The Illuminati Chronicles Part 1

 A Short History of the New World Order Part 1



1773 – Mayer Amschel Rothschild assembles twelve of his most influential friends and

convinces them that if they all pool their resources together, they can rule the world.

This meeting takes place in Frankfurt, Germany. Rothschild also informs his friends

that he has found the perfect candidate, an individual of incredible intellect

and ingenuity, to lead the organization he has planned – Adam Weishaupt.


May 1, 1776 – Adam Weishaupt (code named Spartacus) establishes a secret society

called the Order of the Illuminati. Weishaupt is the Professor of Canon Law at the University

of Ingolstadt in Bavaria, part of Germany. [This date, May Day, is to become highly

significant to the Soviet Communists. They held festive military parades on this day.]

The Illuminati seek to establish a New World Order. Their objectives are as follows:

1) Abolition of all ordered governments
2) Abolition of private property
3) Abolition of inheritance
4) Abolition of patriotism
5) Abolition of the family
6) Abolition of religion
7) Creation of a world government


July 1782 – The Order of the Illuminati joins forces with Freemasonry at the Congress

of Wilhelmsbad. The Comte de Virieu, an attendee at the conference, comes away

visibly shaken. When questioned about the “tragic secrets” he brought back with him,

he replies: “I will not confide them to you. I can only tell you that all this is very much

more serious than you think.” From this time on, according to his biographer,

“the Comte de Virieu could only speak of Freemasonry with horror.”


1785 – An Illuminati courier named Lanze is struck by lightning and killed while traveling

by horseback through the town of Ratisbon. When Bavarian officials examine the contents

of his saddle bags, they discover the existence of the Order of the Illuminati and find plans

detailing the coming French Revolution. The Bavarian government attempts to alert the

government of France of impending disaster, but the French government fails to heed

this warning. Bavarian officials arrest all members of the Illuminati they can

find, but Weishaupt and others have gone underground and cannot be found.


Oct. 11, 1785 – Bavarian authorities raid the home of an Illuminati member named Von Zwack.

They discover Illuminati documents which show quite clearly that they plan to bring about

a “universal revolution that should deal the death-blow to society…this revolution

will be the work of the secret societies, and that is one of our great mysteries.”


1789 – Violence erupts in France. The French Revolution not only overthrows the existing

government but also attempts to eliminate Christianity from the nation. A half-naked

prostitute is placed on the altar of the Cathedral of Notre Dame and extolled as the

“Goddess of Reason.” Revolutionary officials even do away with the seven-day

week and replace it with a ten-day week.


1796 – Freemasonry becomes a major issue in the Presidential election in the United States.

John Adams wins the election by opposing Masonry, and his son John Quincy Adams

warns of the dire threat to the nation posed by the Masonic Lodges: “I do conscientiously

and sincerely believe that the Order of Freemasonry, if not

the greatest, is one of the greatest moral and political evils …”


1797 – John Robison, Professor of Natural History at Edinburgh University in Scotland,

publishes a book entitled “Proofs of a Conspiracy” in which he reveals that Adam Weishaupt

had attempted to recruit him. He exposes the diabolical aims of the Illuminati to the world.


1798 – George Washington acknowledges that Illuminati activity has come to America:

“It is not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and the principles of

Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more

satisfied of this fact than I am.”


1816 – Congress grants a 20-year charter to the Bank of the United States, a private

central bank for America. [The Constitution had granted to Congress the “power to

coin money and regulate the value thereof.” Thomas Jefferson had specifically warned

the American people against turning this power to create money over to a private group

that was unelected and not accountable to the public: “If the American people ever allow

private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation,

the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all

property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”]


1821 – Georg W. F. Hegel formulates what is called the Hegelian dialectic – the process

by which Illuminati objectives are achieved. According to the Hegelian dialectic, thesis plus

antithesis equals synthesis. In other words, first you foment a crisis. Then there is an

enormous public outcry that something must be done about the problem. So you offer a

solution that brings about the changes you really wanted all along, but which people would

have been unwilling to accept initially. (A good example of this would be the killings at

Dunblane and Hungerford. In both cases public outrage was accompanied by the passage

of stringent new gun legislation in the British parliament; yet serious questions remain

unanswered about both incidents, Ed.)


1826 – William Morgan attempts to publish a book exposing the wrongdoing of the

Masonic Lodges. While he is in the process of having his book printed, he

mysteriously disappears. [His body was found in Lake Ontario a year later.]


1828 – Mayer Amschel Rothschild, who finances the Illuminati, expresses his utter

contempt for national governments which attempt to regulate international bankers such

as him: “Allow me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who writes

the laws.” [As Sir Josiah Stamp, president of the Bank of England in the 1920s, would

remark years later: “Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers

own the earth; take it away from them but leave them the power to create deposits,

and with a flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again.”]


1829 – British Illuminist Frances “Fanny” Wright gives a series of lectures in the United

States. She announces that various subversives and revolutionaries are to be united in a

movement that will be called “Communism.” She explains that the movement is to be

made more acceptable to the public by professing to support “equal opportunity” and “equal rights.”


1829-1837 – While President Andrew Jackson is in office, there are attempts to continue

and strengthen the hold of a central bank over the United States. President Jackson

vigorously opposes these efforts. Jackson tells his adversaries: “You are a den of vipers!

I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood

the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before

morning.” In 1832, Jackson vetoes a bill to renew the charter of the Bank of the United

States. In 1833, he removes government funds from the Bank of the United States.


1848 – Moses Mordecai Marx Levy, alias Karl Marx, writes “The Communist Manifesto.”

Marx is a member of an Illuminati front organization called the League of the Just. He

not only advocates economic and political changes; he advocates moral and spiritual

changes as well. He believes the family should be abolished and that all children should

be raised by a central authority. He expresses his attitude toward God by saying: “We

must war against all prevailing ideas of religion, of the state, of country, of patriotism.

The idea of God is the keynote of a perverted civilization. It must be destroyed.”


1870 – John Ruskin is named Professor of Fine Arts at Oxford University in England.

He teaches his students that the government should take control of all means of production

and distribution, and he is prepared to place control of the government in the hands of a

single man: “My continual aim has been to show the eternal superiority of some men to others,

sometimes even of one man to all others.”


1871 – Albert Pike, founder of the Klu Klux Klan, publishes his 861-page book “Morals

and Dogma”, intended only for Masonic eyes. He indicates that those in the lower ranks of

Masonry are deliberately deceived by their superiors: “The Blue degrees [the first three

degrees of the 32] are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are

displayed there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not

intended that he shall understand them; but it is intended that he shall imagine that he

shall understand them. Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of

Masonry.” [This is why about 95% of the men involved in Masonry don’t have a clue as to

what the objectives of the organization actually are. They are under the

delusion that it’s just a fine community organization doing good works.]


1875 – Russian occultist Helena Petrovna Blavatsky founds the Theosophical Society.

Madame Blavatsky claims that Tibetan holy men in the Himalayas, whom she refers to as

the Masters of Wisdom, communicated with her in London by telepathy. She insists that

the Christians have it all backwards – that Satan is good and God is evil. She writes:

“The Christians and scientists must be made to respect their Indian betters. The Wisdom

of India, her philosophy and achievement, must be made known in Europe and America.”


1884 – The Fabian Society is founded to promote Socialism. The Fabian Society takes its

name from the Roman General Fabius Maximus, who fought Hannibal’s army

in small debilitating skirmishes, rather than attempting one decisive battle.


July 14, 1889 – Albert Pike issues instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the world.

He reveals who is the true object of Masonic worship: “To you, Sovereign Grand Instructors

General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th

degrees: The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees,

maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine.”


1890-1896 – Cecil Rhodes, an enthusiastic student of John Ruskin, is Prime Minister of

South Africa, a British colony at the time. He is able to exploit and control the gold and

diamond wealth of South Africa. He works to bring all the habitable portions of the world

under the domination of a ruling elite. To that end, he uses a portion of his vast wealth to

establish the famous Rhodes Scholarships.


Feb. 5, 1891 – Rhodes joins his group from Oxford with a similar group from Cambridge

headed by ardent social reformer William Stead. Rhodes and Stead are members of the

inner “Circle of Initiates” of the secret society which they found.

There is also an outer circle known as the “Association of Helpers.”


1891 – Madame Blavatsky dies. The mantle of leadership for the worldwide theosophical

movement falls to Annie Besant, a militant feminist and a member of the Fabian Socialist

Society of England. She enthusiastically joins in revolutionary street riots and

pens numerous volumes of occultic writings to add to those of Blavatsky.


1909-1913 – Lord Alfred Milner organizes the “Association of Helpers” into

various Round Table Groups in the British dependencies and the United States.


1912 – Colonel Edward M. House, a close advisor of President Woodrow Wilson, publishes

Phillip Dru: Administrator, in which he promotes “socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx.”


1913 – President Woodrow Wilson publishes “The New Freedom” in which he reveals:

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some

of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid

of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so

organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that

they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”


Dec. 23, 1913 – The Federal Reserve [neither federal nor a reserve – it’s a privately

owned institution] is created. It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyl Island,

Georgia, by a group of bankers and politicians, including Col. House. This transfers the

power to create money from the American government to a private group of bankers.

The Federal Reserve Act is hastily passed just before the Christmas break. Plank #5

of “The Communist Manifesto” had called for just such a central bank. [It is probably the

largest generator of debt in the world.] Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. (father of

the famed aviator) warns: “This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When

the President signs this act the invisible government by the money power,

proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized…”


1916 – Three years after signing the Federal Reserve Act into law, President Woodrow

Wilson observes: “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country.

A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is

concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands

of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely

controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government

by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority,

but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”


1917 – With aid from financiers in New York City and London, V. I. Lenin is able to overthrow

the government of Russia. Lenin later comments on the apparent contradiction of the links

between prominent capitalists and Communism: “There also exists another alliance – at

first glance a strange one, a surprising one – but if you think about it, in fact, one which

is well grounded and easy to understand. This is the alliance between our

Communist leaders and your capitalists.” [Remember the Hegelian dialectic?]


May 30, 1919 – Prominent British and American personalities establish the Royal Institute

of International Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs in the U.S. at a

meeting arranged by Col. House; attended by various Fabian socialists, including noted

economist John Maynard Keynes.


1920 – Britain’s Winston Churchill recognizes the connection between the Illuminati and

the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. He observes: “From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt

to those of Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman,

this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of

society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible

equality, has been steadily growing. It played a definitely recognizable role in the tragedy

of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement

during the nineteenth century, and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities

from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian

people by the hair of their heads, and have become practically the undisputed masters

of that enormous empire.”


1920-1931 – Louis T. McFadden is Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and

Curency. Concerning the Federal Reserve, Congressman McFadden notes: “When the

Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive

that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international

bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own

pleasure. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is –

the Fed has usurped the Government. It controls everything here and it controls all

our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.” Concerning the Great

Depression and the country’s acceptance of FDR’s New Deal, he asserts: “It was no accident.

It was a carefully contrived occurrence. The international bankers sought to bring

about a condition of despair here so they might emerge as the rulers of us all.”


1921 – Col. House reorganizes the American branch of the Institute of International

Affairs into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). [For the past 60 years, 80% of

the top positions in every administration – whether Democrat or Republican – have been

occupied by members of this organization. During that time, only two Presidents have not

been directly affiliated with the CFR – John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan.

Kennedy was assassinated and an attempt was made on Reagan’s life!]


December 15, 1922 – The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine “Foreign Affairs.”

Author Philip Kerr states: “Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind

as long as the earth remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states, until some kind of

international system is created. The real problem today is that of world government.”


1932 – “Plan for Peace” by American Birth Control League founder Margaret Sanger

is published. She calls for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative

concentration camps for all “dysgenic stocks,” including Blacks, Hispanics, American

Indians and Catholics. [The American Birth Control League eventually becomes Planned

Parenthood – the nation’s foremost promoter and provider of abortion services.

Many today are not aware of the racist origins of Planned Parenthood.]


1933 – “The Shape of Things to Come” by H. G. Wells

is published. Wells predicts a second world war around


1940, originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there would be an increasing

lack of public safety in “criminally infected” areas. The plan for the “Modern World State”

would succeed on its third attempt, and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq.

The book also states: “Although world government had been plainly coming for some years,

although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no opposition anywhere.”


Nov. 21, 1933 – In a letter to Col. Edward M. House, President Franklin Roosevelt writes:

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the

larger centers has owned the government since the days of Andrew Jackson.”


1934 – “The Externalization of the Hierarchy” by Alice Bailey is published. Bailey is an

occultist, taking over from Annie Besant as head of the Theosophical Society. Bailey’s

works are channeled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit] Djwahl Kuhl.

[Her teachings form the foundation for the current New Age movement.] She writes:

“The hour for the ancient mysteries has arrived. These Ancient Mysteries were hidden in

numbers, in ritual, in words, and in symbology; these veil the secret. There is no question

therefore that the work to be done in familiarizing the general public with the nature of the

Mysteries is of paramount importance at this time. These Mysteries will be restored to

outer expression through the medium of the Church and the Masonic Fraternity.” She

further states: “Out of the spoliation of all existing culture and civilization, the new world

order must be built.” [The book is published by the Lucis Trust, incorporated originally in

New York as the Lucifer Publishing Company. Lucis Trust is a United Nations NGO

(Non-Governmental Organization) and has been a major player at the recent UN summits.

Later, Assistant Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Muller would credit the creation of

his World Core Curriculum for education to the underlying teachings of Djwahl Kuhl, via

Alice Bailey’s writings on the subject.]


1937 – Students at the Lenin School of Political Warfare in Moscow are taught: “Today,

of course, we are not strong enough to attack. To win, we shall need the element of surprise.

The western world will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most

spectacular peace movement on record. There shall be electrifying overtures and unheard

of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate to

their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As

soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist.”


October 28, 1939 – In an address by John Foster Dulles [later U.S. Secretary of State],

he proposes that America lead the transition to a new order of less independent,

semi-sovereign states bound together by a league or federal union.


1939 – “New World Order” by H. G. Wells proposes a “collectivist one-world state” or “new

world order” comprised of “socialist democracies.” He advocates “universal conscription

for service” and declares that “nationalist individualism is the world’s disease.” He continues:

“The manifest necessity for some collective world control to eliminate warfare and the less

generally admitted necessity for a collective control of the economic and biological life

of mankind, are aspects of one and the same process.” He proposes that this

be accomplished through “universal law” and “propaganda” (or education).


1940 – “The New World Order” is published by the Carnegie Endowment for Peace and

contains a select list of references on regional and world federation,

together with some special plans for world order after the war.


June 28, 1945 – President Truman endorses world government in a speech: “It will be just

as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the world as

it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States.”


October 24, 1945 – The United Nations Charter becomes effective.


July 1948 – Sir Harold Butler, in the CFR’s “Foreign Affairs,” sees “a New World Order”

taking shape: “How far can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of themselves

as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are they prepared

to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic

or political union?”


Feb. 7, 1950 – International financier and CFR member James Warburg tells a Senate

Foreign Relations Subcommittee: “We shall have world government whether or not you like it

– by conquest or consent.”


1953 – Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation, tells a Congressional commission

investigating tax-exempt foundations: “We at the executive level here were active in either

the OSS [forerunner of the CIA], the State Department, or the European Economic Administration.

During those times, and without exception, we operated under directives issued by the

White House. We are continuing to be guided by just such directives, the substance of

which were to the effect that we should make every effort to so alter life in the

United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union.”


Feb. 23, 1954 – Senator William Jenner of Indiana says before the U.S. Senate:

“Today the path to total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal

means, unseen and unheard by Congress, the President, or the people. We have a

well-organized political action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution

and establish a one-party state. It has a foothold within our Government, and its own

propaganda apparatus. One may call this group by many names. Some people call it socialism,

some collectivism. I prefer to call it ‘democratic centralism.’ The important point to remember

about this group is not its ideology but its organization. It is a dynamic, aggressive, elite corps,

forcing its way through every opening, to make a breach for a collectivist one-party state.

It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government without our suspecting

the change is underway. This secret revolutionary corps understands well the power to

influence the people by an elegant form of brainwashing. We see this, for example,

in the innocent use of words like ‘democracy’ in place of ‘representative government.’ “


1954 – Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands establishes the Bilderbergers,

international politicians and bankers who meet secretly on an annual basis.


Nov. 25, 1959 – Council on Foreign Relations Study Number 7 calls for a “…new international

order which must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, for social and economic

change…an international order…including states labeling themselves as ‘socialist’ [communist].”


1959 – “The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy” is published, sponsored by

the Rockefeller Brothers’ Fund. It explains that the U.S. “cannot escape, and indeed

should welcome…the task which history has imposed upon us. This is the task of helping

to shape a new world order in all its dimensions – spiritual, economic, political, social.”


1962 – “The Future of Federalism” by Nelson Rockefeller claims that current events

compellingly demand a “new world order.” He says there is: “A fever of nationalism…but

the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political

tasks…These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true

building of a new world order…Sooner perhaps than we may realize

…there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world.”


Nov. 13, 1963 – It is alleged that just ten days prior to his assassination, President

John F. Kennedy tells a Columbia University audience: “The high office of President

has been used to foment a plot to destroy the Americans’ freedom, and before I leave office

I must inform the citizens of this plight.”


1966 – Professor Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton’s mentor at Georgetown University,

authors a massive volume entitled “Tragedy and Hope” in which he states: “There

does exist and has existed for a generation, an international network which operates,

to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this

network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to

cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I

know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and

was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records.

I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close

to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a

few of its policies, but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to

remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”


July 26, 1968 – Nelson Rockefeller pledges that “as President,

he would work toward international creation of a new world order.”


1969 – A document entitled “Marriage and the Family” is published by the British Humanist

Association stating that “some opponents of humanism have accused us of wishing to

overthrow the traditional Christian family. They are right. That is exactly what we intend to do.”


1970 – The U.S. Department of Defense appropriates funds [$2 million a year for five years]

for the “development of immune-system destroying agents for biological warfare.” [Source

of the HIV virus which causes AIDS. The virus was then introduced into the homosexual

community via hepatitis vaccine and into Central Africa via smallpox vaccine.]


1970 – Zbigniew Brzezinski [who later became President Jimmy Carter’s National

Security Advisor] writes a book entitled “Between Two Ages.” He has nothing but praise

for Marxism: “Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s

universal vision…Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the

inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief…Marxism, disseminated on the

popular level in the form of communism, represents a major advance in man’s ability to

conceptualize his relationship to the world.” He also describes how war can be waged

against a nation without its citizens even realizing they are under attack: “Technology

will make available to the leaders of major nations a variety of techniques for conducting

secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of security forces need be appraised.

One nation may attack a competitor covertly…techniques of weather modification could

be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm, thereby weakening

a nation’s capacity and forcing it to accept the demands of the competitor.”


1972 – President Nixon visits China and toasts Chinese Premier Chou En-lai

by talking of “the hope that each of us has to build a new world order.”


1973 – International banker and staunch member of the subversive Council on Foreign

Relations, David Rockefeller founds a new organization called the Trilateral Commission.

He invites future President Jimmy Carter to become one of the founding members.

Zbigniew Brzezinski is the organization’s first director.



1973 – The Club of Rome, a U.N. operative, issues a report entitled “Regionalized and

Adaptive Model of the Global World System.” This report divides the entire world into ten regions.


 See The Illumaniti Chronicles Part II:

Click on this text to see The Illuminati Chronicles Part II

                                                  Warnings About the Invisible Government Running the U.S.


The warnings listed below, which appear in chronological order, began with our first president – George Washington.

The last president to speak out was JFK, who was assassinated. Read what they and other political leaders have

said about the invisible government.


George Washington wrote that the Illuminati want to separate the People from their Government:


“It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in

the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea that I meant to

convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to

propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of seperation).

That Individuals of them may… actually had a seperation [sic] of the People from their Government in view, is too

evident to be questioned.” – George Washington, 1st President of the United States (1789–1797), from a letter that

Washington wrote on October 24, 1798, which can be found in the Library of Congress. For an analysis

of Washington’s warning, see the article “Library of Congress: George Washington Warns of Illuminati”


“I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.” —Thomas Jefferson,

President of the United States (1801–1809) and principal author of the United States Declaration

of Independence (1776), in a letter written to John Taylor on May 28, 1816


“A power has risen up in the government greater than the people themselves, consisting of many and various powerful

interests, combined in one mass, and held together by the cohesive power of the vast surplus in banks.” – John C. Calhoun,

Vice President (1825-1832) and U.S. Senator, from a speech given on May 27, 1836


Note that it appears that Washington’s and Jefferson’s concerns regarding bankers and separation of the people from

the government was realized by 1836. This fact was confirmed in a letter written by FDR in 1933 (see below) in which

he wrote that “a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”

Jackson was the seventh president of the United States (1829-1937). Calhoun served as Jackson’s vice-president from 1829-1832.


“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no

responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business

and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.”— Theodore Roosevelt, 26th President of the United States,

Theodore Roosevelt, An Autobiography, 1913 (Appendix B)


“A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth

of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men… [W]e have come to be one of the worst

ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government

by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion

and the duress of small groups of dominant men.”

– Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, The New Freedom, 1913


“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the

United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power

somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not

speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

– Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, The New Freedom, 1913


“The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs

over our cities, states and nation… The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States

government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties, … and control the majority of the

newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive

out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible

government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies,

schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.”

– New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, New York Times, March 26, 1922


“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the

Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government board, has cheated

the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt…

Mr. Chairman, when the Federal Reserve act was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that a world

system was being set up here… and thatthis country was to supply financial power to an international superstate

— a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together toenslave the world for

their own pleasure.”

– Congressman Louis T. McFadden, from a speech delivered to the House of Representatives on June 10, 1932


“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the

government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.” — Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 32nd President of the United States

(1933–1945), in a letter to Colonel Edward M House dated November 21, 1933, as quoted in F.D.R.: His Personal Letters, 1928-1945.


“Today the path to total dictatorship in the U.S. can be laid by strictly legal means… We have a well-organized

political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state…

It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government… This ruthless power-seeking elite is a

disease of our century… This group…is answerable neither to the President, the

Congress, nor the courts. It is practically irremovable.” – Senator William Jenner, 1954 speech


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.

The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects

even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.”

—J. Edgar Hoover, The Elks Magazine, 1956


“The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically

opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings… Our way of life is under attack. Those who

make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe… no war ever posed a greater threat to our security.

If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only saythat the danger has never been more

clear and its presence has never been more imminent… For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and

ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead

of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead

of armies by day.It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly

knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised.

No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”

— John F Kennedy, 35th President of the United States,

from a speech delivered to the American Newspaper Publishers Association on April 27, 1961

and known as the “Secret Society” speech (click here for full transcript and audio).


“The Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least fifty years, been carefully following a plan to use their economic

power to gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do.

I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”

Congressman Larry P. McDonald, November 1975, from the introduction to a book titled The Rockefeller File.


“There exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and

the ability to pursue its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.”

– Daniel K. Inouye, US Senator from Hawaii, testimony at the Iran Contra Hearings, 1986.


The Federal Reserve


“A power has risen up in the government greater than the people themselves…” – John C. Calhoun


“… owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.” – Theodore Roosevelt


“… one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer

to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank.“ – Louis T. McFadden


In an interview with Jim Lehrer that was aired on PBS’ News Hour on September 18, 2007 that you can watch on

YouTube, formal Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said, essentially, that the

Federal Reserve was above the law and that no agency of government can overrule their actions:


Jim Lehrer: “What is the proper relationship, what should be the proper

relationship between a chairman of the Fed and a president of the United States?”


Alan Greenspan: “Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency, and that means, basically, that there

is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take. So long as that is in place and there is no

evidence that the administration or the Congress or anybody else is requesting that we do things other

than what we think is the appropriate thing, then what the relationships are don’t frankly matter.”


The fact that the Fed is above the law was demonstrated by current Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, during his appearance

before Congress on March 4, 2009 (as shown in this video). Senator Bernie Sanders asked Bernanke about

$2.2 trillion in American tax dollars that was lent out by Federal Reserve. Bernanke refused to provide an answer:


Senator Sanders: “Will you tell the American people to whom yo

lent $2.2 trillion of their dollars? … Can you tell us who they are?”

Bernanke: “No”


David Rockefeller and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)


“We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to

destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state…” – William Jenner


“The Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least fifty years, been carefully following a plan to use their

economic power to gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world.” – Larry P. McDonald


In 1921 the stockholders of the Federal Reserve financed an organization called the “Council on Foreign Relations”

(CFR). A full discussion on the CFR is beyond the scope of this article. Suffice it to say that the CFR likely plays a

prominent role in the invisible government that we have been warned about. The CFR is alleged to be the arm of the

Ruling Elite in the United States. Most influential politicians, academics and media personalities are members.

The CFR uses its influence to push their New World Order agenda on the American people.


David Rockefeller, Sr is the current patriarch of the Rockefeller family. He is the only surviving grandchild of oil tycoon

John D. Rockefeller, founder of Standard Oil. Rockefeller began a lifelong association with the

CFR when he joined as a director in 1949. In Rockefeller’s 2002 autobiography “Memoirs” he wrote:


“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized

incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we

wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against

the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others

around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure

— one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”


James Warburg, son of CFR [Council on Foreign Relations] founder Paul Warburg, delivered

blunt testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950:


“We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is

only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”




Before the American Mercury Magazine came into its present ownership,

it was owned and controlled by a noted patriot by the name of Russell

Maguire. He was a man of wealth and intelligent business initiative.


He became alarmed over what he knew to be Zionism's Master Plan for

World Power. A documented research manuscript came into his hands and he

had the courage to publish it.


Following its publication, he was the victim of attempted blackmail, physical

threat, danger of assassination and the complete sabotage of his business

enterprises. His life became so harassed that he left America for an isolated

island home where he felt he could be safe from harassment, persecution

and the risk of death itself.


Herewith is the Manuscript that this courageous patriot had the courage to reproduce:

                                                                                                      A Chronology of the Zionist Master
Plan for World Domination

Virtually all of the items included in this chronology are direct quotations from Zionists or from

their books. At the end of this article there will be listed the various books, their authors, the

publishing firms and the dates of publication. I. B. means "International Banker,"

A. M. means "American Mercury," p. means "page," MMM means 'Money Made Mysterious."


Theodor Herzl published "The Jewish State." It became the

Zionists' bible. The following exact quotes are from Herzl's book:


1. "When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of all revolutionary

parties; at the same time, when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse." p.10.


2. " . . . the longer Anti-Semitism lies in abeyance the more fiercely will it break out." p. 4.


3."Universal brotherhood is not even a beautiful dream.

Antagonism is essential to man's greatest efforts." p. 42.



1. Lord Edmond Rothschild of London and Jacob H. Schiff of New York City, two of the Elders of Zion,

got Theodor Herzl (of Austria) to arrange for the World Zionist Congress at Basel, Switzerland;

197 delegates met there and laid out a plan of World Conquest with plans for a World Government.

Herzl, founder of Zionism, in opening the meeting, raised his right hand and repeated an ancient

oath of the Talmudists:


"If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, may my right hand forget its cunning." Herzl also said at this meeting:

"We are one nation. We are neither American nor Russian Jews, but only Jews!" He also said:

'With a few exceptions that do not figure at all, the entire press of the world is in our hands."


2. Dr. Mandelstam said on August 29 at the opening of the Zionist Congress of 1897: "The Jews

will use all their influence and power to prevent the rise and prosperity of other nations and are

resolved to adhere to their historic hopes; i.e., to the conquest of world power." LE TEMPS,

Paris, September 3,1897.


3. The Zionist Organization of America was organized in 1897 with Richard Gottheil of Columbia

University as its first president, and Rabbi Stephen Wise as the first secretary. Branches for

women (Hadassah), and children (Young Judea) were soon organized. ZIONIST NETWORK, p. 32.



Dr. Mandelstam, professor of the University of Kiev, Russia, at Basel Zionist Congress in 1898 said:

"The Jews energetically reject the idea of fusion with the other nationalities and cling firmly to their

historical hope, i.e., of world empire." THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY,

by H. S Chamberlain, Vol. I, p. 335. Also p. 221 of DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION.


1. Theodor Herzl, the Zionist leader, went to see Abdul Hamid the Sultan of Turkey, to buy land for

the Zionists in Palestine. When the Sultan said "no" he had a revolution on his hands Note

later item in 1914.


2. Between 1900 and the outbreak of World War I (1914), the United States

was flooded by large waves of immigration from Eastern Europe.


1. Because President William McKinley in the United States refused to be a stooge for the International

Bankers, he was killed by Russian Zionist, Zolkozh. Presidents Lincoln [on Good Friday] and Garfield

had been previously murdered.


2. Doctor Leopold Kahn summed up these sentiments when speaking about Zionism in a Jewish school

at Pozrony (Bratislava) in 1901: "Jews will never be assimilated and will never adopt the customs or

morals of strangers. The Jew will remain a Jew under all circumstances." WORLD CONQUERORS, p. 21.


1. Lenin joins Trotsky in Switzerland on Editorial Board of Zionist

publication ISKRA (THE SPARK). It was printed in Munich, Germany.


2. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. was one of the founders and

chief financiers of the scandalous Panama Canal Co.



1. Dr. Simon Flexner, one of three busy brothers became director of laboratories

of the Rockefeller Institute. AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p. 105.


2. At the Sixth Zionist Congress in 1903 at Basel Switzerland Dr. Max Nordau, an Elder of Zion

said we quote from the AMERICAN JEWISH NEWS, New York, Vol. 4, No 2, September 19, 1919,

"Theodor Herzl has considered it his duty to maintain valuable relations with this great and progressive

power (England). Herzl knows that we stand (in 1903) before a tremendous upheaval of the whole

world. Soon, perhaps some kind of world congress will have to be called, and England, the great,

free and powerful England, will then continue the work it has begun with its generous offer to the

Sixth (Zionist) Congress in 1903. And if you ask me now what has Israel to do in Uganda, then

. . . let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading

upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist (1897) Congress, the English Uganda proposition (1903),

the future World War (1914-1918), the peace conference (1919-1920) where with the help of England a free

and Jewish Palestine will be created."


"Like a mighty thunder these last words came to us, and we all

were trembling and awe-struck as if we had seen a vision of old."


The above speech was also printed in the FASCIST (London) February, 1937. The same speech

has been mentioned in a number of books, including (on page 221) DEMOCRACY AND WORLD

DOMINION, by the great educator, Edwin D. Schoonmaker, publisher, Richard R. Smith, New York City, 1939.


3. Speyer & Co., the Zionist banking house, gave Mexico a loan of 12 & one half million

dollars and secured all oil concessions in Mexico. From then on intrigue dominated Mexico.



1. Kuhn Loeb & Co. (a Rothschild international banking firm) financed the war of Japan

against Czarist Russia. (A planned revolution in Czarist Russia followed one year later.)


2. Chaim Weizmann commented as follows on Theodor Herzl's JUDENSTAAT:


"Four years ago world Jewry was divided into two camps: one on the east and one on the west. And

when Herzl arrived and said to us that we must unite Eastern and Western Jewry, we

carried out this order accordingly. Our unity today is Herzl's legacy to the Jewish people."


Theodor Herzl's JUDENSTAAT states: "Wir sind ein Volk!"Q"We are one people!"

And today this is the only unity existing in a world divided into two hemispheres.


"We are one people despite the ostensible rifts, cracks and differences between the American and

Soviet democracies. We are one people and it is not in our interests that the West should liberate the

East, for in doing this and in liberating the enslaved nations, the West would inevitably deprive Jewry

of the Eastern half of its world power." Chaim Weizmann statement in WORLD CONQUERORS, p. 227.


3. International Workers of the World (IWW) starts promoting violence and trouble

in U. S. Austrian-born Felix Frankfurter later was counsel for IWW anarchists.


1. Sidney Hillman (Schmoul Gilsman) was educated as a Rabbi.

See WHO WAS WHO IN AMERICA, Vol. II, p. 254.


2. Abortive Revolution in Russia failed. It was led by Sidney Hillman who later came to the U.S.

to direct "world operations." Another leader in the same revolution was Leon Trotsky ( Leiba Davidovitch

Bronstein). During the revolution the Rothschilds helped finance, they had their termites in Russia

destroy and sabotage the oil wells and refineries. It took many years to offset this tremendous

sabotage. It handicapped Czarist Russia some years later when "Planned World War I" started.


3. Intercollegiate Socialist Society formed. Felix Frankfurter, a founder.



was recorded in the British Museum, in London.


5. We quote from p. 76 of THE WORLD AT THE CROSS ROADS, by Boris Brasol:


"According to the information of the LONDON JEWISH CHRONICLE, the contribution of international

Jewry to the Russian revolutionary cause in 1905 reached the sum of #874,341. (Nearly $4,500,000 U.S.)


No wonder that Mr. George von Longerke Meyer, United States Ambassador to Russia during the

Russo-Japanese War, stated in an official letter dated December 30, 1905, to Mr. Elihu Root, then

U. S. Secretary of State, that:


"The Jews have undoubtedly to a large extent furnished

the brains and energy in the revolution throughout Russia."

Nevertheless, in 1905, the revolution financed by Jacob H. Schiff failed.


1. In 1906 a dissolution suit was brought by the Attorney General, for the U. S. Government, against

Rockefeller's Oil Company. The case was closed in 1908. The U. S. Supreme Court ruled against

the Rockefeller interest in May 1911 and fined them $29,000,000. The State of Texas issued

an injunction against the Rockefellers doing business in that state. William H. Allen's book,

ROCKEFELLER: GIANT, DWARF, SYMBOL gives some of the details of the Rockefellers' prior

questionable operations. When the Rockefellers maneuvered out of the fine of $29 million, Federal

Judge Landis, who conducted the government trial, bitterly commented: "You can't convict a million dollars."

AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p. 104.


From the beginning the Rockefellers were financed by the Kuhn Loeb & Co. and other Zionist

bankers. The Rothschilds advised and guided the Rockefellers. They had a deal to divide the world


MONOPOLISTS, in the AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p. 100.


2. In the JEWISH ENCYCLOPAEDIA (1906), we read:


"It (Schiff's firm) subscribed for and floated the large Japanese

war loan in 1904-1905." THE ALIEN MENACE, p. 112.


3. The Rothschilds financed ALLIANCE ISRAELITE UNIVERSELLE, published in Russia and elsewhere

in 1907: "Capture the press! Through it everything will come to you in the natural course of events."

Adolphe Cremioux. Founder, ALLIANCE ISRAELITE UNIVERSELLE, quoted from A. Shamakoff,

ADDRESS IN DEFENSE OF T. DOKSHIN AND OTHERS, p. 36. Moscow: University Printing Office, 1907.



1. Labor Zionist Organization of America Q Poale Zion - was organized in the U. S. to shape labor activities.


2. "There was another great crisis when the Knickerbocker Trust failed because manipulators of

the millionaire class wilfully created a run on the banks, from which they emerged incomparably

more powerful, having bought up the stock of the ruined victims which held to resell at par. At the

same time the Steel Trust was able to complete its absolute monopoly. Solomon Loeb of

Kuhn Loeb & Co., was a member of the Knickerbocker Trust." DEADLIER THAN THE H. BOMB, p. 45.



1. The Socialists financed by the International Banking group

said they would, in the future, "bury the whole capitalist system."


2. On advice of the Rothschilds the Belgian Government acquires the Belgian Congo. Edward

Seugier is sent to Elizabethtown. War, minerals and other reasons were mentioned later.


3. Abraham Flexner became education expert for the Carnegie Foundation for

the Advancement of Teaching. AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p 106.


4. Federal Council of Churches of Christ organized at suggestion of Rothschild. Rockefeller and

Carnegie interests active in it. Their Foundations later flow funds into it. 75 per cent of its finances

have come from sources outside of its church membership. Congregations don't vote. "Selected"

delegates meet only once each four years.


5. During a heated Congressional investigation into white slavery, The American Jewish Congress

was formed. See p. 96, INTERNATIONAL JEW by Henry Ford, Sr. During years that followed,

the AJC and Federal Council of Churches were to work closely together on many projects.



1. Walter Rathenau, Zionist, Financial Dictator of Germany, selected by

International Bankers after World War I in THE WIERNER FREE PRESSE,

December 25, 1909: "Only 300 men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of Europe.

They elect their successors from their entourage. These Jews have the means in their

hands of putting an end to the form of any State which they find unreasonable."


2. THE UNSEEN EMPIRE OF FINANCE, a carefully documented research book by E. Alexander

Powell, declared in The SATURDAY EVENING POST, June 19, 1909: "The European peoples are no

longer under the Government of respective nations. They have passed under another scepter. They

have become the subjects of another Power Q a Power unseen, but felt in palace as in cottage, in

Russia as in Spain, by every parent and child, by every potentate and every laborer. No nation on

the European continent has any longer an independence that is more than normal. The political

autonomy of every one of them has been surrendered to the will of a despotism before which every

kingdom and empire and republic fawns in the most abject subserviency."

Above also in ZIONIST NETWORK, p. 6, by Senator Jack B. Tenney.


1. "Mr. Paul Warburg was brother-in-law to Mr. Jacob H. Schiff. Warburg was born in Germany.

His brothers conduct the powerful German banking house of M. Warburg and Company, Hamburg,

financing the German shipping industry and controlling the Hamburg-American and North German

Lloyd lines. Herr Max Warburg, head of this banking house played an important part in German

politics, particularly at the time the Kaiser fled to Holland. Dr. Carl Melchoir, a partner in it, was

one of the five German delegates-in-chief at the Peace Conference at Versailles (1919), and in later

years (1930) was prominent in the founding of the Bank for International Settlements. This was

the central bank of the central International Settlements, the central bank of the central banks

established in Switzerland, which has been internationalized in peace and war alike, it pays

no taxes, and it is above and beyond all law." ALL THESE THINGS, by A. N. Field, p. 5.


2. Correspondence of the Rothschilds to the German Kaiser reveals Rothschilds wanted World War I

delayed. (They needed our Federal Reserve Act to finance World Wars.)

INTERNATIONAL JEW by Henry Ford, Sr., P. 204.


3. The International Group running the Carnegie Foundation trustees' meeting "discussed the

advantages of changing our government and institutions through war."

(Later Alger Hiss was president of this "international" outfit.)


4. "I felt constrained to point out (to Kaiser Wilhelm II on his last visit to England in 1911) that

the Jews . . . had captured and controlled the larger part of the German press. He did not dissent."

Herbert Henry Asquith, Prime Minister of England 1908 - 1916. THE GENESIS OF THE WAR,

New York, 1923, p. 89.


5. The Zionist organization sent a German geologist, Professor Blankenhorn, to investigate

the potentialities of the Dead Sea region in Palestine. THE ALIEN MENACE, p. 168.



1. Bernard Baruch ushered into the President's office in the White House his very weak professor, Woodrow Wilson.


2. Richard J. H. Gottheil wrote that "The closer Jews are kept within

the fold, the greater their interest in Jewish life and thought."


3. The best pamphleteers, the ablest journalists of Europe kept on the payroll of the various financial

groups, were feverishly preparing public opinion for the future

conflict between the European countries. Boris L. Brasol.


4. " . . . Finally it should be borne in mind that the press bureaus and the great Eastern dailies exert

a disproportionate influence on the American press as a whole . . . The foreign news which came

through these bureaus was primarily composed for the New York papers, so, in the last analysis,

the control of the New York press meant the control of the entire American press." Horace C. Peterson.


5. " . . . The Northcliffe (Jewish-owned) press did more before and during the war to embitter and

deliberately poison the English mind against Germany than any other agency." Clinton Hartley Grattan.


1. Colonel E. Mandell House wrote a book, PHILIP DRU, ADMINISTRATOR David-Rex-Universe,

See AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1954, p. 131 (Researchers say that E. Mandell House was

an agent of the Rothschilds.)


2. President Wilson (during brief moments when he was not dominated by Brandeis, Baruch,

Frankfurter, etc.) wrote "we know that something intervenes between the people

of the U. S. and the control of their own affairs at Washington." FAR AND WIDE, p. 327.


The Hidden Hand put across five related items in 1913:


1. Graduated income tax law was passed. (16th Amendment.) A fundamental rule, laid down by

The Communist Manifesto, for destroying of society is "A heavy, progressive or graduated income tax."


2. The Federal Reserve Banking Act was passed, December 23 Q two days before Christmas. It permitted

aliens, through our privately owned Federal Reserve Banks to finance the world wars which were

"planned." Elihu Root blasted this dangerous act in the Senate December 13,1913. (See MONEY MADE

MYSTERIOUS- 3rd Book.) 4,000 pages of fine print was later slipped into

it! It was cooked up at Baruch's Jekyl Island in a secret conference.


3. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was organized by B'nai B'rith. (Its pressure and

intimidation record, and the sad events that happened thereafter, speak for themselves.)


4. The Rockefeller Foundation was established. Thereafter this outfit and

the ADL were to cooperate. (Remember the 2 blades of a pair of scissors.)


5. U. S. senators would no longer he selected by the legislatures of each of the states. Thereafter

senators would be elected by the masses. This gave the Internationalists and their Controlled Press

control of the senators by their control of all communication media. They already had it on the Congressmen.


From this date forward, we were to be lied to, brainwashed and betrayed: Nationalism was thrown

out the window for un-American internationalism. The money properly belonging to the citizen

was taken from him by the Marxist graduated income tax and squandered by the

internationalists through "their controlled government." Planned and promoted wars followed.


1. As Zionists pushed England into war, U. S. had at the critical Constantinople post (Turkey)

Henry Morgenthau, Sr., as Ambassador and Louis Einstein as its special minister.


2 Paul M. Warburg said, at a Congressional hearing: "I only decided to become a citizen

after I was convinced the U. S. money system would be reformed." THE HIDDEN EMPIRE, p. 63.


3. Five men who were later to head various governments (Lenin of Russia, Ebert of Germany,

Branting of Sweden, MacDonald of England, Stauning of Denmark) met as members of the International

Socialist Bureau of the Second International!


4. Trotsky was introduced and recommended to them (Kuhn, Loeb & Co) by the publisher of the

. . . revolutionary newspaper, FORWARD of New York . . . Henry Coston,



5. "One by one the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America . . . " From letter of

Sir Cecil Spring-Rice (British Ambassador to U.S.) to Sir Edward Grey (British Foreign Minister), November, 1914.


6. At the start of World War I, Edmond Rothschild told Dr. Chaim Weizmann that "It would spread to

the Middle East , where things of great significance to Political Zionism would occur." FAR AND WIDE, p. 285.


7. Colonel C. Repington recounts a conversation he had (April 5, 1921) with Count Mensdorff, who

was Austrian Ambassador in London in 1914, as follows: "Mensdorff thought that Israel had won the

War; they had made it, thrived on it, profited by it. It was their supreme revenge on Christianity."

AFTER THE WAR, p. 155, Constable, 1922.


8. Lloyd George, who was counsel for the Zionists in England, was made premier of the English

Government and chosen to "perform" during World War I. His secretary was Sir

Philip Sassoon Rothschild. AMERICAN MERCURY - KNOW - December, 1958.


9. "The part which Jews all over the world play in white slavery is one

of the foulest blots on our people." JEWISH WORLD, March 18, 1914.


10. "Mr. Paul Moritz Warburg practically controls the financial policy of the Administration.' Sir

Cecil Spring-Rice, British Ambassador to the U. S. From ALL THESE THINGS, by A. N. Field, p. 5.


11. "Assimilation is national suicide." Louis D. Brandeis before Menorah Society, Columbia University.



1. In 1915, while the U. S. was at peace, Bernard Baruch took part of his annual income of $2,000,000

to finance the training of soldiers to fight in a war which Baruch said he knew was 'certain."

AMERICAN MERCURY Q October, 1956, p. 83.



1. After months of terrific battle in Congress, Louis D. Brandeis was confirmed as Supreme

Court Justice. He is the uncle of Felix Frankfurter, who years later dominated the Supreme Court.

Christopher Sykes, son of Sir Mark Sykes, (who was the Secretary of the British War Cabinet) wrote

a book TWO STUDIES IN VIRTUE, and, referring to the Balfour Declaration and the,

part played by his father in advancing Zionism, Sykes said, - on page 183 of his book:


"He (Mr. James MalcolmQMalkom, a Zionist) then told Sir Mark Skyes of a very curious and powerful

influence which Zionists could exert. One of President Wilson's closest advisers and friends

was Justice Louis D. Brandeis, a Jew with the passionate Zionist faith of a recent convert.


"That Wilson was attached to Brandeis by ties of peculiar hardiness, because, so the story ran,

in his earlier days the future President had been saved by this man (Brandeis) from appearing in

a damaging lawsuit. It was said that Brandeis was regarded by Wilson as the man to whom he owed his career."


(Researchers said President Wilson was involved in "moral problems" at Princeton University, that

Samuel Untermeyer had some damaging letters returned to Wilson after

Brandeis was put on the Supreme Court). Re: Mrs. Peck, we quote from others:


"Woodrow Wilson's friendship with Mrs. Hulbert Peck (of Princeton, New Jersey) . . . lasted for

seven years . . . It was wrecked in the end by gossip. The so-called Peck scandal furnished the zest

for the whispering campaigns of two Presidential elections . . . Wilson had

written hundreds of letters to the charming divorcee." George S. Viereck 80.283.


"It seems that the Peck letters were finally acquired by the Wilson estate." George S. Viereck.


"Mrs. Peck never demanded and Woodrow Wilson never paid hush money or blackmail." (Edward

Mandell House) Probably correct Q putting Brandeis on the Supreme

Court researchers say was the price the American public paid!


2. "A note drawn up by the American official (intelligence) services and transmitted by the High

Commissioner of the French Republic in the United States, contained the following passage: 'In

February 1916, it was learned for the first time that a revolution was being fomented in Russia.

It was discovered that the undermentioned persons and concerns were engaged in this

enterprise of destruction:


(1) Jacob Schiff; (2) Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Directors: Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn,

Mortimer Schiff, Jerome Hanauer; (3) Guggenheim; (4) Max Breitung." (From the American Consulate,

Elbridge D. Rand, American Consul, Geneva, Switzerland, dated January 21, 1929.)

National Archives, Dept. of State, Decimal File, 1910-1929, No. 861.4016/325.


3. Of the 63 delegates of the Committee of Russian Revolutionists that

met in New York City, 50 were veterans of the 1905 revolution.


4. Zionists secretly cook up Palestine "deal." Documents available.


5. The notorious "Sunrise Conference" in Washington. The record of this sinister planning was

suppressed. (In 1938 the enemy got our Senate Military Affairs Committee to hold a similar conference.

Senator Bridges said in the NEW YORK HERALD TRIBUNE, March 2, 1939, "If the American people

ever learned what was said there Q the nation would be shocked

and stunned." DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION, p. 312.


6. President Woodrow Wilson was re-elected on the slogan "He kept us out of war." (At the same

time, he and his foreign advisers were secretly taking steps to involve us in this unnecessary war.)



1. The Bolshevist Revolution was not, as it is called, a revolution, but

actually an invasion. DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION, p. 210.


2. Rabbi Wise says (New York Times 3/24/17): "I believe that of all the achievements of my people,

none has been nobler than the part the sons and daughters of Israel have taken in the great

movement which has culminated in free Russia" (revolution). From speech of Rabbi

Stephen S. Wise March 23, 1917 to the mass meeting celebrating the revolution in Russia.


3. (April) Jacob H. Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. made a public declaration that

it was thanks to his financial help that the Russian Revolution had succeeded.


4. "I have just had a long talk with Simonds of the NEW YORK TRIBUNE. He is prepared to help us

(Zionists) to speak with vigor, editorially, on our behalf, but I think a word of yours to him

will be important." Letter of Rabbi Stephen S. Wise to Justice Louis D. Brandeis - May 10.


5. We quote from the JEWISH COMMUNAL REGISTER of New York City: "The firm of Kuhn Loeb

& Company floated the largest Japanese war loan of 1904-05 thus making possible the Japanese victory

over Russia" . . . "Jacob Schiff financed the enemies of autocratic Russia and used his

financial influence to keep Russia from the money markets of the United States."


6. " . . . The uprising of July 4, 1917, was intended to overthrow the Provisional Government according

to the plans of Lenin and Trotsky. The revolutionaries were disconcerted by the intervention of a

solitary regiment which had been withdrawn from the front and scattered themselves. Lenin escaped

but Trotsky was arrested. Their cause appeared lost. But the Bolshevists had given proof of their

courage, and a telegram arrived to bring them news of the financial support of Jacob Schiff, who was

determined to push the Russian Revolution to the end. The importance of these funds placed at the

disposal of Lenin and Trotsky in order to foment the Bolshevik insurrection of October, 1917, has

not been fully realized. This action overthrew the Kerensky government and set up the Soviet

regime. How these funds got to them is known. The United States Government published in October,

1918, a series of official documents entitled The German-Bolshevik Conspiracy." Henry Coston,



7. Max Warburg of Hamburg (Sept. 21) opened by cable an account at

(Rothschilds) Nya Banken in Stockholm, Sweden for Trotsky (Bronstein).


8. October 17. Zionists dominated England and France, betrayed the Arab-Moslem people and

bargained away their Palestine territories. Lawrence of Arabia, an Englisman who was loved, trusted,

and respected by the Arabs, returned to the British Government the decorations they gave him.

(Shouldn't Eisenhower, as Commander-in-Charge of the U. S. Armed Forces,

also return the valuable military decorations he received from Soviet Russia?)


9. " . . . Wladimir Olaf Aschberg . . . acted as the intermediary

(in Stockholm, Sweden) between Kuhn, Loeb & Co. in New


York City and the firm of Max Warburg (in Hamburg) when they were financing the (Bolshevik) revolution

of October, 1917. Aschberg was the head of the Nya Banken in Stockholm and later, in 1921, founded

the Russian Commercial Bank. Thanks to this institution he became in a sense the dictator of

Soviet finances." Henry Coston, LES FINANCIERS QUI MENENT LE MONDE, Paris, p. 115.


"In the match between these two heavyweights (the United States and the Soviet Union) the

International Finance of the United States will have trained the adversary." Comte de Saint-Aulaire,

GENEVA VERSUS PEACE, London, 1937, p. 75) (Library of Congress: JX1975,S.32)

(He was the French Ambassador to the Court of St. James, London, from 1920 until 1924.


10. From the great book WORLD REVOLUTION Q THE PLOT AGAINST CIVILIZATION by the famous

English historian, Nesta H. Webster, p. 93, we quote: "In a word, the peasant inherited from the

aristocrat; he was disinherited by the usurer. Here is the true history of the disinherited, not in France

alone, but in Russia, in Austria, in Poland; everywhere that the worker lives by tilling his own soil

the abolition of feudalism has led to the domination of the

money-lender, and the money-lender is in most cases a Jew."


11. We quote from Page 187 of TWO STUDIES IN VIRTUE by Christopher Sykes, as follows:


"Sokolow made a simple request, namely that the Zionist Committee should have facilities for

commuications abroad. He pointed out they were an

international body - should be granted Governmental privileges.


"It was agreed that the War Office and the Foreign Office would send Zionist

letters and telegrams by way of Embassies, Consulates or Headquarters."


12. Jacob H. Schiff, the leader of Zionists, finances the complete rewriting of the Bible provided

it is done under Jewish auspices. See his book p. 63, VII, also AMERICAN MERCURY, July, 1958, p. 120.


13. On Good Friday, April 6, 1917, the conspirators got the United States to foolishly declare World

War I on Germany and to become an ally of the Revolutionists who had invaded and now dominate

Russia. (It was also on Good Friday, April 14, 1865 that Abraham Lincoln was murdered.)


14. "Official information emanating from Russia itself informed the world that Communism, while

barbarously opposed to every form of Christianity, made it a crime

for any comrade to utter a single word of reproach against the Jews."


"The 1917 list of those who, with Lenin, ruled many of the activities of the Soviet

Republic, disclosed that of the 25 quasi-cabinet members, 24 of them were atheistic."


"Between the years 1917 and 1938, more than 20 million Christians

were murdered by the Communistic government in Russia."


"Between these same years, 40 billion dollar of Christian property was appropriated by the Lenins

and Trotskys, the Zinofieffs and the Kemeneffs, the Litvinoffs and the

Lapinskys - by the atheistic Jews and Gentiles Q both of Russia."


"Those were the desperate days when Christians were not expelled from their native land but were

the targets for the machine gun which beat out its tattoo against human hearts; incredible days

when the altars of Christ were desecrated and the servants of Christ were massacred on every

multiplying Calvaries." From nationwide broadcast of Rev. Charles E. Coughlin, Sunday, Nov. 29, 1938.


15. Since 1917, Red Russia has been the land base for the conspirators. Later, evil men in the U. S.

financed and industrialized it. AMERICAN MERCURY, January 1959, Mercury's Opinion, p. 110.



1. " . . . I think that a Jewish Palestine must become a war aim for America . . . " Letter

of Dr. Chaim Weizmann to Justice Louis D. Brandeis, Supreme Court, dated January 14.


2. Sixty-Fifth Congress, House Document 1868, Exhibit 243, "Paper Relating to Foreign Relations

of the United States" contains a whole series of documents showing that the International


Bankers financed Lenin and Trotsky (Bronstein). Transfer of funds started in June, 1917. Document 9

shows that the international banking house of M. Warburg opened an account for Comrade Trotsky

to purchase arms, etc. Also Document 12 shows transfer of funds for "agitation against England and France."


3. Soviet Russia law passed. "From 3/1/18 on, the right to possess women having reached the age of

17 and not more than 32, is abolished. Women proclaimed to be the property of the whole nation.

The former owners may retain the right of using their wives

without waiting for their turn." THE HIDDEN EMPIRE, p. 47.


4. The United States Secret Service (2nd Army Bureau) named the persons who financed the Bolsheviks

in 1916. The State Department, under Jewish pressure,

destroyed this report. As the report remarks: "All Jews."


5. 'We are living in a highly, organized state of socialism. The state is all; the individual is of importance

only as he contributes to the welfare of the state. His property is only (his) as the state does not

need it. He must hold his life and his possessions at the call of the state."

Bernard M. Baruch in THE KNICKERBOCKER PRESS, Albany, New York, August 8, 1918.


(This ties in with (Rothschilds) Alliance Israelite Universelle which sent out bulletins "Nationalities

must disappear, religion must be suppressed. But Israel (i.e., Zionism) must not disappear.")


6. The First World War brought to Edward Rothschild, and his associates, more than one hundred

billion dollars of profit. THE SECRET WORLD GOVERNMENT by Major General Count Cherep-Spiridovich.


7. Bolshevist revolutionaries in Russia murdered adults and children of

the royal family, and many others, thus launching their regime, in blood.


8. Bernard Baruch, testifying at a Congressional inquiry,

said: "I had more power than any other man in the war."


9. U. S. Government paid Col. E. Mandell House $60,000 for

expenses in N.Y.C. (for 6 months, July 1 to December 31, 1918.)


10. Bernard Flexner joins Roger Baldwin and his counsel of Zionist delegation

to 1919 Peace Conference. (Records of both of these men speak for themselves.)


11. How these subsidized alien revolutionaries, having invaded Russia, proceeded to murder and

rob on a wholesale scale has been recorded by many persons who had the misfortunate

to be in Russia during the Bolshevik Revolution. THE ALIEN MENACE, pages 113-114.


12. Those who wish to go further in the history of this plot against civilization should consult the

books quoted; also RUSSIA'S RUIN, by Wilcox (Chapman & Hall, 1919). THE ALIEN MENACE, p. 114.


13. See MERCURY article, pages 115-ll6, February, 1958 entitled "Felix Frankfurter and Louis D. Brandeis."

On 3/2/18 they, Frankfurter from Paris and Brandeis in the U.S., were raising a million dollars

(for Weizmann to use in London).


14. Very few Christians ever read THE WORLD SIGNIFICANCE OF A JEWISH STATE

by Braintruster A. A. Berle. Berle and Herzl had much in common.



1. Of the making of the peace of 1919, Dr. E. J. Dillon of the LONDON DAILY TELEGRAPH wrote in

his book THE INSIDE STORY OF THE PEACE CONFERENCE, Harpers, 1920 that the delegates to the

Conference from Eastern Europe set down the formula: " 'Henceforth the world will be governed

by the Anglo-Saxon people, who in turn are swayed by their Jewish elements'

. . . and who regard it as fatal to the peace of Eastern Europe." Page 497.


2. Between 1919 and 1924, three million recorded

immigrants came to the U. S., mostly from Eastern Europe.


3. Professor J. R. Commons of the University of Wisconsin testified before the United States House

of Representatives Barking and Currency Committee in 1927 that a member of the Federal

Reserve Board had told him that the great inflation of 1919 was deliberately

created by the Federal Reserve Board. ALL THESE THINGS by A. N. Field, p. 6.


4. Council of Foreign Relations was launched by Rothschild and Rockefeller at the

sinister Versailles Peace meeting. The following two groups were set up to do the job:


I. Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.


II. Council on Foreign Relations, New York City (U.S.)


Annual grants by Rockefeller Foundation provided a direct, continuous method of control of both

organizations. Carnegie Foundation and later Rockefeller Foundation were to constitute a gigantic

lobby and pressure group serving to brainwash, influence and warp (or 'mold") the various nations'

policies. Top officials were influenced to come to the Council of Foreign Relations

for "advice" and "guidance." See facts in reprint WEINBERG REPLACES BARUCH.


5. If you read THE INSIDE STORY OF THE PEACE CONFERENCE (Harpers) by Dr. E. J. Dillon, you

will see the characters who put across the vicious Versailles Peace Treaty. It made a

subsequent World War inevitable.


6. In the new constitution recently adopted in the USSR we have another interesting provision which

bears upon this passing of Russia. The Christian religion has for centuries been the religion of the

Slav, as it has been the religion of the other races of Europe. We have seen the record

of hatred of the Bolsheviki and the Soviet Government in relation to that religion.

7. In article 124 of the new Soviet constitution we find the following:


"Freedom to perform religious rites and freedom of antireligious propaganda is recognized for all

citizens." Significant as this is, it becomes even more significant when

taken in connection with a provision in the preceding article, 123:


"Any direct or indirect restriction of these rights . . . as well as any propagation of

racial or national exceptionalism or hatred and contempt, is punishable by law."


8. The following extracts are quotes from the testimony of those who appeared before the U. S. Senate

Overman Committee. Also printed in DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION, per pages listed.


"The leaders of the movement, I should say, are about two-thirds Russian Jews." William C. Huntington,

Commercial Attache of the United States Embassy at Petrograd from June, 1913,

to September, 1918. Page 69.


"In Russia it is well known that three-fourths of the Bolshevist leaders are Jewish."

Mr. Welsh, for two years a junior officer of the National City Bank in Russia. Page 269.


"When the Bolsheviki came into power, all over Petrograd we at once had a predominance of

Yiddish proclamations, big posters, and everything in Yiddish." Dr. Simons, Pastor of the

Methodist Church in Petrograd, p. 142.


In the YALE REVIEW in an article entitled The World Menace, Mr. Henry C. Emery LL.D., former

chairman of the United States Tariff Board supported this testimony. "No one who ever made a visit

to Smolny Institute, when that was the headquarters of the Bolshevist government in Petrograd,

could fail to understand how easy it is to get the impression that the Jews have at last seized power."


9. Potent international financial interests were at work (at the Peace Conference) in favor of the

immediate recognition of the Bolshevists. Those influences had been largely responsible for the

Anglo-American proposal in January (19l9) to call Bolshevist representatives to Paris at the beginning

of the Peace Conference . . . The well known American-Jewish banker, Mr Jacob Schiff, was known

to be anxious to secure recognition for the Bolshevists . . . and Tchitcherin, the Bolshevist Commissar

for Foreign Affairs, had revealed the meaning of the January proposal by offering

extensive commercial and economic concessions in return for recognition."


Henry Wickham Steed, THROUGH THIRTY YEARS, New York 1924 Vol. 2, p 301.

Mr. Steed was the Editor of THE TIMES, London. Library of Congress D 397. S75.


10. Victor Marsden, the (London) MORNING POST reporter who spent many months in Russia, stated

that "among the 545 leading Bolshevik officials there were 377 Jews at the birth of Bolshevism."


11. The German people were robbed and weakened by inflation. As a result of the international

bankers' conspiracy, it took a billion-mark stamp (5 billion pre-war dollars) to send one letter in Germany.


12. British War Cabinet issues official "White Paper" listing Kuhn, Loeb & Co.

and other Zionist bankers who financed Red Russian Revolution.


13. In March, Third International was organized by Zionists. See H. Fish Report.


14. March 1, Capt. Schuyler reported. Here are exact quotes from document in our possession:


"You will think I am hot about this matter (Bolshevism) but it is I feel sure one which is going to

bring great trouble on the United States when the judgment of history shall be recorded on

the part we have played. It is very largely our fault that Bolshevism has spread as it has...."

From confidential report of Capt. Montgomery Schuyler, Chief United States Army Intelligence

Officer, Omsk, Siberia, to Lt. Col. David Prescott Barrows, Intelligence Officer, American Expeditionary

Forces, Vladivostok, Siberia, March 1,1919, p. 2. National Archives, Military Intelligence Files.


15. " . . . The prime movers (for the recognition of the Bolshevists at the Peace Conference in 1919)

were Jacob Schiff, Warburg and other international financiers, who wished above all to boIster up

the Jewish Bolshevists." Henry Wickham Steed, THROUGH THIRTY YEARS,

New York, 1924, Vol. 2, p. 302. Library of Congress: D 397. S 75.


16. " . . . Trotsky was furnished large sums of money in America and . . . sent to Russia." Erich Ludendorff,


p. 149. General Ludendorff was Commander-in-Chief of the

German Army in World War I. Library of Congress: D 359. L 86, 1939.


17. "The collapse of these three Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia) in their old form

represents a considerable gain for the carrying on of a Jewish national policy, and the fact that the

same war, which brought about the world-wide recognition of Zionism, also brought about the fall

of three anti-Jewish powers, is a unique coincidence which may well give cause for

thought." DER JUDE, Vol. 3, p. 449, Dr. Martin Buber, Publisher, Berlin 1918-1919.


18. The Communist Party was set up in the U. S. on September 1, 1919. William Z. Foster (wife,

Esther Abramovich) became its first general secretary. THE DAILY WORKER,

the Communist New York daily, began its first publication about the same time.


19. The Versailles Peace Conference imposed on Germany the harsh conditions that

sent the nation reeling toward Communism, depression, and finally despotism.


20. Bernard Baruch was invited to become the Soviet Union's

peace-time adviser on industry and resources.


21. Dr. Weizmann said "we do not aspire to found a Zionist State. We cannot hope to rule in a

country in which only 1/7th of the population at present are Jews." FAR AND WIDE, p. 318.



22. In the hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United

States Senate, Sixty-Sixth Congress, Document 106, p. 536, we quote:

Senator McCumber questions President Woodrow Wilson: "Do you think if Germany had committed

no act of war or no act of injustice against our citizens that we would have gotten into this war?"


President Wilson: "I do think so."


Senator McCumber: "You think we would have gotten in anyway?"


President Wilson: "I do."


23. Poisonous propaganda started to flow into the minds of United States citizens.


24. "Jewish hopes for the future depend on two linchpins. One is the League of Nations idea, and

the other is the British Government, and we need scarcely say that we refer to Jewish hopes in

the widest application of the term." THE JEWISH WORLD, London, January 15,1919 (No. 2392), p. 5


"There must be a proper lookout for the civic and political rights and the status of Jews in

various countries unless there be established a Power above all nations . . . " as above, p. 5.


25. "Peace" Conference in Paris in 1919 made the resumption

of war inevitable, owing to its impossible financial clauses.


At this conference the chief financial adviser to the German delegation was Dr. Carl Melchior, partner

of Max Warburg, whose brothers Paul and Felix were partners of Jacob Schiff, in Kuhn, Loeb & Co.

The chief economic adviser to the American delegation was Bernard M. Baruch, the dictator of the

all-powerful War Industries Board in America during the war and an associate in business of

Jacob H. Schiff. The British economic delegation was headed by Lord Cunliffe, former Governor of

the Bank of England and a partner in the international Jewish banking house of Goschen (ancestral

cityQLeipzig, Germany). In connection with this conference, Lloyd George wrote in his memoirs:

"They (the international bankers) swept statesmen, politicians, jurists and journalists all on one side

and issued their orders with an imperiousness of absolute monarchs who knew that there

was no appeal from their ruthless decrees." DEADLIER THAN THE H BOMB, p. 47.


26. The second reason for large scale Communist exploitation of the United States was our

traditional lack of any laws prohibiting or regulating immigration into the United states and our

negligence or politics in enforcing immigration laws when they had been passed (Chapter II,

IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA.) "The illegal entry of aliens into the United State] is one of the most

serious and difficult problems confronting the Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . Since

the end of World War II, the problem of illegal entry has increased tremendously . . . There is

ample evidence that there is an alarmingly large number of aliens in the United States in an

illegal status. Under the alien registration act of 1940 some 5,000,000 aliens were registered."



The third principal reason for the Communist exploitation of the United States was the absence

of any effective policy regarding resident foreigners even when their activities are directed

toward the overthrow of the government. Thus in 1950 several hundreds of thousands of foreigners,

among the millions illegally in this country, were arrested and released for want of adequate

provisions for deporting them.


As shown in Chapter II, "persons of Khazar background or traditions had entered the United States

in large numbers in the waves of immigration between 1880 and the outbreak of World War I in

1914. The Soviet seizure of Russia took place in 1917, however, and the hey-clay for Communist-inclined

immigrants from Eastern Europe was the five-year period between the end of World War I (1919) and

the passage of the 1924 law restricting immigration. Recorded immigrants to this country in that

brief span of time amounted to approximately 3 million and large numbers of newcomers

were from Eastern Europe." THE IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA by John Beaty, p. 45.


27. Lenin said: "The first World War gave us Russia, while the Second World War will hand

Europe to us." (Note the certainty of World War II. It came, "as planned" - 2O years later.)


The urging of dual loyalty by Dr. Nahum Goldman, who is president of the World Zionist Movement

and also president of the World Jewish Congress makes real Americans very

concerned. See AMERICAN MERCURY, June, 1959, This Is What They Said, p. 146.  

                                                                Events That Have Confirmed the Research Summarized in the Preceding Manuscript:

1. Five million dollars worth of research by the late Henry Ford resulted in the production

of THE INTERNATIONAL JEW. This almost cost Mr. Ford his life and his company.


2. The Outline is consistent with the PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION, smuggled

out of Russia and translated by a great English journalist. When the Jews told Mr. Ford that the

PROTOCOLS were a forgery, he said: "I don't believe they are a forgery, but

whatever they are they fit what is going on as the Jew attempts to gain world power."


3. By manipulations involving the First World War and the Second World War, the Jews were able

to steal $20,000,000,000.00 (Twenty Billion dollars) worth of real estate, drive millions of helpless

Arabs Q both Christian and Moslem Q into a desert to starve, die and suffer and establish what

intelligent observers refer to as the counterfeit State of Israel. In the fulfillment of this project,

they indulged in genocide, napalm slaughter and every known form of barbarism that could be meted out

to an oppressed and defeated people.


4. In 1967 they seized the entire Holy Land and invaded Jordan and Egypt and announced their

purpose through their Number One Zionist spokesman, Ben-Gurion, who said, "We shall make of this

the Supreme Court of Mankind."


5. Although the Jew Zionists helped create the United Nations, they fouled their own brood and they

were completely condemned by the United Nations, representing the reaction and the awakening

of world-wide sentiment.


6. Jew Zionists have organized a world-wide screaming and complaining campaign against the

Soviet Union because of its alleged mistreatment of the Jews. There is no way to know whether

this means that the Jews have now 'fouled their brood' in the Soviet Union or whether it is a

false front to mislead the world in preparation for the day when the Soviet Union will join with

the Zionists in subduing the Arabs and capturing two-thirds of the world's oil supply. It is important,

however, that every reader of this manuscript have a photostatic copy of the Report of Military

Intelligence referred to in Item 7 on Page 29 which reveals that out of approximately 300 commissars

in the first Communist government of Russia, 284 were Jews from New York and scattered portions of America.




The following books are listed in the same order as they were mentioned in above article.



THE JEWISH STATE by Theodor Herzl, 1896,


ZIONIST NETWORK by Senator Jack B. Tenney, Standard Publications, P. O. Box 2003, Sacramento, California




DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION by Edwin D. Schoonmaker, Richard R. Smith, New York, 1939


THE WORLD CONQUERORS by Louis Marschalko, Joseph Sueli Publications, London, 1958


THE WORLD AT THE CROSS ROADS by Boris Brasol, Boston, 1921. . . ROCKEFELLER: GIANT, DWARF, SYMBOL by William H. Allen, Institute for Public Service, New York, 1930




DEADLIER THAN THE H-BOMB by Commander Leonard Young...


INTERNATIONAL JEW by Henry Ford, Sr....








THE ALIEN MENACE by Lt. Colonel A. H. Lane, Boswell Printing & Publishing Co., Ltd., 10 Essex St. Strand, London, W. C. 1, 1932




FAR AND WIDE by Douglas Reed, Jonathan Cape, 30 Bedford Square, London, 1951


THE HIDDEN EMPIRE, published in London


AFTER THE WAR, published by Constable in 1922


TWO STUDIES IN VIRTUE by Christopher Sykes




GENEVA VERSUS PEACE by Comte de Saint-Aulaire, London, 1937






THE SECRET WORLD GOVERNMENT by Major General Count Cherep-Spiridovich, New York, 1921






THROUGH THIRTY YEARS by Henry Wickham Steed, New York 1924




DER JUDE by Dr. Martin Buber, Publisher, Berlin, Vol. 3 1918-19 .



Ranting Against 'Globalism' Is Anti-Semitic'

... "Globalist" is a term with an anti-Semitic history, and it's often understood as a code for "Jews," so this language
is activating and traumatizing for a lot of Jews. Especially in the wake of a bomb attack at the home of George Soros,
a prominent Jewish philanthropist who is often slammed with the "globalist" label. Much of Soros' recent' work centers
around promoting the idea of an "open society" ... Attacks on Soros and his philosophy are dangerous not only to Soros
himself but to freedom of expression across Europe. The connection between globalists and
Jews is, in part, the old anti-Semitic smear that Jews are not truly loyal citizens of any nation.



America's vilest traitor, Edward Mandell House, is attributed with giving a very

detailed outline of the New World Order plans that were to be implemented gradually

over time to enslave the American people ... a plan that has been repeated in Canada,

Australia, Britain and elsewhere. He stated, in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson:


“Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property

(that’s you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of

the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such

methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect

our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will

be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be

our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever,

by operation of the lawmerchant under the scheme of secured transactions.

Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth

Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges.


They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to

make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million

could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out,

we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way

to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of

benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our

wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud,

which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will

unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless

and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office

(presidency) of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America.”



The Canadian Intelligence Service - Excerpt from September 1952 issue - submitted

by James Moorhouse. - The following speech was given by Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich

before a special meeting of the Emergency Council of European Rabbis in Budapest,

Hungary, January 12, 1952.


"The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for three thousand years is at l

ast within our reach, and because its fulfillment is so apparent, it behooves us to

increase our efforts and our caution tenfold. I can safely promise you that before

ten years have passed, our race will take its rightful place in the world, with every

Jew a king and every Gentile a slave. We will openly reveal our identity with the races

of Asia and Africa. I can state with assurance that the last generation of white

children is now being born. Our control Commissions will, in the interest of peace

and wiping out our interracial tensions, forbid the whites to mate with white.

The white woman must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with

black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with white means

the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory.

We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the

Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior

intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark people."









Straight Talk About Zionism: What Jewish Nationalism Means


By Mark Weber
April 14, 2009


(An audio recording of this article, narrated by the author,

is posted here for listening or downloading)


It’s important to understand Zionism, not just because it’s an influential ideology and a

powerful social-political movement, but also because there’s a

lot of ignorance, confusion and deliberate misinformation about it.


If you look up the word “Zionism” in a standard American dictionary, what you’ll find

is likely to be inaccurate, or least misleading. For example, a popular and supposedly

authoritative American dictionary in my office defines Zionism as “A movement

formerly for reestablishing, now for supporting, the Jewish national state of Israel.”

/ 1 This definition, which is typical of American reference works, is more than

just misleading. It’s deceitful.


The founder of the modern Zionist movement was a Jewish writer named Theodor Herzl.

In the 1890s he was living in Paris, where he was a journalist for a major newspaper in Vienna.

He was deeply troubled by the widespread anti-Semitism, or anti-Jewish sentiment, in

France at the time. He thought a lot about the pattern of tension, distrust and conflict

between Jews and non-Jews that had persisted through the centuries,

and he hit upon what he believed is a solution to this age-old problem.


Herzl laid out his views in a book, written in German, entitled The Jewish State

(Der Judenstaat). Published in 1896, this work is the manifesto or basic document of the

Zionist movement. A year and a half later, Herzl convened the first international Zionist

conference. Fifty one years later, when the “State of Israel” was solemnly proclaimed at

a meeting in Tel Aviv, above the speakers’ podium at the conference was, appropriately,

a large portrait of Herzl.


In his book Herzl explained that regardless of where they live, or their citizenship,

Jews constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people. He used

the German word, Volk. Wherever large numbers of Jews live among non-Jews, he said,

conflict is not only likely, it’s inevitable. He wrote: "The Jewish question exists wherever

Jews live in noticeable numbers. Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving Jews

... I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex phenomenon.

I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear." / 2


In his public and private writings, Herzl explained that anti-Semitism is not an aberration,

but rather a natural response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes.

Anti-Jewish sentiment, he said, is not due to ignorance or bigotry, as so many have

claimed. Instead, he concluded, the ancient and seemingly intractable conflict between

Jews and non-Jews is entirely understandable, because Jews are a distinct and separate

people, with interests that are different from, and which often conflict with, the interests

of the people among whom they live.


A prime source of modern anti-Jewish sentiment, Herzl believed, was that the so-called

“emancipation” of Jews in the 18th and 19th centuries from the confined life of the ghetto

into modern urban society brought them into direct economic competition with non-Jews

in the middle classes. Anti-Semitism, Herzl wrote, is “an understandable reaction to Jewish

defects.” In his diary he wrote: “I find the anti-Semites are fully within their rights.” / 3


Herzl maintained that Jews must stop pretending -- both to themselves and to non-Jews

-- that they are like everyone else, and instead must frankly acknowledge that they are

a distinct and separate people, with distinct and separate goals and interests. The only

workable long-term solution, he said, is for Jews to recognize reality and live, finally, as a

“normal” people in a separate state of their own. In a memo to the Tsar of

Russia, Herzl wrote that Zionism is the “final solution of the Jewish question.” / 4


Over the years many other Jewish leaders have affirmed Herzl’s outlook. Louis Brandeis,

a US Supreme Court justice and a leading American Zionist, said: “Let us all recognize

that we Jews are a distinctive nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station or

shade of belief, is necessarily a member.” / 5


Stephen S. Wise, president of the American Jewish Congress and of the World Jewish

Congress, told a rally in New York in June 1938: "I am not an American citizen of the

Jewish faith. I am a Jew ... Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the Jewish people a race,

and we are a race." / 6


Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann, wrote in his memoirs: “Whenever the quantity

of Jews in any country reaches the saturation point, that country reacts against them ...

[This] reaction ... cannot be looked upon as anti-Semitism in the ordinary or vulgar sense

of that word; it is a universal social and economic concomitant of Jewish immigration,

and we cannot shake it off.” / 7


In keeping with the Zionist worldview, Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon told a meeting

of American Jews in Jerusalem in July 2004 that all Jews around the world should relocate

to Israel as soon as possible. And because anti-Semitism was especially widespread in

France, he added, Jews in that country should immediately move to Israel. French officials

quickly, and predictably, responded by rejecting Sharon’s remarks as “unacceptable.” / 8


But imagine if the leaders of France, the United States, and other countries were to

respond to those remarks by Sharon, and similar ones by other Zionists, by expressing

agreement. Imagine if an American president were to respond by saying: “You’re right,

Mr. Sharon. We agree with you. We agree that Jews do not belong in the United States.

In fact, we are ready to show our support for what you say by doing everything we

can to promote and encourage all Jews to leave our country and move to Israel.”


That would be the logical and honest attitude of non-Jewish political leaders who say that

they support Israel and Zionism. But the political leaders of the United States,

France, Britain, and other such countries today are neither honest nor consistent.


During the 1930s, one European government that was honest and consistent in its

attitude on this issue was the government of Third Reich Germany. Jewish Zionists and

German National Socialists shared similar views about how best to handle what Herzl

called “the Jewish question.” They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different

nationalities, and that Jews did not belong in Europe, but rather in the

so-called "Jewish homeland” in Palestine.


On the basis of their shared views, Germans and Jews worked together for what each

community believed was in its own best national interest. The Hitler government vigorously

supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine from 1933 until 1940-41,

when the Second World War prevented further extensive collaboration. / 9


(During the war years attitudes hardened, and policy shifted drastically. The German policy

of collaboration with Zionists and support for Jewish emigration

to Palestine gave way to a harsh “final solution” policy.)


During the 1930s, the central SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, repeatedly proclaimed

its support for Zionism. An article published in 1935, for example, told readers: / 10


“The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and not on religion leads

the German government to guarantee without reservation the racial separateness of this

community. The government finds itself in complete agreement with the great spiritual

movement within Jewry, the so-called Zionism, with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry

around the world, and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this basis, Germany

undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the future in the handling of the

Jewish problem around the world.”


In late 1933, a leading German shipping line began direct passenger service

from Hamburg to Haifa, Palestine, providing "strictly kosher food” on board.


In September 1935, the German government enacted the “Nuremberg Laws," which

prohibited marriages and sexual relations between Jews and Germans and, in effect,

proclaimed the country’s Jews an alien minority group. / 11 A few days after the Nuremberg

Laws were enacted, the main German Zionist newspaper, the Jüdische Rundschau,

editorially welcomed the new measures. It explained to readers: / 12


“Germany ... is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress when it declares

the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority. Once the Jews have been

stamped a national minority it is again possible to establish normal relations between

the German nation and Jewry. The new laws give the Jewish minority in Germany its own

cultural life, its own national life. In future it will be able to shape its own schools, its

own theater, and its own sports associations. In short, it can create its own future in

all aspects of national life ...”


During the 1930s, Zionist groups, working together with Third Reich authorities,

organized a network of some forty camps and agricultural centers throughout

Germany where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine.


The centerpiece of German-Zionist cooperation during the Hitler era was the Transfer

Agreement, a pact that enabled tens of thousands of German Jews to migrate to Palestine

with their wealth. The Agreement, also known as the Ha’avara -- Hebrew for "transfer"

-- was concluded in August 1933 following talks between German officials and an

official of the Jewish Agency, the Palestine center of the World Zionist Organization. / 13


Between 1933 and 1941, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to Palestine through

the Ha'avara and other German-Zionist arrangements, or about ten percent of Germany's

1933 Jewish population. Some Ha'avara emigrants transferred considerable personal

wealth from Germany to Palestine. As Jewish historian Edwin Black has noted: "Many

of these people, especially in the late 1930s, were allowed to transfer actual replicas

of their homes and factories -- indeed rough replicas of their very existence." / 14


The Transfer Agreement was the most far-reaching example of cooperation between

Hitler's Germany and international Zionism. Through this pact, Hitler's Third Reich did

more than any other government during the 1930s to support the Zionist movement and

Jewish development in Palestine.


The essence of Zionism, or Jewish nationalism, is that Jews everywhere -- regardless

of where they live, regardless of their religious outlook, and regardless of their citizenship

-- are members of the Jewish “people” or “nation,” to whom all Jews owe a primary

loyalty and allegiance.


The overwhelming majority of Jews in the United States today identify with and support

Israel, and are affiliated with Zionist groups and organizations. Every significant Jewish

group or association in the United States, and every prominent Jewish American political

or community leader supports Israel and Zionism, in most cases fervently so. With

very few exceptions, even American Jews who are critical of some of Israel’s more

embarrassing policies nonetheless express support for Israel and

the nationalist ideology upon which the Zionist state is based.


A Zionist Jew, by definition, owes his primary loyalty to the Jewish community and to

Israel. Zionism is not compatible with patriotism to any country or entity other than Israel

and the world Jewish community. That’s why it’s difficult to accept as sincere or honest

the pious assurances of Jewish leaders in the United States that American Jews are just as

loyal to the US as everyone else.


In the United States, nearly every prominent political leader -- Jewish and non-Jewish,

Democrat and Republican -- ardently supports Israel and the Jewish nationalist ideology

upon which it is based. In Washington, political leaders of both major parties insist on US

support for Israel as an ethnically Jewish state. They fervently support, and eagerly seek

the favor of, influential Jewish-Zionist groups, such as the American Israel

Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).


Everyone -- whether Jewish or non-Jewish -- who claims to support Israel should, if he

is honest and consistent, endorse the view of Israeli prime minister Sharon, and other Zionist

leaders, and support the migration of Jews everywhere to Israel. But of course that’s

not what happens.


With regard to Zionism and Israel, the attitude and policies of nearly all American political

leaders, Jewish and non-Jewish, is characterized by hypocrisy and deceit. To put it another

way, Zionist Jews and their non-Jewish supporters embrace a blatant double standard.

Jewish-Zionist organizations, along with their non-Jewish allies, support one social-political

ideology for Israel and the world Jewish community, and a completely different one for the

United States and other non-Jewish countries. They insist that ethnic nationalism is evil and

bad for non-Jews, while at the same time they vigorously support ethnic nationalism

-- that is, Zionism -- for Jews.


They insist that Israel is and must be a Jewish nationalist state, with a privileged status

for its Jewish population, including immigration laws that discriminate against non-Jews.

At the same time, Jewish-Zionist groups and leaders, and the non-Jews who support them,

insist that in the United States, Britain, France, Germany and other countries,

there must be no privileged status for anyone based on race, ethnicity or religion.


Our political leaders tell us that American Jews should be encouraged to think of themselves

as a distinct national group with an identity and community interests separate from those

of other Americans. At the same time American politicians insist that Zionist Jews be given

all rights as full and equal US citizens. On the basis of this double standard,

Jews are given a privileged status in American political and cultural life.


Americans are led to believe that Zionism is a benign outlook of altruistic and righteous

support for a so-called Jewish homeland. In fact, Zionism is an ideology and movement

of ethnically-based Jewish nationalism that reinforces the identity and self-image of Jews

as a distinct and separate community with interests different from those of

non-Jews, and which strengthens the already powerful world Jewish community.



  1. New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition (1978?), p. 1654.
  2. Th. Herzl, Der Judenstaat. ( / )
    Also quoted in: M. Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1993, p. 29. ( )
  3. Kevin MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents (Praeger,1998), pp. 45, 48.
  4. Memo of Nov. 22, 1899. R. Patai, ed., The Complete Diaries of Theodor Herzl (New York: 1960), Vol. 3, p. 888.
  5. Louis D. Brandeis, “The Jewish Problem and How to Solve It.” Speech of April 25, 1915. ( / )
  6. “Dr. Wise Urges Jews to Declare Selves as Such,” New York Herald Tribune, June 13, 1938, p. 12.
  7. Chaim Weizmann, Trial and Error (1949), p. 90. Quoted in: Albert S. Lindemann, The Jew Accused (1991), p. 277.
  8. “French Jews Must `Move to Israel’,” BBC News, July 18, 2004 ( )
    See also: “Sharon Urges Jews to Go to Israel,” BBC News, Nov. 17, 2003. ( )
  9. M. Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 4), pp. 29-37. )
  10. Das Schwarze Korps, Sept. 26, 1935. Quoted in: Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Univ. of Texas, 1985), p. 56-57.
  11. These days the Nuremberg Laws are routinely portrayed as imposing outrageous and inhumane discrimination against Jews. But to put this in perspective, it’s worth mentioning two points. First: the Nuremberg Laws ban on marriage between Jews and non-Jews is consistent with the law in Israel today, where such marriages are not permitted, as well as with the prohibition on such marriages as laid out in the Hebrew scriptures. (See, for example: Numbers 25: 6-8; Deuteronomy 7:3; Ezra 9: 12; 10: 10-11; Nehemiah 10: 30; 13: 25.)
      Second, in 1935 less than one percent of the population of Germany was Jewish, which meant that the Nuremberg laws ban on marriage between Jews and non-Jews was irrelevant for the vast majority of the country’s population. By contrast, in the United States during the 1930s, most of the American states had laws in place that prohibited marriage between people of different races. Because the portion of the American population that was racially non-majority was much larger than in Germany, the US racial laws impacted a much larger portion of the US population at the time than the Nuremberg laws affected the German population.
  12. Jüdische Rundschau, Sept. 17, 1935. Quoted in: Y. Arad, and others, Documents on the Holocaust (Jerusalem: 1981), pp. 82-83.
  13. W. Feilchenfeld, “Ha’avara,” New Encyclopedia of Zionism and Israel (Herzl Press, 1994), pp. 535-536; M. Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1993, pp. 33-34.
  14. Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), p. 379.





Click on this text to see An exposure of The Zionist Plan to Take Over the World...



Click on this text to read & hear "SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS" and fully realize what the plan is...


Click on this text to read: THE ZIONIST MOVEMENT - It's Aims and Achievements... by Israel Cohen (1879-1961)....

Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of

the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City

at one time principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized

Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and

the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing

the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United ...States.


Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the

highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our

nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer,

Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more

movers and shakers of our times.

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington,

D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.

Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become

dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent

than ever before.





Click on this text to examine the full text of the THE REVEALING BENJAMIN FREEDMAN SPEECH



                                                                 Benjamin Freedman Exposed the Khazarian Mafia


Freedman covered the Khazarian Mafia's influence in Russia (behind the revolutions and

installment of the Soviet Union) and exposed how they wanted to (in general) bring

down constitutional monarchies.


Eric Gajewski holds an undergraduate degree in Business and a Master’s Degree
in Business both from Franciscan University in Ohio.
He exposes the new World order spearheaded by the Khazarian Mafia.

Eric runs, the most comprehensive and followed

traditional catholic website in the world (a top 20K website worldwide).

You can subscribe to his Youtube channel tradcatknight.


Jonas E. Alexis: You have done some studies on Benjamin Freedman. He seemed to

have been the antithesis of what the Zionist establishment represented. Obviously they

hated him because he exposed them and revealed their dirty secret

to the world. He was even a strong supporter of the Arab cause.


Tell us a bit about the man and how he actually stripped

the Khazarian Mafia of their ideological clothes.


Eric Gajewski: Benjamin Freedman (1890-1984) was a Jew who converted to Roman

Catholicism from Judaism. He broke with the Khazarian Mafia after the Judeo-Communist

victory in 1945.  From there he spent a considerable amount of his fortune (was a well to

do businessman) exposing the KM and their plots for

dominance in not only America but also worldwide.


He was able to speak so fluently and specifically on the KM because he had been an insider

at the highest levels of various Jewish organizations seeking to gain power over our nation.

Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow

Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more

influential people of his time.


He is well known for his speech in 1961 warning America about the tactics

and plots of the KM in general but also spoke as an American patriot warning

us about the KM’s in our country. He stated then that the Khazarian Mafia already

had control of our country and that Zionists very much had their hands in all the wars. 


Who can doubt that their hand is not behind the forthcoming world war in which it seems

virtually every country will be involved. He warned about the KM’s destruction of Germany

and unmasked their favorite word, “anti- Semitism,” which is still used today when

Jews/Zionists/Israel are admonished or exposed for their illicit actions.


He continued exposing the Khzarian Mafia who call themselves Jews but in reality are not.

The Synagogue of Satan is very much alive today and no wonder Christ was so adamantly

opposed to them.


The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined

that they are going to once again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine

as their foothold for their world government.


Freedman exposed how a lot of people were pagans and how they hide behind

the notion that they are God’s chosen to “build up” the puppet state of “Israel.”


Before Vatican II the popes warned about the KM in general but it is the KM using Free

Masonry who now have infiltrated the Vatican and are now preparing the

stage for the New World Order, which we can logically call the Antichrist.


Freedman went on to elaborate how even in the Jewish community there was much

disunity. He spoke of Rothschild and his influence in France and covered how the KM

were driven out of England by King Edward in 1285 only to later

return in the Cromwell Revolution which was financed by Rothschild.


The Catholic Church had quite frequently in medieval times banished the KM because

of the sinful usury practices and this was exposed as well by Mr. Freedman.


Lastly, Freedman covered the KM’s influence in Russia (behind the revolutions and installment

of the Soviet Union) and exposed how they wanted to (in general) bring down

constitutional monarchies.




Click on this text to see THE INTERNATIONAL JEW, THE WORLD'S FOREMOST PROBLEM by Henry Ford.....

Abridged from the original as published by the world renowned industrial leader,
Henry Ford
Appearing originally in the periodical published by the Ford Motor Co.
"The Dearborn Independent."





Murder and Genocide

   ACCORDING TO THE JEWISH religion, the murder of a Jew

is a capital offense and one of the three most heinous sins

(the other two being idolatry and adultery). Jewish religious

courts and secular authorities are commanded to punish,

even beyond the limits of the ordinary administration of

justice, anyone guilty of murdering a Jew. A Jew who

indirectly causes the death of another Jew is, however,

only guilty of what talmudic law calls a sin against the

'laws of Heaven', to be punished by God rather than by man.


   When the victim is a Gentile, the position is quite different.
A Jew who murders a Gentile is guilty only of a sin against
the laws of Heaven, not punishable by a court. To cause
indirectly the death of a Gentile is no sin at all.

Click on this text to visit: IF AMERICANS KNEW...

If Americans Knew.

Future Israel - Ahavat Eretz Israel

Next Year in Jerusalem

Why do we, the Jews celebrating Pesach (Passover) in Jerusalem,

still say: "Next year in Jerusalem!" Aren't we already here?
The rebuilt Jerusalem we pray for is not this modern city, and the redeemed Eretz Israel is not the political state of the

Jews we see today. As the influence of the Torah extends, so will the boundaries of Eretz Israel expand accordingly.

Futuristic Map Based on the Torah

"To your descendants I have given this land, from the Egyptian River as far as the great river, the Euphrates."
Bereshit (Genesis) 15:18


The speculative map above is mostly based on the commentaries of Rashi and Malbim about the boundaries of the future

described in the Book of Ezekiel, chapters 47-48. The details of the future map of the Land

of Israel are mentioned only cryptically in the Tanach and various Talmudic sources.


The final redemption

The Jew has come home for the third and last time. "But the third shall be left therein" (Zecharia 13:8). "The first

redemption was that from Egypt; the second, the redemption of Ezra. The third will never end" (Tanhuma, Shoftim 9).


G-d's Land

"Therefore say unto the House of Israel... I do this, not for your sake, O House of Israel, but rather for My holy name which

you desecrated through the nations whither you came. And I will sanctify My great name that was desecrated amongst the

nations... and the nations shall know that I am the Lord when I shall be sanctified through you before their eyes. And I shall

take you from among the nations and gather you out of all the countries and I will bring you into your own land." Ezekiel 36:22-24



"The exiles shall be ingathered only through faith"
Mechilta, Exodus.

"When will the Moshiach come? Today, as it is said: 'Today, if you will hearken unto my voice' (Psalms 95:7)"
Talmud, Sanhedrin 98a.


Next Year in Jerusalem

May we soon live in Moshiach's Jerusalem, and plow the land of redeemed Israel. May we celebrate the Pesach

(Passover) Seder in spiritual freedom, when all Jews will have claimed their inheritance in the eternal Eretz Israel.




The Myth of the U.N. Creation of Israel

The Myth of the U.N. Creation of Israel

The popular belief that Israel was established by the United Nations

is rooted in falsehood and prejudice against the rights of the Palestinians.


There is a widely accepted belief that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181

“created” Israel, based upon an understanding that this resolution partitioned Palestine

or otherwise conferred legal authority or legitimacy to the declaration of the existence

of the state of Israel. However, despite its popularity, this belief has no basis in fact,

as a review of the resolution’s history and examination of legal principles

demonstrates incontrovertibly.


Great Britain had occupied Palestine during the First World War, and in July 1922,

the League of Nations issued its mandate for Palestine, which recognized the British

government as the occupying power and effectively conferred to it the color of legal

authority to temporarily administrate the territory. On April 2, 1947, seeking to extract

itself from the conflict that had arisen in Palestine between Jews and Arabs as a result

of the Zionist movement to establish in Palestine a “national home for the Jewish people”,

the United Kingdom submitted a letter to the U.N. requesting the Secretary General “to

place the question of Palestine on the Agenda of the General Assembly at its next

regular Annual Session”, and requesting the Assembly “to make recommendations,

under Article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine.” To that

end, on May 15, the General Assembly adopted Resolution 106, which established the

U.N. Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) to investigate “the question of Palestine”,

to “prepare a report to the General Assembly” based upon its findings, and to “submit

such proposals as it may consider appropriate for the solution of the problem of Palestine”.


On September 3, UNSCOP issued its report to the General Assembly declaring its majority

recommendation that Palestine be partitioned into separate Jewish and Arab states.

It noted that the population of Palestine at the end of 1946 was estimated to be almost

1,846,000, with 1,203,000 Arabs (65 percent) and 608,000 Jews (33 percent). Growth

of the Jewish population had been mainly the result of immigration, while growth of the

Arab population had been “almost entirely” due to natural increase. It observed that

there was “no clear territorial separation of Jews and Arabs by large contiguous areas”,

and even in the Jaffa district, which included Tel Aviv, Arabs constituted a majority. Land

ownership statistics from 1945 showed that Arabs owned more land than Jews in every

single district in Palestine. The district with the highest percentage of Jewish ownership

was Jaffa, where 39 percent of the land was owned by Jews, compared to 47 percent

owned by Arabs. In the whole of Palestine at the time UNSCOP issued its report,

Arabs owned 85 percent of the land, while Jews owned less than 7 percent.


Despite these facts, the UNSCOP proposal was that the Arab state be constituted

from only 45.5 percent of the whole of Palestine, while the Jews would be awarded

55.5 percent of the total area for their state. The UNSCOP report acknowledged that


With regard to the principle of self-determination, although international recognition

was extended to this principle at the end of the First World War and it was adhered to

with regard to the other Arab territories, at the time of the creation of the ‘A’ Mandates,

it was not applied to Palestine, obviously because of the intention to make possible the

creation of the Jewish National Home there. Actually, it may well be said that the Jewish

National Home and the sui generis Mandate for Palestine run counter to that principle.


In other words, the report explicitly recognized that the denial of Palestinian independence

in order to pursue the goal of establishing a Jewish state constituted a rejection of the

right of the Arab majority to self-determination. And yet, despite this recognition, UNSCOP

had accepted this rejection of Arab rights as being within the bounds of a legitimate

and reasonable framework for a solution.


Following the issuance of the UNSCOP report, the U.K. issued a statement declaring

its agreement with the report’s recommendations, but adding that “if the Assembly

should recommend a policy which is not acceptable to both Jews and Arabs, the United

Kingdom Government would not feel able to implement it.” The position of the Arabs

had been clear from the beginning, but the Arab Higher Committee issued a statement

on September 29 reiterating that “the Arabs of Palestine were determined to oppose with

all the means at their disposal, any scheme that provided for segregation or

partition, or that would give to a minority special and preferential status”.


It instead advocated freedom and independence for an Arab State in the whole of

Palestine which would respect human rights, fundamental freedoms and equality of

all persons before the law, and would protect the legitimate rights and interests of

all minorities whilst guaranteeing freedom of worship and access to the Holy Places.


The U.K. followed with a statement reiterating “that His Majesty’s Government could

not play a major part in the implementation of a scheme that was not acceptable to

both Arabs and Jews”, but adding “that they would, however, not wish to impede

the implementation of a recommendation approved by the General Assembly.”


The Ad Hoc Committee on the Palestinian Question was established by the General

Assembly shortly after the issuance of the UNSCOP report in order to continue to

study the problem and make recommendations. A sub-committee was established

in turn that was tasked with examining the legal issues pertaining to the situation in

Palestine, and it released the report of its findings on November 11. It observed that

the UNSCOP report had accepted a basic premise “that the claims to Palestine of the

Arabs and Jews both possess validity”, which was “not supported by any cogent reasons

and is demonstrably against the weight of all available evidence.” With an end to the

Mandate and with British withdrawal, “there is no further obstacle to the conversion of

Palestine into an independent state”, which “would be the logical culmination of the

objectives of the Mandate” and the Covenant of the League of Nations. It found that

“the General Assembly is not competent to recommend, still less to enforce, any solution

other than the recognition of the independence of Palestine, and that the settlement

of the future government of Palestine is a matter solely for the people of Palestine.”

It concluded that “no further discussion of the Palestine problem seems to be

necessary or appropriate, and this item should be struck off the agenda of the General

Assembly”, but that if there was a dispute on that point, “it would be essential to obtain

the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on this issue”, as had already

been requested by several of the Arab states. It concluded further that the partition plan

was “contrary to the principles of the Charter, and the United Nations have no power

to give effect to it.”


The U.N. could not deprive the majority of the people of Palestine of their territory

and transfer it to the exclusive use of a minority in the country…. The United Nations

Organization has no power to create a new State. Such a decision can only be taken

by the free will of the people of the territories in question. That condition is not fulfilled

in the case of the majority proposal, as it involves the establishment of a Jewish

State in complete disregard of the wishes and interests of the Arabs of Palestine.


Nevertheless, the General Assembly passed Resolution 181 on November 29, with 33

votes in favor to 13 votes against, and 10 abstentions. The relevant text of the resolution stated:


The General Assembly…. Recommends to the United Kingdom, as the mandatory

Power for Palestine, and to all other Members of the United Nations the adoption and

implementation, with regard to the future government of Palestine,

of the Plan of Partition with Economic Union set out below;


Requests that (a) The Security Council take the necessary

measure as provided for in the plan for its implementation;


(b) The Security Council consider, if circumstances during the transitional period require

such consideration, whether the situation in Palestine constitutes a threat to the peace.

If it decides that such a threat exists, and in order to maintain international peace and

security, the Security Council should supplement the authorization of the General Assembly

by taking measure, under Articles 39 and 41 of the Charter, to empower the United Nations

Commission, as provided in this resolution, to exercise in Palestine the functions which

are assigned to it by this resolution;


(c) The Security Council determine as a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of

aggression, in accordance with Article 39 of the Charter, any attempt to alter by force the

settlement envisaged by this resolution;


(d) The Trusteeship Council be informed of

the responsibilities envisaged for it in this plan;


Calls upon the inhabitants of Palestine to take such steps

as may be necessary on their part to put this plan into effect;


Appeals to all Governments and all peoples to refrain from taking action

which might hamper or delay the carrying out of these recommendations….


A simple reading of the text is enough to show that the resolution did not partition Palestine

or offer any legal basis for doing so. It merely recommended that the partition plan be

implemented and requested the Security Council to take up the matter from there. It

called upon the inhabitants of Palestine to accept the plan, but they were certainly

under no obligation to do so.


A Plan Never Implemented


The matter was thus taken up by the Security Council, where, on December 9, the Syrian

representative to the U.N., Faris El-Khouri, observed that “the General Assembly is not a

world government which can dictate orders, partition countries or impose constitutions,

rules, regulations and treaties on people without their consent.” When the Soviet representative

Andrei Gromyko stated his government’s opposing view that “The resolution of the General

Assembly should be implemented” by the Security Council, El-Khouri replied by noting further that


Certain paragraphs of the resolution of the General Assembly which concern the

Security Council are referred to the Council, namely, paragraphs (a), (b) and (c),

outlining the functions of the Security Council in respect of the Palestinian question.

All of the members of the Security Council are familiar with the Council’s functions,

which are well defined and clearly stated in the Charter of the United Nations. I do

not believe that the resolution of the General Assembly can add to or delete from

these functions. The recommendations of the General Assembly are well known to

be recommendations, and Member States are not required by force to accept them.

Member States may or may not accept them, and the same applies to the

Security Council.


On February 6, 1948, the Arab Higher Committee again communicated to the U.N.

Secretary General its position that the partition plan was “contrary to the letter and

spirit of the United Nations Charter”. The U.N. “has no jurisdiction to order or recommend

the partition of Palestine. There is nothing in the Charter to warrant such authority,

consequently the recommendation of partition is ultra vires and therefore null and void.”

Additionally, the Arab Higher Committee noted that the Arab Delegations submitted

proposals in the Ad Hoc Committee in order to refer the whole legal issue raised for a

ruling by the International Court of Justice. The said proposals were never put to vote

by the president in the Assembly. The United Nations is an International body entrusted

with the task of enforcing peace and justice in international affairs. How would there be

any confidence in such a body if it bluntly and unreasonably refuses to refer such a dispute

to the International Court of Justice?


“The Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition

recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them”, the Arab Higher

Committee declared, and they would “consider that any attempt by the Jews or any power

or group of powers to establish a Jewish State in Arab territory is an

act of aggression which will be resisted in self-defense by force.”


On February 16, the U.N. Palestine Commission, tasked by the General Assembly

to prepare for the transfer of authority from the Mandatory Power to the successor governments

under the partition plan, issued its first report to the Security Council. It concluded on the

basis of the Arab rejection that it “finds itself confronted with an attempt to defect its purposes,

and to nullify the resolution of the General Assembly”, and calling upon the Security Council

to provide an armed force “which alone would enable the Commission to discharge its

responsibilities on the termination of the Mandate”. In effect, the Palestine Commission

had determined that the partition plan should be implemented against the will of the

majority population of Palestine by force.


In response to that suggestion, Colombia submitted a draft Security Council resolution

noting that the U.N. Charter did “not authorize the Security Council to create special forces

for the purposes indicated by the United Nations Palestine Commission”. The U.S.

delegate, Warren Austin, similarly stated at the 253rd meeting of the Security Council

on February 24 thatThe Security Council is authorized to take forceful measures with

respect to Palestine to remove a threat to international peace. The Charter of the

United Nations does not empower the Security Council to enforce a political settlement

whether it is pursuant to a recommendation of the General Assembly or of the Security

Council itself. What this means is this: The Security Council, under the Charter, can take

action to prevent aggression against Palestine from outside. The Security Council, by

these same powers, can take action to prevent a threat to international peace and security

from inside Palestine. But this action must be directed solely to the maintenance of international

peace. The Security Council’s action, in other words, is directed to keeping the peace

and not to enforcing partition.


The United States nevertheless submitted its own draft text more ambiguously accepting

the requests of the Palestine Commission “subject to the authority of the Security

Council under the Charter”. Faris El-Khouri objected to the U.S. draft on the grounds

that “before accepting these three requests, it is our duty to ascertain whether they are

or are not within the framework of the Security Council as limited by the Charter. If it is

found that they are not, we should decline to accept them.” He recalled Austin’s own

statement on the lack of authority of the Security Council, saying, “It would follow

from this undeniable fact that any recommendation on a political settlement can be

implemented only if the parties concerned willingly accept and complement it.”


Furthermore, “the partition plan itself constitutes a threat to the peace, being openly

rejected by all those at whose expense it was to be executed.” Austin in turn explained

the intent of the U.S. draft that its acceptance of Resolution 181 is subject to the limitation

that armed force cannot be used for implementation of the plan, because the Charter

limits the use of United Nations force expressly to threats to and breaches of the peace

and aggression affecting international peace. Therefore, we must interpret the General

Assembly resolution as meaning that the United Nations measures to implement

this resolution are peaceful measures.


Moreover, explained Austin, the U.S. draft does not authorize use of enforcement

under Articles 39 and 41 of the Charter to empower the United Nations Commission

to exercise in Palestine the functions which are assigned to it by the resolution, because

the Charter does not authorize either the General Assembly or the Security

Council to do any such thing.


When the Security Council did finally adopt a resolution on March 5, it merely made

a note of “Having received General Assembly resolution 181″ and the first monthly Palestine

Commission report, and resolvedto call on the permanent members of the Council to consult

and to inform the Security Council regarding the situation with respect to Palestine and

to make, as the result of such consultations, recommendations to it regarding the guidance

and instructions which the Council might usefully give to the Palestine Commission

with a view to implementing the resolution of the General Assembly.


During further debates at the Security Council over how to proceed, Austin observed that it

had become “clear that the Security Council is not prepared to go ahead with efforts to

implement this plan in the existing situation.” At the same time, it was clear that the

U.K.’s announced termination of the Mandate on May 15 “would result, in the light of

information now available, in chaos, heavy fighting and much loss of life in Palestine.”

The U.N. could not permit this, he said, and the Security Council had the responsibility

and authority under the Charter to act to prevent such a threat to the peace. The U.S.

also proposed establishing a Trusteeship over Palestine to give further opportunity to

the Jews and Arabs to reach a mutual agreement. Pending the convening of a special

session of the General Assembly to that end, “we believe that the Security Council should

instruct the Palestine Commission to suspend its efforts to implement the proposed

partition plan.”


The Security Council President, speaking as the representative from China, responded:

“The United Nations was created mainly for the maintenance of international peace. It

would be tragic indeed if the United Nations, by attempting a political settlement, should

be the cause of war. For these reasons, my delegation supports the general principles

of the proposal of the United States delegation.” At a further meeting of the Security

Council, the Canadian delegate stated that the partition plan “is based on a number

of important assumptions”, the first of which was that “it was assumed that the two

communities in Palestine would co-operate in putting into effect the solution to the Palestine

problem which was recommended by the General Assembly.” The French delegate, while

declining to extend either approval for or disapproval of the U.S. proposal, observed that it

would allow for any number of alternative solutions from the partition plan, including “a

single State with sufficient guarantees for minorities”. The representative from the Jewish

Agency for Palestine read a statement categorically rejecting “any plan to set up a trusteeship

regime for Palestine”, which “would necessarily entail a denial of the Jewish right to

national independence.”


Mindful of the worsening situation in Palestine, and wishing to avoid further debate, the

U.S. proposed another draft resolution calling for a truce between Jewish and Arab

armed groups that Austin noted “would not prejudice the claims of either group” and which

“does not mention trusteeship.” It was adopted as Resolution 43 on April 1.Resolution

44 was also passed the same day requesting “the Secretary-General, in accordance

with Article 20 of the United Nations Charter, to convoke a special session of the General

Assembly to consider further the question of the future government of Palestine.” Resolution

46 reiterated the Security Council’s call for the cessation of hostilities in Palestine, and

Resolution 48 established a “Truce Commission” to further the goal

of implementing its resolutions calling for an end to the violence.


On May 14, the Zionist leadership unilaterally declared the existence of the State of Israel,

citing Resolution 181 as constituting “recognition by the United Nations of the

right of the Jewish people to establish their State”. As anticipated, war ensued.


The Authority of the U.N. with Regard to Partition


Chapter 1, Article 1 of the U.N. Charter defines its purposes and principles, which are to

“maintain international peace and security”, to “develop friendly relations among nations

based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples”, and

to “achieve international co-operation” on various issues and “promoting and

encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all”.


The functions and powers of the General Assembly are listed under Chapter IV, Articles

10 through 17. It is tasked to initiate studies and make recommendations to promote

international cooperation and the development of international law, to receive reports

from the Security Council and other organs of the U.N., and to consider and approve the

organization’s budget. It is also tasked with performing functions under the international

trusteeship system. Its authority is otherwise limited to considering and discussing matters

within the scope of the Charter, making recommendations to Member States or

the Security Council, or calling attention of matters to the Security Council.


Chapter V, Articles 24 through 26, states the functions and powers of the Security Council. 

It is tasked with maintaining peace and security in accordance with the purposes and

principles of the U.N. The specific powers granted to the Security Council are stated in

Chapters VI, VII, VIII, and XII. Under Chapter VI, the Security Council may call upon parties

to settle disputes by peaceful means, investigate, and make a determination as to whether

a dispute or situation constitutes a threat to peace and security. It may recommend

appropriate procedures to resolve disputes, taking into consideration that “legal disputes

should as a general rule be referred by the parties to the International Court of Justice”.

Under Chapter VII, the Security Council may determine the existence of a threat to peace

and make recommendations or decide what measures are to be taken to maintain or restore

peace and security. It may call upon concerned parties to take provisional measures “without

prejudice to the rights, claims, or position of the parties concerned.” It may call upon member

states to employ “measures not involving the use of armed force” to apply such measures.

Should such measures be inadequate, it may authorize the use of armed forces

“to maintain or restore international peace and security”. Chapter VIII states that the

Security Council “shall encourage the development of pacific settlements of local disputes”

through regional arrangements or agencies, and utilize such to enforce actions under its authority.


The functions and powers of the International Trusteeship System are listed under

Chapter XII, Articles 75 through 85. The purpose of the system is to administer and

supervise territories placed therein by agreement with the goal of “development towards

self-government or independence as may be appropriate to the particular circumstances

of each territory and its peoples and the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned”.

The system is to operate in accordance with the purposes of the U.N. stated in Article 1,

including respect for the right of self-determination. The General Assembly is tasked with

all functions “not designated as strategic”, which are designated to the Security Council.

A Trusteeship Council is established to assist the General Assembly

and the Security Council to perform their functions under the system.


Chapter XIII, Article 87 states the functions and powers of the Trusteeship Council,

which are shared by the General Assembly. Authority is granted to consider reports,

accept and examine petitions, provide for visits to trust territories, and “take

these and other actions in conformity with the terms of the trusteeship agreements.”


Another relevant section is Chapter XI, entitled the “Declaration Regarding

Non-Self-Governing Territories”, which states that Members of the United Nations

which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of territories whose

peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government recognize the principle

that the interests of the inhabitants of these territories are paramount, and accept

as a sacred trust the obligation to promote to the utmost, within the system of

international peace and security established by the present

Charter, the well-being of the inhabitants of these territories…


To that end, Member states are “to develop self-government, to take due account of the

political aspirations of the peoples, and to assist them in the progressive development

of their free political institutions”.




The partition plan put forth by UNSCOP sought to create within Palestine a Jewish

state contrary to the express will of the majority of its inhabitants. Despite constituting

only a third of the population and owning less than 7 percent of the land, it sought to

grant to the Jews more than half of Palestine for purpose of creating that Jewish state.

It would, in other words, take land from the Arabs and give it to the Jews. The inherent

injustice of the partition plan stands in stark contrast to alternative plan proposed by

the Arabs, of an independent state of Palestine in which the rights of the Jewish minority

would be recognized and respected, and which would afford the Jewish population

representation in a democratic government. The partition plan was blatantly prejudicial

to the rights of the majority Arab population, and was premised on the rejection of their

right to self-determination. This is all the more uncontroversial inasmuch as the UNSCOP

report itself explicitly acknowledged that the proposal to create a Jewish state in Palestine

was contrary to the principle of self-determination. The plan was also premised upon the

erroneous assumption that the Arabs would simply acquiesce to having their land taken

from them and voluntarily surrender their majority rights, including their righ

t to self-determination.


U.N. General Assembly Resolution 181 neither legally partitioned Palestine nor conferred

upon the Zionist leadership any legal authority to unilaterally declare the existence of

the Jewish state of Israel. It merely recommended that the UNSCOP partition plan be

accepted and implemented by the concerned parties. Naturally, to have any weight of

law, the plan, like any contract, would have to have been formally agreed upon by both

parties, which it was not. Nor could the General Assembly have legally partitioned

Palestine or otherwise conferred legal authority for the creation of Israel to the Zionist

leadership, as it simply had no such authority to confer. When the Security Council took

up the matter referred to it by the General Assembly, it could come to no consensus on

how to proceed with implementing the partition plan. It being apparent that the plan could

not be implemented by peaceful means, the suggestion that it be implemented by force

was rejected by members of the Security Council. The simple fact of the matter is that

the plan was never implemented. Numerous delegates from member states, including

the U.S., arrived at the conclusion that the plan was impracticable, and, furthermore,

that the Security Council had no authority to implement such a plan except

by mutual consent by concerned parties, which was absent in this case.


The U.S., Syria, and other member nations were correct in their observations that, while

the Security Council did have authority to declare a threat to the peace and authorize the

use of force to deal with that and maintain or restore peace and security, it did not have any

authority to implement by force a plan to partition Palestine contrary to the will of most

of its inhabitants. Any attempt to usurp such authority by either the General Assembly

or the Security Council would have been a prima facie violation of the Charter’s founding

principle of respect for the right to self-determination of all peoples, and thus null and

void under international law.


In sum, the popular claim that the U.N. “created” Israel is a myth, and Israel’s own claim

in its founding document that U.N. Resolution 181 constituted legal authority for Israel’s

creation, or otherwise constituted “recognition” by the U.N. of the “right” of the Zionist

Jews to expropriate for themselves Arab land and deny to the majority Arab

population of that land their own right to self-determination, is a patent fraud.


Further corollaries may be drawn. The disaster inflicted upon Palestine was not inevitable.

The U.N. was created for the purpose of preventing such catastrophes. Yet it failed

miserably to do so, on numerous counts. It failed in its duty to refer the legal questions

of the claims to Palestine to the International Court of Justice, despite requests from

member states to do so. It failed to use all means within its authority, including the use

of armed forces, to maintain peace and prevent the war that was predicted would occur

upon the termination of the Mandate. And most importantly, far from upholding its founding

principles, the U.N. effectively acted to prevent the establishment of an independent and

democratic state of Palestine, in direct violation of the principles of its own Charter. The

consequences of these and other failures are still witnessed by the world today on a daily

basis. Recognition of the grave injustice perpetrated against the Palestinian people in this

regard and dispelling such historical myths is essential if a way forward towards peac

e and reconciliation is to be found.






     Key Quotations from ‘You Gentiles’

— by Maurice Samuel

Maurice Samuel (1895 – 1972) was a Romanian-born Zionist Jew whose most

influential book, You Gentiles, was published in 1924. This offered a penetrating

analysis of the Jewish psyche and made the important point that Jews were altogether

so superior and spiritually advanced compared to gentiles that there was no

possibility of the two groups getting on together. Owing to the baser nature of

the gentiles, and the fact that they did not take God seriously like the Jews,

it was inevitable that Jews and gentiles should be at loggerheads for ever. (LD)


Here are some key quotations from the book:


I. The Question


“Wherever the Jew is found he is a problem, a source of unhappiness to himself and to

those around him. Ever since he has been scattered in your midst he has had

to maintain a continuous struggle for the conservation of his identity.” (p. 10).


“Years of observation and thought have given increasing strength to the belief that we

Jews stand apart from you gentiles, that a primal duality breaks the humanity I know into

two distinct parts; that this duality is a fundamental, and that all differences among you

gentiles are trivialities compared with that which divided all of you from us.” (p. 12).


“You may even have Jews in your midst who did not learn their way of life from us, and

did not inherit it from a Jewish forebear. We may have authentic gentiles in our midst: these

single protests are of no account; they are extreme and irrelevant variations.” (p. 21).

“I do not believe that the primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable.

You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There

will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and

constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever – not a mere conviction, not

a mere language, not a mere difference of national or religious allegiance.” (p. 23-24).


“You have your way of life, we ours. In your system of life we are essentially without ‘honor’.

In our system of life you are essentially without morality. In your system of life we

must forever appear graceless; to us you must forever appear godless.” (p. 34).


“We belong to the One mastering God: you belong to the republic of playful gods. ” (p. 36).


“These are two ways of life, each utterly alien to the other. Each has its place in the

world – but they cannot flourish in the same soil, they cannot remain in contact without

antagonism. Though to life itself each way is a perfect utterance, to each other they

are enemies.” (p. 36-37)


II Sport


“THE most amazing thing in your life, the most in contrast with ours, is its sport. By this I

do not mean simply your fondness for physical exercise, your physical exuberance, but

the psychological and social institutionalization of sport, its organization, its

predominant rôle as the outlet and expression of your spiritual energies.” (p. 38)


“Your spirit is sport: particularly your young men, who are not yet absorbed in the struggle

for existence, and whose emotions are therefore for the largest part free, must find in

sport, in games, in contests, the most satisfactory expression of their instincts.” (p. 40)


“The contention of the majority of your educators, that the moral instinct is trained on the

football and baseball field, in boxing, rowing, wrestling and other contests, is a true one,

is truer, perhaps, than most of them realize. Your ideal morality is a sporting morality.

The intense discipline of the game, the spirit of fair play, the qualities of endurance, of

good humor, of conventionalized seriousness in effort, of loyalty, of struggle without

malice or bitterness, of readiness to forget like a sport – all these are brought out in their

sheerest and cleanest starkness in well-organized and closely regulated college sports.

And on the experiences and lessons which these sports imply your entire spiritual life is

inevitably founded.” (p. 42)


“Sport is for you a serious spiritual matter. It is the proper symbolization, the perfect ritual,

wherein your spiritual forces, finding expression, also find exercise and sustenance.” (p. 43)


III Gods


“Our Jewishness is not a creed, it is ourself, our totality. Indeed, it may be fairly said that

the surest evidence of your lack of seriousness in religion is the fact that your religions are

not national, that you are not compromised and dedicated, en masse, to the faith.” (p. 73).


But in the Jew, nation and people and faculties and culture and God are all one.

We do not say: ‘I am a Jew’, meaning, ‘I am a member of this nationality’: the feeling in

the Jew, even in the free-thinking Jew like myself, is that to be one with his people is to

be thereby admitted to the power of enjoying the infinite. I might

say, of ourselves: ‘We and God grew up together’.” (p. 74).


“You have had patron or appropriated gods: we have a national God. In the heart

of any pious Jew, God is a Jew. Is your God an Englishman or an American?

There is no real contradiction between this confessed anthropomorphism and my claim

that we Jews alone understand and feel the universality of God. In anthropomorphism

we merely symbolize God: we reduce the infinite, temporarily, to tangible

proportions: we make it accessible to daily reference. ” (p. 75).


IV Utopia


“We are not free to choose and to reject, to play, to construct, to refine. We are a dedicated

and enslaved people, predestined to an unchangeable relationship. Freedom at large was

not and is not a Jewish ideal. Service, love consecration, these are ideals

with us. Freedom means nothing to us: freedom to do what?” (p. 88)


“For us the end is ecstatic unity, the identification of man with God. Your ideal is eternal

youth, ours lifts toward an unchanging climax of adult perfection. You would like to play

with your gods forever: we will return to God, to the universe. Yours is a sunlit afternoon,

with the combatants swaying forever in a joyous struggle. Ours

is a whole world, with the spirit of God poured through all things.
Your Ideal is Plato’s Republic: ours is God’s kingdom.” (p. 89-90)

V Loyalty


“For your system of morality is no less a need to you than ours to us. And the incompatibility

of the two systems is not passive. You might say: ‘Well, let us exist side by side and tolerate

each other. We will not attack your morality, nor you ours.’ But the misfortune is that the

two are not merely different. They are opposed in mortal, though tacit, enmity. No man

can accept both, or, accepting either, do otherwise than despise the other.” (p. 95-96)

VI Discipline


“In the colleges, in the street, in the army, we betray ourselves. Indeed, your very breaches

of discipline differ from ours by a certain conscious rebelliousness which is partly

homage: our breaches of discipline are off-hand, unconscious, insolent.” (p. 110)


“The fact is, of course, that in true discipline, en effectiveness, we are by no means your

inferiors. No one would dream of asserting that our religion is not more effective than yours

in compelling obedience, or in perpetuating itself. The mere fact that we have persisted for

eighty generations in maintaining a racial and spiritual identity in the face of so much

persecution (and, more significant, of so much infiltration of blood) bespeaks essential

discipline of amazing rigor and power. […] Yet I have no doubt that when Germany and

England and America will long have lost their present identity

or purpose, we shall still be strong in ours.” (p. 111).

VII The Reckoning


“I say, therefore, that in the conflict between us you have fought us physically, while our

attack on your world has been in the spiritual field. It is the nature of the gentile to fight

for his honor, in the nature of the Jew to suffer for this. […] And so, since we have lived

among you, you have instinctively appealed to brute force in combating our influence.” (p. 128)


“We are a disturbing influence in your life not through our own fault. First: we are not in

your midst by our own will, but through your action; and second (which is more to the point):

we do not attack you deliberately. We are unwelcome to you because we are what we are.

It is our own positive way of life which clashes with yours. Our attack on you is only incidental

to the expression of our way of life. You too have this field open to you. As surely as we

are a spiritual discomfort to you, you are a spiritual discomfort to us: as surely as

we attack you peacefully, so you waste us peacefully and weaken our numbers.” (p. 129-130)

VIII But as Moderns


“I have already said, anticipating this objection, that there is the same difference between

the Jewish atheist and the gentile atheist as between the orthodox Jew and the believing

gentile: I have said or implied that the religion itself is but practical expression of the difference

between us, not the cause of it. It is true that the expression of a view serves to strengthen

it, as the exercise of a faculty serves to develop it. But expression does not create a view

nor exercise a faculty. Even conscious adherence to the Jewish people is but partial expression

of our Jewishness: it was not the conscious desire to remain a people which gave us the

will to endure: it was our unavoidable commonalty of feeling which made us and continued

us a people.” (p. 136-137)


“Repudiation of the Jewish religion or even of Jewish racial affiliation does not alter the Jew.

Some of us Jews may delude ourselves as some of you gentiles do. But in effect modernization

seems to have done nothing to decrease the friction between us. The dislike continues: and

though your masses may not know why they dislike us, there must be a sufficient reason: it

is Germany, the mother of the modernized Jew, that gave birth, with him, to modern anti-Semitism.

Where the old ostensible reasons for disliking the Jew collapsed, new ones, more self-conscious,

were substituted. When modernization removed the old, superstitious form of expression,

the professor replaced the priest, science religion. We are disliked on ‘scientific’ grounds,

as we were disliked on ‘religious’ reasons were rationalizations. The true reasons underlay

these analyses.” (p. 137-138)


“We fail to be gentiles.” (p. 140)


“Our best work has been the old, true work of our people – fundamental and serious examination

of the problems of man’s relation to God and humanity. In the arts we have been second-rate,

third-rate. While in the moral effort we have exceeded any living race and have produced an

overwhelming number of revolutionaries and socialists and iconoclasts of the true prophetic

type, we have, in science, belles-lettres and the plastic

arts been a thoroughly minor people.” (p. 141)


“We have joined your capitalistic world in deliberate emulation and rivalry: yet Jewish

socialism and Jewish socialists are the banner

bearers of the world’s ‘armies of liberation’.” (p. 142)


”We modern Jews of the Western world are in this fundamentally different from you.

The occasional in you (revolution against the Game) is the dominant in us. Your instinct

is truer than you know. The dislike of your modern world for the modern

Jews is as relevant as the dislike of your for the orthodox Jew.” (p. 142-143)

IX We, the Destroyers


“IF anything, you must learn (and are learning) to dislike the modern and ‘assimilated’ Jew,

for he is more dangerous to you. At least the old Jew kept apart from you, was easily

recognizable as an individual, as the bearer of the dreaded Jewish world-idea: you were

afraid of him and loathed him. But to a large extent he was insulated. But as the Jew

assimilates, acquires your languages, cultivates a certain intimacy, penetrates into your life,

begins to handle your instruments, you are aware that his nature, once confined safely to

his own life, now threatens yours. You are aware of a new and more than disconcerting

character at work in the world you have built and are building up, a character

which crosses your intentions and thwarts your personality.” (p. 144-145)

“The Jew, whose lack of contact with your world had made him ineffective, becomes

effective. The vial is uncorked, the genius is out. His enmity to your way of life was tacit

before. To-day it is manifest and active. He cannot help himself: he cannot be different

from himself: no more can you. It is futile to tell him: ‘Hands off!’

He is not his own master, but the servant of his lifewill.” (p.145)


“For when he [the Jew] brings into your world his passionately earnest, sinisterly earnest

righteousness, absolute righteousness, and, speaking in your languages and through your

institutions, scatters distrust of yourselves through the most sensitive of you,

he is working against your spirit.” (p. 145)


“I do not believe that we Jews are powerful enough to threaten your way of life seriously.

We are only powerful enough to irritate, to disturb your conscience, and to break here and

there the rhythmic rush of your ideas. We irritate you as a sardonic and humorless adult

irritates young people by laughing at their play. For the real irritation lies in the fact that to

our queries regarding your life there is no answer on our level: as to yours regarding our life

there is no answer on yours.” (p. 146)


“We Jews are accused of being destroyers: whatever you put up, we tear down. It is true

only in a relative sense. We are not iconoclasts deliberately: we are not enemies of your

institutions simply because of the dislike between us. We are a homeless mass seeking

satisfaction for our constructive instincts. And in your institutions we cannot find satisfaction;

they are the play institutions of the splendid children of man – and not of man himself.

We try to adapt your institutions to our needs, because while we live we must have expression;

and trying to rebuild them for our needs, we unbuild them for yours.” (p. 146-147)


“Because your chief institution is the social structure itself,

it is in this that we are most manifestly destroyers.” (p. 147)


“Dislike of the Jew in business springs from the feeling that we regard all your play-conventions

with amusement – or even with contempt. Our abominable seriousness breaks jarringly into

your life-mood. But you feel our disruptive difference most keenly, most resentfully, in our

deliberate efforts to change your social system. We dream of a world of utter justice

and God-spirit, a whole world which would be barren for you, devoid of all nourishment,

bleak, unfriendly, unsympathetic. You do not want such a world: you are unapt for it.

Seen in the dazzling lights of your desires and needs our ideal is repellently morose.”

(p. 148-149)


“We do wrong to thrust these ideals upon you, who are not for justice or peace, but

for play-living. But we cannot help ourselves: any more than you can help resenting our

interference. While we live we must give utterance to our spirit. The

most insistent effort on our part will fail to change our nature.” (p. 149)

“He [the Jew] is a citizen of the world; he is a son of humanity; the progress of all

humankind, and not of only of any single group of it, is in his particular care.” (p. 150)


“The unbelieving and radical Jew is as different from the radical gentile as the orthodox

Jew from the reactionary gentile. The cosmopolitanism of the radical Jew springs from

his feeling (shared by the orthodox Jew) that there is no difference between gentile and

gentile. You are all pretty much alike: then why this fussing and fretting

and fighting? The Jew is not a cosmopolitan in your sense.” (p. 150)


“He is not one who feels keenly the difference between national and nation, and overrides

it. For him, as for the orthodox Jew, a single temper runs through all of you, whatever your

national divisions. The radical Jew (like the orthodox Jew) is a cosmopolitan in a sense which

must be irritating to you: for he does not even understand why you make such a fuss about

that most obvious of facts – that you are all alike. The Jew is altogether

too much of a cosmopolitan – even for your internationalists.” (p. 151)


“Nor in the handful of you who, against the desires and instincts of the mass of you,

proclaim social justice as the life aim, is the Jew any more truly at home, at one with his

milieu, than the old-time Jew in his world. Our [Jews’] very radicalism is of a different

temper. Our spur is a natural instinct. We do not have to uproot something in ourselves

to become ‘radicals’, dreamers of social justice. We are this by instinct: we do not see it

as something revolutionary at all. It is tacit with us. But with you it is an effort and a

wrench. Your very ancestry cries out against it in your blood… And you become silly and

enthusiastic about it, with flag-waving, and shouting, and battle-hymns, and all the regular

game-psychology proper to your world and way of life. Even of this you make a play.”

(p. 151-152)


“But such as these radical and international movements are, the modern Jew (the best and

most thoughtful modern Jew, that is) is nearer to them than to anything else in your world.

He is the only true socialist and cosmopolitan – but in such a true and tacit sense

that he is completely distinguished from all of you. It is one of many vital paradoxes – a

thing illogical and yet true to life. It is our very cosmopolitanism that gives us our national

character. Because we are the only ones who are cosmopolitan by instinct rather than by

argument we remain forever ourselves.” (p. 152)


In everything we are destroyers – even in the instruments of destruction to which we

turn for relief. The very socialism and internationalism through which our choked

spirit seeks utterance, which seem to threaten your way of life, are alien to our spirit’s

demands and needs. Your socialists and internationalists are not serious. The charm

of these movements, the attraction, such as it is, which they exercise, is only in their

struggle: it is the fight which draws your gentile radicals. And indeed, it is only as long as

there is an element of adventure in being a radical that the radical movement retains any

individuality. And it is only in the fierce period of early combat that you welcome us Jews

– as allies. You are deluded in this – so are we. You go into the movement boldly,

adventurously; we darkly, tacitly. You make it a game; we do it because we cannot help

ourselves. And sure enough, in the end, the split comes again. The liberal and the radical

are as apt to dislike the Jew as the reactionaries are. The liberal and the radical do not

use the weapons of the reactionaries: but the dislike is there, finds expression in anti-Semitic

socialist and workers’ movements and in the almost involuntary contempt

which springs to the lips of countless intellectuals.” (p. 152-154)


“Philosophies do not remold natures. What your radicals want is another form of the Game,

with other rules. Their discontent joins hands with Jewish discontent. But it is not the same

kind of discontent. A little distance down the road the ways part for ever. The Jewish radical

will turn from your social movement: he will discover his mistake he will discover that nothing

can bridge the gulf between you and us. He will discover that the spiritual satisfaction which

he thought he would find in social revolution is not to be purchased from you. I believe

the movement has already started, the gradual secession of the Jewish radicals, their

realization that your radicalism is of the same essential stuff as your conservatism.

The disillusionment has set in.” (p. 154)


“A century of partial tolerance gave us Jews access to your world. In that period

the great attempt was made, by advance guards of reconciliation, to bring our two worlds

together. It was a century of failure. Our Jewish radicals are beginning to understand it dimly.”

(p. 154-155)


We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that

you do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy because we

need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build.

Beyond all temporary alliances with this or that faction lies the ultimate split in nature and

destiny, the enmity between the Game and God. But those of us who fail to understand

that truth will always be found in alliance with your rebellious factions, until disillusionment

comes. The wretched fate which scattered us through your midst has thrust this

unwelcome rôle upon us.” (p. 155)


XI The Masses


“The nature of things cannot be solved because we partake of that nature. We can never

get round ourselves: we can only turn round. Your world spins in a joyous illusion of progress;

we, untouched by that illusion, destructive of your mood, stand aside, static,

serious. We will be satisfied with nothing but the absolute.” (p. 186-187)


XII Solution and Dissolution


“Does the situation which I have described constitute a problem? Or is it merely one of

the insoluble difficulties of life which, being insoluble, should be understood as such and

suffered tacitly? Death is not a problem, being inevitable. Is this struggle between our two

worlds as inevitable? Shall we resign ourselves to the struggle and do what we can to

mitigate its worst effects, or shall we continue the search for a complete solution?
The one solution which is generally offered as complete and satisfactory, is quite apart from

its feasibility, not a solution at all: only a dissolution. The disappearance of the Jewish people

by complete submergence in the surrounding world would not, in reality, solve the problem;

any more than one solves a chess problem by burning chess-board and figures. But it

would seem to do the next best thing: it would apparently destroy the situation which creates

the problem. The problem, without having been solved, would at any rate cease to exist.” (p. 188-189)


“And by the dissolution of the Jewish people can be meant only one thing – the disappearance

of Jewish identity in individuals or amasses, the complete obliteration of Jewish self-consciousness,

down to the very name and recollection. When it will be impossible for any man to say of

himself, ‘I am a Jew’, or ‘My father or grandfather was a Jew’ this consummation will have

been achieved.

There is only one instrument to this end: free and unrestrained intermarriage. This act or

fact alone will count. The mere changing of names, the substitution of religious forms,

the so-called ‘liberalization’ and ‘modernization’ of Judaism is ineffective: it is a matter of

common observation that there is no inverse ratio between the Westernization of the Jew

and anti-Semitism. And this very fact will have to be considered again in its relation to the

feasibility of this proposal. If we talk of the submergence of the Jew we must not play with

words: words alone cannot submerge the Jew. If there is anything in what I have said you

cannot make a gentile of a Jew by arguing with him any more than by lynching him. You can

make his children half gentile, his grandchildren only a quarter Jewish – and so on till

the balance is perfect.” (p. 189-190)


“Will the ‘dissolution of Jewish identity’ by free and prolonged intermarriage resolve the

struggle of the two types? Or will the struggle continue in another form, less obvious

but equally uncomfortable? Will the struggle center round isolated individuals, recurrent types?

Or will the final product be homogeneous and, in relation to this particular struggle, static?”

Both the negative and affirmative answers to this question are unsatisfactory. Suppose,

on the one hand, the struggle continues? Suppose the Jewish character persists in strains,

breaks out in individual atavisms, long after the Jewish name has perished? The problem

will be the same: your world will be confronted with recurrent instances of alien and

destructive types, all the more dangerous because they are not isolated in recognized,

repudiated group. Their power of destruction will be the greater because they will work

from within. The ‘Jewish’ problem will have disappeared, but the gentile problem would remain

as bitter as ever. (p. 193-194)


“Let us examine the negative answer. Suppose there are no ‘reversions of type’.

Suppose the Jew is so completely absorbed as to be lost beyond possibility of detection

in the surrounding world. Such a consummation, if possible, calls for one inevitable condition;

that is, the proportionate Judaization of your world. It is unthinkable that so vivid an

element as the Jewish people should be absorbed into your world without producing an

appreciable alteration in its constitution. A world that has absorbed the Jews will to

that extent be a Jewish world.  And this is precisely the condition which you refuse to admit.

You want no tampering with your identity; you want to remain what you are. You have no intention

of meeting us at the point of balance. You do not want a world tinged with Jewish blood.

You want us to be absorbed in you without leaving a trace. And with the best intentions in

the world we cannot oblige. We can, in that sense, no more destroy ourselves than we can

destroy a single particle of matter.” (p. 194-195)

XIII The Mechanism of Dissolution


“Among yourselves assimilation is problem enough. The birth and death of nations is

attended by wars, pains, humiliations. But what you have done a dozen

times over in the last four thousand years we have not done once.” (p. 208-209)


We cannot assimilate: it is so humiliating to us that we become contemptible in

submitting to the process: It is so exasperating to you that, even if we were willing to submit,

it would avail us nothing.” (p. 209)





was already in motion by the early 1900s.

Three major things were to be done:


1. A central Bank.
2. Legislation for an income tax.
3. American involvement in a world war.


Key Jewish players:

- Jacob Schiff, head of Kuhn Loeb Bank
- Paul Warburg, brother-in-law to Schiff
- Bernard Baruch, a leading Wall Street mogul
- Edward Mandell House, who negotiated cotton purchases

in the US for the Jewish Rothschilds bankers.


In 1910, the 4 Jewish leaders found their man: The Professor Woodrow Wilson, recently

retired as president of Princeton University, who was already established as a “political academic”

and with an opening in the Democratic party for the governorship of New Jersey. Wilson

was financed by Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, and their fellow Jewish associate,

Henry Morgenthau, to seat him as New Jersey’s Governor in 1911.


Rabbi Stephen Wise, founder of the Federation of American Zionists in 1897, later to become

Wilson’s most trusted adviser, with secret knowledge told a New Jersey audience that

Woodrow Wilson “would be elected US President” in 1912 and “serve for TWO TERMS.”


In his autobiography, “Challenging Years,” Rabbi Wise boasted “that an immensely

influential hidden power” with which he was intimately acquainted “had chosen Wilson

as a MAJOR PAWN in their political game” EVEN BEFORE Wilson entered politics.


UNDER THE CAMOUFLAGE, to avoid the mention of centralization, Woodrow

Wilson’s promoted a central bank under the appellation, “Federal Reserve Bank.”


On June 23, 1913, Wilson initiated a special session of the 63rd Congress to vote on

the “Federal Reserve Act,” a piece of legislation bought and paid for by Zionist intrigues.

It was on December 19, 1913 that Wilson pushed the bill through the



Three Jewish bankers operating as agents for Nathaniel Rothschild,

took the control of the American monetary system:


- Paul Warburg, appointed by Wilson as the Fed’s first chairman.
- George Blumenthal, a high official of JP Morgan.
- Jacob Schiff head of Kuhn Loeb Bank


The “Treasury” of the US would forever be in Jewish hands with a private Jewish banking

consortium that was neither “Federal” nor with any “reserves” thanks to Mr. president Woodrow Wilson.


Since then the federal government started paying the Jewish bankers' loans

with INTEREST, while they were printing money with no hard currency backing.


Under his “New Freedom” program, Woodrow Wilson brought the American people

under abject slavery with his 1913 "Federal Income Tax" amendment to the US Constitution.

Along with the 16th amendment, came the ratification of the IRS,

installed as a division of the US Treasury Department.


He appointed 2 Jews to the "War Finance Corporation" (Eugene Isaac Meyer & Bernard Baruch),

established to control the finances of US corporations essential to the war effort.







                                                            What Israel Doesn’t Want You To Put Together

1) Initially there were different versions of Zionism. Theodor Herzel’s Zionism carried more egalitarian values and envisioned Jews and Palestinians living side by side as

equals in Palestine. The version that won in the end was the one espoused by David Ben-Gurion and which was based on Jewish supremacism over any non-Jews living

in Palestine.

2) Zionist nationalism is based on a form of nationalism found in Eastern European nations such as Russia and Poland. This nationalism is based on ethnic ownership of the land. Poland is for ethnic Poles and Russia is for ethnic Russians. This contrasts with Western European nationalism found in places like France and the US where the land belongs to anyone who is a citizen of the state.

3) The highest court in Israel has determined that “Israeli” is not an identity. As such Jewishness is the foundation of identity in Israel, not citizenship. Furthermore Palestinians are considered just Arabs, since Palestinian identity is not recognized.

4) Israel is the only country in the world without a constitution (Britain has the Magna Carta rather than a constitution). This means the supreme court of Israel can just make up laws as it goes along as there are no official principles setting the framework of the law.

5) The internationally recognized legal criteria to determine if a country is an Apartheid regime are fully met by Israel. Calling Israel an Apartheid regime is not a figure of speech or an exaggeration, but an actual legal fact. In fact the level of oppression the Palestinians are subjected to exceeds what took place in Apartheid South Africa.

6) Jews living in various western countries and Zionist Israeli Jews have different orientations and foundations within the Jewish tradition. Jews in the west have a more Universalist approach based on the tradition of the prophets, while Israeli zionists follow primarily the book of Joshua and the five books of Moses. For those of you not familiar with the book of Joshua, it can be described quite simply as an ISIS manual for Jews. It is a violent book that calls for the subjugation of non-Jews through violence and terror. Precisely what Israel has been doing for decades. As such Israel is merely a Jewish ISIS.

7) Palestinians are subject to relentless persecution to the extent that they are not just punished for resisting, but also prevented from surrendering. Surrender entails that one is left in peace after surrendering. However Palestinians are not given that choice. They are humiliated, dispossessed and killed no matter what they do.

8) The WestBank and Gaza are laboratories for the testing of weapons and population control techniques. Palestinians are the guinea pigs. The end users are people around the world whose police forces are trained by Israel and whose prisons are supplied by Israeli technology. This includes many western countries among which is Canada, by virtue of the Canada-Israel “Public Security” Agreement signed in 2008. When the police of a country is “Israelized”, it follows that its people are “Palestinianized”. The state of Israel is effectively becoming a template and ideal for state control and domination around the world, ranging from authoritarian China to the current far right Canadian government under Stephen Harper who is a notorious zionist extremist. The Palestinians are also becoming a template and ideal of subjugation and pacification to be gradually imposed on people around the world. The success of Apartheid Israel’s system of oppression and domination is a threat to the entire global populations who will find themselves increasingly “Palestinianized” as their governments adopt “proven” Israeli strategies and techniques of pacification and subjugation. 9) Israel is among the top 10 exporters of weapons in the world. This is all the more remarkable considering it is a very small country that competes with much larger countries like the UK and China in terms weapons sales. One of the main selling points of Israeli weapons is that they are marketed as being “combat proven”. This means the weapons have been successfully tested on Palestinians.

10) Israel sells weapons to 190 countries in the world (bare in mind there are only 193 countries in the world!). This means that many countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia that appear to be enemies of Israel on the surface are actually customers of Israeli weapons manufacturers.

11) Israel sold weapons to Rwanda and Serbia while these countries were in the midst of horrific genocidal campaigns. So to spell it out clearly, the state of Israel which condemns the horrors of the Holocaust when genocide was committed by the Nazis against the Jews has absolutely no problem selling weapons to groups who are committing genocide against another people. It follows that for Israel it’s only genocide when Jews are the victims. When someone else is the victim it’s just a business opportunity.

12) Many of these Israeli weapons are being sold to police forces in countries like Brazil and are designed for urban warfare and crowd control. This is part of a new policy of pacifying local populations in a manner similar to how Palestinians are pacified in occupied Palestine. These weapons include armed drones and tanks for light urban warfare. 13) Many military and police officials from various countries including China visit Israel to learn Israeli crowd control techniques, propaganda and warfare strategies. A Chinese general recently visited Israel to learn how the IDF framed and executed the massacre in Gaza.

14) Israel has nuclear and ballistic missiles capable of reaching as far as Europe in addition to German made Dolphin-class submarines capable of delivering cruise missiles with nuclear warheads. It also has 10 satellites in orbit spying on various parts of the world and the Middle East in particular.

15) Despite all the advanced military technology of the Israeli army, the Israeli soldiers are actually cowards who use their high tech weapons on an impoverished civilian population without an army of its own. Israeli soldiers mostly target women and children with rubber coated bullets and live ammunition. When occasionally attacked by well trained members of the resistance they literally cry for their mommy like cowards since they are only accustomed to bully unarmed civilians.

16) The two state solution is officially dead and buried after the failure of the Kerry initiative. Israel has fully assimilated the WestBank to the extent that trying to get it back in one piece for the establishment of a Palestinian state is the equivalent of trying to get your sandwich back after someone has swallowed it. The only viable alternative to the current Apartheid regime is a binational democratic state similar to Switzerland and Belgium. Such a state would guarantee equality for all and the right of return of Palestinians. The right of Palestinians to live anywhere on the land of Palestine is non-negotiable. A two state solution would not guarantee this fundamental right.

Israelis camp in Palestine







The Jews 1962 Blueprint for Taking over America


"We have castrated society through fear and intimidation. Its manhood exists
only in combination with a feminine outward appearance. Being so neutered,
the populace has become docile and easily ruled. As all geldings in nature,
their thoughts are not involved with the concerns of the future and
their posterity, but only with the present toil and the next meal."

"We Jews have put issue upon issue to the American people. Then we promote both sides of the issue as
confusion reigns. With their eye's fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind
every scene. We Jews toy with the American public as a cat toys with a mouse."
50+ years of lies, subterfuges, bribes, threats, assassinations, spying on the USA,
false-flags, infiltrating Christian groups, intimidating colleges and brainwashing
their students and control of the MSM; Wall Street and the Federal
Reserve have helped install Israel as the de facto head of the USA.

If one was paranoid, one might think these guidelines for taking over
America were straight out of the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion."
"Our power has been created through the manipulation of the national monetary system. We authored
the quotation. 'Money is power.' As revealed in our master plan, it was essential for us to establish a
private national bank. The Federal Reserve system fitted our plan nicely since it is owned by us, but the
name implies that it is a government institution. From the very outset, our purpose was to confiscate all
the gold and silver, replacing them with worthless non-redeemable paper notes. This we have done!"
Document Page 1. In the early 1960's, Israel funneled more than $5 million into
US propaganda and lobbying operations. The funding, equivalent to more
than $35 million in today's dollars, was laundered from the the quasi governmental
Jewish Agency into an Israel lobby umbrella group, the American Zionist
Council. This two page master plan was subpoenaed by the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee and discussed in the 1963 hearings on Israel's US foreign agents.
NOTE: The American Zionist Council became the octopus AIPAC the same year Israel assassinated JFK, 1963.

"At first, by controlling the banking system we were able to control corporation capital. Through this, we
acquired total monopoly of the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing television
media. The printing industry, newspapers, periodicals and technical journals had already fallen into our
hands. The richest plum was later to come when we took over the publication of all school materials. Through
these vehicles we could mold public opinion to suit our own purposes. The people are only
stupid pigs that grunt and squeal the chants we give them, whether they be truth or lies."

These documents and news stories were obtained under June 2008 Freedom of
Information Act filing. More on the penetration, subversion and takeover
of the US government by Israel is available at the Israel Lobby Archive.

After reading these pages, compare them to the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" which we have been
told is a fraud or a forgery or a fake, that is, if you can still think for yourself or do you enjoy your slavery so
much, you no longer care?

Communism is Judaism

What all people must realize is that Communism is Judaism.  No Jews – no Communism.


Communism is a quick version of Talmud.  What Communism is all about is on thing and one thing only – to control the state.  Once you control the state you control the secret police and this is the key to understand how so few Jews controlled the whole Soviet.


Communist, Jews, and non-Jews alike will tell you with tears in their eyes what a wonderful revolution it was in Russia 1917. It was NoT a revolution, it was a well planned coup and it was planned, financed and lead by Jews.  That it was a “revolution” is the Jew mafia propaganda lie.  Do never ever use the word “revolution” and Russia in any context.


Many people will tell you that it was a “revolution” and that lie is one of the major reason many non-Jews will tell you that communism is a good thing. “Revolution” is Jewish propaganda nonsense for dimwits. Do not ever use the word “revolution” and Russia in any context.


When you tell people that it was Jews who run Soviet they will tell you it had nothing to do with them being Jews, they just “happened” to be Jews, and beside that, the Jews was so few, how could they control all the Russians?

Nearly all of the Project for the New American Century signators are Jews, just as in Russia, the Jewish revolutionaries are hidden behind a banner.
Nearly all of the Project for the New American Century signators are Jews, just as in Russia, the Jewish revolutionaries are hidden behind a banner.

The answer is that most people don’t understand what political power really is. Most people think if they vote every four years, that is how political power works. We have all been told the blessing of “Democracy” all our life so naturally most people have never given how political power really works a second thought.  You don’t get power – you take power.


How did the Jews take power in Russia 1917?  The Jews killed the whole secret police and replaced them with Jews and a few trusted non-Jews. The next step is to go to all the military commanders and tell them that you got their entire family looked up, and if they don’t obey the whole family will be killed. If they refuse they are shoot on the spot and the next in line is promoted or simply replaced by a Jew.


Now you control the secret police plus a big chunk of all the armed forces in Russia. Now you can turn the guns at the people. Would you say you had power now? This is exactly what the jews did, they took power by taking over the secret police. This you will never read in any propaganda text and no communist will tell you this either. Why? Because all the Communist Jews want people to think of when it comes to Soviet is the “revolution”,  not how they really did take power over Russia and re-named her Soviet.


To control all the guns is priority number one. To control the secret police is everything, once you do that you can turn the guns on the people. Every single bill on gun ban ever written in America is written by Jews. The Jew mafia knows how you take power. The secret police in Soviet was rank and file 80 percent Jews, and it was not the nice Jews, it was the scumbags of the scumbags among the Jews who went into the secret police – and they controlled all the guns.



This is what really happened and it did not just “happened” to be Jews that controlled the secret police. It was well planned ahead and the reason is that to control the secret police is what made the coup possible. It’s crucial to understand this, because to control the secret police was the key factor to take over Russia. When you control all the guns what resistance could the Russian people come up with? Nothing. The key factor is to control the guns and that the communist Jews did, and it didn’t just “happened” to be Jews. The coup in Russia 1917 was well planned and it was Jews who planned the whole thing.


Of course there was non-Jews involved but the reason is that they bought the Jewish fraud communism. It tells the non-Jews that they are going to be the new rulers and that everybody is going to be rich. A communist will tell you any lie there is plus any unthinkably lie. I have studied communism all my life and I have discussed communism with many hardcore communists and they all lie. They will tell themselves and anyone any lie to justify any atrocity that was done in the name of Communism.


This lying is Judaism to its core. Whatever Jews did to be hated had nothing to do with how the Jews behaved. Most Jews will tell you any lie to not be blamed for what they did. Just look at Soviet communism. Just look at ‘Gulag’ by Anna Applebaum.  First a Jew writes a book about Soviet, omitting any notion of the Jews that really controlled Soviet. That book is one big lie, and the Jews promotes this lie in their propaganda-machine. I remember when the book came out and it was on all front pages, they talked a lot about it on the radio and TV. Prime display in all the bookshop’s. -This is the truth about Soviet, was the message. Just another day in the Jewish propaganda-machine. How many people have read Gulag and thinks this is the truth about Soviet?


You can NoT understand what communism really is without understanding that Communism is Talmud Judaism re-written for non-Jews consumption.  Every single accusation the communist uses, bourgeois, kulak, contra-revolutionary, Nazi, anti-Semite, racist, bigot, white trash, etc. etc. are all code words for anyone that opposes the Jew mafia power takeover.


When you start telling people about Jews and Communism they will typically go into defense mode and start saying that they “happened” to be Jews and Communist. That’s easy to debunk, all you need to say is that 99 percent of all Jews are Communists. Just let them try to debunk that, because they can’t.


That 99 percent of all Jews are communist is nothing that just “happened” to be so. Talmud tells the Jews that they are a chosen elite that one day shall rule over all non-Jews. To do that the Jews must control the state and to control the state the Jews must control the secret police and all the armed forces, and the propaganda-machine – and that the Jews did in Soviet.  According to Jewish yearbook there was seven million Jews in the Russian Empire 1913, four percent of the total population. One Jewish source says that one in three Jews, or 33 percent of all the Jews in Soviet was employed by the state in Soviet.


That means that there was probably not one single Jewish family in Soviet that had not at least one in the family that was employed by the state. This is nothing that just “happens” to be so. When ex-Soviet Jews tells about life in Soviet, they will typically use the first or two paragraph to whine about how the poor Jews was persecuted in Soviet. Then they will tell you how high education they have (they must brag about it) and then tell you what import and and high position she or he had in Soviet. Persecuted and at the same time have high position in government. Any thinking person can figure it out that something don’t add up here. They are lying and they are lying because the non-Jews mustn’t realize that Soviet was totally controlled by Jews.


This lie about Communist Jews and Soviet must be debunked at all cost, because only then can you learn your true history and not the lies and fairy tale we are getting shoveled down our throat in the Jew owned propaganda-machine.



                                                                          Bernays and Tavistock

                                                                                                             By M.K. Styllinski

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. … We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. … In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons … who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”

― Edward L. Bernays, Propaganda



One of the most common questions regarding the nature of 9/11 is how could anyone pull the wool over the eyes of the populace so comprehensively? If the events of 9/11 were engineered and were indeed an “inside job,” how was it possible to conduct such a complex operation without political, military and intelligence personnel blowing the whistle? Such a conspiracy  surely would not be feasible?


Quite apart from the fact that many persons did act as whistle-blowers from an array of government departments, the nature of the media network, law and justice system always censors and restricts any serious breaches and thus threats to its own existence. Effective dissemination of information and awareness is therefore limited unless painted with various colours of propaganda. Perhaps most importantly of all, the firewall of standard beliefs is the most effective method to ensure that state-sponsored atrocities remain in the realm of fantasy.


As we will discover, an effective blackout on 9/11 issues along with a concerted disinformation campaign has dogged any real breakthroughs in achieving an independent inquiry into the events of that day. Furthermore, what applies to the media is the same for any domain within our present culture which prevents the free-flow of ideas and accountability so that any threats to the structure of the status quo are, if not instantly dissolved, gradually eroded by various belief systems. The cultivation of negative myths and memes in the aftermath of a traumatic event has the effect of sealing in the cracks where truth might seep out. As John F. Kennedy wisely stated: “The greatest enemy of the truth is not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth – persistent, pervasive, and unrealistic.”


Propaganda techniques are now the province of a melding between outsourced PR companies and lobbying groups and the Top Secret actions of military PSYOPS which use highly sophisticated methods of media manipulation and electronic warfare to influence mass consciousness. It is common to misunderstand the nature of belief in 21st Century America and the level of socio-cultural engineering which has occurred since the early 1930s. The media’s role has been crucial in weaving an official story which has little connection to facts on the ground. Carefully selected words and images obliterate objective reality, something which one man knew very well indeed. Much of these initial techniques were drawn from Edward Bernays’ insights and taken to stratospheric levels. 911 cannot be understood without this knowledge. So, let’s have a brief refresher.


Jewish Austrian-American Edward Louis Bernays was a pioneer in the manipulation of the mass mind. His techniques have been used by successive governments, oppressive regimes, advertising agencies and intelligence agencies the world over. With a mix of concepts inspired by the psychology of Gustave Le Bon, Wilfred Trotter and his uncle Sigmund Freud he became known as the “the father of public relations” and the darling of the Establishment. “Propaganda” would morph into “Public Relations” under Bernays’ definition.

“The common interests very largely elude public opinion entirely and can be managed only by a specialized class whose personal interests reach beyond the locality.” …Walter Lippman, 1922 (an original architect of the Council on Foreign Relations and Zionist Jew)

This is a good place to mention a pioneer of advertising propaganda, aka - public relations, Jewish-Zionist Edward Bernays, who was a good friend of Walter Lippmann. Bernays was a nephew of Sigmund Freud and was no doubt influenced by his uncle’s work in psychoanalysis. He popularized the use of the ‘press release’ and manipulation of public opinion by the use of “third party authorities” to influence opinion. Bernays argued that the manipulation of public opinion was a necessary part of democracy. The following is a revealing quote from his book, PROPAGANDA (1928):

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by a relatively small number of persons who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses… It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind."

Some of the many successful propaganda campaigns directed by Bernays include the American Tobacco Company’s campaign for the acceptance of women smoking in public by lighting up their Lucky Strike cigarettes as “Torches of Freedom.” He convinced the American public that bacon and eggs was the true all-American breakfast while campaigning for the Best Foods Company. He helped the Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA) and other special interest groups to convince the American public that water fluoridation was safe and beneficial to human health (it’s not, just read the warning on any tube of toothpaste containing fluoride… fluoride is a poison).

Bernays conducted propaganda activities on behalf of United Fruit Company (now Chiquita Brands International) and the U.S. government to successfully overthrow the democratically elected government of Guatemala and other Central American countries. The term ‘banana republic’ was a reference to countries dominated by United Fruit Company.

BTW: the word ‘propaganda’ took on a very negative connotation when Nazi Reich Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, rose to power with Hitler. Goebbels was even using Bernay’s book, Crystallizing Public Opinion, as a basis for his campaign against sinister Jews in Germany. ‘Public Relations’ or ‘PR’ is the now the preferred term rather than propaganda.


The man himself appeared to lack any conscience or sense of responsibility for his experiments and willingly sold his ideas to the highest bidder, whether they were an aspiring despot or corporate racketeer. His influences from psychoanalysis and  B.F. Skinner’s behaviourism meant that he saw manipulation as a necessity in society. He saw ordinary people as part of a wild and selfish group-mind that needed to be controlled, preferably by Elite stewards who could steer society in a “superior” direction of their choosing. As with all the other neo-feudalists whom we have explored so far, he had an extremely dim view of humanity and believed his “engineering of consent” was vital to maintain order and direct its evolution. Accordingly, he was to be hugely useful to the emerging Elite who took Bernays and his “enlightened despotism” to their hearts. 


One of Bernays techniques was the “third-party authority” whereby traditionally independent and trusted members of society are bought and paid for by PR firms to promote a particular product or political spin for their clients. If a doctor, scientist, or journalist gives their seal of approval then the public is more likely to believe what is being said. Although nowadays the public is a little more savvy and cynical regarding these basic methods, in previous years it proved extremely successful for a range of products. The third party technique is obviously still employed though with much greater subterfuge, where government or corporate clients will often keep their PR and lobbying connections hidden from prying eyes – the money involved is often too seductive to declare these conflicts of interest.


The instinct of fear as a linchpin of Freudian thought was integral to Bernay’s methods. He believed it was key to the success of propaganda techniques and urged the US government to ratchet up the fear quota in relation to communism so that the public would become more compliant and malleable to suggestion. He was employed by marketing and advertising companies as well as celebrities, charities and government agencies. Soap, perfume, cigarettes and commerce were all used as an experimental testing ground which proved time and again to be successful in predicting and leading public desires to prearranged outcomes.


Working for the Woodrow Wilson government he was yet another rising star to attend the infamous Paris Peace Conference in 1919 along with all the other World government advocates, international bankers and industrialist families who would later go on to form the Council on Foreign Relations, the Federal Reserve, and the House of Rothschilds’ Round Table Group   Bernays was crucial to the development and formation of social engineering that would be tested on the American people. It was to be the same promotion of the “scientific technique” underpinned by psychoanalysis, the hub of which was found at the Tavistock Institute in England.


The manipulation of the American public saw great strides under Bernays and his colleagues, CFR man Walter Lippmann, and media magnate Lords Rothmere (Harold Harmsworth) and Lord Northcliffe. The latter individuals were employed by Britain’s War Propaganda Bureau otherwise known as Wellington House founded in 1913 and named after the Duke of Wellesly. His task was to assist in the preparation of the American mind to accept and support entry into the First World War. Brainstorming sessions took place where the main target of propaganda operations were young working class men who were required to become machine-gun and cannon fodder on the fields of Flanders and the Somme, all of which was unknown to the American public.


The funding came firstly, from the British Royal Family, Rockefeller family trusts and several years later from the Rothschilds, to whom Lord Rothmere was related by marriage.  As the members of the board had links to Lord Milner’s Oxford set, the Round Table group, the Fabian Society, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, the formation of “mass brain washing” meant that Bernays and his set of skills was employed directly in the service of the Establishment’s emerging Pathocrats. The tripartite relations of the arms industry, banking and Elite designs is a lucrative ideological and geopolitical formula that have defined the financial architecture up to the present day.


War propaganda also came under the guidance of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIAA) whose director of Future Studies, Fabian historian Alfred Toynbee acted as an important liaison. As Lord Rothmere owned both The Times of London and the Daily Mail it was deemed more than feasible that the shaping of the Anglo-American mind in favour of war could proceed.


Various propaganda techniques were tried out through Rothmere’s newspapers under Bernays’ expert tutelage. They discovered that the ability to reason was poor amongst the population, especially the uneducated which made up the vast majority of conscripts. It was the stimulation of mass emotional reaction accompanied by appropriate slogans and images of national pride and family protection that proved the greatest success.* As author and anarchist Edward Abbey has pointed out: “The tragedy of modern war is that the young men die fighting each other – instead of their real enemies back home in the capitals.” This applied not just to seducing young men to fight wars but to all aspects of society that indirectly contribute to such a conclusion.

The late ex-Intelligence analyst Dr. John Coleman and his own research tells us:


With the Tavistock plan modified to suit American conditions, Bernays and Lippmann led President Woodrow Wilson to set up the very first Tavistock methodology techniques for polling (manufacturing) so-called public opinion created by Tavistock propaganda. They also taught Wilson to set up a secret body of “managers” to run the war effort and a body of “advisors” to assist the President in his decision-making. The Creel Commission was the first such body of opinion-makers set up in the United States.  


In 1921, the ideology of Woodrow Wilson’s handlers met the Duke of Bedford, Marquis of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, who gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shell-shock on British soldiers who survived World War I. The British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare sent for Sir John Rawlings-Reese who was given the job of discovering the threshold or “breaking point” of men under severe stress. This was the official starting point, but the ambitions of the Institute were far broader.


Edward Bernays helped to spread Freud’s theories into the USA while assisting the rise of a particular brand of corporatism and social science based on the same. His books Crystallizing Public Opinion (1923) and Propaganda (1928) became bibles of manipulation in business and government circles alike, spawning the growth of Public Relations in Europe and America. In 1919, he had opened for business as a Public Relations Counsellor in New York, with clients falling over themselves to learn the art of engaging the public mind, tailoring their goals to want what they didn’t need. Selfishness, instinct, fear and the importance of Pavlovian responses sat upon an abiding materialism and distrust in human nature, all of which served to feed the machine of the 4Cs


German-born Dr. Kurt Lewin became director of Tavistock in 1932. He went on to set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which worked closely with Edward Bernays’ propaganda campaign to make the American mind amenable to war with Germany. A ratline of psychologists began to create a conduit between the US and UK. By 1937, Wellington House had transferred operations to the Tavistock Clinic which became the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations in 1946. The Climax of Civilization (1917) by Correa Moylan Walsh and Oswald Spengler’s The Decline of Western Civilization (Untergange des Abenlandes) were incorporated into an ideological model which included world government and the precepts of A New World Order. Both authors drew from the usual neo-feudal beliefs which augmented the need to regulate and shape societies. This led to the Institute becoming host to renowned behavioural psychologists and the study of group psychodynamics.   The founding members of the Tavistock Institute were dispatched across the world stage to tweak social and political policy. Brigadier John Rawlings Rees was psychiatrist to Rudolph Hess, Adolf Hitler’s deputy whilst Ronald Hargreaves became deputy director of the World Health Organization (WHO).


As another round of economic destabilisation was required as per the “break and make” formula, World War II loomed into view and the same techniques were employed. The key to this success was to place undue emphasis on the irrationality of the human mind; to elevate this “natural human flaw” to a level that was abnormal in the public consciousness, so much so, that we would all come to believe that this made up a large proportion of the human condition. This implanted conditioning meant that it became easier and easier to manipulate through an array of Pavlovian distractions. In combination with the Hegelian formula, human psychology was like putty in the controllers’ hands.


Tavistock was at the centre of the Nazi elite exodus after of the war and acted as the lab for the continuation of Nazi experimentation in psychology already advanced in wartime Germany through the discoveries of Josef Mengele  in the concentration camps. Tavistock gave the psychological foundation for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) the precursor to CIA, which continued to work from Tavistock guidelines.



With the 1938 Special Operations Executive agreement between Roosevelt and Churchill already in place allowing British interests to dominate American operations, Dr. Lewin took on the directorship of the Strategic Bombing Survey, which was tasked with bombing civilian housing and avoiding military targets and munition depots inside Germany. As we have established, World War II was a bonanza for the international bankers who did not want to see their liquid assets destroyed. Germany had always been a national asset to be preserved for a long term economic power base within Europe. Instead, the ordinary German populace was to be the bulls-eye. Women, children and old people perished in their thousands amid urban fire-storms perpetrated by the Royal Air Force and the celebrated Sir Arthur Travers “Bomber” Harris. Such carnage was celebrated in war-time news reels as inflicting crucial blows against Germany’s war machine. The truth was rather different. The machine was to remain intact – it was far too useful, the truth of which was buried.  Germany was a vast experiment with Tavistock collecting valuable data for future operations.



 Tavistock connections from ex-Intel operative John Coleman’s: “The Conspirator’s Hierarchy: The Committee of 300” (2000).


The Rockefeller impetus to shape the sexual behaviour of Britain and America stemmed from their meetings with their members at the Tavistock Institute. By inverting sexual and social mores, weakening the public’s ability to think critically and breaking down the family unit, ethics and the concept of the sacred, new forms of mass identity and psychological states of mind were inculcated which would best serve the Elite. (See: The Sex Establishment)


Cultural Marxism conjoined with psychoanalysis, and psychodynamics would eventually be used as part of the National Security State, from MK-ULTRA to present day torture techniques in a variety of rendition nations. Freudian psychology would form the basis of a mass defragmentation of character by implanting new socio-sexual “norms” and the introduction of the LSD “counter-culture” fused with New Age psychedelia. A distinctly Kinseyian “revolution” became not so much about love but a mechanistic tool for gratification which further eroded meaning, male and female identity and the proliferation of tribal labels and groupings. The net result was confusion, nihilism, narcissism and the consequent loss of meaning in society. And all that meant populations much easier to control in the face of rising fields of information.



The Tavistock network is firmly embedded in the UK-US institutions, extending from Britain’s University of Sussex to America’s Stanford Research Institute (SRI) and Esalen Institute who have garnered a reputation for mind control studies linked to CoIntelpro operations within the New Age movement. The Heritage Foundation, MIT, Hudson Institute, Centre of Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) at Georgetown, where US State Dept. personal are trained and US Air Force Intelligence who joined hands with the RAND corporation: all these were foci for crowd psychology, the experimentation of which was – and still is -visited on the American public.


Today, the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations is still very much involved in research and consultancy work in social science and applied psychology. The organisation claims its clients are: “international agencies, the EU and its research bodies, UK local and central government and UK research bodies, … private sector and other clients such as regional agencies, health authorities, local authorities, charities and small family firms … and some private clients. In other words, pretty much anyone. Alongside ownership of the international social sciences journal, Human Relations, it owns none other than a very popular and substantial conspiracy forum: “Godlike Productions“.


It is an extremely high probability that this forum is the product of a social experiment devised by Tavistock in order to not only monitor the pulse of alternative and conspiracy-minded individuals in cyberspace, but to muddy the waters of such research. Why else would an institute rooted in unpleasant social engineering programs on behalf of the UK government own such a forum? Moreover, since Godlike Productions has built a considerable reputation as a primary CoIntelpro honey-pot and a major source of the most abject disinformation available on the internet, it is more than curious that Tavistock has ownership. And as one commentator noted: “If it’s happening in the backwoods of the internet, in a place like Godlike Productions, what does that say about the Facebooks and Twitters of the world?” Not that you would have any suspicion of Tavistock’s dark history and present government connections. Upon visiting their website at it offers a suitably clinical yet wholesome image of sociocultural assistance. 

Tavistock’s behavioural psychology and social engineering advances are ensconced in the minds of various Anglo-American think-tanks. These in turn, are associated with political old boys’ clubs like the Trilateral Commission and the Club of Rome, who then come up with mass mind memes designed to create the required responses. This is, in part, Bernays’ legacy, where the relationship is one of a constant feedback loop of information design adhering to the mix of occult “Olympian” belief systems.


In his ground-breaking book entitled: Propaganda (1928) Bernays argued that manipulation of the public was natural and necessary in the maintenance of democracy:


The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …We are governed, our minds are moulded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. …In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind. 

If it was so in the early part of the last century, it is has become turbo-charged in today’s society with the advent of many sophisticated psychological techniques which have trickled into the commercial and public realm. One such operation was under Dwight Eisenhower’s administration who was duped into giving the go ahead for a program of “psychological warfare and political action” and “subversion,” dubbed Operation PBSUCCESS against the democratically elected president of Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán.


With the help of Guatemalan military general Carlos Castillo Armas, who formed a military junta, the president and his government were removed and replaced with a military junta which was all based on Bernays’ carefully constructed package of lies and manipulation predicated on the already sensitive fear of Communism. Arbenz was branded a communist in the US and European media until “Reds-under-the-bed” paranoia was clamouring for his removal. In truth, Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán’s social welfare policies proved highly successful in providing work and a variety of social benefits which were eventually deemed a threat Western interests, in particular the multinational corporation United Fruit Company (today’s Chiquita Brands International).  We have seen the same formula play out over Latin America for decades and most particularly with the late Hugo Chavez and other South American leaders finally taking the courageous step to reject the role of lap dogs for Anglo-American imperialism. (Yet, it seems the CIA finally had its way as Venezuela descends into another round of chaos).


Propaganda has been used to plant false stories in the media to oust legitimate governments and whip up collective fears so that the suppression populations around the globe with violence and intimidation can take place without there being much of a hue and cry. Latin America in the 1970’s and 1980’s was perhaps the most vicious and sustained attack against the right of peoples to determine their own destiny. The USA used the spread of Communism as justification for banking and resource control. It was this experimentation that provided much of the groundwork for what was to come.


Secrecy of the National Security State has fused with the corporate world and private security firms, allowing unfettered greed and power to multiply as cancer in a vast petri-dish. It is for this reason that enormous PR companies like Burston-Marsteller can straddle the world acting as channels for immoral and corrupt influence. The ambitious engineering of 9/11 would simply not have been possible to pull off without this groundswell of financial, military and PR power to back it up. As writer John Stauber observes: “Public relations is now inseparable from the business of lobbying, creating public policy, and getting candidates elected to public office. The PR industry just might be the single most powerful political institution in the world. It expropriates and exploits the democratic rights of millions on behalf of big business by fooling the public about the issues.” [7] When this is combined with an intelligence apparatus, think-tanks and global policy institutions, it represents another indicator of a breakaway society completely set apart from civil society. We are all forced to indulge their psychopathic fantasies for ultimate control, which of course, can never work despite creating untold destruction along the way.


Since the days of Bernays, virtual reality is not found within the software of new technology but is hardwired into our very brains. Our perceptions have been managed with greater alacrity by the advent of transhumanist technology but it is the principles of American education which have been responsible for eroding understanding and independence of mind in favour of info-tainment and the cult of artifice. It is belief and iconography that is the arbiter of reality in ways which have become so ingrained it is difficult to see how it can be outgrown.


Official culture grows not just from a habitual mediocrity and fear of change but a gradual disabling of our ability to think. This stems from dissociative states drawn from trauma and slow-burn, emotional hurts accumulated over decades from the encroachment of societal pathology. A link to meaning and the promise of something more than materialism is suffocated by the sheer speed of a technocratic mainframe designed to change the very cognitive processes involved in learning. Education in America has been dumbed down since the invasion of the industrialist families and Rockefeller-Tavistock agents got to work to shape the public mind in concert with Bernays-led Public Relations.


So, in this way, it is no surprise that, in combination with the deep state and pervasive corruption as a way of life, the events of 9/11 were permitted to run their criminal course. This has been a long-term experiment which culminated in an ambitious false flag terrorist attack designed to take the world into the next phase of global operations.


Image may contain: one or more people and text




                                                                 Masters of Deceit — A Short History of the Jews – Ben Klassen

Nature in her infinite wisdom has put the highest premium on survival of the species. In her profuse variety Nature has brought forth creatures of all kinds, fish and fowl, animal and vegetable, insect and bacteria. Some creatures like the cardinal and bluebird are beautiful to behold. Others like the scorpion fish and the lizard are not. Some creatures are flesh eating. Others are herbivorous. Some animals, like cows, forage on the grass of the meadows. Others like the coyote, the wolf and the tiger are predatory. Other creatures like cockroaches, mosquitoes and maggots are parasitic. Each creature has its means of existence and survival and its means of perpetuating its species. In all, the will to live and perpetuate its own kind is intensely strong. If it were not, the species would soon have died out.


In the human species there is one race that stands out above all others in the intensity and fierceness in its will to survive — that is the Jewish race. How this one race has survived and stayed intact through all the convulsions and upheavals of history for 5,000 years is something remarkable to behold.


Whereas some of the ancient races of recorded history such as the Babylonians, the Romans, the Phoenicians, the Egyptians, as a race, have all gone down the sinkhole of history — the Jew has survived. Not only has he survived, but he has become the slave- master of all the other races of the world, although he only numbers a small percentage of the world’s population.


Whereas the glorious White Race has been a builder, explorer and creator of civilizations, of governments and nations, the Jew has been none of these. On the contrary, he has been the very antithesis of the noble White Man. Throughout his history, which goes back more than 5,000 years, during which he has remained united as a race, the Jew has been the parasite and predator on the backs of those nations who have been his unwilling hosts. The Jew has never been a creator, nor a builder, nor a producer, like the members of the White Race. On the contrary, he has been a destroyer of civilizations, a plunderer of nations, and a killer who invented the very idea of genocide in the earliest stages of his own history. All we have to do is read their own Old Testament to find that in page after page after page they slew, killed and plundered one tribe after another. One nation after another was put to the sword, man, woman and child.


Yes, indeed, the Jews are a blood-thirsty race. They have survived over a long period of time, although they have been scattered throughout the other nations of the world. They have been a plague on the body of mankind from the earliest dawn of recorded history. Nor has that plague abated in modern times. In fact, today it is more deadly than ever, and since we, the White Race, are the chief target and the chief victims marked for destruction, it behooves us to take a close look, and study our destroyer.


It is a fascinating and horror-filled history. It is an ugly story. But study it we must, and understand it we must, if we are to extricate ourselves from our plight and fulfill the obligation that Nature has placed upon us: namely, the survival of our very own species, the noblest creation on the face of the earth: the White Race.


The history of mankind is filled with wars and conflict, but of all the conflicts that have ensued between the different nations and the different races, there is only one race that has aroused the most violent antagonisms no matter where they settled — that race is the Jewish race.


Throughout all the turmoil of history and all the wars, conflicts and massacres, sooner or later the two conflicting parties settled down and either reconciled their differences, and lived peacefully together, or they went elsewhere to live. Not so with the Jews, however. The Jew has never been reconciled with the host nation upon whose back he feeds. Nor have the Jews peacefully migrated to other countries. The history of the Jews demonstrates two things: first, that there has never been a reconciliation between them and their hosts, and second, that no nation has ever succeeded in barring them permanently.


Furthermore, as the Jews bored into their host nations and became more and more reprehensible and intolerable, the host nation generally has turned on them and tried to expel them from their national body. However, in no case has a victimized nation been successful in expelling them permanently. In fact, it is surprising that in every case where Jews were expelled from a nation, often under conditions of humiliation and suffering, within a few years the Jews have returned. Not only have they usually returned, but they then set about with increased viciousness to destroy the host nation upon whom they had previously fed like a parasite. The Jews have since time immemorial been culture destroyers and civilization destroyers. The Jewish problem has been on the back of all nations for at least the past 5,000 years.


Whereas the White Race, with its creativity and restless energy, has moved to the various areas of the world and created civilizations, the Jew invariably followed, bored into their very vitals and sooner or later destroyed those civilizations. They helped to destroy the Egyptian civilization, the Greek civilization, and were the prime cause in the destruction of the great Roman civilization. When Europe slowly again picked up the threads of civilization from Rome, the Jew was already there and has lain like a cancer upon the body of Europe from the time of the Romans.


However, the main center of power of the Jewish world-wide conspiracy now resides in the New World. In fact, in New York is the largest center of Jewish population in the world, and New York is the central financial powerhouse, not only of the United States, but also the rest of the world. Since the United States is now also the last great stronghold of the White Race, it is the untiring and current goal of the Jew to not only destroy the United States as a country, but to destroy White America, mongrelize it, and pump the black blood of Africa into the veins of White America.


Why is it that the Jewish Race has survived through all the upheavals of over 5,000 years of history, whereas more powerful races like the Romans have perished? Is it because the Jew is tough? We find that the Jew is tough, but other races, such as the Romans, have been even tougher and they have not survived. Is it because he is a good fighter? No, he is, in fact, a physical coward and in open combat he is certainly one of the lesser and more cowardly warriors. Is it because he is more treacherous and deceitful? Perhaps, since in this characteristic he undoubtedly excels all other peoples. But this is not the sole reason why he has survived either. The reason for his survival lies in his unique religion.


Early in their history the Jews realized the tremendous potency of religion as a weapon — a weapon to either unite their own race, or a weapon to disintegrate and destroy their enemies. For thousands of years they have capitalized upon this knowledge to the hilt. In a masterful fashion, they have manipulated religion to their advantage with a devilish cunning that no other people seems to have even suspected — least of all the White Race.


If we could briefly look at the wars between Rome and Carthage, and the brief siege and destruction of Jerusalem during the rise and expansion of the Roman Empire, I think we can find the answer to the Jews’ survival.


As Roman power increased and expanded, it was inevitable that it should soon come into conflict with the increasing power of Carthage. For over 100 years these two great rival powers fought battles of attrition and annihilation. Finally Rome emerged the victor, and when they had Carthage at its mercy, they leveled the city, killed all the male population and sold the women and children into slavery. Carthage was no more. It was gone forever.


Now let us contrast this with what happened to Jerusalem in the year 70 A.D.


During the rule of Emperor Vespasian, the Jews in Judea became rebellious. Emperor Vespasian sent General Titus down there and after a 139-day siege of Jerusalem, the city was sacked, leveled to the ground, and the Jews were either killed or dispersed. It would seem that in a fate similar to that of Carthage, this would be the end of the Jews, But not so.


The Jews had one extraordinary thing going for them: and that was the unique religion that bound their race together. Far from being destroyed, the Jews in their cunning and resourcefulness, with their religion uniting and binding them together, planned revenge on the Romans. And revenge they did get. They inflected on the Romans a religion that undermined the will of the Romans to survive as a race and as a nation.


With tremendous zeal the Jews propagated among the Romans a new religion with such suicidal ideas as “turn the other cheek, love your enemies, resist not evil” and other self- destructive philosophies that sapped the strength of the Romans and left them naked and defenseless before their enemies. In a few centuries the great Roman civilization completely disintegrated and was defenseless against the marauding vandals who finally sacked Rome in the year 476 A.D. and Rome was no more.


However, with his tenacity and zeal for preserving the Jewish race as embodied in his fanatic religion, the Jew did not go down with Rome. No, on the contrary, he fed on the corpse and went from the Roman corpse to scatter and infect the incipient and growing new cultures that were emerging in Western Europe, cultures and civilizations that were blighted from the very beginning with the handicap of the new religion with which the Jew had destroyed Rome.


It is true that the Jew is tough. He is cunning and he is treacherous. He is also tenacious and he is persistent. All these qualities fit him well to be the foremost predator and parasite on the body of mankind. But even with all these qualities he would not have survived had it not been for his Mosaic religion. It is the basic ingredients of his religion that bind him together in a holy brotherhood hostile to all mankind, striving, pushing, clawing, always and forever for the good of his race, for the survival of his race, and exhibiting in its raw form one of the strongest laws of Nature: the propagation and survival of its own species.


The Jews learned one other significant fact early in their history: There is nothing as powerful in uniting a group (any group) as having a common enemy. Based on this premise, they have seen to it that they have always been at war with other races. In fact, all other peoples are their enemies at all times. It is only a matter of strategy as to who is the prime enemy at any given time.


This theory has worked wonders. It has kept the Jews united and fighting. Their solidarity has destroyed all enemies before them. It is destroying the White Race today.


The central theme of the Jewish religion is hatred, hatred for the Gentiles, that is all other races. The other overwhelmingly powerful facet of the Jewish religion is racial loyalty, loyalty to its own kind. Whereas to the average White Gentile, sadly enough, it matters very little with whom he does business, whether it is another White Man or not. Nor is the average White Gentile too interested in whether the person next door or the person he meets is one of his own kind. But to a Jew, whether he is doing business with a Jew, living next door to a Jew, or meets a Jew, this means everything. Let us keep this in mind, this factor of racial loyalty, as we go about searching for a better religion for the White Race.


That the Judaic religion has been the rock of strength around which the Jewish race has rallied for the last 5,000 years is without question. The Jews do not believe in God nor are they foolish enough to put their efforts or beliefs centered in a hereafter. Golda Meir, the present Prime Minister of Israel, stated succinctly when she said in her speech from the Knesset, the Israel Parliament in Yiddish, “I am a non-believer, yet no one will be able to root from the heart and mind the conviction that without the Jewish religion we would have been like all other nations, who once existed and disappeared.” From the earliest glimmerings of childhood the Jewish parents inculcate into their offspring the idea of racial loyalty, the idea that the survival of the Jewish race is everything, the idea that all other peoples are their enemies to be either exploited or destroyed.


The Jewish Old Testament is crammed full of make-believe of Jewish history, very little of it true. But interwoven through all this fantasy the idea of racial survival is driven into their brains, advice on how to survive. It and the Talmud are full of advice and wisdom binding the Jewish race together in an indestructible unit of purpose.



In Prov. 29:18 is spelled out the idea of a long term program, “where there is no vision, a people perish.” If we contrast this with the advice the Jews foisted on the White Race in the New Testament, for instance: Matt. 6:34 where it says, “take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself.” Here we see clearly spelled out that it is essential for the Jews to have vision for the long term, a long-term plan. In reality, their religion is a perpetual conspiracy which is essential for their survival as a parasitic race. But in order to weaken and soften their victims for aggression, conquest and slavery, the White Race has had its brains polluted with all kinds of bad Jewish advice of which, “take no thought for tomorrow” is one of the many, and that is exactly the position of the white Race today. The Jews have laid their long-term plans, going back thousands of years, for the mastery and enslavement of the world.


The White Race, in contrast has no plan, no program for survival. It has no religion to rally around or to unite its White Brothers. It is just fumbling, bumbling and stumbling along with absolutely no defense against the Jew, whose historical mission it has been over thousands of years to destroy or enslave the White Race.


Whereas the noble White Race is creative, productive and self-sustaining, the Jews instinctively decided far back in their early history that the best means of survival was to choose the role of a parasite on the bodies of other productive nations. Over the thousands of years this decision has hardened and has become so permanently ingrained and inbred into the Jewish character that he could not now do otherwise, no more than a maggot could fend for itself without devouring the body of its host. This being so, the Jew has planned and planned and prepared.


He has a far-reaching and all-encompassing program for the control, domination and exploitation of his host, for whom he nurtures a terrible, pathological hatred. The driving force of his whole religion is hatred for his host. He has always hated his host nation with a terrible passion. How many times have we heard the expression ingrained in Jewish controlled books about the “whore of Babylon.” The fact is that the Babylonian people were a good White people, a productive people, a creative people, who were finally destroyed by the Jews in their midst. Throughout history the Jews have propagated a vicious lying propaganda about degeneracy of the Babylonian people; a monstrous lie.


When the Jews poured into the Roman civilization and finally destroyed it with the new suicidal religion they foisted upon the Romans, they then pictured the Romans as being cruel, degenerate and immoral. Even to this day, the Jewish movies coming out of Hollywood depict the Romans as a debauched and degenerate people. Even lying Jewish propagandists like Billy Graham perpetually denounce the Romans as cruel, debauched and tyrannical. Another terrible Jewish lie.


Having chosen to play the role of a parasite far back in their history, the die is now long cast and they can do no other than to roam the civilized world seeking any spot where they can settle down in the midst of an established community, where they can remain and prosper at the expense of others. As a parasitic people the Jews can only survive by living on that which others produce. When they come into a community they bring nothing with them but their cunning and their treachery. The Jew knows when he enters the Gentile community that sooner or later he will be discovered and there will be violence and retribution. The thing the Jew fears more than anything else is open detection and the ensuing physical violence. One of his phrases throughout the centuries has been “Oy, gewalt!” This old Yiddish phrase translates “Oh, violence.”


Knowing that his parasitic activities of fleecing, robbing and plundering the Gentile community will eventually result in violence against his person, he prepares for it in advance. We go back to the quotation from Proverbs in which the Jews are advised:

“where there is no vision, a people perish.” So as he sinks his tentacles deeply into the body of the community that he is about to ravish, he prepares in advance to nullify, neutralize and minimize the opposition from the Gentile community that he knows sooner or later will develop into hostility against him. In this respect the Jew is very similar to other parasitic creatures of Nature. When a wood tick crawls up the leg of an individual he does so very stealthily and usually completely unnoticed. The wood tick is searching for an appropriate place on the body of the host he can dig into and suck its blood for its own nourishment. The wood tick knows that when he digs in, normally it would be painful to the host, therefore attract its attention and result in its being picked off and destroyed. But the wood tick has a remedy for this. Before digging in he carefully anesthetizes the skin surface of the victim host. Having done this, it then carefully begins to chew and suck, all this time anesthetizing the area so that the host will feel no pain. Meanwhile, the head bores in deeper and deeper and the parasite begins to bloat itself on the blood of its victim without the host having felt any pain whatsoever, or even being aware of its presence. By the time the victim finally discovers the tick, it is thoroughly rooted into its flesh. The host is no longer in a position to remove it without causing pain and infection to himself and the death and destruction of the parasitic tick. Even though the victim now tries to remove the parasite, he cannot do so. He can pull off the bloated body and destroy part of the tick but the head will remain imbedded and cause infection and perhaps blood poisoning. At this stage it becomes a major operation to remove the infectious tick, which he could have easily flicked off with a finger at the beginning, had he realized that the parasite had designs upon his blood. The parasitic operation of the Jew upon the body of his unfortunate host is very similar.


Being a non-productive parasite, the Jew has less than nothing to offer to the host community or nation which he enters and into which forthwith he beings to sink deep his tentacles. Remember the title of this chapter that the Jews are masters of deceit. His main commodity is deceit and lies on a massive scale. Having chosen to be a professional parasite this characteristic is now so deeply and instinctively ingrained in his very nature that he knows by instinct what he must do to protect himself and what the weaknesses of his Gentile host are. He therefore chooses to concentrate on all the nerve centers of power in his productive and creative host. In short order, he has control of the main functions that determine the destiny and welfare of a people and a nation. The Jew does not farm, he does not labor in the fields, he does not work in the factories. He concentrates on placing himself in control of the money of a nation, of the news media of that country, of its educational facilities, and of its government. He labors diligently and skillfully to manipulate, confuse and confound the minds of his victims. Like the wood tick, he anesthetizes the brain of the Gentile nation in whose midst he has settled. He sinks his tentacles deep and prepares to counter any efforts to dislodge him.


Today, throughout the world in general, and in America in particular, we therefore find the Jew in charge of the nation’s finances. He has complete control of the Federal Reserve System about which most Americans understand nothing, but believe that it is a department of the Federal Government. Many books have been written about Jewish ownership of the Federal Reserve System and we do not have space here to treat this subject in detail. But suffice it to say here that the Federal Reserve Board is not a government function, but a completely private system of banks owned, controlled and manipulated by the international Jewish bankers and completely beyond the reach and control of the Federal Government. Not that this would make much difference in any case, because the Federal Government also is controlled by the Jews, but it is significant to make this distinction.


Through manipulation, through the floating of Government bonds, the Federal Reserve can have billions printed for its own aggrandizement and pay nothing more for the billions of dollars that go into its coffers than the cost of the paper and ink involved. This usually costs about 7/10 of a cent per paper note, whether that note is a $10.00 bill or a $1000.00 bill. The actual printing is done by the U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing, but the notes are then transferred to the international Jewish bankers under the guise of the Federal Reserve System. The only expense to the bankers is the cost of the paper and ink.


Not only do the Jewish bankers get the money virtually free, but the U.S. Government is then obligated to issue U.S. Government Bonds as security for the loan involved. The American people are then shackled with not only paying off the principal of the Government Bonds over a period of years but also the interest thereon. These debts are never paid off, but on the contrary, as the history of the last 40 years shows, they increase from year to year. And so the American taxpayer is increasingly enslaved in debts, paying interest in this generation and the next and the next to the international Jewish bankers, who, by and large, acquired the loan money free of charge from the Government Printing Office itself.


The Jews have been manipulators of money and usurpers of the nation’s treasuries of the world from time immemorial. Their Bible speaks of the money changers in their temples. They were all, of course, Jews. The Jewish monopoly of money goes back as far as the history of money itself. The fraud of the Federal Reserve System is by no means new and it has evolved over the thousands of years from the ancient practice of the goldsmiths being safe keepers of the gold of wealthy individuals.


Gold has had a special and fascinating attraction to the Jews in particular from the earliest of times. From the early beginnings of money, gold has been used as a means of exchange and from the earliest beginnings, the Jews have gravitated around the occupation of being safe keepers of other peoples’ gold. They soon found that as they had a number of clients who kept gold in their vaults, that at no time did they all withdraw their gold at the same time. They then hit upon the secondary idea of loaning out some of the gold that belonged to somebody else at a rate of interest, which means they could loan out somebody else’s gold and have the borrower use it for a limited period of time with an additional amount of gold coming back as a premium. As the number of clients increased they found out that they could loan out practically 90 percent of all the gold they held and still have enough reserve on hand to cover any withdrawals. This then developed into the business of banking and this became a tremendously powerful tool for the benefit of the Jew in accumulating the wealth of the productive traders and merchants in whose midst they operated.


From this basic beginning all foundations of banking have evolved. Today the Jews have added to this tricky arrangement thousands of further embellishments, and through the payments of interest, through the Federal Reserve System, through international loans and manipulations, they now exclusively control the money of the world.


Not only do they control the banking systems but they also control the stock markets of the world. Anyone examining the roster of those who own seats on the N.Y. Stock Exchange, or the other stock exchanges throughout the nation, will find that by and large they’re all Jews, and a few associates of Jews. By also controlling the stock market, which they can manipulate up or down at will, they can and do skim all the benefits of the hard working, productive and creative White Americans off the top into their own coffers. Not only that, but by withholding credit at any time they choose, they can throw this nation (or any other nation) or the whole world economy, into a depression. Since these are planned and the Jews know in advance when they are going to do these things, they can, of course, again reap tremendous benefits and fleece the unsuspecting goyim forever and endlessly.


The Jew could never maintain such a stranglehold and such vicious control over his victims for any period of time were it not for the fact that he is also completely in control of the means of communications, the means of information, and the means of propaganda. Few people realize how powerful a tool propaganda is. Adolf Hitler has said correctly that by the use of propaganda the Jews can make heaven look like hell, and hell look like heaven. This is only too true, and the Jews have done this skillfully and artistically. Because they control the money, they have the means wherewith to acquire control of all newspapers, all radio networks, all television networks, all television stations, all leading national magazines, and moreover, the news wires themselves, such as United Press International, the Associated Press, and every other news wire network. Thus they can control every piece of news that goes nationwide, or worldwide for that matter. They can just as easily also suppress and reject any story that comes into their news gathering headquarters and withhold it from the world, and this is even more important.


Also in their arsenal of propaganda, and a very important one, is the movie industry — again completely controlled by the Jews. In fact, so thoroughly is Hollywood and the movie industry controlled by the Jews that Hollywood has often been referred to as Kosher Valley. The movie industry in the last 50 years has undoubtedly developed into one of the most powerful means of propaganda and brain pollution to the White Race the world has ever seen. It is only in recent years that it has been equaled, and perhaps excelled by the Jewish controlled television industry. You can be sure that the movie industry was not left unexploited in promoting the interests of the Jews and in promoting their program for the destruction of the White Race.


During the war years the Jewish movie industry in Hollywood was busy cranking out one anti-German, anti-Hitler, anti-Nazi propaganda film after another. Being naive and gullible as we are, many of our white brothers swallowed this poisonous bait and was enlisted in the Jewish snare of having the White Americans join in the vicious Jewish program of having White brothers kill White brothers in order to save the neck of the perfidious Jew. At the same time the communist countries were lauded to the skies. By treacherous lying propaganda it was made to seem plausible that we, the United States of America, could join forces with Jewish controlled communist Russia in waging a suicidal war of destruction against the heroic defenders of the White Race, namely the German people.


Not only have the movies been used as instruments for getting us involved in suicidal wars, but they have also been used as a means of setting the tone of our morals and our mores. Basically they have been used to undermine and degenerate the moral climate of our youth and of our country as a whole. During the 1920’s the movies had become debauched and degenerate to the point where they were threatening their own survival. Strangely enough, during the 30′ s the moral tone improved somewhat. Many of the best stories that have been put out by Hollywood originated during the 1930′ s and people were lured back into the movie theatres in large numbers. Then the Jew cleverly began to interject the anti-German, anti-Nazi propaganda into his revitalized movie industry
and began to inflame and pollute the minds of the White people of America towards hatred and a willingness to accept the idea of war against their own White brothers.


During the war itself the movies went into high gear. Nearly every production was viciously slanted to enhance the war effort in destroying Germany. At the same time, injected into the theme was the idea of racial integration. When the war was over the idea 
of co-existence and collaboration with Russia was promoted along with an intensification of the idea of one world, one-world government, and the United Nations.

By the 1950′ s the idea of racial tolerance for the Jews broadened towards acceptance of the negro as an equal in our society and as being the down-trodden victim of the White Man’s greed and cruelty. The suicidal idea of the negro being a permanent and vital equal part in our American society has been progressively promoted ever since. To find a movie today that doesn’t in one way or another promote racial mongrelization is hard to come by. The Jew today in movies, the press and in television, is driving at a vicious and frightening pace for full mongrelization of the American people. All opposition has been effectively clobbered and destroyed.


In the 1950′ s and the 1960’s two new elements were injected into the movie propaganda campaign. One is the use of drugs as an ever-increasing problem. It is made to seem that the people themselves are promoting drugs without any inside or outside influence. To the young people it is made to seem like everybody is doing it, and why shouldn’t they try it, too. The other factor is the ever-increasing outright filth and pornography being injected into our movies, thereby undermining our morals and polluting the thinking of all the people, especially our up-and-coming younger generation.


The television industry, which went into high gear shortly after the end of World War II, now rivals, and undoubtedly excels, the effectiveness and the viciousness of the movie industry itself in polluting the minds of the American people.


So thoroughly polluted have the minds of the American viewing audience become with the obsession of watching television that in many families, if their television set were taken away, they would be left absolutely helpless in knowing what to do with their time. Some mothers shunt their youngsters off into a room with the television set on, full blast, using the Jewish idiot box as a babysitter for their youngsters. Little do they realize that while these impressionable young minds sit in front of these Jewish boob-tubes, they are absorbing degenerate Jewish ideas. Nor do they realize that they are allowing their most precious possessions to become polluted with poison that will be hard to eliminate from the minds of their offspring for the rest of their lives.


And so with the Jews in full control of all the propaganda networks, the news wires, the newspapers, the radio networks, television networks, the movies, magazines and every other form of propaganda, America and the world is being deluged with the Jewish poison. It is being deluged and overwhelmed with the idea of intermarriage with the blacks, with the idea that Jews are sacred, immune and untouchable; with the idea that filth and pornography are the normal state of things in entertainment; with the idea that drugs are the coming thing and that everybody should try to go on a trip.


Above all, the idea of racial loyalty is being portrayed as the most heinous crime a person could ever entertain in his thoughts. Not one constructive idea comes out of all these hours and days and months and years of brain pollution that the Jew is promoting. But everything that is destructive for the White Race is being pushed and promoted: everything that is good for the niggers, the blacks, the coloreds and the Jews is being highlighted and promoted. The list of the confusing, destructive and suicidal ideas that are being slopped upon the American people, like so much garbage, is endless. In another chapter entitled, “False Ideas Disseminated by the Jews” we will discuss a few dozen more ideas with which the American people’s minds are being polluted. However, these are only a few dozen out of thousands that are continuously, forever, perpetually, and unendingly being rained upon the American people.


In their propaganda tactics the Jews are fond of always labeling something just the opposite to what it is and one of the labels they use for mind contamination is “brain washing.” I reject this term, and throughout this book I prefer to use the term “brain pollution” instead, because I believe it more correctly portrays what is actually being done. To wash one’s brain would mean to cleanse it of all impurities and pollutants. But this is not what the Jews are doing. They are actually taking normal healthy brains, that is the brains of the Gentiles, and infecting them with a lot of filth, pornography and pollutants of wrong ideas. Hence, the term “brain pollution” much more correctly signifies what the Jew is doing than does the term “brain washing.”


In aggressive pursuit of his vicious program of brain pollution, the minds of our young people are the initial and main target. In order to capture the brains of our youth, the field of education is of vital importance and the Jews have completely monopolized our educational facilities for many, many decades.


Henry Ford wrote his excellent book The International Jew over 50 years ago. Here is what he says about the Jewry in schools and colleges: “Colleges are being constantly invaded by the Jewish idea.” “The sons of the Anglo-Saxons are being attacked in their very heredity.” “The sons of the builders, the makers, are being subverted to the philosophy of the destroyers.”


“Young men in the first exhilarating months of intellectual freedom are being seized with promissory doctrines, the source and consequences of which they do not see….” “The central group of Red philosophers in every university is a Jewish group, with often enough a ‘Gentile front’ in the shape of a deluded professor. Some of these professors are in the pay of outside Red organizations. There are Intercollegiate Socialist Societies, swarming with Jews and Jewish influences, and toting Jewish professors around the country, addressing fraternities under the patronage of the best civic and university auspices.”


In suggesting what to do about it, Henry Ford said, “Simply identify the source and nature of the influence which has overrun our schools and universities. Let the students know that their choice is between the Anglo-Saxon and the Tribe of Judah. … The only absolute antidote to the Jewish influence is to call college students back to a pride of race.”


Remember Henry Ford, the great American, wrote these lines back in 1921, over 50 years ago. Since then the Jewish avalanche in our educational systems, starting with kindergarten, running through grade school, high school, and through the colleges, has turned these institutions for learning into absolute insane asylums in which the young, fertile, creative mind of the White child is polluted and perverted into an instrument for its own destruction and for the destruction of its country, nation and race. What with compulsory laws compelling the parents to send their impressionable young children to school through the age of 16 today, it invariably amounts to becoming the inmate of a penitentiary for five days a week during school hours, and, whether they like it or not, then having the young brains polluted with Jewish trash and garbage for the destruction of their race.


Henry Ford’s idea of merely identifying the source today is no longer possible or practical. Much more fundamental and drastic measures must be taken. The White Man as a whole needs a completely new outlook on life and religion. He needs a completely new philosophy and, in fact, he needs a new religion that will give him goal and purpose, an identity and ideology that are his own. The fact is the White Race needs a new religion polarized around the value of his race, the greatest value on the face of the earth. This idea and this ideology must be impregnated into the minds of our young offspring from the time they begin to talk.


There is hardly a phase in any sphere of activity that controls the destiny of this nation that the Jews don’t directly or indirectly control. With two powerful segments in their hands, namely control of the means of propaganda, and control of the money, the government of the United States is a captive puppet going through the motions of being a democracy representing all the people. But in truth, it is a powerful instrument in the hands of the Jews used to exploit, tyrannize and destroy the White Race, whose government it only seems to be.


There is hardly a public official in office of any importance today who is a free man. Almost every one of them has been placed in office or has obtained his position through Jewish manipulation and Jewish design. Having arrived where they are through the beneficence of the Jews, they then in turn must answer to the Jewish conspiracy. Behind a man like President Nixon was a Jewish boss like Henry Kissinger, born in Germany of a Jewish Rabbi. Not only does Nixon have one Jewish “advisor,” but two. The other was the Jew Arthur Burns, born Bernstein, in Austria, also the son of a Rabbi. In fact, Nixon’s whole political career was originally launched back in 1946 by a Jew named Murray Chotiner. He  continuously guided Nixon’s career and was the pimp between the Jewish community and Nixon.

President Lyndon B. Johnson had the notorious Abe Fortas and Walter Rostoff, both Jews. President Kennedy had Walter Rostoff and Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. President Roosevelt had as his real boss the head of the Kehilla, the tough, no-nonsense Jew, Bernard Baruch, as well as several lesser Jewish advisors. And, so it goes.


The same kind of Jewish control, of Jewish background, of advising and controlling, is found all the way down to the local municipal level. Many Jews themselves are elected to office, but preferably they like to have some White Gentile stooge fronting for them with the Jews pulling the strings in the background, directing, manipulating, giving orders.


Should any honest, natural leader of the White Race try to run for office and make it on his own, the gigantic propaganda machines that the Jews have at their disposal are immediately set in motion. Such a man is then smeared and attacked and vilified. Or sometimes the reverse tactic is used and he is completely blacked out so that the voters hardly know that he is even running. Should such a natural White leader make it despite all these handicaps, then the full power of the propaganda apparatus is brought into play to smear, besmirch and slander him, and downgrade him before the gullible public. The full resources of their money power is also brought into play and in the next election his opponent is well financed, given a tremendous build-up by the news media.


Usually the Jews like to select as their front stooges, men who have a fatal weakness in their character and a shameful episode in their past, one not generally known to the public. Because of their weakness of character in general and their vulnerability to blackmail, such people are easy to manipulate. What with bribery and financial assistance, they are easily enticed into becoming traitors to their own race and doing the bidding of the Jews. They are easily kept in line by threat of exposure of their disgraceful past.


I have mentioned the means of communications as being in the hands of the Jews. I have mentioned control of money and international banking, control of education and control of government as all being in the hands of the Jews. By no means does this cover the whole territory. In fact, there is hardly an activity of any significance in this country that is not directly or indirectly controlled by the “chosen” race. This also includes the law enforcement agencies, the courts and even the White Man’s religions. Of the latter we will have more to say in another chapter. I do want to mention here, however, the fact that most of the businesses, especially the significant big businesses, are all in the hands of the Jews.


Over 50 years ago Henry Ford wrote the following: “To make a list of the lines of businesses controlled by the Jews of the United States would be to touch most of the vital industries of the country — those which are really vital, and those which cultivated habits have been made to seem vital. The theatrical business is exclusively Jewish: play producing, booking, theatre operations are all in the hands of the Jews. This accounts for the fact that in almost every production today can be detected propaganda, sometimes glaringly commercial advertisement, sometimes direct political construction.”


“The motion picture industry; the sugar industry; the tobacco industry; 50 percent or more of the meat packing industry; over 60 percent of the shoe making industry; most of the musical purveying done in the country; jewelry; grain; cotton, oil; steel; magazine authorship; news distribution; liquor business; the loan business; these, to name only the industries with national and international sweep, are in control of the Jews of the United States, either alone or in association with Jews overseas.”


This is what Henry Ford observed many years ago. This great, creative and productive genius of the White Race, who built one of the world’s biggest empires with his bare hands from the ground up, should know a little something about who controlled the business of the United States during his time.


Having built the mighty Ford empire he found that some mysterious forces were trying to steal it from him through trickery and cunning. He suspected that these manipulators were being engineered by powerful Jewish financiers. Being an intelligent and resourceful man, Mr. Ford set about to find the culprits back of this maneuver. He called into his office the most intelligent research men within his acquaintance. He commissioned them to make a thorough study of the International Jew and published their findings in The Dearborn Independent which, at that time, was the official organ of the Ford Motor Company. The results of those findings, published in 1921, were a bombshell, not only to the White Gentiles, but to the Jewish conspiracy itself, because it exposed their nefarious tactics in their world-wide conspiracy. The information compiled was a valuable contribution to the White Gentiles of America and is recommended reading for everyone who wishes to learn more about the background of the International Jewish Conspiracy.


Since the Jews have had such a deadly impact upon the White civilizations over the last several thousand years, it behooves us to study intensely the nature of our Nemesis. It is also fundamental to our survival to develop a cure for this plague.

Who are these strange, peculiar people who have been able to survive longer than any other race in recorded history? Who are these people that have been destroyers of such great civilizations as Rome, Babylon and Egypt? What peculiarities in their make-up is it that has enabled them to destroy a highly wealthy country such as Russia in modern times and turn it into a Jewish slave labor camp? How, in fact, have they been able to capture the wealth of the world into their hands and turn the world into a Jewish dictatorship? How have they been able to do all this without us, the great White Race of America, even being able to discuss the question intelligently without fear and trembling?


It is of utmost importance that we study this creature biologically, psychologically, economically and also from a standpoint of race and religion.


Most White people are terribly confused about the Jewish race. One of the sorriest notions most Gentiles have fallen for is the mistaken idea that Jews are members of the White Race. This is a most treacherous deception the Jews themselves have promoted among our people, but to their own they have made it abundantly clear that they have nothing in common with the White Race.


The Jews are forever Semitics, originating out of Asia from prehistoric times.


Jewish Professor Leonard J. Fine, makes the racial point crystal clear to his own people: “We are not White symbolically, and we are not White literally. We should not permit ourselves to be lumped together with White America, for that is not where we belong.”


Much time is wasted among the White Gentiles in arguing whether the Jews are a race, or whether they are a religion, or whether they are a nation. The fact is they are all three, and it matters little in what proportion you want to attribute the importance of any of these three factors.


From ancient times, they have constituted a race that has been the plague of the civilized world. This they have been able to do because of the uniqueness of their religion. It was primarily designed to perpetuate and preserve the race by being a parasite on the body of productive nations. They are a world-wide nation and form a nation within a nation in each country on which they have fastened their tentacles. This includes just about every country in the world. If there is one factor that has bound the Jews together and made them the most tenacious, persistent race in the world it is their Mosaic religion, and the resultant racial loyalty that it has imbued upon every Jew member. It is this racial-religious unity that makes them powerful and it is something that we should take heed of in thinking about the preservation of the White Race.


The early origins of the Jewish race are lost in antiquity. The Jewish shibboleths as set forth in the story about Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are, of course, so many Jewish lies which make a good story around which they can rally their ideology, but it has absolutely no basis in fact or history.


The Jews themselves have never bothered about really tracing their origins in history, which origins remain shrouded in mystery. They simply come out with a claim that they are the chosen people of God, a very special people, and they also claim the longest historical record of any people of earth. Whereas the former claim about Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a basic tenet in their religion, one that has built the Jewish race, the second claim about having the longest historical record is hard to dispute.


The Jews appear and reappear in histories of other nations for 5,000 years. Being basically a predator and a parasite, they were either never able to, nor have they ever been willing to establish a nation in their own right. This is rather a sorry record for such a strange and virulent race, and incredible when one considers that they claim to be the favorite “chosen” of God.


The word Jew is of fairly modern usage and derives from the word Judah and Judaic. In ancient history the Jews were known as Hebrews which derives from the Aramaic word “Ebri,” which in turn derives from the Hebrew word “Ibhri” meaning “one who is from across the river.” Hebrew in all ancient literature was written as “Habiru” and appears as such frequently in the Bible and in Egyptian literature. In the Bible, Habiru is used interchangeably with “Sagaz” meaning cutthroat. Thus the Egyptians always wrote of the Jews as “the cut-throat bandits from across the river.”


Since Palestine was the crossroads of the ancient world, most of the wealthy trade routes crossed in this area. This, of course, made it a natural habitat for bands of cutthroats and robbers. The fact that deserts and mountains were part of the natural landscape further attributed to making this area the natural habitat for the development of a nation of bandits, cutthroats, robbers and parasites. This is exactly what developed, and this is as far as historical facts can show the early origin of the Jewish race.


A German Jew, Kastein, who shortened his name from Katzenstein, is recognized as an outstanding scholar of Jewish and Biblical history. In his History of the Jews, Kastein identifies many of the great names in Jewish history as bandits. He mentions Jepthah as one of the saviors of the Jewish people and identifies him as the robber chief of Gilead. Of the great Jewish hero David, he says, “At the time of Saul’s death, we find David the leader of a band of free-booters, living in Ziklag… On hearing that the throne was vacant, David immediately hastened to Hebron in Judea. Nobody had summoned him, but he put forward his claim to the kingship, declaring that Samuel had secretly appointed him.”

About the great and wise Solomon, Kastein has this to say, “Shelmo, Solomon the Peaceable, inaugurated his rule by committing three murders which cleared his path and got rid of his only brother, and did so without the slightest qualms of conscience.”


The fact that Solomon, David and Jepthah were all blood-thirsty bandits is typical of all Jewish leaders. Whereas the Jews have been a part of history since the dawn of civilization, theirs has always been a history of treachery, of bloodshed, murder, robbery
and crime.


Despite the fact that this peculiar race has persisted longer than any other on the face of the earth, two rather strange facts stand out. One is that over these thousands of years they never tried to form a country or nation of their own, and even today’s bandit state of Israel is no exception to that statement. Israel is intended only to become the headquarters for the Jewish dictatorship of the world, not a gathering place for all the Jews of the world. The second strange fact is that this tough and persistent people has never developed a civilization or a culture of their own, all their claims to the contrary not withstanding.


One of the outstanding fortes of the Jews is the skillful manipulation of propaganda. However, the record of the Hebrews and their history shows that all the Jewish claims of culture are entirely without foundation. The Horizon Book of Christianity, a standard reference work, says “The Jews began as an agglomeration of small tribes who later attained independence only in the interlude between the rise and fall of great empires. They have bequeathed no monuments testifying to magnificence. There are no tombs of Hebrew kings with chaplets of gold and chariots studded with jewels. Palestine archeology has unearthed no statues of David or Solomon, but only water pots like the one from which Rebecca watered the camels of Abraham’s servants.”


The Oriental Institute of Chicago contains one of the world’s most outstanding collections of the fine arts, specializing in Egyptian, Syrian and other cultures of the Near East, in the area which the Jews claim as that of their origin. One would expect to find the Jewish contribution to civilization well represented there. After walking through vast halls filled with great works of art, splendid statues, exquisite j ewels, and other artifacts from the tombs of Egyptian and Assyrian conquerors, we come to the Jewish exhibit. Here we find a glass case filled with broken bits of clay pots, crude, undecorated, and unglazed utensils which might have come down to us from the Stone Age. This is the great Jewish “culture” about which the Jews brag so flagrantly and it is about all they have to offer.


The fact is that the Jews were known throughout ancient history only as destroyers. They produced no art, founded no dynasties, built no great cities, and, alone of all the ancient peoples, had no talent for the finer things of culture or civilized life. Yet today we will hear the Jews boast loud and long about how they are the sole torchbearers of civilization.


The noted historian, Arnold Toynbee, defined the Jews for all time a few years ago, when he described them as a “fossil” people. By this he meant that they were a people who had failed to develop since the Stone Age, as their primitive clay pots prove to us. They were never able to master agriculture, animal husbandry, architecture, or any of the civilized arts. Even as a bandit nation the Jews were not too successful, and eked out a precarious living in Palestine where they were often on the verge of starvation.


Kastein says further of the Jews: “Some remained within the confines of Canaan, others settled down along the great military highway of the East, and in the neighboring deserts and wildernesses, where they led a nomadic existence, while a smaller section, driven by hunger, finally succeeded in reaching Egypt, where the Pharaohs took them under their protection.” The Egyptians, who built one of the earliest and one of the great civilizations of all time, failed to recognize their own greatest asset: the innate, inborn value of their racial lines which produced the civilization in their midst. We have already discussed how one of their greatest mistakes was to allow the entry of the blacks from the lower Nile to come into their country and intermingle, defile and bastardize their bloodlines. Of all the races in ancient Egypt that intermingled, the Jews alone held themselves apart.


The Pharaohs, having allowed the Jews to come in through sheer sympathy for their starved and miserable existence, were soon to learn the virulent and destructive nature of the parasite that they had allowed to enter. The Jews soon rose to high positions in the land of the Pharaohs, and, simultaneously, as was to happen in so many other countries, the Empire began to disintegrate. The parasites the Egyptians had taken in through sympathy, in short order began to manifest their outstanding characteristics, namely that of tearing down a civilization from within. Gangs of bandits soon sprang up and began to harass and plunder the trade routes.


They became bolder in the outposts of the Empire. They seemed to know just when to strike and which of the towns were poorly guarded.


With the Jews acting as leaders and catalysts, the process of trading in black slaves was increased and the mongrelization of the White Egyptian nation was hastened. The Empire began to decay from within. Its leadership became apathetic, the race became more and more tinged with black blood and the morale of the people was undermined. Here is what Alan H. Gardiner translates from an ancient papyrus in Leiden: “Egypt was in distress, the social system had become disorganized; violence filled the land. Invaders preyed upon the defenseless population; the rich were stripped of everything and slept in the open, and the poor took their possessions. It is no merely local disturbance that is here described, but a great and overwhelming national disaster. The Pharaoh was strangely inactive.”


Here we have a typical description of the Jewish virulence in spreading disintegration, and destroying a great nation upon which they had fastened their tentacles. We saw the same thing happen in the downfall of Babylon. In studying the French Revolution and the Russian communist revolution we find a similar and parallel occurrence.


By 2,100 B.C. the Egyptian nation was so demoralized and divided that they were unable to resist conquest from outside. And as usual the Jews paved the way for the conquerors. They paved the way for the Hyksos, or Shepherd Kings, who won Egypt without a battle and maintained an iron dictatorship over the people for 511 years. The Hyksos were known as the protectors of the Jews. During this period of five centuries the Jews were princes in Egypt, taking what they wanted from the enslaved Egyptians, and incurring their enmity by their vicious arrogance over the betrayed population. Finally, the native leaders of the Egyptians led a successful revolt, and expelled the Hyksos forever. After the Egyptians regained control of their own country and their own destiny they punished the Jews for their treachery, and enslaved them for a life of hard labor.


This brings us to the period of Moses, when the Jews complained about their hard lot in Egypt. Before they betrayed the nation to the Hyksos, they had enjoyed every freedom in Egypt, and it was only natural that they should now be punished for their treason.


Rather than endure this slavery, they petitioned the Pharaoh to let them return to Palestine, and resume their life of nomadic banditry. But the outraged Egyptian people demanded that they serve out their punishment, and the Pharaoh was forced to agree. Now the Jews used every device to obtain their freedom, bringing plagues upon the Egyptian people through the use of poisons and contaminating the water.


They were finally allowed to depart from Egypt. It is during this period that their religion became more solidified and the bandit race began to develop a more distinct character.


From here on out they scattered into the midsts of other nations such as the Babylonian civilization, the Greek civilization, and the Persian civilization, there to infect and infest the body of these nations and spell their destruction.


A leading businessman, J. J. Cavanaugh, has compared the dispersion of the Jews to the physiological effects of cancer. He says, “The Jews can be best understood as a disease of civilization. They can be likened to the spread of cancer throughout the human system. Just as the Jews spread out through the civilized world, following the trade routes, so cancer cells spread through the body, traveling along the arteries and veins to every part of the system. And just as the Jews gather in critical areas of the world and begin to multiply, and strangle and poison whole communities and nations, so cancer cells gather and multiply and destroy the organs of the body, and finally, the body itself.”


Many historians of the ancient world noted the Jewish phenomenon, and commented upon it, but most of these works have since been destroyed. When Julius Caesar arrived in Alexandria, one of the first acts that he had his soldiers perform was to burn the great libraries that the Egyptians had accumulated in Alexandria. Since Julius Caesar was a defender of the Jews and one of their agents, this is easily understood. If we still had these libraries, these books and this information available to us today, we would undoubtedly be able to focus a lot more light on the influence of Jewish infestation on the ancient civilizations.


Among the few comments on Jews which have survived the Jewish destruction of libraries are those of Philo and Strabo. Philo, an important historian, wrote that “Jewish communities have spread out over all the continents and islands.”


Strabo’ s comments upon the Jews, written in the time of the Emperor Augustus of Rome, is even more revealing. He wrote, “This people (the Jews) has already made its way into every city, and it is not easy to find any place in the habitable world which has not received this nation and in which it has not made its power felt.”


So we see that as the Roman civilization developed the Jews were there. By the time of Julius Caesar the Jews were a powerful and controlling influence on the financial structure of Rome and the government of Rome itself. Julius Caesar was one of their agents, as in modern times were Roosevelt and Churchill. By this time the Romans themselves were becoming well aware of the evil and destructive influence that the Jews heaped upon their nation and there began a reaction against the Jews. The Romans, like so many other peoples who were infested with this parasite, made attempt after attempt to get the Jews out of Rome, but they always came back. Rome, at the time of Julius Caesar, was operating under a republican-democratic form of government made up of many opposing political parties and groups, a situation similar to what we find in America today. In order to win, a politician needed the support of one group which would stick by him without fail and, thus, influence other groups to support him. In Roman times, as in the present day democracies, the one solidified, unified group who knew their purpose in politics were the Jews. They would guarantee their support to any politician who, in turn, would become their stooge.


Julius Caesar discovered this simple fact of life. He sought out the Jews and won their support. With the Jews behind him, Caesar soon became the dictator of Rome and the unchallenged ruler of the world. Alarmed by his increasing subservience to the Jews, a group of loyal senators, led by Brutus, a former friend of Caesar’s in his pre-Jewish period, resolved to assassinate him. We have all heard of the famous assassination of Julius Caesar, but few have heard of the central fact in the case, namely that Julius Caesar was assassinated because he was a stooge for the Jews. Emperor Augustus, who inherited the Empire after Caesar’s generals fell out among themselves, again restored special privileges to the Jews. This explains why he emerged stronger than the other factions which divided Rome after Caesar’s death.


Despite the strong Jewish influence, one factor emerged that helped strengthen the Roman position. The democratic-republican form of government changed to the Empire form, with an Emperor as head of the nation. The Romans had finally found from experience that the multi- party system, with the powers split among several divisive factions, was a weak and ineffective method of government. When they changed over to the leadership principle, the Empire for 200 years progressed amidst peace and prosperity. In fact, Pax Romana, a period from the time of Emperor Augustus to approximately 200 A.D., was the longest period of peace in the history of civilized nations of the world and in the history of the White Race. We must remember that this was
accomplished despite the Jewish influence and because some of the Emperors had the intestinal fortitude to resist the Jewish power.


This they could never have done under the democratic-republican system of government. We find, therefore, under Emperor Vespasian, that when the Jews in Jerusalem and Judea rebelled, he sent General Titus down there to lay siege to the city. In short order the city was conquered, the inhabitants were either slain or sold into captivity and the city itself was leveled to the ground.


Roman justice was tough and final but the Jews were far from finished. It was at this time that Jewish hatred for the Romans reached its peak intensity. They hated the Romans with a vengeance as they had the Babylonians, whom they had destroyed earlier. This is a key characteristic of the Jews: to hate with a fierce passion the host upon whom they are feeding and whom they have marked for destruction. The fact that the host has been their main means of sustenance makes no difference. Like a true parasite they will pursue the destruction of their host to the bitter end, although this might mean their own destruction.


Having learned the lesson in the destruction of Jerusalem that they were no match for the Romans in open combat, the treacherous and cunning mind of the Jews conceived a means of pulling down and destroying the Roman Empire. It was during this period, shortly after the destruction of Jerusalem that the Jews feverishly began propagating the Christian ideology which implanted in the minds of the Romans such suicidal ideas as “turn the other cheek”, “love thine enemy”, “sell all thou hast and give it to the poor”, “resist not evil”, “judge not”, “think not of the morrow”, “lay up treasures in heaven.”


The new religion that the Jews foisted upon the Romans promised them that if they would do all these suicidal things, they would get their reward in the hereafter, eternal salvation, etc. The Romans fell for this suicidal advice with the bait of a promised reward in the hereafter. Shortly thereupon the Roman Empire went into rapid decline.


When the Roman Empire collapsed, one of the primary reasons for its fall was the declining birth rate of White Roman children. History records that eventually there was virtually no one left to rule Rome but mongrelized minority groups who had bred themselves into the majority and formed the mindless mob that brought death and destruction to the Roman Empire. Today the same thing is happening in America as young people of White racial ancestry are being taught and bombarded with the idea that it is a sin to bring children into the world and that if they wish to have children, they should adopt some poor underprivileged children of a minority race.


After the death of Emperor Domitian in 96 A.D., the emperors of Rome were no longer of Roman birth; from there on they were all foreigners influenced by Jewish “advisors” in the background. By the year 313 A.D., Emperor Constantine, in the Edict of Milan proclaimed Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire. From there on out, under the influence of the Jewish ideology imposed on the Roman people, history shows that Rome began to disintegrate rapidly. By the year 476 A.D. the barbarians from the West had conquered Rome with hardly any opposition. The will of the now mongrelized and Christianized people of Rome to defend their nation and homes was gone. Rome was no more.


In all our history books, and especially in religious circles, we are told that Christianity and the Jews were in opposition; that Christ denounced the Jews; that the Jews crucified Christ. Even today we are being told in Kosher Konservative circles that the main objective of the Jews is to destroy Christianity. This is, of course, one of the biggest hoaxes in the history of the world. The facts are plainly there for everyone to see. The Jews concocted Christianity as their special poison to unhinge the minds of the Romans so that they would no longer be able to maintain their civilization. This was the Jews’ revenge for the destruction of Jerusalem and the biological manifestation of the intense Jewish hatred for the host nation upon which they prey.


The Jewish historian, Kastein, frankly admits this extraordinary characteristic of the Jews. He says, “To the Jews, Rome constituted the quintessence of all that was odious and should be swept away from off the face of the earth. They hated Rome and her device, arma et leges, with an inhuman hatred.” We have seen other examples of how the Jew continues to hate the people he has destroyed. Centuries after Babylon was no more the Jew fulminates again and again about “the whore of Babylon.” But of all the nations, the Jews hated Rome the most, probably because Rome represented one of the finest examples of what a beautiful and powerful civilization the creative and productive White Race can produce.


So terrible is the hatred that the parasitic Jew has for the host upon whom he feeds, that it is most important for the Jew to mask his true feelings. Consequently, he always appears bearing an olive branch. His first word is “shalom,” or peace. It is this necessity to conceal his true feelings which leads the Jew to conduct his affairs and his meetings in secret.


We, the White people of the globe, have much to learn from the history of Rome. Roman history probably is the greatest teacher mankind will ever have, for all time. They built a wonderful civilization, an achievement that has never been equaled. On the negative side the lessons we can learn are even stronger.


Let Us Examine What These Lessons Are, First On the Positive Side:


1. The civilization the Romans created was a result of what the Romans themselves were — a blonde, tall, blue-eyed White Race, endowed by Nature with beauty, creativity and intelligence.


2. They were — during their rise and development — a pure and unadulterated race. Their rise continued as long as they remained a pure race. It halted, declined and decayed as they became mongrelized through the mixture of races injected in their national bloodstream.


3. They were manly, brave, courageous and outstanding warriors. In a few centuries they conquered most of the then known world.


4. They were systematic, well organized, and had a penchant for law, order and organization. They were the greatest law-givers that the world has ever seen. Most of the laws of the civilized Western world is based originally on Roman law. They developed the most expressive and orderly language in the history of mankind. Today, 2,000 years later, the Latin language has still not been equaled. They had an inborn sense of responsibility towards their homes, their family and their country. They were a creative, culture loving people and developed language, literature, art and sculpture to heights never before attained and, perhaps, in some respects not equaled today. They could be hard and decisive when dealing with their enemies, as for example the complete destruction of Carthage and Jerusalem.


On the Negative Side We Can Learn the Following:


1. The Romans failed to realize that their empire, their civilization, and their greatness were due to the inherent quality of their outstanding racial stock.


2. They imported blacks and other peoples into their Empire, and took no decisive measures to prevent the contamination of their precious bloodlines.


3. The Romans had a useless and pointless religion that was a copy of, and a modification of, the Greek mythologies and their Gods. The essence of their religion consisted of a number of Gods and semi-Gods, cavorting and clowning from one mischievous affair to another. It did absolutely nothing to give the Romans purpose or unity. It contributed nothing toward any racial or national goals, nor did it teach them the value of their marvelous race. In summation, it failed to protect them from racial destruction.


4. They were completely unable to cope with the treacherous and cunning Jew in their midst. Because they allowed the mongrelization of their racial stock; the infiltration of the Jew into their finances, education and government; and because they then succumbed to the suicidal “new” Christian religion, they perished miserably.


If they had had a strong sense of racial loyalty, rather than “national” loyalty to Rome, and embodied this as their national religion, they would neither have been mongrelized, nor would they have succumbed to the poisonous new religion the Jew injected into their thinking, a religion which unhinged their reasoning and brought about their destruction.

Had the Romans had such a religion, instead of the silly, superficial religion they copied from the Greeks, Roman civilization would undoubtedly have survived to this day and for many thousands of years thereafter. In fact, civilizations do not die except when their racial blood becomes contaminated and the progeny is no longer the same as the forefathers who created the original civilization and culture.


If Roman civilization had prevailed, what a blessing for this world it would have been! Instead of a Jew-ridden world racked by revolution, dissension and anarchy, teeming with increasing floods of mongrels and coloreds, we would today have a beautiful White world in every part of every continent, prosperous, peaceful, orderly, and productive. We would have a world minus the colored and inferior scum that infests so much of the good real estate of the globe today, and undoubtedly minus that destroyer of all civilizations — the parasitic Jew.


Dr. E. Michael Jones - The Intentional Degradation of Our Culture....



“Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East


The Infamous "Oded Yinon Plan". Introduction by Michel Chossudovsky


Settlements israeli flag

This article was first published on Global Research on April 29, 2013.


Global Research Editor’s Note


The following document pertaining to the formation of “Greater Israel” constitutes the cornerstone of powerful Zionist factions within the current Netanyahu government (which has recently been re-elected), the Likud party, as well as within the Israeli military and intelligence establishment.  The election was fought by Netanyahu on a political platform which denies Palestinian statehood.  


According to the founding father of Zionism Theodore Herzl, “the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.”  According to Rabbi Fischmann,  “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”


When viewed in the current context, the war on Iraq, the 2006 war on Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya, the ongoing war on Syria and Iraq, the war in Yemen, the process of regime change in Egypt, must be understood in relation to the Zionist Plan for the Middle East. The latter consists in weakening and eventually fracturing neighboring Arab states as part of an Israeli expansionist project.


“Greater Israel” consists in an area extending from the Nile Valley to the Euphrates.


The Zionist project supports the Jewish settlement movement. More broadly it involves a policy of excluding Palestinians from Palestine leading to the eventual annexation of both the West Bank and Gaza to the State of Israel.


Greater Israel would create a number of proxy States. It would include parts of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, the Sinai, as well as parts of  Iraq and Saudi Arabia. .

According to Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya in a 2011 Global Research article,   The Yinon Plan was a continuation of Britain’s colonial design in the Middle East:


“[The Yinon plan] is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states.


Israeli strategists viewed Iraq as their biggest strategic challenge from an Arab state. This is why Iraq was outlined as the centerpiece to the balkanization of the Middle East and the Arab World. In Iraq, on the basis of the concepts of the Yinon Plan, Israeli strategists have called for the division of Iraq into a Kurdish state and two Arab states, one for Shiite Muslims and the other for Sunni Muslims. The first step towards establishing this was a war between Iraq and Iran, which the Yinon Plan discusses.


The Atlantic, in 2008, and the U.S. military’s Armed Forces Journal, in 2006, both published widely circulated maps that closely followed the outline of the Yinon Plan. Aside from a divided Iraq, which the Biden Plan also calls for, the Yinon Plan calls for a divided Lebanon, Egypt, and Syria. The partitioning of Iran, Turkey, Somalia, and Pakistan also all fall into line with these views. The Yinon Plan also calls for dissolution in North Africa and forecasts it as starting from Egypt and then spilling over into Sudan, Libya, and the rest of the region.


Greater Israel” requires the breaking up of the existing Arab states into small states.


“The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation…  This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme.” (Yinon Plan, see below)

Viewed in this context, the war on Syria and Iraq is part of the process of Israeli territorial expansion. Israeli intelligence working hand in glove with the US, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and NATO is directly supportive of the crusade directed against the so-called Islamic State (ISIS), which ultimately seeks to destroy both Syria and Iraq as nation states. 


Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, September 06, 2015 


                                                                                                    The Zionist Plan for the Middle East 

Translated and edited by

Israel Shahak


The Israel of Theodore Herzl (1904) and of Rabbi Fischmann (1947)


In his Complete Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.”


Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”




Oded Yinon’s

“A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties”


Published by the

Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc.

Belmont, Massachusetts, 1982

Special Document No. 1 (ISBN 0-937694-56-8)


Table of Contents


  Publisher’s Note1


The Association of Arab-American University Graduates finds it compelling to inaugurate its new publication series, Special Documents, with Oded Yinon’s article which appeared in Kivunim (Directions), the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organization. Oded Yinon is an Israeli journalist and was formerly attached to the Foreign Ministry of Israel. To our knowledge, this document is the most explicit, detailed and unambiguous statement to date of the Zionist strategy in the Middle East. Furthermore, it stands as an accurate representation of the “vision” for the entire Middle East of the presently ruling Zionist regime of Begin, Sharon and Eitan. Its importance, hence, lies not in its historical value but in the nightmare which it presents.


The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation.


This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme. This theme has been documented on a very modest scale in the AAUG publication,  Israel’s Sacred Terrorism (1980), by Livia Rokach. Based on the memoirs of Moshe Sharett, former Prime Minister of Israel, Rokach’s study documents, in convincing detail, the Zionist plan as it applies to Lebanon and as it was prepared in the mid-fifties.


The first massive Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1978 bore this plan out to the minutest detail. The second and more barbaric and encompassing Israeli invasion of Lebanon on June 6, 1982, aims to effect certain parts of this plan which hopes to see not only Lebanon, but Syria and Jordan as well, in fragments. This ought to make mockery of Israeli public claims regarding their desire for a strong and independent Lebanese central government. More accurately, they want a Lebanese central government that sanctions their regional imperialist designs by signing a peace treaty with them. They also seek acquiescence in their designs by the Syrian, Iraqi, Jordanian and other Arab governments as well as by the Palestinian people. What they want and what they are planning for is not an Arab world, but a world of Arab fragments that is ready to succumb to Israeli hegemony. Hence, Oded Yinon in his essay, “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980′s,” talks about “far-reaching opportunities for the first time since 1967″ that are created by the “very stormy situation [that] surrounds Israel.”


The Zionist policy of displacing the Palestinians from Palestine is very much an active policy, but is pursued more forcefully in times of conflict, such as in the 1947-1948 war and in the 1967 war. An appendix entitled  ”Israel Talks of a New Exodus” is included in this publication to demonstrate past Zionist dispersals of Palestinians from their homeland and to show, besides the main Zionist document we present, other Zionist planning for the de-Palestinization of Palestine.


It is clear from the Kivunim document, published in February, 1982, that the “far-reaching opportunities” of which Zionist strategists have been thinking are the same “opportunities” of which they are trying to convince the world and which they claim were generated by their June, 1982 invasion. It is also clear that the Palestinians were never the sole target of Zionist plans, but the priority target since their viable and independent presence as a people negates the essence of the Zionist state. Every Arab state, however, especially those with cohesive and clear nationalist directions, is a real target sooner or later.


Contrasted with the detailed and unambiguous Zionist strategy elucidated in this document, Arab and Palestinian strategy, unfortunately, suffers from ambiguity and incoherence. There is no indication that Arab strategists have internalized the Zionist plan in its full ramifications. Instead, they react with incredulity and shock whenever a new stage of it unfolds. This is apparent in Arab reaction, albeit muted, to the Israeli siege of Beirut. The sad fact is that as long as the Zionist strategy for the Middle East is not taken seriously Arab reaction to any future siege of other Arab capitals will be the same.

Khalil Nakhleh

July 23, 1982


by Israel Shahak


The following essay represents, in my opinion, the accurate and detailed plan of the present Zionist regime (of Sharon and Eitan) for the Middle East which is based on the division of the whole area into small states, and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states. I will comment on the military aspect of this plan in a concluding note. Here I want to draw the attention of the readers to several important points:


1. The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in Israeli strategic thinking. For example, Ze’ev Schiff, the military correspondent of Ha’aretz (and probably the most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about the “best” that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq: “The dissolution of Iraq into a Shi’ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part” (Ha’aretz 6/2/1982). Actually, this aspect of the plan is very old.


2. The strong connection with Neo-Conservative thought in the USA is very prominent, especially in the author’s notes. But, while lip service is paid to the idea of the “defense of the West” from Soviet power, the real aim of the author, and of the present Israeli establishment is clear: To make an Imperial Israel into a world power. In other words, the aim of Sharon is to deceive the Americans after he has deceived all the rest.


3. It is obvious that much of the relevant data, both in the notes and in the text, is garbled or omitted, such as the financial help of the U.S. to Israel. Much of it is pure fantasy. But, the plan is not to be regarded as not influential, or as not capable of realization for a short time. The plan follows faithfully the geopolitical ideas current in Germany of 1890-1933, which were swallowed whole by Hitler and the Nazi movement, and determined their aims for East Europe. Those aims, especially the division of the existing states, were carried out in 1939-1941, and only an alliance on the global scale prevented their consolidation for a period of time.


The notes by the author follow the text. To avoid confusion, I did not add any notes of my own, but have put the substance of them into this foreward and the conclusion at the end. I have, however, emphasized some portions of the text.

Israel Shahak

June 13, 1982


A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties

by Oded Yinon

This essay originally appeared in Hebrew in KIVUNIM (Directions), A Journal for Judaism and Zionism; Issue No, 14–Winter, 5742, February 1982, Editor: Yoram Beck. Editorial Committee: Eli Eyal, Yoram Beck, Amnon Hadari, Yohanan Manor, Elieser Schweid. Published by the Department of Publicity/The World Zionist Organization, Jerusalem.


At the outset of the nineteen eighties the State of Israel is in need of a new perspective as to its place, its aims and national targets, at home and abroad. This need has become even more vital due to a number of central processes which the country, the region and the world are undergoing. We are living today in the early stages of a new epoch in human history which is not at all similar to its predecessor, and its characteristics are totally different from what we have hitherto known. That is why we need an understanding of the central processes which typify this historical epoch on the one hand, and on the other hand we need a world outlook and an operational strategy in accordance with the new conditions. The existence, prosperity and steadfastness of the Jewish state will depend upon its ability to adopt a new framework for its domestic and foreign affairs.


This epoch is characterized by several traits which we can already diagnose, and which symbolize a genuine revolution in our present lifestyle. The dominant process is the breakdown of the rationalist, humanist outlook as the major cornerstone supporting the life and achievements of Western civilization since the Renaissance. The political, social and economic views which have emanated from this foundation have been based on several “truths” which are presently disappearing–for example, the view that man as an individual is the center of the universe and everything exists in order to fulfill his basic material needs. This position is being invalidated in the present when it has become clear that the amount of resources in the cosmos does not meet Man’s requirements, his economic needs or his demographic constraints. In a world in which there are four billion human beings and economic and energy resources which do not grow proportionally to meet the needs of mankind, it is unrealistic to expect to fulfill the main requirement of Western Society, 1 i.e., the wish and aspiration for boundless consumption. The view that ethics plays no part in determining the direction Man takes, but rather his material needs do–that view is becoming prevalent today as we see a world in which nearly all values are disappearing. We are losing the ability to assess the simplest things, especially when they concern the simple question of what is Good and what is Evil.


The vision of man’s limitless aspirations and abilities shrinks in the face of the sad facts of life, when we witness the break-up of world order around us. The view which promises liberty and freedom to mankind seems absurd in light of the sad fact that three fourths of the human race lives under totalitarian regimes. The views concerning equality and social justice have been transformed by socialism and especially by Communism into a laughing stock. There is no argument as to the truth of these two ideas, but it is clear that they have not been put into practice properly and the majority of mankind has lost the liberty, the freedom and the opportunity for equality and justice. In this nuclear world in which we are (still) living in relative peace for thirty years, the concept of peace and coexistence among nations has no meaning when a superpower like the USSR holds a military and political doctrine of the sort it has: that not only is a nuclear war possible and necessary in order to achieve the ends of Marxism, but that it is possible to survive after it, not to speak of the fact that one can be victorious in it.2


The essential concepts of human society, especially those of the West, are undergoing a change due to political, military and economic transformations. Thus, the nuclear and conventional might of the USSR has transformed the epoch that has just ended into the last respite before the great saga that will demolish a large part of our world in a multi-dimensional global war, in comparison with which the past world wars will have been mere child’s play. The power of nuclear as well as of conventional weapons, their quantity, their precision and quality will turn most of our world upside down within a few years, and we must align ourselves so as to face that in Israel. That is, then, the main threat to our existence and that of the Western world. 3 The war over resources in the world, the Arab monopoly on oil, and the need of the West to import most of its raw materials from the Third World, are transforming the world we know, given that one of the major aims of the USSR is to defeat the West by gaining control over the gigantic resources in the Persian Gulf and in the southern part of Africa, in which the majority of world minerals are located. We can imagine the dimensions of the global confrontation which will face us in the future.


The Gorshkov doctrine calls for Soviet control of the oceans and mineral rich areas of the Third World. That together with the present Soviet nuclear doctrine which holds that it is possible to manage, win and survive a nuclear war, in the course of which the West’s military might well be destroyed and its inhabitants made slaves in the service of Marxism-Leninism, is the main danger to world peace and to our own existence. Since 1967, the Soviets have transformed Clausewitz’ dictum into “War is the continuation of policy in nuclear means,” and made it the motto which guides all their policies. Already today they are busy carrying out their aims in our region and throughout the world, and the need to face them becomes the major element in our country’s security policy and of course that of the rest of the Free World. That is our major foreign challenge.4


The Arab Moslem world, therefore, is not the major strategic problem which we shall face in the Eighties, despite the fact that it carries the main threat against Israel, due to its growing military might. This world, with its ethnic minorities, its factions and internal crises, which is astonishingly self-destructive, as we can see in Lebanon, in non-Arab Iran and now also in Syria, is unable to deal successfully with its fundamental problems and does not therefore constitute a real threat against the State of Israel in the long run, but only in the short run where its immediate military power has great import. In the long run, this world will be unable to exist within its present framework in the areas around us without having to go through genuine revolutionary changes. The Moslem Arab World is built like a temporary house of cards put together by foreigners (France and Britain in the Nineteen Twenties), without the wishes and desires of the inhabitants having been taken into account. It was arbitrarily divided into 19 states, all made of combinations of minorites and ethnic groups which are hostile to one another, so that every Arab Moslem state nowadays faces ethnic social destruction from within, and in some a civil war is already raging. 5 Most of the Arabs, 118 million out of 170 million, live in Africa, mostly in Egypt (45 million today).


Apart from Egypt, all the Maghreb states are made up of a mixture of Arabs and non-Arab Berbers. In Algeria there is already a civil war raging in the Kabile mountains between the two nations in the country. Morocco and Algeria are at war with each other over Spanish Sahara, in addition to the internal struggle in each of them. Militant Islam endangers the integrity of Tunisia and Qaddafi organizes wars which are destructive from the Arab point of view, from a country which is sparsely populated and which cannot become a powerful nation. That is why he has been attempting unifications in the past with states that are more genuine, like Egypt and Syria. Sudan, the most torn apart state in the Arab Moslem world today is built upon four groups hostile to each other, an Arab Moslem Sunni minority which rules over a majority of non-Arab Africans, Pagans, and Christians. In Egypt there is a Sunni Moslem majority facing a large minority of Christians which is dominant in upper Egypt: some 7 million of them, so that even Sadat, in his speech on May 8, expressed the fear that they will want a state of their own, something like a “second” Christian Lebanon in Egypt.


All the Arab States east of Israel are torn apart, broken up and riddled with inner conflict even more than those of the Maghreb. Syria is fundamentally no different from Lebanon except in the strong military regime which rules it. But the real civil war taking place nowadays between the Sunni majority and the Shi’ite Alawi ruling minority (a mere 12% of the population) testifies to the severity of the domestic trouble.


Iraq is, once again, no different in essence from its neighbors, although its majority is Shi’ite and the ruling minority Sunni. Sixty-five percent of the population has no say in politics, in which an elite of 20 percent holds the power. In addition there is a large Kurdish minority in the north, and if it weren’t for the strength of the ruling regime, the army and the oil revenues, Iraq’s future state would be no different than that of Lebanon in the past or of Syria today. The seeds of inner conflict and civil war are apparent today already, especially after the rise of Khomeini to power in Iran, a leader whom the Shi’ites in Iraq view as their natural leader.


All the Gulf principalities and Saudi Arabia are built upon a delicate house of sand in which there is only oil. In Kuwait, the Kuwaitis constitute only a quarter of the population. In Bahrain, the Shi’ites are the majority but are deprived of power. In the UAE, Shi’ites are once again the majority but the Sunnis are in power. The same is true of Oman and North Yemen. Even in the Marxist South Yemen there is a sizable Shi’ite minority. In Saudi Arabia half the population is foreign, Egyptian and Yemenite, but a Saudi minority holds power.


Jordan is in reality Palestinian, ruled by a Trans-Jordanian Bedouin minority, but most of the army and certainly the bureaucracy is now Palestinian. As a matter of fact Amman is as Palestinian as Nablus. All of these countries have powerful armies, relatively speaking. But there is a problem there too. The Syrian army today is mostly Sunni with an Alawi officer corps, the Iraqi army Shi’ite with Sunni commanders. This has great significance in the long run, and that is why it will not be possible to retain the loyalty of the army for a long time except where it comes to the only common denominator: The hostility towards Israel, and today even that is insufficient.


Alongside the Arabs, split as they are, the other Moslem states share a similar predicament. Half of Iran’s population is comprised of a Persian speaking group and the other half of an ethnically Turkish group. Turkey’s population comprises a Turkish Sunni Moslem majority, some 50%, and two large minorities, 12 million Shi’ite Alawis and 6 million Sunni Kurds. In Afghanistan there are 5 million

Shi’ites who constitute one third of the population. In Sunni Pakistan there are 15 million Shi’ites who endanger the existence of that state.


This national ethnic minority picture extending from Morocco to India and from Somalia to Turkey points to the absence of stability and a rapid degeneration in the entire region. When this picture is added to the economic one, we see how the entire region is built like a house of cards, unable to withstand its severe problems.


In this giant and fractured world there are a few wealthy groups and a huge mass of poor people. Most of the Arabs have an average yearly income of 300 dollars. That is the situation in Egypt, in most of the Maghreb countries except for Libya, and in Iraq. Lebanon is torn apart and its economy is falling to pieces. It is a state in which there is no centralized power, but only 5 de facto sovereign authorities (Christian in the north, supported by the Syrians and under the rule of the Franjieh clan, in the East an area of direct Syrian conquest, in the center a Phalangist controlled Christian enclave, in the south and up to the Litani river a mostly Palestinian region controlled by the PLO and Major Haddad’s state of Christians and half a million Shi’ites). Syria is in an even graver situation and even the assistance she will obtain in the future after the unification with Libya will not be sufficient for dealing with the basic problems of existence and the maintenance of a large army. Egypt is in the worst situation: Millions are on the verge of hunger, half the labor force is unemployed, and housing is scarce in this most densely populated area of the world. Except for the army, there is not a single department operating efficiently and the state is in a permanent state of bankruptcy and depends entirely on American foreign assistance granted since the peace.6


In the Gulf states, Saudi Arabia, Libya and Egypt there is the largest accumulation of money and oil in the world, but those enjoying it are tiny elites who lack a wide base of support and self-confidence, something that no army can guarantee. 7 The Saudi army with all its equipment cannot defend the regime from real dangers at home or abroad, and what took place in Mecca in 1980 is only an example. A sad and very stormy situation surrounds Israel and creates challenges for it, problems, risks but also far-reaching opportunities for the first time since 1967. Chances are that opportunities missed at that time will become achievable in the Eighties to an extent and along dimensions which we cannot even imagine today.


The “peace” policy and the return of territories, through a dependence upon the US, precludes the realization of the new option created for us. Since 1967, all the governments of Israel have tied our national aims down to narrow political needs, on the one hand, and on the other to destructive opinions at home which neutralized our capacities both at home and abroad. Failing to take steps towards the Arab population in the new territories, acquired in the course of a war forced upon us, is the major strategic error committed by Israel on the morning after the Six Day War. We could have saved ourselves all the bitter and dangerous conflict since then if we had given Jordan to the Palestinians who live west of the Jordan river. By doing that we would have neutralized the Palestinian problem which we nowadays face, and to which we have found solutions that are really no solutions at all, such as territorial compromise or autonomy which amount, in fact, to the same thing. 8 Today, we suddenly face immense opportunities for transforming the situation thoroughly and this we must do in the coming decade, otherwise we shall not survive as a state.


In the course of the Nineteen Eighties, the State of Israel will have to go through far-reaching changes in its political and economic regime domestically, along with radical changes in its foreign policy, in order to stand up to the global and regional challenges of this new epoch. The loss of the Suez Canal oil fields, of the immense potential of the oil, gas and other natural resources in the Sinai peninsula which is geomorphologically identical to the rich oil-producing countries in the region, will result in an energy drain in the near future and will destroy our domestic economy: one quarter of our present GNP as well as one third of the budget is used for the purchase of oil. 9 The search for raw materials in the Negev and on the coast will not, in the near future, serve to alter that state of affairs.


(Regaining) the Sinai peninsula with its present and potential resources is therefore a political priority which is obstructed by the Camp David and the peace agreements. The fault for that lies of course with the present Israeli government and the governments which paved the road to the policy of territorial compromise, the Alignment governments since 1967. The Egyptians will not need to keep the peace treaty after the return of the Sinai, and they will do all they can to return to the fold of the Arab world and to the USSR in order to gain support and military assistance. American aid is guaranteed only for a short while, for the terms of the peace and the weakening of the U.S. both at home and abroad will bring about a reduction in aid. Without oil and the income from it, with the present enormous expenditure, we will not be able to get through 1982 under the present conditions and we will have to act in order to return the situation to the status quo which existed in Sinai prior to Sadat’s visit and the mistaken peace agreement signed with him in March 1979. 10


Israel has two major routes through which to realize this purpose, one direct and the other indirect. The direct option is the less realistic one because of the nature of the regime and government in Israel as well as the wisdom of Sadat who obtained our withdrawal from Sinai, which was, next to the war of 1973, his major achievement since he took power. Israel will not unilaterally break the treaty, neither today, nor in 1982, unless it is very hard pressed economically and politically and Egypt provides Israel with the excuse to take the Sinai back into our hands for the fourth time in our short history. What is left therefore, is the indirect option. The economic situation in Egypt, the nature of the regime and its pan-

Arab policy, will bring about a situation after April 1982 in which Israel will be forced to act directly or indirectly in order to regain control over Sinai as a strategic, economic and energy reserve for the long run. Egypt does not constitute a military strategic problem due to its internal conflicts and it could be driven back to the post 1967 war situation in no more than one day. 11


The myth of Egypt as the strong leader of the Arab World was demolished back in 1956 and definitely did not survive 1967, but our policy, as in the return of the Sinai, served to turn the myth into “fact.” In reality, however, Egypt’s power in proportion both to Israel alone and to the rest of the Arab World has gone down about 50 percent since 1967. Egypt is no longer the leading political power in the Arab World and is economically on the verge of a crisis. Without foreign assistance the crisis will come tomorrow. 12 In the short run, due to the return of the Sinai, Egypt will gain several advantages at our expense, but only in the short run until 1982, and that will not change the balance of power to its benefit, and will possibly bring about its downfall. Egypt, in its present domestic political picture, is already a corpse, all the more so if we take into account the growing Moslem-Christian rift. Breaking Egypt down territorially into distinct geographical regions is the political aim of Israel in the Nineteen Eighties on its Western front.


Egypt is divided and torn apart into many foci of authority. If Egypt falls apart, countries like Libya, Sudan or even the more distant states will not continue to exist in their present form and will join the downfall and dissolution of Egypt. The vision of a Christian Coptic State in Upper Egypt alongside a number of weak states with very localized power and without a centralized government as to date, is the key to a historical development which was only set back by the peace agreement but which seems inevitable in the long run. 13


The Western front, which on the surface appears more problematic, is in fact less complicated than the Eastern front, in which most of the events that make the headlines have been taking place recently. Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precendent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unqiue areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today. 14


Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi’ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization. 15


The entire Arabian peninsula is a natural candidate for dissolution due to internal and external pressures, and the matter is inevitable especially in Saudi Arabia. Regardless of whether its economic might based on oil remains intact or whether it is diminished in the long run, the internal rifts and breakdowns are a clear and natural development in light of the present political structure. 16


Jordan constitutes an immediate strategic target in the short run but not in the long run, for it does not constitute a real threat in the long run after its dissolution, the termination of the lengthy rule of King Hussein and the transfer of power to the Palestinians in the short run.


There is no chance that Jordan will continue to exist in its present structure for a long time, and Israel’s policy, both in war and in peace, ought to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the present regime and the transfer of power to the Palestinian majority. Changing the regime east of the river will also cause the termination of the problem of the territories densely populated with Arabs west of the Jordan. Whether in war or under conditions of peace, emigration from the territories and economic demographic freeze in them, are the guarantees for the coming change on both banks of the river, and we ought to be active in order to accelerate this process in the nearest future. The autonomy plan ought also to be rejected, as well as any compromise or division of the territories for, given the plans of the PLO and those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefa’amr plan of September 1980, it is not possible to go on living in this country in the present situation without separating the two nations, the Arabs to Jordan and the Jews to the areas west of the river. Genuine coexistence and peace will reign over the land only when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule between the Jordan and the sea they will have neither existence nor security. A nation of their own and security will be theirs only in Jordan. 17


Within Israel the distinction between the areas of ’67 and the territories beyond them, those of ’48, has always been meaningless for Arabs and nowadays no longer has any significance for us. The problem should be seen in its entirety without any divisions as of ’67. It should be clear, under any future political situation or military constellation, that the solution of the problem of the indigenous Arabs will come only when they recognize the existence of Israel in secure borders up to the Jordan river and beyond it, as our existential need in this difficult epoch, the nuclear epoch which we shall soon enter. It is no longer possible to live with three fourths of the Jewish population on the dense shoreline which is so dangerous in a nuclear epoch.


Dispersal of the population is therefore a domestic strategic aim of the highest order; otherwise, we shall cease to exist within any borders. Judea, Samaria and the Galilee are our sole guarantee for national existence, and if we do not become the majority in the mountain areas, we shall not rule in the country and we shall be like the Crusaders, who lost this country which was not theirs anyhow, and in which they were foreigners to begin with. Rebalancing the country demographically, strategically and economically is the highest and most central aim today. Taking hold of the mountain watershed from Beersheba to the Upper Galilee is the national aim generated by the major strategic consideration which is settling the mountainous part of the country that is empty of Jews today. l8


Realizing our aims on the Eastern front depends first on the realization of this internal strategic objective. The transformation of the political and economic structure, so as to enable the realization of these strategic aims, is the key to achieving the entire change. We need to change from a centralized economy in which the government is extensively involved, to an open and free market as well as to switch from depending upon the U.S. taxpayer to developing, with our own hands, of a genuine productive economic infrastructure. If we are not able to make this change freely and voluntarily, we shall be forced into it by world developments, especially in the areas of economics, energy, and politics, and by our own growing isolation. l9


From a military and strategic point of view, the West led by the U.S. is unable to withstand the global pressures of the USSR throughout the world, and Israel must therefore stand alone in the Eighties, without any foreign assistance, military or economic, and this is within our capacities today, with no compromises. 20 Rapid changes in the world will also bring about a change in the condition of world Jewry to which Israel will become not only a last resort but the only existential option. We cannot assume that U.S. Jews, and the communities of Europe and Latin America will continue to exist in the present form in the future. 21


Our existence in this country itself is certain, and there is no force that could remove us from here either forcefully or by treachery (Sadat’s method). Despite the difficulties of the mistaken “peace” policy and the problem of the Israeli Arabs and those of the territories, we can effectively deal with these problems in the foreseeable future.



Three important points have to be clarified in order to be able to understand the significant possibilities of realization of this Zionist plan for the Middle East, and also why it had to be published.


The Military Background of The Plan

The military conditions of this plan have not been mentioned above, but on the many occasions where something very like it is being “explained” in closed meetings to members of the Israeli Establishment, this point is clarified. It is assumed that the Israeli military forces, in all their branches, are insufficient for the actual work of occupation of such wide territories as discussed above. In fact, even in times of intense Palestinian “unrest” on the West Bank, the forces of the Israeli Army are stretched out too much. The answer to that is the method of ruling by means of “Haddad forces” or of “Village Associations” (also known as “Village Leagues”): local forces under “leaders” completely dissociated from the population, not having even any feudal or party structure (such as the Phalangists have, for example). The “states” proposed by Yinon are “Haddadland” and “Village Associations,” and their armed forces will be, no doubt, quite similar. In addition, Israeli military superiority in such a situation will be much greater than it is even now, so that any movement of revolt will be “punished” either by mass humiliation as in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, or by bombardment and obliteration of cities, as in Lebanon now (June 1982), or by both. In order to ensure this, the plan, as explained orally, calls for the establishment of Israeli garrisons in focal places between the mini states, equipped with the necessary mobile destructive forces. In fact, we have seen something like this in Haddadland and we will almost certainly soon see the first example of this system functioning either in South Lebanon or in all Lebanon.


It is obvious that the above military assumptions, and the whole plan too, depend also on the Arabs continuing to be even more divided than they are now, and on the lack of any truly progressive mass movement among them. It may be that those two conditions will be removed only when the plan will be well advanced, with consequences which can not be foreseen.


Why it is necessary to publish this in Israel?

The reason for publication is the dual nature of the Israeli-Jewish society: A very great measure of freedom and democracy, specially for Jews, combined with expansionism and racist discrimination. In such a situation the Israeli-Jewish elite (for the masses follow the TV and Begin’s speeches) has to be persuaded. The first steps in the process of persuasion are oral, as indicated above, but a time comes in which it becomes inconvenient. Written material must be produced for the benefit of the more stupid “persuaders” and “explainers” (for example medium-rank officers, who are, usually, remarkably stupid). They then “learn it,” more or less, and preach to others. It should be remarked that Israel, and even the Yishuv from the Twenties, has always functioned in this way. I myself well remember how (before I was “in opposition”) the necessity of war with was explained to me and others a year before the 1956 war, and the necessity of conquering “the rest of Western Palestine when we will have the opportunity” was explained in the years 1965-67.


Why is it assumed that there is no special risk from the outside in the publication of such plans?

Such risks can come from two sources, so long as the principled opposition inside Israel is very weak (a situation which may change as a consequence of the war on Lebanon) : The Arab World, including the Palestinians, and the United States. The Arab World has shown itself so far quite incapable of a detailed and rational analysis of Israeli-Jewish society, and the Palestinians have been, on the average, no better than the rest. In such a situation, even those who are shouting about the dangers of Israeli expansionism (which are real enough) are doing this not because of factual and detailed knowledge, but because of belief in myth. A good example is the very persistent belief in the non-existent writing on the wall of the Knesset of the Biblical verse about the Nile and the Euphrates. Another example is the persistent, and completely false declarations, which were made by some of the most important Arab leaders, that the two blue stripes of the Israeli flag symbolize the Nile and the Euphrates, while in fact they are taken from the stripes of the Jewish praying shawl (Talit). The Israeli specialists assume that, on the whole, the Arabs will pay no attention to their serious discussions of the future, and the Lebanon war has proved them right. So why should they not continue with their old methods of persuading other Israelis?


In the United States a very similar situation exists, at least until now. The more or less serious commentators take their information about Israel, and much of their opinions about it, from two sources. The first is from articles in the “liberal” American press, written almost totally by Jewish admirers of Israel who, even if they are critical of some aspects of the Israeli state, practice loyally what Stalin used to call “the constructive criticism.” (In fact those among them who claim also to be “Anti-Stalinist” are in reality more Stalinist than Stalin, with Israel being their god which has not yet failed). In the framework of such critical worship it must be assumed that Israel has always “good intentions” and only “makes mistakes,” and therefore such a plan would not be a matter for discussion–exactly as the Biblical genocides committed by Jews are not mentioned. The other source of information, The Jerusalem Post, has similar policies. So long, therefore, as the situation exists in which Israel is really a “closed society” to the rest of the world, because the world wants to close its eyes, the publication and even the beginning of the realization of such a plan is realistic and feasible.


Israel Shahak

June 17, 1982 Jerusalem



About the Translator


Israel Shahak is a professor of organic chemistly at Hebrew University in Jerusalem and the chairman of the Israeli League for Human and Civil Rights. He published The Shahak Papers, collections of key articles from the Hebrew press, and is the author of numerous articles and books, among them Non-Jew in the Jewish State. His latest book is Israel’s Global Role: Weapons for Repression, published by the AAUG in 1982. Israel Shahak: (1933-2001)



 1. American Universities Field Staff. Report No.33, 1979. According to this research, the population of the world will be 6 billion in the year 2000. Today’s world population can be broken down as follows: China, 958 million; India, 635 million; USSR, 261 million; U.S., 218 million Indonesia, 140 million; Brazil and Japan, 110 million each. According to the figures of the U.N. Population Fund for 1980, there will be, in 2000, 50 cities with a population of over 5 million each. The population ofthp;Third World will then be 80% of the world population. According to Justin Blackwelder, U.S. Census Office chief, the world population will not reach 6 billion because of hunger.


 2. Soviet nuclear policy has been well summarized by two American Sovietologists: Joseph D. Douglas and Amoretta M. Hoeber, Soviet Strategy for Nuclear War, (Stanford, Ca., Hoover Inst. Press, 1979). In the Soviet Union tens and hundreds of articles and books are published each year which detail the Soviet doctrine for nuclear war and there is a great deal of documentation translated into English and published by the U.S. Air Force,including USAF: Marxism-Leninism on War and the Army: The Soviet View, Moscow, 1972; USAF: The Armed Forces of the Soviet State. Moscow, 1975, by Marshal A. Grechko. The basic Soviet approach to the matter is presented in the book by Marshal Sokolovski published in 1962 in Moscow: Marshal V. D. Sokolovski, Military Strategy, Soviet Doctrine and Concepts(New York, Praeger, 1963).


 3. A picture of Soviet intentions in various areas of the world can be drawn from the book by Douglas and Hoeber, ibid. For additional material see: Michael Morgan, “USSR’s Minerals as Strategic Weapon in the Future,” Defense and Foreign Affairs, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1979.


 4. Admiral of the Fleet Sergei Gorshkov, Sea Power and the State, London, 1979. Morgan, loc. cit. General George S. Brown (USAF) C-JCS, Statement to the Congress on the Defense Posture of the United States For Fiscal Year 1979, p. 103; National Security Council, Review of Non-Fuel Mineral Policy, (Washington, D.C. 1979,); Drew Middleton, The New York Times, (9/15/79); Time, 9/21/80.


 5. Elie Kedourie, “The End of the Ottoman Empire,” Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 3, No.4, 1968.


 6. Al-Thawra, Syria 12/20/79, Al-Ahram,12/30/79, Al Ba’ath, Syria, 5/6/79. 55% of the Arabs are 20 years old and younger, 70% of the Arabs live in Africa, 55% of the Arabs under 15 are unemployed, 33% live in urban areas, Oded Yinon, “Egypt’s Population Problem,” The Jerusalem Quarterly, No. 15, Spring 1980.


 7. E. Kanovsky, “Arab Haves and Have Nots,” The Jerusalem Quarterly, No.1, Fall 1976, Al Ba’ath, Syria, 5/6/79.


 8. In his book, former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin said that the Israeli government is in fact responsible for the design of American policy in the Middle East, after June ’67, because of its own indecisiveness as to the future of the territories and the inconsistency in its positions since it established the background for Resolution 242 and certainly twelve years later for the Camp David agreements and the peace treaty with Egypt. According to Rabin, on June 19, 1967, President Johnson sent a letter to Prime Minister Eshkol in which he did not mention anything about withdrawal from the new territories but exactly on the same day the government resolved to return territories in exchange for peace. After the Arab resolutions in Khartoum (9/1/67) the government altered its position but contrary to its decision of June 19, did not notify the U.S. of the alteration and the U.S. continued to support 242 in the Security Council on the basis of its earlier understanding that Israel is prepared to return territories. At that point it was already too late to change the U.S. position and Israel’s policy. From here the way was opened to peace agreements on the basis of 242 as was later agreed upon in Camp David. See Yitzhak Rabin. Pinkas Sherut, (Ma’ariv 1979) pp. 226-227.


 9. Foreign and Defense Committee Chairman Prof. Moshe Arens argued in an interview (Ma ‘ariv,10/3/80) that the Israeli government failed to prepare an economic plan before the Camp David agreements and was itself surprised by the cost of the agreements, although already during the negotiations it was possible to calculate the heavy price and the serious error involved in not having prepared the economic grounds for peace.

The former Minister of Treasury, Mr. Yigal Holwitz, stated that if it were not for the withdrawal from the oil fields, Israel would have a positive balance of payments (9/17/80). That same person said two years earlier that the government of Israel (from which he withdrew) had placed a noose around his neck. He was referring to the Camp David agreements (Ha’aretz, 11/3/78). In the course of the whole peace negotiations neither an expert nor an economics advisor was consulted, and the Prime Minister himself, who lacks knowledge and expertise in economics, in a mistaken initiative, asked the U.S. to give us a loan rather than a grant, due to his wish to maintain our respect and the respect of the U.S. towards us. See Ha’aretz1/5/79. Jerusalem Post, 9/7/79. Prof Asaf Razin, formerly a senior consultant in the Treasury, strongly criticized the conduct of the negotiations; Ha’aretz, 5/5/79. Ma’ariv, 9/7/79. As to matters concerning the oil fields and Israel’s energy crisis, see the interview with Mr. Eitan Eisenberg, a government advisor on these matters, Ma’arive Weekly, 12/12/78. The Energy Minister, who personally signed the Camp David agreements and the evacuation of Sdeh Alma, has since emphasized the seriousness of our condition from the point of view of oil supplies more than once…see Yediot Ahronot, 7/20/79. Energy Minister Modai even admitted that the government did not consult him at all on the subject of oil during the Camp David and Blair House negotiations. Ha’aretz, 8/22/79.


 10. Many sources report on the growth of the armaments budget in Egypt and on intentions to give the army preference in a peace epoch budget over domestic needs for which a peace was allegedly obtained. See former Prime Minister Mamduh Salam in an interview 12/18/77, Treasury Minister Abd El Sayeh in an interview 7/25/78, and the paper Al Akhbar, 12/2/78 which clearly stressed that the military budget will receive first priority, despite the peace. This is what former Prime Minister Mustafa Khalil has stated in his cabinet’s programmatic document which was presented to Parliament, 11/25/78. See English translation, ICA, FBIS, Nov. 27. 1978, pp. D 1-10.

According to these sources, Egypt’s military budget increased by 10% between fiscal 1977 and 1978, and the process still goes on. A Saudi source divulged that the Egyptians plan to increase their militmy budget by 100% in the next two years; Ha’aretz, 2/12/79 and Jerusalem Post, 1/14/79.


11. Most of the economic estimates threw doubt on Egypt’s ability to reconstruct its economy by 1982. See Economic Intelligence Unit, 1978 Supplement, “The Arab Republic of Egypt”; E. Kanovsky, “Recent Economic Developments in the Middle East,” Occasional Papers, The Shiloah Institution, June 1977; Kanovsky, “The Egyptian Economy Since the Mid-Sixties, The Micro Sectors,” Occasional Papers, June 1978; Robert McNamara, President of World Bank, as reported in Times, London, 1/24/78.


 12. See the comparison made by the researeh of the Institute for Strategic Studies in London, and research camed out in the Center for Strategic Studies of Tel Aviv University, as well as the research by the British scientist, Denis Champlin, Military Review, Nov. 1979, ISS: The Military Balance 1979-1980, CSS; Security Arrangements in Sinai…by Brig. Gen. (Res.) A Shalev, No. 3.0 CSS; The Military Balance and the Military Options after the Peace Treaty with Egypt, by Brig. Gen. (Res.) Y. Raviv, No.4, Dec. 1978, as well as many press reports including El Hawadeth, London, 3/7/80; El Watan El Arabi, Paris, 12/14/79.


 13. As for religious ferment in Egypt and the relations between Copts and Moslems see the series of articles published in the Kuwaiti paper, El Qabas, 9/15/80. The English author Irene Beeson reports on the rift between Moslems and Copts, see: Irene Beeson, Guardian, London, 6/24/80, and Desmond Stewart, Middle East Internmational, London 6/6/80. For other reports see Pamela Ann Smith, Guardian, London, 12/24/79; The Christian Science Monitor 12/27/79 as well as Al Dustour, London, 10/15/79; El Kefah El Arabi, 10/15/79.


 14. Arab Press Service, Beirut, 8/6-13/80. The New Republic, 8/16/80, Der Spiegel as cited by Ha’aretz, 3/21/80, and 4/30-5/5/80; The Economist, 3/22/80; Robert Fisk, Times, London, 3/26/80; Ellsworth Jones, Sunday Times, 3/30/80.


 15.  J.P.  Peroncell  Hugoz,  Le  Monde,  Paris  4/28/80;  Dr.  Abbas  Kelidar,  Middle  East  Review,  Summer  1979;


Conflict Studies, ISS, July 1975; Andreas Kolschitter, Der Zeit, (Ha’aretz, 9/21/79) Economist Foreign Report, 10/10/79, Afro-Asian Affairs, London, July 1979.

 16. Arnold Hottinger, “The Rich Arab States in Trouble,” The New York Review of Books, 5/15/80; Arab Press Service, Beirut, 6/25-7/2/80; U.S. News and World Report, 11/5/79 as well as El Ahram, 11/9/79; El Nahar El Arabi Wal Duwali, Paris 9/7/79; El Hawadeth, 11/9/79; David Hakham, Monthly Review, IDF, Jan.-Feb. 79.


 17. As for Jordan’s policies and problems see El Nahar El Arabi Wal Duwali, 4/30/79, 7/2/79; Prof. Elie Kedouri, Ma’ariv 6/8/79; Prof. Tanter, Davar 7/12/79; A. Safdi, Jerusalem Post, 5/31/79; El Watan El Arabi 11/28/79; El Qabas, 11/19/79. As for PLO positions see: The resolutions of the Fatah Fourth Congress, Damascus, August 1980. The Shefa’amr program of the Israeli Arabs was published in Ha’aretz, 9/24/80, and by Arab Press Report 6/18/80. For facts and figures on immigration of Arabs to Jordan, see Amos Ben Vered, Ha’aretz, 2/16/77; Yossef Zuriel, Ma’ariv 1/12/80. As to the PLO’s position towards Israel see Shlomo Gazit, Monthly Review; July 1980; Hani El Hasan in an interview, Al Rai Al’Am, Kuwait 4/15/80; Avi Plaskov, “The Palestinian Problem,” Survival, ISS, London Jan. Feb. 78; David Gutrnann, “The Palestinian Myth,” Commentary, Oct. 75; Bernard Lewis, “The Palestinians and the PLO,” Commentary Jan. 75; Monday Morning, Beirut, 8/18-21/80; Journal of Palestine Studies, Winter 1980.


 18. Prof. Yuval Neeman, “Samaria–The Basis for Israel’s Security,” Ma’arakhot 272-273, May/June 1980; Ya’akov Hasdai, “Peace, the Way and the Right to Know,” Dvar Hashavua, 2/23/80. Aharon Yariv, “Strategic Depth–An Israeli Perspective,” Ma’arakhot 270-271, October 1979; Yitzhak Rabin, “Israel’s Defense Problems in the Eighties,” Ma’arakhot October 1979.


 19. Ezra Zohar, In the Regime’s Pliers (Shikmona, 1974); Motti Heinrich, Do We have a Chance Israel, Truth Versus Legend (Reshafim, 1981).


 20. Henry Kissinger, “The Lessons of the Past,” The Washington Review Vol 1, Jan. 1978; Arthur Ross, “OPEC’s Challenge to the West,” The Washington Quarterly, Winter, 1980; Walter Levy, “Oil and the Decline of the West,” Foreign Affairs, Summer 1980; Special Report–”Our Armed Forees-Ready or Not?” U.S. News and World Report 10/10/77; Stanley Hoffman, “Reflections on the Present Danger,” The New York Review of Books 3/6/80; Time 4/3/80; Leopold Lavedez “The illusions of SALT” Commentary Sept. 79; Norman Podhoretz, “The Present Danger,” Commentary March 1980; Robert Tucker, “Oil and American Power Six Years Later,” Commentary Sept. 1979; Norman Podhoretz, “The Abandonment of Israel,” Commentary July 1976; Elie Kedourie, “Misreading the Middle East,” Commentary July 1979.


 21. According to figures published by Ya’akov Karoz, Yediot Ahronot, 10/17/80, the sum total of anti-Semitic incidents recorded in the world in 1979 was double the amount recorded in 1978. In Germany, France, and Britain the number of anti-Semitic incidents was many times greater in that year. In the U.S. as well there has been a sharp increase in anti-Semitic incidents which were reported in that article. For the new anti-Semitism, see L. Talmon, “The New Anti-Semitism,” The New Republic, 9/18/1976; Barbara Tuchman, “They poisoned the Wells,” Newsweek 2/3/75.





By Raji Abuzalaf | Dissident Voice | August 7, 2014



“There is no such thing as Palestine”


• I am Palestinian. My ancestors have lived in Palestine and were called “Palestinians” for 100 generations. I still have my parents’ Palestine passports.


• Before history is completely rewritten by Zionists, research plainly shows that the land has been called “Palestine” and her inhabitants “Palestinians” since 500 BCE.


• The United Nations partitioned “original Palestine” into two states: Israel (55%) and Palestine (45%) – (U.N. Resolution 181 – 11/29/1947).


Conclusion: Palestine has existed (by that name) for over 2500 years. Although the Zionist state of Israel was illegitimately formed on 78% of the land (which was conveniently overlooked by the U.N.), the remaining 22% is internationally recognized as Palestine. There are millions of Palestinians living in the world:

• In Palestine (living in terror under illegal Israeli occupation)


• In Israel (living as 3rd class citizens)


• In neighboring Arab countries, Europe, Asia, and the Americas.



“Israel has the right to defend itself”


In theory, everyone has the right to self-defense. However, this right is forfeited when the party claiming that right is in the midst of an illegal or immoral act.


Example: If a criminal breaks into a home and lays siege upon it, the homeowner has the right to dispel the intruder – and in turn, any violence used by the criminal to repel the homeowner’s resistance can never be misconstrued as “self-defense” (although that ruse has been attempted many times by criminals in American courtrooms).


Fact: In 1967, Israel attacked the Palestinian Territories and began its military occupation. Both the attack and ensuing occupation were immediately condemned by the United Nations (U.N.S.C. Resolution 242 – 11/22/1967). Despite that and numerous subsequent resolutions, Israel has imposed military rule upon the Palestinians and has perpetrated a long list of crimes against humanity (also condemned by the U.N.):


• Attacks on neighboring Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq


• The prevention of medical and food supplies to Palestinians


• The control of water sources in Palestine


• The building of illegal settlements in Palestine – Gaza, West Bank, East Jerusalem


• The population of these settlements with illegal settlers – armed thugs


• The bulldozing of Palestinian homes killing people in them (or in front of them, e.g., Rachel Corrie)


• The building of the “Apartheid Wall” separating Palestinians from their families, farmlands, water sources, and medical facilities


• Collaboration with Apartheid South Africa to develop non-sanctioned nuclear weapons, along with biological and chemical weapons


• Establishment of “Administrative Detention” which subjects Palestinians – including women and children – to arrest and detention without charges, legal representation, or due process


• Attacks, arrests, and murders of international humanitarians offering assistance to Palestinians


Conclusion: Israel is in violation of a plethora of international and moral laws. Its presence in Palestine amounts to no less than illegal entry, robbery, destruction of property, assault, and murder. Since the international community has failed to enforce international law with regards to Israel’s war crimes, the Palestinians are justified in any attempt to rid themselves of their oppressor – Israel. Any devious attempt on Israel’s part to mislabel its heinous acts as “self-defense” is completely unwarranted and downright deceptive.



“Hamas is to blame! Hamas should stop bombing Israel”


Again – this is the case of the criminal pointing the finger at the victim. Israel’s brutal presence in Palestine is in violation of numerous international and moral laws. The acts of Hamas are akin to the Minutemen who did everything in their power to fight off the British forces in 18th Century America.


Conclusion: Although I am a pacifist and would opt for non-violent resistance against the criminal presence of Israel in Palestine, I must acknowledge in all good conscience that Hamas is legally and morally justified in defending the cause to free Palestine – both in Palestine and in Israel.



“Israel is friend and ally to the United States”


Israel is the United States’ daddy.


Fact: Israel perpetrates crimes against humanity with impunity and the United States not only condones these actions, it funds them.


• Our government has been infiltrated by Zionist judges, legislators, and executive administrators from both the Republican and Democratic parties. This is not to mention AIPAC and other Zionist-controlled lobbies which manipulate finances and legislation at federal, state, and local levels.


• Our financial system (banks, Wall Street, the Federal Reserve) is controlled by Zionists.


• Our entertainment industry (Hollywood, Broadway, Nashville, NBA, MLB, NFL, NHL, etc.) is predominantly owned and operated by Zionists.


• Mainstream media (all major news networks, television and radio stations, newspapers) are owned and operated by Zionists.


Conclusion: The result of all this is twofold: Zionists greatly influence and manipulate the U.S. government into enabling and funding Israel’s war crimes against Palestine and humanity.

Zionists convince the masses that Israel is the “good guy” and Muslims, Arabs, and especially Palestinians are the “bad guys”.

No true friend or ally would manipulate a friend into being complicit in a myriad of war crimes! Zionist Israel is, in fact, a devious enemy of the United States.





Anyone who clings to these and other Zionist myths must fall into one of three categories:


• Liar: Zionist supporter (Jewish, Christian, or other) who knows the facts and is yet involved in the scheme to mislead the public


• Ignorant: common citizen who has fallen prey to Zionist propaganda and has made little or no effort to validate the information


• Fool: one who has learned the truth, but ignores it in a vain display of “loyalty” to a political or religious position.


Raji (Roger) Abuzalaf is a Christian Palestinian (Haifa) refugee raised in Houston, now a long-term Honolulu resident and a U.S. citizen. He is a guitarist, singer, composer, and poet. Raji participates in local progressive/activist causes, at present co-producing pro-Palestine filmfare for Oahu’s main cable provider’s public-access TV network.





The Jew will always accuse you of what his/her tribe have done to you. They (collective Jewry) will always invert the Truth, twisting and projecting their version of reality onto the gullible conditioned masses to suit their agenda.

They inevitably end up being the victim, no matter what injustice they inflict on others.

The extortionate wealth and global power of many of these elite Jews is gained entirely through parasitism: their unlawful usury, corruption, extortion and general malpractice – all of which they openly boast about.

As a collective, they are soulless, materialistic, cruel, aggressive, demonically-driven parasites. Collective Jewry is the physical manifestation of dark spiritual elements and the cancer on humanity. And hiding behind it’s just another religious minority facade, with it’s quirky innocent image – it is in fact mankind’s eternal mortal enemy.

These PPPPs [Pernicious Parasitic Psychotic Predators], along with traitorous self-serving non-jews, are not running the world, but ruining the world – with intent to enslave and destroy most of us. This is their agenda known as The New World Order.

I strongly feel they are the physical conduits working on behalf of a non-physical demonic entity in order to destroy this planet and anything which pertains to nature – they are literally anti-nature and anti-life.

They have instigated the destruction of the planet through poisoning the rivers, seas, lakes, streams, air, soil and most natural habitats.

They are behind all the perverted anti-nature sexualisation and degradation of society, in order to destroy the family unit and commit white genocide with their NWO eugenics plan.

They control all the political parties and most of the counter-revolutionary parties and many alternative outlets, even at local level through their plethora of sayanim agents and gullible mind controlled non-jewish fools. Democracy and voting is just their trickery, to get the gullible goy (non-jews) to think they have levels of autonomy on how society is run.

They have a 360 degree grip on the mainstream media, academia, entertainment industry and any area of social influence. It is all for the purpose of mind-controlling the non-jews to suit their agenda.

Most, if not all, jews despise non-jews. Most are just good at pretending they’re your friend. They are only ever loyal to their tribe and will turn on you to serve their tribe whenever the opportunity prevails. No jews can be trusted! Ultimately there are no ‘good’ jews.

The jews as a collective have been booted out of 109 countries over 2000 years for their anti-social, anti-nature and anti-non-jew shenanigans. They are a nuisance to humanity to say the least.

They have a history of projecting their criminal activities onto others, especially the white European race (i.e. the black slave trade is now blamed on whites to guilt up whites when it was predominantly a jewish enterprise for jewish benefits). They use non whites as a collective tool through their artificially-created immigration policies to destroy White European culture. They despise the White European race, as we have notoriously been the creators. The jewish collective, being the destroyers, are generally the exact antipode of creativity, beauty and nature.

Their holocaust is a fabrication – a myth. It never happened! The camps were merely work camps for criminals (arbeit macht frei) – most definitely not death camps for jews. These work camps were built for those who were antagonistic and destructive to German social order. The only suffering these jews had to endure was that they no longer were able to continue parasitising off the hard-working Germans and actually had to do honest hard work for the first time in their lives. So yes, they did suffer within their ethos.

And the death toll inside the camps at the end of the war was due to the JEWISH-instigated carpet bombing by the Americans, which destroyed the infrastructure – therefore minimum food and resources could get to the camps. But the Germans were also suffering outside the camps. The British Red Cross reported better nutrition inside the camps than the German population outside the camps.

They have to keep perpetrating this holocaust fairytale as a buffer for their plethora of global criminal activity. It is their immediate club card that works every time. You can’t point your finger at me, as I am the victim… the world’s eternal victims. Get the violins out.

These didgeridoos are behind every false flag ’terrorist’ event, such as: Sandy hook, the Boston marathon, 9-11, London 7-7 bombings, Paris bombings, Madrid train bomb, ad infinitum. These are part of their hegelian dialectic [problem-reaction-solution] in order to bring on the next stage of their JWO agenda: more wars, more Orwellian control, race divisions and generally to keep us all in fear – and therefore enslaved.

I am now at a mindset where I see there are three beings sharing this planet: humans, animal kingdom and jewmans. After having studied jewish history and behaviour long enough now; I think they are not of us. I am most definitely open to the concept that they are an outer-world alien species. I accept this sounds far fetched and the world of fantasy; but I cannot accept this race is of mankind.

"The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered, they lack many of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display.”   ....H.L. Menken

It is only until we stop being so polite, gentlemanly, nice and euphemistic when defining our enemy that we will begin to make progress in making this a better world.


How Jews Killed Jews In Order

To Create The State Of Israel

Now, when professor of Jewish history at Brandeis University, Anthony Polonsky published
a monumental three volume work entitled “Jews in Poland and Russia,” and in Israel
opinions are divided about the wisdom of proposed nuclear bombing of Iran one should
also remember the book of Naeim Giladi and his description how Jews killed Jews in
order to create the state of Israel. Naeim Giladi, is the author of the book: “Ben-Gurion’s
Scandals: How The Haganah and Mossad Eliminated Jews,” (Dandelion Books, LLC,
Tempe Arizona, 2nd expanded edition 2003).

Giladi wrote this book first in Hebrew and then in Arabic upon arrival to the US where
he confirmed as an eye witness the facts concerning the Zionist bombings in Iraq, the
rejection by Israel of Arab peace overtures and the deadly violence inflicted by Jews on
Jews in the cause of creating Israel. Then Stalin’s intended Israel to be a “bone of contention”
in the Middle East in the Cold War. Some observers mention the possibility that Stalin
also hoped to create Isarel as a Marxist state, part of the Soviet postwar empire.

Stalin’s decision do use the Zionists in establishing the state of Israel after the Second
World War, was motivated primarily by his intent to oppose the United States in the oil
rich Middle East. The temporary Soviet support for the Zionists materialized in the form
of allowing 711,000 Jews to exit from countries behind the Iron Courtain, in 1945-1947 supposedly
in order to emigrate to Palestine.

The Zionists advertised this migration under the code-name “Briha” - Escape of Jews from
Europe. In reality the vast majority of Jews preferred to go to the United States or stay in
France. Of the 711,000 Jewish refugees, panicked by some fifteen pogroms staged by
the NKVD in 1945-1947, with some Zionist assistance, only 232,000 actually went to Palestine.

Only the Pogrom of Kielce of the 4th of July, 1946, was described in the world press,
naturally in the Soviet version. Fifteen other pogroms in the satellite states, four of them
in Budapest alone, were never reported in the world media or were reported in such a way
that they did not survive in public memory. The Zionists organized the groups of Jewish
refugees who left Poland mainly through the cities of Szczecin and Klodzko.

The Soviet terror apparatus in Kielce conducted show-trials of nine Poles, who under
tortures signed confessions and were immediately executed. Later their families provided
evidence, that none of the executed men, was present in Kielce on the 4th of July, 1946.
The Bishop of Kielce, Czeslaw Kaczmarek was tortured for forty hours and lost nineteen
teeth before Jewish security officers were able to extract from him an incriminating statement.
They acted under the supervision of colonel Jozef Rózanski Goldberg, director of the
ministry of national security (MBP), who wrote threatening note to Bishop Kaczmarek:
“I have smashed the faces of the lawyers, and I warn you Bishop Kaczmarek, not
to ever seek legal help.”

Dr. Roman Dzwonkowski, SAC described these events in Nasz Dziennik of May 20- 21,
2006, Nr . 117m (2527) “War on the Catholic Church in the Polish People’s Republic
(PRL 1945-1989).” These events happened during the reign of terror of Jozef
Berman, Moscow’s representative in Warsaw, in Soviet controlled Poland.

According to Stefan Korbonski, (former head of the military and the civil underground
resistance in Poland), during ten years after World War II, “Poles and Jews in World
War II.” Polish people lived under Jewish terror controlled by Stalinist Russia. Stefan
Korbonski published a number of books on wartime Poland, such as “The Polish Underground
State” (ISBN o-88254-517-5). Stefan Korbonski received the Righteous Gentile Award from Y
ad Vashem in Israel.

The Soviet terror apparatus organized the departure for Palestine of Jewish war-veterans
and provided them with weapons manufactured in Czechoslovakia. In March 1947, the
Soviet Union, represented by Andrei Gromyko, was the first member state of the United
Nations to demand the partition of Palestine and creation there of the state of Israel as a
new member of the UN. The UN authorized the Partition of Palestine in
November 1947 and on May 14, 1948 the state of Israel was founded.

The Israeli armed forces were officially established on May 28, 1948. They were
composed of the Haganah (the defense) and the Irgun Zwei Leumi (National Military
Organization.) The armed forces of the new Israeli state included 60,000 soldiers and
officers, many of them veterans of the Second World War. They occupied more land than
they could settle with Jews present in Palestine where population of million Arabs.
The Israeli conquests provoked an Arab rally in defense of their homeland, which was
confiscated by the Jewish invaders from Europe, mostly Turkmen
Khazar converts to Judaism. who did not have Semitic DNA>

Naeim Giladi, author of the book: “Ben-Gurion’s Scandals: How The Haganah and Mossad
Eliminated Jews,” was 12 years old when on June 1, 1941 during the riots provoked by
the British colonial forces, when several hundred Iraqi Jews were killed. In 1921, a
British puppet, Amir Faisal, became king of Iraq. He appointed many Jews to important
government positions, including that of economics minister. At that time “Zionism has sown
dissension between Jews and Arabs” as a result of the British support for the “Balfour Declaration.”

In exchange for helping to bring the United States into the First World War, the British
proclaimed Palestine as a “Jewish Homeland.” This was done in a letter of November 2,
1917 written by the foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, to the chief Zionist in Gr. Britain,
Walter Rothschild (see John Cornelius: “The Hidden History of the Balfour Declaration.”)

The new bitterness, which did not previously exist, developed between Jews and Arabs.
British support for the Zionists and the British “tutelage” of Iraq was deeply resented by
the Iraqi Arabs, among whom grew an anti-Zionist backlash. The British occupied Basra
in Iraq on April 12, 1941. They alleged that the local Jews pledged allegiance to them
and provoked riots that served as a pretext for intervention and looting by the British army,
which occupied Bagdad on May 30, 1941. False rumor was spread that Jews from Palestine
were fighting alongside the British against the Iraqi’s near the town of Felujah. By June 2,
looting spread to the Jewish quarter in Bagdad damaging 1300 stores and 1000 homes.
The British Indian Gurkha units killed some 500 Jews in the streets of Bagdad as a part
of the British pacification and occupation of Iraq. Then the Zionists underground
was set up in Iraq.

The Zionist conquests in Palestine and massacres of Arabs, such as in the village of Deir
Yassin, strengthened the anti-British movement in Iraq. In January 1948 riots broke out
in Iraq against the British domination. When Israel declared its independence the Iraqis
closed the oil pipeline connected to the refinery in Haifa. As a Zionist, Naeim Giladi was
imprisoned in Abu-Gharib prison later used for torturing the Iraki prisoners by the CIA fifty
years later as described in “One Woman's Army by: The Commanding General of the
Abu-Gharib Prison ... - Powell's Books Oct 12, 2005 – The “One Woman's Army” by Janis
Karpinski: In an outspoken memoir by Brigade General Janis Karpinski, who received a
Bronze Star for service in the Gulf War. The author Naeim
Giladi escaped from Abu-Gharib in September 1949.

Six month later on March 19, 1950, a bomb exploded in the American Cultural Center
and Library frequented by Jews in Bagdad. On April 8, 1950 a bomb was thrown at the
Jews into El-Dar El-Bida Café, where Jews were celebrating the Passover and four of
them were injured. Leaflets were distributed calling on Jews to leave Iraq immediately.
Very many Jews who had no property jammed emigration offices to renounce
their citizenship and to apply for permission to leave for Israel.

Jewish owned The Jewish owned Beit-Lawi Automobile Company building was damaged
by a grenade on May 10, 1950 without any causalities. On June 3, 1950 grenade exploded
harmlessly in the Jewish area El-Batawin and Zionists sent telegrams to Israel asking for
an increase of immigration quotas for Iraqi Jews. On June 5, another Jewish building was
damaged without killing anyone by a bomb explosion on El_Rasjid street. On January 14,
1951 a high-voltage cable damaged by a grenade killed three Jews outside Masouda
Shem-Tov Synagogue. By ten the exodus reached 600-700 Jews per day.

Contrary to the Zionist propaganda, Giladi writes: ”The terrible truth is that the grenades
that killed and maimed Iraqi Jews and damaged their property were thrown by Zionist Jews.”
The leaflets published by the Zionist underground in Iraq on March 16,
1950 and on April 8, 1950, called on Jews to leave Iraq immediately.

Wilbur Crane Eveland, CIA agent stated in 1988 that: “In an attempt to portray the Iraqis
as anti-American and to terrorize the Jews, the Zionists planted bombs in the U.S. Information
Service library and in the synagogues. Soon Leaflets began to appear urging Jews to flee
to Israel.. The Iraqi police later provided our embassy with evidence to show that the
synagogue and library bombings, as well as the anti-Jewish and anti-American leaflet
campaigns, had been the work of an underground Zionist organization, most of the world
believed reports that Arab terrorism had motivated the flight of the Iraqi Jews whom the
Zionists had “rescued” really just in order to increase Israel’s Jewish population.” (Wilbur
Crane Eveland, “Ropes of Sand: America’s Failure in the Middle East,: N.Y. Norton,
1980, pp 48-49).

Giladi writes that Israeli prime minister David Ben-Gurion (1886-1973) needed “Oriental”
(Arab) Jews to farm the thousands of acres of land left by the Palestinians, who were
driven out by Israeli forces in 1948. Israel Shamir describes the hatred of farm work and
farm workers by the European Jews (“Jewish History, Jewish Religion”). Out of over
one million hectares owned by Jews in carist Russia less than 10% was worked by
Jews themselves.

Giladi describes how Israel was using bacteriological methods and deliberately infected
many Palestinians with typhus and dysentery. He quotes Israeli daily, Hadashot of
August 13, 1993 in which Sara Laybobis-Dar reported interviews with Isarelis who
had knowledge of the use of bacteriological weapons in the 1948 war. Mileshtin said that
bacteria was used to poison the wells of every village emptied of its Arab inhabitants and
Moshe Dayan, a division commander at the time “gave orders in 1948 to remove Arabs
from villages, bulldoze their homes, and render water wells unusable with typhus and
dysentery bacteria.”

The Arab town of Acre was well defended and was situated on a creek named Capri.
The Haganah put typhus bacteria upstream into water flowing to Acre, the defenders got
sick and Jewish forces were able to occupy that locality. Haganah sent Jews dressed as
Arabs into Gaza, then occupied by Egyptian soldiers, who caught them putting
two cans of bacteria, typhus and dysentery into the drinking water supply.

Giladi started his political activity because of contemptuous treatment by eastern European,
mostly Polish Jews of Jews from Islamic countries who were treated like “Negroes.” Among
Jews, who came from Poland there were many descendents of mixed marriages
and their features differed from Semitic Jews in the Arab countries.

Giladi organized demonstrations in Ashkelon, against Ben-Gurion’s racist policies and
10,000 people participated. They protested being treated as “second class” citizens in Israel.
The cease-fire with Egypt in 1970 brought enough tranquility to enable the “second class”
Israelis to demand equal treatment. They were called “Israel’s Black Panters” and proudly
displayed posters of personalities such as Martin Luther King, Malcom X, and Nelson Mandela.

Similar attitudes were common in Germany before
WWI when the German Jews discriminated
against the “Ost Juden” who tried to migrate to Germany from the East. According to
professor Israel Shahak at the end of the “golden decade” of Jewish colonization and
exploitation of Poland’s Ukrainian provinces in 1648 Khmelnytzky rebellion broke out and
possibly as many as 50,000 Jews were slaughtered Khmelnytzky’s Cossaks. At that time
the Jewish leadership became convinced, that Jews will be evicted from Poland sooner or
later, as they were evicted earlier from England, France, German states, and most
recently from Spain.

The flight of Jewish money out of Poland to Berlin helped to finance in 1701 the creation
of the Kingdom of Prussia, the initiator of the partitions of Poland in 1762. When the international
crime of the partitions of Poland was taking place, the Germans evicted from western Poland
masses of poor Jews called “Bettel Juden.” Germans allowed
only well-to-do Jews to remain in the Kingdom of Prussia.

The expressions “The Bettel Juden” as well as “The Ost Juden” were used as contemptuous
terms by German Jews, and they were similar in intent to the term
“Jews from Islamic countries” as it is used today in Israel.

When the Isareli authorities condoned the massacres of Palestinians in Lebanon at Sabra
and Shatilla, Naeim Giladi moved to the United States, revoked his Israeli citizenship and
became an American citizen. In order to publish his book translated into English, Giladi
spent $60,000 out of pocket, or rather out of proceeds from the sale of his house in Israel.
He mentions that on Sept 12, 1990, the New York State Supreme Court issued a restraining
order, at the request of the Israeli government, to prevent the publication of Victor Ostrovsky’s
book, “By Way of Deception: The Making and Unmaking of a Mossad Officer.”
(The New York State Appeals Court lifted the ban the next day.)

Giladi now considers the Zionst program to be criminal from the beginning, because
Zionist leaders knew, that in order to establish a Jewish state, they had to expel the
indigenous Palestinians and import hundreds of thousands Jews (first 232,00 from
Soviet satellite states and then 547,000 from the Arab states). Vladimir Jabotinsky
(Włodzimierz Żabotyński) frankly admitted that such a transfer
of population could only be brought by force and terror.

To drive Jews out of their homes in countries such as Poland, Slovakia, and Hungary
pogroms were staged by the NKVD in Kielce in the Soviet occupied eastern Europe.
The best known of these is the pogrom of Kielce on the 4th of July, 1946. There also occurred
two pogroms in Bratislava and four pogroms in Budapest in 1945-1947, etc. But the Pogrom
in Poland received most publicity, because it could “kill two birds with one stone,” so to
speak: persuade the Polish Jews to leave for Israel, and convince the western powers that
only a strong Soviet hand could keep “anti-Semitic” Poland from “doing harm to Jews.”

Subsequently the Zionists organized, with Soviet permission, the exit of some 711,000
Jews from countries behind the “Iron Curtin.” The Zionists also organized the terror in the
Arab states and caused the flight of Jews from Bagdad, Damscus, and other Arab cities
in 1950-1951, and later.

In the early 1950s an Iraqi investigator published in Arabic a book of the1950-51 bombings
in Bagdad. The book was titled “Venom of the Zionist Viper,” in which the anti-hero is
Israeli emissary Mordechai Ben-Porat. Mossad, working through the US Embassy
in Bagdad, bought up all the books about the “Zionist Viper” and destroyed them.

Giladi writes about Zionist collaboration with the Nazis and states that Britain was able to
force the Arab governments to operate under pro-British leaders. And if, as in Iraq, these
leaders were overthrown, then the British would foment an anti-Jewish riot or two in order
to use the riots as useful pretexts to invade the Arab capital and reinstate the “right” leaders.
In 1949, Israel sent the spy Mordechai Ben-Porat to Iraq, to offer the government of
el-Said in Bagdad, large financial incentives to enact a law that would take away the citizenship
from the Iraqi Jews so that they would be forced to migrate to Israel. Uri Avnery, writing in
the magazine Haolam Hazel, accused Ben-Porat of the Bagdad bombings.
Ben- Porat is still called Morad Abu al-Knabel or “Mordechai of the Bombs.”

Giladi asked Ben-Gurion: why, since Israel is a democracy with a parliament, does it not
have a constitution? Ben-Gurion answered: “Look boy if we have a constitution, we have
to write in it the border of our country. And this is not our border, my dear.” Asked: “Then
where is the border?,” Ben-Gurion answered: “Wherever the Sahal (Isareli army) will come,
this is the border.”

Thus, according to Naeim Giladi “Jews killed Jews to create the state of Israel. ” He is the
author of the book mentioned before: “Ben-Gurion’s Scandals: How The Haganah and
Mossad Eliminated Jews.” Ghiladi’s book provides ample proof for that statement.
Thus, in the process of creating, enlarging and consolidating the state of Israel more than
million two hundred thousand Jews were cruelly and brutally driven by terror from their
homes in Europe and in the Middle East. This was planned and done in order
to create a Jewish state in Palestine at the expense of the Palestinian Arabs.




By Raji Abuzalaf | Dissident Voice | August 7, 2014



“There is no such thing as Palestine”


• I am Palestinian. My ancestors have lived in Palestine and were called “Palestinians” for 100 generations. I still have my parents’ Palestine passports.


• Before history is completely rewritten by Zionists, research plainly shows that the land has been called “Palestine” and her inhabitants “Palestinians” since 500 BCE.


• The United Nations partitioned “original Palestine” into two states: Israel (55%) and Palestine (45%) – (U.N. Resolution 181 – 11/29/1947).


Conclusion: Palestine has existed (by that name) for over 2500 years. Although the Zionist state of Israel was illegitimately formed on 78% of the land (which was conveniently overlooked by the U.N.), the remaining 22% is internationally recognized as Palestine. There are millions of Palestinians living in the world:

• In Palestine (living in terror under illegal Israeli occupation)


• In Israel (living as 3rd class citizens)


• In neighboring Arab countries, Europe, Asia, and the Americas.



“Israel has the right to defend itself”


In theory, everyone has the right to self-defense. However, this right is forfeited when the party claiming that right is in the midst of an illegal or immoral act.


Example: If a criminal breaks into a home and lays siege upon it, the homeowner has the right to dispel the intruder – and in turn, any violence used by the criminal to repel the homeowner’s resistance can never be misconstrued as “self-defense” (although that ruse has been attempted many times by criminals in American courtrooms).


Fact: In 1967, Israel attacked the Palestinian Territories and began its military occupation. Both the attack and ensuing occupation were immediately condemned by the United Nations (U.N.S.C. Resolution 242 – 11/22/1967). Despite that and numerous subsequent resolutions, Israel has imposed military rule upon the Palestinians and has perpetrated a long list of crimes against humanity (also condemned by the U.N.):


• Attacks on neighboring Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq


• The prevention of medical and food supplies to Palestinians


• The control of water sources in Palestine


• The building of illegal settlements in Palestine – Gaza, West Bank, East Jerusalem


• The population of these settlements with illegal settlers – armed thugs


• The bulldozing of Palestinian homes killing people in them (or in front of them, e.g., Rachel Corrie)


• The building of the “Apartheid Wall” separating Palestinians from their families, farmlands, water sources, and medical facilities


• Collaboration with Apartheid South Africa to develop non-sanctioned nuclear weapons, along with biological and chemical weapons


• Establishment of “Administrative Detention” which subjects Palestinians – including women and children – to arrest and detention without charges, legal representation, or due process


• Attacks, arrests, and murders of international humanitarians offering assistance to Palestinians


Conclusion: Israel is in violation of a plethora of international and moral laws. Its presence in Palestine amounts to no less than illegal entry, robbery, destruction of property, assault, and murder. Since the international community has failed to enforce international law with regards to Israel’s war crimes, the Palestinians are justified in any attempt to rid themselves of their oppressor – Israel. Any devious attempt on Israel’s part to mislabel its heinous acts as “self-defense” is completely unwarranted and downright deceptive.



“Hamas is to blame! Hamas should stop bombing Israel”


Again – this is the case of the criminal pointing the finger at the victim. Israel’s brutal presence in Palestine is in violation of numerous international and moral laws. The acts of Hamas are akin to the Minutemen who did everything in their power to fight off the British forces in 18th Century America.


Conclusion: Although I am a pacifist and would opt for non-violent resistance against the criminal presence of Israel in Palestine, I must acknowledge in all good conscience that Hamas is legally and morally justified in defending the cause to free Palestine – both in Palestine and in Israel.



“Israel is friend and ally to the United States”


Israel is the United States’ daddy.


Fact: Israel perpetrates crimes against humanity with impunity and the United States not only condones these actions, it funds them.


• Our government has been infiltrated by Zionist judges, legislators, and executive administrators from both the Republican and Democratic parties. This is not to mention AIPAC and other Zionist-controlled lobbies which manipulate finances and legislation at federal, state, and local levels.


• Our financial system (banks, Wall Street, the Federal Reserve) is controlled by Zionists.


• Our entertainment industry (Hollywood, Broadway, Nashville, NBA, MLB, NFL, NHL, etc.) is predominantly owned and operated by Zionists.


• Mainstream media (all major news networks, television and radio stations, newspapers) are owned and operated by Zionists.


Conclusion: The result of all this is twofold: Zionists greatly influence and manipulate the U.S. government into enabling and funding Israel’s war crimes against Palestine and humanity.

Zionists convince the masses that Israel is the “good guy” and Muslims, Arabs, and especially Palestinians are the “bad guys”.

No true friend or ally would manipulate a friend into being complicit in a myriad of war crimes! Zionist Israel is, in fact, a devious enemy of the United States.





Anyone who clings to these and other Zionist myths must fall into one of three categories:


• Liar: Zionist supporter (Jewish, Christian, or other) who knows the facts and is yet involved in the scheme to mislead the public


• Ignorant: common citizen who has fallen prey to Zionist propaganda and has made little or no effort to validate the information


• Fool: one who has learned the truth, but ignores it in a vain display of “loyalty” to a political or religious position.


Raji (Roger) Abuzalaf is a Christian Palestinian (Haifa) refugee raised in Houston, now a long-term Honolulu resident and a U.S. citizen. He is a guitarist, singer, composer, and poet. Raji participates in local progressive/activist causes, at present co-producing pro-Palestine filmfare for Oahu’s main cable provider’s public-access TV network.





 The Solution to this plan: 


Do Unto Others Before They Do Unto You.