The Illuminati Chronicles Part 1

 A Short History of the New World Order Part 1

By cyberpatriot@hotmail.com

1773 – Mayer Amschel Rothschild assembles twelve of his most influential friends and

convinces them that if they all pool their resources together, they can rule the world.

This meeting takes place in Frankfurt, Germany. Rothschild also informs his friends

that he has found the perfect candidate, an individual of incredible intellect

and ingenuity, to lead the organization he has planned – Adam Weishaupt.

May 1, 1776 – Adam Weishaupt (code named Spartacus) establishes a secret society

called the Order of the Illuminati. Weishaupt is the Professor of Canon Law at the University

of Ingolstadt in Bavaria, part of Germany. [This date, May Day, is to become highly

significant to the Soviet Communists. They held festive military parades on this day.]

The Illuminati seek to establish a New World Order. Their objectives are as follows:

1) Abolition of all ordered governments
2) Abolition of private property
3) Abolition of inheritance
4) Abolition of patriotism
5) Abolition of the family
6) Abolition of religion
7) Creation of a world government

July 1782 – The Order of the Illuminati joins forces with Freemasonry at the Congress

of Wilhelmsbad. The Comte de Virieu, an attendee at the conference, comes away

visibly shaken. When questioned about the “tragic secrets” he brought back with him,

he replies: “I will not confide them to you. I can only tell you that all this is very much

more serious than you think.” From this time on, according to his biographer,

“the Comte de Virieu could only speak of Freemasonry with horror.”

1785 – An Illuminati courier named Lanze is struck by lightning and killed while traveling

by horseback through the town of Ratisbon. When Bavarian officials examine the contents

of his saddle bags, they discover the existence of the Order of the Illuminati and find plans

detailing the coming French Revolution. The Bavarian government attempts to alert the

government of France of impending disaster, but the French government fails to heed

this warning. Bavarian officials arrest all members of the Illuminati they can

find, but Weishaupt and others have gone underground and cannot be found.

Oct. 11, 1785 – Bavarian authorities raid the home of an Illuminati member named Von Zwack.

They discover Illuminati documents which show quite clearly that they plan to bring about

a “universal revolution that should deal the death-blow to society…this revolution

will be the work of the secret societies, and that is one of our great mysteries.”

1789 – Violence erupts in France. The French Revolution not only overthrows the existing

government but also attempts to eliminate Christianity from the nation. A half-naked

prostitute is placed on the altar of the Cathedral of Notre Dame and extolled as the

“Goddess of Reason.” Revolutionary officials even do away with the seven-day

week and replace it with a ten-day week.

1796 – Freemasonry becomes a major issue in the Presidential election in the United States.

John Adams wins the election by opposing Masonry, and his son John Quincy Adams

warns of the dire threat to the nation posed by the Masonic Lodges: “I do conscientiously

and sincerely believe that the Order of Freemasonry, if not

the greatest, is one of the greatest moral and political evils …”

1797 – John Robison, Professor of Natural History at Edinburgh University in Scotland,

publishes a book entitled “Proofs of a Conspiracy” in which he reveals that Adam Weishaupt

had attempted to recruit him. He exposes the diabolical aims of the Illuminati to the world.

1798 – George Washington acknowledges that Illuminati activity has come to America:

“It is not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and the principles of

Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more

satisfied of this fact than I am.”

1816 – Congress grants a 20-year charter to the Bank of the United States, a private

central bank for America. [The Constitution had granted to Congress the “power to

coin money and regulate the value thereof.” Thomas Jefferson had specifically warned

the American people against turning this power to create money over to a private group

that was unelected and not accountable to the public: “If the American people ever allow

private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation,

the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all

property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”]

1821 – Georg W. F. Hegel formulates what is called the Hegelian dialectic – the process

by which Illuminati objectives are achieved. According to the Hegelian dialectic, thesis plus

antithesis equals synthesis. In other words, first you foment a crisis. Then there is an

enormous public outcry that something must be done about the problem. So you offer a

solution that brings about the changes you really wanted all along, but which people would

have been unwilling to accept initially. (A good example of this would be the killings at

Dunblane and Hungerford. In both cases public outrage was accompanied by the passage

of stringent new gun legislation in the British parliament; yet serious questions remain

unanswered about both incidents, Ed.)

1826 – William Morgan attempts to publish a book exposing the wrongdoing of the

Masonic Lodges. While he is in the process of having his book printed, he

mysteriously disappears. [His body was found in Lake Ontario a year later.]

1828 – Mayer Amschel Rothschild, who finances the Illuminati, expresses his utter

contempt for national governments which attempt to regulate international bankers such

as him: “Allow me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who writes

the laws.” [As Sir Josiah Stamp, president of the Bank of England in the 1920s, would

remark years later: “Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers

own the earth; take it away from them but leave them the power to create deposits,

and with a flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again.”]

1829 – British Illuminist Frances “Fanny” Wright gives a series of lectures in the United

States. She announces that various subversives and revolutionaries are to be united in a

movement that will be called “Communism.” She explains that the movement is to be

made more acceptable to the public by professing to support “equal opportunity” and “equal rights.”

1829-1837 – While President Andrew Jackson is in office, there are attempts to continue

and strengthen the hold of a central bank over the United States. President Jackson

vigorously opposes these efforts. Jackson tells his adversaries: “You are a den of vipers!

I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood

the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before

morning.” In 1832, Jackson vetoes a bill to renew the charter of the Bank of the United

States. In 1833, he removes government funds from the Bank of the United States.

1848 – Moses Mordecai Marx Levy, alias Karl Marx, writes “The Communist Manifesto.”

Marx is a member of an Illuminati front organization called the League of the Just. He

not only advocates economic and political changes; he advocates moral and spiritual

changes as well. He believes the family should be abolished and that all children should

be raised by a central authority. He expresses his attitude toward God by saying: “We

must war against all prevailing ideas of religion, of the state, of country, of patriotism.

The idea of God is the keynote of a perverted civilization. It must be destroyed.”

1870 – John Ruskin is named Professor of Fine Arts at Oxford University in England.

He teaches his students that the government should take control of all means of production

and distribution, and he is prepared to place control of the government in the hands of a

single man: “My continual aim has been to show the eternal superiority of some men to others,

sometimes even of one man to all others.”

1871 – Albert Pike, founder of the Klu Klux Klan, publishes his 861-page book “Morals

and Dogma”, intended only for Masonic eyes. He indicates that those in the lower ranks of

Masonry are deliberately deceived by their superiors: “The Blue degrees [the first three

degrees of the 32] are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are

displayed there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not

intended that he shall understand them; but it is intended that he shall imagine that he

shall understand them. Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of

Masonry.” [This is why about 95% of the men involved in Masonry don’t have a clue as to

what the objectives of the organization actually are. They are under the

delusion that it’s just a fine community organization doing good works.]

1875 – Russian occultist Helena Petrovna Blavatsky founds the Theosophical Society.

Madame Blavatsky claims that Tibetan holy men in the Himalayas, whom she refers to as

the Masters of Wisdom, communicated with her in London by telepathy. She insists that

the Christians have it all backwards – that Satan is good and God is evil. She writes:

“The Christians and scientists must be made to respect their Indian betters. The Wisdom

of India, her philosophy and achievement, must be made known in Europe and America.”

1884 – The Fabian Society is founded to promote Socialism. The Fabian Society takes its

name from the Roman General Fabius Maximus, who fought Hannibal’s army

in small debilitating skirmishes, rather than attempting one decisive battle.

July 14, 1889 – Albert Pike issues instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the world.

He reveals who is the true object of Masonic worship: “To you, Sovereign Grand Instructors

General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th

degrees: The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees,

maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine.”

1890-1896 – Cecil Rhodes, an enthusiastic student of John Ruskin, is Prime Minister of

South Africa, a British colony at the time. He is able to exploit and control the gold and

diamond wealth of South Africa. He works to bring all the habitable portions of the world

under the domination of a ruling elite. To that end, he uses a portion of his vast wealth to

establish the famous Rhodes Scholarships.

Feb. 5, 1891 – Rhodes joins his group from Oxford with a similar group from Cambridge

headed by ardent social reformer William Stead. Rhodes and Stead are members of the

inner “Circle of Initiates” of the secret society which they found.

There is also an outer circle known as the “Association of Helpers.”

1891 – Madame Blavatsky dies. The mantle of leadership for the worldwide theosophical

movement falls to Annie Besant, a militant feminist and a member of the Fabian Socialist

Society of England. She enthusiastically joins in revolutionary street riots and

pens numerous volumes of occultic writings to add to those of Blavatsky.

1909-1913 – Lord Alfred Milner organizes the “Association of Helpers” into

various Round Table Groups in the British dependencies and the United States.

1912 – Colonel Edward M. House, a close advisor of President Woodrow Wilson, publishes

Phillip Dru: Administrator, in which he promotes “socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx.”

1913 – President Woodrow Wilson publishes “The New Freedom” in which he reveals:

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some

of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid

of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so

organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that

they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

Dec. 23, 1913 – The Federal Reserve [neither federal nor a reserve – it’s a privately

owned institution] is created. It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyl Island,

Georgia, by a group of bankers and politicians, including Col. House. This transfers the

power to create money from the American government to a private group of bankers.

The Federal Reserve Act is hastily passed just before the Christmas break. Plank #5

of “The Communist Manifesto” had called for just such a central bank. [It is probably the

largest generator of debt in the world.] Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. (father of

the famed aviator) warns: “This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When

the President signs this act the invisible government by the money power,

proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized…”

1916 – Three years after signing the Federal Reserve Act into law, President Woodrow

Wilson observes: “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country.

A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is

concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands

of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely

controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government

by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority,

but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”

1917 – With aid from financiers in New York City and London, V. I. Lenin is able to overthrow

the government of Russia. Lenin later comments on the apparent contradiction of the links

between prominent capitalists and Communism: “There also exists another alliance – at

first glance a strange one, a surprising one – but if you think about it, in fact, one which

is well grounded and easy to understand. This is the alliance between our

Communist leaders and your capitalists.” [Remember the Hegelian dialectic?]

May 30, 1919 – Prominent British and American personalities establish the Royal Institute

of International Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs in the U.S. at a

meeting arranged by Col. House; attended by various Fabian socialists, including noted

economist John Maynard Keynes.

1920 – Britain’s Winston Churchill recognizes the connection between the Illuminati and

the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. He observes: “From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt

to those of Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman,

this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of

society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible

equality, has been steadily growing. It played a definitely recognizable role in the tragedy

of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement

during the nineteenth century, and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities

from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian

people by the hair of their heads, and have become practically the undisputed masters

of that enormous empire.”

1920-1931 – Louis T. McFadden is Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and

Curency. Concerning the Federal Reserve, Congressman McFadden notes: “When the

Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive

that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international

bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own

pleasure. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is –

the Fed has usurped the Government. It controls everything here and it controls all

our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.” Concerning the Great

Depression and the country’s acceptance of FDR’s New Deal, he asserts: “It was no accident.

It was a carefully contrived occurrence. The international bankers sought to bring

about a condition of despair here so they might emerge as the rulers of us all.”

1921 – Col. House reorganizes the American branch of the Institute of International

Affairs into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). [For the past 60 years, 80% of

the top positions in every administration – whether Democrat or Republican – have been

occupied by members of this organization. During that time, only two Presidents have not

been directly affiliated with the CFR – John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan.

Kennedy was assassinated and an attempt was made on Reagan’s life!]

December 15, 1922 – The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine “Foreign Affairs.”

Author Philip Kerr states: “Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind

as long as the earth remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states, until some kind of

international system is created. The real problem today is that of world government.”

1932 – “Plan for Peace” by American Birth Control League founder Margaret Sanger

is published. She calls for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative

concentration camps for all “dysgenic stocks,” including Blacks, Hispanics, American

Indians and Catholics. [The American Birth Control League eventually becomes Planned

Parenthood – the nation’s foremost promoter and provider of abortion services.

Many today are not aware of the racist origins of Planned Parenthood.]

1933 – “The Shape of Things to Come” by H. G. Wells

is published. Wells predicts a second world war around

1940, originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there would be an increasing

lack of public safety in “criminally infected” areas. The plan for the “Modern World State”

would succeed on its third attempt, and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq.

The book also states: “Although world government had been plainly coming for some years,

although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no opposition anywhere.”

Nov. 21, 1933 – In a letter to Col. Edward M. House, President Franklin Roosevelt writes:

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the

larger centers has owned the government since the days of Andrew Jackson.”

1934 – “The Externalization of the Hierarchy” by Alice Bailey is published. Bailey is an

occultist, taking over from Annie Besant as head of the Theosophical Society. Bailey’s

works are channeled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit] Djwahl Kuhl.

[Her teachings form the foundation for the current New Age movement.] She writes:

“The hour for the ancient mysteries has arrived. These Ancient Mysteries were hidden in

numbers, in ritual, in words, and in symbology; these veil the secret. There is no question

therefore that the work to be done in familiarizing the general public with the nature of the

Mysteries is of paramount importance at this time. These Mysteries will be restored to

outer expression through the medium of the Church and the Masonic Fraternity.” She

further states: “Out of the spoliation of all existing culture and civilization, the new world

order must be built.” [The book is published by the Lucis Trust, incorporated originally in

New York as the Lucifer Publishing Company. Lucis Trust is a United Nations NGO

(Non-Governmental Organization) and has been a major player at the recent UN summits.

Later, Assistant Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Muller would credit the creation of

his World Core Curriculum for education to the underlying teachings of Djwahl Kuhl, via

Alice Bailey’s writings on the subject.]

1937 – Students at the Lenin School of Political Warfare in Moscow are taught: “Today,

of course, we are not strong enough to attack. To win, we shall need the element of surprise.

The western world will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most

spectacular peace movement on record. There shall be electrifying overtures and unheard

of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate to

their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As

soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist.”

October 28, 1939 – In an address by John Foster Dulles [later U.S. Secretary of State],

he proposes that America lead the transition to a new order of less independent,

semi-sovereign states bound together by a league or federal union.

1939 – “New World Order” by H. G. Wells proposes a “collectivist one-world state” or “new

world order” comprised of “socialist democracies.” He advocates “universal conscription

for service” and declares that “nationalist individualism is the world’s disease.” He continues:

“The manifest necessity for some collective world control to eliminate warfare and the less

generally admitted necessity for a collective control of the economic and biological life

of mankind, are aspects of one and the same process.” He proposes that this

be accomplished through “universal law” and “propaganda” (or education).

1940 – “The New World Order” is published by the Carnegie Endowment for Peace and

contains a select list of references on regional and world federation,

together with some special plans for world order after the war.

June 28, 1945 – President Truman endorses world government in a speech: “It will be just

as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the world as

it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States.”

October 24, 1945 – The United Nations Charter becomes effective.

July 1948 – Sir Harold Butler, in the CFR’s “Foreign Affairs,” sees “a New World Order”

taking shape: “How far can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of themselves

as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are they prepared

to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic

or political union?”

Feb. 7, 1950 – International financier and CFR member James Warburg tells a Senate

Foreign Relations Subcommittee: “We shall have world government whether or not you like it

– by conquest or consent.”

1953 – Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation, tells a Congressional commission

investigating tax-exempt foundations: “We at the executive level here were active in either

the OSS [forerunner of the CIA], the State Department, or the European Economic Administration.

During those times, and without exception, we operated under directives issued by the

White House. We are continuing to be guided by just such directives, the substance of

which were to the effect that we should make every effort to so alter life in the

United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union.”

Feb. 23, 1954 – Senator William Jenner of Indiana says before the U.S. Senate:

“Today the path to total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal

means, unseen and unheard by Congress, the President, or the people. We have a

well-organized political action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution

and establish a one-party state. It has a foothold within our Government, and its own

propaganda apparatus. One may call this group by many names. Some people call it socialism,

some collectivism. I prefer to call it ‘democratic centralism.’ The important point to remember

about this group is not its ideology but its organization. It is a dynamic, aggressive, elite corps,

forcing its way through every opening, to make a breach for a collectivist one-party state.

It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government without our suspecting

the change is underway. This secret revolutionary corps understands well the power to

influence the people by an elegant form of brainwashing. We see this, for example,

in the innocent use of words like ‘democracy’ in place of ‘representative government.’ “

1954 – Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands establishes the Bilderbergers,

international politicians and bankers who meet secretly on an annual basis.

Nov. 25, 1959 – Council on Foreign Relations Study Number 7 calls for a “…new international

order which must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, for social and economic

change…an international order…including states labeling themselves as ‘socialist’ [communist].”

1959 – “The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy” is published, sponsored by

the Rockefeller Brothers’ Fund. It explains that the U.S. “cannot escape, and indeed

should welcome…the task which history has imposed upon us. This is the task of helping

to shape a new world order in all its dimensions – spiritual, economic, political, social.”

1962 – “The Future of Federalism” by Nelson Rockefeller claims that current events

compellingly demand a “new world order.” He says there is: “A fever of nationalism…but

the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political

tasks…These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true

building of a new world order…Sooner perhaps than we may realize

…there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world.”

Nov. 13, 1963 – It is alleged that just ten days prior to his assassination, President

John F. Kennedy tells a Columbia University audience: “The high office of President

has been used to foment a plot to destroy the Americans’ freedom, and before I leave office

I must inform the citizens of this plight.”

1966 – Professor Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton’s mentor at Georgetown University,

authors a massive volume entitled “Tragedy and Hope” in which he states: “There

does exist and has existed for a generation, an international network which operates,

to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this

network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to

cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I

know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and

was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records.

I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close

to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a

few of its policies, but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to

remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”

July 26, 1968 – Nelson Rockefeller pledges that “as President,

he would work toward international creation of a new world order.”

1969 – A document entitled “Marriage and the Family” is published by the British Humanist

Association stating that “some opponents of humanism have accused us of wishing to

overthrow the traditional Christian family. They are right. That is exactly what we intend to do.”

1970 – The U.S. Department of Defense appropriates funds [$2 million a year for five years]

for the “development of immune-system destroying agents for biological warfare.” [Source

of the HIV virus which causes AIDS. The virus was then introduced into the homosexual

community via hepatitis vaccine and into Central Africa via smallpox vaccine.]

1970 – Zbigniew Brzezinski [who later became President Jimmy Carter’s National

Security Advisor] writes a book entitled “Between Two Ages.” He has nothing but praise

for Marxism: “Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s

universal vision…Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the

inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief…Marxism, disseminated on the

popular level in the form of communism, represents a major advance in man’s ability to

conceptualize his relationship to the world.” He also describes how war can be waged

against a nation without its citizens even realizing they are under attack: “Technology

will make available to the leaders of major nations a variety of techniques for conducting

secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of security forces need be appraised.

One nation may attack a competitor covertly…techniques of weather modification could

be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm, thereby weakening

a nation’s capacity and forcing it to accept the demands of the competitor.”

1972 – President Nixon visits China and toasts Chinese Premier Chou En-lai

by talking of “the hope that each of us has to build a new world order.”

1973 – International banker and staunch member of the subversive Council on Foreign

Relations, David Rockefeller founds a new organization called the Trilateral Commission.

He invites future President Jimmy Carter to become one of the founding members.

Zbigniew Brzezinski is the organization’s first director.

1973 – The Club of Rome, a U.N. operative, issues a report entitled “Regionalized and

Adaptive Model of the Global World System.” This report divides the entire world into ten regions.

 See The Illumaniti Chronicles Part II:

The warnings listed below, which appear in chronological order, began with our first president – George Washington.

The last president to speak out was JFK, who was assassinated. Read what they and other political leaders have

said about the invisible government.

George Washington wrote that the Illuminati want to separate the People from their Government:

“It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in

the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea that I meant to

convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to

propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of seperation).

That Individuals of them may… actually had a seperation [sic] of the People from their Government in view, is too

evident to be questioned.” – George Washington, 1st President of the United States (1789–1797), from a letter that

Washington wrote on October 24, 1798, which can be found in the Library of Congress. For an analysis

of Washington’s warning, see the article “Library of Congress: George Washington Warns of Illuminati”

“I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.” —Thomas Jefferson,

President of the United States (1801–1809) and principal author of the United States Declaration

of Independence (1776), in a letter written to John Taylor on May 28, 1816

“A power has risen up in the government greater than the people themselves, consisting of many and various powerful

interests, combined in one mass, and held together by the cohesive power of the vast surplus in banks.” – John C. Calhoun,

Vice President (1825-1832) and U.S. Senator, from a speech given on May 27, 1836

Note that it appears that Washington’s and Jefferson’s concerns regarding bankers and separation of the people from

the government was realized by 1836. This fact was confirmed in a letter written by FDR in 1933 (see below) in which

he wrote that “a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”

Jackson was the seventh president of the United States (1829-1937). Calhoun served as Jackson’s vice-president from 1829-1832.

“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no

responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business

and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.”— Theodore Roosevelt, 26th President of the United States,

Theodore Roosevelt, An Autobiography, 1913 (Appendix B)

“A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth

of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men… [W]e have come to be one of the worst

ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government

by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion

and the duress of small groups of dominant men.”

– Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, The New Freedom, 1913

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the

United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power

somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not

speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

– Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, The New Freedom, 1913

“The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs

over our cities, states and nation… The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States

government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties, … and control the majority of the

newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive

out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible

government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies,

schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.”

– New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, New York Times, March 26, 1922

“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the

Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government board, has cheated

the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt…

Mr. Chairman, when the Federal Reserve act was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that a world

system was being set up here… and thatthis country was to supply financial power to an international superstate

— a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together toenslave the world for

their own pleasure.”

– Congressman Louis T. McFadden, from a speech delivered to the House of Representatives on June 10, 1932

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the

government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.” — Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 32nd President of the United States

(1933–1945), in a letter to Colonel Edward M House dated November 21, 1933, as quoted in F.D.R.: His Personal Letters, 1928-1945.

“Today the path to total dictatorship in the U.S. can be laid by strictly legal means… We have a well-organized

political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state…

It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government… This ruthless power-seeking elite is a

disease of our century… This group…is answerable neither to the President, the

Congress, nor the courts. It is practically irremovable.” – Senator William Jenner, 1954 speech

“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.

The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects

even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.”

—J. Edgar Hoover, The Elks Magazine, 1956

“The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically

opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings… Our way of life is under attack. Those who

make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe… no war ever posed a greater threat to our security.

If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only saythat the danger has never been more

clear and its presence has never been more imminent… For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and

ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead

of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead

of armies by day.It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly

knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised.

No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”

— John F Kennedy, 35th President of the United States,

from a speech delivered to the American Newspaper Publishers Association on April 27, 1961

and known as the “Secret Society” speech (click here for full transcript and audio).

“The Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least fifty years, been carefully following a plan to use their economic

power to gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do.

I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”

Congressman Larry P. McDonald, November 1975, from the introduction to a book titled The Rockefeller File.

“There exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and

the ability to pursue its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.”

– Daniel K. Inouye, US Senator from Hawaii, testimony at the Iran Contra Hearings, 1986.

The Federal Reserve

“A power has risen up in the government greater than the people themselves…” – John C. Calhoun

“… owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.” – Theodore Roosevelt

“… one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer

to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank.“ – Louis T. McFadden

In an interview with Jim Lehrer that was aired on PBS’ News Hour on September 18, 2007 that you can watch on

YouTube, formal Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said, essentially, that the

Federal Reserve was above the law and that no agency of government can overrule their actions:

Jim Lehrer: “What is the proper relationship, what should be the proper

relationship between a chairman of the Fed and a president of the United States?”

Alan Greenspan: “Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency, and that means, basically, that there

is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take. So long as that is in place and there is no

evidence that the administration or the Congress or anybody else is requesting that we do things other

than what we think is the appropriate thing, then what the relationships are don’t frankly matter.”

The fact that the Fed is above the law was demonstrated by current Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, during his appearance

before Congress on March 4, 2009 (as shown in this video). Senator Bernie Sanders asked Bernanke about

$2.2 trillion in American tax dollars that was lent out by Federal Reserve. Bernanke refused to provide an answer:

Senator Sanders: “Will you tell the American people to whom yo

lent $2.2 trillion of their dollars? … Can you tell us who they are?”

Bernanke: “No”

David Rockefeller and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)

“We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to

destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state…” – William Jenner

“The Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least fifty years, been carefully following a plan to use their

economic power to gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world.” – Larry P. McDonald

In 1921 the stockholders of the Federal Reserve financed an organization called the “Council on Foreign Relations”

(CFR). A full discussion on the CFR is beyond the scope of this article. Suffice it to say that the CFR likely plays a

prominent role in the invisible government that we have been warned about. The CFR is alleged to be the arm of the

Ruling Elite in the United States. Most influential politicians, academics and media personalities are members.

The CFR uses its influence to push their New World Order agenda on the American people.

David Rockefeller, Sr is the current patriarch of the Rockefeller family. He is the only surviving grandchild of oil tycoon

John D. Rockefeller, founder of Standard Oil. Rockefeller began a lifelong association with the

CFR when he joined as a director in 1949. In Rockefeller’s 2002 autobiography “Memoirs” he wrote:

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized

incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we

wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against

the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others

around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure

— one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

James Warburg, son of CFR [Council on Foreign Relations] founder Paul Warburg, delivered

blunt testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950:

“We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is

only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”

.

.

Before the American Mercury Magazine came into its present ownership,

it was owned and controlled by a noted patriot by the name of Russell

Maguire. He was a man of wealth and intelligent business initiative.

He became alarmed over what he knew to be Zionism's Master Plan for

World Power. A documented research manuscript came into his hands and he

had the courage to publish it.

Following its publication, he was the victim of attempted blackmail, physical

threat, danger of assassination and the complete sabotage of his business

enterprises. His life became so harassed that he left America for an isolated

island home where he felt he could be safe from harassment, persecution

and the risk of death itself.

Herewith is the Manuscript that this courageous patriot had the courage to reproduce:

Virtually all of the items included in this chronology are direct quotations from Zionists or from

their books. At the end of this article there will be listed the various books, their authors, the

publishing firms and the dates of publication. I. B. means "International Banker,"

A. M. means "American Mercury," p. means "page," MMM means 'Money Made Mysterious."

Theodor Herzl published "The Jewish State." It became the

Zionists' bible. The following exact quotes are from Herzl's book:

1. "When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of all revolutionary

parties; at the same time, when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse." p.10.

2. " . . . the longer Anti-Semitism lies in abeyance the more fiercely will it break out." p. 4.

3."Universal brotherhood is not even a beautiful dream.

Antagonism is essential to man's greatest efforts." p. 42.

1. Lord Edmond Rothschild of London and Jacob H. Schiff of New York City, two of the Elders of Zion,

got Theodor Herzl (of Austria) to arrange for the World Zionist Congress at Basel, Switzerland;

197 delegates met there and laid out a plan of World Conquest with plans for a World Government.

Herzl, founder of Zionism, in opening the meeting, raised his right hand and repeated an ancient

oath of the Talmudists:

"If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, may my right hand forget its cunning." Herzl also said at this meeting:

"We are one nation. We are neither American nor Russian Jews, but only Jews!" He also said:

'With a few exceptions that do not figure at all, the entire press of the world is in our hands."

2. Dr. Mandelstam said on August 29 at the opening of the Zionist Congress of 1897: "The Jews

will use all their influence and power to prevent the rise and prosperity of other nations and are

resolved to adhere to their historic hopes; i.e., to the conquest of world power." LE TEMPS,

Paris, September 3,1897.

3. The Zionist Organization of America was organized in 1897 with Richard Gottheil of Columbia

University as its first president, and Rabbi Stephen Wise as the first secretary. Branches for

women (Hadassah), and children (Young Judea) were soon organized. ZIONIST NETWORK, p. 32.

Dr. Mandelstam, professor of the University of Kiev, Russia, at Basel Zionist Congress in 1898 said:

"The Jews energetically reject the idea of fusion with the other nationalities and cling firmly to their

historical hope, i.e., of world empire." THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY,

by H. S Chamberlain, Vol. I, p. 335. Also p. 221 of DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION.

 1900

1. Theodor Herzl, the Zionist leader, went to see Abdul Hamid the Sultan of Turkey, to buy land for

the Zionists in Palestine. When the Sultan said "no" he had a revolution on his hands Note

later item in 1914.

2. Between 1900 and the outbreak of World War I (1914), the United States

was flooded by large waves of immigration from Eastern Europe.

1. Because President William McKinley in the United States refused to be a stooge for the International

Bankers, he was killed by Russian Zionist, Zolkozh. Presidents Lincoln [on Good Friday] and Garfield

had been previously murdered.

2. Doctor Leopold Kahn summed up these sentiments when speaking about Zionism in a Jewish school

at Pozrony (Bratislava) in 1901: "Jews will never be assimilated and will never adopt the customs or

morals of strangers. The Jew will remain a Jew under all circumstances." WORLD CONQUERORS, p. 21.

1902

1. Lenin joins Trotsky in Switzerland on Editorial Board of Zionist

publication ISKRA (THE SPARK). It was printed in Munich, Germany.

2. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. was one of the founders and

chief financiers of the scandalous Panama Canal Co.

1. Dr. Simon Flexner, one of three busy brothers became director of laboratories

of the Rockefeller Institute. AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p. 105.

2. At the Sixth Zionist Congress in 1903 at Basel Switzerland Dr. Max Nordau, an Elder of Zion

said we quote from the AMERICAN JEWISH NEWS, New York, Vol. 4, No 2, September 19, 1919,

"Theodor Herzl has considered it his duty to maintain valuable relations with this great and progressive

power (England). Herzl knows that we stand (in 1903) before a tremendous upheaval of the whole

world. Soon, perhaps some kind of world congress will have to be called, and England, the great,

free and powerful England, will then continue the work it has begun with its generous offer to the

Sixth (Zionist) Congress in 1903. And if you ask me now what has Israel to do in Uganda, then

. . . let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading

upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist (1897) Congress, the English Uganda proposition (1903),

the future World War (1914-1918), the peace conference (1919-1920) where with the help of England a free

and Jewish Palestine will be created."

"Like a mighty thunder these last words came to us, and we all

were trembling and awe-struck as if we had seen a vision of old."

The above speech was also printed in the FASCIST (London) February, 1937. The same speech

has been mentioned in a number of books, including (on page 221) DEMOCRACY AND WORLD

DOMINION, by the great educator, Edwin D. Schoonmaker, publisher, Richard R. Smith, New York City, 1939.

3. Speyer & Co., the Zionist banking house, gave Mexico a loan of 12 & one half million

dollars and secured all oil concessions in Mexico. From then on intrigue dominated Mexico.

1. Kuhn Loeb & Co. (a Rothschild international banking firm) financed the war of Japan

against Czarist Russia. (A planned revolution in Czarist Russia followed one year later.)

2. Chaim Weizmann commented as follows on Theodor Herzl's JUDENSTAAT:

"Four years ago world Jewry was divided into two camps: one on the east and one on the west. And

when Herzl arrived and said to us that we must unite Eastern and Western Jewry, we

carried out this order accordingly. Our unity today is Herzl's legacy to the Jewish people."

Theodor Herzl's JUDENSTAAT states: "Wir sind ein Volk!"Q"We are one people!"

And today this is the only unity existing in a world divided into two hemispheres.

"We are one people despite the ostensible rifts, cracks and differences between the American and

Soviet democracies. We are one people and it is not in our interests that the West should liberate the

East, for in doing this and in liberating the enslaved nations, the West would inevitably deprive Jewry

of the Eastern half of its world power." Chaim Weizmann statement in WORLD CONQUERORS, p. 227.

3. International Workers of the World (IWW) starts promoting violence and trouble

in U. S. Austrian-born Felix Frankfurter later was counsel for IWW anarchists.

 1905

1. Sidney Hillman (Schmoul Gilsman) was educated as a Rabbi.

See WHO WAS WHO IN AMERICA, Vol. II, p. 254.

2. Abortive Revolution in Russia failed. It was led by Sidney Hillman who later came to the U.S.

to direct "world operations." Another leader in the same revolution was Leon Trotsky ( Leiba Davidovitch

Bronstein). During the revolution the Rothschilds helped finance, they had their termites in Russia

destroy and sabotage the oil wells and refineries. It took many years to offset this tremendous

sabotage. It handicapped Czarist Russia some years later when "Planned World War I" started.

3. Intercollegiate Socialist Society formed. Felix Frankfurter, a founder.

4. A copy of THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION

was recorded in the British Museum, in London.

5. We quote from p. 76 of THE WORLD AT THE CROSS ROADS, by Boris Brasol:

"According to the information of the LONDON JEWISH CHRONICLE, the contribution of international

Jewry to the Russian revolutionary cause in 1905 reached the sum of #874,341. (Nearly $4,500,000 U.S.)

No wonder that Mr. George von Longerke Meyer, United States Ambassador to Russia during the

Russo-Japanese War, stated in an official letter dated December 30, 1905, to Mr. Elihu Root, then

U. S. Secretary of State, that:

"The Jews have undoubtedly to a large extent furnished

the brains and energy in the revolution throughout Russia."

Nevertheless, in 1905, the revolution financed by Jacob H. Schiff failed.

1. In 1906 a dissolution suit was brought by the Attorney General, for the U. S. Government, against

Rockefeller's Oil Company. The case was closed in 1908. The U. S. Supreme Court ruled against

the Rockefeller interest in May 1911 and fined them $29,000,000. The State of Texas issued

an injunction against the Rockefellers doing business in that state. William H. Allen's book,

ROCKEFELLER: GIANT, DWARF, SYMBOL gives some of the details of the Rockefellers' prior

questionable operations. When the Rockefellers maneuvered out of the fine of $29 million, Federal

Judge Landis, who conducted the government trial, bitterly commented: "You can't convict a million dollars."

AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p. 104.

From the beginning the Rockefellers were financed by the Kuhn Loeb & Co. and other Zionist

bankers. The Rothschilds advised and guided the Rockefellers. They had a deal to divide the world

petroleum markets. See ROTHSCHILD' AND ROCKEFELLERS: DEDICATED

MONOPOLISTS, in the AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p. 100.

2. In the JEWISH ENCYCLOPAEDIA (1906), we read:

"It (Schiff's firm) subscribed for and floated the large Japanese

war loan in 1904-1905." THE ALIEN MENACE, p. 112.

3. The Rothschilds financed ALLIANCE ISRAELITE UNIVERSELLE, published in Russia and elsewhere

in 1907: "Capture the press! Through it everything will come to you in the natural course of events."

Adolphe Cremioux. Founder, ALLIANCE ISRAELITE UNIVERSELLE, quoted from A. Shamakoff,

ADDRESS IN DEFENSE OF T. DOKSHIN AND OTHERS, p. 36. Moscow: University Printing Office, 1907.

1. Labor Zionist Organization of America Q Poale Zion - was organized in the U. S. to shape labor activities.

2. "There was another great crisis when the Knickerbocker Trust failed because manipulators of

the millionaire class wilfully created a run on the banks, from which they emerged incomparably

more powerful, having bought up the stock of the ruined victims which held to resell at par. At the

same time the Steel Trust was able to complete its absolute monopoly. Solomon Loeb of

Kuhn Loeb & Co., was a member of the Knickerbocker Trust." DEADLIER THAN THE H. BOMB, p. 45.

1. The Socialists financed by the International Banking group

said they would, in the future, "bury the whole capitalist system."

2. On advice of the Rothschilds the Belgian Government acquires the Belgian Congo. Edward

Seugier is sent to Elizabethtown. War, minerals and other reasons were mentioned later.

3. Abraham Flexner became education expert for the Carnegie Foundation for

the Advancement of Teaching. AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p 106.

4. Federal Council of Churches of Christ organized at suggestion of Rothschild. Rockefeller and

Carnegie interests active in it. Their Foundations later flow funds into it. 75 per cent of its finances

have come from sources outside of its church membership. Congregations don't vote. "Selected"

delegates meet only once each four years.

5. During a heated Congressional investigation into white slavery, The American Jewish Congress

was formed. See p. 96, INTERNATIONAL JEW by Henry Ford, Sr. During years that followed,

the AJC and Federal Council of Churches were to work closely together on many projects.

1. Walter Rathenau, Zionist, Financial Dictator of Germany, selected by

International Bankers after World War I in THE WIERNER FREE PRESSE,

December 25, 1909: "Only 300 men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of Europe.

They elect their successors from their entourage. These Jews have the means in their

hands of putting an end to the form of any State which they find unreasonable."

2. THE UNSEEN EMPIRE OF FINANCE, a carefully documented research book by E. Alexander

Powell, declared in The SATURDAY EVENING POST, June 19, 1909: "The European peoples are no

longer under the Government of respective nations. They have passed under another scepter. They

have become the subjects of another Power Q a Power unseen, but felt in palace as in cottage, in

Russia as in Spain, by every parent and child, by every potentate and every laborer. No nation on

the European continent has any longer an independence that is more than normal. The political

autonomy of every one of them has been surrendered to the will of a despotism before which every

kingdom and empire and republic fawns in the most abject subserviency."

Above also in ZIONIST NETWORK, p. 6, by Senator Jack B. Tenney.

1. "Mr. Paul Warburg was brother-in-law to Mr. Jacob H. Schiff. Warburg was born in Germany.

His brothers conduct the powerful German banking house of M. Warburg and Company, Hamburg,

financing the German shipping industry and controlling the Hamburg-American and North German

Lloyd lines. Herr Max Warburg, head of this banking house played an important part in German

politics, particularly at the time the Kaiser fled to Holland. Dr. Carl Melchoir, a partner in it, was

one of the five German delegates-in-chief at the Peace Conference at Versailles (1919), and in later

years (1930) was prominent in the founding of the Bank for International Settlements. This was

the central bank of the central International Settlements, the central bank of the central banks

established in Switzerland, which has been internationalized in peace and war alike, it pays

no taxes, and it is above and beyond all law." ALL THESE THINGS, by A. N. Field, p. 5.

2. Correspondence of the Rothschilds to the German Kaiser reveals Rothschilds wanted World War I

delayed. (They needed our Federal Reserve Act to finance World Wars.)

INTERNATIONAL JEW by Henry Ford, Sr., P. 204.

3. The International Group running the Carnegie Foundation trustees' meeting "discussed the

advantages of changing our government and institutions through war."

(Later Alger Hiss was president of this "international" outfit.)

4. "I felt constrained to point out (to Kaiser Wilhelm II on his last visit to England in 1911) that

the Jews . . . had captured and controlled the larger part of the German press. He did not dissent."

Herbert Henry Asquith, Prime Minister of England 1908 - 1916. THE GENESIS OF THE WAR,

New York, 1923, p. 89.

5. The Zionist organization sent a German geologist, Professor Blankenhorn, to investigate

the potentialities of the Dead Sea region in Palestine. THE ALIEN MENACE, p. 168.

                                                                                            1912

1. Bernard Baruch ushered into the President's office in the White House his very weak professor, Woodrow Wilson.

2. Richard J. H. Gottheil wrote that "The closer Jews are kept within

the fold, the greater their interest in Jewish life and thought."

3. The best pamphleteers, the ablest journalists of Europe kept on the payroll of the various financial

groups, were feverishly preparing public opinion for the future

conflict between the European countries. Boris L. Brasol.

4. " . . . Finally it should be borne in mind that the press bureaus and the great Eastern dailies exert

a disproportionate influence on the American press as a whole . . . The foreign news which came

through these bureaus was primarily composed for the New York papers, so, in the last analysis,

the control of the New York press meant the control of the entire American press." Horace C. Peterson.

5. " . . . The Northcliffe (Jewish-owned) press did more before and during the war to embitter and

deliberately poison the English mind against Germany than any other agency." Clinton Hartley Grattan.

1. Colonel E. Mandell House wrote a book, PHILIP DRU, ADMINISTRATOR David-Rex-Universe,

See AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1954, p. 131 (Researchers say that E. Mandell House was

an agent of the Rothschilds.)

2. President Wilson (during brief moments when he was not dominated by Brandeis, Baruch,

Frankfurter, etc.) wrote "we know that something intervenes between the people

of the U. S. and the control of their own affairs at Washington." FAR AND WIDE, p. 327.

The Hidden Hand put across five related items in 1913:

1. Graduated income tax law was passed. (16th Amendment.) A fundamental rule, laid down by

The Communist Manifesto, for destroying of society is "A heavy, progressive or graduated income tax."

2. The Federal Reserve Banking Act was passed, December 23 Q two days before Christmas. It permitted

aliens, through our privately owned Federal Reserve Banks to finance the world wars which were

"planned." Elihu Root blasted this dangerous act in the Senate December 13,1913. (See MONEY MADE

MYSTERIOUS- 3rd Book.) 4,000 pages of fine print was later slipped into

it! It was cooked up at Baruch's Jekyl Island in a secret conference.

3. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was organized by B'nai B'rith. (Its pressure and

intimidation record, and the sad events that happened thereafter, speak for themselves.)

4. The Rockefeller Foundation was established. Thereafter this outfit and

the ADL were to cooperate. (Remember the 2 blades of a pair of scissors.)

5. U. S. senators would no longer he selected by the legislatures of each of the states. Thereafter

senators would be elected by the masses. This gave the Internationalists and their Controlled Press

control of the senators by their control of all communication media. They already had it on the Congressmen.

From this date forward, we were to be lied to, brainwashed and betrayed: Nationalism was thrown

out the window for un-American internationalism. The money properly belonging to the citizen

was taken from him by the Marxist graduated income tax and squandered by the

internationalists through "their controlled government." Planned and promoted wars followed.

1. As Zionists pushed England into war, U. S. had at the critical Constantinople post (Turkey)

Henry Morgenthau, Sr., as Ambassador and Louis Einstein as its special minister.

2 Paul M. Warburg said, at a Congressional hearing: "I only decided to become a citizen

after I was convinced the U. S. money system would be reformed." THE HIDDEN EMPIRE, p. 63.

3. Five men who were later to head various governments (Lenin of Russia, Ebert of Germany,

Branting of Sweden, MacDonald of England, Stauning of Denmark) met as members of the International

Socialist Bureau of the Second International!

4. Trotsky was introduced and recommended to them (Kuhn, Loeb & Co) by the publisher of the

. . . revolutionary newspaper, FORWARD of New York . . . Henry Coston,

LES FINANCIERS QUI MENENT LE MONDE, Paris, 1955, p. 114.

5. "One by one the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America . . . " From letter of

Sir Cecil Spring-Rice (British Ambassador to U.S.) to Sir Edward Grey (British Foreign Minister), November, 1914.

6. At the start of World War I, Edmond Rothschild told Dr. Chaim Weizmann that "It would spread to

the Middle East , where things of great significance to Political Zionism would occur." FAR AND WIDE, p. 285.

7. Colonel C. Repington recounts a conversation he had (April 5, 1921) with Count Mensdorff, who

was Austrian Ambassador in London in 1914, as follows: "Mensdorff thought that Israel had won the

War; they had made it, thrived on it, profited by it. It was their supreme revenge on Christianity."

AFTER THE WAR, p. 155, Constable, 1922.

8. Lloyd George, who was counsel for the Zionists in England, was made premier of the English

Government and chosen to "perform" during World War I. His secretary was Sir

Philip Sassoon Rothschild. AMERICAN MERCURY - KNOW - December, 1958.

9. "The part which Jews all over the world play in white slavery is one

of the foulest blots on our people." JEWISH WORLD, March 18, 1914.

10. "Mr. Paul Moritz Warburg practically controls the financial policy of the Administration.' Sir

Cecil Spring-Rice, British Ambassador to the U. S. From ALL THESE THINGS, by A. N. Field, p. 5.

11. "Assimilation is national suicide." Louis D. Brandeis before Menorah Society, Columbia University.

1. In 1915, while the U. S. was at peace, Bernard Baruch took part of his annual income of $2,000,000

to finance the training of soldiers to fight in a war which Baruch said he knew was 'certain."

AMERICAN MERCURY Q October, 1956, p. 83.

                                                                                          1916

1. After months of terrific battle in Congress, Louis D. Brandeis was confirmed as Supreme

Court Justice. He is the uncle of Felix Frankfurter, who years later dominated the Supreme Court.

Christopher Sykes, son of Sir Mark Sykes, (who was the Secretary of the British War Cabinet) wrote

a book TWO STUDIES IN VIRTUE, and, referring to the Balfour Declaration and the,

part played by his father in advancing Zionism, Sykes said, - on page 183 of his book:

"He (Mr. James MalcolmQMalkom, a Zionist) then told Sir Mark Skyes of a very curious and powerful

influence which Zionists could exert. One of President Wilson's closest advisers and friends

was Justice Louis D. Brandeis, a Jew with the passionate Zionist faith of a recent convert.

"That Wilson was attached to Brandeis by ties of peculiar hardiness, because, so the story ran,

in his earlier days the future President had been saved by this man (Brandeis) from appearing in

a damaging lawsuit. It was said that Brandeis was regarded by Wilson as the man to whom he owed his career."

(Researchers said President Wilson was involved in "moral problems" at Princeton University, that

Samuel Untermeyer had some damaging letters returned to Wilson after

Brandeis was put on the Supreme Court). Re: Mrs. Peck, we quote from others:

"Woodrow Wilson's friendship with Mrs. Hulbert Peck (of Princeton, New Jersey) . . . lasted for

seven years . . . It was wrecked in the end by gossip. The so-called Peck scandal furnished the zest

for the whispering campaigns of two Presidential elections . . . Wilson had

written hundreds of letters to the charming divorcee." George S. Viereck 80.283.

"It seems that the Peck letters were finally acquired by the Wilson estate." George S. Viereck.

"Mrs. Peck never demanded and Woodrow Wilson never paid hush money or blackmail." (Edward

Mandell House) Probably correct Q putting Brandeis on the Supreme

Court researchers say was the price the American public paid!

2. "A note drawn up by the American official (intelligence) services and transmitted by the High

Commissioner of the French Republic in the United States, contained the following passage: 'In

February 1916, it was learned for the first time that a revolution was being fomented in Russia.

It was discovered that the undermentioned persons and concerns were engaged in this

enterprise of destruction:

(1) Jacob Schiff; (2) Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Directors: Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn,

Mortimer Schiff, Jerome Hanauer; (3) Guggenheim; (4) Max Breitung." (From the American Consulate,

Elbridge D. Rand, American Consul, Geneva, Switzerland, dated January 21, 1929.)

National Archives, Dept. of State, Decimal File, 1910-1929, No. 861.4016/325.

3. Of the 63 delegates of the Committee of Russian Revolutionists that

met in New York City, 50 were veterans of the 1905 revolution.

4. Zionists secretly cook up Palestine "deal." Documents available.

5. The notorious "Sunrise Conference" in Washington. The record of this sinister planning was

suppressed. (In 1938 the enemy got our Senate Military Affairs Committee to hold a similar conference.

Senator Bridges said in the NEW YORK HERALD TRIBUNE, March 2, 1939, "If the American people

ever learned what was said there Q the nation would be shocked

and stunned." DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION, p. 312.

6. President Woodrow Wilson was re-elected on the slogan "He kept us out of war." (At the same

time, he and his foreign advisers were secretly taking steps to involve us in this unnecessary war.)

                                                                                           1917

1. The Bolshevist Revolution was not, as it is called, a revolution, but

actually an invasion. DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION, p. 210.

2. Rabbi Wise says (New York Times 3/24/17): "I believe that of all the achievements of my people,

none has been nobler than the part the sons and daughters of Israel have taken in the great

movement which has culminated in free Russia" (revolution). From speech of Rabbi

Stephen S. Wise March 23, 1917 to the mass meeting celebrating the revolution in Russia.

3. (April) Jacob H. Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. made a public declaration that

it was thanks to his financial help that the Russian Revolution had succeeded.

4. "I have just had a long talk with Simonds of the NEW YORK TRIBUNE. He is prepared to help us

(Zionists) to speak with vigor, editorially, on our behalf, but I think a word of yours to him

will be important." Letter of Rabbi Stephen S. Wise to Justice Louis D. Brandeis - May 10.

5. We quote from the JEWISH COMMUNAL REGISTER of New York City: "The firm of Kuhn Loeb

& Company floated the largest Japanese war loan of 1904-05 thus making possible the Japanese victory

over Russia" . . . "Jacob Schiff financed the enemies of autocratic Russia and used his

financial influence to keep Russia from the money markets of the United States."

6. " . . . The uprising of July 4, 1917, was intended to overthrow the Provisional Government according

to the plans of Lenin and Trotsky. The revolutionaries were disconcerted by the intervention of a

solitary regiment which had been withdrawn from the front and scattered themselves. Lenin escaped

but Trotsky was arrested. Their cause appeared lost. But the Bolshevists had given proof of their

courage, and a telegram arrived to bring them news of the financial support of Jacob Schiff, who was

determined to push the Russian Revolution to the end. The importance of these funds placed at the

disposal of Lenin and Trotsky in order to foment the Bolshevik insurrection of October, 1917, has

not been fully realized. This action overthrew the Kerensky government and set up the Soviet

regime. How these funds got to them is known. The United States Government published in October,

1918, a series of official documents entitled The German-Bolshevik Conspiracy." Henry Coston,

LES FINANCIERS QUI MENENT LE MONDE, Paris, p.114.

7. Max Warburg of Hamburg (Sept. 21) opened by cable an account at

(Rothschilds) Nya Banken in Stockholm, Sweden for Trotsky (Bronstein).

8. October 17. Zionists dominated England and France, betrayed the Arab-Moslem people and

bargained away their Palestine territories. Lawrence of Arabia, an Englisman who was loved, trusted,

and respected by the Arabs, returned to the British Government the decorations they gave him.

(Shouldn't Eisenhower, as Commander-in-Charge of the U. S. Armed Forces,

also return the valuable military decorations he received from Soviet Russia?)

9. " . . . Wladimir Olaf Aschberg . . . acted as the intermediary

(in Stockholm, Sweden) between Kuhn, Loeb & Co. in New

York City and the firm of Max Warburg (in Hamburg) when they were financing the (Bolshevik) revolution

of October, 1917. Aschberg was the head of the Nya Banken in Stockholm and later, in 1921, founded

the Russian Commercial Bank. Thanks to this institution he became in a sense the dictator of

Soviet finances." Henry Coston, LES FINANCIERS QUI MENENT LE MONDE, Paris, p. 115.

"In the match between these two heavyweights (the United States and the Soviet Union) the

International Finance of the United States will have trained the adversary." Comte de Saint-Aulaire,

GENEVA VERSUS PEACE, London, 1937, p. 75) (Library of Congress: JX1975,S.32)

(He was the French Ambassador to the Court of St. James, London, from 1920 until 1924.

10. From the great book WORLD REVOLUTION Q THE PLOT AGAINST CIVILIZATION by the famous

English historian, Nesta H. Webster, p. 93, we quote: "In a word, the peasant inherited from the

aristocrat; he was disinherited by the usurer. Here is the true history of the disinherited, not in France

alone, but in Russia, in Austria, in Poland; everywhere that the worker lives by tilling his own soil

the abolition of feudalism has led to the domination of the

money-lender, and the money-lender is in most cases a Jew."

11. We quote from Page 187 of TWO STUDIES IN VIRTUE by Christopher Sykes, as follows:

"Sokolow made a simple request, namely that the Zionist Committee should have facilities for

commuications abroad. He pointed out they were an

international body - should be granted Governmental privileges.

"It was agreed that the War Office and the Foreign Office would send Zionist

letters and telegrams by way of Embassies, Consulates or Headquarters."

12. Jacob H. Schiff, the leader of Zionists, finances the complete rewriting of the Bible provided

it is done under Jewish auspices. See his book p. 63, VII, also AMERICAN MERCURY, July, 1958, p. 120.

13. On Good Friday, April 6, 1917, the conspirators got the United States to foolishly declare World

War I on Germany and to become an ally of the Revolutionists who had invaded and now dominate

Russia. (It was also on Good Friday, April 14, 1865 that Abraham Lincoln was murdered.)

14. "Official information emanating from Russia itself informed the world that Communism, while

barbarously opposed to every form of Christianity, made it a crime

for any comrade to utter a single word of reproach against the Jews."

"The 1917 list of those who, with Lenin, ruled many of the activities of the Soviet

Republic, disclosed that of the 25 quasi-cabinet members, 24 of them were atheistic."

"Between the years 1917 and 1938, more than 20 million Christians

were murdered by the Communistic government in Russia."

"Between these same years, 40 billion dollar of Christian property was appropriated by the Lenins

and Trotskys, the Zinofieffs and the Kemeneffs, the Litvinoffs and the

Lapinskys - by the atheistic Jews and Gentiles Q both of Russia."

"Those were the desperate days when Christians were not expelled from their native land but were

the targets for the machine gun which beat out its tattoo against human hearts; incredible days

when the altars of Christ were desecrated and the servants of Christ were massacred on every

multiplying Calvaries." From nationwide broadcast of Rev. Charles E. Coughlin, Sunday, Nov. 29, 1938.

15. Since 1917, Red Russia has been the land base for the conspirators. Later, evil men in the U. S.

financed and industrialized it. AMERICAN MERCURY, January 1959, Mercury's Opinion, p. 110.

1. " . . . I think that a Jewish Palestine must become a war aim for America . . . " Letter

of Dr. Chaim Weizmann to Justice Louis D. Brandeis, Supreme Court, dated January 14.

2. Sixty-Fifth Congress, House Document 1868, Exhibit 243, "Paper Relating to Foreign Relations

of the United States" contains a whole series of documents showing that the International

Bankers financed Lenin and Trotsky (Bronstein). Transfer of funds started in June, 1917. Document 9

shows that the international banking house of M. Warburg opened an account for Comrade Trotsky

to purchase arms, etc. Also Document 12 shows transfer of funds for "agitation against England and France."

3. Soviet Russia law passed. "From 3/1/18 on, the right to possess women having reached the age of

17 and not more than 32, is abolished. Women proclaimed to be the property of the whole nation.

The former owners may retain the right of using their wives

without waiting for their turn." THE HIDDEN EMPIRE, p. 47.

4. The United States Secret Service (2nd Army Bureau) named the persons who financed the Bolsheviks

in 1916. The State Department, under Jewish pressure,

destroyed this report. As the report remarks: "All Jews."

5. 'We are living in a highly, organized state of socialism. The state is all; the individual is of importance

only as he contributes to the welfare of the state. His property is only (his) as the state does not

need it. He must hold his life and his possessions at the call of the state."

Bernard M. Baruch in THE KNICKERBOCKER PRESS, Albany, New York, August 8, 1918.

(This ties in with (Rothschilds) Alliance Israelite Universelle which sent out bulletins "Nationalities

must disappear, religion must be suppressed. But Israel (i.e., Zionism) must not disappear.")

6. The First World War brought to Edward Rothschild, and his associates, more than one hundred

billion dollars of profit. THE SECRET WORLD GOVERNMENT by Major General Count Cherep-Spiridovich.

7. Bolshevist revolutionaries in Russia murdered adults and children of

the royal family, and many others, thus launching their regime, in blood.

8. Bernard Baruch, testifying at a Congressional inquiry,

said: "I had more power than any other man in the war."

9. U. S. Government paid Col. E. Mandell House $60,000 for

expenses in N.Y.C. (for 6 months, July 1 to December 31, 1918.)

10. Bernard Flexner joins Roger Baldwin and his counsel of Zionist delegation

to 1919 Peace Conference. (Records of both of these men speak for themselves.)

11. How these subsidized alien revolutionaries, having invaded Russia, proceeded to murder and

rob on a wholesale scale has been recorded by many persons who had the misfortunate

to be in Russia during the Bolshevik Revolution. THE ALIEN MENACE, pages 113-114.

12. Those who wish to go further in the history of this plot against civilization should consult the

books quoted; also RUSSIA'S RUIN, by Wilcox (Chapman & Hall, 1919). THE ALIEN MENACE, p. 114.

13. See MERCURY article, pages 115-ll6, February, 1958 entitled "Felix Frankfurter and Louis D. Brandeis."

On 3/2/18 they, Frankfurter from Paris and Brandeis in the U.S., were raising a million dollars

(for Weizmann to use in London).

14. Very few Christians ever read THE WORLD SIGNIFICANCE OF A JEWISH STATE

by Braintruster A. A. Berle. Berle and Herzl had much in common.

                                                                                           1919

1. Of the making of the peace of 1919, Dr. E. J. Dillon of the LONDON DAILY TELEGRAPH wrote in

his book THE INSIDE STORY OF THE PEACE CONFERENCE, Harpers, 1920 that the delegates to the

Conference from Eastern Europe set down the formula: " 'Henceforth the world will be governed

by the Anglo-Saxon people, who in turn are swayed by their Jewish elements'

. . . and who regard it as fatal to the peace of Eastern Europe." Page 497.

2. Between 1919 and 1924, three million recorded

immigrants came to the U. S., mostly from Eastern Europe.

3. Professor J. R. Commons of the University of Wisconsin testified before the United States House

of Representatives Barking and Currency Committee in 1927 that a member of the Federal

Reserve Board had told him that the great inflation of 1919 was deliberately

created by the Federal Reserve Board. ALL THESE THINGS by A. N. Field, p. 6.

4. Council of Foreign Relations was launched by Rothschild and Rockefeller at the

sinister Versailles Peace meeting. The following two groups were set up to do the job:

I. Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.

II. Council on Foreign Relations, New York City (U.S.)

Annual grants by Rockefeller Foundation provided a direct, continuous method of control of both

organizations. Carnegie Foundation and later Rockefeller Foundation were to constitute a gigantic

lobby and pressure group serving to brainwash, influence and warp (or 'mold") the various nations'

policies. Top officials were influenced to come to the Council of Foreign Relations

for "advice" and "guidance." See facts in reprint WEINBERG REPLACES BARUCH.

5. If you read THE INSIDE STORY OF THE PEACE CONFERENCE (Harpers) by Dr. E. J. Dillon, you

will see the characters who put across the vicious Versailles Peace Treaty. It made a

subsequent World War inevitable.

6. In the new constitution recently adopted in the USSR we have another interesting provision which

bears upon this passing of Russia. The Christian religion has for centuries been the religion of the

Slav, as it has been the religion of the other races of Europe. We have seen the record

of hatred of the Bolsheviki and the Soviet Government in relation to that religion.

7. In article 124 of the new Soviet constitution we find the following:

"Freedom to perform religious rites and freedom of antireligious propaganda is recognized for all

citizens." Significant as this is, it becomes even more significant when

taken in connection with a provision in the preceding article, 123:

"Any direct or indirect restriction of these rights . . . as well as any propagation of

racial or national exceptionalism or hatred and contempt, is punishable by law."

8. The following extracts are quotes from the testimony of those who appeared before the U. S. Senate

Overman Committee. Also printed in DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION, per pages listed.

"The leaders of the movement, I should say, are about two-thirds Russian Jews." William C. Huntington,

Commercial Attache of the United States Embassy at Petrograd from June, 1913,

to September, 1918. Page 69.

"In Russia it is well known that three-fourths of the Bolshevist leaders are Jewish."

Mr. Welsh, for two years a junior officer of the National City Bank in Russia. Page 269.

"When the Bolsheviki came into power, all over Petrograd we at once had a predominance of

Yiddish proclamations, big posters, and everything in Yiddish." Dr. Simons, Pastor of the

Methodist Church in Petrograd, p. 142.

In the YALE REVIEW in an article entitled The World Menace, Mr. Henry C. Emery LL.D., former

chairman of the United States Tariff Board supported this testimony. "No one who ever made a visit

to Smolny Institute, when that was the headquarters of the Bolshevist government in Petrograd,

could fail to understand how easy it is to get the impression that the Jews have at last seized power."

9. Potent international financial interests were at work (at the Peace Conference) in favor of the

immediate recognition of the Bolshevists. Those influences had been largely responsible for the

Anglo-American proposal in January (19l9) to call Bolshevist representatives to Paris at the beginning

of the Peace Conference . . . The well known American-Jewish banker, Mr Jacob Schiff, was known

to be anxious to secure recognition for the Bolshevists . . . and Tchitcherin, the Bolshevist Commissar

for Foreign Affairs, had revealed the meaning of the January proposal by offering

extensive commercial and economic concessions in return for recognition."

Henry Wickham Steed, THROUGH THIRTY YEARS, New York 1924 Vol. 2, p 301.

Mr. Steed was the Editor of THE TIMES, London. Library of Congress D 397. S75.

10. Victor Marsden, the (London) MORNING POST reporter who spent many months in Russia, stated

that "among the 545 leading Bolshevik officials there were 377 Jews at the birth of Bolshevism."

11. The German people were robbed and weakened by inflation. As a result of the international

bankers' conspiracy, it took a billion-mark stamp (5 billion pre-war dollars) to send one letter in Germany.

12. British War Cabinet issues official "White Paper" listing Kuhn, Loeb & Co.

and other Zionist bankers who financed Red Russian Revolution.

13. In March, Third International was organized by Zionists. See H. Fish Report.

14. March 1, Capt. Schuyler reported. Here are exact quotes from document in our possession:

"You will think I am hot about this matter (Bolshevism) but it is I feel sure one which is going to

bring great trouble on the United States when the judgment of history shall be recorded on

the part we have played. It is very largely our fault that Bolshevism has spread as it has...."

From confidential report of Capt. Montgomery Schuyler, Chief United States Army Intelligence

Officer, Omsk, Siberia, to Lt. Col. David Prescott Barrows, Intelligence Officer, American Expeditionary

Forces, Vladivostok, Siberia, March 1,1919, p. 2. National Archives, Military Intelligence Files.

15. " . . . The prime movers (for the recognition of the Bolshevists at the Peace Conference in 1919)

were Jacob Schiff, Warburg and other international financiers, who wished above all to boIster up

the Jewish Bolshevists." Henry Wickham Steed, THROUGH THIRTY YEARS,

New York, 1924, Vol. 2, p. 302. Library of Congress: D 397. S 75.

16. " . . . Trotsky was furnished large sums of money in America and . . . sent to Russia." Erich Ludendorff,

KRIEGSHETZE UND VOLKERMORDEN IN DEN LETZTEN 150 JAHREN. Muenchen, 1936,

p. 149. General Ludendorff was Commander-in-Chief of the

German Army in World War I. Library of Congress: D 359. L 86, 1939.

17. "The collapse of these three Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia) in their old form

represents a considerable gain for the carrying on of a Jewish national policy, and the fact that the

same war, which brought about the world-wide recognition of Zionism, also brought about the fall

of three anti-Jewish powers, is a unique coincidence which may well give cause for

thought." DER JUDE, Vol. 3, p. 449, Dr. Martin Buber, Publisher, Berlin 1918-1919.

18. The Communist Party was set up in the U. S. on September 1, 1919. William Z. Foster (wife,

Esther Abramovich) became its first general secretary. THE DAILY WORKER,

the Communist New York daily, began its first publication about the same time.

19. The Versailles Peace Conference imposed on Germany the harsh conditions that

sent the nation reeling toward Communism, depression, and finally despotism.

20. Bernard Baruch was invited to become the Soviet Union's

peace-time adviser on industry and resources.

21. Dr. Weizmann said "we do not aspire to found a Zionist State. We cannot hope to rule in a

country in which only 1/7th of the population at present are Jews." FAR AND WIDE, p. 318.

22. In the hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United

States Senate, Sixty-Sixth Congress, Document 106, p. 536, we quote:

Senator McCumber questions President Woodrow Wilson: "Do you think if Germany had committed

no act of war or no act of injustice against our citizens that we would have gotten into this war?"

President Wilson: "I do think so."

Senator McCumber: "You think we would have gotten in anyway?"

President Wilson: "I do."

23. Poisonous propaganda started to flow into the minds of United States citizens.

24. "Jewish hopes for the future depend on two linchpins. One is the League of Nations idea, and

the other is the British Government, and we need scarcely say that we refer to Jewish hopes in

the widest application of the term." THE JEWISH WORLD, London, January 15,1919 (No. 2392), p. 5

"There must be a proper lookout for the civic and political rights and the status of Jews in

various countries unless there be established a Power above all nations . . . " as above, p. 5.

25. "Peace" Conference in Paris in 1919 made the resumption

of war inevitable, owing to its impossible financial clauses.

At this conference the chief financial adviser to the German delegation was Dr. Carl Melchior, partner

of Max Warburg, whose brothers Paul and Felix were partners of Jacob Schiff, in Kuhn, Loeb & Co.

The chief economic adviser to the American delegation was Bernard M. Baruch, the dictator of the

all-powerful War Industries Board in America during the war and an associate in business of

Jacob H. Schiff. The British economic delegation was headed by Lord Cunliffe, former Governor of

the Bank of England and a partner in the international Jewish banking house of Goschen (ancestral

cityQLeipzig, Germany). In connection with this conference, Lloyd George wrote in his memoirs:

"They (the international bankers) swept statesmen, politicians, jurists and journalists all on one side

and issued their orders with an imperiousness of absolute monarchs who knew that there

was no appeal from their ruthless decrees." DEADLIER THAN THE H BOMB, p. 47.

26. The second reason for large scale Communist exploitation of the United States was our

traditional lack of any laws prohibiting or regulating immigration into the United states and our

negligence or politics in enforcing immigration laws when they had been passed (Chapter II,

IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA.) "The illegal entry of aliens into the United State] is one of the most

serious and difficult problems confronting the Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . Since

the end of World War II, the problem of illegal entry has increased tremendously . . . There is

ample evidence that there is an alarmingly large number of aliens in the United States in an

illegal status. Under the alien registration act of 1940 some 5,000,000 aliens were registered."

THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SYSTEMS OF THE UNITED STATES, pp. 629, 630.

The third principal reason for the Communist exploitation of the United States was the absence

of any effective policy regarding resident foreigners even when their activities are directed

toward the overthrow of the government. Thus in 1950 several hundreds of thousands of foreigners,

among the millions illegally in this country, were arrested and released for want of adequate

provisions for deporting them.

As shown in Chapter II, "persons of Khazar background or traditions had entered the United States

in large numbers in the waves of immigration between 1880 and the outbreak of World War I in

1914. The Soviet seizure of Russia took place in 1917, however, and the hey-clay for Communist-inclined

immigrants from Eastern Europe was the five-year period between the end of World War I (1919) and

the passage of the 1924 law restricting immigration. Recorded immigrants to this country in that

brief span of time amounted to approximately 3 million and large numbers of newcomers

were from Eastern Europe." THE IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA by John Beaty, p. 45.

27. Lenin said: "The first World War gave us Russia, while the Second World War will hand

Europe to us." (Note the certainty of World War II. It came, "as planned" - 2O years later.)

The urging of dual loyalty by Dr. Nahum Goldman, who is president of the World Zionist Movement

and also president of the World Jewish Congress makes real Americans very

concerned. See AMERICAN MERCURY, June, 1959, This Is What They Said, p. 146.  

1. Five million dollars worth of research by the late Henry Ford resulted in the production

of THE INTERNATIONAL JEW. This almost cost Mr. Ford his life and his company.

2. The Outline is consistent with the PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION, smuggled

out of Russia and translated by a great English journalist. When the Jews told Mr. Ford that the

PROTOCOLS were a forgery, he said: "I don't believe they are a forgery, but

whatever they are they fit what is going on as the Jew attempts to gain world power."

3. By manipulations involving the First World War and the Second World War, the Jews were able

to steal $20,000,000,000.00 (Twenty Billion dollars) worth of real estate, drive millions of helpless

Arabs Q both Christian and Moslem Q into a desert to starve, die and suffer and establish what

intelligent observers refer to as the counterfeit State of Israel. In the fulfillment of this project,

they indulged in genocide, napalm slaughter and every known form of barbarism that could be meted out

to an oppressed and defeated people.

4. In 1967 they seized the entire Holy Land and invaded Jordan and Egypt and announced their

purpose through their Number One Zionist spokesman, Ben-Gurion, who said, "We shall make of this

the Supreme Court of Mankind."

5. Although the Jew Zionists helped create the United Nations, they fouled their own brood and they

were completely condemned by the United Nations, representing the reaction and the awakening

of world-wide sentiment.

6. Jew Zionists have organized a world-wide screaming and complaining campaign against the

Soviet Union because of its alleged mistreatment of the Jews. There is no way to know whether

this means that the Jews have now 'fouled their brood' in the Soviet Union or whether it is a

false front to mislead the world in preparation for the day when the Soviet Union will join with

the Zionists in subduing the Arabs and capturing two-thirds of the world's oil supply. It is important,

however, that every reader of this manuscript have a photostatic copy of the Report of Military

Intelligence referred to in Item 7 on Page 29 which reveals that out of approximately 300 commissars

in the first Communist government of Russia, 284 were Jews from New York and scattered portions of America.

The following books are listed in the same order as they were mentioned in above article.

THE JEWISH STATE by Theodor Herzl, 1896,

ZIONIST NETWORK by Senator Jack B. Tenney, Standard Publications, P. O. Box 2003, Sacramento, California

FOUNDATIONS OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY by H. S. ChamberIain, Vol. I

DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION by Edwin D. Schoonmaker, Richard R. Smith, New York, 1939

THE WORLD CONQUERORS by Louis Marschalko, Joseph Sueli Publications, London, 1958

THE WORLD AT THE CROSS ROADS by Boris Brasol, Boston, 1921. . . ROCKEFELLER: GIANT, DWARF, SYMBOL by William H. Allen, Institute for Public Service, New York, 1930

JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA, 1906

DEADLIER THAN THE H-BOMB by Commander Leonard Young...

INTERNATIONAL JEW by Henry Ford, Sr....

THE UNSEEN EMPIRE OF FINANCE by E. Alexander Powell

ALL THESE THINGS by A. N. Field

THE GENESIS OF THE WAR, New York, 1923

THE ALIEN MENACE by Lt. Colonel A. H. Lane, Boswell Printing & Publishing Co., Ltd., 10 Essex St. Strand, London, W. C. 1, 1932

PHILIP DRU, ADMINISTRATOR by Col. E. Mandell House

FAR AND WIDE by Douglas Reed, Jonathan Cape, 30 Bedford Square, London, 1951

THE HIDDEN EMPIRE, published in London

AFTER THE WAR, published by Constable in 1922

TWO STUDIES IN VIRTUE by Christopher Sykes

LES FINANCIERS QUI MENENT LE MONDE, by Henry Coston, Paris .

GENEVA VERSUS PEACE by Comte de Saint-Aulaire, London, 1937

WORLD REVOLUTIONQTHE PLOT AGAINST CIVILIZATION by Nester H. Webster, London

JACOB H. SCHIFF, HIS LIFE & LETTERS by Jacob H. Schiff

THE SECRET WORLD GOVERNMENT by Major General Count Cherep-Spiridovich, New York, 1921

THE WORLD SIGNIFICANCE OF A JEWISH STATE by A. A. Berle

THE INSIDE STORY OF THE PEACE CONFERENCE by Dr. E. J. Dillon, Harpers, 1920

THROUGH THIRTY YEARS by Henry Wickham Steed, New York 1924

KRIEGSHETZE UND VOLKERMORDEN IN DEN LETZEN 150 JAHREN, Muenchen, 1933

DER JUDE by Dr. Martin Buber, Publisher, Berlin, Vol. 3 1918-19 .

 ________________________________________

America's vilest traitor, Edward Mandell House, is attributed with giving a very

detailed outline of the New World Order plans that were to be implemented gradually

over time to enslave the American people ... a plan that has been repeated in Canada,

Australia, Britain and elsewhere. He stated, in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson:

“Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property

(that’s you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of

the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such

methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect

our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will

be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be

our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever,

by operation of the lawmerchant under the scheme of secured transactions.

Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth

Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges.

They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to

make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million

could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out,

we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way

to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of

benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our

wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud,

which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will

unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless

and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office

(presidency) of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America.”

 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.

The Canadian Intelligence Service - Excerpt from September 1952 issue - submitted

by James Moorhouse. - The following speech was given by Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich

before a special meeting of the Emergency Council of European Rabbis in Budapest,

Hungary, January 12, 1952.

"The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for three thousand years is at l

ast within our reach, and because its fulfillment is so apparent, it behooves us to

increase our efforts and our caution tenfold. I can safely promise you that before

ten years have passed, our race will take its rightful place in the world, with every

Jew a king and every Gentile a slave. We will openly reveal our identity with the races

of Asia and Africa. I can state with assurance that the last generation of white

children is now being born. Our control Commissions will, in the interest of peace

and wiping out our interracial tensions, forbid the whites to mate with white.

The white woman must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with

black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with white means

the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory.

We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the

Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior

intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark people."

_______________________

Straight Talk About Zionism: What Jewish Nationalism Means

By Mark Weber
April 14, 2009

(An audio recording of this article, narrated by the author,

is posted here for listening or downloading)

It’s important to understand Zionism, not just because it’s an influential ideology and a

powerful social-political movement, but also because there’s a

lot of ignorance, confusion and deliberate misinformation about it.

If you look up the word “Zionism” in a standard American dictionary, what you’ll find

is likely to be inaccurate, or least misleading. For example, a popular and supposedly

authoritative American dictionary in my office defines Zionism as “A movement

formerly for reestablishing, now for supporting, the Jewish national state of Israel.”

/ 1 This definition, which is typical of American reference works, is more than

just misleading. It’s deceitful.

The founder of the modern Zionist movement was a Jewish writer named Theodor Herzl.

In the 1890s he was living in Paris, where he was a journalist for a major newspaper in Vienna.

He was deeply troubled by the widespread anti-Semitism, or anti-Jewish sentiment, in

France at the time. He thought a lot about the pattern of tension, distrust and conflict

between Jews and non-Jews that had persisted through the centuries,

and he hit upon what he believed is a solution to this age-old problem.

Herzl laid out his views in a book, written in German, entitled The Jewish State

(Der Judenstaat). Published in 1896, this work is the manifesto or basic document of the

Zionist movement. A year and a half later, Herzl convened the first international Zionist

conference. Fifty one years later, when the “State of Israel” was solemnly proclaimed at

a meeting in Tel Aviv, above the speakers’ podium at the conference was, appropriately,

a large portrait of Herzl.

In his book Herzl explained that regardless of where they live, or their citizenship,

Jews constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people. He used

the German word, Volk. Wherever large numbers of Jews live among non-Jews, he said,

conflict is not only likely, it’s inevitable. He wrote: "The Jewish question exists wherever

Jews live in noticeable numbers. Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving Jews

... I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex phenomenon.

I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear." / 2

In his public and private writings, Herzl explained that anti-Semitism is not an aberration,

but rather a natural response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes.

Anti-Jewish sentiment, he said, is not due to ignorance or bigotry, as so many have

claimed. Instead, he concluded, the ancient and seemingly intractable conflict between

Jews and non-Jews is entirely understandable, because Jews are a distinct and separate

people, with interests that are different from, and which often conflict with, the interests

of the people among whom they live.

A prime source of modern anti-Jewish sentiment, Herzl believed, was that the so-called

“emancipation” of Jews in the 18th and 19th centuries from the confined life of the ghetto

into modern urban society brought them into direct economic competition with non-Jews

in the middle classes. Anti-Semitism, Herzl wrote, is “an understandable reaction to Jewish

defects.” In his diary he wrote: “I find the anti-Semites are fully within their rights.” / 3

Herzl maintained that Jews must stop pretending -- both to themselves and to non-Jews

-- that they are like everyone else, and instead must frankly acknowledge that they are

a distinct and separate people, with distinct and separate goals and interests. The only

workable long-term solution, he said, is for Jews to recognize reality and live, finally, as a

“normal” people in a separate state of their own. In a memo to the Tsar of

Russia, Herzl wrote that Zionism is the “final solution of the Jewish question.” / 4

Over the years many other Jewish leaders have affirmed Herzl’s outlook. Louis Brandeis,

a US Supreme Court justice and a leading American Zionist, said: “Let us all recognize

that we Jews are a distinctive nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station or

shade of belief, is necessarily a member.” / 5

Stephen S. Wise, president of the American Jewish Congress and of the World Jewish

Congress, told a rally in New York in June 1938: "I am not an American citizen of the

Jewish faith. I am a Jew ... Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the Jewish people a race,

and we are a race." / 6

Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann, wrote in his memoirs: “Whenever the quantity

of Jews in any country reaches the saturation point, that country reacts against them ...

[This] reaction ... cannot be looked upon as anti-Semitism in the ordinary or vulgar sense

of that word; it is a universal social and economic concomitant of Jewish immigration,

and we cannot shake it off.” / 7

In keeping with the Zionist worldview, Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon told a meeting

of American Jews in Jerusalem in July 2004 that all Jews around the world should relocate

to Israel as soon as possible. And because anti-Semitism was especially widespread in

France, he added, Jews in that country should immediately move to Israel. French officials

quickly, and predictably, responded by rejecting Sharon’s remarks as “unacceptable.” / 8

But imagine if the leaders of France, the United States, and other countries were to

respond to those remarks by Sharon, and similar ones by other Zionists, by expressing

agreement. Imagine if an American president were to respond by saying: “You’re right,

Mr. Sharon. We agree with you. We agree that Jews do not belong in the United States.

In fact, we are ready to show our support for what you say by doing everything we

can to promote and encourage all Jews to leave our country and move to Israel.”

That would be the logical and honest attitude of non-Jewish political leaders who say that

they support Israel and Zionism. But the political leaders of the United States,

France, Britain, and other such countries today are neither honest nor consistent.

During the 1930s, one European government that was honest and consistent in its

attitude on this issue was the government of Third Reich Germany. Jewish Zionists and

German National Socialists shared similar views about how best to handle what Herzl

called “the Jewish question.” They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different

nationalities, and that Jews did not belong in Europe, but rather in the

so-called "Jewish homeland” in Palestine.

On the basis of their shared views, Germans and Jews worked together for what each

community believed was in its own best national interest. The Hitler government vigorously

supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine from 1933 until 1940-41,

when the Second World War prevented further extensive collaboration. / 9

(During the war years attitudes hardened, and policy shifted drastically. The German policy

of collaboration with Zionists and support for Jewish emigration

to Palestine gave way to a harsh “final solution” policy.)

During the 1930s, the central SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, repeatedly proclaimed

its support for Zionism. An article published in 1935, for example, told readers: / 10

“The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and not on religion leads

the German government to guarantee without reservation the racial separateness of this

community. The government finds itself in complete agreement with the great spiritual

movement within Jewry, the so-called Zionism, with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry

around the world, and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this basis, Germany

undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the future in the handling of the

Jewish problem around the world.”

In late 1933, a leading German shipping line began direct passenger service

from Hamburg to Haifa, Palestine, providing "strictly kosher food” on board.

In September 1935, the German government enacted the “Nuremberg Laws," which

prohibited marriages and sexual relations between Jews and Germans and, in effect,

proclaimed the country’s Jews an alien minority group. / 11 A few days after the Nuremberg

Laws were enacted, the main German Zionist newspaper, the Jüdische Rundschau,

editorially welcomed the new measures. It explained to readers: / 12

“Germany ... is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress when it declares

the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority. Once the Jews have been

stamped a national minority it is again possible to establish normal relations between

the German nation and Jewry. The new laws give the Jewish minority in Germany its own

cultural life, its own national life. In future it will be able to shape its own schools, its

own theater, and its own sports associations. In short, it can create its own future in

all aspects of national life ...”

During the 1930s, Zionist groups, working together with Third Reich authorities,

organized a network of some forty camps and agricultural centers throughout

Germany where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine.

The centerpiece of German-Zionist cooperation during the Hitler era was the Transfer

Agreement, a pact that enabled tens of thousands of German Jews to migrate to Palestine

with their wealth. The Agreement, also known as the Ha’avara -- Hebrew for "transfer"

-- was concluded in August 1933 following talks between German officials and an

official of the Jewish Agency, the Palestine center of the World Zionist Organization. / 13

Between 1933 and 1941, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to Palestine through

the Ha'avara and other German-Zionist arrangements, or about ten percent of Germany's

1933 Jewish population. Some Ha'avara emigrants transferred considerable personal

wealth from Germany to Palestine. As Jewish historian Edwin Black has noted: "Many

of these people, especially in the late 1930s, were allowed to transfer actual replicas

of their homes and factories -- indeed rough replicas of their very existence." / 14

The Transfer Agreement was the most far-reaching example of cooperation between

Hitler's Germany and international Zionism. Through this pact, Hitler's Third Reich did

more than any other government during the 1930s to support the Zionist movement and

Jewish development in Palestine.

The essence of Zionism, or Jewish nationalism, is that Jews everywhere -- regardless

of where they live, regardless of their religious outlook, and regardless of their citizenship

-- are members of the Jewish “people” or “nation,” to whom all Jews owe a primary

loyalty and allegiance.

The overwhelming majority of Jews in the United States today identify with and support

Israel, and are affiliated with Zionist groups and organizations. Every significant Jewish

group or association in the United States, and every prominent Jewish American political

or community leader supports Israel and Zionism, in most cases fervently so. With

very few exceptions, even American Jews who are critical of some of Israel’s more

embarrassing policies nonetheless express support for Israel and

the nationalist ideology upon which the Zionist state is based.

A Zionist Jew, by definition, owes his primary loyalty to the Jewish community and to

Israel. Zionism is not compatible with patriotism to any country or entity other than Israel

and the world Jewish community. That’s why it’s difficult to accept as sincere or honest

the pious assurances of Jewish leaders in the United States that American Jews are just as

loyal to the US as everyone else.

In the United States, nearly every prominent political leader -- Jewish and non-Jewish,

Democrat and Republican -- ardently supports Israel and the Jewish nationalist ideology

upon which it is based. In Washington, political leaders of both major parties insist on US

support for Israel as an ethnically Jewish state. They fervently support, and eagerly seek

the favor of, influential Jewish-Zionist groups, such as the American Israel

Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

Everyone -- whether Jewish or non-Jewish -- who claims to support Israel should, if he

is honest and consistent, endorse the view of Israeli prime minister Sharon, and other Zionist

leaders, and support the migration of Jews everywhere to Israel. But of course that’s

not what happens.

With regard to Zionism and Israel, the attitude and policies of nearly all American political

leaders, Jewish and non-Jewish, is characterized by hypocrisy and deceit. To put it another

way, Zionist Jews and their non-Jewish supporters embrace a blatant double standard.

Jewish-Zionist organizations, along with their non-Jewish allies, support one social-political

ideology for Israel and the world Jewish community, and a completely different one for the

United States and other non-Jewish countries. They insist that ethnic nationalism is evil and

bad for non-Jews, while at the same time they vigorously support ethnic nationalism

-- that is, Zionism -- for Jews.

They insist that Israel is and must be a Jewish nationalist state, with a privileged status

for its Jewish population, including immigration laws that discriminate against non-Jews.

At the same time, Jewish-Zionist groups and leaders, and the non-Jews who support them,

insist that in the United States, Britain, France, Germany and other countries,

there must be no privileged status for anyone based on race, ethnicity or religion.

Our political leaders tell us that American Jews should be encouraged to think of themselves

as a distinct national group with an identity and community interests separate from those

of other Americans. At the same time American politicians insist that Zionist Jews be given

all rights as full and equal US citizens. On the basis of this double standard,

Jews are given a privileged status in American political and cultural life.

Americans are led to believe that Zionism is a benign outlook of altruistic and righteous

support for a so-called Jewish homeland. In fact, Zionism is an ideology and movement

of ethnically-based Jewish nationalism that reinforces the identity and self-image of Jews

as a distinct and separate community with interests different from those of

non-Jews, and which strengthens the already powerful world Jewish community.

Notes

1. New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition (1978?), p. 1654.
2. Th. Herzl, Der Judenstaat. ( http://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Der_Judenstaat/Einleitung / http://www.zionismus.info/judenstaat/02.htm )
   Also quoted in: M. Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1993, p. 29. ( http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html )
3. Kevin MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents (Praeger,1998), pp. 45, 48.
4. Memo of Nov. 22, 1899. R. Patai, ed., The Complete Diaries of Theodor Herzl (New York: 1960), Vol. 3, p. 888.
5. Louis D. Brandeis, “The Jewish Problem and How to Solve It.” Speech of April 25, 1915. ( http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/personality/sources_document11.html / http://www.law.louisville.edu/library/collections/brandeis/node/234 )
6. “Dr. Wise Urges Jews to Declare Selves as Such,” New York Herald Tribune, June 13, 1938, p. 12.
7. Chaim Weizmann, Trial and Error (1949), p. 90. Quoted in: Albert S. Lindemann, The Jew Accused (1991), p. 277.
8. “French Jews Must `Move to Israel’,” BBC News, July 18, 2004 ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3904943.stm )
   See also: “Sharon Urges Jews to Go to Israel,” BBC News, Nov. 17, 2003. ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3275979.stm )
9. M. Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 4), pp. 29-37.
   ( http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html )
10. Das Schwarze Korps, Sept. 26, 1935. Quoted in: Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Univ. of Texas, 1985), p. 56-57.
11. These days the Nuremberg Laws are routinely portrayed as imposing outrageous and inhumane discrimination against Jews. But to put this in perspective, it’s worth mentioning two points. First: the Nuremberg Laws ban on marriage between Jews and non-Jews is consistent with the law in Israel today, where such marriages are not permitted, as well as with the prohibition on such marriages as laid out in the Hebrew scriptures. (See, for example: Numbers 25: 6-8; Deuteronomy 7:3; Ezra 9: 12; 10: 10-11; Nehemiah 10: 30; 13: 25.)
      Second, in 1935 less than one percent of the population of Germany was Jewish, which meant that the Nuremberg laws ban on marriage between Jews and non-Jews was irrelevant for the vast majority of the country’s population. By contrast, in the United States during the 1930s, most of the American states had laws in place that prohibited marriage between people of different races. Because the portion of the American population that was racially non-majority was much larger than in Germany, the US racial laws impacted a much larger portion of the US population at the time than the Nuremberg laws affected the German population.
12. Jüdische Rundschau, Sept. 17, 1935. Quoted in: Y. Arad, and others, Documents on the Holocaust (Jerusalem: 1981), pp. 82-83.
13. W. Feilchenfeld, “Ha’avara,” New Encyclopedia of Zionism and Israel (Herzl Press, 1994), pp. 535-536; M. Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1993, pp. 33-34.
14. Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), p. 379.

 ___________________________________________________

.

.

                                                                 Benjamin Freedman Exposed the Khazarian Mafia

By Jonas E. Alexis and Eric Gajewski on January 1, 2017

Freedman covered the Khazarian Mafia's influence in Russia (behind the revolutions and

installment of the Soviet Union) and exposed how they wanted to (in general) bring

down constitutional monarchies.

Eric runs tradcatknight.blogspot.com, the most comprehensive and followed

traditional catholic website in the world (a top 20K website worldwide).

You can subscribe to his Youtube channel tradcatknight.

Jonas E. Alexis: You have done some studies on Benjamin Freedman. He seemed to

have been the antithesis of what the Zionist establishment represented. Obviously they

hated him because he exposed them and revealed their dirty secret

to the world. He was even a strong supporter of the Arab cause.

Tell us a bit about the man and how he actually stripped

the Khazarian Mafia of their ideological clothes.

Eric Gajewski: Benjamin Freedman (1890-1984) was a Jew who converted to Roman

Catholicism from Judaism. He broke with the Khazarian Mafia after the Judeo-Communist

victory in 1945.  From there he spent a considerable amount of his fortune (was a well to

do businessman) exposing the KM and their plots for

dominance in not only America but also worldwide.

He was able to speak so fluently and specifically on the KM because he had been an insider

at the highest levels of various Jewish organizations seeking to gain power over our nation.

Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow

Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more

influential people of his time.

He is well known for his speech in 1961 warning America about the tactics

and plots of the KM in general but also spoke as an American patriot warning

us about the KM’s in our country. He stated then that the Khazarian Mafia already

had control of our country and that Zionists very much had their hands in all the wars. 

Who can doubt that their hand is not behind the forthcoming world war in which it seems

virtually every country will be involved. He warned about the KM’s destruction of Germany

and unmasked their favorite word, “anti- Semitism,” which is still used today when

Jews/Zionists/Israel are admonished or exposed for their illicit actions.

He continued exposing the Khzarian Mafia who call themselves Jews but in reality are not.

The Synagogue of Satan is very much alive today and no wonder Christ was so adamantly

opposed to them.

The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined

that they are going to once again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine

as their foothold for their world government.

Freedman exposed how a lot of people were pagans and how they hide behind

the notion that they are God’s chosen to “build up” the puppet state of “Israel.”

Before Vatican II the popes warned about the KM in general but it is the KM using Free

Masonry who now have infiltrated the Vatican and are now preparing the

stage for the New World Order, which we can logically call the Antichrist.

Freedman went on to elaborate how even in the Jewish community there was much

disunity. He spoke of Rothschild and his influence in France and covered how the KM

were driven out of England by King Edward in 1285 only to later

return in the Cromwell Revolution which was financed by Rothschild.

The Catholic Church had quite frequently in medieval times banished the KM because

of the sinful usury practices and this was exposed as well by Mr. Freedman.

Lastly, Freedman covered the KM’s influence in Russia (behind the revolutions and installment

of the Soviet Union) and exposed how they wanted to (in general) bring down

constitutional monarchies.

.

.

Abridged from the original as published by the world renowned industrial leader,
HENRY FORD, SR.

Appearing originally in the periodical published by the Ford Motor Co.
"The Dearborn Independent."
.

.

.

Murder and Genocide

   ACCORDING TO THE JEWISH religion, the murder of a Jew

is a capital offense and one of the three most heinous sins

(the other two being idolatry and adultery). Jewish religious

courts and secular authorities are commanded to punish,

even beyond the limits of the ordinary administration of

justice, anyone guilty of murdering a Jew. A Jew who

indirectly causes the death of another Jew is, however,

only guilty of what talmudic law calls a sin against the

'laws of Heaven', to be punished by God rather than by man.

Next Year in Jerusalem

Why do we, the Jews celebrating Pesach (Passover) in Jerusalem,

still say: "Next year in Jerusalem!" Aren't we already here?
The rebuilt Jerusalem we pray for is not this modern city, and the redeemed Eretz Israel is not the political state of the

Jews we see today. As the influence of the Torah extends, so will the boundaries of Eretz Israel expand accordingly.

Futuristic Map Based on the Torah

"To your descendants I have given this land, from the Egyptian River as far as the great river, the Euphrates."
Bereshit (Genesis) 15:18

The speculative map above is mostly based on the commentaries of Rashi and Malbim about the boundaries of the future

described in the Book of Ezekiel, chapters 47-48. The details of the future map of the Land

of Israel are mentioned only cryptically in the Tanach and various Talmudic sources.

The final redemption

The Jew has come home for the third and last time. "But the third shall be left therein" (Zecharia 13:8). "The first

redemption was that from Egypt; the second, the redemption of Ezra. The third will never end" (Tanhuma, Shoftim 9).

G-d's Land

"Therefore say unto the House of Israel... I do this, not for your sake, O House of Israel, but rather for My holy name which

you desecrated through the nations whither you came. And I will sanctify My great name that was desecrated amongst the

nations... and the nations shall know that I am the Lord when I shall be sanctified through you before their eyes. And I shall

take you from among the nations and gather you out of all the countries and I will bring you into your own land." Ezekiel 36:22-24

Faith!

"The exiles shall be ingathered only through faith"
Mechilta, Exodus.

"When will the Moshiach come? Today, as it is said: 'Today, if you will hearken unto my voice' (Psalms 95:7)"
Talmud, Sanhedrin 98a.

Next Year in Jerusalem

May we soon live in Moshiach's Jerusalem, and plow the land of redeemed Israel. May we celebrate the Pesach

(Passover) Seder in spiritual freedom, when all Jews will have claimed their inheritance in the eternal Eretz Israel.

The popular belief that Israel was established by the United Nations

is rooted in falsehood and prejudice against the rights of the Palestinians.

There is a widely accepted belief that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181

“created” Israel, based upon an understanding that this resolution partitioned Palestine

or otherwise conferred legal authority or legitimacy to the declaration of the existence

of the state of Israel. However, despite its popularity, this belief has no basis in fact,

as a review of the resolution’s history and examination of legal principles

demonstrates incontrovertibly.

Great Britain had occupied Palestine during the First World War, and in July 1922,

the League of Nations issued its mandate for Palestine, which recognized the British

government as the occupying power and effectively conferred to it the color of legal

authority to temporarily administrate the territory. On April 2, 1947, seeking to extract

itself from the conflict that had arisen in Palestine between Jews and Arabs as a result

of the Zionist movement to establish in Palestine a “national home for the Jewish people”,

the United Kingdom submitted a letter to the U.N. requesting the Secretary General “to

place the question of Palestine on the Agenda of the General Assembly at its next

regular Annual Session”, and requesting the Assembly “to make recommendations,

under Article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine.” To that

end, on May 15, the General Assembly adopted Resolution 106, which established the

U.N. Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) to investigate “the question of Palestine”,

to “prepare a report to the General Assembly” based upon its findings, and to “submit

such proposals as it may consider appropriate for the solution of the problem of Palestine”.

On September 3, UNSCOP issued its report to the General Assembly declaring its majority

recommendation that Palestine be partitioned into separate Jewish and Arab states.

It noted that the population of Palestine at the end of 1946 was estimated to be almost

1,846,000, with 1,203,000 Arabs (65 percent) and 608,000 Jews (33 percent). Growth

of the Jewish population had been mainly the result of immigration, while growth of the

Arab population had been “almost entirely” due to natural increase. It observed that

there was “no clear territorial separation of Jews and Arabs by large contiguous areas”,

and even in the Jaffa district, which included Tel Aviv, Arabs constituted a majority. Land

ownership statistics from 1945 showed that Arabs owned more land than Jews in every

single district in Palestine. The district with the highest percentage of Jewish ownership

was Jaffa, where 39 percent of the land was owned by Jews, compared to 47 percent

owned by Arabs. In the whole of Palestine at the time UNSCOP issued its report,

Arabs owned 85 percent of the land, while Jews owned less than 7 percent.

Despite these facts, the UNSCOP proposal was that the Arab state be constituted

from only 45.5 percent of the whole of Palestine, while the Jews would be awarded

55.5 percent of the total area for their state. The UNSCOP report acknowledged that

With regard to the principle of self-determination, although international recognition

was extended to this principle at the end of the First World War and it was adhered to

with regard to the other Arab territories, at the time of the creation of the ‘A’ Mandates,

it was not applied to Palestine, obviously because of the intention to make possible the

creation of the Jewish National Home there. Actually, it may well be said that the Jewish

National Home and the sui generis Mandate for Palestine run counter to that principle.

In other words, the report explicitly recognized that the denial of Palestinian independence

in order to pursue the goal of establishing a Jewish state constituted a rejection of the

right of the Arab majority to self-determination. And yet, despite this recognition, UNSCOP

had accepted this rejection of Arab rights as being within the bounds of a legitimate

and reasonable framework for a solution.

Following the issuance of the UNSCOP report, the U.K. issued a statement declaring

its agreement with the report’s recommendations, but adding that “if the Assembly

should recommend a policy which is not acceptable to both Jews and Arabs, the United

Kingdom Government would not feel able to implement it.” The position of the Arabs

had been clear from the beginning, but the Arab Higher Committee issued a statement

on September 29 reiterating that “the Arabs of Palestine were determined to oppose with

all the means at their disposal, any scheme that provided for segregation or

partition, or that would give to a minority special and preferential status”.

It instead advocated freedom and independence for an Arab State in the whole of

Palestine which would respect human rights, fundamental freedoms and equality of

all persons before the law, and would protect the legitimate rights and interests of

all minorities whilst guaranteeing freedom of worship and access to the Holy Places.

The U.K. followed with a statement reiterating “that His Majesty’s Government could

not play a major part in the implementation of a scheme that was not acceptable to

both Arabs and Jews”, but adding “that they would, however, not wish to impede

the implementation of a recommendation approved by the General Assembly.”

The Ad Hoc Committee on the Palestinian Question was established by the General

Assembly shortly after the issuance of the UNSCOP report in order to continue to

study the problem and make recommendations. A sub-committee was established

in turn that was tasked with examining the legal issues pertaining to the situation in

Palestine, and it released the report of its findings on November 11. It observed that

the UNSCOP report had accepted a basic premise “that the claims to Palestine of the

Arabs and Jews both possess validity”, which was “not supported by any cogent reasons

and is demonstrably against the weight of all available evidence.” With an end to the

Mandate and with British withdrawal, “there is no further obstacle to the conversion of

Palestine into an independent state”, which “would be the logical culmination of the

objectives of the Mandate” and the Covenant of the League of Nations. It found that

“the General Assembly is not competent to recommend, still less to enforce, any solution

other than the recognition of the independence of Palestine, and that the settlement

of the future government of Palestine is a matter solely for the people of Palestine.”

It concluded that “no further discussion of the Palestine problem seems to be

necessary or appropriate, and this item should be struck off the agenda of the General

Assembly”, but that if there was a dispute on that point, “it would be essential to obtain

the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on this issue”, as had already

been requested by several of the Arab states. It concluded further that the partition plan

was “contrary to the principles of the Charter, and the United Nations have no power

to give effect to it.”

The U.N. could not deprive the majority of the people of Palestine of their territory

and transfer it to the exclusive use of a minority in the country…. The United Nations

Organization has no power to create a new State. Such a decision can only be taken

by the free will of the people of the territories in question. That condition is not fulfilled

in the case of the majority proposal, as it involves the establishment of a Jewish

State in complete disregard of the wishes and interests of the Arabs of Palestine.

Nevertheless, the General Assembly passed Resolution 181 on November 29, with 33

votes in favor to 13 votes against, and 10 abstentions. The relevant text of the resolution stated:

The General Assembly…. Recommends to the United Kingdom, as the mandatory

Power for Palestine, and to all other Members of the United Nations the adoption and

implementation, with regard to the future government of Palestine,

of the Plan of Partition with Economic Union set out below;

Requests that (a) The Security Council take the necessary

measure as provided for in the plan for its implementation;

(b) The Security Council consider, if circumstances during the transitional period require

such consideration, whether the situation in Palestine constitutes a threat to the peace.

If it decides that such a threat exists, and in order to maintain international peace and

security, the Security Council should supplement the authorization of the General Assembly

by taking measure, under Articles 39 and 41 of the Charter, to empower the United Nations

Commission, as provided in this resolution, to exercise in Palestine the functions which

are assigned to it by this resolution;

(c) The Security Council determine as a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of

aggression, in accordance with Article 39 of the Charter, any attempt to alter by force the

settlement envisaged by this resolution;

(d) The Trusteeship Council be informed of

the responsibilities envisaged for it in this plan;

Calls upon the inhabitants of Palestine to take such steps

as may be necessary on their part to put this plan into effect;

Appeals to all Governments and all peoples to refrain from taking action

which might hamper or delay the carrying out of these recommendations….

A simple reading of the text is enough to show that the resolution did not partition Palestine

or offer any legal basis for doing so. It merely recommended that the partition plan be

implemented and requested the Security Council to take up the matter from there. It

called upon the inhabitants of Palestine to accept the plan, but they were certainly

under no obligation to do so.

A Plan Never Implemented

The matter was thus taken up by the Security Council, where, on December 9, the Syrian

representative to the U.N., Faris El-Khouri, observed that “the General Assembly is not a

world government which can dictate orders, partition countries or impose constitutions,

rules, regulations and treaties on people without their consent.” When the Soviet representative

Andrei Gromyko stated his government’s opposing view that “The resolution of the General

Assembly should be implemented” by the Security Council, El-Khouri replied by noting further that

Certain paragraphs of the resolution of the General Assembly which concern the

Security Council are referred to the Council, namely, paragraphs (a), (b) and (c),

outlining the functions of the Security Council in respect of the Palestinian question.

All of the members of the Security Council are familiar with the Council’s functions,

which are well defined and clearly stated in the Charter of the United Nations. I do

not believe that the resolution of the General Assembly can add to or delete from

these functions. The recommendations of the General Assembly are well known to

be recommendations, and Member States are not required by force to accept them.

Member States may or may not accept them, and the same applies to the

Security Council.

On February 6, 1948, the Arab Higher Committee again communicated to the U.N.

Secretary General its position that the partition plan was “contrary to the letter and

spirit of the United Nations Charter”. The U.N. “has no jurisdiction to order or recommend

the partition of Palestine. There is nothing in the Charter to warrant such authority,

consequently the recommendation of partition is ultra vires and therefore null and void.”

Additionally, the Arab Higher Committee noted that the Arab Delegations submitted

proposals in the Ad Hoc Committee in order to refer the whole legal issue raised for a

ruling by the International Court of Justice. The said proposals were never put to vote

by the president in the Assembly. The United Nations is an International body entrusted

with the task of enforcing peace and justice in international affairs. How would there be

any confidence in such a body if it bluntly and unreasonably refuses to refer such a dispute

to the International Court of Justice?

“The Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition

recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them”, the Arab Higher

Committee declared, and they would “consider that any attempt by the Jews or any power

or group of powers to establish a Jewish State in Arab territory is an

act of aggression which will be resisted in self-defense by force.”

On February 16, the U.N. Palestine Commission, tasked by the General Assembly

to prepare for the transfer of authority from the Mandatory Power to the successor governments

under the partition plan, issued its first report to the Security Council. It concluded on the

basis of the Arab rejection that it “finds itself confronted with an attempt to defect its purposes,

and to nullify the resolution of the General Assembly”, and calling upon the Security Council

to provide an armed force “which alone would enable the Commission to discharge its

responsibilities on the termination of the Mandate”. In effect, the Palestine Commission

had determined that the partition plan should be implemented against the will of the

majority population of Palestine by force.

In response to that suggestion, Colombia submitted a draft Security Council resolution

noting that the U.N. Charter did “not authorize the Security Council to create special forces

for the purposes indicated by the United Nations Palestine Commission”. The U.S.

delegate, Warren Austin, similarly stated at the 253rd meeting of the Security Council

on February 24 thatThe Security Council is authorized to take forceful measures with

respect to Palestine to remove a threat to international peace. The Charter of the

United Nations does not empower the Security Council to enforce a political settlement

whether it is pursuant to a recommendation of the General Assembly or of the Security

Council itself. What this means is this: The Security Council, under the Charter, can take

action to prevent aggression against Palestine from outside. The Security Council, by

these same powers, can take action to prevent a threat to international peace and security

from inside Palestine. But this action must be directed solely to the maintenance of international

peace. The Security Council’s action, in other words, is directed to keeping the peace

and not to enforcing partition.

The United States nevertheless submitted its own draft text more ambiguously accepting

the requests of the Palestine Commission “subject to the authority of the Security

Council under the Charter”. Faris El-Khouri objected to the U.S. draft on the grounds

that “before accepting these three requests, it is our duty to ascertain whether they are

or are not within the framework of the Security Council as limited by the Charter. If it is

found that they are not, we should decline to accept them.” He recalled Austin’s own

statement on the lack of authority of the Security Council, saying, “It would follow

from this undeniable fact that any recommendation on a political settlement can be

implemented only if the parties concerned willingly accept and complement it.”

Furthermore, “the partition plan itself constitutes a threat to the peace, being openly

rejected by all those at whose expense it was to be executed.” Austin in turn explained

the intent of the U.S. draft that its acceptance of Resolution 181 is subject to the limitation

that armed force cannot be used for implementation of the plan, because the Charter

limits the use of United Nations force expressly to threats to and breaches of the peace

and aggression affecting international peace. Therefore, we must interpret the General

Assembly resolution as meaning that the United Nations measures to implement

this resolution are peaceful measures.

Moreover, explained Austin, the U.S. draft does not authorize use of enforcement

under Articles 39 and 41 of the Charter to empower the United Nations Commission

to exercise in Palestine the functions which are assigned to it by the resolution, because

the Charter does not authorize either the General Assembly or the Security

Council to do any such thing.

When the Security Council did finally adopt a resolution on March 5, it merely made

a note of “Having received General Assembly resolution 181″ and the first monthly Palestine

Commission report, and resolvedto call on the permanent members of the Council to consult

and to inform the Security Council regarding the situation with respect to Palestine and

to make, as the result of such consultations, recommendations to it regarding the guidance

and instructions which the Council might usefully give to the Palestine Commission

with a view to implementing the resolution of the General Assembly.

During further debates at the Security Council over how to proceed, Austin observed that it

had become “clear that the Security Council is not prepared to go ahead with efforts to

implement this plan in the existing situation.” At the same time, it was clear that the

U.K.’s announced termination of the Mandate on May 15 “would result, in the light of

information now available, in chaos, heavy fighting and much loss of life in Palestine.”

The U.N. could not permit this, he said, and the Security Council had the responsibility

and authority under the Charter to act to prevent such a threat to the peace. The U.S.

also proposed establishing a Trusteeship over Palestine to give further opportunity to

the Jews and Arabs to reach a mutual agreement. Pending the convening of a special

session of the General Assembly to that end, “we believe that the Security Council should

instruct the Palestine Commission to suspend its efforts to implement the proposed

partition plan.”

The Security Council President, speaking as the representative from China, responded:

“The United Nations was created mainly for the maintenance of international peace. It

would be tragic indeed if the United Nations, by attempting a political settlement, should

be the cause of war. For these reasons, my delegation supports the general principles

of the proposal of the United States delegation.” At a further meeting of the Security

Council, the Canadian delegate stated that the partition plan “is based on a number

of important assumptions”, the first of which was that “it was assumed that the two

communities in Palestine would co-operate in putting into effect the solution to the Palestine

problem which was recommended by the General Assembly.” The French delegate, while

declining to extend either approval for or disapproval of the U.S. proposal, observed that it

would allow for any number of alternative solutions from the partition plan, including “a

single State with sufficient guarantees for minorities”. The representative from the Jewish

Agency for Palestine read a statement categorically rejecting “any plan to set up a trusteeship

regime for Palestine”, which “would necessarily entail a denial of the Jewish right to

national independence.”

Mindful of the worsening situation in Palestine, and wishing to avoid further debate, the

U.S. proposed another draft resolution calling for a truce between Jewish and Arab

armed groups that Austin noted “would not prejudice the claims of either group” and which

“does not mention trusteeship.” It was adopted as Resolution 43 on April 1.Resolution

44 was also passed the same day requesting “the Secretary-General, in accordance

with Article 20 of the United Nations Charter, to convoke a special session of the General

Assembly to consider further the question of the future government of Palestine.” Resolution

46 reiterated the Security Council’s call for the cessation of hostilities in Palestine, and

Resolution 48 established a “Truce Commission” to further the goal

of implementing its resolutions calling for an end to the violence.

On May 14, the Zionist leadership unilaterally declared the existence of the State of Israel,

citing Resolution 181 as constituting “recognition by the United Nations of the

right of the Jewish people to establish their State”. As anticipated, war ensued.

The Authority of the U.N. with Regard to Partition

Chapter 1, Article 1 of the U.N. Charter defines its purposes and principles, which are to

“maintain international peace and security”, to “develop friendly relations among nations

based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples”, and

to “achieve international co-operation” on various issues and “promoting and

encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all”.

The functions and powers of the General Assembly are listed under Chapter IV, Articles

10 through 17. It is tasked to initiate studies and make recommendations to promote

international cooperation and the development of international law, to receive reports

from the Security Council and other organs of the U.N., and to consider and approve the

organization’s budget. It is also tasked with performing functions under the international

trusteeship system. Its authority is otherwise limited to considering and discussing matters

within the scope of the Charter, making recommendations to Member States or

the Security Council, or calling attention of matters to the Security Council.

Chapter V, Articles 24 through 26, states the functions and powers of the Security Council. 

It is tasked with maintaining peace and security in accordance with the purposes and

principles of the U.N. The specific powers granted to the Security Council are stated in

Chapters VI, VII, VIII, and XII. Under Chapter VI, the Security Council may call upon parties

to settle disputes by peaceful means, investigate, and make a determination as to whether

a dispute or situation constitutes a threat to peace and security. It may recommend

appropriate procedures to resolve disputes, taking into consideration that “legal disputes

should as a general rule be referred by the parties to the International Court of Justice”.

Under Chapter VII, the Security Council may determine the existence of a threat to peace

and make recommendations or decide what measures are to be taken to maintain or restore

peace and security. It may call upon concerned parties to take provisional measures “without

prejudice to the rights, claims, or position of the parties concerned.” It may call upon member

states to employ “measures not involving the use of armed force” to apply such measures.

Should such measures be inadequate, it may authorize the use of armed forces

“to maintain or restore international peace and security”. Chapter VIII states that the

Security Council “shall encourage the development of pacific settlements of local disputes”

through regional arrangements or agencies, and utilize such to enforce actions under its authority.

The functions and powers of the International Trusteeship System are listed under

Chapter XII, Articles 75 through 85. The purpose of the system is to administer and

supervise territories placed therein by agreement with the goal of “development towards

self-government or independence as may be appropriate to the particular circumstances

of each territory and its peoples and the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned”.

The system is to operate in accordance with the purposes of the U.N. stated in Article 1,

including respect for the right of self-determination. The General Assembly is tasked with

all functions “not designated as strategic”, which are designated to the Security Council.

A Trusteeship Council is established to assist the General Assembly

and the Security Council to perform their functions under the system.

Chapter XIII, Article 87 states the functions and powers of the Trusteeship Council,

which are shared by the General Assembly. Authority is granted to consider reports,

accept and examine petitions, provide for visits to trust territories, and “take

these and other actions in conformity with the terms of the trusteeship agreements.”

Another relevant section is Chapter XI, entitled the “Declaration Regarding

Non-Self-Governing Territories”, which states that Members of the United Nations

which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of territories whose

peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government recognize the principle

that the interests of the inhabitants of these territories are paramount, and accept

as a sacred trust the obligation to promote to the utmost, within the system of

international peace and security established by the present

Charter, the well-being of the inhabitants of these territories…

To that end, Member states are “to develop self-government, to take due account of the

political aspirations of the peoples, and to assist them in the progressive development

of their free political institutions”.

Conclusion

The partition plan put forth by UNSCOP sought to create within Palestine a Jewish

state contrary to the express will of the majority of its inhabitants. Despite constituting

only a third of the population and owning less than 7 percent of the land, it sought to

grant to the Jews more than half of Palestine for purpose of creating that Jewish state.

It would, in other words, take land from the Arabs and give it to the Jews. The inherent

injustice of the partition plan stands in stark contrast to alternative plan proposed by

the Arabs, of an independent state of Palestine in which the rights of the Jewish minority

would be recognized and respected, and which would afford the Jewish population

representation in a democratic government. The partition plan was blatantly prejudicial

to the rights of the majority Arab population, and was premised on the rejection of their

right to self-determination. This is all the more uncontroversial inasmuch as the UNSCOP

report itself explicitly acknowledged that the proposal to create a Jewish state in Palestine

was contrary to the principle of self-determination. The plan was also premised upon the

erroneous assumption that the Arabs would simply acquiesce to having their land taken

from them and voluntarily surrender their majority rights, including their righ

t to self-determination.

U.N. General Assembly Resolution 181 neither legally partitioned Palestine nor conferred

upon the Zionist leadership any legal authority to unilaterally declare the existence of

the Jewish state of Israel. It merely recommended that the UNSCOP partition plan be

accepted and implemented by the concerned parties. Naturally, to have any weight of

law, the plan, like any contract, would have to have been formally agreed upon by both

parties, which it was not. Nor could the General Assembly have legally partitioned

Palestine or otherwise conferred legal authority for the creation of Israel to the Zionist

leadership, as it simply had no such authority to confer. When the Security Council took

up the matter referred to it by the General Assembly, it could come to no consensus on

how to proceed with implementing the partition plan. It being apparent that the plan could

not be implemented by peaceful means, the suggestion that it be implemented by force

was rejected by members of the Security Council. The simple fact of the matter is that

the plan was never implemented. Numerous delegates from member states, including

the U.S., arrived at the conclusion that the plan was impracticable, and, furthermore,

that the Security Council had no authority to implement such a plan except

by mutual consent by concerned parties, which was absent in this case.

The U.S., Syria, and other member nations were correct in their observations that, while

the Security Council did have authority to declare a threat to the peace and authorize the

use of force to deal with that and maintain or restore peace and security, it did not have any

authority to implement by force a plan to partition Palestine contrary to the will of most

of its inhabitants. Any attempt to usurp such authority by either the General Assembly

or the Security Council would have been a prima facie violation of the Charter’s founding

principle of respect for the right to self-determination of all peoples, and thus null and

void under international law.

In sum, the popular claim that the U.N. “created” Israel is a myth, and Israel’s own claim

in its founding document that U.N. Resolution 181 constituted legal authority for Israel’s

creation, or otherwise constituted “recognition” by the U.N. of the “right” of the Zionist

Jews to expropriate for themselves Arab land and deny to the majority Arab

population of that land their own right to self-determination, is a patent fraud.

Further corollaries may be drawn. The disaster inflicted upon Palestine was not inevitable.

The U.N. was created for the purpose of preventing such catastrophes. Yet it failed

miserably to do so, on numerous counts. It failed in its duty to refer the legal questions

of the claims to Palestine to the International Court of Justice, despite requests from

member states to do so. It failed to use all means within its authority, including the use

of armed forces, to maintain peace and prevent the war that was predicted would occur

upon the termination of the Mandate. And most importantly, far from upholding its founding

principles, the U.N. effectively acted to prevent the establishment of an independent and

democratic state of Palestine, in direct violation of the principles of its own Charter. The

consequences of these and other failures are still witnessed by the world today on a daily

basis. Recognition of the grave injustice perpetrated against the Palestinian people in this

regard and dispelling such historical myths is essential if a way forward towards peac

e and reconciliation is to be found.

.

.

     Key Quotations from ‘You Gentiles’

— by Maurice Samuel

Maurice Samuel (1895 – 1972) was a Romanian-born Zionist Jew whose most

influential book, You Gentiles, was published in 1924. This offered a penetrating

analysis of the Jewish psyche and made the important point that Jews were altogether

so superior and spiritually advanced compared to gentiles that there was no

possibility of the two groups getting on together. Owing to the baser nature of

the gentiles, and the fact that they did not take God seriously like the Jews,

it was inevitable that Jews and gentiles should be at loggerheads for ever. (LD)

Here are some key quotations from the book:

I. The Question

“Wherever the Jew is found he is a problem, a source of unhappiness to himself and to

those around him. Ever since he has been scattered in your midst he has had

to maintain a continuous struggle for the conservation of his identity.” (p. 10).

“Years of observation and thought have given increasing strength to the belief that we

Jews stand apart from you gentiles, that a primal duality breaks the humanity I know into

two distinct parts; that this duality is a fundamental, and that all differences among you

gentiles are trivialities compared with that which divided all of you from us.” (p. 12).

“You may even have Jews in your midst who did not learn their way of life from us, and

did not inherit it from a Jewish forebear. We may have authentic gentiles in our midst: these

single protests are of no account; they are extreme and irrelevant variations.” (p. 21).

“I do not believe that the primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable.

You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There

will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and

constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever – not a mere conviction, not

a mere language, not a mere difference of national or religious allegiance.” (p. 23-24).

“You have your way of life, we ours. In your system of life we are essentially without ‘honor’.

In our system of life you are essentially without morality. In your system of life we

must forever appear graceless; to us you must forever appear godless.” (p. 34).

“We belong to the One mastering God: you belong to the republic of playful gods. ” (p. 36).

“These are two ways of life, each utterly alien to the other. Each has its place in the

world – but they cannot flourish in the same soil, they cannot remain in contact without

antagonism. Though to life itself each way is a perfect utterance, to each other they

are enemies.” (p. 36-37)

II Sport

“THE most amazing thing in your life, the most in contrast with ours, is its sport. By this I

do not mean simply your fondness for physical exercise, your physical exuberance, but

the psychological and social institutionalization of sport, its organization, its

predominant rôle as the outlet and expression of your spiritual energies.” (p. 38)

“Your spirit is sport: particularly your young men, who are not yet absorbed in the struggle

for existence, and whose emotions are therefore for the largest part free, must find in

sport, in games, in contests, the most satisfactory expression of their instincts.” (p. 40)

“The contention of the majority of your educators, that the moral instinct is trained on the

football and baseball field, in boxing, rowing, wrestling and other contests, is a true one,

is truer, perhaps, than most of them realize. Your ideal morality is a sporting morality.

The intense discipline of the game, the spirit of fair play, the qualities of endurance, of

good humor, of conventionalized seriousness in effort, of loyalty, of struggle without

malice or bitterness, of readiness to forget like a sport – all these are brought out in their

sheerest and cleanest starkness in well-organized and closely regulated college sports.

And on the experiences and lessons which these sports imply your entire spiritual life is

inevitably founded.” (p. 42)

“Sport is for you a serious spiritual matter. It is the proper symbolization, the perfect ritual,

wherein your spiritual forces, finding expression, also find exercise and sustenance.” (p. 43)

III Gods

“Our Jewishness is not a creed, it is ourself, our totality. Indeed, it may be fairly said that

the surest evidence of your lack of seriousness in religion is the fact that your religions are

not national, that you are not compromised and dedicated, en masse, to the faith.” (p. 73).

“But in the Jew, nation and people and faculties and culture and God are all one.

We do not say: ‘I am a Jew’, meaning, ‘I am a member of this nationality’: the feeling in

the Jew, even in the free-thinking Jew like myself, is that to be one with his people is to

be thereby admitted to the power of enjoying the infinite. I might

say, of ourselves: ‘We and God grew up together’.” (p. 74).

“You have had patron or appropriated gods: we have a national God. In the heart

of any pious Jew, God is a Jew. Is your God an Englishman or an American?

There is no real contradiction between this confessed anthropomorphism and my claim

that we Jews alone understand and feel the universality of God. In anthropomorphism

we merely symbolize God: we reduce the infinite, temporarily, to tangible

proportions: we make it accessible to daily reference. ” (p. 75).

IV Utopia

“We are not free to choose and to reject, to play, to construct, to refine. We are a dedicated

and enslaved people, predestined to an unchangeable relationship. Freedom at large was

not and is not a Jewish ideal. Service, love consecration, these are ideals

with us. Freedom means nothing to us: freedom to do what?” (p. 88)

“For us the end is ecstatic unity, the identification of man with God. Your ideal is eternal

youth, ours lifts toward an unchanging climax of adult perfection. You would like to play

with your gods forever: we will return to God, to the universe. Yours is a sunlit afternoon,

with the combatants swaying forever in a joyous struggle. Ours

is a whole world, with the spirit of God poured through all things.
Your Ideal is Plato’s Republic: ours is God’s kingdom.” (p. 89-90)

V Loyalty

“For your system of morality is no less a need to you than ours to us. And the incompatibility

of the two systems is not passive. You might say: ‘Well, let us exist side by side and tolerate

each other. We will not attack your morality, nor you ours.’ But the misfortune is that the

two are not merely different. They are opposed in mortal, though tacit, enmity. No man

can accept both, or, accepting either, do otherwise than despise the other.” (p. 95-96)

VI Discipline

“In the colleges, in the street, in the army, we betray ourselves. Indeed, your very breaches

of discipline differ from ours by a certain conscious rebelliousness which is partly

homage: our breaches of discipline are off-hand, unconscious, insolent.” (p. 110)

“The fact is, of course, that in true discipline, en effectiveness, we are by no means your

inferiors. No one would dream of asserting that our religion is not more effective than yours

in compelling obedience, or in perpetuating itself. The mere fact that we have persisted for

eighty generations in maintaining a racial and spiritual identity in the face of so much

persecution (and, more significant, of so much infiltration of blood) bespeaks essential

discipline of amazing rigor and power. […] Yet I have no doubt that when Germany and

England and America will long have lost their present identity

or purpose, we shall still be strong in ours.” (p. 111).

VII The Reckoning

“I say, therefore, that in the conflict between us you have fought us physically, while our

attack on your world has been in the spiritual field. It is the nature of the gentile to fight

for his honor, in the nature of the Jew to suffer for this. […] And so, since we have lived

among you, you have instinctively appealed to brute force in combating our influence.” (p. 128)

“We are a disturbing influence in your life not through our own fault. First: we are not in

your midst by our own will, but through your action; and second (which is more to the point):

we do not attack you deliberately. We are unwelcome to you because we are what we are.

It is our own positive way of life which clashes with yours. Our attack on you is only incidental

to the expression of our way of life. You too have this field open to you. As surely as we

are a spiritual discomfort to you, you are a spiritual discomfort to us: as surely as

we attack you peacefully, so you waste us peacefully and weaken our numbers.” (p. 129-130)

VIII But as Moderns

“I have already said, anticipating this objection, that there is the same difference between

the Jewish atheist and the gentile atheist as between the orthodox Jew and the believing

gentile: I have said or implied that the religion itself is but practical expression of the difference

between us, not the cause of it. It is true that the expression of a view serves to strengthen

it, as the exercise of a faculty serves to develop it. But expression does not create a view

nor exercise a faculty. Even conscious adherence to the Jewish people is but partial expression

of our Jewishness: it was not the conscious desire to remain a people which gave us the

will to endure: it was our unavoidable commonalty of feeling which made us and continued

us a people.” (p. 136-137)

“Repudiation of the Jewish religion or even of Jewish racial affiliation does not alter the Jew.

Some of us Jews may delude ourselves as some of you gentiles do. But in effect modernization

seems to have done nothing to decrease the friction between us. The dislike continues: and

though your masses may not know why they dislike us, there must be a sufficient reason: it

is Germany, the mother of the modernized Jew, that gave birth, with him, to modern anti-Semitism.

Where the old ostensible reasons for disliking the Jew collapsed, new ones, more self-conscious,

were substituted. When modernization removed the old, superstitious form of expression,

the professor replaced the priest, science religion. We are disliked on ‘scientific’ grounds,

as we were disliked on ‘religious’ reasons were rationalizations. The true reasons underlay

these analyses.” (p. 137-138)

“We fail to be gentiles.” (p. 140)

“Our best work has been the old, true work of our people – fundamental and serious examination

of the problems of man’s relation to God and humanity. In the arts we have been second-rate,

third-rate. While in the moral effort we have exceeded any living race and have produced an

overwhelming number of revolutionaries and socialists and iconoclasts of the true prophetic

type, we have, in science, belles-lettres and the plastic

arts been a thoroughly minor people.” (p. 141)

“We have joined your capitalistic world in deliberate emulation and rivalry: yet Jewish

socialism and Jewish socialists are the banner

bearers of the world’s ‘armies of liberation’.” (p. 142)

”We modern Jews of the Western world are in this fundamentally different from you.

The occasional in you (revolution against the Game) is the dominant in us. Your instinct

is truer than you know. The dislike of your modern world for the modern

Jews is as relevant as the dislike of your for the orthodox Jew.” (p. 142-143)

IX We, the Destroyers

“IF anything, you must learn (and are learning) to dislike the modern and ‘assimilated’ Jew,

for he is more dangerous to you. At least the old Jew kept apart from you, was easily

recognizable as an individual, as the bearer of the dreaded Jewish world-idea: you were

afraid of him and loathed him. But to a large extent he was insulated. But as the Jew

assimilates, acquires your languages, cultivates a certain intimacy, penetrates into your life,

begins to handle your instruments, you are aware that his nature, once confined safely to

his own life, now threatens yours. You are aware of a new and more than disconcerting

character at work in the world you have built and are building up, a character

which crosses your intentions and thwarts your personality.” (p. 144-145)

“The Jew, whose lack of contact with your world had made him ineffective, becomes

effective. The vial is uncorked, the genius is out. His enmity to your way of life was tacit

before. To-day it is manifest and active. He cannot help himself: he cannot be different

from himself: no more can you. It is futile to tell him: ‘Hands off!’

He is not his own master, but the servant of his lifewill.” (p.145)

“For when he [the Jew] brings into your world his passionately earnest, sinisterly earnest

righteousness, absolute righteousness, and, speaking in your languages and through your

institutions, scatters distrust of yourselves through the most sensitive of you,

he is working against your spirit.” (p. 145)

“I do not believe that we Jews are powerful enough to threaten your way of life seriously.

We are only powerful enough to irritate, to disturb your conscience, and to break here and

there the rhythmic rush of your ideas. We irritate you as a sardonic and humorless adult

irritates young people by laughing at their play. For the real irritation lies in the fact that to

our queries regarding your life there is no answer on our level: as to yours regarding our life

there is no answer on yours.” (p. 146)

“We Jews are accused of being destroyers: whatever you put up, we tear down. It is true

only in a relative sense. We are not iconoclasts deliberately: we are not enemies of your

institutions simply because of the dislike between us. We are a homeless mass seeking

satisfaction for our constructive instincts. And in your institutions we cannot find satisfaction;

they are the play institutions of the splendid children of man – and not of man himself.

We try to adapt your institutions to our needs, because while we live we must have expression;

and trying to rebuild them for our needs, we unbuild them for yours.” (p. 146-147)

“Because your chief institution is the social structure itself,

it is in this that we are most manifestly destroyers.” (p. 147)

“Dislike of the Jew in business springs from the feeling that we regard all your play-conventions

with amusement – or even with contempt. Our abominable seriousness breaks jarringly into

your life-mood. But you feel our disruptive difference most keenly, most resentfully, in our

deliberate efforts to change your social system. We dream of a world of utter justice

and God-spirit, a whole world which would be barren for you, devoid of all nourishment,

bleak, unfriendly, unsympathetic. You do not want such a world: you are unapt for it.

Seen in the dazzling lights of your desires and needs our ideal is repellently morose.”

(p. 148-149)

“We do wrong to thrust these ideals upon you, who are not for justice or peace, but

for play-living. But we cannot help ourselves: any more than you can help resenting our

interference. While we live we must give utterance to our spirit. The

most insistent effort on our part will fail to change our nature.” (p. 149)

“He [the Jew] is a citizen of the world; he is a son of humanity; the progress of all

humankind, and not of only of any single group of it, is in his particular care.” (p. 150)

“The unbelieving and radical Jew is as different from the radical gentile as the orthodox

Jew from the reactionary gentile. The cosmopolitanism of the radical Jew springs from

his feeling (shared by the orthodox Jew) that there is no difference between gentile and

gentile. You are all pretty much alike: then why this fussing and fretting

and fighting? The Jew is not a cosmopolitan in your sense.” (p. 150)

“He is not one who feels keenly the difference between national and nation, and overrides

it. For him, as for the orthodox Jew, a single temper runs through all of you, whatever your

national divisions. The radical Jew (like the orthodox Jew) is a cosmopolitan in a sense which

must be irritating to you: for he does not even understand why you make such a fuss about

that most obvious of facts – that you are all alike. The Jew is altogether

too much of a cosmopolitan – even for your internationalists.” (p. 151)

“Nor in the handful of you who, against the desires and instincts of the mass of you,

proclaim social justice as the life aim, is the Jew any more truly at home, at one with his

milieu, than the old-time Jew in his world. Our [Jews’] very radicalism is of a different

temper. Our spur is a natural instinct. We do not have to uproot something in ourselves

to become ‘radicals’, dreamers of social justice. We are this by instinct: we do not see it

as something revolutionary at all. It is tacit with us. But with you it is an effort and a

wrench. Your very ancestry cries out against it in your blood… And you become silly and

enthusiastic about it, with flag-waving, and shouting, and battle-hymns, and all the regular

game-psychology proper to your world and way of life. Even of this you make a play.”

(p. 151-152)

“But such as these radical and international movements are, the modern Jew (the best and

most thoughtful modern Jew, that is) is nearer to them than to anything else in your world.

He is the only true socialist and cosmopolitan – but in such a true and tacit sense

that he is completely distinguished from all of you. It is one of many vital paradoxes – a

thing illogical and yet true to life. It is our very cosmopolitanism that gives us our national

character. Because we are the only ones who are cosmopolitan by instinct rather than by

argument we remain forever ourselves.” (p. 152)

“In everything we are destroyers – even in the instruments of destruction to which we

turn for relief. The very socialism and internationalism through which our choked

spirit seeks utterance, which seem to threaten your way of life, are alien to our spirit’s

demands and needs. Your socialists and internationalists are not serious. The charm

of these movements, the attraction, such as it is, which they exercise, is only in their

struggle: it is the fight which draws your gentile radicals. And indeed, it is only as long as

there is an element of adventure in being a radical that the radical movement retains any

individuality. And it is only in the fierce period of early combat that you welcome us Jews

– as allies. You are deluded in this – so are we. You go into the movement boldly,

adventurously; we darkly, tacitly. You make it a game; we do it because we cannot help

ourselves. And sure enough, in the end, the split comes again. The liberal and the radical

are as apt to dislike the Jew as the reactionaries are. The liberal and the radical do not

use the weapons of the reactionaries: but the dislike is there, finds expression in anti-Semitic

socialist and workers’ movements and in the almost involuntary contempt

which springs to the lips of countless intellectuals.” (p. 152-154)

“Philosophies do not remold natures. What your radicals want is another form of the Game,

with other rules. Their discontent joins hands with Jewish discontent. But it is not the same

kind of discontent. A little distance down the road the ways part for ever. The Jewish radical

will turn from your social movement: he will discover his mistake he will discover that nothing

can bridge the gulf between you and us. He will discover that the spiritual satisfaction which

he thought he would find in social revolution is not to be purchased from you. I believe

the movement has already started, the gradual secession of the Jewish radicals, their

realization that your radicalism is of the same essential stuff as your conservatism.

The disillusionment has set in.” (p. 154)

“A century of partial tolerance gave us Jews access to your world. In that period

the great attempt was made, by advance guards of reconciliation, to bring our two worlds

together. It was a century of failure. Our Jewish radicals are beginning to understand it dimly.”

(p. 154-155)

“We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that

you do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy because we

need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build.

Beyond all temporary alliances with this or that faction lies the ultimate split in nature and

destiny, the enmity between the Game and God. But those of us who fail to understand

that truth will always be found in alliance with your rebellious factions, until disillusionment

comes. The wretched fate which scattered us through your midst has thrust this

unwelcome rôle upon us.” (p. 155)

XI The Masses

“The nature of things cannot be solved because we partake of that nature. We can never

get round ourselves: we can only turn round. Your world spins in a joyous illusion of progress;

we, untouched by that illusion, destructive of your mood, stand aside, static,

serious. We will be satisfied with nothing but the absolute.” (p. 186-187)

XII Solution and Dissolution

“Does the situation which I have described constitute a problem? Or is it merely one of

the insoluble difficulties of life which, being insoluble, should be understood as such and

suffered tacitly? Death is not a problem, being inevitable. Is this struggle between our two

worlds as inevitable? Shall we resign ourselves to the struggle and do what we can to

mitigate its worst effects, or shall we continue the search for a complete solution?
The one solution which is generally offered as complete and satisfactory, is quite apart from

its feasibility, not a solution at all: only a dissolution. The disappearance of the Jewish people

by complete submergence in the surrounding world would not, in reality, solve the problem;

any more than one solves a chess problem by burning chess-board and figures. But it

would seem to do the next best thing: it would apparently destroy the situation which creates

the problem. The problem, without having been solved, would at any rate cease to exist.” (p. 188-189)

“And by the dissolution of the Jewish people can be meant only one thing – the disappearance

of Jewish identity in individuals or amasses, the complete obliteration of Jewish self-consciousness,

down to the very name and recollection. When it will be impossible for any man to say of

himself, ‘I am a Jew’, or ‘My father or grandfather was a Jew’ this consummation will have

been achieved.

There is only one instrument to this end: free and unrestrained intermarriage. This act or

fact alone will count. The mere changing of names, the substitution of religious forms,

the so-called ‘liberalization’ and ‘modernization’ of Judaism is ineffective: it is a matter of

common observation that there is no inverse ratio between the Westernization of the Jew

and anti-Semitism. And this very fact will have to be considered again in its relation to the

feasibility of this proposal. If we talk of the submergence of the Jew we must not play with

words: words alone cannot submerge the Jew. If there is anything in what I have said you

cannot make a gentile of a Jew by arguing with him any more than by lynching him. You can

make his children half gentile, his grandchildren only a quarter Jewish – and so on till

the balance is perfect.” (p. 189-190)

“Will the ‘dissolution of Jewish identity’ by free and prolonged intermarriage resolve the

struggle of the two types? Or will the struggle continue in another form, less obvious

but equally uncomfortable? Will the struggle center round isolated individuals, recurrent types?

Or will the final product be homogeneous and, in relation to this particular struggle, static?”

Both the negative and affirmative answers to this question are unsatisfactory. Suppose,

on the one hand, the struggle continues? Suppose the Jewish character persists in strains,

breaks out in individual atavisms, long after the Jewish name has perished? The problem

will be the same: your world will be confronted with recurrent instances of alien and

destructive types, all the more dangerous because they are not isolated in recognized,

repudiated group. Their power of destruction will be the greater because they will work

from within. The ‘Jewish’ problem will have disappeared, but the gentile problem would remain

as bitter as ever. (p. 193-194)

“Let us examine the negative answer. Suppose there are no ‘reversions of type’.

Suppose the Jew is so completely absorbed as to be lost beyond possibility of detection

in the surrounding world. Such a consummation, if possible, calls for one inevitable condition;

that is, the proportionate Judaization of your world. It is unthinkable that so vivid an

element as the Jewish people should be absorbed into your world without producing an

appreciable alteration in its constitution. A world that has absorbed the Jews will to

that extent be a Jewish world.  And this is precisely the condition which you refuse to admit.

You want no tampering with your identity; you want to remain what you are. You have no intention

of meeting us at the point of balance. You do not want a world tinged with Jewish blood.

You want us to be absorbed in you without leaving a trace. And with the best intentions in

the world we cannot oblige. We can, in that sense, no more destroy ourselves than we can

destroy a single particle of matter.” (p. 194-195)

XIII The Mechanism of Dissolution

“Among yourselves assimilation is problem enough. The birth and death of nations is

attended by wars, pains, humiliations. But what you have done a dozen

times over in the last four thousand years we have not done once.” (p. 208-209)

“We cannot assimilate: it is so humiliating to us that we become contemptible in

submitting to the process: It is so exasperating to you that, even if we were willing to submit,

it would avail us nothing.” (p. 209)

.

.

.

THE ZIONIST JEWISH PLAN TO DOMINATE AMERICAN LIFE

was already in motion by the early 1900s.

Three major things were to be done:

1. A central Bank.
2. Legislation for an income tax.
3. American involvement in a world war.

                                                            What Israel Doesn’t Want You To Put Together

1) Initially there were different versions of Zionism. Theodor Herzel’s Zionism carried more egalitarian values and envisioned Jews and Palestinians living side by side as

equals in Palestine. The version that won in the end was the one espoused by David Ben-Gurion and which was based on Jewish supremacism over any non-Jews living

in Palestine.

2) Zionist nationalism is based on a form of nationalism found in Eastern European nations such as Russia and Poland. This nationalism is based on ethnic ownership of the land. Poland is for ethnic Poles and Russia is for ethnic Russians. This contrasts with Western European nationalism found in places like France and the US where the land belongs to anyone who is a citizen of the state.

3) The highest court in Israel has determined that “Israeli” is not an identity. As such Jewishness is the foundation of identity in Israel, not citizenship. Furthermore Palestinians are considered just Arabs, since Palestinian identity is not recognized.

4) Israel is the only country in the world without a constitution (Britain has the Magna Carta rather than a constitution). This means the supreme court of Israel can just make up laws as it goes along as there are no official principles setting the framework of the law.

5) The internationally recognized legal criteria to determine if a country is an Apartheid regime are fully met by Israel. Calling Israel an Apartheid regime is not a figure of speech or an exaggeration, but an actual legal fact. In fact the level of oppression the Palestinians are subjected to exceeds what took place in Apartheid South Africa.

6) Jews living in various western countries and Zionist Israeli Jews have different orientations and foundations within the Jewish tradition. Jews in the west have a more Universalist approach based on the tradition of the prophets, while Israeli zionists follow primarily the book of Joshua and the five books of Moses. For those of you not familiar with the book of Joshua, it can be described quite simply as an ISIS manual for Jews. It is a violent book that calls for the subjugation of non-Jews through violence and terror. Precisely what Israel has been doing for decades. As such Israel is merely a Jewish ISIS.

7) Palestinians are subject to relentless persecution to the extent that they are not just punished for resisting, but also prevented from surrendering. Surrender entails that one is left in peace after surrendering. However Palestinians are not given that choice. They are humiliated, dispossessed and killed no matter what they do.

8) The WestBank and Gaza are laboratories for the testing of weapons and population control techniques. Palestinians are the guinea pigs. The end users are people around the world whose police forces are trained by Israel and whose prisons are supplied by Israeli technology. This includes many western countries among which is Canada, by virtue of the Canada-Israel “Public Security” Agreement signed in 2008. When the police of a country is “Israelized”, it follows that its people are “Palestinianized”. The state of Israel is effectively becoming a template and ideal for state control and domination around the world, ranging from authoritarian China to the current far right Canadian government under Stephen Harper who is a notorious zionist extremist. The Palestinians are also becoming a template and ideal of subjugation and pacification to be gradually imposed on people around the world. The success of Apartheid Israel’s system of oppression and domination is a threat to the entire global populations who will find themselves increasingly “Palestinianized” as their governments adopt “proven” Israeli strategies and techniques of pacification and subjugation. 9) Israel is among the top 10 exporters of weapons in the world. This is all the more remarkable considering it is a very small country that competes with much larger countries like the UK and China in terms weapons sales. One of the main selling points of Israeli weapons is that they are marketed as being “combat proven”. This means the weapons have been successfully tested on Palestinians.

10) Israel sells weapons to 190 countries in the world (bare in mind there are only 193 countries in the world!). This means that many countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia that appear to be enemies of Israel on the surface are actually customers of Israeli weapons manufacturers.

11) Israel sold weapons to Rwanda and Serbia while these countries were in the midst of horrific genocidal campaigns. So to spell it out clearly, the state of Israel which condemns the horrors of the Holocaust when genocide was committed by the Nazis against the Jews has absolutely no problem selling weapons to groups who are committing genocide against another people. It follows that for Israel it’s only genocide when Jews are the victims. When someone else is the victim it’s just a business opportunity.

12) Many of these Israeli weapons are being sold to police forces in countries like Brazil and are designed for urban warfare and crowd control. This is part of a new policy of pacifying local populations in a manner similar to how Palestinians are pacified in occupied Palestine. These weapons include armed drones and tanks for light urban warfare. 13) Many military and police officials from various countries including China visit Israel to learn Israeli crowd control techniques, propaganda and warfare strategies. A Chinese general recently visited Israel to learn how the IDF framed and executed the massacre in Gaza.

14) Israel has nuclear and ballistic missiles capable of reaching as far as Europe in addition to German made Dolphin-class submarines capable of delivering cruise missiles with nuclear warheads. It also has 10 satellites in orbit spying on various parts of the world and the Middle East in particular.

15) Despite all the advanced military technology of the Israeli army, the Israeli soldiers are actually cowards who use their high tech weapons on an impoverished civilian population without an army of its own. Israeli soldiers mostly target women and children with rubber coated bullets and live ammunition. When occasionally attacked by well trained members of the resistance they literally cry for their mommy like cowards since they are only accustomed to bully unarmed civilians.

16) The two state solution is officially dead and buried after the failure of the Kerry initiative. Israel has fully assimilated the WestBank to the extent that trying to get it back in one piece for the establishment of a Palestinian state is the equivalent of trying to get your sandwich back after someone has swallowed it. The only viable alternative to the current Apartheid regime is a binational democratic state similar to Switzerland and Belgium. Such a state would guarantee equality for all and the right of return of Palestinians. The right of Palestinians to live anywhere on the land of Palestine is non-negotiable. A two state solution would not guarantee this fundamental right.

Israelis camp in Palestine

http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/israels-little-known-concentration-and-labor-camps-1948-1955#content

___________________________________________________________________________________