STOP ALL IMMIGRATION NOW...!

How The Jews Opened America's Borders

 The Jew uses every possible means to undermine the racial foundations

of a subjugated people to break down the last barriers of discrimination

between him and other peoples.

The Jews are responsible for bringing negroes and muslims into Caucasion

countries with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate

and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate.

For as long as a people remain racially pure and are conscious of the treasure of

their blood they can never be overcome by the Jew. Never in this world can the Jew

become master of any people except a bastardized people. That is why the Jew

systematically endeavours to lower the racial quality of a people by permanently

adulterating the blood of the individuals who make up that people. The Star of

David has steadily ascended as the will to National Self-Preservation declined.

Total Global domination is the Jew's endgame. Destroying countries, cultures

and cohesive races are the ways and means to that end.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Jewish Mafia Enforcing Multiculturalism & Gene Mixing (Jews are behind mass migration)

A study was conducted by professors at the University of Copenhagen and

Aarhus University in Denmark to determine the effect of ethnic diversity on society.

(Renegade Tribune)

The researchers performed a meta-analysis of 1,001 estimates from 87 different studies

from around the Western world to make their determinations. Their findings, which

were published in the Annual Review of Political Science, demonstrate that “continued

immigration and corresponding growing ethnic diversity” had a demonstrably negative impact

on social cohesion, unity, and togetherness. This is something that should be entirely

obvious to anyone who has been paying attention and understands the basics of human nature.

Peter Thisted Dinesen, a main researchers on the study, wrote:

"To be clear, the overall negative relationship between residential ethnic diversity

and social trust is statistically significant and holds up when conditioning on a

range of potential confounders and moderators. Extant studies have relatively

consistently reported a significant negative relationship between

neighborhood-level ethnic diversity and various forms of social trust.”

While this study has assuredly angered many of the proponents of “diversity” (aka White genocide),

other serious researchers have recognized the value in this work. Tom var de Meer, professor

of political science at the University of Amsterdam, found the study to be “excellent and

conclusive.” Eric Kaufmann, professor of politics at Birkbeck University of London, reiterates

the findings of the study, saying, “Higher diversity is significantly associated

with lower trust in communities, even when controlling for deprivation.”

Ethnic diversity is a weakness. We all know this to be true. We have watched as homogenous

communities have been destroyed and the remaining White inhabitants no longer even

associate with each other the way they used to – no more block parties, no more cookies

or cake for the new neighbors, and fewer front porches where people converse with others.

People shut themselves off from the alienating world outside of their homes, and the

psychological repercussions are profound.

The people who are enforcing ethnic diversity across the White world do not actually think

that it brings strength to communities; they know it does not. They are flooding White

communities with alien people precisely because they know it will destroy the very fabric

of society, and this weakened populace becomes easier to control and eventually destroy.

Ethnic diversity is a weapon wielded by JEWS.

___________________________________________________

“Like Esau, America has sold its birthright for a mess of multiculturalism and diversity.  In conforming to this radical social

agenda, America betrayed its posterity to an alien ideology which makes White people feel like strangers in their own lands.

“To understand how far we’ve fallen short, we need only look at how life was lived not so long

ago when America was still great because it was still unapologetically White and Christian:”

SEE HERE:   https://christiansfortruth.com/the-beauty-of-the-united-states-of-america-before-multiculturalism/

_____________________________________________

A War Against White People Is

In Full Swing in Europe and the US

 By Mike Walsh

Anti-White racism has distressingly become an accepted cultural norm throughout the

Western World. Mainstream media, education, and even science and medicine have been

hijacked by brainwashed zealots who push relentless white-hating propaganda on the masses.

Their intent is to reduce the current World’s 8% ethnic-European population to

fewer numbers that can be controlled much as are Native Americans today.

Increasingly, ethnic-Europeans, even in their own countries, exist in ghettos (reservations)

Excluded from communities taken over by government-sponsored non-European migrants,

Europeans are now second-class citizens (kaffirs) when seeking benefits, educational and

job opportunities. Anti-White apartheid throughout the West is considered normal

and is institutionalised.

How I Enjoy My “White Privilege”

Sourced from Bitchute

It is obvious, in twenty-first century America, that European-Americans are the most privileged group in the country.

We essentially are the bees knees and everyone else is oppressed just because we exist. So, as a white man,

I want to share how I enjoy my white privilege.

1. I Am Allowed To Be Openly Discriminated Against

If a black man rants and raves on about how he hates me just because of my ethnic heritage, he cannot be racist.

That is impossible. If a Jewish professor advocates all whites commit mass-suicide due to slavery,

or that until the white race is gone we cannot rid our society of ‘oppression,’ he clearly isn’t a racist.

See, as a cisgender heterosexual white male, I am the cherry on top. Even if crime stats display black-on-white

crime is far worse than the contrary, it really is because we’re oppressing them; therefore, it’s not racist.

I love my privilege.

2. I Cannot Wear Symbols Of European Pride

If I want to sport a Kolovrat (Slavic Swastika, sunwheel, spinning cross, circle of life) necklace, that’s clearly

a pendant of racial hatred and that automatically makes me a flaming racist; thus, I am a bad person.

If I like the Celtic cross, I cannot wear that without people seeing a living, breathing Nazi marching their way while

Adolf Hitler gives a speech in the background. That, or I’m a backwoods-dwelling hillbilly Ku Klux Klan member.

I’m also not allowed to be proud of my ancestry and all the years of war, trial and error, hells and glories. I cannot

appreciate my people’s poets and writers, musicians and philosophers, or the pre-Christian

Pagan path, or our dances or architecture or family traditions. But every other race can.

See, it doesn’t matter if I’m part of a long history of people and it’s my turn to carry on their story. I do not

get that opportunity without potentially suffering, societally speaking. I am told to abandon it altogether.

I love my privilege.

3. I Get Legally Discriminated Against In Jobs And Universities

European-Americans and Asian-Americans are the two groups you can legally discriminate against,

in the open and on enforced policy, based solely on our ethnicity through the means of Affirmative Action.

Isn’t it fun to wonder whether checking your race on that job application,

or college you’re applying for, might cost you the position or slot?

Marxism must be enforced and outcome of equality is the set standard. It’ll never happen, but America seems to

think that is actually possible. Therefore, the white man must be told, and forced, to step down and move aside.

I love my privilege.

4. I Am Not Allowed To Use Racial Slurs But Other Ethnicities Can Without Much Consequence

If I dare slip up and utter a racial slur, it is damn near the apocalypse. And, if I’m really unfortunate and caught and I’m

famous, then I need to go on a bunch of late-night talk shows and apologize to a potential million people of whom I’ve offended.

But a man of African heritage or a Hispanic may go on calling me a cracker or whitey all they please. But that’s obviously

not racist because I’m super privileged and my existence oppresses them. See, they’re really giving it hard to

‘the man.’ It’s almost like they’re only defending themselves and my words might as well be literal violence.

I love my privilege.

Who Is Really The Most Privileged?

Sarcasm aside, who is really the most privileged in contemporary America? Well, let us see here. Who is the one group

you dare not criticize over all other groups? Who is the apparent minority that somehow manages to operate much of

Hollywood and mainstream media? Who is the group that gets to perpetuate their moral compass and their politics due to

owning so much control over film and media? Who is fine seeing another entire group of people be

trampled on just so they can keep their little ethno-state, and the West is totally cool with it?

People do not have to like it, but it is obviously the Jewish folk. To me, if I was to talk about who is really privileged, it’d

be them. I do not feel privileged. I’m not saying my life was hardcore and that I fought gangs off to see the light of another

day, but that word doesn’t sit well with me. And, to be a blunt bastard here, if I am privileged, then I do not care.

This observation of this ethnic group has nothing to do with blind senseless hatred, or bias. It does not equate to hating

an entire group either. But much of the Jewish folk have far to many leanings toward liberalism, open borders for

European-majority countries, and find many conservative values as ‘backwards.’ See the manipulative language?

Designed to put them on the moral high-ground while you sit in your outdated world.

.

.

 _________________Direct from the mouth of a Jewess__________________

Yes, Diversity Is About Getting Rid Of White People

(And That’s A Good Thing)

One of the more common memes that I’ve seen white supremacists spread around recently has been “diversity is a

code word for white genocide”. The concept here is that diversity is only promoted in white nations, and that the end

goal is to eliminate white people altogether by flooding all white countries with non-white people until there are no white

people left. Well, guess what, white supremacists? That’s exactly right. Diversity IS about getting rid of white people,

and that’s a good thing.

First off, I am a white person myself, so allow me to get that out of the way. I’m extremely glad that the white race is dying,

and you should be too. White people do not have a right to exist. Period. That may sound like a bold statement, but it’s

entirely true. Any white person with even the faintest knowledge of history should curse themselves every single day

for being white. Throughout all of recorded history, whites have engaged in oppression, genocide, colonialism, imperialism,

and just plain evil on a massive scale. White people have denied every other race the right to exist, and have – at some point in history –

oppressed every single race on the planet.

Why, then, should whites now be allowed to live in peace when whites have historically been the world’s #1 source of

conflict and oppression? Whiteness is racism. Period. Whiteness is the source of all oppression in the world. Whiteness

is racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and heteropatriarchal capitalism.

Eliminate whiteness and you eliminate every single form of oppression that the world currently faces. No white people

means no oppression. White people are like a cancer and oppression is a symptom of the cancer. Cut out the cancer

altogether – with the cancer being white people – and you get rid of all of the oppression which white people cause.

I have dedicated my life to fighting racism, and I have determined – based on all available evidence – that the only

way to really eliminate racism is to eliminate whiteness. Whiteness is the ocean from which racism flows. Get rid of

whiteness and you get rid of racism. Despite what white supremacists often claim, white people do not have a “culture”.

White “culture” consists of nothing more than oppression, genocide, and the disenfranchisement of minorities. White

“culture” is racism and nothing more. When white supremacists talk about “white culture”, what they’re really talking about

is racism. Over the course of history, white people have built a massive empire based entirely on the hard work of oppressed

and disenfranchised minority groups. But guess what, white people? That empire is finally coming to an end now, and

its demise is music to my hears. To quote the great anti-racist activist Tim Wise: “Do you hear it? The sound of your

empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently? Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.”

Descendants of Holocaust survivors can personally attest to the evil that white people are capable of when they hold the

reins of power. Thankfully, whites won’t be holding the reins of power for much longer. When white people die out, so will

racism, sexism, queerphobia, and all other forms of oppression. The only way to eliminate racism, white privilege, and

white supremacy is to eliminate whiteness altogether. When I teach my students about human rights, critical race theory,

and the role of whites in worldwide oppression, my white students often ask me how they can “atone” for the evils of whiteness

and how they can make up for centuries of white oppression. And I tell them: you can do that by not having

any children and ensuring that the white race does not live to oppress anyone ever again in the future.

Thankfully, white birthrates are indeed very low, while the birthrates of minorities are much, MUCH higher. Within our

lifetimes, whites will be a minority in a significant number of formerly white countries, including the US, the UK, France,

Germany, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, to name just a few. To white supremacists yearning for the days when

whites could rape and pillage the world with impunity, this is incredibly frightening. To people on the right side of history,

however, this looks like progress. Whites are finally getting their just desserts – and it’s about time. I sincerely hope that,

when the white power structure finally comes crashing down, whites will receive no mercy from the minority groups that

whites have spent centuries oppressing. We certainly don’t deserve any mercy or kindness, as we have given nothing of

the sort to others.

Whites should also know that, when they do become a minority in formerly white countries, they will NOT be receiving

affirmative action or any of the other benefits meant to assist the minorities that whites have historically oppressed.

Why? Because whites don’t deserve those benefits. It’s as simple as that. One can look to South Africa, where whites

are only about 8.4% of the population, but blacks continue to receive affirmative action because blacks in South Africa

have historically been disenfranchised by whites. The same thing will happen when whites become a minority in North

America, Europe, and Oceania, because whites have historically oppressed minorities in all three of those continents.

Not to mention, why should whites receive any kind of benefits when the ultimate goal is to get rid of whites altogether?

Finally, laws against hate speech will serve to prevent whites from complaining about this, as any white person who

complains will be arrested, given a long prison sentence, and made an example of for the rest of the remaining white

population. Speech that attempts to justify the white power structure and perpetuate white oppression of minorities is

not freedom of speech, and it has absolutely no place in modern society.

As white people, we all need to recognize that we no longer have a place in the world. This world now belongs to

the minorities that us whites have spent centuries oppressing, and there is absolutely nothing that any pathetic white

supremacists can do about it. In order for a better world to be created, white people need to be exterminated. Period.

It’s as simple as that. We should simply be thankful that our death will be accomplished through mass immigration

and declining birthrates. When whites have exterminated other races, it wasn’t nearly so peaceful – it was done through

violent genocide. But other races are not as evil as whites are, and it’s important to remember that. The world belongs

to minorities now, and they will make a much better, more peaceful world with what they’re given. Only when white

people have ceased to exist will a peaceful and progressive society – free of racism and hatred – be possible. The

only way to eliminate white privilege, white oppression, white racism, and

the oppressive white power structure is to eliminate white people altogether.

Madison Avenue, or The Anti-White Agenda of Jewish Ad Agencies

While Israel sits nice and comfy behind its wall, Jewish enablers have been pushing white genocide via replacement with hordes

of darks flooding the Euro nations of earth.  Now, while this program has been in place since the end of WWII, Jews are currently ramping

up their attacks against we whites in advertising.  Just as with population replacement, the end game of Jewish advertising is also nothing

less than our extermination.  

In these commercials concocted by large Jewish ad agencies–known collectively as “Madison Avenue”–straight white males are always

the targets.  As anyone who has watched even a little TV knows by now, virtually all such men are portrayed as fat, fumbling, flopping fools;

as just a bunch of bumbling bozos and buffoons who are incompetent, clumsy clowns incapable of solving even the simplest task. They

are always either bouncing around stupidly and pointlessly from commercial to commercial, or they are standing stunned, baffled, open-mouthed

as if in a daze, or they are stuffing vast amounts of junk food into their gorge holes.  These same clueless white clods–the same, by the

way, whose ancestors gave us electricity, automobiles, airplanes, computers, heart transplants, and moon landings–are clearly lacking

in every department, intellectually, morally, socially, interactionally, and hygienically.  White men are seldom leaders in these commercials;

they are usually confused, perplexed, but willing, followers of their betters, viz, brilliant black and brown men, and young, hard-charging

super women.  Invariably, this motley menagerie, these saviors of the day, are always neat, always clean, always intelligent, always black,

brown or female; these superior beings merely roll their eyes in disgust at the ridiculous predicaments white men get into, then go about

showing by word or example how the unkempt, disgusting white male moron needs to do something the right way (photo above)

Mostly, the only white men who are portrayed as bright, intelligent, slim, clean, and successful in these ads are either gay couples or

those with dark women on their arms.  

In every Jewish commercial ever created, a black or brown is never, no matter what the situation, portrayed in a bad light, ever–in the

fantasy world of Jewish commercials, they are always the flawless decision-makers, the sure, certain, selfless take-chargers, the best

and the brightest mankind has to offer.  They never commit the same stupid mistakes as the crude, clumsy, clueless white men. They

are all cool, confident, well-dressed, natural-born-leader types; they are scientists, surgeons, professors, jet pilots, or just your common

everyday successful black or brown businessman cooly making their million dollar decisions each day inside Fortune 500 boardrooms. 

White males in these commercials are often looked at askance and lectured by blacks and browns on the proper, mature and intelligent

way of doing things even though the ancestors of the latter, with millions of years to work with, somehow never managed to even invent

the simple wheel.

Race-mixing, of course, is the main focus of these Jewish commercials.  Virtually every other couple shown is a mixed race twosome,

usually a charming, successful, intelligent young black man embracing, kissing and rolling happily in bed with a lovely, slim, graceful

white woman.  These couples are always portrayed as laughing, care-free, successful, and deeply in love; they are never seen as they

in reality usually are–miserable, angry, arguing, drunken, drugged, fat, vulgar, disheveled, and violent.  

In one Progressive Insurance ad, a beautiful young white woman bumps into a black man at a juke box whereupon they fall instantly in

love.  In the next shot the deeply smitten duo are happily performing together on stage, singing to a rapturous audience.  “Now That’s

Progressive” reads the Jewish moral message.

Now, fact is, despite Jews trying to convince us on their commercials that every other couple is a mixed race match, no matter where

one looks in the US are mixed-race couples the norm.  Left to our own devices, miscegenation would remain forever but a tiny fraction

of the white population.  If left alone, our instincts would naturally kick in and few of us would even socialize with blacks and browns,

much less date and have sex with them.  If left alone, our instincts will naturally repel us from dark-skinned people, their strange, and to

our instincts, their ugly looks, their childish, irresponsible actions, their impulsive, violent, primitive nature.  And Jews know this.  Their

ambition, their hope, their dream, is to take fiction and create a new reality by portraying race-mixing as the wonderful, inevitable norm to

come.  Once such a consensus among the young and dumb is reached, they feel, the rest will be easy.  The non-stop commercial message

to immature minds is: “If you want to be happy, healthy, successful, then stay away from your fellow whites, the losers, and choose for a

mate a natural winner, a dark person.”  Of course, a heavily or entirely mixed race America would nicely accomplish two of the Jew’s

greatest historical ambitions, i.e., 1) the genocide of the white race, and 2) absolute Jewish control of the ugly, ignorant mulatto/mestizo

mess that remains.

Clearly, blacks, browns and whites do not create these commercials–Jews do.  All the above is how Jews want unthinking TV watchers

to perceive white men.  Blacks and browns in these Jewish commercials are used by Jews as they have always been used–as hammers

against we whites.  Jews do not care a fig about the well-being or elevation of blacks and browns; their sole purpose is for them to be used

as Jews have always used them–as clubs and bricks to attack we whites. 

This is how the Jews who create the ads want us and others to think about ourselves.  Their hope is that ultimately we will think so badly

about ourselves that we will no longer care about ourselves, about our past, about our present or especially about our future, about marriage

and children, about fighting Jewish hate around the world; that we will simply give up and commit suicide.  And, of course, these devious

individuals hope their fanciful dreams become reality for young and dumb white women and that they will naturally fall into the arms of REAL

men–the black and brown mud men.  

Truly, the depth of Jewish hatred is breath-taking.  But so is their almost comical, suicidal ignorance.  Sooner than they could ever imagine

the consequences of their efforts to destroy whites via immigration replacement, inter-racial sex commercials, pornography, abortion, actual

white on white World Wars, or a hundred other means, will bear them a terrible fruit.  As we know from history, when white people finally

get pissed off, really pissed off, hell is to pay.  And, as we all know, the white world is very, very close to critical mass right now.  

A word, a warning, a historical truth:  An armed and angry white man is the most deadly killing machine the earth has ever known–he is

intelligent, resourceful, adaptable, strong as steel, hard as iron, he never sleeps, he never forgets…and he is virtually impossible to kill.

(I apologize for the rushed and rather disorganized article above.  I usually do a better job than this.  The post is merely a piece written

by someone who wanted to say a certain something but lacked the proper time to say it.)

The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail:

Book Review

Jean Raspail
The Camp of the Saints
Social Contract Press, 1994

The Camp of the Saints was published nearly

45 years ago and remains one of the most prophetic

works onthe destruction ofWestern Europe due to

third-world immigration.

I first heard about this novel when it was mentioned multiple times by Steve Bannon. When describing the migrant crisis

he said, “It’s not a migration. It’s really an invasion. I call it the Camp of the Saints.” Previously, Bannon said, “It’s been

almost a Camp of the Saints-type invasion into Central and then Western and Northern Europe.” The book’s been

mentioned several times on Tucker Carlson Tonight, and Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa)

has recommended it. (RELATED: Bannon’s Canon: A Steve Bannon Reading List)

The similarities between the novel’s story and today are uncanny. Instead of a Muslim invasion, it starts with the poor from

India. Instead of staggered migrant boats and rafts coming to Europe’s shores, it’s a fleet of 100 ships arriving at once.

Today Eastern Europe has closed its borders to refugees; in the novel it’s Australia. Rather

than a commie Pope Francis from Argentina, they have a commie pope from Brazil.

The Camp of the Saints predicts our current times, when no one can be proud of their European

heritage or try to save Western civilization without being called a racist or fined for hate speech. 

The novel highlights the role of the elite liberal media and how they use white guilt to make Europeans go against their

conscience. Anyone who speaks against the migrants is called racist,

and even the government leaders won’t protect their nation’s borders:

The Consul General of Belgium tries to fight for Europe. “Your damned, obnoxious, detestable pity!” he yells at his fellow

leaders. “Call it what you please: world brotherhood, charity, conscience . . . Can’t you see where it’s leading? . . .

You’ve got to be out of your minds just to sit back and let it all happen, little by little.

All because of your pity. Your insipid, insufferable pity!”

The message of the book is clear: Christian morality will be the downfall of the West, so long as it continues to be interpreted

as a religion of meekness, whose adherents must roll over and give their countries away to people who want to rob,

rape, and kill them. This is in contrast to most of its history, when Christians wanted to defend

the kingdom of Christendom to preserve their values and religion for future generations. 

In The Camp of the Saints, a fleet of 100 boats carrying 800,000 migrants leaves India’s shores with no clear destination.

They’re rumored to be headed toward France (the author, Jean Raspail, is French) but the country has some

time to decide what to do. As requests pour in to take the migrants, the pleas “[seem] more like threats.” 

Journalists take the side of the migrants, claiming they’ll “enrich, cleanse and redeem the Capitalist West.” Photos that

would sway public opinion negatively toward the refugees are kept out of the press. Every horrid thing the refugee

fleet does is twisted into something noble in the mainstream media, and just like today, it’s always the fault of the Europeans.

Editorial cartoons depict the white president of South Africa torturing a poor Hindu, an attempt to guilt the country to take

the migrants. Protests erupt at South African embassies throughout Europe. South Africa threatens to fire on the boats if

they come to their shores, and the country is spared. (The novel was published 20 years

before the end of apartheid, and assumes whites still maintain power there.) 

In the schools, liberal teachers make students pen essays about sad and suffering refugees who need help. Parents

keep their mouths shut, not wanting to burden their little children with the truth about the crisis. Meanwhile, no matter

what subject is taught—math, literature, science—the teachers

fill students’ heads with ideas about the racist West.  

When Australia refuses the migrant fleet, young people in European cities take to the Australian embassies to protest

their migrant ban, chanting “Racists, Fascists!” The only difference with

today’s protests is that in the novel, the protestors are actually peaceful. 

When someone does take a stand against the insanity, it’s done in a mealy-mouthed way

that will inspire no one to action: “perhaps it wouldn’t be terribly wise, just now.”

As the migrants’ arrival on France’s southern shores becomes imminent, residents flee to the north. An old literature

professor, Calgues, remains on the shores of the Mediterranean in his ancestral home from 1673. A hippie shows up

and delights in telling Calgues how he’ll bring the migrants to use his antique furniture for firewood, to “crap all over your

terrace, and wipe their hands on your shelves full of books.” Why will they do this? Because the world of Calgues, the

world of Western civilization, with thousands of years of literature, mathematics, philosophy, music, art, and culture,

means nothing to them. The Left-wing hippie hates being white and despises “squares” like his middle-class parents

and sisters, who fled north for fear of being raped. Though the phrase “white privilege” isn’t used,

he’s anxious for his white family to be impoverished, just like the brown people of the earth.

After the migrants arrive, they spread throughout France.

Existing immigrants join up with them, along with Left-wing anarchists.

Residents in one small town have to stop using their community swimming pool; the migrants are spreading gonorrhea

to the town’s children in the water. Medical records of all the citizens are checked, so as to not be racist to the Arabs, and

in the end it’s confirmed that the newcomers are spreading it. The townspeople want to require medical certificates before

entering the pool to protect the children. How does the news react? With headlines proclaiming “Anti-Arab Racism Alive

and Well!” Caving to social pressure, the town abandons the required medical screenings. The European

natives abandon the pool they scrimped and saved to pay for, and Arabs get the run of it. 

Meanwhile, the wife of a prominent pro-refugee journalist is gang-raped, then commits suicide. White women are kidnapped

and raped in brothels. The situations predicted by Raspail more than 40 years ago are being played out in Europe today,

as seen in the Rotherham child rape gang cover-up and countless other crimes. Just like today, laws are

passed against what’s now called “hate speech.” And also like today, everything is the fault of whites:  

Meanwhile in New York City, the migrants have arrived. The city is taken over by the sounds of an “infernal symphony”

of glass shattering, gunshots, and screaming. Woe to the car that stops at a light; soon it will “find itself buried in a sea

of black silhouettes, brandishing picks; and then the shouts of no! no! no!, those desperate shouts shrieked into the

darkness and suddenly stilled, snuffed out by a knife, a razor, a chain, by a club full of spikes, by a pounding fist, or

fingers, or phallus …” There’s a new wave of white flight out to American suburbs as people try to flee the crime and poorly performing schools. 

It’s easy to see why The Camp of the Saints is recommended by so many on the Right. Besides its colorful prose,

Raspail’s prescience is astounding when it comes to the effects of third-world immigration on the West.

Since The Camp of the Saints is from the 1970s, it’s refreshing to read something completely non-PC. And despite the

depressing subject matter, made doubly so due to us living a Camp of the Saints scenario today, his memorable characters

create some laugh-out-loud moments.

_________________________________________________

 "If all of the dead allied soldiers could see their countries now, they would have

thrown down their weapons and fought with the Germans." - David Irving

 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Jews Behind Race Mixing

By: Dr. Edward R. Fields

circa 1970

Source: https://katana17.wordpress.com/2015/05/21/jews-behind-race-mixing/

Contents

Jew Civil Rights Bill Author — Jacob Javits
Jews Behind Race-Mixing in America
The Answers Are Complex
Here Are the Facts
From Their Own Mouths — The Jews Reveal Their Plans
Jews Raise Money for Blacks
Lawyers for Militants Are Jews
Jews Urge White Christians to Marry Blacks but Urge Own Kind to Marry Jews Only
Different Story for Jews
Don’t Date Non-Jews
Why the Jews Seek the Mongrelization of the White Christian People
Self-Hate Instilled Within Whites
Charge Whites Guilty of Negroes’ Crimes
New Jersey’s Little Riot Commission
Communist Party Fought for Race Mixing
Millionaire Jews Back the Black Revolution
NAACP — A Jewish Organization

Jew Civil Rights Bill Author — Emanuel Celler

Sen. Jacob Javits (above) at a dinner given by the Joint Defense Appeal, a Jewish Fund raising organization, at the

Hotel Plaza, in N.Y. on Oct. 24, 1957, called on President Eisenhower to name immediately

the members of the CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION called for under the new Civil Rights Law.

At the time Javits was running for the U.S. Senate,

there was much ado about his Red-front associations.

Cong. Emanuel Celler and Sen. Jacob Javits, both Zionists,

were the authors of the infamous; Civil Rights Bill.

JEWS BEHIND RACE-MIXING IN AMERICA

The purpose of this article is to prove, through documented evidence that Jews in America are the prime movers

and guiding force behind the massive attempt to mongrelize the White Christian people with the Black Race.

Of course everyone realizes that there are many gullible

and brainwashed Gentiles working toward this same end.

But the movement to mix the races in America is most definitely sparked and financed by

organized Jewry in every city of any size in America containing a formal Jewish community.

The first question which arises is why are the Jews so fanatical in their zeal to integrate the races and

why do they intensely resist mixing of their own blood with either us White Christians, or the Blacks?

THE ANSWERS ARE COMPLEX

In order to understand Jewish thinking on this matter, one must first recognize that the Jews are a very unique people.

The Jews are bound to one another by three different means— which no other people in the world have in common.

Race is defined as a group of people who have inbred with their own kind for centuries and exhibit like features and

characteristics. Thus the Jews of today are a tight-knit race, and highly conscious of the great gulf which separates

them from White Christians.

Gentiles do not have even the basic rudiments of unity existing in Jewry. We are of many different churches, different

nationalities and from divided language groups of Europe. Feuds, wars, jealousy and hatreds have always divided our White Folk.

This division has made it easy, for a skillful and highly organized Jewish minority to dominate us.

If anyone is in doubt about Jewish control over our daily lives, let them check on who owns all the stores on Main Street.

Find out who controls the three T. V. Networks. (Sarnoff heads NBC, Paley (Palensky) heads CBS and David Goldenson heads ABC.)

Check who controls Hollywood, or which racial group controls many of the giant combines

buying controlling interest in thousands of formerly Christian owned companies in America!

HERE ARE THE FACTS

Within each Jewish Community in every city of any size in America the Jews operate numerous organizations.

They are designed to guide and control the lives of every Jew. They are also constructed to give the Jews a tremendously

powerful single voice in American politics. Almost every Christian politician lives in dread of offending his local Jewish

community. He knows that if he does not tread softly, listen to their every demand, endorse aid to Israel and sale of Israeli

Bonds, support United Jewish Appeal—the Jews will vote for the man against him, spend a fortune

to elect his next opponent, and direct the local daily press in a hate campaign against him.

All the small Jewish clubs and social groups are united under the American Jewish Committee. All Jew businessmen

belong to a secret society called “B’nai B’rith” and they have their own secret spy agency called the “Anti-Defamation League.”

These are the groups that harass Right-Wing Patriots and seek to control elected politicians and the daily press.

But, their most important mission of all, is to integrate the White Christian people to produce an indolent, Mulatto race for the future.

FROM THEIR OWN MOUTHS — THE JEWS REVEAL THEIR PLANS

The following are especially selected quotes from the most important

Jewish leaders in America concerning the integration of the races.

Aaron Goldman addressing the National Council of Jewish Women said:

“We Jews have played a significant part in securing laws for Negroes that guarantee equality. We have raised the

expectations of American Negroes and must not allow them to become frustrated, angry, and

desperate if their dreams fail to materialize. The Negro must enter the mainstream of American life.”

Mrs. Joseph Willen, president of the National Council of Jewish Women

reported on April 9, 1968 that:

“Jewish parents must intensify their fight in behalf of the American Negro’s

struggle for racial justice and economic opportunity.

Our children ask us to look forward, not backward. We cannot

bind our young people to us by reciting past persecutions.

We must set an example far Jewish youth by intensifying efforts in behalf of increased employment

for Negroes and to aid anti-poverty programs. This is the best way to combat White backlash.”

Sen. Jacob Javits addressing the National Commission

of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League in 1967 said:

“The Negroes’ struggle for equal rights is of vital importance to American Jews,

and is the most important struggle in the United States.

Jewish support of the Negroes’ aspirations for equality should be

regarded as a badge of honor.”

Sen. Javits called for massive aid to Negroes and asked

for the taxpayers to provide $35 billion over the next 10 years

to raise the Black man up to the level of Whites. He also called for the adoption

of a guaranteed annual wage at double the amount called for by President Nixon.

Philip M. Klutznick, Vice-President of the Anti-Defamation League at the same convention said:

“Jewish communities have set the pattern in the area of ‘social action’ in America. The outpouring of Federal funds for

poverty programs during the next 25 years will give the Jewish community an opportunity to redistribute their resources

and redirect their energies in the most meaningful religious, cultural and special educational activities for Jews that

history has ever known. Major Jewish organizations must unite to set up long range survey communities

to establish the goals and priorities of American Jewish communities over the next three decades.”

(IMPORTANT NOTE: Readers should re-read this last paragraph. Jews run the poverty aid and urban renewal programs

in many cities. It is not an admission that this tax money is being used by Jews to build political power for Jews).

Saul M. Linowitz, former ambassador to the Organization of American States,

told the Zionist woman’s order, Hadassah at its 53rd meeting at Miami Beach:

“The bedrock for civil rights is nothing less than economic rights, school integration and the right to vote.”

SAUL ALINSKY Trains Black revolutionists.

Rabbi Arthur J. Lelyveld, addressing last year’s American Jewish Congress meeting in Miami Beach said:

“All of us must be prepared to make any sacrifice necessary to achieve an effective program aimed at achieving economic

justice for the negro. We must make the economic sacrifice of paying higher taxes to win the more important war on poverty at home.”

Former Justice Abe Fortas, (removed from the Supreme Court for taking bribes from the corrupt Jew financier,

Louis Wolfson) told a dinner of the American Jewish Committee in July of 1968 in New York City:

“The battles of the non-Whites for equality in America are essentially the same as those of the Jew, and the Jews must help in his struggle.”

Albert Vorspan, addressing the National Federation of Temple Sisterhoods in Miami Beach on Oct. 28, 1969, said:

“We Jews should know something about the outer limits of frustration and rage of the Black Communities.

We who have suffered better understand the anguish of the Black man today.”

MAX FISHER Millionaire Jew Republican finances Black Militants.

Theodore Bikel, Jewish folk singer and star in the play, “Fiddler On The Roof”

in a speech of July, 1969, in a Jewish temple in Honolulu said:

“A strong commitment to civil rights is implicit in Judaism.

We must speak out against discrimination.”

Rabbi Maurice N. Eisendrath, president of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations,

on Oct. 26, speaking inMiami Beach called for a five year moratorium on the space program and an

immediate ceasefire in Vietnam.The rabbi said this would free billions of tax dollars which could be

immediately funneled into the Black ghetto:

“Call it reparations or simple justice, but some form of restitution is owed to the Negro.

America must rush massive aid to the Negro the way aid has been rushed to the Jews of Israel.”

JEWS RAISE MONEY FOR BLACKS

Jewish publications are filled with countless articles about Jews raising money for militant negro causes. The Emma Lazarus Federation

in New York City raised thousands of dollars for Martin Luther King’s now infamous Selma, Alabama march.

Each year Mrs. Edward M. Warburg, wife of the multi-millionaire international Jewish banker, raises millions for the United Negro College Fund.

The most sensational and publicized fund raising dinner was held by wealthy Leonard Bernstein in his plush Park Avenue

apartment for the 21 Black Panthers on trial for bombings in New York City. It was a sight to behold, in Bernstein’s

elegant duplex apartment, the Jewesses in evening gowns, welcoming Black Panthers wearing wild beards, bushy

Afro-hair styles and blue jeans.

The wife of the famous director of the New York Philharmonic, Mrs. Bernstein said later to the press:

“This was not a frivolous party, but a chance for all of us to hear what’s happening to them. They’ve really

been treated very inhumanely. The trial of the 21 New York Black Panthers has had me very upset.”

Here we have the rich affluent left-wing, whose children all go to exclusive private schools, consorting with the

Black militant radicals who are out to destroy this nation. Mr. and Mrs. Leonard Bernstein

personally made out a check for $12,000 to help the Black Panthers at the dinner.

Two other fund raising parties have been held in New York by

millionaire Jews to raise money for the murderous Black Panthers.

John Simon, a Jew editor at T.V. panelist Bennet Cerf’s Random House Publishers,

gave a similar party, as did Jew film director Sidney Lumet.

LAWYERS FOR MILITANTS ARE JEWS

In almost every case of radical militants who are caught burning, killing and bombing, we find Jewish lawyers ready to

defend them. Eldridge Cleaver, who fled the U. S. to escape prison was represented by the Jew Charles Garry.

The New York 21 are defended by the Jews Gerald B. Lefcourt and Sanford Katz. Of course everyone knows that the

“Chicago Seven” (4 were Jews) revolutionaries were defended by the Jew legal team of Leonard Weinglass and William Kunstler.

JACK GREENBERG, lawyer who heads NAACP legal fund

explains how busing should take place in Houston, Texas.

Jew lawyers are also pushing for integration of White suburbs. A Harvard trained lawyer

named Roger N. Beilenson heads “Westchester Residential Opportunities, Inc.”

They purchase homes in fine White neighborhoods for $16,000 up to $50,000 and then

re-sell them to Blacks. Beilenson was a former housing director for the Urban League.

Both the Rockefeller Foundation and (Jew) Aaron Norman Foundation

have given tax free grants to further his work.

“The New York Times” of Sept. 19, 1966, really let the cat out of the bag when it admitted:

 “The Jewish community has long been the financial backbone of the civil rights movement. … No special commission on

race is needed to arouse Jewish support for civil rights activity in the South. … Jewish support for civil rights is still high.”

And, of course, we all know that Jack Greenberg is the head of the NAACP Legal Fund and is responsible for filing all

of the suits which have resulted in so much suffering by innocent White children forced into mixed schools by this Jewish conspiracy.

JEWS URGE WHITE CHRISTIANS TO MARRY BLACKS BUT URGE OWN KIND TO MARRY JEWS ONLY

Rabbi Abraham Feinberg of Canada has won the nickname, “The Red Rabbi” for his visits to North Vietnam

and efforts on behalf of communist causes. In the Maclean’s Review magazine of Sept. 5, 1967 he states:

“Until we learn to fight our ingrown fears of sexual relationsbetween the races,

the end of the race problem will not bein sight. Only when we no longer raise our eyebrows

at the sight of a Negro holding handswith a White girl will the West have begun to tear 

the racial poison from its vitals.

Such a change will involve an inside-out remodelling of the White psyche, for our fear of

mixed marriages is deeply rooted. But the change must begin sometime. Why not now!

If anything, the law should encourage, not forbid, the intermingling

of ‘bloods’. Marches and civil-rights demonstrations can

dramatize the immediate imperative of justice. Religious

teaching can now enunciate the challenge of brotherhood.

Fair-employment laws and other civil rights legislation

can protect minorities from overt discrimination.”

Plan for the Future

“The great ideal of Judaism. … is that the whole world shall be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a

Universal Brotherhood of Nations—a greater Judaism, in fact—all the separate races and religions shall disappear.”

— from the Jewish World, 9th Feb. 1883

“ONE WORLD, ONE RACE … the deliberate encouragement of

interracial marriages is the only way to hasten this process.

And it may be that time is growing short. The dominance of our world has begun

to shift, like cargo in a listing vessel, from the White races to the colored.”

Thus Rabbi Feinberg urges our White Christian people to surrender the blood of our forefathers

and commit racial suicide by helping mongrelize the White race through interracial marriage!

DIFFERENT STORY FOR JEWS

Here we find the great contradiction in Jewish teachings.

While preaching the most extreme forms of race-mixing at inter-religious meetings and on college campuses in the press,

on T.V. and Hollywood, the Jews tell their own youth a completely different story in the confines of the Synagogue.

Dr. Immanuel Jakobovits, Chief Rabbi of England, said in the “New York Times”:

“Intensive Jewish education must cover youths between 13 and 18”.

He said that unless they are warned of the dangers of inter-marriages:

“The whole fabric of the Jewish structure will suffer irreparable harm and damage.”

Rabbi Pesach Z. Levovitz, president of the Rabbinical

Council of America said in the “New York Times,” Jewish;

“religious leaders must exercise all of their influence to stop mixed marriages between Jews and non-Jews.

Those who marry out of the faith disappear within the preponderant Christian religions and cultural community.”

DON’T DATE NON-JEWS

England’s Chief Rabbi, Immanuel Jakobovits recently

made a visit to New York, and in point blank terms declared:

“Jewish teenagers shouldn’t date non-Jews. … Interfaith marriage is something we view with horror, almost as apostasy.

For Jews the problem of intermarriage is the problem of sheer survival. Countless

Jewish martyrs did not die for their faith so that we might fritter away our heritage.”

We would like to ask the rabbi; What about White Christians whose countless ancestors fought and died so that our race

might be preserved? Is not the blood line of our people worth saving in the light of the importance the Jews place on this

question? The Jews are not called “bigots” and “race prejudiced” when they fight against inter-marriage for their own kind.

Yet, these same leftist Jews attack and vilify every White Christian who dares stand up for racial purity for our folk.

JOSEPH POGÁNY alias SCHWARTZ.

A FAMOUS JEW who came to America from Moscow in 1928 to

write the first Civil Rights platform for the U. S. Communist Party.

DAVID GINSBURG. Wrote Riot Commission Report charging Whites were responsible for Negro riots.

WHY THE JEWS SEEK THE MONGRELIZATION OF THE WHITE CHRISTIAN PEOPLE

The most cleverly contrived scheme in the history of race relations is now being employed by the Jews to break down

the resistance of the White race. It is an elaborate plan to make White people ashamed of the color of our skin.

It is deliberately designed to give us an inferiority complex whereby we will feel compelled to bring

about our own racial destruction to rectify the superior position we naturally hold over the Black race.

It is even more clearly spelled out in a book written back in 1912 by a Communist theoretician named Israel Cohen

of London, England. It is titled, “A Racial Program For The Twentieth Century” and has been published in the

Congressional Record of June 7, 1957, and even entered as a paid ad some years ago in the Atlanta

newspapers by Gov. Lester Maddox (then a prominent restaurant owner). Israel Cohen wrote:

“We must realize that our Party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the consciousness of

the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the Whites, we can mold them to the program

of the Communist Party. The terms colonialism and imperialism must be featured in our propaganda.

In America, we will aim for a subtle victory. While inflaming the negro minority against the Whites,

we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes.

We will aid the negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and

entertainment. With this prestige, the negroes will be able to intermarry with the Whites and begin a process which will

deliver America to our cause.”

SELF-HATE INSTILLED WITHIN WHITES

This is the most diabolical plan ever conceived, to instill “self-hate” within White people

so that we will embrace the Black race in order to “up-lift” them to our level (an impossibility).

The plan goes much further and is a master hoax fostered by Jews upon our people.

CHARGE WHITES GUILTY OF NEGROES’ CRIMES

In March of 1968 Lyndon Johnson’s “Commission on Civil Disorder” issued their report on the bloody and destructive

negro riots which swept many of our major cities that previous summer. The full time staff director of the Commission

was the Jew David Ginsburg. With a $1 million dollar budget, and 200 employees Ginsburg

spent 7 months ‘investigating’ the riots. The final report, which he personally drafted found:

“Of the filth, crime and slums in which the Negro lives, White institutions created it, White institutions maintain it,

andWhite society condones it — White racism is essentially responsible for the explosive mixture which has been

accumulatingin our cities since the end of World War II.”

The crux of the million dollar report was that —

WE WHITE PEOPLE ARE TO BLAME FOR THE NEGRO RIOTS!

Many Americans openly expressed their outrage at Ginsburg’s findings. But most people missed the real point in question,

that this was a brazen attempt to instill an inferiority complex in masses of White Christian Americans in one grand sweep.

We are supposed to feel guilty for the oppression Blacks have experienced in the past. Now we should want to throw

ourselves at the feet of the negroes and beg for their forgiveness. The Jews would like for our vast masses to adopt the

attitude of the young White girl from San Francisco, whose story was reported in The Thunderbolt. She said she was

looking for a negro man to marry, so that in her own individual way she could try to make up some of the oppression Negroes had suffered.

Of course the truth of the story is that the American negro has a far higher standard of living than negroes have in

ANY of their own countries in Africa. We do not owe the Black man anything. In fact the negro has shown us the

height of ingratitude to the fact that we lifted them out of jungle savagery, gave them sanitary homes for the first time,

jobs, welfare,free medical care, poverty aid and free food.

But, David Ginsburg says that we have not done enough.

His Riot Commission Report advocates raising the negro to a real life of luxury by the following methods:

This is Ginsburg’s plan to chain the White worker to a lifetime of tax slavery to make

the negro an elite class of citizens to whom we third class Whites owe a free living.

NEW JERSEY’S LITTLE RIOT COMMISSION

Also in 1968, former New Jersey Gov. Richard J. Hughes appointed a “blue ribbon” committee to investigate the

bloody Newark riots. Once again a Jew named Sanford Jaffe, wound up as executive director of this commission.

You guessed it, he also found that White people were guilty of the crimes of the blacks! Sounds unbelievable,

even insane, yet when you control the news media, you can make the right seem wrong and change lies into truth.

The Jaffe Commission found the following:

“Widespread violence in the nation’s urban slums would have happened sooner had not the Negro been patient and forbearing.”

COMMUNIST PARTY FOUGHT FOR RACE MIXING

The 1928 Civil Rights Program of the U. S. Communist Party was written by Joseph Pogany. This was the

first [party] in America to adopt a civil rights program and the major parties copied them after World War Two.

Pogany was a Jew, born in Moscow and sent to America in 1928 to help build the U. S. Communist Party. Using

the alias Joseph Schwartz, he wrote the following program which the Reds adopted and distributed all over America.

OFFICIAL 1928 COMMUNIST PARTY PROGRAM

Every single one of the Jew Pogany’s original Platform points have today been

adopted and put in force by both of the Jew influenced Democratic and Republican Parties.

MILLIONAIRE JEWS BACK THE BLACK REVOLUTION

Some people find it difficult to understand how a millionaire Jew can be a staunch supporter of the Black Militant

Communist Revolution. It is because of their Jewish nature according to one of the richest Jews in America, Max

Fisher of Detroit. Max Fisher owns the Marathon Oil Co. and the Fisher Theater chain. He sits on the board of

directors of Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. and Michigan Bell Telephone Co., is chairman of Fruehauf Trucking Co.,

a director in Allen Industries and Safran Printing Co. and a partner in

the huge $150 million Somerset Park apartment project in Troy, Michigan.

Being a militant revolutionary has not stopped him from declaring himself a Republican, and he is George Romney’s

chief campaign fund raiser. He recently represented President Nixon at a meeting of Jewish leaders in New York City.

He told them Nixon had assured him Israel would receive all the aid she needs. On the negro question,

no one can claim to be more radical than Max Fisher, who the “Detroit News” of Feb. 23, 1969 quotes:

“My fellow Jews must enter the great American Equal Rights Revolution. The growth of the Black Power concept is

healthy because there was no leadership before. Militancy and turmoil are good, because it shows that the Negro is

himself concerned and involved. We are in a revolution and the Negro has to be allowed to develop. I think that

through my Jewishness I have a feeling of what the Negro wants. It comes from an empathy that springs from my Jewishness.”

Or take the Jew Saul Alinsky whose activities are financed by the Jew owned Midas Muffler Co. Alinsky heads a radical

group called F.I.G.H.T. They led riotous picketings and demonstrations by Blacks demanding jobs at the Kodak

Film Co. in Rochester, N. Y. They succeeded in blackjacking the company into giving them hundreds of jobs.

Alinsky now operates a school for Black revolutionaries— still financed

by the Jewish owned Midas Muffler Corp. Recently he said:

“Just think of all the hell we kicked up in the past with only four or five

organizers. Now we will be turning them out by the hundreds.”

NAACP — A JEWISH ORGANIZATION

Last but not least is the NAACP. The largest and best financed of all the groups fighting

for the mongrelization of the White race. This organization has never had a negro as its head.

For the first 35 years of the NAACP’s formal existence it was run by two millionaire Jewish brothers. Joel Spingarn

was president of the NAACP from 1920 until his death in 1939. Thereupon his brother Arthur Spingarn ran it until

1966. Due to old age, he turned the presidency over to Kivie Kaplan, a millionaire Jew shoe manufacturer from

Boston, Mass. He heads it to this day. Roy Wilkins is merely his secretary and front dressing for the outer office.

The real mastermind behind the NAACP’s massive legal offensive which is almost solely responsible for the destruction

of all the South’s laws and traditions keeping the races separate, including all the major school mixing

decisions, were suits brought by Jack Greenberg, Jewish head of the NAACP Legal and Defense Fund.

The Jews visualize themselves in a never ending cold war with the White Christian people. They know that we are an

independent and freedom loving people. The Jew knows that our individualism springs from the restless creative

spirit of our race. They know that eventually our White race will revolt

against Jewish economic, cultural and racial domination of our people.

They have but one hope, to put the White race to sleep through assimilation with the lazy, mindless, leaderless,

shiftless and slave-like Negro race. As Mulattoes our future descendants would make obedient workers under Jewish masters.

The Jews are organized to prevent assimilation of their

racial blood with either us White Christians or the Blacks.

They stand to be the only race in the future which will be mentally

alert if mongrelization conquers our unborn descendants to come.

We are now, TODAY in a life and death STRUGGLE for racial survival. We are faced by a tight knit, political machine

which is hell bent upon using its money power to destroy our White Folk. The time has come for every White man, woman

and child in America to take his stand. The National States Rights Party provides our fellow

White brothers with the best fighting attack program in existence to defeat this evil conspiracy.

Remember that your life upon this earth is but a very short one. We are placed here to create a decent and wholesome

society in which our children can be raised and propagate. It is our duty to keep the

race separate so as to provide for the everlasting continuation of future generations.

This is our God given mission upon this earth. Are you doing your part while there is yet still time to preserve the White race?

It is a task more important than your personal life itself. Sacrifice and struggle lie ahead and we must be prepared to give

our all for the SALVATION of God’s real ‘Chosen People’, —The White Race. Our White Race is

responsible for the concepts of Liberty and Civilization which we have given to the entire world.

Always remember the following quotation from the late Sen. Theodore G. Bilbo

who fought all his life to maintain the separation of the races:

“If our buildings, our highways, our railroads should be wrecked, we could rebuild them. If our cities should be destroyed,

out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed

might should be crushed, we could rear sons who would redeem our power.

But if the blood of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present

greatness of the United States of America would be destroyed and all hope for civilization would be as impossible for

a negroid America as would be redemption and restoration of the White man’s blood which had been mixed with that of the negro.”

JEW CIVIL RIGHTS BILL AUTHOR

Congressman “Manny” Emanuel Celler (above), Zionist Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee is one of the

boastful authors and defenders of the infamous Celler “CIVIL RIGHTS BILL,” which was prepared

as part of the plan. to disorganize and condition the U.S. for the Communist take-over.

He gave a “BOYCOTT AMERICANS” speech in the House of Representatives on Aug. 28, 1957, which appears in

the Congressional Record of Sept. 11, 1957, on page A-7475. It seems

he is more concerned with the welfare of ISRAEL than that of the U.S.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

In a normal world, the daily "Google-Doodle" of March 31, 2017 would have infuriated

Whitelandia. But because the West has ceased being normal, few will see anything wrong

with the subversive messaging. Notice how the Jewish girl is positioned front & center --

the obvious ringleader. The Jewess is flanked by a Muslim girl and a South Indian tranny.

The three White males are castoff to the far sides -- two of them are crippled and one of

them is a one-armed homosexual (as evidenced by the rainbow Google logo G on his shirt).

Google's logo turned rainbow "gay" in 2015.The logo for Google Chrome is 6-6-6.

Everyone has some sort of logo on their shirt -- indicating that they belong to some greater

group or cause -- except for the two non-smiling, isolated and crippled White boys who are

barely dangling on either end.  They are nothing. The lone partially White-Hispanic Christian

girl is sandwiched between the Indian tranny and the tall Black boy she will "hook up with"

as the dispossessed pathetic little White boy with the cane looks on helplessly. She has no

suitable White partners to marry or to mate with here because all of the White boys are either

lame or queer. Notice how the horizontal portion of the cross on her shirt is faded. And also

notice how the Black boy is portrayed as the math genious with a portion of Einstein's fake

equation written on his sweater.

In the background, a shadowy mob flashes devil's horn signs. Wow! Jewish-run Google's message

couldn't possibly be anymore "in-your-face" than this -- "Die, White Man, die!" It is indeed the Satanic

"Kalergi Plan" -- a long term scheme based upon genocidal hatred of European Man.

The visual tactic of isolating an idiot White guy to the far end of a "diverse" group is commonly

used in the Jewish-dominated ad world -- as in the ATT television ad (above left) in which every

character has a speaking part except for the White male who just makes stupid faces throughout.

Richard Coudenhove Kalergi

Kalergi was the son of an Austrian diplomat named Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi

and a Japanese woman named Mitsu Aoyama. His movement was financially backed by

Zionist billionaire bosses such as Rothschild, Baruch and Warburg. With such high-

powered backers and close contacts with European aristocrats and politicians, Kalergi

managed to attract important heads of state to his project for European integration --

what Winston Churchill openly referred to, in 1945, as the "United States of Europe."

 

Kalergis' "Nobility": George Soros, "Sir" Evelyn & "Lord" Jacob de Rothschild, Arthur Ochs-Sulzberger

In Kalergi's World, by his own admission, Whites are to be blended out of their own nations

while the Jew becomes "the spiritual nobility." Is that not exactly what we

are witnessing today? Ah, show us the shekels, Count K, show us the shekels!

The Kalergi plan is the New World Order plan. White genocide, as the "Google-Doodle"

makes very clear, is very real and is playing out exactly as Kalergi and his handlers

envisioned it. That is the real reason why World War II was imposed upon Hitler and

Mussolini; and it is also the real reason why the Marshall Plan contained hidden

provisions for unifying Europe; and it is also the reason why the Frumpy Frau of

Germany is acting as "stupidly" as she is. Speaking of manly Marxist Merkel;

for her slavish devotion to Rothschild's European Unionism, the wicked wench received

the "prestigious" Charlemagne Prize in 2008 --- mistakenly referred to by some as the

"Kalergi Prize" because Kalergi was its very first recipient in 1950.

Besides Kalergi and Merkel, other notable recipients of this treasonous "honor" include:

Winston Churchill (1956), George Marshall (1959), Henry Kissinger (1987),

Queen Beatrix of The Netherlands (1996), Tony Blair (1999), Bill Clinton (2000),

Jean Claude Juncker (2006), Donald Tusk (2010) and Poop Francis (2016).

Talk about a rogue's gallery of Globalist scumbags in service to Satan!

The Rape of Finland:

Multiculturalism Gone Mad

“The Tree of Life Synagogue victims died so that refugees could live.”
Rob Eshman, Jewish Journal

 

“We seek advantage through our dead. We make our dead your problem. The meaning we find in

our deceased we find as a courtesy to you, to help you, to change your societies for the “better.””
David Cole, Takimag

 

Introduction.

Refugee and asylum legislation is now a key policy area for many major immigrant-receiving countries. The UN Refugee

Agency estimates there are currently 28.5 million refugees and asylum seekers worldwide, with most originating in South

Sudan, Afghanistan, and Syria. The world’s largest refugee hosting countries are located near the epicenters of those

countries experiencing difficulties, and include Turkey (3.5 million), Uganda (1.4 million), Pakistan (1.4 million), Lebanon

(1 million), and the Islamic Republic of Iran (979,400). More incongruous, however, is the fact refugee and asylum populations

from these same troubled areas have exploded in the West, in countries both geographically and culturally very distant

from exporting nations. Since 1990, the new refugee population of Austria has climbed from 34,948 to 115,197; in Belgium

from 25,911 to 42,128; in Finland from 2,348 to 20,713; in France from 193,000 to 337,143; in Germany from 816,000 to

970,302; in Ireland from 360 to 6,324; in Italy from 10,840 to 167,260; in Luxembourg from 687 to 1,995; in the Netherlands

from 17,337 to 103,818; in Norway from 19,581 to 59,160; in Sweden from 109,663 to 240,889; in Switzerland from

40,943 to 92,995; and in the United Kingdom from 43,632 to 121,766. Increased lobbying on behalf of refugees, and

increased quotas for refugee admissions, are now a very significant part of the West’s overall approach to migration.

The only significant current exceptions to these trends are Hungary, where the number of new refugees has dropped from

45,123 to 5,641, and the United States and Canada, both of which were home in 2017 to roughly half the number of new

refugees they hosted in 1990.

In the United States, the lower figures can be attributed to clauses within the Refugee Act of 1980, which both defined

a refugee and gave the President (in consultation with Congress) the power to determine the number of refugees

accepted to the United States each year. That figure currently stands at 45,000. The history of the Refugee Act can be

traced to the 1975 State Department, where Lionel Rosenblatt, a Jewish diplomat and future President of Refugees

International, was working on persuading Ted Kennedy to back legislation providing a visa program for refugees from

Indochina in the wake of the Vietnam War and mass executions in Cambodia. Stephen Young, then a recently qualified D.C.

lawyer who worked with Rosenblatt, recalled that “In 1975, no one had any claim to enter the U.S. as a refugee,” though,

since the introduction of the 1952 McCarran-Walter Act, certain foreign aliens could be “paroled” into the country at the

discretion of the Attorney General. In 1975 alone, Rosenblatt helped relocate approximately

140,000 Indochinese to the United States by working within the existing structure.

As the number of claims under McCarran-Walter increased, decision-making power was increasingly dispersed to the

Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, and International Law, then chaired (1967–1979) by Jewish Democrat

Joshua Eilberg. As figures like Rosenblatt and Eilberg began agitating for a more fluid yet formal legislative approach to the

refugee question, Young recalls one conversation where Kennedy informed Rosenblatt he would only be willing to back

legislation that would accept a maximum of 150,000 Indochinese refugees. Kennedy was presumably only too aware that

both Congress and the American public were opposed to the acceptance of significant numbers of Indochinese migrants.

In the final event, however, the Refugee Act, drafted by Jewish Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman and given a public

face by Ted Kennedy — the same Ted Kennedy who gave a public face to the 1965 immigration act

— provided visas for more than 1.7 million Indochinese in the period between 1980 and 1989.

In July 2018, Holtzman penned a scathing letter of resignation from her then role at the Department of Homeland Security,

expressing disgust with the immigration, refugee, and asylum policies of Donald Trump, and claiming, quite contrary to all

available evidence, that the United States in 1980 had “welcomed refugees” and had “readily accepted and absorbed” them.

In reality, in those areas where they settled, Indochinese refugees were a significant drain on welfare and other forms of public

assistance, barely assimilated, and “overloaded the public schools and medical facilities

and were blamed for a rise in the rate of tuberculosis and other diseases.”[1]

The conspicuous presence of influential Jewish diplomats and politicians in the formulation of the Refugee Act of 1980,

together with the obvious dissonance between Elizabeth Holtzman’s presentation of the Act and the reality of it’s impact,

should be contextualized within the question of ethnic conflict in immigration policy more generally. In particular, it should

be contextualized within Kevin MacDonald’s discussion of Jewish involvement in shaping U.S. immigration policy, in the

course of which MacDonald concludes that “Jewish organizations have uniformly advocated high levels of immigration

of all racial and ethnic groups into Western societies and have also advocated a multicultural model for these societies.”[2]

The posited reasons for this uniformity include the historical Jewish interest in securing immigration rights for Jews, and

the fact that pluralism is conducive to increased feelings of Jewish security — a state of affairs in which Jews become

just one among many ethnic groups instead of a sole outgroup in a predominantly White, Christian nation. The theory

allows for exceptions to the rule, in cases where Jewish interests are interpreted differently by a minority of Jews. Further,

Jewish success in advancing pluralistic goals are said to be rooted in a number of Jewish traits, especially high verbal

intelligence and a tendency toward in-group networking. This theoretical framework would seem to predict that Jews

would be overrepresented in positions of influence within contemporary refugee, asylum, and similar pro-immigration or

“immigrants rights” organizations. The following study of a number of such organizations strongly confirms

all aspects of MacDonald’s theoretical framework, and offers a rejoinder to some recent criticisms of it.

Theoretical Issues.

Perhaps the most high-profile recent criticism of MacDonald’s theory of Jewish involvement in shaping U.S. immigration

policy is that of Nathan Cofnas, a graduate student in the philosophy of biology at the University of Oxford. Cofnas offers

an alternative theory in the form of his “default hypothesis.” In his own summary of the default hypothesis, Cofnas

states: “Because of their above average intelligence and concentration in influential urban areas, Jews will be

overrepresented in all intellectual movements and activities that are not overtly anti-Semitic.” As such, while Jews may be

overrepresented in pro-immigration, pro-pluralism organizations and movements, the default hypothesis insists that they

will also be overrepresented in anti-immigration or restrictionist movements (that are not anti-Semitic) also.

There is an inherent implication that these overrepresentati

ons will be, more or less, to the same degree.

Before moving to a discussion of findings in relation to Jewish involvement in contemporary refugee and migrant

organizations, it is first necessary to test the default hypothesis by examining the scale and nature of Jewish involvement

in contemporary anti-immigration organizations that are not anti-Semitic. To date, the only evidence offered by Cofnas

in relation to such a test is the list of scheduled speakers at a single 1994 American Renaissance conference (where

four of the ten speakers were Jewish).[3] While an interesting, if perfectly explicable, statistic, when compared with

the extensive discussion of Jewish involvement in shaping U.S. immigration policy before 1965, and the broader

contemporary context of widespread and intensive Jewish activism on behalf of pro-pluralist, pro-immigration causes,

Cofnas’s riposte can only be described, kindly, as entirely inadequate. For the purposes of this study, the senior

staff directories of the three most prominent anti-immigration think tanks currently in operation in United States were

consulted. The three main anti-immigration organizations are the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), NumbersUSA,

and Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). In the following the thumbnail sketches of these organizations

was provided by a long-time activist against immigration with insider’s insight; figures for Jewish representation are mine.

FAIR: FAIR has been described by former board members as “Dan Stein’s 401(k) plan.” It scarfs up most of the

immigration patriot money available, especially from timid Establishment foundations, does essentially nothing

and spends a lot of its time undercutting and blocking potential rivals. Stein has been running FAIR since 1988, i.e.

has presided over a period of continuous defeats for the immigration patriot movement. Activists seriously debate

whether he is a mole.

At FAIR, four of 52 senior staff members are Jewish, including President Dan Stein, Media Director Ira Mehlman, and Board

members Sarah G. Epstein and Paul Nachman. This is a Jewish representation of approximately 7.7%. Across all three

major anti-immigration organizations, Jews occupy 5.13% of senior roles. This is in fact a generous figure to settle on

as an approximate broader working figure, because Jews were totally absent from the senior levels of every smaller

organization consulted.[4]

CIS: The CIS does a lot of worthy studies, but is determinedly PC, presumably to maintain viability in the MSM/ Beltway,

which limits its ability to appeal to a wider audience. The $PLC named it a Hate Group anyway a couple of years ago

(as was FAIR, for no apparent reason), after which its main spokesman, Mark Krikorian, has been a little more daring,

especially on twitter. Senior positions at CIS are listed in Center Staff, Board of Directors, and Center Fellows, totaling

37 individuals. Of these individuals, two are Jewish: Chief Litigation Counsel Julie Axelrod and Senior Policy Analyst

Stephen Steinlight, although Mark Krikorian is their main public spokesperson. This is a Jewish representation of 5.41%.

NumbersUSA: NumbersUSA is a worthy organization, and its Congressional Grade card system excellent. However,

its founder ,Roy Beck, is apparently planning to retire, so the future is uncertain. There are no Jewish members of staff

listed at NumbersUSA. But we will assume that Jews have an average representation in the anti-immigrant politics of around 5%.

Given that the Jewish proportion of the population of the United States is assumed to be around 2.2-2.5%, the six individual

Jews at CIS and FAIR do technically amount to an overrepresentation at the top level, albeit rather modest in light of the

representation of Jews active in legal and associated professions more generally, not to mention Cofnas’s flamboyant

panegyric to Jewish intellectual and organizational talent. Taking into account an allowance for any such Jewish representation

in anti-immigration politics on the grounds of alternative perceptions of specifically Jewish interests, discussed in the MacDonald

thesis, a search was conducted on commentary on immigration given by these figures, or other

indications as to their ideological leanings that may be evident in their broader work.

Working within MacDonald’s theoretical framework, in which concerns about anti-Semitism will be primary among Jews

of all political hues, a reasonable prediction would be that Jewish representation in anti-immigration movements would

be both exceptional in the larger picture of the immigration debate, and, rather than being concerned about traditional

America as a whole, will be focussed almost exclusively on the exclusion of those immigrants or refugees perceived to

be anti-Semitic, especially Muslims from the Middle East. In other words, such representations will be based on what might

be termed renegade, minority, or abnormal perceptions of Jewish interests, rather than

shared concerns or earnest sympathies with the greater mass of the native population.

In this regard, Ira Mehlman and Stephen Steinlight are especially interesting figures. In a 2012 interview with Peter Beinart,

Mehlman is unambiguous in telling his interviewer: “current mass immigration policies are harming the interests of

American Jews … Mass immigration is introducing large numbers of new people to American society who hold far less

favorable opinions of Jews.” Similarly, in 2001 Steinlight penned an essay for the Center for Immigration Studies bluntly

titled “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography.” In the course of the essay, Steinlight condemns earlier

periods of nativism and restrictionism in the United States, and strongly promotes pluralistic and multicultural ideals.

In fact, Steinlight’s only apparent grievance with existing immigration structures is that they have resulted in the fact

at some point in the next 20 years Muslims will outnumber Jews, and that Muslims with an “Islamic agenda” are

growing active politically through a widespread network of national organizations. This is occurring at a time when

the religion of Islam is being supplanted in many of the Islamic immigrant sending countries by the

totalitarian ideology of Islamism of which vehement anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism form central tenets.

 

Such sentiments are essentially neoconservative, itself of course a largely Jewish ideological movement in conflict with

native interests, and are entirely predictable within the basic theoretical framework offered by MacDonald, while doing

little or nothing to corroborate the default hypothesis offered by Cofnas. Steinlight and Mehlman are primarily concerned

by potential increases in anti-Semitism and a decline in Jewish political clout, and not with

any broader implications of pluralism, multiculturalism, or White demographic decline.

Similar issues emerge when one considers another issue raised by Cofnas, putatively in support of his default hypothesis.

This is the presence of Jewish academics active in what might be termed “race realism,” or genetic determinism, and

the apparent fact that Jews have been strongly overrepresented among high-profile advocates of hereditarianism.

Cofnas writes that “two out of seven of the most prominent hereditarians were Jewish (Hans Eysenck and Richard

Herrnstein), making Jews extremely overrepresented in this group relative to their numbers in the general population.”

Eysenck was half-Jewish, and Herrnstein married outside his group. Neither appear to have lived in any kind of sustained

Jewish milieu, and Eysenck made a point of explicitly denying any affinity or connection to Jewishness.[5] It is interesting

that Cofnas does not place his contention in any kind of context, or seek to prove his theory of rough parity in

overrepresentations, by offering comparisons with overrepresentations among anti-hereditarian scholars.

Another issue, of course, is the obvious problem of extrapolating broader issues of politics and identity from an academic’s

career. An excellent case in this regard, from the Arts, is the Jewish literary critic and Yale scholar Harold Bloom,

who combines an obvious love and respect for the Western canon with a clear loathing for cultural marxist or deconstructionist

approaches in literary academia. Working within the Cofnas approach, Bloom would likely be held up as an example of the

default hypothesis at work. And yet Bloom is otherwise a committed pluralist who viewed the Bush administration as

verging on a theocratic fascist regime, and sees the Trump administration as a catastrophe. Bloom writes: “Trump won

the election because 62 million Americans live in a state of virtual reality. They no longer know what facts are. They’re

also consumed by resentment, racial prejudice, and the deep fear that their America is vanishing forever. It will.”

[Emphasis added] Another example, from the sciences, is the geneticist David Reich who has done much to advance an

understanding of genetic differences between the races, yet has also repeatedly insisted that race is largely a “social construct.”

The point here is that MacDonald’s thesis does not require every Jewish academic to cynically use his or her discipline

to advance Jewish interests, but that it does advance the idea that Jews will overwhelmingly see support for pluralism

and mass immigration as being in their interests. As such, not every Jewish scientist studying race differences

will necessarily oppose multiculturalism, racial pluralism, or mass immigration, and in fact very few will.

While these points may highlight some of the more obvious problems with the default hypothesis offered by Cofnas, a

more thorough test is proposed by examining the scale of Jewish representation in contemporary refugee and migrant organizations.

Jewish Representation in Secular Contemporary Refugee and Migrant Organizations.

In contrast to the modest overrepresentation of Jews in anti-immigration groups (around 5%), Jews are nothing short of

prolific in influential senior roles in contemporary refugee, asylum, and pro-migration organizations. Significantly, Jews

occupy the leadership of all four of the largest and most influential (and nominally secular) organizations active in America

today, the International Rescue Committee (President and CEO David Miliband), Refugees International (President Eric P. Schwartz,

formerly of HIAS), International Refugee Assistance Project (Director Becca Heller), and Human Rights Watch

(Executive Director Kenneth Roth, and Deputy Directors Iain Levine and Fred Abrahams).

The International Rescue Committee (IRC) is one of the most significant organizations bringing migrants to the United States.

In their countries of origin, refugees and their families are assisted by the IRC to prepare their cases to the Department of

Homeland Security (DHS), compiling personal data and background information for security clearance. Once their cases are

approved, refugees are usually greeted at the airport by case workers from the IRC. The IRC then provides these migrants

with a home, furnishings, food, and any other assistance that might be required. The IRC operates 27 offices across the United

States, each offering food, housing, educational, and medical assistance. It also works closely with the U.S. Office of Refugee

Resettlement (ORR) Division of Refugee Assistance, which was reported in August 2018 as quietly removing its staff directory

page. Consultations with the Internet Wayback Machine revealed the Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement to be one

Carl Rubenstein, an alumnus of Tel Aviv Law School. In 2017, the IRC, in conjunction with Rubenstein’s ORR, resettled

more than 51,000 migrants to the United States, and is currently a staunch

lobbyist against current restrictions imposed by President Trump.

(Clockwise) Eric P. Schwartz, David Miliband, Iain Levine, Becca Heller, Kenneth Roth, Fred Abrahams)

 

Jews are very prominent in the leadership of the IRC. In addition to President and CEO David Miliband, there are at least

30 Jews in senior positions within the organization including Morton I. Abramowitz (Overseer), Madeleine Albright (Overseer),

Laurent Alpert (Board Member), Clifford Asness (Board Member), Betsy Blumenthal (Overseer), Alan Batkin (Chairman

Emeritus and Board Member), Michael W. Blumenthal (Overseer), Susan Dentzer (Board Member), Evan G. Greenberg

(Overseer), Morton I. Hamburg (Overseer), Leila Heckman (Overseer), Karen Hein (Overseer), Marvin Josephson (Overseer),

Alton Kastner (Overseer and former Deputy Director), Henry Kissinger (Overseer), David A. Levine (Board Member),

Reynold Levy (Overseer), Robert E. Marks (Overseer), Sara Moss (Overseer), Thomas Nides (Board Member),

Susan Petricof (Overseer), Gideon Rose (Overseer), Thomas Schick (Chairman Emeritus and Board Member), James Strickler

(Overseer), Sally Susman (Board Member), Mona Sutphen (Board Member), Merryl Tisch (Board Member), Maureen White

(Board Member), Jonathan Wiesner (Chairman Emeritus and Board Member), William Winters (Overseer), and

James D. Wolfensohn (Overseer).

The Board of the IRC is comprised of 30 individuals, 12 of whom are Jewish, giving a Jewish representation at senior

board level of 40%. The Board of Overseers consists of 78 individuals, of whom at least 25 are Jewish, giving a Jewish

representation at this level of just over 32%. Since Jews occupy the position of CEO at the IRC, as well as 40% of the

senior board and 32% of the lower board, it would be reasonable to assert that they enjoy a dominant

role within the organization.[6] This dwarfs any Jewish representation seen in anti-immigration groups.

The International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) came to national prominence when Director Becca Heller brought

a class action suit against Trump’s January 2017 travel ban on individuals from certain Muslim countries. Heller, who

has described herself as an “intensely neurotic Jew,” was active from the very earliest airport detentions, and was assisted

by former Yale law professor Michael Wishnie, also Jewish and a former member of Jews for Economic and Social Justice.

Wishnie assembled “a group of students to draft a class action suit to represent not just IRAP’s two clients but anyonewho

had been detained.” The case was later also supported and taken up by the Immigrant’s Rights division of the American

Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) at the direction of its two Deputy Directors, Lee Gelernt and Judy Rabinowitz, both of whom

are Jewish. At IRAP, there are three Jews on the board of the International Refugee Assistance Project: Jon Finer, David

Nierenberg, and Carl Reisner. The board consists of 12 members, giving a Jewish representation of 25%. Aside from

the board, other influential positions in the organization are held by Jews, including Deputy Legal Director (Lara Finkbeiner),

and legal fellow (Julie Kornfeld). Again, this is significantly greater than any Jewish representation seen in anti-immigration groups.

Lee Gelernt & Judy Rabinowitz

 

Heller’s cause has very recently been taken up by what the New York Times has euphemistically been called “Big Law”

but what is in fact a large number of Jewish legal conglomerates based in New York. Of these, the most significant is

Paul Weiss in Manhattan, led by Brad S. Karp, a Director of the American Friends of The Hebrew University and

prize-winner from the Jewish Theological Seminary. Karp, whose previous political adventures have included activism for homosexual marriage,

has offered his company’s services pro bono, via counsels Emily Goldberg and Steven C. Herzog, to Gelernt and Rabinowitz

in order to obstruct Trump’s anti-immigration measures, with Gelernt telling the New York Times that Karp’s help was “indispensable.”

Refugee organizations are also reliant to a great extent on legal assistance provided by “immigrant’s rights” organizations.

Here too, Jews appear to be overrepresented by a large margin. For example, Jews comprise just over 14% of overall

listed staff at the National Immigrant Justice Center, and dominate the most senior positions. These include Director of

Policy (Heidi Altman, former legal director for the Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights Coalition), Associate Director of Legal

Services (Ashley Huebner), Director of Litigation (Charles Roth), and Associate Director of Litigation (Keren Zwick).

Maria Blumenfeld, a former senior lawyer for NIJC departed the group for another, almost identical organization,

named Equal Justice Works, the Director of which is David Stern, also Jewish. Another interesting organization is

The Immigrant Defense Project. Of the 15 listed senior staff, at least four are verifiably Jewish (Development Director

Ariadna Rodenstein, Senior Staff Attorney Genia Blaser, Supervising Attorney Marie Mark, and Supervising Attorney Andrew

Wachtenheim). This is a Jewish representation at senior level of over 26% – significantly greater than any Jewish representation

seen in anti-immigration groups. Of the five members of the Immigrant Defense Project’s Advisory Board, one, Peter Markowitz,

is Jewish. Markowitz is also listed as founder and director of the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic and a

“George Soros Justice Fellow and staff attorney at the Bronx Defenders from 2002 to 2005,” where he “developed the

nation’s first in-house full-service immigration project housed in a public defender office.”

New Hampshire’s “Best Immigration Lawyer” is the Jewish Ron Abramson.

At the National Immigration Law Center, 18.5% of its staff lawyers are verifiably Jewish, and the

Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project is under Jewish Presidency (Ty Frankel) and 26% of its

board is Jewish (Frankel, Ira Feldman, David Androff, Nathan Fidel, and Andrew Silverman). The Immigrant Legal Resource Center

was founded mostly via the efforts of Jewish lawyer Mark Silverman, described here as “one of the very first movement

lawyers helping DREAMers.” Its board is under Jewish chairmanship (Lisa Spiegel), and its Executive Director is

Eric Cohen, also Jewish. One interesting member of its senior staff is Rose Cahn, also Jewish, who is a former Senior

George Soros Justice Fellow at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. Cahn specializes

in what she calls “post-conviction relief for immigrants,” which is rather florid way of saying that she specializes in helping

foreign criminals get into, and remain in, the United States. Other senior staff members include Donna Goolub and Sara

Feldman, a Jewish woman who nevertheless managed to become Migration Policy Advisor to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops,

a fact that sheds some light on how that organization became rabidly pro-migrant.

Another organization providing legal support for the pro-immigration lobby is the Lawyer’s Committee for Civil Right’s Under the Law.

Of its six most senior staff, three are Jewish (Jon M. Greenbaum, Lisa Bornstein, and Samuel Weiss). One of its

most senior lawyers is Ezra Rosenberg, a veteran in the multicultural cause who has worked variously to challenge

racial profiling by police, to stop requests for voter ID among certain ethnic groups in Texas, and to advance school

desegregation in North Carolina. A further interesting organization is the Northwest Immigrants Rights Project, where

two members of the board of 12 can be verified as Jewish (Dave Heiner and Sara Litt), a representation of 16%,

and staff attorneys include Jews Elizabeth Eisenberg, Jenna Golan-Streib, Rachel Rubinstein, and Jordan Wasserman.

At the Asylum Advocacy Project, two of the five members of the advisory board are Jewish (Dani Isaacsohn

and the above mentioned Michael Wishnie), and its list of donors appears to be at least 40% Jewish.

The Director of Refugee Council USA is Naomi Steinberg. The Executive Director of the New York Civil Liberties Union

is the Jewish feminist Donna Lieberman who includes among her ongoing activities “resisting the Trump regime’s attack

on immigrant children and refugees,” while its Legal Director is Arthur Eisenberg. The American Immigration Council is

under the Jewish Directorship of Beth Werlin, its Research Director is the Argentinian Jew Guillermo Cantor (see a great

example of his propaganda here), and its Policy and Media Director is Royce Bernstein Murray. The area director for

Refugee Services of Texas in Austin is the Jewish Erica Schmidt-Portnoy. Schmidt-Portnoy has described the recent 80%

decline in the number of refugees being resettled in Texas as “hard to watch.” Meanwhile, another Portnoy, Diane Portnoy,

Jewish founder and CEO of The Immigrant Learning Center, has demanded that Massachusetts should welcome more Syrian refugees.

A similar organization is the Open Avenues Foundation, which has the stated goal of “helping foreign nationals build

their unique path to thrive in the United States.” The founder and executive director of Open Avenues is Danielle Goldman, also Jewish.

Jewish lawyers, occasionally acting alone or as part of small firms, are also disproportionately represented as major

immigrant and asylum advocates. One good example in this regard is Susan J. Cohen, founder and Chair of Mintz

Law’s Immigration Practice. Cohen was involved in contributing to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

regulations implementing the Immigration Act of 1990, and has won awards for her political asylum work from the

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts and the Political Asylum/Immigration Representation (PAIR) Project (of which

she is now President). PAIR “provides free immigration services to indigent asylum seekers and detained immigrants.”

In 2017, Cohen led a Mintz team that worked with the ACLU of Massachusetts and

others to obtain a temporary restraining order on President Trump’s travel ban.

Cohen also advised the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in drafting the legislation which resulted in the Massachusetts

Global Entrepreneur in Residence (GEIR) program, which enables tens of thousands of non-White foreign students to

stay in Massachusetts if they merely indicate they might start a company. Cohen co-developed the project with another

Jewish lawyer, Jeff Goldman. Goldman describes himself as “a leader in immigration policy” and “chairs Governor Charlie

Baker’s Advisory Council on Refugees and Immigrants.” Goldman and Cohen, like Carl Rubenstein at the Office of Refugee

Resettlement, are illustrative of a remarkable Jewish talent for acquiring key government positions in the areas of

immigration and refugee resettlement. Another useful example is Mark Greenberg, a senior fellow at the Migration Policy

Institute and a former senior administrator at Rubenstein’s Office of Refugee Resettlement. Yet another very notable

Jewish lawyer is Michael Kagan. Kagan led a campaign to ensure changes to refugee status determination (RSD) procedures

by the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) that would result in more migrants attaining official refugee status, thus improving their

chances of getting asylum or visas in the West. Kagan is co-director of the Immigration Clinic at the

University of Nevada, Las Vegas’ Boyd School of Law, which offers free legal aid to all immigrants.

The record of Jews as immigration judges is also quite remarkable. Detailed statistics for most senior immigration judges

are available online. One example is Judge Raisa Cohen, New York Immigration Court. Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch

appointed Cohen to begin hearing cases at the court in March 2016, but Cohen had previously decided on asylum cases as

assistant chief counsel for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in New York.

During the period 2013-2018, Cohen is recorded as deciding 572. Of these, he granted 470 and denied 102. Converted to

percentage terms, Cohen denied 17.8 percent and granted 82.2 percent. Compared to Cohen’s denial rate of 17.8 percent,

nationally during this same period, immigration court judges denied 57.6 percent of asylum claims. Many asylum seekers in

New York are provided with free legal aid by organizations like Central American Legal Assistance(CALA). CALA has a

board of ten people, five of whom can be confirmed as Jewish (Lisa Reiner, Anne Isaak, Zachary Sanders, Harry Shulman, and Ellen Wachtel).

Another example, Judge Leonard Shapiro of Boston, is equally illustrative. Shapiro was appointed as an Immigration Judge

in December 1990, and was coauthor of the 1988 Edition of The American Immigration Lawyers Association Textbook and

the 1995 Edition of The Immigration Judge Benchbook. Shapiro was also the chairman of the Immigration Law Section

of the Massachusetts Bar Association in 1990 prior to his appointment. During the period 2013-2018, Shapiro is recorded

as deciding 160 asylum claims. Of these, he granted 113 and denied 47. Converted to percentage terms, Shapiro denied

29.4 percent and granted 70.6 percent. Again, nationally during this same period,

immigration court judges denied 57.6 percent of asylum claims.

Canada

Jews feature prominently among the top immigration lawyers in Canada. In Nova Scotia, Lee Cohen “has become a

leading light in immigration and human rights law” since “his representation of 174 Sikhs who landed in Shelburne in

the summer of 1987.” Cohen now recalls: “Nobody was for immigration,” he says. “Nobody wanted refugees. I felt I

was one of the very few people struggling to open the eyes of our community to something that needed to be talked

about. We had the opportunity to bring people to Canada — people who would help build our prosperity and our nation,

but who also needed to be here. So I dedicated myself to refugee and immigration law.” Cohen went on to found the

Halifax Refugee Clinic, and has “served as a mentor to a new generation of immigration law professionals, who are

helping him push for changes in the system.” Halifax Magazine has described Cohen as “the face of immigration law in Nova Scotia.”

Montreal’s most prominent immigration lawyer is David Cohen. Cohen is the founder of CanadaVisa.com, and sits

on the Leaders’ Roundtable on Immigration of the Conference Board of Canada. He has appeared before a number

of Canadian Government Parliamentary Committees on immigration issues, where he “has been actively working with

government authorities to educate stakeholders about the finer points of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act

(IRPA).” This took the form of vocal opposition to the Conservative government’s proposed legislative changes, which

would restrict migration. Meanwhile, one of Toronto’s “Premiere” immigration lawyers is the Jewish Shelley Levine,

who has represented thousands of refugees and asylum seekers in Canada’s immigration courts, and regularly prepares

appeals to the Refugee Appeal Division and attends before the Federal Court Trial Division where he argues Judicial Review

cases of negative immigration decisions.

The Canadian Bar Association (CBA) introduced its Immigration Law Section Award of Excellence in 2009, and has

since given the award seven times. Of these, Jews have been recipients three times (2009 – David Matas, senior legal

counsel of B’nai Brith Canada; 2011 – Gary Segal; and 2015 – Lorne Waldman). Waldman, who often waxes lyrical

about his Jewish background, has been described by Canadian Lawyer as among the 25 most influential lawyers in Canada,

and as the most influential refugee and immigration lawyer in the country. In 2013, the award was given to the founders of

the Immigration Law Section of the CBA – Mendel Green, Cecil Rotenberg, Barbara Jackman, Marshall Drukarsh,

Charles Roach, Gary Segal, Carter Hoppe, Steve Abrahams, and Donald Greenbaum. Clearly most, if not all, of these

individuals are Jews. Jewish lawyers are also very well represented on the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

, including Edward E. Aronoff, Gregory Cohen, Jeffrey Kushner, Shereen Benzvy Miller – Deputy Chair of

the organization, Jonathan Rozenstein, Jaclyn Wasserman, Claire Wittenberg, and Marie-Claude Yaacov.

Two of Canada’s most high-profile academic propagandists on behalf of increased immigration are Hugh Segal, an

alumnus of United Talmud Torah Academy, and Maureen Silcoff. Segal is a Distinguished Fellow at the Munk School

of Global Affairs, University of Toronto and Principal of Massey College. He also served in the Canadian Senate as a

Conservative from Ontario, which shows, if nothing else, that the term Conservative is now all but meaningless. Silcoff

is an immigration and refugee lawyer, a former member of the Immigration and Refugee Board, and co-chair of the

Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers litigation committee . In July 2018, Segal and Silcoff, along with an East

Asian named Chen, teamed up to write a piece for the National Post titled: “Canada’s future

prosperity depends on opening — not closing — our borders: We need higher immigration levels.”

Since Jews are estimated to be 1.2% of the Canadian population, we are again seeing not just overrepresentations,

but extraordinary overrepresentations of Jews in the areas of immigration, refugee assistance, the promotion of multiculturalism.

UK

In the UK, Jews have also been remarkably overrepresented in the development of pro-immigration policy. In 2000, Tom Steinberg,

a British Jew who doesn’t appear to have expertise in anything but has been extraordinarily successful in gaining

influence with British and American governments, penned a policy document for the Institute of

Economic Affairs titled “Reforming British Migration Policy.” Among his arguments is the following:

The second advantageous aspect of allowing economic migrants into the UK is the cultural assets they bring

with them, whether they be cuisine, music, science, literature, forms of social organisation or actual objects and

resources. Britain has benefited an incalculable amount from imported practices, from chicken tikka masala to

democracy itself. The dangers presented by nations which legislate to enforce cultural purity hardly need

repeating. Britain is not about to go down such a path, but the lack of open migration channels means an

inevitable retardation of cultural assimilation, with potential social and economic costs. The missed opportunities

themselves are impossible to calculate, but we need only to note that the founder of Intel was a Hungarian

born migrant to the US, or that Picasso received inspiration from African masks, to see the varying and potentially

enormous opportunity costs that hindering cultural interaction could have. Had we had such strict migration policies

in the past as we do today we can be sure that Britain would be a less rich place than it is. Our primary religion,

much of our language, our beer and favourite foods all have strong foreign elements

which could have been excluded by our current migration policies. [emphasis added]

 

Throughout the document are multiple references to speeches by Barbara Roche, Britain’s Minister of State for

Asylum and Immigration, 1999-2001. Roche is also Jewish. In February 2016, a biography of Tony Blair, Broken

Vows: Tony Blair — The Tragedy of Power (serialized in the Daily Mail), described Roche’s part in the deliberate

encouragement of mass immigration into the UK during Blair’s time as Prime Minister. The Daily Mail, in its serialization,

commented: “The most incredible revelations concern Barbara Roche, a little-known MP who was immigration minister

between 1999 and 2001. During this period, she quietly adopted policies that changed the face of the UK … She changed

the rules to allow more work permits to be issued, especially to people who would previously have been considered asylum

seekers.” Stephen Boys Smith, who was then head of the Home Office’s immigration directorate, added: “It was clear that

Roche wanted more immigrants to come to Britain. She didn’t see her job as controlling entry into Britain, but by

looking at the wider picture in a “holistic way” she wanted us to see the benefit of a multicultural society.”

Tom Steinberg and Barbara Roche

 

One of Britain’s foremost pro-migrant activists prior to the Roche years was Steve Cohen, a Jewish human-rights

lawyer in Manchester. Cohen founded the Immigration Aid Unit, and was “politically opposed to immigration controls

in their totality and took part in many anti-deportation and immigration campaigns both as a lawyer and a campaigner.”

He founded the ‘No One is Illegal’ Group in September 2003, and penned a number of tracts with titles such as Imagine

There’s No Countries and From the Jews to the Tamils: Britain’s mistreatment of refugees. Cohen described himself as

a socialist, but his “open borders” ideological is mirrored well by Bryan Caplan, a Jewish American capitalist economist

described by both The Atlantic and Vox as one of the world’s leading proponents of the open borders position. One

of Caplan’s tracts is titled Why Should We Restrict Immigration?, something that could easily have emerged from the

Cohen canon. Apparently differing widely in their economics, their shared ethnic origins emerge as the only significant

connection. The UK’s Refugee Law Initiative, based at the University of London, was founded and is led by a Jew,

Director David Cantor. Cantor previously worked at the Refugee Legal Centre, a London-based public law centre that provide

s free legal advice and representation to asylum seekers.

Discussion

None of the above takes into account the equally prolific presence of Jews in what might be termed the “propagandistic”

elements of the unfolding era of mass migration, or areas of activism in which Jews act explicitly as Jews (e.g. HIAS).

These subject will require separate treatment and will form a later addition to what will undoubtedly become an extended

series exploring the startling similarities in pro-migrant, pro-refugee Jewish activism. The intention of this essay is merely

to act as an introduction to the themes, and to some of the individuals and groups involved, and to act as a corrective to

the Cofnas default hypothesis, which ends all too abruptly and neatly with the assertion that Jews are simply prone to

overrepresentation. We may reply, having surveyed the scene, that there are overrepresentations and then there are

overrepresentations. There really is no comparison between Jewish involvement in anti-immigration politics, and Jewish

involvement in pro-immigration politics. In fact, the only place on earth where one might find ample

evidence of the former is Israel – a fact that damns the Cofnas hypothesis rather than supporting it.

To paraphrase Hamlet, we might say, when looking upon Israel, “Ay, there’s the rub!” Because if the Jewish interest in

immigration and refugees is provoked, as we are so often told, by the Jewish historical experience, then it would appear

that Jews are only willing to indulge this warped self-pitying nostalgia in lands other than their own. If the pro-refugee,

pro-migrant craze is a Diaspora phenomenon, then the lands of the Diaspora have a problem. The practical realities

of this problem are such that anti-immigration politics lacking anti-Semitic elements are doomed to failure. Jews are

demonstrably providing the leadership, organisational capacity, money, and legal aggression that is driving the mass

migration machine. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. The names and groups here can be checked and rechecked –

they aren’t going to disappear, and the percentages won’t change.

It’s time to wake up. (Past time actually).

 _______________________________________________________

Detroit: The Death of White Civilisation

Anyone who doubts the long-term effect of the swamping of the First World by the Third, need look no

further than Detroit, where a new report has revealed that almost half of all adults in

the city are “functionally illiterate” and essentially unable to operate in normal society.

 The report, issued by the “Detroit Regional Workforce Fund” (a government-private sector partnership organisation

set up by race-blind liberals), said that the “National Institute for Literacy estimates that 47% of adults in Detroit are

functionally illiterate, referring to the inability of an individual to use reading,

speaking, writing, and computational skills in everyday life situations.

“Generally, those adults who score at Level 1 (on a scale of 1 to 5, lowest to highest) have difficulty performing such

everyday tasks as locating an intersection on a street map, reading and comprehending

a short newspaper article, or calculating total costs on an order form,” it continued.

The report admitted that the shocking illiteracy levels could not be explained solely by a lack of high school education.

“We also know that of the 200,000 adults who are functionally illiterate, approximately half have a high school diploma

or GED, so this issue cannot be solely addressed by a focus on adult high-school completion,” the baffled liberals said.

In addition, the report said, these figures are “aggregates and communicate a city-wide issue. We also know some

neighborhoods and census tracts within the city have more significant concentrations of adults who are functionally

illiterate and/or lack educational credentials.”

The report ignores the obvious: Detroit is now a “black” city, and has been utterly destroyed after the whites were

driven out by a combination of horrendous black crime levels, collapsing standards and an inefficient bureaucracy.

In a nutshell, whites have found it impossible to live in an area where there

is no longer any semblance of functioning modern white western society.

* Detroit’s violent crime rate is one of the highest in the United States. The official crime rate is 62.18 per 1000 residents

for property crimes, and 16.73 per 1000 for violent crimes (compared to national figures of 32 per 1000 for property

crimes and 5 per 1000 for violent crime). Official records also show that up to 70 percent of homicides are drug related.

* Black crime has run every last major grocery store out of Detroit. Massive shoplifting, stock theft and inoperable

Third World conditions saw the last major store, Farmer Jack, leave in 2007. Since then, Detroit,

one of America’s largest cities, hasn’t had a single grocery chain store within the city limits.

* Vast areas of the city are utterly smashed and lie in ruins, making this once-thriving

home of the American automobile industry, into a wasteland which resembles a war zone.

And the reason for all of this?

According to the US Census Bureau’s 2010 census, 1.23% of Detroit’s population is Asian, 81.84% is black, 10.42% is white,

and 6.51% is “other.” Interestingly, the “Hispanic” population,

which could be of any race, is counted as 6.56%, whatever that might mean.

The racial sea change in Detroit provides the key to understanding the collapse in that city.

In 1930, 92.3% of Detroit’s population was white.

In 1940, 90.8% of Detroit’s population was white.

In 1950, 83.63% of Detroit’s population was white.

In 1960, 70.8% of Detroit’s population was white.

In 1970, 56.0% of Detroit’s population was white.

In 1980, 35.7% of Detroit’s population was white.

In 1990, 22.2% of Detroit’s population was white.

In 2000, 12.3% of Detroit’s population was white.