying about typhus And another lie is spread by Hitchcock stating that there were lice in Bergen
Belsen and not enough soup and water causing
typhus [?!] (18min. 16-19sec.). Quotation of the lies: <Lack of soup and water brought lice to the inmates, and lice carried typhus.> Well, typhus does not come from lice, and lice do not come from too less soup
or water, but typhus is a fever with belly
aches and constipation caused by intestine bacteria when people are not washing their hands after the toilet having remnants of excrements under their finger nails eating
these remnants by food or otherwise entering
their mouth. Wikipedia says: <[...] rise of fever, belly aches, constipation and higher body temperature, slower heart beat. Cause of typhus
is the bacterium Salmonella Typhi (Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica
Serovar Typhi) [...] There is paratyphus with not so strong symptoms
than typhus, not caused by Salmonella Typhi but by Salmonella Paratyphi. [...] The agent is a typhus bacterium (Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Typhi), a feces bacteria transmitted
orally for example by contaminated food or water. Today typhus
is more the problem of development countries. In industrial countries
it's an exception. Big parts of typhus illnesses is in connection with journeys to far countries with low hygienic standard. Immunization should be done for journeys to tropical areas like India also when it's only a partial protection. World wide typhus disease is affecting 32 million people every year.>
orig. in English: <[...] fever, abdominal
pain, constipation and for the high body temperature rather slow heartbeat (relative bradycardia ) is characterized. The disease is caused by the bacterium Salmonella Typhi ( Salmonella enterica ssp. Enterica serovar typhi ). [...] Paratyphoid is an attenuated disease of typhoid fever, not Salmonella typhi , but Salmonella
paratyphi . [...]The causative agent is the typhoid bacterium ( Salmonella enterica subsp. Enterica serovar
typhi), a Gram-negative , flagellated bacterium that is transmitted fecal - orally , for example, through
contaminated food or contaminated water . Typhus is a problem of developing countriestoday . Cases in industrial nations are the exception; a large proportion of the typhoid diseases
that occur here are associated with
long-distance travel of those affected to countries with low hygienic standards. When traveling to tropical areas (eg India ), immunization should be considered, even if it provides only partial protection. Worldwide,
about 32 million people fall ill each year> (from Wikipedia: Typhus: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhus) Divine
service at the mass grave - and the text of Hitchcock - the German text is not permitted A pastor speaking the divine service at the mass grave (25min. 38sec.) [41] | |
A pastor speaking the divine service at the mass grave, view on the book (25min. 42sec.)
[42] | Hitchcock is saying his own sarcastic text not allowing the speech of the German pastor: <We should never know who they were, or for pot holms [?] they were torn, whether they were
catholics, Lutherans, or Jews: We only
know they were born, they suffered, and they died - in agony in Belsen camp.> (25min.30sek.-26min.12sek.) The mass graves of Bergen-Belsen are marked with boards but there is not written if there are Jews, Germans, English or French buried. Alleged mass
grave in Bergen Belsen Nº 6 with about 800 deads [43] This data of 26 April 1945 for the mass grave is not probable because April 1945 was wet and
cold in Germany even with snow. Therefore installing
this mass grave could have been in June 1945. When a camp is even burnt down by the
allies then it's clear that any proof is destroyed
which could be a proof for the German side. British allies invented a typhus epidemic and by this invented reason they burnt down the Bergen Belsen camp (26min. 50sec.) [44]
And then the whole camp was flattened and nothing was left of it. Thus there is even a bigger suspicion that the
allies have to conceal something.
And just in this procedure the only real striped German detainee's uniform is shown in the film. Thus it's clear what ware the dead bodies in the
film: German bodies, most probably from the Rhine meadow camps.
A bulldozer flattening Bergen Belsen camp cutting the barbed wire fence (27min. 58sec.) [45] | |
A bulldozer "taking" a striped
detainee's uniform of German concentration camps which was NEVER seen in the film before (28min. 4sec.) [46]
|
More photos from the faked Hitchcock film about German concentration camps On The Nazi Holocaust", so you get the actual links of the film. Always look
for the film of 53 min. 1 sec. Faked scenes about cc Dachau Hitchcock's lies about undernourished detainees Most of the detainees in German concentration camps were well nourished considering the
testimonies of original detainees
after the war. Here are some examples from the German concentration camp of Dachau: Detainees in the concentration camp of Dachau 01 sitting in the window (30min. 30sec.) [47] | |
Concentration camp of Dachau, portrait of a detainee 02 830min. 40sec.) [48] |
|
And one has to know: German concentration camps were under the control of the Red Cross like herein Bergen Belsen (11min.
50sec.) [49] | |
|
German concentration camps were under the control of the
Red Cross AND of the Zionists. People affected
by heavy illnesses were brought to hospitals by cars of the Red Cross or to military hospitals.
Lies of Hitchcock about shower
rooms as "gas chambers"
Washer nozzle in a shower room in the concentration camp of Dachau (34min. 25sec.) [50]
There is this clear
proof: granulate of "Cyclone B" cannot pass the little holes of this washer nozzle. All gassing in shower rooms is a criminal fantasy of Zionist mass murderers Eisenhower, Baruch, Morgenthau,
Roosevelt, and Hitchcock. It's a normal war propaganda with
a giant calumny against the enemy. The lies of Hitchcock about crematories: single muffle furnaces are not made for masses
of bodies This crematory is shown in the film to
be in Dachau, with single muffle furnaces (35min. 20sec.) [51]
There is the following principle: Such single muffler furnaces in crematories are made
for single burning of dead bodies getting
the ashes for the family of the dead. When there would be masses of dead bodies then a bigger oven had been built for burning about 20 bodies in one. Obviously such
a mass death has NOT happened ant there were only some singular burnings of deads bodies. Additionally one has to know that in these German cc - as
investigations by Faurisson
showed - many crematories were built only AFTER the war by the criminal Zionists - as a propaganda and nothing more! A train with detainees at the cc Dachau in February
1945 There was this train with detainees allegedly at the cc
Dachau in February 1945 about (36min. 20sec.) [52]
At the end of the Third Reich the whole infrastructure was collapsing. The remaining camps were overcrowded and the trains with the detainees had last priority. Thus a transport was not
3 days but 30 days. Such trains with detainees
came to Dachau and the SS leadership of the cc Dachau had not the spirit any more to build a military hospital for the deads and half deads of this train and had not the spirit to install
a cemetery. This omission was exploited by the criminal
"Americans". Instead of helping and helping the survivors and honoring the many 1,000s surviving detainees in the concentration camp of Dachau the SS leadership was killed and executed
because of this neglected train with detainees. Point
3: The principle of the cut in the films of criminal Mr. Hitchcock First one
can see well nourished detainees, mostly with striped zebra detainee's uniforms, and then comes the cut showing the emaciated German prisoners of war from summer 1945 on the meadows
or in the mud of the Rhine meadow camps in the
contaminated gray uniforms WITHOUT the typical striped zebra uniforms of detainees from German concentrations camps in the Third Reich. The title of the film "Documentary" sounds well but this is a film where practically everything is a fake: Gas chamber scenery has been taken after May 1945 for presenting this fantasy to the
whole world provoking a bad mood against Germans.
And in this way the English "American" and Zionist propaganda hast manipulated the brains in the world during more than 50 years and placed their Zionist slaves in
the media in the whole world spreading this propaganda
on and on. The truth about the German concentrations camps can be seen here for example: Point 4: Jews telling from German concentration camps: music, theater, soccer Original Jewish testimonies from German concentration camps report regularly about work
and music and theater and even soccer in the camps.
Here are examples from Shoa Foundation "Survivors who tell the truth":
Video: Holohoax: Survivors who Tell the Truth |
| |
Point 5: Effect of the faked
Hitchcock films about
German concentration camps on the
Nuremberg Process - where is the war tribunal for criminal "U.S.A."? And now one has to know that
the regime of Eisenhower against Germans was not only with the Rhine meadow camps causing 1 million Germans deads and the hunger regime during the post-war era in Germany from
1945 to 1950 provoking 5 million more German deads
- but by these faked Hitchcock films the "U.S.A." have influenced the Nuremberg Process in a way so Germany was convicted with a faked 6 million murder against Jews
and had to pay for this, and the allies were exempted
from any guilt and the mass murderer Eisenhower was not detected until 1989 when historian James Bacque came with his research. These criminal "U.S.A." have to be torn
to a war tribunal for being convicted for their wars, fakes
and manipulations not only concerning the "American" war crimes in Germany 1943-1950 (also the destruction of
towns had not to be and the war could have been
finished in 1943 already), but also concerning Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Iraq, Afghanistan etc. "U.S.A." are the most destructive state in the world destroying all other
states by bombs and propaganda - and the proofs
are very distinct concerning Germany of 1945 here on this web site. And perhaps the criminal Zionists have to pay money back which was payed for a mass murder of millions which was
NEVER COMMITTED - pay money back to Germany. Point 6: No mass murder against
the Jews in German concentration camps - but other sites with mass death With
all these data there is absolutely safe: There was no mass murder in German concentration camps against the Jews in the dimension of 100,000s or millions. The real sites with
many deads in the persecution of the Jews were -- Auschwitz with epidemics because
the camps was in a marsh and bodies were buried
contaminating the ground and the drinking water -- behind the Eastern Front the remaining Jews who were not
deported by Stalin to Russia in 1940 and 1941 and who
were not taken by industries or the Red Army in 1941 were shot partly from 1941 to 1943 in mass shootings partly by the Wehrmacht or by SS commands (with Germans, Ukrainians, Baltic people
and Belorussians etc.) or also by local anti-Semitic
population themselves. Zionists did not protect the Jews from Eastern Europe because they did not want them to have in Palestine for the colonization in Israel. -- the same mass murder for Jews counts for the Red Army where Stalin and his commanders let fight many Jews in the first rows as "cannon fodder" -- since 1943 detainees were taken back from Eastern Europe to the Reich to building sites of the tunnel constructioning and fell sick and died there --
at the same time Hitler and Stalin organized in common
the clandestine deportation of European Jews to the GULAG -- in 1944 and in 1945 there were some 1,000 Jewish
victims in the remaining overcrowded camps because
of hunger and epidemics, in trains and in death marches as a "penalty" for the defeat of Germany in the war -- since 1945 many Jewish women who had suffered hunger a long time during years could not recover well and had no fertility any more -- Jewish children being
safe on "Christian" farms were often not given back because nobody knew where the Jewish parents were and because many men were missing on the farms and there was a general lack
of staff -- many Jews also separated from Jewry in general for not being persecuted any more. -- from 1945 to 1946 Stalin let come back 100,000s of Jews from central Russia to Eastern Europe and
this provoked new pogroms in Poland. Kiev in the
Ukraine became a broad Jewish center and in 1946 Kiev had more Jews than in 1939. At the same time the "American" President Truman was bribed by the Zionists with 2 million Dollars permitting a racist "Jewish State" in
Palestine against all Muslims... -- and when in 1948 this bribed and criminal "U.S.A."
bribed by Zionists was "opening" the new "satellite" of Israel in the Middle East, Stalin felt encircled and betrayed and he shut the Iron Curtain for Jews and
all Jews in Russia could not leave the country
until Gorbachev until 1986. Stalin let russify the Jews by discriminations in professions -- and Stalin's direct
answer to the foundation of the racist Zionist state of Israel under the patronage of the criminal racist "U.S.A." was the blockage of Berlin. We thank to the criminal Zionist bribed and undermined "U.S.A." for their destructive and terrorist "cultural contribution".
Mainstream Holocaust Narrative 'Substantially, if not Entirely, False' - Editor of Top US Conservative Site (Ron Unz)
The author spends a few weeks perusing the literature, which
he summarizes in this 18,000 word article, and concludes that the Holocaust
story relentlessly hammered into the public consciousness by Jewish-owned Hollywood and media is a load of baloney. He suspects that when the lie comes crashing down, a political earthquake will
ensue. "I
wouldn’t be surprised if our current Holocaust narrative eventually suffers that same fate (total collapse), perhaps with unfortunate consequences for those too closely associated with having maintained
it." "Once
I realized to my dismay that I couldn’t believe a word of what our media and political leaders said about major events in the here and now, their credibility on controversial happenings so long ago and far away
entirely disappeared." Reason Magazine
and Holocaust Denial A
few years ago I somehow heard about a ferocious online dispute involving a left-leaning journalist named Mark Ames and the editors of Reason magazine, the glossy flagship publication of
America’s burgeoning libertarian movement. Although I was deep in my difficult
programming work, curiosity got the better of me, so I decided to take a look. During the Immigration Wars of the 1990s, I’d become quite friendly
with the Reasonpeople, frequently visiting their offices, especially
during my “English” campaign of 1998, when I’d located my own political headquarters in the same small
Westside LA office building they used. As my content-archiving software project began absorbing more and more of my time during the early 2000s, I’d
gradually lost touch with them, but even so, the 40-odd years of their magazine
archives had become the first publication I’d incorporated into my system,
and I was now pleased to discover that both sides in the ongoing feud had put my system to good use in exploring those old Reason issues. Apparently,
the libertarians grouped around Reason had successfully been making political inroads into Silicon Valley’s
enormously wealthy technology industry, and had now organized a major conference
in San Francisco to gather together their supporters. Hollywood, controlled by Jews, has been
very energetically selling a very big lie - a
scene from 'Schindler's List' Their left-leaning rivals decided to nip that project in the bud by highlighting
some of the more unsavory ideological positions that mainstream libertarian leaders
had once regularly espoused. Perhaps Ron Paul and other libertarians might oppose overseas
wars and drug laws, and support cutting taxes and regulations, but they and their Republican Party allies were unspeakably vile on all sorts of other issues, and all “good thinkers” should
therefore stay very far away. The debate began in rather mundane fashion with an article by Ames entitled “Homophobia, Racism, and the Kochs” denouncing Reason for sharing a platform with a high-ranking
Republican Congresswoman of Christian conservative views, as well as the magazine’s
reliance upon Koch funding and its alleged support for Apartheid South Africa during the 1970s and 1980s. The response by the Reasoneditor seemed quite persuasive, and he rightfully dismissed the guilt-by-association attacks. He also outlined the gross errors and omissions in the charges regarding South Africa, and
ridiculed Ames as a notoriously error-prone “conspiracy theorist.”
Surely few outsiders would have paid any attention to such a typical exchange of mudslinging between rival ideological camps. But then things took a very different turn, and a week later Ames returned with a 5,000 word article bearing a title sure to grab attention: “Holocaust Denial.”
He claimed that in 1976 Reason had published an entire special issue devoted to that explosive topic. Surely everyone on
the Internet has encountered numerous instances of Holocaust Denial over the years, but for a respectable magazine to have allotted a full issue to promoting that doctrine was something else entirely. For decades, Hollywood
has sanctified the Holocaust, and in our deeply secular society accusations of
Holocaust Denial are a bit like shouting “Witch!” in Old Salem or
leveling accusations of Trotskyism in the Court of the Red Czar. It turns out that his whole life was
a fraud and a lie
Progressive Sam Seder’s Majority Reportradio show devoted a full half-hour segment to the charges against Reason, and Googling “Reason
Magazine”+”Holocaust Denial” today yields thousands of hits. This
substantial explosion of Internet controversy was what caught my own attention at the time. My initial reaction was one of puzzlement. Reason had
been the first periodical I had digitized in my system a dozen years earlier,
and surely I would have noticed an entire issue promoting Holocaust Denial. However, I soon discovered that February 1976 had been excluded from the supposedly complete set the magazine had shipped me
for processing, an omission that itself raises serious suspicions. But Ames
had somehow located a copy in a research library and produced a full PDF, which he conveniently placed on the Internet to support his accusations. Carefully reading his article and then glancing through the contents, I decided that his accusation was technically
false but substantially true. Apparently the actual theme of the issue was
“Historical Revisionism” and except for a couple of paragraphs
buried here and there among the 76 pages, Holocaust Denial never came up,
so characterizing it as a Holocaust Denial issue was obviously a grotesque exaggeration. But on the other hand, although few of the authors were familiar
to me, it seemed undeniably true that they were numbered among America’s
more prominent Holocaust Deniers, and most of them were deeply associated with organizations situated in that same camp. Furthermore, there were strong indications that their positions on that topic must certainly have been known to the Reasoneditors who commissioned their pieces. The clearest case
comes when Ames quoted the explicit statements of Dr. Gary North, a prominent libertarian thinker who had served as one of Ron Paul’s earliest Congressional aides and later became his longtime partner in politics
and business: Probably the most far-out materials on World War II revisionism have been the seemingly endless scholarly studies of the supposed execution of 6 million Jews by Hitler. The anonymous author [Hoggan] of ‘The Myth of the
Six Million’ has presented a solid case against the Establishment’s favorite horror
story—the supposed moral justification for our entry into the war…The untranslated
books by the former Buchenwald inmate Prof. Paul Rassinier, have seriously challenged the story…A
recent and very inexpensive book in magazine form, Did Six Million Really Die?,
appeared in 1973, written by Richard Harwood.
A later issue carried a thousand word letter by Prof. Adam Reed of Rockefeller University,
a past Reason contributor, strongly affirming the mainstream
Holocaust narrative by quoting from standard works, and taking Dr. North to task
for his citation of Holocaust Denial works of doubtful quality. But North firmly stood his ground: “The second point,
that about 6 million Jews really did die in the concentration camps, is one that will be open
until the records of the period become fully available. I am not convinced yet, one way or the other. I am happy to have Dr. Reed’s interpretation of the data, but until the publishing companies and academic guild encourage the re-examination of the data, I shall continue to recommend that those interested in revisionist questions read The Myth of the Six Million and Did Six Million Really Die? as reasonable (though
not necessarily irrefutable) pieces of historical revisionism. If a person can’t make
up his mind, he should do more reading.”
Dr. James J. Martin was the lead contributor to the February Revisionism issue,
and the preceding January issue had featured an extended Q&A by the editors,
with one of the queries directly addressing the controversial topic: REASON: Dr. Martin, do you believe (1) that the specific
charge against the Nazis of having a mass extermination program of several million Jews is
true, and (2) that the Allied atrocities were as great or greater than those of the Germans,
from your study of the question? MARTIN: Well, I never made
a head count of all who lost their lives in the War-we’ve seen a wide variety of statistical
materials, some of which have been pulled out of thin air. As a consequence, it’s hard to make any kind of estimate
of this sort, whether ten more were killed on the one side or the other is not a particularly
entrancing subject as far as I’m concerned. Whether
allegations can be proven it remains to be seen. I don’t believe that the evidence of a planned extermination of the entire Jewish population of Europe is holding up. I have been influenced over the years by the works of
Paul Rassinier, and he still has to be reckoned with. His works have been ignored for a long
time, and sooner or later somebody’s going to have to do a decent job of coping with what
he has presented. I think Rassinier’s general case is sound at the moment and I haven’t
seen any strong evidence to upset his allegations or his assertions that there was no planned
program for the extermination of European Jews. His other
main case is that there were no gas chamber extermination programs. The fact that a great many people lost their lives is incontrovertible—that the German concentration camps weren’t health centers is well known-but they appear to have been far smaller and much less lethal than the Russian ones.
Another major contributor
to the issue was Dr. Austin J. App, and just three years earlier he had published a short book bearing the lurid title The Six Million Swindle: Blackmailing the German People for Hard Marks with
Fabricated Corpses. In a follow-up column by Ames’ own editor, the stunned reactions of various journalists are listed, with one of them Tweeting out “I had no idea that Reason Magazine was once a haven for Holocaust Revisionism. Holy
Moly.” Despite the angry obfuscations of present-day Reason staffers, this description seems quite correct. Indeed, there seems considerable circumstantial
evidence that around that time “Holocaust Skepticism” extended rather
broadly within the entire nascent libertarian movement. Aside from the sharp critique of the aforementioned Prof. Reed, the overwhelming
majority of the reader responses seemed totally favorable, with Samuel Konkin III, editor of New Libertarian Weekly and various similar publications, suggesting that the February issue was one
of the best they had ever published. David Nolan, founder of America’s
Libertarian Party, also praised the issue as “outstanding.” The two editors of the issue in question even today remain quite prominent
figures at Reason and within American libertarianism, while the masthead then carried names such as David Brudnoy and Alan Reynolds, who both later
became influential figures in conservative and libertarian politics. There seems no evidence of any resignations or angry recriminations following
the issue’s publication, which seems to have been digested with total equanimity,
apparently arousing less rancor than might have been generated by a dispute over
monetary policy. I’d never paid much attention to Holocaust discussions over the years, but the name of Murray Rothbard on the
1976 Reason masthead prompted a memory. Rothbard is widely
regarded as the founder of modern libertarianism, and I recalled in the 1990s
reading somewhere that he had often ridiculed the Holocaust as being total nonsense, which had stuck in my mind as a typical example of libertarian eccentricity. A quick Google search seemed to confirm my recollection that Rothbard was an avowed Holocaust Denier.
Although the whole controversy regarding Reason’s editorial
line of the mid-1970s soon died down, it remained a nagging puzzle in the back
of my mind. I’d always been quite skeptical of libertarian ideology, but my Reason friends from
the 1990s had certainly seemed like smart and rational people to me, hardly raving
lunatics of any sort, and two of the ones I’d known best had been the co-editors
of the controversial issue in question. I could easily understand how zealous libertarian ideologues might be swept past the point
of rationality on certain matters—perhaps arguing that the police and the
army should be abolished as statist institutions—but the factual question
of what had or had not happened to the Jews of Europe during World War II hardly fell into that sort of category. Furthermore, libertarianism
had always attracted a very large Jewish contingent, especially in its upper ranks, and one of the issue editors came from that background, as did Rothbard and numerous others featured on the masthead. While deranged anti-Semitism is not impossible among Jews, I would think that it is somewhat less likely. Clearly something very odd must have been going on. I was then too busy
with my work to focus on the matter, but some months later I had more time, and began a detailed i nvestigation. My first step was to carefully read the Reason articles produced by those controversial
writers previously unknown to me. Although those pieces were not Holocaust-related,
I thought they might give me a sense of their thinking. To my surprise, the historiography seemed outstandingly good, and almost
certainly accurate based on what I had picked up over the years from perfectly
mainstream sources. Dr. Martin’s long article on the notorious framing of “Tokyo Rose”was probably the best and most comprehensive treatment I had ever encountered
on that topic, and Dr. App’s analysis of the tragedy of the Sudeten-Germans was equally strong, raising several points I had previously not known. Percy
Greaves effectively summarized many of the very suspicious aspects of the Pearl Harbor attack, and although his case for the prosecution against FDR was certainly not airtight,
it accorded with the views presented by numerous scholars in other books on the subject. Moreover, his position was seconded by a young Bruce Bartlett, later a prominent Reagan and Bush official, and still later a strong Republican opponent of George W. Bush, routinely feted by the New York Times. Most
of the other writings also seemed of very high quality, including Dr. North’s summary of World War II Revisionism. In
general, the academic scholarship of those articles greatly surpassed anything found in opinion magazines of more recent decades, Reason itself included. Those so interested can click on
the above links, read the articles in question, and decide for themselves. Back then, Reason was
a young and struggling magazine, with a shoestring staff and budget. Publishing articles of such obvious quality was surely a remarkable achievement for which the editors could feel justifiably proud, and the overwhelmingly positive letters they received seemed absolutely warranted. Meanwhile, the nasty
attacks by Ames appeared to be those of a mere political hack who may not have
even bothered actually reading the articles whose authors he vilified. As a further sign of Ames’ dishonesty, he flung the epithet “Nazi”
some two dozen times in his hack-job, along with numerous uses of “anti-Semitic”
as well, and Greaves was certainly the subject of many of those slurs. But although Greaves and Bartlett wrote back-to-back articles on exactly
the same Pearl Harbor topic, and according to Wikipedia, the former was the academic advisor to the latter on that subject, Bartlett’s name appears nowhere in Ames’s hit-piece, presumably because denouncing a prominent policy expert much beloved by the New York Times as an “anti-Semitic Neo-Nazi” might prove self-defeating. Even leaving that
aside, accusing the Jewish libertarians running Reason of being Nazi propagandists must surely be the sort of charge that would strain the credulity of even the most gullible. Deborah Lipstadt and Holocaust Denial With Ames’ credibility totally shredded,
I decided to carefully reread his article again, looking for what clues I could find
to the whole bizarre situation. Academic scholars who publish very good history on certain subjects might still have totally irrational views on others, but normally one would assume otherwise. It appeared that much of Ames’ understanding
of the issue had come from a certain Deborah Lipstadt, whom he characterized
as a great Holocaust expert. Her name was very vaguely familiar to me as some sort of academic activist, who years before had won a major legal victory over a rightwing British historian named David Irving, and Irving himself received further denunciations in the Ames article. However, one name did stick out. Apparently
based on Lipstadt’s information, Ames described Harry Elmer Barnes as “the
godfather of American Holocaust denial literature” and Martin’s “Holocaust denial guru.” A dozen years earlier,
the name “Barnes” would have meant almost nothing to me. But as I produced my content-archiving system and digitized so many of America’s most influential publications of the last 150
years, I had soon discovered that many of our most illustrious public intellectuals—Left,
Right, and Center— had been suddenly purged and “disappeared” around 1940 because of their stalwart opposition to FDR’s extremely aggressive
foreign policy, and Barnes, an eminent historian and sociologist, had been among the most prominent of those. He had been one of
the earliest editors at Foreign Affairs and for many years afterward his important articles had graced the pages of The New Republic and The Nation, while even after
his fall, he had edited Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, an important 1953 collection of essays by himself and other once-prominent
figures. But to have a figure of such intellectual stature accused of being a
Holocaust Denier, let alone the “godfather” of the entire movement, seemed rather bizarre to me. Since Ames was merely
an ignorant political hack transmitting the opinions of others, I moved on Lipstadt, his key source. Anyone who has spent much time on the comment-threads of relatively unfiltered websites has certainly encountered the controversial topic of Holocaust Denial, but I now decided to try to investigate
the issue in much more serious fashion. A few clicks on the Amazon.com website, and her 1993 book Denying the Holocaust arrived in
my mailbox a couple of days later, providing me an entrance into the mysterious world. Reading the book was certainly a tremendous revelation to me. Lipstadt
is a professor of Holocaust Studies with an appointment in Emory University’s
Department of Theology, and once I read the opening paragraph of her first chapter,
I decided that her academic specialty might certainly be described as “Holocaust Theology.” The producer was incredulous.
She found it hard to believe that I was turning down an opportunity to appear on
her nationally televised show. “But you are writing a book on this topic. It will be great publicity.” I explained
repeatedly that I would not participate in a debate with a Holocaust denier.
The existence of the Holocaust was not a matter of debate. I would analyze and illustrate who they were and what they tried
to do, but I would not appear with them… Unwilling to accept my no as final,
she vigorously condemned Holocaust denial and all it represented. Then, in one
last attempt to get me to change my mind, she asked me a question: “I certainly don’t agree with them, but don’t
you think our viewers should hear the other side?” Lipstadt’s absolute horror at having someone actually dispute the tenets
of her academic doctrine could not have been more blatant. Surely no zealous
theologian of the European Dark Ages would have reacted any differently. The second chapter of her book supported that impression. Since many of the individuals she
castigates as Holocaust Deniers also supported the Revisionist perspective of
the underlying causes of the First and Second World Wars, she harshly attacked
those schools, but in rather strange fashion.
In recent years, blogger Steve Sailer and others have ridiculed what they describe as the “point-and-sputter” style of debate, in which a “politically-incorrect” narrative is merely described and then automatically treated
as self-evidently false without any accompanying need for actual refutation.
This seemed to be the approach that Lipstadt took throughout her rather short
book. For example, she provided
a very long list of leading academic scholars, prominent political figures, and influential journalists who had championed Revisionist history, noted that their views disagree with the more mainstream perspective she had presumably imbibed from her History 101 textbooks, and thereby regarded
them as fully debunked. Certainly a Christian preacher attempting to refute the evolutionary theories of Harvard’s E.O. Wilson by
quoting a passage of Bible verse might take much the same approach. But few evangelical
activists would be so foolish as to provide a very long list of eminent scientists
who all took the same Darwinist position and then attempt to sweep them aside by citing a single verse from Genesis. Lipstadt seems to approach history much like a Bible-thumper, but a particularly dim-witted
one. Moreover, many of the authors she attacked had already become familiar to
me after a decade of my content-archiving work, and I had found their numerous
books quite scholarly and persuasive. Barnes, in particular, figured quite prominently in Lipstadt’s chapter and throughout
her book. The index listed his name on more than two dozen pages, and he is repeatedly
described as the “godfather” of Holocaust Denial, and its seminal
figure. Given such heavy coverage, I eagerly examined all those references and the accompanying footnotes to uncover the shocking statements he must have made during his very long scholarly career. I was quite disappointed.
There is not a single reference I could find to his supposed Holocaust Denial views
until just the year before his death at age 79, and even that item is hardly what I had been led to believe. In a 9,300 word article
on Revisionism for a libertarian publication, he ridicules a leading Holocaust source for claiming that Hitler had killed 25 million Jews, noting that total was nearly twice their entire worldwide population at
the time. In addition, Barnes several times applied the word “allegedly”
to the stories of the Nazi extermination scheme, an sacrilegious attitude that
appears to have horrified a theologian such as Lipstadt. Finally, in a short, posthumously published review of a book by French
scholar Paul Rassiner, Barnes found his estimate of just 1 million to 1.5 million
Jewish deaths quite convincing, but his tone suggested that he had never previously
investigated the matter himself. So although that last item technically validated Lipstadt’s accusation that Barnes was a Holocaust Denier,
her evidence-free claims that he was the founder and leader of the field hardly
enhances her scholarly credibility. Meanwhile, all the many tens of thousands
of words I have read by Barnes has suggested that he was a careful and dispassionate
historian. A
notorious incident that occurred soon after the Bolshevik Revolution came to my mind. Eminent philologist Timofei Florinsky, one of Russia’s most internationally renowned academic scholars, was hauled
before a revolutionary tribunal for a public interrogation about his ideas,
and one of the judges, a drunken Jewish former prostitute, found his answers
so irritating that she drew her revolver and shot him dead right there and then. Given Lipstadt’s obvious emotional state, I have a strong suspicion
that she might have wished she could deal in a similar fashion with Barnes and
the numerous other scholars she denounced. Among other things, she noted with horror that
more than two decades after his 1940 purge from public life, Barnes’ books
were still required reading at both Harvard and Columbia. All of us reasonably extrapolate what we already know or can easily check
against what is more difficult to verify, and the remaining chapters of Lipstadt’s
book left me very doubtful about the reliability of her work, all of which was
written in a similar near-hysterical style.
Since she had already been vaguely known to me from her well-publicized legal battle
against historian David Irving more than a dozen years earlier, I was hardly
surprised to discover that many pages were devoted to vilifying and insulting
him in much the same manner as Barnes, so I decided to investigate that case. I was only slightly surprised to discover that Irving had been one of the world’s most successful World War II historians, whose remarkable documentary findings had completely upended our knowledge of that conflict and its origins, with his books selling in the many millions. His entire approach
to controversial historical issues was to rely as much as possible upon hard documentary evidence, and his total inability to locate any such documents relating to the Holocaust drove Lipstadt and her fellow ethnic-activists into a frenzy of outrage, so after many years of effort they finally managed
to wreck his career. Out of curiosity, I read a couple of his shorter books, which seemed absolutely outstanding historiography, written in a very measured tone, quite different from that of Lipstadt, whose own 2005 account of
her legal triumph over Irving, History on Trial, merely confirmed
my opinion of her incompetence. Lipstadt’s first book Beyond Belief, published in 1986, tells an interesting story as well,
with her descriptive subtitle being “The American Press and the Coming
of the Holocaust, 1933-1945.” Much of the volume consists of press clippings
from the American print media of that era interspersed with her running rather hysterical commentary, but providing little analysis or judgment. Some of the journalists reported horrifying conditions for Jews in pre-war
Germany while others claim that such stories were wildly exaggerated, and Lipstadt
automatically praised the former and denounced the latter without providing any
serious explanation. Lenni Brenner’s remarkable book Zionism in the Age of the Dictators had been published three years earlier. Although I only discovered it very
recently, surely any half-competent specialist in her own topic would have noticed
it, yet Lipstadt provided no hint of its existence.
Perhaps the reality of the important Nazi-Zionist economic partnership of the 1930s,
with Nazi officials traveling to Palestine as honored Zionist guests and leading
Nazi newspapers praising the Zionist enterprise might have complicated her simple
story of fanatic German Jew-hatred under Hitler steadily rising towards an exterminationist
pitch. Her faculty appointment in a Department of Theology seems very apt. Lipstadt’s wartime coverage is just as bad, perhaps worse. She catalogs
perhaps a couple of hundred print news reports, each describing the massacre
of hundreds of thousands or even millions of Jews by the Nazis. But she expresses her outrage that so many of these reports were buried
deep within the inside pages of newspapers, a placement suggesting that they
were regarded as hysterical wartime atrocity propaganda and probably fictional, with
the editors sometimes explicitly stating that opinion. Indeed, among these under-emphasized stories was the claim that the Germans had recently killed 1.5 million Jews by individually injecting each one of them
in the heart with a lethal drug. And although I don’t see any mention of it, around that same time America’s top Jewish leader Rabbi
Stephen Wise was peddling the absurd report that the Nazis had slaughtered millions
of Jews, turning their skins into lampshades and rendering their bodies into
soap. Obviously, separating truth from falsehood during a blizzard of wartime
propaganda is not nearly as easy as Lipstadt seems to assume. Ordinary Americans were apparently even more skeptical than newspaper editors.
According to Lipstadt: Writing in the Sunday New York Times Magazine,
[Arthur] Koestler cited public opinion polls in the United States in which nine of ten average
Americans dismissed the accusations against the Nazis as propaganda lies and flatly stated that
they did not believe a word of them.
Lipstadt convincingly demonstrates that very few Americans seem to have believed in the reality
of the Holocaust during the Second World War itself, despite considerable efforts
by agitated Jewish activists to persuade them. Over the years, I have seen mention
of numerous other books making this same basic point, and therefore harshly condemning
the American political leaders of the time for having failed “to save the Jews.” Explicit and
Implicit Holocaust Denial After World War II Yet as I began further investigating the history of Holocaust Denial in the wake of the Reason contretemps,
I was very surprised to discover that this same pattern of widespread disbelief
in the Holocaust seems to have continued unabated after the
end of the war and throughout the 1950s, being especially strong among high-ranking American military figures, especially top generals and individuals with an Intelligence background, who seemingly would
have had the best knowledge of the true events. Some years ago, I came across a totally obscure 1951 book entitled Iron
Curtain Over America by John Beaty, a well-regarded university
professor. Beaty had spent his wartime years in Military Intelligence, being tasked with preparing the daily briefing reports distributed to all top American officials summarizing available intelligence information
acquired during the previous 24 hours, which was obviously a position of
considerable responsibility. As a zealous anti-Communist, he regarded much of America’s Jewish population as deeply implicated in subversive
activity, therefore constituting a serious threat to traditional American freedoms.
In particular, the growing Jewish stranglehold over publishing and the media
was making it increasingly difficult for discordant views to reach the American
people, with this regime of censorship constituting the “Iron Curtain” described in his title. He blamed Jewish interests for the totally
unnecessary war with Hitler’s Germany, which had long sought good relations
with America, but instead had suffered total destruction for its strong opposition
to Europe’s Jewish-backed Communist menace.
Beaty also sharply denounced American support for the new state of Israel, which
was potentially costing us the goodwill of so many millions of Muslims and Arabs. And as a very minor
aside, he also criticized the Israelis for continuing to claim that Hitler had killed six million Jews, a highly implausible accusation that had no apparent basis in reality and seemed to be just a fraud concocted by
Jews and Communists, aimed at poisoning our relations with postwar Germany and
extracting money for the Jewish State from the long-suffering German people. He was scathing toward
the Nuremberg Trials, which he described as a “major indelible blot” upon America and “a travesty of justice.” According to him, the proceedings were dominated by vengeful German Jews,
many of whom engaged in falsification of testimony or even had criminal backgrounds.
As a result, this “foul fiasco” merely taught Germans that “our
government had no sense of justice.” Sen.
Robert Taft, the Republican leader of the immediate postwar era took a very similar position, which later won him the praise of John F. Kennedy in Profiles in Courage. The fact that the
chief Soviet prosecutor at Nuremberg had played the same role during the notorious Stalinist show trials of the late 1930s, during which numerous Old Bolsheviks confessed to all sorts of absurd and ridiculous things, hardly enhanced the credibility of the proceedings to many outside observers. Then as now, a book
taking such controversial positions stood little chance of finding a mainstream New York publisher, but it was soon released by a small Dallas firm, and then became enormously successful, going through some seventeen
printings over the next few years. According to Scott McConnell, founding editor
of The American Conservative, Beaty’s book became the second
most popular conservative text of the 1950s, ranking only behind Russell Kirk’s iconic classic, The Conservative Mind. Moreover, although Jewish groups including the ADL harshly condemned the
book, especially in their private lobbying, those efforts provoked a backlash,
and numerous top American generals, both serving and retired, wholeheartedly
endorsed Beaty’s work, denouncing the ADL efforts at censorship and urging all Americans to read the volume. Although Beaty’s
quite explicit Holocaust Denial might shock tender modern sensibilities, at the time it seems to have caused barely a ripple of concern and was almost totally ignored even by the vocal Jewish critics of the work. Much
of this very interesting story is told by Joseph Bendersky, an expert in Holocaust Studies, who devoted ten years of archival research to his 2000 book The “Jewish Threat.” His
work chronicles the extremely widespread anti-Semitism found within the U.S.
Army and Military Intelligence throughout the first half of the twentieth
century, with Jews being widely regarded as posing a serious security risk. The book runs well over 500 pages, but when I consulted the index I found no mention of the
Rosenbergs nor Harry Dexter White nor any of the other very numerous Jewish spies
revealed by the Venona Decrypts, and the term “Venona” itself is
also missing from the index. Reports of the overwhelmingly Jewish leadership of the Russian Bolsheviks are mostly treated as bigotry and paranoia, as are descriptions of the similar ethnic skew of America’s
own Communist Party, let alone the heavy financial support of the Bolsheviks
by Jewish international bankers. At one point, he dismisses the link between Jews and Communism in Germany by noting that “less than half”
of the Communist Party leadership was Jewish; but since fewer than one in a hundred
Germans came from that ethnic background, Jews were obviously over-represented
among Communist leaders by as much as 5,000%. This seems to typify the sort
of dishonesty and innumeracy I have regularly encountered among Jewish Holocaust experts. Meanwhile, with the copyright having long
lapsed, I’m pleased to add Beaty’s work to my Controversial HTML
Books selection, so individuals interested can read it and decide for themselves: Beaty’s very brief 1951 discussion has been the earliest instance
of explicit Holocaust Denial I have managed to locate, but the immediate postwar
years seem absolutely rife with what might be described as “implicit Holocaust
Denial,” especially within the highest political circles. Over the years, Holocaust scholars and activists have very rightfully
emphasized the absolutely unprecedented nature of the historical events they
have studied. They describe how some six million innocent Jewish civilians were deliberately exterminated, mostly in gas chambers,
by one of Europe’s most highly cultured nations, and emphasize that monstrous
project was often accorded greater priority than Germany’s own wartime
military needs during the country’s desperate struggle for survival. Furthermore, the Germans also undertook enormous efforts to totally eliminate all possible traces of their horrifying deed, with huge resources expended to cremate all those millions of bodies and scatter the
ashes. This
same disappearance technique was even sometimes applied to the contents of their mass graves, which were dug up long after initial burial, so that the rotting corpses could then be totally incinerated and all evidence
eliminated. And
although Germans are notorious for their extreme bureaucratic precision, this immense wartime project was apparently implemented without benefit of a single written document, or at least no such document has ever been
located. Lipstadt
entitled her first book “Beyond Belief,” and I think that all of us can agree that the historical event she and
so many others in academia and Hollywood have made the centerpiece of their
lives and careers is certainly one of the most very remarkable occurrences in
all of human history. Indeed, perhaps only a Martian Invasion would have been
more worthy of historical study, but Orson Welles’s famous War of the Worlds radio-play which terrified so many millions of Americans in 1938 turned out to be a hoax rather than real. The six million Jews
who died in the Holocaust certainly constituted a very substantial fraction of all the wartime casualties in the European Theater, outnumbering by a factor of 100 all the British who died during the Blitz, and being dozens of times more numerous than all the Americans who fell there in battle. Furthermore, the sheer monstrosity of the
crime against innocent civilians would surely have provided the best possible
justification for the Allied war effort. Yet for many, many years after the war, a very strange sort of amnesia seems to have gripped most of the leading political protagonists in that regard. Robert Faurisson, a French academic who
became a prominent Holocaust Denier in the 1970s, once made an extremely interesting
observation regarding the memoirs of Eisenhower, Churchill, and De Gaulle: Three of the best known works on the Second World War
are General Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday [Country
Life Press], 1948), Winston Churchill’s The Second World War (London:
Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954), and the Mémoires de guerre of General de Gaulle (Paris: Plon, 3 vols., 1954-1959). In these three works not the least mention of Nazi gas chambers is to be found. Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages;
the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and
de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will
find no mention either of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews,
or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war.
Given that the Holocaust would reasonably rank as the single most remarkable
episode of the Second World War, such striking omissions must almost force us
to place Eisenhower, Churchill, and De Gaulle among the ranks of “implicit
Holocaust Deniers.” Many
others seem to fall into that same category. In 1981, Lucy S. Dawidowicz, a leading Holocaust scholar, published a short book entitled The Holocaust and the Historians, in which she denounced
so many prominent historians for having so totally ignored the reality of
the Holocaust for many years following World War II. Indeed, discussion of that topic was almost entirely confined to the Jewish Studies programs
which Jewish ethnic activists had newly established at numerous universities
throughout the country. Although Lipstadt’s poor scholarly habits and hysterical
style hardly impressed me, she appears to have been among the most successful academics who began a career in those ethnic studies departments, which suggests that their average quality was far below her own. Meanwhile, Dawidowicz
emphasizes that mainstream histories often entirely omitted the Holocaust from
their presentations:
But it is plain from the most cursory review of textbooks and scholarly works by English and American historians that the awesome events of the Holocaust have not been given their historic due. For over two decades some secondary school and college texts never mentioned the subject at all, while others treated it so summarily or vaguely as to fail to convey sufficient information about the events themselves or their historical significance.
With regard to serious
scholarship, she notes that when Friedrich Meinecke, universally acknowledged as Germany’s most eminent historian, published The German Catastrophe in 1946, he harshly denounced Hitler
as the leader of “a band of criminals” but made absolutely no mention
of the Holocaust, which surely would have represented the height of such criminality. Major British accounts
of Hitler and World War II by leading historians such as A.J.P. Taylor, H.R. Trevor-Roper, and Alan Bullock were almost as silent. A similar situation occurred in America as late as 1972 when the massive
1,237 page Columbia History of the World, having a Jewish co-editor,
devoted a full chapter to World War II but confined its discussion of the Holocaust
to just two short and somewhat ambiguous sentences.
One almost gets a sense that many of these experienced professional historians treated
discussion of the Holocaust as a considerable embarrassment, a subject that they
sought to avoid or at least completely minimize.
Dawidowicz even castigates Slaughterhouse-Five, the 1969 fictional
masterpiece by Kurt Vonnegut, for its bald assertion that the firebombing of
Dresden was “the greatest massacre in European history,” a claim that seems to reduce the Holocaust to non-existence. I myself had noticed something similar just a couple of years before Dawidowicz’s book
appeared. The English translation of German journalist Joachim Fest’s widely
praised Hitler had been published in 1974 and I had read it
a few years later, finding it just as excellent as the critics had indicated. But I remember being a little puzzled that the 800 page book contained
no more than a couple of pages discussing the Nazi death camps and the word “Jews”
never even appeared in the index. The vast majority of Hitler’s Jewish victims came from Russia and the Eastern European nations included in
the Soviet Bloc. That was also the location of all the extermination camps that
are the central focus of Holocaust scholars, and therefore the Soviets were the
source of most of the key evidence used at the Nuremberg Trials. Yet Dawidowicz notes that after Stalin grew increasingly suspicious of
Jews and Israel a few years after the end of the war, virtually all mention of
the Holocaust and German wartime atrocities against Jews vanished from the Soviet media and history books. A similar process occurred in the Warsaw Pact satellites, even while the top Communist Party leadership of many
of those countries often remained very heavily Jewish for some years. Indeed,
I recall reading quite a number of newspaper articles mentioning that after the
Berlin Wall fell and the sundered halves of Europe were finally reunited, most
Eastern Europeans had never even heard of the Holocaust. These days, my morning newspapers seem to carry Holocaust-related stories
with astonishing frequency, and probably no event of the twentieth century looms
so large in our public consciousness. According to public survey data, even as far back as 1995, some 97% of Americans knew of the
Holocaust, far more than were aware of the Pearl Harbor attack or America’s
use of the atomic bombs against Japan, while less than half our citizenry were
aware that the Soviet Union had been our wartime ally. But I’d suspect that anyone who drew his knowledge from the mainstream
newspapers and history books during the first couple of decades after the end
of the Second World War might never have even been aware that any Holocaust had
actually occurred. In 1999 Peter Novick published a book on this general theme entitled The Holocaust in American Life, citing
that survey, and his introduction began by noting the very strange pattern
the Holocaust exhibited in its cultural influence, which seems quite unique
among all major historical events. In the case of almost all other searing historical occurrences such as the massive bloodshed of the Somme or the bitter Vietnam War, their greatest impact upon popular consciousness and media came soon
afterward, with the major books and films often appearing within the first five
or ten years when memories were fresh, and the influence peaking within a couple
of decades, after which they were gradually forgotten. Yet in the case of the Holocaust, this pattern was completely reversed.
Hardly anyone discussed it for the first twenty years after the end of the World
War II, while it gradually moved to the center of American life in the 1970s, just as wartime memories were fading and many of the most prominent and knowledgeable figures from that era had departed the scene. Novick cites numerous
studies and surveys demonstrating that this lack of interest and visibility certainly included the Jewish community itself, which had seemingly suffered so greatly under those events, yet apparently had almost completely forgotten about them during the 1950s and much of the 1960s. I can certainly confirm
that impression from my personal experience. Prior to the mid- or late-1970s, I had had only the vaguest impression that virtually all the Jews and Gypsies of Europe had been exterminated during the Second World
War, and although the term “Holocaust” was in widespread use, it
invariably referred to a “Nuclear Holocaust,” a term long-since supplanted
and scarcely used today. Then, after the Berlin Wall fell, I was quite surprised to discover that Eastern Europe was still filled with vast
numbers of unexterminated Gypsies, who quickly flooded into the West and provoked
all sorts of political controversies. The Rediscovery of the Holocaust
The late scholar Raul Hilberg is universally acknowledged as the founder of modern
Holocaust studies, which began with the 1961 publication of his massive volume The
Destruction of the European Jews. In his very interesting 2007 Hilberg obituary, historian Norman Finkelstein emphasizes that prior to Hilberg’s work,
there had been virtually no writing on the Holocaust, and discussion of the
topic was considered almost “taboo.” For a recent event of such apparent enormity
to have been so completely wiped away from public discussion and the consciousness
of historians and political scientists can be explained in several different ways. But once I began to investigate the circumstances behind Hilberg’s ground-breaking work, I encountered all sorts of strange
ironies. According to Wikipedia, Hilberg’s family of Austrian Jews coincidentally arrived in the United States on the exact day in 1939 that war broke out, and in his early teens he was soon horrified to read all the news reports of the ongoing
extermination of his fellow Jews in the continent his family had left behind,
even telephoning Jewish leaders asking why they were doing so little to save
their kinsmen from annihilation. He subsequently served in the U.S. military in Europe, then majored in Political Science at Brooklyn College after
the end of the conflict. The inspiration for his future scholarly focus seems
to have come when he was shocked by a remark made by one of his lecturers, Hans
Rosenberg: The most wicked atrocities perpetrated on a civilian population in modern times occurred
during the Napoleonic occupation of Spain.
When Hilberg asked how Rosenberg, himself a German-Jewish refugee, could have so
totally ignored the murder of 6 million Jews, a monstrous crime committed just
a couple of years earlier, Rosenberg sought to deflect the question, saying that
“it was a complicated matter” and “history doesn’t teach down into the present age.” Since Rosenberg was
a student of Meinecke, whom Lipstadt has bitterly denounced as an implicit Holocaust Denier, one wonders whether Rosenberg may have shared the beliefs of his mentor but was reluctant to admit that fact to his overwhelmingly Jewish students in emotionally-charged postwar Brooklyn. Later, Hilberg conducted his doctoral research
at Columbia under Franz Neumann, another German-Jewish refugee scholar. But when
Hilberg indicated he wanted his research to focus on the extermination of Europe’s Jews, Neumann strongly discouraged that topic, warning Hilberg that doing so would be professionally imprudent and might become “his academic funeral.” When he attempted to publish his research in book form, it received numerous
negative reviews, with Israel’s Yad Vashem fearing it would encounter “hostile
criticism,” and over a six year period, it was rejected by several major publishing houses along with Princeton University, based on the advice of the influential Jewish intellectual Hannah Arendt. One naturally wonders
whether all these established scholars may have quietly known something that a naive young doctoral candidate such as Hilberg did not. His book only appeared in print because a Jewish immigrant whose business had suffered under the Nazis funded the entire publication. I’d never paid much attention to
Holocaust issues, but the supporters of my local Palo Alto Library operate a monthly
book sale, and with serious nonfiction hardcovers often priced at just a quarter each, my personal library has grown by hundreds of volumes over the years, now including several of the thickest and most influential
Holocaust texts. Aside from Hilberg’s classic volume, these include Nora Levin’s The Holocaust (1968),
Lucy Dawidowicz’s The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 (1975),
Martin Gilbert’s The Holocaust (1985), and Daniel Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners (1996). I claim absolutely no expertise in Holocaust issues, and analyzing the
evidence and argumentation these voluminous works offer is entirely beyond my
ability. But I decided to attempt to assess their overall credibility by exploring a
few particular items, without actually bothering to read the thousands of pages of text they provided. Consider the interesting case of Field
Marshal Erhard Milch, Hermann Goering’s very powerful number-two in the German Luftwaffe. His father was certainly a Jew, and according to researchers Robert Wistrich and Louis Snyder, there is archival evidence that his mother was Jewish as well. Now is it certainly not impossible that
a Third Reich supposedly dedicated with grim fanaticism to the extermination
of each and every Jew might have spent the entire war with a full- or half-Jew near the absolute top of its military hierarchy, but surely that puzzling anomaly would warrant careful explanation, and Milch’s apparent Jewish background was certainly known during the Nuremberg Trials. Yet when I carefully consulted the very
comprehensive indexes of those five books, totaling over 3,500 pages, there is virtually
no discussion of Milch, except a few very brief mentions of his name in connection with various military operations. Either the authors
were unaware of Milch’s Jewish background, or perhaps they hoped to keep that fact away from their readers lest it cause “confusion.” Neither of these possibilities enhances the trust we should place
in their research skills or their scholarly objectivity. Indeed, the fascinating and widely-praised
2002 book Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers by Bryan Mark Rigg notes that aside from Milch, Hitler’s military contained over a dozen half-Jewish generals and admirals and another dozen quarter-Jews
of that same high rank, plus a total of roughly 150,000 additional half- or quarter-Jewish soldiers, with a large fraction of these being officers. All of these individuals would have had
some fully-Jewish parents or grand-parents, which seems decidedly odd behavior
for a regime supposedly so focused on the total eradication of the Jewish race. Another obvious matter casts further doubt upon the historical quality
of those five immensely thick volumes of standard Holocaust narrative, which
together occupy nearly a linear foot on my bookshelves. For prosecutors of any crime, establishing a plausible motive is certainly an important goal, and in the case of the Jewish Holocaust, these authors would
seem to have an easy task at hand. Hitler and his German colleagues had always claimed that the Jews overwhelmingly
dominated Bolshevik Communism, and much of their struggle against the former
was in order to prevent further bloody deeds of the latter. So surely devoting
an early chapter or so to describing this central Nazi doctrine would provide an airtight explanation of what drove the
Nazis to their fiendish slaughters, rendering fully explicable the horrifying
events that would occupy the remainder of their text.
Yet oddly enough, an examination of their indexes for “Bolsheviks,”
“Communism,” and all variants reveals almost no discussion of this
important issue. Goldhagen’s 1996 book provides just a couple of short sentences spread across his 600 pages, and the other works seem to contain virtually nothing at all. Since all of these Holocaust books almost
totally avoid Hitler’s self-declared motive for his anti-Jewish actions, they are forced to desperately search for alternative explanations, seeking clues buried deep within the German past or
turning to psychanalytical speculations or perhaps deciding that what they describe
as the greatest massacre in all human history was undertaken out of sheer Nazi
wickedness. The
obvious reason for this glaring omission is that the authors are constructing a morality-play in which the Jews must be portrayed as absolutely blameless victims, and even hinting at their role in the numerous
Communist atrocities that long preceded the rise of the Third Reich might cause
readers to consider both sides of the issue.
When purported historians go to absurd lengths to hide such glaring facts, they unmask
themselves as propagandists, and we must be very cautious about trusting their
reliability and candor in all other matters, whether great or small. Indeed, the issue of Communism raises a far larger matter, one having
rather touchy implications. Sometimes two simple compounds are separately inert,
but when combined together may possess tremendous explosive force. From my introductory history classes and readings in high school, certain
things had always seemed glaringly obvious to me even if the conclusions remained
unmentionable, and I once assumed they were just as apparent to most others as
well. But over the years I have begun to wonder whether perhaps this might not be correct. Back in those late Cold War days, the death
toll of innocent civilians from the Bolshevik Revolution and the first two decades
of the Soviet Regime was generally reckoned at running well into the tens of millions when we include the casualties of the Russian Civil War, the government-induced famines, the Gulag, and the executions. I’ve heard that
these numbers have been substantially revised downwards to perhaps as little as twenty million or so, but no matter. Although determined Soviet apologists may dispute such very large figures, they have always been part of the standard narrative history taught within the West. Meanwhile, all historians know perfectly
well that the Bolshevik leaders were overwhelmingly Jewish, with three of the
five revolutionaries Lenin named as his plausible successors coming from that background. Although only around 4% of Russia’s population was Jewish, a few years ago Vladimir Putin stated that Jews constituted perhaps 80-85% of the early Soviet government, an estimate fully consistent with the contemporaneous claims of Winston Churchill, Times of London correspondent Robert Wilton, and the officers of American Military Intelligence. Recent books by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Yuri Slezkine, and others have all painted a very similar picture. And prior to World War II, Jews remained enormously over-represented in the
Communist leadership, especially dominating the Gulag administration and the
top ranks of the dreaded NKVD. Both of these simple facts have been widely accepted in America throughout my entire lifetime. But combine them together with the relatively tiny size of worldwide Jewry, around 16 million prior to World
War II, and the inescapable conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were
the greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century, holding that unfortunate
distinction by an enormous margin and with no other nationality coming even remotely close. And yet, by the astonishing alchemy of
Hollywood, the greatest killers of the last one hundred years have somehow been
transmuted into being seen as the greatest victims, a transformation so seemingly
implausible that future generations will surely be left gasping in awe. Today’s American Neocons are just as heavily Jewish as were the
Bolsheviks of a hundred years ago, and they have greatly benefited from the political
immunity provided by this totally bizarre inversion of historical reality. Partly as a consequence of their media-fabricated victimhood status, they
have managed to seize control over much of our political system, especially our
foreign policy, and have spent the last few years doing their utmost to foment
an absolutely insane war with nuclear-armed Russia.
If they do manage to achieve that unfortunate goal, they will surely outdo the very
impressive human body-count racked up by their ethnic ancestors, perhaps even
by an order-of-magnitude or more. Holocaust Frauds and Confusions
Since the Holocaust only became a major public topic after wartime memories had
grown dim, the story has always seemed to suffer from the problems traditionally
associated with “recovered memory syndrome.” Truths and falsehoods were
often mixed together in strange ways, and the door was opened wide to an astonishing number of outright frauds and liars. For example, in the
late 1970s I remember many of my high school classmates devouring The Painted Bird by Jerzy Kosinski, perhaps the first widely popular Holocaust memoir. But then a few years later, the media revealed
that Kosinski’s national best-seller was simply fraudulent, and the plagiarizing
author eventually committed suicide. Indeed, there have been so many fake Holocaust memoirs over the years that they nearly constitute a literary genre of their own. Probably the most world’s most famous Holocaust survivor was Elie
Wiesel, who parlayed the stories of his wartime suffering into becoming an enormous
political celebrity. His career was capped with a Nobel Peace Prize in 1986, and the announcement
declared him “a messenger to mankind.” Yet journalist Alexander Cockburn has persuasively argued that Wiesel was simply a fraud, and his famous autobiographical work Night just
another literary hoax. Although the iconic figure of “the Six Million” has been endlessly repeated by our media, the estimated
numbers of the dead have actually been shockingly variable over the years. Although
I never paid much attention to Holocaust issues, I have closely read my major
newspapers and magazines for decades, and had regularly seen the statement that
the Nazi death machine had brutally exterminated five million Gentiles along with the six million Jews. But just last year, I was stunned to discover
that former total was simply a whole-cloth invention by prominent Holocaust-activist
Simon Wiesenthal, who simply made the figure up one day with the intent of giving non-Jews more of a stake in the Holocaust story. And despite being based on absolutely no evidence or research, his casual
claim was never effectively refuted by actual Holocaust scholars, who knew it
to be total nonsense, and therefore it was so regularly repeated in the media that
I probably read it hundreds of times over the years, always assuming it had some firm grounding in proven reality. Similarly, for decades
I had always read the undeniable fact that the Nazis had exterminated 4 million inmates at Auschwitz, with most of the victims being Jews, and Lipstadt certainly treated that number as absolutely rock-solid historical reality. But in the early 1990s after the fall of Communism, the official total was quietly revised downwards to as little as 1.1 million. The
fact that a sudden reduction in the official Holocaust body-count by 3 million has had so little impact upon our public Holocaust media narrative hardly seems to inspire great confidence in either the total figures
or the media reporting of them. Over the last couple of generations, our media has engraved that figure of Six Million so deeply onto the minds
of every Western citizen that the meaning of the iconic number is universally
understood, and those who question it risk a prison sentence in many European
countries. Yet its actual origin is somewhat obscure.
According to some accounts, Jewish groups lobbied President Truman into casually
inserting it into one of his speeches, and thereafter it has endlessly echoed
in the media down to the present day. Some angry Internet activist has put together
a graphic displaying extracts from dozens of New York Times stories between 1869 and 1941 all citing
the figure of 6 million Eastern European Jews as being threatened with death,
suggesting that our official Holocaust body-count actually predated World War
II by as much as three generations. I really wouldn’t be surprised if that might be the original source of the number. Sometimes the creation
of a new Holocaust hoax was only narrowly averted. Throughout most of the twentieth century, Jews and blacks had been close political allies in America, with the top leadership of the NAACP almost invariably
being Jewish, as were nearly all of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s top white
advisors and a very large fraction of the key white activists involved in the
black Civil Rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s.
But by the late 1960s, a schism had erupted, with many younger black activists becoming
deeply hostile to what they perceived as overwhelming Jewish influence, while
more militant blacks, whether Muslim or otherwise, began siding with the Palestinians
against Zionist Israel. This growing conflict became especially bitter during Jesse Jackson’s presidential campaign of 1988 and reached a flash-point in the New York City of the early 1990s. A couple of film-makers
sought to help heal this rift by producing a major 1992 PBS documentary entitled The Liberators, recounting how black American troops had been among the first units that captured the Buchenwald
and Dachau concentration camps, thereby freeing the tens of thousands of Jewish
inmates from Nazi captivity. A historical narrative of such deep symbolic resonance quickly attracted overwhelming support from both black leaders and Jewish ones, with Jesse Jackson sharing the stage with Holocaust survivors and numerous Jewish luminaries at the Harlem premiere, and the film received an Oscar nomination. However, in early
Febuary 1993 Jeffrey Goldberg took to the pages of The New Republic to reveal that the story was merely a hoax, based on falsified history. Although the film’s Jewish co-producer angrily
denounced her critics as racists and Holocaust Deniers, those charges stuck,
and were eventually reported in the New York Times and other major media outlets. The leading Jewish organizations and Holocaust centers that had been heavily promoting the
film soon distanced themselves, and in 2013 The Times of Israel even marked the twenty-year anniversary of what it described as a notorious hoax. But I suspect that if matters
had gone a little differently, the story might soon have become so deeply embedded
in the canonical Holocaust narrative that anyone questioning the facts would have been vilified as a racist. A few years earlier, The
New Republic had actually been in the forefront of promoting a different hoax also relating to Jewish issues, one which might have had far greater international political significance when Joan Peters, an obscure Jewish writer, published a major historical work in 1984. She claimed that her extensive archival
research had revealed that the bulk of the present-day Palestinians were actually
not native to Palestine, but instead were recently-arrived immigrants, drawn there by the heavy economic development produced by the Zionist settlers who had actually preceded them. Her shocking findings received hundreds
of glowing reviews and academic endorsements across the entire spectrum of the
mainstream and elite American media, and her book quickly became a huge bestseller. Leading Jewish Holocaust luminaries such as Dawidowicz and Wiesel took center stage in praising her remarkable scholarship,
which seemed likely to completely demolish the claims of the expelled Palestinians,
thereby reshaping the nature of the Middle East conflict to Israel’s great
advantage. However, a young graduate student in History at Princeton named Norman Finkelstein
had considerable interest in the history of Zionism, and being very much
surprised by her findings, decided to investigate those claims. Once he began carefully checking her footnotes
and her alleged sources, he discovered they were entirely fraudulent, and her
groundbreaking research merely amounted to a hoax, which some later suggested
had been concocted by an intelligence organization and merely published under her name. Although Finkelstein widely distributed his important findings, they were totally ignored by all the American journalists, scholars, and media organizations he contacted, with the sole exception of Noam Chomsky, and the growing Joan Peters Hoax might have destroyed the legal basis of the
international Palestinian claims to their own Palestine homeland. But some independent-minded
British publications eventually picked up his information, and the resulting wave of media
embarrassment caused the Peters claims to fade into oblivion. Meanwhile, Finkelstein himself suffered severe retaliation as a consequence, and according to Chomsky was completely blacklisted by his Princeton
department and the wider academic community. More than a dozen years later, Finkelstein’s work became the focus
of a second major controversy. In the late 1990s, international Jewish organizations
launched a major effort to extract many billions of dollars from the largest
Swiss banks, arguing that such funds were the rightful property of European Jews who had died in the Holocaust. When the banks initially resisted, arguing that no solid evidence was being presented for such enormous claims,
they were harshly denounced by America’s Jewish-dominated media, and Jewish
lobbying led the American government to threaten them with severe financial sanctions
that could have destroyed their businesses. Faced with such serious extortionate pressure,
the banks finally gave way and paid out the bulk of the funds being demanded,
with those billions mostly retained by the Jewish organizations leading the campaign
and spent on their own projects since the purported Jewish heirs were impossible to locate. This situation led historian Finkelstein
to publish a short book in 2000 entitled The Holocaust Industry, in which he harshly critiqued what he characterized as a global Jewish money-making enterprise aimed at unfairly extracting wealth on behalf of the supposed Holocaust victims, often with little regard for truth or fairness. Although almost entirely
ignored by the American media, it became a major bestseller in Europe, which eventually forced American publications to give it some attention. Among other things, Finkelstein noted that more than a half-century after the end of the Holocaust, the number of officially designated Holocaust survivors had
grown so large that simple mortality considerations seemed to imply that huge
numbers of European Jews must have survived the war.
This obviously raised serious questions about how many might have actually died during that conflict and its accompanying Holocaust. Over the years, I had noticed the same sorts of media reports claiming
enormous totals of Holocaust survivors still alive now six or seven decades after
the event. For
example, even as late as 2009 an official at Israel’s Jewish Agency justified laws criminalizing Holocaust Denial by explaining that almost 65 years after the end of the war “there are still hundreds of thousands of living Holocaust survivors,” a statement which itself seems to constitute rather explicit Holocaust Denial. Indeed, a very noticeable
number of all the New York Times obituaries I read these days in my morning newspapers seem to include Holocaust survivors still expiring in their eighties and nineties. Anyone who reads serious history books knows that Jews have generally enjoyed a reputation for producing many
of the world’s greatest swindlers and frauds, hardly surprising given their notorious tendency to lie and dissemble. Meanwhile, the Jewish community also seems to contain far more than its fair
share of the emotionally disturbed and the mentally ill, and perhaps as a consequence
has served as a launching-pad for many of the world’s religious cults and
fanatic ideological movements. Any exploration of the Holocaust certainly tends to support this rather negative appraisal. The Holocaust and Hollywood Although the Holocaust began to enter American consciousness during the
1960s and 1970s with the publication of major books by Hilberg, Levin, Dawidowicz,
and others, together with the resulting articles and reviews that these generated,
the initial social impact was probably not substantial, at least outside the Jewish community. Even highly successful books selling in
the many tens of thousands of copies would have little impact in a population
of more than 200 million. Our media completely shapes our perceived reality of the world, and although intellectuals and many of the highly
educated are greatly influenced by books and other forms of printed content,
the vast majority of the population understands the world through electronic
media, especially that of popular entertainment.
Consider, for example, the 1974 publication of Time on the Cross: The Economics
of American Negro Slavery, a magisterial two volume analysis by economists
Robert William Fogel and Stanley L. Engerman.
By applying quantitative methods, the study overturned generations of assumptions
about the American social institution, demonstrating that black slaves in the
South were encouraged to marry and maintain their households, while having diets
and medical care comparable to that of the free white population and often superior to that of Northern industrial wage-earners. Moreover, following
emancipation the life expectancy of freedmen declined by ten percent and their
illnesses increased by twenty per cent. All of this is summarized in the extensive Wikipedia entry. Although
their results were controversial, the authors had the strongest possible academic credentials, with Fogel, an eminent scholar, being a leading figure in a school of economics who went on to win a Nobel
Prize. And Fogel’s ideological credentials were even more robust, given
that he had had a lifelong commitment to black Civil Rights starting with the
eight years he had spent as a young Communist Party organizer, while his 1949 marriage to a black woman had often subjected the couple to the indignities of the anti-miscegenation laws of that era. Consequently, their
findings received unprecedented coverage in the mainstream media for an academic study and surely influenced numerous historians and journalists. Yet I think the long-term impact upon popular perceptions about
slavery has been almost nil. By contrast, in 1976 the ABC television network ran the prime-time miniseries Roots,
a multi-generational account of a slave family. The story closely adhered to
the traditionally harsh slavery narrative, while supposedly being based upon
the recorded family history of Alex Haley, the author of the best-selling book of that same title. But although his work was later found to
be fraudulent and apparently plagiarized, the ratings were stellar and the social
impact enormous due to the audience of 100 million Americans who watched those episodes. Thus, even the most impressive written scholarship had absolutely no chance of competing with fictionalized television drama. All three of America’s
television networks were under Jewish ownership or control, so it was hardly surprising that two years later ABC decided to repeat this process with the 1978 television miniseries Holocaust,
which also achieved an audience of 100 million and generated enormous profits.
It seems quite possible this may have been the first time many American families
discovered that colossal but almost entirely invisible event of World War II. The following year, William Styron published Sophie’s Choice,
a heart-rending tale involving deeply buried memories of the extermination of
Christian Polish children in the Auschwitz gas chambers. Although such an occurrence was absolutely contrary to the doctrines of
all Jewish Holocaust scholars, the novel became a huge national best-seller anyway,
and a 1982 film of the same name soon followed, with Meryl Streep winning an Oscar
for Best Actress. A decade later, Steven Spielberg’s 1993 Schindler’s List won a remarkable seven Oscars, while grossing nearly $100 million. With Hollywood so overwhelmingly Jewish, the consequences were hardly surprising, and a huge cinematic genre soon developed.
According to Finkelstein, Hollywood produced some 180 Holocaust films just during the years 1989-2004. Even the very partial subset of Holocaust films listed on Wikipedia has grown enormously long, but fortunately the Movie Database has winnowed
down the catalog by providing a list of the 50 Most Moving Holocaust Films. Many
billions of dollars have surely been invested over the years on the total production costs of this ongoing business enterprise. For most ordinary people, “seeing is believing,” and how could anyone
seriously doubt the reality of the Holocaust after having seen all the gas chambers
and mounds of murdered Jewish corpses constructed by highly-paid Hollywood set
designers? Doubting the existence of Spiderman and the Incredible Hulk would be almost as absurd. Some 2% of Americans have a Jewish background,
while perhaps 95% possess Christian roots, but the Wikipedia list of Christian films seems rather scanty and rudimentary by comparison. Very few of those films
were ever widely released, and the selection is stretched to even include The
Chronicles of Narnia, which contains no mention of Christianity whatsoever. One of the very few prominent exceptions on the list is Mel Gibson’s
2004 The Passion of the Christ, which he was forced to personally
self-fund. And despite the enormous financial success of that movie, one of the most highly profitable domestic releases of all time, the project rendered Gibson a hugely vilified pariah in the industry
over which he had once reigned as its biggest star, especially after word got
around that his own father was a Holocaust Denier. In
many respects, Hollywood and the broader entertainment media today provide the unifying spiritual basis of our deeply secular society, and the overwhelming predominance of Holocaust-themed films over Christian
ones has obvious implications. Meanwhile, in our globalized world, the American entertainment-media complex totally dominates Europe and the rest
of the West, so that the ideas generated here effectively shape the minds of
many hundreds of millions of people living elsewhere, whether or not they fully
recognize that fact. In 2009, Pope Benedict XVI sought to heal the long-standing Vatican II rift within the Catholic Church and reconcile
with the breakaway Society of St. Pius X faction. But this became a major media
controversy when it was discovered that Bishop Richard Williamson, one of the
leading members of that latter organization, had long been a Holocaust Denier and also believed that Jews should convert to Christianity. Although
the many other differences in Catholic doctrinal faith were fully negotiable, apparently refusing to accept the reality of the Holocaust was not, and Williamson remained estranged from the Catholic Church. Soon afterward he was even prosecuted for heresy by the German government. Internet critics have suggested that over the last couple of generations, energetic Jewish activists have successfully
lobbied Western nations into replacing their traditional religion of Christianity
with the new religion of Holocaustianity, and the Williamson Affair certainly
seems to support that conclusion. Consider the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. Funded by Jewish interests, it spent years
launching vicious attacks against Christianity, sometimes in crudely pornographic
fashion, and also periodically vilified Islam. Such activities were hailed
by French politicians as proof of the total freedom of thought allowed in the land of Voltaire. But the moment that one of its leading cartoonists made a very
mild joke related to Jews, he was immediately fired, and if the publication
had ever ridiculed the Holocaust, it surely would have been immediately shut
down, and its entire staff possibly thrown into prison. Western journalists and human rights advocates have often expressed support
for the boldly transgressive activities of the Jewish-funded Femen activists when they desecrate Christian churches all around the world. But such pundits
would certainly be in an uproar if anyone were to act in similar fashion toward the growing international network of Holocaust
Museums, most of them built at public expense. Indeed, one of the underlying sources of
bitter Western conflict with Vladimir Putin’s Russia seems to be that he has
restored Christianity to a favored place in a society where the early Bolsheviks had once dynamited churches and massacred many thousands of priests. Western intellectual elites held far more positive feelings toward
the USSR while its leaders retained a stridently anti-Christian attitude. The Rise and Suppression
of Holocaust Denial Since the Holocaust had been almost unknown in America until the mid-1960s, explicit Holocaust
Denial was equally non-existent, but as the former grew in visibility following
the publication of Hilberg’s 1961 book, the latter soon began to awaken
as well. Lipstadt’s
vilification of Barnes as the “godfather” of Holocaust Denial does contain a nugget of truth. His posthumously-published 1968 review endorsing Rassinier’s denialist analysis seems to
be the first such substantial statement published anywhere in America, at least
if we exclude Beaty’s very casual 1951 dismissal of the Jewish claims,
which seem to have attracted negligible public attention. Near the end of the 1960s, a right-wing publisher named Willis Carto came
across a short and unpolished Holocaust Denial manuscript, apparently produced
some years earlier, and he ignored legal niceties by simply putting it into print. The purported author then sued for plagiarism, and although the case was
eventually settled, his identity eventually leaked out as being that of David
L. Hoggan, a Barnes protege with a Harvard Ph.D. in history serving as a junior faculty member at Stanford. His desire for anonymity was aimed at preventing the destruction of his career, but he failed in that effort, and further academic appointments quickly dried up. Meanwhile, Murray Rothbard, the founding
father of modern libertarianism, had always been a strong supporter of historical
Revisionism, and greatly admired Barnes, who for decades had been the leading figure in that field. Barnes had also briefly hinted at his general
skepticism about the Holocaust in a lengthy 1967 articleappearing in the Rampart Journal, a short-lived libertarian publication,
and this may have been noticed within those ideological circles. It appears that
by the early 1970s, Holocaust Denial had become a topic of some discussion within America’s heavily Jewish but fiercely free-thinking libertarian community, and this was to have an important consequence. A professor of Electrical
Engineering at Northwestern named Arthur R. Butz was casually visiting some libertarian gathering during this period when he happened to notice a pamphlet denouncing the Holocaust as a fraud. He had never previously
given any thought to the issue, but such a shocking claim captured his attention, and he began looking into the matter early in 1972. He soon decided that the accusation was probably correct, but found
the supporting evidence, including that presented in the unfinished and anonymous
Hoggan book, far too sketchy, and decided it needed to be fleshed out in much
more detailed and comprehensive fashion. He proceeded to undertake this project over the next few years, working with the methodical diligence of a trained academic engineer. central
text of the Holocaust Denial community, a position it still seems to retain down to this present day, while with all the updates and appendices, the length has grown to well over 200,000 words. Although
no mention of this forthcoming book appeared in the February 1976 issue
of Reason, it is possible that word of the pending publication
had gotten around within libertarian circles, prompting the sudden new focus upon historical Revisionism. Butz was a respectable tenured professor
at Northwestern, and the release of his book laying out the Holocaust Denial case
soon became a minor sensation, covered by the New York Times and other media outlets in January 1977. In one of her books,
Lipstadt devotes a full chapter entitled “Entering the Mainstream” to Butz’s work. According to a December 1980 Commentary article by Dawidowicz, Jewish donors and Jewish
activists quickly mobilized, attempting to have Butz fired for his heretical
views, but back then academic tenure still held firm and Butz survived, an outcome
that seems to have greatly irritated Dawidowicz.
Such a detailed and comprehensive book laying out the Holocaust Denial case naturally
had a considerable impact on the national debate, especially since the author was a mainstream and apparently apolitical
academic, and an American edition of Butz’s book soon appeared in 1977. I’m very pleased to have made arrangements
to include the volume in my collection of Controversial HTML Books, so those interested can easily read it and decide for
themselves. The following year,
these Holocaust Denial trends seemed to gain further momentum as Carto opened a small new publishing enterprise in California called the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), which launched a quarterly periodical entitled The Journal of Historical Review in 1980. Both the IHR and its JHR publication
centered their efforts around Revisionism in general, but with Holocaust Denial
being their major focus. Lipstadt devotes an entire chapter to the IHR, later noting that most of the main authors of the
February 1976 Reason issue soon became affiliated with that
project or with other Carto enterprises, as did Butz, while the editorial board
of the JHR was soon well-stocked with numerous Ph.D.’s, often earned at highly-reputable universities. For the next quarter
century or so, the IHR would hold small conferences every year or two, with David Irving eventually becoming a regular presenter, and even fully mainstream figures such as Pulitzer
Prize-winning historian John Toland occasionally appearing as speakers. a very detailed quantitative analysis of the underlying demographics and
population movements around the period encompassed by World War II, apparently
the first such study undertaken. The author, writing under the pen-name Walter
N. Sanning, sought to revise the extremely simplistic population analysis casually assumed by Holocaust historians. Before the war, millions of Jews had lived
in Eastern Europe, and after the war, those communities had mostly vanished.
This undeniable fact has long stood as an implicit central pillar of the traditional Holocaust narrative. But drawing upon
entirely mainstream sources, Sanning persuasively demonstrates that the situation
was actually far more complicated than it might seem. For example, it was widely reported at
the time that vast numbers of Polish Jews had been transported by the Soviets
to locations deep within their territory, on both voluntary and involuntary terms, with future Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin being including in those transfers. In addition, huge numbers of heavily urbanized Soviet Jews were similarly evacuated ahead of the advancing German forces in 1941. The exact size of
these population movements has long been uncertain and disputed, but Sanning’s careful analysis of postwar Soviet census data and other sources suggests that the totals were likely towards the upper end of
most estimates. Sanning makes no claim that his findings are definitive, but
even if they are only partially correct, such results would certainly preclude
the reality of traditional Holocaust numbers.
Another regular IHR participant was Robert Faurisson. As a professor of literature at the University of Lyons-2, he began expressing his public skepticism about the Holocaust during the 1970s, and the resulting media uproar led to efforts to remove
him from his position, while a petition was signed on his behalf by 200 international
scholars, including famed MIT professor Noam Chomsky.
Faurisson stuck to his opinions, but attacks persisted, including a brutal beating
by Jewish militants that hospitalized him, while a French political candidate
espousing similar views was assassinated. Jewish activist organizations began
lobbying for laws to broadly outlaw the activities of Faurisson and others, and in 1990, soon after the Berlin Wall fell
and research at Auschwitz and other Holocaust sites suddenly became far easier,
France passed a statute criminalizing Holocaust Denial, apparently the first
nation after defeated Germany to do so. During the years that followed, large numbers of other Western countries did the same, setting
the disturbing precedent of resolving scholarly disputes via prison sentences,
a softer form of the same policy followed in Stalinist Russia. Since Faurisson was a literary scholar, it is not entirely surprising that
one of his major interests was The Diary of Anne Frank, generally
regarded as the Holocaust’s iconic literary classic, telling the story of a young Jewish girl who died after being
deported from Holland to Auschwitz. He argued that the text was substantially
fraudulent, written by someone else after the end of the war, and for decades
various determined individuals have argued the case back and forth. I cannot
properly evaluate any of their complex arguments, which apparently involve questions of ballpoint pen technology and textual emendations, nor have I ever read the book itself. But for me, the most striking aspect of
the story is the girl’s actual fate under the official narrative, as recounted
in the thoroughly establishmentarian Wikipedia entry. Apparently
disease was raging in her camp despite the best efforts of the Germans to control it, and she soon became quite ill, mostly remaining bedridden in the infirmary, before eventually dying from typhus in Spring 1945 at a
different camp about six months after her initial arrival. It seems rather odd
to me that a young Jewish girl who fell severely ill at Auschwitz would have
spent so much time in camp hospitals and eventually die there, given that we are told
the primary purpose of Auschwitz and other such camps was the efficient extermination of its Jewish inmates. By the mid-1990s the
Holocaust Denial movement seemed to be gaining in public visibility, presumably aided by the doubts raised after the official 1992 announcement that the estimated deaths at Auschwitz had been reduced by around 3 million. For
example, the February 1995 issue of Marco Polo, a glossy Japanese magazine with a circulation of 250,000, carried a long article declaring that the gas chambers of the Holocaust were a propaganda
hoax. Israel
and Jewish-activist groups quickly responded, organizing a widespread advertising boycott of all the publications of the parent company, one of Japan’s most respected publishers, which quickly folded
in the face of that serious threat. All copies of the issue were recalled from
the newspapers, the staffers were dismissed, and the entire magazine was soon
shut down, while the president of the parent company was forced to resign. In exploring the history of Holocaust Denial, I have noticed this same
sort of recurrent pattern, most typically involving individuals rather than institutions.
Someone highly-regarded and fully mainstream decides to investigate the controversial topic, and soon comes to conclusions that sharply deviate from the official truth of the last two generations. For various reasons,
those views become public, and he is immediately demonized by the Jewish-dominated media as a horrible extremist, perhaps mentally-deranged, while being relentlessly hounded by a ravenous pack of fanatic Jewish-activists. This usually brings about the destruction of his career. In the early 1960s
Stanford historian David Hoggan produced his anonymous manuscript The Myth of the Six Million, but once it got into circulation and his identity became known, his academic career was destroyed.
A dozen years later, something along the same lines happened with Northwestern
Electrical Engineering professor Arthur Butz, and only his academic tenure saved
him from a similar fate. Fred Leuchter was widely regarded as one of America’s leading expert specialists on the technology of executions,
and a long article in The Atlantic treated him as such. During the 1980s, Ernst Zundel, a prominent Canadian Holocaust
Denier, was facing trial for his disbelief in the Auschwitz gas chambers, and
one of his expert witnesses was an American prison warden with some experience
in such systems, who recommended involving Leuchter, one of the foremost figures in the field. Leuchter soon took a trip to Poland and
closely inspected the purported Auschwitz gas chambers, then published the Leuchter Report, concluding that they were obviously a fraud and could not possibly have worked in the manner Holocaust scholars had always claimed. The ferocious attacks which followed soon cost him his entire business
career and destroyed his marriage. David Irving had ranked as the world’s most successful World War
II historian, with his books selling in the millions amid glowing coverage in
the top British newspapers when he agreed to appear as an expert witness at the Zundel trial. He had always previously accepted the conventional
Holocaust narrative, but reading the Leuchter Report changed
his mind, and he concluded that the Auschwitz gas chambers were just a myth. He was quickly subjected to unrelenting media attacks, which first severely damaged and then ultimately destroyed his very illustrious publishing career, and he later even served time in an Austrian prison for his unacceptable views. Dr. Germar Rudolf
was a successful young German chemist working at the prestigious Max Planck Institute when he heard of the controversy regarding the Leuchter Report, which he found reasonably persuasive but containing some weaknesses. Therefore, he repeated the analysis on a more thorough basis, and published
the results as the Chemistry of Auschwitz, which came to the same conclusions as Leuchter. And just like Leuchter before
him, Rudolf suffered the destruction of his career and his marriage, and since
Germany treats these matters in harsher fashion, he eventually served five years
in prison for his scientific impudence. Most recently, Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, who had spent eleven years as a historian of science on the staff of University
College, London, suffered this same fate in 2008. His scientific interests
in the Holocaust provoked a media firestorm of vilification, and he was fired
with a single day’s notice, becoming the first member of his research institution ever expelled for ideological reasons. He had previously provided the Isaac Newton entry for a massive biographical encyclopedia of astronomers, and America’s most prestigious science journal demanded that the entire work be pulped,
destroying the work of over 100 writers, because it had been fatally tainted
by having such a villainous contributor. He recounted this unfortunate personal
history as an introduction to his 2014 book Breaking the Spell, which I highly recommend. Kollerstrom’s text effectively summarizes much of the more recent Holocaust Denial evidence, including the
official Auschwitz death books returned by Gorbachev after the end of the Cold
War, which indicate that Jewish fatalities were some 99% lower than the widely-believed
total. Furthermore, Jewish deaths actually showed a sharp decline once plentiful
supplies of Zyklon B arrived, exactly contrary to what might have been expected under the conventional account. He also discusses
the interesting new evidence contained in the British wartime decrypts of all German communications between the various concentration camps and the Berlin headquarters. Much of this material is presented in an interesting two hour interview on Red Ice Radio, conveniently available
on YouTube: The lives and careers of a very sizable number of other individuals have followed this same unfortunate sequence,
which in much of Europe often ends in criminal prosecution and imprisonment.
Most notably, a German lawyer who became a bit too bold in her legal arguments
soon joined her client behind bars, and as a consequence, it has become increasingly
difficult for accused Holocaust Deniers to secure effective legal representation. By Kollerstrom’s estimates, many thousands of individuals are currently serving time across Europe for Holocaust Denial. My impression is that by the late 1960s, the old Soviet Bloc countries had mostly stopped imprisoning people merely for questioning Marxist-Leninist dogma, and reserved their political prisons only for those
actively organizing against the regime, while Holocaust Denial is treated today
in far harsher fashion. One clear difference is that actual belief in Communist doctrine had entirely faded away to almost nothing even
among the Communist leadership itself, while these days Holocaustianity is still
a young and deeply held faith, at least within a small slice of the population
that exerts enormously disproportionate leverage over our public institutions. Another obvious factor is the many billions of dollars currently at stake
in what Finkelstein has aptly characterized as “the Holocaust Industry.”
For example, potentially enormous new claims are now being reopened against Poland for Jewish property that was lost or confiscated during the World War II era. In America, the situation is somewhat different, and our First Amendment
still protects Holocaust Deniers against imprisonment, though the efforts of
the ADL and various other groups to criminalize “hate speech” are clearly aimed at eventually removing that obstacle. But in the meantime, crippling social and economic sanctions are often used
to pursue the same objectives. Furthermore, various Internet monopolies have been gradually persuaded
or co-opted into preventing the easy distribution of dissenting information.
There have been stories in the media over the last few years that Google has been
censoring or redirecting its Holocaust search results away from those disputing the official narrative. Even more ominously, Amazon, our current
near-monopolistic retailer of books, last year took the unprecedented step of banning thousands of Holocaust Denial works, presumably lest they “confuse” curious readers, so it is fortunate that I had purchased mine a couple of years earlier. These parallels with George Orwell’s 1984 are
really quite striking, and the “Iron Curtain Over America” that Beaty
had warned about in his 1951 book of that title seems much closer to becoming
a full reality. Various figures in the Holocaust Denial community have attempted to mitigate this informational blacklist, and Dr.
Rudolf some time ago established a website HolocaustHandbooks.com, which allows a large number of the key volumes to be purchased or easily read
on-line in a variety of different formats. But the growing censorship by Amazon, Google, and other Internet monopolies greatly reduces the likelihood that anyone will readily encounter the information. Obviously, most supporters of the conventional
Holocaust narrative would prefer to win their battles on the level playing fields
of analysis rather than by utilizing economic or administrative means to incapacitate their opponents. But I have seen little evidence that they have enjoyed any serious success in this regard. Aside from the various
books by Lipstadt, which I found to be of poor quality and quite unpersuasive, one of the most energetic Holocaust supporters of the last couple of decades seems to have been Michael Shermer, the editor of Skeptic magazine, who had earned his degrees in psychology
and the history of science. In 1997, he published Why People Believe Weird Things, seeking to debunk all sorts of irrational beliefs
popular in certain circles, with the book’s subtitle describing these
as “pseudo-science” and “superstition.” His cover text focused on ESP, alien abductions, and witchcraft, but rebutting Holocaust Denial was the single largest portion of that
book, encompassing three full chapters. His discussion of this latter subject was rather superficial,
and he probably undercut his credibility by grouping it together with his debunking
of the scientific reality of “race” as a similar right-wing fallacy, one also long since disproved by mainstream scientists. Regarding the latter issue, he went on to argue that the alleged black-white differences claimed
in works such as The Bell Curveby Richard Herrnstein and
Charles Murray was entirely pseudo-scientific nonsense, and he emphasized that
book and similar ones had been promoted by the same pro-Nazi groups who advocated Holocaust Denial, with those two pernicious doctrines being closely linked together. Shermer had recruited Harvard professor Stephen Jay Gould to write the
Foreword for his book and that raises serious questions about his knowledge or
his judgment since Gould is widely regarded as one of the most notorious scientific frauds of the late twentieth century. In 2000, Shermer returned to the battle, publishing Denying History, entirely focused on refuting
Holocaust Denial. This time he recruited Holocaust scholar Alex Grobman as
his co-author and acknowledged the generous financial support he had received
from various Jewish organizations. A large portion of the text seemed to focus on the psychology and sociology of Holocaust Deniers, trying to explain
why people could believe in such patently absurd nonsense. Indeed, so much space
was devoted to those issues that he was forced to entirely skip over the official
reduction of the Auschwitz body-count by 3 million just a few years earlier, thus
avoiding any need to explain why this large shift had had no impact on the canonical Holocaust figure of Six Million. Although various writers
such as Shermer may have been encouraged by generous financial subsidies to make fools of themselves, their more violent allies on the extreme fringe have probably had a greater impact on the Holocaust
debate. Although judicial and economic sanctions may deter the vast majority
of Holocaust Deniers from showing their face, extra-legal violence has also often
been deployed against those hardy souls who remain undeterred. For example, during the 1980s the offices and warehouse storage facilities
of the IHR in Southern California were fire-bombed and totally destroyed by Jewish
militants. And
although Canada has traditionally had little political violence, in 1995 the large, ramshackle house that served as the residence and business office of Canada’s Ernst Zundel, one of the world’s
leading publishers and distributers of Holocaust Denial literature, was similarly
fire-bombed and burned to the ground. Zundel had already faced several criminal prosecutions on charges of spreading “false
news,” and eventually served years in prison, before being deported back
to his native Germany, where he served additional imprisonment. Various other
prominent Holocaust Deniers have even faced threats of assassination. Most historians and other academic scholars are quiet souls, and surely
the looming threat of such serious terroristic violence must have dissuaded many
of them from involving themselves in such obviously controversial issues. Meanwhile, relentless
financial and social pressure may gradually wear down both individuals and organizations, causing them to eventually either abandon the field or become far less active, with their places sometimes
taken by newcomers. The year after the 9/11 attacks, the JHR ceased print publication. The growth of the Internet
was probably an important contributing factor, and with the national focus shifting
so sharply toward foreign policy and the Middle East, its IHR parent organization
became much less active, while much of the ongoing debate in Revisionism and Holocaust Denial shifted to various other online venues. But at some point over the years, the JHR digitized many hundreds of its
articles and posted them on its website, providing over three million words of
generally very high-quality historical content.
Over the last couple of months, I have been repeatedly surprised to discover that
the historians associated with the IHR had long ago published articles on topics
quite parallel to some of my own. For example, after I published an article on the Suvorov Hypothesis that Germany’s Barbarossa attack had preempted Stalin’s planned
attack and conquest of Europe, someone informed me that a reviewer had extensively discussed the same Suvorov book twenty years earlier in an issue of JHR.
I also discovered several pieces by CIA defector Victor Marchetti, a important figure for JFK assassination researchers, who had received little
attention in the mainstream media. There were also articles on the fate of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, a topic almost entirely excluded from the mainstream media. Casually browsing some of the archives,
I was quite impressed with their quality, and since the archives were freely
available for anyone to republish, I went ahead and incorporated them, making the millions of words of their Revisionist and Holocaust Denial content much more conveniently available to interested readers.
The material is fully searchable, and also organized by Author, Topic, and Time
Period, with a few sample links included below: The Journal of Historical Review, 1980-2002 Issues Author
Archives: Topic Archives: So for those particularly interested
in Holocaust Denial, well over a million words of such discussion may now be
conveniently available, including works by many of the authors once so highly regarded by the early editors of Reason magazine. Secretive Holocaust
Denial The steadily
growing economic and political power of organized Jewish groups, backed by Hollywood image-making, eventually won the visible war and crushed the Holocaust Denial movement in the public arena, enforcing a particular historical narrative by criminal prosecutions across most of Europe and severe social and
economic sanctions in America. But a stubborn underground resistance still exists,
with its size being difficult to estimate. Although my interest in the Holocaust had always been rather minimal, once the Internet came
into being and my circle of friends and acquaintances greatly expanded, the topic
would very occasionally come up. Over the years, a considerable number of seemingly rational people at one time or another privately let slip their
extreme skepticism about various elements of the canonical Holocaust narrative, and such doubts seemed to represent merely the tip of the iceberg. Every now and then someone in that category
spoke a little too freely or became a target for retaliation on a different matter,
and our media went into a feeding frenzy of Holocaust Denial accusations and counter-accusations. For example, during the impeachment battles
of the late 1990s, Clinton partisans believed that prominent liberal pundit Christopher
Hitchens had betrayed the personal confidences of presidential aide Sidney Blumenthal, and journalist Edward Jay Epstein decided to retaliate in kind, widely circulating a memo to the media accusing Hitchens of secretly being a Holocaust Denier. He alleged that at a 1995 dinner gathering following a New Yorker anniversary
celebration, Hitchens had drunk a little too much wine and began expounding
to his table-mates that the Holocaust was simply a hoax. Epstein backed his claim
by saying he had been so shocked at such statements that he had entered them into his personal diary. That telling detail and the fact that most
of the other witnesses seemed suspiciously vague in their recollections persuaded
me that Epstein was probably being truthful. A bitter feud between Hitchens and Epstein soon erupted. In 2005 Hitchens denounced various opponents
of Bush’s Iraq War as anti-Semites, and in retaliation Alexander Cockburn published a couple of Counterpunchcolumns resurrecting that 1999 controversy, which is when I first discovered it.
As a regular reader of Counterpunch, I was intrigued and Googling around a bit, quickly located media accounts
of Epstein’s explicit accusations. Numerous reports of the the incident still survive on the web, including one from the NY Daily News as well as a portion of an MSNBC piece, and although some of the more extensive ones have disappeared over the last dozen years, the media text I remember reading in 2005 has been preserved on the static HTML pages of several websites: Epstein told MSNBC that Hitchens had misspoken himself on the Holocaust on Feb. 12, 1995 – in fact, practically four years ago – as the two of them, along with some other friends, were dining in New York. Epstein was so shocked, he says, and considered Hitchens doubts so grave, that
he went home and noted them in his diary! According to the
Epstein diary: “Once seated in a booth, and freely sipping his free red wine, Hitchens advanced a theory more revealing than anything going on at the Hudson theater. His thesis, to the shock of everyone at the
table, was that the Holocaust was a fiction developed by a conspiracy of interests bent on ‘criminalizing
the German Nation’” “He explained that
no evidence of German mass murder had ever been found – and what gruesome artifacts had
been found had been fabricated after the event,” Epstein confided to his diary.
“What of the testimony of Nazi generals at Nuremberg about the death camps,” he asked. Hitchens, according to the Epstein diary notation, explained “. . . without
missing a beat, that such admissions were obtained under Anglo-American torture.” Epstein
then asked, as noted in his diary: “‘But what happened to the Jews in Europe?’
Hitch shrugged and said, ‘Many were killed by local villagers when they ran away, others died natural deaths, and the remainder made it to Israel.”
After reading these interesting columns, I began noticing that Cockburn
himself sometimes provided hints suggesting that his own personal opinion on
the Holocaust might be somewhat heretical, including his cryptical remarks that
huge hoaxes were actually much easier to create and maintain than most people realized. Just a few months after his attack on Hitchens,
Cockburn published a two-part article strongly arguing that Nobel Peace Prize
Winner Elie Wiesel, the most famous of all Holocaust survivors, was simply a fraud. I had
always been taught that Zyklon B was the deadly agent used by the Nazis to exterminate the Jews of Auschwitz and I had vaguely become aware that Holocaust Deniers absurdly claimed the compound had instead
been employed as a delousing agent in the camps, aimed at preventing the spread
of Typhus; but then the following year, I was shocked to discover in one of Cockburn’s columns that for decades the U.S. government had itself used Zyklon B as the primary
delousing agent for immigrants entering at its Mexican border. I recall several other columns from the mid-2000s dancing around Holocaust
issues, but I now seem unable to locate them within the Counterpunch archives. My growing realization
15-odd years ago that substantial numbers of knowledgeable people appeared to be secret adherents of Holocaust Denial certainly reshaped my own unquestioning assumptions on that subject. The occasional newspaper
account of a Holocaust Denier being discovered and then flayed and destroyed by the media easily explained why the public positions on that subject remained so unanimous. Being busy with other things,
I don’t think I ever had a conversation with anyone on that controversial
subject or even so much as an email exchange, but I did keep my eyes and ears
open, and huge doubts had certainly entered my mind many years before I ever bothered reading my first book on the subject. Meanwhile, the concurrent collapse of my belief in our official American Pravda narrative on so many other controversial topics played a major role as well. Once
I realized to my dismay that I couldn’t believe a word of what our media and political
leaders said about major events in the here and now, their credibility on controversial
happenings so long ago and far away entirely disappeared. For these reasons, I had grown quite suspicious and held a very open mind
on Holocaust matters as I eventually began reading books on both sides of the
issue in the wake of the Reasoncontroversy. The Future of Holocaust Denial For many years following the end of World War II very little seems to
have been written about the momentous topic now known as the Holocaust. But from
the 1960s onward, interest surged so enormously that many thousands or even tens
of thousands of volumes on that once-ignored event have been produced. Therefore,
the fifteen or twenty books that I have personally read is merely a sliver of that total. I have invested only a few weeks of reading
and research in studying this large and complex subject, and my knowledge is
obviously dwarfed by that of the considerable number of individuals who have devoted many years or decades of their lives to such activity. For these reasons, the analysis I have presented above must surely contain
numerous gaping errors that others could easily correct. But sometimes a newcomer
may notice things that deeply-involved professionals might normally miss, and
may also better understand the perspectives of those who have likewise never paid much attention to the subject. Any conclusions I
have drawn are obviously preliminary ones, and the weight others should attach
to these must absolutely reflect my strictly amateur status. However, as an outsider exploring this contentious topic I think it far
more likely than not that the standard Holocaust narrative is at least substantially
false, and quite possibly, almost entirely so.
Despite this situation, the powerful media focus in support of the Holocaust over
the last few decades has elevated it to a central position in Western culture.
I wouldn’t be surprised if it currently occupies a larger place in the minds
of most ordinary folk than does the Second World War that encompassed it, and therefore possesses greater apparent reality. However, some forms
of shared beliefs may be a mile wide but an inch deep, and the casual assumptions of individuals who have never actually investigated a given subject may rapidly change. Also, the popular strength of doctrines
that have long been maintained in place by severe social and economic sanctions,
often coupled by criminal ones, may possibly be much weaker than anyone realizes. Until thirty years
ago, Communist rule over the USSR and its Warsaw Pact allies seemed absolutely permanent and unshakeable, but the roots of that belief had totally rotted away, leaving behind nothing more than a hollow facade. Then one day, a gust
of wind came along, and the entire gigantic structure collapsed. I wouldn’t be surprised if our current Holocaust narrative eventually suffers that same fate, perhaps with unfortunate consequences for those
too closely associated with having maintained it. Related Readings: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________-
Rezeptionsgeschichte, or “history of reception,” has been a significant
concept in German literary studies in recent decades. This notion can well be
extended to other lines of investigation, including the study of the documents on which political and social history is based, in conjunction with such approaches as textual analysis and criticism. In the present
instance, the narratives left by the SS officer Kurt Gerstein after his death
in 1945 have served for almost half a century as the chief evidence for the existence
of “death-camps” at Belzec and Treblinka (and to a lesser extent Sobibor and Majdanek) in Poland, at which many millions of Jews are said to have been gassed or otherwise exterminated. In this French doctoral thesis, Henri Roques examines critically the Gerstein texts themselves, their internal consistency,
their conformity to what is known from other sources, and the history of their
reception down the decades (of which the story of Roques’ thesis itself forms a part). In so doing, Roques thoroughly demolishes the credibility of Gerstein’s affirmations and hence of the existence
of any extermination programs at these locations.
______________________________________________________ Holocaust Revisionism Articles Redux
The Anne Frank Diary Fraud
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=4297 Anne
Frank’s Diary – Some Honest Questions http://rense.com/general65/aan.htm As
Many as 90% of Those Claiming to Be Holocaust Survivors May Be Frauds http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/11/13/gordon-duff-who-speaks-up-for-holocaust-survivors/ Australian
Man’s Holocaust Story Labelled a ‘Lie’ http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/83898/australian-mans-holocaust-story-labelled-a-lie%E2%80%99 Brighton
Beach Holocaust Fund Scammer Jailed for Neary Two Years http://www.sheepsheadbites.com/2013/06/dora-grande-brighton-beach-holocaust-scam/ Documentary
Photographs Proving the National Socialist Persecution of the Jews? http://codoh.com/library/document/924 Fraudster
Gets Eight Years in $57 Million Holocaust Scheme http://nypost.com/2013/11/04/fraudster-gets-8-years-in-57m-holocaust-scheme/ Holocaust
Propaganda Photographs http://www.whale.to/b/holocaust_prop_p.html Holocaust
Trauma Affects Grandchildren of Survivors http://www.haaretz.com/news/study-holocaust-trauma-affects-grandchildren-of-survivors-1.230984 How
Britain Tortured Nazi PoW’s http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223831/How-Britain-tortured-Nazi-PoWs-The-horrifying-interrogation-methods-belie-proud-boast-fought-clean-war.html – How the British Obtained the Confessions of Rudolf
Höss http://rense.com/general68/hoss.htm The
Illustrated Auschwitz Lie http://www.cwporter.com/bild1.htm http://www.cwporter.com/bild2.htm Jewish
Soap http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/soap.shtml A
Prominent False Witness: Elie Wiesel http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/wiesel.shtml Made
in Russia: The Holocaust http://www.cwporter.com/partone.htm http://www.cwporter.com/parttwo.htm http://www.cwporter.com/partthre.htm Money
Running Out for Needy Holocaust Survivors http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/new_york/money_running_out_needy_holocaust_survivors Moshe
Peer’s Astounding Holy Shoah Tale http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.ca/2010/04/moshe-peers-astounding-holy-shoah-tale.html – The Most Famous Holocaust Photo a Fraud
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.se/2013/01/the-most-famous-holocaust-photo-fraud.html?zx=fc280ca0f74bce8f The
Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust http://www.patriot.dk/nurnberg1.html http://www.patriot.dk/nurnberg2.html Nuremberg
Trial Proceedings Volume 1 Article 19 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art19 >The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible
extent expeditious and nontechnical procedure, and
shall admit any evidence which it deems to be of probative value. Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 1 Article
21 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art21 >The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof.
It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental
documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes,
and of records and findings of military or other Tribunals of
any of the United Nations. The Origin of the ’6 Million Jews’ Figure http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/07/origin-of-6-million-jews-figure.html#!/2012/07/origin-of-6-million-jews-figure.html Photo
Manipulations in the USSR http://englishrussia.com/2012/09/06/photo-manipulations-in-the-ussr/ The
“Six Million” Myth http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=24369 Soap
Story http://whale.to/b/soap_story.html Test
Your Holocaust Knowledge http://12bytes.org/articles/rescuing-israel-the-holocaust-index/test-your-holocaust-knowledge Zyklon-B
and the German Delousing Chambers http://www.nazigassings.com/zyklondelousing.html —————————————————————————————————————————————
02) Holocaust Revisionism Documentaries and Videos
Auschwitz – Why the Gas Chambers
are a Myth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-Kl6RHKIQk Buchenwald
a Dumb Dumb Portrayal of Evil https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HlPcaP9x5o David
Irving The Holocaust Truth, The Whole Truth ~ And Nothing but the Truth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcLzTlfJNB4 David
Stein on the Holocaust http://vimeo.com/90965591 Ernst
Zundel – Holocaust Debunked https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp85rXHDJCo Zundel
vs. Zionist – Truth vs. Lies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5Myxi92m4U The
Holocaust Big Lie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijaFu5LjKAY Holocaust
Faker Explains Himself https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j30sWIOMIak The
Holocaust Lie by David Irving https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk Holocaust
Revisionism: The Truth by Thomas Dalton, PhD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Li4o4JCW0To The
Holocaust Testimonies You Didn’t Hear https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtlPlZGvgY0 Holocaust
Hoax Exposed! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Haev1hExU2g – Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax, The http://trutube.tv/video/21170/The-Jewish-Gas-Chamber-Hoax-A-New-Film-By-Holocaust-Debunker-Eric-Hunt Made
in Russia: The Holocaust – Carlos W. Porter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWJRBbCYjp8 The
Montel Williams Show – David Cole and Mark Weber https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jx9G4zmpKv0 Nazi
Shrunken Heads https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eowsbXrBhig One-Third
of the Holocaust https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dxsVSzL4HE Six
Million Jews 1915-1938 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dda-0Q_XUhk Sylvia
Stolz – Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting Evidence in the Zundel Trial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJY5cBxmdw Spielberg’s
Hoax – The Last Days of the Big Lie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80GgRWuXcO8 The
Phil Donahue Show – Holocaust Denial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRrP7AevKi4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOfZu7lu7So https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAQ16VVmv60 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czDx-7nl28s The
Truth Behind the Gates of Auschwitz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWCOjOj4RAU The
Truth is No Defense http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5b4_1256669095 Understanding
the Holocaust as a Legend https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cl3JSLCmO5Q —————————————————————————————————————————————
03) Holocaust Revisionism Websites
Committee
for Open Debate on the Holocaust http://www.codoh.com/ Committee
for Open Debate on the Holocaust – Holocaust Revisionism Books http://codoh.com/library/categories/1160 Exposing
the Holocaust™ Hoax http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.com/ Historical
Revisionism http://www.vho.org/ Holocaust
Handbooks & Movies http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/ The
Holocaust Historiography Project http://www.historiography-project.com/ Institute
for Historical Review http://www.ihr.org/ Historical
Revisionism http://vho.org/ Historical
Revisionism – Holocaust Revisionism Books http://vho.org/dl/ENG.html Nazi
Gassings http://www.nazigassings.com/ Revisionists http://www.revisionists.com/ Shoah
Blogger https://shoabloger.wordpress.com/ Spielberg’s
Hoax https://sites.google.com/site/spielbergshoax/ Zundelsite http://zundelsite.org/
______________________________________________________________ List of Holocaust Lie films - Incessant Propaganda
1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The
Holocaust as Myth: Betraying the Public Trust By John Weir
As a school of historical research and writing, revisionism
has been around probably as long as people have been writing history. The
idea is history has importance beyond the simple recording of events. Political interests push to shape the record of what happened to place those in power in the best light. It is
therefore possible to deduce who has power by looking
at how they are portrayed in popular history. Popular history is not necessarily accurate. The 20th Century
industrialist, Henry Ford has been quoted as having said "History is more or less bunk". While before him, Napoleon Bonaparte said "History is the version of past events
that people have decided to agree upon." So,
history is more than an objective record of events. History is myth. In this context, myth doesn’t necessarily mean
a fiction. Myth can be true. In fact,
it is better that way because the purpose of myth is explain and illustrate a deeper, underlying lesson about the world around us, and our place in it. History can
therefore be a used as means for a deeper understanding of the human condition since the laws of nature and human behavior remain constant. History as myth is a tool through which the distillation
of universals truths can be achieved. If
the model is false, the lessons from it will also be false. When the recording of events is warped to support political goals, the only lesson to be learned
is not to trust either history or those who write it. This is where historical revisionism makes itself useful. As new facts are discovered and old information
is reevaluated, new interpretations
replace the old. The idea is revisionist history is more accurate history because research uncovers what was previously lost, hidden, or suppressed. Those served by the
old interpretations, therefore, see
revisionism as a threat and attack revisionists - branding them as liars with evil motives. There is no question that the Holocaust is a myth. It is the founding
myth of the rogue state of Israel. Oswald Spengler, the German philosopher, believed civilizations are super organisms that form around a central myth. The Nazi writer,
Alfred Rosenberg wrote The
Myth of the Twentieth Century in the hope it would become the myth for a new Germany. Ironically, Nazi Germany provided a myth for Israel instead. Additionally,
Zionists commonly promote the idea that
there are lessons to be learned from the Holocaust. So, like other fables, or parables, the Holocaust is supposed to have something to teach those who take time to study
it.
The major lesson for Jews is one
of a paranoid view of world. The Holocaust has become a metaphor for modern Jewish identity. It is just one in a long list of events where Jewish existence was threatened.
It is commonly said that Jewish holidays
can be described as "They tried to kill us. They failed. Let’s eat!" This is an attitude that predates Nazi
Germany, but is reinforced by the
story of the Nazi extermination. Fear is a powerful motivator. Zionists exploit and encourage the belief that Jews are a besieged people in a hostile world while offering
the refuge of the Zionist homeland as the only chance for survival. The bogey-man specter of an ascendant anti-Semitism is repeatedly raised to try to get Jews
to move to Zionist Israel. There is
always another Hitler out there desirous of finishing what the first one failed to do, so the only safe place for Jews is Israel. The fact that the German image suffers from this situation is purely
circumstantial. The Holocaust myth and Jewish identity require an antagonist. Hitler is one who has been preserved on celluloid. He can be to be trotted out,
with appropriate narration, any time
a particular popular mood needs to be created. For the most part, it is those outside Germany who are being influenced, but Germans too are manipulated by continuous
W.W. II agitprop. The libertarian
economics writer, Gary North recently observed: "When people feel guilty, they are more likely to let the state tax
them and spend the money to make things
better . . . for the state." Though he made this statement in another context, it gives us a clue as to what the German state gets out of its enforcement
of the Holocaust myth, and perpetual
apologizing for twelve years in the last century. The
utility of the Holocaust fable goes beyond Jewish mental conditioning, or Zionist and German state interests. Nazi Germany also plays a prominent role in American
domestic politics. Nazi Germany is always the example given for why U.S. foreign policy has to be aggressive. As Anti-War.com columnist Justin Raimondo recently wrote:
" The neocons, with their Churchillian pretensions, like to pretend it is 1938 all over again: any negotiation is a reenactment of Munich, and the goal is nothing
less than unconditional surrender." Up until December 1941, the American people did not support participation in a foreign war, and especially not after
the disaster of World War I. The
foreign policy the vast majority of the American people supported was the same as that of President John Q. Adams who in 1821 wrote that America " goes not abroad,
in search of monsters to destroy." Since the end of W.W.II, however, that attitude has been altered by a uniformly pro-war mass media. In repudiation of
Adams, Hitler’s Nazi Germany has
been made the prototypical monster America needs to go abroad to destroy. Going abroad in search of monsters to destroy is now the American way. This should be no surprise to anyone. It is the nature
of government to gather power to itself at the price of the liberty of those it claims to rule. America is no exception to this behavior. The most common way
government does this is by promising
security in exchange for its new authority. People don’t need security if there is no threat to their safety. Government,
always desirous to steal what others
have, will manufacture a threat to encourage acceptance of loss of liberty among the governed. German Reichsmarshall Hermann Goering, while in captivity after the death
of Germany as a country stated: "Of course the people don't want war. But after all,
it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter
to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you
have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack
of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." Threats that are imaginary,
real, and manufactured all serve the same purpose in promoting group cohesion and herd behavior. The group can be ethnic, religious, or political. It doesn’t matter
because people behave the same when
they believe they are in danger. Belief influences and governs human behavior: It dictates how people behave in the situations they encounter in their lives. As noted before, the Holocaust is a myth. It is a belief
that is used to influence the behavior of
Jews and Gentiles alike. The two major emotions it is design to evoke are fear and guilt. Whether the myth is historically or factually accurate is beside the
point. The Holocaust is used in this manner by both church and state to manipulate people and tie this fable to some of the most powerful human emotions. This is what Holocaust revisionists find themselves
confronting. Often, revisionists are compared to "flat-Earthers" in the corporate media. If such people actually exist, the comparison is only valid
in that the belief in the Holocaust is
as fundamental to the way the Earth is shaped to many people. The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief even in people who know very little about it. We can see that
not only does disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern Jewish identity as shaped by political Zionism, but for others it brings into question the credibility
of those in authority who told everyone
it was true: the state, the churches, the schools, and media of every kind. These sources are the same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If
these trusted authorities are wrong about
the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other dishonesties are they promoting? Several
people who no longer believe the Holocaust story have told me that when they first discovered revisionist literature they at first felt guilty reading it. This
is testimony to the nature of the emotional conditioning nearly everyone in America has undergone in relation to the Holocaust myth. It takes courage to test
a belief – particularly one connected to many important, authoritative social, religious, and political institutions – and find it flawed. It is not easy, but - as Robert Frost wrote about
the road not taken – it has made all the difference. What people need to realize is these institutions operate on lies. The Holocaust story is only one example
of many. The lie is their stock in
trade. They use lies on a credulous public to their advantage. The problem is not who is in power. The problem is systemic. In his 1891 book, Thus Spake Zarathustra,
Friedrich Nietzsche wrote: "A state, is called the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly lieth it also; and this lie creepeth from its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'"
It is a lie! Creators were they who created peoples, and hung a faith and a love over them: thus they served life.
Destroyers, are they who lay snares for many, and call it the state: they hang a sword and a hundred cravings over them.
Where there is still a people, there the state is not understood,
but hated as the evil eye, and as sin against laws
and customs. This sign I give unto you: every people
speaketh its language of good and evil: this its
neighbour understandeth not. Its language hath it devised for itself in laws and customs. But the state lieth in all languages of good and evil; and whatever it saith it lieth; and whatever it hath it hath stolen. False is everything in it; with stolen teeth it biteth, the biting one. False are even its bowels." Since revisionists have been inept at getting the mass of people to believe the obvious
or even test their beliefs by taking
the time to examine what revisionists have to say, I feel only pity for those sitting back hoping revisionists free them from the guilt and fear inducing story of the
Holocaust which is warping culture, religion, and politics today. Germans do not deserve the destruction heaped upon them during the war or the burden of guilt
draped upon them for twelve years
of Nazi government. A dozen years in the first half of the last century does not constitute the bulk of German history.
Nor does it define the German character.
Regrettably, for as long as people find government pronouncements credible despite that institutions long history of lying, Germans will have to suffer. The
suffering will continue for as long as
there is utility in this lie. In any case, with the long history of failure to make headway in expanding the acceptance of revisionist research, a re-examination of methods
and tactics used by revisionists is long overdue. As the saying goes, repetition of actions with the expectation of a different outcome is sign of insanity. Or
"If you do what you always did
you get what you always got." If they want greater success, revisionist will have do what they do differently. Holocaust revisionism, for the time being, will have
to be a personal vision quest. Each of us will have to take the journey from belief to disbelief alone. Germans, Jews, Americans, everyone! Revisionists are
not going to force governments, or
anyone dining out on the Holocaust story, to admit the Holocaust is, in most of its particulars, a lie. Salvation from this
emotional conditioning - this brain
washing – lies not in the power of revisionists, but within yourselves. The roadmap to freedom is on the internet. Revisionist websites are packed with the
tools break the mental chains that bind you to liars and thieves who have preyed upon your credulity for so long. Take them up. Freedom beckons. There is security in servitude, as the fable of the Wolf and the Dog illustrates. So, taking and keeping freedom always involves personal risk. The
choice ultimately is a very personal one. There is no question that the Holocaust is used for political purposes
by a wide range of governments and other institutions. It is not simply another historical event like invention of the telephone or the light bulb, or the
relocation of the French from Canada
to Louisiana. Unlike these events, it is being used to influence behavior. Belief in it is enforced by law in a growing number of countries. There is also no question that the Holocaust myth,
in most of its essential claims, is a fiction. The evidence is piled and heaped on shelves all around me. It inhabits my computer hard drive. The research
is scattered in a growing number of
places on the Internet and in a growing number of languages. The facts lie in archives, libraries, and in rotting Nazi concentration camps. If you are satisfied with what
you believe, then don’t fear testing it with new information. If you are dissatisfied, start reading and build a better model of the world around you.
The Germans were perfect Gentlemen when compared to the JEW Controlled Allies, especially
the Bolshevik Russians .... Crucifying
German Women: The Testimony of Captain Hermann Sommer A number of troop companies reported
to the fortress commander [at Königsberg] the discovery of several mounds of corpses situated quite close
to one another. (Renegade Tribune) The
commander, General Lasch, ordered a commission to investigate these discoveries. The commission reported that
many similar piles of bodies were strewn throughout the area; but in two cases there were virtual mountains of
bodies made up of ca. 3,000 women, girls, children and only a few men. A special commission of doctors, forensic investigators and foreign
journalists was formed to establish identities and the circumstances of the deaths. The work was made difficult
by the fact that the Russians had poured gasoline on the mounds of bodies and attempted to burn them. Nevertheless
many of the dead were photographed. The pictures graphically showed the often savage circustances under which these
people had been murdered. On the basis of these pictures and of reports made by the forensics team, the conclusion
was drawn that the victims had been beaten and stabbed; in very few cases were persons killed by a shot to the
base of the skull. A large number of bodies had the breasts cut off, the genitals stabbed through and were disemboweled.
The testimonies of witnesses, who had survived the raping and other physical abuse by the Russians, along with
the photographs, are on file in my department. They were used by the security officers and officials of the criminal
police to interrogate prisoners of war brought back from the Eastern Front; and to question civilians in the attempt
to establish the identities of the victims.
I made my own observations when I was sent to Metgethen on official business
on February 27, 1945. Just on the outskirts of town near the first railway crossing, I turned my motorcycle into
a gravel driveway so that I could look over a building and see if it was suitable for service use. Behind the
building I suddenly came upon the bodies of 12 women and six children. Most of the children had been killed by
a blow to the head with a blunt instrument, some had numerous bayonet wounds in their tiny bodies. The women,
mostly between 40 and 60 years of age, had been killed with knife or bayonet. All of them bore the unmistakable
black-and-blue marks of beatings. After the first Soviet blockade had been completely smashed, I was ordered on February
28, 1945, to report to a unit of the 4th Army. On my way, I stopped for a rest in the village of Gross Heydekrug.
I had arrived just as medics and civilians were burying some 35 mostly female bodies. Here again I saw the gruesome
mistreatment practiced by the Russians, all shown to me by indignant soldiers and civilians. Most of the victims
were again women. A corporal told me of a church where a girl and two soldiers had been found. The girl had been
actually crucified on the altar cross, the two soldiers strung up on either side. Farther into the village I saw
civilian bodies lying everywhere, as far as the highway crossing to Powayen. While most of the men had been shot in
the base of the skull, the women were completely naked, raped and then killed in the most brutal way with stab wounds
or rifle butt blows to the head. At the highway crossing to Powayen stood a Soviet tank which had been dragging
the now-dead bodies of four naked women behind it. A commission was already there taking photographs of the scene. Alfred-Maurice
de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans, 1944-1950 (New York: St. Martin’s
Press, 1994), pp. 40-41. Karl
Potrek, a civilian from the capital city of Königsberg, had been recruited into the Volksturm and hurriedly
sent as reinforcement to the area of Gumbinnen and Nemmersdorf. He later reported: At the edge of town, on the left
side of the road, stands the large inn ‘Weisser Krug’ … In the farmyard further down the road
stood a cart, to which four naked women were nailed through their hands in a cruciform position. Behind the Weisser
Krug towards Gumbinnen is a square with a monument to the Unknown Soldier. Beyond is another large inn, ‘Roter
Krug’. Near it, parallel to the road, stood a barn and to each of its two doors a naked woman was nailed through
the hands, in a crucified posture. In the dwellings, we found a total of seventy-two women, including children, and
one old man, 74, all dead … all murdered in a bestial manner, except only for a few who had bullet holes
in their necks. Some babies had their heads bashed in. In one room we found a woman, 84 years old, sitting on a
sofa … half of whose head had been sheared off with an axe or a spade … Not a “war
crime”: German boy and girl, murdered at Nemmersdorf by gallant Soviet liberators. Both the Simon Wiesenthal
Center and the Washington Holocaust Memorial Museum, with characteristic Judeocentrism, honor the Red Army in World
War II as “heroes” for releasing Jews from their internment in German concentration camps. We carried the corpses to the village cemetary where they lay to await a foreign
medical commission … In the meantime, a nurse from Insterburg came, a native of Nemmersdorf, who looked for her parents.
Among the corpses were her mother, 72, and her father, 74, the only man among the dead. She also established that
all the dead were Nemmersdorfers. On the fourth day the bodies were buried in two graves. Only on the following
day did the medical commission arrive, and the tombs had to be reopened. Barn doors were set on blocks on which
to lay the bodies so that the commission could examine them. This foreign commission unanimously established that
all the women, as well as the girls from eight to twelve years and even the woman of 84 years had been raped.
After the examination by the commission, the bodies were again buried. Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, Nemesis at Potsdam: The Expulsion
of the Germans from the East, 3rd edn (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1988), pp. 63-64. For reasons best explained by a psychologist,
one of the aberrations practiced by the [Soviet] soldiers was to take victims, mostly female, strip them naked
and nail them to barn doors in cruciform fashion. This one particular atrocity features prominently in many eyewitness
reports. Alfred-Maurice
de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans, 1944-1950 (New York: St. Martin’s
Press, 1994), p. 42. Flags
will hang in the Holocaust Museum to honor the millions of Soviet soldiers who drove Nazi forces westward and
who were the first allied forces to liberate and publicize the existence of the camps … Much more than simply
wartime memorabilia, these military artifacts are a significant contribution to memory, one that will remind future
generations of the pivotal role Soviet forces played in defeating Nazism. “Russian Embassy Presents Flags of Liberating Units to Museum,” U.S. Holocaust Memorial
Museum Newsletter, Fall 1992, p. 6.
______________________________________________________________ Bobby Fischer, Grand Master of Revisionism
The World Champion Could Always
Figure out His Opponent's Game
Chess Prodigy Robert James “Bobby” Fischer
began playing chess at Age Six when his mother Regina bought him a chess set at a candy store. Fischer and his older sister
Joan learned the rules from the enclosed manual. Bobby and his sister began playing with each other, but Joan soon wasn’t
a match for Bobby.[i]
Fischer’s potential was discovered by Carmine Nigro, the newly elected president of the Brooklyn Chess Club. Although
seven-year-old Bobby lost his first exhibition game with a local chess master, Nigro was impressed with the sensible moves
Bobby made in the game. Nigro approached Regina and Bobby after the game and invited Bobby to join the Brooklyn Chess Club.
Bobby became a regular member of the club, and Nigro, an expert player of near master strength, became Bobby’s first
tutor and mentor.[ii]
Bobby was a dedicated chess student with an insatiable desire to read chess literature. One chess master said of him: “Bobby
virtually inhaled chess literature. He remembered everything and it became a part of him.”[iii]
Bobby at Age 12 became the youngest member in the history of the Manhattan Chess Club. The Manhattan Chess Club was the strongest
chess club in the country, and afforded Bobby the opportunity to play chess 12 hours a day, seven days a week. Bobby would
play as many as 100 speed games a day. With additional tutoring from Jack Collins, one of the great teachers of chess, Fischer
at age 13 became the youngest American ever to achieve the ranking of chess master.[iv]
Fischer became the United States Chess Champion at age 14[v], eventually winning the U.S. title a total of eight times. In December 1963, Fischer won every game in the U.S. Chess Championship
against 11 of the highest-ranked players in the country. It was an awesome performance; Fischer had proven himself to be
in a different league. Everyone realized that Fischer posed a threat to Soviet supremacy in chess, and the world buzzed
in anticipation of his future performances.[vi] World Champion American
Chess Grandmaster Pal Benkö generously gave Fischer the opportunity to play for the 1972 World Chess Championship. Benkö
explains:
It was like this: Fischer did not play in the American championship because of some quarrel. That automatically meant that
he could not play in the interzonal tournament in Palma de Mallorca. The winner of that tournament had the possibility through
all kinds of matches to challenge the world champion in the end. I ceded my place to him because I thought he had a better
chance. That turned out to be correct. He won in Mallorca and after that beat Taimanov, Larsen and Petrosian and finally
had the right to play against Spassky.[vii]
Fischer still almost did not make it to Reykjavik, Iceland to challenge Soviet chess grandmaster Boris Spassky for the World
Chess Championship. A call from U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and additional prize money from millionaire businessman
James Slater were factors that finally persuaded Fischer to make the trip.[viii]
Even with Fischer in Iceland the championship almost did not take place. Fischer forfeited the second game and continued
to make incessant demands of tournament officials. The joke making the rounds in Reykjavik was that Fischer had demanded
the setting of the sun three hours earlier. Fortunately, Boris Spassky was a gentleman and true sportsman throughout the
match. Spassky capitulated to most of Fischer’s demands and allowed the match to continue.[ix]
American Chess Grandmaster Isaac Kashdan stated: “In a contest for the nicest guy in chess, Bobby Fischer would finish
out of the money. But he is definitely the best chess player in the world.” Fischer won the World Chess Championship
by a 12 ½ to 8 ½ margin over Spassky.[x] Spassky and Fischer became lifelong friends after their match.[xi]
Fischer returned to New York City two weeks after his win to a hero’s welcome. Mayor John Lindsay saluted Fischer as
“the grandest master of them all” and Fischer was offered the key to the city. The celebrations found Fischer
in a relaxed state of mind. Fischer was eager to sign autographs and even made a joke during his speech. There was a widespread
consensus that Fischer would soon enter the multi-millionaires’ club. The future of world championship chess seemed
assured.[xii] Retirement Attractive
financial offers were made to Bobby Fischer after he won the World Chess Championship. However, except for a relatively
modest offer to be the guest of honor at the First Philippine International Chess Tournament in 1973, Fischer turned them
all down.[xiii] Fischer also refused to play competitive chess for the next 20 years.
So what did Fischer do with his free time? Fischer
biographer Frank Brady writes:
Many people who haven’t been formally educated awaken later in life
with a desire to progress and deepen their view of the world, to go back to school or self-educate themselves. Bobby joined
their ranks out of an essential self-awareness…
Bobby’s lack of traditional institutional education was well known and continually reported in the press, but what
wasn’t common knowledge was that after he won the World Championship at age 29, he began a systemized regimen of study
outside chess. History, government, religion, politics, and current events became his great interests, and during the 33-year
interval from his first Reykjavik stay to his second he spent most of his spare time reading and amassing knowledge.[xiv]
Fischer began to develop politically incorrect ideas from his readings. Fischer read The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
and many other conspiracy books. He also became convinced that the so-called Holocaust was a major fraud. Fischer’s
Jewish mother Regina wrote him stating that Nazi Germany had murdered children like vermin in homicidal gas chambers. Fischer,
however, remained an outspoken critic of the Holocaust story.[xv]
Fischer would even tell first-time acquaintances that the Holocaust was a hoax. For example, Dutch Chess Grandmaster Jan
Timman writes about his only meeting with Bobby Fischer in 1990 in Brussels: “It was inevitable that the conversation
would touch on the Holocaust. ‘It is a hoax,’ he said very softly, almost mumbling.”[xvi]
Fischer had been embraced as the prodigal son by the Worldwide Church of God after winning the World Chess Championship.
However, Fischer left the church, stating in 1977: “They cleaned out my pockets. Now my only income is a few royalty
checks from my books. I was really very foolish.”[xvii]
Fischer eventually found a way to make money by agreeing to a rematch with Boris Spassky in 1992. Fischer Returns to Chess The Fischer rematch with Spassky took place
in war-ravaged Yugoslavia. Fischer received a letter from the U.S. Department of the Treasury 10 days before the match began
stating that as a U.S. citizen he would be prohibited from playing the match under Executive Order 12810. Violations of
this Executive Order would be punishable by civil and criminal penalties and up to 10 years in prison.[xviii]
Fischer despised the U.S. government and disregarded the Treasury Department’s letter. In a press conference held the
night before the match, Fischer was asked: “Are you worried by U.S. government threats over your defiance of the sanctions?”
Fischer responded: One second here. [He then removed a letter from his briefcase and held it up.] This
is the order to provide information of illegal activities, from the Department of the Treasury in Washington, D.C., August
21, 1992. So this is my reply to their order not to defend my title here. [He then spat on the letter, and applause broke
out.] That is my answer.[xix]
Fischer continued to make controversial statements during the press conference. When asked about Communism, he said, “Soviet
Communism is basically a mask for Bolshevism which is a mask for Judaism.” Denying that he was an anti-Semite, Fischer
responded that Arabs were Semites too, “And I am definitely not anti-Arab.”[xx]
The chess match was somewhat anticlimactic, with Fischer beating Spassky and collecting the winner’s prize of $3.5
million. After receiving the money due him, Fischer’s sister took most of the money and opened an account in Fischer’s
name at the Union Bank of Switzerland. On December 15, 1992, an indictment was issued against Bobby Fischer in federal court
by a grand jury for violating Executive Order 12810. U.S. federal officials issued a warrant for his arrest.[xxi] Exile Fischer spent
most of the next eight years in Hungary. He was the frequent guest of Laszlo Polgar and his three outstanding chess-playing
daughters, Zsuzsa, Zsofia and Judit Polgar. While the Polgars all enjoyed playing and analyzing chess with Fischer, they
eventually grew tired of his Holocaust revisionism and strong statements against the United States government. After a few
years they went their separate ways.[xxii]
Fischer was also the frequent guest in Budapest of Chess Grandmaster Andrei Lilienthal and his wife Olga. Listening to Lilienthal
was like reading a book of chess history, and Fischer greatly enjoyed being with these genial hosts. However, after a few
years a couple of unfortunate incidents ruined their friendship.[xxiii]
The loss of friends never prevented Fischer from expressing his views. Fischer once refused to allow a Jewish chess player
to enter his car until the man was willing to proclaim that the Holocaust was fraudulent. On January 13, 1999, during a
live radio broadcast in Budapest, Fischer declared, “As Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf , the Jews are not
the victims, they are the victimizers!”[xxiv]
Fischer eventually felt safe enough to travel to many countries. While living in Tokyo he was called by Radio Baguio in the
Philippines shortly after the 9/11 attacks in the United States. Fischer later said about this 9/11 interview: “I
was tricked.” Fischer was not in a stable condition when the Filipino radio station phoned him, and they knew what
to expect from him.[xxv]
In a profanity-laced tirade, Fischer said among other things that the World Trade Center attacks were wonderful news and
he wanted the United States to be wiped out.[xxvi] Although aired over a small station in Baguio City, his interview went viral over the Internet. Numerous letters were sent
to the White House and the Justice Department demanding Fischer’s arrest; many of these letters stated that Fischer’s
arrest was long overdue.[xxvii] Final Years
Bobby Fischer was arrested on July 13, 2004, when he went to an airport in Tokyo to board a plane bound for Manila. He was
shackled and sent to a local jail. Several people formed a committee called “Free Bobby Fischer” and worked
with others attempting to free Fischer from prison. Fischer and his supporters began contacting numerous countries to determine
if they would offer him asylum. Iceland was the only country that expressed an interest. The Icelanders not only had the
ability to offer Fischer asylum, but also to secure it and extricate him from prison.[xxviii]
The process to free Fischer advanced slowly. Boris Spassky sent the following telegram to an Icelandic official near the
end of 2004:
Now when the whole chess world is cowardly silent, Icelandic people made a natural and brave move to help Bobby. Congratulations.
And my applause! If you need my assistance or help, please let me know. I will join with great pleasure the group of brave
Icelandic people. I take the opportunity to wish you all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.[xxix]
Bobby Fischer was granted Icelandic citizenship on March 21, 2005, by a special measure of the Icelandic parliament. No one
in the Icelandic parliament opposed the measure.[xxx] On March 23, 2005, Fischer was released from jail, given his Icelandic passport, and flew to Iceland. Fischer was now in
a country that truly wanted him, and for the first time in 13 years he felt safe.[xxxi]
Fischer lived out his final years in Iceland. He spent most of his time reading, and eventually became bored living on the
small island. Fischer died from kidney failure on January 17, 2008.[xxxii] Conclusion Russian Chess
Grandmaster Garry Kasparov pays tribute to Bobby Fischer: There are few names in the history of sport that
have transcended the earthly title of world champion and become legend. Fewer still have achieved this while active, or
while still living for that matter. Bobby Fischer was a member of this select group. He possessed an aura beyond chess and
personality, beyond even his status as a symbol of Cold War confrontation…
Today we have books and databases full of his games, but the best annotations cannot transmit the pressure his opponents
must have felt at the board. Over and over in Fischer’s games you see the strongest players in the world crack, often
making mistakes you wouldn’t believe them capable of making—against anyone but Fischer…Despite his short
reign, he dominated his era to such a degree that it will always bear his name… Fischer’s legacy extends well beyond the 64 squares. Throughout his career
he was, in the excellent phrase of Spassky’s, “the honorary chairman of our trade union.” He believed our
game and its players deserved far better treatment than it received, and he got results. His demands, often criticized as
outrageous at the time, led to better conditions and prizes for all.[xxxiii]
Bobby Fischer was widely criticized for his controversial statements outside of chess. For example, Dick and Jeremy Schaap
questioned Fischer’s sanity, while Charles Krauthammer wrote that “he’s clearly a sick man.”[xxxiv] However, it would be more accurate to state that Fischer used his prodigious intellect to read widely and deeply to discover
many of the lies that pervade our society. His exposure of the Holocaust hoax is especially praiseworthy. Bobby Fischer
was truly an authentic American hero.
Endnotes
[i] Böhm, Hans and Jongkind, Kees, Bobby Fischer: The Wandering King, London: B T Batsford, 2004, p. 25.
[ii] Brady, Frank, Endgame: Bobby Fischer’s Rise and Fall—from America’s Brightest Prodigy to the Edge of
Madness, New York: Crown Publishers, 2011, pp. 18, 20-21. [iv] Ibid., pp. 39, 42, 50-52, 55. [vi] Edmonds, David and Eidinow, John, Bobby Fischer Goes to War, London: Faber and Faber Limited, 2004, pp. 13-14.
[vii] Böhm, Hans et al., op. cit., p. 40. [viii] Edmonds, David et al, op. cit., pp. 130-132. [ix] Ibid., pp. 158-159, 170-171. [xi] Olafsson, Helgi, Bobby Fischer Comes Home, The Netherlands: New in Chess, 2012, pp. 75-76. [xii] Edmonds, David et al., op. cit., pp. 259-260. [xiii] Brady, Frank, op. cit., pp. 207-209. [xvi] Euwe, Max and Timman, Jan, Fischer World Champion!, 3rd edition, Alkmaar, The Netherlands: New in Chess,
2009, p. 19. [xvii] Böhm, Hans and Jongkind, Kees, Bobby Fischer: The Wandering King, London: B T Batsford, 2004, p. 54.
[xviii] Brady, Frankop. cit., pp. 242-244. [xix] Ibid., pp. 247-248. [xxi] Ibid., pp. 253, 255. [xxii] Ibid., pp. 260-262, 265, 269. [xxv] Olafsson, Helgi, op. cit., p. 134. [xxvi] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkLE90jSCWU. [xxvii] Brady, Frank, op. cit., pp. 279-280. [xxix] Olafsson, Helgi, op. cit., p. 57. [xxxi] Brady, Frank, op. cit., pp. 293-294. [xxxii] Olafsson, Helgi, op. cit., pp. 109, 117. [xxxiii] Euwe, Max et al., op. cit., pp. 7, 10. [xxxiv] Olafsson, Helgi, op. cit., pp. 65, 130.
Some of the jews’ fantastical holohoax lies
Christian Responsibility to Truth ...
The day is surely coming when all the evidence showing that the Germans never exterminated six million Jews can no longer
be suppressed. Truth is not determined by majority vote ... There is no dispute over the fact that large numbers of Jews
were deported to concentration camps and ghettos, or that many Jews died or were killed during World War II ... Israel
is using the "fact" of the Holocaust as an excuse to kill Palestinians in Israel. This slaughter, together with
the anti-scriptural notions of the Israel-first Millennialists, almost all of whom believe in the Holocaust, could lead
to another bloody war.
NEW YORK — Walk along the
boardwalk on a late fall day, and Brighton Beach can seem like an old-age home by the sea, where stooped ladies wear rouge
like armor and almost everyone lives in the shadow of a difficult past. Along this Brooklyn outpost’s ocean edge — the heart of much community life
here — locals are talking about the betrayal they feel after the arrest of 17 people, mostly Brighton Beach residents,
accused of faking stories of Holocaust survival to profit from money meant for survivors of Nazi persecution. “I cannot imagine that someone would lie like that; it’s
a terrible crime,’’ says Klara Rakhlin, 72, her bright makeup stark against her black, coiffed hair as she speaks
in Russian. “I lost my family in a concentration camp, and it’s disgusting that people would get compensation
although they haven’t suffered.’’ Rakhlin was little more than a toddler in 1941, when she entered the Pechora concentration camp in what is now
Ukraine’s Vinnitsa region. By the time she left in 1944, she was school age. The arrests don’t close the books on the purported scheme. The organization in charge
of awarding the money continues to weed through hundreds more case files to see how much further deception may have spread.
Federal prosecutors said they have uncovered more than 5,500 fraudulent claims, many of them containing altered birth dates
and faked stories of suffering. Some
people — overwhelmingly residents of this neighborhood and elsewhere in Brooklyn — have received letters saying
they must either appeal or repay tens of thousands of dollars that the nonprofit group, the Conference on the Jewish Material
Claims Against Germany, believes were wrongly awarded. Already, more than 90 people have told the Claims Conference, as it is commonly known, that they intend to appeal
cancellation of their benefits. At least 35 more have returned the money or agreed to repay it on an installment plan. Still other recipients are getting letters telling them their
quarterly payments will be rationed out by the month, while the Claims Conference asks them to again detail their stories
of persecution and reevaluates their eligibility. Conference employees will work to find records that confirm each qualifying
story, said Greg Schneider, the organization’s executive vice president. “Ninety-nine percent of the cases are clear cases, and there’s no issue, and
we won’t be distracted from the fact that helping survivors is our core mission,’’ Schneider said of the
thousands of applications the group receives each year. Some community leaders worry that requesting more information from some recipients will again turn survivors into
victims. “They are making
survivors suffer even more. Why make them prove their status when they’ve gone through so much already?’’
said Pavel Vishnevetsky, director of the Council of Jewish Immigrant Community Organizations. But Schneider contends that writing a description of their ordeal
is not too onerous a task to ask of surivors. And the Nazis, he said, were meticulous record-keepers — often making
it possible to find a paper trail. If someone was on a train headed to a concentration camp, it was recorded. Those trapped
in ghettos or who disappeared into hiding can be harder to track down — but if nothing else, records involving someone
who witnessed their suffering can usually be found, he said. © Copyright 2010 Globe Newspaper
Company.
_______________________________________________________________ The ‘Ten Commandments’ of the ‘Holocaust Religion’
have been enunciated as follows: Thou shalt remember what Amalek (the Non-Jews) has done to thee. Thou shalt never compare THE HOLOCAUST
with any other Genocide. Thou shalt never compare the Nazi crimes with those of Israel.
Thou shalt never doubt the number of 6 million
Jewish victims. Thou shalt never doubt that the majority of them died in gas chambers. Thou shalt not doubt the central role
of SATAN Hitler in the extermination of the Jews. Thou shalt never doubt the right of Israel to exist as the Jewish state. Thou shalt not criticize the leading
Jewish organizations and the Israeli government. Thou must never criticize Jewish organizations and the Zionist leadership
for abandoning the European Jewry in the Nazi era Thou shalt take these commandments literally and never shew mercy to
them that doubt! So what if you question this Holocaust religion? There is an almost universal assumption that if you don’t believe in the Holocaust it
is not because you have an inquiring mind, it’s
because you are innately evil. The belief underlying the draconian legislation relating to Holocaust denial would seem to be that the Holocaust is only questioned by neonazis,
whose ‘denial’ is motivated
by hate and so they should be locked up before they contaminate anyone else. JEWISH HOLOHOAX "SCHOLAR" PUTS FOOT IN MOUTH... See
here: Forensic Evidence Of the Holocaust Must Be Preserved July 7, 2004
Ryback: Last month, Jarek Mensfelt, spokesman for the Auschwitz
memorial site, announced plans to preserve the ruins of the gas chambers and crematoria
in the notorious death camp at Birkenau near the Polish town of Oswiecim (Auschwitz). "This
is an attempt to keep it as it is now -- in ruins -- but not let the ruins go," he
said. "It was meant to be here forever as a warning." Analysis: So, Mr. Ryback,
both you and Mr. Mensfelt now admit that what you claim were "gas chambers ™ and crematoria"
now lie in ruins. That means the "gas chambers and crematoria" that are still being shown
to the teary-eyed tourists are Soviet-era "reconstructions" -- a fact that "Holocaust
Deniers" were once attacked for claiming. Thanks for confirming that for us in the Wall Street Urinal. Images 1 & 2 are of the Soviet-era
reconstruction of the "gas chambers" ™. Image 3 depicts the ruins of the what is said to the original "gas chambers".
Ryback and the Polish curators concede that what is shown to gullible tourists are NOT the actual "gas
chambers" ™. Ryback: In
the coming weeks, as the Auschwitz preservationists begin their work, they should be guided by the knowledge
that these heaps of dynamited concrete and twisted steel are not only historic artifacts but among
the few remnants of untainted, forensic evidence of the Holocaust. Analysis: How exactly do
these bombed-out remnants constitute "forensic evidence" of mass murdering gas chambers? Have
any traces of poisonous gas been detected in the stones? Ryback: Of course, the historical and
circumstantial evidence of a premeditated Nazi plan to exterminate the Jewish population of Europe
is overwhelming. Analysis:
Ah yes. The good ol' "the-evidence-is-overwhelming" rhetorical trick. Such a bold
statement may sway the weak-minded, but it proves nothing. Talk is cheap, as they say. My. Ryback,
could you please share with us this "overwhelming evidence" of a premeditated "Nazi" plan
to exterminate the Jewish population of Europe. Ryback: There
are the watch-tower-girded enclosures of Nazi concentration camps .... Analysis: "Watch-towers?" Well, duh!
They were internment camps, after all. No one is denying the Jewish internment of World War II. What
we want is evidence of a genocide campaign. Continue. Ryback: ...
and the extensive testimonials of Holocaust survivors..... Analysis: Yes, "testimonials"
which, as even some of your Jewish colleagues now openly admit, are often unreliable. Speaking of "testimonials,"
what do you have to say of the former Auschwitz inmates who later told of spirited soccer games and
fun activities for the children? If the
Germans were out to commit genocide, why were so many "survivors" allowed to live? Auschwitz
alone had 9,000 survivors when the Soviets arrived there. Yakov Tzur testimony, March 2009: "I
played soccer games at Auschwitz in 1944." (YouTube here) (Other camps had
actual Jewish soccer leagues.) Ryback:
.... as well as the court protocols of Nazi war criminals, Analysis:
So-called "Nazi war criminals" were tortured and the Nuremberg Trials were a joke. Those same
"court protocols" told of shrunken Jewish heads, and Jews being fashioned into lamp shades
and bars of soaps -- claims which all "Holocaust schollars" now admit were false. Ryback: .... but there is little forensic evidence proving homicidal
intent. Analysis:
Hold it! What did you just say??? Ryback: ...but there is little forensic evidence proving homicidal intent. Analysis: That's what I thought
you said. Thank you! After just having talked about "overwhelming evidence," now you say "there is little forensic evidence."
How can that be? Ryback: The Nazis were scrupulous
when it came to obscuring the "Final Solution" in bureaucratic euphemism and also dismantling
or obliterating their machinery of death. Analysis:
Yet they left the remains of the "gas chambers" ™ on the camp grounds along with 9,000
witnesses behind for the Soviets to interview. That doesn't sound like too "scrupulous" of
a cover up now, does it? Ryback: The dearth
of hard evidence .... Analysis: A "dearth (complete lack) of hard evidence."
Dearth is a very strong word. Thank you, Timmy. Thank you, thank you and thank you! Ryback:
... has fueled a growth industry in Holocaust-denial. Analysis: "Holocaust
Denial" ™ --- a silly slogan used to silence debate. In other
words, just because there is a "dearth of hard evidence," it is still wrong to question the
Holocaust. This is known as "circular logic." It is like a prosecutor saying to a jury:
"Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, do not let the 'dearth' of hard evidence influence your
verdict. The only reason why there is no hard evidence is because the defendant covered his tracks so well."
Absurd, to say
the least. But thanks just the same, Timmy, for conceding that hard evidence is totally lacking.
Open mouth, insert
foot: "The dearth of hard evidence." Thanks,Timmy! Ryback:
The revisionists' plaint is simple: They demand a proverbial "smoking gun"
to prove that the Nazis deliberately and systematically designed an industrial system of extermination.
Analysis: Well,
excuuuuuse us "anti-Semites" for being so impertinent as to simply ask for evidence
of this "industrial
system of extermination." But thanks for admitting that there is no "smoking gun" and
that you cannot prove your case. Ryback: Auschwitz has been a particular target
of Holocaust deniers -- in particular, the gas chamber in Auschwitz I, the original base camp a mile
east of Birkenau. It was here that some of the first experiments with poison gas were undertaken in
a converted air-raid shelter refitted with air-tight doors and special ducts for homicidal purposes.
Dynamited by the Nazis in the autumn of 1944, the gas chamber was reconstructed after
the war.
Analysis: Why did the "Nazis"
dynamite the "gas chamber?" Did they suddenly decide to stop "gassing" people? And thanks again for conceding that the current "gas chamber" is a
Soviet reconstruction -- a fake. Ryback: As one revisionist notes: "The official view holds that the
Soviets and Poles created a 'gas chamber' in an air-raid shelter that had been a 'gas chamber'. The
revisionist view holds that Soviets and Poles created a 'gas chamber' in an air-raid shelter that
had been an air-raid shelter." While
most serious historians refuse to dignify such statements with a response, Polish administrators have
taken the bait. Analysis:
Ah yes. The "No serious person"
Logical Fallacy and the old "I-refuse-to-dignify-that-with-a-response" rhetorical trick. It
is the sure sign of an empty case, and an empty mind, when one has to resort to such pathetic High
School debating tactics. Ryback: In response to revisionist charges, they
(the Poles) tested the gas chamber walls for residual traces of cyanide gas but
found none. Analysis: They found no residual traces of cyanide
gas. THANK YOU! Ryback: Unlike
the delousing chambers whose walls
still show cyanide "staining,"..... Analysis: And thanks for admitting that there were "delousing chambers" at Auschwitz. In so doing,
you have confirmed the fact that the Germans were trying to prevent the inmates from dying of typhus.
I suppose they had to save the Jews in order to kill them? Ryback: ..... the gas chambers betrayed no residual
traces of Zyklon B. Analysis:
So, in addition to your concessions that there is a "dearth" of hard evidence, and that the
gas chambers ™
are Soviet reconstructions, you further concede that the forensic analysis shows no traces of "Zyklon
B" (a pesticide-turned-into-poison) in the stone walls. Stone is like sponge, Timmy. Any
poison gas would have been absorbed and preserved for posterity to analyze, as it was in the de-lousing
chambers which, as you conceded, do indeed show traces of bug spray. Can you explain, or should
I say, rationalize that bit of scientific reality away for us, Timmy? Ryback: The homicidal process was so murderously
brief that the cyanide never penetrated the interior surface. "Murderously brief!" ---
Mass-murder gassings of millions of people were too "murderously brief" to leave a trace, but the delousing
of clothes with a much smaller does of Zyklon B did leave a trace? That's a good one! Ryback:
Similarly, it was found that repeated postwar "cleaning" had leached the
last traces of cyanide from the heaps of human hair, one of the most damning pieces of Holocaust evidence. Analysis: Let me get this straight, Timmy.
You're saying that the "Nazis" shaved the heads of their victims after
killing them in poison-gas chambers but before finally cremating them? And that the poison-saturated
hair was later shampooed by the Soviets and the chemical traces are now gone? Are you flippin' serious?
What were the "Nazis" planning to do with the "heaps of human hair?" Make wigs?
And why would the shaving of hair be considered a "damning piece of evidence"
when it was done to prevent the spread of typhus-carrying lice. Doesn't that prove that the big bad "Nazis"
were NOT out to kill their prisoners? Ryback: In the battle against
Holocaust deniers, Birkenau's extermination facilities remain important forensic evidence.
Analysis: Timmy!
You're gonna give a friggin' heart-attack! What forensic evidence?! You just admitted that there are
no traces of poison in neither the stones nor the hair. There you go again with that quintessentially
Jewish circular reasoning. "The gas chambers existed. Although there is a "dearth"
of hard evidence; that doesn't disprove anything because we already know that the gas chambers existed." Ryback: Between
1942, when they were first put into operation, and 1944, when they were dynamited, more than a million
human beings -- mostly Jewish -- were fed into these extermination plants, forced into subterranean
chambers and gassed, their corpses removed and transported by mechanical conveyance to the crematoria
ovens. Analysis: More than one-million
were gassed, yet you said earlier that "the cyanide never penetrated the interior surface" because the
episodes were "so murderously brief." Timmy, even if the "brief" mass gassing episodes
were just 10 seconds long, when multiplied 1000's of times to reach that one million number -- an average
of 40,000 "gassing deaths per month", (right under the noses of Red Cross inspectors!)
we're talking about many hours of poison gassing. Why no traces of this in the forensic analysis?
And Timmy, one more thing; for nearly 50 years,
you and your gang told us that 4,000,000 died at Auschwitz. Then, after "Holocaust Deniers"
™ began poking
around Auschwitz, the official number was suddenly chopped down to 1,000,000. How do you account for
such a drastic reduction? And if the 4,000,000 was wrong, why should we now take your word now
on the "1,000,000?"
And furthermore, if the Auschwitz "death
toll" was shaved down by 3 million, why do "youse guys" keep saying "6 million"
™
died in all. Has 1st-grade math, like modern physics, now become "relative" too? * Ryback: The chimneys belched smoke into the air. Analysis: Chimneys
emitting smoke? Really? No friggin' way! Perhaps you were expecting little white doves to come out of the chimneys?
Or maybe, soap bubbles? Ryback:
The remnant ash was scattered in the surrounding fields, or dumped in a nearby
pond whose muddied bottom, even today, is of a sticky gray viscosity ... Analysis: So, after 60 years of natural forces at work in the pond (article
written in 2004), the "sticky gray viscosity" never went away; yet the cyanide traces completely
disappeared from the untouched remnants of the stone walls and the "heaps of human hair." Bend that "science," Timmy, bend it hard! Ryback:....laced
with matchstick-size splinters of human bone. Analysis: "Match-like splinters?" Seriously,
Tim? Fish and geese bone splinters and the bottom of a pond, if even that. But thanks for conceding the
fact that there are no actual bodies nor skeletons. No forensics, no documents, no
direct eye-witnesses, no bodies. With a "prosecutor" like you, Timmy, who even needs a defense
lawyer! Ryback: The horrors of this machinery have
been preserved in the classic memoirs of survivor-authors like Elie Wiesel and Primo Levi... Analysis:
The good ole "Appeal to Authority" Fallacy. If it is in a book, written by other known liars
who continue to cash in on book sales and speaking fees, then it must be true, eh Timmy? Elie
the Weasel was the money-grubbing clown who once wrote that Germans used to throw babies into
the bonfires they had lit at Auschwitz -- just for laughs. Ryback: But,
as with any account filtered through human memory, this "evidence" is subject to challenge
and rebuttal. There is no arguing with presence of the Birkenau gas chambers. Here the proof of the
Holocaust is written in concrete and steel. Analysis: "There is no arguing?" Says who, Timmy? Says you?
This is the old, "Case Closed" debating trick; a variation of the "I-refuse-to-dignify-that-with-a-response"
trick. You're right Timothy. There is "no arguing" with lunatics and liars. But thanks for
inadvertently conceding the case by repeatedly admitting that there is no evidence. SUMMARY OF RYBACK'S CONCESSIONS - Auschwitz 'Gas Chambers' shown to tourists
are actually a "reconstruction"
- Germans used delousing chambers to prevent death by typhus
- Remains
of alleged "gas chambers" tested negative for poison gas
- Original Auschwitz death toll of "4 million"
was a massive exaggeration
- No documentary evidence of the "Holocaust"
- No "smoking gun"
evidence / "dearth of hard evidence"
- No bodies
______________________________________________________________________________
Keep making concessions like that and soon they'll be calling you a "Holocaust
Denier" ™ and taking
your books off of Amazon -- as they did with "The Bad War," by yours truly
(see ad below). Timmy, you have lost the
Jewdo match. Next time; know your Miranda Rights and shut that stinking hole in your lying mouth.
Full Wall Street Journal Article: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108914879023756502 ADDENDUM: OTHER
JEWISH 'HOLOCAUST' CONCESSIONS C.L.
Sulzberger The "gas chambers" claim originated
in a report issued by a Soviet Committee just hours after Germany had unconditionally surrendered (and
thus, could not rebut). (here) Deborah Lipstadt German documents never refer to a genocide campaign and
the story of Jews being used to make soap is a hoax. (here) Simon Weisenthal Contrary to Eisenhower's propaganda films, there was no "gas chamber" at the Dachau
Concentration Camp. (here) Elan Steinberg, Peter Novick and others
The testimony of Holocaust survivors is often unreliable.
(here) (here) The Jewish Virtual Library The International Red Cross inspected the German POW and concentration camps and gave passing
grades (but, of course, remained silent about the Jews). (here) The New York Times
The '6 Million Dead' was proclaimed before a single camp had been liberated. (here) The Forward (A Jewish Daily) 3000
babies born at Auschwitz (here) ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ How
to write to German POLITICAL Prisoners – In jail because of BIG JEWISH LIES!
Write to Sylvia Stolz Münchener Str. 33 86551 Aichach Germany Write to Ursula Haverbeck
at the following address: JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede z. Hd. Ursula Haverbeck Umlostraße 100 33649
Bielefeld Germany Write to Alfred Schaefer: Alfred
Erhard Schaefer Stadelheimer Str. 12 81549 Munich Germany WRITE TO HORST MAHLER Justivollzugsanstalt
Brandenburg A.D. Havel, Inhaftierter: Horst Mahler, Anton-Saefkow-Allee
22, 14772 Brandenburg, Germany
| | The "Holocaust"
of 6 Million Jews An Immensely
Successful and Profitable Hoax! Take five minutes to complete the Poll to Exile Blacks
THIS JEWISH MINISTER ADMITS THAT HOLOCAUST IS A BIG LIE USED BY THE JEWS IN AN ATTEMPT TO LIMIT CRITICISM OF THE JEWS WHILE THEY INFILTRATE
ALL WESTERN NATIONS AND DESTROY THEM FROM WITHIN WHILE AT THE SAME TIME KILLING
THE PALESTINIANS AND STEALING THEIR LAND "What a wretched depravity of sentiment and manners must have prevailed
before such corrupt maxims could
have obtained credit! It is impossible to collect from these writings a consistent series of moral Doctrine",
Thomas Jefferson on the depraved state of the Talmud Creation
of the Holocaust Industry There are organizations
which claim to be watchdogs for worldwide Jewry who, with access to the most modern computer equipment, the internet, and
access to very secretive Synagogue records, are not able to tell us with even the slightest hint of credibility, just how
many Jews there really are. These organizations are also the ones who would be screaming from the rooftops if a Christian
or a White man spoke the way they do, or claimed to exist for the sole purpose of being a watchdog for Christians, or for
White men, using slurs like "white supremacist", "anti-semite", "homophobe", "misogynist",
and "sexist", terms which our great White leaders would gladly hand over the secret to the atom bomb rather than
be accused of. What have we learned from them? The
headline of the March 24, 1933 issue of the Jewish "Daily Express" declared that there were 14 million Jews in
the world and that "Judea Declares War on Germany", as if though the 100 million Germans at that time ought to
take note even though there were only 192,000 Jews in Germany at that time. Meyers Hand Lexicon on the other hand estimated
that there were only 11.6 million Jews in 1921, so this would be a 21% increase in only 12 years at a time when Jews were
complaining that Germany was behind and 100% responsible for the persecution and even holocausting of Jews. From 1941 to
1948 the American Jewish Committee, AND Jewish Statistical Bureau, AND Synagogue Council of America, claimed that the population
of Jews increased from 15.2 million to 15.8 million, a 4% INCREASE at a time when the worldwide population of Christians
plunged 261 million. It was not until 1949 that these Jewish watchdog organizations finally figured out that there had been
a "holocaust of 6 million Jews" that they declared that the population was now down to 11.3 million.
Could it be that when world Judea declared war on Germany they were already pumping up their estimate
for the number of Jews and the real figure was the 11.6 million from the Meyers Hand Lexicon. If so, this is a mere 3% decrease
over a 25 year period during which WE lost 260,000 men, and the worldwide Christian population was down 38%. But the plot thickens By 1988, only 40 years later, the figure
was up to 18.1 million, a whopping 60% increase, a population growth rate on par with Africa, China, and the fastest growing
Muslim nations. And now, here in the US, we have the Jewish Defense League declaring "The
study's credibility became an issue last October after part of its findings on population was released and then withdrawn
because some field data were not factored into the 5.2-million population estimate. At the same time, another study by a
San Francisco-based group — using a broader definition of who was Jewish — placed the population at 6.7 million.
But after reevaluating its methodology and findings, UJC said Wednesday that it stood by the 5.2-million figure." What does this mean? How come Jewish watchdog organizations themselves can't give us a figure
in the midst of peacetime, any more accurately than plus or minus 28%, when they were utterly so certain that 6 million Jews
died during the holocaust that to this day they are still prosecuting [read: persecuting] "Nazis" [read: Christians]
for killing Jews who never were killed? By 1994, only 6 years later, these SAME "watchdog
organizations" give us the stunning news that AGAIN, in the midst of peacetime, there was a sudden, stunning, inexplicable
loss of 4.6 million Jews, a figure far greater then the "real" figures from the holocaust of Jews' figure as presented
by the LIARS themselves. Pew Research (from the infamous organization which proclaimed
that their polls proved that 85% of Americans support gay marriage at the SAME time that 92% of the voters in Mississippi
OUTLAWED them) "think" that by 2010, the population of Jews in the world in 2000 was 14 million, a modest 4% increase
from it's low of 13.5 million in 1994. With one caveat. They ADMIT that they too are unable
to tell us the population of Jews in the US with any precision. If they can't do that, then certainly their worldwide view
is questionable, if not DEAD WRONG. If the JDL report is correct, and if the number of Jews in the US is 5.2 million rather
than the previous 6.7 million, then even Pew could be OVER-ESTIMATING the worldwide population by 1.5 million, putting them
at 12.5 million instead of 14 million. Jews are homosexuals. Homosexuals not only have
an extremely low fertility rate, but they have a very high death rate, not the least of which is their very high AIDS death
rate, which has been known to wipe out 80% of the homosexuals in some areas in less than 7 years. The odds are very low that
such a homosexual sect could even sustain itself, much less grow at all from the 1921 figure of 11.6 million, much less
outpace Arab nations which have seen their populations double in half a century. As China
has discovered, population trends are almost impossible to reverse, even with the most draconian laws which limit Chinese
families to one child. Even with that, in less than half a century, their population more than doubled by 2000 to 1.2 billion,
and will triple to 1,713 billion by 2040. As the Japanese have discovered, a declining
population is even more difficult to reverse than a rapidly increasing one. Nicest thing about Lying with Figures: PERMANENT Record of public figures who are LIARS Israel population 2014 = 8,296,000 Arab citizens of
Israel in 2014 = 1,658.000 Non-Arab Christians in Israel = 366,000 Putative Jewish population = 6,272,000
Russians or Ethiopians pretending to be Jews = 3,136,000 Actual Jews = 3,136,000
Many Jews in Israel have reported to us that their
immigrants are mostly "Russians pretending to be Jews", or Ethiopians who have even less Jewish blood. Since these
expert Israeli LIARS have been so "successful" at creating a TWENTY BILLION DOLLARS holocaust industry out of whole
cloth, we must not be at all surprised to discover that half of the Jewish population of "Israel" of 6,272,000
are not Jews, putting the current worldwide figure at 12,500,000 minus 3,136,000, or 9,364,000. This is a decrease
since 1921 of 2,236,000 Jews, or 5.2%, which is .05% per year. "THIS PUBLICATION
IS PROVIDED BY THE NORTH AMERICAN JEWISH DATA BANK WITH PERMISSION FROM THE STUDY AUTHORS", shows the change in population
between 2000 and 2006 in the Congressional Districts with the most Jews: Florida 19th
Congressional District 273,000 to 227,000, a loss of 46,000 Jews California 29th, 189,000 to 178,000, a loss of 11,000
Jews New York 5th, 120,000 to 96,000, a loss of 24,000 Jews New York 14th, 128,000 to 124,000, a loss of 4,000
Jews Florida 22nd, 103,125 to 75,125, a loss of 28,000 Jews Florida 20th, from 101,000 to 128,000, a GAIN of 27,000
Jews New York 18th, from 100,000 to 112,000, a GAIN of 12,000 Jews California 26th,from 70,000 to 64,000, a loss
of 6,000 Jews Maryland 3rd, from 71,000 to 62,000, a loss of 9,000 Jews Massachusetts 4th, 68,000 to 71,000, a
gain of 3,000 Jews New Jersey 12th, 58,000 to 54,000, a loss of 4,000 Jews Pennsylvania 13th, from 53,000 to 63,000,
a gain of 10,000 Jews Pennsylvania 3rd, 58,000 to unknown, a potential loss of 58,000 Jews New York 10th, 60,000
to 69,000, a gain of 9,000 Jews California 8th, unknown to 54,000, either a loss or a gain of jews Ohio 11th,
54,000 to 56,000, a gain of 2,000 Jews Illinois 9th, 73,000 to 74,000, a gain of 1,000 Jews Net Loss = 64,000 In only 6 years, in the US Congressional Districts with the most Jews,
and the most Jewish representation, with a total Jewish population of 2,922,000 Jews (about half the US population of Jews),
the population of Jews decreased 2.2%, or 0.37% per year.
The REAL holocaust The historic
growth rate of the Christian population of 1.5% per year means that the 682,400,000 Christians in the world in 1933 would have been 853,158,362 by 1948. Instead, mostly due to W.W.II, the actual population
was 592,406,542, a loss of 260,751,820 Christians. Even at a more conservative growth rate of Christians of 1% per year, there
were 199,838,673 fewer Christians in 1948 than there would have been without W.W.II. What about the worldwide population of jews?
Per figures from FOUR different jewish sources: 1) The American Jewish Committee, Bureau of the Synagogue Council,
2) Judaica Encyclopedia, 3) The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, and 4) The jews, their History, Culture, and Religion, it
INCREASED by 584,549 jews between 1941 and 1948! "The
Jewish figures in the table above are based in part on revised estimates made in 1923 by Dr. H. S. Linfield of the Bureau of Jewish
Social Research of New York City. His total for the Jews of the world is 15,500,000. "He credits 3,600,000 Jews to the United States, over 126,000 to Canada;
100,000 to Argentina; 3,500,000 to Poland; 3,130,000 to Russia in Europe; 84,000 to Palestine; 142,000 to Syria, Mesopotamia,
and Arabia; 377,000 in Asia including the Near East and including, also, 27,000 in India, China, and Japan. "Dr. Linfield found that nearly 800,000 Jews live under the British
flag, while 500,000 are in France or the French dependencies along the Mediterranean Sea. He estimated that 295,000
Jews live in Great Britain and Northern Ireland; 213,000 in the British dominions--Australia, Canada, Irish Free State, New
Zealand and the Union of South Africa--and 335,000 in Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and Syria. "In Africa, according to Dr. Linfield's compilation, nearly 400,000 Jews live in the Mohammedan
Arabic-speaking countries of the north, contributing 1.4 percent of the population. Four percent of the white population
of the Union of South Africa or about 50,000, are Jews, while there are 50,000 in Abyssinia. "The Jews in New York City he puts at 1,643,000, or 29 percent of the total population. "The American Jewish Year Book for 1923-23 estimates the Jews in Europe
at 10,536,735." Many White men have been harassed, fired, imprisoned,
tortured, persecuted, prosecuted, and murdered for simply speaking the truths you will read in the following statistical analysis
of the FACTS which are right at the fingertips of 295 million Americans and a billion Whites worldwide. The REAL criminals,
the ones who must now pay reparations to the WHITE men who simply spoke the truth, are the jews who used OUR own laws against
our OWN people, simply to enrich themselves in a multi-billion holocaust industry of unfathomable proportions. The
jews must also pay reparations for the many Christians who died at the hands of jews like Dylan Klebold who killed in retribution for a holocaust that never was. The Missing Holocaust
"I've checked out Churchill's Second World War and the statement
is quite correct” not a single mention of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide'
of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war. This is astonishing.
How can it be explained? Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find
no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or
of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war." Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus, University of Ulster, December 5, 2005 NEWS FLASH!--FIVE MILLION JEWS DISAPPEAR BETWEEN 1988 AND 2000, according to JEW sources, THE WORLDWIDE
SUPPLY OF JEWS PLUNGED FROM 18.1 TO 13.2. FINALLY, JEWS HAVE PROOF OF A HOLOCAUST! But there was no war.
The Nazis are long gone. In the midst of peacetime, the jews LOST 4.9 million people, and still haven't been able to
locate them. Could it be that they need a war in Iraq to increase the jew population back to 18 million?
On top of that, the 2000 figure for jews in the world included 6.7 million in the US when in fact there may have been only
5.2 million. The jews in the US, with all the modern techniques for counting populations and handling membership lists,
a first class mail delivery system, no war or insurrection or gas ovens or mass graves, were unable to pin down their population
to within 1.5 million jews--an error of 29%! "The study's credibility became an issue last October [1999] after part of its findings on population was released and then withdrawn because
some field data were not factored into the 5.2-million population estimate. At the same time, another study by a San Francisco-based
group — using a broader definition of who was Jewish — placed the population at 6.7 million. But after reevaluating
its methodology and findings, UJC said Wednesday that it stood by the 5.2-million figure." If so, this means the REAL decrease in the world Jewish population
was 6.4 million, or a whopping 35% decrease in a mere 12 years, from 18.1 to 11.7 million?
BUT WAIT At
a time when this worldwide watchdog for jews told us that there were only 13.2 million jews in the world, they thought that
6.7 million of them were in the US. And now a DIFFERENT worldwide watchdog for jews "stood by the 5.2-million
figure", which means their 13.2 million figure was TOO HIGH--by 1.5 million jews. And THAT means that instead
of there being 13.2 million jews in the world in 2000, there were only 11.7 million. And THAT means that the population
of jews between 1988 and 2000 plunged 6.3 million (a perfect mathematical figure for jews). Just to get back to the
population of 1988, a mere 12 years earlier, would require a WHOPPING 54% increase in their population, something NO race,
particularly jews, have EVER done. These folks,
who didn't have the brains to use modern techniques for estimating their own population to within an accuracy of 6.4 million
jews, during peacetime, are the very same folks who claimed that they knew precisely, for certain, without ANY doubt, with
such certitude that they had hundreds or thousands of people EXECUTED for denying it, that 6 million jews were missing during
Nazi persecution, world war, massive jew migration, and the death or disappearance of 264 million CHRISTIANS! Why are these worldwide watchdog for jews organizations not screaming
from the rooftops that those responsible for this even LARGER, and certainly more recent and CREDIBLE holocaust of jews
be held to account as loudly and vociferously and chronically as they pursued John Demjanjuk?
Scripture Commands Us to Punish False Accusers Even More Severely Than The
Accused Clearly these above facts prove beyond the shadow of all doubt
that John Demjanjuk, who was falsely accused, tormented by jews for three decades, falsely imprisoned in Israel for six years, sentenced to
five more years in Germany at the ripe old age of 91, could not possibly have been guilty of the death of even ONE jew. Scripture commands us to punish false accusers even more severely than those who they
falsely accused were, or are going to be without proper justice, punished. Impossible, says
Amhadineajad, who claims the holocaust was a "myth"! Old Almanacs Never Lie
They just expose jew LIES like the rotten fish they are 584,549 MORE jews in 1949 than in 1940 Meyers Handlexicon, Germany 1921 -- 11,600,000
World Almanac, 1925, pg. 752 -- 15,630,000, "In 1925 a census of Palestine gave a total of 115,151
Jews" World Almanac, 1929, pg. 727 -- 15,630,000 National
Council of Churches 1930 -- 15,600 ,000 March 24, 1933, jewish newspaper Daily Express -- 14,000,000
jews worldwide World Almanac, 1933, pg. 419 -- 15,316,359, ["The estimate for Jews in the
above table is for 1933, and is by the American Jewish Committee" World Almanac, 1936,
pg. 748 -- world jewish population = 15,753,633 World Almanac, 1938, pg. 510 -- world jewish
population = 15,748,091, with 240,000 in Germany American Jewish Committee Bureau of the Synagogue
Council, 1939 -- 15,600,000 World Almanac, 1940, pg. 129: World Jewish Population -- 15,319,359
World Almanac, 1941, pg. 510: World Jewish Population -- 15,748,091 World
Almanac, 1942, pg. 849: World Jewish Population -- 15,192,089 ("Jews include Jews by race not necessarily by religion")
World Almanac USA, 1947, pg. 748: World Jewish Population -- 15,690,000 World
Almanac, 1949, pg. 289: World Jewish Population -- 15,713,638 Statistical Handbook of Council
of Churches USA 1951 -- 15,300,000 Encyclopedia Britannica's 1955 Book of the Year -- 11,627,450,
"Jewish figures include all Jews whether members of a synagogue or not" World Almanac,
US News & World Report, 1983 population of jews -- 16,820,850 World
Almanac, 1996, pg. 646: World Jewish Population -- 14,117,000 World Almanac & Book of Facts,
1989: World Jewish Population --18,080,000 World Almanac & Book of Facts, 2001: World Jewish
Population -- 13,200,000 Nazis Evacuate Two Million jews from German Held Territory Total
World Population of jews
America Europe Asia
Africa Oceania Total 1938
5,343,319 8,939,608 839,809 598,339 27,016
15,748,091 1948 5,198,219 9,372,666 572,930
542,869 26,954 15,763,638 Diff
-145,100 +433,058 -266,879 -55,470 -9,938
+15,547 The Wandering jew--from EIGHT million to 30,000 dead
jews Above left: This was the
plaque on display at the Auschwitz camp until 1989: note the "4 million" victims. Above right: This is the plaque currently
on display at Auschwitz (2002) - note the suddenly reduced number of victims to 1.5 million - a casual reduction in the number
of deaths by 2.5 million which never appeared in the American "free press" Four million
people suffered and died here at the hands of the Nazi murderers between the years of 1940 and 1945 | Forever let this place be a cry of despair and a warning to humanity
where the Nazis murdered about one and a half million men, women, and children, mainly jews from various countries of Europe,
Auschwitz-Birkenam, 1940-1945 | CRYING "WOLF" ONCE TOO OFTEN Jews complained about a holocaust in 1919! "Six million men and women
are dying ... eight hundred thousand children cry for bread. And this fate is upon them through no fault of their own, ...
but through the awful tyranny of war and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood. In this threatened holocaust of human life ..."
--The American Hebrew (New York, issue 582 of October 31, 1919) The Talmud also has atrocity claims which demonstrate the
Jewish mentality: Gittin 57b claims that four billion Jews were killed by the Romans in the city of Bethar. Gittin 58a claims that 16 million Jewish children were wrapped in scrolls and burned alive by the Romans. Actual Auschwitz
records released by Russia reduce that figure to 30,000 jews HAPPY,
SMILING, CHRISTIAN FACES released from Dachau! Why did
"Judea declare war on Germany" in 1933. Why should "Holocaust denial" be a crime? Yet one
more jew LIE exposed: Rumbula. Why are
so many holocaust stories being exposed as frauds? Why
was Ernst Zundel imprisoned for telling the TRUTH? Dr. E. R.
Fields analyzes the known facts. Holocaust
is a "death by fire". Torturing
Rudolph Hoess to get at the "truth", jew style.
The absurdity of the Zyklon-B claims. How
to start a holocaust. Many RED CROSS recipients were jews. Why
did the US government keep the Nazi Master Plan to destroy Christian churches classified for half a century Why did the number of dead jews mysteriously decrease from 8 million to 74,000 with no media fanfare? Why
did jews worldwide not celebrate the sudden reappearance of 7,926,000 supposedly holocausted jews? Why would Semen Wiesenthal blacklist supporters of the Second Amendment
as "hate sites"? Why
did jew Dyland Klebold kill dozens of "fellow" Littleton High School students as revenge for the "holocaust"
that never was, a gift that keeps on giving? Is
Professor Butz really a "holocaust denier"? Why
is "White only" a "venomous message" to a jew? Play
"Hide the jew in Auschwitz" Win
$6 trillion, personally guaranteed by financial jew wizard Alan Greenspan who made 18 trillion dollars disappear from our economy without raising a SINGLE eyebrow in Congress
Dec. 31, 1945 | French Research Dept. for Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal | 8,000,000 | April 20, 1978 | Le Monde (One of Frances largest newspapers) | 5,000,000 | Jan. 23, 1995 | Die Welt (One of Germanys largest newspapers) | 5,000,000 | April 20, 1989 | Kogon, Der-SS-Staat (Expert on III Reich) | 4,500,000 | Oct. 1, 1946 | International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg document number 008-USSR |
4,000,000 |
Nov. 24, 1989 |
Chief Prosecutor Majorowsky,
Wuppertal File No. (12 js 1037/89) | 4,000,000 | July 26, 1990 | Germany's largest Jewish Weekly, "Allgemeine J�dische Wochenzeitung" | 4,000,000 |
Dec. 08, 1993 |
ZDF, Germany's second largest
T.V. network | 4,000,000 |
Jan. 25, 1995 |
German paper "Wetzlaer Neue
Zeitung" | 4,000,000 |
Oct. 1, 1946 |
International Military Tribunal
at Nuremberg document number 3868-PS | 3,000,000 | Jan. 1, 1995 | German magazine "Damals" (Magazine about history) | 3,000,000 | July 18, 1990 | The Peninsula Times Tribune, San Fransisco (USA) | 2,000,000 | July 25, 1990 | German newspaper Hamburger Adendblatt | 2,000,000 | Jan. 27, 1995 | German newspaper "Die Welt" | 2,000,000 | June 11, 1992 | Germany's largest Jewish Weekly, "Allgemeine J�dische
Wochenzeitung" | 1,500,000 | Oct. 8, 1993 | ZDF,
Germany's second largest T.V. network | 1,500,000 | Jan. 23, 1995 | German newspaper "Die Welt" | 1,500,000 | Sept. 1, 1989 | French newspaper "Le Monde" | 1,433,000 | Feb. 2, 1995 | Large German weekly magazine "Bunte" | 1,400,000 | Jan. 22, 1995 | German newspaper "Welt am Sonntag" | 1,200,000 | Jan. 27, 1995 | German newspaper "Die Welt" | 1,100,000 | Dec. 21, 1994 | Institute for Contempory History, Semi-official organ of the German State | 1,000,000 | Dec. 31, 1989 | Jean-Claude Pressac's book "Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the
Gas Chamber" | 928,000 | Sept. 27, 1993 | German
newspaper "Die Welt" | 800,000 | Jan. 22, 1995 | German newspaper "Welt am Sonntag" | 750,000 | May 1, 1994 | Focus newsmagazine. Over 2 million circulation | 700,000 | Jan. 23, 1995 | German newspaper "Die Welt" | 700,000 | Jan. 31, 1994 | Jean-Claude Pressac's book "The Auschwitz Crematorium" | 470,000 | Jan. 8, 1948 | Allied censored post-war German News Reels (Wochenschau Nr. 137) |
300,000 |
Jan. 6, 1990 |
Frankfurter Rundschau |
74,000 |
May 31, 1995 |
Former Director of the Institute
for Military History at Freiburg, Hoffmann in his book "Stalins war of Destruction"--74,000 PEOPLE, of whom "many
were jews" | 74,000 |
Jan. 10, 2002 |
Pre-WWII vs post-WWII Almanacs: an worldwide increase of 584,549 jews | -584,549 | WORLDWIDE
ALMANACS DISPUTE JEW LIES The following data from the 1929,
1942, 1947, and 1963 editions of The World Almanac and Book of Facts published by the New York World Telegram, on pages 727,
849, 748, and 441, respectively, and from the 1996 edition published by Funk & Wagnalls, pg. 646, proves that six million
Jews did not die in Nazi concentration camps. While it's true that the number of Jews in Europe decreased from 10 to
9.4 million between 1928 and 1941, the entire population of Jews in rest of the world also decreased, and much of that was
before they could have been exterminated in camps. All world almanacs show that during WWII the number of Jews in Europe
remained flat, but Britannica Book of the Year reports that the number of Jews in the world increased by 600,000, or 4% .
How could 6 million Jews (40% of all Jews and 64% of those in Europe) have died in the Holocaust if their worldwide population
increased by 4%? DID CHRISTIANS BECOME JEWS TO GET WAR REPARATIONS? A possible explanation is that 584,549 jews disappeared,
and then reappeared AFTER the "holocaust" in order to qualify for "war reparations" against a nation neither
jews nor Israel ever took up arms against. In other words, Jews who didn't admit to being Jews during the war suddenly
did admit to being Jews when the money was being handed out. Why
don't we STOP SUBSIDIZING THE HOLOCAUST INDUSTRY? 307 DEAD CHRISTIANS FOR EACH DEAD
JEW Why do reputable references like Encyclopedia Britannica
report that there 447,274 MORE jews in 1948, AFTER the war, than there were in 1933, BEFORE the war? why were there
264 million FEWER Christians in the world in 1948 than there would have been without
WWII (an event which reduced Europe's total population by more than 25%)? If the 1942 and 1949
World Almanacs are correct (that there were 15.2 million jews in the world in 1941 and 15.75 million in 1948), and if the
natural increase of jews was an unprecedented [unprecedented particularly for jews] rate of 1.5% per year for six years, then
in 1947 there would have been 16.6 million jews, 850,000 more than reported by these reputable, unbiased references. Many jews claim that WWII was all about "saving
jews from the Nazis". If so, then we have the legitimate right to ask how many Christians must be sacrificed for
each jew saved, particularly when jew Hitler's fruits were 307 dead Christians for each dead jew. World Population of jews in Millions--no holocaust of jews Year |
North America | South America | Europe
| Rest of World | World Total | Source | 1800 |
| |
| |
2.5 |
jews | 1840 |
| |
| |
3.95 |
jews | 1880 |
| |
| |
7.74 |
jews |
1900 |
| |
| |
11 | jews | 1914 |
| |
| |
13.5 |
jews |
1921 | 2.97 |
0.0742 | 7.422 |
1.14 | 11.6
| Meyers Hand Lexicon, Germany |
1924 | 3.7 |
0.11 |
10 |
1.49 | 15.3 |
Dr. H.S. Linfield, Jewish Social Research, NYC |
1925 | 4 | 0.1 |
10 | 1.53 |
15.63 | World Almanac & Book
of Facts, 1925 | 1928 | 4.4
| 0.3 |
9.5 | 1.1 |
15.3 |
World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1928, pg. 288 |
1928 | 4 | 0.2 | 10 |
1.4 |
15.6 |
World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1929 |
1929 | 4 | 0.1 |
10 | 1.53 |
15.63 | 1929 World Almanac &
Book of Facts, American Heritage Press, pg. 443 | 1930 | 4 | 0.2 |
10 | 1.4 |
15.6 | National Council of Churches,
pg. 752 World Alm | 1933 | 4.38
| 0.29 |
9.49 | 1.15 |
15.31 |
World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1934 |
1933 | | | | |
14 | Daily Express, March 24, 1933,
front page headline "Judea Declares War on Germany" | 1938 | | | | |
15.75 | World Almanac, 1941, pg.
510 |
1939 | | |
| | 15.6 | American Jewish Committee, Bureau of the Synagogue Council |
1940 | | |
| | 15.29 | Jewish Statistical Brueau, Dr. H.S. Linfield, AND the American Jewish Committee
| 1941 | 4.4
| 0.03 |
9.4 | 1.37 |
15.2 |
World Almanac & Book of Facts,1942 | 1946 | 5 | 0.1 |
9.4 | 1.3 |
15.69 | World Almanac & Book
of Facts, 1947, pg. 488, American Jewish Committee, AND Jewish Statistical Bureau, AND Synagogue Council of America
| 1947 | | |
| | 15.69 | World Almanac USA 1947, pg. 219, American Jewish Committee, AND Jewish
Statistical Bureau, AND Synagogue Council of America |
1948 | 4.97 |
0.23 |
9.37 | 1.18 | 15.75
| World Almanac, 1949, pg. 289 |
1949 | 5.2
| 0.6 |
3.9 | 1.6 |
11.3 |
World Almanac USA 1949, pg. 204, American Jewish Committee, AND Jewish Statistical Bureau, AND Synagogue Council
of America | 1950 | 5.2
| 0.6 |
3.8 | 1.8 |
11.4 |
World Almanac USA 1951, pg. 473, American Jewish Committee, AND Jewish Statistical Bureau, AND Synagogue Council
of America | 1955 | 5.22
| 0.64 |
3.42 | 2.35 |
11.63 | World
Almanac & Book of Facts,1956 |
1963 | 5.8
| 0.6 |
3.8 | 2.7 |
12.9 |
World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1964 |
1975 | 6.7
| 0.8 |
3.5 | 3.4 |
14.4 |
Encyclopedia Britannica, 1976 Book of the Year | 1983 | 7.3 |
0.7 |
4.5 | 4.1 | 16.8
| 1984 World Almanac, US News & World Report, Pg.
351 | 1986 | | | | | 16.9 | World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1986, pg. 341 | 1987 | | | | | 17.98 | World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1987, pg. 591 |
1988 | 8.08
| 0.99 |
1.48 | 7.53 |
18.08 |
World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1988, pg. 591 |
1994 | 5.9
| 0.5 |
1.8 | 5.3 |
13.5 |
World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1995 | 1996
| 5.58 |
1.1356 | 2.74 | 4.63
| 14.1 |
World Almanac, 1996, pg. 646 | 1997 | 5.9
| 1.2 |
2.9 | 4.9 |
14.9 |
World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1999, pg. 687 |
2000 | |
| |
| 13.2 |
World Almanac & Book of Facts, 2001 |
2010 | dunno? | |
1.4 | | 14.0 |
Pew Research,OR 12.5 million | Also see these detailed statistics and graphs from JEWISH sources themselves, which DENY the holocaust! 261 MILLION DEAD CHRISTIANS IN EUROPE AND RUSSIA W.W.II reduced the total population of all of Europe by more than 25% or 150 million,
from 542 million in 1940 to 392 million in 1950. If the Jewish population in Europe alone had decreased by a similar
25%, or 2.5 million jews, there would have been only 12.8 million Jews worldwide in 1946. If the 1946 almanac is correct,
then there were 3 million more Jews than that in 1946 and even more in 1950. This would mean that the Jewish population
increased at the same time that the European and Christian populations were decimated. And that suggests that the Nazis
did a better job of protecting Jews than of protecting Christians, or, conversely, that it was Christians and not jews who
the Nazis persecuted. There were undoubtedly Jews who were treated unfairly during W.W.II, because war
is that way. But if this data doesn't suggest that Nazis treated Jews much more fairly than they treated Christians
and other Europeans, it definitely proves that Jews died at a much lower rate than Christians. If fewer than 2.5 million Jews died during W.W.II, then they died at a rate lower than
all of the rest of Europe. BUT THERE WERE 584,549 MORE JEWS AFTER W.W.II THAN BEFORE. Even by 1990, the population of Europe of 501 million was still 7% lower than it was in
1940. But the worldwide population of jews in 1988 was 18.08 million, 85% higher than the 9.8 million whom the holocaust
organizers claimed were alive in 1946, and 55% higher than the 11.63 million figure in the 1955 Almanac.
Isn't it strange that Americans are so consumed with images of millions of Jews dying in Nazi concentration
camps that they are oblivious to 216 million Christians who died? Nobody, not even jews, disputes that less than half
the population of concentration camps were jews. Who were the other half? Christians. Even if you accepted
the Holocaust story in its entirety as historical fact, this is still 25 times as many Christians as Jews who died.
Many of these Christians died in the course of defending their homes and homelands, rather than in concentration camps
where Jews were herded after they successfully lobbied for and got gun control laws in pre-war Germany, just
as they're now doing in the US. NAZIS COULD
NOT POSSIBLY HAVE CAUSED A FORTY PERCENT REDUCTION IN JEWS Even
if you rejected the data from the world almanacs, it's still impossible that Nazis caused a 40% instant reduction in the number
of Jews worldwide. To accept that 6 million of 15.2 million Jews worldwide died in a Holocaust would require you to
believe that the Jewish population was only 9.2 million in 1946, which would require you to believe that it suddenly increased
by an unprecedented 1.9% per year after W.W.II to 12.9 million by 1963. That would require you to believe that the downward
trend in the Jewish population prior to W.W.II suddenly changed to a dramatically increasing trend. For what reason
would you believe that such a trend could change so dramatically? The population of Jews in Europe did decrease dramatically,
from 10 million in 1928 to 1.8 million in 1994, but 7.6 million of that 8.2 million decrease was after the
war which means that this was the result of emigration rather than extermination. How could the worldwide population
of Jews increase when there were so many pressures on Jews to leave Europe? And why did we allow so many of them to
come to North America?
BY THEIR OWN WORDS, THE REAL "JEWISH HOLOCAUST" WAS BEFORE W.W.II The worldwide population of Jews did decrease by 17% between 1946 and 1994, the same 0.2% per year rate that
it had been decreasing during the non-war years between 1928 and 1941, before the Holocaust. But this was after the
alleged Holocaust. Even if the 1941 estimate of 15.2 million Jews worldwide had not taken into account those who died
at the hands of the Nazis, this figure would not have been much different. There were only 26,000 Jews in concentration
camps in 1938, and even if they were all exterminated (which we have no evidence that they were), there still would have been
15.2 million Jews in the world in 1941. If the downward trend of the total Jewish population which occurred before the
Holocaust had just continued at the same rate, then there would have been 13.5 million Jews in the world in 1994--exactly
the number in the almanac. In other words, this is solid statistical evidence that the worldwide population of Jews
was known to have been decreasing before the world ever heard of the term "jewish holocaust", now called "shoa".
It is not surprising that the reduction in the Jewish population had already begun before the Holocaust hoax, considering
that the heinous nature of the Talmud is now known by so many more people around the world. THE SHOCK OF REALITY
Realizing that so many Americans have been so seriously
misled by such a well calculated hoax requires a careful reexamination of our entire view of the world. Willie Martin provides one view, but that view shocks the senses so severely that you need some way to decompress.
He provides more details than are available in most simple almanacs, which makes his estimates more accurate, but it
also makes them harder to verify. If we relied solely on the large numbers in the almanacs, a few hundred thousand Jews
could have died in Nazi concentration camps without our knowing about it. Even so, it's impossible that half a million
additional Jews died in the camps, much less 6 million. The almanacs are thus sufficient to confirm his thesis. SOCIAL COSTS OF THIS HOAX
Because of this colossal hoax, Americans failed to heed
the warnings of our Forefathers and of the Holy Bible and let our guard down. We permitted Jews to become judges and politicians without even requiring
them to place their hand on the Holy Bible and swear before God to uphold the US Constitution, judges who can take the
Kol Nidre oath the very next day and nullify all such oaths and promises. We have no idea now how many
of them uphold the Talmud instead of our founding principles. We sent $130 billion to Israel, $30,000 per man, woman,
and child in Israel, even though they have money in the bank and we are broke. We encouraged reparations from Germany to the Jews by the tens of billions of dollars
when it might be the German people themselves who should be receiving reparations from these expert worldwide LIARS.
LOSS OF FREE SPEECH The worst ill-effect of this colossal hoax is the problem it caused with free speech
in the US. We can't criticize or even talk about Jews because of the inbred fear that a critical analysis of the facts
will somehow instantly subject them to another Holocaust and kill 6 million more of them. The belief by many Americans
that the Holocaust was such a heinous event subjects those who dare to compare the statistics to the facts to ridicule, racial
slurs, and hate speech of all kinds. It is easy for the critics to accuse anyone who would dare to question the mantra
of being "anti-semitic", "neo-nazis", and "hateful", and not so easy to explain that you don't
"hate" Jews just because they are colossal LIARS. Those who sling such mantra will always believe that being
more concerned that 46 million of your fellow Christians died than that some unspecified but small percentage of Jews died
are "anti-semitic". The Jewish-controlled mainstream media will never present the above facts to the American
public and thus expose the hypocrisy of this slur. Thus, the number of Americans willing to speak up and defend their
Christian heritage is pitifully small. OTHER REFERENCES | | Why it is impossible to gas 6 million Jews http://www.codoh.com/gcgv/gcgvself.html | | | Why Pope Pius XII did not speak up against exterminations of Jews http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v01/v01p--5_Butz.html | | | Jew Norman Finkelstein rejects the 6 million figure. | | | David Irving explores the FACTS for a change http://www.revisionism.com/index2.html | | | Why ninety percent of Lousianians never heard of the Holocaust http://metalab.unc.edu/uncpress/chapters/p/powell_troubled_chapter.html | | | Why it is ILLEGAL in France, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Belgium, Italy, Sweden and Israel to even question
the Holocaust http://www.skeptic.com/02.4.miele-holocaust.html | | | Why the promoters of the Holocaust can't present a reasoned argument http://www.bethune.w-3productions.com/documents/onthemove.html | | | Links to historical reviews http://vho.org/Links.html | | | Organizations which object to Zionist control http://www.jewwatch.com/ | | | The mythology of Bergen-Belsen http://patriot.dk/Belsen.html | | | Paul Rassinier, "holocaust survivor", denies the Holocaust and claimed more Christians than Jews
died in Auschwitz http://www.bnp.net/cole.html | | | Universities can't mention that Allied bombing killed far more people than died in the concentration camps
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/basic_articles/open_debate.html | | | Why American libraries banned "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century" http://www.jubilee-newspaper.com/news_per_82.htm | | | Stormfront http://www.stormfront.org/links.htm | | | Fred A. Leuchter and Ernst Z�ndel TRIED for questioning the Holocaust hoax http://www.abbc.com/islam/english/revision/leuch2_0.htm | | | The Institute for Historical Review: "FBI determined the Jewish Defense League to be the second most
active terrorist group in the US" http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/fewfacts.html | | | Holocaust: violation of the First Amendment | | | What Jews mean by "tolerance". | | | Herman Otten on the holocaust industry. | | | ADL: the definition of hypocrisy. | | | Jewish Programming. | | | Ground Penetrating Radar scan of Treblinka exposes massive lie http://www.codoh.org/bbs/messages/2407.html | | | Dr. Fredrick Toben, an Australian scholar and educator, is free after seven months in German prison for having
disputed Holocaust extermination allegations http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v18/v18n4p-2_Toben.html | | | The ADL, a KNOWN terrorist organization, convinces Kathleen McEvoy to shut down the Adelaide Institute under
"terrestrial law" http://www.codoh.com/newsdesk/960706.HTML |
The following misinformation is from Infoplease Almanac http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001286.html The Holocaust (1933–1945) “Holocaust” is the term describing the Nazi annihilation of about 6 million
Jews (two thirds of the pre-World War II European Jewish population), including 4,500,000 from Russia, Poland, and the Baltic;
750,000 from Hungary and Romania; 290,000 from Germany and Austria; 105,000 from The Netherlands; 90,000 from France; 54,000
from Greece. The Holocaust was unique in its being genocide—the
systematic destruction of a people solely because of religion, race, ethnicity, nationality, or sexual preference—on
an unmatched scale. Along with the Jews, another 9 to 10 million people—Gypsies, Slavs (Poles, Ukrainians, and Belarussians),
homosexuals, and the disabled—were exterminated. 1933
Hitler named German Chancellor (Jan.). Dachau, first concentration camp, established (March).
Boycotts against Jews begin (April). - 1935 Anti-Semitic Nuremberg Laws passed by Reichstag;
Jews lose citizenship and civil rights (Sept.).
- 1937 Buchenwald concentration camp opens (July).
-
- 1938 Extension of anti-Semitic laws to Austria after annexation (March). Kristallnacht
(Night of Broken Glass)—anti-Semitic riots and destruction of Jewish institutions in Germany and Austria (Nov.
9). 26,000 Jews sent to concentration camps; Jewish children expelled from schools (Nov. 9-10).
Expropriation of Jewish property and businesses (Dec.).
-
- 1940 As war continues, Einsatzgruppen (mobile killing squads) follow German army into conquered lands, rounding
up and massacring Jews and other “undesirables.”
-
- 1941
Goering instructs Heydrich to carry out the “final solution to the Jewish question” (July 31).
Deportation of German Jews begins; massacres of Jews in Odessa and Kiev (Nov.); and in Riga and Vilna
(Dec.).
-
- 1942 Mass killings
using Zyklon-B begin at Auschwitz-Birkenau (Jan.). Nazi leaders attend Wannsee Conference to coordinate the
“final solution” (Jan. 20). 100,000 Jews from Warsaw Ghetto deported to Treblinka death camp
(July).
-
- 1943
Warsaw Ghetto uprisings (Jan. and April); Ghetto exterminated (May).
-
- 1944 476,000 Hungarian Jews sent to Auschwitz (May-June). D-day (June 6). Soviet
Army liberates Maidanek death camp (July). Nazis try to hide evidence of death camps (Nov.).
-
- 1945 As Allies advance, Nazis force
concentration camp inmates on death marches. Americans liberate Buchenwald and British liberate Bergen-Belsen camps (April).
Nuremberg War Crimes Trial (Nov. 1945 to Oct. 1946).
Birdman Bryant World Almanac, 1940, pg. 129: World Jewish Population- 15,319,359 World Almanac, 1949, pg. 289: World Jewish Population- 15,713,638 World Almanac, 1996, pg. 646: World Jewish Population-
14,117,000 or
Meyers Handlexicon, Germany 1921 - 11,600,000 National Council
of Churches 1930 - 15,600 ,000 American Jewish Committee, Bureau of the Synagogue Council, 1939 - 15,600,000 World
Almanac USA 1947 - 15,690,000 Statistical Handbook of Council of Churches USA 1951 - 15,300,000
"According to the census of June 16, 1933, the Jewish population of Germany, including the Saar region
(which at that time was still under the administration of the League of Nations), was approximately 505,000 people". "Fourteen million Jews dispersed throughout the world have banded together as one
man to declare war on the German persecutors of their co-religionists. Sectional differences and antagonisms have been
submerged in one common aim--to stand by the 600,000 Jews of Germany who are terrorised by Hitlerist anti-semitism, and to
compel Fascist Germany to end its campaign of violence and suppression directed against its Jewish Minority", front page,
the jewish "Daily Express", March 24, 1933. Fourteen MILLION jews in 1933? That's almost
TWO MILLION LESS than all jew publications reported AFTER World War II. 600
THOUSAND jews in Germany in 1933? That total figure is less than a TENTH of what the jews claim Hitler killed. Judgment Day Perspectives
Newsletter, Volume 2, #6 The Thirty-Nine Lashes Against the Hoaxacaust By
Eli James The following are 39 good reasons why you should not
believe in the biggest myth of the Twentieth Century: 1.) Consider the
source. All of the “evidence” presented at the Nuremberg trials came from two sources: Communists and Zionists.
Neither of these groups could be considered impartial. All communists are liars; and all Zionists are tyrants who believe
that critics of Zionism should have no public say. Many of these people, such as Leon Trotsky and David Ben-Gurion, were both
communists and Zionists! Since the myth-makers cannot prove their contentions in an open, public, discussion, the only choice
they have is to quash dissent by making “questioning the holocaust” a crime in every country in the world, except
the USA, where freedom of speech is hanging by a thread. 2.) Zyklon B
delousing gas was just that. In the days of World War II, typhus was a scourge which was transmitted by fleas and lice. Xyklon
B was the treatment given to all prison internees, no matter what their religious background, because typhus had to
be controlled. The claim that it was used to poison people is absurd because it was highly flammable. To use it for the purposes
described by the hoaxers would have put all of the camp facilities at risk of fire and explosion. Signed confessions, extracted
by Jewish and communist interrogators, say that the dead bodies, after death by gassing, were extracted by workers who were
“drinking and smoking.” Rudolph Hoess signed such a document, which was written for him. Hmm. Would you turn the
gas on in your oven without lighting it, wait a while, and then walk into the room with a lit cigarette in your mouth? Obviously,
the hoaxers had little technical knowledge when they made their ridiculous claims. In addition, the manufacturer of Zyklon
B gas stated that, due to the adhesive qualities of the gas, it would require a 24-hour ventilation period before anyone could
safely enter a room which had been used for such a purpose. In addition,
shaving heads was necessary in order to remove the breeding grounds of the lice. 3.) Killing six million people and disposing of their bodies is no small order for an army trying to conduct a war.
Can you imagine the waste of fuel and other resources that would otherwise go to the war effort? Of the thousands of reconnaissance
photos available from World War II, why are there no pictures of the fuel tanker convoys which would be needed to deliver
the fuel for the crematoria? Why are there no pictures of the smokestacks, which were supposedly belching smoke day and night?
The reality is that the Germans could hardly afford to waste fuel for such a purpose. Everyone agrees that the Germans kept
tremendous records for efficiency and documentation purposes. Where are the records of these fuel shipments? Think, think, think, you gullible Christian! The Zionists are laughing at you! 4.) Auschwitz, one of the largest concentration camps, had only about twenty ovens in
its crematory. The crematoria at the various concentration camps were very crude and required lots of fuel and many hours
to consume one body. One researcher has calculated that, given the exact number of ovens available and hours per body, the
ovens would have to be going day and night from the War’s beginning until 1975 before that many bodies could be cremated.
Are you beginning to comprehend the absurdity of such a claim? Yet, it is repeated by the Zionist-dominated bias machine on
an almost daily basis, and it is force-fed to our school children at taxpayer expense and Zionist urging. 5.) If the bodies were not cremated as many hoaxers suggest, then where are the skeletons
of all these bodies? Surely a few dozen would have turned up by now. Or did the Germans find some super-secret body disposal
system that no one yet knows of? 6.) Would the Germans go out of their
way to provide fuel for the crematoria when their airplanes and tanks were desperately in need of fuel? Not once have I heard
anyone accuse the Germans of being stupid. Toward the end of the war, the Germans lost battles because lack of fuel. Would
they be so stupid is to redirect fuel to the camps for “the ovens” when battles are at stake? 7.) Jews were singled out for special interrogation because so many of them were communists.
The camp directors had to determine whether these Jews were harmless or dangerous - whether they would make reliable workers
or just be troublemakers. Those who were determined to be useful workers were allowed many privileges, including the formation
of orchestras. If the Jews were automatically gassed (killed), how would any of these privileges be considered, let alone
established? The mere fact that there are so many Jewish survivors of concentration camps is evidence against the hoax. 8.) During the entire length of the War, the International Red Cross had constant access
to the concentration camps. They delivered mail and packages containing food and clothing. The International Red Cross, despite
this constant presence, never once filed a complaint or report about “the ovens of Auschwitz” or any other camp.
It truly begs credulity to think that not a single Red Cross agent ever became suspicious, unless, of course, there was nothing
to be suspicious about. 9.) The Nuremberg trials were conducted by the
OSS (Office of Strategic Services, forerunner of the CIA) at the behest of the Zionist International. The Israeli State did
not yet exist. The vast bulk of “evidence” was provided by the pro-Zionist Soviet Union. Neither of these two
organizations could possibly be considered fair or trustworthy. Again, consider the source. 10.) Confessions were obtained under duress and torture. “It was this same War Crimes Branch which itself
administered the nightmarish trials at Dachau, where prisoners were beaten, kicked, starved, and brutalised by Jewish-American
jailers.” -- Richard Harwood, from Nuremberg and Other War Crimes Trials, p. 14. In true gangland
style, the accused were told that their family members would be hurt or killed if they did not cooperate. Techniques of interrogation
included beatings, starvation, testicle smashing and other forms of torture. The German prisoners were often so badly beaten
that they could not be brought into the courtroom for fear of demonstrating their adverse treatment. The State of Israel today
continues to use torture and murder as part of their terrorist campaign. Amnesty International has repeatedly cited Israel
for such violations of human rights. 11.) There were no more than 4 million
Jews living in Nazi-occupied territory. As the Nazi army advanced, the Jews fled rather than be captured. On June 30, 1965,
the West German government announced that 3,375,000 Jewish “holocaust survivors” had applied for reparations.
Now, if we subtract 3,375,000 from 4,000,000, that leaves 625,000 unaccounted for. If we take 625,000 and add a zero to the
figure, we arrive at the fictitious and truly fantastic six million lie. 12.)
According to the World Almanac of 1947, the world population of Jews in 1939 was 15,688,259. These figures
were supplied to the Almanac by the American Jewish Committee. Then, the Jewish-owned New York Times of Feb.
22, 1948 listed the Jewish population in Palestine as 600,000 to 700,000; and for the rest of the world, the Jewish population
is listed as 15,600,000 to 18,700,000. If we add the two lower figures together, we get a minimum total of 16,200,000 Jews
world-wide, which is still a net increase in the world Jewish population of at least 500,000. If six million Jews had really
died, then the total should have been 10,200,000. But since the whole
six million myth was just in the process of being fabricated by the world Zionist propaganda machine, these accurate figures
came out before the hoaxacaust figures could be subtracted from the equation. Considering the fact that populations generally
decrease during times of war - which it most certainly did for the German people and other nationalities - it is quite astounding
that the Jewish population actually increased during this time. The fact is that the vast majority of Jews simply relocated
to other parts of the world: Palestine, Russia, America, South America, etc. 13.)
According to a pamphlet by Dr. E.R. Fields, entitled Was There Really a Holocaust?, the Red Cross reported in 1946
that of registered Jewish camp inmates, no more than 300,000 could have died. In item #11 above, we were willing to grant
that possibly 625,000 were unaccounted for. If half of them died in the concentration camps and the other half died or disappeared
to some other country, then our figures agree. 14.) Heinrich Himmler,
Chief Commandant of the Concentration Camps, issued an order, dated Dec. 28, 1942, stating: “The death rate in the
concentration camps must be reduced at all costs.” - from Reitlinger’s book, The Final Solution.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Germans were fighting a war, and they needed the productive capacity of the inmates of the
camps to produce war material. An extermination policy would have shifted vital resources away from production to waste. Isn’t
this holocaust claim incredible just from this consideration alone? 15.)
One of the Nuremberg documents, a letter of April 10, 1943, was issued by Oswald Pohl, the head of the Economic Administration
of the concentration camps. After addressing the above-cited order by Himmler, the mortality rate of the camps had been reduced
from 8.5% in July, 1942 to 2.8% in June, 1943. Given an extermination policy, why would there be any concern for mortality
rates? 16.) Numerous claims of the hoaxers have been amended over time
because the claims were obviously exaggerated or invented. In April 1975, Simon Wiesenthal of the Los Angeles Holocaust Center
was forced to admit in the paper, Books and Bookmen, “No gassing took place in any camp on German soil.”
At that time, Auschwitz and other camps were still in the possession of the Soviets, who would not allow serious researchers
into these camps to validate holocaust claims. We expect that, with full disclosure, Mr. Wiesenthal will be forced to admit
that no gassing ever took place in any camp. 17.) The Red Cross interviewed
thousands of freed camp inmates at the end of the war. When asked if they witnessed any alleged “gassings,” the
response was negative. From Red Cross document #9925, June, 1946, the entry states: “The detainees themselves have
not spoken of them.” How can you gas six million Jews and nobody notices? 18.) Photos of emaciated bodies, both alive and dead, are not proof of an extermination campaign. The fact is that
toward the end of the war, the Allies were bombing railroads and roads to the point of obliteration. This meant that valuable
food, medicine, Red Cross packages, and other supplies were no longer reaching the camps. This was the real reason for the
malnutrition, not to mention the serious side effects of malnutrition, which would be an increase in all types of disease.
The same thing happened in America during the Civil War. Northern prisoners
in the Southern camp of Andersonville were also emaciated to the point of being only skin and bone. The commander of the camp,
at his trial, said that he simply had no supplies with which to feed the inmates and he was not allowed to set them free.
Pictures of these prisoners could easily be substituted for WWII inmates and no one would know the difference. One thing we know for sure: The Jews are good at writing captions.
Please note that the published photos of concentration camp inmates show relatively well-fed people
lining up for the showers. All of the photos of dead bodies being bulldozed show emaciated bodies. If they were gassed and
killed immediately, as the hoaxers claim, there would be some photographic evidence of well-fed people being bulldozed into
graves. There is none. 19.) In 1943, the SS arrested Buchenwald Commandant
Karl Koch for mistreating and executing prisoners. He was found guilty by SS Judge Konrad Morgan and was executed for his
crimes. If there were an extermination policy in force, would they bother trying and executing Commandant Koch? Again, these
were work camps designed to assist the war effort. An extermination policy would have required tremendous resources
and effort. It would have disrupted the crucial work that was going on and it would have risked undermining the war effort.
20.) Cremating 6,000,000 bodies in order to dispose of the evidence would
have left 15,000 tons of ashes. No such volume of ashes was ever found, and no air reconnaissance ever revealed enormous clouds
of smoke, and certainly there was never any such total of bodies found. It is only when one considers the enormous lack
of evidenceof a holocaust - all the physical matter that would have been left over from such a campaign (six million corpses?!!!!)
and the sheer magnitude of such an undertaking - then the hoax becomes obvious. It is only the hoaxers themselves and those
who have not really thought about the physical details who believe in this tragic farce. It is quite certain that the Germans did not have enough fuel to consume anywhere near that amount of bodies. One
of the hoaxers, Mr. Henri Michel, editor-in-chief of the Revue d’Histoire De La Seconde Guerre Mondial,
exclaimed of Auschwitz: “This camp was the most international and the most western of the death factories, and its
soil is enriched with the ashes of 4,000,000 corpses.” -- p. 3. The dust cloud of crematoria smoke from such a
volume of corpses would certainly have prompted some aerial reconnaissance photos, don’t you think? Where is the evidence?
Why is there not one single photo of the crematoria smokestacks belching out their tons of ashes?
21.) William L. Shirer, one of those authors who continued the hoaxacaust story in his book, The
Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, was forced to admit in a footnote on the crematoria: “…the measurements
are those which are standard for a crematory oven of not very modern design intended for small cemeteries, and would be unsuitable
for mass burning.” This footnote occurs on p. 972 of the German edition only. The rest of the world is still
in the midst of the Zionist Dark Age. 22.) Thies Christopherson, a German
soldier and author stated: “I was at Auschwitz! There was no gas chamber there.” Now, remember, this
man does not practice the religion of lies. His statement was proven to be true when, in 1960, Auschwitz was opened to tourists
and no gas chamber could be found. What a disappointment this must have been for the tourists! Later, in order to make up
for this communist oversight (they didn’t have much experience at developing capitalist-style theme parks), the
Soviets built one themselves! No doubt, the money for construction was provided by some Zionist or rabbinical organization.
23.) The so-called Diary of Anne Frank was not written
by Anne Frank at all. Photocopies of the supposed manuscript show two distinct styles of handwriting, one which is not handwriting
at all but printing, and the other a very smooth handwriting angled at two o’clock. At least half of the manuscript
was handwritten in ballpoint pen. The ballpoint pen, invented during WWII, was not commercially available until after the
war. In addition, the American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, sued Anne Frank’s father and won an award of $50,000
for his participation in the writing of “Anne Frank’s” supposed diary. This fact was only brought to light
because one Jew tried to cheat another. 24.) Although death by starvation
and disease had increased toward the end of the war, the videos of huge piles of dead bodies in civilian clothing were most
often footage which was filmed in Dresden. Dresden was devastated by the firebombing raids of the Allies on February 13 and
14, 1945. This was one of the greatest wartime atrocities in history, because Dresden had become, in effect,
a large refugee camp for German women, children, wounded soldiers, and old men. Dresden was one of Germany’s main artistic
centers and had virtually no industry located in its vicinity. The Allies knew this and yet they bombed the city mercilessly
for two nights, apparently to dispose of war ordnance which would otherwise go to waste, for Germany at that point was a defeated
nation and the war was nearing its end. Why not kill as many unarmed civilians as you can? Who will know? The German refugees thought that Dresden would be a safe haven because of its lack of
industry. They were, sadly, wrong. They could not imagine that there would be such immense Zionist bloodlust in command of
the U.S. and British military. You can imagine the horror of those who thought they would be safe in Dresden until the end
of the war! The war criminals have successfully blocked out this war crime from the history books; but I am sure that Yahweh
God will remember those who are responsible. 25.) The Nuremberg trials
were an absolute farce. One of the most damning conditions of the trials agreed to by the Allies in the August 1945 London
Agreement was “The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply, to the
greatest possible extent, expeditious and non-technical procedure, and shall submit any evidence which it deems to have probative
value.” In other words, let’s railroad these “war
criminals” as quickly as possible, so we can go home and collect our medals. How would you like to be tried by a court
which does not abide by “rules of evidence?” A mere technicality, you say? Can you see the kangaroos hopping around?
Except, these kangaroos have hooked noses and wear yarmulkas now and then. 26.)
The fact that American Jews were allowed to be prosecutors and judges is a travesty in itself. The fact that many of them,
if not all, were merely instruments of the Zionist International makes the entire proceeding suspect because of a lack of
impartiality. No court would consider it impartial if an agent of the accuser were to be allowed to be a prosecutor or
a judge. Yet, this is exactly what happened at the Nuremberg trials. Unfortunately, the American people were not aware
of these shady Zionist dealings. They assumed, as people still assume today, that the Nuremberg trials were held in accordance
to standard procedures. Regarding the London Agreement, Harwood says:
“…the same people who drew up the arrangements for Nuremberg promptly had themselves appointed as prosecutors
and judges. Nikitchenko and Falco became judges. Jackson was American Chief Presecutor, Fyfe was Deputy-Chief British Prosecutor.
Thus, virtually the same people were judges, prosecution, and court.” -- p. 14. And you were told that the Nuremberg
trials were fair and impartial? 27.) Incriminating documents were simply
fabricated by the Soviets. In his opening speech at the War Crimes Tribunal, Chief Prosecutor Robert H. Jackson appeared to
be quoting from a document which he ascribed to Baron Werner von Fritsch, the pre-war Commander-in-Chief of the German Armed
Forces. In fact, he was quoting from a typewritten document of unknown origin. No original document was ever produced. (You
can imagine how many clerks and other military personnel were recruited by the Zionists, at U.S. and British expense, to produce
“documents.” Oops! I shouldn’t encourage you to use your imagination. There’s been too much of that
already! Even if you’ve only heard the Zionist version of these events, it would only be prudent to exercise some common
sense and good old-fashioned skepticism before accepting their story without criticism. It seems that only the Jews routinely
get away without scrutiny. Why is that?) 28.) Budd Schulberg, Jewish
film producer, was recruited by the OSS to produce the photographic and film “evidence” at Nuremberg. Again, lack
of impartiality at its worst. He received a military reward for his efforts. Surprising that he didn’t get an Academy
Award as well! The Jews of Russia (Khazaria), America, Britain and Israel were the prosecution, the judge, the jury, the newspaper
reporters and the film crew. The poor, persecuted Jew has no influence at all! Why do the goyim hate him so? 29.) Paul Rassinier, author of The Drama of the European Jews, relates
that many of the hoaxers, authors who had profited from the hoax, could not verify their claims. One author, Dr. Miklos Nyiszli,
claimed to have been to Aushwitz but gave travel directions which made absolutely no sense. Professor Rassinier attempted
to contact Dr. Nyiszli about such discrepancies and received from him a reply through a Mr. Tibere Kremer. As it turned out,
Dr. Nyiszli had long since died, so even the reply was a forgery. Says Dr. Rassinier: “…this dead witness
- another one - was peculiar enough himself to write to me after his death. And so Mr. Tibere Kremer’s silence is understandable.
No further comment.” -- p. 41. This incident should give the reader an idea of the quality of the “evidence”
which has been presented in the hoaxacaust literature. When faced with
a mountain lies, at least some statements must be true, right? Not necessarily. 30.) Prof. Rassinier’s book is a detailed examination of Jewish populations in virtually every country of Europe,
including Poland and Russia, from 1931 to 1945. According to Rassinier’s statistics, in 1931 Europe had 9,777,500 documented
Jews (figures from the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation). The population that remained in these locations
in 1945 was 4,250,000. The emigrants who left Europe altogether is numbered at 4,416,608. These people went to three main
locations: Palestine (the Israeli state had not yet been created), Central Asia (Soviet Union) and the United States. So,
the total, documented numbers of living European Jews in 1945, according to Rassinier, was 8,666,608. If we subtract the documented
number of survivors from the documented pre-war population, we have a total of l,003,392 unaccounted for. Of these, a certain
number must have died from causes unrelated to the war. If we grant that half of them died from such causes, then we have
a total of about 500,000 Jews who perished in the war. This is consistent with our previous totals from items 11 and 13. 31.) At the Nuremberg trials, Philip Auerbach, the Jewish attorney-general for post-war
Bavaria was denounced by SS General Otto Ohlendorf. Auerbach had claimed the absurd figure of 11 million Jews having suffered
in the concentration camps. “Ohlendorf lived long enough to see Auerbach convicted for embezzlement and fraud (forging
documents purporting to show huge payments of compensation to non-existent people) before his own execution took place in
1951.” -- p. 10-11, The True History of “The Holocaust,” Did Six Million Really Die?
- by the Institute for Historical Review. 32.) It has been frequently
reported by American prisoners of war that the Germans treated them much more humanely than the Japanese. The same is true
for the civilian prisoners in the concentration camps. Many of these people were arrested for being communist spies. Hundreds
of affidavits described the circumstances at the camps as “humane.” “One Berta Schirotschin, who worked
at the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testified that the working inmates…received their customary second
breakfast at 10 a.m. every morning…The Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, who was at Dachau from May 22nd,
1940 until April 29th, 1945, also testified on March 21st, 1946 that prisoners there received good treatment.”
-- p. 21, Did Six Million Really Die? 33.) Elie Wiesel
has a poor memory. According to the New York Times of Sunday, January 4, 1987, Wiesel recalled “the day the Soviets
arrived at Auschwitz.” Previously, in a speech to the National Press Club in Washington D.C., in April, 1983, Wiesel
“noted that on April 15, 1945, he was one of the survivors liberated at Dachau by the U.S. Army.” - Jewish
Telegraph Agency, April 11, 1983. “Oy, vey! I remember it like it vas yesterday” we can hear him sighing. Is this
two lies or only one? Wiesel would have the distinction of being the only prisoner of war to be liberated from two different
camps. Talk about bragging rights! The father of lies is truly proud of this weasel. 34.) In flagrant violation of the principle of freedom of speech, the Zionists impose their will on every organization
they possibly can in order to prevent people from speaking out against the hoax. In Germany, it is against the law to deny
the holocaust. Numerous people have been imprisoned for making public statements against the mythology. This fact should infuriate
anyone who believes in freedom of speech. 35.) The holocaust industry
makes millions of dollars every year promoting this holocaust trash. In literary circles, it is still a “hot ticket.”
Truth be damned. Money talks. 36.) The Soviets brought out a bunch of
“human skin” artifacts and “human soap” (presumably dusting off the trunks from their WWI displays),
but the Tribunal chose not to pursue the matter any further. 37.) One
of the chief presiding judges, Charles F. Wennerstrum, denounced the proceedings: “If I had known seven months ago
what I know today, I would never have come here…Obviously, the victor in any war is not the best judge of the war crime
guilt...The prosecution has failed to maintain objectivity aloof from vindictiveness, aloof from personal ambitions for convictions...the
defense had access only to those documents which the prosecution considered material to the case…also abhorrent to
the American sense of justice is the prosecution’s reliance upon self-incriminating statements made by the defendants
while prisoners for more than 2&1/2 years and repeated interrogations without the presence of counsel.” - Harwood,
p. 39, 40. But we are not dealing with the American sense of justice. We are dealing with the Talmudic, Zionist sense of justice.
Dare we call it Satanic in origin? Judge Wennerstrum went to Nuremberg expecting to dispense justice. Instead, he was asked
to rubber stamp a show trial. 38.) Many prisoners of the War Crimes Tribunal
were kept in prison, held without charges being filed for months. This included even the wives of the suspects. (Harwood,
p. 57.) 39.) Holocaust propaganda has changed with the times. Truth is
not flexible. Lies are. No consistent flow of information has ever been established by the hoax industry. New charges and
claims arise, all without any substantiation. Old ones dissolve, depending upon which charges have been refuted or not. We
all know that the original story was that the Germans kept their “extermination program” a secret. How else could
it have happened, anyway? Recently, the hoaxers, contradicting this theory, have claimed that it was common knowledge in those
days that the exterminations were going on, but that nobody did anything about it. This claim has been fabricated for the
sole purpose of trying to indict Pope Pius XII for “not helping the Jews.” But how can you prevent something that
isn’t happening? I remember very clearly as a child around 1954
standing in a mom-and-pop grocery store. Two Jewish women were reacting to a radio news story about the holocaust. I will
never forget what the one woman said to the other: “If I had known they were being gassed, I would have never gotten
on the train.” So, obviously, six million others didn’t know about it either! And she also survived, whatever
camp she was in; and, from her statement, she did not witness any gassings either, because this was the first she had heard
about it! Sooner or later, the liar gets caught in his lies. The fact that he owns all the newspapers will not prevent this
eventuality. Never underestimate the power of the BIG LIE. The Jews are
the masters of it. My personal opinion is the Zionists decided to promote this myth in order to cover up their own involvement
with Nazi Germany in transferring Jews from Germany to Palestine. They needed a smoke screen and a continuous barrage of propaganda
to clamp the lid down on any criticism of their WWII maneuverings. The more newspaper space that is taken up by their lies,
the less room there is for the truth. As the previous stories have revealed, the Zionists have much to hide. The continuing decline of Europe’s Jewish population By
Michael Lipka44 comments It’s been seven decades since the end of the Holocaust, an event that decimated the Jewish population in Europe.
In the years since then, the number of European Jews has continued to decline for a variety of reasons. And now, concerns
over renewed anti-Semitism on the continent have prompted Jewish leaders to talk of a new “exodus” from the region. There are still more than a million Jews living in Europe, according to 2010 Pew Research Center estimates. But that number has dropped significantly over the last several decades – most dramatically in Eastern Europe
and the countries that make up the former Soviet Union, according to historical research by Sergio DellaPergola of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. In 1939, there were 16.6 million Jews worldwide, and
a majority of them – 9.5 million, or 57% – lived in Europe, according to DellaPergola’s estimates. By the end of World War II, in 1945, the Jewish population of Europe had shrunk to 3.8 million, or 35% of the world’s
11 million Jews. About 6 million European Jews were killed during the Holocaust, according to common estimates. Since then, the global Jewish population –
estimated by Pew Research at 14 million as of 2010 – has risen, but it is still smaller than it was before the Holocaust. And in the decades
since 1945, the Jewish population in Europe has continued to decline. In 1960, it was about 3.2 million; by 1991, it fell
to 2 million, according to DellaPergola’s estimates. Now, there are about 1.4 million Jews in Europe – just
10% of the world’s Jewish population, and 0.2% of Europe’s total population. Measuring
Jewish populations, especially in places like Europe and the United States where Jews are a small minority, is fraught with
difficulty. This is due to the complexity both of measuring small populations and of Jewish identity, which can be defined by ethnicity or religion. As a result, estimates vary, but Pew Research’s recent figures are
similar to those reported by DellaPergola, one of the world’s leading experts on Jewish demography. In Eastern Europe, a once large and vibrant Jewish population has nearly disappeared. DellaPergola estimates that there
were 3.4 million Jews in the European portions of the Soviet Union as of 1939. Many were killed in the Holocaust, and
others moved to Israel or elsewhere. Today, a tiny fraction of the former Soviet republics’ population – an
estimated 310,000 people – are Jews. Similar trends have occurred in Eastern European
countries that were outside the USSR, including Poland, Hungary, Romania and several other nations. Collectively, they
were home to about 4.7 million Jews in 1939, but now there are probably fewer than 100,000 Jews in all these countries
combined. Much of the postwar decline has been a result of emigration to Israel, which declared
its independence as a Jewish state in 1948. The Jewish population of Israel has grown from about half a million in 1945
to 5.6 million in 2010. But there are other possible factors in the decline of European Jewry, including intermarriage
and cultural assimilation. In addition, Jewish populations have not decreased uniformly in every
European country. For example, we estimate that there were about as many Jews in France as of 2010 (310,000) as DellaPergola
estimates there were in 1939 (320,000), although recent reports have indicated a surge in Jewish emigration from France. The United Kingdom also continues to have a significant Jewish population (about 280,000
in 2010, down from DellaPergola’s estimate of 345,000 in 1939). But a new report released this week found a record level of anti-Semitism in the U.K., with more than 1,000 anti-Semitic incidents recorded in 2014.
|
________________________________________________________________________________ A Holocaust Was What
the Americans Did to the Germans Eisenhower’s Starvation Order
By James Bacque Never had so many people been put in prison. The size of the Allied captures was unprecedented
in all history. The Soviets took prisoner some 3.5 million Europeans, the Americans about 6.1 million, the British
about 2.4 million, the Canadians about 300,000, the French around 200,000. Uncounted millions of Japanese entered
American captivity in 1945, plus about 640,000 entering Soviet captivity. As soon as Germany surrendered on 8 May 1945, the American Military
Governor, General Eisenhower, sent out an “urgent courier” throughout the huge area that he commanded,
making it a crime punishable by death for German civilians to feed prisoners. It was even a death-penalty crime
to gather food together in one place to take it to prisoners … The order was sent in German to the provincial
governments, ordering them to distribute it immediately to local governments. Copies of the orders were discovered
recently in several villages near the Rhine … The message [which Bacque reproduces] reads in part: “…
under no circumstances may food supplies be assembled among the local inhabitants in order to deliver them to
the prisoners of war. Those who violate this command and nevertheless try to circumvent this blockade to allow
something to come to the prisoners place themselves in danger of being shot….”
Eisenhower’s order was also posted in English, German and
Polish on the bulletin board of Military Government Headquarters in Bavaria, signed by the Chief of Staff of the
Military Governor of Bavaria. Later it was posted in Polish in Straubing and Regensburg, where there were many
Polish guard companies at nearby camps. One US Army officer who read the posted order in May 1945 has written that
it was “the intention of Army command regarding the German POW camps in the US Zone from May 1945 through
the end of 1947 to exterminate as many POWs as the traffic would bear without international scrutiny.” … The [American] army’s
policy was to starve [German] prisoners, according to several American soldiers who were there. Martin Brech,
retired professor of philosophy at Mercy college in New York, who was a guard at Andernach in 1945, has said that
he was told by an officer that “it is our policy that these men not be fed.” The 50,000 to 60,000
men in Andernach were starving, living with no shelter in holes in the ground, trying to nourish themselves on
grass. When Brech smuggled bread to them through the wire, he was ordered to stop by an officer. Later, Brech
sneaked more food to them, was caught, and told by the same officer, “If you do that again, you’ll
be shot.” Brech saw bodies go out of the camp “by the truckload” but he was never told how many there
were, where they were buried, or how. … The prisoner Paul Schmitt was shot in the American camp at Bretzenheim after coming close to the wire
to see his wife and young son who were bringing him a basket of food. The French followed suit: Agnes Spira was
shot by French guards at Dietersheim in July 1945 for taking food to prisoners. The memorial to her in nearby Buedesheim,
written by one of her chidren, reads: “On the 31st of July 1945, my mother was suddenly and unexpectedly
torn from me because of her good deed toward the imprisoned soldiers.” The entry in the Catholic church register
says simply: “A tragic demise, shot in Dietersheim on 31.07.1945. Buried on 03.08.1945.” Martin Brech
watched in amazement as one officer at Andernach stood on a hillside firing shots towards German women running
away from him in the valley below. The prisoner Hans Scharf … was watching as a German woman with her two children came towards an
American guard in the camp at Bad Kreuznach, carrying a wine bottle. She asked the guard to give the bottle to
her husband, who was just inside the wire. The guard upended the bottle into his own mouth, and when it was empty,
threw it on the ground and killed the prisoner with five shots. ….Many prisoners and German civilians saw the American guards burn the food
brought by civilian women. One former prisoner described it recently: “At first, the women from the nearby
town brought food into the camp. The American soldiers took everything away from the women, threw it in a heap and poured
gasoline [benzine] over it and burned it.” Eisenhower himself ordered that the food be destroyed, according
to the writer Karl Vogel, who was the German camp commander appointed by the Americans in Camp 8 at Garmisch-Partenkirchen.
Although the prisoners were getting only 800 calories per day, the Americans were destroying food outside the
camp gate. James Bacque, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, pp. 41-45, 94-95. Note from
RI: See also Thomas Goodrich's: Summer 1945—Germany, Japan and the Harvest of Hate ______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________ Extracts From The Book Germany's War, German POWs Post-WWII Buried
Alive Screaming In The Night: German POW Survivors
Describe Eisenhower’s Extermination Camps After WWII Had Ended One night in April 1945, I was startled out of my stupor in the rain and the mud by piercing screams
and loud groans… I saw this bulldozer moving forward through the crowd of prisoners who lay there. In the
front it had a blade making a pathway. How many of the prisoners were buried alive in their earth holes… A similar incident occurred at the
American camp at Rheinberg in mid-June 1945… the last act of the Americans at Rheinberg before the British
took over was to bulldoze one section of the camp level while there were still living men in their holes in the
ground. On July 27, 1929, the Allies extended the Protective Regulations of the Geneva Convention for Wounded
Soldiers to include prisoners of war (POWs). These regulations state: “All accommodations should be equal
to the standard of their troops. The Red Cross supervises. After the end of the hostilities the POWs should be
released immediately.” On March 10, 1945, Dwight Eisenhower, the Supreme Allied Commander of the Allied
Expeditionary Force, disregarded these regulations by classifying German prisoners captured on German territory
as “Disarmed Enemy Forces” (DEFs). The German prisoners were therefore at the mercy of the Allies
and were not protected by international law. [i] The Western Allies deliberately murdered
approximately 1 million disarmed German POWs by means of starvation, exposure, and illness. This Allied atrocity
was first publicly exposed in 1989 in the book Other Losses by James Bacque. Bacque estimates in Other
Losses that the victims undoubtedly number over 790,000, almost certainly over 900,000, and quite likely over
a million. The prisoners’ deaths were knowingly caused by army officers who had sufficient resources to keep
these prisoners alive. Relief organizations such as the Red Cross that attempted to help prisoners in the American
camps were refused permission by the army. [ii]
The vast U.S. camps in open fields stretched for 10 kilometers along the Rhine
river. The men were denied access to the river only a few meters away. For no cost and with little effort the Americans
could have provided the disarmed German POWs access to the Rhine river for drinking and sanitation purposes.
“Did
they not know all children under the age of 5 must die?” This was stated by a British doctor
attending to the Boer women and children held in the concentration camps of the 2nd Anglo-Boer war. Not Auschwitz.
(Read here). In stark contrast the Auschwitz labor camp provided inmates, at great cost and effort, with modern facilities including
a maternity ward and nursery to care for the thousands of babies born during the war.
Read more here. Pictured above healthy babies in the Auschwitz nursery in 1942, before the Dresden-style carpet bombing of Germany destroyed
vital supply lines and infrastructure with devastating affects on all civilians. Furthermore, the German POWs
in Eisenhower’e extermination camps were soldiers from the front line, not camp guards. They were neither
tried nor convicted by the Nuremberg trials for war crimes before their deaths. Germans
Testify to the Eisenhower POW Extermination Camps Surviving German prisoners have provided testimony of the horrific conditions and mistreatment they received
in the Allied prisoner of war (POW) camps. Many surviving German prisoners were badly mistreated even before arriving
at the Allied camps. Werner Wilhelm Laska, a German prisoner of war, reports his transfer to an American prison
camp: The American guards who arrived with the truck were nasty and cruel
from the start. I was forced in with kicks and punches to my back. Other German soldiers were already on board.
After a drive of an hour or two we arrived at an open field on which many servicemen were already assembled, in rank and
file. As we got off the truck, a large group of Americans awaited us. They received us with shouts and yells,
such as: “You Hitler, you Nazi, etc….” We got beaten, kicked and pushed; one of those gangsters
brutally tore my watch from my wrist. Each of these bandits already possessed 10 or 20 watches, rings and other
things. The beating continued until I reached the line where my comrades stood. Most of our water-bottles (canteens),
rucksacks etc. were cut off, and even overcoats had to be left on the ground. More and more prisoners arrived,
including even boys and old men. After a few hours, big trailer-trucks—usually used for transporting cattle—lined
up for loading with human cattle. We had to run the gauntlet to get into
the trucks; we were beaten and kicked. Then they jammed us in so tightly that they couldn’t even close the
hatches. We couldn’t even breathe. The soldiers drove the vehicles at high speed over the roads and through
villages and towns; behind each trailer-truck always followed a jeep with a mounted machine gun.
In late afternoon we stopped in an open field again, and were unloaded in the same manner, with
beating and kicking. We had to line up at attention just like recruits in basic training. Quickly, the Americans
fenced us in with rolls of barbed wire, so there was no space to sit or to lie down that night. We even had to
do our necessities in the standing position. Since we received no water or foodstuffs, our thirst and hunger became acute
and urgent. Some men still had tea in their canteens, but there was hardly enough for everyone.
Next day the procedure began as on the day before; running the gauntlet into the cattle-trailers, then
transport to the next open field. No drinking and no eating, but always fenced in–there is an American song:
“… Don’t fence me in…”–as well as the childish behavior of most of the Americans:
Punishing the Nazis! After the first night, when we were loaded again, some of us stayed on that field, either
dead or so weak and sick that they could not move any more. We had been approaching the Rhine River, as we noticed,
but we had still one night to pass in the manner related. It was terrible! All
this could not have been a coincidence. It must have been a plan, because, as we later learned, there was nearly
the same treatment in all camps run by American units. During the war we heard about the “Morgenthau Plan”
and the “Kaufman Plan,” and exactly that seemed to have been happening to us in those moments: the
extermination of an entire people! Laska eventually was sent to France to work in
coal mines and other unpleasant places, where his ordeal continued. On January 7, 1950, the French finally discharged
Laska to Germany. James Bacque writes that the response he has received following the original publication of Other Losses
has been amazing. Bacque states: “Most gratifying has been the huge response from thousands of ex-prisoners who have written to me,
or telephoned, sent faxes or e-mail, or even called at my door, to thank me for telling a story they feared would
die with them. They continue to send me diaries, letters, Tagebücher, self-published books, typescripts
of memoirs, in three or four languages, along with photographs, maps, drawings, paintings and even a few artifacts.” Several prisoners from Heilbronn have written Bacque to confirm the
dreadful conditions witnessed by U.S. Cpl. Daniel McConnell and U.S. Maj. Gen. Richard Steinbach. One is Anton
Pfarrer, who was 16 years old when captured and imprisoned at Heilbronn. Pfarrer writes: “I can recall nearly every day of suffering, but
I made it back, although so many thousands never did. There were 3,000 men in my cage in May but by the end of
August, only 1,500 were left to answer roll call. They had all died.”
There were no discharges from his cage during that time. Pfarrer telephoned
Gen. Steinbach in 1998 to thank Steinbach for saving his life. Rudi Buchal had been ordered to serve as a German medical orderly-clerk
in the POW “hospital” at Bretzenheim, a tent with an earth floor inside the camp. The hospital had
no beds, no medical supplies, no blankets, and starvation rations for the first month or more. A few supplies
were later obtained by American teams from the German towns nearby. Buchal was told by drivers of the 560th
Ambulance Company that 18,100 POWs had died in the six camps around Bretzenheim in the 10 weeks of American control.
Buchal also heard the figure of 18,100 dead from the Germans who were in charge of the hospital statistics, and
from other American hospital personnel. The six camps were Bretzenheim, Biebelsheim, Bad Kreuznach, Dietersheim,
Hechtsheim and Heidesheim. The reliability of Rudi Buchal has been attested
to by the U.S. Army itself. Upon discharge Buchal received a paper stating that in the opinion of U.S. Army officers
who commanded him, “During the above mentioned period [April-July 1945] he proved himself to be co-operative,
capable, industrious and reliable.” Similar to the experiences of U.S. Cpl. Daniel McConnell and French
Dr. Joseph Kirsch, Buchal discovered that these “hospitals” were merely places to take moribund prisoners
rather than places to help the prisoners get well. Buchal recalls that many of the mortally sick evacuees were
taken to Idstein, north of Wiesbaden. Buchal states, “And I can remember that from there no prisoners returned.” German prisoners who survived Bretzenheim have described arriving
there on May 9, 1945. The prisoners saw three rows of corpses along the road in front of the camp. A total of
135 dead from Bretzenheim were acknowledged by the Americans to have been buried in Stromberg on May 9 and May
10. Not all of the dead at Bretzenheim were killed by the usual starvation, disease and exposure. Johannes Heising, formerly the abbot of a monastery on the Rhine, published a book in the 1990s about
his experiences in the U.S. camp at Remagen. Franz-Josef Plemper, another former prisoner at Remagen, reminded
Heising of an event not described in Heising’s book: on one night the Americans had bulldozed living men
under the earth in their foxholes. Plemper described the scene to Heising: One night in April 1945, I was startled out of my stupor in the
rain and the mud by piercing screams and loud groans. I jumped up and saw in the distance (about 30 to 50 meters)
the searchlight of a bulldozer. Then I saw this bulldozer moving forward through the crowd of prisoners who lay there.
In the front it had a blade making a pathway. How many of the prisoners were buried alive in their earth holes
I do not know. It was no longer possible to ascertain. I heard clearly cries of “You murderer.” The horror of this incident had been so painful that Heising had
suppressed it from his memory. Heising remembered this event only after Plemper reminded him of it. A similar incident
occurred at the American camp at Rheinberg in mid-June 1945. According to reports from several ex-prisoners, the
last act of the Americans at Rheinberg before the British took over was to bulldoze one section of the camp level
while there were still living men in their holes in the ground. Prisoner Wolfgang Iff said that in his sub-section of perhaps 10,000
people at Rheinberg, 30 to 40 bodies were dragged out every day. As a member of the burial commando, Iff was
well placed to see what was going on. Iff saw about 60 to 70 bodies going out per day in other cages of similar
size. A
50-year-old sergeant with a Ph.D. kept a diary in ink on toilet paper at Rheinberg. He wrote on May 20, 1945: “How long will we
have to be without shelter, without blankets or tents? Every German soldier once had shelter from the weather.
Even a dog has a doghouse to crawl into when it rains. Our only wish is finally after six weeks to get a roof over
our heads. Even a savage is better housed. Diogenes, Diogenes, you at least had your barrel.” Part of the problem at Rheinberg was that for a long time it was
overcrowded. A cage measuring 300 meters by 300 meters was supposed to hold no more than 10,000 people. However,
at the beginning, as many as 30,000 prisoners were forced in, leaving about three square meters per person. Prisoner
Thelen told his son through the barbed wire that approximately 330 to 770 prisoners per day were dying at Rheinberg.
The camp then contained between 100,000 and 120,000 prisoners. Charles von Luttichau said of his POW camp at Kripp near Remagen on
the Rhine: The
latrines were just logs flung over ditches next to the barbed wire fences. To sleep, all we could do was to dig
out a hole in the ground with our hands, then cling together in the hole. We were crowded very close together.
Because of illness, the men had to defecate on the ground. Soon, many of us were too weak to take off our trousers
first. So our clothing was infected, and so was the mud where we had to walk and sit and lie down. There was no
water at all at first, except the rain, then after a couple of weeks we could get a little water from a standpipe.
But most of us had nothing to carry it in, so we could get only a few mouthfuls after hours of lining up, sometimes
even through the night. We had to walk along between the holes on the soft earth thrown up by the digging, so
it was easy to fall into a hole, but hard to climb out. The rain was almost constant along that part of the Rhine that
spring. More than half the days we had rain. More than half the days we had no food at all. On the rest, we got
a little K ration. I could see from the package that they were giving us one-tenth of the rations that they issued
to their own men. So in the end we got perhaps 5% of a normal U.S. Army ration. I complained to the American camp
commander that he was breaking the Geneva Convention, but he just said, “Forget the Convention. You haven’t
any rights.” Within a few days, some of the men who had gone healthy
into the camp were dead. I saw our men dragging many dead bodies to the gate of the camp, where they were thrown
loose on top of each other onto trucks, which took them away. One
17-year-old boy who could see his village in the distance was found shot one morning at the foot of the barbed
wire fence. His body was strung up and left hanging on the wire by the guards as a warning to the other prisoners.
Many prisoners cried out, “Moerder, moerder [murderer, murderer]!” In retaliation, the camp
commander withheld the prisoners’ meager rations for three days. For prisoners who were already starving
and could hardly move because of weakness, it was frightful; for many it meant death. The commander also withheld
rations at other times to punish the prisoners.
George Weiss, a German tank repairman, said his camp on the Rhine was
so crowded that “we couldn’t even lie down properly. All night we had to sit up jammed against each other.
But the lack of water was the worst thing of all. For three and a half days we had no water at all. We would drink
our own urine. It tasted terrible, but what could we do? Some men got down on the ground and licked the ground
to get some moisture. I was so weak I was already on my knees, when finally we got a little water to drink. I
think I would have died without that water. But the Rhine was just outside the wire. The guards sold us water through
the wire, and cigarettes. One cigarette cost 900 marks. I saw thousands dying. They took the bodies away on trucks.” German Cpl. Helmut Liebich was captured near Gotha in central Germany
by the Americans on April 17, 1945. The Gotha DEF camp had only the usual barbed wire fences with no tents. The
prisoners were forced to run a gauntlet between lines of guards who hit them with sticks in order to get a small
ration of food. On April 27, 1945, the prisoners were transferred to the American camp at Heidesheim farther west,
where there was no food at all for days, and then very little. The prisoners started to die in large numbers from
exposure, starvation and thirst. Liebich saw about 10 to 30 bodies a day being dragged out of his section, Camp
B, which held about 5,200 prisoners. On May 13, 1945, Liebich was transferred to another American camp at Bingen-Büdesheim
near Bad Kreuznach. Liebich soon fell sick with dysentery and typhus. He was transferred again, semi-conscious,
in an open-topped railway car with about 60 other prisoners. On a detour through Holland, the Dutch stood on bridges
to smash stones down on the heads of the prisoners. After three nights, Liebich’s fellow prisoners helped
him stagger into the American camp at Rheinberg, again without shelter or much food. One day in June 1945, Liebich saw the British
coming through the hallucinations of his fever. The British saved his life in their hospital at Lintfort.
Liebich remembered the life-saving care he received from the British with gratitude for the rest of his life. Liebich
states: “It
was wonderful to be under a roof in a real bed. We were treated like human beings again. The Tommies treated us
like comrades.” Former
prisoners have also reported numerous instances of prisoners and civilians who were shot by American and French
guards. Paul Kaps, a German soldier who was in the U.S. camp at Bad Kreuznach, wrote, “In one night, May
8, 1945, 48 prisoners were shot dead in Cage 9.” Prisoner Hanns Scharf witnessed an especially gruesome
killing when a German woman with her two children asked an American guard at Bad Kreuznach to give a wine bottle
to her husband, who was just inside the wire. The guard drank the wine himself, and when the bottle was empty the
guard killed the prisoner with five shots. The other prisoners protested, and U.S. Army Lt. Holtsman said: “This
is awful. I’ll make sure there is a stiff court-martial.” No evidence of a court-martial of this or
any other similar incidents has ever been found. Prisoners and civilian women were shot even though the Eisenhower
order gave individual camp commanders a chance to exempt family members trying to feed relatives through the
wire. German prisoner Paul Schmitt was shot in the American camp at Bretzenheim when he came close to the wire
to receive a basket of food from his wife and young son. Dr. Helmut von Frizberg saw an American guard at Remagen
shoot a German prisoner for talking to his wife through the wire. Frau Agnes Spira was shot by French guards at
Dietersheim in July 1945 for taking food to prisoners. Her memorial in nearby Büdesheim reads, “On the 31 of July
1945, my mother was suddenly and unexpectedly torn from me because of her good deed toward the imprisoned soldiers.” French Capt. Julien got into serious trouble for quarreling with
a fellow officer, Capt. Rousseau. Rousseau shot at German women in Julien’s presence, at about the same
time and in the same place as a French officer shot Frau Spira. At Bad Kreuznach, William Sellner said that at
night guards would shoot machine gun bullets at random into the camps, apparently for sport. Ernst Richard Krische
in Bad Kreuznach wrote in his diary on May 4, 1945:
“Wild shooting in the night, absolute fireworks. It must be the supposed
peace. Next morning 40 dead as ‘victims of the fireworks,’ in our cage alone, many wounded.”
________________________________________________ Mass Starvation of Germans, 1945-1950 (Eisenhower's Death Camps) [back] Genocide Food as a Weapon of War Allied War Crimes [More than nine million Germans died
as a result of deliberate Allied starvation and expulsion policies after the Second World War, including 1.5-2 million
German prisoners, which is the alleged number that died in Auschwitz. Architect--Morgenthau.] See: Allied War Crimes US based Concentration Camps for Germans Concentration Camp (USA) Concentration Camps (Boer War) Concentration Camps (Holocaust) See: Eisenhower Churchill [2013] Rhine meadow camps in summer 1945 (part 1) [2012 June] The European Atrocity You Never Heard About An estimated 500,000 people died in the course of the organized expulsions; survivors were left in Allied-occupied
Germany to fend for themselves. Allied War Crimes 1941-1950 by Rixon Stewart [2008] Eisenhower's Holocaust - His Slaughter Of 1.7 Million
Germans .. [1989] Eisenhower's Death Camps. The Last Dirty Secret of World War Two by James Bacque War Crimes: USA by Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr, AUS Ret. In 'Eisenhower痴 Death Camps': A U.S. Prison Guard Remembers New Book Details Mass Killings and Brutal Mistreatment of Germans at the End of World War Two A Review of James Bacque's "Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation 1944-1950" by
Eric Blair [REVIEW] Eisenhower Telegram to the War Department, 18 October 1945 [2000] HOW ALLIES TREATED GERMAN POWs by Michael Walsh In 'Eisenhower痴 Death Camps': A U.S. Prison Guard Remembers Books [2014 Book, Film] Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 by Thomas Goodrich [2007] After the Reich: The Brutal History of Allied Occupation by Giles MacDonogh REVIEW Review [2003] Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation 1944-1950 by James
Bacque More than nine million Germans died as a result of deliberate Allied starvation and
expulsion policies after the Second World War [1989] Other
Losses by James Bacque [1988] Nemesis at Potsdam: The Expulsion of the Germans from the East by Alfred M. de Zayas External Mass Starvation of Germans, 1945-1950 See: Eisenhower Holocaust revisionism Quotes According
to Bacque between 1941 and 1950 around one and a half to two million German prisoners of war died, whilst a further five
million seven hundred thousand German civilians died between 1946 and 1950, largely, Bacque maintains, as a result of Allied
policy. In all Bacques estimates that between nine and half and fourteen million ethnic Germans, German prisoners of war
and civilians were to die in these iniquities. Part of the blame for this can be laid at the feet of Josef Stalin who, through
his propaganda minister, Ilya Ehrenburg, actually encouraged the rape and degradation of the German civilian population. Allied War Crimes 1941-1950 by Rixon Stewart ..."it
is hard to escape the conclusion that Dwight Eisenhower was a war criminal of epic proportions. His (DEF) policy killed more
Germans in peace than were killed in the European Theater." [2008] Eisenhower's Holocaust - His Slaughter Of 1.7 Million
Germans His best estimate
is that some three million Germans, military and civilians, died unnecessarily after the official end of hostilities. A
million of these were men who were being held as prisoners of war, most of whom died in Soviet captivity. (Of the 90,000
Germans who surrendered at Stalingrad, for example, only 5,000 ever returned to their homeland.) Less well known is
the story of the many thousands of German prisoners who died in American and British captivity, most infamously in horrid
holding camps along the Rhine river, with no shelter and very little food. Others, more fortunate, toiled as slave labor
in Allied countries, often for years. Most of the two million
German civilians who perished after the end of the war were women, children and elderly -- victims of disease, cold, hunger,
suicide, and mass murder. Apart from the wide-scale rape of millions
of German girls and woman in the Soviet occupation zones, perhaps the most shocking outrage recorded by MacDonogh is the
slaughter of a quarter of a million Sudeten Germans by their vengeful Czech compatriots.New Book Details Mass Killings and Brutal Mistreatment of Germans at the End of World War Two According
to Bacque, given the extraordinarily harsh conditions imposed upon them by the Allies (i.e., the British, French, Soviets,
and Americans), at least 9.3 million and possibly as many as 13.7 million Germans, had, by 1950, needlessly died as a result.A Review of James Bacque's "Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation 1944-1950" by
Eric Blair [REVIEW] After the Reich: The Brutal History of Allied Occupation by Giles
MacDonogh His best estimate is that some three million Germans, military and civilians, died unnecessarily after the
official end of hostilities.....Most of the two million German civilians who perished after the end of the war
were women, children and elderly -- victims of disease, cold, hunger, suicide, and mass murder.....perhaps
the most shocking outrage recorded by MacDonogh is the slaughter of a quarter of a million Sudeten Germans by their vengeful
Czech compatriots......We are ceaselessly reminded of the Third Reich痴 wartime concentration camps.
But few Americans are aware that such infamous camps as Dachau, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen and Auschwitz stayed in business
after the end of the war, only now packed with German captives, many of whom perished miserably.
Holocaust Skepticism 20 Questions and Answers about Holocaust RevisionismInfo Holocaust Welcome to
our Introduction to Holocaust Revisionism! This pamphlet gives succinct answers to questions which are most frequently
asked about Holocaust revisionism. If you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to get in touch: Castle Hill Publishers, PO Box 243, Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK, Email: feedback@codoh.com 20 Questions and Answers 1.
What is revisionism?......................................................................................................................................................1 2. Why is historical revisionism important?....................................................................................................................1 3. Why is Holocaust revisionism necessary?....................................................................................................................2 4. What is meant by “The Holocaust” or “Shoah”?.......................................................................................................3 5. What does Holocaust revisionism claim?.....................................................................................................................3 6. Does Holocaust revisionism ignore important evidence?...........................................................................................4 7. Does Holocaust revisionism just deny what is said about what happened?.............................................................5 8. Is Holocaust revisionism an anti-Semitic ideology?....................................................................................................5 9. Why should I take Holocaust revisionism more seriously than the claim that the earth is flat?............................5 10. Why should I take Holocaust revisionism seriously, if mainstream scholars don’t?...............................................6 11. What about the pictures of corpse piles in the camps?..............................................................................................7 12. How about the testimonies by survivors and confessions by perpetrators?.............................................................7 13. What does it matter whether prisoners died from disease or poison gas?................................................................8 14. Why does it matter how many Jews were killed by the Nazis, since even 1,000 would have been
too many?......9 15. Whatever the circumstances, don’t Jewish victims deserve respect and
compensation?.....................................10 16. Who are the Holocaust revisionists?..........................................................................................................................10 17. Do Holocaust revisionists want to exonerate Hitler?................................................................................................
11 18. What do Holocaust revisionists want?.......................................................................................................................12 19. Is Holocaust revisionism illegal?.................................................................................................................................12 20. Where can I learn more about Holocaust revisionism?...........................................................................................14 1. What is revisionism? The word “revisionism” is derived from the Latin word “revi- dere,”
which means to view again. The revision of long-held theories is entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of his- tory belongs. Science is not a static condition. It
is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for evi- dence. When ongoing research finds new
evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories
have to be changed or even abandoned. By “revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories
and hypotheses in order to test their va- lidity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or contradicts
old theories; indeed, one of their obligations is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them. Only
in an open society in which individuals are free to chal- lenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of
these theories, and be confident that we are approaching the truth. The famous science philosopher Sir Karl Popper
once ex- pressed it as follows: 1 “The demand for scientific objectivity makes it inevitable that every
scientific statement must remain tentative forever. It may indeed be corroborated, but every corroboration is rela- tive. [...] it is not his possession of knowledge, of irrefutable truth, that makes the man a scientist, but his persistent
and reckless critical quest for truth. [...] Those among us who are unwilling to expose their ideas to the hazard
of refutation do not take part in the scientific game.” 2. Why is historical revisionism important? Like
other scientific concepts, our historical concepts deserve critical scrutiny, especially when new evidence is discovered. A re-examination of historical narratives is particularly due if: 1. We are dealing with events which
occurred in the far dis- tant past. In this case our problem is that we often have very little evidence on which
to base our theories. 2. We are dealing with events which occurred in the recent past. In this
case, our problem is that we must contend with political influence deriving from these events. When we are dealing
with the distant past, even a small piece of new evidence can profoundly change our view. As for the recent past,
the truism “the victor writes the history” still holds; victors are hardly ever objective. Revising a victor’s narrative of history is usually not possible until the confronta- 1Info Holocaust tion between victor and vanquished
has ceased to exist. Some- times these confrontations last for centuries. Since historical research is rarely a
profitable enterprise, almost all historical institutes are financed by their respective governments. Free and independent
historical institutes are practically nonex- istent. In contemporary history, in which individual govern- Info Holocaust ments have huge political interests, we must be skeptical toward the official narrative. Another truism reminds us
that “he who pays the piper, calls the tune.” These reasons explain why historical revisionism is important
and why the rulers of the world tend to oppose it. 3. Why is Holocaust revisionism necessary? The Holocaust
is – or should be – a historical event and not certain lobby groups have been pushing for a war against Iran a matter of religion. As such, it is subject to the same kind of since 2005, we recognize a pattern: Slobodan Milosevic,
in research and scrutiny as other past events, and so our concep- 1999 leader of tiny Serbia, as well as Saddam Hussein
and tions of the Holocaust must be subjected to critical investiga- now the various presidents of Iran (most notably
Mahmoud tion. If new evidence necessitates a change of our view of the Ahmadinejad) were compared with... Adolf Hitler.
Milos- Holocaust, then a change must take place. The evic and Hussein were even accused of having same holds
true when old assumptions are prov- committed similar crimes of genocide – against en false. There is nothing
reprehensible about the Kosovo Albanians here or the Kurds there. questioning the accuracy of scientific assertions These claims, among others, were used to justify and attempting to deny their validity. Therefore, the wars. And
there is no better justification for it is not reprehensible to approach prevailing a war than to prevent a new
Hitler – or a new conceptions of the Holocaust with skepticism, threat to exterminate the Jewish people, an
ac- as long as it is done objectively and we have cusation later leveled against Ahmadinejad. valid reasons
to be skeptical. We know today that the claims about weap- Most people know that the powers existing ons of mass destruction raised against Hussein Norman Finkelstein today, particularly in German-speaking coun- were false. But they served their purpose well, tries, are opposed to any critical approach to because the world
is so conditioned to react with the orthodox Holocaust narrative. In fact, many European automatic, Pavlovian-style reflexes
to such claims. One rea- governments prosecute such approaches. Here then is an an- son why these accusations work so
well and why the world swer to the question of why revisionism as such is important is so gullible as to believe them,
no matter how often they (Question 2): Governments outlawing Holocaust skepticism have been revealed to be wrong in the
past, is because of that obviously intend to maintain the present narrative of the Ho- giant bogeyman called Hitler.
Once his name is dropped and locaust with all the official power at their command. One successfully put into the “right”
context, there seems to be reason for this is the massive political and financial interests no stopping. War is the only
solution to stop Hitler, Slobo- of those religious groups so meticulously described by the Hitler, Saddam-Hitler, Mahmoud-Hitler,
or whatever their political scientist Dr. Norman G. Finkelstein in his book The names may be. It has come to the point
where summoning Holocaust Industry that we strongly recommend to everyone the evil spirits of Adolf Hitler and “his”
über-genocide – the (goo.gl/wmq2ep). Because of common exaggerations, inven- Holocaust – is the trump
card needed to start just about any tions and distortions of the Holocaust, Prof. Finkelstein la- war the Powers That
Be want to wage. ments the fact that there aren’t more Holocaust skeptics: Norman G. Finkelstein agreed with
this when he stated in “Given the nonsense churned out daily by the Holocaust in- an interview in the 2009 documentary
Defamation by Israeli dustry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics.” (p. 68) documentary filmmaker
Yoav Shamir: 3 And the late Prof. Raul Hilberg, during his lifetime the lead- “The irony is that the Nazi
holocaust has now become the main ideological weapon for launching wars of aggression. ing Holocaust scholar, repeatedly
stated that superficiality Every time you want to launch a war of aggression, drag in and inadequate quality control
are the greatest problems in the Nazi holocaust.” the field of Holocaust research. 2 Hence, Holocaust skeptics Wasn’t one of the primary lessons of the world wars supposed are badly needed. When challenging the orthodox
Holocaust narrative, we to be that wars are evil? And wasn’t another lesson that gov- are inevitably forced to
contend with the entire postwar order, ernments use propaganda tricks to drive people into discrimi- which was created
by the victorious Allies. The very credibil- nating against minorities, into ethnic cleansing, into genocide, ity of
the victors’ version of history is at risk, as the Holocaust and into wars? And yet, after World War II the Powers That is the moral cornerstone of their version of World-War-II his- Be have been very successful in driving their people into
one tory. But this is not just a matter of maintaining a worldwide war after another by referring to this “mother-of-all-wars.” pecking order of nations or spheres of political influence. For Pacifists are dumbfounded at how good those warmongers instance, if we look into the war propaganda put forth by the are in using the horrors of this greatest war ever to instigate U.S. before and during the wars against Serbia in 1999 and even more wars. And so have some of us been for the past against
Iraq in 1991 and 2003, plus when we look into how decade or so. Holocaust revisionism throws a monkey wrench 2 you
to believe in justification of their into this mechanism of “Perpetual War deeds! Instead, look again (Latin:
re- for Perpetual Peace.” It challenges videre) into their claims! Review their the core of the dogma
which serves evidence! Revise your opinion, if today’s imperialists so well. Famous needed. This definition
of revisionism British Jewish musician and writer Gi- is the opposite of what those warmon- lad Atzmon wrapped
it up nicely in a gers want you to believe, isn’t it? And blog entry on March 13, 2010 (goo.gl/ for a
good reason: because they want cHt6mi): Gilad Atzmon “What is the holocaust religion there to prevent
by all means that we obtain to conceal? As long as we fail to ask and entertain a critical mind. questions,
we will be subjected to Zionists and their Neocon The Catholic priest Viktor R. Knirsch of Kahlenbergerdorf agents’
plots. We will continue killing in the name of Jewish in Austria has given us some insightful remarks on this sub- suffering.
We will maintain our complicity in Western impe- ject: 4 rialist crimes against humanity. [...] The holocaust became “It is the right and the duty of everyone who seeks the truth to the new Western religion. Unfortunately, it
is the most sinister doubt, investigate and consider all available evidence. Wher- religion known to man. It is
a license to kill, to flatten, to nuke, ever this doubting and investigating is forbidden; wherever to wipe [out],
to rape, to loot and to ethnically cleanse. It authorities demand unquestioning belief – there is evidence of made vengeance and revenge into a Western value. [...] Holo- a profane arrogance, which arouses our suspicions. If
those caust religion robs humanity of its humanism. For the sake of whose contentions are questioned had truth on
their side, they would patiently answer all questions. Certainly they would peace and future generations, the holocaust
must be stripped not continue to conceal evidence and documents which per- of its exceptional status immediately.
It must be subjected to thorough historical scrutiny. Truth and truth seeking is an el- tain to the controversy.
If those who demand belief are lying, ementary human experience. It must prevail.” however, they will call
for a judge. By this ye shall know them. He who tells the truth is calm and composed, but he who lies Hence, critically
verifying what our leaders claim is the key demands worldly justice.” to peace. And this is what revisionism
stands for: Be criti- cal! Don’t take for granted what those militant Powers want 4. What is meant by “The
Holocaust” or “Shoah”? By “Holocaust” (the Greek word for sacrifice of a burnt offer- ing) as well as “Shoah,” which is the Hebrew word for “Ca- tastrophe,” we mean the near-total
extermination of a distinct group of persons through violence. Here we are referring to Jews who lived in areas
controlled by the Third Reich. Loss of citizenship, deportation, and incarceration with forced la- bor, things which
have always existed and exist today, should not be included since they do not result in the physical de- struction
of these groups. In the public’s mind, the opinion is often created that simply depriving Jews of civil rights
during the Third Reich was part of the Holocaust. But if this were true, then depriving blacks in South Africa until
the end of last century, Palestinians in Israel and the territories occupied by it, or the (partial) deprivation
of the civil rights of Blacks and Native Americans in the USA until the middle of the 20th century would also have
to be described as part of a Holo- caust. Hence, this cannot be correct. The common historical narrative of the
Holocaust against the Jews is postulated on the following specific points: 1. An intention on
the part of the National Socialist govern- ment to physically exterminate Jews. 2. An actual plan
of the National Socialist government to physically exterminate the Jews. 3. A governmental agency
and a budget to carry out this plan. 4. Technically refined methods of mass killing to achieve this goal, whereby homicidal gas chambers as well as mass shootings behind the Russian front would play a major role. 5. Techniques for disposing of millions of bodies; that is, cre- matories or pyres with adequate
capacity and fuel. Such allegations of mass murder in fast-acting homicidal gas chambers followed by disposal of
the bodies in adjoining cre- matoria, that is to say, expertly planned and efficiently func- tioning assembly lines
for homicide, are described as having been “unique” in human history. They distinguish the Holo- caust
from all atrocities that have ever happened. 5. What does Holocaust revisionism claim? First of all, because of
misrepresentations by the media, it is necessary that we first clarify what Holocaust revisionism does not maintain: – – it does not deny that Jews were persecuted by the Third Reich; – – it does not deny
that Jews were deprived of civil rights; – – it does not deny that Jews were deported; – –
it does not deny the existence of Jewish ghettos; – – it does not deny the existence of concentration camps; – – it does not deny the existence of crematoria in concentra- tion camps; – – it does
not deny that Jews died for a great number of rea- 3Info Holocaust sons; – – it does not deny that
other minorities were also persecuted such as gypsies, Jehovah’s Witnesses, homosexuals, and political dissidents; – – and finally, it does not deny that all the above mentioned things were unjust. None of these crimes
of the National Socialist regime is doubted by Holocaust revisionists. Revisionists maintain, however, that all
these injustices have nothing to do with the Holocaust, which is defined as planned and organized mass murder, carried
out specifically in homicidal gas chambers (see Question 4). Holocaust revisionists believe the following to be
correct: 1. There was no National Socialist order or plan for the physi- cal extermination of
Jews (goo.gl/9XMpfN); 2. There was no German organization and no budget for car- rying out the
alleged extermination plan. Consider the statement by Professor Dr. Raul Hilberg: 5 “But what began in 1941
was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agen- cy. There was no blueprint
and there was no budget for destructive measures [of the Jews]. They [the measures] were taken step by step. Thus
came about not so much a plan being carried out but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus mind-reading by
a far-flung [German] bureau- cracy.” 3. In detailed investigations of former German concentration camps, expert researchers have established: No documen- tation or physical evidence for the existence of homicidal gas chambers or other methods of mass murder exists, and material traces of the victims are lacking as well. 6 Further- Info Holocaust more, the reports of mass shootings were greatly exagger- ated and taken out of context, 7 and
the infamous “gas van,” the so-called mobile gas chambers, are a product of war- time propaganda. 8 4. There were neither adequate industrial facilities nor suf- ficient fuel to cremate such a huge
number of corpses. In fact, the capacity of the crematoria was barely enough to cremate the bodies of those who
died from starvation and epidemics. 9 5. Mass-murder claims rely almost exclusively on eyewitness accounts, whose unreliability is legendary and widely ac- knowledged (see Question 12). 10 6.
Despite massive surveillance by spies and resistance groups active in the vicinity of, and inside German labor, concentration
and alleged extermination camps, all of Ger- many’s wartime enemies and adversaries conducted them- selves
as if no exterminations of Jews were taking place. The charges of genocide were not seriously raised until af- ter
Germany’s defeat, when there was no German govern- ment to dispute them. 11 7. Statistical
investigations of living Jews worldwide show clearly that the losses of this ethnic group during the Sec- ond World
War were nowhere near six million. Although attempts were made to establish a somewhat more accurate figure, 12
the truth is that we simply don’t know for certain, as a comparison of revisionist and mainstream research has shown. 13 In fact, the six-million figure, together with ex- termination and Holocaust claims, has been bandied about mainly by Jewish media outlets since the late 1800s! 14 To find out more, please read the answer to the last Question. 6. Does Holocaust revisionism ignore important evidence? This imputation is quite ironic, considering that revisionism is a reaction to orthodox historians ignoring vast amounts of evidence. Take, for example, the infamous Auschwitz
Camp. While orthodox and revisionist historians agree to a large degree about aspects of the camp’s history
not related to mass mur- der, their views diverge drastically from each other in this latter regard. The best effort
mainstream historians have mus- tered so far to document mass-murder claims is a 270-page volume. 15 Each mass-murder
location and method is covered in it with only a few pages. On the other hand, revisionist scholar Carlo Mattogno
has published nine studies of alto- gether more than 3,500 pages, each one of which examines in detail these various
as- pects of extermination claims made about Auschwitz. 16 The evidence presented in his studies greatly surpasses
that of the orthodoxy both in quantity and quality. Or take the so-called “Aktion Rein- hardt”
Camps (Belzec, Chelmno, Sobi- bor, Treblinka), which are said to have 4 been pure extermination centers. Mainstream
books on them are mainly based on selected quotations from cherry-picked testimonies 17 that they never subject
to any source criticism, which is the Alpha and Omega of any historical scholarship worthy of that term. Compare
this with revisionist studies on these camps that critically verify what witnesses have testi- fied in a broader
context. 18 By so doing, these studies also determine the trustworthiness of these witnesses, a factor as- siduously
avoided by the orthodoxy. 19 Hence, revisionist studies on the Holocaust are actually the only ones meeting scholarly
standards. The others? They play to popular – and legally mandated – ren- ditions of the subject
matters. They may be re- assuring to the many, but they are disquieting to the discerning few. revisionism just deny what is said about 7. Does Holocaust what happened? Mostly, it must be admitted, we
contest and refute, or at least question on grounds which we disclose in exhaustive detail. If sheer effort, ingenuity
and integrity could get The Past to give up her secrets, revisionists would win the day with a clear, complete and
factual account of What Happened. As it is, the past in its totality is vouchsafed to no one – each of us
is at best one of the six blind men feeling merely parts of the elephant, as the ancient Indian parable goes –
and this ironically applies to “eyewitnesses” even more than to others. All of us, as eyewitnesses,
can barely understand what we see, to say nothing of what we hear from others who claim to have seen. “War
criminals” have been hanged, and a people (the Ger- mans) condemned and even expelled from their ancestral homes
on the strength of disprovable testimony by selected parties eager to wreak revenge and receive compensation for wrongs
committed, or not committed, against them by a dic- tatorial German government that never told the German peo- ple
what it was doing, let alone asked them to approve of it. Revisionists are troubled by such developments, if only because anyone, after the next war, might find themselves on the receiving end of such a process themselves. Thus,
it is on the score of a concern for justice that we concentrate so on debunking unfounded and false claims of cruelty
and murder leveled against the losers of the last world war. Ask not for whom the bell tolls ... 8. Is Holocaust
revisionism an anti-Semitic ideology? Holocaust revisionism is a scholarly, fact-seeking method based on the critical
review of evidence, not an ideology. It simply reviews the prevailing historical narrative that has been influenced
mainly by Soviet, British and American war- time propaganda. This concerns not just the fate of Jews dur- ing the
Third Reich but also that of Slavs, Sinti and Roma (Gypsies), Jehovah’s Witnesses and homosexuals. 20 Impor- tantly, recent mainstream scholarship has confirmed that Re- visionists are correct on several critical points of Holocaust history and probably correct on many more (see the back cover of this brochure on the Majdanek Camp). Questioning
what we are told by government authorities, orthodox scholars or mainstream media may be anti-estab- lishment, but
it is not directed against any religious or ethnic group. Presenting evidence from thorough archival studies and
forensic research, however, isn’t anti-anything. In fact, the shoe is on the other foot. To explain this, here
is a less-contested example: Just because some Christians detest certain research results on biological evolution
doesn’t make the results anti-Christian; it only makes these Christians anti- scientific. And in the same
vein: Just because certain people detest certain research results on the Holocaust doesn’t make the results
anti-Semitic; it only makes these people anti-scien- tific. While belief in the Holocaust is understandably impor- tant to many Jewish groups, not believing in the impossible tales of human-soap factories or steam chambers of death
is no more anti-Semitic than not believing in the transubstantia- tion of the flesh is anti-Catholic. It is
true that revisionist findings are sometimes cited by individuals or groups with certain religious or ideological agendas. But that is potentially true for every field of study that has any bearing on current issues. The problem
then lies in those citing research results to support ideological political agendas, not with the research results.
The same, of course, holds for those opposing such results on any grounds other than scientific ones. I take
Holocaust revisionism more seriously 9. Why should than the claim that the earth is flat? There is no topic
where dissent is taken more seriously than when it comes to the Holocaust. The United Nations have issued a number
of resolutions against it, 21 and an increas- ing number of nations prosecute Holocaust revisionism as a crime,
punished with up to 20 years in prison (see Question 19). The comparison is therefore wrong. In fact, the shoe is on the other foot. It was once a sin to proclaim the truth that the earth is a sphere and revolves around the sun,
a crime punished by the Catholic Church with imprisonment or even death, as Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei found
out the hard way. Today, flat-earthers may be laughed at, but they are not persecuted beyond that. Holocaust revisionism,
how- ever, is being taken very seriously, because if it were not sup- pressed, it would spread like a wildfire and
threaten the Pow- ers That Be, just as Bruno’s and Galilei’s theories did. Whether an unusual claim
ought to be looked into and maybe taken seriously should be judged by what is at stake. Let me give a few examples: 1. What would be the repercussions if it turned out the earth is flat? I cannot see any. So why bother?
And why do millions of scientists, technicians and global logistics people, work- ing daily with satellites, GPS
technology, global(!) naviga- tion techniques etc., successfully rely on the assumption that the earth is spherical,
if that were not so? 5Info Holocaust 1. Take, on the other hand, the events of 9/11/2001. What would be the repercussion if it wasn’t a Muslim terror act, but a false-flag operation by government authorities? (See www.ae911truth.org) It would have enormous ef- fects, so it’s worth our time looking into the arguments of both sides. 2. Or take the claim that no man ever landed on the moon. Other than leaving
the LB Johnson and Nixon adminis- trations with egg in their faces, and a dent in the U.S.’s self-confidence
and credibility, the issue is more academ- ic than impactful. Although it is an admittedly interesting challenge. 3. Last but not least we have the climate-change debate. What if climate change is – rightly
or wrongly – assumed real, and we implement drastic measures to counter it? Then worldwide carbon-emission
limits might cause a major economic crisis at worst. On the other hand, what if climate change is erroneously assumed
a hoax, and we keep spewing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere? Then a mass extinction event might happen on earth,
wiping out most life as we know it, including all humans. Which brings up the issue of risk assessment. Any side
in any de- bate can be wrong. The question then is: what is at stake? If the matter is merely academic in nature,
there is no need to get involved, but when world peace or even the survival of humanity is at risk, one should get
informed and get involved. Coming back to the Holocaust, the question is what is at stake here. Some of it
was touched upon in the answer to Question 3. This is not the place for a thorough political and sociologi- cal
analysis of the Holocaust’s place in modern western soci- ety. Suffice it to say that the Powers That Be prove
ultimately Info Holocaust with their unparalleled and unprecedented persecution and suppression that this is
THE MOST IMPORTANT TOPIC about which they are hell-bent on keeping an absolute control over our minds. That’s
fishy enough to warrant a closer look. In addition to this, here are a few observations highlighting the importance
of this greatest of all taboos: – – The Holocaust was and is the justification for the creation of Israel,
and the ethnic cleansing of Arab Palestinians from territories under its control. – – The Holocaust
is the most important aspect of modern, pre- dominantly secularized Jewish identity (goo.gl/zBRE87). – –
The Holocaust is abused as a justification for human-rights violations and violations of international law by Israel. – – The Holocaust is the moral justification for the special re- lationship between the US and other western
nations on the one hand and Israel on the other, resulting in almost unani- mous and unconditional support for whatever
Israel does. – – The Holocaust is in extension used to support and justify the “war on terror,”
which is to a large degree a war of the West against the Arab and Muslim world as Israel’s poten- tially most-dangerous
opponent and enemy. – – The Holocaust is by a great margin the most important as- pect of modern, predominantly
secularized German iden- tity. It makes the German nation defenseless against many claims usually resisted by self-confident
nations. Germa- ny’s Holocaust cult is a suicidal death cult. This has be- come crystal clear with the 2015
refugee crisis. – – The Holocaust is abused to undermine any attempt at self- preservation by any European
nation, or by Europe in gen- eral, thus jeopardizing European civilization as we know it and threatening all European
countries to be turned into an assembly of failed third-world countries. I take Holocaust revisionism seriously, 10. Why should if mainstream scholars don’t? They do take it seriously. Some orthodox Holocaust scholars – Auschwitz: Plain Facts. A Response to Jean-Claude Pres- have dedicated entire books trying
in vain to refute revisionist sac arguments (they usually avoid the core revisionist points and –
Auschwitz Lies: Legends, Lies, and Prejudices on the focus on straw-man arguments or side issues), while many Holocaust other mainstream scholars are simply – Inside the Gas Chambers: The Exter- mortally afraid
to address the issue, mination of Mainstream Holocaust because they either have to lie (regur- Historiography gitate the orthodox narrative uncriti- – The Real Case for Auschwitz: Robert cally), which
most scholars refuse to van Pelt’s Evidence from the Irving do, or have their careers ruined and Trial
Critically Reviewed their social life upended, which is not – Bungled: “Denying the
Holocaust.” a pleasant prospect either. So they How Deborah Lipstadt Botched Her stay out of trouble
by not getting in- Attempt to Demonstrate the Growing volved and paying lip service to the Assault on Truth
and Memory taboo. – Bungled: “Debunking Holocaust Here are some of the attempts
at Denial Theories.” How James and refutation by orthodox scholars as Lance Morcan Botched Their At- Book and counter-book: van Pelt’s The discussed by revisionists (find out tempt to Affirm the Historicity
of the Case for Auschwitz and Mattogno’s The Real Case for Auschwitz (Holocaust more about them at shop.codoh.com; Nazi Genocide Handbooks, Volumes 22) some are available as free eBooks): 6 11. What about the pictures
of corpse piles in the camps? To the right we see a photograph of victims of the typhus epi- demic in a mass grave
at the Bergen-Belsen Camp as taken by the British Army in May 1945. This photo is typical of a large number of such
photos often shown on Holocaust documentaries either without commen- tary or else with allegations that the dead
are victims of the Holocaust. In fact, it is a photograph of victims of an epidem- ic which occurred at war’s
end. The cause of death is evident from the condition of the corpses and was also demonstrated by thousands of autopsies
performed after the camps’ libera- tion by Allied forensic experts. 22 If they had been gassed, they would
not be emaciated, and if they had died of starvation, they would have swollen joints and stomachs. All photographs
of heaps of corpses were taken in camps located in west and central Germany around the end of the war, such as Dachau,
Bergen-Belsen, and Buchenwald, where historians now agree no mass murders took place. Significant- ly, there are
no such photographs taken at the camps in which mass murder is alleged to have occurred (such as Auschwitz, Treblinka,
Belzec, Sobibor, Chelmno, Majdanek.) These east- ern camps were all in areas which came under Soviet control at
war’s end. It is very telling that the Soviets released no pictures of mass graves or heaps of corpses, and allowed
no journalists, medical professionals, or other experts to exam- ine the camps. Since the end of the 1980s,
revisionists have been inves- tigating these sites for evidence of mass murder, but govern- ment authorities have
obstructed their efforts by all possible means. In the absence of authentic photographs documenting mass murder,
it frequently happens that photographs of those who died of malnutrition and typhus in the western camps at war’s
end are presented as evidence of deliber- ate mass murder. To be sure, the hellish conditions in these camps at
war’s end convinced many Allied observers that mass murder had taken place, as initial reports indicate. In
reality, however, these conditions resulted from a situation for which the German government was not solely responsible. Toward the end of the war, Himmler illogically ordered the evacuation of the eastern camps as the Red Army approached, which led to hopeless overcrowding in the western camps. By that time, Allied bombing had completely destroyed the
Ger- man infrastructure, making it impossible to supply the camps Photo of victims of the typhus epidemic in a mass
grave at the Bergen-Belsen Camp, taken by the British Army. with food, medical and sanitation supplies. Misunderstandings
about the causes of the subsequent massive die-off continue to this day, especially among Ameri- cans. The respected
leftist historian Norbert Frei has given the following reason for misinterpretation, (goo.gl/pTsqHY, p. 400): “The shock of these discoveries [piles of corpses] often led to false conclusions which turned out to be enduring.” There is no denying that a government which imprisons peo- ple in camps is responsible for them, and so those unjustly imprisoned were therefore victims of the Third Reich, even if they died “only” of disease. 23 However,
one should not over- look the fact that by the war’s end mountains of corpses had become commonplace throughout
Germany. In German cities there were 600,000 victims of Allied terror bombings. Mil- lions more died of starvation
and disease, which continued rampant through 1949. In Eastern Europe some two million Germans were murdered by Serbs,
Czechs, Poles, and Rus- sians in the course of history’s bloodiest ethnic cleansing. In the POW camps of the
western Allies, a million young Ger- man men died and millions more vegetated. Hundreds of thousands more were shipped
to the labor camps of the Soviet GULag never to be seen again. But the media show only one variety of corpse piles,
those in the concentration camps. We should all ask ourselves why this is so. Should the dignity and respect, which
we owe the victims of atrocities, depend on their nationality or religious affiliation? the testimonies by survivors 12. How about and confessions by perpetrators? Let’s talk about perpetrator confessions first, as they seem most compelling. After all, why would they lie? These testi- monies can be divided into roughly three groups: 1.
confessions under duress 2. tactical court room confessions 3. uncoerced, voluntary
confessions On 1: Right after the World War II, the Soviet, British and US forces maintained torture centers where
they systematically tortured and abused hundreds, if not thousands of German defendants (see for instance Ian Cobain’s
book Cruel Britan- nia 24 ). Some of the most “important” confessions resulted from this, for instance
that of Rudolf Höss, former comman- 7Info Holocaust Info Holocaust dant of the Auschwitz camp, whose family
was threatened on top of it. 25 On 2: As the archives of the Holy Inquisi- tion prove, tens of thousands of
defendants con- fessed voluntarily during centuries of witch tri- als that they were witches and had intercourse with the devil. The vast majority of them were never put under duress. What has that to do with the Holocaust?
Challenging the doctrines of the Catholic Church was as futile back then as chal- lenging the doctrine of the Holocaust
has been since the end of World War II. In both cases, any defendant put on trial could expect a mild sentence
only if he confirmed the general story but tried to minimize his own involvement and Three trail-blazing critiques
of “eyewitness” testimony: Rudolf Höss, Elie Wiesel and Miklós Nyiszli. responsibility.
This is the exact pattern one finds (Holocaust Handbooks, Volumes 35, 30 and 37) with many modern defendants. Some,
of course, didn’t get the message and stubbornly denied, many German camps. One of its symptoms resembles and they were the ones who frequently were treated harshly. meningitis in that the patient experiences nightmarish
hor- On 3: These are similar to depositions by survivors, treated ror delusions expressing his deepest fears. Many
inmates below. Uncoerced testimonies by survivors, bystanders or survived the disease but were unable to process
the memo- alleged perpetrators can be wrong for many reasons. When ries from their hallucinatory episodes. it
comes to survivors, the obvious one is that some of them – Pressure – almost everybody
in the world expects survi- might exaggerate or lie resulting from a desire for revenge. vors to “remember.”
That pressure is huge, in particular for But that can explain only some of the testimony. Other pos- Jewish survivors,
who are considered traitors if they don’t sible reasons are: remember the “right” things. –
Rumors – especially during times of war and unrest, any – Fear and threats – anyone
failing to remember the “right” kind of prisoner camp is a hotbed for the creation and things, or even
contesting certain things, must fear nega- spreading of rumors. tive social and sometimes even legal repercussions.
After – Misunderstandings – partial information about events are all, there is nothing
viler in this world than to deny that “it” frequently misinterpreted to fit into preconceived notions, happened, whatever “it” means. feeding on rumors and anxieties. – Impunity
– no matter what camp survivors say, they will be – Hearsay – information not experienced
directly but im- believed. The more fantastic their stories, the more riveted parted orally has the tendency of
getting distorted quickly. the audience, the more fame and money can be reaped. – Interpolation
– the human brain abhors uncertainty. We all If they are ever caught lying, there is no repercussion. In consciously
and even more so subconsciously fill the lack fact, criticizing survivors is considered blasphemous and of data
by making assumptions and jumping to conclu- can lead to social persecution and in many countries even sions, which
we then perceive as “data.” prosecution. There is simply no incentive to tell the truth, –
Manipulating the human memory – research has shown but lots of incentives to lie and exaggerate. that many
people tend to integrate information and disin- In the end, whether we think a witness tells the truth or not formation
they receive from others into their memory in should not depend on how likable or trustworthy we think he such a way
that they wrongly assume it stems from their is, but on whether his or her statement is plausible, physically own first-hand
experience. That tendency increases with possible, and supported by other, verifiable evidence. After increased exposure
to such information and with increased all, the unreliability of testimonies by persons who are party expectations by
others to “remember.” to a crime (victims and perpetrators) is legendary. 26 –
Disease – typhus was a widespread epidemic raging in it matter whether prisoners 13. What does died from
disease or poison gas? From the point of view of each victim and their personal suf- fering, there is no difference.
One could even make the point that it would be preferable to die quickly from poison than to die slowly from an
epidemic disease. However, in the present discussion we are not focusing on the intensity of the victims’
suffering, which no one questions. 8 Here we are concerned with the historical accuracy of certain allegations
and the moral guilt of the so-called German “na- tion of perpetrators” as well as the consequences which
re- sulted from these allegations. Considered from the historian’s as well as the perpetrators’ point
of view, there is a tremendous difference between being victims of raging epidemics and victims of planned industrial mass murder in chemical slaughterhouses designed specifi- cally for homicide. Epidemics, starvation and other catastro- phes resulting from poor treatment, political mistakes and military defeats are recurrent in the history of mankind. Here we are concerned with the historical and moral uniqueness of industrial mass annihilation of a specific sub- group of a population. The entire German nation has been held responsible for this unique crime, not just individual perpetrators. This is the source of occasional discrimination against Germans (“collective responsibility”
and “hereditary guilt”), and of privileged treatment of Jews as the main tar- gets of this claimed genocide. We strongly suggest you read what Dr. Finkelstein had to say on this subject. (The Holocaust Industry, goo.gl/wmq2ep). it matter how many Jews were killed by the 14. Why does Nazis, since even 1,000 would have been too many? It
is doubtless correct that even one is one too many, and re- ally one must go even farther than that: even those measures of Third Reich persecution which did not result in outright deaths were in every respect unacceptable. But this is
not a valid argument against the statistical investigation of the “whether” and “how” of
the destruction of the Jews, and for three reasons. First, this objection does not satisfy simply for the reason that it is precisely the number of victims that has been con- sidered sacrosanct for decades. If the number of victims
did not matter, it would not be necessary to protect it as a social and even criminal taboo. Evidently there really
is more to the six-million figure than merely the fact that it includes a great many individual fates: What is at
stake is a symbol not to be easily relinquished, since justified doubts about the number might quickly lead to further
undesirable skepticism about further subsections of the Holocaust narrative. While not de- nying the tragedy of
the victims’ individual fates in any way, science must nevertheless insist that numbers always be open to
discussion. It is downright irrational that, on the one hand, those who doubt the six-million figure are socially persecuted or even subjected to criminal prosecution, while society and the justice system, on the other hand, react to valid
arguments against this selfsame six-million figure by suddenly declaring it irrelevant and insisting instead on
the dignity of even the very first victim. Is the six-million figure a standard deserving of protection by criminal
law, or is it irrelevant? It cannot be both at once. The second and also most important argument goes as fol- lows: The ethically correct evaluation that even one victim would be too many must not be a pretext for prohibiting scientific research. This is intolerable for the simple rea- son that science must always be allowed to find
precise an- swers. What would we think of an official who demanded that an engineer not be al- lowed to
conduct thorough risk assessments of con- struction projects, because even a low risk value would Carlo
Mattogno be intolerable? An engineer subjected to such an absurd demand would quickly arrive at incorrect results
and would be a threat to any company that hired him. The same is true for historians. If a historian is forbidden
to conduct critical investigations because they are considered morally unacceptable, then we have to assume that
the results of such skewed historiography are unreliable. And since our knowledge of contemporary history exerts a direct influence on politics, our public policies are mistaken and unreliable as well. It is the key function
and responsibility of every branch of science to provide accurate figures and values. The principles applying to
engineering, physics, and chemistry cannot sud- denly be abandoned in historiography for political reasons – unless one is intellectually prepared to retreat deep into the darkest middle ages. Third, the morally correct
view that even one victim is one too many cannot on principle be a barrier to the scientific in- vestigation of
a crime which is generally called so morally reprehensible as to be unique and unparalleled in the history of mankind.
An allegedly uniquely reprehensible crime must be open to a procedure that is standard for any other crime as well,
namely that it is – and must be – investigated in detail. Further still: anyone who postulates a crime to
be unique must be prepared for a uniquely thorough investigation of this alleged crime before its uniqueness is
accepted as fact. If a person or group blocks investigation of an allegedly unique crime on grounds of moral outrage,
then that person or group is guilty of a unique crime itself. This unique crime consists of first denying defense
against preposterous allegations, then preventing criticism of such tyrannical methods on the pre- text of unusual
guilt. This was the precise fate of Germany following World War II, with the result that Germans were first
brutalized, then slan- dered and denied opportunity to defend themselves. The treatment of vanquished Ger- many by the victorious Allies has been truly unique in mod- ern times, since the same Al- lies otherwise
give even the most notorious serial murder- ers an opportunity to defend Athur R. Butz themselves in court. 9Info Holocaust Info Holocaust circumstances, don’t Jewish victims 15. Whatever the deserve respect
and compensation? Everyone who is treated unjustly is entitled to reparations, and every victim of crime deserves
respect commensurate with human dignity. Revisionism is concerned solely with determination of objective historic
fact and has no aim to deny either respect or restitution to anyone who has suffered injustice. In case the evidence
shows that a particular histori- cal event did not have anywhere near as many victims as was previously believed,
this is simply a historical determination that has no effect on the fate of anyone. Objective evidence could even
be of assistance to newly discovered victims. As of 2016, the German government had paid some 75.5 billion eEuros
(ca. 93 billion U.S. dollars) in reparations to those “persecuted by the Nazi regime” (goo.gl/boSmaZ). But as large as these sums seem to be, the main issue isn’t even financial in nature, which can be demonstrated with
just one example. According to Wikipedia, in just the year 2010, the Germans collectively spent 120 billion euros
(almost 150 bil- lion U.S. dollars) on their vacations! 27 This makes Germa- ny the world leader in per-capita tourism
expenditures. It is therefore obvious that the Germans spend on their vacation every single year more than they
have ever paid to victims of the Holocaust and other (alleged or real) persecution commit- ted during World War
II. This shows clearly that the burden on the Germans cannot be all that high, financially speaking. So this is
not primarily a financial issue. The real issue is mor- al and legal in nature. Perhaps you remember a basic principle which is the law in every constitutional state: accountability does not extend to convicts’ relatives. There
should therefore be a time limit for claims made against the German people, as the wartime generation is dying out.
In addition, this is also a matter or fairness, as the Germans weren’t the only ones inflicting pain and suffering
on others. For instance, wouldn’t it be interesting to know when the four million Germans who were exploited
as slave laborers by France, the UK, Norway, the United States, the Soviet Union, Poland, Czechoslova- kia... for
years and sometimes even decades after the end of WWII (goo.gl/tEBaFd) may finally be allowed to claim repa- rations?
When will the 12 million eastern German victims of ethnic cleansing and the survivors of the two million who were
murdered or died in the process (goo.gl/3Q98Z7), the six hundred thousand victims of Allied terror bombings (goo. gl/Yng7GA), the millions of Germans who died of starvation under Allied postwar blockade and de-industrialization and Eisenhower’s withholding of food to them, be given proper recompense? 28 Do not all victims of injustice
deserve the same respect and reparations? Or are some victims more equal than others? 16. Who are the Holocaust
revisionists? Holocaust revisionists are not a homogenous group. They in- as well as teachers in other fields, such as
Jürgen Graf. The ranks of Holocaust revisionists include Communists clude Jews (defined by heritage: Josef
G. Burg, Roger Guy Dommergue, David Cole, Joel Hayward, Gerard Menuhin, and Socialists (Paul Rassinier, Roger Garaudy),
moderate Paul Eisen, Henry Herskovitz); Christians (Michael A. Hoff- Leftists (Pierre Guillaume, Serge Thion), Libertarians
(An- man, Robert Countess); Muslims (Ibrahim Alloush, Ahmed drew Allen, Germar Rudolf, David Cole, Bradley Smith, Rami, Roger Garaudy) as well as agnostics and atheists (Ger- Richard Widmann), Conservatives (Carlo Mattogno, Willy Wallwey),
Rightists (Udo Walendy, Mark Weber) and Na- mar Rudolf, Bradley Smith, Robert Faurisson) Some revisionists suffered
persecution by the National So- tional Socialists (Ernst Zündel, Vincent Reynouard). Since we don’t consider
it important to classify revisionists cialist regime as well as internment in concentration camps (Paul Rassinier,
Josef G. Burg). Others are veterans of World according to political orientation, we cannot vouch for the War II, from
both the German and Allied armed forces (Willy correctness of these designations, though. Among our ranks are Frenchmen
(Rob- Wallwey, Wilhelm Stäglich, Douglas ert Faurisson, Pierre Guillaume, Roger Ga- Collins.). Some revisionists
are profes- raudy, Paul Rassinier, Vincent Reynouard, sors (Prof. Robert Faurisson, Prof. Ar- Jean Plantin),
Americans (Bradley Smith, thur R. Butz, Prof. Thomas Dalton, Prof. Thomas Dalton, Mark Weber, Arthur Butz, Costas
Zaverdinos) and some have PhD Richard Widmann, Fred Leuchter), Germans degrees (Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich, Dr. Rob- (Germar Rudolf, Walter Lüftl, Willy Wall- ert Countess, Dr. Herbert Tiedemann. Dr. wey, Arnulf Neumaier,
Wilhelm Stäglich), Nicholas Kollerstrom). Some have mas- Swiss (Jürgen Graf, Arthur Vogt), Ital- ters
degrees in chemistry, physics or en- ians (Carlo Mattogno), Spaniards (Enrique gineering (Willy Wallwey, Walter
Lüftl, Aynat), Jordanians (Ibrahim Alloush), Mo- Germar Rudolf, Arnulf Neumaier, Fried- roccans (Ahmed
Rami), Swedes, Danes, rich Berg); there are historians (Mark Britons (Nicholas Kollerstrom), Poles, and Weber,
Robert Countess, Carlo Mattog- Germar Rudolf Russians, to name just a few. 29 no, Jean Plantin, Nicholas Kollerstrom) 10 17. Do Holocaust revisionists want to exonerate Hitler? with the possible ‘moral’ spin-off effects
of our findings in Historians must not pay attention to what effect their research relation to politicians or regimes
of the past or present, but has on anyone’s reputation, even and especially their own. solely with the facts.
Anyone who argues otherwise is the en- Hence, whatever the effects of revisionist findings are on Hit- emy of knowledge.” ler’s or anyone else’s reputation, it simply is of no moment. Again, it may be true that some individuals
or groups Let’s quote Germar Rudolf on this point: 30 “Revisionists are repeatedly accused of wanting
to whitewash sometimes cite revisionist findings to support their religious National Socialism, redeem it, or even resurrect
nationalistic- or ideological agendas. But let us be very clear here: We authoritarian political systems, or assist in
a breakthrough Holocaust revisionists depend more than anyone else on the of nationalism. That may be true for some revisionists,
but protection of our inalienable rights to freedom of information certainly not for all of them. But be that as it may,
the fact is and freedom of expression. Hence, we oppose any measure that political suspicions do not contribute anything
to the fac- limiting these rights, be they in the past, the present or the tual debate, as they cannot refute factual
arguments. When it future. In the spring of 1933, the German government under comes to discussing facts, it is therefore
irrelevant both what the revisionists want and what others accuse them of wanting. Hitler decided to suspend and later
effectively revoke most While researching, our highest goal must at all times be to Germans’ civil rights as they
were enshrined in the German discover how historical events actually occurred – as the constitution of the time.
Anyone decrying similar acts hap- 19th-Century German historian Leopold Ranke maintained. pening today in many European
countries (see Question 19) For example, historians should not place research in the ser- must also condemn Hitler’s
acts as unacceptable. We can’t vice of making criminal accusations against Genghis Khan have it both ways. Moreover,
when Hitler decided in the summer of 1934 to and the Mongol hordes, nor to whitewash any of their wrong- doings.
Anybody insisting that research be barred from exon- execute without due process several leaders of the SA for erating
Genghis Khan of criminal accusations would be the allegedly planning a putsch, rather than handing them over object of
ridicule and would be subject to the suspicion that to the court system for prosecution, they committed murder, he was,
in fact, acting out of political motives. If this were plain and simple. Anyone decrying arsons, bomb attacks, not so,
why would anyone insist that our historical view of physical assaults and murder perpetrated against revision- Genghis
Khan forever be defined solely by Khan’s victims and ists as unacceptable acts of (attempted) murder 31 must also condemn Hitler’s acts as unacceptable. We can’t have it both enemies? The same reasoning applies to
Hitler and the Third Reich. ways. Both revisionists and their adversaries are entitled to their Finally, after the
infamous 1938 “Night of Broken Glass” political views. The accusation, however, that revisionists are pogroms
against Jews in Germany, Hitler and his govern- only interested in exonerating National Socialism and that ment decided
to make matters worse by prohibiting insurance such an effort is reprehensible or even criminal, is a boomer- companies
from paying indemnifications to Jews for damages ang: This accusation implies that it is deemed unacceptable incurred
during these acts of vandalism, and by collectively to partially exonerate National Socialism historically, and by punishing
all the Jews in Germany with a fine of one billion so doing, always also morally. But by declaring any hypothet- Reichsmarks!
Anyone decrying that we revisionists as vic- ical exoneration based on possible facts as unacceptable, one tims of societal
persecution get fined and imprisoned on top admits openly not to be interested in the quest of this must also condemn
Hitler’s acts of for the truth, but in incriminating National So- blaming and punishing the victims. We cialism historically and morally under any cir- can’t have it both ways. cumstances and at all costs. And
the motivation And we won’t even start with incar- behind this can only be political. Hence, those cerating
people with or without due pro- accusing revisionists of misusing their research cess merely because of their peacefully for political ends have themselves been proven expressed views or religious and ethnic guilty of exactly this
offense. It is therefore not affiliations. Anyone decrying that we re- necessarily the revisionists who are guided
by visionists are incarcerated for our peace- political motives – though quite a few of them fully expressed
views – and we are – must certainly are – but with absolute certainty all also condemn Hitler’s
acts along the same those who accuse the revisionists of harboring lines. We can’t have it both ways. reprehensible
motives. Although many consider We cannot stop certain people from ap- the anti-fascist motives of those combatting
re- plauding, condoning or defending these visionism as morally worthwhile, they remain and other criminal
acts of the Hitler gov- What is more important: political motives that are hostile to discovering ernment.
But we can show that we con- Vilifying Hitler and evaluating the factual issues at hand. demn them wholeheartedly,
on our own or finding out the truth? In short, our research must never be concerned behalf, as peaceful dissidents. 11Info Holocaust Info Holocaust 18. What do Holocaust revisionists want? I would like to turn that question
around: What do our de- tractors want who declare an irreproachable intention – the critical review of one
chapter in history – to be taboo, and who ostracize, persecute and even incarcerate any offenders? These are
frequently the same people who impute all sorts of evil intentions to us revisionists. But we are not the ones persecuting
and incarcerating peaceful, innocent people! It is therefore much more conducive and important to ask about the
motives of those who mercilessly persecute the revision- ists with their worldwide power. Why do they do that? And
if you, dear reader, are unwilling to pursue the ques- tion about their motives, but keep wondering about ours, then maybe you should start questioning your own bias. Since the revisionists comprise such a heterogeneous group (see
Question 16), it is impossible to state what “the” revisionists hope to accomplish. Obviously, any cliché
about revisionists must therefore be false and misleading. However, revisionists do have one thing in common: determination
to expose the lack of evidence for the conventional Holocaust narrative and to convince others of it. Revisionists
would probably quarrel endlessly about ev- erything else, particularly if they tried to seek common politi- cal
ground. It is, therefore, false and misleading to ascribe a uniform political agenda to them. The political views of
revi- sionists are indeed varied and incongruous. In contrast to that, the governments and media of most western
societies spread the cliché that all revisionists are right-wing extremists who are attempting to rehabilitate
the National Socialist regime in order to usher in a new authoritarian government of the right. This may be true
for some revisionists, but they are a minority within revisionist ranks. Perhaps a few prominent examples will illustrate
the po- litical variety of revisionists’ political leanings, which makes it inconceivable that they harbor
the sinister intentions often ascribed to them: Paul Rassinier: What would have motivated a French Communist,
who was interned in a German concentration camp on account of his activities in the Resistance in helping Jews to
escape the Nazis, to rehabilitate National Socialism? Josef G. Burg: What would have motivated a Jew who suffered
under the occupation of both the Germans and Rus- sians during the Second World War? Fred Leuchter: What would have
motivated an entirely apolitical American expert in execution technology? Pierre Guillaume, Serge Thion: What would
have mo- tivated leftist-anarchist Frenchmen to rehabilitate National Socialism in Germany? Roger Garaudy:
What would have motivated a longtime prominent French Communist? Bradley Smith, Richard Widmann: What would have motivated American libertarians? Jean Plantin, Germar Rudolf: What would motivate these liberal and conservative
European professionals, born in the mid-1960s, to rehabilitate National Socialism? Does it really matter what a
revisionist is trying to achieve with his political or other ideas? After all, the proof for some- one’s claim
lies in the evidence adduced, not in their political agenda. 19. Is Holocaust revisionism illegal? In the United
States, it is covered by the First Amendment, like a peaceful, scholarly speech, which means that it is per- fectly
legal to voice, write, publish revisionist views. Things are quite different, however, when we turn to Canada, Austra- lia, or even many countries in Europe and to Israel (see goo. gl/8Tpbiq). The reason for this persecution is the
claim that revision- ist theories insult Jews, and that it is illegitimate to heap in- sult upon those who have
been injured during World War II. Although Holocaust revisionism does not address anything about Jews as such (although
some supporters of revisionism might), the leaders of most Jewish communities feel heav- ily offended by it, because
revisionism directly or indirectly comes to the conclusion that several Jewish personalities were not always truthful
when testifying about their experi- ences in World War II. Of course, it would be surprising if Jews were the only identifiable group of humanity who never lie, distort, exag- gerate or are simply mistaken, but apparently leading
Jewish representatives feel, and the authorities in numerous western countries agree, that nobody should ever be
allowed to claim 12 that certain Jews made untrue statements about the Holocaust. However, if we look into
the legal situation, we must insist that theoretically speaking Holocaust revisionism should be perfectly legal
in all these countries. This is so because all these nations signed the United Nations Declaration of Hu- man Rights,
which makes these Human Rights binding on all these nations. Freedom of speech can be limited only in cases of insult
or incitement to criminal acts, but freedom of scientific research and peaceful speech can never be limited –
theoretically. For this reason, a comprehensive German PhD thesis on The Punishability of the Auschwitz Lie (Die
Strafbarkeit des Auschwitz-Leugnens) came to the conclusion that Holocaust revisionism itself cannot be legally
repressed, as this violates basic human rights. 32 The facts are different, however. So how is that discrepancy
between ideal and reality justified? As a justification for this blatant violation of civil rights, it is often
claimed that revisionist views, even if presented soberly and without any inflammatory words, could instigate people
to commit illegal acts against others (mainly Jews) or could even threaten “public peace.” Purely factual,
soberly presented and substantiated claims, however, can never cause position to war and slavery): 33 such acts,
no matter how controversial and taboo-breaking “Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have suc- they might be. If people overreact to such texts, the problem ceeded, or shall we transgress them at once? Men generally, lies within those people – their upbringing or social
condi- under such a government as this, think that they ought to wait tioning – or within society itself for
having created a taboo in until they have persuaded the majority to alter them. They the first place. think
that, if they should resist, the remedy would be worse The claim that matter-of-factual views about the persecu- than
the evil. But it is the fault of the government itself that tion of the Jews itself could be inflammatory is therefore
a the remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it worse. Why is it simple lie. If that method were to be applied
universally, it not more apt to anticipate and provide for reform? Why does could be misused for the prohibition
of each and everything, it not cherish its wise minority? Why does it cry and resist if only some influential group
can be found that feels suffi- before it is hurt? Why does it not encourage its citizens to be ciently upset or
unsettled by it. In fact, the concept of “public on the alert to point out its faults, and do better than it would peace” is a perfect authoritarian tool to suppress any contro- have them? Why does it always crucify Christ,
and excom- versial view, no matter how legitimate. municate Copernicus and Luther, and pronounce Washington The
only rule needed for governing free speech is this: Ev- and Franklin rebels? [...] erything is permitted, as long
as one does not call for, pro- A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it mote, condone or justify
the violation of the civil rights of is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs others. Since
all acts that really threaten the public peace, like by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men
in calls for a violent revolution, insurrection, putsch, riot, po- prison, or give up war and slavery, the State
will not hesitate grom, ethnic cleansing, etc., are at once calls for the violation which to choose. [...] of
the civil rights of others, the concept of “public peace” Under a government which imprisons any unjustly,
the true becomes obsolete and can no longer be misused by the au- place for a just man is also in prison.” thorities to stifle legitimate peaceful yet controversial views. Another justification for anti-revisionist oppressive
laws, Or to put it as did Mahatma Gandhi, who was inspired by in particular in the German-speaking countries, goes roughly
Thoreau’s essay some 70 years later: 34 “So long as the superstition that men should obey unjust laws as follows: exists, so long will their slavery exist.” In order to prevent that minorities will again be
persecuted, dissidents imprisoned and books burned, as has happened in the [Nazi] past, we must for a change persecute some other minorities, imprison other kinds of dissidents and burn their books. This perversion of logic does not re- quire any further comment. Hence, we are dealing with “democratically” enacted, yet tyran- nical laws permit- ting the majority to suppress a
peaceful minority, plain and simple. It is there- fore not Holocaust revisionism which is unlawful,
but the laws that outlaw it. U.S. American Hen- ry David Thoreau wrapped it up nicely when he wrote
some Map of Europe, with countries outlawing dissent on the orthodox Holocaust narrative in red, with the year given
when each country introduced its law. 160 years ago (in op- 13Info Holocaust Info Holocaust 20. Where
can I learn more about Holocaust revisionism? The best, fastest, cheapest place for this is the Internet and, especially
for English-language readers, the websites www. codoh.com and www.HolocaustHandbooks.com. If your ser- vice provider
blocks these pages (obvious proof of censor- ship), you can circumvent Big Brother with the help of the free service
provided by various anonymizing services which hide the content you are requesting and receiving from your Internet
service provider, so they won’t withhold it. 2017, Amazon blocked all our books and deleted all associ- ated book
reviews, so you can’t find the reviews quoted here anymore – so much for freedom of speech...): “Phenomenal.
A fantastic starting point. For a 115-page book, it is a truly shocking and eye-opening work. I cannot recommend
this highly enough. Honestly, sub- ject your accepted opinion on the matter to this 1-hour read and see where you
sit after that.” Don’t Know Where to Start? Start with a Movie T. Dalton, Debating the Holocaust: A New Look
at Both Sides The above-mentioned brief introduction into the topic is a condensation of this more-encompassing
study, in which Dalton studies the topic more thoroughly by juxtaposing the most important arguments of the two
contending sides in the raging debate about the “Holocaust,” which, some say, should not be debated
in the first place. The book has some 300 pages of text of a larger format (6×9 inches). At $25/£18 as a
hard copy, it’s still a steal. Amazon customer “patito,” a verified buyer of the book, wrote this
brief review about it: “Most important Holocaust book in this moment The updates to the 2015 edition are especially
important as the author corrects and forwards a proposal towards the end. A very good compilation of the real state
of affairs regard- ing the actual evidence for one argument or the other. The Epilogue is especially critical to
understanding the whole picture.” To ease you into the subject, we recommend that you sit back, relax
and watch an introductory documentary. There are sev- eral choices we recommend. You can find them all for watch- ing and downloading free of charge at www.HolocaustHand- books.com: Holocaust, Hate Speech & Were the Germans
So Stupid? The late British video-journalist Anthony Lawson, a retired international-prize-winning commercials director,
camera- man, ad agency creative director and voice-over artist, ex- pertly introduces the viewer to the basic concepts
and conse- quences of skepticism about the orthodox Holocaust narra- tive. (35 min.) The First Holocaust: The
Surprising Origin of the Six-Million Figure This documentary reveals how the myth of six million per- secuted
Jews threatened by a holocaust was created in the late eighteen-hundreds (yes 1800s!), became a popular theme during
and after the FIRST World War (not the Second), and has stayed with us ever since. (1 hr 10 min.) Probing the Holocaust:
The Horror Explained, Part 1 This documentary shows with a few pertinent, well-documen ted examples –
the cases of the Dachau, Nordhausen and Ber- gen-Belsen Camps – why it is important to distrust wartime propaganda
about claimed Nazi atrocities, not least because much of this propaganda has been admitted by mainstream historians
to have been mendacious. (1 hr 36 min.) Read Our Books If you’re hungry for more, you can browse any of our
grow- ing roster of documentaries, or, if you want to delve into the matter even deeper, you may want to start reading
our books, whose information density is easily tenfold that of a docu- mentary. As introductory reads I recommend
one of the follow- ing books, depending on how many pages you want to go through, and which level of immersion you
are looking for (find out more about them at shop.codoh.com): Thomas Dalton, The Holocaust: A Beginner’s Guide This book has only 115 pages of text in a handy, small paper- back format of 5×8 inches, and it costs only $10/£8
as a hard copy. Amazon customer E.J. Peterson, a verified buyer of the book, wrote the following brief review about
it (on March 6, 14 Nicholas Kollerstrom, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust – Myth & Reality Science
historian Dr. Kollerstrom explains the Holocaust is- sue for the common reader from a scientific, but also from a
societal point of view. This paperback book has some 220 pages of text (6×9 inches). At $25/£20 as a hard
copy, it has been our best-selling book ever since it was first published. Amazon customer “Giordano Bruno,”
a Amazon-verified buyer of the book, wrote this brief review about it: “Myth Busting An interesting and
informative book, particularly how it ex- presses that the “Holocaust” has basically become a sacred religion
that cannot be challenged even by science. Anyone who dares to criticise or explain that certain narratives of the holocaust are physically impossible is instantly branded as a heretic and excommunicated. Would definitely recommend reading it!” Germar Rudolf, Lectures on the Holocaust: Controversial Issues Cross-Examined At 510 pages
of text, this book has been characterized as en- cyclopedic in its coverage of the topic, yet at the same time as
a truly riveting read. Written in an unusual dialogue form, it draws you right into the debate the author engages in.
This is a brand-new edition issued in July 2017, which is greatly improved by new material. It costs merely $30/£25
as a hard copy, and it can be downloaded as an eBook (PDF and Kin- dle) free of charge at www.Holocausthandbooks.com.
Ama- zon customer “HolocaustHistory channel,” a verified buyer of the book (he bought it from us, not
from Amazon), wrote this brief review about it: “Outstanding This is without doubt one of the best treatments
of the holo- caust debate. Rudolf is judicious and moderate throughout, and packs in a great deal of information.
By writing dia- logues, he gives himself the opportunity to give clear answers to many questions that will occur
to the reader. If you are at all interested in the holocaust, you have to read this book.” ...and more If you want to have answers to even deeper-penetrating ques- tions, we highly recommend you familiarize yourself with our prestigious series Holocaust Handbooks, which has many References For sources on Majdanek as summarized on
the back cover see goo.gl/n2Bz3B. 1 Karl Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson
& Co., London 1968, p. 280. 2 In an interview with the Berlin daily Berliner Zeitung
on Sept. 4, 2000 (goo.gl/BMhmtc); and in a private letter, J. Graf, The Giant with Feet of Clay, 2nd ed., Uckfield
2015, p. 126 (goo.gl/VHpmzh). 3 https://archive.org/details/Defamation; starting at 1:15:46 into
the movie. 4 In a letter to revisionist Gerd Honsik, in: idem, Freispruch für Hitler?, Bur- genländischer Kulturverband, Vienna 1988, p. 7 (goo.gl/uuVSK6). 5 George De Wan, “The
Holocaust in Perspective,” Newsday, New York, Feb. 23, 1983, p. II/3. 6 See the studies
on various camps as published in our series Holocaust Handbooks (subsequently HH): www.HolocaustHandbooks.com; in particu- lar Volumes 2, 10, 11, 17, 20-22 (Auschwitz), 4 (Stutthof), 5 (Majdanek), 8 (Treblinka), 9 (Belzec), 19 (Sobibor),
23 (Chelmno), 25 (Dachau, Mauthau- sen, Neuengamme, Ravensbrück, Sachsenhausen). 7 See
Volume 39 of HH. 8 See Volume 26 of HH. 9 See esp. Volumes 24 and
40 of HH re. Auschwitz. 10 See Köhler in Volume 1, pp. 85-131, plus Volumes 30, 35-37 of
HH; Sec- tion 4.2. in Volume 15; and the ubiquitous critique of testimonies in almost all of these volumes. 11
See esp. Volume 7 of HH. 12 See Volume 29 of HH. 13 Rudolf
in Volume 1 of HH, pp. 181-213. 14 See Volume 6 of HH and the documentary posted there. 15
Franciszek Piper, “Mass Murder,” Volume 3 of: Wacław Długoborski, Fran- ciszek Piper (eds.),
Auschwitz 1940-1945: Central Issues in the History of the Camp, Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum, Auschwitz 2000. 16
HH Volumes 10, 11, 13, 17, 20-22 24, 33. studies on highly specialized topics. Most of these books can be
downloaded as eBooks (PDF and Kindle formats) free of charge at www.HolocaustHandbooks.com. For readers who are
interested in papers on certain topics, the following revisionist periodicals are recommended: –
Inconvenient History (ongoing since 2009): www.InconvenientHistory.com – The Revisionist
(1999-2005; defunct since my arrest in Oct. 2005): goo.gl/1VzGXh – The Journal of Historical
Review (1980-2002; defunct): goo.gl/SxL1Zs – Vierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung
(1997- 2006; defunct, German language): www.vho.org/VffG You can also visit our revisionist bookstores selling some
of these items in hardcopy: shop.codoh.com 17 Most notably Arad, Yitzhak, Bełżec.
Sobibór, Treblinka: The Operation Reinhard Death Camps, Indiana University Press, Bloomington/Indianapo- lis
1987; Donat, Alexander (ed.), The Death Camp Treblinka, Holocaust Li- brary, New York 1979; Schelvis, Jules, Sobibór:
A History of a Nazi Death Camp, Berg Publishers, Oxford 2007. 18 HH volumes 8, 9, 19, 23,
28. 19 See HH Volumes 30, 35-37 for some detailed studies on the trustworthiness of certain
witnesses. 20 See e.g. Guenter Lewy‘s book The Nazi Persecution of the Gypsies and Anna
Tijsseling‘s paper “A Sincere Belief in Dracula” at goo.gl/bS2CRK. 21 11 January
2005 (goo.gl/YpEyqh); 26 January 2007 (goo.gl/rui8ew); 27 January 2009 (goo.gl/MpRMbb). 22 See
the documentary Probing the Holocaust, Part 1 at goo.gl/rVAAuc, with its footnoted transcript for more information. 23 See next to the documentary mentioned in the previous note: Graf in Vol ume 1 of HH,
pp. 283-309; plus Weber at goo.gl/458eBo. 24 See also Cobain’s articles at goo.gl/pnaCus;
goo.gl/4dFJUF; goo.gl/5acDjA. 25 See Volume 35 of HH. 26 See Köhler
in Volume 1 of HH, pp. 85-131. 27 http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourismus 28
See James Bacque’s books Other Losses and Crimes and Mercies. 29 To learn about their
views, see these individuals’ entries in the CODOH library at www.codoh.com/library/authors. 30
Volume 2 of HH, pp. 41f. 31 On violent acts perpetrated against revisionists see HH Volume 15,
Chapter 5.2. “Violence,” pp. 497-501. 32 Thomas Wandres, Die Strafbarkeit des
Auschwitz-Leugnens, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 2000. 33 Walden and Other Writings,
Bantam, Toronto 1981, pp. 92, 94. 34 Shriman Narayan (ed.), The Selected Works of Mahatma Gandhi,
Vol. 4, Navajivan Publishing House, Ahmedabad 1969, p. 174. 15Who in Their Right Mind Would Doubt the Holocaust
Happened? To ask that question means to have mis understood the issue. The question is not whether “the
Holocaust” happened, but rather what exactly happened during the events usually referred to as “the
Holo caust.” After all, there is no such place or single event as “the Holocaust.” It con sists of many individual events and loca tions spread out over an entire continent during a time span of
some four years. Let us take as one example the Maj danek Camp near the Polish city of Lu blin. What
happened there during its ex istence between the summer of 1941 and the summer of 1944? How many inmates died in that concentration camp for what reasons and in which ways? If we consult mainstream sources, we get
different answers, depending on when they were published. Shortly after the capture of the camp, the Soviets
claimed a death toll of some two million for that camp during a press conference in Lublin on August 25th, 1944.
During the Polish trial in late 1944 against six former camp guards, the Maj danek death toll was set to 1.7
million. Roughly a year later, during the Nurem berg International Military Tribunal, the Soviets introduced
an investigation report claiming that up to 1.5 million inmates had been killed in that camp us ing seven
different gas chambers, among other methods. This figure, however, was significant ly reduced three years
after the war, when Quantity Discounts Available! You can download a PDF file of this pam phlet free of
charge, use it to print cop ies as you see fit, or order printed copies from us (with optional bulk discounts)
at shop.codoh.com, Category “Promotion,” or by contacting us: shop@codoh.com Castle Hill Publishers PO Box 243 Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK ISBN 978-1-59148-198-0 9 781591 481980 > Polish judge Zdzisław
Łukaszkiewicz, a member of the Polish “Commission to Investigate German Crimes in Poland,” published
the commission’s findings about Majdanek, which set that camp’s death toll at 360,000. The next
downgrading came after the collapse of the communist Eastern Bloc, when Polish historian Czesław Rajca re duced the death toll down to 235,000. But that was still not the end of the death-toll deflation, because in a
detailed research paper of 2005, Tomasz Kranz, then head of the Majdanek Museum, decided to streamline the
official narrative by reduc ing the death toll down to 78,000, and to ditch five of the seven initially claimed gas chambers. We learn from this that for many de cades the official narrative of that camp was filled
with exaggerations and in ventions caused by wartime propaganda and hysteria. Much of what was initially claimed “never happened,” so to say. And how can we be sure that today’s narrative is accurate?
We cannot, because “denying the Holocaust” is a crime in Po land, so there is a limit to what historians are allowed to say and write. The question is: how can one get to the bottom of this, if relying on main stream sources seems to be a bad idea? Well, why not start with research results published by non-governmental,
inde pendent historians? These “revisionist” historians are usually and wrongly vili fied
as “deniers,” but their thoroughly researched book on Majdanek, first pub lished in 1998,
proves them right. In it, they meticulously documented a total of some 42,000 victims of the Majdanek Camp,
and the absence of any execution gas chambers. Hence, today’s officially sanctioned Majdanek narrative
is much closer to what revisionists have found out than to the initial propaganda-infested version, see the
chart below. Anyone with a skeptical mind should rightfully ask: And what else did they get wrong? This
brochure introduces the novice to the concept of Holocaust revisionism, and answers some tough questions that may come to the reader’s mind, such as: – – What does Holocaust revisionism claim? –
– Why should I take Holocaust revisio nism more seriously than the claim that the earth is flat? –
– What about the pictures of corpse piles in the camps? – – How about the testimonies by survivors and confessions by perpetrators? – – What does it matter whether prisoners died from disease or poison
gas? – – Why does it matter how many Jews were killed by the Nazis, since even 1,000 would have
been too many? – – Whatever the circumstances, don’t Jewish victims deserve respect and compensation?
|