Articles, Links, Etc.
9/11 does not go away. It is with us on a daily basis. It has been the emotional rationale
for a long list of radical changes in US policy, many of which continue with us even
under the Obama administration:
- a supposed “War
- actual wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
future wars against a supposed “axis of evil”
- condoning torture and indefinite detention
without any kind of due process
- scuttling the Geneva conventions
sacrifice of civil liberties at home
If 9/11 “changed everything,” as George W. Bush said, then it is extremely important that
we “get it right.” What really happened that day? The administration made a rush to judgement,
immediately destroyed much of the evidence, stamped much of the remaining
“Secret,” and implied that critics were “with the terrorists.”
If all you know is what you have read in the papers or seen on the TV News, you
fully informed, and you are quite possibly misinformed. We believe you have also been
Truth Movement,” inspired initially by families of 9/11 victims, has amassed a
amount of research that casts doubt on the official story line, but many people
never heard this or thought through the implications. The administration and the
media want this issue to go away, so any attempt to discuss or speak out on
is dismissed as a “conspiracy theory.” But keep in mind that
even the official
story of 9/11 is a rather bizarre “conspiracy theory.”
[If you have inside information on what happened on 9/11, get a copy of the
Whisteblower’s Handbook as a guide to how to get the information out while protecting
yourself as well
as possible, and visit http://nisterrors.com for assistance.]
In 2015 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth published Beyond Misinformation, an
excellent overview of the evidence for controlled demolition of the World Trade Center
1, 2, and 7. More recently (2016) Europhysics News has published
“15 Years Later: On the Physics of High Rise Building Collapses,”
an overview article by Steven Jones, Robert Korol, Anthony Szamboti, and
Ted Walter, giving this information wide circulation in the science community.
Linked Bibliography of 9/11 Scientific Source Materials
28 Academic Articles Critical of the Official Narrative of 9/11
Why I Am Convinced 9/11 Was an Inside Job by David Chandler
(mp3 Version: Recorded for KNFS low power radio in Visalia, CA)
Our most solid evidence for the use of explosives in the destruction of the World Trade Center
Anyone who has presented the evidence that the World Trade
Center was demolished
with explosives has run into people with psychological barriers
to even hearing the information.
Psychology professional Frances Shure has explored
this subject in a series of essays,
originally serialized in the Architects and Engineers
for 9/11 Truth newsletter entitled
Why Good People Become Silent — or Worse — About 9/11. (There are 20 parts to the
complete series. A partial series is posted here for
now and the others will be added
as they are edited into this format.)
9/11…So What? People want to know how they can respond once they have been made
conscious of the truth
of 9/11. I get that question a lot. Here are my thoughts on that subject.
Transcript of the entire August 2008 NIST Technical Briefing
My official “Request for Correction” submitted to NIST regarding freefall of WTC7 by David Chandler
My Measurement of Freefall for WTC7 by David Chandler
(Article for the Rock Creek Free Press)
Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics
by David Chandler, Journal of 9/11 Studies, Volume 28, February 2010
(Same Article interpreted for less technical readers)
(Refutation of attempted debunking of this paper by Dave Thomas)
Introduction to the Science of 9/11 on the Scientists for 9/11 Truth website
25 Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports
The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis
by Prof. Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti, Journal of 9/11 Studies, Volume 24, January 2009
Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction by Dr. Steven E. Jones,
Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins, Dr. Frank Legge, James
Gourley, Kevin Ryan,
Daniel Farnsworth, and Dr. Crockett Grabbe
Chemical Evidence of Explosives in the WTC Dust:
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
[This seminal paper has been unavailable recently at the Bentham Open Chemical Physics
web site. If you can’t find it at the Bentham site, try this alternative download link to a mirror copy.
A copy is also available among the extra materials in the pdf folder on the 9/11 Analysis DVD.]
Article interpreting the significance of the “Active Thermitic Materials” paper by Jim Hoffman
Brief video description of discovery of nanothermite by Steven Jones
Talk by Steven Jones about the nanothermite paper given at UC Davis, May 1, 2009
Presentation by Mark Basile about his confirming experiments with WTC dust.
The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nanothermites by Kevin Ryan
Case Report by the National Institute of Environmental Health Science (Environ Health Perspect. 2010 April; 118(4): 499–504.)
identifying carbon nanotubes in the lungs of first responders. These are not found associated
with other building fires. The carbon nanotubes were also found in the WTC dust. Production
of carbon nanotubes requires high temperatures in the presence of carbon and a metal catalyst.
These conditions are present in the combustion of nanothermite. Kevin Ryan and
Niels Harritt have shown that combustion of nanothermite actually produces carbon nanotubes.
Demolition Access To The World Trade Center Towers
A 4-Part Investigative Series by Kevin Ryan
Analysis of the
Structure of the Buildings at the WTC
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
by Gregory Szuladzinski, Anthony Szamboti and Richard Johns
(That is a very conservative
title.) This is a disproof of the official explanation for the
collapse of the North
Tower through mechanical analysis. Published in the International Journal
of Protective Structures. Summary: The energy absorbed by the buckling of the columns
would have arrested the collapse within one, or at most two, stories of the onset of collapse.
This paper shows the Bazant papers (claiming once initiated, total collapse was inevitable) to
have fatal flaws based on unrealistic assumptions.
Overview of the WTC Collapse Analysis paper by co-author Tony Szamboti:
The energy situation in the first several stories of the collapse needs to
at by separating the fall through the first story from the collision between
1. Constant acceleration [which we see by direct measurement] shows
that the average
resistive force during the fall through the first story is equal
to that which just barely allows
the initial movement and thus precludes development
of any significant velocity in a natural
fall. Arrest should have occurred at the end
of that one floor drop in a natural collapse.
In fact, this is a serious problem for
the official story since there is no natural way to
generate a significant velocity
in the first story due to heat weakening caused buckling.
2. Using actual
velocity measurements, the kinetic energy available after the measured
one floor drop
is not sufficient to break through the lower floor’s columns. Bazant’s
show continued propagation only by assuming free fall generated
velocity through the
first story, nearly doubling the mass of the upper section,
and underestimating lower
section column strength by about 70%.
3. Even if somehow a significant
velocity could be developed through the fall of
the first story there is no deceleration
during the collision between floors, which is
necessary to generate the dynamic/amplified
load to deform the columns and propagate
through the next story down (which was capable of supporting
several times the static load above it).
Up to this point Bazant has not
been taken to task for the first and second issues, as
earlier critiques had largely concentrated
on the third. Bazant has been given a pass
concerning the velocity developed during
the first story fall to be at least what was
measured, and although I had been complaining
about Bazant’s extreme inflation of
the kinetic energy available and underestimate
of column strength, it hadn’t been
explained well publicly.
Open Letter to Bazant from Tony Szamboti on the errors in his analysis, requesting a response.
ASCE Journals refuse to correct fraudulent paper they published on WTC collapses.
Misrepresentation of the WTC7 Structure
Letter by Attorney William Pepper to the Office of the Inspector General of the US Department
of Commerce, which oversees NIST + A description of misrepresentations by NIST
of the structures that are key to their proposed WTC 7 failure mechanism.
Tony Szamboti and others have been investigating the mechanism NIST asserts caused
the collapse of WTC 7. It has been discovered that in order to make their mechanism
work, they needed to deceptively alter their description of the construction details in
several ways. These differences show up when NIST’s description of their modeling is
compared to recently released drawings of the actual structures. The deception is central
to an effort to challenge the NIST WTC 7 investigation on legal grounds as being evidence
of an intentional coverup. Following the letter, in the same pdf file, is an extensive discussion
of the key omissions. This is an ongoing effort.
Modeling WTC 7
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth has sponsored a major project
to model the
structure of WTC 7 as a check on the modeling done by NIST. They contracted
Dr. Leroy Hulsey, a professor of structural engineering at the University of Alaska,
with two collaborators, an engineering post-doc and a PhD candidate, to construct
computer models of the building and test its response to fire and other
stresses that might
account for its observed behavior on 9/11/2001. The entire
process is completely open
and transparent. The amount of detail presented might
seem overwhelming to a casual
audience, but it should provide a basis for confidence
in the process and the results to
anyone with technical competence who wishes to understand
the issues in detail.
The September 2017 “final report” on the fire modeling and the hypothesis that fire caused the collapse.
Later there will be a second “final report” dealing with issues of progressive
Already this project has revealed that the NIST modeling was false
and deceptive in many
respects. This video has been enhanced from the AE911Truth
version in that the slides
are full screen and highlighted with pointers that mimic
the comments in the live presentation.
WTC 7 Evaluation Project YouTube Channel
A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 – Draft Report, September 2019
Recommended web sites
911 Review — 911Research.wtc7.net — 911Encyclopedia.com — Scienceof911.com.au —
Scientists for 9/11 Truth — Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice — Journal of 9/11 Studies —
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth — 911blogger.com — The Complete 9/11 Timeline — 911Truth.org
YouTube videos/channels of Particular Interest
Achimspok’s Channel /
[The videos below do not appear to
be available on YouTube at this point.
I found a copy of one of them here:
UA175 – the last 12 seconds;
UA175 – the last 12 seconds – part2;
The last 12 seconds of the alleged flight UA175 – refined
(Achimspok’s analysis provides a 3-dimensional model of the final approach of UA175
the South Tower consistent with all of the video footage, a direct measurement of
high speed of the plane, and reason to believe it was not being controlled manually.)
Nathan Flach’s Channel / Great collection of videos and video compilations, many stabilized
Incontrovertible / an excellent (British made) full-length, broad scope exploration of 9/11,
and implications. Most non-technical overview films have mixed good
with weak evidence and/or speculation. This one is solid. It focuses on WTC 7,
evidence of demolition and insider involvement, but its overall scope is very broad. Beautifully produced.
Calling Out Bravo 7 / excellent video, free of erroneous speculation, with a firefighter perspective
Articles of Particular Interest
Brief Overview of Omissions and Distortions in the 9/11 Commission Report
Testimony by David Ray Griffin to the Congressional Black Caucus
Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? (Updated Version)
Analysis showing evidence of thermite in the WTC rubble pile, by Steven E. Jones, Ph.D.
Propping Up the War on Terror:
Lies about the WTC by NIST and Underwriters Laboratories by Kevin Ryan
September 11th And The Bush Administration
Compelling Evidence for Complicity by Walter E. Davis, PhD
(online and DVD)
Visibility 9-11 audio archive
Extended interviews of many of the key figures of the 9/11 Truth Movement by Michael Wolsey
Interview with Emergency Coordinator, Barry Jennings : who was IN
World Trade Center Building 7 when the first two towers came down
Lecture by Stephen E. Jones at Utah Valley State College
A New Standard for Deception A lecture by Kevin Ryan
9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!
A collection of eyewitness evidence of multiple explosions and “secondary devices” planted
in the building and exploding over an extended period of time. (I could do without
the dramatic background music, but the eyewitness testimony speaks for itself.)
Thermite 6 Mb version download — Thermite 58 Mb version download
Graeme MacQueen: Part I / Part II (Analysis of Interviews with Firemen)
Donna Marsh outside the UN (A reminder of what the Truth movement is all about)
Books by 9/11 Researchers
By Kevin Ryan
By Graeme MacQueen
By David Ray Griffin
Tools for Video Analysis
I (DC) started out doing measurements of the 9/11 videos using a tool called Physics Toolkit.
More recently I have been using a much more capable and easy-to-use
tool called Tracker, part of the Open Source Physics project.
Tracker allows you to mark multiple tracks with
an unlimited number of points on a full-screen
video, and it allows you to zoom in
while placing the marks. No more magnifying glass to
the screen! It also has a large
collection of analysis tools. You need a little physics background
to be able to use
it intelligently, but no particular background to use the software.
There may be a bit of a learning curve but if you’re interested, give it a try. Here is a brief
Mark Dotzler writes:
“I’m an artist and I made a piece of artwork called ‘The Split’ that
was inspired in part by one of David Chandler’s early videos.”
On his website Mark writes: “The title ‘The Split’ has a number of meanings here, but chiefly
refers to a split with reality that occurred on that day.” (The blue Ipod screen with the “2”
running a countdown timer program. I love the representation of Building 7
with an old high school physics text.)
Thank you Mark.
Hitler knows what Nano-Thermite in the WTC dust means
Even Hitler understands that physics trumps propaganda, disinformation,
explainations” and psudo-science.