THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE


 

BEGIN DEPROGRAMMING HERE:

 

1. What proof exists that the Nazis killed six million Jews?

None. All we have is postwar testimony, mostly of individual "survivors." This testimony

is contradictory, and very few claim to have actually witnessed any "gassing." There are no

contemporaneous documents or hard evidence: no mounds of ashes, no crematories capable of

disposing of millions of corpses, no "human soap," no lamp shades made of human skin, and

 no credible demographic statistics. 

 

2. What evidence exists that six million Jews were not killed by the Nazis?

Extensive forensic, demographic, analytical and comparative evidence demonstrates the

impossibility of such a figure. The widely repeated "six million" figure is an irresponsible exaggeration. 

 

3. Did Simon Wiesenthal state in writing that "there were no extermination camps on German soil"?

Yes. The famous "Nazi hunter" wrote this in Stars and Stripes, Jan. 24, 1993.

He also claimed that "gassings" of Jews took place only in Poland. 

 

4. If Dachau was in Germany, and even Wiesenthal says that it was not an extermination camp,

why do many American veterans say it was an extermination camp?

After the Allies captured Dachau, many GIs and others were led through the camp and shown

a building alleged to have been a "gas chamber." The mass media widely, but falsely, continues

to assert that Dachau was a "gassing" camp. 

 

5. What about Auschwitz? Is there any proof that gas chambers were used to kill people there?

No. Auschwitz, captured by the Soviets, was modified after the war, and a room was reconstructed

to look like a large "gas chamber." After America's leading expert on gas chamber construction and

 design, Fred Leuchter, examined this and other alleged Auschwitz gassing facilities, he stated that

it was an "absurdity" to claim that they were, or could have been, used for executions. 

 

6. If Auschwitz wasn't a "death camp," what was its true purpose?

It was an internment center and part of a large-scale manufacturing complex.

Synthetic fuel was produced there, and its inmates were used as a workforce. 

 

7. Who set up the first concentration camps?

During the Boer War (1899-1902), the British set up what they called "concentration camps"

in South Africa to hold Afrikaner women and children. Approximately 30,000 died in

these hell-holes, which were as terrible as German concentration camps of World War II. 

 

8. How did German concentration camps differ from American "relocation"

camps in which Japanese-Americans were interned during WWII?

The only significant difference was that the Germans interned persons on the basis of being real

or suspected security threats to the German war effort, whereas the Roosevelt administration interned

persons on the basis of race alone. 

 

9. Why did the German government intern Jews in camps?

It considered Jews a direct threat to national security. (Jews were overwhelmingly represented

in Communist subversion.) However, all suspected security risks -- not just Jews --

were in danger of internment. 

 

10. What hostile measure did world Jewry undertake against Germany as early as 1933? 

In March 1933, international Jewish organizations declared an international boycott of German goods. 

 

11. Did the Jews of the world "declare war on Germany"?

Yes. Newspapers around the world reported this. A front-page headline in the London Daily Express

 (March 24, 1933), for example, announced "Judea Declares War on Germany." 

 

12. Was this before or after the "death camp" stories began?

This was years before the "death camp" stories, which began in 1941-1942. 

 

13. What nation is credited with being the first to practice mass civilian bombing?

Britain -- on May 11, 1940. 

 

14. How many "gas chambers" to kill people were there at Auschwitz?

None. 

 

15. How many Jews were living in the areas that came under German control during the war?

Fewer than six million. 

 

16. If the Jews of Europe were not exterminated by the Nazis, what happened to them?

After the war millions of Jews were still alive in Europe. Hundreds of thousands (perhaps as many

as one and a half million) had died of all causes during the war. Others had emigrated to Palestine,

the United States, and other countries. Still more Jews left Europe after the war. 

 

17. How many Jews fled or were evacuated to deep within the Soviet Union?

More than two million fled or were evacuated by the Soviets in 1941-1942.

These Jews thus never came under German control. 

 

18. How many Jews emigrated from Europe prior to the war,

thus putting them outside of German reach?

Perhaps a million (not including those absorbed by the USSR). 

 

19. If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did

the commandant, Rudolf Hoess, confess that it was?

He was tortured by British military police,

as one of his interrogators later admitted. 

 

20. Is there any evidence of American, British and Soviet policy to torture German prisoners

in order to exact "confessions" for use at the trials at Nuremberg and elsewhere?

Yes. Torture was extensively used to produce fraudulent "evidence" for the

infamous Nuremberg trials, and in other postwar "war crimes" trials. 

 

21. How does the Holocaust story benefit Jews today?

It helps protect Jews as a group from criticism. As a kind of secular religion, it provides an

emotional bond between Jews and their leaders. It is a powerful tool in

Jewish money-raising campaigns, and is used to justify US aid to Israel. 

 

22. How does it benefit the State of Israel?

It justifies the billions of dollars in "reparations" Germany has paid to Israel and many individual

"survivors." It is used by the Zionist/Israeli lobby to dictate a pro-Israel American foreign policy in

the Middle East, and to force American taxpayer aid to Israel, totaling billions of dollars per year. 

 

23. How is it used by many Christian clergymen?

The Holocaust story is cited to justify the Old Testament notion

of Jews as a holy and eternally persecuted "Chosen People." 

 

24. How did it benefit the Communists?

It diverted attention from Soviet war mongering and atrocities

before, during and after the Second World War. 

 

25. How does it benefit Britain?

In much the same way it benefitted the Soviet Union. 

 

26. Is there any evidence that Hitler ordered mass extermination of Jews?

No. 

 

27. What kind of gas was used in German wartime concentration camps?

Hydrocyanic gas from "Zyklon B," a commercial

pesticide that was widely used throughout Europe. 

 

28. For what purpose was "Zyklon B" manufactured?

It was a pesticide used to fumigate clothing and 

quarters to kill typhus-bearing lice and other pests. 

 

29. Was this product suitable for mass extermination?

No. If the Nazis had intended to use poison gas to exterminate people, far more

efficient products were available. Zyklon is a slow-acting fumigation agent. 

 

30. How long does it take to ventilate an area after fumigation with Zyklon B?

Normally about 20 hours. The whole procedure is very complicated and dangerous.

Gas masks must be used, and only trained technicians are employed. 

 

31. Auschwitz commandant Hoess said that his men would enter the "gas chambers"

to remove bodies ten minutes after the victims had died. How do you explain this?

It can't be explained because had they done so they would

have suffered the same fate as the "gassing" victims. 

 

32. Hoess said in his "confession" that his men would smoke cigarettes as they pulled

bodies out of gas chambers, ten minutes after gassing. Isn't Zyklon B explosive?

Yes. The Hoess confession is obviously false. 

 

33. What was the exact procedure the Nazis allegedly used to exterminate Jews?

The stories range from dropping gas canisters into a crowded room from a hole in the ceiling,

to piping gas through shower heads, to "steam chambers," to "electrocution"

machinery. Millions are alleged to have been killed in these ways. 

 

34. How could a mass extermination program have been kept

secret from those who were scheduled to be killed?

It couldn't have been kept secret. The fact is that there were no mass gassings.

The extermination stories originated as wartime atrocity propaganda. 

 

35. If Jews scheduled for execution knew the fate in store for them,

why did they go along with the Germans without resisting?

They didn't fight back because they did not believe there was any intention to kill them. 

 

36. About how many Jews died in the concentration camps?

Competent estimates range from about 300,000 to 500,000. 

 

37. How did they die?

Mainly from recurring typhus epidemics that

ravaged war-torn Europe during the war, as well

as from starvation and lack of medical attention during the final months of the conflict,

when virtually all road and rail transportation had been bombed out by the Allies. 

 

38. What is typhus?

This disease always appears when many people are jammed together under unsanitary conditions.

It is carried by lice that infest hair and clothes. Ironically, if the Germans had used more Zyklon B,

more Jews might have survived the camps. 

 

39. What is the difference if six million or 300,000 Jews

died during the Second World War?

5,700,000. 

 

40. Some Jewish "death camp" survivors say they saw bodies being dumped

into pits and burned. How much fuel would have been required for this?

A great deal more than the Germans had access to,

as there was a substantial fuel shortage during the war. 

 

41. Can bodies be burned in pits?

No. It is impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed

by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen. 

 

42. Holocaust historians claim that the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in about ten minutes.

How long does it take to incinerate one body, according to professional crematory operators?

About an hour and a half, although the larger bones require further processing afterwards. 

 

43. Why did the German concentration camps have crematory ovens?

To dispose efficiently and sanitarily of the corpses of those who had died. 

 

44. Given a 100 percent duty cycle of all the crematories in all the camps in German-controlled

territory, what is the maximum number of corpses it would have been possible to

incinerate during the entire period such crematories were in operation?

About 430,600. 

 

45. Can a crematory oven be operated 100 percent of the time?

No. Fifty percent of the time is a generous estimate (12 hours per day). Crematory

ovens have to be cleaned thoroughly and regularly when in heavy operation. 

 

46. How much ash is left from a cremated corpse?

After the bone is all ground down, about a shoe box full. 

 

47.If six million people had been incinerated by

the Nazis, what happened to the ashes?

That remains to be "explained." Six million bodies would have produced many

tons of ashes, yet there is no evidence of any large ash depositories. 

 

48. Do Allied wartime aerial reconnaissance photos of Auschwitz (taken during the period

when the "gas chambers" and crematoria were supposedly in full operation)

show evidence of extermination?

No. In fact, these photographs do not even reveal a trace of the enormous amount of smoke

that supposedly was constantly over the camp, nor do they show evidence of the "open pits" in

which bodies were allegedly burned. 

 

49. What was the main provision of the German "Nuremberg Laws" of 1935?

They forbid marriage and sexual relations between

Germans and Jews, similar to laws existing in Israel today. 

 

50. Were there any American precedents for the Nuremberg Laws?

Years before Hitler's Third Reich, most states in the USA had enacted

laws prohibiting marriage between persons of different races. 

 

51. What did the International Red Cross have to report

with regard to the "Holocaust" question?

An official report on the visit of an IRC delegation to Auschwitz in September 1944 pointed out

that internees were permitted to receive packages, and that rumors of gas chambers could not be verified. 

 

52. What was the role of the Vatican during the time six

million Jews were allegedly being exterminated?

If there had been an extermination plan, the Vatican would most certainly have been in a

position to know about it. But because there was none, the Vatican had no reason to

speak out against it, and didn't. 

 

53. What evidence is there that Hitler knew of an

on-going Jewish extermination program?

None. 

 

54. Did the Nazis and the Zionists collaborate?

As early as 1933, Hitler's government signed an agreement with the Zionists permitting

Jews to emigrate from Germany to Palestine, taking large amounts of capital with them. 

 

55. How did Anne Frank die?

After surviving internment in Auschwitz, she succumbed to typhus in the Bergen-Belsen camp,

just a few weeks before the end of the war. She was not gassed. 

 

56. Is the Anne Frank Diary genuine?

No. Evidence compiled by Dr. Robert Faurisson of France

establishes that the famous diary is a literary hoax. 

 

57. What about the familiar photographs and film footage taken in the liberated

German camps showing piles of emaciated corpses? Are these faked?

Photographs can be faked, but it's far easier merely to add a misleading caption to a photo or

commentary to a piece of footage. Piles of emaciated corpses do not mean that these people

were "gassed" or deliberately starved to death. Actually, these were tragic victims of raging

epidemics or of starvation due to a lack of food in the camps toward the end of the war. 

 

58. Who originated the term "genocide"?

Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew, in a book published in 1944. 

 

59. Are films such as "Schindler's List"

or "The Winds of War" documentaries?

No. Such films are fictional dramatizations loosely based on history. Unfortunately,

all too many people accept them as accurate historical representations. 

 

60. How many books have been published that refute

some aspect of the standard "Holocaust" story?

Dozens. More are in production. 

 

61. What happened when the Institute for Historical Review offered $50,000

to anyone who could prove that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz?

No proof was submitted as a claim on the reward, but the Institute was sued for $17 million

by former Auschwitz inmate Mel Mermelstein, who claimed that the reward offer caused him

to lose sleep and his business to suffer, and represented "injurious denial of established fact." 

 

62. What about the charge that those who question the

Holocaust story are merely anti-Semitic or neo-Nazi?

This is a smear designed to draw attention away from facts and honest arguments. Scholars

who refute Holocaust story claims are of all persuasions and ethnic-religious backgrounds (including Jewish).

There is no correlation between "Holocaust" refutation and anti-Semitism or neo-Nazism.

Increasing numbers of Jewish scholars openly admit the lack of evidence for key Holocaust claims. 

 

63. What has happened to "revisionist" historians

who have challenged the Holocaust story?

They have been subjected to smear campaigns, loss of academic positions,

loss of pensions, destruction of their property and physical violence. 

 

64. Has the Institute for Historical Review suffered any retaliation for its

efforts to uphold the right of freedom of speech and academic freedom?

The IHR had been bombed three times, and was completely destroyed on July 4, 1984, in a criminal

arson attack. Numerous death threats by telephone have been received. Media coverage of the IHR

has been overwhelmingly hostile. 

 

65. Why is there so little publicity for the revisionist view?

Because for political reasons the Establishment does not want any in-depth

discussion about the facts surrounding the Holocaust story. 

 

66Where can I get more information about the "other side" of the Holocaust story,

as well as facts concerning other aspects of World War II historical revisionism?

 

Jim Rizoli's Bitchute Channel - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/kDHBE5vylTdI/

 

 

 

 
 

Ernst Zundel, Interviewed by an Israeli Journalist 1996

Click to watch on BitChute!
Click on the image to load the video from BitChute!
Watch on Bitchute.com

Watch on Minds.com

The greatest lie ever told - The Holocaust - 2015 Documentary HD

Click to watch on Youtube!
Click on the image to load the video from BitChute!
Watch on Bitchute.com

Watch on Minds.com

Bishop Richard Williamson - Gas Chambers, Anti-Semitism and the Truth!

Click to watch on BitChute!
Click on the image to load the video from BitChute!
Watch on Bitchute.com

Watch on Minds.com

HOLOHOAX - German Grandmother & the Central Council of the Jews!

Click to watch on Youtube!
Click on the image to load the video!
Watch on Bitchute.com

Watch on Minds.com

HoloCost Revisionism

Click to watch on BitChute!
Click on the image to load the video. Right click on video for options.
Watch on Bitchute.com

Watch on Minds.com

Secret Facts of the Holocaust

Click to watch on BitChute!
Click on the image to load the video from BitChute!
Watch on Bitchute.com

Watch on Minds.com

Holocaust Survivors Who Tell The Truth - English Subtitles

Click to watch on BitChute!
Click on the image to load the video from BitChute!
Watch on Bitchute.com

Watch on Minds.com

HOLOCAUST FAKERY EXPOSED

Click to watch on BitChute!
Click on the image to load the video from BitChute!
Watch on Bitchute.com

Watch on Minds.com

Zionism's Holocaustianity Big Lie

Click to watch on BitChute!
Click on the image to load the video from BitChute!
Watch on Bitchute.com

Watch on Minds.com
 
 

 

 THE JEW'S HOLOCAUST NARRATIVE IS THE MOST MASSIVE CYNICAL EXPLOITIVE FRAUD IN HISTORY

 

The alleged genocide of European Jewry has been used to justify the Allied war

effort, to establish the State of Israel, to justify Israeli violence against its neighbors,

to induce guilt in both Germans and the Allied nations, to cover up and ignore

Allied crimes against Germans, to allow Jews to receive massive reparations

from Germany, and to create solidarity in the Jewish community. The extreme

importance of the Holocaust story in advancing Zionist/Jewish interests

ensures that this falsification of history will continue in the future.

 

No one can deny that Jews were rounded up and imprisoned by Germans in

German occupied territories after the suspension of the HAAVARA TRANSFER

AGREEMENT during WWII. Nor can anyone deny that Japanese Americans were

rounded up and imprisoned in America for the same reasons, those reasons

being primarily security issues, and in the same fashion during WWII. And, after

examining the facts, the German prisons built for Jews were far more

humanely accommodating than the American prisons built for Japanese.  

(See World War II West Coast Camps for Japanese-Americans 

here: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v02/v02p-45_Weber.html )


What is staunchly denied is the existence, much less the use, of homicidal

gas chambers, the manufacture of human skin lampshades, the manufacture of

human derived soap, institutionalized torture all conducted at "death factories"

where 6,000,000 Jews were gassed and cremated and other

outright lies disseminated by vindictive and vengeful Jews.

 

In all of German occupied Europe there were 2.4 million Jews.

After World War II, 3.8 million Jews applied for holocaust reparations.

 

Indeed tens of thousands of imprisoned Jews died during the last months of WWII

due to disease, especially typhus, and starvation (The International Committee

of the Red Cross reported: 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German

custody, about half of them Jews). After all, as the fortunes of war turn against the

losing side, food and medicine become extremely scarce... and deadly scarce for

those imprisoned by the losing side due to the ruination of food production, medicine

manufacturing, and transportation supply lines. Germany was carpet bombed and

firebombed into the stone age during the last year of WWII (a totally merciless

war conducted by three Jewish controlled empires against a country the size of Montana).


Indeed there were crematoriums
working overtime as a means of sanitarily disposing

of disease ridden corpses, but these were built during the last year of the war and

never was a living person burned alive in one as JEWS would have you believe.


As a matter of fairness
, try to imagine what would have become of all the Japanese

incarcerated in American prison camps during WWII had the fortunes of war

turned against an America that was bombed into the stone age. I'll wager that they

would have been massacred by furious Americans before they had starved to death.


Once you fully realize
that there were no "gas chambers" or such things as

human skin lampshades, most of the Jewish narrative regarding the so called

"holocaust" becomes a self-serving fabrication disseminated by the lowest

sort of scammers.


Only lies need laws for protection. There are many individuals who have been

imprisoned in occupied Germany for merely telling the truth about the holocaust

scam. These people are imprisoned for "inciting hatred for the Jews" whereas it's

actually the JEWS incessantly inciting hatred for Germans with their holocaust LIES.

 

Free yourself from the power of a lie designed to render you impotent. By instilling

unwarranted guilt and shame upon humanity via the "holocaust", humanity is

rendered incapable, or at least very hesitant, to criticize, much less interfere with,

any of the designs of Jews or their nation of Israel. The "holocaust" is also an

ongoing cash cow for Jewish "holocaust survivors" through the collection of hundreds

of billions of euros from Germany, and elsewhere, as WWII reparations that

continues to this day.

 

 

Jews have made questioning the details of the so-called Holocaust a criminal offense,
with fines and imprisonment, and doing this has only hurt their credibility and soured
many against their official narrative.  The truth does not need laws to enforce it, only
lies do, and the stupidest thing the Jews could ever have done — and want to do in
America — is criminalize not believing their improbable narrative.  It is their
“education” that has created doubters, which is why it continues to fail.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Holocaust Propaganda Isn't Just a Lie,

It's a Crime Against Humanity

 



 

It is a crime because it not only justifies innumerable other crimes, but because it

creates a huge mass of hatred, which in turn contains the potential for new crimes. 

 

People whose souls have been drenched in the hatred of the Holocaust Lie must be

counted among its victims. This includes the millions of twelve to fifteen-year old school

children dragged through the memorials of former concentration camps, often

weeping uncontrollably at the atrocity stories and lies vomited up at them. 

 

How much suffering, how much heartbreak, how many tragedies are due to the so called

“Holocaust”, this hair-raising Lie of the Century, which the jews invented, crammed down our

throats, and have defended tooth and nail, with fines, with abuse, with imprisonment, for

over half a century? 

 

It is painful to think of the thousands, indeed tens of thousands, of people who have

been humiliated, persecuted, imprisoned, or even executed in the name of this shameless swindle. 

 

It is pathetic to see the once-great German people, having lost its pride, its sense of direction,

its self-respect, to such an extent that it no longer dares to defend itself

against a flood of slander and is too ashamed to look itself in the face. 

 

One single mention of the “gas chambers”, the extermination of the jews, was enough to

justify purging entire cities and provinces of their German population. Almost 17 million

people were driven from their homes between 1944 and 1948 in an unbroken series of

atrocities during which over two million died. 

 

“After what they did to the jews, they had it coming to them,”

is the classical justification. 

 

It is truly disgusting to think of the millions of people all over the world watching Marvin Chomsky,

Claude Lanzmann, Steven Spielberg and all the others — Holocaust, Shoa,

Schindler’s List, etc. — in the cinemas, on television — and taking it all seriously. 

 

The jews invented a story which they’ve called the Shoa or the Holocaust,

and which they now claim is the history of their people. 

 

The Holocaust money-making machine has brought them such tremendous advantages,

that they can no longer live without it. But they made one fatal error: the Holocaust swindle

is so endlessly absurd that its inventors can only take refuge in a suicide charge; having lost

all sense of proportion, they have gone too far and will soon come crashing down. 

 

To suppress all open debate on the subject appears an impossibility

in the long run, despite all manner of repression. 

 

From minor explanations to wholesale re-writing, including whole new “Revised Versions”,

the profiteers of the myth continue to entangle themselves in increasingly greater numbers

of contradictions; the fables of today contradict the fables told yesterday; the defenders of

the official version of history are being compelled to make so many concessions

that more and more people are starting to wonder about it all. 

 

Doubts expressed in private conversation no longer shock as much as they

did a few years ago; it is getting easier for revisionists to gain a hearing. 

 

In brief: for the exterminationists, the time is running out. Increasingly

hysterical repression is an unmistakable sign of growing panic. 

It is also a sign of weakness. 

 

Instead of listening to the discussion, they simply grab for

a truncheon. But how long can they get away with it? 

 

The revisionists must not hope for quick victory; it will not come overnight. They should

remember the wisdom expressed in the phrase from the Czech philosopher, Karel Capek, who said: 

 

“Truth must be smuggled. It must be distributed in small doses.

A drop here, a drop there — until people get used to it. Not all at once.” 

 

At a time when the Lie appears to be triumphing without hindrance, we would like

to close with an optimistic message. We wish to make the following appeal: 

 

All of you, all friends of the truth, both known and unknown, from many European countries,

those who, like Günter Deckert and Gottfried Küssel, sit in German and Austrian prisons for

“denying the existence of the gas chambers,” or who have been compelled to go into exile

like Remer and Rudolf, all persecuted revisionists and nationalists — do not lose

your courage, since your struggle against state-ordained lies is not in vain. 

 

Your courage, the sacrifice of a few, will help to free entire nations and peoples, including

the German and Russian peoples — from the darkness which has so long covered them.

Originally appeared at: Renegade Tribune 
Jürgen Graf  (Renegade Tribune)
 
 
 
 
 
I DENY NO HOLOCAUST

 

Many ignorant, brainwashed people have contemptuously called me a “Holocaust Denier”. 

The following is the response I give, to those who will listen:

Excuse me, but I don’t “deny” ANY “Holocaust”… Do you?

 

I fully accept the account of the brave and famous Russian writer and historian, Aleksandr

Solzhenitsyn, who was often called “The Conscience of the 20th Century”; who served eight

long years in the Soviet Gulag prison system, when he reports in the book he published in

the year 2000 entitled “Together For Two Hundred Years” that, in the Soviet Holocaust, 66

million innocent Gentiles, mostly Christians (and it being a full ELEVEN TIMES the number

of Jews claimed to have been killed by the Germans in WWII), were kidnapped, tortured,

raped, and murdered in a wide variety of cruel, wanton, and horribly inhuman ways in

the thousands of monstrously evil Gulag concentration camps at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevik

“Ivan the Terrible” Cheka corps.

 

I freely acknowledge the fact that on February 13 & 14, 1945, in the quintessential Holocaust

of the non-military city of Dresden, more than 700,000 phosphorus bombs were dropped on

1.2 million helpless people, which produced a firestorm that was called a “Single Column

of Flame”, where the temperature in the center of the city reached 1600 degrees centigrade,

and in which approximately 500,000 German women, children, elderly, wounded soldiers,

random citizens, and even all of the animals in the city zoo were slaughtered

by concussion and fire in a single night.

 

I absolutely recognize that more people died there in Dresden, in that one big flame, than

the estimated total of 246,000 helpless people who died in two other quintessential Holocausts,

the senseless, wantonly murderous, abominable, and unnecessary atomic

attacks upon the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.

 

I openly avow the virtually forgotten Holocaust endured by the passengers and crew of the

Wilhelm Gustloff, an unarmed German passenger liner which was torpedoed and sunk in the

freezing waters of the Baltic Sea, 13 miles off the coast of Pomerania on January 30, 1945,

as it carried, besides it’s men and crew, some 73 wounded soldiers, 373 members of the

Womens’ Naval Auxilliary, and some 9,000 German civilian refugees – mostly women and

children – who were all fleeing in terror from East Prussia in the advance of the Red Army,

and where only a few hundred lived to tell the tale, making it the deadliest disaster

in maritime history, killing nearly ten times the number who died on the Titanic.

 

And I fully admit that, as tallied and reported by the International Red Cross, a grand total

of 271,304 people – not all of them Jews – died in all of the German concentration camps,

combined, by the end of World War II – a Holocaust which was solely the result of typhus

epidemics and starvation caused by the Zionist controlled, allied carpet bombings of supply

routes and centers all over Germany that made it impossible to transport

food and medical supplies to prisoners, soldiers, and civilians alike.

 

I certainly do not deny the Holocaust of the over 1,000,000 German post-war, non-combatants

who were rounded up, detained without any food, water, shelter, or medical care, and

purposely, and systematically killed through starvation and exposure in 1945-46 under

the supervision of the allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, in the largest outdoor

concentration camp this side of modern-day Palestine, or the concurrent Holocaust of the

wholesale cold-blooded rape and murder of untold hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of

women and children as the communist Red Army of the Soviets also took its “revenge”

upon the defeated Germans.

 

I do not deny the Holocaust suffered by the good men and crew of the practically unarmed

USS Liberty surveillance ship, which was deliberately attacked by air and sea, with machine

gun, cannon, and torpedo fire by Israeli forces on June 8, 1967, killing 34 and wounding 174,

in an attempted false flag operation which was intended to sink the ship, and murder all aboard,

in order to draw the United States into the Middle East conflict on the side of Israel, and was

only foiled by the ingenuity and resourcefulness of the crew in aiding the radio operator

to successfully get off a call for help.

 
And I do not deny the Holocaust of the some 3,000 people who died in a single day as a result

of the false flag attack on the World Trade Center in New York which was engineered and

perpetrated by leaders of Israel in order to kick off their pre-planned “Clash of Civilizations”

which they hope will eventually cause their two sworn enemies, the Christians, and the Muslims,

to forget their historical religious commonalities, and annihilate one another in the yet to be

the greatest Holocaust in history – a third world war – as the “Chosen Ones” sit on the

sidelines… and direct… and watch… and profit… while gleefully rubbing their hands as

even more untold millions of innocents die.

 

I also do not deny the Holocaust of the Jenin Refugee Camp, on April 13, 2002, where

Israeli forces attacked the camp using bulldozers, tanks, and Apache helicopters, in a cruel,

indiscriminate, blood-lust slaughter, which was said to be “Horrific beyond belief”, and

which lasted for 13 days, flattening large areas of the town, and killing unknown hundreds

of innocent men, women, and children, many of whom were buried alive; or the earlier,

similar, Holocausts at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon in 1982, in which it is known

that at least 800 Palestinians were killed.

 

Nor do I deny the wholesale slaughter and destruction perpetrated upon the sovereign

nation of Iraq, in the Holocaust that was the illegal, and unjustified war of aggression that,

from 2003 to the present, has resulted in the murder of over 1,000,000 innocent Iraqi men,

women, and children, and brought their country to ruin, as one of the first steps in Israel’s

ongoing war of terror, which they have the unmitigated gall to present to the

world as a war “ON” terror… for which the final tally of victims is yet to be seen.

 

And while I’m at it, let me just note here that I fully acknowledge the fact that the perpetrators

of the above mentioned, and relatively recent Holocausts have a very long history of either

directly, or indirectly committing numerous other such atrocities against many peoples over

many millenia, even since ancient Biblical times – from the slaughter of the Midianites to the

African slave trade – a number of which being the basis of, and celebrated during various

Jewish holidays. And though I do not particularly describe them here, I don’t deny any of them either.

 

What I do deny is the ridiculous and exaggerated claim that there is ANY evidence at all

that ANY Jews at all – much less “six million” of them – died from ANY intentional gassings,

or as a result of ANY kind of organized or systematic program of genocide perpetrated

against Jews by Germany’s Nazi regime… and I challenge you to produce ANY evidence

or “proof” that is not merely made up of either pre-war, wartime, or post-war

anti-German propaganda… because none, from either then or now, actually exists.

 

So, if you want to talk about a “Holocaust”… and I mean a REAL, genuine, genocidal

“Holocaust”, and not only the ones from the past, but one that is happening right NOW,

in the present, all you need to do is to pull your brain-dead/brainwashed heads out of your

collectively ignorant rear ends, and look into the current goings-on in Gaza, The West

Bank, Syria, and the Middle East in general, where the racist, supremacist, Zionist, Talmudic

Jews are feverishly working day and night to exterminate anyone, either Gentile or Jew,

who stands in their way in their quest to build their racist,

supremacist, “Kingdom of the World”… a.k.a., Eretz Israel.

 

And if any of you sanctimonious accusers deny any of these realities, and merely cling to

the all too common view that the only “Holocaust” that really matters is one that is purported

to have been suffered by the Jews, then for people like you to call anyone else a “Holocaust Denier”

is one of the most laughable, and hypocritical examples of psychopathic projection I have yet

seen anywhere… even as you continue to stupidly, and unashamedly, prove

your ignorance and psychopathy with every ridiculous charge you make.

 

                                   https://d1gy5epzn1e47f.cloudfront.net/file/pic/comment/2022/01/1135_5aaa622862e9e5eddb40a07c9a5d834fbf55936ee40ffd9b97b9681eb7056a9c.jpg

 

                                 

 

 
https://d1gy5epzn1e47f.cloudfront.net/file/pic/comment/2021/12/1135_e5cbc8a400b007f2da053ed5de1b8d9306ae4bb2402da577f87c03c4a4072a5d.jpg

 
 

Finally Putting The “HOLOCAUST” To Bed.

A LETTER TO STEVEN SPIELBERG,

FROM JEWISH FRENCH DR. ROGER DOMMERGUE POLACCO de MENASCE:

___________________________________________

Dear Mr. Spielberg,

 

I wish your honesty to be equal to your very great talent. I saw you on TV in France.

You declared that you would pour out Shoa propaganda in German schools. You mentioned

that witnesses would be convinced for good, as to the reality of the Shoah (6-million-gas-chambers).

I feel it my duty as a Jew and after 20 years of study of the historical

problem of the holocaust, to call your attention to the facts.

 

Facts are very stubborn and as no one can gainsay them, our congeners have been

compelled to make disgusting politicians enact Stalino – Orwellian laws which forbid

to mention anything concerning the dogma of the “six-million-gas-chambers”,

definitively reduced to perpetual worship of this alchemy.

 

In case of no respect of silence and worship of the myth, you suffer the penalty of fines

or prison or both. Professor Faurisson, who has been studying the subject for 20 years,

has been practically massacred. This is utterly ridiculous, but give the Police and the

Justice of all countries to Mr Lévy, he will not be ridiculous any more: here is the XXth century!

 

These laws are, accordingly, the absolute proof of the fake before we study its arithmetical

and technical ineptitude. No Sir, you will not find ONE witness who saw 6 million Jews

slaughtered. You will not find ONE witness of Zyclon-B – gas chamber’s to exterminate

1000 or 2000 people at a time, close to the crematoria. See my “Shoa Sherlockholmized”

herewith: it is the summary of 20 years study on the subject.

 

The “6-million-gas-chambers myth “is an arithmetic and technical nonsense.

 

As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah business, 50 years after the war, is

disgusting, debasing: it is a disgraceful shame. No people in History has ever been wailing

about its losses 50 years after a war, even its true and real losses. Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers

were true, it would be a dishonour to make such din and pump up so much money

everywhere: who were the usurers of the Weimar Republic? You know it as well as I do.

 

It is all the more so as we know that 6.000.000 is gross exaggeration and that the Zyclon-B

gas chambers are a technical impossibility. (See Degesh Trial in 1949). In fact 150,000 or

200,000 Jews died in the German camps of typhus or starvation. Many others died but as

fighters against Germany to which we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933! (Herr. Hitler

was allergic to the hegemony of gold and of the dollar: so he could give work to

six million unemployed, before the functioning of German armament factories!).

 

Do you know the book published at this period and written by our congener Kaufmann:

GERMANY MUST PERISH? We know that 80,000,000 Goyim were slaughtered in

the USSR, in a political regime which was entirely Jewish, from Marx and Warburg, to

Kaganovitch, Frenkel, Yagoda, the executioners. We know that after 1945 Americans

and Russians killed and raped German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to

Albania. We know that 1,500,000 German war prisoners were starved to death after the

war (a quite famous book was published a few years ago, but is ignored to day). You will

find there included in French the text of a rabbi: “A rabbi pleads guilty”: unfortunately

I possess neither the German original nor an English translation.

You should have it translated.

 

The Rabbi condemns the Jewish behaviour in Germany 50 years before Nazism and

vindicates the emergence of Hitler. As for the harm we have done to Humanity absolutely

not redeemed by your excellent films or the virtuosity of Yehudi Menuhin, or the neutron

bomb of S.T. Cohen, I wrote a book about it from texts written by important

Jews which are much above the most anti-Semitic text written by Goyim.

 

Simone Weil drew a tragic summary:

 

“The Jews, this handful of uprooted people, have been the cause of the uprooting of

the whole mankind”. And George Steiner:“For 5000 years we

have been talking too much: words of death for us and for the others”.

 

We know that all the German towns of more than 100,000 people have been destroyed

during the last war, with women and children: silence about this real holocaust. If we

consider the turn taken by the Shoah business, what you intend to do in Germany is

actually the safest way to a heaping up of a huge amount of anti-Jewism the explosion

of which will be unique in History. Discretion and moderation must be our behaviour:

all the rest is suicide.

 

Neither “mondialism” nor Orwellian laws for “crime of thought” can prevent antisemitism to

explode: only OUR behaviour can. What you do and all the whining and money pumping

can only egg it on. It will increase out of reasonable proportions, if there can be a reasonable

proportion to antisemitism. I know that it is practically impossible to check our propensity

to speculation and that only the abolition of circumcision, the 8th day could (our particularism

derives from the disturbance of the 21 days of the 1st puberty, which starts precisely at the

8th day) but we must, at least, try to avoid such blunders as the one you intend to perform

in Germany and which would be appalling. I am a great admirer of your films (except the

Shindler list: ask his wife and the historical real reality, but this is a minor blunder). I hope

you will scrutinize what I send you and escape the folly of the majority of our

congeners. I will always answer you if you have the integrity to write to me.

 

Cordialement à vous.

Signed by: Dr. Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 

The «Shoa» Sherlockholmised – By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce.

 

1. Do we know, in the course of History, of an ethnic group which would not rejoice when

learning that, in a war ended fifty years before, it had suffered many less losses

than it thought? Would the discoverer of such good piece of news, not be rewarded,

celebrated? Would he be overwhelmed with heavy fines, would he escape attempted

murder, as such was the case with Professor Faurisson? Do such reactions not belong

to a heavy case of psychopathy?

 

2. Have the live skeletons which can be seen in such films as “ Night and Fog” (by Alain Resnais),

have anything to do with gassing? Are they not the result of famine in the camps because

of the systematic bombing of German towns containing more than 100,000 people, “holocausting”

hundreds of thousands of women and children who are never mentioned?

 

3. Where would have been the 4 million Jews ( if we consider that 2 millions were killed

in battlefields), when it is well known that one camp could not contain more than 60,000

thousand people, and that except in Auschwitz, there was no Zyclon- B gas-chambers?

( there never was any proof of mass gasing with any other gas).

 

4. Are the witnesses worth anything, when you know that torture was the way to squeeze

out evidence. Such was the case of Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration has

become a legend . What about the 100 witnesses of gassing in Dachau,

when it is official that there was no gas chamber in that camp?

 

5. 130 kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of one dead body. We are told that

the Germans cremated 1300 corpses a day. U.S.A aircraft took hundreds of pictures

of Auschwitz, during the supposed period of the holocaust. (1943-44). Why is there

not a single gigantic heap of the necessary coal? Why not a single black coil of smoke?

 

6. Why do radio, films, press, T.V., continue daily to inflict upon us the myth of the

six-million-gas-chambers, in a never ending whining and moaning? Why is the Jewish

lobby chasing, 50 years after the end of the war, nonagenarians who attempted to

rescue Germany from the iniquity of the Versailles treaty, from the rot of the Weimar Republic,

from the collapse of German youth, from the unemployment of 6 million people, who,

back to work could give bread to the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent on them?

 

7. Why does the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, issue 43, page 666,

inform us that in 1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?

 

8. How is it possible that the gas chambers could be just near the crematoria,

when any chemist will tell you that Zyclon-B is hyperflammable?

 

9. Why are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the Shoa?

A scientific dialogue, a court ordered appraisal have been demanded since 1980 about

a problem specifically arithmetic and technical. It would seal truth for ever. It would

definitively shut the mouths. Such was the case for Katyn, thanks to the revisionist Gorbatchev.

 

10. How could Zyclon-B gas 1000 people at one time, when it is well known that the

USA gas chamber for one ( maximum 2) persons sentenced to death, are of an unheard

of complexity and cost? Why, at the trial of the Degesh, which fabricated the Zyclon-B,

was it declared in 1949, that gassing in such conditions is impossible and unthinkable?

 

11. Why did Leuchter, who was in charge of the maintenance of the USA gas chambers,

give the firm evidence that there was no gassing in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian and

Polish reports confirmed the Leuchter report? Why is the Rudolf report, which analyses

all results, forbidden? Why are those who divulge the Rudolf report, heavily sentenced

by the law? And yet the slightest care of the quality and accuracy of the report is not taken.

 

12. Why was, for the first time in History, the doctors degree of Mr Roques, on the

“Gerstein report” cancelled? And still, this report was not accepted at the Nuremberg trial!

Besides the well known historian, a socialist minister, Alain Decaux, mentioned in

the press that ” nobody could have access to the Gerstein report, without passing first

through the excellent thesis of M. Roques” Alain Decaux said: “I admired the skill and

perfection of a “chartist” performed by M.Roques in his doctors degree on the Gerstein report”

(in his book: “la guerre absolue” 1998).

 

13. Why did Raymond Aron and François Furet at a Sorbonne seminar, (to which no

revisionist was invited), (state) that there was not the slightest

trace of a written or oral order for the extermination of the Jews?

 

14. Why is it never spoken of the planning of the extermination of the Germans as

expressed in a book written by the Jew Kaufmann (“Germany must perish”),

by sterilisation of German men.? It is undoubtedly a small detail?

 

15. Why Zyclon-B, used by the Germans for hygiene since 1920, could be used in the

concentration camps for other purposes than delousing and protection against typhus?

Why large quantities of Zyclon-B could be found in camps

where it is official that there never was any gasings???

 

16. Why do they harp on the “six-million-gas-chamber” and never on the 80 million

Goyim exterminated in the USSR, by an entirely Jewish political regime, the executioners

of which bore the names of Kaganovitch, Yagoda, Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport,

and fifty other Jews?

 

17. Why, during the Zundel trial in Canada, the famous exterminationist Jews disgraced

themselves by talking of “poetic licence” in their holocaust

assertions, and never came back when summoned by the judges?
18. Why the Fabius-Gayssot law ? (the man of the contaminated blood

and another man, a Communist dragging along 200,000,000 corpses).

 

19. Is it not the supreme proof of the fake? Is it not casting out nines? There is no need

of Stalino-Orwellian law “to be put in prison because of ones beliefs” (thought crime of ” 1984 “)

as stated M. Toubon, before he became a minister of Justice in France, to set up truth.

This law is anti constitutional, anti democratic, against the rights of men. Facts, proofs,

pros and cons, are only what we need. Professor Faurisson besought for the granting

of a forum with an unlimited number of contradictors: he never obtained it. L’abbé Pierre

did ask for it: they pretended to grant it but refused it almost immediately. The forum did

take place at the television of Lugano. It was a complete success for the Revisionists

and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows it as the media at the beck and

call of the Jewish lobby, move their little finger only when authorized.

 

20. Why is it that when a professor declares that the holocaust is an arithmetic and

technical ineptitude, he is forthwith dismissed! This, for the first time in History, sets

up the insane concept of religious historical dogma, which in case of non perennial

worship, is doomed to be struck by the lightning of the inquisition of a secular state.

 

21. Why did the EXPRESS, a famous French newspaper, in January 1995, assert that

the gas-chamber shown for decades in Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after the war, and that all

that concerns it, is false?

 

22. There was actually a holocaust of 60 million people in a war declared in 1933 by

the Jews against Hitler. Hitler had given bread to 6 million unemployed, he had rejected

the dictatorship of the dollar and the Jewish totalitarianism which pollute man and

the planet and which is called “democracy” by semantic mystification. Only two parties

are left: the totalitarian Judeopathy, exterminating man and the planet, and

Nationalism for the Goyim not yet cankered by Capitalisto-Marxist Jewish influence.

 

In “Marianne” Jean François Kahn expresses anger against the bureaucrats of the Jewish

World Congress about the despoilment of Jewish property, which ended on the 3rd of

March 1998 in Washington. He writes: “They have reduced the Shoah to a financial market.

So the typical victim of Nazi barbarity, the archetype of the most frightful genocide of this

time, is not the exploited worker in Cracovie, the humble artisan of Lodz, the small civil

servant of Kiev, the modest shopkeeper of la rue des Rosiers, or the unknown craftsman

of Riga, but the cosmopolitan billionaire who collected Rembrandt and Rubens, slept on

a heap of gold signed here and there comfortable insurance policies, sent his children to

the U.S.A in order that they should make a brilliant career. This mighty lobby of

American oligarchs is not ashamed of reducing the holocaust to a Shoa-business.”
If Faurisson had written what J.F. Kahn wrote he would have had one

more trial on his shoulders ! There is not the shadow of a doubt!

 

By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce.

(A Jew who strongly takes issue with the totalitarian Judeopathy)

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Why Hitler Put Jews in Camps and Ghettos

By John Wear

Many people question why Adolf Hitler put Jewish civilians into camps and ghettos during

World War II. People often assign false reasons for why Jews were interned in these camps.

For example, Dr. Christiane Northrup, a highly intelligent and ethical medical doctor, says

that Hitler interned Jews because he claimed they were infecting other people with typhus.[1]

Jewish “Holocaust” historian Yehuda Bauer writes:[2]

 

“Part of the Nazi propaganda effort was to persuade non-Jews that the ghettoes were

necessary to protect them from the Jews. Jews were said to be

carriers of epidemic illnesses while non-Jews were immune to them.”

 

In reality, Jews were interned in camps and ghettos during World War II because Jews

were generally hostile toward Germany, and many Jewish partisans were actively killing

German troops. In addition to ghetto fighters, Jewish civilians fled to the forests and enlisted

in partisan units, carrying out sabotage and intelligence missions.[3] The authorities of the

Third Reich reasoned that Jews had to be interned to protect against these sabotage and

intelligence operations.

 

This article documents some of the Jewish civilians and groups

who actively fought against the Third Reich during World War II.

 

Jewish Female Assassins

 

Jewish historian Dr. Judy Batalion, in her book The Light of Days, states that Jewish women

who resisted the Third Reich were far more numerous than she had ever imagined. She writes:[4]

 

“At first, I imagined that the several dozen resistance operatives mentioned in Freuen

comprised the total amount. But as soon as I touched on the topic, extraordinary tales

of female fighters crawled out from every corner: archives, catalogues, strangers who

emailed me their family stories. I found dozens of women’s memoirs published by small

presses, and hundreds of testimonies in Polish, Russian, Hebrew, Yiddish, German,

French, Dutch, Danish, Greek, Italian, and English, from the 1940s to today.”

 

Many Jewish women used stealth and disguises to murder Germans. For example,

24-year-old Niuta Teitelbaum, from the Communist group Spartacus, wore her flaxen hair

in braids, appearing like a young 16-year-old—an innocent disguise that hid her role as

an assassin. She walked into the office of a high-ranking Gestapo officer, and shot him in

cold blood at his desk. Teitelbaum pulled the trigger on yet another German officer while

he was in bed in his own home. In another operation, she killed two Gestapo agents and

wounded a third who was taken to a hospital. Disguising herself as a doctor, Teitelbaum

entered the wounded Gestapo agent’s room, and murdered both him and his guard.[5]

 

In another instance, Teitelbaum dressed like a Polish farm girl with a kerchief in her blond

hair. She walked into a German command post, smiled, and then shot an SS soldier with

her pistol. Another time, Teitelbaum strolled up to the guards outside Szucha, and said she

needed to speak to a certain officer about a “personal matter.” The guards showed her

the way to her “boyfriend’s office,” where she pulled out a concealed pistol with a

silencer and shot him in the head. She smiled meekly at the guards on her way out.[6]

 

For these and other acts of lethal resistance, the Gestapo nicknamed Teitelbaum

“Little Wanda with the Braids,” and put her on all of its most-wanted lists. She survived the

Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, but was eventually hunted down and executed a few months later.[7]

 

The lethal nature of the Jewish female assassins caused the Germans to take

extreme measures against them. German SS commander Jürgen Stroop wrote:[8]

 

“They were not human, perhaps devils or goddesses. Calm. As nimble as circus

performers. They often fired simultaneously with pistols in both hands. Fierce in combat,

right to the end. Approaching them was dangerous. One captured Haluzzenmädel

looked timid. Completely resigned. And then suddenly, when a group of our men

got within a few steps of her, she pulls a hand grenade out from under her skirt or

her breeches and slaughters the SS while showering them with curses to the 10th

generation—your hair stands on end! We suffered losses in those situations, and so

I gave orders not to take girls prisoner, not to let them get too close,

but to finish them off with submachine guns from a distance.”

 

Other Jewish Female Resistance Activities

 

Because of their gender and ability to camouflage their Jewishness, women were uniquely

suited to engage in important and life-threatening tasks such as couriers. As fighter Chaika

Grossman said:[9]

 

“The Jewish girls were the nerve-centers of the movement.”

 

Historian Emanuel Ringelblum, a Warsaw Ghetto chronicler,

wrote about the Jewish courier girls at the time:[10]

 

“Without a murmur, without a second’s hesitation, they accept and carry out the most

dangerous missions. […] How many times have they looked death in the eyes? […]

The story of the Jewish woman will be a glorious page in the history of Jewry during the present war.”

 

The courier girls’ psychological skills were especially important in the most dangerous

task of smuggling weapons and ammunition to ghettos and camps. For example, Jewish

courier Bronka Klibanski was smuggling a revolver and two hand grenades inside a loaf

of country bread in her suitcase. A German policeman at the train station asked her what

she was carrying. She managed to avoid having to open her bag by “confessing” that she

was smuggling food. Klibanski’s “honest confession” evoked a protective response from

the policeman, who instructed the train conductor to make sure no one bothered her or her suitcase.[11]

 

Jewish courier Hela Schüpper, who was sent to Warsaw to buy guns, knew she would be

spending 20 hours undercover on trains. She dressed stylishly so that she looked like she

was on her way to an afternoon at the theater. Schüpper flirted shamelessly on the train,

flashing her provocative smile, giving the impression that she might be going on a vacation.

Instead, she met a People’s Army contact at the gate of a clinic. Schüpper received five

weapons, four pounds of explosives, and clips of cartridges. These weapons were later

used against German forces.[12]

 

Jewish courier Chasia Bielicka worked with 18 other Jewish girls in Bialystok to arm the

local resistance. They leased rooms from Polish peasants and held day jobs in German

homes, hotels and restaurants. While working as a maid for an SS man who had an armoire

filled with handguns, Bielicka periodically grabbed a few bullets and dropped them into her

coat pocket. The courier girls passed machine-gun bullets and other ammo to the ghetto

through the window of a latrine that bordered the ghetto wall. This courier ring continued

to supply intelligence and arms to numerous partisans after the Bialystok Ghetto’s liquidation.[13]

 

Soviet Jewish Partisans

 

Partisan warfare has traditionally been considered illegal, since it undermines the convention

of uniformed armies directing violence against each other rather than against civilian

populations. Soviet partisan warfare was extremely brutal and capable of severely disrupting

German military planning. Because German forces were always limited and always in

demand at the front, German military and civilian authorities were all the more fearful of

the disruption partisans could bring. Consequently, German army officers

were trained to take a severe line against partisan activity in the Soviet Union.[14]

 

The combat of Soviet partisans in forests and swamps was regarded by German troops

as the most dangerous of all types of warfare—favoring the hunted rather than the hunter.

The partisans almost always killed captured German soldiers, frequently after inflicting

brutal torture. The German anti-partisan forces operated in an extremely unpleasant

environment that made the German units resent the partisans whose activities had caused

them to be there. In summer huge swarms of flies and mosquitos made

life miserable; in winter frostbite and trench foot were rampant.[15]

 

Letters from German soldiers reveal the danger of partisan warfare. A letter from German

Cpl. Hans Brüning illustrates how the wooded areas of the Soviet Union were especially

effective locations for partisan warfare:[16]

 

“(The forests are teeming with danger.) Any snipers who fall into our hands are of course

shot; their bodies lie everywhere. Sadly, though, many of our own comrades have been

lost to their dirty methods. We’re losing more men to the bandits than in the fighting itself.

 

Hardly any sleep to be had. We’re awake and alert almost every night; you have to

be in case they attack suddenly. If the sentry drops his guard just

once it could be over for all of us. Traveling alone is out of the question.”

 

German Cpl. Erich Stahl wrote:[17]

 

“These are dangerous swine, and no soldier is safe from them. The danger is there

wherever you go and wherever you stay…and you only breathe out when you’ve come

back from your post unhurt. […] If the moon’s not out, you stay awake at your post like an ox.”

 

German Pvt. Hans Schröder described how Soviet partisan

activity killed two Germans on June 19, 1942:[18]

 

“Two of our comrades in first company tragically lost their lives. […] Though we kept

watch, a partisan still was able to creep up to one of our houses. A grenade chucked

in through the window, and it was done. […] We took revenge straight away, and rightly.

I used to think one should act humanely, but this subhumanity just isn’t worth it.”

 

Germany established numerous ghettos in an effort to contain or eliminate Soviet partisan

activities. In Belorussia alone, hundreds of thousands of Jews were imprisoned in more

than 100 ghettos and camps. The largest ghetto was in Minsk (100,000 people); other

ghettos were in Brest (34,000 people), Bobruisk (20,000 people), Vitebsk (20,000 people),

Borisov (10,000 people), Slonim (24,000 people), Novogrodek (6,500 people) and so on.[19]

 

Specifically Jewish partisan units were usually frowned upon. The Soviet command

preferred to mix nationalities in so-called territorial (e.g., Belorussian, Ukrainian, etc.) units.

However, a few entirely Jewish units nevertheless survived. These include those of the

brothers Tuvia, Zusia, and Asael Belski in the Naliboki forests; the unit of Misha Gildenman

near Korzec in western Belorussia; Dr. Yehezkel Atlas’s unit in the same general area;

and the large unit commanded by Abba Kovner in the Rudniki forests in Lithuania.[20]

 

Soviet partisan warfare against Germany became increasingly barbaric and murderous. I

n February 1943, 596 German prisoners were killed and many of them mutilated by Soviet

partisans at Grischino. A German judge who interrogated witnesses and survivors of this

atrocity remembers:[21]

 

“You have no idea how much trouble the commanders and company chiefs had […] to

restrain the German soldiers from killing every Russian prisoner of war of the Popov Army.

The troop was very bitter and angry. You cannot imagine the vehemence of the soldiers

after they had seen what had happened.”

 

German anti-partisan activity resulted in a horrific loss of civilian and partisan lives as well

as the destruction of many Russian villages. However, the Soviet partisans’ sabotage

operations effectively tied up increasing numbers of German troops and prevented the

Germans from ever feeling secure on Russian soil. By the time the bulk of Russian territory

had been liberated in early 1944, a large and effective Soviet guerilla movement had emerged.

Stalin’s support had allowed the Soviet partisans to survive the German anti-partisan reprisals

and grow into an effective fighting force that helped the Soviet Union win the war.[22]

 

European Jewish Partisans

 

Jews actively participated in the anti-German underground movement in France. After

Germany attacked Russia in June 1941, French Jewish communists discovered their

anti-German patriotism. Numerous French Jews joined underground resistance

organizations, or Jewish groups that actively maintained links with such organizations.[23]

 

French resistance activity began to increase toward the end of the war. Since Allied leaders

planned to invade Europe on the coast of France, French partisans received substantial

weaponry and supplies to aid the Allied invasion. By June 6, 1944, French partisans had

received enough arms through airdrops to fully equip 20,000 resisters, and partially equip

another 50,000. Large stocks of guns, ammunition and explosives were in the

hands of the partisans for a do-or-die effort to assist the Allied invasion.[24]

 

Italian partisan activity also assumed impressive proportions in the northern part of Italy

after Mussolini’s collapse in 1943. However, this Italian partisan activity, which included

many Jews, developed at a time and place where the Germans were well positioned to

contest its growth. In March 1944, for example, a partisan attack on a German column

marching through Rome caused many German casualties. The Germans shot 335 hostages

in a nearby abandoned quarry—the so-called Fosse Ardeatine—in a massacre that still

provokes heated debates today.[25]

 

Germans were confronted by armed resistance groups in at least 24 ghettoes in western

and central Poland: Warsaw, Krakow, Czestochowa, Wlodawa, Sosnowice, Tomaszow

Lubelski, Kielce, Iwaniska, Chmielnik, Sandomierz, Jozefow, Opatow, Kalwaria, Ozialoszica,

Markuszew, Rzeszow, Miedzyrzec Podlaski, Opoczno, Tarnow, Pilica, Radom, Radzyn,

Sokolow Podlaski, and Zelechow. In northeastern Poland, there were 63 armed underground

groups in 110 ghettoes or other Jewish concentrations. The existence of some

form of organization is also indicated by armed actions in another 30 ghettoes.[26]

 

In August 1944, an estimated 2,500 Jewish fighters participated in a national uprising

in Slovakia. After the defeat of this uprising, some 2,000 Jewish fighters joined 15,000

partisans in the Tatra mountains. Jews participated in underground activities in Bulgaria,

in the Greek partisan movement, and about 6,000 Jews also fought with the Tito

partisans in Yugoslavia.[27]

 

German anti-partisan reprisals were usually effective in reducing partisan activity in Western

Europe during the war. German reprisals against partisan activity frequently prevented

opposition from surfacing over much of occupied Europe, and broke up opposition when

it became visible. There were few places in Western Europe where the Germans were

overwhelmed by partisan activities for very long. Only in the Soviet Union did German

anti-partisan reprisals fail.[28]

 

Conclusion

 

Judy Batalion writes concerning the extensive involvement of Jewish

women in resistance efforts against Germany during World War II:[29]

 

“Despite years of Jewish education, I’d never read accounts like these, astonishing in

their details of the quotidian and extraordinary work of woman’s combat. I had no idea

how many Jewish women were involved in the resistance effort, nor to what degree. […]

 

Why, I kept asking myself, had I never heard these stories? Why had I not heard about

the hundreds, even thousands, of Jewish women who were involved in every aspect of

this rebellion, often at its helm?”

 

It is this author’s opinion that Judy Batalion had never heard of the extensive involvement

of Jewish women in resistance efforts against Germany because such involvement has

intentionally been kept quiet. If the extensive murderous female participation in these

resistance organizations were widely known, then people would get closer to understanding

one reason why Hitler interned Jews in camps and ghettos. Jews were not interned because

Hitler hated Jews. Rather, Jews were interned in camps and ghettoes to a large degree

because the German authorities considered Jewish civilians, both male and

female, a serious threat to German military operations during World War II.

 

Endnotes

 

[1] https://rumble.com/vmcalv-critically-thinking-with-dr.-m-and-dr.-n-episode-61-sept-9-2021.html. Critically thinking Northrup Madej September 2021.
[2] Bauer, Yehuda, A History of the Holocaust, New York: Franklin Watts, 1982, p. 153.
[3] Batalion, Judy, The Light of Days: The Untold Story of Women Resistance Fighters in Hitler’s Ghettos, New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2020, p. 5.
[4] Ibid., p. 4.
[5] Ibid., p. 219.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Ibid., p. 220.
[8] Ibid., p. 161.
[9] Ibid., p. 8.
[10] Ibid.
[11] Ibid., pp. 226-227.
[12] Ibid., pp. 227-228.
[13] Ibid., p. 229.
[14] Snyder, Timothy, Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin, New York: Basic Books, 2010, pp. 233-234.
[15] MacLean, French L., The Cruel Hunters: SS-Sonderkommando Dirlewanger Hitler’s Most Notorious Anti-Partisan Unit, Atglen, Pa.: Schiffer Military History, 1998, pp. 69-70.
[16] Shepherd, Ben, War in the Wild East: The German Army and Soviet Partisans, Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, 2004, pp. 77-78.
[17] Ibid., pp. 188-189.
[18] Ibid., p. 189.
[19] Kagan, Jack and Cohen, Dov, Surviving the Holocaust with the Russian Jewish Partisans, Portland, Ore.: Vallentine Mitchell, 1998, p. xi.
[20] Bauer, Yehuda, A History of the Holocaust, New York: Franklin Watts, 1982, p. 271.
[21] De Zayas, Alfred M., The Wehrmacht War Crimes Bureau, 1939-1945, Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press, 1989, p. 106.
[22] Mazower, Mark, Hitler’s Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe, New York: The Penguin Press, 2008, pp. 490-491.
[23] Bauer, Yehuda, A History of the Holocaust, New York: Franklin Watts, 1982, p. 275.
[24] Lande, D. A., Resistance!: Occupied Europe and Its Defiance of Hitler, Osceola, Wis.: MBI Publishing Company, 2000, pp. 154-155.
[25] Mazower, Mark, Hitler’s Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe, New York: The Penguin Press, 2008, p. 500.
[26] Bauer, Yehuda, A History of the Holocaust, New York: Franklin Watts, 1982, p. 270.
[27] Ibid., p. 272.
[28] Mazower, Mark, Hitler’s Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe, New York: The Penguin Press, 2008, pp. 485, 516.
[29] Batalion, Judy, The Light of Days: The Untold Story of Women Resistance Fighters in Hitler’s Ghettos, New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2020, pp. 3, 7.
 
 
 
 

 
 THE FOLLOWING IS TAKEN FROM THE BOOK TITLED, IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA
(Published 1952 By COLONEL JOHN BEATY):
 
It appears also that the world‘s troubles from little blood-born Israel are not over. An official Israeli
view of Germany was expressed in Dallas, Texas, on March 18, 1951, when Abba S. Eban was talking in
Dallas about Israel to the United States and Israel‘s representative at the United Nations, stated that
Israel resents the rehabilitation of Germany. Ambassador Eban visited the Texas city in the interest of
raising funds for taking 200,000 immigrants this year, 600,000 within the next three years (Dallas
Morning News, March 13, 1951) to the small state of Palestine, or Israel. The same day that Ambassador
Eban was talking in Dallas about Israel‘s resentment at the rehabilitation of Germany, a Reuters dis-
patch of March 13, 1951 from Tel Aviv (Washington Times-Herald) stated that notes delivered yesterday
[March 12] in Washington, London, and Paris and to the Soviet Minister at Tel Aviv urge the occupying
powers of Germany not to hand over full powers to any German government without express reserva-
tions for the payment of reparations to Israel in the sum of $1,500,000,000.

This compensation was said to be for 6,000,000 Jews killed by Hitler. This figure has been used repeated-
ly (as late as January, 1952 Israeli broadcast heard by the author), but one who consults statistics and
ponders the known facts of recent history cannot do other than wonder how it is arrived at. According to
Appendix VII, Statistics on Religious Affiliation, of The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the
United States (A Report of the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States Senate, 1950), the number
of Jews in the world is 15,713,638. The World Almanac, 1949, p. 289, is cited as the source of the statistical
table reproduced on p. 842 of the government document. The article in the World Almanac is headed Re-
ligious Population of the World. A corresponding item, with the title, Population, Worldwide, by Reli-
gious Beliefs is found in the World Almanac for 1940 (p. 129), and in it the world Jewish population is
given as 15,319,359. If the World Almanac figures are correct, the world‘s Jewish population did not de-
crease in the war decade, but showed a small increase.

Assuming, however, that the figures of the U.S. document and the World Almanac are in error, let us make
an examination of the known facts. In the first place, the number of Jews in Germany in 1939 was about
600,000, by some estimates considerably fewer, and of these, as shown elsewhere in this book, many
came to the United States, some went to Palestine, and some are still in Germany. As to the Jews in East-
ern European lands temporarily overrun by Hitler‘s troops, the great majority retreated ahead of the Ger-
man armies into Soviet Russia. Of these, many came later to the U.S., some moved to Palestine, some un-
questionably remained in Soviet Russia and may be a part of the Jewish force on the Iranian frontier, and
enough remained in Eastern Europe or have returned from Soviet Russia to form the hard core of the new
ruling bureaucracy in satellite countries (Chapter II ). It is hard to see how all these migrations and all
these power accomplishments can have come about with a Jewish population much less than that which
existed in Eastern Europe before World War II. Thus the known facts on Jewish migration and Jewish
power in Eastern Europe tend, like the World Almanac figures accepted by the Senate Judiciary
Committee, to raise a question as to where Hitler got the 6,000,000 Jews he is said to have killed. This
question should be settled once and for all before the United States backs any Israeli claims against
Germany. In this connection, it is well to recall also that the average German had no more to do with Hitl-
ler‘s policies; than the average American had to do with Franklin Roosevelt‘s policies; that 5,000,000
Germans are unaccounted for, 4,000,000 civilians (pp. 70, 71, above) and 1,000,000 soldiers who never
returned from Soviet labor camps (p. 137); and that a permanent hostile attitude toward Germany on our
part is the highest hope of the Communist masters of Russia.

In spite of its absurdity, however, the Israeli claim for reparations from a not yet created country, whose
territory has been nothing but an occupied land through the entire life of the state of Israel, may well de-
lay reconciliation in Western Europe; and the claim, even though assumed under duress by a West Ger-
man government, would almost certainly be paid, directly or indirectly, by the United States. 

 
 
 
As to Ambassador Eban‘s 600,000 more immigrants to Israel: Where will these people go unless more
Arab lands are taken and more Christians and Moslems are driven from their homes?

And of equal significance: Whence will Ambassador Eban‘s Jewish immigrants to Israel come? As stated
above, a large portion of pre-war Germany‘s 600,000 Jews came, with other European Jews, to the United
States on the return trips of vessels which took American soldiers to Europe. Few of them will leave the
United States, for statistics dhow that of all immigrants to this country, the Jew is least likely to leave. The
Jews now in West Germany will probably contribute few immigrants to Israel, for these Jews enjoy a
preferred status under U.S. protection. It thus appears that Ambassador Eban‘s 600,000 reinforcments to
Israel apart from stragglers from the Arab world and a possible mere handful from elsewhere can
come only from Soviet and satellite lands. Ifso, they will come on permission of and by arrangement with
some Communist dictator (Chapter II, above). Can it be that many of the 600,000 will be young men with
Soviet military training? Can it be that such permission will be related to the Soviet‘s great concentration
of Jews in 1951 inside the Soviet borders adjacent to the Soviet-Iranian frontier?
 
___________________________________________
 
 
 

 
 
 
HOLOCAUSTdenialLawsCRUEL

Why the Holocaust Story Was Invented

Historian John Wear has been asked the questions: “Why was the Holocaust story invented?

Who benefits from this falsification of history?” This article will answer these questions.

 

By John Wear

The first reason the Holocaust was invented was for justification for the war with Germany. 

World War II was by far the bloodiest and most destructive war in human history. Many people

wondered whether all of the death and destruction caused by the war had been necessary.

 

The so-called Holocaust (alleged genocide of Jews) was used by the Allies to demonize

Germany and prove that their war effort was necessary to defeat such an evil nation.

With the liberation of Ohrdruf, Buchenwald and Dachau by the American Army and the liberation

of Bergen-Belsen by British troops, large groups of Western observers

confronted the horrors of the German camps for the first time.

 

The gruesome scenes of huge piles of dead bodies and emaciated and diseased surviving

inmates were filmed and photographed for posterity by the U.S. Army Signal Corps.

Prominent newsmen and politicians were flown in to formerly German-occupied territory

to see the harrowing evidence at the camps for themselves. The horrific scenes in

the German-run camps were used by the Allies to justify their participation in the war.1

 

Jewish historian Robert Jan van Pelt writes:

To the Allies, the discovery of the camps proved a final justification of their war effort. In 1940, Churchill had proclaimed that a Nazi victory would bring “a new dark age

made more sinister by perverted science.” The liberation of the camps proved that Churchill had not exaggerated the danger.

And even though Auschwitz had been liberated by the Russians, the English and Americans heard many stories about that camp.2

 

Establishment of Israel

The Holocaust story has also been used to justify the creation of the nation-state of Israel.

Simon Wiesenthal writes: “The creation of Israel was the only possible and the only correct reaction

to Auschwitz. There had to be a country in the world where the Jews were the landlords instead of

tolerated guests, a place of refuge in the truest meaning of the word, even for Jews who live in other countries.”3

 

David Ben-Gurion stated at the beginning of World War II that the war should end by giving

the Zionists their own state. After the war, Ben-Gurion and other Israeli leaders said that th

e Holocaust had proven once again that the only solution to the Jewish problem was an

 independent state in Palestine. Ben-Gurion again mentioned during Adolf Eichmann’s

trial that the Holocaust happened because Jews did not live in their own country.4

 

Israeli historian Tom Segev explains why

the Holocaust story is so important to Israel:

Israel differs from other countries in its need to justify—to the rest of the world, and to itself—its very right to exist. Most countries need no such ideological justifications.

But Israel does—because most of its Arab neighbors have not recognized it and because most of the Jews of the world prefer to live in other countries. So long as these

factors remain true, Zionism will be on the defensive. As a justification for the state of Israel, the Holocaust is comparable only to the divine promise contained in the Bible:

It seems to be definitive proof of the Zionist argument that Jews can live in security and with full equal rights only in their

own country and that they therefore must have an autonomous and sovereign state, strong enough to defend its existence.5

 

Tom Segev further writes, “The demonization of Nazism and its mythologizing, in general,

were also necessary since the Holocaust served as the main justification for the creation

and existence of the state of Israel.”6

 

Justification of Israeli Violence

There were at least 33 massacres of Palestinian villages during Israel’s “war of independence.”

Zionist forces were larger and better equipped than their opponents, and by the

end of the war over 750,000 Palestinians were ruthlessly expelled from their homes.7

 

As Segev writes, “Israel was born of terror, war, and revolution,

and its creation required a measure of fanaticism and of cruelty.”8

 

Entire cities and hundreds of villages in Israel were left empty and repopulated with new Jewish

immigrants. The Jewish immigrants numbered 100,000 in April 1949, most of them survivors

of the so-called Holocaust. The Palestinians lost everything they had and became destitute

refugees, while the Jewish immigrants to Israel stole the Palestinians’ property and 

confiscated everything they needed.9

 

The Holocaust story has been repeatedly used to justify Israel’s aggression against its neighbors.

Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin justified the demolition of an alleged Iraqi nuclear

facility in June 1981 with the words, “We must protect our nation, a million and

a half of whose children were murdered by the Nazis in the gas chambers.”10

 

Before Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in June 1982, Begin told his cabinet: “You know what I have

done and what we have all done to prevent war and loss of life. But such is our fate in Israel.

There is no way other than to fight selflessly. Believe me, the alternative

is Treblinka, and we have decided that there will be no more Treblinkas.”11

 

A few weeks after Israel’s invasion of Lebanon, Begin stated that after the Holocaust the international

community had lost its right to demand that Israel answer for its actions. Begin declared in the Knesset,

“No one, anywhere in the world, can preach morality to our people.” A similar statement was

included in the resolution adopted by Begin’s cabinet after the massacres in Palestinian refugee camps

on the outskirts of Beirut.12

 

By the late 1980s there was hardly a day when the Holocaust story was not mentioned in one of

the Israeli newspapers. Such constant exposure encouraged many Israeli soldiers to plan ways

to exterminate the Arabs. According to Israeli education-corps officer Ehud Praver,

 “too many soldiers were deducing that the Holocaust justifies every kind of disgraceful action.”13

 

German Guilt

The so-called Holocaust has also been effectively used to induce guilt in the German people.

As British historian Ian Kershaw writes: “Decades would not fully erase

the simple but compelling sentiment: ‘I am ashamed to be German.’ ”14

 

Friedrich Grimm, a renowned German authority on international law, was shown samples of

new leaflets printed in German soon after the war to be distributed by the Allies throughout Germany.

Describing alleged German war crimes, the leaflets were the first step in the reeducation program

designed for Germany. Grimm suggested to an Allied officer

that since the war was over, it was time to stop the libel.

 

The Allied officer replied:

Why no, we’re just getting started. We’ll continue this atrocity campaign, we’ll increase it till no one will want to hear a good word about the Germans anymore,

till whatever sympathy there is for you in other countries is completely destroyed, and until the Germans themselves become so mixed up they won’t know what they’re doing!15

 

The Allied campaign to make Germans feel guilty concerning

the so-called Holocaust has been highly successful.

 

German guilt feeling is so powerful it has caused the German government to make enormous

reparations and offer humble apologies to the Allies, while ignoring the atrocities committed

by the Allies against the German people during and after the war. Millions of German expellees

have paid reparations to survivors of the German concentration camps even though

these German expellees had their land and personal possessions stolen from them.

 

James Bacque writes in regard to German feelings of guilt:

Guilt pervades Germany like a religion. It is the “Canossa Republic,” penitent in pain before its judges. Guilt is so powerful that it has caused the Canossa Republic

repeatedly to deny any intention of reclaiming sovereignty over the eastern lands, although it is a well-established UN principle that no

government has the right to waive the claims of individuals to their property. Nor may it impede their right of return to their former homeland.16

 

Allied Guilt and Apathy

The Allies have also been declared guilty of not doing more to prevent the

alleged genocide of European Jewry. Jewish historian Deborah Lipstadt writes:

A real antipathy toward Jews certainly affected the Allied response. While no one among the Allies or in the press wanted to see Jews killed, virtually no one was

willing to advocate that steps be taken to try to stop the carnage. Many Allied officials in positions of power in London and Washington were

tired of hearing about Jews and even more tired of being asked to do something about them even though there were steps that could have been taken.17

 

Elie Wiesel writes in regard to the Allies’ failure to rescue European Jewry, “It almost seems

as if both diplomats and statesmen spent more time inventing reasons not to save the Jews

than trying to find a way to save them.”18

 

U.S. presidents Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush have all made statements

that the United States will never again fail to act to stop something as evil as the genocide

of European Jewry. At the dedication of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington,

President Bill Clinton spoke in a similar vein: “For those of us here today representing the

nations of the West, we must live forever with this knowledge: Even as our fragmentary

awareness of crimes grew into indisputable facts, far too little was done.”19

 

Michael Goldberg says in regard to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum: “The museum

stands as a grim reminder that for all its purported ideals, America nevertheless turned its

back on Jews fleeing Hitler. . . . Hence, the museum’s recalling what happened to Jews in

the past may move Americans and their national policymakers in Washington to support

Israel in the present, lest in the future, the same fate lie in store for Jews again—

and the same moral failure await Americans once more.”20

 

President Barack Obama affirmed on the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Dachau:

“. . . we fervently vow that such atrocities will never happen again,” and, “History will not repeat itself.”21

 

Of course, Obama forgot to tell his audience that most of the inmates at Dachau died of natural

causes. Obama also conveniently failed to mention that the single biggest atrocity that occurred

at Dachau was the mass murder by American troops of 520 German guards on the day Dachau was liberated.22

 

Reparations to Jews

German guilt for the so-called Holocaust has resulted in massive reparations being paid to

Holocaust survivors and the state of Israel. German reparations to

Jews were discussed from the beginning of World War II.

 

Segev writes:

The idea [of reparations] seems to have been in the air from the time the war started, apparently sparked by the punitive reparations payments imposed on Germany

at the end of World War I. Ben-Gurion received a memorandum on the subject as early as 1940. Berl Katznelson spoke of it publicly toward the end of that year.

By December 1942, there was already a private organization in Tel Aviv called Justicia that offered to help Nazi victims draft compensation demands.23

 

Hatred of Germans in Israel was intense after the war. Many advocated a special law barring

Israelis from all social contacts with German citizens. However, since most Israelis felt that the

Germans owed them massive paybacks for the so-called Holocaust, Germany and Israel began

negotiating reparations on March 20, 1952. The Luxembourg Agreement was reached six months

later and committed the German government to paying massive reparations to Holocaust survivors.24

 

Nahum Goldmann said in a 1976 interview that the Luxembourg Agreement “constituted an

extraordinary innovation in the matter of international rights.” Goldmann also boasted that he

had obtained 10 to 14 times more from the Bonn government than he had originally expected.25

 

Millions of Jews eventually received personal compensation for their pain and suffering in the

so-called Holocaust. The German federal government as of 1998 had paid reparations to Israel

and Third Reich victims of about $61.8 billion. In addition, Germans had paid many additional

billions in private and other public funds to wartime forced laborers.26 German reparations to

Israel and Jews continue to this day.27

 

Jewish Solidarity

The Holocaust story is described by many Jewish leaders as a uniquely evil event. An example

of this view was expressed by Abraham H. Foxman when he was

the national director of the Anti-Defamation  League of B’nai B’rith:

The Holocaust is something different. It is a singular event. It is not simply one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God’s chosen children and,

thus, on God Himself. It is an event that is the antithesis of Creation as recorded in the Bible; and like its direct opposite,

which is relived weekly with the Sabbath and yearly with the Torah, it must be remembered from generation to generation.28

 

Michael Goldberg confirms that the Holocaust story has become a religion [sometimes called

Holocaustianity—Ed.] to many Jews: “As the Holocaust has become many contemporary Jews’

master story, so, too, its perpetual observance has become their paramount Jewish practice, its

veneration their religion. And as with any organized church, this Holocaust cult has its own

tenets of faith, rites, and shrines.”29

 

Israelis are obsessed with the history and heritage of the Holocaust. A 1992 study of Israeli college

students found that close to 80% of those asked identified with the statement, “We are all Holocaust

 survivors.” The so-called Holocaust has become a way for secular Jews to feel connected to their Jewish heritage.30

 

The Holocaust, commemorated ritually through the observance of Holocaust Remembrance Day,

is a major means of creating solidarity among Jews. While some Jewish communities experience

conflicts among Orthodox, Conservative and Reform Jews, they set aside their differences and join

together to mourn the so-called Holocaust. Any truth in Judaism’s slogan of “Jews Are One”

manifests itself ritually on Holocaust Remembrance Day.31

 

Conclusion

The alleged genocide of European Jewry has been used to justify the Allied war effort, to establish

the state of Israel, to justify Israel’s violence against its neighbors, to induce guilt in both Germans

and the Allied nations, to allow Jews to receive massive reparations from Germany and to create

solidarity in the Jewish community. The extreme importance of the Holocaust story in advancing

Zionist/Jewish interests ensures that this falsification of history will continue in the future.

 

ENDNOTES

Van Pelt, Robert Jan, The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2002, p. 165.

2 Ibid.

3 Wiesenthal, Simon, Justice Not Vengeance: New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1989, p. 224.

4 Segev, Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, New York: Hill and Wang, pp. 82, 185, 330.

5 Ibid., p. 514.

6 Ibid., p. 480.

7 Weir, Alison, Against Our Better Judgement: The Hidden History of How the U.S. was Used to Create Israel, 2014, p. 58.

8 Segev, Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, New York: Hill and Wang, p. 63.

9 Ibid., pp. 161-162.

10 Ibid., p. 399.

11 Ibid.

12 Ibid.

13 Ibid., pp. 407, 412.

14 Kershaw, Ian, Hitler 1936-45: Nemesis, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000, p. 840.

15 Tedor, Richard, Hitler’s Revolution, Chicago: 2013, p. 263.

16 Bacque, James, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, 2nd edition, Vancouver, British Columbia: Talonbooks, 2007, pp. 175-176.

17 Lippstadt, Deborah E., Beyond Belief: The American Press & the Coming of the Holocaust 1933-1945, New York: The Free Press, 1986, p. 277.

18 Wyman, David S., The Abandonment of the Jews: America and the Holocaust, 1941-1945, New York: The New Press, 2007, p. x.

19 Ibid., pp. 342-343.

20 Goldberg, Michael, Why Should Jews Survive?: Looking Past the Holocaust Toward a Jewish Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 55.

21 http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Obama-vows-never-again-on-70th-anniversary-of-liberation-of-Nazis-Dachau-camp-400570.

22 Buechner, Howard A., Dachau: The Hour of the Avenger, Metairie, LA: Thunderbird Press, Inc., 1986, pp. 5, 29, 96-97.

23 Segev, Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, New York: Hill and Wang, p. 104.

24 Ibid., pp. 190-191, 227, 233.

25 “West Germany’s Holocaust Payoff to Israel and World Jewry,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 8, No. 2,
Summer 1988, p. 245.

26 “Germany Has Paid Out More Than $61.8 Billion in Third Reich Reparations,” The Journal of Historical Review,
Vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1998, p. 19.

27 See http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/world/europe/for-60th-year-germany-honors-duty-to-pay-holocaust-victims.html and http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Germany-to-pay-250-Million-to-child-Holocaust-survivors-374596.

28 ADL on the Frontline, January 1994, p. 2.

29 Goldberg, Michael, Why Should Jews Survive? Looking Past the Holocaust Toward a Jewish Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 41.

30 Segev, Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust New York: Hill and Wang, pp. 513, 515-516.

31 Goldberg, Michael, Why Should Jews Survive? Looking Past the Holocaust Toward a Jewish Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 50.

 ____________________________________________________________

 

 

Click on this text to watch HOLOCAUST: Shifting the Blame, Part 1

Click on this text to watch The Holocaust Shifting The Blame Part 2


 

 

https://d1gy5epzn1e47f.cloudfront.net/file/pic/comment/2021/12/1135_f5b0034d23b873992dd0ce057f9b908cf20cd8a68296dbcf628dcebeadf8c706.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

David Cole in Auschwitz Full Documentary

Click to watch on BitChute!
Watch on Bitchute.com
Watch on Minds.com

Donahue Show Holocaust Deniers ~ (David Cole)

Click to watch on BitChute!
Watch on Bitchute.com
Watch on Minds.com

There is no Evidence of Gas Chambers!

Click to watch on BitChute!
Watch on Bitchute.com
Watch on Minds.com
 
 
 
 

Click on this text to visit the JAN. 27 Committee website for the truth about Auschwitz etc.

 
 
 
 
 

Click on this text to examine Holocaust Skepticism a "Beginners Guide to Revisionism"

__________________________________________________________________________

 

THE OPEN LETTER SPIELBERG COULDN’T REPLY TO

 Posted on October 30, 2018 by Mike Walsh 

 

 

PENNED BY R. Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce,

a noted Jewish holocaust researcher: 

 

“Dear Mr. Spielberg, I wish your honesty

to be equal to your talent. I saw you on

TV in France.You declared that you would pour

out Shoah (holocaust) propaganda in German

schools.I feel it my duty as a Jew and

after 20 years of study of the historical

problem of the holocaust, to call your attention

to the facts.Facts are very stubborn and as

no one can contradict them, zealots have been

forced to make disgusting politicians enact

Orwellian laws which forbid to mentionanything concerning

the dogma of the ‘six-million-gas-chambers’.

 

Professor Faurisson, who has been studying

the subject for 20 years, has been massacred.

These laws are, accordingly, the absolute proof

of the fake before we study its arithmetical

and technical ineptitude. No Sir, you will not

find a single witness who saw six million Jews

slaughtered. You will not find one witness of

gas chambers to exterminate 1000 or 2000

people at a time, close to the crematoria.

The 6-million-gas-chambers myth is an

arithmetic and technical nonsense.

 

As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah

business is disgusting, debasing: it is a disgraceful shame.

No people in history have ever been wailing about its

losses 50 – 70 years after a war, even its true and real losses.

Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would be a dishonour

to make such din and pump up so much money everywhere.

 

We know that 6 million is a gross exaggeration and that the gas

chambers are a technical impossibility. (Degesh Trial in 1949).

In fact, 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in

the German camps of typhus or starvation.

Many others died but as fighters against Germany

to which we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933.

 

We know that after 1945 Americans and Russians killed and raped

German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to Albania.

We know that 1,500,000 German war prisoners

were starved to death after the war

(a quite famous book was published but is

ignored (Other Losses, James Bacque).

 

We know that all German towns of more than 100,000 people have

been destroyed during the last war, with women and children:

yet silence about this real holocaust. If we consider the turn

taken by the Shoah business, what you intend to do in

Germany is actually the safest way to a heaping up

of a huge amount of anti-Semitism the explosion of

which will be unique in history. Discretion and moderation

must be our behaviour: all the rest is suicide.

 

Orwellian laws for ‘crime of thought’ cannot prevent

anti-Semitism to explode: only our behaviour can.

What you do and all the whining and money

pumping can only egg it on and it will increase

out of reasonable proportions. We must,

at least, try to avoid such blunders as

the one you intend to perform in

Germany and which would be appalling.

 

POINT 1: Do we know, in the course of History,

of any ethnic group which would not rejoice

when learning that, in a war ended fifty years

before, it had suffered many less losses than

it thought? Would the discovery of such good

piece of news, not be rewarded, and celebrated?

Would he be overwhelmed with heavy fines,

would he escape attempted murder, as such was

the case with Professor Faurisson? Do such reactions

not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy?

 

POINT 2: Have the living corpses which

can be seen in such films as Night and Fog 

(by Alain Resnais), have anything to do

with gassing? Are they not instead of the result

of famine in the camps because of the

systematic bombing of German towns containing

more than 100,000 people, bringing a real

holocaust to hundreds of thousands of women

and children who are never mentioned?

 

POINT 3: Where would have been the 4 million

Jews (if we consider that 2 million were

killed in battlefields), when it is well known

that one camp could not contain more than

60,000 thousand people and that except in Auschwitz,

there was no Zyclon- B gas-chambers?

 

POINT 4: Are witnesses worth anything, when

you know that torture was the only way

to squeeze out evidence. Such was the case of

Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration

has become a legend. What about the 100

witnesses of gassing in Dachau, when it is

officially recognised that there were no gas

chambers situated in that camp either?

 

POINT 5: 130 kilos of coal are necessary for

the cremation of just one corpse. We are told

that the Germans cremated 1,300 corpses a

day. The USAAF took hundreds of pictures of

Auschwitz, during the supposed period of

the holocaust. (1943-44). Why is there

not a single heap of the essential coal?

Why not a single column of smoke?

 

POINT 6: Why do media continue daily to inflict upon

us the myth of the six-million-gas-chambers,

in a never-ending whining and moaning? Why

are the Jewish lobby chasing, nonagenarians

who attempted to rescue Germany from the iniquity

of the Versailles treaty, from the joblessness

of 6 million people, who, back to work could give bread to

the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent on them?

 

POINT 7: Why does the American

Jewish Year Book, issue 43, page 666,

inform us that in 1941, there were

3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?

 

POINT 8: How is it possible that the gas

chambers could be just near the crematoria,

when any chemist will tell you

that Zyclon-B is hyper flammable?

 

POINT 9: Why are revisionist historians

persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the

holocaust? A scientific dialogue, a court-ordered

appraisal have been demanded since 1980

about a problem specifically arithmetic and

technical. It would seal the truth for ever.

 

POINT 10: How could Zyclon-B gas 1,000

people at one time, when it is well known that

American gas chambers made for just one

person, are of an unheard of complexity and

cost? Why, at the trial of the Degesh,

which fabricated the Zyclon-B, was it

declared in 1949, that gassing in such

conditions is impossible and unthinkable?

 

POINT 11: Why did Leuchter, who was in

charge of the maintenance of the US gas chambers,

give the firm evidence that there was no gassing

in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian and Polish

reports confirmed the Leuchter report? Why is

the Rudolf report, which analyses all results,

forbidden? Why are those who divulge the

Rudolf report, heavily sentenced by the law?

And yet the slightest care of the quality

and accuracy of the report is not taken.

 

POINT 12: Why was, for the first time in

history, the doctor’s degree of Mr Roques, on the

Gerstein report cancelled? And still, this

report was not accepted at the Nuremberg trial!

 

POINT 13: Why did Raymond Aron and François

Furet at a Sorbonne seminar, to which

no revisionist was invited, (state)

that there was not the slightest

trace of a written or oral order for

the extermination of the Jews?

 

POINT 14: Why is it never spoken of the planning

of the extermination of the Germans as

expressed in a book written by the

Jew Kaufmann (Germany must perish),

by sterilisation of German men?

It is undoubtedly a small detail?

 

POINT 15: How could Zyclon-B, used by the

Germans for hygiene since 1920, be used

in the concentration camps for other purposes

than delousing and protection against typhus?

 

POINT 16: Why do they harp on about the six-million

and never mention 80 million non-Jews

exterminated in the USSR, by an entirely Jewish

political regime, the executioners of which

bore the names of Kaganovich, Yagoda,

Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport,

and fifty other Jews?

 

POINT 17: Why, during the Zundel trial in Canada,

did the famous pro-holocaust Jews disgrace

themselves by talking of ‘poetic licence’

in their holocaust assertions,

and who never returned when

summoned to do so by the judges?


POINT 18: Why the Fabius-Gayssot law; the ludicrous fable of

one illness stricken man dragging along 200,000,000 corpses?

 

POINT 19: Is it not the supreme proof of the

fake? There is no need of Stalinist-Orwellian

laws imposing prison sentences because of

one’s beliefs (thought crime of 1984) as stated

by M. Toubon, before he became a Minister

of Justice in France, to set up the truth.

 

This law is anti-constitutional, anti-democratic,

against the rights of men. Facts, proofs,

pros and cons, are only what we need.

Professor Faurisson besought for the granting of

a forum with an unlimited number of

contradictors: he never obtained it. L’abbé

Pierre did ask for it: they pretended to

grant it but refused it almost immediately.

 

The forum did take place at the Lugarno television

studios. It was a complete success

for the revisionists and was broadcast twice.

Nobody knows it as the media, at the beck

and call of the Jewish lobby, move their

little finger only when authorised by

the Jewish lobby to do so.

 

POINT 20: Why is it that when a professor

declares that the holocaust is an arithmetic and

technical impossibility, he is dismissed? This,

for the first time in history, sets up the insane

concept of religious historical dogma,

which in case of non-perennial worship,

is doomed to be struck by the lightning

of the inquisition of a secular state.

 

POINT 21: Why did the ‘Express’, a famous

French newspaper, in January 1995, assert

that the gas-chamber shown for decades in

Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after the war,

and that all that concerns it, is false?

 

POINT 22: There was actually a holocaust

of 60 million people in a war declared in 1933

by the Jews against Hitler. Hitler had given

bread to six million unemployed, he had rejected

the dictatorship of the dollar and Jewish

totalitarianism which pollute man and the planet

and which is called democracy by semantic

mystification. Only two parties are left: the totalitarian

Judeopathy, exterminating man and

the planet, and Nationalism for the

non-Jews not yet poisoned by

Capitalist-Marxist Jewish influence.”

 

NOTE: For reasons of space this open letter

to movie producer Steven Spielberg has

been abridged from the French language

original penned by R. Dommergue Polacco

de Ménasce, a Jew who strongly takes

issue with the totalitarian Judeopathy.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 
 
 ____________________________________
The Facts About the Origins of the Concentration Camps
and Their Administration 
Article from The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 11-16.
Here’s a fascinating look at the concentration camp system inside Germany, devoid of the jewish hysteria often associated with the subject in jewish Hollywood films and in the “mainstream” jewish media and academia. The Barnes Review and The Scriptorium are pleased to present what may be the first-ever detailed examination of the concentration camp system, presenting a far different picture from what we’ve been told by the jews.
In propagating a politicized view of German history many in the jewish media and jewish academia have attempted to portray the German system of imprisonment in concentration camps as some sort of precursor to genocide, as a living hell where it was official German policy to make life miserable and to victimize, beat, torture, rape and murder innocent civilians simply because of religious or political persuasion or sexual orientation.  
Is this sensational jewish view of history correct? No, the role of German concentration camps was much different and probably better in many ways than the American prison system today. German concentration camps had a much more positive role to play in Hitler’s new and progressive National Socialist state.
The facts will bear out that the jewish Establishment historians have purveyed a view of concentration camp life that cannot be substantiated.
The daily life in a concentration camp was much different than most historians will admit.
In 1948, Paul Rassinier, a former Socialist and critic of National Socialist Germany who had himself been interned in the concentration camps of Buchenwald and Dora, published Crossing the Line (Le Passage de la Ligne). In this work, Rassinier claimed that the Germans had been benign, if not positive, in their motives for putting enemies of Hitler’s National Socialist state in concentration camps. Rassinier claimed that the concentration camps were a “gesture of compassion” since inmates had been placed where they could “not hurt the new regime and where they could be protected from the public anger.”  
Not only did the concentration camps protect anti-social elements in Rassinier’s view, but they were also designed to “rehabilitate the strayed sheep and to bring them back to a healthier concept of the German community.”1 According to Rassinier, the German government was helping those whom it committed to concentration camps by putting them in a setting so that they could be rehabilitated into more productive members of the German community. 
Those who fell into the categories of persons assigned to concentration camps included any person condemned for treasonable activities, as well as judeo-Communist Party officials and anyone who incited a German citizen to refuse military service.2 Persons who were considered by the authorities of the Third Reich as being an anti-social malefactor were also sent to the camps.  
Anti-social malefactors consisted of professional and habitual criminals, that is, those people who had been sentenced to a minimum of six months imprisonment or hard labor on at least three separate occasions. Anti-social malefactors also specifically included beggars, prostitutes, homosexuals, drunkards, psychopaths and lunatics.3 Persons who were “work shy” were also sent to concentration camps. According to Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS, work shy meant unemployed men who “could be proved to have refused without adequate reason employment offered to them on two occasions.”4
The first persons arrested and sent to concentration camps were communists who had taken part in efforts to undermine the fabric of the German state. Most of these communists arrested were denounced to local authorities by fellow workers and neighbors who were concerned about their activities.
During March and April 1933, the German people reported the activities of over 10,000 communists in Germany. Given the large membership and well-organized activities of the German Communist Party (KPD), the local jails were soon filled, and the National Socialist government in Berlin was forced to decide where to house these persons, who were a clear and present danger to the continuation of Germany as an independent and sovereign nation. With the jails and prisons filled to capacity, local officials began to take over abandoned warehouses and factories to hold the communists. These makeshift holding facilities have since become known as “wild concentration camps” since they were spur-of-the-moment inventions.  
The name “concentration camp” simply means an area where dangerous elements are concentrated. Hitler once said the idea for concentration camps came from his studies of the Boer War in South Africa.5
During that war, the British built camps and concentrated women and children of Dutch ancestry. During their confinement in British concentration camps, over 26,000 died mainly of starvation, since the British made no effort to feed the unarmed and helpless women, nor did they allow them to leave and go back to their farmsteads. This action of the British against unarmed women and children mainly goes overlooked by jewish Establishment historians, who instead accuse the German concentration camps of being death camps whose sole purpose was killing unarmed civilians. But this is not the case.  
The first official concentration camp set up in Germany was established about 12 miles from Munich in the town of Dachau, inside a former gunpowder factory, on March 22, 1933. Unlike what judeo-Allied propaganda would have us believe, the Germans were not ashamed of this camp. In fact, Heinrich Himmler held a press conference to announce its opening two days before the first inmates were scheduled to arrive. His announcement was carried in German newspapers,6 and the camp was opened with the arrival of 200 communists. But the camp was built to hold 5,000 and was mainly established to act as a deterrent to further communist activity. 
Himmler stated that it was his promise not to wait until crimes were committed before arresting criminals, and pledged that, in order to protect the populace, professional criminals who had been sentenced many times would be pursued more ruthlessly than before and isolated away from the German people by being incarcerated in concentration camps. Himmler also added that his camps were to be models of cleanliness, order and instruction.
It was through this instruction that Himmler hoped to re-educate minor criminals as well as communists.
Himmler had ordered strong disciplinary measures to be employed, but the treatment inmates received was just, and they learned trades through their work and training. In the concentration camps, the motto was: “There is one way to freedom. Its milestones are: obedience, zeal, honesty, order, cleanliness, temperance, truth, sense of sacrifice and love for the Fatherland.”7
In the Soviet Union’s “model” of socialism, the German communists found what they were looking for: liberalism, urbanism, and modernism – all of which rejected the traditional Aryan-German way of life.
For this reason, the German communists looked at Hitler’s appointment to the chancellorship by President Paul von Hindenburg as a signal for an uprising aimed at creating a German soviet state, closely modeled on the Soviet Union and taking its orders from the Comintern in Moscow. But Hitler saw the threat the communists posed to German society, and after the burning of the Reichstag by a communist, he reacted swiftly to take them into custody. Hitler now decided to build the first concentration camps.
However, instead of being vindictive or out to do harm to the communists, the concentration camp at Dachau was designed to reform them and make them into citizens that the Germans could be proud of – citizens who could return to German society at large and live out their lives as peaceful and proper German men and women. Instead of being an institution aimed at punishment, the German system of concentration camps was designed to reform and to reeducate enemies of the new German state.
A correspondent for The Jew York Times was allowed to visit Dachau shortly after it was opened and came away with the impression that the commandant of the camp, Theodor Eicke, and the men under his command took their job of reeducation seriously.
“They honestly and sincerely believed that their task was pedagogic rather than punitive…. They felt sincerely sorry for the misguided non-Nazis who had not yet found the true faith.”8
Not only had the inmates not yet found faith in the leadership of Adolf Hitler, but they also took part in or supported subversive activities aimed at overthrowing the state.
An internal document written in 1934 and circulated at Gestapo headquarters stated that National Socialist Germany would not be complete until its opponents learned to support it and identify with the goals of the German community at large. The writer of the document reiterated the educational value and ideological indoctrination that the camps were to instill in the inmates, and suggested imbuing the inmates with the knowledge that upon their release they would be able to become full members of German society.9 Just a short time later, another Gestapo document warned all state authorities not to harass released inmates so as not to make their complete re-integration into German society difficult.10
The Germans themselves often referred to these camps as “education camps.”
In the summer of 1942, three years after World War II began, Himmler was still emphasizing the re-educational aspects of the camps when he wrote a letter to Oswald Pohl.11 The language that he used in this letter was also given as part of official instructions to guards at the camps.
Himmler instructed each guard to make his behavior a personal example to the prisoners, in order to imbue them with respect for the National Socialist state and to teach them how to behave properly.12
This re-education at the camps was to stress traditional Aryan virtues, such as hard work, strict discipline, a belief in law and order, support for the complete family and respect for traditional German society, as well as encouraging them to respect the National Socialist state and the National Socialist movement in general.
Over the years, tens of thousands of inmates were released from the camps once they had shown that they had chosen to reform themselves.
On many occasions the commandants of the camps had determined that inmates had abandoned their old ways and had chosen to become loyal members of German society. As late as October 1944, inmates were being released, and many of these were communists who had abandoned their previous beliefs.13  

Of the persons sent to the concentration camps, many were sent there by court order for fixed terms. Other persons were arrested because of the danger they presented to German society. Some prisoners, who had been convicted during the Weimar era, were sent to the concentration camps after their release from prison. Since some of these prisoners were murderers, rapists and pedophiles, the National Socialist state refused to allow them to return to German society until the authorities were sure that they had abandoned their old ways. Contrary to modern political myth, German newspapers frequently carried stories on the concentration camps and often reported on the internment of dangerous persons.
Many of the camps were open to inspection by foreign diplomats and even by German civilians.
Often the curious persons would travel to the camps only to be met by friendly guards and escorted through the camps on a personal tour. Of the tens of thousands of prisoners who were released, most probably told their relatives, friends and neighbors of the conditions present in the camps. Over the years, judges, lawyers, members of the clergy, social workers and repairmen were allowed into the camps for official business. 
Merchants often visited the camps to bring new stocks of supplies, and local civilians were often employed in the camps. If conditions in the camps had been deplorable, German society would have learned of it and would have been outraged. The Germans were and still are a decent people whose only crime in establishing the camps was showing leniency to persons who wanted to do them harm.
In a book written on the camp established at Oranienburg, Werner Schafer claimed that some citizens in the local communities asked permission to send some of their rebelling children to the camps to learn self-discipline. Schafer also said that
there were some prisoners who were offered release who refused since they could not remember doing work since the beginning of the Great Depression.14
Schafer listed the types of food eaten by the prisoners and computed how much weight they had gained during their internment in the camp. Citizens of National Socialist Germany therefore had good reason to support the officials who administered the camps.
The nature of imprisonment in concentration camps can best be guessed by a document signed by Himmler, in which the principles of internment in a concentration camp were clarified. The document was not meant for public distribution and was classified “secret” before being sent to senior officers of the Gestapo on 27 May 1942. It reads:
Recently, various officials in the party and the government have begun threatening to lodge complaints with the police against citizens, or to have them imprisoned in concentration camps, in order to give greater force to various orders and decrees.
In this manner, for instance, one officer threatened a citizen that he would be sent to a camp for “police interrogation” if he did not produce within five days a certain form, as he had been told to do by one of the officials.
I request in all seriousness that the parties involved be instructed to cease this practice immediately, and if this is not done I will take upon myself to declare publicly that citizens are not liable in such instances to either police investigation or imprisonment in a concentration camp.
The most severe punishments lose their deterrent ability when they are threatened at every opportunity, or when the impression is given that every official, in every office, is authorized to make use of it.
Imprisonment in a concentration camp, involving as it does separation from one’s family, isolation from the outside world, and the hard labor assigned to the prisoner, is the most severe of punishments.
Its use is reserved exclusively for the secret police, in accordance with precise regulations which specify the form of imprisonment and its term. In this matter I have retained for myself a large measure of authority and exclusive discretion.
All in all the German people are uniquely fair-minded. Most Germans obey the instructions of the authorities of their own free will and desire. Instructions accompanied by threats will, however, be received with disrespect and will be obeyed only unwillingly, not to mention that the multiplication of threats of this type will give a completely false impression, both here and abroad.15
Not only does this document illuminate the fact that the concentration camp system was not vindictive or there to terrorize the civilian population, but it also shows that the leaders of the state had concern for the prisoners. Himmler recognized that imprisonment involved isolation and separation from loved ones and was determined to allow the German people to know that the only persons imprisoned in the camps were extreme cases.  
But more importantly, as the value of hindsight allows us to [see], the document also allows us to understand where some of the judeo-Allied propaganda came from; minor officials were eager to add threats to their orders in an attempt to give the impression that they were more powerful than they actually were. Because of the actions of these minor officials, the judeo-Allies had the propaganda to claim that the concentration camps were there to terrorize the civilian population and to force them to become subservient to a state that only cared about itself. This was exactly what Himmler was afraid would happen: that the concentration camps would be seen to be a punitive punishment and not the center of re-education that they really were.
To meet the needs of re-education, the camp command in each camp was divided into several departments, which dealt with matters of administration, personnel, transport, communications, mail, equipment, kitchen work, supplies, health and sanitation and so forth. The camp commandants were assisted by a deputy, an adjutant, a master sergeant, a medical officer and education officer, a legal officer, a fire officer and others.
The commandants were held personally responsible for the re-education of those prisoners who were not considered to be “lost cases.” Because the camps were often open for public inspections, the commandants were also required to have some amount of political sensitivity. Starting in 1942, the commandants were also responsible for the work of the camp doctor and the medical staff.
The camp commandants had full responsibility for almost everything that happened in the camps, except for the work of the political departments. The political department operated in the camp as an extension of the Gestapo, and a plainclothes officer of the secret police headed it. This department dealt with the reception and registration of inmates, and was also in charge of their release. This department:
  • Kept files on each inmate that included personal details about the inmate, the inmate’s picture and fingerprints;
  • Was responsible for filing death notices and was responsible for passing this information on to government authorities;
  • Corresponded with the relatives of the inmates in cases where there was a need for guardianship of underage children, insurance claims and so forth;
  • Had the authority to decree special conditions of imprisonment;
  • Was responsible for all interrogation that went on in the camps; and,
  • Supervised prisoner informers, censorship, field security, and the prevention of rebellion.
Not all members of the command had direct and daily contact with the inmates. The inmates were kept in a special compound within the camps, overseen by their own commanding officer and his staff. Some staff officers were responsible for head counts, others for work arrangements; others actually accompanied prisoners when they went out to work, while other officers were responsible for each of the living quarters, which were themselves referred to as a block. The personal deputy of the camp commandant usually oversaw the prisoner division of the camp.
The camp commandants were also required to prevent cruelty to inmates.
A training manual for camp guards asked the following question: “What is completely prohibited a camp guard? Answer: Under all circumstances he is forbidden to strike prisoners at his own initiative, outside the framework of the disciplinary regulations.”
In 1935 Reinhard Heydrich wrote to the camp guards stating that “it is not becoming an interrogator to insult a prisoner, demean him, or behave with rudeness and brutalize or torture him when there is no need to do so.” Heydrich went on and warned the camp men that if they beat prisoners they would be court-martialed.16 Eicke himself wrote in 1937 that “the guards should be instructed to abstain from mistreating prisoners…. Even if a guard had done no more than slap a prisoner’s face, the slap will be considered an act of brutality and the guard will be punished.”17
The SS actually punished a number of its own men for their conduct while serving in the concentration camps. Two concentration camp commandants, Adam Gruenwald and Karl Chmielewshi, were placed on trial and found guilty of the deaths of prisoners as a result of brutality in their camps. The SS tried over 700 staff members throughout the course of the Third Reich for their conduct toward inmates. This was because the SS and the National Socialist state always considered concentration camps to be re-education camps first and foremost.
It is true that persons who were considered to be hopeless cases such as habitual offenders were sent to the camps, but most prisoners always could earn their release by conforming to traditional Aryan-German standards of conduct. Unfortunately, many guards could not tell the difference between the habitual criminals and those who were there to be re-educated. This problem plagued the camp administration throughout the history of the Third Reich.
Oswald Pohl complained that “As a result of my personal attention to the matter, and the repeated irregularities recently noted, I have learned that many of the guards at the camps are aware only in the faintest way of the obligations imposed upon them.”18
But historians must take into consideration the fact that tens of thousands of individuals served in the camps. If 700 committed crimes and were punished for it, it only highlights the fact that the other tens of thousands of Germans serving in the camps took their responsibilities seriously.
Most camp men understood that their personal behavior was a way of encouraging inmates to aspire to be upstanding and proud citizens of Germany According to an SS booklet:
“The prisoner must know that the guard represents a philosophy superior to his, an unblemished political approach and a higher moral level, and the prisoner must take these as a personal example as part of his efforts to correct himself so that he may once again be a loyal citizen in his community.”19
In April 1939, Adolf Hitler celebrated his 50th birthday. To celebrate this occasion, plans were drawn up for a pardon for several thousand prisoners in the camps. The instructions that determined who was to be freed and who would remain as an inmate reveal the different kinds of prisoners in the camps as well as revealing Hitler’s generosity and good will. The intention of the pardon was to free inmates who were brought to the camps in 1933, six years before.
It was determined to at least consider releasing repeat offenders who were arrested in the years 1933 to 1934 for short sentences and who had at least served a year in the camps; political and white-collar offenders who had been convicted on minor offenses and who had served at least six months; prisoners of 60 or more years of age, including Jehovah’s Witnesses whose faith would not allow them to swear loyalty to the German state; first-time homosexuals who had not been convicted of sexual relations with minors; as well as prisoners who had in the past been members of the National Socialist Party.20
Then in 1941 the camps were classified into four groups, in accordance with the severity of the discipline and conditions of imprisonment imposed upon the inmates. Those prisoners who had been imprisoned for minor offenses and whom the SS considered to be possible to re-educate had the conditions of their imprisonment eased.
The workdays in the camps were formalized in 1938. On weekdays, the inmates worked from 0730 to 1200 and from 1230 to 1700, for a total of nine hours a day. On Saturdays work was from 0730-1200, for a total of four and one-half hours.
Not only were Saturday afternoons free, but Christian inmates had all of Sunday to attend their own services within the camp and to contemplate the reasons for their imprisonment.21

Inside the camp, the barracks were segregated by sex, but in many cases prisoners were allowed to marry, even other prisoners. Registration in such cases was carried out by SS officers.22 The heirs of any prisoner who died while being held at one of the camps were eligible to collect their life insurance. Since the life insurance policies would expire if the premiums were not paid, and the inmates were incarcerated and without any substantial income, the SS came up with a solution that jewish Establishment historians will not give them credit for. The SS set up its own fund to pay the insurance premiums of prisoners until the day they died.23 In this way, the loved ones of incarcerated inmates would not be overly burdened if their relative died while in custody.  
In 1936, the question was raised for the first time as to who would take care of the children when both parents were prisoners in concentration camps. Instead of taking the children away from their loving parents as is now done in countries such as the U.S. and Great Britain, the National Socialist authorities in Germany decided it would be better for the children if the parents were released on a rotating monthly basis so at least one parent would always be there to care for their needs. This rotating release continued until one of the parents was released for good.24
Needless to say, this program did pose a slight security risk to Germany, but Hitler apparently was more concerned about the welfare of young German children than he was with anything else.
Even though judeo-Allied war-time propaganda concerning the German concentration camps paints a bleak picture with ritual murder, rape, assault and other crimes, the facts of the period do not support this view.  
The efforts of the National Socialist authorities to rehabilitate and re-educate incarcerated criminals and communists show a dedication and a firm belief in their convictions that, in comparison, the United States and Great Britain are sorely lacking in their own prison administrations. Those Germans, tens of thousands of patriotic citizens, who served in the camps as doctors, nurses, cooks, clerks, bookkeepers, and guards, were much maligned and viciously attacked by judeo-Allied authorities in post-war Germany.   
Notes:
1See Pierre Hofstetter, Introduction to Paul Rassinier, Debunking the Genocide Myth: A Study of the Nazi Concentration Camps and the Alleged Extermination of European Jewry (Torrance, California, 1978), p. x. …back…
2Heiniz Hoehne, The Order of the Death’s Head (New York, 1966), p. 225. …back…
3Ibid., p. 226. …back…
4Ibid., quoted in, p. 226. …back…
5Max Domarus, Hitler Reden, v. 3 (Wiesbaden: R. Loweit, 1973), p. 58. …back…
6Becker, Hitlers Machtergreifung, pp. 149-50. …back…
7Ibid., Frs. 2494-5. …back…
8“Nazi Prison Camps to be Permanent,” The New York Times, July 27, 1933, p. 7. …back…
9BAKO R 58/264 fol. 1309 u. 198a. …back…
10Ibid. …back…
11BAKO NS 19 320, May 29, 1942. …back…
12BAKO NS 3 426, July 27, 1943. …back…
13BAKO NS 3 vol. 401. …back…
14Schafer, Konzentrationslager Oranienburg, p. 247. …back…
15BAKO R 58 1027 fol. 1-291. …back…
16BAKO R 58 264 fol. 309 u. 198a RSHA, January 8, 1935. …back…
17TV Befehlsblätter 1937, no. 5, p. 12, TV file, Berlin Document Center. …back…
18BAKO NS 3 442, November 7, 1944. …back…
19Aufgaben und Pflichten der Wachposten, July 27, 1943, BAKO NS 3 426. …back…
20BAKO R 58/1027 fold. 1-291. …back…
21Natzweiler Routine Orders, February 25, 1943, American Historical Association, Captured German Documents, Microfiled at the Berlin Document Center, 7. 75 R. 216 2/755081. …back…
22BAKO NS 3 Vol. 426, May 1943. …back…
23Weiterversicherung von Häftlingen, BAKO NS 3 405. …back…
24BAKO R 58 246 fol. 1 309 u. 198a. (RSHA), April 21, 1936.
 
__________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
 
 

 
___________________________________________________________
 
NEIN
 
Click on any of the text below to hear the truth spoken by accused "NAZIS"
who knew nothing of the holocaust lie because there was no intentional "holocaust"
 
 

NICHT SCHULDIG! - NOT GUILTY!

REINHARD HEYDRICH ON THE MEANING OF THE "FINAL SOLUTION"

ADOLF HITLER DENYING THE HOLOCAUST

HERMANN GOERING DENYING THE HOLOCAUST

HEINRICH HIMMLER AND HIS FAMILY DENYING THE HOLOCAUST

HEINRICH HIMMLER DENIED THE 'HOLOCAUST'

ALFRED JODL DENYING HIS GUILT

ALBERT SPEER DENYING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST

SECRETARIES OF NAZI LEADERS DENYING KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST

JOSEF MENGELE DENYING HIS EXPERIMENTS

DENIAL IN JOSEF MENGELE'S FAMILY

OSWALD POHL DENYING KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST

ALFRED ROSENBERG DENYING HIS GUILT

OTTO OHLENDORF DENYING HIS GUILT

HANS FRANK DENYING HIS PERSONAL GUILT

FRITZ SAUCKEL DENYING HIS GUILT

WALTER RAUFF DENYING HIS GUILT

KARL WOLFF DENYING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST

HANS LAMMERS DENYING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE HOLOCAUST

DAUGHTER OF AUSCHWITZ KOMMANDANT - "THERE WAS NO SMOKE, THERE WAS NO SMELL"

ROBERT MULKA DENIES KNOWLEDGE OF GASSINGS AT AUSCHWITZ (FRANKFURT AUSCHWITZ TRIAL 1963)

DENIAL IN THE FAMILIES OF "EVIL NAZIS"

 
 
____________________________________________________________
 

Former Concentration Camp Supervisor Exposes the Auschwitz Lie

image
 

Die Auschwitz-Lüge: A Personal Account

By Thies Christophersen

Published: 1973-01-01

 

I was in Auschwitz from January to December 1944. After the war I heard about the alleged mass murders of jews and I was quite taken aback. Despite all the testimony submitted and all the reports in the media, I know such atrocities were never committed. I have said so repeatedly, everywhere and at all times, but it has always been useless for no one has wanted to believe me. The evidence, I am told, is unequivocal and confirmed without contradiction.

 

 

Court cases have clearly established that gas chambers existed in Auschwitz and the Camp Commander Hoss, has himself said so. Whoever dares to deny this, makes himself suspect of perhaps, having personally participated in the murders of these jews.

 

I have been warned to take care because war crimes have not yet come under the Statute of Limitation (as applicable in any civilized nation) and so I can still be tried and be prosecuted and it would be best to keep silent.

 

Friends and acquaintances have said:

 

“What would you serve were you still to try to correct history?” “You cannot change a thing!” “Acknowledgement of our guilt has brought us back into the community of nations.” “Remember, you have a family“. “No one will believe your reports . . . Keep silent, that’s the smartest thing you can do.“

 

Quite honestly, I began to have doubts myself. When one continually hears the same stories from all sides, it is only reasonable that finally one begins to believe them. “But what happened to all those jews if they were not gassed?” I do not know, but I wonder where so many jews come from if six million of them are supposed to have been killed during the war. In my area of the country there hardly ever were any jews even before the war. So-called “cattle-jews” simply did not exist in rural areas. Spiteful people have remarked that the only reason for this was that the peasants in these northern lands were smarter than the jews. Very many jews were able to emigrate before the war, some escaped during the war and many of them have survived the concentration camps … and of course many jews today live in our midst again.

 

My doubts were first roused when I read a flyer distributed by Einar Aberg of Norrviken (Sweden). He compared official statistics of the jewish world population before the war with those after the war. He concluded their numbers had increased to the extent where every woman must have given birth to a child every year of her productive life, if the number of 6 million murdered jews could be judged to be correct. In 1938 there were supposed to be 15,688,259 jews in the world. This figure is derived from the “World Almanac” of the American Jewish Committee. In 1948, according to an article in the New York Times by W. Baldwin, there were supposed to be 18,700,000 jews in the world. Baldwin is a well-known population expert, entirely neutral, and even the most far-fetched imagination could not describe him as “anti-Semitic.” Thus the story of the 6 million murdered jews cannot be true, for it is impossible for a nation’s population to increase by 50% in just ten years.

 

The losses of the jewish people during WW II, certainly regrettable, were not 6 million, but approximately 200,000, according to facts compiled by the UNO, which body surely has no reason to grant special protection to any one nation in particular.

 

A book published in Brazil contains the following statement:

 

“… These facts were used by the Canadian Anti-Defamation Committee of Christian Laymen in ascertaining that 200,000 jews died in the twelve years of Hitler’s rule (1933-45), regardless of how they died, i.e. whether they were killed, sentenced and shot as guerillas or saboteurs, or in air raids on camps, or through other circumstances due to war, including sickness and old age.“

 

The leading Austrian Social Democrat, Dr. Benedikt Kautsky — himself a jew — who spent the years from 1938 to 1945 in concentration camps, three of these in Auschwitz, said:

“I was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might have resembled gas chambers.“

 

Richard Baer, the last commander at Auschwitz (from 1943) and therefore the most important witness, of whom the Parisian weekly “Rivarol” reported that he could not be dissuaded from his insistence that;

 

”during all the time he was in Auschwitz, he had never seen gas chambers, nor had he known that any existed.“

 

Commander Baer died suddenly on June 17th, 1963 whilst being held under investigation, although two weeks previous to this he had been given a clean bill of health.

 

I never made a secret of my having been at Auschwitz. When asked about the destruction of jews, I answered that I knew nothing about that. I simply marvelled at how quickly the populace was willing to accept and believe the stories about these mass gassings, without any apparent resistance.

 

As a result of a war injury in 1940 I developed a severe case of chronic sinus. The slightest cold put me back in hospital. The Autumn of 1942 brought an official medical finding: service on the home front. I filed a request for furlough to attend a higher agricultural school and did so in 1942/43. In the spring of 1943 a commander of Army Headquarters came to our school to solicit agrarians willing to go to the Ukraine to raise india rubber plants. I applied and was accepted.

 

Kok-Sagis

 

A mobile war needs vehicles, and vehicles need tires, and tires are made from rubber. Of course there is synthetic rubber, made from carbon, lime and sulphur, called “buna.” But without the addition of natural India rubber to the mixture, it cannot be produced as there is then no cohesion. The Russians, in their attempt to become self-sufficient (in our case this was called preparation for war), had systematically searched their whole flora for plants that contained India rubber . . . and found some — among others, one called Kok Sagis, a close relation of the dandelion. The white latex in its roots contains India rubber. This became very important to carrying on the war. The motorized vehicles branch at HQ had organized departments for the cultivation, utilization and research of plants with India rubber content. After a short training period I was sent to the Ukraine to supervise the planting and cultivation of India rubber bearing plants. I had never seen a Kok Sagis plant, but practical work and assistance from some Russian agrarians soon provided the necessary knowledge.

 

In 1943 we lost the Ukraine, and early In 1944 I was transferred to the department of plant cultivation at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute. This institute had established a branch at Auschwitz, so I went there, and only on my way did I learn that it was a concentration camp. When relating my experiences at Auschwitz, I have some doubts as to whether I should mention names of former colleagues who today are still alive and with whom I still maintain contact. I know that I myself must be prepared for reprisals for breaking the silence. I am now ready to accept these … and in part already have had to do so.

 

Life In the Camp

 

It was cold and windy when I arrived at the railroad station of Auschwitz on January 15, 1944. I wondered whether to go by horse and carriage, but decided to walk. Leaving my baggage at the station, I asked my way to the camp. Actually the camp, consisting of barracks, that were ugly but massively built, was very near. The first thing I noticed was the inscription over the gate “ARBEIT MACHT FREI“, (“Work will set us Free“). I was surprised to see so many inmates of the camp walk around unguarded. Later I learned that the camp, surrounded with an electrified barbed wire fence was under guard only at night. There were guards posted outside the grounds, however, who were pulled in at night after roll call.

 

I reported to my superior, Dr. A., a fine-looking man with steel-blue eyes and reddish hair. He greeted me warmly. I was curious about the camp and asked about the inmates. He said, “The Germans who are here belong here . . . apart from that it is the European elite that is here.” Later I discovered there was some truth to that statement. I was introduced to his co-workers. There was a former Czarist officer, an exile, who also spoke German and French, and he offered to drive me to my quarters. The officers had no cars but they did have a carriage and a driver at their disposal to travel on the extensive lands that were under cultivation. However, I found this somewhat pompous. I also found it embarrassing that inmates whom we passed on the way, took off their caps and stood at attention as we went by, but we were officers and the SS-men also gave us the military salute.

 

My quarters were in Raisko, about 3 km from the main camp. This was where a women’s camp, the botany buildings with their hot houses, and the laboratories for our research work were located. I was given a room in an unattached dwelling; I shared the house with a colleague who was the supervisor of the department of plant cultivation. He was a man with a happy disposition. There was something heartwarming about his laughter and he was well liked by the inmates and he still corresponds with some of them today. Later on he had his wife and two young children join him.

 

I then moved to an apartment in a botanic building that had just been completed. This I shared with a scientist whose name I can mention; it was Dr. Boehme. He was shot and killed by Polish civilians who went wild after the capitulation. He had never harmed anyone and had been kindness and courtesy personified.

 

The first inmate I met was “Agnes.” She was a member of the Jehovah’s Witnesses and was our cleaning lady. I questioned her about conditions at the camp but she would not speak about them. Not so Mrs. Pohl who was in control of the kitchen. She also was a student of the Bible and made up flyers which she distributed to the inmates. Actually, this was against the regulations, but it wasn’t my job to watch the inmates. Apart from that, her publications seemed harmless to me, and I had always been tolerant in matters of religion. Even now I cannot deny Jehovah’s Witnesses a certain measure of respect, for they were willing to have themselves locked up and suffer for their faith simply because they wanted to suffer. There was no need to watch them and they were free to move even beyond the line of posted guards.

 

In our camp about 300 women were housed in three barracks. They were made up of a select type of worker who worked almost exclusively for the department of plants. For the most part they were jewish and Polish with a sprinkling of French. All spoke German quite well and many had an academic degree. Their work was of a scientific nature and they were quite self-sufficient. In fact, it was not I who was training the inmates, they were training me, and they did so with a certain pride, in fact, I might almost say, with an air of self-importance. At any rate, I had the impression that the inmates performed their research tasks gladly and with enthusiasm.

 

The cultivation of plants proceeded on a basis of selectivity. The roots of the plants were examined as to their India rubber content and reproduced through seedlings. Their seeds were carefully gathered and re-sown. Sabotage could easily have been committed but we never learned of even a single instance. It must be mentioned, however, that the inmates did not trust each other. There was that ancient feeling of hate between jews and Poles. Compared to this hate, so-called National Socialist hatred of the jews was quite harmless.

 

The results in increased India rubber production were quite satisfactory. One of our superiors went to Russia, and returned with a number of scientists. They came with their families and worked for us as civilians, enjoying their work.

 

A sort of drama developed with the arrival of one Russian agronomist, J. Sassmoshek. He found a former sweetheart among the inmates and this re-union had its natural effects. Sassmoshek married the woman and she was released from her internment. After the evacuation from Auschwitz, I saw them again at Halle and both were radiantly happy. I myself was not so happy at the time, I had just been through that terrible air raid of February 13th on Dresden, which had been declared an open, undefended city, and from which I had escaped unharmed, as if by some miracle. I believe on this one day in Dresden more people died than had supposedly died in Auschwitz throughout all the years of the war. But the war crimes of the Allies are not debatable, even to this day.

 

Just what was the daily routine at Auschwitz? Rising at 7 a.m.. washing, showering, breakfast and roll call, on the job at 8. Lunch from 12-1, and work again until 5 p.m. Roll call once more at 7 p.m., following which the guards posted outside the camp were pulled in and the camp put under guard. Mail was delivered daily. Packages were opened at roll call and examined by the camp supervisor. Only rarely had some of the contents to be withheld, such as for instance, certain medical preparations, books and pamphlets, cameras, radios and technical instruments. These things, however, remained the property of the inmates and were stored in a huge warehouse called “Kanada“, where also all possessions of jews interned at Auschwitz, were kept.

 

Kanada” was kept under guard at all times to prevent looting from the outside. In our weather station we had a female SS-worker who, on one occasion, “organized” a pair of stockings for herself from “Kanada“. She was court-martialed for “plundering“. However, the inmates themselves, who worked there, stole constantly.

 

Surprising to me was the elegance of the inmates’ wearing apparel. Their outer garments did, of course, consist of uniforms, but all other apparel, including shoes, was of the finest quality, nor was there any lack in beauty care, and make-up was all part of the female dress. Every Saturday our women were sent to the main camp for an exchange of laundry and they brought back alluring bits of booty, which were then distributed among the inmates. It was a type of theft that I think was being quietly tolerated.

 

Olga

 

In May my wife, for the first time, came to visit me. She was a teacher in agricultural home economics and was curious about my work at the concentration camp. This fact alone, that we were able to have our relatives visit us at any time, should prove that the camp administration had nothing to hide. Had Auschwitz been the death factory it is reputed to have been, such visits would certainly not have been permitted. Formalities, such as even today are required for a visit to that prison camp, otherwise known as East Germany, were not required at Auschwitz. We were a young married couple and had not seen too much of each other in our marriage. I met my wife at the railway station. She wore wooden sandals without stockings and a kerchief over her hair. It was war time and elegance was a luxury we could not afford.

 

At that time I had a new cleaning lady — personal maid would have been a more fitting title. Olga! Olga was Polish. She was a factotum. But there was something touching about the solicitous care with which she took my affairs in hand. There were always flowers in my room; always a clean tablecloth and clean curtains, and somehow she always managed to have a surprise for me.

 

She had taken special pains in getting my room ready for my wife’s visit. Above my bed she had attached a praying angel to the wall — Lord only knows where she got that! Actually, her care was a bit overpowering, but I had to accept since I didn’t want to hurt the concerned soul that she was. 

 

During my wife’s visit, work was commenced on the india rubber fields and I did not have too much time for my visitor, but she had the best possible companion in Olga, who could talk like a waterfall. My wife felt she should compensate Olga for her thoughtfulness and bought her a small gift. The result was that when I took my wife to the railway station for her trip back home, I hardly recognized her. She was dressed in new clothes from head to toe. Olga had “obtained” everything for her, even a brand new suitcase. My wife had brought me a few delicate morsels saved from her own meager rations, among other things, a piece of butter. Olga managed to make fried potatoes for me evenings and strangely enough there was no end to the butter. Care packages arrived daily and Olga felt duty-bound to include me in the distribution of this bounty. The inmates at Raisko never went hungry, and any new arrival looking somewhat undernourished, after only a few days seemed to have a “smooth fur.”

 

The Death Camp

 

The death camp was not in Auschwitz, it was at Birkenau.” This is what I heard and read after the war. Well. I was also in Birkenau. This camp I did not like. It was overcrowded and the people there did not make a good impression on me. Everything looked neglected and grubby. I also saw families with children. It hurt to see them, but I was told that the authorities felt it kinder not to separate children from their parents when the latter were interned. Some children played ball merrily enough. Still, I felt children did not belong there and the fact that the English had done likewise — in the Boer War, for instance, was a poor excuse, I said so to my superior. His answer: “I agree with you, but I can’t change it.

 

I had been commissioned to pick 100 workers for hoeing the Kok-Sagis plants. At roll call the inmates were asked if they were interested in this kind of work and if they had done it before. Then followed the “selection” of the workers. This “selection” was later completely misinterpreted. The purpose was to give the inmates something to do and they themselves wanted to be occupied. Selecting them meant no more than to inquire about their inclinations, their capabilities, and their physical state of health with regard to the work they were to do.

 

The fact was, however, that in Auschwitz there were more people than were jobs. Naturally, I was concerned with getting workers who had experience on farms. Jews, of course, were not experienced for any kind of farm work, whilst on the other hand, Poles were excellent farm workers. Gypsies were entirely useless. Detachment 11 — that was the name of our female workers from Birkenau — came every day to work in the fields that lay beyond the outer line of posted guards. I dealt with these people almost daily and listened to their complaints. On one occasion I saw an SS guard kick a woman. I confronted him about this.

 

He claimed that the woman had called him a “Nazi” pig, but the fact was that he had first insulted her. I reported this case and the SS-guard was sent to “Strafbataillon” in Danzig. From this day on, my favor with the inmates rose significantly, especially with those in Detachment 11. They often came to me with requests or complaints and I did whatever I could for them, because to me they were not enemies, they were simply interned. Often, I did favours for them that were against the regulations. Their greatest joy was for me to take them for a walk down to the river Sula, where on those hot summer days of 1944 I allowed them to go bathing.

 

Apart from all else, the hoeing-detachment from Birkenau was a merry bunch. They sang their Polish folk songs while working and the gypsies danced to the melodies. In the beginning, I was quite upset and worried about the undernourished appearance of some of the inmates. Then I learned that they had arrived in rather poor physical shape and it took some time before they had padded themselves with some extra poundage. Often I shared their common noonday meals and fared well doing so.

 

But Detachment 11 also had a secret supply source. The most wonderful things were found by them in unknown hiding places. In the night these were replenished by friends of the inmates. Sometimes these friends even donned inmate attire and marched into the camp, allowing an inmate to take a few days off. Auschwitz was located in Poland and the population helped the inmates as much as possible, though this was officially not permitted.

 

The occupation troops, but especially the so-called civil administration, often roused the antagonism of the population, as was well-known. One measure I decidedly disapproved of was the expropriation of land from small farmers. They had to give it up for agricultural use by the concentration camp. I was told, however, that they were compensated for their property on the same basis as land expropriated from Germans for the construction of autobahns. I also did not like the re-settlement measures that were carried out, but I was told repeatedly that these were never forced on anyone. Curtailment of freedom is hard, but war is tough and it became increasingly tougher for us too. In the fall of 1944, for the first time, the camp at Auschwitz was bombed by American planes. There were about 20 victims among the inmates. I myself had lost faith in victory after the successful landing at the English Channel. Reports from the front became more and more ominous, and the inmates too were well informed — the devil knows through whom.

 

In our area the inmates were looked after now just as well as they had been before. Once a week a film was shown. Camp supervisors and inmates jointly saw, among others, the film “Muenchhausen” and the “Golden City.” Church services were held in community halls. I attended several myself and found them to be quite solemn, especially those of the Russian Orthodox Community, to which our Russian civilian workers also belonged. A theater group had been organized by the inmates and one evening they invited us to a performance of “Faust.” Professional actors could not have produced a better show.

 

As for myself, I would have liked to take some more time off for studies but the war situation was serious and chances were poor. It was suggested that I take a correspondence course, and I sent away for books. An inmate, a jewish female doctor from Prague offered to help me cram, and she did so every afternoon. This was possible in Raisko.

 

The jews were intelligent and so far as I got to know them in Auschwitz, quite nice too. In the summer my mother came for a visit and stayed several days. Of course, a fat friendship developed between her and Olga. One evening my mother asked about the crematorium where corpses were supposed to be burned. I knew nothing about this, so I asked Olga. She could not tell me anything definite either. She did intimate, however, that around Bielitz there always was what seemed to be a reflection against the sky, as if from a fire.

 

So I went in the direction of Bielitz and there found a mining camp in which some inmates also worked. I travelled around the entire camp and examined all fire grates and all smoke stacks, but found nothing. I asked my colleagues; the answer … a shrug of the shoulder and “don’t pay any attention to those rumors.” Actually, there was a crematorium in Auschwitz, I was told, for there were 20,000 people there and any city of that size has a crematorium. Of course people died here as they did elsewhere, but not only inmates at the camp. The wife of one of our supervisors had also died here. As far as I was concerned, that was enough of an answer.

 

During all the time I was in Auschwitz I never in the least observed anything that even indicated mass killings in gas chambers. Also the story of a smell of burned flesh that allegedly hovered over the camp at times was an infamous lie. In the vicinity of the main camp there was a smithy where horses’ hooves were shod. The burning of the horses’ hooves when fitting them with shoes naturally caused an unpleasant smell. Incidentally, the man who was in charge of this particular smithy at the time, now lives in a neighboring village.

 

As a matter of fact, camp regulations became more generous all the time. In the main camp there was now a brothel for the men. Love and sex, is something human after all, and was not withheld from those who were interned. Of course there were also love relationships among the inmates. I doubt that the so-called “house of pleasure” was a deterrent. The fact that such houses did exist for the inmates in Auschwitz was completely ignored in all post-war reports. An admission to such a brothel was a kind of reward for good behaviour. There were also some inmates who flung their ticket into the Kapo’s face. Hats off to them, I say, for that to me was a special show of good behaviour. Olga loved to constantly chatter and her continual gossiping, rumouring and wondering as to whether or not corpses were being burned (whilst I knew for sure there was no such happening) finally got on my nerves. This, plus her almost slavish servitude, brought us to a parting of the ways. She was given a new job, one I did not begrudge her. She was made “overseer” in the women’s camp and it was her job to keep out men who had no business there. Olga had a gift for “raising hell” and could scold so beautifully that it was a joy to see her eject males from the female camp. Her fellow inmates called her “Zerberus“, (hound of hell).

 

Good old Olga, sometimes I wonder what became of her. She didn’t want to return to a Communist Poland — almost none of the inmates wanted that, not even the jews. Many of them even prayed for a German victory. From a colleague, whom I visited recently, I learned that quite a number of them are in the U.S. He still corresponds with some. Some were also willing to testify on behalf of SS Officers at their trials but were denied this privilege by Allied and especially by West German authorities. These reports were publicized by the “right wing” press at the time.

 

There were no secrets in Auschwitz. In September 1944 a Commission of the Red Cross came to inspect the camp, but it was more interested in the camp at Birkenau.

 

Publishers note:— Having read the 156-page Report put out by the International Red Cross, it seems strange that Auschwitz, one of the largest camps of its kind and much publicized as being a “death camp,” should warrant only a few paragraphs in the Red Cross reporting, and this would seem to add verity to the statements of Thies Christophersen.

 

We also had a great many inspections at Raisko, but the people who came were largely interested in plant cultivation. I was often involved in these tours. Although it was actually not permitted that inmates converse with visitors, they did explain their work to them.

 

At the time we experimented with colchezin. This is a poison of the Autumn Crocus (colchium autumnale). With the aid of this poison we developed a plant with twice its number of chromosomes. Such plants tended to grow into giants, but at the cost of fertility. The collection of plant seed therefore still played an important role, but the harvesting of the seed was not exactly simple, because the reproduction device of this plant was similar to that of the dandelion. With the aid of some talented mechanics and Russian agronomists, I had begun to construct a harvesting machine. Some Russian agronomists worked with a so-called “longalvanization” method. For this purpose, the inmates built tools that worked with ultra short waves. The material for these I picked up at a shop where planes that had been brought down were dismembered. The inmates also found material there with which they could build small radios. These of course they could not take into the camp. I myself learned to build radios at Auschwitz. My teachers were the inmates and they supplied me with everything I needed for a small receiving set.

 

At Auschwitz we did not of course only cultivate plants. Innumerable research tasks were carried out. Because of the availability of workers there, more and more research work was being delegated to Auschwitz. At that time the place was also fairly safe from air attacks. About every two weeks the SS officers met for a casino night. On these occasions, department leaders spoke about their particular field of work. I heard many interesting lectures there and I do not recall anything that might have been offensive. Later on I heard that experiments were supposed to have been carried out on living human beings. I remember having listened to a lecture on the development of the embryo in the womb of the mother under various kinds of diet. Whether these women had to carry and give birth to a child while subjected to starvation diets, I cannot say. We were told, however, that these experiments produced valuable insights into the dietary care of pregnancies. Reports on experiments of newly developed medicines carried out on inmates do not appear plausible to me. A medical doctor at Auschwitz told me that new medicines were given to people only when experiments on animals were concluded. This practise is still carried on in all civilized countries.

 

After the war I saw a TV film about Auschwitz that showed a building with huge smoke stacks. I am very sorry, but when I left the camp at Auschwitz in December 1944, I did not see this building. I cannot imagine that these smoke stacks were built in the cold winter of 1944/45, but 1 suspect that these structures were erected after the war. It also seems implausible that, if they should have existed, the SS did not destroy them. During the past few days I have heard a report on the radio according to which 4 million people are supposed to have been shot at Auschwitz. It is an absolute certainty that no people were shot at Auschwitz, because this we would have heard. I do, however, recall one occasion when there was great excitement in the camp. A rumour was being spread that hostages were to be shot. This type of revenge is the most despicable I can think of because it hits innocent people. That it did take place — on either side — is quite likely. If for every bombing victim an inmate should have been killed, none of the 200,000 inmates would have left a concentration camp alive. On this basis, considering that Auschwitz was in operation only four years, one million people a year or 3,000 per day would have had to die. Just what would a crematorium look like in which 3,000 corpses were burned every day? Even mass graves on this order could not be kept secret.

 

Yet the German people continue to believe in these mass murders. Why? We who know the truth, have we not burdened ourselves with an awful responsibility? Why did we keep silent for so long? I shall try to answer these questions.

 

  1. We have not kept silent at all. There was no one who wanted to hear our reports, no paper wanted to publish them, no publisher print them.
  2. Even today there are still enough witnesses alive who could verify my statements and make similar ones of their own. What we need, however, is an unbiased constitutional state. To tell the truth is tantamount to social ostracism and financial suicide.

  3. I cannot say that I am tired of life, but my life’s task lies behind me; my children are taken care of, and my wife should receive her well-earned pension at 65. At least, I hope it will not be withheld from her if something should happen to me.

  4. During the long years that I have worked as a journalist and publisher, I have created a small circle of readers and with the aid of the German Citizenship initiative I can publish my reports independently.

  5. It is being maintained and regretfully also by members and voters of the main German political parties, that “only recognition of our guilt in starting the war and destroying 6 million jews will make it possible for us to re-enter the community of nations and that whoever denies that, brings great harm to the German people.”

  6. However, to disprove the mass murders in concentration camps would not only prove the entire thrust of post-war German politics to be a mistake, but the post-war politicians still in power would have to admit their political concepts to be entirely. This must not be allowed.

  7. Of course there were also cowards, liars and paid witnesses. Some of the accused who must have known that the testimony against them was false, still made a confession because they thought — and of this they were no doubt assured — that they would gain advantages for themselves if they adjusted their statements to the testimony of the accusers. However, it must also be stated here, that confessions were obtained through torture.

What changes will take place when the disclosure of my own personal experience is made public? Most likely none. Some sort of decree may be issued against me and an attempt might be made to confiscate this pamphlet.

 

Our people, especially our children, must be freed from the feeling of guilt being forced upon them by the victors of the last war — and it is only the truth that will make them free.

 

I have recorded the memories of my experiences as I recall them. I have stated the truth, so help me God. If these my statements contribute to our youth having more respect for their fathers, who as soldiers fought for Germany, and who were definitely not criminals, then I shall be very happy.

 

Kaelberhagen, January 3, 1973.

2341 Mohrkirch/Kalberhagen. Tel. (0 48 46) 8 88.

 

EPILOGUE

The publication of THE AUSCHWITZ-LIE (Die Auschwitz-Luege) in March 1973 hit the pseudo-democratic establishment like a bombshell. For almost 30 years the world has been flooded with the official version of so-called ‘Nazi atrocities.‘ All documents and reports of a different truth had been destroyed or suppressed, all witnesses who dared to give the real story were hanged, imprisoned or intimidated so that the Inquisition of the 15th century looked pale in comparison. All historians who dared to publish different facts, came under attack or ridicule and usually lost their contracts for teaching at universities.

 

Some were even murdered.

 

The general public therefore had hardly any access to truthful information and — to a large extent — began to believe that the Germans were brutal monsters who had gassed six million innocent jews, simply because they were jews, all of them, of course, nice and good-natured people, the crown of humanity. According to general belief, no jew was ever killed legally for being a criminal or executed rightfully under martial-law. The death of a jew is always an illegal act — no questions or doubts allowed.

 

Manfred Roeder, himself having gone through all the methods of re-education, believed for many years that six million jews had been killed or gassed. He, like so many others, believed that concentration camps were extermination camps. Until he met Thies Christophersen, who told him the real story from his own experience.

 

Christophersen is one of the very few unbiased witnesses who has no ax to grind. He was neither a guard at Auschwitz who may have reason to hide something, nor was he a prisoner who may be inclined to exaggerate his sufferings. Christophersen was a totally neutral person. He had to work with the inmates of the camp, but had no executive power over them nor the right to guard or punish them.

 

His report is so simple and convincing, so un-dramatic, so contrary to everything anybody has heard about Auschwitz, that it puts to shame all other ‘witnesses’ and especially the judges who based their judgments on those dramatic stories of ‘professional witnesses’ even if these stories had to be changed seven times before the court!

 

The publication of this report with the introduction by a lawyer caused a sensation. This was incredible! After 30 years the whole edifice of lies and distortions began to crack. There was an outcry of madness by the jews. In Tel Aviv the jewish papers attacked this book as ferociously as they did in all the Western countries. The Jewish Weekly in West Germany dedicated a front page article by chief editor Galinski under the banner headline ‘Liars at Work,’ and he called Christophersen and Roeder the two biggest liars since Goebbels. A flattering compliment because Goebbels was probably the greatest genius of propaganda that ever lived — and his propaganda was based on facts, not lies!

 

Simon Wiesenthal urged the courts and the bar association to take ‘proper action.’

 

“Especially in Mr. Roeder’s preface there are remarks worth investigating.“

 

At first, the court and bar association refused to do anything. But under growing pressure, finally Roeder was disbarred for his ‘improper radical political views and actions,‘ and another court in Darmstadt sentenced him to seven months imprisonment as well as a $2,000 fine plus court and lawyer costs. Only Roeder was taken to court for his introduction, not Christophersen for his report, because — as the judge sneeringly said to Mr. Roeder —

 

“We have freedom of speech, and anybody can write as he pleases, but your interpretation of Christophersen’s report sounds anti-semitic, and for this criminal attitude you are punished.“

 

The court found Roeder guilty of ‘willfully inciting race hatred against a minority‘ (the jews). Denying the existence of gas chambers may include the assumption that all jews, who have testified to the contrary, are liars. (Which indeed it does!) The merits of the case contain the following statement:

 

“Even if there had been no extermination program and no persecution of jews at all (which means that all jews are liars), it is anti-Semitism to suggest that the jews are lying, because it would stir up racial hatred! It would endanger the public peace!“

 

The Supreme Court of West Germany declared this sentence to be invalid, not because it was ridiculous, arbitrary and contradicting any logic, but because it was too lenient. Another lower court was directed to re-try Mr. Roeder and to increase the punishment to several years, at least, because;

 

“a responsible citizen like a lawyer cannot neglect the well-established facts of recent history. Otherwise he would prove his ill-will against a minority and his criminal intentions.“

 

Mr. Roeder is now living in exile since January 1978. Literally dozens of similar ‘charges‘ by kangaroo courts are pending. If he returned to Germany under the present political system and occupation regime he would be immediately arrested and put in jail for ‘defaming democracy’ (as Plato has done) or for ‘unconstitutional propaganda.‘ By demanding the re-unification of Germany and the withdrawal of all occupation forces, Roeder has become the most ardent regime critic of pseudo-democracy, which he calls mobocracy. For his ‘thought-crimes,‘ as described in the classic study of tyranny by George Orwell in 1984, he is now persecuted by Interpol, and several warrants of arrest have been issued.

 

THE AUSCHWITZ-LIE has become a secret best-seller with youngsters in Germany, as well as the ‘proof of dangerous neo-Nazi activity,‘ which has to be wiped out once and for all. There is hardly any other book that has caused such public controversy and uproar.

 

 

 

Thies Christophersen 

by Mark Weber

 

Thies Christophersen — pioneer revisionist writer and courageous fighter for truth in history — died February 13, 1997, at Molfsee, Kiel, in north Germany. He was 79.

 

In a memoir first published in Germany in 1973, he related his wartime experiences as a German army officer in the Auschwitz camp complex. “During the time I was in Auschwitz, I did not notice the slightest evidence of mass gassings,” he wrote in Die Auschwitz-Lüge (“The Auschwitz Lie”). As one of the first important works squarely to confront the Auschwitz extermination legend, Christophersen’s first-hand account was a major factor in the growth and development of Holocaust revisionism.

 

“The Auschwitz Lie” caused an immediate sensation in Germany, where it was soon banned. This did not stop publication of German-language editions in Switzerland and Denmark, however, and before long editions appeared in all the major European languages, including several in English. Christophersen predictably came under hostile and mendacious media attack. Numerous newspaper reports, for example, inaccurately referred to him as a former “SS officer.”

 

Wartime Experiences

 

Born in 1918, Christophersen worked as a farmer in Schleswig, northern Germany, until the outbreak of war in Europe. Called to military service, he was badly wounded in 1940 while serving in the western campaign. After recuperating and undergoing some specialized agricultural training, he was assigned to a research center in German-occupied Ukraine which experimentally cultivated a variety of dandelion (kok saghyz) as an alternative source of natural rubber, to be produced from the plant’s latex.

 

In the face of Soviet military advances, and the withdrawal of German forces from Ukraine, the center was transferred to the labor camp of Raisko, a satellite of Auschwitz. During the period he lived and worked there — January to December 1944 — Christophersen was responsible for the daily work of inmate laborers. The young second lieutenant supervised about 300 workers, many of them jewish, of whom 200 were women from the Raisko camp, and 100 were men from the nearby Auschwitz-Birkenau camp. On a number of occasions he visited Birkenau where, it is alleged, hundreds of thousands of jews were systematically gassed to death in May-July 1944. Although he knew of Birkenau’s crematories, it wasn’t until after the war that he first heard anything of “gas chamber” killings or mass exterminations.

 

A Prolific Writer

 

After the war he returned to farming. A ardent and life-long defender of the interests of German farmers, he also turned his considerable talents as a writer to this cause. For years he edited and published the quarterly magazine Die Bauernschaft (“The Farming Community”), which served as a forum for his straight-forward reporting and forthright and often witty commentary on farming, cultural, historical and current social-political issues. He also ran the Nordwind book service, which distributed a range of works, including revisionist titles.

 

In March 1988 he testified in the “Holocaust trial” in Toronto of German-Canadian Ernst Zündel. Under oath, he detailed his wartime experiences at Auschwitz, and answered numerous pointed questions by the prosecuting attorney. (His testimony is related in the remarkable record of the trial compiled by Barbara Kulaszka, Did Six Million Really Die?, and in Robert Lenski’s book, The Holocaust on Trial.)

 

Persecution and Exile

 

Although he was never prosecuted for his “Auschwitz Lie” booklet, he was put on trial for other outspoken writings. In the 1980s he served a year in prison on charges of “insulting the state” (“Verunglimpfung des Staates“) and “insulting the memory of the dead.”

 

Driven from his beloved homeland, he was forced to live in exile in Denmark, Belgium and Switzerland. (To its credit, Denmark rejected German requests to extradite him, pointing out that he had a valid residency permit and had not broken any Danish law.) While Danish police stood by, hundreds of “anti-fascist” thugs attacked his modest home in the small town of Kollund, pelting it with stones and defacing it with spray paint. They also severely damaged his book warehouse and, using corrosive acid, ravaged his car and expensive copy equipment. After months of such abuse, in 1995 Christophersen was forced to leave Denmark. Ill with cancer, he sought treatment in Switzerland, but in December 1995 was forced to leave that country. He next found temporary refuge in Spain. Meanwhile, the German printer of his Bauernschaft magazine was fined 50,000 marks.

 

During his final months, German officials treated him as a virtual “enemy of the state.” His bank account in Germany was closed down, and in early 1996 a German court rejected his application to return to his homeland for a brief visit to attend the burial of a son who had died in a car crash. On the grounds that he had no permanent place of residence, in 1996 German authorities cancelled his state medical insurance coverage and stopped payment of his modest state retirement pension (into which he had paid for 45 years), as well as his military service pension. Christophersen was arrested for the last time a few weeks before his death, but a German judge declared him too ill to be jailed. Released to a son’s custody, he died a few days later.

 

Originally appeared at: Thies Christophersen
 
_______________________________________________________________________________
 
 

Click on this text to watch David Cole in Auschwitz (Full Documentary) The Holohoax aka Shoah


 David Cole's 1992 visit to Auschwitz and his interview with Auschwitz museum curator
Dr. Francicek Piper. During that interview Piper admits that the alleged homicidal gas
chamber was reconstructed from a bomb shelter by the Soviets after the war and that the
number of deaths at Auschwitz during the years when the supposed gassings occurred
was 69,000 according to released Soviet documents after the war. Most of
those deaths were from natural causes and only a minority were Jews.
 
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. This film has everything in it. Since Cole was an
orthodox Jew, the museum authorities thought he was onside and freely admitted everything.

As you will see in the Cole video, the holy gas chamber is a fake. Which makes the entire
Holocaust story a fake. You can study it for a day or for a lifetime and your conclusion will
be the same. There was never a plan for exterminating Jews and there was never an
instrument. As Professor Robert Faurisson has asked for years, “Show me a gas chamber.
Draw for me a gas chamber.” It can’t be done because there was never such a thing.
 
 
 
 
OTHER JEWISH 'HOLOCAUST' CONCESSIONS


C.L. Sulzberger

The "gas chambers" claim originated in a report issued by a Soviet Committee just hours

after Germany had unconditionally surrendered (and thus, could not rebut). (here)


Deborah Lipstadt

German documents never specifically refer to a genocide campaign.


Haretz News (Israel)

The story of Jews being used to make soap is a hoax. (here)

 

Simon Weisenthal

Contrary to Eisenhower's propaganda films, there was no

"gas chamber" at the Dachau Concentration Camp. (here)


Elan Steinberg, Peter Novick and others

The testimony of Holocaust survivors is often unreliable. (here)


The Jewish Virtual Library

The International Red Cross inspected the German POW and concentration camps

and gave passing grades (but, of course, remained silent about the Jews). (here)

 

The New York Times

The '6 Million Dead' was proclaimed before

a single camp had been liberated. (here)


The Forward (A Jewish Daily)

3000 babies born at Auschwitz (here)

 

 

 
 
The most effective ammunition one can use to blow-up the official fairy tale of the Holocaust
consists of the many inadvertent admissions that the enemies of truth let slip out from time to time.
Indeed, one can wreck the entire Holohoax tale just by using such admissions, and nothing else.
 
Some examples -- the Holohoaxers themselves admit that:
 
  • Forensic tests on the "gas chambers" do not reveal any trace of "gas" or "poison."

  • Millions of corpses or remains were never discovered.

  • There is no German documentation of any mass killings.

  • Tales of Jews being made into bars of soap and lamp shades were invented.

  • Zyklon B was a pesticide developed to kill typhus-lice, not people.

  • The Holocaust story relies heavily upon Soviet reports.

  • Football / Soccer games and other forms of entertainment took place in the camps.

  • The International Red Cross had access to all camps and never mentioned any mass killings.

  • Some Jewish "survivors" claimed they knew nothing about "gas chambers"  in Auschwitz.

Of course, after being forced to make these huge concessions, the hoaxsters always return with

the quintessentially Jewish and truly psychopathic  "yeah but" -- that goes something like this:

"Yes, it is indeed true that (insert any of the above), but blah, blah, blah -- the Holocaust still happened."

String enough of these "yeah buts" together and the silly story begins to take on ridiculous proportions.http://www.inspirechippenham.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/yeah.png

"Yeah buts" are the ignoramus's way of defending his ego, or his lies.

Nonetheless, they can be quite useful for turning the argument against him.

 

One of the strongest "yeah buts" to support us "Holocaust Deniers" comes from an article published in

The Forward -- a New York based Jewish-Marxist publication that dates back more than 100 years.

Just how left-wing is 'The Forward' -- you ask? Well, there are images of Karl Marx

and his buddy Friedrich Engels carved into the facade of the building.

 

Just how Jewish is The Forward -- you ask? Well, both the newspaper and the website also publish

an edition in Yiddish. So when 'The Forward' makes what lawyers refer to as "an admission against

interest" (putting foot in mouth) about the Holocaust , it makes for powerful contradicting

testimony for us truthers to seize upon and disseminate.

 

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PKdk-SS4uBA/TevkjqetIbI/AAAAAAAACrs/zPXyK_a8_pk/s1600/IMG_5310.JPG  photo forwardfaces1.jpg

Marx & Engels immortalized in the stone of The Forward. We'll let the "yeah buts"

of the Yiddish-Marxist Forward make our case for "Holocaust Denial."

 

Have a look at this shocking admission and "yeah but" that 'The Forward' published just this past

July, 2015, and judge for yourself.

 

Excerpts below -- analysis and wise-cracks added.

 
https://d-pt.ppstatic.pl/k/r/1/f8/c0/51b1f40fd392a_o.jpg?1400805793

 

Barbara Puc

This Baby Was Born in Auschwitz — and Survived

Full story -- (here)

 

The Forward: Germans treated pregnant women and newborns living in this section of the camp

less harshly than in the other ones. They were given a little bit more food, sometimes even milk.

Analysis: If the Germans were running an extermination camp, why were they expending resources,

during wartime no less, to feed pregnant women and newborns? Why didn't they "gas" these

"worthless eaters" as soon as they showed signs of having been knocked up? If life was so brutal,

and death was always pending, then how did these young ladies and their husbands /

boyfriends manage to get intimate?

* (It is unclear how many women arrived at the camp pregnant vs how many

became pregnant while incarcerated. There were cases of both.)

 

 

The Forward: Infants were registered in a registry book....

Analysis: Germans are famous for meticulous record-keeping, so this is no surprise. Oddly enough,

there are no such German records of the numbers of prisoners "gassed." Interesting.

 

 

The Forward: These privileges, however, were very short-term; the vast majority of these mothers,

and those of their children who were not murdered soon after birth, perished not long after in the gas chambers.

Analysis: So, the big bad Germans allowed couples to have relations (there were private quarters for this);

provided extra rations to pregnant women; waited until the babies were born; and then,

finally killed both the mothers and babies? Makes perfect sense! (rolling eyes sarcastically)

 

 

The Forward: In fact, thousands of babies were born in Auschwitz ...

Analysis: Wait a second! "Thousands of babies" -- you say?

Analysis: Mein Gott! Were the big bad "Nazis"

running an extermination operation or a frickin'

maternity ward?! No further response is necessary.

 

 

The Forward: ... the vast majority of whom the Nazis killed virtually upon their emergence from the womb. 

Analysis: "Killed virtually upon their emergence from the womb," eh?


 
 

The mushy story goes on about a Polish woman named Barbara Puc, who was born at Auschwitz

in November, 1944 -- just two months before the camp was liberated by the Soviets. (here)

She tells of how "lucky" she was and gives credit to God and blah, blah, blah. 

Again -- from the Forward article:

"thousands of babies were born in Auschwitz" 

 

 

There are more such "miracle" tales that can be found from Jewish and/or "mainstream media" sources.

There is the "miracle" of Miriam Rosenthal and her baby, Leslie, a son. From the National Post (Canada):

 

"An SS officer in big black boots and a crisp uniform appeared before the barracks in Auschwitz with a loudspeaker in hand.

All pregnant women line up, he barked. Line up, line up — your food portions are being doubled.

 

"Can you imagine?" Miriam asks. "Even women who were not pregnant stepped forward.

I was standing with my younger cousin, but I wouldn't go. She says, 'Miriam, what are you doing?' "

 

"Something was holding me back. Someone was watching over me. I feel maybe my mother, maybe God.

Two hundred women stepped forward and 200 women went to the gas chamber. And I don't know why I didn't step forward."  (here)

               

 Image result for Miriam Rosenthal 

Miriam Rosenthal spins a tale of miraculous quick-thinking which saved her

and her unborn baby from  the non-existent "gas chambers".

 
The Daily Mail (UK) informs us of how Jewish inmates Anka Nathanova and Priska Lowenbeinova,
also "miraculously" cheated death at Auschwitz by hiding their pregnancies from the clueless "Nazis"
who then, for some strange reason, allowed them and their babies to live after they were born. (here)
 
Rachel Friedman, we are told, saved her baby boy's life by taking the advice of an
SS Guard by claiming that the child was born on Hitler's birthday -- April 20.  (here)
 

 



 

A Wedding and a Honeymoon Suite too?

 

This photo of an Auschwitz marriage announcement congratulating newlywed communist

guerilla fighters Rudolf Friemel (from Austria) and Margarita Ferrer Rey

(from Spain) was circulated on March 18th, 1944. (here)

 

An SS officer performed the ceremony. The bride was given flowers and the couple and

their son (evidently born before Friemel and Ferrer Rey were incarcerated) were also photographed

by the camp photographer! The communist couple spent their wedding night in the

camp brothel where they found some solitude, peace and quiet. (here)

 

In closing, let us repeat, from 'The Jewish Daily Forward': "thousands of babies were born in Auschwitz"

--- again, "thousands of babies were born in Auschwitz"

--- encore,"thousands of babies were born in Auschwitz".

Let that reality sink in -- and please share this important piece.

 

___________________________________________

 

 Multi-Media 'Liberators' Project Exposed As A Fraud

Institute for Historical Review

Exposing historical and media fraud sometimes takes years or even decades. In the
case of a recent heavily promoted and widely praised multi-media project – designed to
promote the Holocaust story, condemn official racism against blacks in America during the
Second World War, and encourage racial tolerance – debunking has come much more
quickly. Liberators: Fighting on Two Fronts in World War II – a lavishly financed project
that claims to tell the story of how black troops liberated Buchenwald and Dachau – was
exposed as an error-packed fraud within weeks of its debut. Producers Nina Rosenblum
and William Miles collaborated with author Lou Potter, on the slickly promoted project
that includes a much-touted “documentary” film, a book, a high school workbook, a
screenplay and a theatrical version.
 
______________________________________________
 
 
 

 

 

Piles of Corpses at Dachau, Buchenwald Were Dead German Soldiers

Staged for Propaganda by Jews in US Military

CFT Team (Christians For Truth) May 4, 2020
 
 

We are all familiar with the pictures and film footage of piles of dead “Jews” discovered

at the liberated “death camps” Dachau and Buchenwald at the end of World War II, but what

we were never told is that most of those corpses were actually dead German soldiers that

were dumped there as part of an elaborate psy-op by British Intelligence, and many of those

ghastly images were filmed by none other than horror film master, Alfred Hitchcock.

 

The following is an excerpt from the corroborated eye witness testimony of a captured German soldier:

In 1977, during a visit to New York and Cape May, I recounted the story of the trainload

of dying German prisoners to two former US officers. They had both been stationed in

Heidelberg shortly after the war and they knew all about it. They agreed that the cattle

cars were filled with captured German soldiers who were infected with typhus and dysentery.

 

…On a sunny day in mid-June 1945, I hopped on a freight train and went to Erfurt.

The train stopped about a kilometer and a half before the station, so I shouldered my

rucksack and began walking toward the station. I soon noticed a freight train of about

20 cattle cars sitting on a side track. A bad odor was coming from that direction.

As I came closer I saw hands protruding from ventilation holes and heard

sounds of moaning, so I crossed several tracks and approached the cattle cars.

The people inside noticed me and began crying “Water, comrade, water!” Then I reached

the train and recognized the terrible stench of feces and rotting corpses.

The sliding doors and ventilation holes were crisscrossed with barbed wire securely nailed.

Urine and partially dried feces oozed from under the sliding doors and between the boards.

…They were in fact unwitting extras in a movie being made by Alfred Hitchcock, the

Hollywood horror-film specialist. He had been awarded a contract to make a movie about

concentration camps for the Nuremberg tribunal.

 

At night the dead prisoners would be unloaded at Buchenwald, Dachau and

other concentration camps by those who were still alive. Hitchcock would then

film them, depicting the heaps of corpses as victims of German atrocities. A large

number of corpses were dumped at Buchenwald at night, and next day the

citizens of Weimar were forced to walk past the heaps of rotting corpses and

smell the sickening stench.

 

Some of them actually believed the American propaganda, that the corpses

had been concentration-camp inmates. It was all filmed as part of Hitchcock’s movie. 

Afterwards the corpses were shoved into mass graves in the vicinity. That too was

part of the script. This is the explanation that the two former officers of the US Army

gave me concerning the trainload of dying German prisoners that I witnessed on June 16, 1945.

 

I certify that my testimony is a true account of what

I myself have personally seen and experienced.

 

[Note: Alfred Hitchcock was persuaded by his friend and movie producer the British Jew,

 Sidney Bernstein, to leave Hollywood to assist on project “F3080.” F3080 was the name

British Intelligence gave to a project to compile a documentary film on German atrocities.

 

The project originated in February 1945 in the Psychological Warfare Division of SHAEF

(Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force). Hitchcock was recorded expressing

his primary concern that “we should try to prevent people thinking that any of this was faked.”]

 

The testimony of the German soldier can be verified by multiple other witnesses, including

British Ministry Of Information, which admitted that the British Broadcasting Company

(BBC) would be involved in an ongoing anti-German propaganda campaign to

distract the public from the horrifying atrocities committed by the Soviet army.

 

And Victor Cavendish-Bentick, the Head of British Psychological Warfare Executive

(Propaganda), in a handwritten note, written on Aug 27th, 1943, confirmed that the

alleged mass murder of Jews in the so-called ‘death camps’ was indeed a psy-op:

 

We have had a good run for our money with this gas chamber story we have

been putting about, but don’t we run the risk eventually we are going to be

found out and when we are found out the collapse of that lie is going to bring

the whole of our psychological warfare down with it? So isn’t it rather time now

to let it drift off by itself and concentrate on other lines that we are running.” [Public

Record Office Document F0371/34551 revealed by Stephen Mitford Goodson,

 Inside the South African Reserve Bank]

 

Of course, it would be very easy to confirm the ethnicity of the bodies in the mass graves

at Dachau and Buchenwald simply by exhuming some of the bodies and running DNA

tests on them.  Any simple DNA test could confirm that the remains were Jewish or German. 

But as we know from all over Europe, Jewish groups have absolutely forbidden any of these

“Jewish mass graves” to be disturbed because to do so would allegedly

violate their “religious” beliefs, except where it’s convenient to them.

 

And now governments in America and Europe are spending tens of millions of dollars every year

 to make sure each and every impressionable school-age child is shown these faked images

for one simple purpose: to transform the victimizers of World War II into the victims, to

essentially illicit sympathy for the devil.

 

 

Click on this text to watch "Nuremberg Executions 1946 - What Happened to the Bodies?" At 5:13 the fact that it took all day to cremate 11 bodies at a modern mortuary facility is mentioned. We are required to believe millions were cremated at Auschwitz alone during the last year of the war.

 

FINALLY . . PUTTING THE “HOLOCAUST” TO BED.

A LETTER TO STEVEN SPIELBERG,

FROM JEWISH FRENCH DR. ROGER DOMMERGUE POLACCO de MENASCE.

 

Dear Mr. Spielberg,

 

I wish your honesty to be equal to your very great talent. I saw you on TV in France. You declared that you would pour

out Shoa propaganda in German schools. You mentioned that witnesses would be convinced for good, as to the reality

of the Shoah (6-million-gas-chambers). I feel it my duty as a Jew and after 20 years

of study of the historical problem of the holocaust, to call your attention to the facts.

 

Facts are very stubborn and as no one can gainsay them, our congeners have been compelled to make disgusting

politicians enact Stalino – Orwellian laws which forbid to mention anything concerning the

dogma of the “six-million-gas-chambers”, definitively reduced to perpetual worship of this alchemy.

 

In case of no respect of silence and worship of the myth, you suffer the penalty of fines or prison or both. Professor

Faurisson, who has been studying the subject for 20 years, has been practically massacred. This is utterly ridiculous,

but give the Police and the Justice of all countries to Mr Lévy, he will not be ridiculous any more: here is the XXth century!

 

These laws are, accordingly, the absolute proof of the fake before we study its arithmetical and technical ineptitude.

No Sir, you will not find ONE witness who saw 6 million Jews slaughtered. You will not find ONE witness of Zyclon-B – gas

chamber’s to exterminate 1000 or 2000 people at a time, close to the crematoria.

See my “Shoa Sherlockholmized” herewith: it is the summary of 20 years study on the subject.

 

The “6-million-gas-chambers myth “is an arithmetic and technical nonsense.

 

As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah business, 50 years after the war, is disgusting, debasing: it is a

disgraceful shame. No people in History has ever been wailing about its losses 50 years after a war, even its true

and real losses. Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would be a dishonour to make such din and

pump up so much money everywhere: who were the usurers of the Weimar Republic? You know it as well as I do.

 

It is all the more so as we know that 6.000.000 is gross exaggeration and that the Zyclon-B gas chambers are a technical

impossibility. (See Degesh Trial in 1949). In fact 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in the German camps of typhus or starvation.

Many others died but as fighters against Germany to which we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933! (Herr. Hitler

was allergic to the hegemony of gold and of the dollar: so he could give work to six million unemployed,

before the functioning of German armament factories!).

 

Do you know the book published at this period and written by our congener Kaufmann: GERMANY MUST PERISH?

We know that 80,000,000 Goyim were slaughtered in the USSR, in a political regime which was entirely Jewish,

from Marx and Warburg, to Kaganovitch, Frenkel, Yagoda, the executioners. We know that after 1945 Americans

and Russians killed and raped German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to Albania. We know that 1,500,000

German war prisoners were starved to death after the war (a quite famous book was published a few years ago, but is

ignored to day). You will find there included in French the text of a rabbi: “A rabbi pleads guilty”:

unfortunately I possess neither the German original nor an English translation. You should have it translated.

 

The Rabbi condemns the Jewish behaviour in Germany 50 years before Nazism and vindicates the emergence of Hitler.

As for the harm we have done to Humanity absolutely not redeemed by your excellent films or the virtuosity of Yehudi Menuhin,

or the neutron bomb of S.T. Cohen, I wrote a book about it from texts written by important Jews which are much

above the most anti-Semitic text written by Goyim.

 

Simone Weil drew a tragic summary:

 

“The Jews, this handful of uprooted people, have been the cause of the uprooting of the whole mankind”.

And George Steiner:“For 5000 years we have been talking too much: words of death for us and for the others”.

 

We know that all the German towns of more than 100,000 people have been destroyed during the last war, with women

and children: silence about this real holocaust. If we consider the turn taken by the Shoah business, what you intend to

do in Germany is actually the safest way to a heaping up of a huge amount of anti-Jewism the explosion

of which will be unique in History. Discretion and moderation must be our behaviour: all the rest is suicide.

 

Neither “mondialism” nor Orwellian laws for “crime of thought” can prevent antisemitism to explode: only OUR

behaviour can. What you do and all the whining and money pumping can only egg it on. It will increase out of reasonable

proportions, if there can be a reasonable proportion to antisemitism. I know that it is practically impossible to check our

propensity to speculation and that only the abolition of circumcision, the 8th day could (our particularism derives from

the disturbance of the 21 days of the 1st puberty, which starts precisely at the 8th day) but we must, at least, try to avoid

such blunders as the one you intend to perform in Germany and which would be appalling. I am a great admirer of your

films (except the Shindler list: ask his wife and the historical real reality, but this is a minor blunder). I hope you will

scrutinize what I send you and escape the folly of the majority of our congeners. I will always answer you if you

have the integrity to write to me.

 

Cordialement à vous.

Signed by: Dr. Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 

The «Shoa» Sherlockholmised – By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce.

 

1. Do we know, in the course of History, of an ethnic group which would not rejoice when learning that, in a war

ended fifty years before, it had suffered many less losses than it thought? Would the discoverer of such good piece

of news, not be rewarded, celebrated? Would he be overwhelmed with heavy fines, would he escape attempted murder,

as such was the case with Professor Faurisson? Do such reactions not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy?

 

2. Have the live skeletons which can be seen in such films as “ Night and Fog” (by Alain Resnais), have anything to

do with gassing? Are they not the result of famine in the camps because of the systematic bombing of German

towns containing more than 100,000 people, “holocausting” hundreds of thousands of women and children who

are never mentioned?

 

3. Where would have been the 4 million Jews ( if we consider that 2 millions were killed in battlefields), when it is

well known that one camp could not contain more than 60,000 thousand people, and that except in Auschwitz,

there was no Zyclon- B gas-chambers? ( there never was any proof of mass gasing with any other gas).

 

4. Are the witnesses worth anything, when you know that torture was the way to squeeze out evidence. Such was

the case of Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration has become a legend . What about

the 100 witnesses of gassing in Dachau, when it is official that there was no gas chamber in that camp?

 

5. 130 kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of one dead body. We are told that the Germans cremated

1300 corpses a day. U.S.A aircraft took hundreds of pictures of Auschwitz, during the supposed period of the

holocaust. (1943-44). Why is there not a single gigantic heap of the necessary coal? Why not a single black coil of smoke?

 

6. Why do radio, films, press, T.V., continue daily to inflict upon us the myth of the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never

ending whining and moaning? Why is the Jewish lobby chasing, 50 years after the end of the war, nonagenarians

who attempted to rescue Germany from the iniquity of the Versailles treaty, from the rot of the Weimar Republic,

from the collapse of German youth, from the unemployment of 6 million people, who,

back to work could give bread to the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent on them?

 

7. Why does the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, issue 43, page 666,

inform us that in 1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?

 

8. How is it possible that the gas chambers could be just near the

crematoria, when any chemist will tell you that Zyclon-B is hyperflammable?

 

9. Why are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the Shoa? A scientific dialogue,

a court ordered appraisal have been demanded since 1980 about a problem specifically arithmetic and technical.

It would seal truth for ever. It would definitively shut the mouths. Such was the case for Katyn, thanks to

the revisionist Gorbatchev.

 

10. How could Zyclon-B gas 1000 people at one time, when it is well known that the USA gas chamber for one

( maximum 2) persons sentenced to death, are of an unheard of complexity and cost? Why, at the trial of the

Degesh, which fabricated the Zyclon-B, was it declared in 1949, that gassing in such conditions is impossible and unthinkable?

 

11. Why did Leuchter, who was in charge of the maintenance of the USA gas chambers, give the firm evidence that

there was no gassing in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian and Polish reports confirmed the Leuchter report? Why is

the Rudolf report, which analyses all results, forbidden? Why are those who divulge the Rudolf report,

heavily sentenced by the law? And yet the slightest care of the quality and accuracy of the report is not taken.

 

12. Why was, for the first time in History, the doctors degree of Mr Roques, on the “Gerstein report” cancelled?

And still, this report was not accepted at the Nuremberg trial! Besides the well known historian, a socialist minister,

Alain Decaux, mentioned in the press that ” nobody could have access to the Gerstein report, without passing

first through the excellent thesis of M. Roques” Alain Decaux said: “I admired the skill and perfection of a

“chartist” performed by M.Roques in his doctors degree on the Gerstein report” (in his book: “la guerre absolue” 1998).

 

13. Why did Raymond Aron and François Furet at a Sorbonne seminar, (to which no revisionist was invited),

(state) that there was not the slightest trace of a written or oral order for the extermination of the Jews?

 

14. Why is it never spoken of the planning of the extermination of the Germans as expressed in a book written

by the Jew Kaufmann (“Germany must perish”), by sterilisation of German men.? It is undoubtedly a small detail?

 

15. Why Zyclon-B, used by the Germans for hygiene since 1920, could be used in the concentration camps for

other purposes than delousing and protection against typhus? Why large quantities

of Zyclon-B could be found in camps where it is official that there never was any gasings???

 

16. Why do they harp on the “six-million-gas-chamber” and never on the 80 million Goyim exterminated in the USSR,

by an entirely Jewish political regime, the executioners of which bore the names of

Kaganovitch, Yagoda, Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport, and fifty other Jews?

 

17. Why, during the Zundel trial in Canada, the famous exterminationist Jews disgraced themselves by

talking of “poetic licence” in their holocaust assertions, and never came back when summoned by the judges?


18. Why the Fabius-Gayssot law ? (the man of the contaminated blood

and another man, a Communist dragging along 200,000,000 corpses).

 

19. Is it not the supreme proof of the fake? Is it not casting out nines? There is no need of Stalino-Orwellian law

“to be put in prison because of ones beliefs” (thought crime of ” 1984 “) as stated M. Toubon, before he became a

minister of Justice in France, to set up truth. This law is anti constitutional, anti democratic, against the rights of men.

Facts, proofs, pros and cons, are only what we need. Professor Faurisson besought for the granting of a forum with

an unlimited number of contradictors: he never obtained it. L’abbé Pierre did ask for it: they pretended to grant it but

refused it almost immediately. The forum did take place at the television of Lugano. It was a complete success for the

Revisionists and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows it as the media at the beck and call of the Jewish lobby,

move their little finger only when authorized.

 

20. Why is it that when a professor declares that the holocaust is an arithmetic and technical ineptitude, he is

forthwith dismissed! This, for the first time in History, sets up the insane concept of religious historical dogma,

which in case of non perennial worship, is doomed to be struck by the lightning of the inquisition of a secular state.

 

21. Why did the EXPRESS, a famous French newspaper, in January 1995, assert that the gas-chamber

shown for decades in Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after the war, and that all that concerns it, is false?

 

22. There was actually a holocaust of 60 million people in a war declared in 1933 by the Jews against Hitler. Hitler

had given bread to 6 million unemployed, he had rejected the dictatorship of the dollar and the Jewish totalitarianism

which pollute man and the planet and which is called “democracy” by semantic mystification. Only two parties are left:

the totalitarian Judeopathy, exterminating man and the planet, and Nationalism for the Goyim not yet cankered by

Capitalisto-Marxist Jewish influence.

 

In “Marianne” Jean François Kahn expresses anger against the bureaucrats of the Jewish World Congress about the

despoilment of Jewish property, which ended on the 3rd of March 1998 in Washington. He writes: “They have reduced

the Shoah to a financial market. So the typical victim of Nazi barbarity, the archetype of the most frightful genocide of

this time, is not the exploited worker in Cracovie, the humble artisan of Lodz, the small civil servant of Kiev, the modest

shopkeeper of la rue des Rosiers, or the unknown craftsman of Riga, but the cosmopolitan billionaire who collected

Rembrandt and Rubens, slept on a heap of gold signed here and there comfortable insurance policies, sent his children

to the U.S.A in order that they should make a brilliant career. This mighty lobby of American oligarchs is not ashamed of reducing

the holocaust to a Shoa-business.” If Faurisson had written what J.F. Kahn wrote he would have had one more trial

on his shoulders ! There is not the shadow of a doubt!

 

By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce.

(A Jew who strongly takes issue with the totalitarian Judeopathy)

 

 

 

 

Click on this text to read TELL THE TRUTH AND SHAME THE DEVIL... by GERARD MENUHIN


Click on this text to watch a Holocaust Quiz

 
 _________________________________________________________________________________
 
 

Stutthof
An Important But Little-Known Wartime Camp

By Mark Weber

 

While Stutthof is not as well-known as other wartime German camps, a close look at the history of this important internment center is revealing. The patterns of deportations to and from the camp, and the treatment of inmates, both Jewish and non-Jewish, disclose some surprising features.

 

Stutthof (Sztutowo in Polish) was located 36 kilometers east of the city of Danzig (now the Polish city of Gdansk) in a wooded clearing near the Baltic coast at the mouth of the Vistula river. Hastily set up as an emergency internment center in September 1939, as German forces were subduing Poland, it was soon established on a more permanent basis, and in 1942 was officially designated as a concentration camp. (1).

 

In 1943 and 1944 it was considerably enlarged until it included three large sections encompassing an area 2.5 by 1.2 kilometers. The Stutthof camp complex eventually embraced several dozen smaller satellite camps spread across a large part of East and West Prussia. In addition to administration and general upkeep work in the camp itself, inmates were employed in nearby workshops and factories that turned out equipment and clothing for the German armed forces. Other internees worked in a camp brick factory and greenhouse, and on nearby agricultural projects, quarries, ports and airfields. Inmates could send letters and receive parcels. At the end of 1943, a new regulation prohibited punishment by beating. (2).

 

Until 1944 there were relatively few Jewish internees. Most of the prisoners were Poles. In the fall of 1943 several hundred Jews found in hiding in the Bialystok ghetto (after the suppression of the uprising there) were transferred to Stutthof. (3). Beginning in June 1944, large numbers of Jews began arriving at Stutthof from Auschwitz. The first shipment of 2,500 Jewish women from Auschwitz-Birkenau was soon sent on to several hundred factories in the Baltic region. Between June and October 1944, 20,000 to 30,000 Jewish women, originally from Hungary, arrived at Stutthof from Auschwitz. In addition, Jewish women originally from the Lodz ghetto also arrived at Stutthof from Auschwitz. (4).

 

During the summer and fall of 1944, as Soviet forces advanced toward the Baltic region, thousands of Jews, including Jewish mothers and their children, were evacuated to Stutthof from more than a dozen camps and remnant ghettos in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. In particular, Jews were transferred from the camps at Riga (Latvia) and Kaunas (Lithuania), and the ghetto of Siauliai (Lithuania) in July 1944. Most were evacuated by sea on scarce ships. (5).

 

During the second half of 1944, as Soviet forces continued their westward advance, the Germans transferred large numbers of Jews, including hundreds of Jewish children, from Lithuania and Estonia through Stutthof to Auschwitz. (6). Many of these evacuees were Jews who had earlier been deported to the Baltic region from Germany as part of the "final solution" policy of mass deportation to occupied Soviet territories in the "East." (7).

 

These transfers to Stutthof are difficult to reconcile with a German policy to annihilate Europe's Jews. If there had been such an extermination policy, it is particularly difficult to understand why Jews from the Baltic region -- all of whom were supposedly doomed -- were evacuated on Germany's overtaxed transportation system instead of being killed on the spot. The fact that many of the Jews evacuated by the Germans from the Baltic area to Stutthof were unemployable children is particularly difficult to reconcile with a general extermination policy. (8).

 

This new influx dramatically changed the camp's character. By late 1944, Jews made up about 70 percent of the inmate population. Russians constituted about 20 percent, and other nationalities made up the remaining ten percent. (9). The camp was divided into separate male and female compounds. Most of the inmates were reportedly young, above all Jewish girls and young women between the ages of 13 and 22. There was a separate barracks block for Jewish boys below the age of 17. As a rule, Jews did not have to work, although some were occasionally assigned to farm work on the outside. (10).

 

As a result of the chaos and tremendous overcrowding brought about by the worsening military situation, conditions in the camp deteriorated badly during 1944. Although new arrivals were routinely subjected to a quarantine period of two to four weeks, an epidemic of typhus broke out in the second half of the year. The death rate rose dramatically and reached a high point at the end of that year, when nine percent of the total inmate population reportedly died during December 1944. Besides typhus, inmates fell victim to enteric fever and hunger. (11).

 

Camp administrators did what they could under the almost impossible conditions to save lives. Hospital facilities for inmates were greatly expanded, and eventually took up a whole complex of barracks. Inmate physicians and nurses, as well as SS medical personnel, worked in these facilities, which were divided into 12 departments. Unfortunately, care for sick internees was severely limited by a serious lack of medicines and proper instruments. (12). In mid-January 1945, there were about 50,000 Stutthof inmates, about half of whom were in the main camp. There were 29,000 Jewish internees, including nearly 26,000 women. (13).

 

On January 25, 1945, with Soviet forces only a few kilometers away and the sound of gunfire audible in the distance, camp commandant SS Major Paul-Werner Hoppe, acting on higher instructions, ordered a general evacuation of internees to the interior of the Reich. Sick inmates, as well as a group needed to dissolve the camp, were to remain behind, he added. (14). Israeli Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer has acknowledged the difficulty of reconciling this evacuation order with an extermination policy. At a 1981 conference, he asked rhetorically: "What was their [the Germans'] intention? Why did the SS march these people away? ... Why did the commander of the camp in Stutthof give an order in January 1945 that everybody was to march except for the sick?" (15).

 

Coming as it did in the middle of winter, this mass evacuation in groups of fifteen hundred each was a terrible ordeal that claimed many thousands of lives. The ten-day march was carried out in snow and freezing temperatures, with very little food or adequate shelter. One Polish historian has estimated that 30,000 died during this evacuation trek. (16). One group of evacuees was rescued by Soviet forces in February 1945, but many in this group died after their liberation. (17).

 

Stutthof's prisoners were not the only ones to endure this terrible calamity. During this same period, hundreds of thousands of German civilians, most of them women and children, as well civilians of other nationalities, were slowly making their way westward in the snow and freezing weather. Many of these people also died during the winter trek. (18).

 

In March and April 1945, Soviet war planes repeatedly attacked the Stutthof camp. A bomb that hit the Jewish hospital on March 26, 1945, killed 28 and wounded 35. (19). During the following weeks, Soviet air and artillery strikes became more frequent. By April 20, 1945, a former Jewish inmate later recalled (20).

 

 

Stutthof was bombarded from the air and ground. The bombing went on day and night.... The Stutthof camp was enormous and from one end to the other it was burning down from the air attacks. Countless numbers of Katzetler [inmates] were killed by the bombs. I myself was lucky, because a bomb hit our ward and three-quarters of the sick were killed or wounded.

 

Evacuation by Sea

 

In late April 1945, with Stutthof now cut off from unoccupied Germany except by sea, it was finally decided to evacuate the 3,000 or so Jewish women still remaining in the camp. One inmate who was evacuated on a cargo ship later recalled her terrible ordeal: (21).

 

 

We sailed and sailed and went into ports many times. Which, I can't remember. But no port would let us stay because there was a yellow flag flying from the top, meaning the ship was supposed to be carrying people with contagious diseases on board. ...At every port, the captain declared that he was carrying women refugees and asked permission to unload them.

 

But time and time again they were turned away, although at one port some German soldiers gave them some bread. With almost no water or food, the ship drifted for eleven days from one port to another. During this terrible period, Allied planes twice attacked the unarmed vessel, killing many of the Jews on board. During a third bombing attack, which came while the ship was anchored outside of Kiel harbor and only a day before the arrival of British troops there, the vessel caught fire and sank. Many died in the flames or during the mad scramble to get on deck, and others drowned. One survivor recalls that all but 33 of the 2,000 Jewish women on board perished.(22)

 

The final evacuation from Stutthof took place on April 27, 1945. Under attack from Soviet warplanes, the prisoners were loaded onto several barges at nearby Hela harbor, which were then towed westward to territory still under German control. One barge, packed with sick inmates, was destined for Kiel. Others were taken to the port town of Neustadt near Lübeck.(23) One Polish historian has estimated that 3,000 of the Stutthof internees who were evacuated by sea lost their lives in the ordeal.(24)

 

Not all of Stutthof's inmates were evacuated. Hundreds who were not able to move were left behind in the camp, which remained in German hands as part of the fiercely defended Danzig enclave until it was surrendered to Soviet forces on May 10, 1945.(25)

 

Gas Chamber Allegations

 

Some historians have insisted that prisoners were killed at Stutthof in a camp gas chamber.(26) According to a 1985 statement by Munich's Institute for Contemporary History "more than one thousand" people were killed in a Stutthof gas chamber.(27) However, the evidence cited for homicidal gassings at Stutthof is meager and not very credible. The camp's "gas chamber" building, which is still intact, is a small brick structure about two and a half meters high, five meters in length, three meters wide. American historian Konnilyn Feig has written that it looks "almost like a toy." Polish officials have seriously claimed that the Germans gassed one hundred persons at a time in the chamber (that is, six or seven persons per square meter). Homicidal gassings with Zyklon were supposedly carried out intermittently between June and December 1944 in this chamber.(28)

 

Polish historian Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz believes that this building was neither designed nor built as a homicidal gassing facility. In an essay published in a semi-official work about the alleged homicidal "gas chambers," he writes that this building was built as a (non-homicidal) gas chamber for treating clothes. However, he goes on to claim that this it was sometimes also improvisationally used to kill people. ("Originally the gas chamber was built as a room for delousing clothing, and it continued to be used for this purpose, too, for as long as it existed.")(29)

 

Interestingly, the "gas chamber" building is not at all hidden or camouflaged, nor is it disguised as a shower. Therefore, if it had actually been used as a homicidal gassing facility, prospective victims apparently would have been under no illusion about the fate that awaited them. It is worth noting that the Germans in charge of the camp never made any effort to destroy or dismantle Stutthof's supposed "extermination facility," which is difficult to believe if, in fact, it had been a execution gas chamber. (30).

 

A West German court that heard "eyewitness testimony" about homicidal gassings at Stutthof declared in its 1964 verdict that "with regard to the gassings a positive determination was likewise not possible." Evidence given by several supposed witnesses of gassings was found to be dubious or not credible.(31) Raul Hilberg makes no mention of homicidal gassings at Stutthof in his detailed three-volume Holocaust work. Two other prominent Holocaust historians, Lucy Dawidowicz and Nora Levin, likewise said nothing about the camp's alleged extermination facility.

 

Estimates of Victims

 

According to Polish historian Czeslaw Pilichowski, director of Poland's "Central Commission for the Investigation of German Crimes," of the 120,000 people (Jews and non-Jews) who were ever interned in Stutthof or its satellite camps, 85,000 died. (32). Polish historian Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz has estimated that of the camp's 120,000 inmates, "about 80,000 of them either died or were murdered." (33). Another Polish historian gives a "conservative" estimate of 65,000 Stutthof victims. (34)

 

Altogether more than 52,000 Jews were interned in Stutthof and its satellite camps, according to Jewish historian Martin Gilbert and the Encyclopaedia Judaica. Only about 3,000 survived, they estimate, and add that perhaps 26,000 of the Jewish victims died or drowned during the evacuation in 1945. (35).

 

Although it is difficult to determine the actual number of deaths with any precision, in this regard it is important to keep in mind that the great majority of Stutthof's victims were direct and indirect victims of war, including thousands who lost their lives in Allied air attacks during the final weeks of fighting. As was also the case at Dachau, Buchenwald and other German camps, a considerable portion of those who died in the Stutthof main camp were victims of typhus and other diseases who succumbed during the final months of the war.

 

As we have seen, most Stutthof victims apparently lost their lives in the grim and hastily organized evacuations by foot or sea. As harsh as they were, these evacuations were not part of any killing policy. In spite of its high death rate, Stutthof was not organized or operated as an extermination center, and the many deaths there were not the result of any systematic policy or program.


Notes

 

  1. Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz, "Stutthof," in: I. Gutman, ed., Encyclopedia of the Holocaust (New York: Macmillan, 1990), pp. 1421, 1423.
  2. Krzysztof Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (Gdynia: 1966), pp. 253-254 (English-language abstract); "Stutthof," Gedenkbuch (Koblenz: Bundesarchiv, 1986), p. 1772.
  3. "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: Macmillan and Keter, 1971), vol. 15, p. 464; Martin Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (New York: William Morrow, 1993), pp. 194-195.
  4. Jean-Claude Pressac, Die Krematorien von Auschwitz: Die Technik des Massenmordes (München: Piper, 1994), p. 199. (In the earlier, French edition of this book, Pressac writes of the deportation of 40,000-50,000 Hungarian Jewish women from Auschwitz to Stutthof and surrounding area. Jean-Claude Pressac, Les Crémetoires d'Auschwitz: La Machinerie du Meurtre de Masse [CNRS Editions, 1993], p. 147.); "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 15, p. 464; Martin Gilbert, The Holocaust (New York: 1986), p. 686; M. Gilbert, Atlas of the Holocaust (1993), p. 194.
  5. "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 15, p. 464; Roman Hrabar, et al, The Fate of Polish Children During the Last War (Warsaw: 1981), p. 72; M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), pp. 705, 722; Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 6, p. 917; M. Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (1993), pp. 200, 207, 208, 209; Benjamin B. Ferencz, Less Than Slaves (Harvard, 1979), p. 107; "Stutthof," Less Than Slaves (1986), p. 1772; Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1985), p. 985.
  6. Y. Gutman and M. Berenbaum, eds., Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp (1994), pp. 417, 420.
  7. Justiz und NS-Verbrechen (Amsterdam: Univ. Press Amsterdam, 1968 ff.), vol. 20, p. 600, or p. 585-6 (Verdict in 1964 Tübingen case Ks 5/63).
  8. R. Hrabar, et al, The Fate of Polish Children During the Last War (1981), p. 72.
  9. Olga M. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation of the Stutthof Concentration Camp, Yad Vashem Bulletin (Israel), No. 17, Dec. 1965, p. 37.
  10. Olga M. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation," Yad Vashem Bulletin, Dec. 1965, p. 36.
  11. K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), pp. 252, 255; Olga M. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation," Yad Vashem Bulletin, Dec. 1965, p. 37; Justiz und NS-Verbrechen, vol. 20, p. 600; Central Commission for Investigation of German Crimes in Poland, German Crimes in Poland (Warsaw: 1946-1947), vol. 2, p. 112.
  12. K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), p. 252.
  13. K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (Gdynia: 1966), pp. 253-254; "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica, vol. 15, p. 464.
  14. Hoppe order, Jan. 25, 1945. Nuremberg document NO-3796.
  15. Brewster Chamberlain and M. Feldman, eds., The Liberation of the Nazi Concentration Camps 1945 (Washington, DC: USHMC, 1987), p. 92.
  16. K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), p. 257; Konnilyn Feig, Hitler's Death Camps (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1981), p. 202; "Stutthof," Less Than Slaves (1986), p. 1772; M. Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (1993), pp. 216-217.
  17. M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), p. 783.
  18. See: Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, Nemesis at Potsdam: The Expulsion of the Germans From the East (Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska, 1989; 3rd rev. ed.), and, Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, The German Expellees: Victims in War and Peace (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993).
  19. M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), p. 786.
  20. Isaiah Trunk, Jewish Responses to Nazi Persecution (New York: Stein and Day, 1982), pp. 322-323.
  21. I. Trunk, Jewish Responses (1982), pp. 323-326.
  22. I. Trunk, Jewish Responses (1982), pp. 323-326.
  23. R. Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews (1985), p. 985; O. Pickholz-Barnitsch, "The Evacuation," Yad Vashem Bulletin, Dec. 1965, p. 37; M. Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (1993), pp. 228-229.
  24. R. Hrabar, et al, Fate of Polish Children (1981), p. 74. See also: M. Gilbert, The Holocaust (1986), p. 806.
  25. "Stutthof," Less Than Slaves (1986), p. 1772; K. Feig, Hitler's Death Camps (1981), p. 203.
  26. Eugen Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass Murder (New Haven, Conn.: 1994), pp. 190-193, and, in the original German-language edition, Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen durch Giftgas (Frankfurt: S. Fischer, 1986), pp. 263-266; The entry by K. Dunin-Wasowicz in the Encyclopedia of The Holocaust (New York: 1990), p. 1423, refers to "the camp's gas chambers" (plural).
  27. Statement by the Institut für Zeitgeschichte (Hellmuth Auerbach), March 6, 1985. Facsimile in: I. Weckert, "Massentötungen" oder Desinformation, "Historische Tatsachen Nr. 24" (published by U. Walendy in 1985), p. 21.
  28. E. Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass Murder (1994), p. 191 (in the 1986 German edition, Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen durch Giftgas, this is p. 263); Justiz und NS-Verbrechen (Amsterdam), vol. 20, p. 600 or p. 585-6 (Verdict in 1964 Tübingen case Ks 5/63.); K. Feig, Hitler's Death Camps (1981), pp. 192-193, 200; Central Commission..., German Crimes in Poland (Warsaw: 1946-1947), vol. 2, pp. 118-119.
  29. E. Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass Murder (1994), p. 191 (in the 1986 German edition, Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen durch Giftgas, this is p. 263).
  30. It has also been claimed that Jews were gassed at Stutthof with Zyklon in a rail car. See: E. Kogen, et al., Nazi Mass Murder (1994), pp. 192-193; Central Commission..., German Crimes in Poland (Warsaw: 1946-1947), vol. 2, p. 119.
  31. Justiz und NS-Verbrechen (Amsterdam), vol. 20, p. 615.
  32. Czeslaw Pilichowski, No Time Limit for These Crimes (Warsaw: Interpress, 1980), pp. 156-157.
  33. K. Dunin-Wasowicz, Oboz Koncentracyjny Stutthof (1966), p. 255.
  34. Szymon Datner, et al, Le Genocide Nazi 1939-1945 (Warsaw: 1962), p. 218.
  35. "Stutthof," Encyclopaedia Judaica, vol. 15, p. 464; M. Gilbert, Atlas of The Holocaust (1993), pp. 195, 217.; According to Polish historian K. Dunin-Wasowicz, "Of the fifty thousand Jews who were brought to Stutthof, nearly all died." Source: Encyclopedia of The Holocaust (New York: 1990), p. 1423.
 
 
________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
 
 

 

 

How the “Holocaust” Was Faked

“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one

and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial

swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism

and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders –

and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”

 

– Robert Faurisson, internationally renowned historical revisionist[1]

 

The alleged “Holocaust” of “6 million Jews” at the hands of Adolf Hitler and National

Socialist Germany during WWII is perhaps the greatest deception ever perpetuated

against humanity. National Socialist Germany and her allies were fighting a multi-front war

– physically and ideologically – against some of the most powerful nations in the world at

the time, including the United States, the British Empire, and the Soviet Union. The idea

that they would divert their precious and scarce resources and manpower towards

implementing a systematic campaign of mass murder designed to “exterminate” European

Jewry is simply absurd, and indeed has no basis in reality, as we will see in the pages that follow.

 

Simply put, there was no German conspiracy to systematically genocide and destroy

European Jewry during WWII, a fact which Jewish “Holocaust” historians and scholars

have been forced to concede. Aryeh Leon Kubovy of the Israeli Center for Jewish

Documentation has frankly admitted: “There exists no document signed by Hitler, Himmler,

or Heydrich speaking of exterminating Jews… and, the word ‘extermination’ does not

appear in the letter from Herman Goering to Heydrich concerning the Final Solution

to the Jewish Question.”[2]

 

Leuchter reports

There were no “homicidal gas chambers” utilized to murder Jews and other “undesirables,”

as official “Holocaust” propaganda and countless Hollywood movies allege and depict.

Fred Leuchter, an expert in execution procedures who was commissioned by revisionist

Ernst Zundel to investigate the viability of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at the

various German-administered concentration camps, particularly Auschwitz, published

his findings in 1988. The now notorious Leuchter Reports[3] concluded in part:

 

The author finds no evidence that any of the facilities normally alleged to be execution

gas chambers were ever used as such and find, further, that because of the design

and fabrication of these facilities, they could not have been utilized for execution

gas chambers.

 

We have produced definitive proof that there were no execution gas chambers utilized

for genocidal purposes by the Germans at these wartime camps. The simple fact of the

matter is that the holocaust story is not true.

 

Many people erroneously believe that Zyklon B, a pesticide invented and manufactured

with the support of the German industrial and chemical firm IG Farben, was used for

extermination purposes. In reality, Zyklon B was used to save Jewish lives, not end them,

as it was utilized to kill disease-spreading insects and to delouse clothing and bedding

materials in the German-administered camps. Zyklon B was used to help stop the spread

of typhus and other diseases that were present at the time in the various concentration

camps.[4] German chemists, including Bruno Tesch, Gerhard Peters and Walter Heerdt,

developed Zyklon B, with the assistance and support of IG Farben, specifically for fumigation

purposes in the 1920s. Tesch was later brutally interrogated and eventually hanged by the

British after WWII for his alleged involvement in the “Holocaust,” which amounted to him

supplying the SS with Zyklon B in order to fumigate and sanitize inmates’ clothing and bedding.

 

The system of concentration camps throughout much of Europe developed and administered

by the Germans and their allies during WWII were simply a network of labor, transit,

industrial, and detention facilities – not “death camps”. Jews, political prisoners and Communist

subversives, homosexuals, and criminals were detained and either put to work or imprisoned

in German-administered concentration camps and industrial facilities throughout Europe.

 

These forced laborers and prisoners were generally well cared for, at least until the end

of the war when Germany’s supply lines broke down and chaos ensued as a result of a

deliberate Allied bombing campaign of German roads, railways, cities, and industrial facilities,

followed by the combined Soviet and Anglo-American invasion of German territory.

Throughout the war, prisoners and workers in the concentration camps received medical

treatment and were even compensated for their labor. They were allowed to attend concerts,

organize plays, make music, and play sports. If the Germans were determined to murder

these people, why would they provide medical care and entertainment for them? Why

would they set up hospitals and ensure sanitary working and living quarters for

people they planned to “genocide”?

 

The simple fact of the matter is that the alleged “death camps” were in reality labor camps,

where individuals detained by the Germans were sent to live and work, providing much

needed and valuable labor and man power for the German war effort. The United States,

Britain and other nations had similar concentration camps for their internal enemies

and dangerous political subversives. The entire WWII narrative, especially the alleged

“Holocaust” narrative, is basically the exact opposite of what truly transpired.

 

 

The Jewish Bolshevik terrorists who overthrew the Russian monarchy during WWI and

established the Soviet Union and their Western allies – namely, the United States and

British Empire – committed the real atrocities during and after WWII. National Socialist

Germany and her allies were targeted for extermination and were systematically destroyed,

a fact largely hidden and unknown in the Western world. The Western Allies

and the Soviet Union were the real war criminals – not “the evil Nazis.”

 

During WWII, the British and Americans engaged in a systematic fire-bombing campaign

specifically targeting German industrial and civilian centers for destruction. Major cities

all throughout Germany were fire-bombed, resulting in the horrific death of millions of

innocent German civilians – men, women, and children. Sir Arthur Harris, head of Bomber

Command of the British Royal Air Force, openly described the barbaric, ruthless nature

of Allied fire-bombing policy in October 1943: “The aim of Bomber Command should be…

publicly stated: the destruction of German cities and the killing of German workers.”[5]

 

The Western Allies engaged in a vicious firebombing campaign of Germany during WWII at the behest of organized Jewry.

The Western Allies engaged in a vicious firebombing campaign of Germany during WWII at the behest of organized Jewry.

 

The Allies also sunk German civilian ships escaping the rampaging Soviet Red Army towards

the end of the war, ending the lives of countless civilians including, ironically enough, many

Eastern European Jews fleeing the advancing Red Army. In one particularly egregious

example, the MV Wilhelm Gustloff, which was carrying thousands of civilians, was sunk

by a Soviet submarine, resulting in the tragic death of roughly 9,400 civilians.[6]

 

 

The barbaric, out-of-control Red Army was encouraged to rape, pillage, torture, and murder

German soldiers and civilians alike as they advanced into German territory, and they did.

Over one million German POWs and civilians were starved and murdered after the war,

often suffering gruesome deaths from exposure, thirst, and torture at the hands of the

victorious and ruthless Allies.[7] The National Socialist political, cultural, and educational

establishment was systematically dismantled and destroyed, with many top officials and

leaders imprisoned, robbed, tortured, and even murdered.

 

Jewish propagandists have entirely reversed the reality of the situation using their

control of the media and Hollywood, and their influence upon the Western political and

educational establishment. Officially, the Germans are blamed for initiating WWII and

committing all of the atrocities, when in actual fact the last thing Adolf Hitler and

National Socialist Germany wanted was yet another World War. Hitler was determined

to diplomatically resolve the various disputes and conflicts with his neighbors, and

even sought an alliance with the British against the Jewish dominated Soviet Union.

The Germans and their allies were the most disciplined, honorable, and righteous force

fighting in the fratricidal Jewish-instigated war, while the Allied armies and military forces

were simply ruthless barbarians and vicious murderers. The German people and their

allies were the ones who experienced a genuine holocaust – a real genocide –

during and after WWII, not the Jewish population of Europe.[8]

 

In the late Willis Carto’s essential pamphlet “A Straight Look at the Second World War,”

originally published in the January/February 2012 edition of The Barnes Review, the

legendary American nationalist and publisher clearly explains that WWII was not the

“Good War” Americans and the rest of the world have been led to believe. WWII was not

about checking “Nazi” aggression and designs on world conquest, or “liberating” Europe

from fascism and tyranny, or even a war of self-defense against a war-mongering, imperial

German-Japanese alliance – it was a fratricidal, Jewish-instigated genocidal campaign

whose only beneficiaries were the clique of Jewish bankers, plutocrats, propagandists,

and Communists largely controlling the United States, United Kingdom, and Soviet Union.

 

Straight Look At WWII

It was, as Carto correctly points out, the suicide of the West:

 

[WWI and WWII] must be seen as a civil war in the West; 8.5 million American,

British, and continental European troops were killed during WWI and 43 million

during WWII. The civilian count in WWI is about 13 million and 38 million in WWII…

 

Regardless of persons like Tom Brokaw (who refer to WWII as “the good war,”) it

was unnecessary, and all belligerents – Great Britain, America and Russia included – lost.

American Francis Parker Yockey pointed out that to win a war, a power must gain

resources, strength and prosperity. Since 1939, all three major powers who started

and fought it have declined into a pit of escalating inflation, unpayable debt, national

bankruptcy, loss of national character, the immigration of millions of aliens and

a highly questionable future.[9]

 

To state it bluntly, the entire “Holocaust” narrative – 6 million Jews persecuted, abused,

and systematically exterminated by “those evil Nazis” during WWII – endlessly promoted

and perpetuated by the Jewish-owned and controlled mass media, Hollywood, and

educational and political establishment is completely bogus in virtually all respects. The

Germans simply wanted the Jews out of Germany, clearly and correctly recognizing

them as an alien, hostile, and treacherous force operating in German society, working

to subvert, pollute, and destroy the German nation specifically and Western

civilization generally.

 

Jews were encouraged to leave Germany, and many did. Others were imprisoned or

detained in the various labor and concentration camps established and administered by

National Socialist Germany. Incredibly, some were even permitted to serve in the German

armed forces and live as German citizens, as Jewish historian Bryan Mark Rigg has detailed.[10]

Jews were certainly not killed using “homicidal gas chambers” and other sadistic forms of

murder in a systematic campaign to eliminate European Jewry, as official “Holocaust”

and WWII historiography would have you believe.

 

But how exactly was such a monstrous hoax manufactured and presented to the public

as if it actually occurred? What follows is a general overview identifying the primary means

by which the alleged Jewish “Holocaust” during WWII was fabricated and presented to

the public as if it were a genuine aspect of our collective history in order to advance

certain geopolitical, cultural, and economic agendas beneficial to the organized

Jewish community.

 

The role of Allied propaganda before, during, and after WWII

 

The false Jewish “Holocaust” narrative is really just an extension of an elaborate and

on-going anti-German propaganda campaign going all the way back to WWI, and arguably

even prior to it. During WWI, Western (often Jewish) propagandists targeted Germany

and her armed forces with ridiculous “atrocity propaganda,” alleging in their newspapers

and other media outlets that the Germans were engaged in barbaric, ruthless behavior,

including raping, mutilating, and murdering innocent civilians. The Germans, especially

their military and political leaders, were depicted as savage monsters, and were

blamed for starting the war – which is exactly what happened prior to and after WWII.

Typical anti-German propaganda. The Germans were the most honorable and righteous fighting force during WWI and WWII.

Typical anti-German propaganda. In reality, the Germans were the most honorable and righteous fighting force during WWI and WWII.

The Germans were depicted as savage, violent monsters that murdered innocent civilians.

The Germans were depicted as savage, violent monsters that murdered innocent civilians.

 

The entirely fabricated idea that “millions of Jews” in Europe were being exterminated by

the Germans and other “fascists” was systematically promoted by Jewish propagandists

and their lackeys in the West beginning in 1915 during WWI. This slanderous, false

accusation has been and continues to be endlessly promoted to the often gullible and

susceptible Western public, resulting in extremely negative anti-German sentiment, not

to mention the widespread belief that the Germans did in fact commit these outrageous

(although quite ridiculous) atrocities.

 

 

In his book The First Holocaust: Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns With Holocaust

Claims During and After World War One, historian Don Heddesheimer details the fact that

organized Jewry and the mainstream mass media were propagandizing the Western public

during WWI with outrageous “atrocity propaganda” leveled against Germany and her allies,

laying the groundwork for the official “6 million” figure and the general narrative of the

Jewish “Holocaust” later institutionalized by the victorious Allies and international Jewry

following WWII. According to the description of The First Holocaust provided by

The Barnes Review, Heddesheimer:

 

… documents post-WWI propaganda that claimed East European Jewry was on

the brink of annihilation, regularly invoking nowadays well-known buzzwords like ‘extermination,’

‘holocaust,’ and the now famous and almost talismanic six million figure. It gives details

how that propaganda was used prior to WWI in order to agitate for minority rights

for Jews in Poland, and for Zionism and Bolshevism in Poland and Russia; and demonstrates

how Jewish fundraising operations in America raised vast sums in the name of

feeding Polish and Russian Jews, then funneled much of the money to Zionist and

Communist constructive undertakings – including banks, unions, and kibbutzes –

rather than to starving Jews. The First Holocaust also includes eye-opening testimony

from American diplomats and military attaches stationed in Poland and Russia

that contradicted Jewish persecution claims between the two world wars.

 

 

Although this exaggerated propaganda of Jewish suffering slowed down during the 1930s,

it never completely ceased and received new momentum in the 1940s during the

Second World War. As we all know today, this propaganda skyrocketed after Germany’s

total defeat, as the victorious nations of the Second World War seized upon the

opportunity to take advantage of such propaganda and to increase its scope and impact.

Heddesheimer’s book clearly shows that the “six million” figure, together with “extermination”

and “holocaust” claims, are Jewish-Zionist in nature and part of a propaganda pattern

which started at the very dawn of the 20th century in order to promote Jewish political

and financial goals.[11]

 

To document just two brazen examples of this deceitful propaganda prior to WWII even

beginning, first consider an article written by Martin H. Glynn, former governor of the

state of New York, entitled, “The Crucifixion of the Jews Must Stop!”

published in The American Hebrew on October 31, 1919.

 

“From across the sea six million men and women call to us for help, and eight hundred

thousand little children cry for bread,” Glynn begins the article. He continues:

 

These children, these men and women are our fellow-members of the human family,

with the same claim on life as we, the same susceptibility to the winter’s cold, the same

propensity to death before the fangs of hunger. Within them reside the illimitable possibilities

for the advancement of the human race as naturally would reside in six million human beings.

We may not be their keepers but we ought to be their helpers. (Emphasis in original)

 

Glynn proceeds with his emotional screed, entirely based on Jewish propaganda designed

to demonize the Germans and other White European Christian peoples, by invoking

the six million figure at least three more times. Glynn even managed to use the word

“holocaust” in his essay, and argued:

 

Six million men and women are dying from lack of necessities of life, eight hundred

thousand children cry for bread. And this fate is upon them through no fault of their

own, through no transgression of the laws of God or man; but through the awful tyranny

of war and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood.

 

In this threatened holocaust of human life, forgotten are the niceties of philosophical

distinctions, forgotten are the differences of historical interpretation; and the determination

to help the helpless, to shelter the homeless, to clothe the naked and to feed the hungry

becomes a religion at whose altar men of every race can worship and women of every

creed can kneel.[12]

 

It must be noted that this type of rhetoric sounds exactly like what the Jews and their

brainwashed liberal followers say about the millions of non-White immigrants, both

legal and illegal, flooding Western nations – and only Western nations – today.

 

Shortly after Adolf Hitler’s legal, entirely democratic rise to power in Germany in 1933, the

Jewish-led propaganda assault against the Germans stepped into high gear. Samuel Untermyer,

a wealthy Jewish lawyer deeply connected to the American political and banking establishment,

almost immediately declared an international boycott of German goods on behalf of international

Jewry, which amounted to an act of war. The Friday, March 24, 1933 edition of the Daily Express,

a British newspaper at the time, featured this leading headline:

 

“Judea Declares War On Germany:

Jews Of All The World Unite In Action.”[13]

 

Why were facts like this never presented in high school history class?

Why were facts like this never presented in high school history class?

 

Untermyer would later broadcast an unhinged, extremely vicious anti-German screed

over the radio in which he decried the Germans as “cruel and savage beasts,” and

advocated a Christian-Jewish alliance to punish Germany. In the broadcast, Untermyer

hysterically claimed the Germans were “annihilating” European Jewry by “locking them

in vile concentration camps, starving and torturing them, murdering and beating them

without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form of torture, inhuman beyond

conception, until suicide has become their only means of escape, and all solely because

they are or their remote ancestors were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating

them.”[14] This slanderous speech was publicly broadcast in 1933, years before

the official “Holocaust” and “extermination” of European Jews allegedly began.

 

During and immediately following WWII, deceitful propagandists continued to level this

“atrocity propaganda” against the Germans in order to demonize them and prepare the

Western world for the institutionalization of the myth of “6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis.”

Western and Soviet propagandists, including psychological warfare specialists in the

United States Army and individuals connected to Hollywood, were involved in manufacturing

“evidence” – including fake, altered, or otherwise misrepresented photographs and videos,

“human lampshades,” “shrunken heads,” and other absurd props – which was used to “prove”

to the world that the Germans did in fact commit these outrageous atrocities during the war,

particularly at the various concentration camps and industrial facilities under their administration.

 

 

Shortly after the German surrender in 1945, Sefton Delmer, the former British Chief of

“Black Propaganda,” is alleged to have stated: “Atrocity propaganda is how we

won the war. And we’re only really beginning with it now!” He would go on to explain:

 

We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will escalate it until nobody will accept

even a good word from the Germans, until all the sympathy they may still have aboard

will have been destroyed and they themselves will be so confused that they will no longer

know what they are doing. Once that has been achieved, once they begin to run down

their own country and their own people, not reluctantly but with eagerness to

please the victors, only then will our victory be complete. It will never be final.

 

Re-education needs careful tending, like an English lawn. Even one moment of

negligence, and the weeds crop up again – those indestructible weeds of historical truth.[15]

 

The propaganda used to instill the idea of a “Jewish Holocaust” into the minds of the public

is extremely emotionally and psychologically exploitative, resulting in psychological trauma,

severe emotional reactions, and a general inability of the broad masses to objectively evaluate

the information they are being presented with. This aspect of the false

“Holocaust” narrative will be discussed in more detail as we continue.

 

The role of the Nuremberg trials

 

Following Germany’s defeat in WWII, the Allied countries organized a series of military

tribunals often referred to simply as the Nuremberg Trials. The trials consisted of the

International Military Tribunal and the Nuremberg Military Tribunal. The Nuremberg Trials

were a total sham, a disgrace to traditional Western jurisprudence, and a violation of

every standard code of military honor and conduct – “show trials” if there ever were any.

According to Article 19 establishing the military tribunal, “The Tribunal shall not be bound

by rules of evidence.” Additionally, Article 21 states: “The Tribunal shall not require proof

of facts of common knowledge, but shall take judicial notice thereof.” As Robert H. Jackson,

chief American prosecutor at the Nuremberg Tribunal, openly admitted, the Tribunal

was “a continuation of the war effort of the Allied nations” against National Socialist Germany.[16]

 

The trials were essentially organized to:

  1. Demonize, vilify, and falsely blame the Germans for initiating
  2. the war and committing all of the atrocities and war crimes;
  3. To whitewash and cover up the very real crimes committed
  4. by the victorious Allies; and Officially institutionalize the
  5.  false Jewish “Holocaust” narrative.

Fabricated evidence and false, oftentimes completely ridiculous and fanciful, testimony

was introduced by the Allies, and many of the German defendants were physically and

psychologically tortured or otherwise coerced into making false confessions during the trials.

One noteworthy case are the false confessions made by Rudolf Hoss, which were instrumental

in manufacturing the fake “Holocaust” narrative, particularly as

it relates to the notorious Auschwitz concentration camp.

 

Robert Faurisson, a leading historical revisionist and expert on the various aspects of the

official “Holocaust” narrative, wrote an essay entitled, “How the British Obtained the

Confessions of Rudolf Höss,” published by the Institute for Historical Review. Faurisson explains:

 

Rudolf Höss was the first of three successive commandants of Auschwitz concentration

camp. He is often called “the Commandant of Auschwitz,” and the general public

knows of him from a book published under the title Commandant in Auschwitz.

 

He appeared before the International Military Tribunal as a witness on 15 April 1946,

where his deposition caused a sensation. To the amazement of the defendants and in

the presence of journalists from around the world, he confessed to the most frightful

crimes that history had ever known. He said that he had personally received an order

from Himmler to exterminate the Jews. He estimated that at Auschwitz 3,000,000

people had been exterminated, 2,500,000 of them by means of gas chambers.

His confessions were false. They had been extorted from Hoss by torture, but it took

until 1983 to learn the identity of the torturers and the nature of the tortures

they inflicted upon him.

 

The confessions of Rudolf Hoss supply the keystone to the theory which maintains

that systematic extermination of the Jews, especially by means of homicidal gas

chambers, was a historical reality.

 

For the full details of Hoss’ case, including the barbaric torture he was subjected to by

British soldiers led by Bernard Clarke, a sergeant of Jewish extraction, Faurisson’s entire

article is a must read.[17]

 

The recently deceased Hans Krampe, a German translator, writer, and student of history

devoted to debunking the slanders leveled against his nation and people, has written one

the most concise and powerful summaries of the Nuremberg Trials that I have come across.

Krampe states:

 

The Nuremberg Trials Show (sic), a grand standing, self-righteous performance launched

under the label of “International Military Tribunal” (IMT) – none of its members, except for

the Russians, having actually fought in the war – was a politically motivated orgy of

revenge, malice, hypocrisy, humiliation and lies. The icing on the cake was the simultaneously

ongoing Allied mass murder of the German populace, then very much in progress.

 

It was a copycat Stalinist show trial, stage managed by Jewish-controlled media hacks,

whose principal contribution to the war had been the fabrication of anti-German hate

propaganda throughout, performed by mean-spirited lawyers, oozing with malice,

principal among them high-ranking Soviet war criminals; zealously assisted by largely

Jewish torturers (interrogators) and sadistic murders (executioners), often in brand

new uniforms.[18]

 

 

The role of the iconic imagery associated with

the “Holocaust” and alleged “Nazi death camps”

 

Virtually all of the iconic imagery associated with the alleged Jewish “Holocaust” turns

out to be entirely fabricated, altered, or extremely misrepresented and taken out of context.

 

The imagery associated with the “Holocaust” – photographs of piles of dead bodies,

emaciated prisoners, Jews and other prisoners being “rounded up,” train cars filled

with dead bodies, etc. – has been used to psychologically and emotionally traumatize

the masses, including vulnerable school children, rendering them easily susceptible to

manipulation, and facilitating the false narrative of “6 million Jews sadistically murdered

by the Nazis” to be literally implanted in their minds.

 

Horrific images such as this have been deliberately used to psychologically exploit mass audiences.

Horrific images such as this have been deliberately used to psychologically exploit mass audiences.

 

Photographic and video images depicting piles of dead, emaciated bodies have been

shown to unsuspecting audiences, inducing psychological trauma and fear in their minds,

in order to sell the false notion that the Germans systematically murdered millions of people,

particularly Jews, in “death camps.” The fact of the matter is that while the war was ending,

the German-administered labor and industrial camps were not supplied and many people

did in fact perish in horrible conditions. Disease was rampant, especially typhus, and

many detainees died from lack of medical care, food, and clean water. The piles of dead

bodies photographed in various concentration camps throughout German-administered

Europe do not prove that the Germans were systematically murdering the inmates detained

there. It simply demonstrates how deceitful, brazen, and ruthless the Western and Soviet

propagandists were in their efforts to demonize and slander the Germans with this

type of “atrocity propaganda,” an activity they had been engaged in for decades.

 

Additionally, some of the iconic imagery associated with the Jewish “Holocaust” turns out

to be photographs of dead German civilians murdered in Allied fire-bombing campaigns,

which were then presented to the masses as “proof” of German atrocities. Again, the

shameless, deceitful behavior of the Western Allies and their Soviet Communist

partners knows no bounds.

 

The iconic imagery shown repeatedly to mass audiences is never put into context.

The images are simply shown, and we are expected to believe that the “Holocaust” was

a real event. The vast majority of people have never objectively investigated the claims being

made about the alleged “Holocaust” simply because of the psychological trauma and fear

induced by the imagery, in addition to the testimony provided by “Holocaust survivors” and

other “eye witnesses to Nazi atrocities,” a topic we will explore in more detail next.

 

The role of “Holocaust survivors” and other

“eye witnesses to Nazi atrocities”

 

Complimenting the psychologically and emotionally exploitative “Holocaust” imagery,

which as we have discussed has either been deliberately taken out of context, misrepresented,

or entirely fabricated, the testimony of alleged “Holocaust survivors” and other “eye witnesses

to Nazi atrocities” has been used to deceive the masses about this purported event.

The testimony provided by alleged “Holocaust survivors” has been effectively utilized to

psychologically and emotionally exploit the masses, instilling in their minds the entirely fabricated

and deceitfully manufactured narrative of “6 million Jews” murdered at the hands of

“the evil Nazis” during WWII.

 

The courageous historical revisionist and filmmaker Eric Hunt has done a masterful job

of not only debunking the official historiography of the alleged “Holocaust,” but also of

demonstrating how entirely ridiculous and absurd much of the testimony provided by

“Holocaust survivors” actually is.

 

In virtually all cases, the alleged “Holocaust survivors” are either entirely fabricating or

outrageously embellishing their experiences during WWII, or they are providing testimony

that actually discredits and disproves certain aspects of the official “Holocaust” narrative

(particularly as it relates to the purported “extermination camps” in the East

often referred to as the “Aktion Reinhard death camps” or “death factories”).

 

One particularly brazen “Holocaust survivor” who was exposed as a liar is a man named

Herman Rosenblat. In late 2008, mainstream news outlets began exposing Rosenblat’s

entirely fake “Holocaust” story, including CNN. A December 30, 2008 CNN article reads in part:

 

Oprah Winfrey once dubbed it the “greatest love story” she had ever heard: a boy

held at a Nazi concentration camp during World War II and a girl on the outside who

tossed him apples to keep him alive. They eventually married and grew old together.

 

It turns out the story of Herman and Roma Rosenblat isn’t true.

 

The two had told their love story for years and years, inspiring a book deal, an upcoming

movie, and stories across the globe on television, in papers and on the Internet

. A children’s book, “Angel Girl,” was also based on their love story.

 

When the couple appeared on “The Oprah Winfrey Show” more than a decade ago,

the famed host called it “the single greatest love story in 22 years of doing this show.”

 

But over the weekend, Herman Rosenblat issued a statement through his literary agent,

Andrea Hurst, acknowledging the story of how he met his wife was made up.

 

“Why did I do that and write the story with the girl and the apple, because I wanted to

bring happiness to people, to remind them not to hate, but to love and tolerate all people.

I brought good feelings to a lot of people, and I brought hope to many.

My motivation was to make good in this world,” he said in the statement.

 

“In my dreams, Roma will always throw me an apple,

but I now know it is only a dream.”[19]

 

Rosenblat would later appear on ABC’s “Good Morning America” television news broadcast

to discuss the fake story he told for years, revealing a great deal of insight into the

nature of the various “Holocaust survivors” endlessly paraded in front of

vulnerable school children and unsuspecting audiences around the world.

 

Rosenblat, referring to his fake story, explained to ABC: “It wasn’t a lie. It was my imagination,

in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it, that she was there and she threw the apple to me…

In my imagination, it was true.”[20]

 

The aforementioned Eric Hunt’s powerful films “The Last Days of The Big Lie” and

“The Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax” thoroughly expose the fraudulent nature of

many of the most prominent “Holocaust survivors” who have been utilized to promote

and perpetuate the false “Holocaust” narrative using extremely emotionally and psychologically

traumatizing testimony. [21]

 

The role of Jewish Hollywood and the

organized international Jewish community

 

Since WWII, an entire industry relating to the false “Holocaust” narrative has arisen in the

West. Disgusted by the outrageously brazen corruption emanating from the deceitful,

unscrupulous leaders and representatives of “Holocaust survivors,” Jewish academic

Norman Finkelstein wrote a book discussing and exposing what he calls The Holocaust Industry.[22]

 

Organized Jewish interests and their lobbies have successfully created an extremely lucrative

financial and sympathy racket based on their false, entirely fabricated narrative of

“6 million Jews” systematically murdered by “the evil Nazis” during WWII now known

as the “Holocaust.”

 

“At the end of the twentieth century, the ‘Holocaust’ is being bought and sold,” wrote

Tim Cole, a Professor of History specializing in the “Holocaust” at Bristol University, in his

book Selling the Holocaust: From Auschwitz to Schindler, How History is Bought,

Packaged and Sold. “In short, ‘Shoah [Hebrew word for Holocaust] business’ is big business.”[23]

 

The “Holocaust” is indeed an industry at this point – a commodity endlessly pushed

and promoted by academia, politicians, government officials, international political organizations

such as the United Nations, media moguls, Hollywood producers and directors, organized

Jewish groups, the Jewish state of Israel, and others connected to the “Holocaust” racket.

 

Hollywood and the “entertainment” complex in the West – which is virtually entirely owned

and dominated by Jews with deep ties to the Jewish state of Israel and the “Holocaust”

industry – have produced countless propaganda films masquerading as objective depictions

of the experiences of European Jews during WWII. These films and documentaries have

served to perpetuate, reinforce, and even expand upon the false, entirely fabricated

official narrative of the “Holocaust,” which has been manufactured and sold to the

public during and after WWII.

 

There are countless “Holocaust” museums and memorials all across the world, many

of which receive official state funding and endorsement, including the U.S. Holocaust

Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. Not a day goes by without a mention of the false

“Holocaust” story in the mass media, “entertainment” complex, or political establishment.

This false narrative is constantly being reinforced and perpetuated to the public on a daily

basis, often in the most crass, deceptive, and emotionally exploitative ways imaginable.

 

 

The official “Holocaust” narrative has advanced a number of important geopolitical, cultural,

and economic agendas primarily benefitting international Jewry and Israel –

the self-proclaimed Jewish state. These agendas include:

  1. Elevating the alleged “suffering and persecution” of the Jewish people

  2. during WWII specifically, and throughout history generally, over all others;

  3. Covering up the crimes committed by Jewish terrorists, Communists, propagandists,
  4. and the Western Allies prior to, during, and after WWII by projecting those crimes
  5.  (and even fabricating new ones) on to the German armed forces and their allies;

  6. Creating an extremely lucrative financial and sympathy racket, netting the Jewish state
  7. of Israel and the organized international Jewish community billions of dollars annually;
  8. Serving as the basis for the creation of the Jewish state of Israel, while excusing and
  9.  justifying the genocidal, illegal policies and state-sponsored terrorism the Jewish state
  10.  has pursued since its founding;

  11. Instilling a deep sense of ethnocentrism and strong Jewish identity within the Jewish
  12. community, while demonizing and delegitimizing White European ethnocentrism and identity; and

  13. Demonizing the one man – Adolf Hitler – and political movement who stood up for their
  14. country and race against the Talmudic forces of internationalism and globalism seeking
  15.  the subjugation and ultimate destruction of the White race and all genuine nationalities,
  16. ethnicities, and cultures.

Writing in Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler described the Jews as having an “unqualified capacity

for falsehood,” and would go on to explain the concept of the Big Lie technique of psychological

warfare and propaganda, which organized Jewry has used masterfully throughout history and

to this very day, especially concerning the false “Holocaust” narrative, in order to falsify history

and psychologically exploit mass audiences:

 

… in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses

of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature

than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they

more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell

small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large scale falsehoods.

It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not

believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though

the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still

doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.

For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed

down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together

in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the

basest purposes.[24]

 

Keep these profound insights in mind the next time you are exposed to the endless barrage

of “Holocaust” propaganda emanating from Jewish Hollywood, the mass media,

and the educational and political establishment in America and around the world.

 

The “Holocaust” in a nutshell

 

A comment on my blog[25] expertly explained everything you need to know about the

alleged “Holocaust” narrative of WWII – a narrative that has been weaponized specifically

against White people.

 

The “Holocaust” is a mammoth lie, unequaled in its deception. How is it even possible

that, by 1944, the Germans, fighting to defend their fatherland against several enemies

who were numerically superior, would have the resources to carry out a genocide of

several million?

 

We have bombastic, ridiculous numbers of deaths shoved down our throats through

every tentacle of our Jew-owned bureaucracy, and any rational person who questions

these absurd figures is intimidated by the Jewish power structure into shutting up and

going along with this gargantuan lie or is thrown in jail. If one takes the time to

read some basic facts, the Jews’ “Holocaust” lie falls apart rather quickly.

 

The Jews, after millennia of oppressing White peoples, were intimidated when Adolf Hitler

and his Nazi Party came along, finally saying “You Jews control Germany no more!”

and sought to fabricate an enormous lie to permanently dehumanize in the eyes of the

gullible masses a movement that in reality was not a brutal satanic mass of maniacs

with a blood lust, but a movement that peaceably stood up to Jewish domination

of Germany and the world.

 

The masses have been indoctrinated for decades about the so-called “Holocaust” by

every part of our Western European and North American Jew-owned infrastructure,

public schools, colleges, on TV and the news, on film and radio, etc. and most people

are too gullible to research the other side of the story and form a balanced opinion on

the matter. Because if they did, few people would believe the sheer stupidity of the

“Holocaust” fairy tale.

 

Perhaps the German infantry shot a Jew or two here and there, but unfortunately in

war all sides commit crimes. There was no systematic extermination of the Jews,

and let us not forget the Allies – the “noble gods of war” as portrayed in Western propaganda

– raped almost every German women (including children) east of Berlin, and fire-bombed

entire cities, burning to death millions of innocent civilians.

 

The Allies were the evil ones in

World War II, ruled by their Jewish masters.

 

The Jews are the biggest liars and troublemakers in history,

and let no White person ever forget that.

 

[1] See: http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/2012/02/against-hollywoodism-revisionism.html

 

[2] Quote taken from page 16 of the late Victor Thorn’s excellent book The Holocaust Hoax Exposed:

Debunking the 20th Century’s Biggest Lie, available from The Barnes Review.

 

[3] See The Leuchter Reports. Critical Edition, available from The Barnes Review.

 

[4] See Thorn’s The Holocaust Hoax Exposed, especially part one

Deconstructing Holocaust Mythology, available from The Barnes Review.

 

[5] See: http://www.johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/evil-jew-puppet-sir-arthur-harris-i.html

 

[6] See: https://www.britannica.com/topic/MV-Wilhelm-Gustloff

 

[7] See James Bacque’s Other Losses: An Investigation into Mass Deaths of German

Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans after WWII, available from The Barnes Review.

 

[8] See Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany,

1944-1947, available from The Barnes Review.

 

[9] A PDF version of this article is available online.

See: http://barnesreview.org/pdf/TBR2012-no1-4-14.pdf

 

[10] See Rigg’s Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers: The Untold Story of Nazi Racial Laws and

Men of Jewish Descent in the German Military, available from The Barnes Review.

 

[11] See: https://barnesreview.org/product/the-first-holocaust-jewish-fund-

raising-campaigns-with-holocaust-claims-during-and-after-world-war-one/

 

[12] The full article is available online.

See: http://jrbooksonline.com/HTML-docs/The%20Crucifixion%20of%20Jews%20Must%20Stop.htm

 

[13] See: https://www.nationalists.org/library/hitler/daily-express/judea-declares-war-on-germany.html

 

[14] Untermyer’s August 1933 speech was broadcast on WABC, and was transcribed and

printed in the August 7, 1933 edition of The New York Times. The speech is available online at:

 http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/untermeyer.htm

 

[15] See: http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=3562

 

[16] See the heroic German lawyer Sylvia Stolz’s 2012 speech in Switzerland, which

ultimately resulted in her criminal prosecution in Germany for “denying the Holocaust,”

available online with English subtitles here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJY5cBxmdw

 

[17] Faurisson’s article was originally published in The Journal of Historical Review,

Winter 1986-87 (Vol. 7, No. 4), pp. 380-403, and is available online at:

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p389_faurisson.html

 

[18] See: Warwolves of the Iron Cross: The Union Jackal, pp. 199

particularly and Chapter 16 generally

 

[19] See: http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/12/30/holocaust.hoax.love.story/

 

[20] See: http://www.abc30.com/archive/6666467

 

[21] Both documentary films are available online simply by searching for their titles.

 

[22] Finkelstein’s book is available from Amazon.com. Richard Hoste wrote an excellent

review of the book for Counter-Currents Publishing, which can be accessed at:

https://www.counter-currents.com/2011/10/norman-finkelsteins-the-holocaust-industry/

 

[23] See Jonas E. Alexis’ article “The Rise and Fall of the Holocaust Industry,”

which can be accessed at:

https://justice4poland.com/2015/06/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-holocaust-industry/

 

[24] See: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/kampf.html

 

[25] See: http://johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-holocaust-in-nutshell.html

 

 

Click on this text to view hundreds of videos exposing the HOLOCAUST LIES

 



Well-nourished children – in a ‘death camp’? 
Do these JEWS  look like they've been starved?…
 
That's not how they would have looked like
in a Jew-run Soviet concentration camp, apart
from having been raped and sodomized, as well.

Likewise, in the Jew-occupied Palestine, their
fellow Jews could have had them killed and
cannibalized for their marketable body parts.

Whether in their guise as Judo-communists
or in their latter-day incarnation as Zionists,
the last people on earth the Jews would want
to be imprisoned by is anyone like themselves.

Mr Hitler's 1941 anti-Bolshevik Crusade made
the internment of Jews unavoidable – clearly
necessitated by the massive recruitment of
the Jews by the NKVD (KGB).  
 
The American
FBI and the German Gestapo had numerous
identical examples of having arrested some
Soviet spies – only to find that they've got
Jews in custody.  
 
 
By contrast, no such hostile
recruitment was ever evidenced in regard of
the Japanese-Americans, who were interned
on purely racial grounds.  (And how many of
them would have survived in the American
‘death camps’ – had the U.S. lost the war?)

As far as the Third Reich was concerned,
from 1941 on, the Jewish problem suddenly
became a matter of security, rather than
a racial or political matter.  
 
 
For example,
despite Mr Hitler's 1941 Commissar Order
providing for summary executions of all
terrorist suspects in a war zone, no measures
of any kind were taken against the Mountain
Jews of North Caucasus, as their Muslim
neighbours vouched that they weren't 
involved with communism.
 
 
 And the Germans
appreciated the friendly disposition on the
part of the Muslims, who, of course, were
glad to see the back of the Soviets – and paid
a terrible price when the scumbags returned.




 

Jews partially invented the "holocaust" to distract people from what the JEWS actually

did to the Russians/Germans/Ukrainians/Poles etc.. Instead of appearing as  criminal

oppressors, the JEW planners of all wars and the real bosses controlling our countries,

are now considered "poor innocent victims" that we should never criticize.

 




GULAG boss Moishe Berman with his accomplices.
Semi-anonymous KGB cutthroats exterminated sixty six
million – and not one of those vile Judo-communist mass
murderers was ever prosecuted in ‘democratized’ Russia.


Yet the Jew/KGB-suborned Russian media gloated every
time some dying ex-SS-man was being dragged through
the courts by the bloodthirsty Jews in ‘democratic’ West.


Back in the Soviet times, KGB – this partly Jewish gang
of pimps, mass murderers and bumbling
poisoners – was a mere government agency.
 

And became the government itself.



Offer the FREE HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE to those who may need it:  http://user1252122.sites.myregisteredsite.com/id172.html

 
 
 

TIMELINE OF THE PROPAGANDA & LIES OF THE HOLY-COST (HOLOCAUST)!

TIMELINE OF THE PROPAGANDA & LIES

OF THE HOLY-COST (HOLOCAUST)!

FAKED AND FORGED HOLY-HOAX PHOTOS FOR $BILLION(S) INDUSTRY TO DISTORT HISTORY
AND DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZIS & ROTHSCHILDS CRIME MOB ATROCITIES:
RED CROSS RECORDS SHOW 271,301 TOTAL PERSONS DIED IN ALL GERMAN PRISON CAMPS DURING ALL OF WW II.
FAKED AND FORGED HOLY-HOAX PHOTOS FOR $BILLION(S) INDUSTRY TO DISTORT HISTORY AND DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZIS & ROTHSCHILDS CRIME MOB ATROCITIES!
 
 
1919 CE-1921 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Americans had a camp at Auschwitz before the Germans, following
WWI the Americans set up a quarantine, disinfection and work camp at Oświęcim (Auschwitz) in 1919 CE to combat
typhus. The American Polish Typhus Relief Expedition 1919-1921 established the camp(s) because it was less than
50 miles to Krakow, Poland and had excellent railroad connections. Local gardens producing food at reasonable prices.
From there also, the peasants refugees could be spread out over the farms in western Galicia to help with the
harvest, thereby easing the burden that they were to the country.” The American-Poland Camp “housed some
700 children and about 2,500 prisoners.” A Red Cross hospital was established there for refugees, some 5,000
to 6,000 persons per day and about 75% were transient military personnel. The American army used Zyklon, once
the typhus epidemics started to arrive around 1942 CE. A 1921 CE report in the New York Times titled “New Delousing Plant”
described how immigrants infected with typhus were treated on Hoffman’s Island, New York. Their clothing was
gassed with cyanide gas using their equivalent of Zyklon, while the immigrants had their hair cut off and were
put through showers; then their clothes were returned. It was the same process in the German camps.
 

ISRAEL 100 YEARS OF AMERICANS DYING FOR ZIONIST GOALS =

ROBBERY OF PALESTINE OVER 70 YEARS OF MASS MURDER AND OVERWHELMING FORCE

 

BENJAMIN FREEDMAN – DESCRIBES HOW ZIONIST FORCED USA INTO WW 1!
Click here to see video in separate window:  Click for Video
 
1919 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — THE BALFOUR DECLARATION, WORLD WAR ONE AND 6 MILLION JEWS —
During WW I the British Government had agreed with leading Rothschilds Crime Mob Ashkenazis that they
would support a Ashkenazi homeland in Palestine in exchange for the powerful Ashkenazi lobby in America
(ROTHSCHILDS AIPAC) getting the USA into WW II. This led to the Balfour Declaration being made by the
British Government promising the Ashkenazis a homeland in Palestine. After WW I the British Government were
unable, or unwilling, to make good on this promise. From 1919 onwards the Ashkenazis claimed 6 million Jews
in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in Palestine. This was
14 years before the Nazis came to power and 24 years before the alleged Holocaust started.
 
1925 CE-1941 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — HUMAN SOAP LIES & PROPAGANDA — “the classic lie of war
propaganda” Radha Binod Pal (1886 – 1967) was a judge at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East,
the Japanese version of the Nuremberg Witch Trials. He wrote a 700 page Dissenting Judgement of the trial
which was banned in Britain and occupied-Japan. Pal made reference to the World War I British propaganda
lie that the Germans boiled down their dead to make pig food, which later morphed into them making soap.
In 1925 the British Foreign Secretary admitted in Parliament, the story was untrue, in 1941 CE, “there
wasn’t a word of truth in it”, but Jews still re-hashed it in World War II. Same Ashkenazi lies about lampshades.
 
1933 CE-1948 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Jewish World Almanacs on Jewish Population
show 1933 population of 15,315,000 Jews and show in 1948 15,753,000 Jews.
 
1933 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Haavara Agreement – THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT
between HITLER and Zionists Negotiated to send Ashkenazis to Palestine.
 
1933 CE-1934 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — GOEBBELS HAD A SPECIAL GERMAN COIN MINTED TO CELEBRATE
ZIONISM & it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side.  Mildenstein, SS Office for
Jewish Affairs, travelled to Palestine for 6 months accompanied by Zionist officials & spent
time at Kibbutz Farms.  ZIONISTS THANKED GOEBBELS FOR THE ‘RACE LAWS’ OF 1935 CE.
 
1935 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germany introduced strict race separation laws and the Head of Germany’s
Zionist Movement Mr Georg Kareski gave an interview said he had been trying for years to find a method to
keep the two races (Germans & Jews) separate, and he said the race laws supported the
Jewish desires as the Jews had been struggling against assimilation for nearly 2000 years.
 
1936 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — A growing enormous opposition to the Haavara Transfer Agreement came from
powerful Jewish circles in the USA. Many of European Jews were extremely rich and powerful and they had
started to use their influence to sabotage the Haavara Agreement. They set up armed resistance and agitator
groups to fight against Hitlers idea. They also spread fabricated ‘atrocity’ propaganda about how badly Jews
were being treated in Germany. This propaganda was designed to swing world opinion against Hitlers Haavara Pact.
 
1938 CE-1949 CE: Mengele (1911 CE-1979 CE) spent three years with a Waffen SS unit, mostly in the East and
in Russia, where, according to SS records, he was wounded and declared medically unfit for combat. 
 He was a German officer and physician in Auschwitz camp supposedly to perform human experiments
on prisoners.  Mengele had doctorates in anthropology and medicine and was a researcher interested in genetics.
  After the war Mengele sailed to Argentina in 1949 and ended up in Brazil in 1960. The Ashkenazis were after
him all that time, and supposedly he drowned after suffering a stroke while swimming off the Brazilian
coast in 1979 CE. After the war he was intercepted in his travel by British Intelligence who were interested
in Mengele’s supposed work on creating bizarre trauma for breaking young people and creating a blank slate
brain-wiped individual who could be “layered” with “alters” (Programmed) that would robotically carry out
spying or dangerous criminal activities.  British thought they most needed the perfect trauma for programming
transnational robotic tools of war. But Mengele may have been a front or victim of his own work and became
a brainwashed and did as he was told – whatever he was told like smile, chuckle, and he might have become
a display or front for the British.  The British Ashkenazis were so paranoid that in 1985, amidst much hoopla,
they put on a HOLY-HOAX show trial conducted to quell the MEDIA DEVELOPED uprisings of hate against
Mengele and his fellow escapes.  Of course, with NO DEFENSE, he was found “guilty” in his absence, but it
was just for the cameras. The Ashkenazi Brits and Yanks didn’t want any discussion of brainwashing, and nobody
was thought able to believe it was considered so bizarre. Mengele’s research ideas and efforts likely led to
the CIA-Monarch programming program which was designed for brainwashing to program our children’s
futures.  Mengele is now fully linked to “Monarch Programming” on the internet thanks to MEDIA HYPE.
 
1939 CE-1944 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — British government decided in 1941 CE that there were not enough
dramatic photographs of Nazi atrocities and the BRITISH COVERT OPERATIONS (BSC) arranged for a studio
in CANADA to create such photographs using actors, stage-sets, costumes, and dummies for the manufacture
of war scenes in which actors dressed up as Nazi soldiers were shown mass-murdering innocent people. These
photos were widely circulated in the United States. – Desperate Deception: British Covert Operations in the
United States, 1939 CE-1944 CE. WWII UK and US PSYOPS Exposed the details of how British and Americans
set up a fake German Concentration Camp on Staten Island to create “news reel” footage depicting “Nazi atrocities”
with which to get the American public to support the war against Germany. PURE FAKERY IN ENGLAND +
CANADA + AMERICA too fake photos to demonize the Germans! And they still teach it in High School & College
history classes. The American army used Zyklon for a typhus epidemic in 1942 CE. A 1921 report in the
New York Times titled “New Delousing Plant” described how immigrants infected with typhus were treated on
Hoffman’s Island, New York. Their clothing was gassed with cyanide gas using their equivalent of Zyklon, while
the immigrants had their hair cut off and were put through showers; then their clothes were returned. It was the
same process in the German camps. THE SOVIET, BRITISH, AND AMERICAN DOCUMENTARY FORGERY FACTORIES
— Russian forgery experts spent most of their time in producing material designed to delude, confound and
mislead their perceived enemies, both domestic and foreign. Much of this began after the Second World War with
extensive rewriting, editing and deliberate forgeries of German military and political documents designed to
embarrass the United States and its client, as well as to elevate the image of their own regime. One of the most
ambitious Soviet productions concerned the writings of Dr. Josef Goebbels. Because handwritten documents on
the original, special paper Goebbels used would have been nearly impossible to successfully fake, the new
Soviet line was that the documents had actually been typed and then put onto glass negatives. These were hidden
by the Germans in cases where the Soviets were able to “discover” them after the war. Having altered the
Goebbels’ diaries from “several stacked folders” of handwritten material to a box of more easily forged photographs
of typed manuscript, the Russians began to offer their rare, politically incorrect material to sources in Germany
for sale and publication. German experts universally rejected these productions as completely fake.
 
1939 CE-1945 CE: HOLOCAUST SAD FACTS — FAKED WAR BUILT ON LIES & PROPAGANDA ABOUT GAS
CHAMBERS AND 6 MILLION GENOCIDE REFUTED BY 7,061 PAGES OF WW II ALLIED LEADERS — Churchill’s
Second WW II propaganda never mentions Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish
victims of the war. Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second
World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Memoirs is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which
altogether totals 7,061 pages there is no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of
‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.”1941 CE: Stalin’s “Torch-men-Order” #0428 confirmed by Russia – Declares
that Russian partisans in German uniforms, particularly those of the Waffen-SS, were to destroy all settlements
within a swathe of about 40 – 60 km depth from the main battle lines and to ruthlessly kill the civilian population.
With these tactics it was important to leave a few survivors, which would report the supposed German terror attacks.
This method of warfare was also confirmed by German soldiers
who captured many Russian partisans wearing German uniforms.
 

4 minute video — MSM AGGRANDIZED THIS COWARDLY DRUNKEN WARMONGER!

 

CHURCHILL USED TRICKS TO FORCE WW II – NOW SOROS IS!
HOW CHURCHILL TRICKED AND FAKED WW II by David Irving, Famous BRITISH Author
CHURCHILL = REFUSE TO EVEN HEAR GERMANY’S PEACE OFFER
CHURCHILL = WANTED LONDON BOMBED BY THE GERMANS TO BEGIN WW II –
MOST LIKELY UNDER ORDERS FROM THE ROTHSCHILDS MAFIA!
Click here to see video in separate window:  Click for Video
 
1941 CE-1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Hitler had second thoughts about setting up a Jewish Nation State
and sending thousands of Jews to that State to create Jewish forces & money to use against Germany, but the
Haavara Agreement continued right on into WW  II to at least 1942 CE. Hitler wanted young and healthy Jews
to work for their food and lodgings in factories and eventually resettle in Western Russia south of Minsk until
after the war finished. Arabs were so concerned by the close co-operation between the Nazis & Zionists that
they became convinced that Hitler must be a Jew who was just trying to establish a Jewish State throughout
the Middle East. “Between January 1 1943 and March 3 1943 CE 113,015 Jews were evacuated from the Reich
including Bohemia and Moravia, the new Eastern Territories and the district of Bialystok to the East
and 8,025 Jews were moved to the Ghetto for the Aged in Theresienstadt.” – The Korherr Report.
 
1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Auschwitz was a major work camp that had forty different industries.
The true reason for the existence of the Auschwitz camp is as an industrial complex which surrounded the
camp – most of it within full view of the interior of the camp itself. German industry included arms factories,
foundries and mines. They used the prisoners for most of the labour. The largest work camp was Auschwitz III
(Monowitz). It started operations in May 1942 CE and was associated with the synthetic rubber and liquid fuel
plant Buna-Werke owned by IG Farben. Eleven thousand laborers worked at Monowitz. Seven thousand inmates
worked at various chemical plants. Eight thousand worked in mines. Approximately 40,000 prisoners worked in
labor camps at Auschwitz. Some put the number of prisoners who worked at Auschwitz at 83,000. It is clear
these prisoners worked for the German war effort in the Auschwitz prison complex. The Monowitz industrial
complex was where most of Auschwitz’s inmates were put to work in a variety of heavy industries, ranging
from rubber manufacture, medical supplies, armaments and clothing. Auschwitz was the site of Germany’s
newest and most technologically advanced synthetic rubber plant; and Germany was the world’s leader in this
particular field of technology. Shortly after the First World War the Germans were cut off from their supply of
natural rubber. Auschwitz was picked because it was a railway centre. Auschwitz had a hospital
next door to treat prisoners.
 
1942 CE-1948 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Far from being the “death camps” as you have heard so often, places
like Auschwitz, Dachau and Buchenwald were not in the business of extermination. They were work camps,
critical to the German war effort. The Jewish workers were compensated for their labor with scrip printed
specifically for their use in stores, canteens and even brothels? The prisoner monetary system was conceived
in ghettos such as Lodz, carried to camps such as Auschwitz and Dachau and still existed in the displaced persons
camps that were established by the Allies after World War II. Many thousands of secret German wartime
documents dealing with Auschwitz were confiscated after the war by the Allies. But not a single one refers to
a policy or program of extermination. In fact, the familiar Auschwitz extermination story cannot be reconciled
with the documentary evidence. Evidence shows those unable to work were, a very high percentage of the Jewish
inmates, and were treated in the hospital or clinic. German telex message dated 1943 CE from the chief of the
Labor Allocation department, reported that of 25,000 Jews held in Auschwitz, only 3,581 or 14% were able to work,
and that all of the remaining Jewish inmates — some 21,500, or about 86% were unable to work. 1944 CE
report on “security measures in Auschwitz” by Oswald Pohl, head of the camp system, to Heinrich Himmler
reported that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp complex, of whom 18,000 were
hospitalized or disabled and in Auschwitz II camp there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom “approximately
15,000 are unable to work.” This camp II was established primarily as a camp for Jews who were not able to work,
including the sick and elderly. A Jewish scholar Arno Mayer, a professor of history at Princeton University,
acknowledges in his 1988 CE book about the “final solution” that more Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result
of typhus and other “natural” causes than were executed. Auschwitz had a Swimming Pool, Soccer Field, Post Office,
Cinema, Hospital, Art Studio & Classes, Dental Office, Six Camp Orchestras, and a Library with 45,000 books.
The elegant swimming-pool at Auschwitz was built by the inmates, who would sunbathe there on Saturday and
Sunday afternoons. 1944 CE there are photos showing a fencing tournament for prisoners at Auschwitz (note
the sign in the background). Postcards written from Auschwitz still exist and the postman would collect the mail
twice-weekly. Auschwitz was visited monthly by International Red Cross inspection teams who were allowed
to speak to prisoner representatives alone, in order to hear first-hand of any mistreatment, chicanery,
interruption of mail and parcel delivery, health concerns, food and ration matters etc.
 
1942 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Auschwitz Nurses and Doctors provided Medical Care and Special Treatment
to Inmates in sickbays and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured. The camp authorities, and the
garrison physician Dr. Wirths, tried with all conceivable means to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive and healthy.
 
1943 CE-1968 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — The Office of Strategic Services (OSS) was the CIA’s “black propaganda”
branch during WW II. At its peak in late 1944, the OSS employed almost 13,000 men and women. OSS agent and
propagandist says 6,000,000 Jews will be obliterated Wallace R. Deuel, a Chicago-born political scientist who
worked at the American University in Beirut and wrote anti-German books and advised Walt Disney on anti-German
propaganda cartoons and was OSS special assistant to OSS’s director William J. Donovan. 1954 CE-1968 CE Deuel
held numerous senior positions in the CIA in which he oversaw propaganda, and he was also the CIA representative
at the White House during the Kennedy administration (close to a future dead president). “The Nazis set out in
the beginning to destroy whole peoples. They expected to obliterate from the earth not
less than 6,000,000 Jews as a beginning.” Says the propagandist Wallace R. Deuel.
 
1943 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — David Irving said, “As late as August 1943 the head of the (British) PWE
[Psychological Warfare Executive] minuted the Cabinet secretly that despite the stories they were putting out,
there was not the slightest evidence that such contraptions (tools of genocide) existed.” This attitude changed
in 1944, when British Intelligence finally came to believe its own atrocity propaganda, as it was recycled back to them
through the chaos and fury of war.
 
1944 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — BRITISH MINISTRY OF INFORMATION SAID IN 1944 THAT HOLOCAUST
ATROCITY PROPAGANDA MUST BE CREATED TO DISTRACT FROM ASHKENAZI USSR MASSACRES OF 66+
MILLION RUSSIANS – MOSTLY CHRISTIANS – February 29, 1944 CE letter to the BBC & higher members of the
British clergy, from the British Ministry of Information ordered the propaganda buildup against the Germans.
Today, the BBC has begun to play a major role in recycling these lies and propaganda back to their point of
origin in Poland. These broadcasts in effect created a feedback loop that repeated and gave authority to Polish
rumors, which were then re-injected back into Poland. — The Gas Chambers of Sherlock Holmes by Samuel Crowell
 
1945 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — British Intelligence decrypted German reports show
that 39% of German prisoners were Jews, 65% Poles and only 3% Russians.
 
1945 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Picture of the detainees who were left to be freed by the Soviet Army
in January 1945. Again, see for yourself how healthy even the sick looks. Many children are among
them too.
 

1 minute video — JEWISH FRENCH PROFESSOR’S VIEWS ON “HOLY-COST! (sic)”

ENDS DEBATE = ONE OF THE BIGGEST BAMBOOZLES OF ALL TIME! = TRUTH FROM
WHAT ASHKENAZIS CALL A SELF-HATING ASHKENAZI ABOUT THE LIES OF THE HOLY-COST
Click here to see video in separate window:  Click for Video
 
1945 CE: HOLOCAUST FACT WITH HOAX — Bruno Baum, a former communist inmate in Auschwitz, was
allowed to brag in summer 1945 in a Soviet newspaper: “The whole propaganda which started about
Auschwitz abroad was initiated by us [communist inmates] with the help of our Polish comrades.” (Deutsche
Volkszeitung, Soviet paper in occupied East Germany, 31 July 1945). Thus, it is not surprising to learn that
during several trials in Germany, it emerged that the testimony of witnesses from eastern Europe had been
orchestrated by communist authorities. — THE HOLOCAUST CONTROVERSY
The Case For Open Debate An Introduction by Germar Rudolf in 1991 CE.
 
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “Of course, no physical evidence whatsoever was shown to verify the
alleged homicidal gas chambers, despite knowledge of their existence being denied
by every single defendant.” —Jason Myers, on the Nuremberg trials of 1946 CE.
 
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The only thing at Auschwitz resembling a human gas chamber was constructed
in 1946 by Stalin of the Ashkenazi USSR that mass murdered 66+ million Russians, mostly Christians.
 
1946 CE-Today: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Not a single diagnosis of death by cyanide poisoning is on record for
any German labor camp. No trace whatever remains of the millions of bodies allegedly gassed in the German
labor camps. None of the war generals after the war who wrote their memoirs made any allusion to human gas
chambers or indeed to any intention to exterminate an ethnic group. The Red Cross made normal, routine
visits to Auschwitz during the war, and its published reports made no allusion to any ongoing
human gassing there. No authentic documents attesting to “The Holocaust” exist anywhere.
 
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — Report of Council on Foreign Relations – Funded by Rockefeller-Rothschilds
Crime Syndicate — Made up their mind that no “revisionism” was to be encouraged after World War II:
“The Committee on Studies of the Council on Foreign Relations is concerned that the debunking journalistic
campaign following World War I should not be repeated and believes that the American public deserves
a clear and competent statement of our basic aims and activities during the second World War.”
 
1946 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Illegal Jewish immigrants were sprayed by British as a precaution
against typhus carrying lice with large AMOUNTS OF ZYKLON-B USED ALSO AT THE CAMPS.
 
1948 CE-1949 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume
 “Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War”.
In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the German camps. They were not allowed to
interview prisoners in the Ashkenazi run USSR (Russian) camps. The Official International Red Cross Records
of WWII at Arolsen, Germany show Actual prison camp Total Deaths at 271,301 people. The Bad Arolsen archives
list everyone who lived and died in all the German labor camps. The question naturally arises as to what is the total
number recorded in this tremendous archive. Clearly, the managers of this archive are not at liberty to tell of this
or they would be jailed for so awful a crime, but we know the FACTS! But fortunately, the Red Cross Report was
a 1650 page detailed report that never mentioned a gas chamber and showed approximately 271,300 total
dead for all the camps.
 
 
1950 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — “…most of the memoirs and reports [of ‘Holocaust survivors’] are full of
preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante
philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…”
— Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65.
 
1968 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — ANTI-GERMAN HATE SPEECH shows where these motives to LIE AND SPREAD
HATE PROPAGANDA are focused — “Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate —
healthy, virile hate — for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German.
To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead.” — Elie Wiesel, The Legends of Our Time
 
1979 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was
technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research
regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas
chambers, and there can never be one.” — Published in the prominent French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979 CE.
 
1980 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — Diary of Anne Frank was totally debunked by a lawsuit in a German court.
German state forensic bureau examined the original “diary” manuscript found “significant” portions of the
work were written with a ballpoint pen, but ballpoint pens were not available before 1951. They also found
that none of the “diary” handwriting matched known examples of Anne’s handwriting, but all of the writing in
the “diary” was by the same hand. Therefore, the entire “diary” was a postwar fake. The true author of the
diary was Jewish novelist Meyer Levin, who demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payment for his work in
a court action against Anne’s father, Otto Frank. But even more weird is the Diary was Co-Authored by Anne
Franks Father and controlled by SWISS in Basel, Switzerland. All done years after the war.
 
1982 CE-2001 CE: HOLOCAUST HOAX — “Holocaust denial” laws are the result of a well-organized, long-term
Jewish campaign. In 1982 CE, the Institute for Jewish Affairs in London, a London-based agency of the
World Jewish Congress, announced that it was launching a worldwide campaign to persuade and pressure
governments to outlaw “Holocaust denial.” The anti-revisionist laws that were subsequently enacted in several
European countries reflect the success of this initiative. Germany enacted its “Holocaust denial” statute in
1985 CE (amended in 1994 CE), France in 1990 CE, Austria in 1992 CE, Belgium in 1995 CE, and Slovakia in
2001 CE. Underscoring the organized nature of this campaign, the International Association of Jewish
Lawyers and Jurists in June 1998 CE called for new and more severe laws against “Holocaust denial.”
 
1991 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf (1964 CE-Today) is an author and chemist who was amazingly
convicted of the SILLY CHARGE of Holocaust denier. After his military service with the German Air Force, in 1990
CE he joined the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research at Stuttgart, where he prepared a PhD thesis.
In 1991 CE, Rudolf began work on a paper entitled Report on the formation and verifiability of cyanide
compounds in the Auschwitz “gas chambers” and in 1993 CE, this work was reported in the media, and Rudolf
was told not to enter the Max Planck Institute again without permission. When he did so, his employment was
terminated without notice. OTHER VICTIMS OF HOLY-COST INSANITY include Ernst Zundel, Sylvia Stolz
and Vincent Reynouard.
 
1985 CE and 1988 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Zundel Trials, a famous court trial with expert witness
Raul Hilberg was at a loss when asked: “Can you give me one scientific report that shows the existence of
gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory?” — Zundel’s Defense counsel Doug Christie asked Hilberg
in a day-long rapid fire of cross-examination. “I am at a loss,” Hilberg replied. “You are (at a loss) because
you can’t,” Christie said. “The witness countered that there are aerial photographs of concentration camps,
examples of ruined or reconstructed gas chambers, German industrial documents describing the lethal nature
of various gases and filters for gas masks were found at the camps.” During this trial, not a single
eyewitness for the plaintiff could be found. Zundel won and they finally stopped harassing him.
 

Ernst Zundel, a Canadian, was denied entry into the United States

and his story is an example of the HOAX EXPOSED COMPLETELY.

$80 BILLION to $100 BILLION “HOLY-COST” SCAM SINCE WW II AND EVEN BACK
TO 1915 OR BEFORE!
TIME TO GET THE FACTS OUT AND END THE LIES AND SCAMS!
Click here to see video in separate window:  Click for Video
 
1995 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf was sentenced to 14 months in prison for “inciting racial hatred”
(TELLING THE TRUTH) by the district court of Stuttgart because of his dissertation research now known as the
“Rudolf Report”. Rudolf avoided prison by fleeing to Spain, England, and finally
to the United States. All the while, criminal investigations continued in Germany.
 
1995 CE: KABALISTIC ORIGINS OF THE SIX MILLION FIGURE — Ben Weintraub’s book, Holocaust Dogma Of
Judaism, fully explores and explains the Kabalistic occultism involved in the number. 6,000,000 as the number
of perfect souls times ten, and ten is number of the Sephiroth, the divine emanations of G_d as seen in the Kabala.
The 6 million number was published over and over in newspaper as revealed by Ashkenazi Friedman from 1916 CE-Today!
 
1996 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — University of Stuttgart asked Rudolf to withdraw his application for a final PhD
examination, or it would be denied, rendering his PhD thesis worthless. The university said Rudolf used his
academic credentials or knowledge to commit a crime – Meaning facts about “HOLY-COST!” Rudolf knew
his work would be associated with Holocaust denial, but stated that his findings at Auschwitz and Birkenau
“completely shattered his world view” when he found only insignificant traces of cyanide compounds can be found
in the samples taken from Auschwitz.
 
1996 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “It is necessary to recognize that the lack of traces involves the inability
to directly establish the reality of the existence of homicidal gas chambers.” — French
‘historian’ Jacques Baynac, Le Nouveau Quotidien (Lausanne, Switzerland), Sept. 3, 1996 CE, p. 14.
 
1997 CE-2013 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf began to publish books on Holocaust CHEMICAL FACTS
and founded Castle Hill Publishers in 1997 based in Hastings, England and was linked to Theses & Dissertations Press
as its American outlet. In 2000, Rudolf initiated an English language Holocaust Handbooks Series which, as of 2013,
encompassed 25 titles. Until his arrest in late 2005, he published the now defunct “Quarterly journal for free historical research.”
 
2000 CE: HOLOCAUST TEACHING — “Care must be taken not to give a platform for deniers… or seek to disprove
the deniers’ position through normal historical debate and rational argument.” —
‘Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust’ at the Stockholm International Forum, 2000 CE.
 
2003 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — The Holocaust story has served to create a highly profitable business for
large numbers of Jews, something which the honest Jewish professor Norman Finkelstein described as the
“Holocaust Industry” in his book of the same name (The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation
of Jewish Suffering, Verso Books, 2003). The “Holocaust” served (and still serves) well in justifying the Zionist
seizure of Palestine. Any criticism of the overt human rights violations and atrocities
committed by the state of Israel against the Palestinians is dismissed as “anti- Semitism.”
 

THE OUTRIGHT EMBARRASSMENT OF ISRAELIS AND THEIR EVIL IS TOSSED

BACK AT THEM BY NORMAN FINKELSTEIN, A BRAVE AND HONEST LEADER!

Click here to see video in separate window:  Click for Video
 
2004 CE-2010 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — Germar Rudolf, THE TRUTH TELLER, in district court of Mannheim
grabbed Rudolf’s bank account to rob 55% of Rudolf’s business turnover from the years 2001-2004, but at
that time the account contained only some €5,000. Rudolf and his associates had earned this money by
selling TRUTH TELLING publications banned in Germany, but Rudolf’s business was in the UK and the US.
In 2004, Rudolf married a US citizen and settled in Chicago, and they later had a child. For some reason he
had to apply for political asylum, or at least for the right not to be expelled, but this was turned down.
In 2005 Immigration Services said that Rudolf did not have a right to stay with his family and was extradited to
Germany and on arrival was arrested by the police and transferred to a prison in Rottenburg, then to another in
Stuttgart in Baden-Württemberg. In 2007, the German Court sentenced him to two years and six months in
prison for TELLING THE TRUTH or as the court put it “inciting hatred, disparaging the dead, and libel.” The German
police confiscated copies of his “Lectures on the Holocaust” and destroyed. In 2009 the TRUTH
TELLER Rudolf was released from prison and now lives in the US with his wife and daughter.
 
2007 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief even in people who know very
little about it. We can see that not only does disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern Jewish identity as
shaped by political Zionism, but for others it brings into question the credibility of those in authority who
told everyone it was true: the state, the churches, the schools, and media of every kind. These sources are the
same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If these trusted authorities are wrong about
the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other dishonesties are they promoting?”
– John Weir, The Holocaust as Myth: Betraying the Public Trust. https://codoh.com/library/document/680/
 
2015 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s
knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or
return towards its source.” – Robert Faurisson, The revisionists’ total victory on the historical and scientific level – click link:
 
2016 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “If the Holocaust were unimportant, we wouldn’t have around 20 countries on
this planet outlawing its critical investigation. In fact, this is the only historical topic that is regulated by penal
law. This is proof for the fact that the powers that be consider this topic to be the most important issue to keep
under their strict control. Those censoring, suppressing powers are the real criminals—not the historical
dissidents they send to prison.” – Germar Rudolf, Logic and Reason Can and Will Destroy the Holocaust Establishment,
 
2016 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s
knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance
or return towards its source.” – Robert Faurisson. When we ask detailed and pointed questions, our historians
fall short. They don’t really know when, where, or how the Jews died. They have no technical explanation of how
it was possible. They cannot find the mass graves that allegedly held thousands of bodies. And they refuse to
even consider a raft of contradictory evidence. The ‘Holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives
ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted and even put in prison. Truth needs no
protection from scrutiny, but lies do.
 
2017 CE: HOLOCAUST FACTS — “The three victor nations, Russia, America and Britain, collaborated together
at Nuremberg to fabricate the horrorillusion, which would enable the US/UK to gain the post-war moral high
ground, even after incinerating the German cities with two million tons of bombs. People were loath to
believe that such a thing could have happened – until maybe after Iraq, when we saw how British-American
intelligence had fabricated the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) lie without a tremor of conscience.
Only then, I suggest, does it start to dawn upon the world that the notion of big human gas chambers was
the original WMD hoax.” – Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom Breaking the Spell — The Holocaust, Myth & Reality.
 
Today CE: ASHKEANAZI FACTS — We know Ashkenazis are the Masters of Make-Believe to make the world
believe in Death Camps. They now infest Hollywood with the fakery and lies continually spewing out falsehoods
to gain sympathy for a group of ROTHSCHILDS CRIME SYNDICATE CRIMINALS attacking Americans and
Europeans with their propaganda and outright lies. Today’s Hollywood Ashkenazis are the heirs of the
original crop of wartime Hollywood producers and directors who were called into service by the U.S. Army to “document”
(PROPAGANDIZE) the concentration camps.
 _________________________________________________
 

HOLOHOAX TRICK:
WESTERN LABOR CAMPS vs EASTERN DEATH CAMPS
 
 
For the past 20 years or so, it has been fun to watch how the ever-evolving field of "Holocaust Studies"
adjusts to new discoveries which contradict the original narrative. For example, when it became
apparent that there wasn't actually any documentation to support the Holohoax, the Holohoaxers
abandoned their 50 year old mantra of "It's well documented!", and seamlessly transitioned to:
"The Germans destroyed the documents" mode.
 
Another addition to Holocaustianity is the distinction that is now made between "work camps"
and "extermination camps." You see, as pathetic and self-abasing as modern day German guilt-trippers
are, they still aren't going to say that a certain German-based camp, Dachau for example, had
homicidal gas chambers when it didn't; or that "millions" died there when they didn't. The fact
that the West, in spite of its intellectual tyranny, was still much more open and free that the old
Soviet bloc, began to complicate things for the Holohoaxers. For that reason, all of internment
camps which were located in the West are now described as "work camps" whereas seven
of those located in Poland and Ukraine have been classified as "extermination camps." 
 
The chart below was copied from 'The Jewish Virtual Library " -- which pulled the information
from the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Notice where the seven "annihilation camps"
(in red) are said to have been located:
 

Auschwitz-Birkenau
Poland
Annihilation;
Forced Labor
     
Belzec
Poland
Annihilation
     
Bergen-Belsen
Germany
Holding Center
     
Buchenwald
Germany
Forced Labor
     
Chelmno
Poland
Annihilation
     
Dachau
Germany
Forced Labor
     
Dora-Mittelbau
Germany
Forced Labor
     
Flossenburg
Germany
Forced Labor
     
Gross-Rosen
Poland
Forced Labor
     
Janowska
Ukraine
Annihilation;
Forced Labor
     
Kaiserwald
Latvia
Forced Labor
     
Majdanek
Poland
Annihilation
     
Mauthausen
Austria
Forced Labor
     
Natzweiler-Struthof
France
Forced Labor
     
Neuengamme
Germany
Forced Labor
     
Oranienburg
Germany
Holding Center
     
Plaszow
Poland
Forced Labor
     
Ravensbruck
Germany
Forced Labor
     
Sachsenhausen
Germany
Forced Labor
     
Sobibor
Poland
Annihilation
     
Stutthof
Poland
Forced Labor
     
Terezin
Czech Republic
Holding Center/Transit
     
Treblinka
Poland
Annihilation
     
Westerbork
Netherlands
Transit
     
You see that? Six of the "annihilation camps" were based in Poland, one in Ukraine; but zero
in either of the western states Germany, France or the Netherlands. That's a very
weird "anomaly." Why the east-west divide between "work" and "extermination"?
 
It's elementary dear reader, elementary. If you know anything at all about World War II and the
subsequent birth of "The Iron Curtain", you know that no western researchers, no aid workers,
no religious groups, no Red Cross volunteers, no human rights activists, no investigative
researchers and no do-gooders of any stripe ever got a chance to poke around in Joe Stalin's
Communist post-war front yard of Poland or Ukraine. Therein lies the rub! Hence, the
Holohoaxers, both then and now, can make any claim they want to in regard to what took place in
the air-tight closed east. 
 
In 1945, it was essential for the Holohoaxers to keep the "annihilation camps" mainly in Stalin's
Poland & Ukraine. Seventy years later, it is essential the Holohoaxers to keep the "annihilation
camps" completely in Poland & Ukraine.  By now, the Stalinist tales of "gas chambers" and
"millions dead" have become ossified. The modern-day Poles and Russians have no interest in rocking
this leaky boat because theyweren't the ones falsely accused.
 
 
The Bottom Line:
 
Belief in the purely eastern-front "extermination" Holohoax necessarily
requires blind faith in the press releases of Joe Stalin and his propaganda
henchmen, as well as claims about the eastern camps which could never be verified!
 
 
 https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/591580/joseph-stalin.jpg Image result for happy jew
 
"We would never lie to you. Trust us."
 
___________________________________________________________________
 
 
 

Click on this text to watch HOLOCAUST: Shifting the Blame, Part 1, Jews for Hitler...

.

.

View the REAL PLAN for a massive HOLOCAUST perpetrated by JEWS titled EUROPA THE LAST BATTLE (Part 5)...

_______________________________________________________________________________________

.

 
Concentration Camp Money

'Lagergeld' used to Pay Prisoners for Their Work

Article from The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 7-9.
The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C. 20003, USA.
By Jennifer White, administrative director of TBR;

 

Far from being the "death camps" as you have heard so often, places like Auschwitz,
Dachau and Buchenwald were not in the business of extermination. They were
work camps, critical to the German war effort. But did you know that the Jewish
workers were compensated for their labor with scrip printed specifically for their
use in stores, canteens and even brothels? The prisoner monetary system was
conceived in ghettos such as Lodz, carried to camps such as Auschwitz and Dachau
and still existed in the displaced persons camps that were established by the Allies
after World War II. Here is the story of the money the court historians do not want
you to even suspect existed.
 

Piles of incinerated corpses were indicting images at Nuremberg, used to prove that

the German-run concentration camps during World War II were intended for purposes of

exterminating the Jews of Europe. However, a plethora of documentary evidence, long

suppressed, shows that prisoners were relatively well-treated, compensated for their

hard work and allowed to purchase luxuries to which even the German public did not have

ready access. This is not the image of abject deprivation that the Holocaust lobby

would like you to entertain.

 


 
 
The irrefutable proof is the existence of a means of exchange for goods and services:
Money. There were at least 134 separate issues, in different denominations and styles,
for such notorious places as Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Dachau, Oranienburg, Ravensbrück,
Westerbork and at least 15 other camps. (See Paper Money of the World Part I:
Modern Issues of Europe by Arnold Keller, Ph.D., 1956, pp. 23-25 for a complete listing.)
 

A monetary system was also in existence in the ghettos, most notably Theresienstadt and Lodz,

which produced beautiful notes (veritable works of art) that make U.S. currency look dull.

 

There are numerous dealers in rare currency and numismatics who specialize in selling

"concentration camp money" or "Holocaust money" as it has been sometimes called.

But the very fact of its existence does not seem to have raised questions - as it should have

- about what really did (and did not) happen inside the so-called

"death camps" where the Holocaust scrip was circulating in the first place.

 

This scrip was not negotiable outside of the camp for which it was issued. This decreased

the chance of a successful escape and made it impossible for the general public to purchase

some of the rare luxuries available in the camps. According to Albert Pick in

Das Lagergeld der Konzentrations- und D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945:

 

 


    Inmates were not paid for the work but were given "coupons" now and then to
     buy things in the "Kantine".... As the war progressed badly and the number
     of workers declined, the KZ worker potential became important. Offers of "premiums"
     and other advantages were made to the inmates, tobacco was offered and even
     visits to bordellos.... In order that these scrips could not
     be used outside the camps, special money was printed.

Letter from Prisoner No. 11647 Block 28/3 Dachau KIII on

September 8, 1940 to his relative in Litzmannstadt (Lodz):

 

 

    I must write you something about myself. I am very well. In the canteen I buy

     honey, marmalade, cookies, fruit and other food. If you worry about me, you'll
    indeed be committing a sin. I have more reason to worry about you....
    (Letters
     from the Doomed: Concentration Camp Correspondence 1940-1945
    , Richard S. Geehr.)

There was a payment schedule at Theresienstadt utilizing Th. kr. (Theresienstadt kroner)

as the unit of exchange. (The Shekel Vol. XVI, No. 2, March-April 1983 p. 29). The breakdown looked like this:

 

 

    Working men, according to their jobs: 105-205 Th. kr.
    Working women, according to their jobs: 95-205 Th. kr.
    Part-time workers: 80 Th. kr.
    Caretakers: 70 Th. kr.
    War-wounded and holders of the Iron Cross,
     First Class degree or higher: 195 Th. kr.
    Prominente (doctors, professors, scientists, well-known
    cultural artists and politicians): 145 Th. kr.


To put this in perspective, a cup of coffee cost 2 Th. kr. The circulation in Theresienstadt

was such that it was necessary to print over 5 million notes. See Papirove Penize Na Uzemi

Ceskoslovenska 1762-1975, Second Edition, 1975, Hradek Kralove, trans. by Julius Sem, pp. 134-135.

 

The first worker's camp to have its own scrip was Oranienburg. Before using the camp scrip

they used German currency in nearby towns, but the authorities decided to centralize.

Currency was exchanged for camp money, less 30%. (The Shekel, Vol XVI, No. 2, March-April

1983, p. 40: "Concentration Camp Money of the Nazi Holocaust" by Steven Feller.)

 

Similarly at Buchenwald:

 

 

 

    Each prisoner was allowed up to 10 marks per week to be used for the purchase
     of cigarettes at the camp canteen, other canteen purchases, brothel visits, or
     credit to a savings account. The regulations went on to specify that a visit to a
    brothel would cost 2 marks for which 1.5 marks would be kept by
    the SS and 0.5 marks would be used for "expenses."
    (Ibid., p. 41.)


Was there a similar situation at all of the other camps - at least those that issued currency?

As this includes Auschwitz, it would be shocking indeed to even consider marmalade and

cigarettes being purchased in this "death camp." Even the existence of money in camps gives

us a look at what life was really like there, yet this information has yet to make it

to the History Channel.

 
 
 

Bibliography:

American Israel Numismatic Association (Temarac, Florida).

Pick, Albert. Das Lagergeld der Konzentrations- und D.P.-Lager: 1933-1945, Munich, Battenberg Publishers, 1976.

Schöne, Michael H., Das Papiergeld im besetzten Deutschland 1945-1949, Regenstauf: Gietl, 1994.

Stahl, Zvi, Jewish Ghettos and Concentration Camps' Money, 1933-1945, London: D. Richman Books, 1990.


See also:

Campbell, Lance K., Dachau concentration camp scrip, Margate, Florida: American Israel Numismatic Association, 1992.

The Numismatist, April 1981, by Steven Feller.

Numismatic Scrapbook Magazine, 1965, 1996, "POW Money and Medals" by Slabaugh, R. Arlie.

Schultze, Manfred, Unsere Arbeit - unsere Hoffnung: Das Ghetto in Lodz 1940-1945, Schwalmtal: Phil-Creativ, 1995.

Sem, Julius, Standard Catalog of World Paper Money, 1977 (Theresienstadt notes).

Shtarot, Vol. I, No. 2, Oct. 1976. Yasha L. Beresiner.

 

___________________________________________________________________

 

 

Click on this text to watch a six minute video titled: Hard Facts Of The Holocaust Lies...

.

.

Click on this text to examine the enhanced HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE...

 ___________________________________________________________________________

 

 

“New Pages” of Anne Frank Diary Prove

that Her Father Wrote Most of the Book

 

Two “newly discovered” pages from the “Diary of Anne Frank” — which supposedly

contain risqué jokes — are in fact further proof that the book attributed to the Jewish

teenager was in fact written by her father — because the “hidden” writing is,

like most of the rest of the “diary,” in her father Otto Frank’s handwriting.

 

(The New Observer)

 

The “newly-discovered” pages were announced at a press conference at the “Anne Frank House”

museum in Amsterdam, where researchers apparently were able to remove two brown

paper pasted pages and “read” the obscured writing underneath using lamps and optical

character recognition technology.

 

The compliant Jewish lobby controlled media focused all its attention on the contents of

the “new pages,” but ignored the obvious fact of the difference in handwriting styles on

the new pages, with the “new material” all in her father’s handwriting,

which contrasts obviously and strongly with the juvenile scrawl of Anne herself.

 

In fact, as revealed in 2015, most of the diary was written by her father after the war,

and who then passed it off as “real” in order to sell it as a “holocaust memoir.”

 

The scam was revealed in an article in the New York Times that year, when the copyright

holders to the diary admitted Otto Frank’s involvement in an attempt to extend their

control of the manuscript.

 

 
 

As the New York Times pointed out, when “Otto Frank first published his daughter’s

red-checked diary and notebooks, he wrote a prologue assuring readers that the book mostly

contained her words, written while hiding from the Nazis in a secret annex of a factory in Amsterdam.”

 

Normal copyright on books extends only 70 years after the author’s death. As Anne Frank

died of typhus in Bergen Belsen in February 1945, the book theoretically entered the public

domain in February 2015.

But, as the New York Times went on to say, the Anne Frank Fonds has now decided to

try to extend copyright on the book past the 70 year cut-off period—by

admitting that Otto Frank, who died in 1980, was indeed a “co-author” after all.

 

The implications of this admission are obvious. As the New York Times put it:

 

While the foundation, the Anne Frank Fonds, in Basel, signaled its intentions a year ago,

warnings about the change have provoked a furor as the deadline approaches. Some

people opposed to the move have declared that they would defy the foundation

and publish portions of her text.

 

Foundation officials “should think very carefully about the consequences,” said Agnès Tricoire,

a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights in France, where critics

have been the most vociferous and are organizing a challenge. “If you follow their

arguments, it means that they have lied for years about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank.”

 

The latest pages confirm once again that much of what is claimed to be “Anne Frank’s diary”

was in fact written by her father after the war—a fact which also explains the use of ball

point pen in the “diary,” a writing device which only became available after 1945.

 

 

 

 

Click on this text to examine the Anne Frank Fraud.

 

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________________________________________________

The Secular Religion of the 'HOLOCAUST'


The religion of "the Holocaust" is a secular one: it belongs to the lay world; it is profane;
in actuality, it has at its disposal the secular arm, that is a temporal authority with dreaded power.
It has its dogma, its commandments, its decrees, its prophets and its high priests. As one
revisionist has observed, it has its circle of saints, male and female, amongst whom, for
example, Saint Anne (Frank), Saint Simon (Wiesenthal) and Saint Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy
places, its rituals and its pilgrimages. It has its sacred (and macabre) buildings and its relics ...
_________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Click on this text to meet URSULA HAVERBECK who will spend her 91st Birthday in a German prison for questioning the holocaust fraud.

Click on this text to examine PEOPLE EXPOSING THE HOLOCAUST LIES...

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
 
 
 

Click on this text to watch JIM RIZOLI - HOLO-FACTS

.

 

.


 

Click on this text to examine an actual holocaust perpetrated by JEWS upon the Ukrainians.

 
 
 ______________________________________
 
 
Allied Attacks Killed Thousands of Camp Inmates: The 1945 'Cap Arcona' and 'Thielbek' Sinkings
Mark Weber -- Institute for Historical Review
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n4p-2_Weber.html

All prisoners of German wartime concentration camps who perished while in German custody
are routinely regarded as "victims of Nazism" -- even if they lost their lives as direct or
indirect result of Allied policy ... Among the German concentration camp prisoners who perished
at Allied hands were some 7,000 inmates who were killed during the war's final week as they
were being evacuated in three large German ships that were attacked by British war
planes. This little-known tragedy is one of history's greatest maritime disasters.
 
 
 

Auschwitz Chemistry: How Science Proves The ‘Final Solution’

Was Systematically Gassing Lice Infested Clothing To Save Lives

By John Wear

 

 

 

 

 

 

Above: “Gassing Clothing”. Left: Healthy inmates at work sterilizing clothing. 

 

Right: Healthy prisoners at Auschwitz working in oneof the larger clothing disinfestation chambers in the camp.

Above: The Auschwitz camp employed a number of delousing stations, which used steam and Zyklon-B to kill lice in

prisoner clothing. This picture shows autoclave number 2, seen from the “dirty” clothing side. Infected clothing was put

on hangers attached to a trolley and pushed inside the chamber. Dirty clothes were put on hangers on a trolley which was

pushed into the chamber on two short rails. The disinfection stations were constructed with double doors so that the

infected and cleaned clothes would not be mixed together. This picture was taken while the camp was operational.

 

Source: Peter Winter, Chapter 10- Auschwitz

Source: https://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com/

The Chemistry of Auschwitz/Birkenau

Defenders of the Holocaust story have attempted to discredit scientific reports which disprove the existence of homicidal

gas chambers at German camps during World War II. For example, Deborah Lipstadt’s defense attorney, Richard Rampton,

referred in court to The Leuchter Report as “…a piece of so-called research which is not worth the paper it is written on…”[1]

 

Dr. Richard Green states about Germar Rudolf:

 

Owing to the fact that he actually has some understanding of chemistry, many of his deceptions are more sophisticated

than other Holocaust deniers…Ultimately, he engages in the same deceptions and specious arguments as [Fred] Leuchter

and [Walter] Lüftl , but the case he makes for those deceptions and arguments involves more difficult chemistry.”[2]

 

This article will discuss attempts by chemists to discredit scientific reports which disprove

the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau during World War II.

 

Historical Background

 

In 1988, the Canadian government put Ernst Zündel on trial a second time for the criminal offense of knowingly disseminating

false news about “the Holocaust.” As part of his defense in this trial, Zündel commissioned the American gas-chamber

expert Fred Leuchter to make a scientific examination of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau

and Majdanek. The resulting Leuchter Report is the first scientific study of the alleged German homicidal gas chambers.[3]

 

In addition to reporting that the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek were structurally

unsuitable for gassing, Leuchter researched the chemical properties of the Zyklon B fumigant. Leuchter found that Zyklon B

is a highly toxic compound that releases deadly hydrogen cyanide gas. The released hydrogen cyanide gas clings to

surfaces and  reacts chemically with materials containing iron, forming ferrocyanide compounds that have a distinctive blue

color called Prussian Blue. Since building materials normally contain a certain amount of rust (iron oxide, usually between

one and four percent), repeated exposure to hydrogen cyanide gas would result in Prussian Blue staining on the walls

of the alleged gas chambers.[4]

 

Leuchter took forensic samples from the alleged gas chambers at the visited sites and a control sample from the delousing

facility at Birkenau. The samples were analyzed by an independent laboratory in the United States. The laboratory found

no significant ferrocyanide compound traces in the samples taken from the alleged homicidal gas chambers, but the

sample from a wall of the Birkenau delousing facility had heavy concentrations of the ferrocyanide compounds. Leuchter

concluded that this result would be impossible if the alleged homicidal gas chambers had been repeatedly exposed to

hydrogen cyanide gas.[5]

 

Germar Rudolf, a certified chemist, expanded on Leuchter’s work by writing the Rudolf Report in the spring of 1992.

The Rudolf Report, which has been updated and revised several times, focused on engineering and chemical aspects

of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau. Rudolf observed in his on-site examinations that all

of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof and Majdanek have one thing in common: their walls are permeated

with Prussian Blue. Not only the inner surfaces, but also the outside walls and the mortar between the bricks of the delousing

facilities have Prussian Blue staining. Nothing of this sort can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas

chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau.

 

Rudolf also took samples from the alleged homicidal gas chambers and the delousing facilities at Auschwitz and Birkenau.

Similar to Leuchter’s samples, the alleged homicidal gas chambers exhibit only insignificant traces of ferrocyanide residue

on the same order of magnitude found in any other building. The samples from the delousing chambers, however, all

showed very high ferrocyanide residues. Rudolf determined that, if mass execution gassings with hydrocyanic acid had

taken place in the alleged homicidal gas chambers, the rooms in the alleged homicidal gas chambers would exhibit similar

ferrocyanide residue as the delousing chambers. Therefore, Rudolf concluded that mass gassings

with Zyklon B did not occur in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau.[6]

 

Kraków Institute of Forensic Research

 

The Kraków Institute of Forensic Research published results in 1994 that attempted to refute the Leuchter Report.

The team from this forensic institute led by Dr. Jan Markiewicz claims not to have understood how it was possible for

Prussian Blue to have formed in walls as a result of their being exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas. The researchers therefore

excluded Prussian Blue and similar iron cyanide compounds from their analyses, resulting in much lower cyanide traces

for the delousing chambers. Their analysis made it practically impossible to distinguish between rooms massively exposed

to hydrogen cyanide and those which were not: all would have a cyanide residue of close to zero. The Kraków researchers

concluded from their analysis that since the gas chambers and delousing facilities all

had the same amount of cyanide residues, humans were gassed in the gas chambers.

 

Germar Rudolf gave the Kraków researchers irrefutable proof that Prussian Blue can be formed in walls exposed to

hydrogen cyanide gas, citing a case document in expert literature.[7] The authors of the Kraków

report refused to change their report and admit they made a mistake. Rudolf writes:

 

The only ‘scientific’ attempt to refute Frederick A. Leuchter’s most intriguing thesis turns out to be one of the

biggest scientific frauds of the 20th century. How desperate must they be—those who try to defend the established

version of the Holocaust, i.e., the alleged systematic extermination of Jews in

homicidal ‘gas chambers’, that they resort to such obviously fraudulent methods?”[8]

 

British science historian Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom also refuted the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research

report, as succinctly summarized by the retired professor of the philosophy of science Dr. James H. Fetzer:

 

When the Auschwitz museum was confronted with the fact that the innocuous delousing chambers at Auschwitz

have blue walls–due to being saturated with blue iron cyanide compounds–but the alleged homicidal gas chambers

have not, they commissioned their own chemical research. Instead of testing wall samples for the chemicals

that had caused the blue stains, the researchers they commissioned simply excluded those chemicals from their

analysis by employing a procedure that could not detect them. They justified this measure with the claim that

they did not understand exactly how these compounds could form and that they might therefore be mere artifacts.

Researchers who don’t understand what they are investigating have no business becoming involved. In this case,

however, it appears to be deliberate. They have deliberately ignored an obvious explanation–that Zyklon B was only

used for delousing–which would have remedied their lack of comprehension. As a result of this failure to

adhere to the principles of science, they produced a report of no scientific value, which they used to arrive at a

predetermined conclusion.[9]

 

Dr. Arthur Robert Butz writes in regard to the Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report:

 

The argument, to the extent that it was intelligible enough to be summarized at all, was that they did not understand

how the iron-cyanide compounds got to be there, so they decided to ignore them in reaching their conclusions.

I don’t understand how the moon got there, so I will ignore all effects associated with it, such as tides. I hope I don’t drown.”[10]

 

Read Previous Article: 

Wear’s War Movie Review: “Mr Death” An Epic Propaganda Stuff Up & The Jewish Panic To Remedy It

 

Dr. James Roth

 

Dr. James Roth testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he received samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity as

an Analytical Chemist at Alpha Analytical Laboratories. The purpose of the tests was to determine the total iron and cyanide

content in the samples. Dr. Roth testified that the Prussian Blue produced by a reaction of the iron

and hydrogen cyanide could penetrate deeply in porous materials such as brick and iron.[11]

 

Dr. Roth later changed his testimony in a documentary movie titled

 Mr. Deathproduced by Errol Morris. Dr. Roth states in this movie:

 

Cyanide is a surface reaction. It’s probably not going to penetrate more than 10 microns. Human hair is 100 microns

in diameter. Crush this sample up, I have just diluted that sample 10,000; 100,000 times. If you’re going to go

looking for it, you’re going to look on the surface only. There’s no reason to go deep, because it’s not going to be there.[12]

 

Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes that Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death are wrong:

 

The 1999 film about Leuchter features an interview with the chemist [Dr. James Roth] who had done the analysis

of his wall-samples back in 1988. He had done this “blind,” i.e. with no knowledge of where they had come from,

which was correct scientific procedure. During the second Zündel trial in Toronto in 1988 he testified under oath

concerning the method used and what Leuchter had sent him. He said back then that hydrogen cyanide can easily

penetrate into brick and mortar. But then, when he was interviewed again by Morris for his documentary, he

suddenly stated that the results were quite meaningless, because the cyanide could only have soaked a few microns

 into the brickwork. Wow, that was quite a whopper. Mortar and brickwork are highly porous to hydrogen cyanide,

obviously so because the delousing chambers were more or less equally blue inside and out, it had soaked right through.

But you can watch him on video explaining this, as if he were confusing brick and mortar with rock. The latter will only

absorb cyanide to a few microns of its surface.[13]

 

Germar Rudolf writes in regard to Dr. Roth’s statements in Mr. Death:

“It can be shown that Prof. Dr. James Roth is wrong for the following reasons:

 

  1. It is a fact that the walls of the disinfestation chambers in Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof, and Majdanek are saturated
  2.  with cyanide compounds, and this not only superficially, but into the depth of the masonry, as I have demonstrated
  3. by taking samples from different depths of the wall. Compare in this regard my mortar and plaster Sample Pairs
  4.  9 & 11, 12 & 13, 19a & b…, which were each taken at the same spot but at different depths, as well as Sample 17,
  5. taken from below the overlying lime plaster (which is thus similar to 19b). These values prove that hydrogen cyanide
  6. can rather easily reach deep layers of plaster and mortar. But even the other samples taken from the surface prove
  7. that Prof. Roth’s allegation is wrong: Provided that most of the cyanide detectable today is present in the form of
  8.  iron cyanide (Iron Blue and other cyanoferrates), as Prof. Roth assumes himself, his thesis would mean that 10% to
  9. 75% of the iron content of these samples are located in the upper 10 micrometers thin layer of the samples (0.010 mm),
  10. i.e., they are located in less than 1% of the entire sample mass. The rest of the samples, however, would have been
  11.  massively deprived of iron. How this migration of a major portion of iron to a thin surface
  12.  layer would have happened is inexplicable to me. Fact is that this simply could not happen.

  13. Furthermore, expert literature is detailed about the following:

    1. Hydrogen cyanide is an extremely mobile chemical compound with physical properties comparable to water…

    2. Water vapor can quite easily penetrate masonry material, and thus also hydrogen cyanide…

    3. Hydrogen cyanide can easily penetrate thick, porous layers like walls…

  14. In addition, it is generally known that cement and lime mortar are highly porous materials, comparable for instance
  15.  to sponges. In such materials, there does not exist anything like a defined layer of 0.01 mm beyond which hydrogen
  16. cyanide could not diffuse, as there can also be no reason, why water could not penetrate a sponge deeper than a millimeter.
  17.  Steam, for example, which behaves physically comparable to hydrogen cyanide, can very easily penetrate walls.

  18. Finally, the massive discolorations of the outside of the walls of the disinfestation chambers in Birkenau and Stutthof,
  19.  as shown in this expert report, are clearly visible and conclusive evidence for the fact of
  20. how easily hydrogen cyanide and its soluble derivatives can and do penetrate such walls.

As a professor of analytical chemistry, Prof. Roth must know this, so one can only wonder why he spreads such outrageous

nonsense. That Prof. Roth is indeed a competent chemist can be seen from what he said during his testimony under oath

as an expert witness during the above mentioned Zündel trial..: ‘In porous materials such as brick or mortar, the Prussian blue

 [hydrogen cyanide] could go fairly deep as long as the surface stayed open, but as the Prussian 

blue formed, it was possible that it would seal the porous material and stop the penetration.

 

…It is also revealing that Prof. Roth mentioned during this interview that, if he had known where Leuchter’s samples

originated from, his analytical results would have been different. Does that mean that Prof. Roth manipulates his result

according to whether or not he likes the origin of certain samples? Such an attitude is exactly the reason why one should

never tell an ‘independent’ laboratory about the origin of the samples to be analyzed, simply because ‘independence’ is

a very flexible term when it comes to controversial topics. What Prof. Dr. Roth has demonstrated here is only his

lack of professional honesty.”[14]

 

Dr. Richard Green

 

Dr. Richard Green, who has a Ph.D. in Chemistry from Stanford University, agrees with Germar Rudolf that the Prussian Blue

found in the delousing chambers is the result of gassings with hydrogen cyanide. However, Dr. Green offers a possible

alternative explanation for why the outside walls of the delousing chambers having blue staining. Green writes: “…the

discoloration on the outside of walls [of the delousing chambers], ought to make one consider what possible processes

could have taken place outside of the delousing chambers. For example, is it possible that materials that had been

soaked with aqueous solutions of HCN were leaned against the outside of the buildings? Not enough is known, but it is

premature to conclude that the staining on the outside of buildings owes its origins to processes

that took place within those buildings.”[15]

 

Dr. Green’s speculation is absurd. Why would the Germans lean materials that had been soaked with aqueous solutions

of HCN against the outside walls of the delousing chambers? Dr. Green is desperate to find an

alternative reason for the heavy blue staining on the outside walls of the delousing chambers.[16]

 

Germar Rudolf writes in regard to Dr. Green’s speculation:

 

One major rule of science is that it is impermissible to immunize a theory against refutation, here in particular by

inventing untenable auxiliary hypotheses to shore up an otherwise shaky thesis…This is exactly what Dr. Green

is doing: coming up with a ludicrous attempt at explaining a fact which does not

fit into his theory. Yet instead of fixing his theory, he tries to bend reality.”[17]

 

Dr. Green also challenges the possibility of formation of any noticeable quantities of Prussian Blue in the alleged homicidal

gas chambers. Dr. Green writes: “The difference in total cyanides (Prussian blue + non-Prussian blue) owes to the fact

that Prussian blue formed efficiently in the case of the delousing chambers but not in the homicidal gas chambers, and Prussian

blue once formed is likely to remain.”[18]

 

Dr. Green is not able to provide any convincing evidence why Prussian Blue would not form efficiently in the homicidal

gas chambers. For example, Dr. Green states that masonry in the alleged homicidal gas chambers has a neutral pH

value which does not allow for the formation of cyanide salts. Germar Rudolf writes: “But if that were true,

how come huge amounts of cyanides did accumulate in the walls of the disinfestation chambers?”[19]

 

Rudolf has documented with expert literature on the chemistry of building materials that the cement mortars and concretes

used in the alleged homicidal gas chambers are noticeably alkaline for many weeks, months, or even years. These walls

would have been very much inclined to accumulate cyanide salts and to form Prussian Blue, even more so than the lime

plaster of the disinfestation chambers.[20]

 

 

 

Conclusion

 

The alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau could not have been used to exterminate hundreds of

thousands of people as described in pro-Holocaust literature for numerous reasons: 1) they did not have escape-proof

doors and windows; 2) they did not have panic-proof equipment; 3) they did not have technically gastight doors and shutters;

4) they had no provision to quickly release and distribute the poison gas; and 5) they had no effective

device to ventilate or otherwise render ineffective the poison gas after the execution.[21]

 

By contrast, Germany built highly sophisticated and expensive disinfestation facilities at Auschwitz/Birkenau to kill lice

and save inmate lives. By one estimate, the SS at Auschwitz spent almost $1 billion in today’s values to bring the typhus

epidemics raging there under control.[22] An enormous amount of information exists concerning these German

delousing facilities[23], but no similar information exists regarding the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[24]

 

The roof of the semi-underground Morgue #1 of Crematorium II at Birkenau, which is said to have been the building’s

homicidal gas chamber, remains intact to some degree today. Contrary to eyewitness testimony, that roof has no

Zyklon-B-introduction holes. This has been acknowledged by pro-Holocaust researcher Robert Jan van Pelt. Since it is

impossible to close holes measuring 70 x 70 cm from a concrete roof without leaving clearly visible traces, it is certain

that no Zyklon-B-introduction holes ever existed at Crematorium II. Consequently, Zyklon B could not

have been introduced through the roof at this morgue as alleged by pro-Holocaust supporters.[25]

 

As documented in this article, chemists adhering to the orthodox Holocaust narrative have failed to explain why the walls

of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz/ Birkenau are permeated with Prussian Blue, while nothing of this sort can be

observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers. The only reasonable explanation is that Zyklon B

was never used in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes:

 

…for any alleged human gas chamber found in a German World War II labour camp

let us merely measure cyanide in the walls: if it’s not there, it didn’thappen.”[26]

 

 
 

ENDNOTES

[1] Van Pelt, Robert Jan, The Case for Auschwitz:

Evidence From the Irving Trial, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2002, pp. 137, 435.

 

[2] Richard J. Green, “The Chemistry of Auschwitz,” 10 May 1998, 

http://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/.

 

[3] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,”

in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and

Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 337. See the currently available edition of Leuchter’s report: Fred A. Leuchter,

Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf, The Leuchter Reports: Critical Edition, 4th ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, 2015.

 

[4] Rudolf, Germar, “A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz,” 

The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, March/April 2001, p. 7.

 

[5] Leuchter, Fred A., “The Leuchter Report: The How and the Why,” 

The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, Summer 1989, pp. 138-139.

 

[6] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,”

in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis

and Dissertations Press, 2000, pp. 363-371.

 

[7] Rudolf, Germar, “A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz,” 

The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, March/April 2001, p. 9.

 

[8] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,”

in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL:

Thesis and Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 369.

 

[9] Preface to: Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality,

Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, pp. 12-13.

 

[10] Butz, Arthur R., “Historical Past vs. Political Present,” 

The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2000, p. 15.

 

[11] Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in theCanadian

“False News” Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers  Ltd., 1992, pp. 362-363.

 

[12] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mr._Death; Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, introduced in evidence

during the libel case before the Queen’s Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, David John Caldwell

Irving  vs. (1) Penguin Books Limited, (2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, ref. 1996 I. No. 1113, 2001,

p. 16; http://www.phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/irving-david/rudolf/affweb.pdf,

 

[13] Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality,

Uckfeld, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 66.

 

[14] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the

Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, pp. 342-345.

 

[15] Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, op. cit. (note 12), pp. 18, 36, 41.

 

[16] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the

Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, pp. 347-349.

 

[17] Ibid., p. 348.

 

[18] Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, op. cit. (note 12), p. 51.

 

[19] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers—

A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, p. 345.

 

[20] Ibid., pp. 345-346.

 

 

[21] Ibid., pp. 174-175.

 

[22] Ibid., pp. 175, 293.

 

[23] Berg, Friedrich R., “Zyklon B and the German Delousing Chambers,” Journal of Historical Review,

Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 1986, pp. 73-94;  http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p-73_Berg.html.

 

[24] Rudolf, Germar, The Chemistry of Auschwitz: The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the

Gas Chambers—A Crime-Scene Investigation, Uckfield, Great Britain: Castle Hill Publishers, 2017, p. 114.

 

[25] Ibid., pp. 143-147.

 

[26] Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfeld, Great Britain:

Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 70.

 

Ernst and Ingrid Zündel. Never forgotten, always cherished. Their contribution to #Justice4Germans is immeasurable: 

The Desperate Measures To Enforce Belief In One & ONLY One Historical Event Are Escalating In Absurdity: Old Ladies Get Jail, Rapists Go Free</a

 

 

 

 
 
A number of Israeli intellectuals-historians, philosophers and others-use the
Holocaust in a systematic way in order to raise anti-Zionist or post-Zionist claims.

A number of Israeli intellectuals-historians, philosophers and others-use the
Holocaust in a systematic way in order to raise anti-Zionist or post-Zionist claims.
 
 The Holocaust of Truth Gilad Atzmon
Gilad Atzmon discusses the hate campaign against him, the shutdown
of free speech and his new book Being in Time: A Post-Political Manifesto.
 
 
Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist tells the story of how I first became
aware of revisionist arguments challenging the orthodox Holocaust story,
how it felt-how it felt was that it made me feel ashamed and made the palms
of my hands sweat-and the first information I had the misfortune (?) to
discover that there were serious questions to be asked about what I had believed
all my life, with all my heart, about the unique monstrosity of the Germans.



A 1997 speech on Internet Free Speech and Revisionism - Rae West.
This video includes Questions-and-Answers. Before the big revolution that
the Internet caused on media, consider the next seven points, taken into
consideration that some of this still happens now: 1. Revisionist criticisms
aren't new, but have been suppressed; 2. There have been and are many hard-working
revisionists; 3. The supposedly heavyweight historians don't debate;
4. No technical descriptions or investigations of 'gas chambers';
5. Damning 'confessions' were extracted under torture;
6. Demographic figures have been avoided, and mythology
substituted; 7. There are no photos of gas chambers.
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

Jewish ‘Auschwitz Survivor’ Admits He Lied About Everything..

 Joseph Hirt said he fabricated story of being sent to camp and meeting

Nazi doctor Josef Mengele to ‘keep memories alive’ about history of the Holocaust

by Theguardian



A Pennsylvania man who claimed for years to have escaped from Auschwitz,

met track and field star Jesse Owens and Nazi doctor Josef Mengele,

confessed on Friday that he had fabricated the entire story... of course.


“I am writing today to apologize publicly for harm caused to anyone because of my inserting myself into the
descriptions of life in Auschwitz,” Joseph Hirt, 86, wrote in a letter sent to his local paper, LNP, this week.

“I was not a prisoner there. I did not intend to lessen or overshadow the events which truly happened there
by falsely claiming to have been personally involved.”

“I was wrong. I ask forgiveness,” he added. “I determined at that moment to do everything in my power to
prevent the loss of the truth about wartime life (and death) at Auschwitz.”
For years, Hirt gave public speeches at schools around the US about his experiences in the second world war,
including his Jewish family’s flight from Poland to Belgrade.

But he also told people that he was arrested by the Nazis, sent to the concentration camp at Auschwitz, and met

Hirt claimed to have escaped under an electric fence at the camp.

He added an extraordinary prologue and epilogue to the story, saying that he saw Adolf Hitler turn his back on Jesse
Owens at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, and that he met Eleanor Roosevelt and Owens after his arrival in the United States.

Earlier this year, New York history teacher Andrew Reid became suspicious
of Hirt’s story and wrote a refutation of many of Hirt’s points.

The names of concentration camp victims and survivors are publicly
available, and there is no record of Hirt at Auschwitz or elsewhere.

Hirt (showing his fake tattoo in the photo above) admitted in his letter that he had tattooed the camp
number of Auschwitz survivor Primo Levi, the acclaimed author and chemist, on his left forearm:
“In no way an attempt to take on his identity, but in an effort
to incorporate his symbol as a way of remembering him.”

Reid also found that Hirt’s escape story did not fit with camp records, that Mengele did not arrive at the

camp until after the alleged escape, and other lies, errors and far-fetched claims in Hirt’s account.

He was a six-year-old Polish boy and extraordinarily unlikely to be anywhere near Hitler at the Olympics, for instance,

and Owens’ biographer found the snub was likely a fabrication, possibly conflated with another black sprinter’s story.

Hirt is not the first to fabricate or exaggerate a Holocaust story. Herman Rosenblat

, a Polish survivor, embellished his 1993 memoir and made up some parts entirely.

At the time, historian Ken Waltzer wrote in the New Republic

that he was alarmed by how quickly people accepted the story.

Read: Anne Frank — the Jewish Girl That DIDN'T Write the Famous Auschwitz Diary

 

 

 

 

 

Click on this text to examine the enormity of Jewish lies regarding the HOLOCAUST HOAX...

.

.

Click on this text to examine the truth about AUSCHWITZ.

Click on this text to watch a video titled INSIDE AUSCHWITZ that reveals the truth about the work camp.

 
 
______________________________________________________
 
 
 

The Hoax that won’t die

 

How the World Jewish Congress invented the Holocaust

 

By Carolyn Yeager

 

the first and continuing reports that Jews were being wiped out by the Nazis in Poland

were supplied to newspapers around the world by the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX

 

“the first authentic information about Hitler’s decision to ‘exterminate’ European Jewry came from an unnamed German

industrialist who visited Switzerland in July 1942 and informed a Jewish friend of the World Jewish Congress … HOAX

 

the first ‘eyewitness’ account of the inner working of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Gas Chamber/Crematorium

complex came from ‘two escaped Slovakian Jews’ working with the World Jewish Congress” … HOAX

 

 

The Holocaust is a hoax that’s already been unmasked. But the Establishment won’t give it up.

 

Instead of a hoax, we could call it a sleight-of-hand, in the sense of the tricks magicians use. (‘Hoax’ derives from the magic

incantation hocus pocus). We could call it a myth, except that it was deliberately created to deceive and gain advantage, and

continues to be upheld for that purpose. We could call it war propaganda that got out of control, and indeed it has slipped out of

its World War II niche and become a free-standing phenomenon, fueling the world-wide ‘campaigns

against anti-Semitism’ with ever-expanding laws that forbid speaking ill of Jews and/or Israel.

 

But it is properly called a hoax because it was deliberately created by a few men in the upper ranks of the World Jewish Congress

(WJC) utilizing their tight network of influential, well-placed accomplices throughout Europe, Britain and the United States.

 

It was inspired by rumors circulated by Polish and Jewish inmates at the Auschwitz-Birkinau

work/concentration/transit camp located in Poland near the sprawling I.G. Farben ‘Buna’ Rubber Plant.

 

Some of these inmates organized into secret underground networks that maintained wireless communication to the Polish

Government-in-Exile in London. All this was told in the book released in 1976 by Arthur R. Butz, Ph.D.,

The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, which I quoted extensively from here and will refer to later.

 

This year, as every year since a resolution was established in 2005 by a voice vote in the United Nations, the World Jewish Congress

leads the way in recognizing and promoting a commemoration popularly known as “International Holocaust Remembrance Day.”

The media faithfully plays up the day, and governments throughout the Western world pay tribute.

 

Amazing when you think about its reach. THIS YEAR the World Jewish Congress has announced that “social media giants”

are joining with them in 2019 to create “mass global awareness” ahead of the Israel-initiated commemoration day (however, it

looks like only Twitter came through). Along with the United Nations, the world-wide media, and major government leaders, the

Memorial Museum at Auschwitz-Birkenau also recognizes the day with special events. January 27, 1945

was chosen because it is the day it is claimed the Auschwitz camp was ‘liberated’ by the Red Army.

 

Yes, it’s amazing how much of our reality is created and developed without our decision, but simply our acquiescence in seemingly

harmless (and usually disguised in moral terms) votes in large bodies such as the UN general assembly or Congressional and parliamentary bodies.

 

In the articles that I have previously published on the WJC (especially here, here and here), drawing on the work of esteemed historians

and revisionists, the answer to who, what, why of the Holocaust has already been presented. In this article I will pull all this information

together in an attempt to make the full case as to why the hoax of the Holocaust can be attributed to the World Jewish Congress far

more than to any other single entity. We will see that the very first unconfirmed reports of mass shootings of Jews came from the

World Jewish Congress, and the final unconfirmed reports of gas chambers and mass cremations came from the WJC, also.

 

The World Jewish Congress is the prime institution devoted to propagating Holocaust belief. Holocaust is

part and parcel of their other main aims of “defending Jews around the world” and “supporting Israel.”

 

Udo Walendy

We will begin with Udo Walendy, German historian, author and publisher, and his examination of a very important report published

in 1948 on the occasion of  the second plenary assembly of the WJC in Montreux, Switzerland. The title of the report is

Unity in Dispersion, a History of the World Jewish Congress.” It was published, and at the time I write can be read online here.

 

The World Jewish Congress is an openly Zionist organization. It’s name echos the first World Zionist Congress held in Basle,

Switzerland in the year 1897, convened by Dr. Theodore Herzl, a Hungarian-born Jew.

Herzl’s portrait hangs in the office of the president at the WJC headquarters in New York City.

 

In the same spirit of uniting Jews to define and defend their interests, the World Jewish Congress was convened for the first

time 39 years later in Geneva, Switzerland by Dr. Stephen S. Wise, another Budapest-born offspring of rabbis who was brought to New York as an infant.

 

At this Congress, of which they bragged of having 230 delegates representing 32 countries around the world, the vast majority (181)

were from the United States, Poland, Roumania and Great Britain. From seven countries there was only one delegate, and from the rest,

between 2 and 10. The center of worldwide Jewish interests and leadership had moved to the United States after WWI.

 

Nahum Goldmann, left, and Stephen Wise, right, playing on American patriotism in 1942.

 

Prior to this first Congress in 1936, a preparative World Jewish Conference was held in August 1932, also in Geneva. It was chaired

by Dr. Nahum Goldmann, a Russia-born Jew who grew up in Germany. Some anti-Zionist German Jewish groups refused to participate.

Goldmann defined the purpose as to establish a legitimate collective representation of all 16 million Jews in the world. At this conference,

Nahum Goldmann and Stephen Wise were entrusted with the leading positions. At two more preparative

conferences in ’33 and ’34, the rise to power of National Socialism became a main subject.

 

[Also in 1936, Samuel Untermeyer, who had called for a holy war against Germany in 1933, founded a World Anti-Nazi Council

to Fight for Human Rights.” He partnered with British Unionist Walter Citrine, and the Council served as an Agent for “psychological warfare”

and – concealed from the public – was to be financed by the Jewish Defense Fund. Winston Churchill became one of its activists.]

 

At the 1936 Congress, Nahum Goldmann made the radical announcement that the existing sovereignty of nations should be

considered obsolete! The League of Nations should be reinforced (militarily, apparently) to safeguard

the interests of the weaker groups in the world. By these weaker groups he meant Jews.

 

“Millions of Jews in eastern Europe are being disenfranchised and terrorized

in the name of supremacy of the state and the dominant nation” he said, and

“Where the equal rights of a Jewish community are affected […] it becomes of common,

worldwide Jewish interest.” (Surrender of Jewish rights anywhere equals surrender everywhere.)

 

“We know that we can only succeed by joining forces with the many others in the world who must fight with us.”

 

Goldmann also said that mankind had to fight against “an aggression which was started by Germany,” emphasizing that

fighting against Hitlerism is one of the most important tasks” and that “anti-Semitism must be branded an international crime.”

He also stated that “propaganda is at present one of the main instruments of foreign politics,” with boycotts and international

intelligence services required to be used as weapons. Remember this was in 1936

when Hitler was still being admired for bringing Germany back to economic health!

 

Goldmann became President of the permanent Administrative Committee and Wise President of the Executive Committee.

In July 1940, the World Jewish Congress moved it’s headquarters to New York City, with the Geneva office continuing to exist

under 29-year old Dr. Gerhart Riegner and Dr. Abraham Silberschein, maintaining contact with German-occupied countries

and the International Red Cross.

 

WJC creates the Institute of Jewish Affairs as a research arm

 

In 1941, another section of the World Jewish Congress was founded as the “Institute of Jewish Affairs.” It was assigned the

task of gathering information from all parts of the world concerning Jewish affairs, with the aim of submitting Jewish demands

to the peace conference at the end of hostilities. The Jews were looking to get as much as they could out of the war – a war in

which they knew very well they were not physically fighting! They thus wanted to emphasize their losses as Hitler’s political victims.

 

In order to best situate themselves, they decided to consider the period from 1919 to 1939 an “armistice,” not a peace. They stressed

that a basis must be created by which “war crimes” could be punished retroactively from 1933. And of course,

they would be the victims of these war crimes.

 

In June 1942, the Advisory Staff for European Jewish Matters (of the Institute of Jewish Affairs) met in coordination with the

World Jewish Congress. Here, a demand was made for the first time that no peace negotiation should ever be carried out without

representatives of the WJC participating.

 

The Institute of Jewish Affairs entertained close relations with the Geneva office and the British Section of the WJC in London.

The British Section had built up a research staff of over thirty experts, allowing the Institute to compile a remarkable amount of

material, including thousands of documents, press reports, papers, projects, drafts and manuscripts ready for printing. Some of

the most important publications are:

 

  • Zorach Warhaftig, Starvation over Europe (1943);

  • Jews in Nazi Europe, Where Shall They Go? no authors named, (1941);

  • Hitler’s Ten Year War on the Jews (1943) (this book made a tremendous impression on the
  •  Allied governments and served as a basic textbook at the Nuremberg Military Tribunal)

An important paper transmitted to the American authorities was “The Conspiracy

against the Jewish People,” the main chapters of which were headed:

 

  1. The Originally Conceived  Plan of Extermination of the Jewish People

  2. The Different Stages of the Crime Against the Jewish People

  3. The Responsibility of Individuals and Organizations (translated from the German original)

In Europe in January 1942, the National committee of ‘Free France’ convened for a discussion on German war crimes. But not one

reference was made to the crimes against the Jews. So in February the World Jewish Congress asked for a specific statement with

reference to the “many and special crimes against the Jews.” It took three months before the President of the Conference on crimes,

General Wladyslaw Sikorski, replied that specifically referencing the Jews “might be equivalent to recognizing racial theories that

we all reject.” (Touché! We can see from this that not everyone was on the same page about who were the victims

of the Germans. Since the Poles evidently did not want to feature the Jews, the Jews went around them.)

 

After that rejection, the British section of the World Jewish Congress in June organized their own “Conference of the Press of the

Free World” where Facts of a Systematic Extermination of European Jewry were announced (but not revealed in the conference

minutes). This would have been the first suggestion of a planned extermination of Jews. Immediate reactions occurred in Britain and

abroad. The BBC transmitted this type of news for the first time—and there were mass demonstrations in the US (organized by Jews)

addressing war crimes and the need for the rescue of European Jewry. On 21 July 1942, Prime Minister Winston Churchill

sent a message to a meeting held in Madison Square Garden, NYC, which contained the following:

 

The Jews were Hitler’s first victims, and ever since they have been in the forefront of resistance to Nazi aggression.

 

The World Jewish Congress jumped on this and announced that “This sentence rightly characterized the Jews of whatever nationality as

an allied people of the United Nations (which is the name the Allies gave themselves at that time).

The WJC said they wanted all Jews to be accepted as “one nation” represented by the World Jewish Congress.

 

The Riegner Telegram

Gerhart Riegner

Sensing an opportune time, on 8 Aug 1942, young Gerhart Riegner, as Secretary of the Geneva WJC office, sent a telegram to

the British Foreign Office and the U.S. State Dept, through secure diplomatic channels the WJC was privy to. The telegram read:

 

Received alarming report stating that, in the Fuehrer’s Headquarters, a plan has been discussed, and is under consideration,

according to which all Jews in countries occupied or controlled by Germany numbering 3½ to 4 millions should, after

deportation and concentration in the East, be at one blow exterminated, in order to resolve, once and for all the Jewish question

in Europe. Action is reported to be planned for the autumn. Ways of execution are still being discussed including the use

of prussic acid. We transmit this information with all the necessary reservation, as exactitude cannot be confirmed by us.

Our informant is reported to have close connexions with the highest German authorities, and his reports are generally reliable.

Please inform and consult New York.

 

So, an anonymous report, and supposedly not the first from this ‘source’. The British Foreign Office took its time forwarding the

telegram, calling for it to be investigated first, and the State Dept. was also wary. It wasn’t until 3 weeks later on 28 August that it

reached Stephen Wise, WJC President in New York, who decided not to make it public. But this telegram is what the

WJC and its acolytes use to say the US and UK governments knew from 1942 that Jews were being exterminated.

 

The informant in this case is the “mysterious German industrialist” that Bradley Smith wrote about and concluded did not exist.

And he didn’t, until 40 years later, in October 1983 when it was claimed in the New York Times, without evidence, that he was

Eduard Schulte, a mining company executive who died in 1966 in Switzerland. Twenty years after his death, the death of his first

wife and one of his sons, and most who could contradict the story, Schulte is named as the ‘informer.’ Even Gerhart Riegner,

a life-long WJC executive, refused to confirm Schulte for the NYTimes, reportedly using as his excuse that “I have not identified

the man for 40 years and I see no reason not to keep the one request he ever made of me.” The mass of biographical and business

information written in the Times article is in no way evidence for the claim—its only purpose in being there

is to make it appear to those who don’t actually read that this is a big story with a lot information behind it.

 

There isn’t. There is none. But the current World Jewish Congress leadership thought it worthwhile to bolster their claim of

“inside information” about extermination plans coming directly from Adolf Hitler in 1942 by supplying the name of a real person

40 years after the fact.

 

Without a source given for it, the sentence that Schulte was “the first to tell the world about the extermination of Jews” has been

added to Wikipedia pages, such as here, here, here and here. This attempt to fool the public is in itself evidence

that there never was an informant, that the story was an invention of Gerhart Riegner and his WJC confidants.

 

At the WJC website this article characterizes the worth of the telegram far beyond what it actually was. Note the

words “reliable” and “authoritative” in the first paragraph, neither of which are at all appropriate, since it was hearsay.

 

The Making of the War Refugee Board

 

From 1942 to 1944, the World Jewish Congress continued to send messages to the State Department with information from

anonymous sources about atrocities taking place against Jews in German-occupied Europe.

Many were quite similar to the debunked false stories from WWI, and this was noted by State.

 

A conflict developed between the State Dept. and the U.S. Treasury Dept. headed by Jew Henry Morgenthau Jr. who was good

friends with the leadership of the World Jewish Congress. A particular disagreement was over a plan to ship 7000 Romanian

Jews to Palestine at a cost of $1200 per person. Apart from who would pay the money and how, there were British objections to

admitting Jews to Palestine. The State Dept. found it problematic, while Treasury and the World Jewish Congress were pressing

for the proposed project, insisting that the only alternative was death for the Jews at the hands of Hitler. From Wikipedia:

 

While the Treasury Department had granted the World Jewish Congress permission to send the money to Switzerland in July 1943,

the State Department used various excuses, delaying permission until December, a full eight months after the program was first proposed.

 

Jewish newspapers like this one from Omaha, Nebraska, played it up big.

 

 

Roosevelt was eventually drawn into this State vs. Treasury friction and, because of his close friendship with Morgenthau,

he backed the Treasury Dept. Just as the WJC had been pushing for, Roosevelt then agreed to assist in the escape of European

Jews with the creation of the War Refugee Board in January 1944. He placed in charge Morgenthau, Sec of State Cordell Hull,

and Sec of War Henry Stimson. However, the executive director was Morgenthau’s fair-haired

boy John Pehle, with Josiah DuBois as general counsel, making it Morgenthau’s board.

 

Not only that, but Morgenthau had delegated all of Treasury’s powers in the areas relevant to the WRB to Harry Dexter White,

later exposed as a Soviet agent. Thus, the Board became an instrument of Rabbi Wise and the Zionists, and as such its main

achievement was the booklet, German Extermination Camps: Auschwitz and Birkenau,

Executive Office of the President, Washington, Nov. 1944, hereinafter referred to as the WRB report.

 

 

Rudolf Vrba, born Walter Rosenberg

Alfred Wetzler, alias Jozef Lánik

 

According to revisionist Arthur R. Butz, this report constituted the birth of the official thesis of exterminations via gas chambers

at Auschwitz. Once Washington committed to the claim that Auschwitz was an extermination camp, the way was cleared for newspapers

to carry the story. It was placed on the front page of the New York Times on Nov. 26, 1944 with some excerpts given. It is

described as two reports, one written by “two young Slovakian Jews” and the other by “a Polish major” whom had been inmates

at Auschwitz from Spring 1942 until Spring 1944 when they escaped. All the essentials of the “Holocaust” are found in it.

 

You can read the Vrba-Wetzler Report in full here http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/eng/English45.pdf if you want to.

But I doubt you will want to. It’s very boring as is often the case with lies. At the end the author says:

 

I soon lost my comparatively comfortable job [October 1942?] with the Aufräumungskommando,

and as punishment was transferred to Birkenau, where I spent one and a half years.

 

I ask, what did a healthy young man do at Birkenau for a year and a half? It wasn’t known as a work camp. Of course, that assumes

that he was actually there. Examination shows that the information in the report is the sort of thing that could have been built up

from intelligence data. This is exactly what one should expect, as Germany’s enemies had the means of gathering information

about German camps and about events in Europe. The Communist Party, being “the world’s most efficient intelligence organization,”

could transmit any information desired to any destination without needing “escaped inmates” to supply the facts.

 

Conclusion

 

The WRB report was put into evidence at the International Military Tribunal on Dec. 14, 1945. There was no objection from

the defense and it was accordingly accepted as evidence. However at the later Farben trial, the defense objected to the report,

questioning the “competence and materiality of each and every document in the book” and the objection was sustained by that court.

 

It was undoubtedly the determined, even dogged efforts of the World Jewish Congress leaders and friends in pursuing the extermination

thesis that paid off in the end for Jews. From the summer of 1942, “Stephen Wise had continuously campaigned for the Allied

governments to take a public position directly condemning the alleged extermination of Jews in Europe.” It was J. Breckenridge

Long of the State Dept. who most strongly resisted the propaganda. Long never believed the talk of extermination, and wrote that:

 

Wise always assumes such a sanctimonious air and pleads for the ‘intellectuals and brave spirits, refugees from the tortures

of the dictators’ or words to that effect. Of course only an infinitesimal fraction of the immigrants are of that category –

and some are certainly German agents.

 

What we can say for sure is that, in the end, the World Jewish Congress has prevailed, and that it continues to work tirelessly both

for the Zionist cause of Israel and the welfare of every Jew in the world. What is one hoax more or less to them in the

face of such a monumental undertaking?

 

 

 

_________________________________

 

 

Click on this text to examine websites exposing the holocaust lies.

.

.

Click on this text to visit the CODOH (Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust) page.

.

.

Click in this text to meet holocaust revisionist Germar Rudolf.

.

.

Click on this text to examine the HAAVARA Transfer Agreement (The Transfer Agreement between Germany and German Jews prior to WWII).

 ________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

JEWISH WORLD POPULATION 1938

For over a century, the Jewish World Almanac has been widely regarded

as the most authentic source for the world’s Jewish population numbers.

Academics all over the world, including the editors of the Encyclopedia

Britannica, used to rely on the accuracy of those numbers.

Here is what the World Alamanacs of 1933 and 1948

had to say about the world population of Jews.

 

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/jews1933.jpg

 

 

Jewish World Population 1948

In other words, according to the World Almanac the world population of Jews

increased (!) between 1933 and 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000. If the German

government under Adolf Hitler had – as alleged – murdered six million Jews those losses

should have been reflected in the Jewish population numbers quoted in the World Almanac.

 

The suspicions raised by above numbers concerning the veracity of the allegations

made against the Hitler government are confirmed by the official three-volume report by the

International Committee of the Red Cross, released 1948 in Geneva, according to which 272,000

concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews.

The following article elaborates.

 

 

 

 

 

  A Factual Appraisal Of The ‘Holocaust’ By The Red Cross

The Jews And The Concentration Camps: No Evidence Of Genocide

 

There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World War Two and the conditions of Germany’s

concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International

Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.

 

This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous

works: Documents sur l’activité du CICR en faveur des civils détenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne

1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War (Geneva, 1947).

The team of authors, headed by Frédéric Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object,

in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value.

 

The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in

Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the

Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR,

whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision.

 

The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained

in concentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes

the second type as “Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, “Schutzhäftlinge”), who were arrested for

political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces” (Vol. 111, p. 73).

These persons, it continues, “were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons.” (P.74).

 

The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained

on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany.

They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and “from

February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and prisons” (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon

established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programme which continued to function until

the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.

 

Red Cross Recipients Were Jews

 

The Report states that “As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about

1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps” (Vol. III, p. 80). In addition

to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen,

Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme,

Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany.

The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83).

 

In the course of the war, “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over

twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout the world, in particular by the American

Joint Distribution Committee of New York” (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation was permitted by the German Government

to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief

operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their

purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.

 

The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits

there in April 1945. This camp, “where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively

privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75). According to the Report, “‘The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at

Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information

gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men

wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing

almost complete autonomy. . . two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favourable

impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p . 642).

 

The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend

special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and the ICRC

complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation

applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail

from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the

efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food

parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.

 

No Evidence Of Genocide

 

One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that

undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany

after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed

an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on

February 1st, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner

gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised

to stay in each camp …” (Vol. III, p. 83).

 

Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are

quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in

the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies”

(Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse

of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.

 

In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International

Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the

Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like

many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned

extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the

Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day.

So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps

were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945

broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) – Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in

gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not only

the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to

take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged” (Vol. III, p. 594).

 

Not All Were Interned

 

Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish

section of the free population,” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were

placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This

conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged

Höss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing “every single Jew he could lay his hands on.”

 

In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large

proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon

as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia

seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took

place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these

people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were

allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).

 

Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration

of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish

emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who

had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance

permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further

agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of

South American countries” (Vol. I, p. 645).

 

As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration

of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March

1944,” says the. Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. I, p. 648).

Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union)

with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.

 

The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the

emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government

of the United States … now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews

who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I, p . 649).

 

Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that “Did Six Million Really Die?” quoted from the Report of the

International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas

(this includes the above material), it did so accurately.

 

A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross’

International Tracing Service) under oath at the Zündel Trial (February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).

 

The above is chapter nine from the book “Did Six Million Really Die?”.
 
 
 
_____________________________________________________________________
 
 
 Regarding the quote below by Gerard Menuhin mentioning the "annihilation of millions of disarmed soldiers and
innocent civilains" after the German surrender, it needs to be understood that he was referring to German
soldiers and German civillians.
 
story denial 7
 
 
 

Click on this text to watch Natali Cohen Vaxberg, a radical Israeli political performance artist point out the fact that the "Holocaust" has been used to justify the Creation of Israel in 1948 and it's immoral army, the brutal and sometimes perverse persecution of Palestinians without interference from super-powers, and the creation of a nuclear weapons stockpile. BTW: a dreidel is a four-sided toy top played with during Hannukkah...

.

.

.

 

Click on this text to view: Cremation Technology vs the Holocaust...

Ernst Zundel and David Cole Discuss THE BIGGEST MYTH of the 20th and 21st Centuries AKA THE HOLOCOST

 

 

 

 

 

Click on this text to meet HOLOCAUST REVISIONIST ROBERT FARISSON.

 
 
Footage allows the viewer to see more about Professor Robert Faurisson, who is arguably the one key individual in modern revisionism who opened the door for many more questions to be asked about the historiography, the narrative of what is now called the Holocaust and open the way for many more of those who would dare to openly question the Holocaust in a serious, much more objective manner free of dogma or ideology.
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Fake shower heads

One more reason why the real gas chambers
had to have real shower heads

Like all strong poisons, hydrocyanic acid (HCN)
is very good at being water-soluble – and could
have been most effectively dispensed dissolved
in boiling water – or, better still, superheated
steam – run through the real shower heads.

Moreover, while a whole can of Zyklon B was
required to kill all insects in a relatively small
fumigation chamber, hardly more than one
scoop of the Zyklon
B pellets should have
been needed to dispatch any number of
humans in a shower room of any size.

Besides, only the lethal agent HCN was
required, Zyklon
B as such was unnecessary.
This more costly compound was specifically
developed for use in fumigation chambers,
where, not unlike any other dry cleaning
process, the fumigated clothes had to be
given back dry to the inmates coming out
of the shower rooms – as the properly run
camp routine demanded.

What's more, HCN itself – highly flammable
and potentially explosive – was superfluous
to the task, as, in an enclosed space, any
volatile noxious substance – such as cheap
as rubbish ammonia, for example – is just
as deadly, but reasonably safe to handle.

As the Jews themselves very well know,
they murdered numerous Palestinians just
by firing ‘harmless’ tear gas into their houses.

The more one reads the Holohoax literature
and the closer one looks at those putative
‘gas chambers’ – the less sense they make.
And the kosher Holo-mongers themselves
are keenly aware of this.
 And hence, those
once-obligatory Jewish ‘holes in the roof’ or
the later ‘holes in the wall’ – through which
the Zyklon
B was supposedly chucked in –
are hardly ever heard of anymore.

The Jewish Holohoax is getting assimilated.
It's no longer as Jewish and hysterical as
it used to be in the 1970s-80s, in the wake
of the October
(Yom Kippur)  War (1973-4),
when little I$rael  is said to have experienced
some ‘existential angst’ (enter Madison Avenue).

In their latter-day rendition, the physical details
of this ever-apocryphal Zio narrative get to be
more and more like the Holy Ghost – positively
invisible – and never again rendered in graven
images.
 And the ‘venerable’ Anne Frank gets
to be more and more like the Holy Virgin...

(In fact, with HCN boiling point at 25.6 °C,
Zyklon
B couldn't have been used at room
temperature in fumigation chambers, either –
not without the special pulverizer/blower –
never ever mentioned in the whole
of the Holohoax literature in relation
to the putative gas chambers.)

 

 

 
 

 
 
 
In order to deprogram yourself, after an entire lifetime of incessant brainwashing by the JEW
owned and controlled media, you can begin almost anywhere... such as learning exactly
WHO coined the word "NAZI" - THE Most Misused Word in Any Language...
 
 
Here is the facts regarding JEW owned and controlled media
(Hollywood and Television in particular): http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id35.html


 
 
 
____________Holocaust Revisionism Articles____________  
 
 
 

 
As Many as 90% of Those Claiming to Be Holocaust Survivors May Be Frauds
 
Australian Man’s Holocaust Story Labelled a ‘Lie’
 
Brighton Beach Holocaust Fund - Scammer Jailed for Neary Two Years
 
 
Fraudster Gets Eight Years in $57 Million Holocaust Scheme
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
How Britain Tortured Nazi PoW’s
 
 
 

Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg

. . . by Lasha Darkmoon

Confessions at Nuremberg were obtained under torture. The grimmest of these tortures,

practiced mostly by Jewish operatives on their German prisoners of war, was testicle crushing.

Nuremberg defendants

(Above) German defendants at the Nuremberg War Crimes trials, 1946-1949.

How many of them had their testicles crushed?

 

“The Holocaust legend is built on ‘confessions’ obtained by the use of  torture.”

 So begins an article that has just been brought to my attention by an unknown emailer.

 

At the same time, by sheer coincidence, another correspondent has just sent me some stomach-churning details

about testicle crushing. He ends his letter with these words : “This is what Jewish interrogators did to their

German prisoners of war after WWII in order to get them to “sing”—i.e., to confess to crimes they never committed.”

 

I was a bit shocked by these words. To tell the truth, testicle crushing is not something I have thought about a great deal,

nor do I wish to dwell too much on this distasteful subject. I am aware of course that a lot of testicle crushing went on at

Nuremberg in order to wring confessions out of the prostrate Germans, but I had been

unaware that American  Jews had been foremost in the ranks of these torturers.

 

Apparently, as many as three out four interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jewish—and these Jewish interrogators,

I was to learn to my horror, had been by far the most sanguinary and sadistic. There was almost no level of human

depravity to which these monsters were not willing to sink, including forcing their German victims to eat excrement and to

have sex with disinterred corpses.

 

Yes, so this is something we ought to bear in mind when watching all those Hollywood movies celebrating the heroic

deeds of the Allies in World War Two and lamenting the horrors of the Holocaust : that Jewish interrogators, working for

the Americans, are known to have beaten, tortured, and crushed the testicles of German defendants before charging

them with war crimes at Nuremberg. Without these confessions, obtained under extreme torture, there is no solid proof

that any Jewish Holocaust took place at all. There is only legend, hearsay and “eyewitness accounts” : like those of

Elie Wiesel and his kind—accounts that have turned out, in retrospect, to be based on pure fantasy, fiction, and

grotesque exaggeration.

 

Proponents of the official storyline say that some of the strongest evidence that “proves” the Holocaust—i.e. the

systematic extermination of 6 million Jews in gas chambers on the instructions of Hitler—consists of the supposed

“confessions” of the German officials who were put on trial at Nuremberg. What they neglect to tell you is that most of

these confessions were obtained under extreme torture. Indeed, according to Jewish investigator John Sack, torture

was often practiced for its own sake, even when there was nothing to find out. It was practiced for sheer

pleasure: because it gave the torturers a ‘high’, a feeling of sadistic omnipotence, of orgasmic euphoria.

 

It has since been openly admitted in the memoirs of the top British official, Colonel Alexander Scotland, who ran the

interrogation program, that thousands of Germans were tortured by British Military Intelligence, under the direction

of the Prisoner of War Interrogation Section (PWIS). This torture of German POWs occurred during the war to obtain

military intelligence. After the war was over, it was used again in order to obtain confessions for convictions of “war crimes”.

 

German POWs reported that the torture techniques included deprivation of sleep, starvation, systematic

beatings, ripping hair from the scalp, menacing with red-hot pokers, threatened use of electrical devices

to deliver shocks, and, finally, the worst torture of all, the slow and systematic mangling of the spermatic

cords of the testicles—a procedure that had their victims thrashing about and screaming

like wild animals for hours.

 

The prosecutors at Nuremberg accused and convicted the Germans of murdering some 4 million people at Auschwitz.

These charges were based largely upon the supposed “confessions” obtained by the torture of German officers, such

as the signed “confession” by Rudolf Hössthe commandant at Auschwitz,

giving details of how he had personally supervised the murder of 2.5 million jews.

 

In 1989, however, the Soviet government reduced the claim of the number killed at Auschwitz

 from 4 million to 1.5 million. (See picture below). This was later reduced to 1 million.

Auch_dees

 

It became apparent at once that if only 1 million Jews had died at Auschwitz, as was now officially admitted, it no longer

became possible to state that 2.5 million Jews had been killed there under Höss while he was a commandant there. The

“confession” by Höss that 2.5 million Jews had been killed at Auschwitz  under his auspices

was therefore worthless. It had been a confession clearly extracted under torture.

 

If, moreover, only 1 million Jews perished at Auschwitz instead of the 4 million originally claimed to have

died there, it’s obvious that there has been an overestimate of three million dead Jews.  It is no longer

possible to assert that 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust. That becomes a mathematical impossibility. 

 

And yet, incredibly, this mathematical impossibility is brazenly

asserted to this day in every mainstream media outlet.

21_52

 

We are all expected to pretend that 6 million Jews minus  3 million Jews somehow

equals 6 million Jews, just as Winston Smith (in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four) was

expected to believe that 2 + 2  = 5. Winston Smith, you will remember, managed to

believe this absurdity in the end, with the help of a little extra tuition he received via the famous

rat torture“.        

§

The startling revelation that almost all the German defendants at Nuremberg had had their testicles crushed

must make us sit up and think. How can testimonies obtained under testicle crushing be regarded in any way as reliable?

 

Following reports that defendants were tortured at the Malmedy massacre trial, the US Army formed the “Simpson Commission”

to investigate the alleged misconduct.  Judge Edward L. Van Roden was part of this commission. According to

Van Roden’s book, American Atrocities in Germany, out of 139 cases of treatment of alleged German “war criminals”

who were investigated by the commission—and who were subsequently put on trial by the American Military Tribunal 

in Dachau after World War II—”137 of these Germans were tortured by having their testicles crushed.” 

 

Other methods used by the American interrogators included brutal beatings, placing a hood over prisoners

and punching them in the face with brass knuckles, breaking their jaws, knocking out their teeth, putting

them on starvation rations, and subjecting them to solitary confinement. The prisoners were

then presented with prepared statements to sign. Confess or face more torture!

 

It emerged that Jewish prosecutors and interrogators had obtained complete control over the US Military

tribunal that was to put German officials on trial for war crimes. This is seldom mentioned, as to do so is

regarded as “anti-Semitic”. To state the unvarnished truth—that 137 Germans had their testicles mangled

at Nuremberg by largely Jewish interrogators in order to obtain proof for the Holocaust

—is regarded as “hate speech”.

 

perl_william

Lt. William Perl (pictured above) was an Austrian Jew who had emigrated to America in 1940.

He was the chief interrogator of Germans accused of the Malmedy massacre.

This was because he could speak fluent German; and indeed many of the interrogators at Nuremberg were German or

Austrian Jews who had emigrated to America before WWII and were known as the ‘Ritchie Boys’. There were roughly

9000 of these Jews in America and they specialized in the “interrogation” of German prisoners. (See here).

 

Perl supervised the torture of the German defendants. He was an ardent and active Zionist and was assisted by other

Jews in his endeavors to extract confessions by the infliction of maximum pain. Jews specalizing in

torture techniques at Nuremberg included  Josef Kirschbaum, Harry Thon and Morris Ellowitz. (See here)

 

This is what Wikipedia has to say about the interrogation of Germans at Malmedy:

 

“The accusations [against the German defendants]  were mainly based on the sworn and written statements

provided by the defendants in Schwäbish Hall. To counter the evidence given in the men’s sworn statements and

by prosecution witnesses, the lead defense attorney, Lieutenant Colonel Willis M. Everett

tried to show that the statements had been obtained by inappropriate methods.

 

Note that exquisite euphemism: “inappropriate methods”. That’s how respectable, politically correct Americans refer to

confessions obtained under torture. The methods are not described as horrendously cruel.

They are not described as morally indefensible. They are described as “inappropriate”.

On Sept. 25, 1945, Thomas Dodd, who was the second in command on the American prosecution team at Nuremberg,

made the following observation in which he claimed that three out of four interrogators at Nuremberg were Jewish:

 

“You know how I have despised anti-Semitism,” he said. “You know how strongly I feel toward those who

preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge, you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about

 seventy-five percent Jewish.”

 

One person who has made a close study of the Nuremberg trial archives in the original German and knows more about

this subject than anyone else I know is the multilingual American scholar Carlos W. Porter who is fluent in German, French,

Italian, Spanish and Portuguese. Having renounced his American citizenship in 1984, and having then relocated to Belgium

with his wife and children, the Holocaust revisionist author of “Not Guilty at Nuremberg” took the trouble to write to me

about the Nuremberg trials in a private communication (July 28, 2015 at 9:55 pm). Porter confirmed what I had always

suspected: that most of the American interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jews, and that torture had been freely

practiced against the helpless Germans on trial in order to force them to confess to non-existent crimes:

 

“You can be absolutely CERTAIN,” Carlos Porter wrote to me, “that nearly ALL the interrogators and interpreters

in ALL the trials were Jewish, because the Americans stamped out the German language from all American

schools during WWI, so German Jewish refugees were almost the only competent people they had. Of

course, other “German-Americans” could not be trusted not to be “Nazis”, so they were stuck with the German Jews.

 

That there was a great deal of mistreatment and torture in the minor trials is absolutely certain. I reproduced

a couple of accounts of torture at the Dachau trials in “War Crimes Trials and Other Essays”. But I’m sure it’s

only the tip of the iceberg. Minor personnel could be tortured with impunity, and 99% of them would be

afraid even to mention it. It would be hard to get away with torturing somebody like Goering though.

 

There’s a lot of literature on the subject, more all the time. The Brits appear

to have been surprisingly enthusiastic torturers, whether Jewish or not.”

 

Testicle crushing, incidentally, is a tried and tested method for obtaining confessions. It was used throughout the

Middle Ages and particularly in France during the French Revolution. That the Jews, a scholarly race noted for their

vast erudition and academic achievements, should have mastered all the techniques of testicle crushing

is therefore not surprising. Their talents for acquiring such outré information must not be underestimated.

 

Though Perl had lots of German blood on his hands, he was nevertheless allowed by the Americans to serve as a

prosecutor at the Nuremberg War trials. Another Jew of note at the Nuremberg war crimes trials was Richard W. Sonnenfeldt.

He was the chief interpreter for American prosecutors such as Perl. He “interrogated” some of the most notorious

Nazi leaders of World War II and died in 2009, age 86, at his home in Port Washington, N.Y. (See here)

 

The Presiding Judge at Nuremberg was also—coincidence?—a Jew. His name was A.H. Rosenfeld and he was a

colonel in the American army. Col. Rosenfeld cheerfully admitted to torturing German prisoners of war as a matter of policy.

“We couldn’t have made those birds talk otherwise,” he remarked cynically. “It was a trick, and it worked like a charm.”

 

 

antisemitism_Shlomo_MorelIn a recent private email to me, in response to some of my queries about torture at Nuremberg, Thomas Goodrich,

acclaimed author of Hellstorm : The Death of NaziGermany (1944-1947),

mentioned the names of four well-known Jews in the American zone whom he identified as “torturer-inquisitors” :

Harry Thon, William Perl, AH Rosenfeld, and Shlomo Morel.

 

This last-named individual, Shlomo Morel (pictured right), was a particularly

nasty piece of work whom Goodrich describes as follows:

 

“a vicious monster who drowned men and women in outdoor latrines, who made them eat excrement, who

personally beat captives to death, and who forced women to kiss and make love with disinterred corpses.”

 

(For more grisly details, confirming all this, see here)

 

After escaping from the killing fields of Germany, where he had taken immense pleasure in dancing over mounds

of corpses and shedding rivers of human blood, this cruel psychopath  “lived out his life in comfort and ease in Israel.” 

Yes, Israel!the final bolthole and refuge dump for many a runaway Jew fleeing the long arm of the law, a place described

in a prescient comment by Adolf Hitler as early as 1925 as “a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” 

(Mein Kampf, chapter 11, excerpt.)

§

Here now are some grisly details about testicle crushing that the reader may find of some interest. These distasteful

details are given here only because they are relevant to our discussion. If you are of a queasy disposition and prone to

easy vomiting, you are advised to skip the description and stop reading right here. Remember that all this was done to

137 Germans at Nuremberg in order to extract confessions from them with a view to establishing the “truth”

about the Holocaust. Without all that testicle crushing, the Holocaust might have been much harder to prove.

 

“Standard practice [to obtain castration] in France from the Middle Ages to the French Revolution was to

crush the condemned’s testicles in a vise, which burst them as mush from the scrotum, then crunch the

spermatic cords with pliers. The condemned was turned upside down in order to maximize the blood flow

to his brain, after which he was unable to pass out or enter a state of shock until, perhaps,

the last few seconds of his ordeal.

 

The condemned was sure to vomit repeatedly with violent convulsions, even well after he had voided the

contents of his stomach, but he rarely screamed except for an initial shriek, which immediately silenced,

because the pain overwhelmed his ability to breathe. Most men would hang and thrash wildly during and

after the crushing of each testicle, and their thrashing would renew upon the crushing of each spermatic cord.

 

This torture method (accompanied by others) was usually reserved for the crime of regicide or attempted regicide.

The condemned was mercifully put to death afterwards, but his torture routinely lasted for the better part of a

day, witnessed by large crowds. It is interesting to note that, whereas most crowds were instructed to jeer,

mock, and ridicule the condemned, and did so even during a disemboweling, and drawing and quartering,

most crowds remained silent and stared with shocked expressions as a castration was carried out in this manner.

 

Onlookers, male and female, are recorded to have vomited at the sight of the spectacle.

 

Yes, they certainly knew what they were doing at Nuremberg! They were the experts.

 
 
 
 
Money Running Out for Needy Holocaust Survivors
 
Moshe Peer’s Astounding Holy Shoah Tale
 

 
https://cigpapers.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/pic0121.jpg
 


 
 
 
 
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 1 Article 19
 
>The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible extent
expeditious and nontechnical procedure, and shall admit any evidence which it deems to be of probative value. 
 
 
 
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 1 Article 21
 
>The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also
take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents
of the committees set up in the various  allied countries for the investigation of war crimes,
and of records and findings military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations. 
 
 
 
The Origin of the ’6 Million Jews’ Figure
 

 
The “Six Million” Myth

 
 
 
Test Your Holocaust Knowledge
 
Zyklon-B and the German Delousing Chambers
 
 
 
 
 —————————————————————————————————————————————  
 
____Holocaust Revisionism Documentaries and Videos___
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Buchenwald a Dumb Dumb Portrayal of Evil
 
 
 
 
 
 
David Irving The Holocaust Truth, The Whole Truth ~ And Nothing but the Truth
 
Ernst Zundel – Holocaust Debunked
 
Zundel vs. Zionist – Truth vs. Lies
 
 
Holocaust Faker Explains Himself
 
The Holocaust Lie by David Irving
 
Holocaust Revisionism: The Truth by Thomas Dalton, PhD
 
The Holocaust Testimonies You Didn’t Hear
 
Holocaust Hoax Exposed!
 
Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax
 
 
 
 
 
Made in Russia: The Holocaust – Carlos W. Porter
 
The Montel Williams Show – David Cole and Mark Weber
 

 
 

 
 
One-Third of the Holocaust
 
Six Million Jews 1915-1938
 
Sylvia Stolz – Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting Evidence in the Zundel Trial
 
Spielberg’s Hoax – The Last Days of the Big Lie
 
The Phil Donahue Show – Holocaust Denial
 

 

 
 
 
—————————————————————————————————————————————  
 

 
Exposing the Holocaust™ Hoax
 

 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

Ordered To Be Silent

 

Recite the Jews’ version of history

or face gag orders and/or jail time

 

The thing to keep in mind is that people are being put in jail for telling the truth.

That makes the idea that you are living in a free country a willful delusion

from which no competent decisions about anything may be made.

 

 

By John Kaminski

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

http://johnkaminski.org

 

 

You are no longer allowed to tell a story that is not approved by the Jews, especially if it involves holy

Holocaust defamation. Like a spreading stain of darkness slowly asphyxiating the minds of everyone

on Earth, the monstrous judicial invention that “truth is no defense” has unleashed the worst possible future upon

our lemming-like human species.

 

People are being snatched off the streets for daring to analyze their country’s provably criminal history.

A woman lampooning a well-known ethnic group is ordered to stay off the Internet for a year. And

anyone who dares speak critically about Jews in public, after first having their character

assassinated by a huffy Jewish spokesperson, is likely to be arrested by a very real thought police.

 

The stain of darkness has spread much further than you may have thought, but a quick scan of the

literature that has not yet been completely erased by Amazon and the other Jewish mind erasers reveals

the public knew more 80 years ago about the problem that has poisoned all life on this planet than we do today.

 

Those who claim to be involved in the quest for justice should take this assessment to heart, for the

time is running out for humanity’s best qualities as they are steadily being

erased by crazies who know nothing of compassion, humanity or justice.

 

Revisionists are telling the truth

 

You know the revisionists are telling the truth, that Holohoax is the proper term for all this Jewish

Holocaust hysteria, because you know by now — if you are even remotely conscious — that your

government is lying about everything it does, so if it says the Holocaust

was real, you’d automatically know it is lying to you . . . again . . . and still.

 

For instance, our government says it is fighting ISIS in Syria, and then we learn it is funding ISIS

in Syria through such third party operatives as Qatar and Saudi Arabia. This not the first time this

has happened. America’s longest war is now Afghanistan, and the same principles are at work. The

U.S. trains and funds the very people it is supposed to be fighting. We trained the

mujahadeen and they became al-Qaeda, paid by our Pentagon to be both friend and foe.

 

The purpose of all these tragic invasions is the same. In Afghanistan, 17 years of military adventurism

and many thousands of lives were spent to protect the poppy crop, providing fuel for the cycle of

depravity that funnels drugs to the streets, children into prison, and profits from slave

labor. In Syria, it’s the oil in the Golan Heights which Israel is already stealing.

 

The thing to keep in mind is that people are being put in jail for telling the truth. That makes the

idea that you are living in a free country a willful delusion from which no competent decisions about

anything may be made.

 

The only thing Jews fear is the truth.

 

That’s why all these white countries that have been taken over by Jews are slamming people into jail

for challenging the bogus Jewish version of history. Unfortunately — due to Jews owning the majority

of media outlets around the world — the majority of the people

in the world tend to believe their well-distributed propaganda.

 

Like the official story of 9/11 that has long since fallen apart, or the now-debunked lies about the invasion

of Libya, which led to the mass invasion of migrants in Europe. Jew puppets Hillary and Obama

were responsible for the tragic debasement of Europe, which they triggered by their criminal assassination of

Libya and its beloved leader.

 

One hundred years of evidence clearly reveals that the Jews tell the truth about nothing, but nothing

they have done matches the lies they have told about what they did to the Germans during World War II.

 

These lies, and the twisted laws they have spawned, are inexorably strangling every country on Earth,

and every person on this planet. These laws prevent the perpetrators from humanity’s greatest

crimes from ever being apprehended, charged and convicted — because it would be anti-Semitic.

 

Zombie Germany

 

No one who knows the real history of the 20th century dares to travel to Germany — or any European

Union nation —  anymore. They will be slammed into prison for harboring unacceptable thoughts. 

 

As we speak Lady Michelle Renouf, attempting to attend the kangaroo court trial of the Schaeffer

siblings, fears suffering the same fate as Monika Schaeffer, the Canadian fiddle player who made a

humorous YouTube about her mother and the Holocaust, went to Germany to visit her brother Alfred,

and then was promptly snatched by the Holohoax police and slammed into prison with no charges

for many months.

 

She and her brother Alfred are in court this week, with their futures not bright and on the line.

 

This is banana republic garbage. In Germany there is no liberty or justice for those who understand

the worldwide Jewish mind scam. Now that Merkel has set the Africans free in Germany, one can

no longer expect any justice there. Renouf has to skulk around Stuttgart clandestinely

lest she be arrested by Jewish thugs and funneled off to jail for yet another trial.

 

And now for the first time, this mind virus has spread to England, where for the

first time a man has been jailed for daring to insist on the true facts of history. 

 

Jew cops in England

 

Jeremy Bedford-Turner — a.k.a. Jez Turner — was sentenced to 12 months for a 2015 speech he gave

criticizing a Jewish organization known as Shomrim, which is essentially a Jewish police force

that works closely with local police.

 

Prior to Turner’s hasty conviction, Andrew Joyce wrote:

 

Bear in mind that the Crown Prosecution Service has already told Gideon Falter—not once,

but several times—that Jez Turner has committed no crime. If Jez is now found “guilty” on

some trumped-up charge, the Crown Prosecution Service will not only lose all credibility

but the world will see for itself that Jez was right all along when he allegedly said:

“All politicians are nothing but a bunch of puppets dancing to a Jewish tune.”

https://www.darkmoon.me/2017/the-trial-of-jez-turner-a-jewish-witch-hunt/ 

 

Writer Robert Henderson wrote, 

 

But even with a jury the odds were heavily against a not guilty verdict. In the minds of

jurors must be the fear of being called a racist, a fear which has been so successfully inculcated

in the general population that it produces an automated reflex of panic and terror when faced

with the possibility of the label being stuck on them. Any juror faced with a case such as

this must have in the back of their minds that to return a not guilty would be to risk being

called a racist. There is also the sheer shock factor of hearing politically incorrect views being

unashamedly spoken. As it was the jury was out for less than two hours and returned a

unanimous version of guilty.

https://livinginamadhouse.wordpress.com/2018/05/17/the-ever-narrowing-range-of-permitted-opinion-in-england/

 

Long ago we knew more than we know now

 

Before World War II started, one observer wrote:

 

The press has degenerated under Jewish control and influence into lying propaganda agencies

whose chief mission appears to be to deceive and befuddle the people.

In Protocol 12 the Elders of Zion say of the Press:

 

“Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already

being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose

offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be

already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

— George Armstrong, The Rothschild Money Trust, 1940, p.47

 

This Protocol was written before 1905. Seventy-eight years after this was written, the modern

world has much less an idea that Jews control everything, and the laws across Europe that prevent

debunking all these obvious Jewish lies are swallowing up people trying to point out the truth of history

one valiant martyr at a time.

 

Jews can’t prove 6 million died, but we can prove 273,000

died, not all of them Jews, in the German labor camps.

 

To think of all the false Jewish stories about fake Holocaust stories told by pathetic wretches

in search of celebrity is to contemplate the spectrum of human psychological disorders.

 

So, the long and short of it is, you may not even think about a story that affects

Jews negatively, because this has been determined to be a crime against the state.

 

Perhaps you can think of other things that the Jews appear

to be out to take from you, beyond your ability to think for yourself.

 

 

 

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why
we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise.
 
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
 
 
 

British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!


British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!


British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!


British historian David Irving talks about the manipulation of history.
A video talk in four parts that you cannot miss!


Greetings ladies and gentlemen. A few days ago an article about
your humble author appeared at the Holocaust Controversies
blog written by a certain Hans Metzner. Titled Panagiotis Heliotis -
The New Star Shining in the Revisionist Coffin?


This is the last of a series of parts on the same topic. And what a topic that is! 
If you have missed the previous parts you can find them here or on our
You Tube Channel. 

 

 

 _____________________________________________________________________

 

 

Review of Auschwitz Forensically Examined


Auschwitz—Forensically Examined by Cyrus Cox summarizes the forensic evidence proving that Auschwitz

was not an extermination camp. This article will review some of the important points mentioned in this book.

 

The Chemistry of Auschwitz

 

Forensic tests show that all of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Stutthof and Majdanek have one thing

in common: their walls are permeated with Prussian Blue, a compound of cyanide and iron readily discernible by a

distinctive deep blue color. Not only the inner surfaces, but also the outside walls and the mortar between the bricks of

the delousing facilities have Prussian Blue staining. On the other hand, nothing of this sort

can be observed in any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[1]

 

Cyrus Cox writes:

 

While there is an enormous presence of cyanide residue in the masonry of the disinfestation chambers, in the alleged

homicidal gas chambers there is no significant presence at all… The simplest explanation for this is that

there were no gassings with Zyklon B in the alleged homicidal gas chambers, plain and simple.[2]

 

Proponents of the orthodox Holocaust story, however, cannot concede that there were no gassings with Zyklon B in

the alleged-homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau. They have made the following attempts to

explain away the results of forensic tests showing no significant cyanide residues in the alleged gas

chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau:[3]

 

1)   The Kraków Institute of Forensic Research published results in 1994 that claimed not to have understood how it was

possible for Prussian Blue to have formed in walls as a result of their being exposed to hydrogen-cyanide gas.

The researchers therefore adopted methods that excludedPrussian Blue and similar iron/cyanide compounds from

their analyses. Their assumptions made it practically impossible to distinguish between rooms massively exposed to hydrogen

cyanide and those which were not: all would have a “cyanide residue” of close to zero. The Kraków researchers concluded

from their deliberately crippled analyses that, since the gas chambers and delousing facilities all had similar

amounts of cyanide residues, humans were gassed in the gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.[4]

 

Cox dismisses this Kraków Institute of Forensic Research report:

 

The cockeyed blabber about not understanding or about blue wall paint is egregious

flimflam at best; in reality, however, it is a lie to confuse the audience.[5]

 

2)   Dr. James Roth testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he received samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity

as the laboratory manager of Alpha Analytical Laboratories. The purpose of the tests was to determine the total iron

and cyanide content in the samples. Dr. Roth testified that the Prussian Blue produced by a reaction of

the iron and hydrogen cyanide could penetrate deeply into porous materials such as brick and iron.[6]

 

Dr. Roth later changed this testimony in a 1999 movie titled

Mr. Death produced by Errol Morris. Dr. Roth states in this movie:

 

Cyanide is a surface reaction. It’s probably not going to penetrate more than 10 microns. Human hair is 100 microns

in diameter. Crush this sample up, I have just diluted that sample 10,000; 100,000 times. If you’re going to go

looking for it, you’re going to look on the surface only. There’s no reason to go deep, because it’s not going to be there.[7]

 

Cox writes in regard to Dr. Roth’s statement in Mr. Death:

 

That was a lie. To hydrogen-cyanide gas, plaster and mortar are as permeable as a sponge is to water… Roth knows

this, because when he testified under oath at the 1988 Zündel trial, he truthfully said: ‘In porous materials such

as brick and mortar, [hydrogen cyanide] could go fairly deep as long as the surface stayed open’…[8]

 

3)   Dr. Richard Green, who says “I am not embarrassed to call Holocaust denial hate speech,” agrees with Germar Rudolf

that the Prussian Blue found in the delousing chambers is the result of gassing with hydrogen cyanide. However, Dr. Green

offers a possible alternative explanation for why the outside walls of the delousing chambers have blue staining. Green writes:

 

[T]he discoloration on the outside of walls [of the delousing chambers], ought to make one consider what possible

processes could have taken place outside of the delousing chambers. For example, is it possible that materials that

had been soaked with aqueous solutions of HCN were leaned against the outside of the buildings? Not enough is

known, but it is premature to conclude that the staining on the outside of buildings

owes its origins to processes that took place within those buildings.[9]

 

Cox writes concerning Dr. Green’s statement:

 

Which absurd auxiliary thesis will come next? Maybe the one by Dr. Richard Green, who seriously proposed that

the cyanide residues in the disinfestation chambers did not stem from fumigations, but were caused by objects

leaning against the wall which had been soaked in a “hydrogen-cyanide solution”? Where then do

the cyanide residues close to the ceiling, in the middle and outside of the wall come from?[10]

 

4)   French biochemist and Auschwitz veteran Dr. Georges Wellers provides another explanation by stating that humans

are considerably more sensitive to hydrogen cyanide than insects. The homicidal gassings at Auschwitz/Birkenau thus

were conducted with smaller amounts of hydrogen cyanide over shorter times. Wellers says the victims would have

inhaled almost all of the hydrogen cyanide, so there presumably was nothing left to react with the masonry.[11]

 

Cox writes that Wellers’s explanation overlooks several things:

 

  1. Executions in U.S. gas chambers took on average around nine minutes before the victims were dead;

  2. The Zyklon B used in Auschwitz/Birkenau slowly discharges its toxin over a period of one to two hours,
  3. in contrast to US methods, in which a cyanide “egg” virtually “boils” in a pot of pure sulfuric acid;

  4. None of the alleged-homicidal gas chambers used in Auschwitz/Birkenau had devices such as warm-air blowers
  5. to aid evaporation of the hydrogen cyanide. Such devices were part of the standard equipment of the disinfestation
  6. chambers used in that period (the gas chambers are said to have used
  7.  precisely the same form of Zyklon B as did the disinfestation chambers);

  8. The concentration of toxic gas in the chambers would have steadily increased for one or two hours; therefore,
  9.  ventilation of the chamber before the complete evaporation
  10.  of the hydrogen cyanide would have been of no avail; and
  11. The victims before dying could have inhaled only an insignificant part of the
  12.  hydrogen-cyanide gas that would have been in the homicidal gas chambers.[12]

Cox lists several additional factors indicating that the alleged-homicidal gas chambers had a significantly

higher tendency of forming long-term-stable cyanide residue than the disinfestation buildings. He concludes:

 

In the masonry samples of the underground morgue, we should find approximately similar residues as in

the disinfestation chambers, if not even more, provided that the stories told by the witnesses are true.[13]

 

The Cremations of Auschwitz

 

Cyrus Cox debunks eyewitness testimony claiming that gigantic flames burst from the chimneys of the crematories

of Auschwitz/Birkenau. The construction blueprints show that the flues and the chimney of the largest crematories in

Auschwitz/Birkenau each had a length of about 15 meters. The coke and coal used to fuel the furnaces burn with a short

flame not exceeding half a meter. This fuel could not even have produced flames that protruded out of the cremation muffles.[14] 

 

Many witnesses also claim that smoke constantly covered all of Auschwitz/Birkenau. However, none of the aerial photos

taken of Birkenau by Allied reconnaissance planes since late May 1944 shows a column of smoke from any of the crematories.

This is so even though these facilities were allegedly cremating the Jews deported from Hungary at their peak capacity.[15]

 

The capacity of the Auschwitz/Birkenau crematories has also been exaggerated by proponents of the official Holocaust story.

The crematories of Auschwitz/Birkenau had muffles with doors 1.97 feet in width and height, and were meant to cremate

only one corpse at a time without casket. The full incineration of a single corpse took about an hour.[16] If one considers

that the furnace had to be cleaned daily from ash and cinders, a coke-fired crematory

could be operated for a maximum of only about 20 hours per day.[17]

 

There effectively were never more than 38 cremation muffles concurrently operating at Auschwitz/Birkenau.

Their theoretical maximum daily capacity on a 20-hour-per-day operational schedule amounts to:

 

38 muffles x 20 hours x 1 corpse/hour = 760 corpses.

 

Since single furnaces or even complete crematories had to be shut down on occasion for necessary repairs, and since

the furnaces were often operated by unskilled detainees, one can assume that the actual cremation capacity at Auschwitz/Birkenau

was significantly lower.[18] There was never enough capacity at Auschwitz/Birkenau

to cremate 4,800 corpses per day as alleged by pro-Holocaust historians.[19]

 

A set of documents has been preserved showing the quantities of coke delivered to Auschwitz/Birkenau in the period

from February 1942 to October 1943. These documents show that the new crematories at Birkenau weren’t used as

intensively as the old one at the Auschwitz main camp, and that there was not enough fuel delivered to cremate the

additional hundreds of thousands of corpses claimed to have accrued at Auschwitz/Birkenau. These documents

also show that coke deliveries starting in March 1943 approximately match the

numbers of dead reported in the Auschwitz/Birkenau Death Books. [20]

 

Cox does acknowledge that approximately 13,000 corpses were buried in mass graves in Birkenau in 1942 because

deaths from a typhus epidemic exceeded the limited cremation capacity in the camp at the time. Most of these bodies

were later exhumed, with many bodies probably directly burned on pyres.[21] However, Cox says a photograph taken

of Birkenau on May 31, 1944 provides irrefutable proof that the alleged incineration of Hungarian

Jews on enormous outdoor pyres has been nothing other than a gigantic propaganda lie.[22]

 

Carlo Mattogno agrees with Cox’s analysis. In his book Auschwitz: The End of a Legend,

Mattogno states in regard to Allied aerial photographs taken at Birkenau on May 31, 1944:

 

It is pointed out also that the aerial photographs taken by the Allied military on 31 May 1944, at the crucial time

of presumed extermination, on the day of the arrival at Birkenau of about 15,000 deportees, and after 14 days

of intense arrivals (184,000 deportees, averaging 13,000 per day) and with an extermination toll (according to Pressac’s

hypothesis) of at least 110,000 homicidally gassed, which would have had to average 7,800 per day, every single

day for 14 consecutive days; after all of that, the photographs do not show the slightest evidence of this alleged

enormous extermination: No trace of smoke, no trace of pits, crematory or otherwise, burning or not, no sign of dirt

extracted from pits, no trace of wood set aside for use in pits, no sign of vehicles or any other type of activity in the

crucial zones of the courtyard of Crematory V nor in the earth of Bunker 2, nor in Crematories II and III.

These photographs constitute irrefutable proof that the story of extermination of the Hungarian Jews is historically unfounded.[23]     

                

Suppressing Evidence

 

Cox describes the first independent forensic report on Auschwitz:

 

In 1972, the two architects Walter Dejaco and Fritz Ertl, who were involved in the planning and construction of

the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau, had to stand trial in Vienna for assisting in mass murder. The Auschwitz

Museum had sent the Viennese court the construction plans of these buildings. Because the judges found themselves

incompetent to evaluate these plans, they tasked the Viennese architect Gerhard Dubin, a certified engineer, to

examine these designs to ascertain whether the spaces denoted by the Auschwitz Museum as execution

chambers could have been used as such or could have been restructured for such use. Dubin answered “No” to

both questions in his expert report. This was one of the reasons why both defendants were ultimately acquitted

by the jury. Subsequently, an unknown person removed Dubin’s embarrassing (for the orthodoxy) expert report

from the trial records, because today it is not to be found there. This destruction

of evidence is not only grossly anti-scientific, it is also a criminal act.[24]

 

The Holocaust orthodoxy continues to suppress evidence to this day. Publicly disputing the official Holocaust narrative

is a crime in some 19 countries. Moreover, in Germany it is prohibited by threat of punishment to file a motion with the

court to admit evidence seeking to prove that revisionist statements are correct. The reason given is that such motions

constitute “Holocaust denial” and would therefore be a criminal act during a public trial. Accordingly,

several defense lawyers have been sentenced simply because they filed such a motion.[25] 

 

Holocaust revisionist writings cannot even be read in court in modern-day Germany. Cox writes:

 

In order to keep the public in the dark about the fact that the defendants are being sent to the dungeon for entirely

harmless and scientifically well-based statements, their writings for which they are on trial are moreover not read out

in the courtroom, which would normally be obligatory, but the trial participants—judges,

prosecution, defense—are ordered to read the material by themselves at home.

 

Ever since the introduction of these measures, silence has been once more every

citizen’s primary duty in German courtrooms. Shut up, and don’t you dare protest![26]     

     

Conclusion

 

Auschwitz—Forensically Examined provides an excellent introduction to the forensic evidence proving that Auschwitz/Birkenau

was not an extermination camp. Readers who are interested in a more detailed analysis of the forensic

evidence can read books written by Germar Rudolf and Carlo Mattogno to gain additional insights. 

 

Cyrus Cox states the primary reason for knowing that there were no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau:

“While there is an enormous presence of cyanide residue in the masonry of the disinfestation chambers, in the alleged

homicidal gas chambers there is no significant presence at all.”[27] Pro-Holocaust historians have yet to provide a

credible explanation why no significant presence of cyanide residue has been

found in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz/Birkenau.

 

Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom writes: “…for any alleged human gas chamber found in a German World War II

labour camp let us merely measure cyanide in the walls: if it’s not there, it didn’t happen.”[28]    

 

 

Endnotes


[1] Rudolf, Germar, “Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, Ala.: Theses and Dissertations Press, 2000, pp. 363-371.

[2] Cox, Cyrus, Auschwitz—Forensically Examined, Uckfield, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, 2019, pp. 41, 53.

[3] Ibid., p. 41.

[4] Rudolf, Germar. op. cit., pp. 368-369.

[5] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 40.

[6] Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in the Canadian “False News” Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers  Ltd., 1992, pp. 362-363.

[7] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mr._Death; Richard J. Green, “Report of Richard J. Green”, introduced in evidence during the libel case before the Queen’s Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice, The Strand, London, David John Cawdell Irving  v. (1) Penguin Books Limited, (2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, ref. 1996 I. No. 1113, 2001, p. 16; http://www.phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/irving-david/rudolf/affweb.pdf.

[8] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 42.

[9] Richard J. Green. “The Chemistry of Auschwitz,” 10 May 1998, p. 18. http://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/.

[10] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., p. 54.

[11] Ibid., p. 42.

[12] Ibid., pp. 42-45.

[13] Ibid., pp. 45-47.

[14] Ibid., pp. 57-58.

[15] Ibid., pp. 59-60.

[16] Ibid., pp. 61-62.

[17] Ibid., pp. 64-65.

[18] Ibid., p. 66.

[19] Ibid., p. 61.

[20] Ibid., pp. 67, 70-71.

[21] Ibid., pp. 69-70.

[22] Ibid., p. 84.

[23] Mattogno, Carlo. Auschwitz: The End of a Legend, Newport Beach, Cal.: The Institute for Historical Review, 1994, p. 32.

[24] Cox, Cyrus. op. cit., pp. 21-22.

[25] Ibid., pp. 92-94.

[26] Ibid., p. 95.

[27] Ibid., p. 41.

[28] Kollerstrom, Nicholas. Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfield, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, 2015, p. 70.

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

 

DEBUNKING THE MYTH OF DR. MENGELE

 

 By Mike King

 

Of the many sub-fables spun off of the grand fable of “Auschwitz ,” the most shocking and

enduring is the myth of that evil, sadistic, mass-murdering monster whose name ranks behind

only those of Adolf Hitler and SS Chief Heinrich Himmler on the all-time scary dude list.

The notorious camp doctor known for conducting live invasive experiments on Jewish inmates

has long since been immortalized in articles, books and films. You know the name –

none other than the big bad Dr. Josef Mengele (cue dramatic piano music) --

aka "The Angel of Death ." (cue even more dramatic piano music)

 

There is, however, just a wee little problem with this official narrative of the big bad Mengele..

To put it bluntly, just like those long-since discredited tales of shrunken heads, lamp shades &

soap made from dead Jews, “zee gas chambers ,” and babies being tossed into open fire-pits

– the Myth of Mengele is, well, bullshit from start to finish!

 

Mengele-Mania has generated lots of shekels for lots of writers and film makers.

Image result for mengele Image result for BOYS FROM BRAZIL

*

Image result for mengele books

  *

 

The Three Biggest Lies About Dr. Mengele

1.   He condemned inmates who could not work to death in the gas chambers

2.   He conducted cruel experiments with twins.

3.   He conducted other cruel medical experiments on random inmates

 

Let us debunk:

 

1. Mengele and the Gas Chambers

This one is easy because we absolutely know, for certain, that there were no gas chambers at

Bullschwitz or any other internment camp! If you’re new to “Holocaust Denial ,” here are

a pair of powerful pieces (to read later) which will – unless you are in deep denial – forever

dispel the silly notion of “zee gas chambers ” (here & here). Hence, how could

Dr. Mengele have condemned people to die in "gas chambers " that never even existed?

 

Image result for gas chambers hoax Image result for holocaust hoax books breaking the spell

The "gas chambers" lie has been debunked so thoroughly that Amazon had to be pressured by
"the usual suspects" into banning many books about the Holohoax and World War II.
 
 

2. Mengele and Experiments on Twins

If the alleged experiments Mengele is alleged to have performed with twins were so cruel and

deadly (like sewing twin babies together in an attempt to artificially create conjoined “Siamese Twins!”

--- ha ha ha ha ha -- yeah, right!), then how were most of the twins enrolled in his research able

to survive the war and then, in 1984, form an association which still lobbies for their interests?

The organization / museum is named “CANDLES” (Children of Auschwitz Nazi Deadly Lab

Experiment Survivors). In fact, they, their descendants and their advocates are still

raking in shekels off of Mengele's wrongly tarnished name (cha ching!). (here)

Now just focus on the name of that organization for a bit and ask yourself: How the frickety-frack can

“deadly lab experiments” leave any so many "survivors?" The evidence – or lack thereof – is very

clear: Mengele did not commit any crimes on the Jewish twins. An anthropologist in addition to

being a physician, Mengele's research was limited to behavioral / observational studies only – nothing surgical.

Image result for mengele Image result for CANDLES&amp;rdquo; (Children of Auschwitz 

1. Twins Jiri and Josef Fiser were studied by Mengele, and "survived" to tell tales

about it. // 2  & 3: Twin Eva Kor gives speeches on how she "survived" Mengele.

 

3. Mengele Randomly Conducted Other Cruel Experiments

The “eyewitness” testimony as to the medically senseless and cruel experiments supposedly

performed by Mengele (changing eye colors by dye injections, removing healthy teeth just for

the fun of it, transplanting organs to random places in the body -- ha ha ha ha ha --yeah, right!)

ring as absurd and untrue as stories of shrunken heads and lamp shades.

But because the “survivors ” have been sainted, none dare to question them.

 

Interestingly, the “victims” of these monstrous experiments, never showed any signs of these

cruel procedures. There was never even the slightest bit of evidence to support the claims of these “survivors” -- 

no documents, no autopsies. Nothing!

Image result for mengele experiments Image result for mad dentists

1. Mengele also studied dwarfism. Above, the 7 dwarfs of the Ovitz family. // 2. Tales of

Mad Mengele torturing Jews by ripping out healthy teeth just for his amusement are totally without basis,

and not even worth rebutting.

 

Who Really was Josef Mengele?

 

Before the war, the brilliant Mengele, after studying philosophy, went on to earn doctorates in

anthropology and medicine. His main career focus was as a researcher – hence, the observation

of twins, dwarfs and others at Auschwitz. During the war, Mengele was awarded the Iron Cross 2nd Class,

and then an Iron Cross 1st Class for his bravery in rescuing two men from a burning tank.

After being seriously wounded in action on the eastern front in 1942, he was declared unfit for

active service and then transferred to Auschwitz where he served as a doctor and researcher.

 

Now, here’s the kicker. Dr. Mengele, as one of the lead physicians in a camp afflicted from time

to time with outbreaks of typhus, worked tirelessly to save lives – not take them! The Zyklon B

“gas” was a pesticide used to kill lice, not people. Furthermore, under the jurisdiction of Mengele,

and other camp doctors, an estimated 3000 Jewish babies were born and cared for at Auschwitz.

True story, boys and girls. Read "The Auschwitz Baby Boom" (here)

 

Image result for A drawing of a prisoner showing Dr. Wirths, garrison physician at AuschwitzImage result for A drawing of a prisoner showing Dr. Wirths, garrison physician at Auschwitz Image result for mengele experiments

1. Drawing depicts Dr. Eduard Wirths -- an Auschwitz doctor and colleague of Mengele's --

as a valiant knight waging battle against deadly typhus-carrying lice. // 2. SS officers at Auschwitz.

From left to right: Richard Baer, Josef Mengele, Josef Kramer, Rudolf Höss // 3.

Many of the Jewish babies born at Auschwitz "survived" and lived long lives.

 

About four years after the end of the war, Mengele, a true-believing SS man, escaped to Argentina

-- where he lived for about 10 years while working as a carpenter. He then fled to Paraguay in

1959 and Brazil in 1960. Now a most-wanted fugitive, Mengele was being hunted by the

United States, West Germany, Israel, and independently by the hideous “Nazi hunter,” Simon Wiesenthal

of "babies in the bon-fire" fame. He eluded capture in spite of extradition requests

by the West German government and covert operations by Israel’s Mossad.

 

Headline: New York Times (May 11, 1985)

Three Nations Joining to Hunt Mengele 

By Ralph Blumenthal (cough cough)

(here)

The article as it originally appeared.  Image result for mengele wanted
In time, the hate-filled psychopaths came to believe their own dirty lies about noble Dr. Mengele
-- Image 1: NY Slimes front page story // Image 2: Lots of shekels were offered to locate Dr. Mengele.

 

 

Unbeknown to his hunters at the time -- the good doctor, philosopher, anthropologist, decorated

war hero, gentleman, scholar, humanitarian and carpenter died in 1979, at the age of 67, after

suffering a stroke while swimming off the coast in Brazil. (Or did Mossad finally get him "on the

down low?") He was buried under a fake name. According to his only child, his son, Rolf, Dr. Mengele

maintained his innocence until the end. We totally believe him. And, given all the other lies

we’ve been fed about everything else related to The Bad War -- you should too.

 

 _______________________________________________________________

 

 

How Danuta Czech Invented

100,000 Gassing Victims

An Analysis of the Auschwitz Chronicle

– Part 1: 1942

 
 
 

Abstract

Danuta Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle are one of the most important secondary sources on

the history of the Auschwitz Camp.[1] The information found in it is a major basis for a large

body of literature dealing with the Auschwitz Camp. All the more important it is, then, to

verify whether the data contained in it is accurate. The following paper looks into the reliability

of data contained in the Chronicle dealing with mass deportations mainly of Jews[2] from

all over Europe to Auschwitz in 1942. It compares the data contained in the primary

sources quoted by Czech with what Czech herself claims about them.

 

 

Previous Research

Already in 1994, the Spanish revisionist Enrique Aynat published a booklet that contains

a critical article on the way Danuta Czech determined the fate of the Jews deported from

France and Belgium to Auschwitz in 1942.[3] He pointed out that the only source Czech

relied upon regarding arrivals at Auschwitz were handwritten lists of registration numbers

assigned to the deportees which were clandestinely compiled by inmates and smuggled

out of the camp in 1944. These lists contain the date of an arriving transport, the registration

numbers assigned to male and female deportees, and in many but not all cases the location

whence these transports had come. It is not known how reliable these lists are. After all,

they were compiled by individuals naturally hostile to their captors. It is important to emphasize,

however, that these lists do not contain any information about inmates arriving at the

camp who were not registered, and if such deportees existed, what their fates were.

 

Extant documents from the German wartime authorities in France, Belgium and the Netherlands

are more detailed about the persons deported to Auschwitz, since among them are lists

containing not only the exact number of deportees sent to Auschwitz with every transport,

but also the deportees’ names, among other things. Hence it is known that not every person

deported on a certain train to Auschwitz was admitted to that camp on the train’s arrival

(the journey usually took two days). The central question is: what happened to the persons

put on a train at the point of origin who were not registered at the Auschwitz Camp? The

(obligatory) mainstream hypothesis is that, by and large, these persons simply perished

“in the gas chambers” at Auschwitz.

 

In his 1994 paper, Aynat put forward a number of arguments disputing that claim,

among them German wartime documents indicating that Jews fit for labor where sent to

Auschwitz for the purpose of labor deployment, whereas those unfit for work were meant

to be deported not to Auschwitz but to the “Government General”, i.e., occupied Poland.

Since during the war Germany had incorporated the area around Auschwitz into its

province of Upper Silesia, in their eyes Auschwitz was a part of Germany, not of occupied Poland.

 

Aynat discusses in some detail the fact that, for the various resistance movements highly

active inside and outside the camp, Auschwitz was virtually transparent, as information

about what was going on inside the camp was frequently and easily reported to the

various headquarters of the resistance. In other words: nothing could be kept a secret at

Auschwitz. However, when analyzing the documents produced by the Polish government in

exile regarding Auschwitz, it becomes clear that the sensational news of conveyor-belt mass

murder in chemical slaughterhouses does not play a major role, and that the claims (not)

made in these documents to a large degree undercut today’s mainstream narrative.

[4] Aynat also discusses several wartime sources and documents pointing to

the fact that Jews sent to Auschwitz were in some cases shipped further east.

 

A year after Aynat’s initial book on the topic was published, the Auschwitz Museum

published a five-volume work on the so-called Death Books (Sterbebücher) of Auschwitz

containing detailed information on almost 69,000 inmates incarcerated at Auschwitz –

meaning officially registered there – who had died there. Aynat subsequently did the Herculean

work of matching, one by one, the names listed on the deportation lists of transports originating

in France with those listed in the Death Books in order to match them, so the fate of these

deportees could be determined. His results show that many if not most of the French Jews

deported to and registered at Auschwitz tragically died there, probably mainly due to the

catastrophic typhus epidemic which raged in this camp starting in early 1942.[5]

 

The present paper will look in a more-detailed fashion into how Danuta Czech handled the

sources she had at her disposal to come to the claims she made in her Chronicle about

the number of Auschwitz deportees allegedly killed in gas chambers. I will focus here

exclusively on deportees sent to the camp with major deportation transports organized by

Germany’s Reichssicherheitshauptamt (RSHA, Reich Security Main Office), the National-Socialist

equivalent to the current U.S. Department of Homeland Security, so to speak. A

considerable number of deportees from these transports are said to have been sent,

without registration, straight from the railway ramp to the gas chambers. I will establish in

this paper how Czech makes that determination based on the evidence adduced. I will not

discuss the many claimed gassings of usually smaller batches of inmates which had been

properly admitted to and registered in the camp but which are said to have met their gruesome

end in the gas chambers later due to some more-or-less-arbitrary decision by the SS

administration or some SS physician. The gassings resulting from these so-called “selections”

among regular prisoners have been thoroughly discussed elsewhere by Carlo Mattogno, where

he shows how the extant documentation in many cases clashes with claims of mass murder.[6]

 

 

The Data

 

The following table contains data about all the entries in Czech’s Chronicle referring to

arrivals of deportation transports at Auschwitz which are mentioned either in extant documents

by the German authorities responsible for these deportation trains, and/or in the clandestinely

compiled list of registered arrivals mentioned earlier.[7] The meaning of each column is as follows:

 

Column 1: The train’s date of arrival at Auschwitz;

also the respective entry in Czech’s Chronicle.

 

Column 2: Number of arriving inmates according to D. Czech. In some case, Czech either

gives no number or indicates by the way she expresses herself that she does not know

how many inmates were on that transport (“etwa” in the German edition; “approximately”

in the English edition). In these cases, I entered three question marks for cases where

Czech makes no assumptions, followed with a number in parentheses

in cases where she speculates about the total number of deportees.

 

Column 3: point of origin; this derives either from the clandestine list of assigned registration

numbers or from other extant wartime documentation. In some cases, this is based merely

on temporal correlation with an event claimed elsewhere (Norway, Luxemburg). In that

case, I have entered a question mark with Czech’s speculation given in parentheses.

 

Column 4: number of registered females according to the clandestinely compiled lists of registration numbers.

 

Column 5: number of registered males, as above.

 

Column 6: sum of previous two columns.

 

Column 7: percentage of deported inmates registered at Auschwitz.

 

Column 8: Number of deportees not registered at Auschwitz with unknown fate.

 

Column 9: fate of claimed unregistered deportees according to Czech.

 

Column 10: proof adduced by Czech to support here claim about the fate of unregistered

deportees. In case the total number of deportees is unknown/uncertain but she makes

a claim in this regard anyhow, her source for that number is given, if she has any.

 

Date arrivals from reg. male reg. female reg. total reg. % unreg. unreg. fate proof
3/26/1942 999 Slovakia   999 999 100% 0    
3/28/1942 798 Slovakia   798 798 100% 0    
3/30/1942 1112 France 1112   1112 100% 0    
4/2/1942 965 Slovakia   965 965 100% 0    
4/3/1942 997 Slovakia   997 997 100% 0    
4/19/1942 1000 Slovakia 464 536 1000 100% 0    
4/23/1942 1000 Slovakia 543 457 1000 100% 0    
4/24/1942 1000 Slovakia 442 558 1000 100% 0    
4/29/1942 723 Slovakia 423 300 723 100% 0    
5/22/1942 1000 Slovakia     1000 100% 0    
6/7/1942 1000 France     1000 100% 0    
20/6/1942 659 Slovakia 404 255 659 100% 0    
6/24/1942 999 France 933 66 999 100% 0    
6/27/1942 1000 France 1000   1000 100% 0    
6/30/1942 1038 France 1004 34 1038 100% 0    
7/4/1942 ??? Slovakia 264 108 372 - “rest” gassed none
7/8/1942 1170* France     1170 100% 0    
7/11/1942 ??? Slovakia 182 148 330 - “rest” gassed none
7/17/1942 2000 Netherlands 1251 300 1551 78% 449 gassed Höss
7/18/1942 ??? Slovakia 327 178 505 - “rest” gassed none
7/19/1942 928 France 809 119 928 100% 0    
7/21/1942 1000 France 504 121 625 63% 375 gassed none
7/22/1942 931 Netherlands 479 297 776 83% 155 gassed none
7/23/1942 827 France 411 390 801 97% 26 gassed none
7/24/1942 1000 France 615 385 1000 100% 0    
7/25/1942 ??? Slovakia 192 93 285 - “rest” gassed none
7/25/1942 1000 Netherlands 516 293 809 81% 191 gassed none
7/26/1942 1000 France 370 630 1000 100% 0    
7/28/1942 1010 Netherlands 473 315 788 78% 222 gassed none
7/29/1942 990 France 248 742 990 100% 0    
7/30/1942 1000 France 270 514 784 78% 216    
8/1/1942 ??? Slovakia 165 75 240 - “rest” gassed none
8/2/1942 1052 France 693 359 1052 100% 0    
8/4/1942 1013 Netherlands 429 268 697 69% 316 gassed none
8/5/1942 1034 France 22 542 564 55% 470 gassed none
8/5/1942 998 Belgium 426 318 744 75% 254 -  
8/7/1942 1014 France 214 96 310 31% 704 gassed none
8/7/1942 987 Netherlands 315 149 464 47% 523 gassed none
8/9/1942 1069 France 63 211 274 26% 795 gassed none
8/11/1942 559 Netherlands 164 131 295 53% 264 gassed none
8/12/1942 1006 France 140 100 240 24% 766 gassed none
8/13/1942 999 Belgium 290 228 518 52% 481 gassed none
8/14/1942 1007 France 233 62 295 29% 712 gassed none
8/15/1942 505 Netherlands 98 79 177 35% 328 gassed none
8/16/1942 991 France 115 0 115 12% 876 gassed none
8/17/1942 1000 Belgium 157 205 362 36% 638 gassed none
8/18/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 87 69 156 - 0 -  
8/18/1942 506 Netherlands 319 40 359 71% 147 gassed none
8/19/1942 997 France 65 35 100 10% 897 gassed none
8/20/1942 998 Belgium 104 71 175 18% 823 gassed none
8/21/1942 1000 France 138 45 183 18% 817 gassed none
8/22/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 110 86 196 - 0 -  
8/22/1942 1008 Netherlands 411 217 628 62% 380 gassed none
8/23/1942 1000 France 90 18 108 11% 892 gassed none
8/25/1942 519 Netherlands 231 38 269 52% 250 gassed none
8/26/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 71 88 159 - 0 -  
8/26/1942 1000 France 92   92 9% 908 gassed none
8/27/1942 ??? ? (Luxemburg) 82   82 - 0 -  
8/27/1942 995 Belgium 101 114 215 22% 780 gassed none
8/28/1942 1000 France 227 36 263 26% 737 gassed none
8/30/1942 608 Netherlands 0 0 0 0% 608 -  
8/30/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 45 31 76 - unknown gassed? none
8/31/1942 1000 France 253 71 324 32% 676 gassed none
8/31/1942 1000 Belgium 200   200 20% 800 gassed none
9/1/1942 608 Netherlands 0 0 0 0% 608 -  
9/2/1942 1000 France 212 27 239 24% 761 gassed none
9/3/1942 1000 Belgium 210 86 296 30% 704 gassed none
9/4/1942 1000 France 210 113 323 32% 677 gassed none
9/5/1942 714 Netherlands 53 0 53 7% 661 gassed none
9/6/1942 1013 France 216 38 254 25% 759 gassed none
9/8/1942 930 Netherlands 206 26 232 25% 698 gassed none
9/9/1942 1000 France 259 52 311 31% 689 gassed none
9/10/1942 1000 Belgium 221 64 285 29% 715 gassed none
9/11/1942 1000 France 223 68 291 29% 709 gassed none
9/12/1942 874 Netherlands 226 34 260 30% 614 gassed none
9/12/1942 1000 France 302 78 380 38% 620 gassed none
9/14/1942 1000 Belgium 295 105 400 40% 600 gassed none
9/16/1942 902 Netherlands 247 29 276 31% 626 gassed none
9/16/1942 1000 France 306 49 355 36% 645 gassed none
9/17/1942 1048 Belgium 230 101 331 32% 717 gassed none
9/18/1942 1003 France 300 147 447 45% 556 gassed none
9/19/1942 ??? Slovakia 206 71 277 - “rest” gassed none
9/20/1942 1002 Netherlands 301 111 412 41% 590 gassed none
9/20/1942 1000 France 231 110 341 34% 659 gassed none
9/22/1942 713 Netherlands 133 50 183 26% 530 gassed none
9/23/1942 ??? Slovakia 294 67 361 - “rest” gassed none
9/24/1942 1000 France 215 144 359 36% 641 gassed none
9/25/1942 1000 France 399 126 525 53% 475 gassed none
9/26/1942 928 Netherlands 129 50 179 19% 749 gassed none
9/27/1942 1004 France 215 91 306 30% 698 gassed none
9/28/1942 1742 Belgium 286 58 344 20% 1398 gassed none
9/29/1942 904 France 223 48 271 30% 633 gassed none
9/30/1942 610 Netherlands 37 119 156 26% 454 gassed none
10/2/1942 210 France 34 22 56 27% 154 gassed none
10/3/1942 1014 Netherlands 329 33 362 36% 652 gassed none
10/7/1942 2012 Netherlands 540 58 598 30% 1414 gassed none
10/11/1942 1703 Netherlands 344 108 452 27% 1251 gassed none
10/12/1942 1674 Belgium 28 88 116 7% 1558 gassed none
10/14/1942 1711 Netherlands 351 69 420 25% 1291 gassed none
10/18/1942 1710 Netherlands 0 116 116 7% 1594 gassed none
10/21/1942 ??? Slovakia 121 78 199 - “rest” gassed none
10/21/1942 1327 Netherlands 497 0 497 37% 830 gassed none
10/25/1942 988 Netherlands 21 32 53 5% 935 gassed none
10/26/1942 1471 Belgium 460 116 576 39% 895 gassed none
10/27/1942 841 Netherlands 224 205 429 51% 412 gassed none
10/28/1942 1866 Theresienstadt 215 32 247 13% 1619 gassed none
11/1/1942 659 Netherlands 0 0 0 0% 659 gassed none
11/1/1942 1014 Germany 0 37 37 4% 977 gassed none
11/3/1942 1696 Belgium 702 75 777 46% 919 gassed none
11/4/1942 954 Netherlands 0 50 50 5% 904 gassed none
11/6/1942 1000 France 269 92 361 36% 639 gassed none
11/7/1942 ??? (2000) Zichenau 465 229 694 35% 1306 gassed none
11/7/1942 465 Netherlands 0 0 0 0% 465 gassed none
11/8/1942 ??? (1000) Zichenau 0 0 0 0% 1000 gassed none
11/8/1942 1000 France 145 82 227 23% 773 gassed none
11/9/1942 ??? (1000) Białystok 190 104 294 29% 706 gassed none
11/11/1942 1000 France 150 100 250 25% 750 gassed none
11/12/1942 758 Netherlands 3 48 51 7% 707 gassed none
11/13/1942 745 France 112 34 146 20% 599 gassed none
11/14/1942 ??? (2500) Zichenau 633 135 768 31% 1732 gassed none
11/14/1942 ??? (1500) Białystok 282 379 661 44% 839 gassed none
11/18/1942 ??? (209) ? (Norway) 8 22 30 - ­- gassed none
11/18/1942 ??? (1000) Białystok 165 65 230 23% 770 gassed none
11/19/1942 ??? (1500) Zichenau 532 361 893 60% 607 gassed none
11/21/1942 726 Netherlands 47 35 82 11% 644 gassed none
11/22/1942 ??? (1500) Zichenau 300 132 432 29% 1068 gassed none
11/25/1942 ??? (2000) Grodno Ghetto 305 128 433 22% 1567 gassed none
11/26/1942 709 Netherlands 0 42 42 6% 667 gassed none
11/28/1942 ??? (1000) Zichenau 325 169 494 49% 506 gassed none
11/30/1942 ??? (1000) Zichenau 130 37 167 17% 833 gassed none
12/1/1942 532 Norway 186 0 186 35% 346 gassed none
12/2/1942 826 Netherlands 77 0 77 9% 749 gassed none
12/2/1942 ??? (1000) Grodno Ghetto 178 60 238 24% 762 gassed none
12/3/1942 ??? (1000) Płonsk Ghetto 347 0 347 35% 653 gassed none
12/6/1942 811 Netherlands 16 0 16 2% 795 gassed none
12/6/1942 ??? (2500) Mława Ghetto 406 0 406 16% 2094 gassed none
12/8/1942 ??? (1000) Grodno Ghetto 231 60 291 27% 769 gassed none
12/10/1942 927 Netherlands 39 3 42 5% 885 gassed none
12/10/1942 1060 Germany 137 25 162 15% 898 gassed none
12/10/1942 ??? (2500) Małkinia 524 0 524 21% 1976 gassed none
12/12/1942 ??? (2000) Małkinia 416 6 422 21% 1578 gassed none
12/14/1942 757 Netherlands 121 0 121 16% 636 gassed none
12/14/1942 ??? (1500) N.D. Mazow. 580 0 580 39% 920 gassed none
12/17/1942 ??? (2000) Płonsk Ghetto 523 257 780 39% 1220 gassed none
Totals: 143,209       60,815 43% 82,394    

* Acc. to Czech, this transport actually contained political detainees from France, some of whom may have been Jews.

 

Danuta Czech also lists a number of deportations for which no entries exist in

the clandestinely compiled registration lists. They all come from either of two sources:

 

1. A book by the Polish author Natan E. Szternfinkiel (Zagłada Żydow

Sosnowca, Centralna Żydowska Komisja Historyczna, Katowice 1946).

 

2. Martin Gilbert’s atlas on the Holocaust (Endlösung: Die Vertreibung

und Vernichtung der Juden. Ein Atlas, Rowohlt, Reinbek 1982).

 

The first book is marked by anti-German propaganda and is devoid of any reference to

any sources regarding its claims on deportation of Jews from Ilkenau and Sosnowiec

(German Sosnowitz) to Auschwitz. The second is marked by the total absence of any source

references. In other words: both books back up their claims with – nothing. Here are these

claimed deportations backed up by nothing:

 

Date arrivals from reg. male reg. female reg. total reg. % unreg. unreg. fate proof
5/5/1942 5200 ??? 0 0 0 0% 5,200 gassed Gilbert
5/12/1942 1500 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 1,500 gassed Szternfinkiel
6/2/1942 ??? Ilkenau 0 0 0 0% ??? gassed Szternfinkiel
6/17/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 2,000 gassed Szternfinkiel
6/20/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 2,000 gassed Szternfinkiel
1/8/1942 5000 Bendsburg 0 0 0 0% 5,000 gassed Gilbert
8/15/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 27 75 102 5% 1,898 gassed Szternfinkiel
8/16/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 2,000 gassed Szternfinkiel
8/17/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 2,000 gassed Szternfinkiel
8/18/1942 2000 Sosnowitz 0 0 0 0% 2,000 gassed Szternfinkiel
Subtotals: 23,700       102   23,598    
Totals: 166,909       60,917 36% 105,992

 

 

 

 

All deportees of these transports are said to have been killed in gas chambers, with only

one exception: the entry of August 15, for which Czech gives a number of registered inmates

which she must have derived from the registration lists. However, there is nothing in these

documents confirming that the transport with which these 102 admitted deportees arrived

consisted of 2,000 inmates, let alone that 1898 of them were killed. In fact, Szternfinkiel insists in all ca

ses that the deportees were killed all and sundry, hence Czech’s correction here is a manipulation of the source.

Data Analysis

 

Idle Bunker 1

 

The mass murder of the Jews at Auschwitz using gas chambers is said to have started

sometime in early 1942. For this purpose, the interior of an old farmhouse in the vicinity

of the Birkenau Camp is said to have been converted into a set of homicidal gas chambers.

Czech claims that this building was put into operation on March 20. The sources she quotes

for this event (statements by R. Höss and P. Broad), however, do not confirm her date.

In fact, the sources are not specific regarding the exact date and contradict each other to some degree.

 

A more important question is: who was killed in these gas chambers? If we look at the

first table containing deportation transports for whose existence there is at least some

documentary evidence, we realize that, until early July 1942, every single person deported

to Auschwitz with those transport was properly registered and admitted to the camp.

Czech even says so explicitly in a footnote to her entry of March 26, 1942 about the first

transport arriving at Auschwitz (from Slovakia), explaining that only individuals fit for

labor were sent. This proves that at least until early July 1942, deportees were sent to

Auschwitz with the exclusive aim to deploy them as slave laborers. There was no policy

of extermination in place.

 

The only way of supporting the claim that Jews were killed en masse at Auschwitz during

the first half of 1942 is the use of dubious sources full of wild claims without any support in

the extant documentation: Gilbert’s and Szternfinkiel’s wholly invented mass gassings as

listed in the second table, plus a few gassing events among registered inmates whose

reality is confirmed only by self-proclaimed “eyewitnesses” who testified during the Polish

show trials against Rudolf Höss and members of the Auschwitz camp garrison.[8] Since

each death of a registered inmate was recorded numerous times and in a number of ways

by the various Auschwitz authorities, and because these documents do not reflect these

mass murders, as Mattogno has aptly shown, it is quite safe to say that these

events are based merely on witness fantasies and are simply untrue.

 

In other words, no gassing happened at Auschwitz before early July 1942. Hence, the

so-called Bunker 1 would not have served any purpose. This jibes well with the results

of Carlo Mattogno’s detailed research into the question of whether or not this “Bunker 1”

existed in the first place: it did not. It, too, is a mere figment of the imagination.[9]

 

In early July, things are said to have changed drastically, though. Czech writes that on

June 30, the second gas-chamber building – Bunker 2 – became operational. She supports

her claim by again quoting Rudolf Höss’s post-war statements, which are of little value,

however, due to the circumstances of coercion under which they were made and due

to their internal inconsistencies and blatant contradictions to external, more-reliable sources.

[10] Since Czech’s claims about Bunker 1 are obviously bogus, how can we take such lore

seriously anymore? The fact of the matter is that, after July 1942, not all deportees sent

toward Auschwitz were being taken into the camp anymore. So what happened in

July 1942 that changed things?

 

There were actually at least two factors that changed the way the deportees were being processed.

 

Typhus

 

In her entry for April 6, 1941, Danuta Czech mentions that typhus was introduced to the

Auschwitz Camp by inmates transferred from Lublin. However, she does not support her

claim with any contemporaneous documents. Her next entry mentioning the dreaded disease

is more than a year later, on May 10, 1942, where she remarks that the Auschwitz garrison

physician Dr. Siegfried Schwela died of the disease. Hence, not only the inmates, but

also the SS personnel were affected by the epidemic. Dr. Schwela’s successor, Dr. Kurt Uhlenbrok,

got infected as well and, being unable to perform his duties, was relieved of the post only

a month later, on June 9 (although Czech reports about this only in her entry for August 17).

Thus, the pivotal post of garrison physician, responsible for the camp’s hygiene, was pretty

much unoccupied until after the peak of the epidemic. The camp’s health and sanitary

situation started to improve only after Dr. Eduard Wirths, previously posted as garrison

physician of the Dachau Camp, showed up at Auschwitz on September 6 to take

over Uhlenbrok’s position.[11]

 

 

Figure 1: Monthly deaths at Auschwitz.

 

 

If we look at the trend of the camp’s mortality in 1942 as reflected in the Death Books,

see Figure 1, we clearly recognize the catastrophic rising tide peaking in August of 1942,

with daily deaths reaching a maximum of almost 500 on certain days.[12] The disease was

brought somewhat under control in late 1942, but flared up again in early 1943 and

then once more, although less pronouncedly, during the winter of 1943/1944.

 

Considering the crucial role the Auschwitz camp system was supposed to play as a provider

of slave labor for the region’s war-related industries, the Auschwitz camp authorities reacted

rather sluggishly to this disaster, to put it mildly. As Czech reports, Commandant Höss

imposed a partial camp lockdown (Lagersperre) only on July 10. A week later, Heinrich Himmler

arrived for a two-days’ visit to inspect the SS’s undertakings in the area. During that

visit, it would have been impossible to hide the disastrous situation from him.

 

Although Czech, in her entry for July 17, has Himmler attend a mass gassing of 499 deportees

from the Netherlands on that day, an inspection of Himmler’s diary shows that he never

went to Birkenau at all. Since that camp was the hotbed of typhus and other infectious diseases

– unsurprisingly, since at that time it was still under construction and lacked any proper sanitary

facilities – it would have been highly dangerous for him to go there. That he in fact did not

go there also results from the fact that Rudolf Höss’s claim of Himmler having attended the

entire procedure – from unloading the transport train until the clearing of the victims’ bodies

from the gas chambers[13] – cannot be true, because the train from the Netherlands

arrived at Auschwitz already in the evening of July 16, and the newly admitted inmates

showed up in the camp’s record already during the morning roll call of July 17. Himmler,

however, arrived at Kattowitz Airport only at 3:15 pm on July 17, but did not get to the camp

itself before late afternoon.[14] Considering that the primary source upon which the tale of

Himmler’s attendance of a gassing rests is none other than Rudolf Höss’s postwar fairy tales,

the entire episode can be dismissed safely as just another myth cooked up by Höss in an

attempt to directly implicate Himmler in what supposedly transpired at Auschwitz

under Höss’s command.

 

Interestingly, this mass gassing of deportees from an incoming transport is the only one

of 1942 for which Czech provides a source to back it up – and what a source it is:

the tortured Rudolf Höss facing the noose.

 

This transport of July 17 is also the very first one arriving at Auschwitz for which we

know with some certainty that not all deportees who boarded the train were registered

at Auschwitz, for we know how many were on that train (2000, 1551 of whom were registered).

Although Czech claims that an unspecified (hence unknown) number of deportees from two

earlier transports from Slovakia were gassed in “the bunker” (July 4 and 11), we have

no record of how many deportees were on these trains. I’ll get back to this later.

 

Crematorium I

 

When the typhus epidemic struck in the spring of 1942, the only cremation facility operational

at Auschwitz was the old crematorium with its three double-muffle furnaces. Each muffle

could cremate a normal corpse on average within roughly an hour, meaning that, for a

20-hour workday, this facility could cremate a theoretical maximum of (6×20=) some 120

corpses.[15] In July 1942, the death rate exceeded 4,000, or 130 corpses per day on

average. But already the load put on that facility in the months prior to July led to such

massive strain that some of the refractory lining of the flues had to be replaced in mid-May

1942; a few weeks later, it was noticed that the chimney was deteriorating to such a degree

that it was decided to tear it down entirely and rebuild it. That work was done between

July 12 and August 8, 1942. During these almost four weeks, the crematorium was by

necessity out of operation, meaning that, when the typhus epidemic approached its cataclysmic

peak, Auschwitz had no cremation capacity at all.[16] After Crematorium I went back into

operation in mid-August, the death rate was more than twice the number of theoretically

possible cremations. What happened to all these corpses that could not be burned? Although

the situation improved considerably in November and December, things got out of hand

again in January 1943, with no additional cremation capacity ready to help out until mid-March

of that year (when Crematorium II went operational briefly, was overloaded and was shut

down again a few weeks later for major repairs…). At any rate, witnesses (among them Höss)

state that these “excess corpses” were buried in mass graves but later exhumed and burned

on pyres, because the corpses were lying in the groundwater threatening to poison the

drinking-water supply of the entire region. Considering all the circumstances, this part of the

witnesses’ story is most likely true.

 

In the context of the present study, we need not concern ourselves with the particulars

of this situation. Fact is that, when Himmler visited Auschwitz on July 17 and 18, 1942, he

saw his plans to turn this camp into a main hub of Germany’s exploitation of slave labor for

the war effort seriously threatened. In fact, Himmler saw the camp at its worse, with the

typhus epidemic raging out of control, with no garrison physician in charge, with few, if

any sanitary installations, with no capacity to cremate the victims, with corpses

piling up everywhere by the hundreds.

 

In this situation, it is claimed that at that very time the mass murder of thousands of

deportees in gas chambers started, that in fact a new gassing facility (Bunker 2) went

into operation. In view of the fact that the camp authorities had lost control of the epidemic

and could not even handle the corpses resulting from the disease, how likely is it that they

could have even thought of making this already uncontrollable situation even worse by adding

thousands of additional corpses every month which they wouldn’t have been able to

process in any way either?

 

Himmler’s reaction to the situation in Auschwitz is not known but may be inferred from the

fact that his subordinate Richard Glücks demanded only five days later, on July 23, that

Höss put the entire Auschwitz Camp on a total camp lockdown.[17] Thus,

Auschwitz, at that time a death camp quite literally, had been quarantined.

 

Deportation of Individuals Unfit for Labor

 

While initially the German authorities deported only such individuals to Auschwitz they deemed

capable of working, this policy gradually changed in July 1942, first by expanding the age

range upward, then by increasingly including individuals unfit for labor (primarily children),

as Aynat has shown in his 1994 study. The mainstream narrative has it that these individuals

were primarily those who were not registered on their arrival at the Auschwitz camp

but were killed in gas chambers.

 

Cosel

 

In her entry for August 28, 1942, Czech writes that some 200 deportees fit for work were

taken off the deportation train at Cosel in Upper Silesia (halfway between Gleiwitz and

Oppeln, some 50 km northwest of Auschwitz) in order to be deployed as slave laborers in

Upper Silesian industry. There is evidently no direct documentary support for this claim,

but considering that Auschwitz had been put under a camp lockdown, and that sending even

deportees fit for labor there seems rather unwise, it stands to reason that the German

authorities tried to send as many deportees as possible to other places not threatened by

typhus. We know of the Cosel case only indirectly because some of the deportees taken off

there were later admitted to the Auschwitz Camp after all. Czech handles this situation by

arbitrarily subtracting invented numbers of deportees from several trains coming from France,

Belgium and the Netherlands:

 

Arrival Date # of Deportees from detrained at Cosel
8/28/1942 1000 France 200
9/2/1942 1000 France 200
9/3/1942 1000 Belgium 200
9/4/1942 1000 France 200
9/6/1942 1013 France 200
9/8/1942 930 Netherlands 200
9/9/1942 1000 France 200
9/10/1942 1000 Belgium 200
9/11/1942 1000 France 200
9/12/1942 874 Netherlands 200
9/12/1942 1000 France 300
9/14/1942 1000 Belgium 250
9/16/1942 902 Netherlands 200
9/16/1942 1000 France 250
9/18/1942 1003 France 300
9/20/1942 1002 Netherlands 200
9/22/1942 1000 France 200
9/24/1942 1000 France 150
9/27/1942 1004 France 175
9/29/1942 904 France 100
10/3/1942 1014 Netherlands 300
10/7/1942 2012 Netherlands 500
Total:

4925

 

Hence, in total Czech claims that, during 1942, some 4925 deportees were taken off the

trains travelling through Cosel. This is pure conjecture. For all we know, the number of

inmates taken off at Cosel could have been lower or higher, or could have

included even all of the inmates that were not registered at Auschwitz.

 

Although the same could have happened to any train coming from the western Europe,

Czech limits this procedure arbitrarily to only a select few of them, and without foundation

denies it for the rest.

 

It may well be that the trains approaching Auschwitz made other stops elsewhere as well

where deportees were also taken off in order to be employed in local enterprises – including

trains coming from other countries such as Slovakia, Poland, Belarus (Grodno) etc. And it

may well be that some deportees did not finish their journey when arriving at Auschwitz, but

that they left again – without having been registered – on other trains or by other means of

transportation to be sent either to labor-deployment sites around Auschwitz or farther to

the East, or to some ghetto, for instance.

 

That this is closer to the truth than what Czech conjectures can be demonstrated with the

transport of Dutch Jews arriving at Auschwitz on Oct. 18. Here is what

Carlo Mattogno has found out about that particular transport:[18]

 

“According to Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle, a Jewish transport from Holland arrived

on October 18, 1942, with 1,710 deportees, of whom only 116 women were registered,

and the remaining 1,594 persons are said to have been gassed. The ‘special

operation’ mentioned by [Johann] Kremer allegedly refers to this claimed gassing.

 

According to a Dutch Red Cross report, the transport in question, comprising 1,710

persons, departed from Westerbork on October 16 and stopped first in Kosel,

where 570 [sic!] persons were taken off. The rest continued on to the following camps:

 

‘St. Annaberg or Sakrau – Bobrek or Malapane – Blechhammer and further

some to Bismarckhütte/Monowitz. A separate group into the Groß-Rosen zone.’

 

A list of the transports from Westerbork to the east – probably prepared by Louis de Jong

– names as the destinations of the October 16, 1942, transport ‘Sakrau, Blechhammer, Kosel.’

 

For its false assertions regarding this transport, Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle again cites

the Kremer diary! Thus only a small percentage of the Jews deported

from Holland on October 16, 1942, actually arrived in Auschwitz.”

 

So it wasn’t just Cosel where the trains stopped and

deportees got off; they detrained at many stations.

 

While it is to some degree speculative to apply this pattern generously to all transports where

we don’t know the fates of deportees not arriving at Auschwitz or at least not having been

registered there, Czech’s procedure of picking a few transports and taking a few inmates off

at Cosel is at least as speculative, and even more so her utterly unsupported claim that the

difference between deportees boarding a train and those registered at Auschwitz

(plus those taken off at Cosel) equals the number of deportees gassed on arrival.

 

One thing is for certain, however: Considering that Auschwitz had turned into a deathtrap

due to the raging typhus epidemic, it would have made perfect sense for the German authorities

to send as many deportees elsewhere rather than to let them perish at Auschwitz.

 

Some Honesty

 

I mentioned earlier that Czech claims that an unspecified number of deportees from two

transports from Slovakia were gassed in “the bunker” (July 4 and 11). The only extant

document for this transport is the clandestinely compiled list of registration numbers

assigned to deportees on these transports (372 and 330, respectively). These lists tell us

neither how many deportees were on these trains altogether nor what happened to those

that were not registered, if any deportees were left unregistered in the first place. Czech

repeats this same arbitrary procedure of simply claiming, without any proof or trace,

that there was an unregistered rest subsequently gassed in each instance where the

clandestine lists mention registration numbers assigned to deportees from Slovakia:

 

Date arrivals from registered males registered females registered total unregistered unregistered fate proof
7/4/1942 ??? Slovakia 264 108 372 “rest” gassed none
7/11/1942 ??? Slovakia 182 148 330 “rest” gassed none
7/18/1942 ??? Slovakia 327 178 505 “rest” gassed none
7/25/1942 ??? Slovakia 192 93 285 “rest” gassed none
8/1/1942 ??? Slovakia 165 75 240 “rest” gassed none
9/19/1942 ??? Slovakia 206 71 277 “rest” gassed none
9/23/1942 ??? Slovakia 294 67 361 “rest” gassed none
10/21/1942 ??? Slovakia 121 78 199 “rest” gassed

none

 

It would have been much more honest to state right away that we don’t know how many

deportees were on these trains, hence that it is unknown how many deportees were gassed,

if any at all. This is the procedure she applies to transports coming from Yugoslavia, of which

we also have merely the range of registration numbers assigned. For the first three instances

she doesn’t even mention any unregistered deportees, let alone their presumed fates, while

her last entry for Yugoslavia states expressly that it is unknown how many perished in the gas chambers:

 

Date arrivals from registered males registered females registered total unregistered unregistered fate
8/18/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 87 69 156 ­- -
8/22/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 110 86 196 - -
8/26/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 71 88 159 - -
8/30/1942 ??? Yugoslavia 45 31 76 unknown

gassed?

 

She always states, however, that the registered inmates were admitted into the amp

“after a selection,” implying that some inmates might have been selected not to get registered.

These entries are probably the only ones in her entire book which come close to being honest,

together with a few exotic ones about which she evidently didn’t dare make gassing

speculation for lack of any documentary evidence or even anecdotal hints by self-proclaimed

witnesses (Aug. 27: 82 registered deportees from Luxemburg; Nov. 18: 30 registered deportees

of unknown origin).[19]

 

There are many other cases of registration numbers assigned to inmates coming from

eastern Europe where Czech is less prudent and simply speculates wildly as to the numbers

of deportees contained in the respective deportation trains. I highlighted them in my first table

by rendering the number of alleged unregistered deportees – Czech’s gassing victims – in bold.

Here they are once more:

 

Arrival date Claimed deportees from registered registered % unregistered
11/7/1942 2000 Zichenau 694 35% 1306
11/8/1942 1000 Zichenau 0 0% 1000
11/9/1942 1000 Białystok 294 29% 706
11/14/1942 2500 Zichenau 768 31% 1732
11/14/1942 1500 Białystok 661 44% 839
11/18/1942 1000 Białystok 230 23% 770
11/19/1942 1500 Zichenau 893 60% 607
11/22/1942 1500 Zichenau 432 29% 1068
11/25/1942 2000 Grodno Ghetto 433 22% 1567
11/28/1942 1000 Zichenau 494 49% 506
11/30/1942 1000 Zichenau 167 17% 833
12/2/1942 1000 Grodno Ghetto 238 24% 762
12/3/1942 1000 Płonsk Ghetto 347 35% 653
12/6/1942 2500 Mława Ghetto 406 16% 2094
12/8/1942 1000 Grodno Ghetto 291 27% 769
12/10/1942 2500 Małkinia 524 21% 1976
12/12/1942 2000 Małkinia 422 21% 1578
12/14/1942 1500 Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki Ghetto 580 39% 920
12/17/1942 2000 Płonsk Ghetto 780 39% 1220
Total of claimed gassing victims:

20906

 

Note that in lack of any extant document regarding these transports there is no evidence regarding the number of deportees contained in them. Hence, Czech’s numbers (here in the second column) are arbitrary at best, and, perforce, so are the numbers of alleged unregistered deportees, all of whom Czech lists as gassing victims with the exact number, in spite of the fact that she starts out with a made-up estimate. It’s all hocus-pocus.

 

Małkinia

 

There are two particularly interesting deportation cases in the above table: those arriving at

Auschwitz on December 10 and 12. They came from Małkinia, which was a transit camp

near the infamous Treblinka camp. Here is the question: if the vast majority of Jews coming

from Małkinia (Czech claims that 79% of them were gassed at Auschwitz) were really slated

to perish in gas chambers, why did the German authorities in charge of shipping Jews

around Europe not select them right in Małkinia and send those unfit for labor – or unworthy

of living, whatever the case may be – around the corner to the claimed highly efficient

gassing facilities at the Treblinka extermination camp? Maybe because there was no such

thing as a Treblinka extermination camp?[20] Or maybe because no Jew

deported from Małkinia to Auschwitz was killed at Auschwitz? You decide.

 

Conclusions

 

The number of Jews killed in the gas chambers of Auschwitz right after arriving at the

camp, hence without any registration, amounted to 105,992 for the entire year of 1942, if

we are to take Danuta Czech’s words as printed in her Auschwitz Chronicle at face value.

However, she has literally nothing in terms of documentation to back up her claims.

Where there is a difference proven by documents between the number of deportees who

boarded a train and the number of those who were registered at Auschwitz, she always

claims that all of them were killed in the gas chambers (except for those who she speculates

left the train in Cosel), although there are plenty of other explanations possible for this

numerical difference, be it that more deportees than she assumes detrained at Cosel, that

there were other stations along the journey where deportees were taken off, or that for some

of the deportees arriving at Auschwitz their journey simply hadn’t come to an end yet, meaning

that they were deported farther east, either to other locations

of labor deployment or to places of ghettoization.

 

Any serious scholar wishing to write history based only on verifiable data must conclude that, for the year 1942, there is not a shred of evidence for even one single deportee arriving at Auschwitz and being led straight to the gas chambers without prior registration and admission to the camp. This analysis confirms Mattogno’s conclusion that there never were any homicidal gassing “bunkers” at Auschwitz.9 There simply was no need for them, as there is no evidence for any such gassings.

 


Notes

[1] Danuta Czech, Auschwitz Chronicle 1938-1945, Tauris, London 1990; German original: Kalendarium der Ereignisse im Konzentrationslager Auschwitz-Birkenau 1939-1945, Rowohlt Verlag, Reinbek 1989; I have posted OCR-processed scans of Czech’s 172 pages devoted tot he year 1942 here: https://codoh.com/media/files/downloads/CzechChronicle1942-OCR.pdf.
[2] Czech mentions only one deportation train that contained political prisoners rather than Jews: on July 8, 1942, 1170 deportees from France arrived at Auschwitz which consisted of Jews and Gentiles alike. All of them were admitted to the camp and assigned registration numbers.
[3] Enrique Aynat, Estudios sobre el “Holocausto,” La deportación de judíos de Francia y Bélgica en 1942, Graficas Hurtado, Valencia 1994, pp. 3-88; https://codoh.com/library/document/6349/.
[4] Aynat devoted the second part of the above-mentioned book to a detailed translation and discussion of these reports, ibid., pp. 89-181. It will appear shortly in English translation in a modified form as part of Jürgen Graf’s Auschwitz: Confessions and Testimonies. A Critical Analysis, Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2019 (in preparation; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=36).
[5] Enrique Aynat, “Die Sterbebücher von Auschwitz: Statistische Daten über die Sterblichkeit der 1942 aus Frankreich nach Auschwitz deportierten Juden,” Vierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung, Vol. 2, No. 3 (1998), pp. 188-198; http://vho.org/VffG/1998/3/Aynat3.html. The Spanish original appeared as a chapter in: Enrique Aynat, Jean-Marie Boisdefeu, Estudios sobre Auschwitz, self-published, Valencia 1997.
[6] Carlo Mattogno, Healthcare in Auschwitz: Medical Care and Special Treatment of Registered Inmates, Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016, pp. 87-216; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=33.
[7] Czech refers to these lists once only in her entry for June 14, 1940 (for males), indicating that henceforth all those deportation data without any further source given originate from these lists (for females here reference can be found in her entry for March 26, 1942).
[8] Czech mentions this on three dates: on May 4 with an unspecified number of victims during an unspecified number of events based on the claim that the overfilled Auschwitz sick bay is said to have been reduced repeatedly this way; June 11, with 320 victims; and June 23, with 566 victims.
[9] Carlo Mattogno, Debunking the Bunkers of Auschwitz: Black Propaganda versus History, 2nd ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=11.
[10] For details see Rudolf Höss, Carlo Mattogno, Commandant of Auschwitz: Rudolf Höss, His Torture and His Forced Confessions, Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2017; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=35.
[11] On Wirths’s Herculean struggle to get the epidemic under control see Carlo Mattogno’s book Healthcare in Auschwitz, op. cit. (note 5), especially Part 3 by Christoph Wieland, pp. 219-269.
[12] Compiled using data contained in Staatliches Museum Auschwitz-Birkenau (ed.), Die Sterbebücher von Auschwitz, Saur, Munich 1995.
[13] Czech quotes Martin Broszat (ed.), Kommandant in Auschwitz, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Munich 1963, pp. 161, 181-183.
[14] For a detailed analysis see Carlo Mattogno, Special Treatment in Auschwitz: Origin and Meaning of a Term, 2nd ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016, pp. 16-25; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=10.
[15] On these furnaces see Carlo Mattogno, Franco Deana, The Cremation Furnaces of Auschwitz: A Technical and Historical Study, Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2015, particularly Vol. 1, pp. 337f.; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=24; as well as Carlo Mattogno, Franco Deana, “The Crematoria Ovens of Auschwitz and Birkenau,” in: Germar Rudolf (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of “Truth” and “Memory,” 2nd ed., Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago, Ill., 2003, pp. 373-412, esp. pp. 402; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1.
[16] Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz: Crematorium I and the Alleged Homicidal Gassings, 2nd ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016, pp. 46-48; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=21.
[17] See Carlo Mattogno, Special Treatment in Auschwitz, op. cit. (note 13), p. 45.
[18] C. Mattogno, Special Treatment in Auschwitz, op. cit. (note 18), p. 94.
[19] In one case, Czech probably simply forgot her cookie-cutter claim that all unregistered deportees were killed in gas chambers: Aug. 5: 998 deportees from Belgium, 744 of which were registered; the difference (254) is not mentioned by her.
[20] See Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, 2nd ed., Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield 2016; http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=8.
Author(s): Germar Rudolf
Title: How Danuta Czech Invented 100,000 Gassing Victims
Sources: Inconvenient History, Vol. 11, No. 1 (2019)
Dates:

published: 2019-02-18, first posted: 2019-02-18 12:01:39

 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Click on this text to examine THE HOLOCAUST LIES.

_________________________________________________________


Eyewitnesses to the Treblinka “Gas Chambers”

 
 


      Traditional Holocaust historians state that Treblinka was a pure extermination camp in

which approximately 870,000 Jews were murdered. The number of Jewish survivors of

Treblinka is generally thought to have been between 40 and 70, and probably closer to

the lower figure.This article will examine the credibility of several Jewish survivors

of Treblinka.

 

 

CHIL RAJCHMAN

      Chil Rajchman was a Jewish survivor of Treblinka who was interviewed by the US Office

of Special Investigations in 1980. He later traveled to the United States to appear as a witness

for the prosecution in the extradition trial of John Demjanjuk. Rajchman also took the witness

stand in Jerusalem where Demjanjuk was put on trial for allegedly being a murderous guard

at Treblinka.[2] The Israeli Supreme Court ruled that Demjanjuk’s guilt had not been proven,

and that the eyewitness testimony of Rajchman and four other witnesses failed to identify

Demjanjuk credibly.[3]

 

Rajchman described the gas chambers at Treblinka in his memoirs:

 

     The Schlauch road is not long. In a few minutes you find yourself in a white structure,

on which a Star of David is painted. On the steps of the structure stands a German, who

points to the entrance and smiles—Bitte, bitte! The steps lead to a corridor

lined with flowers and with long towels hanging on the walls.

 

       The size of the gas chamber is seven by seven meters. In the middle of the chamber

there are shower-heads through which the gas is introduced. On one of the walls a thick

pipe serves as an exhaust to remove the air. Thick felt around the doors of the

chamber renders them airtight.

 

      In this building there are some 10 gas chambers. At a short distance from the main

structure there is a smaller one with three gas chambers. By the doors stand several

Germans who shove people inside. Their hands do not rest for a moment as they

scream fiendishly—Faster, faster, keep moving![4]

 

      Rajchman wrote that exhaust gas from a Diesel engine was piped into the gas chambers.

[5] However, Austrian engineer Walter Lüftl and American engineer Friedrich Paul Berg h

ave both documented that exhaust from Diesel engines could not have been used for mass

executions at Treblinka. Lüftl concludes in his report that the stories of gas chambers with

Diesel engines and gas vans at places such as Treblinka can only be disinformation.[6]

 

         Berg writes: “However, the story [of mass gassings] becomes even more incredible

when one discovers that far better sources of carbon monoxide, better even than gasoline

engines, were readily available to the Germans. Those other

sources did not require either Diesel fuel or gasoline.”[7]

 

      Rajchman in his memoirs also reported the following horrific incident:

 

       It once happened that an oven was brought next to a huge grave, where perhaps

a quarter of a million people were buried. As usual the oven was loaded with the proper

number of bodies and in the evening it was lit. But a strong wind carried the fire over

to the huge grave and engulfed it in flames. The blood of some quarter of a million

people began to flare, and thus burned for a night and a day. The whole camp administration

came to look upon this marvel, gazing with satisfaction at the blaze.

The blood came up to the surface and burned as if it were fuel.[8]

 

       Since blood consists mostly of water and is nonflammable,

Rajchman’s story that blood burned as if it were fuel is totally absurd.[9] 

 

        Rajchman also reported other instances when the blood from gassed victims rose to

the surface: “I remember that every morning when we went out to work, we would notice

that the surfaces of the pits had burst in dozens of places. By day the ground was firmly

trodden down, but at night the blood pressed up to the surface…The blood of tens

of thousands of victims, unable to rest, thrust itself up to the surface.”[10]

 

         Rajchman’s story that blood “pressed up to the surface” at night but was trodden

down during the day is ludicrous. Rajchman’s memoirs about his stay in

Treblinka are no more credible than his testimony at the John Demjanjuk trial.   

 

RICHARD GLAZAR

 

      Richard Glazar was a Jew sent to Treblinka at the beginning of October 1942.

He said he spent 10 months in Treblinka before escaping from the camp.[11] Glazar in

his memoirs also stated that exhaust gasses from motors were used in the gas chambers at Treblinka:

 

      The gas chambers are the only brick buildings in the entire camp. Actually,

they comprise two structures. At first was built—somewhat farther from the

entrance—a smaller structure with three gas chambers, each about five by five meters.

Sometime in the fall of 1942 the second building, containing 10 gas chambers, was

completed. This building is located very close to the Pipeline, at the point where it

opens into the second part of the camp. There is a hallway running all the way down

the middle of the new building. One enters the gas chambers, five on either side, from

this hallway. The new gas chambers measure about seven by seven meters. The motor

room is built onto the back wall, where the hallway ends. The exhaust gases from the

motors are pumped into the gas chambers through conduits in the ceilings of the chambers.

These conduits are disguised as showers.[12]

 

      Glazar made two major errors in his book. First, Glazar wrote that the Germans

started to burn the corpses “one overcast November afternoon” in 1942.[13] This statement

contradicts the standard Holocaust literature, which claims the incineration of corpses did

not start until March/April 1943.[14]         

                             

      Second, Glazar said that he was part of a camouflage unit that

performed forestry work in the vicinity of Treblinka. Glazar wrote:

 

      The camouflage unit is the only one of the old work squads that still has enough

real work to do…Several times a day…some part of the 25-man unit has to go out into

the forest, climb into the trees, harvest large branches, and carry them back into the

camp, where they will be used for repairs. The other part of the unit straightens and firms

up the posts, tightens the barbed wire, and weaves the new pine boughs into

the fence until there are no longer any gaps in the dense green wall.[15]

 

      Thus, according to Glazar, 25 inmates supplied Treblinka with its greenery for concealment.

The “camouflage unit” would have been much larger if wood from the forest had been used

to cremate the 870,000 corpses in Treblinka. The camouflage unit would also have chopped

down the trees and then cut off the branches rather than engaging in tree-climbing activities.

Yet Glazar apparently opines that such tree-felling never occurred during his time at Treblinka.

This rules out the cremation of some 870,000 corpses using firewood.[16]    

 

      Air-photo evidence also indicates that the massive deforestation necessary to

cremate 870,000 bodies never took place around Treblinka. Thomas Kues writes:

      By comparing a detailed 1936 map of the Treblinka area with air photos taken

by the Luftwaffe in May and November 1944 we are able to estimate the scope of

contemporary deforestation in the area. If 870,000 bodies had really been burned at

Treblinka, then the procurement of the required fuel would have denuded the entire

wooded area north of the camp site. The air photos show that this is clearly not the

case. Rather, the visible possibly deforested areas—amounting to less than

10 hectares—indicate the cremation of at most some ten thousands of bodies.[17

 

      The argument that only a fraction of the corpses were burned is not valid, since the

Soviet and Polish forensic examinations of Treblinka would have discovered hundreds of

thousands of corpses. The Allies would have shown these corpses to the world as

proof of German genocide.

 

      The only remaining conclusion is that most Jews at Treblinka were sent somewhere

else, most likely to German-occupied Soviet territory. Richard Glazar’s memoirs

inadvertently confirmed the revisionist thesis that Treblinka was a transit camp.[18]    

 

JANKIEL WIERNIK   

 

      Jankiel Wiernik escaped from Treblinka and published a document

in May 1944 describing his experiences at Treblinka. Wiernik wrote:

 

      A Jew had been selected by the Germans to function as a supposed “bath attendant.”

He stood at the entrance of the building housing the chambers and urged everyone to

hurry inside before the water got cold. What irony! Amidst shouts and blows, the

people were chased into the chambers.

 

     As I have already indicated, there was not much space in the gas chambers. People

were smothered simply by overcrowding. The motor which generated the gas in the new

chambers was defective, and so the helpless victims had to suffer for hours on end

before they died. Satan himself could not have devised a more fiendish torture. When the

chambers were opened again, many of the victims were only half dead

and had to be finished off with rifle butts, bullets or powerful kicks.

 

      Often people were kept in the gas chambers overnight with the motor not turned

on at all. Overcrowding and lack of air killed many of them in a very painful way. However,

many survived the ordeal of such nights; particularly the children showed a remarkable

degree of resistance. They were still alive when they were dragged out of the

chambers in the morning, but revolvers used by the Germans made short work of them…[19] 

 

      So according to Wiernik, the gas chambers at Treblinka were not very efficient.

Many victims suffocated or had to be killed with bullets, rifle butts or powerful kicks.

 

      Jankiel Wiernik wrote: “Between 10,000 and 12,000 people were gassed each day.”[20]

Wiernik also wrote: “The number of transports grew daily, and there were periods when

as many as 30,000 people were gassed in one day…”[21] This is an incredibly large number

of people killed by a defective motor that took “hours on end” to kill the victims and which was

frequently left off overnight.

 

      Wiernik also wrote that handsome Bulgarian Jews were discriminated against: “These

handsome Jews were not permitted an easy death. Only small quantities of gas were let

into the chambers, so that their agony lasted through the night.”[22] This would have

made the gassing process at Treblinka even more inefficient. I wonder

how 870,000 Jews could have been killed by such inefficient methods.

 

       Wiernik described the corpses of the alleged gassing victims: “All were equal. There

was no longer any beauty or ugliness, for they were all yellow from the gas.”[23] Actually,

victims of carbon-monoxide poisoning exhibit a cherry-red or rosy red coloring.[24]

Wiernik’s statement that the victims were “all yellow from the gas” is obviously false.

 

      Wiernik wrote in regard to the cremation of corpses: “It turned out that bodies of women

burned more easily than those of men. Accordingly, the bodies of women were used for

kindling the fires…When corpses of pregnant women were cremated, their bellies would

burst open. The fetus would be exposed and could be seen burning inside the mother’s womb.”

[25] The absurdities promulgated by Wiernik are really beyond description, yet he is

probably the most prominent witness to the alleged gassings at Treblinka.[26]   

                    

ABRAHAM GOLDFARB     

 

      Abraham Goldfarb arrived in Treblinka on August 25, 1942, and escaped from

Treblinka during the revolt in 1943.[27] Goldfarb described the gassings at Treblinka:

 

      On the way to the gas chambers Germans with dogs stood along the fence on

both sides. The dogs had been trained to attack people; they bit the men’s genitals

and the women’s breasts, ripping off pieces of flesh. The Germans hit the people

with whips and iron bars to spur them on, so that they would press forward into the

“showers” as quickly as possible. The screams of the women could be heard far away,

even in the other parts of the camp. The Germans drove the running victims on with

shouts of “Faster, faster, the water is getting cold, and others still have to take a shower!”

To escape from the blows, the victims ran to the gas chambers as quickly as they

could, the stronger ones pushing the weaker ones aside. At the entrance to the gas

chambers stood the two Ukrainians, Ivan Demjaniuk and Nikolai, one of them armed

with an iron bar, the other with a sword. Even they drove the people inside with blows…

 

       As soon as the gas chambers were full, the Ukrainians closed the doors and started

the engine. Some 20 to 25 minutes later an SS man or a Ukrainian looked through a

window in the door. When he had made sure that everyone had been asphyxiated,

the Jewish prisoners had to open the doors and remove the corpses. Because the

chambers were overcrowded and the victims had held onto one another,

they were all standing upright and were like one single mass of flesh.[28]

 

      Goldfarb stated that dogs at Treblinka attacked the men’s genitals and the women’s

breasts while the victims ran to the gas chambers. I wonder why the other survivors failed

to report these vicious dog attacks of the gassingvictims. Goldfarb’s story is

highly suspicious

 

     Goldfarb’s statement that the victims “were all standing upright and were like one single

mass of flesh” is also not credible. Many of the dead victims would have fallen to the floor no

matter how crowded the gas chambers. The dead victims would not have been

“like one single mass of flesh.” 

 

CONCLUSION 

 

      No documentary or credible material trace exists of the alleged gas chambers at Treblinka.

We would know nothing about the Treblinka gas chambers except for the testimony of a

small number of eyewitnesses. 

 

      A November 15, 1942 report produced by the resistance movement of the Warsaw

ghetto originally stated that steam chambers were used to kill Jews at Treblinka. In 1944,

Jankiel Wiernik converted the embarrassing “steam chambers,” which characterized the first

phase of the Treblinka atrocity propaganda, into “gas chambers.” Official historiography

now considers the gas chambers of Treblinka as established historical fact.[29]

 

      However, as discussed in this article, the eyewitness testimony of the Treblinka gas

chambers is not credible. Such testimony cannot be used to prove that Germany

mass murderedJews at Treblinka. Germar Rudolf writes:

 

      Thus, if 100 witnesses and 100 confessions state that the moon is made of green

cheese or that 870,000 corpses can be burned within a few months without fuel and

without leaving traces, both assertions being of a similar intellectual quality, then we

have to conclude—in light of all the forensic evidence—

that the witnesses and the defendants are wrong.

Like it or not![30]        

     

ENDNOTES

 

[1] Willenberg, Samuel, Surviving Treblinka, New York: Basil Blackwell Inc., 1989, p. 2.

[2] Kues, Thomas. “Chil Rajchman and His Memoirs.” Inconvenient History, Vol.2, No. 1, Spring 2010. https://inconvenienthistory.com/2/1/1916.

[3] An excellent account of John Demjanjuk’s trial is provided in Sheftel, Yoram, Defending “Ivan the Terrible”: The Conspiracy to Convict John Demjanjuk, Washington, D.C., Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1996.

[4] Rajchman, Chil, The Last Jew of Treblinka: A Survivor’s Memory 1942-1943, New York: Pegasus Books, 2011, pp. 11-12.

[5] Ibid., p. 58.

[6] Lüftl, Walter, “The Lüftl Report,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, Winter 1992-1993, pp. 391-406. 

[7] Berg, Friedrich Paul, “The Diesel Gas Chamber: Ideal for Torture—Absurd for Murder,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, Ala.: Theses and Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 456.

[8] Rajchman, Chil, The Last Jew of Treblinka: A Survivor’s Memory 1942-1943, New York: Pegasus Books, 2011, pp. 91-92.

[9] https://inconvenienthistory.com/2/1/1916.

[10] Ibid., p. 79.        

[11] Glazar, Richard, Trap with a Green Fence: Survival in Treblinka, Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1995, p. VIII.

[12] Ibid., p. 37.

[13] Ibid., p. 29.

[14] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes Review, 2010, p. 39.

[15] Glazar, Richard, Trap with a Green Fence: Survival in Treblinka: Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1995, pp. 127-128.

[16] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes Review, 2010, pp. 39-40.

[17] https://inconvenienthistory.com/1/2/1912.

[18] Ibid.

[19] Donat, Alexander (editor), The Death Camp Treblinka: A Documentary, New York: Holocaust Library, 1979, pp. 163-164.

[20] Ibid., p. 159.

[21] Ibid., p. 164.

[22] Ibid., p. 172.

[23] Ibid., p. 159.

[24] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes Review, 2010, p. 73.

[25] Donat, Alexander (editor), The Death Camp Treblinka: A Documentary, New York: Holocaust Library, 1979, p. 170.

[26] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes Review, 2010, p. 154.

[27] http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/ar/treblinka/treblinkarememberme.html.

[28] Kogon, Eugen, Langbein, Hermann, and Rückerl, Adalbert (editors), Nazi Mass Murder: A Documentary History of the Use of Poison Gas, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1993, pp. 126-127.

[29] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes Review, 2010, pp. 51-62, 299.

[30] Ibid., p. 307.

 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

Dachau’s 800-Pound Kangaroo (Court)


The Dachau trial began on November 15, 1945 and ended four weeks later on December 13.

All 40 of the defendants were convicted, with 36 being sentenced to death by hanging.

[1] This article will examine whether the defendants at the Dachau trial received a fair hearing.

 

Unjustness of the Dachau Trials

The Dachau tribunal was composed of eight senior U.S. military officers with

the rank of at least full colonel. The president of the court, Brig. Gen. John M. Lentz,

was the former commanding general of the 3rd Army’s 87th Infantry Division.[2] These

U.S. military officers, with no formal legal training, were not qualified to objectively review the evidence presented in the trial.

 

William Denson, the chief prosecuting attorney, used a legal concept called “common design”

for establishing that camp personnel at Dachau were guilty of violating the laws and usages

of war. The Dachau tribunal accepted Denson’s legal concept of common design. In common

design, Denson exploited a legal concept broad enough to apply to everyone who had

worked in Dachau.[3] In essence, every Dachau defendant was guilty

unless proven innocent (a verdict most-unlikely to ensue).    

               

The rules of evidence used at the Dachau trial were also atrociously lax. For example,

hearsay evidence presented by the prosecution was routinely allowed by the “judges.”

Such testimony was permitted at the Dachau trials if it seemed “relevant to a reasonable

man.” This departure from normal Anglo-Saxon law was intended to compensate

for the fact that some potential eyewitnesses had died in captivity.[4]

 

False witnesses were used at most of the American-run war-crimes trials at Dachau.

Joseph Halow, a young U.S. court reporter at the Dachau trials in 1947,

described some of the false witnesses at the Dachau trials:

 

[T]he major portion of the witnesses for the prosecution in the concentration-camp cases

were what came to be known as “professional witnesses,” and everyone working at

Dachau regarded them as such. “Professional,” since they were paid for each day they

testified. In addition, they were provided free housing and food, at a time when these

were often difficult to come by in Germany. Some of them stayed in Dachau for months,

testifying in every one of the concentration-camp cases. In other words, these witnesses

made their living testifying for the prosecution. Usually, they were former inmates from

the camps, and their strong hatred of the Germans should, at

the very least, have called their testimony into question.[5]

 

Stephen F. Pinter, an American lawyer who served as a U.S. Army prosecuting attorney

at the American-run trials of Germans at Dachau, confirmed Halow’s statement. In a 1960

affidavit Pinter said that “notoriously perjured witnesses” were used to convict Germans

of false and unfounded crimes. Pinter stated, “Unfortunately, as a result of these miscarriages

of justice, many innocent persons were convicted and some were executed.”[6]

 

The use of false witnesses has also been acknowledged by Johann Neuhäusler, who was

an ecclesiastical resistance fighter interned in two German concentration camps from

1941 to 1945. Neuhäusler stated that in some of the American-run trials “many of the witnesses,

perhaps 90%, were paid professional witnesses with criminal

records ranging from robbery to homosexuality.”[7]

 

Lt. Col. Douglas T. Bates, the chief defense attorney, was also not permitted to fully

cross-examine all of the prosecution witnesses. For example, prosecution witness Arthur Haulot,

a 32-year-old journalist and former lieutenant in the Belgian army, threatened to leave the

trial after being aggressively cross-examined by Bates. An hour later, Bates and the other

defense lawyers met with Haulot outside of the courtroom. Bates put a friendly arm around

Haulot’s shoulder and said: “We just want to thank you. By speaking up, you got us properly

scolded. We were doing what we had to do, and frankly it disgusted us.

You won’t be bothered like that again.”[8]                       

 

Such a concession by the defense counsel could never have occurred if the trial had taken

place in a court in America. However, at Dachau the defense attorneys were soldiers who

took seriously reprimands from their superior officers, who were judges in the trial.[9]

 

Signed confessions by the defendants were often used to obtain convictions at the Dachau trial.

Evidence was presented that many of the defendants in the Dachau trial made

their confessions under torture. For example, defendant Johann Kick testified:

I was under arrest here in Dachau from sixth to 15th of May. During this time I was

beaten all day and night. I had to stand at attention for hours. I had to kneel down on

pointed objects. I had to stand under a lamp for hours and look into the light, at which

time I was also beaten and kicked. As a result of this treatment my arm was

paralyzed for about 10 weeks.[10]

 

Kick testified that as a result of these beatings, he signed the confession presented

to him by U.S. Lt. Paul Guth.[11] Kick’s report regarding his torture, however, made

no difference to the eight U.S. military officers who presided as judges in the trial.

Common Design

The prosecution used the legal device of common design to establish that (wartime)

camp personnel at Dachau were guilty of violating the laws and usages of war. Defense

attorney Douglas Bates in his closing statement challenged the court’s use of common design.

 

Bates said:

 

The most talked-of phrase has been “common design.” Let us be honest and admit that

common design found its way into the judgment for the simple expedient of trying 40

defendants in one mass trial instead of having to try one each in 40 trials. Where

is the common design? Conspicuous by its absence, established for the purpose of

trapping some defendants against whom there was a shortage of proof—by arguing,

for example, that if Schoep was a guard in the camp, then he was equally responsible

for everything that went on. There are guards at each gate of this American post today.

Is it not far-fetched to say they are responsible for crimes that may be committed

within the confines of this large area? If every one of the defendants is guilty of

participating in that large common design, then it becomes necessary to hold responsible

every member of the Nazi Party and every citizen of

Germany who contributed to the waging of total war

—and I submit that can’t be done.

 

I read this in Life magazine today: “Justice cannot be measured quantitatively. If the

whole of Germany is guilty of murder, no doubt it would be just to exterminate the

German people. The real problem is to know who is guilty of what.” Perhaps the prosecution

has arrived at a solution as to how an entire people can be indicted as an acting part of a

mythical common design.

 

And a new definition of murder has been introduced along with common design. This

new principle of law says, “I am given food and told to feed these people. The food

is inadequate. I feed them with it, and they die of starvation. I am guilty of murder.”

Germany was fighting a war she had lost six months before. All internal business had

completely broken down. I presume people like Filleboeck and Wetzel should have

reenacted the miracle at Galilee, where five loaves and fishes fed a multitude.

 

There has been a lot of impressive law read by the chief counsel, and it is good law

—Miller, Wharton. The sad thing is that little of it is applicable to the facts in this case.

Perhaps we have not been diligent enough in seeking applicable law. Some think the

prosecution has found applicable law in the Rules of Land Warfare on the doctrine of

superior orders. We have no intention of arguing that executions by the German Reich

were due process. Nevertheless, we contend that executions were the result of law of

 the then recognized regime in Germany and that members of the firing squad were simple

soldiers acting in the same capacity as in any military organization in the world….

 

If law cloaks a bloodbath in Germany, the idea of law will be the real victim. Lynch law,

of which we have known a good deal in America, often gets the right man. But its

aftermath is a contempt for the law, a contempt that breeds more criminals. It is far,

far better that some guilty men escape than that the idea of law be endangered.

In the long run, the idea of law is our best defense against Nazism in all its forms

In closing, I ask permission to paraphrase a great statesman. Never in the history of j

udicial procedure has so much punishment been asked against so many on so little proof.[12]

 

Despite its injustice, William Denson refused to acknowledge that the legal concept of

common design should not apply in this case. Denson stated: “I do not want the court

to feel that it is necessary to establish individual acts of misconduct to show guilt or innocence.

If he participated in this common design, as evidence has shown, it is sufficient to establish his guilt.”[13]

 

The Case of Dr. Schilling   

 

The injustice and hypocrisy of the Dachau trial is illustrated by the case of Dr. Klaus Karl Schilling

(pictured at his execution). Malaria experiments at Dachau were performed by Dr. Schilling,

who was an internationally famous parasitologist. Dr. Schilling was ordered by Heinrich

Himmler in 1936 to conduct medical research at Dachau for the specific purpose of

immunizing individuals against malaria. The medical supervisor at Dachau would select the

people to be inoculated and then send this list of people to Berlin to be approved by a higher

authority. Those who were chosen were then turned over to Dr. Schilling to conduct the medical experimentation.[14]

Dr. Schilling acknowledged in court that he had performed malaria experiments on inmates

in Dachau. When asked why these experiments had not been performed on animals, Dr. Schilling replied:

 

I have been asked hundreds of times why I do not work with animals. The simple answer

is that malaria of the human being cannot be transmitted to animals. Even highly

developed apes and chimpanzees are not receivers of malaria.

That is a recognized principle of malaria experiments.[15]

William Denson stated that Dr. Schilling was

“nothing more than a common murderer”

whose medical experimentation could not be

compared to that performed in the United States.[16]

 

However, evidence in the later Doctors’ trial in Nuremberg showed that doctors in the

United States performed medical experiments on prison inmates and conscientious

objectors during the war. The evidence showed that large-scale malaria experiments were

performed on 800 American prisoners, many of them black, from federal penitentiaries in

Atlanta and state penitentiaries in Illinois and New Jersey. U.S. doctors conducted human

experiments with malaria tropica, one of the most dangerous of the

malaria strains, to aid the U.S. war effort in Southeast Asia.[17]

 

Although Dr. Schilling’s malaria experiments were no more-dangerous or illegal than the

malaria experiments performed by U.S. doctors, Dr. Schilling had to pay for his malaria

experiments by being hanged to death while his wife watched.[18] The U.S. doctors

who performed malaria experiments on humans were never charged with any crime.     

                           

Verdict 

 

It took the Dachau tribunal only 90 minutes to convict all 40 defendants. Joshua Greene

writes: “Even if history looked back and judged his work charitably, Denson might have

imagined one hour and 30 minutes to be a shockingly

short time in which to determine the fate of 40 men.”[19]     

 

William Denson had no doubt that the U.S. Army tribunal would find the German defendants

guilty of war crimes.[20] The 90 minutes it took to convict the 40 defendants was also probably

not a surprise to Denson. In fact, in the later Mauthausen trial in which Denson was the lead

prosecutor, the American military tribunal took only 90 minutes to find all 61 defendants guilty.[21]

 

Historian Tomaz Jardim writes concerning these verdicts: “Given the brevity of deliberations,

it is clear that the judges spent no significant amount of time reviewing the evidence, examining

legal precedent, or evaluating the issues surrounding the common-design charge that defense

counsel had raised. In all likelihood, the judges had begun deliberations with their minds made up.”[22]

 

Conclusion

 

Benjamin Ferencz acknowledges the injustice of the Dachau trial:

 

I was there for the liberation, as a sergeant in the Third Army, General Patton’s Army,

and my task was to collect camp records and witness testimony, which became the

basis for prosecutions…But the Dachau trials were utterly contemptible. There was

nothing resembling the rule of law. More like court-martials…It was not my idea

of a judicial process. I mean, I was a young, idealistic Harvard law graduate.[23]

Ferencz states that nobody including himself protested against such procedures in the Dachau trials.[24]     

        

The defendants did not receive a fair and impartial hearing in the Dachau trial. The use of

interrogation methods designed to produce false confessions, lax rules of evidence and

procedure, the presumption that the defendants were guilty unless proven innocent, American

military judges with little or no legal training, unreliable eyewitness testimony, the nonexistence

of an appeals process, and the inability of defense counsel to aggressively cross-examine

some of the prosecution witnesses ensured the conviction of all of the defendants in the Dachau trial.

 

 Endnotes

 

[1] Jaworski, Leon, Confession and Avoidance: A Memoir, Garden City, N.Y: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1979, p. 115.

[2] Greene, Joshua M., Justice at Dachau: The Trials of an American Prosecutor, New York: Broadway Books, 2003, p. 41.

[3] Ibid., pp. 42-43.

[4] Ibid., pp. 47-48.

[5] Halow, Joseph, Innocent at Dachau, Newport Beach, Cal.: Institute for Historical Review, 1992, p. 61.

[6] Sworn and notarized statement by Stephen F. Pinter, Feb. 9, 1960. Facsimile in Erich Kern, ed., Verheimlichte Dokumente, Munich: 1988, p. 429. 

[7] Frei, Norbert, Adenauer’s Germany and the Nazi Past: The Politics of Amnesty and Integration, New York: Columbia University Press, 2002, pp. 110-111.

[8] Greene, Joshua M., Justice at Dachau: The Trials of an American Prosecutor, New York: Broadway Books, 2003, pp. 55-57.

[9] Ibid., p. 57.

[10] Ibid., p. 77.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Ibid. pp. 113-115.

[13] Ibid., p. 112.

[14] McCallum, John Dennis, Crime Doctor, Mercer Island, Wash.: The Writing Works, Inc., 1978, pp. 64-65.

[15] Greene, Joshua M., Justice at Dachau: The Trials of an American Prosecutor, New York: Broadway Books, 2003, p. 88.

[16] Ibid., p. 112.

[17] Schmidt, Ulf, Karl Brandt: The Nazi Doctor, New York: Continuum Books, 2007, p. 376.

[18] McCallum, John Dennis, Crime Doctor, Mercer Island, Wash.: The Writing Works, Inc., 1978, pp. 66-67.

[19] Greene, Joshua M., Justice at Dachau: The Trials of an American Prosecutor, New York: Broadway Books, 2003, p. 115.

[20] Ibid., p. 116.

[21] Ibid., p. 221.

[22] Jardim, Tomaz, The Mauthausen Trial, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2012, pp. 180-181.

[23] Stuart, Heikelina Verrijn and Simons, Marlise, The Prosecutor and the Judge, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2009, p. 17.

[24] Ibid.

 _______________________________________
 
 
 

 

 

“CONFESSIONS” UNDER TORTURE

 

The Allies used extremely brutal torture against their German prisoners, not just during

the war, but afterward, to force them to provide fraudulent confessions to crimes they

never committed—all to get convictions at war crime trials. The subject is well known to

Revisionists, but the facts have been suppressed by the mainstream for

more than 65 years and few people outside of this circle are aware of it.

 

The American Senator, Joseph McCarthy, in a statement given to the American Press

on May 20th, 1949, drew attention to the following cases of torture to secure such confessions.

In the prison of the Swabisch Hall, he stated, officers of the S.S. Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler

were flogged until they were soaked in blood, after which their sexual organs were trampled

on as they lay prostrate on the ground. As in the notorious Malmedy Trials of private soldiers,

the prisoners were hoisted in the air and beaten until they signed the confessions demanded

of them. On the basis of such “confessions” extorted from S.S. Generals Sepp Dietrich

and Joachim Paiper, the Leibstandarte was convicted as a “guilty organisation”. S.S.

General Oswald Pohl, the economic administrator of the concentration camp system,

had his face smeared with faeces and was subsequently beaten until he supplied his confession.

 

In dealing with these cases, Senator McCarthy told the Press: “I have heard evidence

and read documentary proofs to the effect that the accused persons were beaten up,

maltreated and physically tortured by methods which could only be conceived in sick brains.

They were subjected to mock trials and pretended executions, they were told their families

would be deprived of their ration cards. All these things were carried out with the approval of

the Public Prosecutor in order to secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the

extortion of the required confessions. If the United States lets such acts committed by a few

people go unpunished, then the whole world can rightly criticise us severely and forever

doubt the correctness of our motives and our moral integrity.” The methods of intimidation

described were repeated during trials at Frankfurt-am-Mein and at Dachau, and large

numbers of Germans were convicted for atrocities on the basis of their admissions.

 

The American Judge Edward L. van Roden, one of the three members of the Simpson Army

Commission which was subsequently appointed to investigate the methods of justice at

the Dachau trials, revealed the methods by which these admissions were secured in the

Washington Daily News, January 9th, 1949. His account also appeared in the British

newspaper, the Sunday Pictorial, January 23rd, 1949. The methods he described were:

“Posturing as priests to hear confessions and give absolution; torture with burning matches

driven under the prisoners finger-nails; knocking out of teeth and breaking jaws; solitary

confinement and near starvation rations.” Van Roden explained: “The statements which

were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary

confinement for three, four and five months … The investigators would put a black hood

over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him

and beat him with rubber hoses … All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we

investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair.

This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators.”

 

The American investigators responsible (and who later functioned as the prosecution

in the trials) were: Lt.-Col. Burton F. Ellis (chief of the War Crimes Committee) and his

assistants, Capt. Raphael Shumacker, Lt. Robert E. Byrne, Lt. William R. Perl, Mr. Morris

Ellowitz, Mr. Harry Thon, and Mr. Kirschbaum. The legal adviser of the court was Col. A. H.

Rosenfeld. The reader will immediately appreciate from their names that the majority of

these people were “biased on racial grounds” in the words of Justice Wenersturm – that is,

were Jewish, and therefore should never have been involved in any such investigation.

Despite the fact that “confessions” pertaining to the extermination of the Jews were

extracted under these conditions, Nuremberg statements are still regarded as conclusive

evidence for the Six Million by writers like Reitlinger and others, and the illusion is maintained

that the Trials were both impartial and impeccably fair. When General Taylor, the Chief Public

Prosecutor, was asked where he had obtained the figure of the Six Million, he replied that it

was based on the confession of S.S. General Otto Ohlendorf. He, too, was tortured and his

case is examined below. But as far as such “confessions” in general are concerned, we can

do no better than quote the British Sunday Pictorial when reviewing the report of Judge van

Roden: “Strong men were reduced to broken wrecks ready to

mumble any admission demanded by their prosecutors.”

 

http://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd03.html

 

Reports of widespread torture at the postwar American-run “war crimes” trials at Dachau

leaked out, resulting in so many protests that a formal investigation was eventually carried

out. A US Army Commission of inquiry consisting of Pennsylvania Judge Edward van Roden

and Texas Supreme Court Judge Gordon Simpson officially confirmed the charges of gross

abuse. German defendants, they found, were routinely tortured at Dachau with savage

beatings, burning matches under fingernails, kicking of testicles, months of solitary

confinement, and threats of family reprisals. Low ranking prisoners were assured that their

“confessions” would be used only against their former superiors in the dock. Later, though,

these hapless men found their own “confessions” used against them when they were tried

in turn. High ranking defendants were cynically assured that by “voluntarily” accepting all

responsibility themselves they would thereby protect their former subordinates from prosecution.

 

One Dachau trial court reporter was so outraged at what was happening there in the

name of justice that he quit his job. He testified to a US Senate subcommittee that

the “most brutal” interrogators had been three German-born Jews. Although operating

procedures at the Dachau trials were significantly worse than those used at Nuremberg,

they give some idea of the spirit of the “justice” imposed on the vanquished Germans.

 

Virtually all of the US investigators who brought cases before American military courts at

Dachau were “Jewish refugees from Germany” who “hated the Germans,” recalled Joseph

Halow, a US Army court reporter at the Dachau trials in 1947. “Many of the investigators

gave vent to their hated by attempting to force confessions from

the Germans by treating them brutally,” including “severe beatings.”

 

The case of Gustav Petrat, a German who had served as a guard at the Mauthausen,

was not unusual. After repeated brutal beatings by US authorities, he broke down and

signed a perjured statement. He was also whipped and threatened with immediate shooting.

Petrat was prevented from securing exonerating evidence, and even potential defense

witnesses were beaten and threatened to keep them from testifying. After a farcical trial

by a US military court at Dachau, Petrat was sentenced to death and hanged in late 1948.

He was 24 years old.

 

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_weberb.html

 

James J. Weingartner, the author of A Peculiar Crusade: Willis M. Everett and the

Malmedy Massacre, wrote the story of the Dachau proceedings from information provided

by Everett’s family and gleaned from his letters and diary. According to Weingartner, shortly

before the proceedings were to begin, defense attorney Lt. Col. Everett interviewed a few

of the 73 accused with the help of an interpreter. Although the accused were being held

in solitary confinement and had not had the opportunity to consult with each other,

most of them told identical stories of misconduct by their Jewish interrogators.

 

Benjamin Ferencz, Jewish lead U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals

in 1945 and 1947: “We did not have a regular courtroom where to call witnesses and question

them, with a secretary present and someone who did the cross-examination or that would

guarantee their rights. We collected statements from witnesses that we considered favorable

and they would write an affidavit. And then they had to swear it in front of an officer. If it was

from a hostile witness we would interrogate him privately to see if we could determine the

truth. And when we reached the point where we felt we had ascertained the truth, we asked

him to write in his own hand and sign it; then usually brought in an officer to witness that.”

 

– USHMM interview 1994

 

Washington Post: Giving Hitler Hell (21 July 2005)

 

Jewish Intelligence Officer Arnold Weiss: “How did you do it?” I ask Weiss. “The kapos,”

he explains, “that’s where we got the idea. We had seen what the DPs (displaced persons)

did to the kapos, and we realized they could do us a favor. We studied up a little on

military law, and there was nothing on the books preventing us from delivering suspects

for additional debriefing to the DPs,” Weiss recalls. He says he’s not sure where the idea

originated, who first put it into motion, or how widespread it was. “Whoever first

came up with this, I honestly don’t know. I don’t think they’d own up to it anyway.”

 

While it was perfectly legal under military law to hand over suspects for further questioning

to DPs, says Benjamin Ferencz, who was a lead U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg War

Crimes Tribunals in 1945 and 1947, knowingly delivering suspects for execution

was not. And of course the DPs were not interested in extracting information.

 

Benjamin Ferencz: “I once saw DPs (displaced persons) beat an SS man and then strap

him to the steel gurney of a crematorium. They slid him in the oven, turned on the heat

and took him back out. Beat him again, and put him back in until he was burnt alive. I

did nothing to stop it. I suppose I could have brandished my weapon or shot in the

air, but I was not inclined to do so. Does that make me an accomplice to murder?”

 

Lt. William Perl was an Austrian Jew who had emigrated to America in 1940. He was the

chief interrogator of Germans accused of the Malmedy massacre. This was because he

could speak fluent German; and indeed many of the interrogators at Nuremberg were German

or Austrian Jews who had emigrated to America before WWII and were known as the

‘Ritchie Boys’. There were roughly 9000 of these Jews in America and they specialized in

the “interrogation” of German prisoners. Perl was an active Zionist who had worked to get

European Jews into Palestine illegally before he came to America. Perl was also a good

friend and associate of the Zionist Ze’ev Jabotinsky, founder of the murderous Irgun terrorist

organization in Israel. Perl supervised the torture of the German defendants. Other Jews

on the interrogation staff specalizing in torture techniques at Nuremberg included

Josef Kirschbaum, Harry Thon and Morris Ellowitz.

 

British Postwar Torture Centers

 

Col. Robin Stephens (pictured left) was in charge of a sadistic torture program during

and after WWII, still largely covered up by the British government. Much of the fabricated

“evidence” obtained under duress was used as a pretext to convict National

Socialist leaders for war crimes.

 

The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German

officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed

through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes.

The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German

civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.

 

Cruel Britannia: A Secret History of Torture by Ian Cobain

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cruel-Britannia-Secret-History-Torture/dp/184627334X

The secrets of the London Cage

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/nov/12/secondworldwar.world

How Britain tortured Nazi PoWs

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223831/How-Britain-tortured-Nazi-PoWs-The-horrifying-interrogation-methods-belie-proud-boast-fought-clean-war.html

Bad Nenndorf interrogation centre

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_Nenndorf_interrogation_centre

The interrogation camp that turned prisoners into living skeletons

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/dec/17/secondworldwar.topstories3

The postwar photographs that British authorities tried to keep hidden

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2006/apr/03/uk.freedomofinformation

Further reading:

Tortured Confessions: How the Allies extracted confessions out of captured German soldiers after WWII

http://wariscrime.com/new/tortured-confessions/

Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg

https://www.darkmoon.me/2015/torture-and-testicle-crushing-at-nuremberg/

How the Allied Victors of WWII tortured and killed their German prisoners

https://www.darkmoon.me/2015/german-victims-how-the-allied-victors-of-wwii-tortured-and-killed-their-german-prisoners-part-1-of-2/

How Jews tortured innocent Germans to make Holocaust Evidence

http://www.nazigassings.com/BernardClarke.html

The Holocaust legend is built on “confessions” obtained VIA TORTURE; Jewish interrogators beat, tortured, and crushed the testicles of German defendants at war crimes trials

http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/the-holocaust-legend-is-built-on.html

Untrue Confessions: Fabricated Testimony & Circumstantially Prudent Concessions

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-Doc-Jews/+Doc-Jews-Holocaust-DebunkingLies&Liars/FabricationOfTheNurembergTrials.htm

Hellstorm — The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 By Thomas Goodrich

http://www.amazon.com/Hellstorm-Death-Nazi-Germany-1944-1947/dp/1494775069


Is There Life After Persecution?

The Botched Execution of Fred Leuchter

Presented at the Eleventh IHR Conference, October 1992.

by Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.

 

 

Many of you, I am sure, know who I am, where I've been, and what I've done. Today I'm

here to tell you what has happened to me since I addressed the Tenth International

Revisionist Conference in Washington, DC, in October 1990.

 

One of my jobs as an engineer of execution technology has been to "post mortem" executions

from a technical standpoint, that is, to determine if anything went wrong and, if so, to

determine just how the execution was botched. This normally entails reviewing eyewitness

accounts of how the executees were tortured, mutilated, or otherwise dehumanized in society's name.

 

I will do that here today, except that, in this case, it is myself that I post mortem -- and the

cadaver isn't dead! Much to the dismay of my executioners, the execution was so badly botched

that I am able to stand here before you to speak the truth, and to tell the world that it is not

myself, but the Holocaust story that is dead. I repeat for the record: I was condemned

for maintaining that there were no execution gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Majdanek,

Dachau, Mauthausen, or Hartheim Castle. There's no proof for the charge, only innuendo,

lies, and half-truths. Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zündel and others said this first. They, too,

live as victims of botched executions, but nevertheless free to speak the truth in a strong

and growing voice that repeats: No gas chambers, no gas chambers, no damn gas chambers!

 

This address, then, is not a post mortem on my cadaver but rather a post mortem by my cadaver.

 

As you know, I was sent to Poland in 1988 by and for Mr. Ernst Zündel to investigate the

alleged execution gas chamber facilities at the three concentration camps of Auschwitz,

Birkenau, and Majdanek. I was chosen for this task from a field of experts numbering one,

and recommended by those states in the USA where lethal gas chambers are used to execute

convicted criminals. My forensic analysis and subsequent report prove beyond any shadow

of a doubt that there were no gas execution facilities operated by the Nazis at these sites.

I also entered these findings (which are also detailed in my published report)

into the court record in sworn testimony in Toronto as a court-qualified expert.

 

Because I was somewhat naive at the time, I was not aware that by so testifying I was

offending the organized world Jewish community. By providing final, definitive proof that

there were no execution gas chamber utilized for genocidal purposes by the Germans at

these wartime camps, I established the simple fact that the Holocaust story is not true. What

I did not know was that anyone expressing such beliefs is guilty of a capital crime:

that of thinking and telling the unspeakable truth about the greatest lie of the age.

 

I would have to pay for this crime. While I innocently told the truth in Toronto, plans were

made, and subsequently implemented, for a major effort to destroy me. If I could be destroyed

and discredited -- so the reasoning went -- no one would

accept my professional findings, no matter how truthful.

 

Overview

 

Since April 1988, when I testified in the second Zündel trial in Toronto about my inspection

of the alleged gas chambers in Poland, my life has been turned upside down.

 

I have been vilified both privately and publicly in all forms of the media. My clients have

been cajoled and threatened into not dealing with me. High-level law enforcement officials,

acting for personal reasons, have lied about me and have prevented clients from dealing

with me. My person and reputation have been defiled by lies

and innuendo. My family and I have been repeatedly threatened.

 

Behind this campaign to punish me and suppress the truth about the gas chambers,

have been several Jewish organizations, which have publicly vowed to silence

me by destroying my ability to make a living.

 

 

At the forefront of this effort has been Beate Klarsfeld of the Paris-based Klarsfeld Foundation.

In the United States, the campaign has been orchestrated through the US-based "Holocaust

Survivors and Friends in Pursuit of Justice." Associated with these two organizations have

been the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith and the Jewish Defense League.

 


Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.

 

At Klarsfeld's initiative, these groups first carried out an extensive one year investigation.

After they were unable to turn up any impropriety or wrongdoing on my part, they began to

threaten prison wardens with political consequences if they dealt with me. This first came

to light when the ABC television news program, "Prime Time," decided to do a network

television piece on myself and my work. This involved filming at various prisons. Prison

wardens advised the "Prime Time" personnel of the threats and problems that resulted from

my presence at the prisons for the filming. ABC news was told not to air the program.

It refused to succumb to the pressure, and consequently

suffered vilification by the organizations involved.

 

To sum up here, this campaign has consisted of the following:

 

  1. Threats against prison officials who dealt with me.
  1. False and slanderous vilification through private channels,
  2.  as well as publicly in newspapers and magazines.
  3. Legislation to prevent me from working at my profession.
  4. Criminal prosecution for working at my profession.
  5. Lies by public officials spread both officially and privately.

  6. Restriction of my personal freedom and right to travel by effecting my
  7.  illegal arrest and imprisonment in England, from where I was finally deported.
  8. Interference with my right as an American citizen to help and protection from the US
  9. State Department, which refused to assist me during my illegal imprisonment in England.

As a result of this campaign, my livelihood has been destroyed,

and my career has been ruined. All this for telling the truth under oath.

 

The organizations cited above also interfered with the execution in Illinois of a certain

Mr. Walker by threatening to pass legislation to prevent that state from allowing me to

complete an ongoing contract. As a result, Director McGinnis ultimately yielded to this

pressure and proceeded with the execution using equipment known to be defective.

Under pressure from these groups, and through the efforts of Alabama Deputy Attorney

General, Ed Carnes, the State of Alabama did not purchase a new electric chair. Carnes

wrote a lying memorandum to all Departments of Corrections around the United States claiming

that I was dangerous and held unorthodox views on execution. He caused the State to breach

its contract. According to his office, this means I support only humane and painless executions.

Carnes actually lied to me to get me to testify that a prior execution was humane.

 

As a direct result of interference by these groups, at least one man was tortured to death

in Virginia. Purchasing agents and wardens have been mendaciously told that my equipment

failed during an execution, which is not true. It has never failed. Delaware Deputy Attorney

General Silverman breached my contract, which was already underway, because I wrote the

Zündel trial Leuchter Report. This contract was for maintenance on their lethal injection

machine and gallows, previously fabricated by me, and for training of their execution personnel.

Delaware has refused to pay me for the work I completed, and has instructed me to keep

the control module of their lethal injection machine. However, the protocol I wrote for

execution by hanging was submitted by them and approved by the court system. In Massachusetts,

legislation specifically designed to put me out of business has been filed for four years running.

 

Finally, and also at the insistence of these same Jewish groups, a spurious criminal complaint

was filed against me in the Massachusetts court system with the intent of

destroying my reputation by putting me in prison for three months.

 

I was charged with practicing as an engineer without a license. In point of fact, a license is

not required in Massachusetts, or any other state, unless the engineer is involved in construction

of buildings, and is certifying compliance with specifications. There is also

a statutory exemption for engineers who do not deal with the general public.

 

As confirmation of the spurious nature of this charge, it should be pointed out there are more

than fifty thousand practicing engineers in Massachusetts, of whom only five thousand are

licensed. Although the state's licensing law has been in effect since

1940, there has been no record of any prosecution for this offense.

 

The charge was improperly brought. Nevertheless, if it had been successful,

and I had been convicted, I would have been imprisoned for three months.

 

The Massachusetts state Engineering Board, under pressure from Klarsfeld and her

"Holocaust Survivors and Friends in Pursuit of Justice," filed this criminal complaint in

Middlesex County. The name of the complainant was denied me, and was not made available

until the matter was brought before the court. Before the complaint was issued, and

several times thereafter, I was given the chance to recant in return for non-issuance or

dismissal of the complaint. I also would have been obliged to give up my profession, in order

to discredit my Report. I refused, and responded to the Board's threat with a denial that

any law had been violated. The original clerk magistrate who issued the complaint apologized

for bowing to Jewish pressure in prosecuting me under a statute that was being mis-applied.

A representative of the ADL tried to force her testimony on the hearing, but was denied

access because she had no evidence to offer that was pertinent to the matter. The District

Court judge, in an excellent imitation of Pontius Pilate, summarily dismissed our motions for

dismissal, allowed my court-appointed attorney to withdraw, and instructed Kirk Lyons,

Director of the Cause Foundation and my out-of-state attorney, to re-file our motions for

dismissal, because they all had merit. After it became clear that there would be no justice

for us in the Malden District Court, we moved the case to Superior Court for a jury trial.

 

With this charge hanging over my head, it was impossible for me to consult, supply

equipment, or even act as an expert witness in American courts, as I had often done.

 

The district attorney's office, under heavy pressure from various Jewish organizations,

selected its best prosecuting attorney to handle my case. In the belief that he would be

the person most likely to bring about a conviction, he was pulled from a murder trial.

In June, just prior to the trial, our motions for dismissal were heard. The judge, also under

heavy pressure from Jewish groups, told the district attorney that this case was not properly

a criminal matter, and strongly suggested that the case be resolved short of a trial. With

the ever-present possibility of conviction and jail (faced by most political prisoners)

we negotiated a settlement.

 

A very special consent agreement was signed [on June 11, 1991] that made legal

history in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The agreement was not a promise by

the defendant to the court, as is normally the case, but an agreement between the State

Engineering Board and myself. The board which, on two previous occasions, had refused

to accept my application for registration because they do not register people who practice

my discipline, was required to become a party to the agreement.

[For more on this agreement, see the IHR Newsletter, July-August 1991, p. 3.]

 

The consent agreement requires the board to accept my application and process it with

"due diligence." Until the application is approved, or until two years are up, I have agreed

not to use the title "engineer" or issue an engineering opinion in the Commonwealth of

Massachusetts. This is, in effect, a temporary gag order imposed to satisfy the

interested Jewish groups.

 

By removing the case from consideration by criminal courts, the possibility of my imprisonment

has been eliminated. If the Engineering Board fails to process and issue a license to me

within a reasonable period, and in due course, the matter should then move to the civil

courts. Attorney Lyons is presently preparing the necessary application. However, a new

problem has arisen. All applications must be accompanied by the recommendations of three

state-licensed engineers, but none is willing to risk the wrath of the Jews in my behalf.

 

The de facto gag order, imposed by the settlement, applies only within the Commonwealth

of Massachusetts, and I am free to pursue my profession anywhere else.

 

Most of the execution equipment in the United States is either worn out, obsolete, or improperly

fabricated, and is in need of repair or replacement. I am the only person who does this

work, and states are being denied the right to deal with me. Although wardens and

commissioners are afraid to even speak with me, they often do so anyway through intermediaries.

One state has a leaking gas chamber, but will use it, endangering the lives of guards and

witnesses, rather than risk discovery in dealing with me. How many more inmates will

be tortured, or lives lost, through the callous interference of these Jewish groups?

 

Owing to the successful conspiracy of these Jewish groups, I am completely out of business,

unable to find work to feed my family. In spite of everything, though, I am still here, and I

am still telling the truth. Furthermore, I intend to continue to tell the truth. If the

organized Jewish community wants to stop me, it will have to try much harder.

 

Moreover, attempts to discredit the Leuchter Report have failed, most notably with

Pressac's inept analysis. Since the release of the Leuchter Report [in 1988], independent

evidence has shown that the six million death figure has been grossly exaggerated, and

an investigation by the Polish state forensic institute [among others] has corroborated

that no gas was utilized in the alleged execution chambers at Auschwitz.

 

England

 

In the spring of 1991, David Irving asked me if I would consider a speaking engagement

in England later that year. I said that I would, and I was advised in mid-summer

that this would take place during the second week of November.

 

Irving apparently announced the speech sometime later. This apparently enraged Jewish

groups in London which protested to UK Home Secretary Mr. Kenneth Baker in an effort

to prevent me from traveling to London. This is a clear infringement of the rights of British

people to hear me speak. This certainly also curtails my right to travel to England as

any other American citizen.

 

As a result of pressure by these Jewish groups, Mr. Baker apparently promised to take

action. The Jewish Chronicle, a London weekly paper, reported in its issue of October 4, 1991,

that Home Secretary Baker had banned my travel to the United Kingdom. This was the

only mention of the ban in the British media,and was not a particularly reliable source.

 

A week or so later, my father, Fred A. Leuchter, Sr., received a letter, ostensibly from the

Immigration and Naturalization Department of Her Majesty's government, informing him

that, by direction of the Home Secretary, he was not permitted to travel

to the United Kingdom. My father communicated this letter to me.

 

Because my father had no such travel plans, my first assumption was that this letter was

meant for me. However, a closer reading of it suggested that it might be a fraud. The

signatory, Mr. "G.P.J. Catt," had no title, and part of the date was written by hand. Certainly,

the Home Secretary and Her Majesty's Immigration Office would not be so sloppy and

unbusinesslike as to send off an amateurishly prepared letter to the wrong

person. My address is publicly known, and is easy to ascertain.

 

I turned the questionable document over to my attorney, Kirk Lyons, to authenticate. He,

in turn, formally protested the letter to the UK Consulates in both Houston and Boston. In

each case, the Consulate advised him that his protest was unfounded because there was

no ban on travel to the UK by me (or my father, for that matter). He was informed that the

letter must be fraudulent, and that it did not prohibit my travel to Britain in any way. Lyons

was also informed that all Home Office documents must contain a reference number,

which this did not. Based on all this, I confirmed my travel plans to London.

 

Because I also had also arranged to visit Germany, I combined that trip with my visit to

London. Accordingly, my wife Carol and I left for Germany on November 2, 1991. We planned

to drive to Calais and take the ferry to Dover from there on or about November 11, 1991.

We also planned to return to Germany on or about November 15, immediately following my

scheduled speech in London. Because our visit in Germany would be very hectic, we intended

to arrive in England several days prior to my speech,

giving us a few days to relax and see some of that country.

 

As planned, we arrived in Dover on the ferry from Calais late on November 11, and spent

the night in Dover. The next morning we drove to London, where we met with Irving. We

then left to see the country, leisurely driving south to Salisbury to see

Stonehenge. We returned to London by way of Wimbledon on November 15.

 

On Friday evening, November 15, we arrived at the Town Hall in Chelsea where I was to

give my speech. After Irving opened the program, Dr. Robert Faurisson spoke. I was then

called to the podium, and began my presentation. At approximately 9:15 p.m., some

five minutes into my speech, I was interrupted by Irving, who told me that a "gentleman"

wished to speak to me in the anteroom to the stage. I did not know it then, but I would

remain in illegal police custody, without interruption, until I was expelled from

England, and would not see my host, Dr. Faurisson, or the audience again.

 

In the anteroom I was greeted by Chief Inspector Philip Selwood and three metro police

officers. I was asked to identify myself, which I did by presenting my passport (which

Selwood kept) and my driver's license (which he returned). I was told that two male technicians

with the Thames television news team had quietly spoken with him outside, and had

insisted (as citizens) that I be arrested as an illegal alien because I had sneaked into

the country contrary to a ban by the Home Secretary. I responded by pointing out that

my passport was properly stamped, and that, as the two British Consulates in the

United States had indicated, there was no such ban.

 

I further informed Selwood that if it was indeed determined that was in the country illegally,

I would leave immediately. I told him that I had no wish to stay where I was not wanted, and

that did not want to violate the law. Selwood told me that Thames television was trying

to make news instead of reporting it, and that my cooperation would be very much appreciated.

He asked me to accompany him to the Chelsea police station, without talking to the media,

whilst he made an investigation. If I refused, I would be arrested on suspicion of illegal entry.

I agreed. After he spirited me out of the building and into an unmarked van, away we went.

Selwood was also afraid of violent Jews, who might attempt to break up the speech, and

that was the reason for the presence of himself and his large contingent of men. I asked

him to bring my wife, who was at the back of the hall. He stopped the van, ordered his

men to take me to the station, and personally returned to collect my wife. I arrived

at the station, and he soon followed with Carol. We were placed in a visitors' room.

 

Selwood advised me that I was not under arrest, and that if the Home Office determined

that I was in the country illegally I would be permitted to leave. I was

told that I was free to call the American consul, if I wished. I did not.

 

At this point I asked to leave. I was informed that I would have to wait for my status to be

determined, because it would be necessary to escort me out of the country if I was there

illegally. Selwood further told me that persons who were in the country illegally must be

permitted to leave, if they so wished, providing they had the means. (In fact, we had

ferry tickets.) Chief Inspector Selwood and the other police personnel were cordial and

accommodating, providing us with a toilet and refreshment. We advised the police that

Carol was diabetic. After first introducing us to his second-incommand,

and leaving instructions as to our treatment, Selwood left before midnight.

 

At approximately 12:05 a.m., early Saturday morning, November 16, the Deputy Chief

Inspector received a call, apparently from the Home Office. We could not hear very much,

but we did hear him say that we should leave by way of Dover. A few minutes later, shortly

before 12:15 a.m., he again received a call, to which he replied "Yes sir." He then came to

speak to me. "I'm sorry," he said. "I have been ordered to arrest you." He informed me

of my rights, and told me that I could talk with the US Consul, or the Duty Solicitor

(Public Defender), or both. When I asked if it had been determined that I was in the country

illegally, he said that he did not know for sure. I then asked to leave, and he told me that

this was not possible. At this point I asked to speak with the US Consul, and was told that

this would be arranged. I was then searched, booked, and locked in a detention room

with someone else, also under arrest.

 

About an hour later I was removed from the detention room, and told that the American

Consulate was on the telephone. I spoke with Under Consul Christopher Randall who

informed me that the Consular Corps was not there to help US citizens. He totally refused

to help. I asked to talk with the Duty Solicitor, and was told he would be called. I was taken

to a cell (instead of a detention room) for lock-up. When I asked why I was being moved to

a cell, I was told that the other occupant of the detention room was

there for assault, and that I was being moved for my own protection.

 

I now found myself in an isolation cell with one other occupant who turned out to be there

for theft. Because I make execution equipment (and criminals know this), I should

never have been put in a cell with others. To do so might put my life in danger.

 

Moreover, the cell was freezing, and I had no coat. The other inmate had a blanket and

mattress. In an effort to keep warm, I wrapped my arms

around myself, but this didn't work. I was unable to sleep.

 

Some time later I was let out to accept a phone call from the Duty solicitor, who told me

he was unable to help because I had not committed a crime. He told me that I should call

my Consul, who ought to be able to help. When I told him that my consul had refused to

help, he urged me to call back and insist, because he was obliged by law to help.

I was returned to my cell.

 

At approximately 3:00 a.m., I was removed from my cell for interrogation by two Immigration

Department personnel. I was taken to an interrogation room with recording equipment,

and advised that my statement would be taped. I was also advised that I did not have to

make a statement if I chose not to. I agreed to speak with them, but they first had to give

me time to warm up so that my teeth would stop chattering and I would be able to speak

normally. I gave them the same information that I had given hours earlier to Chief Inspector

Selwood. I affirmed that I was a legal entrant, and once again requested permission to

leave. I was refused. I was told that I should call the American Consul and/or the Duty Solicitor.

I was also informed that charges might be brought. At this point I was served with Immigration

form IS 151-A. I was also told that I would not be allowed to leave by way of Dover, but would

instead be sent out though Heathrow airport (where they were from),

and that my wife and our rental car would have to stay behind.

 

 

I asked about my wife, concerned that she had not eaten in over twelve hours, which could

be a problem because of her diabetes. I was told that they would make a decision later about

my legal status, and that in the meantime I would have to remain in the cold cell. I asked to be

allowed to warm up, and to see my wife. They agreed to this. Carol had also asked to see me.

 

I met with Carol. After talking with her, I once again asked to talk with my Consul.

The Consulate official again gave me a hard time, but after I told him of my discussion with

the Duty Solicitor he said he would at least inquire into the matter. The guard rushed me to

complete my phone conversation. Carol subsequently found out that the Under Consul had

inquired late that morning. Carol had been removed while I was on the telephone, and I was

rushed back to my cell. I froze again, but at about 4:30 a.m. I was given a blanket.

 

The day shift personnel who arrived at about seven o'clock proved more difficult to deal with.

At 7:00 a.m., the other inmates were awakened to be taken to court. They were given coffee;

I was not. My cellmate asked the guard to give me some coffee, which he did.

By 7:45 a.m., all the inmates were gone, and new inmates began to arrive.

 

I repeatedly asked about my wife to make sure that she was well. I inquired at 7:00, 8:00,

9:00, 10:00, 11:00, 12:00, and 1:00 o'clock, but no one would tell me how she was. Later

I found out that just one officer had checked on her. She likewise had been asking about

me, and was told nothing. At noon I was given a breakfast that consisted of cold eggs, sausage,

and toast left over from hours earlier. It was inedible. It certainly would have made my ulcer

worse. Carol had been given nothing to eat, even though she had been required

to stay there by the Immigration officers who knew of her medical problem.

 

At about 1:20 p.m., I was again taken from my cell, this time to see Mr. Phillips of the

Immigration Department. He met with Carol and me together. Phillips told us that it had been

determined that I was in the country illegally, because I had entered in violation of the

ban by the Home Secretary. I was told that I would be held until I was deported.

 

He acknowledged that he could not understand why I had been arrested and imprisoned after

I had asked on three occasions to leave. Once again I asked to leave, but Mr. Phillips told me

that this was now not possible because I had been formally arrested. This should not have

happened, he said, but, because it did, I would now have to be deported. Carol asked how

it was possible for me to be in the country illegally if I had entered legally at Dover and had

a valid passport stamp. Phillips replied that I was not actually in the country illegally, but that

an official determination had been made that I was, and that was the law. I asked why those

immigration officials who had interviewed me had made this determination, and Phillips

responded that they had not. He further said that the "decision has been made very high

up in the Home Office," higher than he would ever reach in his career. He added that I

could legally be held for up to five days after my arrest, even though

I wanted (and should have been allowed) to leave earlier.

 

Phillips also told us that the Immigration Department had contacted French immigration

about my possible deportation to France, but that I had been refused entry there. I responded

by commenting that this is not surprising, because no country would

want a deportee unless it is one of its own citizens. Phillips agreed.

 

He said that his next step would be to ask Belgium, and, if I was refused there, Germany.

He did not expect Belgium to accept, but if Germany did, I would be sent on the Hamburg

Ferry that ran only twice a week, the next time being on Tuesday [three days hence].

If I were to go this way, I would have to remain incarcerated until that time.

 

However, I was asked, in view of my desire to leave, would I consider going to the United

States? Phillips informed me that if I officially told him that I wished to return to the United

States, he could not stop me, and would put me on a flight that very evening. I then formally

asked to be returned to the United States, and Phillips said that he would begin making the

necessary arrangements. We would have to leave the rental car in England and make some

arrangement for its return to Germany (other than by our driving it). Furthermore, we would

have to forego our remaining commitments in Germany because time would not permit our return.

 

After taking our airline tickets, he contacted Lufthansa to reschedule our flight. The only

available fight that day was at 3:30 p.m., which was too soon for us to get to the airport.

He returned our tickets, and promised to make arrangements at the UK government's

expense. He booked us on a British Airways flight to New York (not Boston) that departed

at 6:30 p.m. We were escorted in two cars. Phillips' car went first, and we followed in

another police car, under guard. We stopped for our luggage at our car which was parked

behind Selfridge's [in London], at a parking meter, and proceeded to the airport in

rush-hour traffic. If we did not make it on time, they would have to return me to my cell.

 

After a stop at the Immigration office to pick up the necessary forms, we arrived at the

airport, passed through security, and reached the gate just as the plane was being loaded.

The police officer had left us at the entrance to the terminal. After returning my passport

(which noted my detention on form IS 151 A), Mr. Phillips watched us enplane. The

people at the ticket counter had been told that I was being deported, as were the gate attendants.

 

We took our seats, flew to New York, and arrived at about 9:45 p.m. We had to purchase

air tickets to Boston at our own expense. After barely making this flight,

we arrived in Boston at approximately 11:45 p.m., exhausted and hungry.

 

In summary, I was detained and held in custody for some twenty one and three-quarters hours,

fourteen of them in an unheated cell. I was given a breakfast at noon, and was given one

cup of coffee only at my cellmate's insistence. I was given no water, and there was none

in the cell. My ulcer did not fare well under these circumstances,

particularly because of my anxious concern for Carol.

 

For her part, Carol fared even less well that I did. After my arrest, she was given no

food or water, even though she was not free to leave, and the police knew that she was

a diabetic. After my arrest, she was allowed to see me only once. By the time we left,

we were both cold and ill. The conduct of both Chief Inspector Selwood and Mr. Phillips,

as well as that of the police personnel on the evening shift, was exemplary.

By contrast, the conduct of the day shift personnel was poor and careless.

 

During the time that I was being held, Dr. Robert Faurisson went to the US Embassy in

London to see if he could obtain help for me. He was informed that neither I, nor any other

American, had been arrested that evening. That the US Embassy would lie about the illegal

arrest and imprisonment of an American citizen is inexcusable. Faurisson also went to the

police station where I was being held. He was told there I had been arrested and was being

held in a cell in the station, but that I was not permitted any visitors. The police

later told Faurisson that I had been deported on Saturday at 6:30 p.m.

 

As shown by the statements of the two British consular officials in the United States, and

the fact that my name was not on any list and was legally permitted to enter at Dover,

it is clear that no order barring me from entering the UK was ever officially given.

 

It is likewise clear that the difficulty started only when the Thames television people lied

about me to Chief Inspector Selwood, apparently in order to make a "better" news story.

 

It is also clear that the Home Secretary (or someone acting for him) illegally ordered my

arrest, imprisonment and deportation, knowing full well that I had entered the country

legally and should have been left alone or, if later determined to be there illegally, at least

permitted to leave. This plain violation of international law by the Home Secretary's Office

was undoubtedly done to please the complaining Jewish groups which bear the ultimate responsibility.

 

By failing to uphold one of the prime responsibilities of the Consular Corps -- that is, to protect

the rights of Americans abroad -- the United States Embassy in London, and Under

Consul Christopher Randall in particular, clearly failed in their responsibility to me as an

American citizen, as well as their responsibility to the nation as a whole. It is a shameful

disgrace that the British duty solicitor and UK Immigration Officer

Phillips cared more for my rights than my own embassy.

 

A formal protest to State Department, and requests for help from our

Senators and Representatives, have resulted in nothing but lip service.

 

Conclusion

 

Unfortunately, my clients -- the state governments -- are still intimidated by my Jewish persecutors.

This continues to deprive me of my income, and it is not at all clear whether this will ever end.

 

I have been unable to apply for my state engineering license because no engineers have

been willing to sign papers recommending me (which is a requirement), out of fear of

retaliation. Without some official change in my status, such as a license, even the friendly

state governments are afraid to deal with me. The major lawsuit we had planned against

my persecutors is stalled, perhaps permanently, because of a lack of funds.

 

And, although my findings will ultimately be accepted by all, I still have no contracts, have

been unable to find work and have no income. It does not seem that this will improve in the near future.

 

From The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1992 (Vol. 12, No. 4), pages 429-444.
 
 
 
 
 

 ___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Censored History:

Britain put Jews in Concentration Camp During WWII

 

The Balfour Declaration of 1917 was a letter from Britain’s Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour

to Walter Rothschild to be read before the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland.

 

It announced British support for Jewish immigration into the Palestinian Mandate. The Zionist Federation had promised

the British government they could mobilize Hollywood and other assets to push America into WWI on the side of the Axis

. America entered WWI on April 6, 1917. The Balfour Declaration was made on November 2, 1917.

It was widely viewed in Europe as a thank you for American Jewish support for America’s entry into WWI.

 

The Balfour Declaration was considered a major step towards the creation of the Jewish state of Israel.

 

The fallout however, was not good for European Jews. Germany had been a safe haven for Jews for hundreds of years.

Jews were thriving so much so, that the average Jewish income was significantly higher than that of the average German.

Germans felt the Jewish community as a whole had betrayed them. German Jews

quickly became stigmatized as disloyal, draft dodgers, war profiteers, and more.

 

If that wasn’t enough, European Jews soon felt the sting of betrayal from Britain. In the 1930′s the German government

offered to move European Jews to the Palestinian Mandate. The National Socialist regime encouraged Jews to obtain

Palestinian passports and argued that Jews would be much happier living in a country of their own in the Middle East.

The German government promised the Arabs in the Palestinian Mandate free Volkwagon trucks and construction supplies

to pacify them. Ideological Zionists living in the Mandate embraced the idea and some even openly supported the

National Socialist regime.

 

Britain immediately capped the number of Jews who could move to the Palestinian

Mandate to only 15,000 a year, so they would not change the balance of power.

 

In 1940, the National Socialist regime sent the first wave of Jews to the Palestinian Mandate. The first convoy was three

ships full of Jews from Prague, Danzig, Vienna, and Tulcea, Romania. The British immediately blockaded the ports and

declared that the Jews were illegal immigrants. The Jews were all arrested by the British army and placed in quickly erected

concentration camps. Once WWII started many Jews tried to reach the territory to avoid being sent to Nazi run concentration

camps. Britain captured tens of thousands and imprisoned them in concentration camps in the Palestinian Mandate,

Cyprus, and Mauritius. The British concentration camps looked the same as the dreaded camps run by Germany, Croatia,

and Romania. When inmates arrived at the British camps they were forced to strip naked and then sprayed with DDT.

 

In 1944, the government of Hungary collapsed. The arrow cross party seized control of Hungary to keep the Hungarian

army fighting on the Eastern front. To pay for the Hungarian army, Jewish owned property in Hungary was seized. The

National Socialist regime made another major attempt to send Jews to the Palestinian Mandate. They had Turkish

cooperation to transport Jews to the territory by train. One train was even filled up with Hungarian Jews and ready to

leave, but the British said the Hungarian Jews would be refused. The passengers were ordered to switch trains to be sent

to concentration camps in Poland. At that time Britain knew full well that the IRC was the sole provider of food and

supplies to the camps and it was only a matter of time until access would be cut off due to the advancing red army.

 

What is even more shocking is that after the Allies and the IRC began liberating the concentration camps, Britain continued

to imprison Jewish refugees who tried to enter the Palestinian Mandate.

Many survived WWII in concentration camps, only to be imprisoned by the British.

 

The main British concentration camp was in Atlit, north of Haifa. Many Jews were imprisoned in Atlit before being transported

to Cyprus or Mauritius. Over 70,000 Jews were imprisoned there between 1940 and 1945. The camp was shut down when

it was attacked by Zionist guerrillas in 1945. Yitzhak Rabin allegedly masterminded the operation, but he did not lead it.

 

It took a very violent guerrilla war and major acts of terrorism to convince

the British to give up the Palestinian Mandate after WWII was over.

 

by Jason Swartz

 

 


 
             ____________________AN ACTUAL PURPOSEFUL HOLOCAUST____________________________
 
The Rhine meadow camps in summer 1945


Liberation of Bergen Belsen, well nourished Jewish detainees with German striped detainee suits and caps on a cold day in wet and cold April 1945, April 15, 1945 [5]; other web sites state that this photo would be from Dachau.
In 1945 and 1946 London Satanist Zionist Committee of 300 presented German dead
bodies as Jewish dead bodies - dead body plays are typical for Satanist behavior:
 
 
The Rhine meadow camps in summer 1945 (part 4)

Part 4: German bodies shown as Jewish bodies for Hitchcock's films about German concentration camps:
wrong bodies from Rhine meadow camps, wrong lorries, showers and crematories etc.


Hitchcock, Portrait 1956
Hitchcock, portrait 1956, he likes betraying and laughing at Germans

Liberation of Bergen Belsen, well                           nourished Jewish detainees with German striped                           detainee suits and caps on a cold day in wet                           and cold April 1945, April 15, 1945 [5]; other                           web sites state that this photo would be from                           Dachau.

 

 

 Liberation of Bergen Belsen, well nourished Jewish detainees with German striped detainee suits and caps on a cold day in wet and cold April 1945, April 15, 1945 ; other web sites state that this photo would be from Dachau.

 

 

 

 

 

Dead bodies torn by SS men on the way to                           the mass grave 01, the clothes are NO striped                           uniforms of detainees in German ccs, and there                           are NO tattooed numbers, and there are NO                           remnants of earth on the bodies (23min.                           14sec.)

Dead bodies torn by SS men on the way to the mass grave 01, the clothes are NO striped uniforms of detainees in German ccs, and there are NO tattooed numbers, and there are NO remnants of earth on the bodies


Part 4: German bodies shown as Jewish bodies for Hitchcock's films about German concentration camps:
wrong bodies from Rhine meadow camps, wrong lorries, showers and crematories etc.

Master liar Hitchcock was in Germany together with mass murderer and Zionist Eisenhower. Mass murderer Eisenhower
had organized the Rhine meadow camps with 5 million German prisoners of war, and within 6 months 1 million died
(750,000 on the "American" side and 250,000 on the French side). Since 1942 Zionists made propaganda on and on in
the whole world that Jews would be "gassed" in German concentration camps. Well, but all this was a big lie because the
German concentration camps were under control of the Red Cross AND of the Zionists themselves who could move freely
everywhere! But Eisenhower wanted a "confirmation" for the propaganda. Eisenhower gave the order to Hitchcock: Make
some films thus people will believe that the rumors about the German mass murder against the Jews are right. They
should believe it really. This was simple: Hitchcock was filming in the Rhine meadow camps and simply said in the films
that the emaciated Germans and the German bodies would be Jewish bodies - and the film was ready. They were also
driving piles of German bodies from the Rhine meadow camps through Germany showing the bodies in German concentration
camps stating that these would be Jewish bodies. And these lies were established by force of arms and were spread in the whole world. 

Well, the principle faults one can detect these lies
of Eisenhower and Hitchcock are the following ones:

-- German dead bodies from the Rhine meadow camps - when they wear clothes - are NOT wearing the German striped
"zebra" prison uniforms but are mostly wearing remnants of the German gray soldier uniforms of the German army "Wehrmacht"
-- German bodies have no tattooed number of detainees
-- and there are no remnants of earth on the bodies and thus these bodies
never were excavated before but these bodies are "fresh" bodies.

Journalists were never watching precisely and since 1945 they mean that the NS regime had murdered millions of Jews.
But it was just the other way round: Criminal allied murdered 1 million German soldiers in the Rhine meadow camps and
then were presenting the dead bodies as Jewish dead bodies. And for making the lie even more perfect the
allies also invented epidemics in the German concentration camps having been the "cause" for the bodies.

Point 1: Rhine meadow camps with emaciated German soldiers and with piles of German bodies

The Rhine meadow camps of 1945 with 5 million detained German soldiers in Germany were deliberately concealed.
Eisenhower - a hater of the Germans - had not enough having murdered in Dresden over 230,000 Germans. In the
Rhine meadow camps Eisenhower let die deliberately 750,000 German soldiers, and 250,000 more were murdered
by hunger in the French zone which was installed in July 1945 taking over Eisenhower's death camps there. But this
was not published because there were no newspapers in Germany in 1945 and the Red Cross had no good press
spokesman as it seems. Even "U.S." president Truman was not informed what was going on in Germany in the
"American" zone but the Morgenthau plan was fulfilled killing as many Germans as possible after the war - and the Rhine
meadow camps were only the beginning because the deliberately installed starvation which was installed by Zionist
Eisenhower was killing even 5 million more Germans in remaining Germany from 1945 to 1950. During 1945 "American"
soldiers had a paradise life and were making holidays in criminal Nazi Switzerland and Swiss press - whereas the
International Red Cross has it's seat in Switzerland in Geneva - is concealing until today
(2013) the mass murder in the Rhine meadow camps under mass murderer Eisenhower...
 
Point 2: Hitchcock presenting emaciated German soldiers and piles with German bodies as Jewish victims

Eisenhower was a racist Zionist and Bible Jehova racist. His bosses were the Zionists Baruch (financier and stock
exchange guru) and Zionist Morgenthau. Morgenthau wanted to have all Germans killed having a powerless or even
a Germany without population. Zionist Eisenhower wanted to kill as many Germans as possible, and he had a "friend"
with him, film maker Hitchcock. There should be films made supporting the claim "Germans" had gassed "6 million Jews".
Now German dead bodies in the Rhine meadow camps were filmed and the German dead bodies were driven around in
whole Germany and they were presented in the German concentration camps claiming that the dead bodies would be dead Jews. 

Analysis of Hitchcock's films: some fakes and some proofs

Controlling the Hitchcock films one can detect the fake, see the following details. German helmets had an ear protection
and a neck protection, but "American" helmets were round like a circle without protection of ear and neck. 

Different forms of helmets of the Wehrmacht and the "U.S." Army
Helmets of the Wehrmacht with the                         protection of ears and neck, example during                         Barbarossa campaign

Helmets of the Wehrmacht with the protection of ears and neck, example during Barbarossa campaign [1]
German helmets of the Wehrmacht with the                         protection of ears and neck, example of a hand                         grenade course

German helmets of the Wehrmacht with the protection of ears and neck, example of a hand grenade course [2]
&quot;American&quot; soldiers with round                         &quot;American&quot; helmets and with rows of                         German bodies in a Rhine meadow camp

"American" soldiers with round "American" helmets and with rows of German bodies in a Rhine meadow camp [3]
&quot;American&quot; soldiers with round                         &quot;American&quot; helmets piling German                         bodies on a trailer in a Rhine meadow camp

"American" soldiers with round "American" helmets piling German bodies on a trailer in a Rhine meadow camp [4]

Eisenhower and Hitchcock were bringing the fake to a head. German bodies were partly driven around in whole Germany,
were shown on the trailers or piled on the ground and presented to the population as "Jewish bodies". But the mass fraud was clear

-- there were no tattooed numbers of detainees on the bodies
-- when the bodies had clothes on then these were German uniforms and not striped
zebra uniforms from German concentration camps which had Jewish detainees
-- and the bodies could not be digged out either because the bodies
were so clean and new that there were no rests of earth on them.

"American" occupation forces claimed that Auschwitz had been the "center" of the murder of the Jews whereas NEVER ANY
"American" soldier was in Auschwitz in the concentration camp. Well, Eisenhower just copied the cc of Auschwitz in a
Rhine meadow camp and thus Hitchcock made his Auschwitz films. But all these fakes can be detected easily with the "American" helmets. 

Examples of fakes from Bergen Belsen

Liberation of                 Bergen Belsen, well nourished Jewish detainees with                 German striped detainee suits and caps on a cold day in                 wet and cold April 1945, April 15, 1945 [5]; other web                 sites state that this photo would be from Dachau.

Liberation of Bergen Belsen, well nourished Jewish detainees with German striped detainee suits and caps on a cold day in wet and cold April 1945, April 15, 1945 [5]; other web sites state that this photo would be from Dachau.

Photos from the faked cc film by Hitchcock: "An Alfred Hitchcock Documentary On The Nazi Holocaust" (53min.1sec.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0wA4rDuG58
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRr6P0d6r9I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaR3qud2-e8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIZ2KPZhDUs

When the links are not working, go to 
http://www.youtube.com looking for the title "An Alfred Hitchcock Documentary On The Nazi Holocaust", so you get the actual links of the film. Always look for the film of 53 min. 1 sec.

Let's see the fakes about Bergen-Belsen

Hitchcock made some little mistakes: In the film he is saying himself that the prisoners are "soldiers". And there are also women greeting the detainees - thus German women greeting German soldiers - and these are not women greeting Jews. And there are allied lorries with a five pointed star of the "American" army on the hood. And all detainees have dark gray clothes. Thus these are GERMAN PRISONERS OF WAR, above all those with a white "turban" on the head. These are white massive head bandages after having suffered head injuries in the fight. In Bergen Belsen there were allegedly dead bodies by typhus and these bodies are said having been buried only 9 days after the liberation, and these dead bodies of typhus only partly show irregular dark spots, but often no one. In the film is also a medical doctor presented without medical white coat calling himself Mr. Little (Mr. Klein). And at the end the English are claiming that there had been typhus in Bergen Belsen concentration camp installing a warning sign in English "Typhus" and the film is inventing a laboratory of "London students". Hitchcock is inventing that typhus came from getting too less soup and too less water - word by word. Well, when there had been a typhus epidemic in Bergen Belsen then the German camp leadership had installed an own warning sign - in German - and in coordination with the Red Cross!

According to the Baron of the Lies Hitchcock even Jewish children survived Bergen-Belsen in a good estate of health, even a new born baby.:
<There were more than 200 children under 12 years old still alive in Belsen camp.>



Children in Bergen-Belsen                             (22min.37sek.)

Children in Bergen-Belsen (22min.37sek.) [6] 


New born baby in Bergen-Belsen                             (22min.5sek.)

New born baby in Bergen-Belsen (22min.5sek.) [7]

Some children were born in the camp.



Bergen-Belsen camp (11min.1sek.)

Bergen-Belsen camp (11min.1sek.) [8]

Here the mass murderer Eisenhower and film maker Hitchcock were organizing a huge fraud and calumny against Germany.

&quot;American&quot; lorries with a                             five pointed star on the hood coming with                             German prisoners of war (1min. 49sec.)

"American" lorries with a five pointed star on the hood coming with German prisoners of war (1min. 49sec.) [9]

Thus this is not a German lorry but an "American" or British lorry. And here do not come Jews but here come German detainees being greeted by German women and children.
Such                             people are NOT Jewish detainees but GERMAN                             soldiers in gray coats and with head                             injuries with white head bandages. Here they                             are standing allegedly around a &quot;water                             lorry&quot;. (2min. 9sec.)

Such people are NOT Jewish detainees but GERMAN soldiers in gray coats and with head injuries with white head bandages. Here they are standing allegedly around a "water lorry". (2min. 9sec.) [10]

This                             is NO Jew but this is a German soldier in                             his gray army uniform of the Wehrmacht. He                             is eating bread at a barbed wire fence                             (2min. 23sec.)

This is NO Jew but this is a German soldier in his gray army uniform of the Wehrmacht. He is eating bread at a barbed wire fence (2min. 23sec.) [11]

German soldiers under the allied command had to "arrange" themselves on a meadow.
Women sector, women meadow (4min.                             22sec.)

Women sector, women meadow (4min. 22sec.) [12]

Also these women are NOT wearing the striped German zebra uniform for detainees in German ccs as Jewish detainees had, but these are German assistant staff members from the camp being forced under allied command to arrange on the meadow. Additionally there were no "women's meadows" in German concentrations camps but there were "women's camps". "Women's meadows" only existed under mass murderer Eisenhower from 1945 to 1946...

German prisoners of war in a queue                             (11min. 6sec.), many have white bandages on                             their head because of head injuries

German prisoners of war in a queue (11min. 6sec.), many have white bandages on their head because of head injuries [13]. Jews in German concentration camps had NO head bandages for sure.

Thus here are NO Jews but GERMAN soldiers - in the concentration camp of Bergen-Belsen under allied English administration.
Water pipes and in the back ground a                               car of the Red Cross can be seen (11min.                               50sec.)

Water pipes and in the back ground a car of the Red Cross can be seen (11min. 50sec.) [14]

A car of the Red Cross is closed                               (18min. 37sec.

A car of the Red Cross is closed (18min. 37sec.) [15]

When pictures with a car from the Red Cross are shown then it can be admitted that the camp was well managed and there were no or hardly any epidemics, but all cases of illnesses were brought to hospitals as long it was possible.
Water supply in the camp (11min.                               33sec.)

Water supply in the camp (11min. 33sec.) [16]

When films are claiming that German administration had blocked the water supply leaving Jewish detainees suffering without water then this is just a normal propaganda fake to destroy the reputation of the Germans. 

Water supply in the camp 03 with                               washing possibility (11min. 39sec.)

Water supply in the camp 03 with washing possibility (11min. 39sec.) [17]

Additionally there cannot be seen any striped Jewish zebra detainee's uniform in this film, but these detainees are women from SS.
Here                             is a German prisoner of war topless in                             summer 1945 searching clothes on the ground,                             and in the background there is a dead German                             detainee in a gray uniform (3min. 7sec.)

Here is a German prisoner of war topless in summer 1945 searching clothes on the ground, and in the background there is a dead German detainee in a gray uniform (3min. 7sec.) [18]

This scenery cannot be from April 145 because April 1945 was cold and wet with much rain and even snow. Nobody was walking topless in April 1945. But liar Hitchcock claims this would be a Jewish detainee during the liberation of the camp in April 1945...

The ground is full of                             German bodies or full of helpless dying                             German prisoners of war in gray uniforms                             starving and suffering in their own                             excrements (3min. 23sec.)

The ground is full of German bodies or full of helpless dying German prisoners of war in gray uniforms starving and suffering in their own excrements (3min. 23sec.) [19]

There CANNOT BE SEEN ANY striped zebra uniform of German concentration camps. All clothes come from dead German soldiers. These are NO Jews FOR SURE.

Male                             emaciated dead bodies without clothes and                             without spots and without tattooed numbers                             of detainees (4min. 54sec.)

Male emaciated dead bodies without clothes and without spots and without tattooed numbers of detainees (4min. 54sec.) [20].

These dead bodies are German bodies from the Rhine meadow camps. 

Woman's dead body with big breast and                               with irregular spots on her body with an                               open mouth (4min. 8sec.)

Woman's dead body with big breast and with irregular spots on her body with an open mouth (4min. 8sec.) [21]

The irregular spots are never explained. Some bodies have spots, others not. Nothing is clear about it. Thus there is the suspicion that the spots are painted.
Region of Bergen-Belsen: SS has to                               dig out a mass grave and allies are                               helping with a bulldozer (6min. 48sec.)

Region of Bergen-Belsen: SS has to dig out a mass grave and allies are helping with a bulldozer (6min. 48sec.) [22]

When a mass grave is digged out with sun shine and dry earth this scenery cannot be from cold and wet April 1945 but this scene was taken more at the end of May or in June 1945.

Faked board in English with the claim                             &quot;Typhus&quot; at the concentration camp                             of Bergen-Belsen AFTER the liberation                             (18min. 4sec.)

Faked board in English with the claim "Typhus" at the concentration camp of Bergen-Belsen AFTER the liberation (18min. 4sec.) [23]

When an "occupation power" claims that there had been an epidemic in a German concentration camp this is mostly a lie. In the case of Bergen-Belsen a board in English was installed. But when Bergen-Belsen had had typhus then the German administration had installed an own board with a warning in German. Thus the English occupation power has invented this epidemic justifying the masses of dead bodies which were brought to the camp later. Inventing an epidemic concealing the own crimes is a standard maneuver of the Anglo-Saxon psychological warfare...
Bergen-Belsen: task force with an                             alleged action on April 24, 1945, dead                             bodies arriving in a trailer (12min.                             33sec.)

Bergen-Belsen: task force with an alleged action on April 24, 1945, dead bodies arriving in a trailer (12min. 33sec.) [24]

German bodies from a Rhine meadow camp were brought to Bergen-Belsen in a trailer and German SS men have to push the trailer.

Bergen-Belsen, hips of dead bodies on                               a trailer (12min. 54sec.)

Bergen-Belsen, hips of dead bodies on a trailer (12min. 54sec.) [25]

The dead bodies on the trailer have NO tattooed numbers of detainees and the bodies are absolutely clean and have NO remnants of earth or other contamination by earth. Thus these are German bodies from Rhine meadow camps. But the British occupation power with it's weapons is ordering here in Bergen-Belsen that these would be Jews...
Corpse pit in the region of                             Bergen-Belsen (13min. 30sec.)

Corpse pit in the region of Bergen-Belsen (13min. 30sec.) [26]

The bodies in the mass grave have - when they have clothes yet - no striped German detainee's uniform as Jews had in German concentration camps but they mostly have remnants of German gray Wehrmacht uniforms. And not one single body has a detainee's number which would have been shown at once by the journalists. Thus these bodies are German bodies from the Rhine meadow camps being buried here in Bergen-Belsen. 

Public with emotions watching the lorry                             full of emaciated dead bodies coming                             probably from the Rhine meadow camps (12min.                             48sec.)

Public with emotions watching the lorry full of emaciated dead bodies coming probably from the Rhine meadow camps (12min. 48sec.) [27]

British occupation power organized a public booing SS men. By force of arms SS men were ordered to believe that these bodies would be Jewish bodies. And the local German public cannot detect the lie that these are German bodies because they don't know that the Rhine meadow camps exist...
A                             cameraman filming SS men how they take dead                             bodies to the pit (15min. 12sec.)

A cameraman filming SS men how they take dead bodies to the pit (15min. 12sec.) [28]

When there had been tattooed numbers then the media staff had shown these tattoos with zooms at once.

SS                             men have to take the dead bodies from the                             trailer to the pit, the bodies have no spots                             (14min. 30sec.)

SS men have to take the dead bodies from the trailer to the pit, the bodies have no spots (14min. 30sec.) [29]


Not one single dead body has got a tattooed number as Jewish captives had in German concentration camps. 

These dead bodies are totally clean and there is no earth on them, thus these bodies NEVER were buried and NEVER have been digged out

Not one single body has got a tattooed number as Jewish detainees had in German concentration camps. There is no striped German zebra uniform for detainees in German concentration camps as Jews had. And the dead bodies show no remnants of earth or other contamination by earth. Thus these bodies were not buried and not digged out. These bodies mostly have dark clothes and remnants of German army uniforms. Thus these are German dead bodies in Bergen-Belsen being taken to the mass grave by force of arms of the criminal occupation forces. Hitchcock simply indicates that these would be Jewish bodies. And the stupid journalists are not aware of the fraud spreading it in the whole world, also in "neutral" Switzerland where the Red Cross has got it's seat and where the documents show how the German concentration camps really were...
Dead                             bodies torn by SS men on the way to the mass                             grave 01, the clothes are NO striped                             uniforms of detainees in German ccs, and                             there are NO tattooed numbers, and there are                             NO remnants of earth on the bodies (23min.                             14sec.)

Dead bodies torn by SS men on the way to the mass grave 01, the clothes are NO striped uniforms of detainees in German ccs, and there are NO tattooed numbers, and there are NO remnants of earth on the bodies (23min. 14sec.) [30]

Thus these dead bodies are NOT Jewish detainees but very probably German victims from Eisenhower's Rhine meadow camps. 

Dead                             bodies torn by SS men on the way to the mass                             grave 02, the clothes are NO striped                             uniforms of detainees in German ccs, and                             there are NO tattooed numbers, and there are                             NO remnants of earth on the bodies                             (23min.21sec.)

Dead bodies torn by SS men on the way to the mass grave 02, the clothes are NO striped uniforms of detainees in German ccs, and there are NO tattooed numbers, and there are NO remnants of earth on the bodies (23min.21sec.) [31]

Thus these dead bodies are NOT Jewish detainees but very probably German victims from Eisenhower's Rhine meadow camps.



An SS group in a mass                             grave under the order of British machine                             guns (23min. 55sec.)

An SS group in a mass grave under the order of British machine guns (23min. 55sec.) [32]

The machine gun of the criminal allies is dictating the allied meaning here. In Germany there is developing a submissive mentality concerning the persecution of the Jews and at the end any free research is prohibited.

SS men with a medical doctor in white                               (5min. 31sec.)

SS men with a medical doctor in white (5min. 31sec.) [33]

Medical doctors of the allies also have got the white dress as one can see here in this scene.

Here a person is speaking presenting                             himself as a medical doctor Mister Fed                             Little (Fritz Klein), and he says that this                             day would be April 24, 1945 standing before                             the mass grave (15min. 54sec.)

Here a person is speaking presenting himself as a medical doctor Mister Fed Little (Fritz Klein), and he says that this day would be April 24, 1945 standing before the mass grave (15min. 54sec.) [34]

This person is speaking German perfectly claiming to be a "medical doctor" from Romania being working in concentration camps since 1 1/2 years already. But he does not even have a doctor's white dress on and he is not stating any cause of death in his speech. Thus this is probably no doctor but is is a background artist making a statement in this film for a pocket money stating being a medical doctor and stating that this day would be April 24, 1945 (but April 1945 was very cold and wet...



German mayors and pastors have to see                               the piles of bodies (13min. 9sec.)

German mayors and pastors have to see the piles of bodies (13min. 9sec.) [35]

Also these mayors are going into the trap that these would be Jewish bodies. British occupation force is operating with force of arms and personal meanings contradicting the official one is punished by shooting.

Wrong telling-off at the mass grave                               with wards with machine guns (17min.                               35sec.)

Wrong telling-off at the mass grave with wards with machine guns (17min. 35sec.) [36]

With the constant extortion of being shot the criminal occupation forces (here the British) are asserting the meaning that the bodies would be Jews...
The commander of Bergen-Belsen, Josef                               Kramer, portrait (6min. 19sec.)

The commander of Bergen-Belsen, Josef Kramer, portrait (6min. 19sec.) [37]

He was the victim of the criminal Western Allies - in his case by the British occupation forces - they made the calumny blaming Mr. Kramer for being responsible for 70,000 Jewish deads which have never been...

Women wards in Bergen-Belsen (6min.                               5sec.)

Women wards in Bergen-Belsen (6min. 5sec.) [38]

They were also victims of the criminal Western allies, in this case of the British occupation forces. They were blamed for having caused the death of 70,000 Jews...
An English operations manager                               speaking with revolver to the camera                               &quot;We actually don't know what has been                               going on in these camps&quot; (24min.                               6sec.)

An English operations manager speaking with revolver to the camera "We actually don't know what has been going on in these camps" (24min. 6sec.) [39]

At the end of his speech he is confessing that he did not know what was going on precisely in this camp. He only knew what he was fighting for: <We actually don't know, what has been going on in these camps. I know personally what I am fighting for.> (24min.28-35sek.)

An English reporter with Hebrew                               accent is installed before the mass grave                               from allegedly April 24, 1945 filled with                               dead bodies (24min. 44sec.) - stating he                               &quot;does not know where the dead bodies                               are coming from&quot;...

An English reporter with Hebrew accent is installed before the mass grave from allegedly April 24, 1945 filled with dead bodies (24min. 44sec.) - stating he "does not know where the dead bodies are coming from"... [40]

Thus the reporter does not know where the bodies are coming from, and there is no medical investigation either!!!


Here is the statement of the English Hebrew reporter: 

<I am T. D. Tredges, attached as partway to controlling this camp. [...] I have been here 8 days. And never in my life I have seen such damnable gustiness. This morning they brought about 5,000 bodies. We don't know from where they are. Behind me you can see the pit which contain another 5,000. There were two others like it in preparation. All these deaths have been caused by systematic starvation and typhus and disease - it has been splead - because of the treatment meeted out for this poor people by the SS guards and their SS chief.> (24min.35sek.-25min.23sek.)





Hitchcock also lying about typhus

And another lie is spread by Hitchcock stating that there were lice in Bergen Belsen
and not enough soup and water causing typhus [?!] (18min. 16-19sec.).

Quotation of the lies: 

<Lack of soup and water brought lice to the inmates, and lice carried typhus.>

Well, typhus does not come from lice, and lice do not come from too less soup or water, but typhus is a fever with
belly aches and constipation caused by intestine bacteria when people are not washing their hands after the toilet
having remnants of excrements under their finger nails eating these remnants by food or otherwise
entering their mouth. Wikipedia says: 
<[...] rise of fever, belly aches, constipation and higher body temperature, slower heart beat. Cause of typhus is the
bacterium Salmonella Typhi (Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica Serovar Typhi) [...] There is paratyphus with not so
strong symptoms than typhus, not caused by Salmonella Typhi but by Salmonella Paratyphi. [...] The agent is a
typhus bacterium (Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Typhi), a feces bacteria transmitted orally for example
by contaminated food or water. Today typhus is more the problem of development countries. In industrial countries
it's an exception. Big parts of typhus illnesses is in connection with journeys to far countries with low hygienic standard.
Immunization should be done for journeys to tropical areas like India also when it's only a
partial protection. World wide typhus disease is affecting 32 million people every year.>

orig. in English: <[...] fever, abdominal pain, constipation and for the high body temperature rather slow heartbeat
(relative bradycardia ) is characterized. The disease is caused by the bacterium Salmonella Typhi ( Salmonella
enterica ssp. Enterica serovar typhi ). [...] Paratyphoid is an attenuated disease of typhoid fever, not Salmonella
typhi , but Salmonella paratyphi . [...]The causative agent is the typhoid bacterium ( Salmonella enterica subsp. 
Enterica serovar typhi), a Gram-negative , flagellated bacterium that is transmitted fecal - orally , for example,
through contaminated food or contaminated water . Typhus is a problem of developing countriestoday . Cases in 
industrial nations are the exception; a large proportion of the typhoid diseases that occur here are associated with
long-distance travel of those affected to countries with low hygienic standards. When traveling to tropical areas (eg India ),
 immunization should be considered, even if it provides only partial protection. Worldwide, about 32 million people fall ill each year>
(from Wikipedia: Typhus: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhus)

Divine service at the mass grave - and the text of Hitchcock - the German text is not permitted

A pastor speaking the divine service at                           the mass grave (25min. 38sec.)

A pastor speaking the divine service at the mass grave (25min. 38sec.) [41]
A pastor speaking the                           divine service at the mass grave, view on the                           book (25min. 42sec.)

A pastor speaking the divine service at the mass grave, view on the book (25min. 42sec.) [42]

Hitchcock is saying his own sarcastic text not allowing the speech of the German pastor: 

<We should never know who they were, or for pot holms [?] they were torn, whether they were catholics, Lutherans,
or Jews: We only know they were born, they suffered, and they died - in agony in Belsen camp.> (25min.30sek.-26min.12sek.)

The mass graves of Bergen-Belsen are marked with boards but there is
not written if there are Jews, Germans, English or French buried.

Alleged                   mass grave in Bergen Belsen N&ordm; 6 with about 800 deads

Alleged mass grave in Bergen Belsen Nº 6 with about 800 deads [43]
This data of 26 April 1945 for the mass grave is not probable because April 1945 was wet and cold in
Germany even with snow. Therefore installing this mass grave could have been in June 1945.

When a camp is even burnt down by the allies then it's clear that any
proof is destroyed which could be a proof for the German side.

British                 allies invented a typhus epidemic and by this invented                 reason they burnt down the Bergen Belsen camp (26min.                 50sec.)

British allies invented a typhus epidemic and by this invented reason
they burnt down the Bergen Belsen camp (26min. 50sec.) [44]

And then the whole camp was flattened and nothing was left of it. Thus there is even a bigger suspicion that the allies have
to conceal something. And just in this procedure the only real striped German detainee's uniform is shown in the film. Thus
it's clear what ware the dead bodies in the film: German bodies, most probably from the Rhine meadow camps. 

A bulldozer flattening Bergen Belsen camp                         cutting the barbed wire fence (27min. 58sec.)

A bulldozer flattening Bergen Belsen camp cutting the barbed wire fence (27min. 58sec.) [45]
A bulldozer                         &quot;taking&quot; a striped detainee's uniform                         of German concentration camps which was NEVER                         seen in the film before (28min. 4sec.)

A bulldozer "taking" a striped detainee's uniform of German concentration camps which was NEVER seen in the film before (28min. 4sec.) [46]


More photos from the faked Hitchcock film about German concentration camps
"An Alfred Hitchcock Documentary On The Nazi Holocaust"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0wA4rDuG58
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRr6P0d6r9I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaR3qud2-e8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIZ2KPZhDUs

When the links are not working, go to 
http://www.youtube.com looking for the title "An Alfred Hitchcock Documentary
On The Nazi Holocaust", so you get the actual links of the film. Always look for the film of 53 min. 1 sec.

Faked scenes about cc Dachau

Hitchcock's lies about undernourished detainees

Most of the detainees in German concentration camps were well nourished considering the testimonies of original
detainees after the war. Here are some examples from the German concentration camp of Dachau: 

Detainees in the concentration camp of                         Dachau 01 sitting in the window (30min. 30sec.)

Detainees in the concentration camp of Dachau 01 sitting in the window (30min. 30sec.) [47]
Concentration camp of                         Dachau, portrait of a detainee 02 830min.                         40sec.)

Concentration camp of Dachau, portrait of a detainee 02 830min. 40sec.) [48]
And one has to know: German                         concentration camps were under the control of                         the Red Cross like herein Bergen Belsen (11min.                         50sec.)

And one has to know: German concentration camps were under the control of the Red Cross like herein Bergen Belsen (11min. 50sec.) [49]



German concentration camps were under the control of the Red Cross AND of the Zionists. People affected
by heavy illnesses were brought to hospitals by cars of the Red Cross or to military hospitals. 

Lies of Hitchcock about shower rooms as "gas chambers"

Washer                 nozzle in a shower room in the concentration camp of                 Dachau (34min. 25sec.)

Washer nozzle in a shower room in the concentration camp of Dachau (34min. 25sec.) [50]

There is this clear proof: granulate of "Cyclone B" cannot pass the little holes of this washer nozzle. All gassing in shower
rooms is a criminal fantasy of Zionist mass murderers Eisenhower, Baruch, Morgenthau,
Roosevelt, and Hitchcock. It's a normal war propaganda with a giant calumny against the enemy.

The lies of Hitchcock about crematories: single muffle furnaces are not made for masses of bodies

This                 crematory is shown in the film to be in Dachau, with                 single muffle furnaces (35min. 20sec.)

This crematory is shown in the film to be in Dachau, with single muffle furnaces (35min. 20sec.) [51]

There is the following principle: Such single muffler furnaces in crematories are made for single burning of dead bodies
getting the ashes for the family of the dead. When there would be masses of dead bodies then a bigger oven had been
built for burning about 20 bodies in one. Obviously such a mass death has NOT happened ant there were only some
singular burnings of deads bodies. Additionally one has to know that in these German cc - as investigations by Faurisson
showed - many crematories were built only AFTER the war by the criminal Zionists - as a propaganda and nothing more!

A train with detainees at the cc Dachau in February 1945

There was                 this train with detainees allegedly at the cc Dachau in                 February 1945 about (36min. 20sec.)

There was this train with detainees allegedly at the cc Dachau in February 1945 about (36min. 20sec.) [52]

At the end of the Third Reich the whole infrastructure was collapsing. The remaining camps were overcrowded and
the trains with the detainees had last priority. Thus a transport was not 3 days but 30 days. Such trains with detainees
came to Dachau and the SS leadership of the cc Dachau had not the spirit any more to build a military hospital for
the deads and half deads of this train and had not the spirit to install a cemetery. This omission was exploited by the
criminal "Americans". Instead of helping and helping the survivors and honoring the many 1,000s surviving detainees
in the concentration camp of Dachau the SS leadership was killed and executed because of this neglected train with detainees.

Point 3: The principle of the cut in the films of criminal Mr. Hitchcock

First one can see well nourished detainees, mostly with striped zebra detainee's uniforms, and then comes the cut
showing the emaciated German prisoners of war from summer 1945 on the meadows or in the mud of the Rhine meadow
camps in the contaminated gray uniforms WITHOUT the typical striped zebra uniforms of detainees from German
concentrations camps in the Third Reich. The title of the film "Documentary"
sounds well but this is a film where practically everything is a fake: 

Gas chamber scenery has been taken after May 1945 for presenting this fantasy to the whole world provoking a bad
mood against Germans. And in this way the English "American" and Zionist propaganda hast manipulated the brains
in the world during more than 50 years and placed their Zionist slaves in the media in the whole world spreading
this propaganda on and on. The truth about the German concentrations camps can be seen here for example: 
 
Point 4: Jews telling from German concentration camps: music, theater, soccer

Original Jewish testimonies from German concentration camps report regularly about work and music and
theater and even soccer in the camps. Here are examples from Shoa Foundation "Survivors who tell the truth": 

Video: Holohoax: Survivors who Tell the Truth




Point 5: Effect of the faked Hitchcock films about German concentration camps
on the Nuremberg Process - where is the war tribunal for criminal "U.S.A."?
And now one has to know that the regime of Eisenhower against Germans was not only with the Rhine meadow camps
causing 1 million Germans deads and the hunger regime during the post-war era in Germany from 1945 to 1950 provoking
5 million more German deads - but by these faked Hitchcock films the "U.S.A." have influenced the Nuremberg Process in
a way so Germany was convicted with a faked 6 million murder against Jews and had to pay for this, and the allies were
exempted from any guilt and the mass murderer Eisenhower was not detected until 1989 when historian James Bacque
came with his research. These criminal "U.S.A." have to be torn to a war tribunal for being convicted for their wars, fakes
and manipulations not only concerning the "American" war crimes in Germany 1943-1950 (also the destruction of towns
had not to be and the war could have been finished in 1943 already), but also concerning Korea, Vietnam, Laos,
Iraq, Afghanistan etc. "U.S.A." are the most destructive state in the world destroying all other states by bombs and propaganda
- and the proofs are very distinct concerning Germany of 1945 here on this web site. And perhaps the criminal Zionists have
to pay money back which was payed for a mass murder of millions which was NEVER COMMITTED - pay money back to Germany.

Point 6: No mass murder against the Jews in German concentration camps - but other sites with mass death

With all these data there is absolutely safe: There was no mass murder in German concentration camps against
the Jews in the dimension of 100,000s or millions. The real sites with many deads in the persecution of the Jews were

-- Auschwitz with epidemics because the camps was in a marsh
and bodies were buried contaminating the ground and the drinking water

-- behind the Eastern Front the remaining Jews who were not deported by Stalin to Russia in 1940 and 1941 and who
were not taken by industries or the Red Army in 1941 were shot partly from 1941 to 1943 in mass shootings partly by
the Wehrmacht or by SS commands (with Germans, Ukrainians, Baltic people and Belorussians etc.) or also by local
anti-Semitic population themselves. Zionists did not protect the Jews from Eastern
Europe because they did not want them to have in Palestine for the colonization in Israel.

-- the same mass murder for Jews counts for the Red Army where Stalin
and his commanders let fight many Jews in the first rows as "cannon fodder"

-- since 1943 detainees were taken back from Eastern Europe to the Reich
to building sites of the tunnel constructioning and fell sick and died there

-- at the same time Hitler and Stalin organized in common
the clandestine deportation of European Jews to the GULAG

-- in 1944 and in 1945 there were some 1,000 Jewish victims in the remaining overcrowded camps because
of hunger and epidemics, in trains and in death marches as a "penalty" for the defeat of Germany in the war

-- since 1945 many Jewish women who had suffered hunger a long
time during years could not recover well and had no fertility any more

-- Jewish children being safe on "Christian" farms were often not given back because nobody knew where the
Jewish parents were and because many men were missing on the farms and there was a general lack of staff

-- many Jews also separated from Jewry in general for not being persecuted any more.

-- from 1945 to 1946 Stalin let come back 100,000s of Jews from central Russia to Eastern Europe and this provoked
new pogroms in Poland. Kiev in the Ukraine became a broad Jewish center and in 1946 Kiev had more Jews than
in 1939. At the same time the "American" President Truman was bribed by the Zionists
with 2 million Dollars permitting a racist "Jewish State" in Palestine against all Muslims...

-- and when in 1948 this bribed and criminal "U.S.A." bribed by Zionists was "opening" the new "satellite" of Israel in
the Middle East, Stalin felt encircled and betrayed and he shut the Iron Curtain for Jews and all Jews in Russia
could not leave the country until Gorbachev until 1986. Stalin let russify the Jews by discriminations in professions

-- and Stalin's direct answer to the foundation of the racist Zionist state of Israel
under the patronage of the criminal racist "U.S.A." was the blockage of Berlin.

We thank to the criminal Zionist bribed and undermined "U.S.A."
for their destructive and terrorist "cultural contribution".
 

 

 _______________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

Mainstream Holocaust Narrative 'Substantially, if not Entirely, False'

- Editor of Top US Conservative Site (Ron Unz)

 

The author spends a few weeks perusing the literature, which he summarizes in this 18,000 word article, and concludes

that the Holocaust story relentlessly hammered into the public consciousness by Jewish-owned Hollywood and

media is a load of baloney. He suspects that when the lie comes crashing down, a political earthquake will ensue.

 

"I wouldn’t be surprised if our current Holocaust narrative eventually suffers that same fate (total collapse),

perhaps with unfortunate consequences for those too closely associated with having maintained it."

 

"Once I realized to my dismay that I couldn’t believe a word of what our media and political leaders said about major events

in the here and now, their credibility on controversial happenings so long ago and far away entirely disappeared."

 

Reason Magazine and Holocaust Denial

 

A few years ago I somehow heard about a ferocious online dispute involving a left-leaning journalist named Mark Ames

and the editors of Reason magazine, the glossy flagship publication of America’s burgeoning libertarian movement.

Although I was deep in my difficult programming work, curiosity got the better of me, so I decided to take a look.

 

During the Immigration Wars of the 1990s, I’d become quite friendly with the Reasonpeople, frequently visiting their offices,

especially during my “English” campaign of 1998, when I’d located my own political headquarters in the same small

Westside LA office building they used.

 

 

As my content-archiving software project began absorbing more and more of my time during the early 2000s, I’d gradually

lost touch with them, but even so, the 40-odd years of their magazine archives had become the first publication I’d incorporated

into my system, and I was now pleased to discover that both sides in the ongoing feud had put my system to good use

in exploring those old Reason issues.

 

Apparently, the libertarians grouped around Reason had successfully been making political inroads into Silicon Valley’s

enormously wealthy technology industry, and had now organized a major conference in San Francisco to gather

together their supporters.

 

Hollywood, controlled by Jews, has been very energetically
selling a very big lie - a scene from 'Schindler's List'
 

Their left-leaning rivals decided to nip that project in the bud by highlighting some of the more unsavory ideological positions

that mainstream libertarian leaders had once regularly espoused. Perhaps Ron Paul and other libertarians might oppose

overseas wars and drug laws, and support cutting taxes and regulations, but they and their Republican Party allies

were unspeakably vile on all sorts of other issues, and all “good thinkers” should therefore stay very far away.

 

The debate began in rather mundane fashion with an article by Ames entitled “Homophobia, Racism, and the Kochs” 

denouncing Reason for sharing a platform with a high-ranking Republican Congresswoman of Christian conservative

views, as well as the magazine’s reliance upon Koch funding and its alleged support for Apartheid South Africa during the

1970s and 1980s.

 

The response by the Reasoneditor seemed quite persuasive, and he rightfully dismissed the guilt-by-association attacks.

He also outlined the gross errors and omissions in the charges regarding South Africa, and ridiculed Ames as a notoriously

error-prone “conspiracy theorist.” Surely few outsiders would have paid any attention to such a typical exchange of mudslinging

between rival ideological camps.

 

 

But then things took a very different turn, and a week later Ames returned with a 5,000 word article bearing a title sure to

grab attention: “Holocaust Denial.” He claimed that in 1976 Reason had published an entire special issue devoted to that explosive topic.

 

Surely everyone on the Internet has encountered numerous instances of Holocaust Denial over the years, but for a respectable

magazine to have allotted a full issue to promoting that doctrine was something else entirely. For decades, Hollywood has

sanctified the Holocaust, and in our deeply secular society accusations of Holocaust Denial are a bit like

shouting “Witch!” in Old Salem or leveling accusations of Trotskyism in the Court of the Red Czar.

 

It turns out that his whole life was a fraud and a lie
 

Progressive Sam Seder’s Majority Reportradio show devoted a full half-hour segment to the charges against Reason,

and Googling “Reason Magazine”+”Holocaust Denial” today yields thousands of hits.

This substantial explosion of Internet controversy was what caught my own attention at the time.

 

My initial reaction was one of puzzlement. Reason had been the first periodical I had digitized in my system a dozen years

earlier, and surely I would have noticed an entire issue promoting Holocaust Denial. However, I soon discovered that

February 1976 had been excluded from the supposedly complete set the magazine had shipped me for processing,

an omission that itself raises serious suspicions. But Ames had somehow located a copy in a research

library and produced a full PDF, which he conveniently placed on the Internet to support his accusations.

 

 
Carefully reading his article and then glancing through the contents, I decided that his accusation was technically false
but substantially true. Apparently the actual theme of the issue was “Historical Revisionism” and except for a couple
of paragraphs buried here and there among the 76 pages, Holocaust Denial never came up,
so characterizing it as a Holocaust Denial issue was obviously a grotesque exaggeration.
 

But on the other hand, although few of the authors were familiar to me, it seemed undeniably true that they were

numbered among America’s more prominent Holocaust Deniers, and most of them were deeply associated with organizations

situated in that same camp.

 

Furthermore, there were strong indications that their positions on that topic must

certainly have been known to the Reasoneditors who commissioned their pieces.

 

The clearest case comes when Ames quoted the explicit statements of Dr. Gary North, a prominent libertarian thinker who

had served as one of Ron Paul’s earliest Congressional aides and later became his longtime partner in politics and business:

 

Probably the most far-out materials on World War II revisionism have been the seemingly endless scholarly studies

of the supposed execution of 6 million Jews by Hitler. The anonymous author [Hoggan] of ‘The Myth of the Six Million’

has presented a solid case against the Establishment’s favorite horror story—the supposed moral justification for

our entry into the war…The untranslated books by the former Buchenwald inmate Prof. Paul Rassinier, have seriously

challenged the story…A recent and very inexpensive book in magazine form, 

Did Six Million Really Die?, appeared in 1973, written by Richard Harwood.

 

A later issue carried a thousand word letter by Prof. Adam Reed of Rockefeller University, a past Reason contributor,

strongly affirming the mainstream Holocaust narrative by quoting from standard works, and taking Dr. North

to task for his citation of Holocaust Denial works of doubtful quality. But North firmly stood his ground:

 

“The second point, that about 6 million Jews really did die in the concentration camps, is one that will be open

until the records of the period become fully available. I am not convinced yet, one way or the other. I am happy

to have Dr. Reed’s interpretation of the data, but until the publishing companies and academic guild encourage

the re-examination of the data, I shall continue to recommend that those interested in revisionist questions read 

The Myth of the Six Million and Did Six Million Really Die? as reasonable (though not necessarily irrefutable)

pieces of historical revisionism. If a person can’t make up his mind, he should do more reading.”

 

Dr. James J. Martin was the lead contributor to the February Revisionism issue, and the preceding January issue had

featured an extended Q&A by the editors, with one of the queries directly addressing the controversial topic:

 

REASON: Dr. Martin, do you believe (1) that the specific charge against the Nazis of having a mass extermination

program of several million Jews is true, and (2) that the Allied atrocities were as

great or greater than those of the Germans, from your study of the question?

 

MARTIN: Well, I never made a head count of all who lost their lives in the War-we’ve seen a wide variety of statistical

materials, some of which have been pulled out of thin air. As a consequence, it’s hard to make any kind of estimate

of this sort, whether ten more were killed on the one side or the other is not a particularly entrancing subject as far as I’m concerned.

 

Whether allegations can be proven it remains to be seen. I don’t believe that the evidence of a planned extermination

of the entire Jewish population of Europe is holding up. I have been influenced over the years by the works of

Paul Rassinier, and he still has to be reckoned with. His works have been ignored for a long time, and sooner or

later somebody’s going to have to do a decent job of coping with what he has presented. I think Rassinier’s general

case is sound at the moment and I haven’t seen any strong evidence to upset his allegations

or his assertions that there was no planned program for the extermination of European Jews.

 

His other main case is that there were no gas chamber extermination programs. The fact that a great many people

lost their lives is incontrovertible—that the German concentration camps weren’t health centers is

well known-but they appear to have been far smaller and much less lethal than the Russian ones.

 

Another major contributor to the issue was Dr. Austin J. App, and just three years earlier he had published a short

book bearing the lurid title The Six Million Swindle: Blackmailing the German People for Hard Marks with Fabricated Corpses.

 

In a follow-up column by Ames’ own editor, the stunned reactions of various journalists are listed, with one of them

Tweeting out “I had no idea that Reason Magazine was once a haven for Holocaust Revisionism. Holy Moly.”

 Despite the angry obfuscations of present-day Reason staffers, this description seems quite correct.

 

Indeed, there seems considerable circumstantial evidence that around that time “Holocaust Skepticism” extended

rather broadly within the entire nascent libertarian movement. Aside from the sharp critique of the aforementioned Prof.

 

Reed, the overwhelming majority of the reader responses seemed totally favorable, with Samuel Konkin III, editor of 

New Libertarian Weekly and various similar publications, suggesting that the February issue was one of the best

they had ever published. David Nolan, founder of America’s Libertarian Party, also praised the issue as “outstanding.”

 

The two editors of the issue in question even today remain quite prominent figures at Reason and within American

libertarianism, while the masthead then carried names such as David Brudnoy and Alan

Reynolds, who both later became influential figures in conservative and libertarian politics.

 

There seems no evidence of any resignations or angry recriminations following the issue’s publication, which seems

to have been digested with total equanimity, apparently arousing less rancor than might have been generated by a

dispute over monetary policy.

 

I’d never paid much attention to Holocaust discussions over the years, but the name of Murray Rothbard on the 1976

 Reason masthead prompted a memory. Rothbard is widely regarded as the founder of modern libertarianism, and I

recalled in the 1990s reading somewhere that he had often ridiculed the Holocaust as being total nonsense, which

had stuck in my mind as a typical example of libertarian eccentricity. A quick Google

search seemed to confirm my recollection that Rothbard was an avowed Holocaust Denier.

 

Although the whole controversy regarding Reason’s editorial line of the mid-1970s soon died down, it remained a nagging

puzzle in the back of my mind. I’d always been quite skeptical of libertarian ideology, but my Reason friends from the

1990s had certainly seemed like smart and rational people to me, hardly raving lunatics of any sort,

and two of the ones I’d known best had been the co-editors of the controversial issue in question.

 

I could easily understand how zealous libertarian ideologues might be swept past the point of rationality on certain

matters—perhaps arguing that the police and the army should be abolished as statist institutions—but the factual

question of what had or had not happened to the Jews of Europe during World War II hardly fell into that sort of category.

 

Furthermore, libertarianism had always attracted a very large Jewish contingent, especially in its upper ranks, and

one of the issue editors came from that background, as did Rothbard and numerous others featured on the masthead.

While deranged anti-Semitism is not impossible among Jews, I would think that

it is somewhat less likely. Clearly something very odd must have been going on.

 

I was then too busy with my work to focus on the matter, but some months later I had more time, and began a detailed i

nvestigation. My first step was to carefully read the Reason articles produced by those controversial writers previously

unknown to me. Although those pieces were not Holocaust-related, I thought they might give me a sense of their thinking.

 

To my surprise, the historiography seemed outstandingly good, and almost certainly accurate

based on what I had picked up over the years from perfectly mainstream sources.

 

Dr. Martin’s long article on the notorious framing of “Tokyo Rose”was probably the best and most comprehensive treatment

I had ever encountered on that topic, and Dr. App’s analysis of the tragedy of the Sudeten-Germans was equally strong,

raising several points I had previously not known. Percy Greaves effectively summarized many of

 the very suspicious aspects of the Pearl Harbor attack, and although his case for the prosecution against FDR

was certainly not airtight, it accorded with the views presented by numerous scholars in other books on the subject.

 

Moreover, his position was seconded by a young Bruce Bartlett, later a prominent Reagan and Bush official, and still

later a strong Republican opponent of George W. Bush, routinely feted by the New York Times. Most of the

other writings also seemed of very high quality, including Dr. North’s summary of World War II Revisionism.

 

In general, the academic scholarship of those articles greatly surpassed anything found in opinion magazines of more

recent decades, Reason itself included. Those so interested can click on

the above links, read the articles in question, and decide for themselves.

 

Back then, Reason was a young and struggling magazine, with a shoestring staff and budget. Publishing articles of

such obvious quality was surely a remarkable achievement for which the editors could feel

justifiably proud, and the overwhelmingly positive letters they received seemed absolutely warranted.

 

Meanwhile, the nasty attacks by Ames appeared to be those of a mere political hack

who may not have even bothered actually reading the articles whose authors he vilified.

 

As a further sign of Ames’ dishonesty, he flung the epithet “Nazi” some two dozen times in his hack-job, along

with numerous uses of “anti-Semitic” as well, and Greaves was certainly the subject of many of those slurs.

 

But although Greaves and Bartlett wrote back-to-back articles on exactly the same Pearl Harbor topic, and 

according to Wikipedia, the former was the academic advisor to the latter on that subject, Bartlett’s name appears

nowhere in Ames’s hit-piece, presumably because denouncing a prominent policy expert

much beloved by the New York Times as an “anti-Semitic Neo-Nazi” might prove self-defeating.

 

Even leaving that aside, accusing the Jewish libertarians running Reason of being Nazi propagandists

must surely be the sort of charge that would strain the credulity of even the most gullible.

 

Deborah Lipstadt and Holocaust Denial

 

With Ames’ credibility totally shredded, I decided to carefully reread his article again, looking for what clues I could find

to the whole bizarre situation. Academic scholars who publish very good history on certain subjects

might still have totally irrational views on others, but normally one would assume otherwise.

 

It appeared that much of Ames’ understanding of the issue had come from a certain Deborah Lipstadt, whom he

characterized as a great Holocaust expert. Her name was very vaguely familiar to me as some sort of academic activist,

who years before had won a major legal victory over a rightwing British historian named

David Irving, and Irving himself received further denunciations in the Ames article.

 

However, one name did stick out. Apparently based on Lipstadt’s information, Ames described Harry Elmer

Barnes as “the godfather of American Holocaust denial literature” and Martin’s “Holocaust denial guru.”

 

A dozen years earlier, the name “Barnes” would have meant almost nothing to me. But as I produced my

content-archiving system and digitized so many of America’s most influential publications of the last 150 years,

I had soon discovered that many of our most illustrious public intellectuals—Left, Right, and Center—

had been suddenly purged and “disappeared” around 1940 because of their stalwart opposition to FDR’s extremely

aggressive foreign policy, and Barnes, an eminent historian and sociologist, had been among the most prominent of those.

 

He had been one of the earliest editors at Foreign Affairs and for many years afterward his important articles had graced

the pages of The New Republic and The Nation, while even after his fall, he had edited Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace,

an important 1953 collection of essays by himself and other once-prominent figures. But to have a figure of such intellectual

stature accused of being a Holocaust Denier, let alone the “godfather” of the entire movement, seemed rather bizarre to me.

 

Since Ames was merely an ignorant political hack transmitting the opinions of others, I moved on Lipstadt, his

key source. Anyone who has spent much time on the comment-threads of relatively unfiltered websites has certainly

encountered the controversial topic of Holocaust Denial, but I now decided to try to investigate the issue in much more serious fashion.

 

A few clicks on the Amazon.com website, and her 1993 book Denying the Holocaust arrived

in my mailbox a couple of days later, providing me an entrance into the mysterious world.

 

Reading the book was certainly a tremendous revelation to me. Lipstadt is a professor of Holocaust Studies with an

appointment in Emory University’s Department of Theology, and once I read the opening paragraph of her

first chapter, I decided that her academic specialty might certainly be described as “Holocaust Theology.”

 

The producer was incredulous. She found it hard to believe that I was turning down an opportunity to appear

on her nationally televised show. “But you are writing a book on this topic. It will be great publicity.” I explained

repeatedly that I would not participate in a debate with a Holocaust denier. The existence of the Holocaust was

not a matter of debate.

 

I would analyze and illustrate who they were and what they tried to do, but I would not appear with them…

Unwilling to accept my no as final, she vigorously condemned Holocaust denial and all it represented. Then, in

one last attempt to get me to change my mind, she asked me a question: “I certainly don’t agree with them, but don’t you think our

viewers should hear the other side?”

 

 
Lipstadt’s absolute horror at having someone actually dispute the tenets of her academic doctrine could not have
been more blatant. Surely no zealous theologian of the European Dark Ages would have reacted any differently.
 

The second chapter of her book supported that impression. Since many of the individuals she castigates as Holocaust

Deniers also supported the Revisionist perspective of the underlying causes of the First

and Second World Wars, she harshly attacked those schools, but in rather strange fashion.

 

In recent years, blogger Steve Sailer and others have ridiculed what they describe as the “point-and-sputter” style of

debate, in which a “politically-incorrect” narrative is merely described and then automatically treated as self-evidently

false without any accompanying need for actual refutation. This seemed to be the approach that Lipstadt took throughout

her rather short book.

 

For example, she provided a very long list of leading academic scholars, prominent political figures, and influential

journalists who had championed Revisionist history, noted that their views disagree with the more mainstream

perspective she had presumably imbibed from her History 101 textbooks, and thereby regarded them as fully debunked.

 

Certainly a Christian preacher attempting to refute the evolutionary theories of Harvard’s E.O. Wilson by quoting a passage

of Bible verse might take much the same approach. But few evangelical activists would be so foolish as to provide a

very long list of eminent scientists who all took the same Darwinist position and then attempt to sweep them aside by citing a

single verse from Genesis.

 

Lipstadt seems to approach history much like a Bible-thumper, but a particularly dim-witted one. Moreover, many of the

authors she attacked had already become familiar to me after a decade of my

content-archiving work, and I had found their numerous books quite scholarly and persuasive.

 

Barnes, in particular, figured quite prominently in Lipstadt’s chapter and throughout her book. The index listed his name

on more than two dozen pages, and he is repeatedly described as the “godfather” of Holocaust Denial, and its seminal

figure. Given such heavy coverage, I eagerly examined all those references and the accompanying

footnotes to uncover the shocking statements he must have made during his very long scholarly career.

 

I was quite disappointed. There is not a single reference I could find to his supposed Holocaust Denial views

until just the year before his death at age 79, and even that item is hardly what I had been led to believe.

 

In a 9,300 word article on Revisionism for a libertarian publication, he ridicules a leading Holocaust source for claiming

that Hitler had killed 25 million Jews, noting that total was nearly twice their entire worldwide population at the time.

In addition, Barnes several times applied the word “allegedly” to the stories of the Nazi extermination

scheme, an sacrilegious attitude that appears to have horrified a theologian such as Lipstadt.

 

Finally, in a short, posthumously published review of a book by French scholar Paul Rassiner, Barnes found his estimate

of just 1 million to 1.5 million Jewish deaths quite convincing, but his tone suggested that he had never previously

investigated the matter himself.

 

So although that last item technically validated Lipstadt’s accusation that Barnes was a Holocaust Denier, her

evidence-free claims that he was the founder and leader of the field hardly enhances her scholarly credibility.

Meanwhile, all the many tens of thousands of words I have read by

Barnes has suggested that he was a careful and dispassionate historian.

 

A notorious incident that occurred soon after the Bolshevik Revolution came to my mind. Eminent philologist Timofei

Florinsky, one of Russia’s most internationally renowned academic scholars, was hauled before a revolutionary

tribunal for a public interrogation about his ideas, and one of the judges, a drunken Jewish former prostitute,

found his answers so irritating that she drew her revolver and shot him dead right there and then.

 

Given Lipstadt’s obvious emotional state, I have a strong suspicion that she might have wished she could deal in a

similar fashion with Barnes and the numerous other scholars she denounced. Among other things, she noted with horror

that more than two decades after his 1940 purge from public life, Barnes’

books were still required reading at both Harvard and Columbia.

 

All of us reasonably extrapolate what we already know or can easily check against what is more difficult to verify, and

the remaining chapters of Lipstadt’s book left me very doubtful about the

reliability of her work, all of which was written in a similar near-hysterical style.

 

Since she had already been vaguely known to me from her well-publicized legal battle against historian David Irving

more than a dozen years earlier, I was hardly surprised to discover that many pages were devoted to

vilifying and insulting him in much the same manner as Barnes, so I decided to investigate that case.

 

I was only slightly surprised to discover that Irving had been one of the world’s most successful World War II historians,

whose remarkable documentary findings had completely upended our knowledge

of that conflict and its origins, with his books selling in the many millions.

 

His entire approach to controversial historical issues was to rely as much as possible upon hard documentary evidence,

and his total inability to locate any such documents relating to the Holocaust drove Lipstadt and her fellow

ethnic-activists into a frenzy of outrage, so after many years of effort they finally managed to wreck his career.

 

Out of curiosity, I read a couple of his shorter books, which seemed absolutely outstanding historiography, written

in a very measured tone, quite different from that of Lipstadt, whose own 2005 account of her

legal triumph over Irving, History on Trial, merely confirmed my opinion of her incompetence.

 

Lipstadt’s first book Beyond Belief, published in 1986, tells an interesting story as well, with her descriptive subtitle

being “The American Press and the Coming of the Holocaust, 1933-1945.” Much of the volume consists of press

clippings from the American print media of that era interspersed with her running rather hysterical commentary, but providing

little analysis or judgment.

 

Some of the journalists reported horrifying conditions for Jews in pre-war Germany while others claim that such stories

were wildly exaggerated, and Lipstadt automatically praised the former and denounced the latter without providing

any serious explanation.

 

Lenni Brenner’s remarkable book Zionism in the Age of the Dictators had been published three years earlier. Although

I only discovered it very recently, surely any half-competent specialist in her

own topic would have noticed it, yet Lipstadt provided no hint of its existence.

 

Perhaps the reality of the important Nazi-Zionist economic partnership of the 1930s, with Nazi officials traveling to

Palestine as honored Zionist guests and leading Nazi newspapers praising the Zionist enterprise might have complicated

her simple story of fanatic German Jew-hatred under Hitler steadily rising towards an

exterminationist pitch. Her faculty appointment in a Department of Theology seems very apt.

 

Lipstadt’s wartime coverage is just as bad, perhaps worse. She catalogs perhaps a couple of hundred print

news reports, each describing the massacre of hundreds of thousands or even millions of Jews by the Nazis.

 

But she expresses her outrage that so many of these reports were buried deep within the inside pages of newspapers,

a placement suggesting that they were regarded as hysterical wartime atrocity propaganda and probably fictional, with

the editors sometimes explicitly stating that opinion. Indeed, among these under-emphasized stories was the claim that

the Germans had recently killed 1.5 million Jews by individually injecting each one of them in the heart with a lethal drug.

 

And although I don’t see any mention of it, around that same time America’s top Jewish leader Rabbi Stephen Wise

was peddling the absurd report that the Nazis had slaughtered millions of Jews, turning their skins into lampshades and

rendering their bodies into soap. Obviously, separating truth from falsehood during a

blizzard of wartime propaganda is not nearly as easy as Lipstadt seems to assume.

 

Ordinary Americans were apparently even more skeptical than newspaper editors.

According to Lipstadt:

 

Writing in the Sunday New York Times Magazine, [Arthur] Koestler cited public opinion polls in the United States in

which nine of ten average Americans dismissed the accusations against the Nazis

as propaganda lies and flatly stated that they did not believe a word of them.

 

Lipstadt convincingly demonstrates that very few Americans seem to have believed in the reality of the Holocaust during

the Second World War itself, despite considerable efforts by agitated Jewish activists to persuade them. Over the years,

I have seen mention of numerous other books making this same basic point, and therefore harshly

condemning the American political leaders of the time for having failed “to save the Jews.”

 

 

Explicit and Implicit Holocaust Denial After World War II

 

Yet as I began further investigating the history of Holocaust Denial in the wake of the Reason contretemps, I was very

surprised to discover that this same pattern of widespread disbelief in the Holocaust seems to have continued unabated

 after the end of the war and throughout the 1950s, being especially strong among high-ranking American military figures,

especially top generals and individuals with an Intelligence background, who seemingly would have had the best knowledge

of the true events.

 

 
 
Some years ago, I came across a totally obscure 1951 book entitled Iron Curtain Over America by John Beaty, a well-regarded
university professor. Beaty had spent his wartime years in Military Intelligence, being tasked with preparing the daily briefing
reports distributed to all top American officials summarizing available intelligence information acquired
during the previous 24 hours, which was obviously a position of considerable responsibility.
 

As a zealous anti-Communist, he regarded much of America’s Jewish population as deeply implicated in subversive

activity, therefore constituting a serious threat to traditional American freedoms. In particular, the growing Jewish stranglehold

over publishing and the media was making it increasingly difficult for discordant views to reach the

American people, with this regime of censorship constituting the “Iron Curtain” described in his title.

 

He blamed Jewish interests for the totally unnecessary war with Hitler’s Germany, which had long sought good

relations with America, but instead had suffered total destruction for

its strong opposition to Europe’s Jewish-backed Communist menace.

 

Beaty also sharply denounced American support for the new state of Israel, which

was potentially costing us the goodwill of so many millions of Muslims and Arabs.

 

And as a very minor aside, he also criticized the Israelis for continuing to claim that Hitler had killed six million Jews,

a highly implausible accusation that had no apparent basis in reality and seemed to be just a fraud concocted by Jews

and Communists, aimed at poisoning our relations with postwar Germany and

extracting money for the Jewish State from the long-suffering German people.

 

He was scathing toward the Nuremberg Trials, which he described as a “major indelible blot” upon America and

“a travesty of justice.” According to him, the proceedings were dominated by vengeful German Jews, many of

whom engaged in falsification of testimony or even had criminal backgrounds. As a result,

this “foul fiasco” merely taught Germans that “our government had no sense of justice.” Sen.

 

Robert Taft, the Republican leader of the immediate postwar era took a very similar

position, which later won him the praise of John F. Kennedy in Profiles in Courage.

 

The fact that the chief Soviet prosecutor at Nuremberg had played the same role during the notorious Stalinist show

trials of the late 1930s, during which numerous Old Bolsheviks confessed to all sorts of absurd

and ridiculous things, hardly enhanced the credibility of the proceedings to many outside observers.

 

Then as now, a book taking such controversial positions stood little chance of finding a mainstream New York publisher,

but it was soon released by a small Dallas firm, and then became enormously successful, going through some seventeen

printings over the next few years. According to Scott McConnell, founding editor of The American Conservative,

Beaty’s book became the second most popular conservative text of the 1950s, ranking only behind Russell Kirk’s iconic classic, 

The Conservative Mind.

 

Moreover, although Jewish groups including the ADL harshly condemned the book, especially in their private lobbying,

those efforts provoked a backlash, and numerous top American generals, both serving and retired, wholeheartedly

endorsed Beaty’s work, denouncing the ADL efforts at censorship and urging all Americans to read the volume.

 

Although Beaty’s quite explicit Holocaust Denial might shock tender modern sensibilities, at the time it seems to have

caused barely a ripple of concern and was almost totally ignored even by the vocal Jewish critics of the work.

 

 
Much of this very interesting story is told by Joseph Bendersky, an expert in Holocaust Studies, who devoted ten
years of archival research to his 2000 book The “Jewish Threat.” His work chronicles the extremely widespread
anti-Semitism found within the U.S. Army and Military Intelligence throughout the first half
of the twentieth century, with Jews being widely regarded as posing a serious security risk.
 

The book runs well over 500 pages, but when I consulted the index I found no mention of the Rosenbergs nor

Harry Dexter White nor any of the other very numerous Jewish spies revealed by the Venona Decrypts, and the

term “Venona” itself is also missing from the index. Reports of the overwhelmingly Jewish leadership of the Russian Bolsheviks

are mostly treated as bigotry and paranoia, as are descriptions of the similar ethnic skew of America’s own

Communist Party, let alone the heavy financial support of the Bolsheviks by Jewish international bankers.

 

At one point, he dismisses the link between Jews and Communism in Germany by noting that “less than half” of

the Communist Party leadership was Jewish; but since fewer than one in a hundred Germans came from that ethnic

background, Jews were obviously over-represented among Communist leaders by as much as 5,000%.

This seems to typify the sort of dishonesty and innumeracy I have regularly encountered among Jewish Holocaust experts.

 

Meanwhile, with the copyright having long lapsed, I’m pleased to add Beaty’s work to my

Controversial HTML Books selection, so individuals interested can read it and decide for themselves:

 

The Iron Curtain Over America

JOHN BEATY • 1951 • 82,000 WORDS

 

Beaty’s very brief 1951 discussion has been the earliest instance of explicit Holocaust Denial I have managed to

locate, but the immediate postwar years seem absolutely rife with what might be

described as “implicit Holocaust Denial,” especially within the highest political circles.

 

Over the years, Holocaust scholars and activists have very rightfully emphasized

the absolutely unprecedented nature of the historical events they have studied.

 

They describe how some six million innocent Jewish civilians were deliberately exterminated, mostly in gas chambers,

by one of Europe’s most highly cultured nations, and emphasize that monstrous project was often accorded greater

priority than Germany’s own wartime military needs during the country’s desperate struggle for survival. Furthermore,

the Germans also undertook enormous efforts to totally eliminate all possible traces of their horrifying

deed, with huge resources expended to cremate all those millions of bodies and scatter the ashes.

 

This same disappearance technique was even sometimes applied to the contents of their mass graves, which were

dug up long after initial burial, so that the rotting corpses could then be totally incinerated and all evidence eliminated.

 

And although Germans are notorious for their extreme bureaucratic precision, this immense wartime project was

apparently implemented without benefit of a single written document, or at least no such document has ever been located.

 

Lipstadt entitled her first book “Beyond Belief,” and I think that all of us can agree that the historical event she and so

many others in academia and Hollywood have made the centerpiece of their lives and careers is certainly one of the

most very remarkable occurrences in all of human history. Indeed, perhaps only a Martian Invasion would have been

more worthy of historical study, but Orson Welles’s famous War of the Worlds radio-play

which terrified so many millions of Americans in 1938 turned out to be a hoax rather than real.

 

The six million Jews who died in the Holocaust certainly constituted a very substantial fraction of all the wartime casualties

in the European Theater, outnumbering by a factor of 100 all the British who died during the

Blitz, and being dozens of times more numerous than all the Americans who fell there in battle.

 

Furthermore, the sheer monstrosity of the crime against innocent civilians would surely have provided the best possible

justification for the Allied war effort. Yet for many, many years after the war, a very strange sort

of amnesia seems to have gripped most of the leading political protagonists in that regard.

 

Robert Faurisson, a French academic who became a prominent Holocaust Denier in the 1970s, once

made an extremely interesting observation regarding the memoirs of Eisenhower, Churchill, and De Gaulle:

 

Three of the best known works on the Second World War are General Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe

 (New York: Doubleday [Country Life Press], 1948), Winston Churchill’s The Second World War (London:

Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954), and the Mémoires de guerre of General de Gaulle (Paris: Plon,

3 vols., 1954-1959). In these three works not the least mention of Nazi gas chambers is to be found.

 

Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War

 total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing,

which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will

find no mention either of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews, or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war.

 

Given that the Holocaust would reasonably rank as the single most remarkable episode of the Second World War,

such striking omissions must almost force us to place Eisenhower, Churchill, and De Gaulle among the ranks of

“implicit Holocaust Deniers.”

 

 
Many others seem to fall into that same category. In 1981, Lucy S. Dawidowicz, a leading Holocaust scholar, published
a short book entitled The Holocaust and the Historians, in which she denounced so many prominent
historians for having so totally ignored the reality of the Holocaust for many years following World War II.
 

Indeed, discussion of that topic was almost entirely confined to the Jewish Studies programs which Jewish ethnic activists

had newly established at numerous universities throughout the country. Although Lipstadt’s poor scholarly habits and

hysterical style hardly impressed me, she appears to have been among the most successful academics who began

a career in those ethnic studies departments, which suggests that their average quality was far below her own.

 

Meanwhile, Dawidowicz emphasizes that mainstream histories

often entirely omitted the Holocaust from their presentations:

 

But it is plain from the most cursory review of textbooks and scholarly works by English and American historians

that the awesome events of the Holocaust have not been given their historic due. For over two decades some secondary

school and college texts never mentioned the subject at all, while others treated it so summarily or vaguely

as to fail to convey sufficient information about the events themselves or their historical significance.

 

With regard to serious scholarship, she notes that when Friedrich Meinecke, universally acknowledged as Germany’s

most eminent historian, published The German Catastrophe in 1946, he harshly denounced Hitler as the leader of

“a band of criminals” but made absolutely no mention of the Holocaust, which surely would have represented the

height of such criminality.

 

Major British accounts of Hitler and World War II by leading historians such as A.J.P. Taylor, H.R. Trevor-Roper,

and Alan Bullock were almost as silent. A similar situation occurred in America as late as 1972 when the massive

1,237 page Columbia History of the World, having a Jewish co-editor, devoted a full chapter to World War II

but confined its discussion of the Holocaust to just two short and somewhat ambiguous sentences.

 

One almost gets a sense that many of these experienced professional historians treated discussion of the

Holocaust as a considerable embarrassment, a subject that they sought to avoid or at least completely minimize.

 

Dawidowicz even castigates Slaughterhouse-Five, the 1969 fictional masterpiece by Kurt Vonnegut, for its bald assertion

that the firebombing of Dresden was “the greatest massacre in European history,” a claim that seems to reduce the

Holocaust to non-existence.

 

I myself had noticed something similar just a couple of years before Dawidowicz’s book appeared. The English translation

of German journalist Joachim Fest’s widely praised Hitler had been published in 1974 and

I had read it a few years later, finding it just as excellent as the critics had indicated.

 

But I remember being a little puzzled that the 800 page book contained no more than a couple

of pages discussing the Nazi death camps and the word “Jews” never even appeared in the index.

 

The vast majority of Hitler’s Jewish victims came from Russia and the Eastern European nations included in the Soviet Bloc.

That was also the location of all the extermination camps that are the central focus of Holocaust scholars,

and therefore the Soviets were the source of most of the key evidence used at the Nuremberg Trials.

 

Yet Dawidowicz notes that after Stalin grew increasingly suspicious of Jews and Israel a few years after the end of the war,

virtually all mention of the Holocaust and German wartime atrocities against Jews vanished from the Soviet media

and history books.

 

A similar process occurred in the Warsaw Pact satellites, even while the top Communist Party leadership of many of those

countries often remained very heavily Jewish for some years. Indeed, I recall reading quite a number of newspaper

articles mentioning that after the Berlin Wall fell and the sundered halves of Europe

were finally reunited, most Eastern Europeans had never even heard of the Holocaust.

 

These days, my morning newspapers seem to carry Holocaust-related stories with astonishing frequency,

and probably no event of the twentieth century looms so large in our public consciousness.

 

According to public survey data, even as far back as 1995, some 97% of Americans knew of the Holocaust, far more than

were aware of the Pearl Harbor attack or America’s use of the atomic bombs against Japan,

while less than half our citizenry were aware that the Soviet Union had been our wartime ally.

 

But I’d suspect that anyone who drew his knowledge from the mainstream newspapers and history books during the first

couple of decades after the end of the Second World War might never have even been aware that any Holocaust

had actually occurred.

 

 
In 1999 Peter Novick published a book on this general theme entitled The Holocaust in American Life, citing that survey,
and his introduction began by noting the very strange pattern the Holocaust exhibited
in its cultural influence, which seems quite unique among all major historical events.
 

In the case of almost all other searing historical occurrences such as the massive bloodshed of the Somme or the

bitter Vietnam War, their greatest impact upon popular consciousness and media came soon afterward, with the major

books and films often appearing within the first five or ten years when memories were fresh,

and the influence peaking within a couple of decades, after which they were gradually forgotten.

 

Yet in the case of the Holocaust, this pattern was completely reversed. Hardly anyone discussed it for the first twenty

years after the end of the World War II, while it gradually moved to the center of American life in the 1970s, just as wartime

memories were fading and many of the most prominent and knowledgeable figures from that era had departed the scene.

 

Novick cites numerous studies and surveys demonstrating that this lack of interest and visibility certainly included the

Jewish community itself, which had seemingly suffered so greatly under those events,

yet apparently had almost completely forgotten about them during the 1950s and much of the 1960s.

 

I can certainly confirm that impression from my personal experience. Prior to the mid- or late-1970s, I had had only the

vaguest impression that virtually all the Jews and Gypsies of Europe had been exterminated during the Second World War,

and although the term “Holocaust” was in widespread use, it invariably referred to a “Nuclear Holocaust,” a term long-since

supplanted and scarcely used today.

 

Then, after the Berlin Wall fell, I was quite surprised to discover that Eastern Europe was still filled with vast

numbers of unexterminated Gypsies, who quickly flooded into the West and provoked all sorts of political controversies.

 

The Rediscovery of the Holocaust

 

The late scholar Raul Hilberg is universally acknowledged as the founder of modern Holocaust studies, which began

with the 1961 publication of his massive volume The Destruction of the European Jews. In his very interesting 2007 Hilberg obituary,

historian Norman Finkelstein emphasizes that prior to Hilberg’s work, there had been virtually

no writing on the Holocaust, and discussion of the topic was considered almost “taboo.”

 

 

For a recent event of such apparent enormity to have been so completely wiped away from public discussion and the

consciousness of historians and political scientists can be explained in several different ways. But once I began to

investigate the circumstances behind Hilberg’s ground-breaking work, I encountered all sorts of strange ironies.

 

According to Wikipedia, Hilberg’s family of Austrian Jews coincidentally arrived in the United States on the exact day

in 1939 that war broke out, and in his early teens he was soon horrified to read all the news reports of the ongoing

extermination of his fellow Jews in the continent his family had left behind, even telephoning

Jewish leaders asking why they were doing so little to save their kinsmen from annihilation.

 

He subsequently served in the U.S. military in Europe, then majored in Political Science at Brooklyn College after the

end of the conflict. The inspiration for his future scholarly focus seems to have come

when he was shocked by a remark made by one of his lecturers, Hans Rosenberg:

 

The most wicked atrocities perpetrated on a civilian population in

modern times occurred during the Napoleonic occupation of Spain.

 

When Hilberg asked how Rosenberg, himself a German-Jewish refugee, could have so totally ignored the murder of

6 million Jews, a monstrous crime committed just a couple of years earlier, Rosenberg sought to deflect the

question, saying that “it was a complicated matter” and “history doesn’t teach down into the present age.”

 

Since Rosenberg was a student of Meinecke, whom Lipstadt has bitterly denounced as an implicit Holocaust Denier,

one wonders whether Rosenberg may have shared the beliefs of his mentor but was reluctant to

admit that fact to his overwhelmingly Jewish students in emotionally-charged postwar Brooklyn.

 

Later, Hilberg conducted his doctoral research at Columbia under Franz Neumann, another German-Jewish refugee

scholar. But when Hilberg indicated he wanted his research to focus on the extermination of Europe’s Jews, Neumann

strongly discouraged that topic, warning Hilberg that doing so would be professionally imprudent and might become

“his academic funeral.”

 

When he attempted to publish his research in book form, it received numerous negative reviews, with Israel’s Yad Vashem

fearing it would encounter “hostile criticism,” and over a six year period, it was rejected by several major publishing

houses along with Princeton University, based on the advice of the influential Jewish intellectual Hannah Arendt.

 

One naturally wonders whether all these established scholars may have quietly known something that a naive young

doctoral candidate such as Hilberg did not. His book only appeared in print because a

Jewish immigrant whose business had suffered under the Nazis funded the entire publication.

 

I’d never paid much attention to Holocaust issues, but the supporters of my local Palo Alto Library operate a monthly

book sale, and with serious nonfiction hardcovers often priced at just a quarter each, my personal library has grown

by hundreds of volumes over the years, now including several of the thickest and most influential Holocaust texts.

 

Aside from Hilberg’s classic volume, these include Nora Levin’s The Holocaust (1968), Lucy Dawidowicz’s 

The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 (1975), Martin Gilbert’s The Holocaust (1985), and Daniel Goldhagen’s

 Hitler’s Willing Executioners (1996).

 

I claim absolutely no expertise in Holocaust issues, and analyzing the evidence and argumentation these voluminous

works offer is entirely beyond my ability. But I decided to attempt to assess their overall credibility by exploring

a few particular items, without actually bothering to read the thousands of pages of text they provided.

 

Consider the interesting case of Field Marshal Erhard Milch, Hermann Goering’s very powerful number-two in the German Luftwaffe.

His father was certainly a Jew, and according to researchers Robert Wistrich

and Louis Snyder, there is archival evidence that his mother was Jewish as well.

 

Now is it certainly not impossible that a Third Reich supposedly dedicated with grim fanaticism to the extermination

of each and every Jew might have spent the entire war with a full- or half-Jew near the absolute top of its military hierarchy,

but surely that puzzling anomaly would warrant careful explanation, and Milch’s

apparent Jewish background was certainly known during the Nuremberg Trials.

 

Yet when I carefully consulted the very comprehensive indexes of those five books, totaling over 3,500 pages, there is

virtually no discussion of Milch, except a few very brief mentions of his name in connection with various military operations.

 

Either the authors were unaware of Milch’s Jewish background, or perhaps they hoped to keep that fact away from their

readers lest it cause “confusion.” Neither of these possibilities enhances the trust we should place in their research skills or

their scholarly objectivity.

 

Indeed, the fascinating and widely-praised 2002 book Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers by Bryan Mark Rigg notes that aside from

Milch, Hitler’s military contained over a dozen half-Jewish generals and admirals and another dozen quarter-Jews of

that same high rank, plus a total of roughly 150,000 additional half- or

quarter-Jewish soldiers, with a large fraction of these being officers.

 

All of these individuals would have had some fully-Jewish parents or grand-parents, which seems

decidedly odd behavior for a regime supposedly so focused on the total eradication of the Jewish race.

 

Another obvious matter casts further doubt upon the historical quality of those five immensely thick volumes of standard

Holocaust narrative, which together occupy nearly a linear foot on my bookshelves. For prosecutors of any crime, establishing

a plausible motive is certainly an important goal, and in the case of the Jewish Holocaust, these authors would seem to have an

easy task at hand.

 

Hitler and his German colleagues had always claimed that the Jews overwhelmingly dominated Bolshevik Communism,

and much of their struggle against the former was in order to prevent further bloody deeds of the latter. So surely devoting

an early chapter or so to describing this central Nazi doctrine would provide an airtight explanation of what drove the Nazis

to their fiendish slaughters, rendering fully explicable the horrifying events that would occupy the remainder of their text.

 

Yet oddly enough, an examination of their indexes for “Bolsheviks,” “Communism,” and all variants reveals almost no

discussion of this important issue. Goldhagen’s 1996 book provides just a couple of short sentences

spread across his 600 pages, and the other works seem to contain virtually nothing at all.

 

Since all of these Holocaust books almost totally avoid Hitler’s self-declared motive for his anti-Jewish actions, they are

forced to desperately search for alternative explanations, seeking clues buried deep within the German past or turning

to psychanalytical speculations or perhaps deciding that what they describe as the

greatest massacre in all human history was undertaken out of sheer Nazi wickedness.

 

The obvious reason for this glaring omission is that the authors are constructing a morality-play in which the Jews must be

portrayed as absolutely blameless victims, and even hinting at their role in the numerous Communist atrocities

that long preceded the rise of the Third Reich might cause readers to consider both sides of the issue.

 

When purported historians go to absurd lengths to hide such glaring facts, they unmask themselves as propagandists,

and we must be very cautious about trusting their reliability and candor in all other matters, whether great or small.

 

Indeed, the issue of Communism raises a far larger matter, one having rather touchy implications. Sometimes two

simple compounds are separately inert, but when combined together may possess tremendous explosive force.

 

From my introductory history classes and readings in high school, certain things had always seemed glaringly obvious to

me even if the conclusions remained unmentionable, and I once assumed they were just as apparent to most

others as well. But over the years I have begun to wonder whether perhaps this might not be correct.

 

Back in those late Cold War days, the death toll of innocent civilians from the Bolshevik Revolution and the first two

decades of the Soviet Regime was generally reckoned at running well into the tens of millions when we include

the casualties of the Russian Civil War, the government-induced famines, the Gulag, and the executions.

 

I’ve heard that these numbers have been substantially revised downwards to perhaps as little as twenty million or so, but

no matter. Although determined Soviet apologists may dispute such very large figures,

they have always been part of the standard narrative history taught within the West.

 

Meanwhile, all historians know perfectly well that the Bolshevik leaders were overwhelmingly Jewish, with three of the

five revolutionaries Lenin named as his plausible successors coming from that background. Although only around 4% of

Russia’s population was Jewish, a few years ago Vladimir Putin stated that

 Jews constituted perhaps 80-85% of the early Soviet government,

an estimate fully consistent with the contemporaneous claims of Winston Churchill

Times of London correspondent Robert Wilton,

and the officers of American Military Intelligence. Recent books by 

Alexander SolzhenitsynYuri Slezkine, and others

 have all painted a very similar picture. And prior to World War II,

Jews remained enormously over-represented in the

Communist leadership, especially dominating the Gulag

administration and the top ranks of the dreaded NKVD.

 

Both of these simple facts have been widely accepted in America throughout my entire lifetime. But combine them

together with the relatively tiny size of worldwide Jewry, around 16 million prior to World War II, and the inescapable

conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were the greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century, holding

that unfortunate distinction by an enormous margin and with no other nationality coming even remotely close.

 

And yet, by the astonishing alchemy of Hollywood, the greatest killers of the last one hundred years have somehow

been transmuted into being seen as the greatest victims, a transformation

so seemingly implausible that future generations will surely be left gasping in awe.

 

Today’s American Neocons are just as heavily Jewish as were the Bolsheviks of a hundred years ago, and they

have greatly benefited from the political immunity provided by this totally bizarre inversion of historical reality.

 

Partly as a consequence of their media-fabricated victimhood status, they have managed to seize control over much

of our political system, especially our foreign policy, and have spent the last few years

doing their utmost to foment an absolutely insane war with nuclear-armed Russia.

 

If they do manage to achieve that unfortunate goal, they will surely outdo the very impressive human

body-count racked up by their ethnic ancestors, perhaps even by an order-of-magnitude or more.

 

 

Holocaust Frauds and Confusions

 

Since the Holocaust only became a major public topic after wartime memories had grown dim, the story has always

seemed to suffer from the problems traditionally associated with “recovered memory syndrome.” Truths and falsehoods

were often mixed together in strange ways, and the door was opened wide to an astonishing number of outright frauds and liars.

 

For example, in the late 1970s I remember many of my high school classmates devouring The Painted Bird by

Jerzy Kosinski, perhaps the first widely popular Holocaust memoir. But then a few years later, the media revealed that

Kosinski’s national best-seller was simply fraudulent, and the plagiarizing author eventually committed suicide. Indeed,

there have been so many fake Holocaust memoirs over the years that they nearly constitute a literary genre of their own.

 

Probably the most world’s most famous Holocaust survivor was Elie Wiesel, who parlayed the stories of his wartime suffering

into becoming an enormous political celebrity. His career was capped with a Nobel Peace Prize in 1986, and the

announcement declared him “a messenger to mankind.” Yet journalist Alexander Cockburn has persuasively argued 

that Wiesel was simply a fraud, and his famous autobiographical work Night just another literary hoax.

 

Although the iconic figure of “the Six Million” has been endlessly repeated by our media, the estimated numbers of the

dead have actually been shockingly variable over the years. Although I never paid much attention to Holocaust issues,

I have closely read my major newspapers and magazines for decades, and had regularly seen the statement

that the Nazi death machine had brutally exterminated five million Gentiles along with the six million Jews.

 

But just last year, I was stunned to discover that former total was simply a whole-cloth invention by prominent Holocaust-activist

Simon Wiesenthal, who simply made the figure up one day with the intent of giving non-Jews more of a stake in the Holocaust story.

 

And despite being based on absolutely no evidence or research, his casual claim was never effectively refuted by

actual Holocaust scholars, who knew it to be total nonsense, and therefore it was so regularly repeated in the media

that I probably read it hundreds of times over the years, always assuming it had some firm grounding in proven reality.

 

Similarly, for decades I had always read the undeniable fact that the Nazis had exterminated 4 million inmates at Auschwitz,

with most of the victims being Jews, and Lipstadt certainly treated that number as absolutely rock-solid historical

reality. But in the early 1990s after the fall of Communism, the official total was quietly revised downwards to as little as 1.1 million.

 

The fact that a sudden reduction in the official Holocaust body-count by 3 million has had so little impact upon our public

Holocaust media narrative hardly seems to inspire great confidence in either the total figures or the media reporting of them.

 

 

Over the last couple of generations, our media has engraved that figure of Six Million so deeply onto the minds of every

Western citizen that the meaning of the iconic number is universally understood, and those who question

it risk a prison sentence in many European countries. Yet its actual origin is somewhat obscure.

 

According to some accounts, Jewish groups lobbied President Truman into casually inserting it into one of his speeches,

and thereafter it has endlessly echoed in the media down to the present day. Some angry Internet activist has put together

a graphic displaying extracts from dozens of New York Times stories between 1869 and 1941 all citing the figure of

6 million Eastern European Jews as being threatened with death, suggesting that our official

Holocaust body-count actually predated World War II by as much as three generations.

 

I really wouldn’t be surprised if that might be the original source of the number.

 

Sometimes the creation of a new Holocaust hoax was only narrowly averted. Throughout most of the twentieth century,

Jews and blacks had been close political allies in America, with the top leadership of the NAACP almost invariably being

Jewish, as were nearly all of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s top white advisors and a very large fraction

of the key white activists involved in the black Civil Rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s.

 

But by the late 1960s, a schism had erupted, with many younger black activists becoming deeply hostile to what they

perceived as overwhelming Jewish influence, while more militant blacks, whether Muslim or otherwise, began siding

with the Palestinians against Zionist Israel. This growing conflict became especially bitter during Jesse Jackson’s

presidential campaign of 1988 and reached a flash-point in the New York City of the early 1990s.

 

A couple of film-makers sought to help heal this rift by producing a major 1992 PBS documentary entitled The Liberators,

recounting how black American troops had been among the first units that captured the Buchenwald and Dachau

concentration camps, thereby freeing the tens of thousands of Jewish inmates from Nazi captivity.

 

A historical narrative of such deep symbolic resonance quickly attracted overwhelming support from both black leaders

and Jewish ones, with Jesse Jackson sharing the stage with Holocaust survivors and numerous

Jewish luminaries at the Harlem premiere, and the film received an Oscar nomination.

 

However, in early Febuary 1993 Jeffrey Goldberg took to the pages of The New Republic to reveal that the story was merely a hoax,

based on falsified history. Although the film’s Jewish co-producer angrily denounced her critics as racists and Holocaust Deniers,

those charges stuck, and were eventually reported in the New York Times and other major media outlets.

 

The leading Jewish organizations and Holocaust centers that had been heavily promoting the film soon distanced themselves,

and in 2013 The Times of Israel even marked the twenty-year anniversary of what it described as a notorious hoax.

But I suspect that if matters had gone a little differently, the story might soon have become so deeply embedded

in the canonical Holocaust narrative that anyone questioning the facts would have been vilified as a racist.

 

A few years earlier, The New Republic had actually been in the forefront of promoting a different hoax also relating to

Jewish issues, one which might have had far greater international political significance

when Joan Peters, an obscure Jewish writer, published a major historical work in 1984.

 

She claimed that her extensive archival research had revealed that the bulk of the present-day Palestinians were

actually not native to Palestine, but instead were recently-arrived immigrants, drawn there by the

heavy economic development produced by the Zionist settlers who had actually preceded them.

 

Her shocking findings received hundreds of glowing reviews and academic endorsements across the entire spectrum

of the mainstream and elite American media, and her book quickly became a huge bestseller. Leading Jewish Holocaust

luminaries such as Dawidowicz and Wiesel took center stage in praising her remarkable scholarship, which seemed likely

to completely demolish the claims of the expelled Palestinians, thereby

reshaping the nature of the Middle East conflict to Israel’s great advantage.

 

 
 
However, a young graduate student in History at Princeton named Norman Finkelstein had considerable interest
in the history of Zionism, and being very much surprised by her findings, decided to investigate those claims.
 
 

Once he began carefully checking her footnotes and her alleged sources, he discovered they were entirely fraudulent,

and her groundbreaking research merely amounted to a hoax, which some later suggested

had been concocted by an intelligence organization and merely published under her name.

 

 

Although Finkelstein widely distributed his important findings, they were totally ignored by all the American journalists,

scholars, and media organizations he contacted, with the sole exception of Noam Chomsky, and the growing Joan Peters Hoax

might have destroyed the legal basis of the international Palestinian claims to their own Palestine homeland.

 

 

But some independent-minded British publications eventually picked up his information, and the resulting wave of

media embarrassment caused the Peters claims to fade into oblivion. Meanwhile, Finkelstein himself suffered severe

retaliation as a consequence, and according to Chomsky was completely blacklisted by his Princeton department and the

wider academic community.

 

 
More than a dozen years later, Finkelstein’s work became the focus of a second major controversy. In the late 1990s,
international Jewish organizations launched a major effort to extract many billions of dollars from the largest
Swiss banks, arguing that such funds were the rightful property of European Jews who had died in the Holocaust.
 
 

When the banks initially resisted, arguing that no solid evidence was being presented for such enormous claims, they

were harshly denounced by America’s Jewish-dominated media, and Jewish lobbying led the American

government to threaten them with severe financial sanctions that could have destroyed their businesses.

 

 

Faced with such serious extortionate pressure, the banks finally gave way and paid out the bulk of the funds being

demanded, with those billions mostly retained by the Jewish organizations leading the campaign

and spent on their own projects since the purported Jewish heirs were impossible to locate.

 

This situation led historian Finkelstein to publish a short book in 2000 entitled The Holocaust Industry, in which he harshly

critiqued what he characterized as a global Jewish money-making enterprise aimed at unfairly

extracting wealth on behalf of the supposed Holocaust victims, often with little regard for truth or fairness.

 

Although almost entirely ignored by the American media, it became a major bestseller in Europe, which eventually forced

American publications to give it some attention. Among other things, Finkelstein noted that more than a half-century

after the end of the Holocaust, the number of officially designated Holocaust survivors had grown so large that

simple mortality considerations seemed to imply that huge numbers of European Jews must have survived the war.

 

This obviously raised serious questions about how many might

have actually died during that conflict and its accompanying Holocaust.

 

Over the years, I had noticed the same sorts of media reports claiming enormous

totals of Holocaust survivors still alive now six or seven decades after the event.

 

For example, even as late as 2009 an official at Israel’s Jewish Agency justified laws criminalizing Holocaust Denial

by explaining that almost 65 years after the end of the war “there are still hundreds of thousands of

living Holocaust survivors,” a statement which itself seems to constitute rather explicit Holocaust Denial.

 

Indeed, a very noticeable number of all the New York Times obituaries I read these days in my

morning newspapers seem to include Holocaust survivors still expiring in their eighties and nineties.

 

Anyone who reads serious history books knows that Jews have generally enjoyed a reputation for producing many

of the world’s greatest swindlers and frauds, hardly surprising given their notorious tendency to lie and dissemble.

Meanwhile, the Jewish community also seems to contain far more than its fair share of the emotionally disturbed and

the mentally ill, and perhaps as a consequence has served as a launching-pad for many of the world’s religious cults

and fanatic ideological movements. Any exploration of the Holocaust certainly tends to support this rather negative appraisal.

 

 

The Holocaust and Hollywood

 

 

Although the Holocaust began to enter American consciousness during the 1960s and 1970s with the publication of

major books by Hilberg, Levin, Dawidowicz, and others, together with the resulting articles and reviews that

these generated, the initial social impact was probably not substantial, at least outside the Jewish community.

 

Even highly successful books selling in the many tens of thousands of

copies would have little impact in a population of more than 200 million.

 

Our media completely shapes our perceived reality of the world, and although intellectuals and many of the highly educated

are greatly influenced by books and other forms of printed content, the vast majority of the population

understands the world through electronic media, especially that of popular entertainment.

 

Consider, for example, the 1974 publication of Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery,

a magisterial two volume analysis by economists Robert William Fogel and Stanley L. Engerman.

 

By applying quantitative methods, the study overturned generations of assumptions about the American social institution,

demonstrating that black slaves in the South were encouraged to marry and maintain their households, while having

diets and medical care comparable to that of the free white population and often superior to that of Northern industrial wage-earners.

 

Moreover, following emancipation the life expectancy of freedmen declined by ten percent and their

illnesses increased by twenty per cent. All of this is summarized in the extensive Wikipedia entry.

 

Although their results were controversial, the authors had the strongest possible academic credentials, with Fogel,

an eminent scholar, being a leading figure in a school of economics who went on to win a Nobel Prize. And Fogel’s

ideological credentials were even more robust, given that he had had a lifelong commitment to black Civil Rights starting

with the eight years he had spent as a young Communist Party organizer, while his 1949 marriage to a

black woman had often subjected the couple to the indignities of the anti-miscegenation laws of that era.

 

Consequently, their findings received unprecedented coverage in the mainstream media for an academic study and surely

influenced numerous historians and journalists. Yet I think the long-term impact upon popular perceptions about slavery has been almost nil.

 

By contrast, in 1976 the ABC television network ran the prime-time miniseries Roots, a multi-generational account of a

slave family. The story closely adhered to the traditionally harsh slavery narrative, while supposedly being

based upon the recorded family history of Alex Haley, the author of the best-selling book of that same title.

 

But although his work was later found to be fraudulent and apparently plagiarized, the ratings were stellar and the

social impact enormous due to the audience of 100 million Americans who watched those episodes. Thus, even

the most impressive written scholarship had absolutely no chance of competing with fictionalized television drama.

 

All three of America’s television networks were under Jewish ownership or control, so it was hardly surprising that

two years later ABC decided to repeat this process with the 1978 television miniseries Holocaust, which also achieved

an audience of 100 million and generated enormous profits. It seems quite possible this may have been the

first time many American families discovered that colossal but almost entirely invisible event of World War II.

 

The following year, William Styron published Sophie’s Choice, a heart-rending tale involving deeply

buried memories of the extermination of Christian Polish children in the Auschwitz gas chambers.

 

Although such an occurrence was absolutely contrary to the doctrines of all Jewish Holocaust scholars, the novel became

a huge national best-seller anyway, and a 1982 film of the same name soon followed, with Meryl Streep winning an

Oscar for Best Actress. A decade later, Steven Spielberg’s 1993 Schindler’s List 

won a remarkable seven Oscars, while grossing nearly $100 million.

 

With Hollywood so overwhelmingly Jewish, the consequences were hardly surprising, and a huge cinematic genre soon

developed. According to Finkelstein, Hollywood produced some 180 Holocaust films just during the years 1989-2004.

 

Even the very partial subset of Holocaust films listed on Wikipedia has grown enormously long, but fortunately

the Movie Database has winnowed down the catalog by providing a list of the 50 Most Moving Holocaust Films.

 

Many billions of dollars have surely been invested over the years on the total production costs of this ongoing business

enterprise. For most ordinary people, “seeing is believing,” and how could anyone seriously doubt the reality of the

Holocaust after having seen all the gas chambers and mounds of murdered Jewish corpses constructed by highly-paid

Hollywood set designers? Doubting the existence of Spiderman and the Incredible Hulk would be almost as absurd.

 

Some 2% of Americans have a Jewish background, while perhaps 95% possess Christian roots, but the Wikipedia list of Christian films 

seems rather scanty and rudimentary by comparison. Very few of those films were ever widely released, and the selection

is stretched to even include The Chronicles of Narnia, which contains no mention of Christianity whatsoever.

 

One of the very few prominent exceptions on the list is Mel Gibson’s 2004 The Passion of the Christ, which he was forced

to personally self-fund. And despite the enormous financial success of that movie, one of the most highly profitable domestic

releases of all time, the project rendered Gibson a hugely vilified pariah in the industry over which he had once

reigned as its biggest star, especially after word got around that his own father was a Holocaust Denier.

 

In many respects, Hollywood and the broader entertainment media today provide the unifying spiritual basis of our deeply

secular society, and the overwhelming predominance of Holocaust-themed films over Christian ones has obvious implications.

 

Meanwhile, in our globalized world, the American entertainment-media complex totally dominates Europe and the rest of

the West, so that the ideas generated here effectively shape the minds of many hundreds

of millions of people living elsewhere, whether or not they fully recognize that fact.

 

In 2009, Pope Benedict XVI sought to heal the long-standing Vatican II rift within the Catholic Church and reconcile with

the breakaway Society of St. Pius X faction. But this became a major media controversy when it was discovered that

Bishop Richard Williamson, one of the leading members of that latter organization, had long been 

a Holocaust Denier and also believed that Jews should convert to Christianity.

 

Although the many other differences in Catholic doctrinal faith were fully negotiable, apparently refusing to accept the

reality of the Holocaust was not, and Williamson remained estranged from the Catholic Church.

Soon afterward he was even prosecuted for heresy by the German government.

 

Internet critics have suggested that over the last couple of generations, energetic Jewish activists have successfully

lobbied Western nations into replacing their traditional religion of Christianity with the new

religion of Holocaustianity, and the Williamson Affair certainly seems to support that conclusion.

 

 
Consider the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. Funded by Jewish interests, it spent years launching vicious
attacks against Christianity, sometimes in crudely pornographic fashion, and also periodically vilified Islam.
Such activities were hailed by French politicians as proof of the total freedom of thought allowed in the land of Voltaire.
 

But the moment that one of its leading cartoonists made a very mild joke related to Jews, he was immediately fired,

and if the publication had ever ridiculed the Holocaust, it surely would

have been immediately shut down, and its entire staff possibly thrown into prison.

 

Western journalists and human rights advocates have often expressed support for the boldly transgressive activities

of the Jewish-funded Femen activists when they desecrate Christian churches all around the world. But such pundits

would certainly be in an uproar if anyone were to act in similar fashion toward the growing international network of Holocaust Museums,

most of them built at public expense.

 

Indeed, one of the underlying sources of bitter Western conflict with Vladimir Putin’s Russia seems to be that he has

restored Christianity to a favored place in a society where the early Bolsheviks had once dynamited churches and massacred

many thousands of priests. Western intellectual elites held far more positive feelings toward the USSR while its leaders retained

a stridently anti-Christian attitude.

 

The Rise and Suppression of Holocaust Denial

 

 

Since the Holocaust had been almost unknown in America until the mid-1960s, explicit Holocaust Denial was equally

non-existent, but as the former grew in visibility following the publication of Hilberg’s 1961 book, the latter soon began

to awaken as well.

 

Lipstadt’s vilification of Barnes as the “godfather” of Holocaust Denial does contain a nugget of truth. His

posthumously-published 1968 review endorsing Rassinier’s denialist analysis seems to be the first such substantial

statement published anywhere in America, at least if we exclude Beaty’s very casual 1951

dismissal of the Jewish claims, which seem to have attracted negligible public attention.

 

Near the end of the 1960s, a right-wing publisher named Willis Carto came across a short and unpolished Holocaust

Denial manuscript, apparently produced some years earlier, and he ignored legal niceties by simply putting it into print.

 

The purported author then sued for plagiarism, and although the case was eventually settled, his identity eventually

leaked out as being that of David L. Hoggan, a Barnes protege with a Harvard Ph.D. in history serving as a junior faculty

member at Stanford. His desire for anonymity was aimed at preventing the destruction of

his career, but he failed in that effort, and further academic appointments quickly dried up.

 

Meanwhile, Murray Rothbard, the founding father of modern libertarianism, had always been a strong supporter

of historical Revisionism, and greatly admired Barnes, who for decades had been the leading figure in that field.

 

Barnes had also briefly hinted at his general skepticism about the Holocaust in a lengthy 1967 articleappearing in the

 Rampart Journal, a short-lived libertarian publication, and this may have been noticed within those ideological circles.

It appears that by the early 1970s, Holocaust Denial had become a topic of some discussion within America’s

heavily Jewish but fiercely free-thinking libertarian community, and this was to have an important consequence.

 

A professor of Electrical Engineering at Northwestern named Arthur R. Butz was casually visiting some libertarian

gathering during this period when he happened to notice a pamphlet denouncing the Holocaust as a fraud.

 

He had never previously given any thought to the issue, but such a shocking claim captured his attention, and he

began looking into the matter early in 1972. He soon decided that the accusation was probably correct, but found

the supporting evidence, including that presented in the unfinished and anonymous Hoggan book, far

too sketchy, and decided it needed to be fleshed out in much more detailed and comprehensive fashion.

 

He proceeded to undertake this project over the next few years,

working with the methodical diligence of a trained academic engineer.

 

 
His major work, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, first appeared in print late in 1976, and immediately became the
central text of the Holocaust Denial community, a position it still seems to retain down to this present day, while
with all the updates and appendices, the length has grown to well over 200,000 words. Although no mention of this
forthcoming book appeared in the February 1976 issue of Reason, it is possible that word of the pending publication
had gotten around within libertarian circles, prompting the sudden new focus upon historical Revisionism.
 

Butz was a respectable tenured professor at Northwestern, and the release of his book laying out the Holocaust Denial

case soon became a minor sensation, covered by the New York Times and other media outlets in January 1977.

 

In one of her books, Lipstadt devotes a full chapter entitled “Entering the Mainstream” to Butz’s work. According to a

December 1980 Commentary article by Dawidowicz, Jewish donors and Jewish activists quickly mobilized, attempting

to have Butz fired for his heretical views, but back then academic tenure still held

firm and Butz survived, an outcome that seems to have greatly irritated Dawidowicz.

 

Such a detailed and comprehensive book laying out the Holocaust Denial case naturally had a considerable impact on the national debate, especially since the author was a mainstream and apparently apolitical academic, and an American edition of Butz’s book soon appeared in 1977. I’m very pleased to have made arrangements to include the volume in my collection of Controversial HTML Books, so those interested can easily read it and decide for themselves.

 

The Hoax of the Twentieth Century

 

The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry

ARTHUR R. BUTZ • 1976/2015 • 225,000 WORDS

 

 

The following year, these Holocaust Denial trends seemed to gain further momentum as Carto opened a small new

publishing enterprise in California called the Institute for Historical Review (IHR),

which launched a quarterly periodical entitled The Journal of Historical Review in 1980.

 

Both the IHR and its JHR publication centered their efforts around Revisionism in general, but with Holocaust Denial

being their major focus. Lipstadt devotes an entire chapter to the IHR, later noting that most of the main authors of the

February 1976 Reason issue soon became affiliated with that project or with other Carto enterprises, as did Butz,

while the editorial board of the JHR was soon well-stocked with numerous Ph.D.’s, often earned at highly-reputable universities.

 

For the next quarter century or so, the IHR would hold small conferences every year or two, with David Irving eventually

becoming a regular presenter, and even fully mainstream figures such as

Pulitzer Prize-winning historian John Toland occasionally appearing as speakers.

 

 
As an important example of IHR efforts, in 1983 the organization published The Dissolution of Eastern Europe Jewry,
a very detailed quantitative analysis of the underlying demographics and population movements around the period
encompassed by World War II, apparently the first such study undertaken. The author, writing under the pen-name
Walter N. Sanning, sought to revise the extremely simplistic population analysis casually assumed by Holocaust historians.
 

Before the war, millions of Jews had lived in Eastern Europe, and after the war, those communities had mostly vanished.

This undeniable fact has long stood as an implicit central pillar of the traditional Holocaust narrative. But drawing upon

entirely mainstream sources, Sanning persuasively demonstrates that the situation was actually far more complicated

than it might seem.

 

For example, it was widely reported at the time that vast numbers of Polish Jews had been transported by the

Soviets to locations deep within their territory, on both voluntary and involuntary terms, with future Israeli Prime Minister

Menachem Begin being including in those transfers. In addition, huge numbers of heavily

urbanized Soviet Jews were similarly evacuated ahead of the advancing German forces in 1941.

 

The exact size of these population movements has long been uncertain and disputed, but Sanning’s careful analysis

of postwar Soviet census data and other sources suggests that the totals were likely towards the upper end of most

estimates. Sanning makes no claim that his findings are definitive, but even if they are only

partially correct, such results would certainly preclude the reality of traditional Holocaust numbers.

 

Another regular IHR participant was Robert Faurisson. As a professor of literature at the University of Lyons-2, 

he began expressing his public skepticism about the Holocaust during the 1970s, and the resulting media uproar

led to efforts to remove him from his position, while a petition was signed on his

behalf by 200 international scholars, including famed MIT professor Noam Chomsky.

 

Faurisson stuck to his opinions, but attacks persisted, including a brutal beating by Jewish militants that hospitalized him,

while a French political candidate espousing similar views was assassinated. Jewish activist organizations began

lobbying for laws to broadly outlaw the activities of Faurisson and others, and in 1990, soon after the Berlin Wall fell

and research at Auschwitz and other Holocaust sites suddenly became far easier, France passed

a statute criminalizing Holocaust Denial, apparently the first nation after defeated Germany to do so.

 

During the years that followed, large numbers of other Western countries did the same, setting the disturbing precedent

of resolving scholarly disputes via prison sentences, a softer form of the same policy followed in Stalinist Russia.

 

Since Faurisson was a literary scholar, it is not entirely surprising that one of his major interests was The Diary of Anne Frank,

generally regarded as the Holocaust’s iconic literary classic, telling the story of a young Jewish girl who died after being

deported from Holland to Auschwitz. He argued that the text was substantially fraudulent, written by someone else

after the end of the war, and for decades various determined individuals have argued the case back and forth. I cannot

properly evaluate any of their complex arguments, which apparently involve questions of

ballpoint pen technology and textual emendations, nor have I ever read the book itself.

 

But for me, the most striking aspect of the story is the girl’s actual fate under the

official narrative, as recounted in the thoroughly establishmentarian Wikipedia entry.

 

Apparently disease was raging in her camp despite the best efforts of the Germans to control it, and she soon became

quite ill, mostly remaining bedridden in the infirmary, before eventually dying from typhus in Spring 1945 at a different

camp about six months after her initial arrival. It seems rather odd to me that a young Jewish girl who fell severely

ill at Auschwitz would have spent so much time in camp hospitals and eventually die there, given that we are

told the primary purpose of Auschwitz and other such camps was the efficient extermination of its Jewish inmates.

 

By the mid-1990s the Holocaust Denial movement seemed to be gaining in public visibility, presumably aided by the doubts

raised after the official 1992 announcement that the estimated deaths at Auschwitz had been reduced by around 3 million.

 

For example, the February 1995 issue of Marco Polo, a glossy Japanese magazine with a circulation of

250,000, carried a long article declaring that the gas chambers of the Holocaust were a propaganda hoax.

 

Israel and Jewish-activist groups quickly responded, organizing a widespread advertising boycott of all the publications

of the parent company, one of Japan’s most respected publishers, which quickly folded in the face of that serious threat.

All copies of the issue were recalled from the newspapers, the staffers were dismissed, and the entire

magazine was soon shut down, while the president of the parent company was forced to resign.

 

In exploring the history of Holocaust Denial, I have noticed this same sort of recurrent pattern, most typically involving

individuals rather than institutions. Someone highly-regarded and fully mainstream decides to investigate the controversial

topic, and soon comes to conclusions that sharply deviate from the official truth of the last two generations.

 

For various reasons, those views become public, and he is immediately demonized by the Jewish-dominated media as

a horrible extremist, perhaps mentally-deranged, while being relentlessly hounded by a ravenous

pack of fanatic Jewish-activists. This usually brings about the destruction of his career.

 

In the early 1960s Stanford historian David Hoggan produced his anonymous manuscript The Myth of the Six Million,

but once it got into circulation and his identity became known, his academic career was destroyed. A dozen years later,

something along the same lines happened with Northwestern Electrical Engineering professor Arthur Butz, and only his academic

tenure saved him from a similar fate.

 

Fred Leuchter was widely regarded as one of America’s leading expert specialists on the technology of executions,

and a long article in The Atlantic treated him as such. During the 1980s, Ernst Zundel, a prominent Canadian Holocaust Denier,

was facing trial for his disbelief in the Auschwitz gas chambers, and one of his expert witnesses was an American prison

warden with some experience in such systems, who recommended involving Leuchter, one of the foremost figures in the field.

 

Leuchter soon took a trip to Poland and closely inspected the purported Auschwitz gas chambers, then published

 the Leuchter Report, concluding that they were obviously a fraud and could not possibly have worked in the manner

Holocaust scholars had always claimed. The ferocious attacks which followed soon cost him his entire business career

and destroyed his marriage.

 

David Irving had ranked as the world’s most successful World War II historian, with his books selling in the millions amid

glowing coverage in the top British newspapers when he agreed to appear as an expert witness at the Zundel trial.

 

He had always previously accepted the conventional Holocaust narrative, but reading the Leuchter Report changed

his mind, and he concluded that the Auschwitz gas chambers were just a myth. He was quickly subjected to unrelenting

media attacks, which first severely damaged and then ultimately destroyed his very illustrious publishing career,

and he later even served time in an Austrian prison for his unacceptable views.

 

Dr. Germar Rudolf was a successful young German chemist working at the prestigious Max Planck Institute when he

heard of the controversy regarding the Leuchter Report, which

he found reasonably persuasive but containing some weaknesses.

 

Therefore, he repeated the analysis on a more thorough basis, and published the results as the Chemistry of Auschwitz,

which came to the same conclusions as Leuchter. And just like Leuchter before him, Rudolf suffered the destruction

of his career and his marriage, and since Germany treats these matters in harsher

fashion, he eventually served five years in prison for his scientific impudence.

 

 
Most recently, Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, who had spent eleven years as a historian of science on the staff of University
College, London, suffered this same fate in 2008. His scientific interests in the Holocaust provoked a media firestorm
of vilification, and he was fired with a single day’s notice, becoming the first member of his research institution ever
expelled for ideological reasons.
 

He had previously provided the Isaac Newton entry for a massive biographical encyclopedia of astronomers, and

America’s most prestigious science journal demanded that the entire work be pulped, destroying the work of over

100 writers, because it had been fatally tainted by having such a villainous contributor. He recounted this

unfortunate personal history as an introduction to his 2014 book Breaking the Spell, which I highly recommend.

 

Kollerstrom’s text effectively summarizes much of the more recent Holocaust Denial evidence, including the official

Auschwitz death books returned by Gorbachev after the end of the Cold War, which indicate that Jewish fatalities

were some 99% lower than the widely-believed total. Furthermore, Jewish deaths actually showed a sharp decline

once plentiful supplies of Zyklon B arrived, exactly contrary to what might have been expected under the conventional account.

 

He also discusses the interesting new evidence contained in the British wartime decrypts of all German communications

between the various concentration camps and the Berlin headquarters. Much of this material is presented

in an interesting two hour interview on Red Ice Radio, conveniently available on YouTube:

 

The lives and careers of a very sizable number of other individuals have followed this same unfortunate sequence,

which in much of Europe often ends in criminal prosecution and imprisonment. Most notably, a German lawyer who

became a bit too bold in her legal arguments soon joined her client behind bars, and as a consequence, it has

become increasingly difficult for accused Holocaust Deniers to secure effective legal representation. By Kollerstrom’s

estimates, many thousands of individuals are currently serving time across Europe for Holocaust Denial.

 

 

My impression is that by the late 1960s, the old Soviet Bloc countries had mostly stopped imprisoning people merely

for questioning Marxist-Leninist dogma, and reserved their political prisons only for those actively

organizing against the regime, while Holocaust Denial is treated today in far harsher fashion.

 

One clear difference is that actual belief in Communist doctrine had entirely faded away to almost nothing even among

the Communist leadership itself, while these days Holocaustianity is still a young and deeply held faith, at least

within a small slice of the population that exerts enormously disproportionate leverage over our public institutions.

 

Another obvious factor is the many billions of dollars currently at stake in what Finkelstein has aptly characterized

as “the Holocaust Industry.” For example, potentially enormous new claims are now

 being reopened against Poland for Jewish property that was lost or confiscated during the World War II era.

 

In America, the situation is somewhat different, and our First Amendment still protects Holocaust Deniers against

imprisonment, though the efforts of the ADL and various other groups to criminalize “hate speech” are clearly aimed

at eventually removing that obstacle. But in the meantime, crippling social and economic sanctions are often used to

pursue the same objectives.

 

Furthermore, various Internet monopolies have been gradually persuaded or co-opted into preventing the easy distribution

of dissenting information. There have been stories in the media over the last few years that Google has

been censoring or redirecting its Holocaust search results away from those disputing the official narrative.

 

Even more ominously, Amazon, our current near-monopolistic retailer of books, last year took the unprecedented step of 

banning thousands of Holocaust Denial works, presumably lest they “confuse” curious readers, so it is fortunate that I

had purchased mine a couple of years earlier. These parallels with George Orwell’s 1984 are really quite striking,

and the “Iron Curtain Over America” that Beaty had warned about in his 1951 book of that title seems much closer

to becoming a full reality.

 

Various figures in the Holocaust Denial community have attempted to mitigate this informational blacklist, and Dr. Rudolf

some time ago established a website HolocaustHandbooks.com, which allows a large number

of the key volumes to be purchased or easily read on-line in a variety of different formats.

 

But the growing censorship by Amazon, Google, and other Internet monopolies

greatly reduces the likelihood that anyone will readily encounter the information.

 

Obviously, most supporters of the conventional Holocaust narrative would prefer to win their battles on the level playing

fields of analysis rather than by utilizing economic or administrative means to incapacitate their

opponents. But I have seen little evidence that they have enjoyed any serious success in this regard.

 

Aside from the various books by Lipstadt, which I found to be of poor quality and quite unpersuasive, one of the

most energetic Holocaust supporters of the last couple of decades seems to have been Michael Shermer,

the editor of Skeptic magazine, who had earned his degrees in psychology and the history of science.

 

 
In 1997, he published Why People Believe Weird Things, seeking to debunk all sorts of irrational beliefs popular in
certain circles, with the book’s subtitle describing these as “pseudo-science” and “superstition.” His cover text focused
on ESP, alien abductions, and witchcraft, but rebutting Holocaust Denial was the single largest portion of that book,
encompassing three full chapters.
 

His discussion of this latter subject was rather superficial, and he probably undercut his credibility by grouping it together

with his debunking of the scientific reality of “race” as a similar right-wing fallacy, one also long since disproved

by mainstream scientists.

 

Regarding the latter issue, he went on to argue that the alleged black-white differences claimed in works such as 

The Bell Curveby Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray was entirely pseudo-scientific nonsense, and he emphasized

that book and similar ones had been promoted by the same pro-Nazi groups who advocated Holocaust Denial,

with those two pernicious doctrines being closely linked together.

 

Shermer had recruited Harvard professor Stephen Jay Gould to write the Foreword for his book and that raises serious

questions about his knowledge or his judgment since Gould is widely regarded as one of the most notorious scientific frauds

of the late twentieth century.

 

 
In 2000, Shermer returned to the battle, publishing Denying History, entirely focused on refuting Holocaust Denial.
This time he recruited Holocaust scholar Alex Grobman as his co-author and acknowledged
the generous financial support he had received from various Jewish organizations.
 

A large portion of the text seemed to focus on the psychology and sociology of Holocaust Deniers, trying to explain why

people could believe in such patently absurd nonsense. Indeed, so much space was devoted to those issues that he

was forced to entirely skip over the official reduction of the Auschwitz body-count by 3 million just a few years earlier,

thus avoiding any need to explain why this large shift had had no impact on the canonical Holocaust figure of Six Million.

 

Although various writers such as Shermer may have been encouraged by generous financial subsidies to make fools

of themselves, their more violent allies on the extreme fringe have probably had a greater impact on the Holocaust debate.

Although judicial and economic sanctions may deter the vast majority of Holocaust Deniers from showing their

face, extra-legal violence has also often been deployed against those hardy souls who remain undeterred.

 

For example, during the 1980s the offices and warehouse storage facilities of the

IHR in Southern California were fire-bombed and totally destroyed by Jewish militants.

 

And although Canada has traditionally had little political violence, in 1995 the large, ramshackle house that served as

the residence and business office of Canada’s Ernst Zundel, one of the world’s leading publishers and

distributers of Holocaust Denial literature, was similarly fire-bombed and burned to the ground.

 

Zundel had already faced several criminal prosecutions on charges of spreading “false news,” and eventually served

years in prison, before being deported back to his native Germany, where he served additional imprisonment.

Various other prominent Holocaust Deniers have even faced threats of assassination.

 

Most historians and other academic scholars are quiet souls, and surely the looming threat of such serious terroristic

violence must have dissuaded many of them from involving themselves in such obviously controversial issues. Meanwhile,

relentless financial and social pressure may gradually wear down both individuals and organizations, causing them to

eventually either abandon the field or become far less active, with their places sometimes taken by newcomers.

 

The year after the 9/11 attacks, the JHR ceased print publication. The growth of the Internet was probably an important

contributing factor, and with the national focus shifting so sharply toward foreign policy and the Middle East, its IHR parent

organization became much less active, while much of the ongoing debate in Revisionism and Holocaust Denial shifted to

various other online venues.

 

But at some point over the years, the JHR digitized many hundreds of its articles and posted them

on its website, providing over three million words of generally very high-quality historical content.

 

Over the last couple of months, I have been repeatedly surprised to discover that the historians

associated with the IHR had long ago published articles on topics quite parallel to some of my own.

 

For example, after I published an article on the Suvorov Hypothesis that Germany’s Barbarossa attack had preempted

Stalin’s planned attack and conquest of Europe, someone informed me that a reviewer had extensively discussed

 the same Suvorov book twenty years earlier in an issue of JHR. I also discovered several pieces by CIA defector Victor Marchetti,

a important figure for JFK assassination researchers, who had received little attention in the mainstream media.

There were also articles on the fate of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, a topic almost entirely

excluded from the mainstream media.

 

Casually browsing some of the archives, I was quite impressed with their quality, and since the archives were freely

available for anyone to republish, I went ahead and incorporated them, making the millions of words of their

Revisionist and Holocaust Denial content much more conveniently available to interested readers. The material is

fully searchable, and also organized by Author, Topic, and Time Period, with a few sample links included below:

 

 

The Journal of Historical Review, 1980-2002 Issues

 

Author Archives:

Topic Archives:

So for those particularly interested in Holocaust Denial, well over a million words of such discussion may now

be conveniently available, including works by many of the authors once so highly regarded by the early editors of Reason magazine.

 

Secretive Holocaust Denial

 

The steadily growing economic and political power of organized Jewish groups, backed by Hollywood image-making,

eventually won the visible war and crushed the Holocaust Denial movement in the public arena, enforcing a particular

historical narrative by criminal prosecutions across most of Europe and severe social and economic

sanctions in America. But a stubborn underground resistance still exists, with its size being difficult to estimate.

 

Although my interest in the Holocaust had always been rather minimal, once the Internet came into being

and my circle of friends and acquaintances greatly expanded, the topic would very occasionally come up.

 

Over the years, a considerable number of seemingly rational people at one time or another privately let slip their extreme

skepticism about various elements of the canonical Holocaust narrative,

and such doubts seemed to represent merely the tip of the iceberg.

 

Every now and then someone in that category spoke a little too freely or became a target for retaliation on a

different matter, and our media went into a feeding frenzy of Holocaust Denial accusations and counter-accusations.

 

For example, during the impeachment battles of the late 1990s, Clinton partisans believed that prominent liberal

pundit Christopher Hitchens had betrayed the personal confidences of presidential aide Sidney Blumenthal, and

journalist Edward Jay Epstein decided to retaliate in kind, widely circulating

a memo to the media accusing Hitchens of secretly being a Holocaust Denier.

 

He alleged that at a 1995 dinner gathering following a New Yorker anniversary celebration, Hitchens had drunk a

little too much wine and began expounding to his table-mates that the Holocaust was simply a hoax. Epstein backed

his claim by saying he had been so shocked at such statements that he had entered them into his personal diary.

 

That telling detail and the fact that most of the other witnesses seemed suspiciously vague in their recollections

persuaded me that Epstein was probably being truthful. A bitter feud between Hitchens and Epstein soon erupted.

 

In 2005 Hitchens denounced various opponents of Bush’s Iraq War as anti-Semites, and in retaliation Alexander Cockburn

published a couple of Counterpunchcolumns resurrecting that 1999 controversy, which is when I first discovered it.

As a regular reader of Counterpunch, I was intrigued and Googling around a bit, quickly located media accounts of

Epstein’s explicit accusations.

 

Numerous reports of the the incident still survive on the web, including one from the NY Daily News as well as a portion

of an MSNBC piece, and although some of the more extensive ones have disappeared over the last dozen years,

the media text I remember reading in 2005 has been preserved on the static HTML pages of several websites:

 

Epstein told MSNBC that Hitchens had misspoken himself on the Holocaust on Feb. 12, 1995 – in fact,

practically four years ago – as the two of them, along with some other friends, were dining in New York.

 

Epstein was so shocked, he says, and considered Hitchens doubts so grave, that he went home and noted them in his diary!

 

According to the Epstein diary: “Once seated in a booth, and freely sipping his free red wine, Hitchens advanced a

theory more revealing than anything going on at the Hudson theater. His thesis, to the shock of everyone at the table,

was that the Holocaust was a fiction developed by a conspiracy of interests bent on ‘criminalizing the German Nation’”

 

“He explained that no evidence of German mass murder had ever been found – and what gruesome

artifacts had been found had been fabricated after the event,” Epstein confided to his diary.

 

“What of the testimony of Nazi generals at Nuremberg about the death camps,” he asked.

 

Hitchens, according to the Epstein diary notation, explained “. . . without missing a beat, that such admissions were

obtained under Anglo-American torture.” Epstein then asked, as noted in his diary: “‘But what happened to the

Jews in Europe?’ Hitch shrugged and said, ‘Many were killed by local villagers when they ran away, others died natural deaths,

and the remainder made it to Israel.”

 

After reading these interesting columns, I began noticing that Cockburn himself sometimes provided hints suggesting

that his own personal opinion on the Holocaust might be somewhat heretical, including his cryptical

remarks that huge hoaxes were actually much easier to create and maintain than most people realized.

 

Just a few months after his attack on Hitchens, Cockburn published a two-part article strongly arguing

that Nobel Peace Prize Winner Elie Wiesel, the most famous of all Holocaust survivors, was simply a fraud.

 

I had always been taught that Zyklon B was the deadly agent used by the Nazis to exterminate the Jews of Auschwitz

and I had vaguely become aware that Holocaust Deniers absurdly claimed the compound had instead been employed

as a delousing agent in the camps, aimed at preventing the spread of Typhus; but then the following year, I was shocked

to discover in one of Cockburn’s columns that for decades the U.S. government had itself used

Zyklon B as the primary delousing agent for immigrants entering at its Mexican border.

 

I recall several other columns from the mid-2000s dancing around Holocaust issues,

but I now seem unable to locate them within the Counterpunch archives.

 

My growing realization 15-odd years ago that substantial numbers of knowledgeable people appeared to be secret

adherents of Holocaust Denial certainly reshaped my own unquestioning assumptions on that subject.

 

The occasional newspaper account of a Holocaust Denier being discovered and then flayed and destroyed by the media

easily explained why the public positions on that subject remained so unanimous. Being busy with other things, I don’t

think I ever had a conversation with anyone on that controversial subject or even so much as an email exchange, but

I did keep my eyes and ears open, and huge doubts had certainly entered my mind many years before I ever bothered reading

my first book on the subject.

 

Meanwhile, the concurrent collapse of my belief in our official American Pravda narrative on so many other controversial

topics played a major role as well. Once I realized to my dismay that I couldn’t believe a word of what our media and

political leaders said about major events in the here and now, their credibility

on controversial happenings so long ago and far away entirely disappeared.

 

For these reasons, I had grown quite suspicious and held a very open mind on Holocaust matters

as I eventually began reading books on both sides of the issue in the wake of the Reasoncontroversy.

 

The Future of Holocaust Denial

 

For many years following the end of World War II very little seems to have been written about the momentous topic

now known as the Holocaust. But from the 1960s onward, interest surged so enormously that many thousands or even

tens of thousands of volumes on that once-ignored event have been produced. Therefore,

the fifteen or twenty books that I have personally read is merely a sliver of that total.

 

I have invested only a few weeks of reading and research in studying this large and complex subject, and my knowledge

is obviously dwarfed by that of the considerable number of individuals who have devoted many years or decades of

their lives to such activity.

 

For these reasons, the analysis I have presented above must surely contain numerous gaping errors that others could

easily correct. But sometimes a newcomer may notice things that deeply-involved professionals might normally miss,

and may also better understand the perspectives of those who have likewise never paid much attention to the subject.

 

Any conclusions I have drawn are obviously preliminary ones, and the weight

others should attach to these must absolutely reflect my strictly amateur status.

 

However, as an outsider exploring this contentious topic I think it far more likely than not that the

standard Holocaust narrative is at least substantially false, and quite possibly, almost entirely so.

 

Despite this situation, the powerful media focus in support of the Holocaust over the last few decades has elevated

it to a central position in Western culture. I wouldn’t be surprised if it currently occupies a larger place in the minds

of most ordinary folk than does the Second World War that encompassed it, and therefore possesses greater apparent reality.

 

However, some forms of shared beliefs may be a mile wide but an inch deep, and the casual assumptions of individuals

who have never actually investigated a given subject may rapidly change. Also, the popular strength of doctrines that

have long been maintained in place by severe social and economic sanctions,

often coupled by criminal ones, may possibly be much weaker than anyone realizes.

 

Until thirty years ago, Communist rule over the USSR and its Warsaw Pact allies seemed absolutely permanent and

unshakeable, but the roots of that belief had totally rotted away, leaving behind nothing more than a hollow facade.

 

Then one day, a gust of wind came along, and the entire gigantic structure collapsed. I wouldn’t be surprised if our

current Holocaust narrative eventually suffers that same fate, perhaps with unfortunate consequences for those too closely

associated with having maintained it.

 

Related Readings:

 

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________-
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Rezeptionsgeschichte, or “history of reception,” has been a significant concept in German literary studies in recent decades.

This notion can well be extended to other lines of investigation, including the study of the documents on which political and

social history is based, in conjunction with such approaches as textual analysis and criticism. In the present instance, the

narratives left by the SS officer Kurt Gerstein after his death in 1945 have served for almost half a century as the chief

evidence for the existence of “death-camps” at Belzec and Treblinka (and to a lesser extent Sobibor and Majdanek) in

Poland, at which many millions of Jews are said to have been gassed or otherwise exterminated. In this French doctoral

thesis, Henri Roques examines critically the Gerstein texts themselves, their internal consistency, their conformity to what

is known from other sources, and the history of their reception down the decades (of which the story of Roques’ thesis itself forms a part).

In so doing, Roques thoroughly demolishes the credibility of Gerstein’s affirmations and hence of the existence of any

extermination programs at these locations.

 

 

 
 ______________________________________________________
 
 
 
Holocaust Revisionism Articles Redux

 

The Anne Frank Diary Fraud
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=4297

 

Anne Frank’s Diary – Some Honest Questions
http://rense.com/general65/aan.htm

 

As Many as 90% of Those Claiming to Be Holocaust Survivors May Be Frauds
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/11/13/gordon-duff-who-speaks-up-for-holocaust-survivors/

 

Australian Man’s Holocaust Story Labelled a ‘Lie’
http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/83898/australian-mans-holocaust-story-labelled-a-lie%E2%80%99

 

Brighton Beach Holocaust Fund Scammer Jailed for Neary Two Years
http://www.sheepsheadbites.com/2013/06/dora-grande-brighton-beach-holocaust-scam/

 

Documentary Photographs Proving the National Socialist Persecution of the Jews?
http://codoh.com/library/document/924

 

Fraudster Gets Eight Years in $57 Million Holocaust Scheme
http://nypost.com/2013/11/04/fraudster-gets-8-years-in-57m-holocaust-scheme/

 

Holocaust Propaganda Photographs
http://www.whale.to/b/holocaust_prop_p.html

 

Holocaust Trauma Affects Grandchildren of Survivors
http://www.haaretz.com/news/study-holocaust-trauma-affects-grandchildren-of-survivors-1.230984

 

How Britain Tortured Nazi PoW’s
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223831/How-Britain-tortured-Nazi-PoWs-The-horrifying-interrogation-methods-belie-proud-boast-fought-clean-war.html

 

How the British Obtained the Confessions of Rudolf Höss
http://rense.com/general68/hoss.htm

 

The Illustrated Auschwitz Lie
http://www.cwporter.com/bild1.htm
http://www.cwporter.com/bild2.htm

 

Jewish Soap
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/soap.shtml

 

A Prominent False Witness: Elie Wiesel
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/wiesel.shtml

 

Made in Russia: The Holocaust
http://www.cwporter.com/partone.htm
http://www.cwporter.com/parttwo.htm
http://www.cwporter.com/partthre.htm

 

Money Running Out for Needy Holocaust Survivors
http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/new_york/money_running_out_needy_holocaust_survivors

 

Moshe Peer’s Astounding Holy Shoah Tale
http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.ca/2010/04/moshe-peers-astounding-holy-shoah-tale.html

 

The Most Famous Holocaust Photo a Fraud
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.se/2013/01/the-most-famous-holocaust-photo-fraud.html?zx=fc280ca0f74bce8f

 

The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust
http://www.patriot.dk/nurnberg1.html
http://www.patriot.dk/nurnberg2.html

 

Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 1
Article 19
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art19
>The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible extent

expeditious and nontechnical procedure, and shall admit any evidence which it deems to be of probative value.

 

Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 1
Article 21
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art21
>The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also

take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents

of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes,

and of records and findings of military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations.

 

The Origin of the ’6 Million Jews’ Figure
http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/07/origin-of-6-million-jews-figure.html#!/2012/07/origin-of-6-million-jews-figure.html

 

Photo Manipulations in the USSR
http://englishrussia.com/2012/09/06/photo-manipulations-in-the-ussr/

 

The “Six Million” Myth
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=24369

 

Soap Story
http://whale.to/b/soap_story.html

 

Test Your Holocaust Knowledge
http://12bytes.org/articles/rescuing-israel-the-holocaust-index/test-your-holocaust-knowledge

 

Zyklon-B and the German Delousing Chambers
http://www.nazigassings.com/zyklondelousing.html


—————————————————————————————————————————————


02) Holocaust Revisionism Documentaries and Videos

 

Auschwitz – Why the Gas Chambers are a Myth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-Kl6RHKIQk

 

Buchenwald a Dumb Dumb Portrayal of Evil
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HlPcaP9x5o

 

David Irving The Holocaust Truth, The Whole Truth ~ And Nothing but the Truth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcLzTlfJNB4

 

David Stein on the Holocaust
http://vimeo.com/90965591

 

Ernst Zundel – Holocaust Debunked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp85rXHDJCo

 

Zundel vs. Zionist – Truth vs. Lies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5Myxi92m4U

 

The Holocaust Big Lie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijaFu5LjKAY

 

Holocaust Faker Explains Himself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j30sWIOMIak

 

The Holocaust Lie by David Irving
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk

 

Holocaust Revisionism: The Truth by Thomas Dalton, PhD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Li4o4JCW0To

 

The Holocaust Testimonies You Didn’t Hear
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtlPlZGvgY0

 

Holocaust Hoax Exposed!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Haev1hExU2g

 

Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax, The
http://trutube.tv/video/21170/The-Jewish-Gas-Chamber-Hoax-A-New-Film-By-Holocaust-Debunker-Eric-Hunt

 

Made in Russia: The Holocaust – Carlos W. Porter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWJRBbCYjp8

 

The Montel Williams Show – David Cole and Mark Weber
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jx9G4zmpKv0

 

Nazi Shrunken Heads
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eowsbXrBhig

 

One-Third of the Holocaust
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dxsVSzL4HE

 

Six Million Jews 1915-1938
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dda-0Q_XUhk

 

Sylvia Stolz – Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting Evidence in the Zundel Trial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJY5cBxmdw

 

Spielberg’s Hoax – The Last Days of the Big Lie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80GgRWuXcO8

 

The Phil Donahue Show – Holocaust Denial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRrP7AevKi4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOfZu7lu7So
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAQ16VVmv60
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czDx-7nl28s

 

The Truth Behind the Gates of Auschwitz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWCOjOj4RAU

 

The Truth is No Defense
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5b4_1256669095

 

Understanding the Holocaust as a Legend
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cl3JSLCmO5Q


—————————————————————————————————————————————


03) Holocaust Revisionism Websites

 

Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
http://www.codoh.com/

 

Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust – Holocaust Revisionism Books
http://codoh.com/library/categories/1160

 

Exposing the Holocaust™ Hoax
http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.com/

 

Historical Revisionism
http://www.vho.org/

 

Holocaust Handbooks & Movies
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/

 

The Holocaust Historiography Project
http://www.historiography-project.com/

 

Institute for Historical Review
http://www.ihr.org/

 

Historical Revisionism
http://vho.org/

 

Historical Revisionism – Holocaust Revisionism Books
http://vho.org/dl/ENG.html

 

Nazi Gassings
http://www.nazigassings.com/

 

Revisionists
http://www.revisionists.com/

 

Shoah Blogger
https://shoabloger.wordpress.com/

 

Spielberg’s Hoax
https://sites.google.com/site/spielbergshoax/

 

Zundelsite
http://zundelsite.org/

 

 ______________________________________________________________

 

List of Holocaust Lie films - Incessant Propaganda

 

1940s

Year Country Title Director Notes
1940  UK Night Train to Munich Carol Reed First feature film to show concentration camps.
1945  Soviet Union The Unvanquished Mark Donskoy First feature film to show mass execution of Jews and hunting for them on the occupied territories. 1946 Venice festival award.
1946  USA The Stranger Orson Welles First feature film to include footage of concentration camps[2]
1946  Germany Die Mörder sind unter uns Wolfgang Staudte The first Rubble Film and the first German film to address Nazi atrocities. English title: Murderers Among Us
1947  Poland The Last Stage Wanda Jakubowska English titles: The Last Stage, The Last Stop
1947  Germany Ehe im Schatten Kurt Maetzig One of the earliest DEFA productions. English title: Marriage in the Shadows
1947  Germany Zwischen Gestern und Morgen Harald Braun One of the first German films to be made in Munich after the war and the first to openly address the Holocaust. English title: Between Yesterday and Tomorrow
1948  Germany Morituri Eugen York
1948  USA The Search Fred Zinnemann In post-war Berlin, an American private helps a lost Czech boy find his mother.
1948  Poland Ulica Graniczna Aleksander Ford A Polish film about the uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto, it premieres at the Venice Film Festival; it is released in English as Border Street in 1950.[3][4]
1949  Italy L'ebreo errante Goffredo Alessandrini First Italian film to openly address the Holocaust
1949  USA
 West Germany
Lang ist der Weg Herbert B. Fredersdorf
Marek Goldstein
Yiddish title: Lang iz der Veg; English title: Long Is the Road

1950s

Year Country Title Director Notes
1950  Czechoslovakia Distant Journey Alfréd Radok English title: Distant Journey
1953  USA The Juggler Edward Dmytryk In 1949, former concentration camp inmate and Berlin native Hans Muller, immigrates to Israel where, due to psychological problems, he can't adjust to peacetime life.
1956  USA Singing in the Dark Max Nosseck Musical about Holocaust survivor with amnesia
1958–59  USA Pursuit Ian Sharp Anthology series
1959  East Germany
 Bulgaria
Stars Konrad Wolf English title: Stars
1959  USA The Diary of Anne Frank George Stevens Won 3 Academy Awards, including Best Supporting Actress
1959  Italy
 Yugoslavia
 France
Kapò Gillo Pontecorvo

1960s

Year Country Title Director Notes
1960  Czechoslovakia Romeo, Julie a tma Jiří Weiss English title: Romeo, Juliet and Darkness. Concerns Operation Anthropoid.
1960  USA Exodus Otto Preminger Based on the novel by Leon Uris; screenplay by Dalton Trumbo.
1960  Yugoslavia Deveti krug France Stiglic English title:The Ninth Circle
1961  Italy Gold of Rome Carlo Lizzani Italian title: L'oro di Roma
1961  USA Judgment at Nuremberg Stanley Kramer Winner of 2 Academy Awards For Best Actor and Best Adapted Screenplay
1961  Poland Samson Andrzej Wajda
1961  Belgium L'enclos Armand Gatti Italian title: Otto ore al buio. Prix de la Critique at 1961 Cannes Festival.
1963  Poland Passenger Andrzej Munk
1964  USA The Pawnbroker Sidney Lumet A Jewish pawnbroker, victim of Nazi persecution, loses all faith in his fellow man until he realizes too late the tragedy of his actions.
1965  East Germany Chronik eines Mordes Joachim Hasler English title:Chronicle of a Murder
1965  Czechoslovakia The Shop On Main Street Ján Kadár and Elmar Klos
1967  USA The Diary of Anne Frank Alex Segal TV movie: Harrowing story of a young Jewish girl who, with her family and their friends, is forced into hiding in an attic in Nazi-occupied Amsterdam.
1967  France Army of Shadows Jean Pierre Melville

1970s

Year Country Title Director Notes
1970  Italy
 West Germany
The Garden of the Finzi-Continis Vittorio De Sica Italian title: Il Giardino dei Finzi-Contini; based on the novel by Giorgio Bassani; Oscar for Best Foreign Film
1970  Yugoslavia Hranjenik Vatroslav Mimica English title:The Fed Ones
1972  USA The Day the Clown Cried Jerry Lewis Never shown to the general public
1974  UK QB VII Tom Gries TV miniseries; based on Leon Uris novel of same name
1974  Italy The Night Porter Liliana Cavani
1974  UK
 West Germany
The Odessa File Ronald Neame Based on Frederick Forsyth novel of same name
1975  East Germany Jacob the Liar Frank Beyer Based on the novel by Jurek Becker
1975  USA The Hiding Place James F. Collier Based on the autobiography of Corrie ten Boom
1975  Italy Seven Beauties Lina Wertmüller
1975  USA The Man in the Glass Booth Arthur Hiller
1976  USA Marathon Man John Schlesinger
1976  Spain Voyage of the Damned Stuart Rosenberg
1977  Italy L'ultima orgia del III Reich Cesare Canevari
1978  USA Holocaust Marvin J. Chomsky TV miniseries, popularised the term 'Holocaust'.
1978  Yugoslavia Okupacija u 26 slika Lordan Zafranovic
1979  West Germany Baranski Werner Masten
1979  West Germany David Peter Lilienthal
1979  USA The House on Garibaldi Street Peter Collinson

1980s

Year Country Title Director Notes
1980  USA The Diary of Anne Frank Boris Sagal TV movie
1980  USA Playing For Time Daniel Mann TV film; based on the autobiography of Fania Fénelon; adaptation by Arthur Miller
1981  France Les Uns et les Autres Claude Lelouch English title: Bolero
1982  West Germany Ein Stück Himmel Franz Peter Wirth TV mini-series; based on the autobiography of Janina David
1982  USA Sophie's Choice Alan J. Pakula Based on the novel by William Styron; Meryl Streep won Academy Award for Best Actress
1983  Hungary Jób lázadása Barna Kabay English title: Job's Revolt
1983  France
 Canada
Au Nom de Tous les Miens Robert Enrico English title: For Those I Loved; based on the book by Martin Gray
1983  USA
 West Germany
 Italy
The Scarlet and the Black Jerry London TV movie; based on the J.P. Gallagher novel "The Scarlet Pimpernel of the Vatican"
1983  USA To Be Or Not To Be Alan Johnson A remake of the 1942 comedy, starring Mel Brooks and Anne Bancroft.
1984  Yugoslavia Banjica Sava Mrmak TV mini-series
1984  West Germany
 UK
Forbidden Anthony Page
1984  West Germany Wannseekonferenz Heinz Schirk TV movie
1985  USA Wallenberg: A Hero's Story Lamont Johnson
1985  Soviet Union Come and see Elem Klimov Russian title: Idi i smotri
1987  UK
 Yugoslavia
Escape from Sobibor Jack Gold Based on the book by Richard Rashke
Nominated for 3 Golden Globe Awards; won 2 including Best Limited Series or Motion Picture made for Television
1987  France Au Revoir, Les Enfants Louis Malle
1988  Poland
 USA
And the Violins Stopped Playing Alexander Ramati
1988  USA The Attic: The Hiding of Anne Frank John Erman TV movie
1988  USA Hanna's War Menahem Golan
1988  USA War and Remembrance Dan Curtis TV mini-series; based on the novel by Herman Wouk, and the sequel to The Winds of War
Nominated for 15 Primetime Emmy Awards; won 3 including Outstanding Miniseries
1989  USA Enemies, a Love Story Paul Mazursky Based on the novel by Isaac Bashevis Singer
1989  USA Music Box Costa-Gavras
1989  USA Triumph of the Spirit Robert M. Young

1990s

Year Country Title Director Notes
1990  West Germany Abrahams Gold Jörg Graser
1990  Germany
 France
 Poland
Europa Europa Agnieszka Holland Nominated for the Academy Award for Best Writing (Adapted Screenplay)
1990  Australia Father John Power
1990  Poland Korczak Andrzej Wajda Based on the true story of Dr. Janusz Korczak and his attempt to keep alive the children in his Warsaw Ghetto orphanage.
1991  Poland Jeszcze tylko ten las Jan Lomnicki English title: Just Beyond That Forest
1991  Czechoslovakia Poslední motýl Karel Kachyňa English title: The Last Butterfly
1991  USA Never Forget Joseph Sargent TV movie; based on the life of Mel Mermelstein
1991  Canada The Quarrel Eli Cohen Based on the story My Quarrel with Hersh Rasseyner by Chaim Grade
1992  UK
 France
Prague Ian Sellar
1992  USA Alan and Naomi Sterling Van Wagenen based on a novel by Myron Levoy
1992  USA The Witness Chris Gerolmo Short film
1993  Italy
 France
Jona che visse nella balena Roberto Faenza English title: Jonah Who Lived in the Whale, aka Look to the Sky
1993  USA Schindler's List Steven Spielberg Based on the novel by Thomas Kenneally about the real-life Schindler, a popular industrialist who cleverly manipulated the Nazis to save others, this movie, filmed entirely in black and white, won 7 Academy Awards, including Best Picture.[5]
1993  USA Swing Kids Thomas Carter Young teens in Nazi Germany listen to banned swing music and deal with the pressures of joining the Nazi Youth Army.
1995  France Les Misérables Claude Lelouch
1995  Japan Anne no nikki Akinori Nagaoka Anime adaptation of The Diary of Anne Frank
1996  USA The Empty Mirror Barry J. Hershey
1996  USA The Man Who Captured Eichmann William A. Graham Based on the book Eichmann in My Hands by Peter Z. Malkin
1996  USA Mother Night Keith Gordon Based on the novel by Kurt Vonnegut, and starring Nick Nolte.
1996  USA The Ring Armand Mastroianni TV film; based on the novel by Danielle Steel
1996  USA The Substance of Fire Daniel J. Sullivan Based on the play by Jon Robin Baitz
1996  Hungary A hetedik szoba[6] Márta Mészáros English title: The Seventh Room. Dramatic portrayal of the life of Edith Stein, a nun and Auschwitz victim who was later canonized in the Roman Catholic Church
1997  Italy
 France
 Germany
  Switzerland
La Tregua Francesco Rosi English title: The Truce. Based on the autobiography by Primo Levi
1997  USA Visas and Virtue Chris Tashima Short film; based on the play by Tim Toyama
1997  Italy La vita è bella - Life Is Beautiful Roberto Benigni English title: Life is Beautiful. Won 3 Academy Awards Including Best Actor for Robert Benigni
1997  Denmark
 UK
 Germany
The Island on Bird Street Søren Kragh-Jacobsen Based on the book by Uri Orlev
1997  UK Bent Sean Mathias Based on the play by Martin Sherman
1998  USA Apt Pupil Bryan Singer Based on the novela by Stephen King
1998  Netherlands
 Belgium
Left Luggage Jeroen Krabbé Based on the novel by Carl Friedman
1998  USA Miracle at Midnight Ken Cameron TV movie
1998  USA Pola's March Jonathan Gruber
1998  France
 Belgium
 Netherlands
 Israel
Train of Life Radu Mihaileanu
1999  Czech Republic All My Loved Ones Matej Mináč
1999  USA The Devil's Arithmetic Donna Deitch Based on the novel by Jane Yolen
1999  Germany Gloomy Sunday - Ein Lied von Liebe und Tod Rolf Schübel Based on the novel by Nick Barkow
1999  USA Jakob the Liar Peter Kassovitz Based on the novel by Jurek Becker
1999  Germany
 Austria
 Canada
 Hungary
Sunshine István Szabó

2000s

Year Country Title Directors Notes
2000  Czech Republic Musíme si pomáhat Jan Hřebejk English title: Divided We Fall
2000  Canada Nuremberg Yves Simoneau TV movie; based on the book by Joseph E. Persico
2000  Czech Republic Pramen života Milan Cieslar English title: The Spring Of Life; based on the book by Vladimír Körner
2000  USA
 Poland
Edges of the Lord Yurek Bogayevicz
2001  USA Anne Frank: The Whole Story Robert Dornhelm TV movie; based on the book by Melissa Müller
2001  USA
 UK
Conspiracy Frank Pierson TV movie
2001  USA The Grey Zone Tim Blake Nelson Based on the book
2001  Germany Nirgendwo in Afrika Caroline Link English title: Nowhere in Africa; adaptation of Stefanie Zweig's autobiographical novel
2001  USA Uprising Jon Avnet TV movie
2002  France
 Germany
Amen. Costa-Gavras Based on the play The Deputy by Rolf Hochhuth
2002  France
 Germany
 UK
 Poland
The Pianist Roman Polanski Based on the autobiography by Wladyslaw Szpilman; Won 3 Academy Awards
2002  Czech Republic The Power of Good Matej Mináč Documentary[7][8]
2003  Hungary A Rózsa énekei Andor Szilágyi
2003  Italy Facing Windows Ferzan Özpetek English title: Facing Windows
2003  USA The Singing Forest Jorge Ameer
2003  USA Out of the Ashes Joseph Sargent Based on the book I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz by Gisella Perl
2003  USA Hitler: The Rise of Evil Christian Duguay TV movie
2003  Germany Babiy Yar Jeff Kanew
2004  Brazil Olga Jayme Monjardim
2005  Poland
 Sweden
Ninas resa Lena Einhorn
2005  France A Love to Hide Christian Faure TV movie
2005  USA Everything is Illuminated Liev Schreiber Based on the book by Jonathan Safran Foer
2005  UK Primo Richard Wilson TV movie
2005  Germany Sophie Scholl - Die letzten Tage Marc Rothemund English title: Sophie Scholl: The Final Days
2005  Hungary Fateless Lajos Koltai Based on the book by Imre Kertész
2006  Netherlands Black Book Paul Verhoeven
2006  Germany
 Czech Republic
Der Letzte Zug Joseph Vilsmaier/ Dana Vávrová English title: The Last Train
2006  USA Forgiving Dr. Mengele Bob Hercules
Cheri Pugh

2007  Germany
 Austria
The Counterfeiters Stefan Ruzowitzky Based on a memoir written by Adolf Burger; won the 2007 Best Foreign Language Film Oscar at the 80th Academy Awards.
2008  UK God on Trial Andy DeEmmony
2008  UK
 USA
The Boy in the Striped Pajamas Mark Herman Adaptation of John Boyne's novel
2008  USA Defiance Edward Zwick Based on the book by Nechama Tec; nomination for an Academy Award in the category of Best Original Score
2008  UK
 USA
The Reader Stephen Daldry Based on the book by Bernhard Schlink
Kate Winslet won Academy Award For Best Actress
2008  Hungary
 Germany
 UK
Good Vicente Amorim Based on the play by Cecil Philip Taylor
2009  France La rafle Rose Bosch Based on the true story of a young Jewish boy
2009  France L'armée du crime Robert Guédiguian English title: The Army of Crime
2009  USA
 Germany
Inglourious Basterds Quentin Tarantino Nominated for 8 Academy Awards
2009  USA
 Poland
 Canada
The Courageous Heart of Irena Sendler John Kent Harrison TV movie

2010s

Year Country Title Directors Notes
2010  USA
 Poland
Esther's Diary Mariusz Kotowski Features original footage from the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum
2010  France Sarah's Key Gilles Paquet-Brenner An adaptation of the novel Elle s'appelait Sarah by Tatiana De Rosnay
2010  Czech Republic Austria

 Germany

Habermann Juraj Herz Based on true events and is the first major motion picture to dramatize the expulsion of 3 million Germans from Czechoslovakia.
2010  France The Round Up Rose Bosch The Vel' d'Hiv Roundup.
2010  China A Jewish Girl in Shanghai Wang Genfa, Zhang Zhenhui Animated. Life of a Jewish girl with her little brother in Shanghai, and her parents in Europe.
2011  Poland In Darkness Agnieszka Holland Nominated for Best Foreign Language Film at the 84th Academy Awards.
2011  Germany Wunderkinder Markus Rosenmüller Story about deep friendship between three musically talented children.
2012  Republic of Macedonia The Third Half Darko Mitrevski
2012  Serbia When Day Breaks Goran Paskaljević
2013  Germany
 Poland
Run Boy Run Pepe Danquart
2013   Switzerland Akte Grüninger Alain Gsponer Based on the true story of Paul Grüninger.
2013  Czech Republic
 Slovakia
Colette Milan Cieslar An adaptation of the novel A girl from Antwerp by Arnošt Lustig
2013  Poland
 Denmark
Ida Paweł Pawlikowski Won Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film at the 87th Academy Awards
2014  Poland Warsaw 44 Jan Komasa Original title Miasto '44
2015  Canada Remember Atom Egoyan Won Best Original Screenplay at 4th Canadian Screen Awards
2015  Russia
 Germany
The Way Out Mikhail Uchitelev Short. Accepted at the Short Film Corner of the 68th Cannes Festival
2015  Hungary Son of Saul László Nemes Won Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film at the 88th Academy Awards; Winner of the Grand Prix at the 2015 Cannes Film Festival; Winner of the Best Foreign Language Film Category at the 73rd Golden Globe Awards; Winner of Best International Film at the 31st Independent Spirit Awards
2015  Germany Meine Tochter Anne Frank Raymond Lay German television film about Anne Frank, on the view of her father
2016  Germany Das Tagebuch der Anne Frank Hans Steinbichler German cinematographic feature about Anne Frank
2016  USA Denial Mick Jackson Adaptation of the book: Denying the Holocaust
2017  USA
 UK
The Zookeeper's Wife Niki Caro Adaptation of the novel The Zookeeper's Wife
2017  USA
The Man with the Iron Heart Cédric Jimenez Based on French writer Laurent Binet's novel HHhH
2018  Russia
Sobibor Konstantin Khabensky
2018  USA
Operation Finale Chris Weitz Follows the efforts of Israeli intelligence officers to capture former SS officer Adolf Eichmann in 1960


 
 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
The Holocaust as Myth: Betraying the Public Trust
 
By John Weir



As a school of historical research and writing, revisionism has been around probably as long as people have been writing history.
The idea is history has importance beyond the simple recording of events. Political interests push to shape the record
of what happened to place those in power in the best light. It is therefore possible to deduce who has power by
looking at how they are portrayed in popular history. Popular history is not necessarily accurate. The 20th Century
industrialist, Henry Ford has been quoted as having said "History is more or less bunk". While before him,
Napoleon Bonaparte said "History is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon."
 
So, history is more than an objective record of events. History is myth. In this context, myth doesn’t necessarily mean a fiction.
Myth can be true. In fact, it is better that way because the purpose of myth is explain and illustrate a deeper, underlying
lesson about the world around us, and our place in it. History can therefore be a used as means for a deeper understanding
of the human condition since the laws of nature and human behavior remain constant.
History as myth is a tool through which the distillation of universals truths can be achieved.
 
If the model is false, the lessons from it will also be false. When the recording of events is warped to
support political goals, the only lesson to be learned is not to trust either history or those who write it.
 
This is where historical revisionism makes itself useful. As new facts are discovered and old information is reevaluated,
new interpretations replace the old. The idea is revisionist history is more accurate history because research uncovers
what was previously lost, hidden, or suppressed. Those served by the old interpretations,
therefore, see revisionism as a threat and attack revisionists - branding them as liars with evil motives.
 
There is no question that the Holocaust is a myth. It is the founding myth of the rogue state of Israel. Oswald Spengler,
the German philosopher, believed civilizations are super organisms that form around a central myth. The Nazi writer,
Alfred Rosenberg wrote The Myth of the Twentieth Century in the hope it would become the myth for a new Germany.
Ironically, Nazi Germany provided a myth for Israel instead. Additionally, Zionists commonly promote the idea that
there are lessons to be learned from the Holocaust. So, like other fables, or parables,
the Holocaust is supposed to have something to teach those who take time to study it.
 
The major lesson for Jews is one of a paranoid view of world. The Holocaust has become a metaphor for modern Jewish
identity. It is just one in a long list of events where Jewish existence was threatened. It is commonly said that Jewish
holidays can be described as "They tried to kill us. They failed. Let’s eat!" This is an attitude that predates Nazi Germany,
but is reinforced by the story of the Nazi extermination. Fear is a powerful motivator. Zionists exploit and encourage the
belief that Jews are a besieged people in a hostile world while offering the refuge of the Zionist homeland as the only
chance for survival. The bogey-man specter of an ascendant anti-Semitism is repeatedly raised to try to get Jews to move
to Zionist Israel. There is always another Hitler out there desirous of finishing
what the first one failed to do, so the only safe place for Jews is Israel.
 
The fact that the German image suffers from this situation is purely circumstantial. The Holocaust myth and Jewish
identity require an antagonist. Hitler is one who has been preserved on celluloid. He can be to be trotted out, with
appropriate narration, any time a particular popular mood needs to be created. For the most part, it is those outside
Germany who are being influenced, but Germans too are manipulated by continuous W.W. II agitprop. The libertarian
economics writer, Gary North recently observed: "When people feel guilty, they are more likely to let the state tax them
and spend the money to make things better . . . for the state." Though he made this statement in another context, it gives
us a clue as to what the German state gets out of its enforcement of the Holocaust
myth, and perpetual apologizing for twelve years in the last century.
 
The utility of the Holocaust fable goes beyond Jewish mental conditioning, or Zionist and German state interests.
Nazi Germany also plays a prominent role in American domestic politics. Nazi Germany is always the example
given for why U.S. foreign policy has to be aggressive. As Anti-War.com columnist Justin Raimondo recently
wrote: " The neocons, with their Churchillian pretensions, like to pretend it is 1938 all over again: any negotiation
is a reenactment of Munich, and the goal is nothing less than unconditional surrender." Up until December 1941, the
American people did not support participation in a foreign war, and especially not after the disaster of World War I.
The foreign policy the vast majority of the American people supported was the same as that of President John Q. Adams
who in 1821 wrote that America " goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy." Since the end of W.W.II, however,
that attitude has been altered by a uniformly pro-war mass media. In repudiation of Adams, Hitler’s Nazi Germany has
been made the prototypical monster America needs to go abroad to destroy.
Going abroad in search of monsters to destroy is now the American way.
 
This should be no surprise to anyone. It is the nature of government to gather power to itself at the price of the liberty
of those it claims to rule. America is no exception to this behavior. The most common way government does this is by
promising security in exchange for its new authority. People don’t need security if there is no threat to their safety. Government,
always desirous to steal what others have, will manufacture a threat to encourage acceptance of loss of liberty among the
governed. German Reichsmarshall Hermann Goering, while in captivity after the death of Germany as a country stated:
 
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's
always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament,
or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce
the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."
 
Threats that are imaginary, real, and manufactured all serve the same purpose in promoting group cohesion and herd
behavior. The group can be ethnic, religious, or political. It doesn’t matter because people behave the same when
they believe they are in danger. Belief influences and governs human behavior:
It dictates how people behave in the situations they encounter in their lives.
 
As noted before, the Holocaust is a myth. It is a belief that is used to influence the behavior
of Jews and Gentiles alike. The two major emotions it is design to evoke are fear and guilt.
 
Whether the myth is historically or factually accurate is beside the point. The Holocaust is used in this manner
by both church and state to manipulate people and tie this fable to some of the most powerful human emotions.
 
This is what Holocaust revisionists find themselves confronting. Often, revisionists are compared to "flat-Earthers"
in the corporate media. If such people actually exist, the comparison is only valid in that the belief in the Holocaust
is as fundamental to the way the Earth is shaped to many people. The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief even in
people who know very little about it. We can see that not only does disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern
Jewish identity as shaped by political Zionism, but for others it brings into question the credibility of those in authority
who told everyone it was true: the state, the churches, the schools, and media of every kind. These sources are the
same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If these trusted authorities are wrong
about the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other dishonesties are they promoting?
 
 
Several people who no longer believe the Holocaust story have told me that when they first discovered revisionist
literature they at first felt guilty reading it. This is testimony to the nature of the emotional conditioning nearly everyone
in America has undergone in relation to the Holocaust myth. It takes courage to test a belief – particularly one connected
to many important, authoritative social, religious, and political institutions – and find it flawed.
It is not easy, but - as Robert Frost wrote about the road not taken – it has made all the difference.
 
What people need to realize is these institutions operate on lies. The Holocaust story is only one example of many.
The lie is their stock in trade. They use lies on a credulous public to their advantage. The problem is not
who is in power. The problem is systemic. In his 1891 book, Thus Spake Zarathustra, Friedrich Nietzsche wrote:
 
"A state, is called the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly lieth it
also; and this lie creepeth from its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'"
It is a lie! Creators were they who created peoples,
and hung a faith and a love over them: thus they served life.
Destroyers, are they who lay snares for many, and call it
the state: they hang a sword and a hundred cravings over them.
Where there is still a people, there the state is not understood,
but hated as the evil eye, and as sin against laws and customs.
This sign I give unto you: every people speaketh its language of good and evil: this
its neighbour understandeth not. Its language hath it devised for itself in laws and customs.
But the state lieth in all languages of good and evil; and
whatever it saith it lieth; and whatever it hath it hath stolen.
False is everything in it; with stolen teeth it
biteth, the biting one. False are even its bowels."
 
Since revisionists have been inept at getting the mass of people to believe the obvious or even test their beliefs by
taking the time to examine what revisionists have to say, I feel only pity for those sitting back hoping revisionists free
them from the guilt and fear inducing story of the Holocaust which is warping culture, religion, and politics today. Germans
do not deserve the destruction heaped upon them during the war or the burden of guilt draped upon them for twelve
years of Nazi government. A dozen years in the first half of the last century does not constitute the bulk of German history.
Nor does it define the German character. Regrettably, for as long as people find government pronouncements credible
despite that institutions long history of lying, Germans will have to suffer. The suffering will continue for as long as
there is utility in this lie. In any case, with the long history of failure to make headway in expanding the acceptance of
revisionist research, a re-examination of methods and tactics used by revisionists is long overdue. As the saying goes,
repetition of actions with the expectation of a different outcome is sign of insanity. Or "If you do what you always did
you get what you always got." If they want greater success, revisionist will have do what they do differently.
 
Holocaust revisionism, for the time being, will have to be a personal vision quest. Each of us will have to take the
journey from belief to disbelief alone. Germans, Jews, Americans, everyone! Revisionists are not going to force governments,
or anyone dining out on the Holocaust story, to admit the Holocaust is, in most of its particulars, a lie. Salvation from this
emotional conditioning - this brain washing – lies not in the power of revisionists, but within yourselves. The roadmap to
freedom is on the internet. Revisionist websites are packed with the tools break the mental chains that bind you
to liars and thieves who have preyed upon your credulity for so long. Take them up. Freedom beckons.
 
 
There is security in servitude, as the fable of the Wolf and the Dog illustrates. So, taking and
keeping freedom always involves personal risk. The choice ultimately is a very personal one.
There is no question that the Holocaust is used for political purposes by a wide range of governments and other institutions.
It is not simply another historical event like invention of the telephone or the light bulb, or the relocation of the French from
Canada to Louisiana. Unlike these events, it is being used to influence
behavior. Belief in it is enforced by law in a growing number of countries.
 
There is also no question that the Holocaust myth, in most of its essential claims, is a fiction. The evidence is piled and
heaped on shelves all around me. It inhabits my computer hard drive. The research is scattered in a growing number
of places on the Internet and in a growing number of languages. The facts lie in archives, libraries, and in rotting Nazi
concentration camps. If you are satisfied with what you believe, then don’t fear testing it with new
information. If you are dissatisfied, start reading and build a better model of the world around you.

The Germans were perfect Gentlemen when compared to the JEW Controlled Allies, especially the  Bolshevik Russians ....

 

 

Crucifying German Women: The Testimony of Captain Hermann Sommer


A number of troop companies reported to the fortress commander [at Königsberg] the discovery of several mounds of corpses situated quite close to one another.

 

(Renegade Tribune)

 

The commander, General Lasch, ordered a commission to investigate these discoveries. The commission reported that many similar piles of bodies were strewn throughout the area; but in two cases there were virtual mountains of bodies made up of ca. 3,000 women, girls, children and only a few men.

 

A special commission of doctors, forensic investigators and foreign journalists was formed to establish identities and the circumstances of the deaths. The work was made difficult by the fact that the Russians had poured gasoline on the mounds of bodies and attempted to burn them. Nevertheless many of the dead were photographed. The pictures graphically showed the often savage circustances under which these people had been murdered. On the basis of these pictures and of reports made by the forensics team, the conclusion was drawn that the victims had been beaten and stabbed; in very few cases were persons killed by a shot to the base of the skull. A large number of bodies had the breasts cut off, the genitals stabbed through and were disemboweled. The testimonies of witnesses, who had survived the raping and other physical abuse by the Russians, along with the photographs, are on file in my department. They were used by the security officers and officials of the criminal police to interrogate prisoners of war brought back from the Eastern Front; and to question civilians in the attempt to establish the identities of the victims.

 

I made my own observations when I was sent to Metgethen on official business on February 27, 1945. Just on the outskirts of town near the first railway crossing, I turned my motorcycle into a gravel driveway so that I could look over a building and see if it was suitable for service use. Behind the building I suddenly came upon the bodies of 12 women and six children. Most of the children had been killed by a blow to the head with a blunt instrument, some had numerous bayonet wounds in their tiny bodies. The women, mostly between 40 and 60 years of age, had been killed with knife or bayonet. All of them bore the unmistakable black-and-blue marks of beatings.

 

After the first Soviet blockade had been completely smashed, I was ordered on February 28, 1945, to report to a unit of the 4th Army. On my way, I stopped for a rest in the village of Gross Heydekrug. I had arrived just as medics and civilians were burying some 35 mostly female bodies. Here again I saw the gruesome mistreatment practiced by the Russians, all shown to me by indignant soldiers and civilians. Most of the victims were again women. A corporal told me of a church where a girl and two soldiers had been found. The girl had been actually crucified on the altar cross, the two soldiers strung up on either side.

 

Farther into the village I saw civilian bodies lying everywhere, as far as the highway crossing to Powayen. While most of the men had been shot in the base of the skull, the women were completely naked, raped and then killed in the most brutal way with stab wounds or rifle butt blows to the head. At the highway crossing to Powayen stood a Soviet tank which had been dragging the now-dead bodies of four naked women behind it. A commission was already there taking photographs of the scene.

 

Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans, 1944-1950 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994), pp. 40-41.


Karl Potrek, a civilian from the capital city of Königsberg, had been recruited into the Volksturm and hurriedly sent as reinforcement to the area of Gumbinnen and Nemmersdorf. He later reported:

 

At the edge of town, on the left side of the road, stands the large inn ‘Weisser Krug’ … In the farmyard further down the road stood a cart, to which four naked women were nailed through their hands in a cruciform position. Behind the Weisser Krug towards Gumbinnen is a square with a monument to the Unknown Soldier. Beyond is another large inn, ‘Roter Krug’. Near it, parallel to the road, stood a barn and to each of its two doors a naked woman was nailed through the hands, in a crucified posture.

 

In the dwellings, we found a total of seventy-two women, including children, and one old man, 74, all dead … all murdered in a bestial manner, except only for a few who had bullet holes in their necks. Some babies had their heads bashed in. In one room we found a woman, 84 years old, sitting on a sofa … half of whose head had been sheared off with an axe or a spade …

 

Not a “war crime”: German boy and girl, murdered at Nemmersdorf by gallant Soviet liberators. Both the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Washington Holocaust Memorial Museum,

with characteristic Judeocentrism, honor the Red Army in World War II as “heroes” for releasing Jews from their internment in German concentration camps.

 

We carried the corpses to the village cemetary where they lay to await a foreign medical commission … In the meantime, a nurse from Insterburg came, a native of Nemmersdorf, who looked for her parents. Among the corpses were her mother, 72, and her father, 74, the only man among the dead. She also established that all the dead were Nemmersdorfers. On the fourth day the bodies were buried in two graves. Only on the following day did the medical commission arrive, and the tombs had to be reopened. Barn doors were set on blocks on which to lay the bodies so that the commission could examine them. This foreign commission unanimously established that all the women, as well as the girls from eight to twelve years and even the woman of 84 years had been raped. After the examination by the commission, the bodies were again buried.

 

Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, Nemesis at Potsdam: The Expulsion of the Germans from the East, 3rd edn (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1988), pp. 63-64.


For reasons best explained by a psychologist, one of the aberrations practiced by the [Soviet] soldiers was to take victims, mostly female, strip them naked and nail them to barn doors in cruciform fashion. This one particular atrocity features prominently in many eyewitness reports.

 

Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans, 1944-1950 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994), p. 42.


Flags will hang in the Holocaust Museum to honor the millions of Soviet soldiers who drove Nazi forces westward and who were the first allied forces to liberate and publicize the existence of the camps … Much more than simply wartime memorabilia, these military artifacts are a significant contribution to memory, one that will remind future generations of the pivotal role Soviet forces played in defeating Nazism.

 

“Russian Embassy Presents Flags of Liberating Units to Museum,” U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Newsletter, Fall 1992, p. 6.

 ______________________________________________________________

 

Bobby Fischer, Grand Master of Revisionism

The World Champion Could Always Figure out His Opponent's Game


Chess Prodigy
 

      Robert James “Bobby” Fischer began playing chess at Age Six when his mother Regina bought him a chess set at a candy store. Fischer and his older sister Joan learned the rules from the enclosed manual. Bobby and his sister began playing with each other, but Joan soon wasn’t a match for Bobby.[i]

 

      Fischer’s potential was discovered by Carmine Nigro, the newly elected president of the Brooklyn Chess Club. Although seven-year-old Bobby lost his first exhibition game with a local chess master, Nigro was impressed with the sensible moves Bobby made in the game. Nigro approached Regina and Bobby after the game and invited Bobby to join the Brooklyn Chess Club. Bobby became a regular member of the club, and Nigro, an expert player of near master strength, became Bobby’s first tutor and mentor.[ii]

 

      Bobby was a dedicated chess student with an insatiable desire to read chess literature. One chess master said of him: “Bobby virtually inhaled chess literature. He remembered everything and it became a part of him.”[iii]

 

      Bobby at Age 12 became the youngest member in the history of the Manhattan Chess Club. The Manhattan Chess Club was the strongest chess club in the country, and afforded Bobby the opportunity to play chess 12 hours a day, seven days a week. Bobby would play as many as 100 speed games a day. With additional tutoring from Jack Collins, one of the great teachers of chess, Fischer at age 13 became the youngest American ever to achieve the ranking of chess master.[iv]

 

      Fischer became the United States Chess Champion at age 14[v], eventually winning the U.S. title a total of eight times. In December 1963, Fischer won every game in the U.S. Chess Championship against 11 of the highest-ranked players in the country. It was an awesome performance; Fischer had proven himself to be in a different league. Everyone realized that Fischer posed a threat to Soviet supremacy in chess, and the world buzzed in anticipation of his future performances.[vi]

 

World Champion

 

      American Chess Grandmaster Pal Benkö generously gave Fischer the opportunity to play for the 1972 World Chess Championship. Benkö explains:

 

      It was like this: Fischer did not play in the American championship because of some quarrel. That automatically meant that he could not play in the interzonal tournament in Palma de Mallorca. The winner of that tournament had the possibility through all kinds of matches to challenge the world champion in the end. I ceded my place to him because I thought he had a better chance. That turned out to be correct. He won in Mallorca and after that beat Taimanov, Larsen and Petrosian and finally had the right to play against Spassky.[vii]

 

      Fischer still almost did not make it to Reykjavik, Iceland to challenge Soviet chess grandmaster Boris Spassky for the World Chess Championship. A call from U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and additional prize money from millionaire businessman James Slater were factors that finally persuaded Fischer to make the trip.[viii]

 

      Even with Fischer in Iceland the championship almost did not take place. Fischer forfeited the second game and continued to make incessant demands of tournament officials. The joke making the rounds in Reykjavik was that Fischer had demanded the setting of the sun three hours earlier. Fortunately, Boris Spassky was a gentleman and true sportsman throughout the match. Spassky capitulated to most of Fischer’s demands and allowed the match to continue.[ix]

 

      American Chess Grandmaster Isaac Kashdan stated: “In a contest for the nicest guy in chess, Bobby Fischer would finish out of the money. But he is definitely the best chess player in the world.” Fischer won the World Chess Championship by a 12 ½ to 8 ½ margin over  Spassky.[x] Spassky and Fischer became lifelong friends after their match.[xi]

 

      Fischer returned to New York City two weeks after his win to a hero’s welcome. Mayor John Lindsay saluted Fischer as “the grandest master of them all” and Fischer was offered the key to the city. The celebrations found Fischer in a relaxed state of mind. Fischer was eager to sign autographs and even made a joke during his speech. There was a widespread consensus that Fischer would soon enter the multi-millionaires’ club. The future of world championship chess seemed assured.[xii]

 

Retirement

 

      Attractive financial offers were made to Bobby Fischer after he won the World Chess Championship. However, except for a relatively modest offer to be the guest of honor at the First Philippine International Chess Tournament in 1973, Fischer turned them all down.[xiii] Fischer also refused to play competitive chess for the next 20 years.

 

      So what did Fischer do with his free time? Fischer biographer Frank Brady writes:

 

      Many people who haven’t been formally educated awaken later in life with a desire to progress and deepen their view of the world, to go back to school or self-educate themselves. Bobby joined their ranks out of an essential self-awareness…

 

      Bobby’s lack of traditional institutional education was well known and continually reported in the press, but what wasn’t common knowledge was that after he won the World Championship at age 29, he began a systemized regimen of study outside chess. History, government, religion, politics, and current events became his great interests, and during the 33-year interval from his first Reykjavik stay to his second he spent most of his spare time reading and amassing knowledge.[xiv]

 

      Fischer began to develop politically incorrect ideas from his readings. Fischer read The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and many other conspiracy books. He also became convinced that the so-called Holocaust was a major fraud. Fischer’s Jewish mother Regina wrote him stating that Nazi Germany had murdered children like vermin in homicidal gas chambers. Fischer, however, remained an outspoken critic of the Holocaust story.[xv]

 

      Fischer would even tell first-time acquaintances that the Holocaust was a hoax. For example, Dutch Chess Grandmaster Jan Timman writes about his only meeting with Bobby Fischer in 1990 in Brussels: “It was inevitable that the conversation would touch on the Holocaust. ‘It is a hoax,’ he said very softly, almost mumbling.”[xvi]

 

      Fischer had been embraced as the prodigal son by the Worldwide Church of God after winning the World Chess Championship. However, Fischer left the church, stating in 1977: “They cleaned out my pockets. Now my only income is a few royalty checks from my books. I was really very foolish.”[xvii]

 

      Fischer eventually found a way to make money by agreeing to a rematch with Boris Spassky in 1992.

 

Fischer Returns to Chess

 

      The Fischer rematch with Spassky took place in war-ravaged Yugoslavia. Fischer received a letter from the U.S. Department of the Treasury 10 days before the match began stating that as a U.S. citizen he would be prohibited from playing the match under Executive Order 12810. Violations of this Executive Order would be punishable by civil and criminal penalties and up to 10 years in prison.[xviii]

 

      Fischer despised the U.S. government and disregarded the Treasury Department’s letter. In a press conference held the night before the match, Fischer was asked: “Are you worried by U.S. government threats over your defiance of the sanctions?” Fischer responded:

 

      One second here. [He then removed a letter from his briefcase and held it up.] This is the order to provide information of illegal activities, from the Department of the Treasury in Washington, D.C., August 21, 1992. So this is my reply to their order not to defend my title here. [He then spat on the letter, and applause broke out.] That is my answer.[xix]

 

      Fischer continued to make controversial statements during the press conference. When asked about Communism, he said, “Soviet Communism is basically a mask for Bolshevism which is a mask for Judaism.” Denying that he was an anti-Semite, Fischer responded that Arabs were Semites too, “And I am definitely not anti-Arab.”[xx]

 

      The chess match was somewhat anticlimactic, with Fischer beating Spassky and collecting the winner’s prize of $3.5 million. After receiving the money due him, Fischer’s sister took most of the money and opened an account in Fischer’s name at the Union Bank of Switzerland. On December 15, 1992, an indictment was issued against Bobby Fischer in federal court by a grand jury for violating Executive Order 12810. U.S. federal officials issued a warrant for his arrest.[xxi]

 

Exile

 

      Fischer spent most of the next eight years in Hungary. He was the frequent guest of Laszlo Polgar and his three outstanding chess-playing daughters, Zsuzsa, Zsofia and Judit Polgar. While the Polgars all enjoyed playing and analyzing chess with Fischer, they eventually grew tired of his Holocaust revisionism and strong statements against the United States government. After a few years they went their separate ways.[xxii]

 

      Fischer was also the frequent guest in Budapest of Chess Grandmaster Andrei Lilienthal and his wife Olga. Listening to Lilienthal was like reading a book of chess history, and Fischer greatly enjoyed being with these genial hosts. However, after a few years a couple of unfortunate incidents ruined their friendship.[xxiii]

 

      The loss of friends never prevented Fischer from expressing his views. Fischer once refused to allow a Jewish chess player to enter his car until the man was willing to proclaim that the Holocaust was fraudulent. On January 13, 1999, during a live radio broadcast in Budapest, Fischer declared, “As Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf , the Jews are not the victims, they are the victimizers!”[xxiv]

 

      Fischer eventually felt safe enough to travel to many countries. While living in Tokyo he was called by Radio Baguio in the Philippines shortly after the 9/11 attacks in the United States. Fischer later said about this 9/11 interview: “I was tricked.” Fischer was not in a stable condition when the Filipino radio station phoned him, and they knew what to expect from him.[xxv]

 

      In a profanity-laced tirade, Fischer said among other things that the World Trade Center attacks were wonderful news and he wanted the United States to be wiped out.[xxvi] Although aired over a small station in Baguio City, his interview went viral over the Internet. Numerous letters were sent to the White House and the Justice Department demanding Fischer’s arrest; many of these letters stated that Fischer’s arrest was long overdue.[xxvii] 

 

Final Years

 

      Bobby Fischer was arrested on July 13, 2004, when he went to an airport in Tokyo to board a plane bound for Manila. He was shackled and sent to a local jail. Several people formed a committee called “Free Bobby Fischer” and worked with others attempting to free Fischer from prison. Fischer and his supporters began contacting numerous countries to determine if they would offer him asylum. Iceland was the only country that expressed an interest. The Icelanders not only had the ability to offer Fischer asylum, but also to secure it and extricate him from prison.[xxviii]

 

      The process to free Fischer advanced slowly. Boris Spassky sent the following telegram to an Icelandic official near the end of 2004:

 

      Now when the whole chess world is cowardly silent, Icelandic people made a natural and brave move to help Bobby. Congratulations. And my applause! If you need my assistance or help, please let me know. I will join with great pleasure the group of brave Icelandic people. I take the opportunity to wish you all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.[xxix]  

 

      Bobby Fischer was granted Icelandic citizenship on March 21, 2005, by a special measure of the Icelandic parliament. No one in the Icelandic parliament opposed the measure.[xxx] On March 23, 2005, Fischer was released from jail, given his Icelandic passport, and flew to Iceland. Fischer was now in a country that truly wanted him, and for the first time in 13 years he felt safe.[xxxi]

 

      Fischer lived out his final years in Iceland. He spent most of his time reading, and eventually became bored living on the small island. Fischer died from kidney failure on January 17, 2008.[xxxii]   

 

Conclusion

 

      Russian Chess Grandmaster Garry Kasparov pays tribute to Bobby Fischer:

 

      There are few names in the history of sport that have transcended the earthly title of world champion and become legend. Fewer still have achieved this while active, or while still living for that matter. Bobby Fischer was a member of this select group. He possessed an aura beyond chess and personality, beyond even his status as a symbol of Cold War confrontation…

 

      Today we have books and databases full of his games, but the best annotations cannot transmit the pressure his opponents must have felt at the board. Over and over in Fischer’s games you see the strongest players in the world crack, often making mistakes you wouldn’t believe them capable of making—against anyone but Fischer…Despite his short reign, he dominated his era to such a degree that it will always bear his name…

 

      Fischer’s legacy extends well beyond the 64 squares. Throughout his career he was, in the excellent phrase of Spassky’s, “the honorary chairman of our trade union.” He believed our game and its players deserved far better treatment than it received, and he got results. His demands, often criticized as outrageous at the time, led to better conditions and prizes for all.[xxxiii]

 

      Bobby Fischer was widely criticized for his controversial statements outside of chess. For example, Dick and Jeremy Schaap questioned Fischer’s sanity, while Charles Krauthammer wrote that “he’s clearly a sick man.”[xxxiv] However, it would be more accurate to state that Fischer used his prodigious intellect to read widely and deeply to discover many of the lies that pervade our society. His exposure of the Holocaust hoax is especially praiseworthy. Bobby Fischer was truly an authentic American hero.        

 

Endnotes


[i] Böhm, Hans and Jongkind, Kees, Bobby Fischer: The Wandering King, London: B T Batsford, 2004, p. 25.

[ii] Brady, Frank, Endgame: Bobby Fischer’s Rise and Fall—from America’s Brightest Prodigy to the Edge of Madness, New York: Crown Publishers, 2011, pp. 18, 20-21.

[iii] Ibid., p. 23.

[iv] Ibid., pp. 39, 42, 50-52, 55.

[v] Ibid., p. 79.

[vi] Edmonds, David and Eidinow, John, Bobby Fischer Goes to War, London: Faber and Faber Limited, 2004, pp. 13-14.

[vii] Böhm, Hans et al., op. cit., p. 40.

[viii] Edmonds, David et al, op. cit., pp. 130-132.

[ix] Ibid., pp. 158-159, 170-171.

[x] Ibid., pp. 205, 215.

[xi] Olafsson, Helgi, Bobby Fischer Comes Home, The Netherlands: New in Chess, 2012, pp. 75-76.

[xii] Edmonds, David et al., op. cit., pp. 259-260.

[xiii] Brady, Frank, op. cit., pp. 207-209.

[xiv] Ibid., p. 297.

[xv] Ibid., pp. 212-215.

[xvi] Euwe, Max and Timman, Jan, Fischer World Champion!, 3rd edition, Alkmaar, The Netherlands: New in Chess,  2009, p. 19.

[xvii] Böhm, Hans and Jongkind, Kees, Bobby Fischer: The Wandering King, London: B T Batsford, 2004, p. 54.

[xviii] Brady, Frankop. cit., pp. 242-244.

[xix] Ibid., pp. 247-248.

[xx] Ibid., p. 249.

[xxi] Ibid., pp. 253, 255.

[xxii] Ibid., pp. 260-262, 265, 269.

[xxiii] Ibid., pp. 262-265.

[xxiv] Ibid., pp. 266, 271.

[xxv] Olafsson, Helgi, op. cit., p. 134.

[xxvi] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkLE90jSCWU.

[xxvii] Brady, Frank, op. cit., pp. 279-280.

[xxviii] Ibid., pp. 282-286.

[xxix] Olafsson, Helgi, op. cit., p. 57.

[xxx] Ibid., p. 61.

[xxxi] Brady, Frank, op. cit., pp. 293-294.

[xxxii] Olafsson, Helgi, op. cit., pp. 109, 117.

[xxxiii] Euwe, Max et al., op. cit., pp. 7, 10.

[xxxiv] Olafsson, Helgi, op. cit., pp. 65, 130.

 


 

Some of the jews’ fantastical holohoax lies

 

 

Christian Responsibility to Truth

... The day is surely coming when all the evidence showing that the Germans never exterminated six million Jews can no longer be suppressed. Truth is not determined by majority vote ... There is no dispute over the fact that large numbers of Jews were deported to concentration camps and ghettos, or that many Jews died or were killed during World War II ... Israel is using the "fact" of the Holocaust as an excuse to kill Palestinians in Israel. This slaughter, together with the anti-scriptural notions of the Israel-first Millennialists, almost all of whom believe in the Holocaust, could lead to another bloody war.

 


 
 
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
 

Holocaust survivors disgusted by fraud

Arrests targeting false claimants

A sign in Brighton Beach in Brooklyn decried those arrested on charges of falsely claiming Holocaust victim compensation.
A sign in Brighton Beach in Brooklyn decried those arrested on charges of falsely claiming Holocaust victim compensation. (Bebeto Matthews/ Associated Press)
By Samantha Gross Associated Press / November 25, 2010

NEW YORK — Walk along the boardwalk on a late fall day, and Brighton Beach can seem like an old-age home by the sea, where stooped ladies wear rouge like armor and almost everyone lives in the shadow of a difficult past.

 

Along this Brooklyn outpost’s ocean edge — the heart of much community life here — locals are talking about the betrayal they feel after the arrest of 17 people, mostly Brighton Beach residents, accused of faking stories of Holocaust survival to profit from money meant for survivors of Nazi persecution.

 

“I cannot imagine that someone would lie like that; it’s a terrible crime,’’ says Klara Rakhlin, 72, her bright makeup stark against her black, coiffed hair as she speaks in Russian. “I lost my family in a concentration camp, and it’s disgusting that people would get compensation although they haven’t suffered.’’

 

Rakhlin was little more than a toddler in 1941, when she entered the Pechora concentration camp in what is now Ukraine’s Vinnitsa region. By the time she left in 1944, she was school age.

 

The arrests don’t close the books on the purported scheme. The organization in charge of awarding the money continues to weed through hundreds more case files to see how much further deception may have spread. Federal prosecutors said they have uncovered more than 5,500 fraudulent claims, many of them containing altered birth dates and faked stories of suffering.

 

Some people — overwhelmingly residents of this neighborhood and elsewhere in Brooklyn — have received letters saying they must either appeal or repay tens of thousands of dollars that the nonprofit group, the Conference on the Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, believes were wrongly awarded.

 

Already, more than 90 people have told the Claims Conference, as it is commonly known, that they intend to appeal cancellation of their benefits. At least 35 more have returned the money or agreed to repay it on an installment plan.

 

Still other recipients are getting letters telling them their quarterly payments will be rationed out by the month, while the Claims Conference asks them to again detail their stories of persecution and reevaluates their eligibility. Conference employees will work to find records that confirm each qualifying story, said Greg Schneider, the organization’s executive vice president.

 

“Ninety-nine percent of the cases are clear cases, and there’s no issue, and we won’t be distracted from the fact that helping survivors is our core mission,’’ Schneider said of the thousands of applications the group receives each year.

 

Some community leaders worry that requesting more information from some recipients will again turn survivors into victims.

 

“They are making survivors suffer even more. Why make them prove their status when they’ve gone through so much already?’’ said Pavel Vishnevetsky, director of the Council of Jewish Immigrant Community Organizations.

 

But Schneider contends that writing a description of their ordeal is not too onerous a task to ask of surivors. And the Nazis, he said, were meticulous record-keepers — often making it possible to find a paper trail. If someone was on a train headed to a concentration camp, it was recorded. Those trapped in ghettos or who disappeared into hiding can be harder to track down — but if nothing else, records involving someone who witnessed their suffering can usually be found, he said.

 _______________________________________________________________

 

 

The ‘Ten Commandments’ of the ‘Holocaust Religion’ have been enunciated as follows:

 

 

Thou shalt remember what Amalek (the Non-Jews) has done to thee.

Thou shalt never compare THE HOLOCAUST with any other Genocide.

Thou shalt never compare the Nazi crimes with those of Israel.

Thou shalt never doubt the number of 6 million Jewish victims.

Thou shalt never doubt that the majority of them died in gas chambers.

Thou shalt not doubt the central role of SATAN Hitler in the extermination of the Jews.

Thou shalt never doubt the right of Israel to exist as the Jewish state.

Thou shalt not criticize the leading Jewish organizations and the Israeli government.

Thou must never criticize Jewish organizations and the Zionist leadership for abandoning the European Jewry in the Nazi era

Thou shalt take these commandments literally and never shew mercy to them that doubt!

 

 

 

So what if you question this Holocaust religion? There is an almost universal assumption

that if you don’t believe in the Holocaust it is not because you have an inquiring mind,

it’s because you are innately evil. The belief underlying the draconian legislation relating to

Holocaust denial would seem to be that the Holocaust is only questioned by neonazis,

whose ‘denial’ is motivated by hate and so they should be locked up before they contaminate anyone else.

 

JEWISH HOLOHOAX "SCHOLAR" PUTS FOOT IN MOUTH... See here:

 

Forensic Evidence Of the Holocaust Must Be Preserved

Ryback:  Last month, Jarek Mensfelt, spokesman for the Auschwitz memorial site, announced plans to preserve the ruins of the gas chambers and crematoria in the notorious death camp at Birkenau near the Polish town of Oswiecim (Auschwitz). "This is an attempt to keep it as it is now -- in ruins -- but not let the ruins go," he said. "It was meant to be here forever as a warning."

 

Analysis: So, Mr. Ryback, both you and Mr. Mensfelt now admit that what you claim were "gas chambers and crematoria" now lie in ruins. That means the "gas chambers and crematoria" that are still being shown to the teary-eyed tourists are Soviet-era "reconstructions" -- a fact that "Holocaust Deniers" were once attacked for claiming. Thanks for confirming that for us in the Wall Street Urinal.

http://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/Photos2005/GasChEntrance.jpg http://jan27.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ausch-gas-chamber_2012.jpg

Images 1 & 2 are of the Soviet-era reconstruction of the "gas chambers" ™. Image 3 depicts the ruins of the what is said to the original "gas chambers". Ryback and the Polish curators concede that what is shown to gullible tourists are NOT the actual "gas chambers" ™.

 

 

Ryback: In the coming weeks, as the Auschwitz preservationists begin their work, they should be guided by the knowledge that these heaps of dynamited concrete and twisted steel are not only historic artifacts but among the few remnants of untainted, forensic evidence of the Holocaust.

Analysis: How exactly do these bombed-out remnants constitute "forensic evidence" of mass murdering gas chambers? Have any traces of poisonous gas been detected in the stones?

 

 

Ryback:  Of course, the historical and circumstantial evidence of a premeditated Nazi plan to exterminate the Jewish population of Europe is overwhelming.

Analysis: Ah yes. The good ol' "the-evidence-is-overwhelming" rhetorical trick. Such a bold statement may sway the weak-minded, but it proves nothing. Talk is cheap, as they say. My. Ryback, could you please share with us this "overwhelming evidence" of a premeditated "Nazi" plan to exterminate the Jewish population of Europe.

 

 

Ryback: There are the watch-tower-girded enclosures of Nazi concentration camps ....

Analysis: "Watch-towers?" Well, duh! They were internment camps, after all. No one is denying the Jewish internment of World War II. What we want is evidence of a genocide campaign. Continue.

 

 

Ryback: ... and the extensive testimonials of Holocaust survivors.....

Analysis: Yes, "testimonials" which, as even some of your Jewish colleagues now openly admit, are often unreliable. Speaking of "testimonials," what do you have to say of the former Auschwitz inmates who later told of spirited soccer games and fun activities for the children? If the Germans were out to commit genocide, why were so many "survivors" allowed to live? Auschwitz alone had 9,000 survivors when the Soviets arrived there.

 

 

 

 http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OlqL38hUC4E/hqdefault.jpg http://www.7thart.com/images/films/Liga_Terezin_keyArt.jpg

Yakov Tzur testimony, March 2009: "I played soccer games at Auschwitz in 1944." (YouTube here)

(Other camps had actual Jewish soccer leagues.)

 

 

Ryback: .... as well as the court protocols of Nazi war criminals,

Analysis: So-called "Nazi war criminals" were tortured and the Nuremberg Trials were a joke. Those same "court protocols" told of shrunken Jewish heads, and Jews being fashioned into lamp shades and bars of soaps -- claims which all "Holocaust schollars" now admit were false.

 

 

Ryback: .... but there is little forensic evidence proving homicidal intent.

Analysis: Hold it! What did you just say???

 

 

Ryback: ...but there is little forensic evidence proving homicidal intent.

Analysis: That's what I thought you said. Thank you! After just having talked about "overwhelming evidence," now you say "there is little forensic evidence." How can that be?

 

 

Ryback: The Nazis were scrupulous when it came to obscuring the "Final Solution" in bureaucratic euphemism and also dismantling or obliterating their machinery of death.

Analysis: Yet they left the remains of the "gas chambers" on the camp grounds along with 9,000 witnesses behind for the Soviets to interview. That doesn't sound like too "scrupulous" of a cover up now, does it?

 

 

Ryback: The dearth of hard evidence ....

Analysis: A "dearth (complete lack) of hard evidence." Dearth is a very strong word. Thank you, Timmy. Thank you, thank you and thank you!

 

 

Ryback: ... has fueled a growth industry in Holocaust-denial.

Analysis: "Holocaust Denial" --- a silly slogan used to silence debate. In other words, just because there is a "dearth of hard evidence," it is still wrong to question the Holocaust. This is known as "circular logic." It is like a prosecutor saying to a jury: "Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, do not let the 'dearth' of hard evidence influence your verdict. The only reason why there is no hard evidence is because the defendant covered his tracks so well."

Absurd, to say the least. But thanks just the same, Timmy, for conceding that hard evidence is totally lacking.

 

 

 

http://www.clipartguide.com/_named_clipart_images/0511-1109-0811-5038_A_man_with_foot_in_mouth_looking_very_embarrassed_clipart_image.jpg

Open mouth, insert foot: "The dearth of hard evidence." Thanks,Timmy!

 

Ryback: The revisionists' plaint is simple: They demand a proverbial "smoking gun" to prove that the Nazis deliberately and systematically designed an industrial system of extermination.

Analysis: Well, excuuuuuse us "anti-Semites" for being so impertinent as to simply ask for evidence of this "industrial system of extermination." But thanks for admitting that there is no "smoking gun" and that you cannot prove your case.

 

 

Ryback: Auschwitz has been a particular target of Holocaust deniers -- in particular, the gas chamber in Auschwitz I, the original base camp a mile east of Birkenau. It was here that some of the first experiments with poison gas were undertaken in a converted air-raid shelter refitted with air-tight doors and special ducts for homicidal purposes. Dynamited by the Nazis in the autumn of 1944, the gas chamber was reconstructed after the war.

Analysis: Why did the "Nazis" dynamite the "gas chamber?" Did they suddenly decide to stop "gassing" people? And thanks again for conceding that the current "gas chamber" is a Soviet reconstruction -- a fake.

 

 

Ryback: As one revisionist notes: "The official view holds that the Soviets and Poles created a 'gas chamber' in an air-raid shelter that had been a 'gas chamber'. The revisionist view holds that Soviets and Poles created a 'gas chamber' in an air-raid shelter that had been an air-raid shelter." While most serious historians refuse to dignify such statements with a response, Polish administrators have taken the bait.

Analysis: Ah yes. The "No serious person" Logical Fallacy and the old "I-refuse-to-dignify-that-with-a-response" rhetorical trick. It is the sure sign of an empty case, and an empty mind, when one has to resort to such pathetic High School debating tactics.

 

 

Ryback: In response to revisionist charges, they (the Poles) tested the gas chamber walls for residual traces of cyanide gas but found none.

Analysis: They found no residual traces of cyanide gas.  THANK YOU! 

 

 

Ryback: Unlike the delousing chambers whose walls still show cyanide "staining,".....

Analysis: And thanks for admitting that there were "delousing chambers" at Auschwitz. In so doing, you have confirmed the fact that the Germans were trying to prevent the inmates from dying of typhus. I suppose they had to save the Jews in order to kill them?

 

 

Ryback: ..... the gas chambers betrayed no residual traces of Zyklon B.

Analysis: So, in addition to your concessions that there is a "dearth" of hard evidence, and that the gas chambers are Soviet reconstructions, you further concede that the forensic analysis shows no traces of "Zyklon B" (a pesticide-turned-into-poison) in the stone walls. Stone is like sponge, Timmy. Any poison gas would have been absorbed and preserved for posterity to analyze, as it was in the de-lousing chambers which, as you conceded, do indeed show traces of bug spray. Can you explain, or should I say, rationalize that bit of scientific reality away for us, Timmy?


 

Ryback: The homicidal process was so murderously brief that the cyanide never penetrated the interior surface.

 

"Murderously brief!" ---  Mass-murder gassings of millions of people were too "murderously brief" to leave a trace, but the delousing of clothes with a much smaller does of Zyklon B did leave a trace? That's a good one!

 

Ryback:  Similarly, it was found that repeated postwar "cleaning" had leached the last traces of cyanide from the heaps of human hair, one of the most damning pieces of Holocaust evidence.

Analysis: Let me get this straight, Timmy. You're saying that the "Nazis" shaved the heads of their victims after killing them in poison-gas chambers but before finally cremating them? And that the poison-saturated hair was later shampooed by the Soviets and the chemical traces are now gone? Are you flippin' serious? What were the "Nazis" planning to do with the "heaps of human hair?" Make wigs? And why would the shaving of hair be considered a "damning piece of evidence" when it was done to prevent the spread of typhus-carrying lice. Doesn't that prove that the big bad "Nazis" were NOT out to kill their prisoners?

 

 

Ryback: In the battle against Holocaust deniers, Birkenau's extermination facilities remain important forensic evidence.

Analysis: Timmy! You're gonna give a friggin' heart-attack! What forensic evidence?! You just admitted that there are no traces of poison in neither the stones nor the hair. There you go again with that quintessentially Jewish circular reasoning. "The gas chambers existed. Although there is a "dearth" of hard evidence; that doesn't disprove anything because we already know that the gas chambers existed."

 

 

Ryback:  Between 1942, when they were first put into operation, and 1944, when they were dynamited, more than a million human beings -- mostly Jewish -- were fed into these extermination plants, forced into subterranean chambers and gassed, their corpses removed and transported by mechanical conveyance to the crematoria ovens.

Analysis: More than one-million were gassed, yet you said earlier that "the cyanide never penetrated the interior surface" because the episodes were "so murderously brief." Timmy, even if the "brief" mass gassing episodes were just 10 seconds long, when multiplied 1000's of times to reach that one million number -- an average of 40,000 "gassing deaths per month", (right under the noses of Red Cross inspectors!) we're talking about many hours of poison gassing. Why no traces of this in the forensic analysis?

And Timmy, one more thing; for nearly 50 years, you and your gang told us that 4,000,000 died at Auschwitz. Then, after "Holocaust Deniers" began poking around Auschwitz, the official number was suddenly chopped down to 1,000,000. How do you account for such a drastic reduction? And if the 4,000,000 was wrong, why should we now take your word now on the "1,000,000?"

 

 

https://antizionistleague.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/poland-lowers-official-auschwitz-death-toll.jpg

 



And furthermore, if the Auschwitz "death toll" was shaved down by 3 million, why do "youse guys" keep saying "6 million" died in all. Has 1st-grade math, like modern physics, now become "relative" too?

 

 

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-QTjmiF-d2-0/VlMzqFAJrEI/AAAAAAAAAVQ/5_KOQ44ltYI/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/10-crazy-facts-you-didnt-know-about-albert-einstein-6.jpg

 

 *

 

Ryback: The chimneys belched smoke into the air.

Analysis: Chimneys emitting smoke? Really? No friggin' way! Perhaps you were expecting little white doves to come out of the chimneys? Or maybe, soap bubbles?

 

 

Ryback: The remnant ash was scattered in the surrounding fields, or dumped in a nearby pond whose muddied bottom, even today, is of a sticky gray viscosity ...

Analysis: So, after 60 years of natural forces at work in the pond (article written in 2004), the "sticky gray viscosity" never went away; yet the cyanide traces completely disappeared from the untouched remnants of the stone walls and the "heaps of human hair." Bend that "science," Timmy, bend it hard!

 

 

Ryback:....laced with matchstick-size splinters of human bone.

Analysis: "Match-like splinters?" Seriously, Tim? Fish and geese bone splinters and the bottom of a pond, if even that. But thanks for conceding the fact that there are no actual bodies nor skeletons. No forensics, no documents, no direct eye-witnesses, no bodies. With a "prosecutor" like you, Timmy, who even needs a defense lawyer!

 

 

Ryback: The horrors of this machinery have been preserved in the classic memoirs of survivor-authors like Elie Wiesel and Primo Levi...

Analysis: The good ole "Appeal to Authority" Fallacy. If it is in a book, written by other known liars who continue to cash in on book sales and speaking fees, then it must be true, eh Timmy? Elie the Weasel was the money-grubbing clown who once wrote that Germans used to throw babies into the bonfires they had lit at Auschwitz -- just for laughs.

 

 

Ryback: But, as with any account filtered through human memory, this "evidence" is subject to challenge and rebuttal. There is no arguing with presence of the Birkenau gas chambers. Here the proof of the Holocaust is written in concrete and steel.

Analysis: "There is no arguing?" Says who, Timmy? Says you? This is the old, "Case Closed" debating trick; a variation of the "I-refuse-to-dignify-that-with-a-response" trick. You're right Timothy. There is "no arguing" with lunatics and liars. But thanks for inadvertently conceding the case by repeatedly admitting that there is no evidence.

 

 

SUMMARY OF RYBACK'S CONCESSIONS

  • Auschwitz 'Gas Chambers' shown to tourists are actually a "reconstruction"

  • Germans used delousing chambers to prevent death by typhus

  • Remains of alleged "gas chambers" tested negative for poison gas

  • Original Auschwitz death toll of "4 million" was a massive exaggeration

  • No documentary evidence of the "Holocaust"

  • No "smoking gun" evidence / "dearth of hard evidence"

  • No bodies
______________________________________________________________________________
 


 

 

Keep making concessions like that and soon they'll be calling you a "Holocaust Denier" and taking your books off of Amazon -- as they did with "The Bad War," by yours truly (see ad below). Timmy, you have lost the Jewdo match. Next time; know your Miranda Rights and shut that stinking hole in your lying mouth.

 

Full Wall Street Journal Article: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108914879023756502

 

ADDENDUM: OTHER JEWISH 'HOLOCAUST' CONCESSIONS

C.L. Sulzberger

The "gas chambers" claim originated in a report issued by a Soviet Committee just hours after Germany had unconditionally surrendered (and thus, could not rebut).
(here)

Deborah Lipstadt

German documents never refer to a genocide campaign and the story of Jews being used to make soap is a hoax. (here)

Simon Weisenthal

Contrary to Eisenhower's propaganda films, there was no "gas chamber" at the Dachau Concentration Camp. (here)

Elan Steinberg, Peter Novick and others

The testimony of Holocaust survivors is often unreliable. (here)  (here)

The Jewish Virtual Library

The International Red Cross inspected the German POW and concentration camps and gave passing grades (but, of course, remained silent about the Jews). (here)

The New York Times

The '6 Million Dead' was proclaimed before a single camp had been liberated. (here)

The Forward (A Jewish Daily)

3000 babies born at Auschwitz (here)


 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 

How to write to German POLITICAL Prisoners – In jail because of BIG JEWISH LIES!


Write to Sylvia Stolz
Münchener Str. 33
86551 Aichach

Germany

 

 

Write to Ursula Haverbeck at the following address:

JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede
z. Hd. Ursula Haverbeck
Umlostraße 100
33649 Bielefeld
Germany

 

 

Write to Alfred Schaefer:

Alfred Erhard Schaefer
Stadelheimer Str. 12
81549 Munich
Germany

 

 

WRITE TO HORST MAHLER

Justivollzugsanstalt Brandenburg A.D. Havel,
Inhaftierter: Horst Mahler,
Anton-Saefkow-Allee 22,
14772 Brandenburg,
Germany

 

 

 


 
 


 

 

The "Holocaust" of 6 Million Jews

An Immensely Successful and Profitable Hoax!

Whines from a holohoaxster

Take five minutes to complete the Poll to Exile Blacks

 

THIS JEWISH MINISTER ADMITS THAT HOLOCAUST IS A BIG LIE USED BY THE JEWS IN AN ATTEMPT

TO LIMIT CRITICISM OF THE JEWS WHILE THEY INFILTRATE ALL WESTERN NATIONS AND DESTROY

THEM FROM WITHIN WHILE AT THE SAME TIME KILLING THE PALESTINIANS AND STEALING THEIR LAND

 

"What a wretched depravity of sentiment and manners must have prevailed before such corrupt maxims could

have obtained credit! It is impossible to collect from these writings a consistent series of moral Doctrine",

Thomas Jefferson on the depraved state of the Talmud

 

 

 

Creation of the Holocaust Industry

There are organizations which claim to be watchdogs for worldwide Jewry who, with access to the most modern computer equipment, the internet, and access to very secretive Synagogue records, are not able to tell us with even the slightest hint of credibility, just how many Jews there really are. These organizations are also the ones who would be screaming from the rooftops if a Christian or a White man spoke the way they do, or claimed to exist for the sole purpose of being a watchdog for Christians, or for White men, using slurs like "white supremacist", "anti-semite", "homophobe", "misogynist", and "sexist", terms which our great White leaders would gladly hand over the secret to the atom bomb rather than be accused of.

What have we learned from them?

The headline of the March 24, 1933 issue of the Jewish "Daily Express" declared that there were 14 million Jews in the world and that "Judea Declares War on Germany", as if though the 100 million Germans at that time ought to take note even though there were only 192,000 Jews in Germany at that time. Meyers Hand Lexicon on the other hand estimated that there were only 11.6 million Jews in 1921, so this would be a 21% increase in only 12 years at a time when Jews were complaining that Germany was behind and 100% responsible for the persecution and even holocausting of Jews. From 1941 to 1948 the American Jewish Committee, AND Jewish Statistical Bureau, AND Synagogue Council of America, claimed that the population of Jews increased from 15.2 million to 15.8 million, a 4% INCREASE at a time when the worldwide population of Christians plunged 261 million. It was not until 1949 that these Jewish watchdog organizations finally figured out that there had been a "holocaust of 6 million Jews" that they declared that the population was now down to 11.3 million.

Could it be that when world Judea declared war on Germany they were already pumping up their estimate for the number of Jews and the real figure was the 11.6 million from the Meyers Hand Lexicon. If so, this is a mere 3% decrease over a 25 year period during which WE lost 260,000 men, and the worldwide Christian population was down 38%.

But the plot thickens



By 1988, only 40 years later, the figure was up to 18.1 million, a whopping 60% increase, a population growth rate on par with Africa, China, and the fastest growing Muslim nations.

And now, here in the US, we have the Jewish Defense League declaring "The study's credibility became an issue last October after part of its findings on population was released and then withdrawn because some field data were not factored into the 5.2-million population estimate. At the same time, another study by a San Francisco-based group — using a broader definition of who was Jewish — placed the population at 6.7 million. But after reevaluating its methodology and findings, UJC said Wednesday that it stood by the 5.2-million figure."

What does this mean? How come Jewish watchdog organizations themselves can't give us a figure in the midst of peacetime, any more accurately than plus or minus 28%, when they were utterly so certain that 6 million Jews died during the holocaust that to this day they are still prosecuting [read: persecuting] "Nazis" [read: Christians] for killing Jews who never were killed?

By 1994, only 6 years later, these SAME "watchdog organizations" give us the stunning news that AGAIN, in the midst of peacetime, there was a sudden, stunning, inexplicable loss of 4.6 million Jews, a figure far greater then the "real" figures from the holocaust of Jews' figure as presented by the LIARS themselves.

Pew Research (from the infamous organization which proclaimed that their polls proved that 85% of Americans support gay marriage at the SAME time that 92% of the voters in Mississippi OUTLAWED them) "think" that by 2010, the population of Jews in the world in 2000 was 14 million, a modest 4% increase from it's low of 13.5 million in 1994.

With one caveat. They ADMIT that they too are unable to tell us the population of Jews in the US with any precision. If they can't do that, then certainly their worldwide view is questionable, if not DEAD WRONG. If the JDL report is correct, and if the number of Jews in the US is 5.2 million rather than the previous 6.7 million, then even Pew could be OVER-ESTIMATING the worldwide population by 1.5 million, putting them at 12.5 million instead of 14 million.

Jews are homosexuals. Homosexuals not only have an extremely low fertility rate, but they have a very high death rate, not the least of which is their very high AIDS death rate, which has been known to wipe out 80% of the homosexuals in some areas in less than 7 years. The odds are very low that such a homosexual sect could even sustain itself, much less grow at all from the 1921 figure of 11.6 million, much less outpace Arab nations which have seen their populations double in half a century.

As China has discovered, population trends are almost impossible to reverse, even with the most draconian laws which limit Chinese families to one child. Even with that, in less than half a century, their population more than doubled by 2000 to 1.2 billion, and will triple to 1,713 billion by 2040.

As the Japanese have discovered, a declining population is even more difficult to reverse than a rapidly increasing one.


Nicest thing about Lying with Figures: PERMANENT Record of public figures who are LIARS

Israel population 2014 = 8,296,000
Arab citizens of Israel in 2014 = 1,658.000
Non-Arab Christians in Israel = 366,000
Putative Jewish population = 6,272,000
Russians or Ethiopians pretending to be Jews = 3,136,000
Actual Jews = 3,136,000

Many Jews in Israel have reported to us that their immigrants are mostly "Russians pretending to be Jews", or Ethiopians who have even less Jewish blood. Since these expert Israeli LIARS have been so "successful" at creating a TWENTY BILLION DOLLARS holocaust industry out of whole cloth, we must not be at all surprised to discover that half of the Jewish population of "Israel" of 6,272,000 are not Jews, putting the current worldwide figure at 12,500,000 minus 3,136,000, or 9,364,000.  This is a decrease since 1921 of 2,236,000 Jews, or 5.2%, which is .05% per year.

"THIS PUBLICATION IS PROVIDED BY THE NORTH AMERICAN JEWISH DATA BANK WITH PERMISSION FROM THE STUDY AUTHORS", shows the change in population between 2000 and 2006 in the Congressional Districts with the most Jews:

Florida 19th Congressional District 273,000 to 227,000, a loss of 46,000 Jews
California 29th, 189,000 to 178,000, a loss of 11,000 Jews
New York 5th, 120,000 to 96,000, a loss of 24,000 Jews
New York 14th, 128,000 to 124,000, a loss of 4,000 Jews
Florida 22nd, 103,125 to 75,125, a loss of 28,000 Jews
Florida 20th, from 101,000 to 128,000, a GAIN of 27,000 Jews
New York 18th, from 100,000 to 112,000, a GAIN of 12,000 Jews
California 26th,from 70,000 to 64,000, a loss of 6,000 Jews
Maryland 3rd, from 71,000 to 62,000, a loss of 9,000 Jews
Massachusetts 4th, 68,000 to 71,000, a gain of 3,000 Jews
New Jersey 12th, 58,000 to 54,000, a loss of 4,000 Jews
Pennsylvania 13th, from 53,000 to 63,000, a gain of 10,000 Jews
Pennsylvania 3rd, 58,000 to unknown, a potential loss of 58,000 Jews
New York 10th, 60,000 to 69,000, a gain of 9,000 Jews
California 8th, unknown to 54,000, either a loss or a gain of jews
Ohio 11th, 54,000 to 56,000, a gain of 2,000 Jews
Illinois 9th, 73,000 to 74,000, a gain of 1,000 Jews

Net Loss = 64,000

In only 6 years, in the US Congressional Districts with the most Jews, and the most Jewish representation, with a total Jewish population of 2,922,000 Jews (about half the US population of Jews), the population of Jews decreased 2.2%, or 0.37% per year.

 

 

 

The REAL holocaust

The historic growth rate of the Christian population of 1.5% per year means that the 682,400,000 Christians in the world in 1933 would have been 853,158,362 by 1948.  Instead, mostly due to W.W.II, the actual population was 592,406,542, a loss of 260,751,820 Christians.  Even at a more conservative growth rate of Christians of 1% per year, there were 199,838,673 fewer Christians in 1948 than there would have been without W.W.II.

What about the worldwide population of jews?  Per  figures from FOUR different jewish sources: 1) The American Jewish Committee, Bureau of the Synagogue Council, 2) Judaica Encyclopedia, 3) The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, and 4) The jews, their History, Culture, and Religion, it INCREASED by 584,549 jews between 1941 and 1948!

"The Jewish figures in the table above are based in part on revised estimates made in 1923 by Dr. H. S. Linfield of the Bureau of Jewish Social Research of New York City.  His total for the Jews of the world is 15,500,000. 

"He credits 3,600,000 Jews to the United States, over 126,000 to Canada; 100,000 to Argentina; 3,500,000 to Poland; 3,130,000 to Russia in Europe; 84,000 to Palestine; 142,000 to Syria, Mesopotamia, and Arabia; 377,000 in Asia including the Near East and including, also, 27,000 in India, China, and Japan.

"Dr. Linfield found that nearly 800,000 Jews live under the British flag, while 500,000 are in France or the French dependencies along the Mediterranean Sea.  He estimated that 295,000 Jews live in Great Britain and Northern Ireland; 213,000 in the British dominions--Australia, Canada, Irish Free State, New Zealand and the Union of South Africa--and 335,000 in Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and Syria.

"In Africa, according to Dr. Linfield's compilation, nearly 400,000 Jews live in the Mohammedan Arabic-speaking countries of the north, contributing 1.4 percent of the population.  Four percent of the white population of the Union of South Africa or about 50,000, are Jews, while there are 50,000 in Abyssinia.

"The Jews in New York City he puts at 1,643,000, or 29 percent of the total population.

"The American Jewish Year Book for 1923-23 estimates the Jews in Europe at 10,536,735."

 

Many White men have been harassed, fired, imprisoned, tortured, persecuted, prosecuted, and murdered for simply speaking the truths you will read in the following statistical analysis of the FACTS which are right at the fingertips of 295 million Americans and a billion Whites worldwide.   The REAL criminals, the ones who must now pay reparations to the WHITE men who simply spoke the truth, are the jews who used OUR own laws against our OWN people, simply to enrich themselves in a multi-billion holocaust industry of unfathomable proportions.   The jews must also pay reparations for the many Christians who died at the hands of jews like Dylan Klebold who killed in retribution for a holocaust that never was.

expressyourself.jpg (1388 bytes)

The Missing Holocaust

 

"I've checked out Churchill's Second World War and the statement
is quite correct” not a single mention of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a
'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war.

This is astonishing.  How can it be explained?

Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six
volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and
de Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.  In this
mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including
the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find
no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews,
or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war."

Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus, University of Ulster, December 5, 2005

 

 

    GREAT article from National Vanguard on the population of jews in Germany.
bullet bullet Eisenhower coins the phrase "holocaust" a holocaust of Christians, not jews!.
bullet bullet NEWS FLASH JUNE 8, 2007--RED CROSS CONFIRMS ONLY 271,301 "HOLOCAUST" DEATHS.
bullet bullet A GREAT private video debunking the Auschwitz "death" camp "theory", from a jew.

 

holocaustdenial.png (57913 bytes)

NEWS FLASH!--FIVE MILLION JEWS DISAPPEAR

BETWEEN 1988 AND 2000, according to JEW sources, THE WORLDWIDE SUPPLY OF JEWS PLUNGED FROM 18.1 TO 13.2.   FINALLY, JEWS HAVE PROOF OF A HOLOCAUST!  But there was no war.  The Nazis are long gone.  In the midst of peacetime, the jews LOST 4.9 million people, and still haven't been able to locate them.   Could it be that they need a war in Iraq to increase the jew population back to 18 million?  On top of that, the 2000 figure for jews in the world included 6.7 million in the US when in fact there may have been only 5.2 million.  The jews in the US, with all the modern techniques for counting populations and handling membership lists, a first class mail delivery system, no war or insurrection or gas ovens or mass graves, were unable to pin down their population to within 1.5 million jews--an error of 29%!

"The study's credibility became an issue last October [1999] after part of its findings on population was released and then withdrawn because some field data were not factored into the 5.2-million population estimate. At the same time, another study by a San Francisco-based group — using a broader definition of who was Jewish — placed the population at 6.7 million. But after reevaluating its methodology and findings, UJC said Wednesday that it stood by the 5.2-million figure."

If so, this means the REAL decrease in the world Jewish population was 6.4 million, or a whopping 35% decrease in a mere 12 years, from 18.1 to 11.7 million?

BUT WAIT

At a time when this worldwide watchdog for jews told us that there were only 13.2 million jews in the world, they thought that 6.7 million of them were in the US.  And now a DIFFERENT worldwide watchdog for jews "stood by the 5.2-million figure", which means their 13.2 million figure was TOO HIGH--by 1.5 million jews.  And THAT means that instead of there being 13.2 million jews in the world in 2000, there were only 11.7 million.  And THAT means that the population of jews between 1988 and 2000 plunged 6.3 million (a perfect mathematical figure for jews).  Just to get back to the population of 1988, a mere 12 years earlier, would require a WHOPPING 54% increase in their population, something NO race, particularly jews, have EVER done. 

These folks, who didn't have the brains to use modern techniques for estimating their own population to within an accuracy of 6.4 million jews, during peacetime, are the very same folks who claimed that they knew precisely, for certain, without ANY doubt, with such certitude that they had hundreds or thousands of people EXECUTED for denying it, that 6 million jews were missing during Nazi persecution,  world war, massive jew migration, and the death or disappearance of 264 million CHRISTIANS!

Why are these worldwide watchdog for jews organizations not screaming from the rooftops that those responsible for this even LARGER, and certainly more recent and CREDIBLE holocaust of jews be held to account as loudly and vociferously and chronically as they pursued John Demjanjuk?

Scripture Commands Us to Punish False Accusers Even More Severely Than The Accused

Clearly these above facts prove beyond the shadow of all doubt that John Demjanjuk, who was falsely accused, tormented by jews for three decades, falsely imprisoned in Israel for six years, sentenced to five more years in Germany at the ripe old age of 91, could not possibly have been guilty of the death of even ONE jew.

Scripture commands us to punish false accusers even more severely than those who they falsely accused were, or are going to be without proper justice, punished.

Impossible, says Amhadineajad, who claims the holocaust was a "myth"!amhadinejad.jpg (10970 bytes)

 

Old Almanacs Never Lie

They just expose jew LIES like the rotten fish they are

584,549 MORE jews in 1949 than in 1940

Meyers Handlexicon, Germany 1921 -- 11,600,000

World Almanac, 1925, pg. 752 -- 15,630,000, "In 1925 a census of Palestine gave a total of 115,151 Jews"

World Almanac, 1929, pg. 727 -- 15,630,000

National Council of Churches 1930 -- 15,600 ,000

March 24, 1933, jewish newspaper Daily Express -- 14,000,000 jews worldwide

World Almanac, 1933, pg. 419 -- 15,316,359, ["The estimate for Jews in the above table is for 1933, and is by the American Jewish Committee"

World Almanac, 1936, pg. 748 -- world jewish population = 15,753,633

World Almanac, 1938, pg. 510 -- world jewish population = 15,748,091, with 240,000 in Germany

American Jewish Committee Bureau of the Synagogue Council, 1939 -- 15,600,000

World Almanac, 1940, pg. 129: World Jewish Population -- 15,319,359

World Almanac, 1941, pg. 510: World Jewish Population -- 15,748,091

World Almanac, 1942, pg. 849: World Jewish Population -- 15,192,089 ("Jews include Jews by race not necessarily by religion")

World Almanac USA, 1947, pg. 748: World Jewish Population -- 15,690,000

World Almanac, 1949, pg. 289: World Jewish Population -- 15,713,638

Statistical Handbook of Council of Churches USA 1951 -- 15,300,000

Encyclopedia Britannica's 1955 Book of the Year -- 11,627,450, "Jewish figures include all Jews whether members of a synagogue or not"

World Almanac, US News & World Report, 1983 population of jews -- 16,820,850

World Almanac, 1996, pg. 646: World Jewish Population -- 14,117,000

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1989: World Jewish Population --18,080,000

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 2001: World Jewish Population -- 13,200,000

 

Nazis Evacuate Two Million jews from German Held Territory

Total World Population of jews

            America         Europe         Asia             Africa         Oceania    Total

1938    5,343,319     8,939,608    839,809    598,339     27,016    15,748,091

1948    5,198,219     9,372,666   572,930    542,869     26,954    15,763,638

Diff         -145,100    +433,058     -266,879    -55,470    -9,938         +15,547

The Wandering jew--from EIGHT million to 30,000 dead jews

holocaust4.gif (15137 bytes)holocaust5.gif (28132 bytes)

Above left: This was the plaque on display at the Auschwitz camp until 1989: note the "4 million" victims.

Above right: This is the plaque currently on display at Auschwitz (2002) - note the suddenly reduced number

of victims to 1.5 million - a casual reduction in the number of deaths by 2.5 million which never appeared in the American "free press"

Four million people suffered and died here at the hands of the Nazi murderers between the years of 1940 and 1945 Forever let this place be a cry of despair and a warning to humanity where the Nazis murdered about one and a half million men, women, and children, mainly jews from various countries of Europe, Auschwitz-Birkenam, 1940-1945

auschwitz.gif (30593 bytes)

CRYING "WOLF" ONCE TOO OFTEN

Jews complained about a holocaust in 1919! "Six million men and women are dying ... eight hundred thousand children cry for bread. And this fate is upon them through no fault of their own, ... but through the awful tyranny of war and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood. In this threatened holocaust of human life ..." --The American Hebrew (New York, issue 582 of October 31, 1919) The Talmud also has atrocity claims which demonstrate the Jewish mentality: Gittin 57b claims that four billion Jews were killed by the Romans in the city of Bethar. Gittin 58a claims that 16 million Jewish children were wrapped in scrolls and burned alive by the Romans.

Actual Auschwitz records released by Russia reduce that figure to 30,000 jews

 

HAPPY, SMILING, CHRISTIAN FACES released from Dachau!

Why did "Judea declare war on Germany" in 1933.

Why should "Holocaust denial" be a crime?

Yet one more jew LIE exposed:  Rumbula.

Why are so many holocaust stories being exposed as frauds?

Why was Ernst Zundel imprisoned for telling the TRUTH?

Dr. E. R. Fields analyzes the known facts.

Holocaust is a "death by fire".

Torturing Rudolph Hoess to get at the "truth", jew style.

The absurdity of the Zyklon-B claims.

How to start a holocaust.

Many  RED CROSS recipients were jews.

Why did the US government keep the Nazi Master Plan to destroy Christian churches classified for half a century

Why did the number of dead jews mysteriously decrease from 8 million to 74,000 with no media fanfare?

Why did jews worldwide not celebrate the sudden reappearance of 7,926,000 supposedly holocausted jews?

Why would Semen Wiesenthal blacklist supporters of the Second Amendment as "hate sites"?

Why did jew Dyland Klebold kill dozens of "fellow" Littleton High School students as revenge for the "holocaust" that never was, a gift that keeps on giving?

Is Professor Butz really a "holocaust denier"?

Why is "White only" a "venomous message" to a jew?

horizontal rule

 

Play "Hide the jew in Auschwitz"

Win $6 trillion, personally guaranteed by financial jew wizard Alan Greenspan who made 18 trillion dollars disappear from our economy without raising a SINGLE eyebrow in Congress

Dec. 31, 1945 French Research Dept. for Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal 8,000,000
April 20, 1978 Le Monde (One of Frances largest newspapers) 5,000,000
Jan. 23, 1995 Die Welt (One of Germanys largest newspapers) 5,000,000
April 20, 1989 Kogon, Der-SS-Staat (Expert on III Reich) 4,500,000
Oct. 1, 1946 International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg document number 008-USSR 4,000,000
Nov. 24, 1989 Chief Prosecutor Majorowsky, Wuppertal File No. (12 js 1037/89) 4,000,000
July 26, 1990 Germany's largest Jewish Weekly, "Allgemeine J�dische Wochenzeitung" 4,000,000
Dec. 08, 1993 ZDF, Germany's second largest T.V. network 4,000,000
Jan. 25, 1995 German paper "Wetzlaer Neue Zeitung" 4,000,000
Oct. 1, 1946 International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg document number 3868-PS 3,000,000
Jan. 1, 1995 German magazine "Damals" (Magazine about history) 3,000,000
July 18, 1990 The Peninsula Times Tribune, San Fransisco (USA) 2,000,000
July 25, 1990 German newspaper Hamburger Adendblatt 2,000,000
Jan. 27, 1995 German newspaper "Die Welt" 2,000,000
June 11, 1992 Germany's largest Jewish Weekly, "Allgemeine J�dische Wochenzeitung" 1,500,000
Oct. 8, 1993 ZDF, Germany's second largest T.V. network 1,500,000
Jan. 23, 1995 German newspaper "Die Welt" 1,500,000
Sept. 1, 1989 French newspaper "Le Monde" 1,433,000
Feb. 2, 1995 Large German weekly magazine "Bunte" 1,400,000
Jan. 22, 1995 German newspaper "Welt am Sonntag" 1,200,000
Jan. 27, 1995 German newspaper "Die Welt" 1,100,000
Dec. 21, 1994 Institute for Contempory History, Semi-official organ of the German State 1,000,000
Dec. 31, 1989 Jean-Claude Pressac's book "Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chamber" 928,000
Sept. 27, 1993 German newspaper "Die Welt" 800,000
Jan. 22, 1995 German newspaper "Welt am Sonntag" 750,000
May 1, 1994 Focus newsmagazine. Over 2 million circulation 700,000
Jan. 23, 1995 German newspaper "Die Welt" 700,000
Jan. 31, 1994 Jean-Claude Pressac's book "The Auschwitz Crematorium" 470,000
Jan. 8, 1948 Allied censored post-war German News Reels (Wochenschau Nr. 137) 300,000
Jan. 6, 1990 Frankfurter Rundschau 74,000
May 31, 1995 Former Director of the Institute for Military History at Freiburg, Hoffmann in his book "Stalins war of Destruction"--74,000 PEOPLE, of whom "many were jews" 74,000
Jan. 10, 2002 Pre-WWII vs post-WWII Almanacs: an worldwide increase of 584,549 jews -584,549

 

WORLDWIDE ALMANACS DISPUTE JEW LIES

The following data from the 1929, 1942, 1947, and 1963 editions of The World Almanac and Book of Facts published by the New York World Telegram, on pages 727, 849, 748, and 441, respectively, and from the 1996 edition published by Funk & Wagnalls, pg. 646, proves that six million Jews did not die in Nazi concentration camps.  While it's true that the number of Jews in Europe decreased from 10 to 9.4 million between 1928 and 1941, the entire population of Jews in rest of the world also decreased, and much of that was before they could have been exterminated in camps.   All world almanacs show that during WWII the number of Jews in Europe remained flat, but Britannica Book of the Year reports that the number of Jews in the world increased by 600,000, or 4% .  How could 6 million Jews (40% of all Jews and 64% of those in Europe) have died in the Holocaust if their worldwide population increased by 4%?

 

show me da holocaust

 

DID CHRISTIANS BECOME JEWS TO GET WAR REPARATIONS?

A possible explanation is that 584,549 jews disappeared, and then reappeared AFTER the "holocaust" in order to qualify for "war reparations" against a nation neither jews nor Israel ever took up arms against.  In other words, Jews who didn't admit to being Jews during the war suddenly did admit to being Jews when the money was being handed out.

Why don't we STOP SUBSIDIZING THE HOLOCAUST INDUSTRY?

 

show me da holocaust

 

307 DEAD CHRISTIANS FOR EACH DEAD JEW

Why do reputable references like Encyclopedia Britannica report that there 447,274 MORE jews in 1948, AFTER the war, than there were in 1933, BEFORE the war?  why were there 264 million FEWER Christians in the world in 1948 than there would have been without WWII (an event which reduced Europe's total population by more than 25%)?  If the 1942 and 1949 World Almanacs are correct (that there were 15.2 million jews in the world in 1941 and 15.75 million in 1948), and if the natural increase of jews was an unprecedented [unprecedented particularly for jews] rate of 1.5% per year for six years, then in 1947 there would have been 16.6 million jews, 850,000 more than reported by these reputable, unbiased  references.

Many jews claim that WWII was all about "saving jews from the Nazis".  If so, then we have the legitimate right to ask how many Christians must be sacrificed for each jew saved, particularly when jew Hitler's fruits were 307 dead Christians for each dead jew.

 

World Population of jews in Millions--no holocaust of jews 

Year

North America

South America

Europe

Rest of World

World Total

Source

1800

 

 

 

 

2.5

 jews

1840

 

 

 

 

3.95

 jews

1880

 

 

 

 

7.74

 jews

1900

 

 

 

 

11

 jews

1914

 

 

 

 

13.5

 jews

1921

2.97

0.0742

7.422

1.14

11.6

Meyers Hand Lexicon, Germany

1924

3.7

0.11

10

1.49

15.3

Dr. H.S. Linfield, Jewish Social Research, NYC

1925

4

0.1

10

1.53

15.63

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1925

1928

4.4

0.3

9.5

1.1

15.3

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1928,   pg. 288

1928

4

0.2

10

1.4

15.6

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1929

1929

4

0.1

10

1.53

15.63

1929 World Almanac & Book of Facts, American Heritage Press, pg. 443

1930

4

0.2

10

1.4

15.6

National Council of Churches, pg. 752 World Alm

1933

4.38

0.29

9.49

1.15

15.31

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1934

1933

 

 

 

 

14

Daily Express, March 24, 1933, front page headline "Judea Declares War on Germany"

1938

 

 

 

 

15.75

World Almanac, 1941, pg. 510

1939

 

 

 

 

15.6

American Jewish Committee, Bureau of the Synagogue Council

1940

 

 

 

 

15.29

Jewish Statistical Brueau, Dr. H.S. Linfield, AND the American Jewish Committee

1941

4.4

0.03

9.4

1.37

15.2

World Almanac & Book of Facts,1942

1946

5

0.1

9.4

1.3

15.69

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1947, pg. 488, American Jewish Committee, AND Jewish Statistical Bureau, AND Synagogue Council of America

1947

 

 

 

 

15.69

World Almanac USA 1947, pg. 219, American Jewish Committee, AND Jewish Statistical Bureau, AND Synagogue Council of America

1948

4.97

0.23

9.37

1.18

15.75

World Almanac, 1949, pg. 289

1949

5.2

0.6

3.9

1.6

11.3

World Almanac USA 1949, pg. 204, American Jewish Committee, AND Jewish Statistical Bureau, AND Synagogue Council of America

1950

5.2

0.6

3.8

1.8

11.4

World Almanac USA 1951, pg. 473, American Jewish Committee, AND Jewish Statistical Bureau, AND Synagogue Council of America

1955

5.22

0.64

3.42

2.35

11.63

World Almanac & Book of Facts,1956

1963

5.8

0.6

3.8

2.7

12.9

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1964

1975

6.7

0.8

3.5

3.4

14.4

Encyclopedia Britannica, 1976 Book of the Year

1983

7.3

0.7

4.5

4.1

16.8

1984 World Almanac, US News & World Report, Pg. 351

1986         16.9 World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1986, pg. 341
1987         17.98 World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1987, pg. 591

1988

8.08

0.99

1.48

7.53

18.08

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1988, pg. 591

1994

5.9

0.5

1.8

5.3

13.5

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1995

1996

5.58

1.1356

2.74

4.63

14.1

World Almanac, 1996, pg. 646

1997

5.9

1.2

2.9

4.9

14.9

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1999, pg. 687

2000

 

 

 

 

13.2

World Almanac & Book of Facts, 2001

2010 dunno?   1.4   14.0 Pew Research,OR 12.5 million

 

Also see these detailed statistics and graphs from JEWISH sources themselves, which DENY the holocaust!

261 MILLION DEAD CHRISTIANS IN EUROPE AND RUSSIA

W.W.II reduced the total population of all of Europe by more than 25% or 150 million, from 542 million in 1940 to 392 million in 1950.  If the Jewish population in Europe alone had decreased by a similar 25%, or 2.5 million jews, there would have been only 12.8 million Jews worldwide in 1946.  If the 1946 almanac is correct, then there were 3 million more Jews than that in 1946 and even more in 1950.  This would mean that the Jewish population increased at the same time that the European and Christian populations were decimated.  And that suggests that the Nazis did a better job of protecting Jews than of protecting Christians, or, conversely, that it was Christians and not jews who the Nazis persecuted.  There were undoubtedly Jews who were treated unfairly during W.W.II, because war is that way.  But if this data doesn't suggest that Nazis treated Jews much more fairly than they treated Christians and other Europeans, it definitely proves that Jews died at a much lower rate than Christians. 

If fewer than 2.5 million Jews died during W.W.II, then they died at a rate lower than all of the rest of Europe.  BUT THERE WERE 584,549 MORE JEWS AFTER W.W.II THAN BEFORE.

Even by 1990, the population of Europe of 501 million was still 7% lower than it was in 1940.  But the worldwide population of jews in 1988 was 18.08 million, 85% higher than the 9.8 million whom the holocaust organizers claimed were alive in 1946, and 55% higher than the 11.63 million figure in the 1955 Almanac.

Isn't it strange that Americans are so consumed with images of millions of Jews dying in Nazi concentration camps that they are oblivious to 216 million Christians who died?  Nobody, not even jews, disputes that less than half the population of concentration camps were jews.  Who were the other half?   Christians.  Even if you accepted the Holocaust story in its entirety as historical fact, this is still 25 times as many Christians as Jews who died.  Many of these Christians died in the course of defending their homes and  homelands, rather than in concentration camps where Jews were herded after they successfully lobbied for and got gun control laws in pre-war Germany, just as they're now doing in the US.

NAZIS COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE CAUSED A FORTY PERCENT REDUCTION IN JEWS

Even if you rejected the data from the world almanacs, it's still impossible that Nazis caused a 40% instant reduction in the number of Jews worldwide.  To accept that 6 million of 15.2 million Jews worldwide died in a Holocaust would require you to believe that the Jewish population was only 9.2 million in 1946, which would require you to believe that it suddenly increased by an unprecedented 1.9% per year after W.W.II to 12.9 million by 1963.  That would require you to believe that the downward trend in the Jewish population prior to W.W.II suddenly changed to a dramatically increasing trend.  For what reason would you believe that such a trend could change so dramatically?  The population of Jews in Europe did decrease dramatically, from 10 million in 1928 to 1.8 million in 1994, but 7.6 million of that 8.2 million decrease was after the war which means that this was the result of emigration rather than extermination.  How could the worldwide population of Jews increase when there were so many pressures on Jews to leave Europe?   And why did we allow so many of them to come to North America?

BY THEIR OWN WORDS, THE REAL "JEWISH HOLOCAUST" WAS BEFORE W.W.II

The worldwide population of Jews did decrease by 17% between 1946 and 1994, the same 0.2% per year rate that it had been decreasing during the non-war years between 1928 and 1941, before the Holocaust.  But this was after the alleged Holocaust.  Even if the 1941 estimate of 15.2 million Jews worldwide had not taken into account those who died at the hands of the Nazis, this figure would not have been much different.  There were only 26,000 Jews in concentration camps in 1938, and even if they were all exterminated (which we have no evidence that they were), there still would have been 15.2 million Jews in the world in 1941.  If the downward trend of the total Jewish population which occurred before the Holocaust had just continued at the same rate, then there would have been 13.5 million Jews in the world in 1994--exactly the number in the almanac.  In other words, this is solid statistical evidence that the worldwide population of Jews was known to have been decreasing before the world ever heard of the term "jewish holocaust", now called "shoa".   It is not surprising that the reduction in the Jewish population had already begun before the Holocaust hoax, considering that the heinous nature of the Talmud is now known by so many more people around the world. 

show me da holocaust

 

THE SHOCK OF REALITY

Realizing that so many Americans have been so seriously misled by such a well calculated hoax requires a careful reexamination of our entire view of the world.   Willie Martin provides one view, but that view shocks the senses so severely that you need some way to decompress.   He provides more details than are available in most simple almanacs, which makes his estimates more accurate, but it also makes them harder to verify.  If we relied solely on the large numbers in the almanacs, a few hundred thousand Jews could have died in Nazi concentration camps without our knowing about it.  Even so, it's impossible that half a million additional Jews died in the camps, much less 6 million.   The almanacs are thus sufficient to confirm his thesis.

SOCIAL COSTS OF THIS HOAX

Because of this colossal hoax, Americans failed to heed the warnings of our Forefathers and of the Holy Bible and let our guard down.   We permitted Jews to become judges and politicians without even requiring them to place their hand on the Holy Bible and swear before God to uphold the US Constitution, judges who can take the Kol Nidre oath the very next day and nullify all such oaths and promises.   We have no idea now how many of them uphold the Talmud instead of our founding principles.  We sent $130 billion to Israel, $30,000 per man, woman, and child in Israel, even though they have money in the bank and we are broke.   We encouraged reparations from Germany to the Jews by the tens of billions of dollars when it might be the German people themselves who should be receiving reparations from these expert worldwide LIARS. 

LOSS OF FREE SPEECH

The worst ill-effect of this colossal hoax is the problem it caused with free speech in the US.  We can't criticize or even talk about Jews because of the inbred fear that a critical analysis of the facts will somehow instantly subject them to another Holocaust and kill 6 million more of them.  The belief by many Americans that the Holocaust was such a heinous event subjects those who dare to compare the statistics to the facts to ridicule, racial slurs, and hate speech of all kinds.  It is easy for the critics to accuse anyone who would dare to question the mantra of being "anti-semitic", "neo-nazis", and "hateful", and not so easy to explain that you don't "hate" Jews just because they are colossal LIARS.   Those who sling such mantra will always believe that being more concerned that 46 million of your fellow Christians died than that some unspecified but small percentage of Jews died are "anti-semitic".  The Jewish-controlled mainstream media will never present the above facts to the American public and thus expose the hypocrisy of this slur.  Thus, the number of Americans willing to speak up and defend their Christian heritage is pitifully small.

horizontal rule

OTHER REFERENCES

bullet bullet Why it is impossible to gas 6 million Jews http://www.codoh.com/gcgv/gcgvself.html
bullet bullet Why Pope Pius XII did not speak up against exterminations of Jews http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v01/v01p--5_Butz.html
bullet bullet Jew Norman Finkelstein rejects the 6 million figure.
bullet bullet David Irving explores the FACTS for a change http://www.revisionism.com/index2.html
bullet bullet Why ninety percent of Lousianians never heard of the Holocaust http://metalab.unc.edu/uncpress/chapters/p/powell_troubled_chapter.html
bullet bullet Why it is ILLEGAL in France, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Belgium, Italy, Sweden and Israel to even question the Holocaust http://www.skeptic.com/02.4.miele-holocaust.html
bullet bullet Why the promoters of the Holocaust can't present a reasoned argument http://www.bethune.w-3productions.com/documents/onthemove.html
bullet bullet Links to historical reviews http://vho.org/Links.html
bullet bullet Organizations which object to Zionist control http://www.jewwatch.com/
bullet bullet The mythology of Bergen-Belsen http://patriot.dk/Belsen.html
bullet bullet Paul Rassinier, "holocaust survivor", denies the Holocaust and claimed more Christians than Jews died in Auschwitz http://www.bnp.net/cole.html
bullet bullet Universities can't mention that Allied bombing killed far more people than died in the concentration camps http://www.zundelsite.org/english/basic_articles/open_debate.html
bullet bullet Why American libraries banned "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century" http://www.jubilee-newspaper.com/news_per_82.htm
bullet bullet Stormfront http://www.stormfront.org/links.htm
bullet bullet Fred A. Leuchter and Ernst Z�ndel TRIED for questioning the Holocaust hoax http://www.abbc.com/islam/english/revision/leuch2_0.htm
bullet bullet The Institute for Historical Review: "FBI determined the Jewish Defense League to be the second most active terrorist group in the US" http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/fewfacts.html
bullet bullet Holocaust: violation of the First Amendment
bullet bullet What Jews mean by "tolerance".
bullet bullet Herman Otten on the holocaust industry.
bullet bullet ADL: the definition of hypocrisy.
bullet bullet Jewish Programming.
bullet bullet Ground Penetrating Radar scan of Treblinka exposes massive lie http://www.codoh.org/bbs/messages/2407.html
bullet bullet Dr. Fredrick Toben, an Australian scholar and educator, is free after seven months in German prison for having disputed Holocaust extermination allegations http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v18/v18n4p-2_Toben.html
bullet bullet The ADL, a KNOWN terrorist organization, convinces Kathleen McEvoy to shut down the Adelaide Institute under "terrestrial law" http://www.codoh.com/newsdesk/960706.HTML

 

The following misinformation is from Infoplease Almanac http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001286.html

The Holocaust (1933–1945)

“Holocaust” is the term describing the Nazi annihilation of about 6 million Jews (two thirds of the pre-World War II European Jewish population), including 4,500,000 from Russia, Poland, and the Baltic; 750,000 from Hungary and Romania; 290,000 from Germany and Austria; 105,000 from The Netherlands; 90,000 from France; 54,000 from Greece.

The Holocaust was unique in its being genocide—the systematic destruction of a people solely because of religion, race, ethnicity, nationality, or sexual preference—on an unmatched scale. Along with the Jews, another 9 to 10 million people—Gypsies, Slavs (Poles, Ukrainians, and Belarussians), homosexuals, and the disabled—were exterminated.

1933 Hitler named German Chancellor (Jan.). Dachau, first concentration camp, established (March). Boycotts against Jews begin (April).

1935 Anti-Semitic Nuremberg Laws passed by Reichstag; Jews lose citizenship and civil rights (Sept.).

 

1937 Buchenwald concentration camp opens (July).
 
1938 Extension of anti-Semitic laws to Austria after annexation (March). Kristallnacht (Night of Broken Glass)—anti-Semitic riots and destruction of Jewish institutions in Germany and Austria (Nov. 9). 26,000 Jews sent to concentration camps; Jewish children expelled from schools (Nov. 9-10). Expropriation of Jewish property and businesses (Dec.).
 
1940 As war continues, Einsatzgruppen (mobile killing squads) follow German army into conquered lands, rounding up and massacring Jews and other “undesirables.”
 
1941 Goering instructs Heydrich to carry out the “final solution to the Jewish question” (July 31). Deportation of German Jews begins; massacres of Jews in Odessa and Kiev (Nov.); and in Riga and Vilna (Dec.).
 
1942 Mass killings using Zyklon-B begin at Auschwitz-Birkenau (Jan.). Nazi leaders attend Wannsee Conference to coordinate the “final solution” (Jan. 20). 100,000 Jews from Warsaw Ghetto deported to Treblinka death camp (July).
 
1943 Warsaw Ghetto uprisings (Jan. and April); Ghetto exterminated (May).
 
1944 476,000 Hungarian Jews sent to Auschwitz (May-June). D-day (June 6). Soviet Army liberates Maidanek death camp (July). Nazis try to hide evidence of death camps (Nov.).
 
1945 As Allies advance, Nazis force concentration camp inmates on death marches. Americans liberate Buchenwald and British liberate Bergen-Belsen camps (April). Nuremberg War Crimes Trial (Nov. 1945 to Oct. 1946).

Birdman Bryant 

bullet bullet More details
bullet bullet

Direct From the Birdman http://www.thebirdman.org/   


World Almanac, 1940, pg. 129: World Jewish Population- 15,319,359
World Almanac, 1949, pg. 289: World Jewish Population- 15,713,638
World Almanac, 1996, pg. 646: World Jewish Population- 14,117,000


or


Meyers Handlexicon, Germany 1921 - 11,600,000
National Council of Churches 1930 - 15,600 ,000
American Jewish Committee, Bureau of the Synagogue Council, 1939 - 15,600,000
World Almanac USA 1947 - 15,690,000
Statistical Handbook of Council of Churches USA 1951 - 15,300,000
 

"According to the census of June 16, 1933, the Jewish population of Germany, including the Saar region (which at that time was still under the administration of the League of Nations), was approximately 505,000 people".

"Fourteen million Jews dispersed throughout the world have banded together as one man to declare war on the German persecutors of their co-religionists.   Sectional differences and antagonisms have been submerged in one common aim--to stand by the 600,000 Jews of Germany who are terrorised by Hitlerist anti-semitism, and to compel Fascist Germany to end its campaign of violence and suppression directed against its Jewish Minority", front page, the jewish "Daily Express", March 24, 1933.

Fourteen MILLION jews in 1933?  That's almost TWO MILLION LESS than all jew publications reported AFTER World War II.

600 THOUSAND jews in Germany in 1933?  That total figure is less than a TENTH of what the jews claim Hitler killed.

 

Judgment Day Perspectives Newsletter, Volume 2, #6

The Thirty-Nine Lashes Against the Hoaxacaust

By Eli James

The following are 39 good reasons why you should not believe in the biggest myth of the Twentieth Century:

1.) Consider the source. All of the “evidence” presented at the Nuremberg trials came from two sources: Communists and Zionists. Neither of these groups could be considered impartial. All communists are liars; and all Zionists are tyrants who believe that critics of Zionism should have no public say. Many of these people, such as Leon Trotsky and David Ben-Gurion, were both communists and Zionists! Since the myth-makers cannot prove their contentions in an open, public, discussion, the only choice they have is to quash dissent by making “questioning the holocaust” a crime in every country in the world, except the USA, where freedom of speech is hanging by a thread.

2.) Zyklon B delousing gas was just that. In the days of World War II, typhus was a scourge which was transmitted by fleas and lice. Xyklon B was the treatment given to all prison internees, no matter what their religious background, because typhus had to be controlled. The claim that it was used to poison people is absurd because it was highly flammable. To use it for the purposes described by the hoaxers would have put all of the camp facilities at risk of fire and explosion. Signed confessions, extracted by Jewish and communist interrogators, say that the dead bodies, after death by gassing, were extracted by workers who were “drinking and smoking.” Rudolph Hoess signed such a document, which was written for him. Hmm. Would you turn the gas on in your oven without lighting it, wait a while, and then walk into the room with a lit cigarette in your mouth? Obviously, the hoaxers had little technical knowledge when they made their ridiculous claims. In addition, the manufacturer of Zyklon B gas stated that, due to the adhesive qualities of the gas, it would require a 24-hour ventilation period before anyone could safely enter a room which had been used for such a purpose.

In addition, shaving heads was necessary in order to remove the breeding grounds of the lice.

3.) Killing six million people and disposing of their bodies is no small order for an army trying to conduct a war. Can you imagine the waste of fuel and other resources that would otherwise go to the war effort? Of the thousands of reconnaissance photos available from World War II, why are there no pictures of the fuel tanker convoys which would be needed to deliver the fuel for the crematoria? Why are there no pictures of the smokestacks, which were supposedly belching smoke day and night? The reality is that the Germans could hardly afford to waste fuel for such a purpose. Everyone agrees that the Germans kept tremendous records for efficiency and documentation purposes. Where are the records of these fuel shipments?

Think, think, think, you gullible Christian! The Zionists are laughing at you!

4.) Auschwitz, one of the largest concentration camps, had only about twenty ovens in its crematory. The crematoria at the various concentration camps were very crude and required lots of fuel and many hours to consume one body. One researcher has calculated that, given the exact number of ovens available and hours per body, the ovens would have to be going day and night from the War’s beginning until 1975 before that many bodies could be cremated. Are you beginning to comprehend the absurdity of such a claim? Yet, it is repeated by the Zionist-dominated bias machine on an almost daily basis, and it is force-fed to our school children at taxpayer expense and Zionist urging.

5.) If the bodies were not cremated as many hoaxers suggest, then where are the skeletons of all these bodies? Surely a few dozen would have turned up by now. Or did the Germans find some super-secret body disposal system that no one yet knows of?

6.) Would the Germans go out of their way to provide fuel for the crematoria when their airplanes and tanks were desperately in need of fuel? Not once have I heard anyone accuse the Germans of being stupid. Toward the end of the war, the Germans lost battles because lack of fuel. Would they be so stupid is to redirect fuel to the camps for “the ovens” when battles are at stake?

7.) Jews were singled out for special interrogation because so many of them were communists. The camp directors had to determine whether these Jews were harmless or dangerous - whether they would make reliable workers or just be troublemakers. Those who were determined to be useful workers were allowed many privileges, including the formation of orchestras. If the Jews were automatically gassed (killed), how would any of these privileges be considered, let alone established? The mere fact that there are so many Jewish survivors of concentration camps is evidence against the hoax.

8.) During the entire length of the War, the International Red Cross had constant access to the concentration camps. They delivered mail and packages containing food and clothing. The International Red Cross, despite this constant presence, never once filed a complaint or report about “the ovens of Auschwitz” or any other camp. It truly begs credulity to think that not a single Red Cross agent ever became suspicious, unless, of course, there was nothing to be suspicious about.

9.) The Nuremberg trials were conducted by the OSS (Office of Strategic Services, forerunner of the CIA) at the behest of the Zionist International. The Israeli State did not yet exist. The vast bulk of “evidence” was provided by the pro-Zionist Soviet Union. Neither of these two organizations could possibly be considered fair or trustworthy. Again, consider the source.

10.) Confessions were obtained under duress and torture. “It was this same War Crimes Branch which itself administered the nightmarish trials at Dachau, where prisoners were beaten, kicked, starved, and brutalised by Jewish-American jailers.” -- Richard Harwood, from Nuremberg and Other War Crimes Trials, p. 14. In true gangland style, the accused were told that their family members would be hurt or killed if they did not cooperate. Techniques of interrogation included beatings, starvation, testicle smashing and other forms of torture. The German prisoners were often so badly beaten that they could not be brought into the courtroom for fear of demonstrating their adverse treatment. The State of Israel today continues to use torture and murder as part of their terrorist campaign. Amnesty International has repeatedly cited Israel for such violations of human rights.

11.) There were no more than 4 million Jews living in Nazi-occupied territory. As the Nazi army advanced, the Jews fled rather than be captured. On June 30, 1965, the West German government announced that 3,375,000 Jewish “holocaust survivors” had applied for reparations. Now, if we subtract 3,375,000 from 4,000,000, that leaves 625,000 unaccounted for. If we take 625,000 and add a zero to the figure, we arrive at the fictitious and truly fantastic six million lie.

12.) According to the World Almanac of 1947, the world population of Jews in 1939 was 15,688,259. These figures were supplied to the Almanac by the American Jewish Committee. Then, the Jewish-owned New York Times of Feb. 22, 1948 listed the Jewish population in Palestine as 600,000 to 700,000; and for the rest of the world, the Jewish population is listed as 15,600,000 to 18,700,000. If we add the two lower figures together, we get a minimum total of 16,200,000 Jews world-wide, which is still a net increase in the world Jewish population of at least 500,000. If six million Jews had really died, then the total should have been 10,200,000.

But since the whole six million myth was just in the process of being fabricated by the world Zionist propaganda machine, these accurate figures came out before the hoaxacaust figures could be subtracted from the equation. Considering the fact that populations generally decrease during times of war - which it most certainly did for the German people and other nationalities - it is quite astounding that the Jewish population actually increased during this time. The fact is that the vast majority of Jews simply relocated to other parts of the world: Palestine, Russia, America, South America, etc.

13.) According to a pamphlet by Dr. E.R. Fields, entitled Was There Really a Holocaust?, the Red Cross reported in 1946 that of registered Jewish camp inmates, no more than 300,000 could have died. In item #11 above, we were willing to grant that possibly 625,000 were unaccounted for. If half of them died in the concentration camps and the other half died or disappeared to some other country, then our figures agree.

14.) Heinrich Himmler, Chief Commandant of the Concentration Camps, issued an order, dated Dec. 28, 1942, stating: “The death rate in the concentration camps must be reduced at all costs.” - from Reitlinger’s book, The Final Solution. Ladies and gentlemen, the Germans were fighting a war, and they needed the productive capacity of the inmates of the camps to produce war material. An extermination policy would have shifted vital resources away from production to waste. Isn’t this holocaust claim incredible just from this consideration alone?

15.) One of the Nuremberg documents, a letter of April 10, 1943, was issued by Oswald Pohl, the head of the Economic Administration of the concentration camps. After addressing the above-cited order by Himmler, the mortality rate of the camps had been reduced from 8.5% in July, 1942 to 2.8% in June, 1943. Given an extermination policy, why would there be any concern for mortality rates?

16.) Numerous claims of the hoaxers have been amended over time because the claims were obviously exaggerated or invented. In April 1975, Simon Wiesenthal of the Los Angeles Holocaust Center was forced to admit in the paper, Books and Bookmen, “No gassing took place in any camp on German soil.” At that time, Auschwitz and other camps were still in the possession of the Soviets, who would not allow serious researchers into these camps to validate holocaust claims. We expect that, with full disclosure, Mr. Wiesenthal will be forced to admit that no gassing ever took place in any camp.

17.) The Red Cross interviewed thousands of freed camp inmates at the end of the war. When asked if they witnessed any alleged “gassings,” the response was negative. From Red Cross document #9925, June, 1946, the entry states: “The detainees themselves have not spoken of them.” How can you gas six million Jews and nobody notices?

18.) Photos of emaciated bodies, both alive and dead, are not proof of an extermination campaign. The fact is that toward the end of the war, the Allies were bombing railroads and roads to the point of obliteration. This meant that valuable food, medicine, Red Cross packages, and other supplies were no longer reaching the camps. This was the real reason for the malnutrition, not to mention the serious side effects of malnutrition, which would be an increase in all types of disease.

The same thing happened in America during the Civil War. Northern prisoners in the Southern camp of Andersonville were also emaciated to the point of being only skin and bone. The commander of the camp, at his trial, said that he simply had no supplies with which to feed the inmates and he was not allowed to set them free. Pictures of these prisoners could easily be substituted for WWII inmates and no one would know the difference.

One thing we know for sure: The Jews are good at writing captions.

Please note that the published photos of concentration camp inmates show relatively well-fed people lining up for the showers. All of the photos of dead bodies being bulldozed show emaciated bodies. If they were gassed and killed immediately, as the hoaxers claim, there would be some photographic evidence of well-fed people being bulldozed into graves. There is none.

19.) In 1943, the SS arrested Buchenwald Commandant Karl Koch for mistreating and executing prisoners. He was found guilty by SS Judge Konrad Morgan and was executed for his crimes. If there were an extermination policy in force, would they bother trying and executing Commandant Koch? Again, these were work camps designed to assist the war effort. An extermination policy would have required tremendous resources and effort. It would have disrupted the crucial work that was going on and it would have risked undermining the war effort.

20.) Cremating 6,000,000 bodies in order to dispose of the evidence would have left 15,000 tons of ashes. No such volume of ashes was ever found, and no air reconnaissance ever revealed enormous clouds of smoke, and certainly there was never any such total of bodies found. It is only when one considers the enormous lack of evidenceof a holocaust - all the physical matter that would have been left over from such a campaign (six million corpses?!!!!) and the sheer magnitude of such an undertaking - then the hoax becomes obvious. It is only the hoaxers themselves and those who have not really thought about the physical details who believe in this tragic farce.

It is quite certain that the Germans did not have enough fuel to consume anywhere near that amount of bodies. One of the hoaxers, Mr. Henri Michel, editor-in-chief of the Revue d’Histoire De La Seconde Guerre Mondial, exclaimed of Auschwitz: “This camp was the most international and the most western of the death factories, and its soil is enriched with the ashes of 4,000,000 corpses.” -- p. 3. The dust cloud of crematoria smoke from such a volume of corpses would certainly have prompted some aerial reconnaissance photos, don’t you think? Where is the evidence? Why is there not one single photo of the crematoria smokestacks belching out their tons of ashes?

21.) William L. Shirer, one of those authors who continued the hoaxacaust story in his book, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, was forced to admit in a footnote on the crematoria: “…the measurements are those which are standard for a crematory oven of not very modern design intended for small cemeteries, and would be unsuitable for mass burning.” This footnote occurs on p. 972 of the German edition only. The rest of the world is still in the midst of the Zionist Dark Age.

22.) Thies Christopherson, a German soldier and author stated: “I was at Auschwitz! There was no gas chamber there.” Now, remember, this man does not practice the religion of lies. His statement was proven to be true when, in 1960, Auschwitz was opened to tourists and no gas chamber could be found. What a disappointment this must have been for the tourists! Later, in order to make up for this communist oversight (they didn’t have much experience at developing capitalist-style theme parks), the Soviets built one themselves! No doubt, the money for construction was provided by some Zionist or rabbinical organization.

23.) The so-called Diary of Anne Frank was not written by Anne Frank at all. Photocopies of the supposed manuscript show two distinct styles of handwriting, one which is not handwriting at all but printing, and the other a very smooth handwriting angled at two o’clock. At least half of the manuscript was handwritten in ballpoint pen. The ballpoint pen, invented during WWII, was not commercially available until after the war. In addition, the American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, sued Anne Frank’s father and won an award of $50,000 for his participation in the writing of “Anne Frank’s” supposed diary. This fact was only brought to light because one Jew tried to cheat another.

24.) Although death by starvation and disease had increased toward the end of the war, the videos of huge piles of dead bodies in civilian clothing were most often footage which was filmed in Dresden. Dresden was devastated by the firebombing raids of the Allies on February 13 and 14, 1945. This was one of the greatest wartime atrocities in history, because Dresden had become, in effect, a large refugee camp for German women, children, wounded soldiers, and old men. Dresden was one of Germany’s main artistic centers and had virtually no industry located in its vicinity. The Allies knew this and yet they bombed the city mercilessly for two nights, apparently to dispose of war ordnance which would otherwise go to waste, for Germany at that point was a defeated nation and the war was nearing its end. Why not kill as many unarmed civilians as you can? Who will know?

The German refugees thought that Dresden would be a safe haven because of its lack of industry. They were, sadly, wrong. They could not imagine that there would be such immense Zionist bloodlust in command of the U.S. and British military. You can imagine the horror of those who thought they would be safe in Dresden until the end of the war! The war criminals have successfully blocked out this war crime from the history books; but I am sure that Yahweh God will remember those who are responsible.

25.) The Nuremberg trials were an absolute farce. One of the most damning conditions of the trials agreed to by the Allies in the August 1945 London Agreement was “The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply, to the greatest possible extent, expeditious and non-technical procedure, and shall submit any evidence which it deems to have probative value.

In other words, let’s railroad these “war criminals” as quickly as possible, so we can go home and collect our medals. How would you like to be tried by a court which does not abide by “rules of evidence?” A mere technicality, you say? Can you see the kangaroos hopping around? Except, these kangaroos have hooked noses and wear yarmulkas now and then.

26.) The fact that American Jews were allowed to be prosecutors and judges is a travesty in itself. The fact that many of them, if not all, were merely instruments of the Zionist International makes the entire proceeding suspect because of a lack of impartiality. No court would consider it impartial if an agent of the accuser were to be allowed to be a prosecutor or a judge. Yet, this is exactly what happened at the Nuremberg trials. Unfortunately, the American people were not aware of these shady Zionist dealings. They assumed, as people still assume today, that the Nuremberg trials were held in accordance to standard procedures.

Regarding the London Agreement, Harwood says: “…the same people who drew up the arrangements for Nuremberg promptly had themselves appointed as prosecutors and judges. Nikitchenko and Falco became judges. Jackson was American Chief Presecutor, Fyfe was Deputy-Chief British Prosecutor. Thus, virtually the same people were judges, prosecution, and court.” -- p. 14. And you were told that the Nuremberg trials were fair and impartial?

27.) Incriminating documents were simply fabricated by the Soviets. In his opening speech at the War Crimes Tribunal, Chief Prosecutor Robert H. Jackson appeared to be quoting from a document which he ascribed to Baron Werner von Fritsch, the pre-war Commander-in-Chief of the German Armed Forces. In fact, he was quoting from a typewritten document of unknown origin. No original document was ever produced. (You can imagine how many clerks and other military personnel were recruited by the Zionists, at U.S. and British expense, to produce “documents.” Oops! I shouldn’t encourage you to use your imagination. There’s been too much of that already! Even if you’ve only heard the Zionist version of these events, it would only be prudent to exercise some common sense and good old-fashioned skepticism before accepting their story without criticism. It seems that only the Jews routinely get away without scrutiny. Why is that?)

28.) Budd Schulberg, Jewish film producer, was recruited by the OSS to produce the photographic and film “evidence” at Nuremberg. Again, lack of impartiality at its worst. He received a military reward for his efforts. Surprising that he didn’t get an Academy Award as well! The Jews of Russia (Khazaria), America, Britain and Israel were the prosecution, the judge, the jury, the newspaper reporters and the film crew. The poor, persecuted Jew has no influence at all! Why do the goyim hate him so?

29.) Paul Rassinier, author of The Drama of the European Jews, relates that many of the hoaxers, authors who had profited from the hoax, could not verify their claims. One author, Dr. Miklos Nyiszli, claimed to have been to Aushwitz but gave travel directions which made absolutely no sense. Professor Rassinier attempted to contact Dr. Nyiszli about such discrepancies and received from him a reply through a Mr. Tibere Kremer. As it turned out, Dr. Nyiszli had long since died, so even the reply was a forgery. Says Dr. Rassinier: “…this dead witness - another one - was peculiar enough himself to write to me after his death. And so Mr. Tibere Kremer’s silence is understandable. No further comment.” -- p. 41. This incident should give the reader an idea of the quality of the “evidence” which has been presented in the hoaxacaust literature.

When faced with a mountain lies, at least some statements must be true, right? Not necessarily.

30.) Prof. Rassinier’s book is a detailed examination of Jewish populations in virtually every country of Europe, including Poland and Russia, from 1931 to 1945. According to Rassinier’s statistics, in 1931 Europe had 9,777,500 documented Jews (figures from the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation). The population that remained in these locations in 1945 was 4,250,000. The emigrants who left Europe altogether is numbered at 4,416,608. These people went to three main locations: Palestine (the Israeli state had not yet been created), Central Asia (Soviet Union) and the United States. So, the total, documented numbers of living European Jews in 1945, according to Rassinier, was 8,666,608. If we subtract the documented number of survivors from the documented pre-war population, we have a total of l,003,392 unaccounted for. Of these, a certain number must have died from causes unrelated to the war. If we grant that half of them died from such causes, then we have a total of about 500,000 Jews who perished in the war. This is consistent with our previous totals from items 11 and 13.

31.) At the Nuremberg trials, Philip Auerbach, the Jewish attorney-general for post-war Bavaria was denounced by SS General Otto Ohlendorf. Auerbach had claimed the absurd figure of 11 million Jews having suffered in the concentration camps. “Ohlendorf lived long enough to see Auerbach convicted for embezzlement and fraud (forging documents purporting to show huge payments of compensation to non-existent people) before his own execution took place in 1951.” -- p. 10-11, The True History of “The Holocaust,” Did Six Million Really Die? - by the Institute for Historical Review.

32.) It has been frequently reported by American prisoners of war that the Germans treated them much more humanely than the Japanese. The same is true for the civilian prisoners in the concentration camps. Many of these people were arrested for being communist spies. Hundreds of affidavits described the circumstances at the camps as “humane.” “One Berta Schirotschin, who worked at the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testified that the working inmates…received their customary second breakfast at 10 a.m. every morning…The Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, who was at Dachau from May 22nd, 1940 until April 29th, 1945, also testified on March 21st, 1946 that prisoners there received good treatment.” -- p. 21, Did Six Million Really Die?

33.) Elie Wiesel has a poor memory. According to the New York Times of Sunday, January 4, 1987, Wiesel recalled “the day the Soviets arrived at Auschwitz.” Previously, in a speech to the National Press Club in Washington D.C., in April, 1983, Wiesel “noted that on April 15, 1945, he was one of the survivors liberated at Dachau by the U.S. Army.” - Jewish Telegraph Agency, April 11, 1983. “Oy, vey! I remember it like it vas yesterday” we can hear him sighing. Is this two lies or only one? Wiesel would have the distinction of being the only prisoner of war to be liberated from two different camps. Talk about bragging rights! The father of lies is truly proud of this weasel.

34.) In flagrant violation of the principle of freedom of speech, the Zionists impose their will on every organization they possibly can in order to prevent people from speaking out against the hoax. In Germany, it is against the law to deny the holocaust. Numerous people have been imprisoned for making public statements against the mythology. This fact should infuriate anyone who believes in freedom of speech.

35.) The holocaust industry makes millions of dollars every year promoting this holocaust trash. In literary circles, it is still a “hot ticket.” Truth be damned. Money talks.

36.) The Soviets brought out a bunch of “human skin” artifacts and “human soap” (presumably dusting off the trunks from their WWI displays), but the Tribunal chose not to pursue the matter any further.

37.) One of the chief presiding judges, Charles F. Wennerstrum, denounced the proceedings: “If I had known seven months ago what I know today, I would never have come here…Obviously, the victor in any war is not the best judge of the war crime guilt...The prosecution has failed to maintain objectivity aloof from vindictiveness, aloof from personal ambitions for convictions...the defense had access only to those documents which the prosecution considered material to the case…also abhorrent to the American sense of justice is the prosecution’s reliance upon self-incriminating statements made by the defendants while prisoners for more than 2&1/2 years and repeated interrogations without the presence of counsel.” - Harwood, p. 39, 40. But we are not dealing with the American sense of justice. We are dealing with the Talmudic, Zionist sense of justice. Dare we call it Satanic in origin? Judge Wennerstrum went to Nuremberg expecting to dispense justice. Instead, he was asked to rubber stamp a show trial.

38.) Many prisoners of the War Crimes Tribunal were kept in prison, held without charges being filed for months. This included even the wives of the suspects. (Harwood, p. 57.)

39.) Holocaust propaganda has changed with the times. Truth is not flexible. Lies are. No consistent flow of information has ever been established by the hoax industry. New charges and claims arise, all without any substantiation. Old ones dissolve, depending upon which charges have been refuted or not. We all know that the original story was that the Germans kept their “extermination program” a secret. How else could it have happened, anyway? Recently, the hoaxers, contradicting this theory, have claimed that it was common knowledge in those days that the exterminations were going on, but that nobody did anything about it. This claim has been fabricated for the sole purpose of trying to indict Pope Pius XII for “not helping the Jews.” But how can you prevent something that isn’t happening?

I remember very clearly as a child around 1954 standing in a mom-and-pop grocery store. Two Jewish women were reacting to a radio news story about the holocaust. I will never forget what the one woman said to the other: “If I had known they were being gassed, I would have never gotten on the train.” So, obviously, six million others didn’t know about it either! And she also survived, whatever camp she was in; and, from her statement, she did not witness any gassings either, because this was the first she had heard about it! Sooner or later, the liar gets caught in his lies. The fact that he owns all the newspapers will not prevent this eventuality.

Never underestimate the power of the BIG LIE. The Jews are the masters of it. My personal opinion is the Zionists decided to promote this myth in order to cover up their own involvement with Nazi Germany in transferring Jews from Germany to Palestine. They needed a smoke screen and a continuous barrage of propaganda to clamp the lid down on any criticism of their WWII maneuverings. The more newspaper space that is taken up by their lies, the less room there is for the truth. As the previous stories have revealed, the Zionists have much to hide.

 

 

The continuing decline of Europe’s Jewish population

By Michael Lipka44 comments

Jewish Population in EuropeIt’s been seven decades since the end of the Holocaust, an event that decimated the Jewish population in Europe. In the years since then, the number of European Jews has continued to decline for a variety of reasons. And now, concerns over renewed anti-Semitism on the continent have prompted Jewish leaders to talk of a new “exodus” from the region.

There are still more than a million Jews living in Europe, according to 2010 Pew Research Center estimates. But that number has dropped significantly over the last several decades – most dramatically in Eastern Europe and the countries that make up the former Soviet Union, according to historical research by Sergio DellaPergola of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

In 1939, there were 16.6 million Jews worldwide, and a majority of them – 9.5 million, or 57% – lived in Europe, according to DellaPergola’s estimates. By the end of World War II, in 1945, the Jewish population of Europe had shrunk to 3.8 million, or 35% of the world’s 11 million Jews. About 6 million European Jews were killed during the Holocaust, according to common estimates.

Since then, the global Jewish population – estimated by Pew Research at 14 million as of 2010 – has risen, but it is still smaller than it was before the Holocaust. And in the decades since 1945, the Jewish population in Europe has continued to decline. In 1960, it was about 3.2 million; by 1991, it fell to 2 million, according to DellaPergola’s estimates. Now, there are about 1.4 million Jews in Europe – just 10% of the world’s Jewish population, and 0.2% of Europe’s total population.

Measuring Jewish populations, especially in places like Europe and the United States where Jews are a small minority, is fraught with difficulty. This is due to the complexity both of measuring small populations and of Jewish identity, which can be defined by ethnicity or religion. As a result, estimates vary, but Pew Research’s recent figures are similar to those reported by DellaPergola, one of the world’s leading experts on Jewish demography.

Jewish Population in EuropeIn Eastern Europe, a once large and vibrant Jewish population has nearly disappeared. DellaPergola estimates that there were 3.4 million Jews in the European portions of the Soviet Union as of 1939. Many were killed in the Holocaust, and others moved to Israel or elsewhere. Today, a tiny fraction of the former Soviet republics’ population – an estimated 310,000 people – are Jews.

Similar trends have occurred in Eastern European countries that were outside the USSR, including Poland, Hungary, Romania and several other nations. Collectively, they were home to about 4.7 million Jews in 1939, but now there are probably fewer than 100,000 Jews in all these countries combined.

Much of the postwar decline has been a result of emigration to Israel, which declared its independence as a Jewish state in 1948. The Jewish population of Israel has grown from about half a million in 1945 to 5.6 million in 2010. But there are other possible factors in the decline of European Jewry, including intermarriage and cultural assimilation.

In addition, Jewish populations have not decreased uniformly in every European country. For example, we estimate that there were about as many Jews in France as of 2010 (310,000) as DellaPergola estimates there were in 1939 (320,000), although recent reports have indicated a surge in Jewish emigration from France.

The United Kingdom also continues to have a significant Jewish population (about 280,000 in 2010, down from DellaPergola’s estimate of 345,000 in 1939). But a new report released this week found a record level of anti-Semitism in the U.K., with more than 1,000 anti-Semitic incidents recorded in 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

A Holocaust Was What the Americans Did to the Germans

 

 

Eisenhower’s Starvation Order

By James Bacque

 

Never had so many people been put in prison. The size of the Allied captures was unprecedented in all history. The Soviets took prisoner some 3.5 million Europeans, the Americans about 6.1 million, the British about 2.4 million, the Canadians about 300,000, the French around 200,000. Uncounted millions of Japanese entered American captivity in 1945, plus about 640,000 entering Soviet captivity.

 

As soon as Germany surrendered on 8 May 1945, the American Military Governor, General Eisenhower, sent out an “urgent courier” throughout the huge area that he commanded, making it a crime punishable by death for German civilians to feed prisoners. It was even a death-penalty crime to gather food together in one place to take it to prisoners … The order was sent in German to the provincial governments, ordering them to distribute it immediately to local governments. Copies of the orders were discovered recently in several villages near the Rhine … The message [which Bacque reproduces] reads in part: “… under no circumstances may food supplies be assembled among the local inhabitants in order to deliver them to the prisoners of war. Those who violate this command and nevertheless try to circumvent this blockade to allow something to come to the prisoners place themselves in danger of being shot….”

 

 

Eisenhower’s order was also posted in English, German and Polish on the bulletin board of Military Government Headquarters in Bavaria, signed by the Chief of Staff of the Military Governor of Bavaria. Later it was posted in Polish in Straubing and Regensburg, where there were many Polish guard companies at nearby camps. One US Army officer who read the posted order in May 1945 has written that it was “the intention of Army command regarding the German POW camps in the US Zone from May 1945 through the end of 1947 to exterminate as many POWs as the traffic would bear without international scrutiny.”

 

… The [American] army’s policy was to starve [German] prisoners, according to several American soldiers who were there. Martin Brech, retired professor of philosophy at Mercy college in New York, who was a guard at Andernach in 1945, has said that he was told by an officer that “it is our policy that these men not be fed.” The 50,000 to 60,000 men in Andernach were starving, living with no shelter in holes in the ground, trying to nourish themselves on grass. When Brech smuggled bread to them through the wire, he was ordered to stop by an officer. Later, Brech sneaked more food to them, was caught, and told by the same officer, “If you do that again, you’ll be shot.” Brech saw bodies go out of the camp “by the truckload” but he was never told how many there were, where they were buried, or how.

 

… The prisoner Paul Schmitt was shot in the American camp at Bretzenheim after coming close to the wire to see his wife and young son who were bringing him a basket of food. The French followed suit: Agnes Spira was shot by French guards at Dietersheim in July 1945 for taking food to prisoners. The memorial to her in nearby Buedesheim, written by one of her chidren, reads: “On the 31st of July 1945, my mother was suddenly and unexpectedly torn from me because of her good deed toward the imprisoned soldiers.” The entry in the Catholic church register says simply: “A tragic demise, shot in Dietersheim on 31.07.1945. Buried on 03.08.1945.” Martin Brech watched in amazement as one officer at Andernach stood on a hillside firing shots towards German women running away from him in the valley below.

 

The prisoner Hans Scharf … was watching as a German woman with her two children came towards an American guard in the camp at Bad Kreuznach, carrying a wine bottle. She asked the guard to give the bottle to her husband, who was just inside the wire. The guard upended the bottle into his own mouth, and when it was empty, threw it on the ground and killed the prisoner with five shots.

 

….Many prisoners and German civilians saw the American guards burn the food brought by civilian women. One former prisoner described it recently: “At first, the women from the nearby town brought food into the camp. The American soldiers took everything away from the women, threw it in a heap and poured gasoline [benzine] over it and burned it.” Eisenhower himself ordered that the food be destroyed, according to the writer Karl Vogel, who was the German camp commander appointed by the Americans in Camp 8 at Garmisch-Partenkirchen. Although the prisoners were getting only 800 calories per day, the Americans were destroying food outside the camp gate.

 

James Bacque, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, pp. 41-45, 94-95.

 

Note from RI: See also Thomas Goodrich's: Summer 1945—Germany, Japan and the Harvest of Hate

 

______________________________________________________________________________________ Edit Text

 
 
A Few Sources
[1] Video: Jewish-Zionist-racist Morgenthau faction: "The beautiful Rhine meadow camps of the Allies"; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5PULzOrIaI 

[2] Video: "The Rheinwiesenlager - Unglaublichkeiten"; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3bmKhBKZO8 

[3] Video: "The whole truth about the big lie"; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmIXTmt7kP4 

Photo sources [0a] Hitchcock, portrait of 1956: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Hitchcock [1] German helmets of Wehrmacht protecting ears and neck, example Barbarossa campaign:



http://einestages.spiegel.de/static/entry/als_den_vaetern_die_seele_erfror/10986/kampfpause.html?s=5&r=1&a=560&c=1, Foto Nr. 6

[2] German helmets of Wehrmacht protecting ears and neck, example hand granade course: 
http://einestages.spiegel.de/static/entry/als_den_vaetern_die_seele_erfror/10984/grundausbildung.html?s=7&r=1&a=560&c=1, Foto Nr. 8

[3] "American" soldiers with round "American" helmets and rows of German bodies: Video: Die ganze Wahrheit über die grosse Lüge:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmIXTmt7kP4, 6min. 0sek.

[4] "American" soldiers with round helmets with pile of German dead bodies on a trailer: Video: Die ganze Wahrheit über die grosse Lüge:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmIXTmt7kP4, 6min. 9sek.

[5] liberation of Bergen Belsen camp with well nourished detainees with caps, April 15, 1945: BBC: Überlebende von Bergen-Belsen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=es4YLI2mFnQ

[6-94] Video: "An Alfred Hitchcock Documentary On The Nazi Holocaust ": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0wA4rDuG58
 
_______________________________________________________________________________
 
 
 
 
  Edit Text

 

Extracts From The Book Germany's War, German POWs Post-WWII

Buried Alive Screaming In The Night: German POW Survivors

                                                          Describe Eisenhower’s Extermination Camps After WWII Had Ended

 

One night in April 1945, I was startled out of my stupor in the rain and the mud by piercing screams and loud groans… I saw this bulldozer moving forward through the crowd of prisoners who lay there. In the front it had a blade making a pathway. How many of the prisoners were buried alive in their earth holes…

 

A similar incident occurred at the American camp at Rheinberg in mid-June 1945… the last act of the Americans at Rheinberg before the British took over was to bulldoze one section of the camp level while there were still living men in their holes in the ground.

 

On July 27, 1929, the Allies extended the Protective Regulations of the Geneva Convention for Wounded Soldiers to include prisoners of war (POWs). These regulations state: “All accommodations should be equal to the standard of their troops. The Red Cross supervises. After the end of the hostilities the POWs should be released immediately.” On March 10, 1945, Dwight Eisenhower, the Supreme Allied Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force, disregarded these regulations by classifying German prisoners captured on German territory as “Disarmed Enemy Forces” (DEFs). The German prisoners were therefore at the mercy of the Allies and were not protected by international law. [i]

 

The Western Allies deliberately murdered approximately 1 million disarmed German POWs by means of starvation, exposure, and illness. This Allied atrocity was first publicly exposed in 1989 in the book Other Losses by James Bacque. Bacque estimates in Other Losses that the victims undoubtedly number over 790,000, almost certainly over 900,000, and quite likely over a million. The prisoners’ deaths were knowingly caused by army officers who had sufficient resources to keep these prisoners alive. Relief organizations such as the Red Cross that attempted to help prisoners in the American camps were refused permission by the army. [ii]

 


 The vast U.S. camps in open fields stretched for 10 kilometers along the Rhine river. The men were denied access to the river only a few meters away. For no cost and with little effort the Americans could have provided the disarmed German POWs access to the Rhine river for drinking and sanitation purposes. 
 
 

german pows eisenhower death camp 1

auschwitz-camp-nursery-1942
 
Did they not know all children under the age of 5 must die?” This was stated by a British doctor attending to the Boer women and children held in the concentration camps of the 2nd Anglo-Boer war. Not Auschwitz. (Read here). In stark contrast the Auschwitz labor camp provided inmates, at great cost and effort, with modern facilities including a maternity ward and nursery to care for the thousands of babies born during the war.   Read more here. Pictured above healthy babies in the Auschwitz nursery in 1942, before the Dresden-style carpet bombing of Germany destroyed vital supply lines and infrastructure with devastating affects on all civilians. Furthermore, the German POWs in Eisenhower’e extermination camps were soldiers from the front line, not camp guards. They were neither tried nor convicted by the Nuremberg trials for war crimes before their deaths.

 

Germans Testify to the Eisenhower POW Extermination Camps

 

Surviving German prisoners have provided testimony of the horrific conditions and mistreatment they received in the Allied prisoner of war (POW) camps. Many surviving German prisoners were badly mistreated even before arriving at the Allied camps. Werner Wilhelm Laska, a German prisoner of war, reports his transfer to an American prison camp:

 

The American guards who arrived with the truck were nasty and cruel from the start. I was forced in with kicks and punches to my back. Other German soldiers were already on board. After a drive of an hour or two we arrived at an open field on which many servicemen were already assembled, in rank and file. As we got off the truck, a large group of Americans awaited us. They received us with shouts and yells, such as: “You Hitler, you Nazi, etc….” We got beaten, kicked and pushed; one of those gangsters brutally tore my watch from my wrist. Each of these bandits already possessed 10 or 20 watches, rings and other things. The beating continued until I reached the line where my comrades stood. Most of our water-bottles (canteens), rucksacks etc. were cut off, and even overcoats had to be left on the ground. More and more prisoners arrived, including even boys and old men. After a few hours, big trailer-trucks—usually used for transporting cattle—lined up for loading with human cattle.

 

We had to run the gauntlet to get into the trucks; we were beaten and kicked. Then they jammed us in so tightly that they couldn’t even close the hatches. We couldn’t even breathe. The soldiers drove the vehicles at high speed over the roads and through villages and towns; behind each trailer-truck always followed a jeep with a mounted machine gun.

 

In late afternoon we stopped in an open field again, and were unloaded in the same manner, with beating and kicking. We had to line up at attention just like recruits in basic training. Quickly, the Americans fenced us in with rolls of barbed wire, so there was no space to sit or to lie down that night. We even had to do our necessities in the standing position. Since we received no water or foodstuffs, our thirst and hunger became acute and urgent. Some men still had tea in their canteens, but there was hardly enough for everyone.

 

Next day the procedure began as on the day before; running the gauntlet into the cattle-trailers, then transport to the next open field. No drinking and no eating, but always fenced in–there is an American song: “… Don’t fence me in…”–as well as the childish behavior of most of the Americans: Punishing the Nazis! After the first night, when we were loaded again, some of us stayed on that field, either dead or so weak and sick that they could not move any more. We had been approaching the Rhine River, as we noticed, but we had still one night to pass in the manner related. It was terrible!

 

All this could not have been a coincidence. It must have been a plan, because, as we later learned, there was nearly the same treatment in all camps run by American units. During the war we heard about the “Morgenthau Plan” and the “Kaufman Plan,” and exactly that seemed to have been happening to us in those moments: the extermination of an entire people!

 

Laska eventually was sent to France to work in coal mines and other unpleasant places, where his ordeal continued. On January 7, 1950, the French finally discharged Laska to Germany.

 

James Bacque writes that the response he has received following the original publication of Other Losses has been amazing. Bacque states:

 

“Most gratifying has been the huge response from thousands of ex-prisoners who have written to me, or telephoned, sent faxes or e-mail, or even called at my door, to thank me for telling a story they feared would die with them. They continue to send me diaries, letters, Tagebücher, self-published books, typescripts of memoirs, in three or four languages, along with photographs, maps, drawings, paintings and even a few artifacts.”

 

Several prisoners from Heilbronn have written Bacque to confirm the dreadful conditions witnessed by U.S. Cpl. Daniel McConnell and U.S. Maj. Gen. Richard Steinbach. One is Anton Pfarrer, who was 16 years old when captured and imprisoned at Heilbronn. Pfarrer writes:

 

“I can recall nearly every day of suffering, but I made it back, although so many thousands never did. There were 3,000 men in my cage in May but by the end of August, only 1,500 were left to answer roll call. They had all died.”

 

There were no discharges from his cage during that time. Pfarrer telephoned Gen. Steinbach in 1998 to thank Steinbach for saving his life.

Dc8YbqwWAAAvuZ1.jpg large

 

Rudi Buchal had been ordered to serve as a German medical orderly-clerk in the POW “hospital” at Bretzenheim, a tent with an earth floor inside the camp. The hospital had no beds, no medical supplies, no blankets, and starvation rations for the first month or more. A few supplies were later obtained by American teams from the German towns nearby. Buchal was told by drivers of the 560th Ambulance Company that 18,100 POWs had died in the six camps around Bretzenheim in the 10 weeks of American control. Buchal also heard the figure of 18,100 dead from the Germans who were in charge of the hospital statistics, and from other American hospital personnel. The six camps were Bretzenheim, Biebelsheim, Bad Kreuznach, Dietersheim, Hechtsheim and Heidesheim.

 

The reliability of Rudi Buchal has been attested to by the U.S. Army itself. Upon discharge Buchal received a paper stating that in the opinion of U.S. Army officers who commanded him, “During the above mentioned period [April-July 1945] he proved himself to be co-operative, capable, industrious and reliable.” Similar to the experiences of U.S. Cpl. Daniel McConnell and French Dr. Joseph Kirsch, Buchal discovered that these “hospitals” were merely places to take moribund prisoners rather than places to help the prisoners get well. Buchal recalls that many of the mortally sick evacuees were taken to Idstein, north of Wiesbaden. Buchal states,

 

“And I can remember that from there no prisoners returned.”

 

German prisoners who survived Bretzenheim have described arriving there on May 9, 1945. The prisoners saw three rows of corpses along the road in front of the camp. A total of 135 dead from Bretzenheim were acknowledged by the Americans to have been buried in Stromberg on May 9 and May 10. Not all of the dead at Bretzenheim were killed by the usual starvation, disease and exposure.

 

 

Johannes Heising, formerly the abbot of a monastery on the Rhine, published a book in the 1990s about his experiences in the U.S. camp at Remagen. Franz-Josef Plemper, another former prisoner at Remagen, reminded Heising of an event not described in Heising’s book: on one night the Americans had bulldozed living men under the earth in their foxholes. Plemper described the scene to Heising:

 

One night in April 1945, I was startled out of my stupor in the rain and the mud by piercing screams and loud groans. I jumped up and saw in the distance (about 30 to 50 meters) the searchlight of a bulldozer. Then I saw this bulldozer moving forward through the crowd of prisoners who lay there. In the front it had a blade making a pathway. How many of the prisoners were buried alive in their earth holes I do not know. It was no longer possible to ascertain. I heard clearly cries of “You murderer.”

 

The horror of this incident had been so painful that Heising had suppressed it from his memory. Heising remembered this event only after Plemper reminded him of it.

 

A similar incident occurred at the American camp at Rheinberg in mid-June 1945. According to reports from several ex-prisoners, the last act of the Americans at Rheinberg before the British took over was to bulldoze one section of the camp level while there were still living men in their holes in the ground.

 

Prisoner Wolfgang Iff said that in his sub-section of perhaps 10,000 people at Rheinberg, 30 to 40 bodies were dragged out every day. As a member of the burial commando, Iff was well placed to see what was going on. Iff saw about 60 to 70 bodies going out per day in other cages of similar size.

 

A 50-year-old sergeant with a Ph.D. kept a diary in ink on toilet paper at Rheinberg. He wrote on May 20, 1945:

 

“How long will we have to be without shelter, without blankets or tents? Every German soldier once had shelter from the weather. Even a dog has a doghouse to crawl into when it rains. Our only wish is finally after six weeks to get a roof over our heads. Even a savage is better housed. Diogenes, Diogenes, you at least had your barrel.”

 

Part of the problem at Rheinberg was that for a long time it was overcrowded. A cage measuring 300 meters by 300 meters was supposed to hold no more than 10,000 people. However, at the beginning, as many as 30,000 prisoners were forced in, leaving about three square meters per person. Prisoner Thelen told his son through the barbed wire that approximately 330 to 770 prisoners per day were dying at Rheinberg. The camp then contained between 100,000 and 120,000 prisoners.

 

Charles von Luttichau said of his POW camp at Kripp near Remagen on the Rhine:

 

The latrines were just logs flung over ditches next to the barbed wire fences. To sleep, all we could do was to dig out a hole in the ground with our hands, then cling together in the hole. We were crowded very close together. Because of illness, the men had to defecate on the ground. Soon, many of us were too weak to take off our trousers first. So our clothing was infected, and so was the mud where we had to walk and sit and lie down. There was no water at all at first, except the rain, then after a couple of weeks we could get a little water from a standpipe. But most of us had nothing to carry it in, so we could get only a few mouthfuls after hours of lining up, sometimes even through the night. We had to walk along between the holes on the soft earth thrown up by the digging, so it was easy to fall into a hole, but hard to climb out. The rain was almost constant along that part of the Rhine that spring. More than half the days we had rain. More than half the days we had no food at all. On the rest, we got a little K ration. I could see from the package that they were giving us one-tenth of the rations that they issued to their own men. So in the end we got perhaps 5% of a normal U.S. Army ration. I complained to the American camp commander that he was breaking the Geneva Convention, but he just said, “Forget the Convention. You haven’t any rights.”

 

Within a few days, some of the men who had gone healthy into the camp were dead. I saw our men dragging many dead bodies to the gate of the camp, where they were thrown loose on top of each other onto trucks, which took them away.

 

One 17-year-old boy who could see his village in the distance was found shot one morning at the foot of the barbed wire fence. His body was strung up and left hanging on the wire by the guards as a warning to the other prisoners. Many prisoners cried out, “Moerder, moerder [murderer, murderer]!” In retaliation, the camp commander withheld the prisoners’ meager rations for three days. For prisoners who were already starving and could hardly move because of weakness, it was frightful; for many it meant death. The commander also withheld rations at other times to punish the prisoners.

 

George Weiss, a German tank repairman, said his camp on the Rhine was so crowded that

 

“we couldn’t even lie down properly. All night we had to sit up jammed against each other. But the lack of water was the worst thing of all. For three and a half days we had no water at all. We would drink our own urine. It tasted terrible, but what could we do? Some men got down on the ground and licked the ground to get some moisture. I was so weak I was already on my knees, when finally we got a little water to drink. I think I would have died without that water. But the Rhine was just outside the wire. The guards sold us water through the wire, and cigarettes. One cigarette cost 900 marks. I saw thousands dying. They took the bodies away on trucks.”

 

German Cpl. Helmut Liebich was captured near Gotha in central Germany by the Americans on April 17, 1945. The Gotha DEF camp had only the usual barbed wire fences with no tents. The prisoners were forced to run a gauntlet between lines of guards who hit them with sticks in order to get a small ration of food. On April 27, 1945, the prisoners were transferred to the American camp at Heidesheim farther west, where there was no food at all for days, and then very little. The prisoners started to die in large numbers from exposure, starvation and thirst. Liebich saw about 10 to 30 bodies a day being dragged out of his section, Camp B, which held about 5,200 prisoners.

 

On May 13, 1945, Liebich was transferred to another American camp at Bingen-Büdesheim near Bad Kreuznach. Liebich soon fell sick with dysentery and typhus. He was transferred again, semi-conscious, in an open-topped railway car with about 60 other prisoners. On a detour through Holland, the Dutch stood on bridges to smash stones down on the heads of the prisoners. After three nights, Liebich’s fellow prisoners helped him stagger into the American camp at Rheinberg, again without shelter or much food.

 

One day in June 1945, Liebich saw the British coming through the hallucinations of his fever. The British saved his life in their hospital at Lintfort.  Liebich remembered the life-saving care he received from the British with gratitude for the rest of his life. Liebich states:

 

“It was wonderful to be under a roof in a real bed. We were treated like human beings again. The Tommies treated us like comrades.”

 

Former prisoners have also reported numerous instances of prisoners and civilians who were shot by American and French guards. Paul Kaps, a German soldier who was in the U.S. camp at Bad Kreuznach, wrote, “In one night, May 8, 1945, 48 prisoners were shot dead in Cage 9.”  Prisoner Hanns Scharf witnessed an especially gruesome killing when a German woman with her two children asked an American guard at Bad Kreuznach to give a wine bottle to her husband, who was just inside the wire. The guard drank the wine himself, and when the bottle was empty the guard killed the prisoner with five shots. The other prisoners protested, and U.S. Army Lt. Holtsman said: “This is awful. I’ll make sure there is a stiff court-martial.” No evidence of a court-martial of this or any other similar incidents has ever been found.

 

Prisoners and civilian women were shot even though the Eisenhower order gave individual camp commanders a chance to exempt family members trying to feed relatives through the wire. German prisoner Paul Schmitt was shot in the American camp at Bretzenheim when he came close to the wire to receive a basket of food from his wife and young son. Dr. Helmut von Frizberg saw an American guard at Remagen shoot a German prisoner for talking to his wife through the wire. Frau Agnes Spira was shot by French guards at Dietersheim in July 1945 for taking food to prisoners. Her memorial in nearby Büdesheim reads,

 

“On the 31 of July 1945, my mother was suddenly and unexpectedly torn from me because of her good deed toward the imprisoned soldiers.”

 

French Capt. Julien got into serious trouble for quarreling with a fellow officer, Capt. Rousseau. Rousseau shot at German women in Julien’s presence, at about the same time and in the same place as a French officer shot Frau Spira. At Bad Kreuznach, William Sellner said that at night guards would shoot machine gun bullets at random into the camps, apparently for sport. Ernst Richard Krische in Bad Kreuznach wrote in his diary on May 4, 1945:

 

“Wild shooting in the night, absolute fireworks. It must be the supposed peace. Next morning 40 dead as ‘victims of the fireworks,’ in our cage alone, many wounded.”

 

________________________________________________

 

 

Mass Starvation of Germans, 1945-1950 (Eisenhower's Death Camps)
[back] Genocide   Food as a Weapon of War  Allied War Crimes

[More than nine million Germans died as a result of deliberate Allied starvation and expulsion policies after the Second World War, including 1.5-2 million German prisoners, which is the alleged number that died in Auschwitz.  Architect--Morgenthau.]

See: Allied War Crimes US based Concentration Camps for Germans Concentration Camp (USA)  Concentration Camps (Boer War)  Concentration Camps (Holocaust) 
See: Eisenhower  Churchill

[2013] Rhine meadow camps in summer 1945 (part 1)

[2012 June] The European Atrocity You Never Heard About An estimated 500,000 people died in the course of the organized expulsions; survivors were left in Allied-occupied Germany to fend for themselves.

Allied War Crimes 1941-1950 by Rixon Stewart 

[2008] Eisenhower's Holocaust - His Slaughter Of 1.7 Million Germans  ..German POWs had to dig holes for shelter

[1989] Eisenhower's Death Camps.  The Last Dirty Secret of World War Two by James Bacque

War Crimes: USA by Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr, AUS Ret.

In 'Eisenhower痴 Death Camps': A U.S. Prison Guard Remembers

New Book Details Mass Killings and Brutal Mistreatment of Germans at the End of World War Two 

A Review of James Bacque's "Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation 1944-1950" by Eric Blair 

[REVIEW]

Eisenhower Telegram to the War Department, 18 October 1945

[2000] HOW ALLIES TREATED GERMAN POWs by Michael Walsh

In 'Eisenhower痴 Death Camps': A U.S. Prison Guard Remembers

Books
[2014 Book, Film] Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 by Thomas Goodrich

[2007] After the Reich: The Brutal History of Allied Occupation by Giles MacDonogh
REVIEW  Review

[2003] Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation 1944-1950 by James Bacque  More than nine million Germans died as a result of deliberate Allied starvation and expulsion policies after the Second World War

[1989] Other Losses by James Bacque

[1988] Nemesis at Potsdam: The Expulsion of the Germans from the East by Alfred M. de Zayas

External
Mass Starvation of Germans, 1945-1950

See: Eisenhower  Holocaust revisionism

Quotes
  According to Bacque between 1941 and 1950 around one and a half to two million German prisoners of war died, whilst a further five million seven hundred thousand German civilians died between 1946 and 1950, largely, Bacque maintains, as a result of Allied policy. In all Bacques estimates that between nine and half and fourteen million ethnic Germans, German prisoners of war and civilians were to die in these iniquities. Part of the blame for this can be laid at the feet of Josef Stalin who, through his propaganda minister, Ilya Ehrenburg, actually encouraged the rape and degradation of the German civilian population. Allied War Crimes 1941-1950 by Rixon Stewart

  ..."it is hard to escape the conclusion that Dwight Eisenhower was a war criminal of epic proportions. His (DEF) policy killed more Germans in peace than were killed in the European Theater." [2008] Eisenhower's Holocaust - His Slaughter Of 1.7 Million Germans

  His best estimate is that some three million Germans, military and civilians, died unnecessarily after the official end of hostilities. A million of these were men who were being held as prisoners of war, most of whom died in Soviet captivity. (Of the 90,000 Germans who surrendered at Stalingrad, for example, only 5,000 ever returned to their homeland.)  Less well known is the story of the many thousands of German prisoners who died in American and British captivity, most infamously in horrid holding camps along the Rhine river, with no shelter and very little food. Others, more fortunate, toiled as slave labor in Allied countries, often for years. 
    Most of the two million German civilians who perished after the end of the war were women, children and elderly -- victims of disease, cold, hunger, suicide, and mass murder.
    Apart from the wide-scale rape of millions of German girls and woman in the Soviet occupation zones, perhaps the most shocking outrage recorded by MacDonogh is the slaughter of a quarter of a million Sudeten Germans by their vengeful Czech compatriots.New Book Details Mass Killings and Brutal Mistreatment of Germans at the End of World War Two

    According to Bacque, given the extraordinarily harsh conditions imposed upon them by the Allies (i.e., the British, French, Soviets, and Americans), at least 9.3 million and possibly as many as 13.7 million Germans, had, by 1950, needlessly died as a result.A Review of James Bacque's "Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation 1944-1950" by Eric Blair

[REVIEW] After the Reich: The Brutal History of Allied Occupation by Giles MacDonogh
His best estimate is that some three million Germans, military and civilians, died unnecessarily after the official end of hostilities.....Most of the two million German civilians who perished after the end of the war were women, children and elderly -- victims of disease, cold, hunger, suicide, and mass murder.....perhaps the most shocking outrage recorded by MacDonogh is the slaughter of a quarter of a million Sudeten Germans by their vengeful Czech compatriots......We are ceaselessly reminded of the Third Reich痴 wartime concentration camps. But few Americans are aware that such infamous camps as Dachau, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen and Auschwitz stayed in business after the end of the war, only now packed with German captives, many of whom perished miserably.

Holocaust
Skepticism
20 Questions and Answers
about Holocaust RevisionismInfo Holocaust
Welcome
to our Introduction to Holocaust Revisionism!
This pamphlet gives succinct answers to questions which are most frequently asked about Holocaust revisionism.
If you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to get in touch:
Castle Hill Publishers, PO Box 243, Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK, Email: feedback@codoh.com
20 Questions and Answers
1.     What is revisionism?......................................................................................................................................................1
2.     Why is historical revisionism important?....................................................................................................................1
3.     Why is Holocaust revisionism necessary?....................................................................................................................2
4.     What is meant by “The Holocaust” or “Shoah”?.......................................................................................................3
5.     What does Holocaust revisionism claim?.....................................................................................................................3
6.     Does Holocaust revisionism ignore important evidence?...........................................................................................4
7.     Does Holocaust revisionism just deny what is said about what happened?.............................................................5
8.     Is Holocaust revisionism an anti-Semitic ideology?....................................................................................................5
9.     Why should I take Holocaust revisionism more seriously than the claim that the earth is flat?............................5
10.     Why should I take Holocaust revisionism seriously, if mainstream scholars don’t?...............................................6
11.     What about the pictures of corpse piles in the camps?..............................................................................................7
12.     How about the testimonies by survivors and confessions by perpetrators?.............................................................7
13.     What does it matter whether prisoners died from disease or poison gas?................................................................8
14.     Why does it matter how many Jews were killed by the Nazis, since even 1,000 would have been too many?......9
15.     Whatever the circumstances, don’t Jewish victims deserve respect and compensation?.....................................10
16.     Who are the Holocaust revisionists?..........................................................................................................................10
17.     Do Holocaust revisionists want to exonerate Hitler?................................................................................................ 11
18.     What do Holocaust revisionists want?.......................................................................................................................12
19.     Is Holocaust revisionism illegal?.................................................................................................................................12
20.     Where can I learn more about Holocaust revisionism?...........................................................................................14
1. What is revisionism?
The word “revisionism” is derived from the Latin word “revi-
dere,” which means to view again. The revision of long-held
theories is entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences
as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of his-
tory belongs. Science is not a static condition. It is a process,
specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for evi-
dence. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when
critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it
often happens that old theories have to be changed or even
abandoned. By “revisionism” we mean critically examining
established theories and hypotheses in order to test their va-
lidity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies
or contradicts old theories; indeed, one of their obligations is
to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them.
Only in an open society in which individuals are free to chal-
lenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these
theories, and be confident that we are approaching the truth.
The famous science philosopher Sir Karl Popper once ex-
pressed it as follows: 1
“The demand for scientific objectivity makes it inevitable that
every scientific statement must remain tentative forever. It
may indeed be corroborated, but every corroboration is rela-
tive. [...] it is not his possession of knowledge, of irrefutable
truth, that makes the man a scientist, but his persistent and
reckless critical quest for truth. [...] Those among us who are
unwilling to expose their ideas to the hazard of refutation do
not take part in the scientific game.”
2. Why is historical revisionism important?
Like other scientific concepts, our historical concepts deserve
critical scrutiny, especially when new evidence is discovered.
A re-examination of historical narratives is particularly due if:
1.    We are dealing with events which occurred in the far dis-
tant past. In this case our problem is that we often have
very little evidence on which to base our theories.
2.    We are dealing with events which occurred in the recent
past. In this case, our problem is that we must contend with
political influence deriving from these events.
When we are dealing with the distant past, even a small piece
of new evidence can profoundly change our view. As for the
recent past, the truism “the victor writes the history” still
holds; victors are hardly ever objective. Revising a victor’s
narrative of history is usually not possible until the confronta-
1Info Holocaust
tion between victor and vanquished has ceased to exist. Some-
times these confrontations last for centuries. Since historical
research is rarely a profitable enterprise, almost all historical
institutes are financed by their respective governments. Free
and independent historical institutes are practically nonex-
istent. In contemporary history, in which individual govern-
Info Holocaust
ments have huge political interests, we must be skeptical
toward the official narrative. Another truism reminds us that
“he who pays the piper, calls the tune.” These reasons explain
why historical revisionism is important and why the rulers of
the world tend to oppose it.
3. Why is Holocaust revisionism necessary?
The Holocaust is – or should be – a historical event and not certain lobby groups have been pushing for a war against Iran
a matter of religion. As such, it is subject to the same kind of since 2005, we recognize a pattern: Slobodan Milosevic, in
research and scrutiny as other past events, and so our concep- 1999 leader of tiny Serbia, as well as Saddam Hussein and
tions of the Holocaust must be subjected to critical investiga- now the various presidents of Iran (most notably Mahmoud
tion. If new evidence necessitates a change of our view of the Ahmadinejad) were compared with... Adolf Hitler. Milos-
Holocaust, then a change must take place. The
evic and Hussein were even accused of having
same holds true when old assumptions are prov-
committed similar crimes of genocide – against
en false. There is nothing reprehensible about
the Kosovo Albanians here or the Kurds there.
questioning the accuracy of scientific assertions
These claims, among others, were used to justify
and attempting to deny their validity. Therefore,
the wars. And there is no better justification for
it is not reprehensible to approach prevailing
a war than to prevent a new Hitler – or a new
conceptions of the Holocaust with skepticism,
threat to exterminate the Jewish people, an ac-
as long as it is done objectively and we have
cusation later leveled against Ahmadinejad.
valid reasons to be skeptical.
We know today that the claims about weap-
Most people know that the powers existing
ons
of mass destruction raised against Hussein
Norman Finkelstein
today, particularly in German-speaking coun-
were false. But they served their purpose well,
tries, are opposed to any critical approach to
because the world is so conditioned to react with
the orthodox Holocaust narrative. In fact, many European automatic, Pavlovian-style reflexes to such claims. One rea-
governments prosecute such approaches. Here then is an an- son why these accusations work so well and why the world
swer to the question of why revisionism as such is important is so gullible as to believe them, no matter how often they
(Question 2): Governments outlawing Holocaust skepticism have been revealed to be wrong in the past, is because of that
obviously intend to maintain the present narrative of the Ho- giant bogeyman called Hitler. Once his name is dropped and
locaust with all the official power at their command. One successfully put into the “right” context, there seems to be
reason for this is the massive political and financial interests no stopping. War is the only solution to stop Hitler, Slobo-
of those religious groups so meticulously described by the Hitler, Saddam-Hitler, Mahmoud-Hitler, or whatever their
political scientist Dr. Norman G. Finkelstein in his book The names may be. It has come to the point where summoning
Holocaust Industry that we strongly recommend to everyone the evil spirits of Adolf Hitler and “his” über-genocide – the
(goo.gl/wmq2ep). Because of common exaggerations, inven- Holocaust – is the trump card needed to start just about any
tions and distortions of the Holocaust, Prof. Finkelstein la- war the Powers That Be want to wage.
ments the fact that there aren’t more Holocaust skeptics:
Norman G. Finkelstein agreed with this when he stated in
“Given the nonsense churned out daily by the Holocaust in- an interview in the 2009 documentary Defamation by Israeli
dustry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics.” (p. 68)
documentary filmmaker Yoav Shamir: 3
And the late Prof. Raul Hilberg, during his lifetime the lead-
“The irony is that the Nazi holocaust has now become the
main ideological weapon for launching wars of aggression.
ing Holocaust scholar, repeatedly stated that superficiality
Every time you want to launch a war of aggression, drag in
and inadequate quality control are the greatest problems in
the Nazi holocaust.”
the field of Holocaust research. 2 Hence, Holocaust skeptics
Wasn’t one of the primary lessons of the world wars supposed
are badly needed.
When challenging the orthodox Holocaust narrative, we to be that wars are evil? And wasn’t another lesson that gov-
are inevitably forced to contend with the entire postwar order, ernments use propaganda tricks to drive people into discrimi-
which was created by the victorious Allies. The very credibil- nating against minorities, into ethnic cleansing, into genocide,
ity of the victors’ version of history is at risk, as the Holocaust and into wars? And yet, after World War II the Powers That
is the moral cornerstone of their version of World-War-II his- Be have been very successful in driving their people into one
tory. But this is not just a matter of maintaining a worldwide war after another by referring to this “mother-of-all-wars.”
pecking order of nations or spheres of political influence. For Pacifists are dumbfounded at how good those warmongers
instance, if we look into the war propaganda put forth by the are in using the horrors of this greatest war ever to instigate
U.S. before and during the wars against Serbia in 1999 and even more wars. And so have some of us been for the past
against Iraq in 1991 and 2003, plus when we look into how decade or so. Holocaust revisionism throws a monkey wrench
2
you to believe in justification of their
into this mechanism of “Perpetual War
deeds! Instead, look again (Latin: re-
for Perpetual Peace.” It challenges
videre) into their claims! Review their
the core of the dogma which serves
evidence! Revise your opinion, if
today’s imperialists so well. Famous
needed. This definition of revisionism
British Jewish musician and writer Gi-
is the opposite of what those warmon-
lad Atzmon wrapped it up nicely in a
gers want you to believe, isn’t it? And
blog entry on March 13, 2010 (goo.gl/
for a good reason: because they want
cHt6mi):
Gilad Atzmon
“What is the holocaust religion there
to prevent by all means that we obtain
to conceal? As long as we fail to ask
and entertain a critical mind.
questions, we will be subjected to Zionists and their Neocon
The Catholic priest Viktor R. Knirsch of Kahlenbergerdorf
agents’ plots. We will continue killing in the name of Jewish in Austria has given us some insightful remarks on this sub-
suffering. We will maintain our complicity in Western impe- ject: 4
rialist crimes against humanity. [...] The holocaust became
“It is the right and the duty of everyone who seeks the truth to
the new Western religion. Unfortunately, it is the most sinister
doubt, investigate and consider all available evidence. Wher-
religion known to man. It is a license to kill, to flatten, to nuke,
ever this doubting and investigating is forbidden; wherever
to wipe [out], to rape, to loot and to ethnically cleanse. It
authorities demand unquestioning belief – there is evidence of
made vengeance and revenge into a Western value. [...] Holo-
a profane arrogance, which arouses our suspicions. If those
caust religion robs humanity of its humanism. For the sake of
whose contentions are questioned had truth on their side, they
would patiently answer all questions. Certainly they would
peace and future generations, the holocaust must be stripped
not continue to conceal evidence and documents which per-
of its exceptional status immediately. It must be subjected to
thorough historical scrutiny. Truth and truth seeking is an el-
tain to the controversy. If those who demand belief are lying,
ementary human experience. It must prevail.”
however, they will call for a judge. By this ye shall know them.
He who tells the truth is calm and composed, but he who lies
Hence, critically verifying what our leaders claim is the key
demands worldly justice.”
to peace. And this is what revisionism stands for: Be criti-
cal! Don’t take for granted what those militant Powers want
4. What is meant by “The Holocaust” or “Shoah”?
By “Holocaust” (the Greek word for sacrifice of a burnt offer-
ing) as well as “Shoah,” which is the Hebrew word for “Ca-
tastrophe,” we mean the near-total extermination of a distinct
group of persons through violence. Here we are referring to
Jews who lived in areas controlled by the Third Reich. Loss
of citizenship, deportation, and incarceration with forced la-
bor, things which have always existed and exist today, should
not be included since they do not result in the physical de-
struction of these groups. In the public’s mind, the opinion is
often created that simply depriving Jews of civil rights during
the Third Reich was part of the Holocaust. But if this were
true, then depriving blacks in South Africa until the end of
last century, Palestinians in Israel and the territories occupied
by it, or the (partial) deprivation of the civil rights of Blacks
and Native Americans in the USA until the middle of the 20th
century would also have to be described as part of a Holo-
caust. Hence, this cannot be correct.
The common historical narrative of the Holocaust against
the Jews is postulated on the following specific points:
1.    An intention on the part of the National Socialist govern-
ment to physically exterminate Jews.
2.    An actual plan of the National Socialist government to
physically exterminate the Jews.
3.    A governmental agency and a budget to carry out this plan.
4.    Technically refined methods of mass killing to achieve this
goal, whereby homicidal gas chambers as well as mass
shootings behind the Russian front would play a major
role.
5.    Techniques for disposing of millions of bodies; that is, cre-
matories or pyres with adequate capacity and fuel.
Such allegations of mass murder in fast-acting homicidal gas
chambers followed by disposal of the bodies in adjoining cre-
matoria, that is to say, expertly planned and efficiently func-
tioning assembly lines for homicide, are described as having
been “unique” in human history. They distinguish the Holo-
caust from all atrocities that have ever happened.
5. What does Holocaust revisionism claim?
First of all, because of misrepresentations by the media, it
is necessary that we first clarify what Holocaust revisionism
does not maintain:
– – it does not deny that Jews were persecuted by the Third
Reich;
– – it does not deny that Jews were deprived of civil rights;
– – it does not deny that Jews were deported;
– – it does not deny the existence of Jewish ghettos;
– – it does not deny the existence of concentration camps;
– – it does not deny the existence of crematoria in concentra-
tion camps;
– – it does not deny that Jews died for a great number of rea-
3Info Holocaust
sons;
– – it does not deny that other minorities were also persecuted
such as gypsies, Jehovah’s Witnesses, homosexuals, and
political dissidents;
– – and finally, it does not deny that all the above mentioned
things were unjust.
None of these crimes of the National Socialist regime is
doubted by Holocaust revisionists. Revisionists maintain,
however, that all these injustices have nothing to do with the
Holocaust, which is defined as planned and organized mass
murder, carried out specifically in homicidal gas chambers
(see Question 4).
Holocaust revisionists believe the following to be correct:
1.    There was no National Socialist order or plan for the physi-
cal extermination of Jews (goo.gl/9XMpfN);
2.    There was no German organization and no budget for car-
rying out the alleged extermination plan. Consider the
statement by Professor Dr. Raul Hilberg: 5
“But what began in 1941 was a process of destruction not
planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agen-
cy. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for
destructive measures [of the Jews]. They [the measures]
were taken step by step. Thus came about not so much a
plan being carried out but an incredible meeting of minds,
a consensus mind-reading by a far-flung [German] bureau-
cracy.”
3.    In detailed investigations of former German concentration
camps, expert researchers have established: No documen-
tation or physical evidence for the existence of homicidal
gas chambers or other methods of mass murder exists, and
material traces of the victims are lacking as well. 6 Further-
Info Holocaust
more, the reports of mass shootings were greatly exagger-
ated and taken out of context, 7 and the infamous “gas van,”
the so-called mobile gas chambers, are a product of war-
time propaganda. 8
4.    There were neither adequate industrial facilities nor suf-
ficient fuel to cremate such a huge number of corpses. In
fact, the capacity of the crematoria was barely enough to
cremate the bodies of those who died from starvation and
epidemics. 9
5.    Mass-murder claims rely almost exclusively on eyewitness
accounts, whose unreliability is legendary and widely ac-
knowledged (see Question 12). 10
6.    Despite massive surveillance by spies and resistance
groups active in the vicinity of, and inside German labor,
concentration and alleged extermination camps, all of Ger-
many’s wartime enemies and adversaries conducted them-
selves as if no exterminations of Jews were taking place.
The charges of genocide were not seriously raised until af-
ter Germany’s defeat, when there was no German govern-
ment to dispute them. 11
7.    Statistical investigations of living Jews worldwide show
clearly that the losses of this ethnic group during the Sec-
ond World War were nowhere near six million. Although
attempts were made to establish a somewhat more accurate
figure, 12 the truth is that we simply don’t know for certain,
as a comparison of revisionist and mainstream research has
shown. 13 In fact, the six-million figure, together with ex-
termination and Holocaust claims, has been bandied about
mainly by Jewish media outlets since the late 1800s! 14
To find out more, please read the answer to the last Question.
6. Does Holocaust revisionism ignore important evidence?
This imputation is quite ironic, considering that revisionism
is a reaction to orthodox historians ignoring vast amounts of
evidence.
Take, for example, the infamous Auschwitz Camp. While
orthodox and revisionist historians agree to a large degree
about aspects of the camp’s history not related to mass mur-
der, their views diverge drastically from each other in this
latter regard. The best effort mainstream historians have mus-
tered so far to document mass-murder claims is a 270-page
volume. 15 Each mass-murder location and method is covered
in it with only a few pages. On the other hand, revisionist
scholar Carlo Mattogno has published nine studies of alto-
gether more than 3,500 pages, each one of
which examines in detail these various as-
pects of extermination claims made about
Auschwitz. 16 The evidence presented in
his studies greatly surpasses that of the
orthodoxy both in quantity and quality.
Or take the so-called “Aktion Rein-
hardt” Camps (Belzec, Chelmno, Sobi-
bor, Treblinka), which are said to have
4
been pure extermination centers. Mainstream books on them
are mainly based on selected quotations from cherry-picked
testimonies 17 that they never subject to any source criticism,
which is the Alpha and Omega of any historical scholarship
worthy of that term. Compare this with revisionist studies on
these camps that critically verify what witnesses have testi-
fied in a broader context. 18 By so doing, these studies also
determine the trustworthiness of these witnesses, a factor as-
siduously avoided by the orthodoxy. 19
Hence, revisionist studies on the Holocaust are actually
the only ones meeting scholarly standards. The others? They
play to popular – and legally
mandated – ren-
ditions of the
subject matters.
They may be re-
assuring to the
many, but they
are disquieting
to the discerning
few.
revisionism just deny what is said about
7. Does Holocaust
what happened?
Mostly, it must be admitted, we contest and refute, or at least
question on grounds which we disclose in exhaustive detail.
If sheer effort, ingenuity and integrity could get The Past to
give up her secrets, revisionists would win the day with a
clear, complete and factual account of What Happened.
As it is, the past in its totality is vouchsafed to no one –
each of us is at best one of the six blind men feeling merely
parts of the elephant, as the ancient Indian parable goes – and
this ironically applies to “eyewitnesses” even more than to
others. All of us, as eyewitnesses, can barely understand what
we see, to say nothing of what we hear from others who claim
to have seen.
“War criminals” have been hanged, and a people (the Ger-
mans) condemned and even expelled from their ancestral
homes on the strength of disprovable testimony by selected
parties eager to wreak revenge and receive compensation for
wrongs committed, or not committed, against them by a dic-
tatorial German government that never told the German peo-
ple what it was doing, let alone asked them to approve of it.
Revisionists are troubled by such developments, if only
because anyone, after the next war, might find themselves on
the receiving end of such a process themselves.
Thus, it is on the score of a concern for justice that we
concentrate so on debunking unfounded and false claims of
cruelty and murder leveled against the losers of the last world
war.
Ask not for whom the bell tolls ...
8. Is Holocaust revisionism an anti-Semitic ideology?
Holocaust revisionism is a scholarly, fact-seeking method
based on the critical review of evidence, not an ideology. It
simply reviews the prevailing historical narrative that has
been influenced mainly by Soviet, British and American war-
time propaganda. This concerns not just the fate of Jews dur-
ing the Third Reich but also that of Slavs, Sinti and Roma
(Gypsies), Jehovah’s Witnesses and homosexuals. 20 Impor-
tantly, recent mainstream scholarship has confirmed that Re-
visionists are correct on several critical points of Holocaust
history and probably correct on many more (see the back
cover of this brochure on the Majdanek Camp).
Questioning what we are told by government authorities,
orthodox scholars or mainstream media may be anti-estab-
lishment, but it is not directed against any religious or ethnic
group. Presenting evidence from thorough archival studies
and forensic research, however, isn’t anti-anything.
In fact, the shoe is on the other foot. To explain this, here is
a less-contested example: Just because some Christians detest
certain research results on biological evolution doesn’t make
the results anti-Christian; it only makes these Christians anti-
scientific. And in the same vein: Just because certain people
detest certain research results on the Holocaust doesn’t make
the results anti-Semitic; it only makes these people anti-scien-
tific. While belief in the Holocaust is understandably impor-
tant to many Jewish groups, not believing in the impossible
tales of human-soap factories or steam chambers of death is
no more anti-Semitic than not believing in the transubstantia-
tion of the flesh is anti-Catholic.
It is true that revisionist findings are sometimes cited by
individuals or groups with certain religious or ideological
agendas. But that is potentially true for every field of study
that has any bearing on current issues. The problem then lies
in those citing research results to support ideological political
agendas, not with the research results. The same, of course,
holds for those opposing such results on any grounds other
than scientific ones.
I take Holocaust revisionism more seriously
9. Why should
than the claim that the earth is flat?
There is no topic where dissent is taken more seriously than
when it comes to the Holocaust. The United Nations have
issued a number of resolutions against it, 21 and an increas-
ing number of nations prosecute Holocaust revisionism as a
crime, punished with up to 20 years in prison (see Question
19). The comparison is therefore wrong. In fact, the shoe is
on the other foot. It was once a sin to proclaim the truth that
the earth is a sphere and revolves around the sun, a crime
punished by the Catholic Church with imprisonment or even
death, as Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei found out the
hard way. Today, flat-earthers may be laughed at, but they
are not persecuted beyond that. Holocaust revisionism, how-
ever, is being taken very seriously, because if it were not sup-
pressed, it would spread like a wildfire and threaten the Pow-
ers That Be, just as Bruno’s and Galilei’s theories did.
Whether an unusual claim ought to be looked into and
maybe taken seriously should be judged by what is at stake.
Let me give a few examples:
1.    What would be the repercussions if it turned out the earth is
flat? I cannot see any. So why bother? And why do millions
of scientists, technicians and global logistics people, work-
ing daily with satellites, GPS technology, global(!) naviga-
tion techniques etc., successfully rely on the assumption
that the earth is spherical, if that were not so?
5Info Holocaust
1.    Take, on the other hand, the events of 9/11/2001. What
would be the repercussion if it wasn’t a Muslim terror
act, but a false-flag operation by government authorities?
(See www.ae911truth.org) It would have enormous ef-
fects, so it’s worth our time looking into the arguments
of both sides.
2.    Or take the claim that no man ever landed on the moon.
Other than leaving the LB Johnson and Nixon adminis-
trations with egg in their faces, and a dent in the U.S.’s
self-confidence and credibility, the issue is more academ-
ic than impactful. Although it is an admittedly interesting
challenge.
3.    Last but not least we have the climate-change debate.
What if climate change is – rightly or wrongly – assumed
real, and we implement drastic measures to counter it?
Then worldwide carbon-emission limits might cause a
major economic crisis at worst. On the other hand, what
if climate change is erroneously assumed a hoax, and we
keep spewing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere? Then
a mass extinction event might happen on earth, wiping
out most life as we know it, including all humans. Which
brings up the issue of risk assessment. Any side in any de-
bate can be wrong. The question then is: what is at stake?
If the matter is merely academic in nature, there is no
need to get involved, but when world peace or even the
survival of humanity is at risk, one should get informed
and get involved.
Coming back to the Holocaust, the question is what is at stake
here. Some of it was touched upon in the answer to Question
3. This is not the place for a thorough political and sociologi-
cal analysis of the Holocaust’s place in modern western soci-
ety. Suffice it to say that the Powers That Be prove ultimately
Info Holocaust
with their unparalleled and unprecedented persecution and
suppression that this is THE MOST IMPORTANT TOPIC
about which they are hell-bent on keeping an absolute control
over our minds. That’s fishy enough to warrant a closer look.
In addition to this, here are a few observations highlighting
the importance of this greatest of all taboos:
– – The Holocaust was and is the justification for the creation
of Israel, and the ethnic cleansing of Arab Palestinians
from territories under its control.
– – The Holocaust is the most important aspect of modern, pre-
dominantly secularized Jewish identity (goo.gl/zBRE87).
– – The Holocaust is abused as a justification for human-rights
violations and violations of international law by Israel.
– – The Holocaust is the moral justification for the special re-
lationship between the US and other western nations on the
one hand and Israel on the other, resulting in almost unani-
mous and unconditional support for whatever Israel does.
– – The Holocaust is in extension used to support and justify
the “war on terror,” which is to a large degree a war of the
West against the Arab and Muslim world as Israel’s poten-
tially most-dangerous opponent and enemy.
– – The Holocaust is by a great margin the most important as-
pect of modern, predominantly secularized German iden-
tity. It makes the German nation defenseless against many
claims usually resisted by self-confident nations. Germa-
ny’s Holocaust cult is a suicidal death cult. This has be-
come crystal clear with the 2015 refugee crisis.
– – The Holocaust is abused to undermine any attempt at self-
preservation by any European nation, or by Europe in gen-
eral, thus jeopardizing European civilization as we know it
and threatening all European countries to be turned into an
assembly of failed third-world countries.
I take Holocaust revisionism seriously,
10. Why should
if mainstream scholars don’t?
They do take it seriously. Some orthodox Holocaust scholars
–    Auschwitz: Plain Facts. A Response to Jean-Claude Pres-
have dedicated entire books trying in vain to refute revisionist
sac
arguments (they usually avoid the core revisionist points and
–    Auschwitz Lies: Legends, Lies, and Prejudices on the
focus on straw-man arguments or side issues), while many
Holocaust
other mainstream scholars are simply
–    Inside the Gas Chambers: The Exter-
mortally afraid to address the issue,
mination of Mainstream Holocaust
because they either have to lie (regur-
Historiography
gitate the orthodox narrative uncriti-
–    The Real Case for Auschwitz: Robert
cally), which most scholars refuse to
van Pelt’s Evidence from the Irving
do, or have their careers ruined and
Trial Critically Reviewed
their social life upended, which is not
–    Bungled: “Denying the Holocaust.”
a pleasant prospect either. So they
How Deborah Lipstadt Botched Her
stay out of trouble by not getting in-
Attempt to Demonstrate the Growing
volved and paying lip service to the
Assault on Truth and Memory
taboo.
–    Bungled: “Debunking Holocaust
Here are some of the attempts at
Denial Theories.” How James and
refutation by orthodox scholars as
Lance Morcan Botched Their At-
Book and counter-book: van Pelt’s The
discussed by revisionists (find out
tempt to Affirm the Historicity of the
Case for Auschwitz and Mattogno’s The
Real Case for Auschwitz (Holocaust
more about them at shop.codoh.com;
Nazi Genocide
Handbooks, Volumes 22)
some are available as free eBooks):
6
11. What about the pictures of corpse piles in the camps?
To the right we see a photograph of victims of the typhus epi-
demic in a mass grave at the Bergen-Belsen Camp as taken by
the British Army in May 1945.
This photo is typical of a large number of such photos often
shown on Holocaust documentaries either without commen-
tary or else with allegations that the dead are victims of the
Holocaust. In fact, it is a photograph of victims of an epidem-
ic which occurred at war’s end. The cause of death is evident
from the condition of the corpses and was also demonstrated
by thousands of autopsies performed after the camps’ libera-
tion by Allied forensic experts. 22 If they had been gassed, they
would not be emaciated, and if they had died of starvation,
they would have swollen joints and stomachs.
All photographs of heaps of corpses were taken in camps
located in west and central Germany around the end of the
war, such as Dachau, Bergen-Belsen, and Buchenwald, where
historians now agree no mass murders took place. Significant-
ly, there are no such photographs taken at the camps in which
mass murder is alleged to have occurred (such as Auschwitz,
Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor, Chelmno, Majdanek.) These east-
ern camps were all in areas which came under Soviet control
at war’s end. It is very telling that the Soviets released no
pictures of mass graves or heaps of corpses, and allowed no
journalists, medical professionals, or other experts to exam-
ine the camps.
Since the end of the 1980s, revisionists have been inves-
tigating these sites for evidence of mass murder, but govern-
ment authorities have obstructed their efforts by all possible
means.
In the absence of authentic photographs documenting
mass murder, it frequently happens that photographs of
those who died of malnutrition and typhus in the western
camps at war’s end are presented as evidence of deliber-
ate mass murder. To be sure, the hellish conditions in these
camps at war’s end convinced many Allied observers that
mass murder had taken place, as initial reports indicate.
In reality, however, these conditions resulted from a situation
for which the German government was not solely responsible.
Toward the end of the war, Himmler illogically ordered the
evacuation of the eastern camps as the Red Army approached,
which led to hopeless overcrowding in the western camps. By
that time, Allied bombing had completely destroyed the Ger-
man infrastructure, making it impossible to supply the camps
Photo of victims of the typhus epidemic in a mass grave
at the Bergen-Belsen Camp, taken by the British Army.
with food, medical and sanitation supplies.
Misunderstandings about the causes of the subsequent
massive die-off continue to this day, especially among Ameri-
cans. The respected leftist historian Norbert Frei has given
the following reason for misinterpretation, (goo.gl/pTsqHY,
p. 400):
“The shock of these discoveries [piles of corpses] often led to
false conclusions which turned out to be enduring.”
There is no denying that a government which imprisons peo-
ple in camps is responsible for them, and so those unjustly
imprisoned were therefore victims of the Third Reich, even if
they died “only” of disease. 23 However, one should not over-
look the fact that by the war’s end mountains of corpses had
become commonplace throughout Germany. In German cities
there were 600,000 victims of Allied terror bombings. Mil-
lions more died of starvation and disease, which continued
rampant through 1949. In Eastern Europe some two million
Germans were murdered by Serbs, Czechs, Poles, and Rus-
sians in the course of history’s bloodiest ethnic cleansing. In
the POW camps of the western Allies, a million young Ger-
man men died and millions more vegetated. Hundreds of
thousands more were shipped to the labor camps of the Soviet
GULag never to be seen again. But the media show only one
variety of corpse piles, those in the concentration camps. We
should all ask ourselves why this is so. Should the dignity and
respect, which we owe the victims of atrocities, depend on
their nationality or religious affiliation?
the testimonies by survivors
12. How about
and confessions by perpetrators?
Let’s talk about perpetrator confessions first, as they seem
most compelling. After all, why would they lie? These testi-
monies can be divided into roughly three groups:
1.    confessions under duress
2.    tactical court room confessions
3.    uncoerced, voluntary confessions
On 1: Right after the World War II, the Soviet, British and US
forces maintained torture centers where they systematically
tortured and abused hundreds, if not thousands of German
defendants (see for instance Ian Cobain’s book Cruel Britan-
nia 24 ). Some of the most “important” confessions resulted
from this, for instance that of Rudolf Höss, former comman-
7Info Holocaust
Info Holocaust
dant of the Auschwitz camp, whose family was
threatened on top of it. 25
On 2: As the archives of the Holy Inquisi-
tion prove, tens of thousands of defendants con-
fessed voluntarily during centuries of witch tri-
als that they were witches and had intercourse
with the devil. The vast majority of them were
never put under duress. What has that to do with
the Holocaust? Challenging the doctrines of the
Catholic Church was as futile back then as chal-
lenging the doctrine of the Holocaust has been
since the end of World War II. In both cases,
any defendant put on trial could expect a mild
sentence only if he confirmed the general story
but tried to minimize his own involvement and
Three trail-blazing critiques of “eyewitness” testimony:
Rudolf Höss, Elie Wiesel and Miklós Nyiszli.
responsibility. This is the exact pattern one finds
(Holocaust Handbooks, Volumes 35, 30 and 37)
with many modern defendants. Some, of course,
didn’t get the message and stubbornly denied,
many German camps. One of its symptoms resembles
and they were the ones who frequently were treated harshly.
meningitis in that the patient experiences nightmarish hor-
On 3: These are similar to depositions by survivors, treated
ror delusions expressing his deepest fears. Many inmates
below. Uncoerced testimonies by survivors, bystanders or
survived the disease but were unable to process the memo-
alleged perpetrators can be wrong for many reasons. When
ries from their hallucinatory episodes.
it comes to survivors, the obvious one is that some of them
–    Pressure – almost everybody in the world expects survi-
might exaggerate or lie resulting from a desire for revenge.
vors to “remember.” That pressure is huge, in particular for
But that can explain only some of the testimony. Other pos-
Jewish survivors, who are considered traitors if they don’t
sible reasons are:
remember the “right” things.
–    Rumors – especially during times of war and unrest, any
–    Fear and threats – anyone failing to remember the “right”
kind of prisoner camp is a hotbed for the creation and
things, or even contesting certain things, must fear nega-
spreading of rumors.
tive social and sometimes even legal repercussions. After
–    Misunderstandings – partial information about events are
all, there is nothing viler in this world than to deny that “it”
frequently misinterpreted to fit into preconceived notions,
happened, whatever “it” means.
feeding on rumors and anxieties.
–    Impunity – no matter what camp survivors say, they will be
–    Hearsay – information not experienced directly but im-
believed. The more fantastic their stories, the more riveted
parted orally has the tendency of getting distorted quickly.
the audience, the more fame and money can be reaped.
–    Interpolation – the human brain abhors uncertainty. We all
If they are ever caught lying, there is no repercussion. In
consciously and even more so subconsciously fill the lack
fact, criticizing survivors is considered blasphemous and
of data by making assumptions and jumping to conclu-
can lead to social persecution and in many countries even
sions, which we then perceive as “data.”
prosecution. There is simply no incentive to tell the truth,
–    Manipulating the human memory – research has shown
but lots of incentives to lie and exaggerate.
that many people tend to integrate information and disin- In the end, whether we think a witness tells the truth or not
formation they receive from others into their memory in should not depend on how likable or trustworthy we think he
such a way that they wrongly assume it stems from their is, but on whether his or her statement is plausible, physically
own first-hand experience. That tendency increases with possible, and supported by other, verifiable evidence. After
increased exposure to such information and with increased all, the unreliability of testimonies by persons who are party
expectations by others to “remember.”
to a crime (victims and perpetrators) is legendary. 26
–    Disease – typhus was a widespread epidemic raging in
it matter whether prisoners
13. What does
died from disease or poison gas?
From the point of view of each victim and their personal suf-
fering, there is no difference. One could even make the point
that it would be preferable to die quickly from poison than to
die slowly from an epidemic disease.
However, in the present discussion we are not focusing on
the intensity of the victims’ suffering, which no one questions.
8
Here we are concerned with the historical accuracy of certain
allegations and the moral guilt of the so-called German “na-
tion of perpetrators” as well as the consequences which re-
sulted from these allegations.
Considered from the historian’s as well as the perpetrators’
point of view, there is a tremendous difference between being
victims of raging epidemics and victims of planned industrial
mass murder in chemical slaughterhouses designed specifi-
cally for homicide. Epidemics, starvation and other catastro-
phes resulting from poor treatment, political mistakes and
military defeats are recurrent in the history of mankind.
Here we are concerned with the historical and moral
uniqueness of industrial mass annihilation of a specific sub-
group of a population. The entire German nation has been
held responsible for this unique crime, not just individual
perpetrators. This is the source of occasional discrimination
against Germans (“collective responsibility” and “hereditary
guilt”), and of privileged treatment of Jews as the main tar-
gets of this claimed genocide.
We strongly suggest you read what Dr. Finkelstein had to
say on this subject. (The Holocaust Industry, goo.gl/wmq2ep).
it matter how many Jews were killed by the
14. Why does
Nazis, since even 1,000 would have been too many?
It is doubtless correct that even one is one too many, and re-
ally one must go even farther than that: even those measures
of Third Reich persecution which did not result in outright
deaths were in every respect unacceptable. But this is not
a valid argument against the statistical investigation of the
“whether” and “how” of the destruction of the Jews, and for
three reasons.
First, this objection does not satisfy simply for the reason
that it is precisely the number of victims that has been con-
sidered sacrosanct for decades. If the number of victims did
not matter, it would not be necessary to protect it as a social
and even criminal taboo. Evidently there really is more to the
six-million figure than merely the fact that it includes a great
many individual fates: What is at stake is a symbol not to be
easily relinquished, since justified doubts about the number
might quickly lead to further undesirable skepticism about
further subsections of the Holocaust narrative. While not de-
nying the tragedy of the victims’ individual fates in any way,
science must nevertheless insist that numbers always be open
to discussion. It is downright irrational that, on the one hand,
those who doubt the six-million figure are socially persecuted
or even subjected to criminal prosecution, while society and
the justice system, on the other hand, react to valid arguments
against this selfsame six-million figure by suddenly declaring
it irrelevant and insisting instead on the dignity of even the
very first victim. Is the six-million figure a standard deserving
of protection by criminal law, or is it irrelevant? It cannot be
both at once.
The second and also most important argument goes as fol-
lows: The ethically correct evaluation that even one victim
would be too many must not
be a pretext for prohibiting
scientific research. This is
intolerable for the simple rea-
son that science must always
be allowed to find precise an-
swers. What would we think
of an official who demanded
that an engineer not be al-
lowed to conduct thorough
risk assessments of con-
struction projects, because
even a low risk value would
Carlo Mattogno
be intolerable? An engineer
subjected to such an absurd demand would quickly arrive at
incorrect results and would be a threat to any company that
hired him. The same is true for historians. If a historian is
forbidden to conduct critical investigations because they are
considered morally unacceptable, then we have to assume
that the results of such skewed historiography are unreliable.
And since our knowledge of contemporary history exerts a
direct influence on politics, our public policies are mistaken
and unreliable as well.
It is the key function and responsibility of every branch of
science to provide accurate figures and values. The principles
applying to engineering, physics, and chemistry cannot sud-
denly be abandoned in historiography for political reasons –
unless one is intellectually prepared to retreat deep into the
darkest middle ages.
Third, the morally correct view that even one victim is one
too many cannot on principle be a barrier to the scientific in-
vestigation of a crime which is generally called so morally
reprehensible as to be unique and unparalleled in the history
of mankind. An allegedly uniquely reprehensible crime must
be open to a procedure that is standard for any other crime as
well, namely that it is – and must be – investigated in detail.
Further still: anyone who postulates a crime to be unique
must be prepared for a uniquely thorough investigation of this
alleged crime before its uniqueness is accepted as fact. If a
person or group blocks investigation of an allegedly unique
crime on grounds of moral outrage, then that person or group
is guilty of a unique crime itself. This unique crime consists
of first denying defense against preposterous allegations, then
preventing criticism of such tyrannical methods on the pre-
text of unusual guilt. This was the precise fate of Germany
following World War II, with
the result that Germans were
first brutalized, then slan-
dered and denied opportunity
to defend themselves. The
treatment of vanquished Ger-
many by the victorious Allies
has been truly unique in mod-
ern times, since the same Al-
lies otherwise give even the
most notorious serial murder-
ers an opportunity to defend
Athur R. Butz
themselves in court.
9Info Holocaust
Info Holocaust
circumstances, don’t Jewish victims
15. Whatever the
deserve respect and compensation?
Everyone who is treated unjustly is entitled to reparations,
and every victim of crime deserves respect commensurate
with human dignity. Revisionism is concerned solely with
determination of objective historic fact and has no aim to
deny either respect or restitution to anyone who has suffered
injustice. In case the evidence shows that a particular histori-
cal event did not have anywhere near as many victims as was
previously believed, this is simply a historical determination
that has no effect on the fate of anyone. Objective evidence
could even be of assistance to newly discovered victims.
As of 2016, the German government had paid some 75.5
billion eEuros (ca. 93 billion U.S. dollars) in reparations to
those “persecuted by the Nazi regime” (goo.gl/boSmaZ). But
as large as these sums seem to be, the main issue isn’t even
financial in nature, which can be demonstrated with just one
example. According to Wikipedia, in just the year 2010, the
Germans collectively spent 120 billion euros (almost 150 bil-
lion U.S. dollars) on their vacations! 27 This makes Germa-
ny the world leader in per-capita tourism expenditures. It is
therefore obvious that the Germans spend on their vacation
every single year more than they have ever paid to victims of
the Holocaust and other (alleged or real) persecution commit-
ted during World War II. This shows clearly that the burden
on the Germans cannot be all that high, financially speaking.
So this is not primarily a financial issue. The real issue is mor-
al and legal in nature. Perhaps you remember a basic principle
which is the law in every constitutional state: accountability
does not extend to convicts’ relatives. There should therefore
be a time limit for claims made against the German people, as
the wartime generation is dying out. In addition, this is also
a matter or fairness, as the Germans weren’t the only ones
inflicting pain and suffering on others. For instance, wouldn’t
it be interesting to know when the four million Germans who
were exploited as slave laborers by France, the UK, Norway,
the United States, the Soviet Union, Poland, Czechoslova-
kia... for years and sometimes even decades after the end of
WWII (goo.gl/tEBaFd) may finally be allowed to claim repa-
rations? When will the 12 million eastern German victims
of ethnic cleansing and the survivors of the two million who
were murdered or died in the process (goo.gl/3Q98Z7), the
six hundred thousand victims of Allied terror bombings (goo.
gl/Yng7GA), the millions of Germans who died of starvation
under Allied postwar blockade and de-industrialization and
Eisenhower’s withholding of food to them, be given proper
recompense? 28
Do not all victims of injustice deserve the same respect
and reparations? Or are some victims more equal than others?
16. Who are the Holocaust revisionists?
Holocaust revisionists are not a homogenous group. They in- as well as teachers in other fields, such as Jürgen Graf.
The ranks of Holocaust revisionists include Communists
clude Jews (defined by heritage: Josef G. Burg, Roger Guy
Dommergue, David Cole, Joel Hayward, Gerard Menuhin, and Socialists (Paul Rassinier, Roger Garaudy), moderate
Paul Eisen, Henry Herskovitz); Christians (Michael A. Hoff- Leftists (Pierre Guillaume, Serge Thion), Libertarians (An-
man, Robert Countess); Muslims (Ibrahim Alloush, Ahmed drew Allen, Germar Rudolf, David Cole, Bradley Smith,
Rami, Roger Garaudy) as well as agnostics and atheists (Ger- Richard Widmann), Conservatives (Carlo Mattogno, Willy
Wallwey), Rightists (Udo Walendy, Mark Weber) and Na-
mar Rudolf, Bradley Smith, Robert Faurisson)
Some revisionists suffered persecution by the National So- tional Socialists (Ernst Zündel, Vincent Reynouard).
Since we don’t consider it important to classify revisionists
cialist regime as well as internment in concentration camps
(Paul Rassinier, Josef G. Burg). Others are veterans of World according to political orientation, we cannot vouch for the
War II, from both the German and Allied armed forces (Willy correctness of these designations, though.
Among our ranks are Frenchmen (Rob-
Wallwey, Wilhelm Stäglich, Douglas
ert Faurisson, Pierre Guillaume, Roger Ga-
Collins.). Some revisionists are profes-
raudy, Paul Rassinier, Vincent Reynouard,
sors (Prof. Robert Faurisson, Prof. Ar-
Jean Plantin), Americans (Bradley Smith,
thur R. Butz, Prof. Thomas Dalton, Prof.
Thomas Dalton, Mark Weber, Arthur Butz,
Costas Zaverdinos) and some have PhD
Richard Widmann, Fred Leuchter), Germans
degrees (Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich, Dr. Rob-
(Germar Rudolf, Walter Lüftl, Willy Wall-
ert Countess, Dr. Herbert Tiedemann. Dr.
wey, Arnulf Neumaier, Wilhelm Stäglich),
Nicholas Kollerstrom). Some have mas-
Swiss (Jürgen Graf, Arthur Vogt), Ital-
ters degrees in chemistry, physics or en-
ians (Carlo Mattogno), Spaniards (Enrique
gineering (Willy Wallwey, Walter Lüftl,
Aynat), Jordanians (Ibrahim Alloush), Mo-
Germar Rudolf, Arnulf Neumaier, Fried-
roccans (Ahmed Rami), Swedes, Danes,
rich Berg); there are historians (Mark
Britons (Nicholas Kollerstrom), Poles, and
Weber, Robert Countess, Carlo Mattog-
Germar Rudolf
Russians, to name just a few. 29
no, Jean Plantin, Nicholas Kollerstrom)
10
17. Do Holocaust revisionists want to exonerate Hitler?
with the possible ‘moral’ spin-off effects of our findings in
Historians must not pay attention to what effect their research
relation to politicians or regimes of the past or present, but
has on anyone’s reputation, even and especially their own.
solely with the facts. Anyone who argues otherwise is the en-
Hence, whatever the effects of revisionist findings are on Hit-
emy of knowledge.”
ler’s or anyone else’s reputation, it simply is of no moment.
Again, it may be true that some individuals or groups
Let’s quote Germar Rudolf on this point: 30
“Revisionists are repeatedly accused of wanting to whitewash sometimes cite revisionist findings to support their religious
National Socialism, redeem it, or even resurrect nationalistic- or ideological agendas. But let us be very clear here: We
authoritarian political systems, or assist in a breakthrough Holocaust revisionists depend more than anyone else on the
of nationalism. That may be true for some revisionists, but protection of our inalienable rights to freedom of information
certainly not for all of them. But be that as it may, the fact is and freedom of expression. Hence, we oppose any measure
that political suspicions do not contribute anything to the fac- limiting these rights, be they in the past, the present or the
tual debate, as they cannot refute factual arguments. When it future.
In the spring of 1933, the German government under
comes to discussing facts, it is therefore irrelevant both what
the revisionists want and what others accuse them of wanting. Hitler decided to suspend and later effectively revoke most
While researching, our highest goal must at all times be to Germans’ civil rights as they were enshrined in the German
discover how historical events actually occurred – as the constitution of the time. Anyone decrying similar acts hap-
19th-Century German historian Leopold Ranke maintained. pening today in many European countries (see Question 19)
For example, historians should not place research in the ser- must also condemn Hitler’s acts as unacceptable. We can’t
vice of making criminal accusations against Genghis Khan have it both ways.
Moreover, when Hitler decided in the summer of 1934 to
and the Mongol hordes, nor to whitewash any of their wrong-
doings. Anybody insisting that research be barred from exon- execute without due process several leaders of the SA for
erating Genghis Khan of criminal accusations would be the allegedly planning a putsch, rather than handing them over
object of ridicule and would be subject to the suspicion that to the court system for prosecution, they committed murder,
he was, in fact, acting out of political motives. If this were plain and simple. Anyone decrying arsons, bomb attacks,
not so, why would anyone insist that our historical view of physical assaults and murder perpetrated against revision-
Genghis Khan forever be defined solely by Khan’s victims and ists as unacceptable acts of (attempted) murder 31 must also
condemn Hitler’s acts as unacceptable. We can’t have it both
enemies?
The same reasoning applies to Hitler and the Third Reich. ways.
Both revisionists and their adversaries are entitled to their
Finally, after the infamous 1938 “Night of Broken Glass”
political views. The accusation, however, that revisionists are pogroms against Jews in Germany, Hitler and his govern-
only interested in exonerating National Socialism and that ment decided to make matters worse by prohibiting insurance
such an effort is reprehensible or even criminal, is a boomer- companies from paying indemnifications to Jews for damages
ang: This accusation implies that it is deemed unacceptable incurred during these acts of vandalism, and by collectively
to partially exonerate National Socialism historically, and by punishing all the Jews in Germany with a fine of one billion
so doing, always also morally. But by declaring any hypothet- Reichsmarks! Anyone decrying that we revisionists as vic-
ical exoneration based on possible facts as unacceptable, one tims of societal persecution get fined and imprisoned on top
admits openly not to be interested in the quest
of this must also condemn Hitler’s acts of
for the truth, but in incriminating National So-
blaming and punishing the victims. We
cialism historically and morally under any cir-
can’t have it both ways.
cumstances and at all costs. And the motivation
And we won’t even start with incar-
behind this can only be political. Hence, those
cerating people with or without due pro-
accusing revisionists of misusing their research
cess merely because of their peacefully
for political ends have themselves been proven
expressed views or religious and ethnic
guilty of exactly this offense. It is therefore not
affiliations. Anyone decrying that we re-
necessarily the revisionists who are guided by
visionists are incarcerated for our peace-
political motives – though quite a few of them
fully expressed views – and we are – must
certainly are – but with absolute certainty all
also condemn Hitler’s acts along the same
those who accuse the revisionists of harboring
lines. We can’t have it both ways.
reprehensible motives. Although many consider
We cannot stop certain people from ap-
the anti-fascist motives of those combatting re-
plauding, condoning or defending these
visionism as morally worthwhile, they remain
and other criminal acts of the Hitler gov-
What is more important:
political motives that are hostile to discovering
ernment. But we can show that we con-
Vilifying Hitler
and evaluating the factual issues at hand.
demn them wholeheartedly, on our own
or finding out the truth?
In short, our research must never be concerned
behalf, as peaceful dissidents.
11Info Holocaust
Info Holocaust
18. What do Holocaust revisionists want?
I would like to turn that question around: What do our de-
tractors want who declare an irreproachable intention – the
critical review of one chapter in history – to be taboo, and
who ostracize, persecute and even incarcerate any offenders?
These are frequently the same people who impute all sorts
of evil intentions to us revisionists. But we are not the ones
persecuting and incarcerating peaceful, innocent people! It is
therefore much more conducive and important to ask about
the motives of those who mercilessly persecute the revision-
ists with their worldwide power. Why do they do that?
And if you, dear reader, are unwilling to pursue the ques-
tion about their motives, but keep wondering about ours, then
maybe you should start questioning your own bias.
Since the revisionists comprise such a heterogeneous
group (see Question 16), it is impossible to state what “the”
revisionists hope to accomplish. Obviously, any cliché about
revisionists must therefore be false and misleading. However,
revisionists do have one thing in common: determination to
expose the lack of evidence for the conventional Holocaust
narrative and to convince others of it.
Revisionists would probably quarrel endlessly about ev-
erything else, particularly if they tried to seek common politi-
cal ground. It is, therefore, false and misleading to ascribe a
uniform political agenda to them. The political views of revi-
sionists are indeed varied and incongruous. In contrast to that,
the governments and media of most western societies spread
the cliché that all revisionists are right-wing extremists who
are attempting to rehabilitate the National Socialist regime in
order to usher in a new authoritarian government of the right.
This may be true for some revisionists, but they are a minority
within revisionist ranks.
Perhaps a few prominent examples will illustrate the po-
litical variety of revisionists’ political leanings, which makes
it inconceivable that they harbor the sinister intentions often
ascribed to them:
Paul Rassinier: What would have motivated a French
Communist, who was interned in a German concentration
camp on account of his activities in the Resistance in helping
Jews to escape the Nazis, to rehabilitate National Socialism?
Josef G. Burg: What would have motivated a Jew who
suffered under the occupation of both the Germans and Rus-
sians during the Second World War?
Fred Leuchter: What would have motivated an entirely
apolitical American expert in execution technology?
Pierre Guillaume, Serge Thion: What would have mo-
tivated leftist-anarchist Frenchmen to rehabilitate National
Socialism in Germany?
Roger Garaudy: What would have motivated a longtime
prominent French Communist?
Bradley Smith, Richard Widmann: What would have
motivated American libertarians?
Jean Plantin, Germar Rudolf: What would motivate
these liberal and conservative European professionals, born
in the mid-1960s, to rehabilitate National Socialism?
Does it really matter what a revisionist is trying to achieve
with his political or other ideas? After all, the proof for some-
one’s claim lies in the evidence adduced, not in their political
agenda.
19. Is Holocaust revisionism illegal?
In the United States, it is covered by the First Amendment,
like a peaceful, scholarly speech, which means that it is per-
fectly legal to voice, write, publish revisionist views. Things
are quite different, however, when we turn to Canada, Austra-
lia, or even many countries in Europe and to Israel (see goo.
gl/8Tpbiq).
The reason for this persecution is the claim that revision-
ist theories insult Jews, and that it is illegitimate to heap in-
sult upon those who have been injured during World War II.
Although Holocaust revisionism does not address anything
about Jews as such (although some supporters of revisionism
might), the leaders of most Jewish communities feel heav-
ily offended by it, because revisionism directly or indirectly
comes to the conclusion that several Jewish personalities
were not always truthful when testifying about their experi-
ences in World War II.
Of course, it would be surprising if Jews were the only
identifiable group of humanity who never lie, distort, exag-
gerate or are simply mistaken, but apparently leading Jewish
representatives feel, and the authorities in numerous western
countries agree, that nobody should ever be allowed to claim
12
that certain Jews made untrue statements about the Holocaust.
However, if we look into the legal situation, we must insist
that theoretically speaking Holocaust revisionism should be
perfectly legal in all these countries. This is so because all
these nations signed the United Nations Declaration of Hu-
man Rights, which makes these Human Rights binding on
all these nations. Freedom of speech can be limited only in
cases of insult or incitement to criminal acts, but freedom of
scientific research and peaceful speech can never be limited
– theoretically.
For this reason, a comprehensive German PhD thesis on
The Punishability of the Auschwitz Lie (Die Strafbarkeit des
Auschwitz-Leugnens) came to the conclusion that Holocaust
revisionism itself cannot be legally repressed, as this violates
basic human rights. 32 The facts are different, however. So how
is that discrepancy between ideal and reality justified?
As a justification for this blatant violation of civil rights,
it is often claimed that revisionist views, even if presented
soberly and without any inflammatory words, could instigate
people to commit illegal acts against others (mainly Jews) or
could even threaten “public peace.” Purely factual, soberly
presented and substantiated claims, however, can never cause position to war and slavery): 33
such acts, no matter how controversial and taboo-breaking
“Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them, or shall
we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have suc-
they might be. If people overreact to such texts, the problem
ceeded, or shall we transgress them at once? Men generally,
lies within those people – their upbringing or social condi-
under such a government as this, think that they ought to wait
tioning – or within society itself for having created a taboo in
until they have persuaded the majority to alter them. They
the first place.
think that, if they should resist, the remedy would be worse
The claim that matter-of-factual views about the persecu-
than the evil. But it is the fault of the government itself that
tion of the Jews itself could be inflammatory is therefore a
the remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it worse. Why is it
simple lie. If that method were to be applied universally, it
not more apt to anticipate and provide for reform? Why does
could be misused for the prohibition of each and everything,
it not cherish its wise minority? Why does it cry and resist
if only some influential group can be found that feels suffi-
before it is hurt? Why does it not encourage its citizens to be
ciently upset or unsettled by it. In fact, the concept of “public
on the alert to point out its faults, and do better than it would
peace” is a perfect authoritarian tool to suppress any contro-
have them? Why does it always crucify Christ, and excom-
versial view, no matter how legitimate.
municate Copernicus and Luther, and pronounce Washington
The only rule needed for governing free speech is this: Ev-
and Franklin rebels? [...]
erything is permitted, as long as one does not call for, pro-
A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it
mote, condone or justify the violation of the civil rights of
is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs
others. Since all acts that really threaten the public peace, like
by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in
calls for a violent revolution, insurrection, putsch, riot, po-
prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate
grom, ethnic cleansing, etc., are at once calls for the violation
which to choose. [...]
of the civil rights of others, the concept of “public peace”
Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true
becomes obsolete and can no longer be misused by the au-
place for a just man is also in prison.”
thorities to stifle legitimate peaceful yet controversial views.
Another justification for anti-revisionist oppressive laws, Or to put it as did Mahatma Gandhi, who was inspired by
in particular in the German-speaking countries, goes roughly Thoreau’s essay some 70 years later: 34
“So long as the superstition that men should obey unjust laws
as follows:
exists, so long will their slavery exist.”
In order to prevent that minorities will again be persecuted,
dissidents imprisoned and books burned, as has happened in
the [Nazi] past, we
must for a change
persecute
some
other minorities,
imprison
other
kinds of dissidents
and burn their
books.
This perversion of
logic does not re-
quire any further
comment.
Hence,
we are dealing with
“democratically”
enacted, yet tyran-
nical laws permit-
ting the majority to
suppress a peaceful
minority, plain and
simple. It is there-
fore not Holocaust
revisionism which
is unlawful, but the
laws that outlaw it.
U.S. American Hen-
ry David Thoreau
wrapped it up nicely
when he wrote some
Map of Europe, with countries outlawing dissent on the orthodox Holocaust narrative in red,
with the year given when each country introduced its law.
160 years ago (in op-
13Info Holocaust
Info Holocaust
20. Where can I learn more about Holocaust revisionism?
The best, fastest, cheapest place for this is the Internet and,
especially for English-language readers, the websites www.
codoh.com and www.HolocaustHandbooks.com. If your ser-
vice provider blocks these pages (obvious proof of censor-
ship), you can circumvent Big Brother with the help of the
free service provided by various anonymizing services which
hide the content you are requesting and receiving from your
Internet service provider, so they won’t withhold it. 2017, Amazon blocked all our books and deleted all associ-
ated book reviews, so you can’t find the reviews quoted here
anymore – so much for freedom of speech...):
“Phenomenal. A fantastic starting point.
For a 115-page book, it is a truly shocking and eye-opening
work. I cannot recommend this highly enough. Honestly, sub-
ject your accepted opinion on the matter to this 1-hour read
and see where you sit after that.”
Don’t Know Where to Start? Start with a Movie T. Dalton, Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both
Sides
The above-mentioned brief introduction into the topic is
a condensation of this more-encompassing study, in which
Dalton studies the topic more thoroughly by juxtaposing the
most important arguments of the two contending sides in the
raging debate about the “Holocaust,” which, some say, should
not be debated in the first place. The book has some 300 pages
of text of a larger format (6×9 inches). At $25/£18 as a hard
copy, it’s still a steal. Amazon customer “patito,” a verified
buyer of the book, wrote this brief review about it:
“Most important Holocaust book in this moment
The updates to the 2015 edition are especially important as
the author corrects and forwards a proposal towards the end.
A very good compilation of the real state of affairs regard-
ing the actual evidence for one argument or the other. The
Epilogue is especially critical to understanding the whole
picture.”
To ease you into the subject, we recommend that you sit back,
relax and watch an introductory documentary. There are sev-
eral choices we recommend. You can find them all for watch-
ing and downloading free of charge at www.HolocaustHand-
books.com:
Holocaust, Hate Speech & Were the Germans So Stupid?
The late British video-journalist Anthony Lawson, a retired
international-prize-winning commercials director, camera-
man, ad agency creative director and voice-over artist, ex-
pertly introduces the viewer to the basic concepts and conse-
quences of skepticism about the orthodox Holocaust narra-
tive. (35 min.)
The First Holocaust: The Surprising Origin of the Six-Million
Figure
This documentary reveals how the myth of six million per-
secuted Jews threatened by a holocaust was created in the
late eighteen-hundreds (yes 1800s!), became a popular theme
during and after the FIRST World War (not the Second), and
has stayed with us ever since. (1 hr 10 min.)
Probing the Holocaust: The Horror Explained, Part 1
This documentary shows with a few pertinent, well-documen­
ted examples – the cases of the Dachau, Nordhausen and Ber-
gen-Belsen Camps – why it is important to distrust wartime
propaganda about claimed Nazi atrocities, not least because
much of this propaganda has been admitted by mainstream
historians to have been mendacious. (1 hr 36 min.)
Read Our Books
If you’re hungry for more, you can browse any of our grow-
ing roster of documentaries, or, if you want to delve into the
matter even deeper, you may want to start reading our books,
whose information density is easily tenfold that of a docu-
mentary.
As introductory reads I recommend one of the follow-
ing books, depending on how many pages you want to go
through, and which level of immersion you are looking for
(find out more about them at shop.codoh.com):
Thomas Dalton, The Holocaust: A Beginner’s Guide
This book has only 115 pages of text in a handy, small paper-
back format of 5×8 inches, and it costs only $10/£8 as a hard
copy. Amazon customer E.J. Peterson, a verified buyer of the
book, wrote the following brief review about it (on March 6,
14
Nicholas Kollerstrom, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust
– Myth & Reality
Science historian Dr. Kollerstrom explains the Holocaust is-
sue for the common reader from a scientific, but also from
a societal point of view. This paperback book has some 220
pages of text (6×9 inches). At $25/£20 as a hard copy, it has
been our best-selling book ever since it was first published.
Amazon customer “Giordano Bruno,” a Amazon-verified
buyer of the book, wrote this brief review about it:
“Myth Busting
An interesting and informative book, particularly how it ex-
presses that the “Holocaust” has basically become a sacred
religion that cannot be challenged even by science. Anyone
who dares to criticise or explain that certain narratives of the
holocaust are physically impossible is instantly branded as
a heretic and excommunicated. Would definitely recommend
reading it!”
Germar Rudolf, Lectures on the Holocaust: Controversial
Issues Cross-Examined
At 510 pages of text, this book has been characterized as en-
cyclopedic in its coverage of the topic, yet at the same time
as a truly riveting read. Written in an unusual dialogue form,
it draws you right into the debate the author engages in. This
is a brand-new edition issued in July 2017, which is greatly
improved by new material. It costs merely $30/£25 as a hard
copy, and it can be downloaded as an eBook (PDF and Kin-
dle) free of charge at www.Holocausthandbooks.com. Ama-
zon customer “HolocaustHistory channel,” a verified buyer
of the book (he bought it from us, not from Amazon), wrote
this brief review about it:
“Outstanding
This is without doubt one of the best treatments of the holo-
caust debate. Rudolf is judicious and moderate throughout,
and packs in a great deal of information. By writing dia-
logues, he gives himself the opportunity to give clear answers
to many questions that will occur to the reader. If you are at
all interested in the holocaust, you have to read this book.”
...and more
If you want to have answers to even deeper-penetrating ques-
tions, we highly recommend you familiarize yourself with
our prestigious series Holocaust Handbooks, which has many
References
For sources on Majdanek as summarized on the back cover see goo.gl/n2Bz3B.
1     Karl Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson & Co., London
1968, p. 280.
2     In an interview with the Berlin daily Berliner Zeitung on Sept. 4, 2000
(goo.gl/BMhmtc); and in a private letter, J. Graf, The Giant with Feet of
Clay, 2nd ed., Uckfield 2015, p. 126 (goo.gl/VHpmzh).
3     https://archive.org/details/Defamation; starting at 1:15:46 into the movie.
4     In a letter to revisionist Gerd Honsik, in: idem, Freispruch für Hitler?, Bur-
genländischer Kulturverband, Vienna 1988, p. 7 (goo.gl/uuVSK6).
5     George De Wan, “The Holocaust in Perspective,” Newsday, New York, Feb.
23, 1983, p. II/3.
6     See the studies on various camps as published in our series Holocaust
Handbooks (subsequently HH): www.HolocaustHandbooks.com; in particu-
lar Volumes 2, 10, 11, 17, 20-22 (Auschwitz), 4 (Stutthof), 5 (Majdanek), 8
(Treblinka), 9 (Belzec), 19 (Sobibor), 23 (Chelmno), 25 (Dachau, Mauthau-
sen, Neuengamme, Ravensbrück, Sachsenhausen).
7     See Volume 39 of HH.
8     See Volume 26 of HH.
9     See esp. Volumes 24 and 40 of HH re. Auschwitz.
10     See Köhler in Volume 1, pp. 85-131, plus Volumes 30, 35-37 of HH; Sec-
tion 4.2. in Volume 15; and the ubiquitous critique of testimonies in almost
all of these volumes.
11     See esp. Volume 7 of HH.
12     See Volume 29 of HH.
13     Rudolf in Volume 1 of HH, pp. 181-213.
14     See Volume 6 of HH and the documentary posted there.
15     Franciszek Piper, “Mass Murder,” Volume 3 of: Wacław Długoborski, Fran-
ciszek Piper (eds.), Auschwitz 1940-1945: Central Issues in the History of
the Camp, Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum, Auschwitz 2000.
16     HH Volumes 10, 11, 13, 17, 20-22 24, 33.
studies on highly specialized topics. Most of these books can
be downloaded as eBooks (PDF and Kindle formats) free of
charge at www.HolocaustHandbooks.com.
For readers who are interested in papers on certain topics, the
following revisionist periodicals are recommended:
–    Inconvenient History (ongoing since 2009):
www.InconvenientHistory.com
–    The Revisionist (1999-2005; defunct since my arrest in
Oct. 2005): goo.gl/1VzGXh
–    The Journal of Historical Review (1980-2002; defunct):
goo.gl/SxL1Zs
–    Vierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung (1997-
2006; defunct, German language): www.vho.org/VffG
You can also visit our revisionist bookstores selling some of
these items in hardcopy: shop.codoh.com
17     Most notably Arad, Yitzhak, Bełżec. Sobibór, Treblinka: The Operation
Reinhard Death Camps, Indiana University Press, Bloomington/Indianapo-
lis 1987; Donat, Alexander (ed.), The Death Camp Treblinka, Holocaust Li-
brary, New York 1979; Schelvis, Jules, Sobibór: A History of a Nazi Death
Camp, Berg Publishers, Oxford 2007.
18     HH volumes 8, 9, 19, 23, 28.
19     See HH Volumes 30, 35-37 for some detailed studies on the trustworthiness
of certain witnesses.
20    See e.g. Guenter Lewy‘s book The Nazi Persecution of the Gypsies and
Anna Tijsseling‘s paper “A Sincere Belief in Dracula” at goo.gl/bS2CRK.
21     11 January 2005 (goo.gl/YpEyqh); 26 January 2007 (goo.gl/rui8ew); 27
January 2009 (goo.gl/MpRMbb).
22     See the documentary Probing the Holocaust, Part 1 at goo.gl/rVAAuc, with
its footnoted transcript for more information.
23     See next to the documentary mentioned in the previous note: Graf in Vol­
ume 1 of HH, pp. 283-309; plus Weber at goo.gl/458eBo.
24     See also Cobain’s articles at goo.gl/pnaCus; goo.gl/4dFJUF; goo.gl/5acDjA.
25     See Volume 35 of HH.
26     See Köhler in Volume 1 of HH, pp. 85-131.
27     http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourismus
28     See James Bacque’s books Other Losses and Crimes and Mercies.
29     To learn about their views, see these individuals’ entries in the CODOH
library at www.codoh.com/library/authors.
30    Volume 2 of HH, pp. 41f.
31     On violent acts perpetrated against revisionists see HH Volume 15, Chapter
5.2. “Violence,” pp. 497-501.
32     Thomas Wandres, Die Strafbarkeit des Auschwitz-Leugnens, Duncker &
Humblot, Berlin 2000.
33       Walden and Other Writings, Bantam, Toronto 1981, pp. 92, 94.
34     Shriman Narayan (ed.), The Selected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, Vol. 4,
Navajivan Publishing House, Ahmedabad 1969, p. 174.
15Who in Their Right Mind
Would Doubt the Holocaust Happened?
To ask that question means to have mis­
understood the issue. The question is not
whether “the Holocaust” happened, but
rather what exactly happened during the
events usually referred to as “the Holo­
caust.” After all, there is no such place or
single event as “the Holocaust.” It con­
sists of many individual events and loca­
tions spread out over an entire continent
during a time span of some four years.
Let us take as one example the Maj­
danek Camp near the Polish city of Lu­
blin. What happened there during its ex­
istence between the summer of 1941 and
the summer of 1944? How many inmates
died in that concentration camp for what
reasons and in which ways?
If we consult mainstream sources, we
get different answers, depending on when
they were published.
Shortly after the capture of the camp,
the Soviets claimed a death toll of some
two million for that camp during a press
conference in Lublin on August 25th,
1944. During the Polish trial in late 1944
against six former camp guards, the Maj­
danek death toll was set to 1.7 million.
Roughly a year later, during the Nurem­
berg International Military Tribunal,
the Soviets introduced an investigation
report claiming that up to 1.5 million
inmates had been killed in that camp us­
ing seven different gas chambers, among
other methods.
This figure, however, was significant­
ly reduced three years after the war, when
Quantity Discounts Available!
You can download a PDF file of this pam­
phlet free of charge, use it to print cop­
ies as you see fit, or order printed copies
from us (with optional bulk discounts) at
shop.codoh.com, Category “Promotion,”
or by contacting us: shop@codoh.com
Castle Hill Publishers
PO Box 243
Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK
ISBN 978-1-59148-198-0
9 781591 481980 >
Polish judge Zdzisław Łukaszkiewicz, a
member of the Polish “Commission to
Investigate German Crimes in Poland,”
published the commission’s findings
about Majdanek, which set that camp’s
death toll at 360,000.
The next downgrading came after the
collapse of the communist Eastern Bloc,
when Polish historian Czesław Rajca re­
duced the death toll down to 235,000. But
that was still not the end of the death-toll
deflation, because in a detailed research
paper of 2005, Tomasz Kranz, then head
of the Majdanek Museum, decided to
streamline the official narrative by reduc­
ing the death toll down to 78,000, and to
ditch five of the seven initially claimed
gas chambers.
We learn from this that for many de­
cades the official narrative of that camp
was filled with exaggerations and in­
ventions caused by wartime propaganda
and hysteria. Much of what was initially
claimed “never happened,” so to say.
And how can we be sure that today’s
narrative is accurate? We cannot, because
“denying the Holocaust” is a crime in Po­
land, so there is a limit to what historians
are allowed to say and write.
The question is: how can one get to
the bottom of this, if relying on main­
stream sources seems to be a bad idea?
Well, why not start with research results
published by non-governmental, inde­
pendent historians? These “revisionist”
historians are usually and wrongly vili­
fied as “deniers,” but their thoroughly
researched book on Maj­danek, first pub­
lished in 1998, proves them right. In it,
they meticulously documented a total of
some 42,000 victims of the Majdanek
Camp, and the absence of any execution
gas chambers. Hence, today’s officially
sanctioned Maj­danek narrative is much
closer to what revisionists have found out
than to the initial propaganda-infested
version, see the chart below.
Anyone with a skeptical mind should
rightfully ask: And what else did they get
wrong?
This brochure introduces the novice
to the concept of Holocaust revisionism,
and answers some tough questions that
may come to the reader’s mind, such as:
– – What does Holocaust revisionism
claim?
– – Why should I take Holocaust revisio­
nism more seriously than the claim that
the earth is flat?
– – What about the pictures of corpse piles
in the camps?
– – How about the testimonies by survivors
and confessions by perpetrators?
– – What does it matter whether prisoners
died from disease or poison gas?
– – Why does it matter how many Jews
were killed by the Nazis, since even
1,000 would have been too many?
– – Whatever the circumstances, don’t
Jewish victims deserve respect and
compensation?