President ​
 Wilson was blackmailed


WORLD WAR I broke out in the summer of 1914.

Within two years Germany had won the war.



The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept

all the British convoys from the Atlantic Ocean and leaving

Britain without ammunition and food for her soldiers.



At that time the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the

flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme.

The Russian army was defecting. And the Italian army had collapsed.



Not a shot had been fired on German soil yet Germany was offering

England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on

what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis which means:

“Let’s call the war off and let everything be as it was before the war started.”



England, in the summer of 1916, was considering Germany’s peace terms.

They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that

Germany was offering them or going on with the war and being totally defeated.



While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, led by the Jew,

Chaim Weitzman, who later became the 1st President of Israel,

went to the British War Cabinet and said: “Don’t capitulate to Germany.

You can win this war if the United States comes in as your ally. We can

arrange this. But in return, you must promise us Palestine once the tide

turns in your favor.”



THE ZIONIST JEW CHAIM WEITZMAN was a Russian born chemist

who moved to England in 1904. By 1915, Weitzman had developed a

chemical process of producing acetone from maize. Acetone was a vital

ingredient in production of artillery shells which Britain and her

allies had a short supply of in the beginning of World War I.



It was during this period that Weitzman, through the mediation of

Walter Rothschild, met Sir Arthur James Balfour, the First Lord of the

Admiralty, and David Lloyd George, Britain’s Minister of Munitions.



Both of these political figures were under the influence of the Rothschild

banking dynasty, of which the Zionist Jew, Walter Rothschild, was the head.

It did not hurt Weitzman’s goals when in 1916 Lloyd George became the

British Prime Minister and Arthur Balfour the Foreign Secretary.



It was through this connection that the Balfour Declaration granted

“a Jewish homeland within Palestine.” The Balfour Declaration was

officially written to Walter Rothschild in 1919. The Balfour Declaration

was merely Great Britain’s promise to pay the Zionists what

they had agreed upon for getting the United States into the war.



During this time period in America, President Woodrow Wilson was

campaigning for his re-election in 1916 on his popular campaign slogan,

“He Kept Us out of War.” But on April 2, 1917, President Wilson

addressed both houses of Congress and pleaded with them to declare

war against Germany. What made Wilson change his mind?




a Jewish visitor in the White House by the name of Samuel Untermeyer.



The Jew Untermeyer was a prominent New York City attorney

of the Law Firm, Guggenheim, Untermeyer, & Marshall.



The Firm had as one of its main clients, Kuhn Loeb Bank, of which

Jacob Schiff, an agent of Walter Rothschild, was the head. Both Untermeyer

and Schiff contributed generously to the National Democratic Committee

that installed President Wilson in the White House in both of his elections.



Untermeyer informed President Wilson that he had been retained

to bring a Breach of Promise action against President Wilson.

Untermeyer’s client was the former wife of a professor at Princeton

University at the same time that Wilson was a professor at Princeton

University. Untermeyer informed Wilson that his client was willing to

accept $40,000 in lieu of commencing the Breach of Promise action.



Untermeyer produced a packet of letters from his pocket written by

President Wilson to his colleague’s wife when they were neighbors at

Princeton University. These letters established the fact that an illicit

relationship had existed between Wilson and the wife of his Princeton

colleague. Wilson immediately acknowledged his authorship of the letters.

Untermeyer then informed Wilson that his former sweetheart was in dire need of $40,000.



President Wilson informed Untermeyer that he did not have the

$40,000 to pay his blackmailer. Untermeyer then volunteered to give

Wilson’s former sweetheart the $40,000 out of his own pocket - but on

one condition: that President Wilson promise to appoint to the first vacancy

on the United States Supreme Court, the Zionist and Talmudic Jew,

Louis Dembitz Brandeis.



Without further talk, President Wilson accepted Mr. Untermeyer’s

generous offer. Then on June 5 1916, nearly one year before Wilson

asked Congress to declare war on Germany, Wilson appointed

the Zionist Jew, Louis Brandeis, to the Supreme Court.



Many were surprised that Wilson, the son of a Christian minister,

would appoint to the highest court in the land the first Jewish

Supreme Court Justice in US history.



President Wilson and Justice Brandeis became unusually intimate friends.

Brandeis knew the circumstances behind his appointment by

President Wilson and Wilson feared him because of it.



Justice Brandeis, through the advice of his Zionist colleague,

Rabbi Stephen Wise, volunteered his opinion to President Wilson that

the sinking of the S.S. Sussex by a German submarine in the English

channel with the loss of lives of US citizens justified a US Declaration

of War against Germany.



Relying to a great extent upon the legal opinion of Justice Brandeis,

(as well as fear of what Brandeis knew of Wilson’s illicit affair),

President Wilson appealed to Congress to declare war against Germany.



This Congress did, on April 6, 1917. The Declaration of War against

Germany by the United States guaranteed the Jews throughout the

world that Palestine would be turned over to them upon the defeat of

Germany even though Britain had already promised it to

Trans-Jordan upon the defeat of the Ottoman Empire.



Indeed, Congress declared war against Germany because of Wilson’s

assertion that Germany had sunk the S.S. Sussex and that US citizens

aboard had perished with the ship. But after General Pershing’s troops

were fighting in Europe, the hoax was exposed. The S.S. Sussex had

not been sunk and no citizens of the US had lost their lives.



But now the United States was officially at war in Europe. In this war,

115,516 American soldiers were killed and 202,002 were maimed for life.



That is what the Anti-Christian Jews of the world conspired

to achieve in their crooked diplomatic underworld.




 The influence of Brandeis over Wilson was a prime factor in America‘s entry into World
War I and its consequent prolongation with terrible blood losses to all participants, especially among boys
and young men of British, French, and German stock. Although Britain had promised self-rule to the Pa-
lestine Arabs in several official statements by Sir Henry MacMahon, the High Commissioner for Egypt, by
Field Marshal Lord Allenby, Commander in Chief of British Military forces in the area, and by others (The
Surrender of An Empire, by Nesta H. Webster, Boswell Printing and Publishing Co., Ltd., 10 Essex St.,
London, W.C. 2, 1931, pp. 351-356), President Wilson was readily won over to a scheme concocted later in
another compartment of the British government. This scheme, Zionism, attracted the favor of the Prime
Minister, Mr. David Lloyd George, who, like Wilson, had with prominent Jews certain close relations, one
of which is suggested in the Encyclopedia Britannica article (Vol. XIX, p. 4) on the first Marquess of Read-
ing (previously Sir Rufus Daniel Isaacs). Thus, according to S. Landman, in his paper Secret History of
the Balfour Declaration (World Jewry, March 1, 1935), after an understanding had been arrived at be-
tween Sir Mark Sykes and Weizmann and Sokolow, it was resolved to send a secret message to Justice
Brandeis that the British Cabinet would help the Jews to gain Palestine in return for active Jewish sympa-
thy and support in U.S.A. for the allied cause so as to bring about a radical pro-ally tendency in the United

An article, The Origin of the Balfour Declaration (The Jewish Chronicle, February 7, 1936), is
more specific. According to this source, certain representatives of the British and French Governments
had been convinced that the best and perhaps the only way to induce the American President to come in-
to the war was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jewry by promising them Palestine. In so doing the
Allies would enlist and mobilize the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful force of Zionist Jewry in America and
elsewhere. Since President Wilson at that time attached the greatest possible importance to the advice of
Mr. Justice Brandeis, the Zionists worked through him and helped to bring America in.

The strange power of Brandeis over President Wilson is indicated several times in the book, Challenging
Years, The Autobiography of Stephen Wise (G.P. Putnam‘s Sons, New York, 1949). Rabbi Wise, for in-
stance, spoke of Wilson‘s leaning heavily, as I well know he chose to do, on Brandeis (p.187), and records
a surprising remark by the supposedly independent minded World War I President. To Rabbi Wise, who
spoke of Zionism and the plans for convening the first session of the American Jewish Congress, Wilson
said (p. 189): Whenever the time comes, and you and Justice Brandeis feel that the time is ripe for me to
speak and act, I shall be ready.

Big Baruch rescued (bought) little Winnie the drunken, spendaholic, gambler
during the stock market Crash of 1929. (here) // 2. Baruch's deep pockets also saved
Harry Truman struggling Senate re-election campaign in 1940 (here). Hiroshima
Harry would become FDR's new Vice President in 1944,
and then President when FDR died in April of 1945.
How America Entered The War (WW1)

During the war, William J. Flynn was the Head Of The United States Secret Service who later published his War Memoirs.
The Service encompasses the whole country, and is brilliantly organised.
In peacetime it primarily provides for the personal security of the President.

Its attention (Secret Service) is enjoyed by whatever else in the national capital is in need of protection, or thinks it needs so. It
keeps under surveillance all doubtful elements somehow suspected of connections with political tendencies
hostile to the government and its spokesmen. During the war its principal task was to keep an eye on those who
more or less loudly had made themselves noticeable in opposition to the war, or who merely were suspected of
not being in agreement with the Wilsonian war policy. Germans also enjoyed its special care, and at that time
many fell into the traps which had been laid everywhere by the Federal Secret Service.

From Flynn's memoirs, however, we learn that the Secret Service had been assigned an important mission even
before our entry into the war. In the year 1915, a full two years before the declaration of war, the most efficient
telephone expert was summoned to Washington and assigned the task of arranging the leading telephone wires
to the German and Austrian embassies in such a way that Secret Service officials could tap every conversation
from any source that was held between the ambassadors and their personnel, as well as every conversation
emanating from the embassy offices. A room was set up with which all the wires were linked in such an
ingenious way that not even a single conversation could be missed. Service men sat in this room day and night,
dictating the overheard conversations to the stenographers seated beside them. Every night the head of the Secret
Service Bureau, that is, the author of the article in Liberty, received a stenographic report of all the conversations
held in the preceding twenty four hours, so that on the very same evening he was able to communicate
everything important to the State Department and to President Wilson.

Let us bear in mind the time this installation was created, at the beginning of the year 1915, that is, at the time
when the United States still lived in peace with Germany and Austria-Hungary, and Wilson never tired of giving
assurances that he harboured no hostile intentions against Germany. It was also the time when the German
Ambassador in Washington, Count Bernstorff, neglected no opportunity to show due appreciation of Wilson's
friendly disposition and feelings for Germany and the German Folk. It was also the time when Wilson gave his
confidant Baruch instructions to begin the gradual mobilisation of industry for war; also the time in which it
became increasingly obvious, as the American historian Harry Elmer Barnes also sets forth in his book On The
Origins Of The Great War, that Wilson was firmly decided to enter the war, and postponed the execution of his
bellicose plans only because public opinion first had to be won over for these plans.

Flynn's memoirs must finally remove the ground from the foolish chatter that Wilson was pushed into the war
against his will by German submarine warfare. The tapping of the telephone wires leading to the German
embassy took place with his knowledge. We also learn this from Flynn's memoirs. The author adds that the
material thus gathered against Germany contributed considerably to the eventual break. This can prove only that
this put means in Wilson's hands to win public opinion for the war long planned by him. And in fact this
material was wholly and ideally suited for it. The Memoirs confirm to the fullest extent what unfortunately must
still be said, that Germany at that time was represented in Washington in a downright incredibly incompetent
and incredibly unworthy way. If we hear that in one passage Flynn writes that the stenographic reports prepared
for him daily contained enough material to keep a divorce lawyer busy for months on end, then we get a general
idea of what went on.

The Secret Service maintained women agents in Washington and New York whose job it was to sound out the
members of the German Embassy, Bernstorff included, whenever anything important happened. One of these
woman agents kept a better class apartment in Washington in which the gentlemen met their ladies, and where
occasionally even Secretary Of State Lansing dropped in to hear what was new. On New Year's Day, 1916,
when the news of the sinking of the liner Persia became known in the national capital, Bernstorff telephoned five
women one after the other in order to make sweet compliments to them and to receive similar compliments in
return, although in view of the mood which news of the sinking of the Persia had left behind in the State
Department and the White House, he really could not have been lacking in more serious pursuits.

One of the ladies complimented Bernstorff on the fact that he was a great lover, and always would be, even were
he a hundred years old. The rest of the gentlemen of the embassy were not differently built. One, whom Flynn
designates as the best diplomatic aide in the embassy, had a lady friend in New York, a married woman, with
whom he had a daily telephone conversation which each time cost the German Reich twenty dollars, and whom
he visited frequently. He told her about everything that happened, and she then took care to bring this
information to the right places. Even quite vulgar remarks about Wilson and his consort were made during the
telephone conversations, and thus we can without difficulty imagine that thereby the mood of the White House
vis-à-vis Germany did not get any friendlier.
From the conversation held at the beginning of March, 1916, we learn how little the embassy knew about the
country and the Folk, and with what childish plans it concerned itself. At that time a bill introduced by Senator
Gore lay before Congress to the effect that a proclamation be issued warning the American Folk not to use
armed commercial vessels. President Wilson most bitterly fought against the proposal. He needed the loss of
American lives in order to incite feelings against Germany. People in the German embassy knew that the
prospects of the bill were not favourable, so they earnestly concerned themselves with plans to buy Congress.

Only at first they did not know where to get the money. On March 3rd, the Senate decided to postpone the Gore
Bill provisionally. The vote in the House was supposed to follow a few days later. So the plan first to buy the
House was further eagerly pursued, but in this case at least Bernstorff was reasonable enough to advise against
the plan decisively.

The reading of the Flynn article must leave a feeling of deep indignation in the veins of every man of healthy
German blood, not only over Wilson's treacherous policy, but rather, and especially, over the incredible stupidity
with which the German Embassy played into the hands of this policy. Wilson duped Bernstorff more and more
from day to day. When Colonel House, his adviser, returned from his European journey in May, 1916,
Bernstorff travelled to New York to meet him there. Wilson, however, who vis-à-vis Bernstorff had acted as
though he had no objections to this meeting, secretly instructed House not to have anything to do with the Count,
and to avoid him at all events. Thus it happened. Bernstorff waited in New York in vain. Then he went to a
nearby beach and let himself be photographed in a bathing suit with two lady friends in a very intimate position.

The photo accompanies Flynn's article. At that time it fell into the hands of the Russian Ambassador
Bakhmateff, who had it enlarged and sent it to London, where it was published in the newspapers under the
caption, The Dignified Ambassador, and it rendered a capital service to Allied propaganda.

This is what the München Latest News writes now. The man thus characterised, however, was a typical
representative of German foreign policy before the War, just as he is also the typical representative of the
German foreign policy of the Republic. This fellow, who would have been sentenced to hanging by a political
tribunal in any other State, is the German representative at the League Of Nations in Geneva.

These men bear the guilt and the responsibility for Germany's collapse, and, therefore, also for the loss of the
Southern Tyrol. And with them the guilt falls on all parties and men who either caused such conditions, or
covered them up, or also tacitly countenanced them or did not fight against them in the sharpest manner.

The men, however, who today brazenly try to deceive public opinion anew, and would like to aver that others
are guilty of the loss of the Southern Tyrol, must first give a detailed accounting of what they have done for its

As for my person, at any rate, I can proudly declare that, since the time that I became a man, I have always been
for the strengthening of my Folk. And when the War came, I fought on the German Western Front for four and a
half years, and since its end I have been fighting against the corrupt creatures whom Germany can thank for this
disaster. Since that time I have entered into no compromise with the betrayers of the German Fatherland, either
in domestic or foreign policy matters, but immovably proclaim their destruction one day as the aim of my life's
work, and the mission of the National Socialist Movement.

I can all the more calmly endure the yelping of the cowardly bourgeois curs as well as that of the Patriotic
Leaguers, as I know the average poltroon of these creatures, for me unspeakably contemptible, all too well. That
they also know me is the reason for their hue and cry.

Mr. Morgenthau Doesn’t Go to Istanbul


A little known historical incident took place in the spring of 1917, shortly after the U.S.

entered World War I on the side of the Allies. President Woodrow Wilson devised a plan

for bringing about an early end to the war by detaching Turkey from the Central Powers.

To this end, he sent a mission to Europe, where it was to meet with representatives of

Britain and France in Switzerland and then make its way to Turkey. The mission was

headed by Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who had been American ambassador to Turkey from

1912 to 1915 and had many contacts there. This story is related in

Chapter 17 of Chaim Weizmann’s 1949 autobiography, Trial and Error.


The American mission never arrived in Switzerland, let alone Turkey. In early June of

1917, Weizmann, who was then in London, received a cable from Louis Brandeis

in the U.S., informing him of the mission and suggesting that he contact it. Weizmann

immediately contacted members of the British government and learned the nature of the

mission. Weizmann was concerned that the Morgenthau mission might result in the war

ending with the Ottoman Empire still intact, eliminating the possibility of a Jewish state in Palestine.


A subsequent conference with Lord Balfour lead to Weizmann’s being sent as the official

British representative to meet with the American mission and a French representative.

This meeting took place at Gibraltar after the American mission disembarked at Cadiz on July 4, 1917.


Weizmann reports that he had no difficulty persuading Morgenthau to drop the whole

matter, so instead of proceeding to Switzerland and Istanbul, Morgenthau went to Biarritz,

in the South of France, where, he said, he would communicate with General Pershing and

await further instructions from President Wilson.


The Morgenthau mission was apparently secret, for Weizmann says he does not know

how the story got out. He also says that in 1922, when Congress was looking into the

merits of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, a senator stated that the leaders of the Zionist

movement were unworthy men and that Weizmann, in particular,

had prolonged the war for two years by scuttling the Morgenthau mission.


Morgenthau seems to have shown more loyalty to Zionism

than to his president or his country.









Jewish Control of the White House


Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations


Helen Thomas Tells Playboy ‘Jews Control the White House’


Joe Biden Says “I Am a Zionist”


Obama and the Jews


Rabbis Changed Prayers to Make Barack Obama’s Inaugural Service ‘Jew-ier’


Who are the Top Five Donors to the Obama, Romney Campaigns?


Who Controls the White House


Who Runs the Obama White House


From the book by FDR's Son-in-law (Curtis B. Dall) titled:
FDR, My  Exploited Father-in-law





Communist infiltration of the U.S. government had occurred on a grand scale during the

reign of Franklin Roosevelt. Congressman Martin Dies, Democrat of Texas and chairman

of the House Committee on Un-American Activities from its inception in 1938 until 1945,

had warned Roosevelt in 1940 that there were thousands of Communists and

pro-Communists on the government payroll, but FDR refused to take action, saying:


"I do not believe in Communism any more than you do, but there is nothing wrong with the

Communists in this country. Several of the best friends I have are Communists. . . .

I do not regard the Communists as any present or future threat to our country; in fact,

I look upon Russia as our strongest ally in the years to come. As I told you when

you began your investigation, you should confine yourself to Nazis and

Fascists. While I do not believe in Communism, Russia is far better off

and the world is safer under Communism than under the Czars."


     ...Traitorous Fool Franklin Delano Roosevelt
 (Responding to Congressman Martin Dies, Democrat of Texas

and chairman of the House Committee on Un-American Activities)




The first spectacular triumph of the non-Christian Jewish Eastern European Democrats was Roosevelt‘s recogni-
tion, less than nine months after his inauguration, of the Soviet government of Russia. A lengthy factual
article, Moscow‘s RED LETTER DAY in American History, by William La Varre in the American Legion
Magazine (August, 1951), gives many details on our strange diplomatic move which was
arranged by Jewish Soviet Foreign Commissar Maxim Litvinoff, of deceitful smiles and
by Henry Morgenthau (Jewish) and Dean Acheson, both proteges of Felix Frankfur-
ter (Jewish). Incidentally, Litvinoff‘s birth-name was Wallach and he also used the Finkelstein. Three of the four
persons thus named by Mr, La Varre as influential in this deal were of the same non-Christian stock or as-
sociation and the fourth was Dean Acheson, who served as law clerk of Justice Louis D. Brandeis (U.S.
News and World Report, November 9, 1951) before becoming famous as a Frankfurter boy (see below,
this chapter). The principal Frankfurter boy is the subject of a most important article in the American
Mercury magazine (11, East 36 th Street, New York 16, N.Y.., 10 copies for $1.00) for April, 1952. Thee au-
thor, Felix Wittner, says in part:

Acheson‘s record of disservice to the cause of freedom begins at least nineteen years ago when he became
one of Stalin‘s paid American lawyers. Acheson was on Stalin‘s payroll even before the Soviet Union was
recognized by the United States.

Mr. La Varre‘s article should be read in full, among other things for its analyses of F.D. Roosevelt,s betray-
al of Latin America to penetration by Communism. Bearing on the basic question of the recognition of the
Soviet, here are significant quotations:

The very special agent from Moscow, Commissar of all the Red Square‘s nefarious international machina-
tions, chief of the Kremlin‘s schemes for communizing the American hemisphere, sat victoriously at the
White House desk at midnight, smiling at the President of the United States.

For fifteen deceitful years the corrupt Kremlin had tried to obtain a communist base, protected by diplo-
matic immunities, within the United States; four Presidents—Wilson, Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover—
had refused to countenance Moscow‘s pagan ideology or its carriers. But here, at last, was a President the
communists could deal with.

Many patriotic, well-informed Americans, in the old Department of State, in the American Legion, and in
the American Federation of Labor, had begged Franklin Roosevelt not to use his new leadership of the

                                                             United States for the aggrandizement of an evil, dangerous and pagan guest but to send him back to
Moscow, red with the blood of the Commissar‘s own countrymen, without a handshake.

But Franklin Roosevelt, piqued with the power of his new office, stimulated by the clique of Marxian and
Fabian socialists posing as intellectuals and liberals and by radicals in labor unions, universities, and his
own sycophant bureaucracy had signed his name to the Kremlin‘s franchise. Without the approval of
Congress, he made an actual treaty with the Soviets, giving them the right to establish a communist em-
bassy and consulates in the United States, with full diplomatic hospitalities and immunities to Stalin‘s
agents, the bloody bolsheviki.

November 16, 1933 at midnight! That is a date in American history our children will long have tragic
cause to remember. That was the day Jewish Soviet Foreign Commissar Maxim Litvinov, plunderer of Estonia and
the Kremlin;s first agent for socializing England, sat down with Franklin Roosevelt, after Dean Acheson
and Henry Morgenthau had done the spadework of propaganda, and made the deal that has led the Amer-
ican people, and our once vast resources, into a social and economic calamity to the very brink, now, of na-
tional and international disaster.

One of the greatest concentrations of factual information, wise analyses, police records and military intel-
ligence ever to pile up spontaneously on one subject in Washington, all documenting the liabilities of deal-
ing with the Kremlin, had no effect on Franklin Roosevelt. He had appointed Henry Morgenthau (Jewish) and Dean
Acheson, both proteges of Felix Frankfurter (Jewish), to study trade opportunities between the U.S.S.R. and the
United States, and he praised their report of the benefits to come to all U.S. citizens from Soviet friend-

The record shows that Cordell Hull, upon the receipt of this authentic document disclosing the Soviet‘s
continuing duplicity, sent a note of protest to Moscow, but President Roosevelt could not be persuaded to
withdraw his diplomatic recognition. He began, instead, the reorganization of the State Department in
Washington and the dispatching to far, isolated posts of its anti-communist career officers.

The Roosevelt-Stalin Deal, of November, 1933, has been so costly to us, as a nation and as a hemisphere,
that the full appraisal of our losses and liabilities will not be known for several generations. The Kremlin‘s
gains within the United States and communism‘s cost to us is only now, in 1951 after eighteen years of
suffering a Soviet embassy in our Capital, and its agents to roam the States coming to public conscious-

It has truly been a costly era of mysterious friendship for an appeasement of the devil, of un-American
compromises with deceit and pagan ideologies. Some of its protagonists are now dead, their graves mo-
numents to our present predicament, but others, again mysteriously, have been allowed to step into their
strategic places.

Under the sort of government described by Mr. La Varre in his Legion article, large numbers of recently
arrived and recently naturalized citizens and their ideological associates were infiltrated by appoint-
ment, or by civil service, into the State Department, the presidential coterie, and other sensitive spots in
the government. Among those who feathered their Washington nests in this period were not only leftist
East Europeans, but actual Communist converts or sell-outs to the Communist party among native
Americans. The solicitude of President F. D. Roosevelt for America‘s Communists was constant, as was
shown in his steady opposition to proposed curbs upon them.
Ex-Congressman Martin Dies, former
Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Un-American Activities, bears witness in lec-
tures (one of them heard by the author, 1950) that he was several times summoned to the White House by
President Roosevelt and told with suggestions of great favors to come that he must stop annoying
Communists (see Chapter IV). To the unyielding Dies, Roosevelt,s climactic argument was We need those
votes! A speech (May 17, 1951) on a similar theme by Mr. Dies has been published by the American Herit-
age Protective Committee (601 Bedell Building, San Antonio, Texas, 25 cents). Another speech by Mr,
Dies, White House Protects Communists in Government, was inserted (September 22, 1950) in the Con-
gressional Record by Congressman Harold H. Velde of Illinois.

The government was infiltrated with risks from the above described grooups of Eastern Europeans and
with contaminated native Americans, but those were not all. After the beginning of World War II, so-
called refugees immediately upon arrival in this country were by executive order introduced into sensi-
tive government positions without the formality of having them wait for citizenship, and without any in-
vestigation of their reasons for leaving Europe. The way for this infiltration was paved by an executive or-
der providing specifically that employment could not be denied on the grounds of race, creed, or national

Since no form of investigation could be made by the United Stated in the distant and hostile areas from
which these refugees came, and since their number contained persons sympathetic to the Soviet Union,
this executive order was a potential and in many instanced a realized death blow to security.

Almost as if for a double check against security, the control of security measures in the new atom projects
was not entrusted to the expert F.B.I., but to the atomic officials themselves. In view of their relative inex-
perience in such matters and in view of the amazing executive order so favorable to alien employees, the
atomic officials were probably less to blame for the theft of atomic secrets than the left-of-center admin-
istrations which appointed them. Among those admitted to a proper spot for learning atomic secrets was
the celebrated alien, the British subject but not British-born Klaus Fuchs. Other atomic spies, all aliens
or of alien associations, were named in Chapter II.

Next to the atomic energy employees, the United Public Workers of America offered perhaps the best op-
portunity for the theft of secrets vital to the U.S. defense. This union included a generous number of
people of Jewish Eastern European stock or connections, among them Leonard Goldsmith and Robert Weinstein,
organizers of Panama Canal workers, and both of them said to have definite Communist affiliations (Li-
berty, May, 1948). This union whose chief bloc of members was in Washington was later expelled
(March 1, 1950) by the C.I.O. on charges of being Communist-dominated (Directory of Labor Unions in
the United States, Bulletin No. 980, U.S. Dept. of Labor, 1950. 25c). However, if the U.S. Government has
shown any signs of being as particular about its employee (see Tydings Committee Report, U.S. Senate,
1950) as the C.I.O. is about its members, the fact has escaped the attention of the author.

As the years passed, the infiltration of Jewish Eastern Europeans into the government had swelled to a torrent.
Many of these persons, of course, were not Communists and were not sympathetic with Communist aims.
As repeated elsewhere in this book, the contrary is neither stated nor implied. the author‘s purpose is
simply to show that persons of Eastern European stock, or of an ideology not influential in the days of the
founding and formative period of our country, have in recent years risen to many of the most strategic
spots in the Roosevelt-Truman Democratic Party and thereby to positions of great and often decisive pow-
er in shaping the policy of the United States. The subject was broached by W. M. Kiplinger in a book,
Washington Is Like That (Harper and Brothers, 1942). According to a Reader‘s Digest condensation (Sep-
tember, 1942), entitled The Facts About Jews in Washington, Jews were by 1942 conspicuously numer-
ous in government agencies and departments concerned with money, labor, and justice. The situation
stemmed from the fact that non-Jewish officials within government, acting under the direction of the
President, were trying to get various agencies to employ more Jews. . .
The influence of persons of Jewish Eastern European origin, or of related origin or ideology, reached its peak
(thus far) with Mr. Milton Katz at the helm of U.S. policy in Europe (to mid -1951) with Mrs. Anna Rosen-
berg in charge of the manpower of the U.S. Army, Navy, and Air Corps; with Mr. Manly Fleischman as
Administrator of the Defense Production Administration; and with Mr. Nathan P. Feinsinger (New York
Times, August 30, 1951) as Chairman of the Wage Stabilization Board. Likewise, in October, 1948, when
President Truman appointed a committee on religious and moral welfare and character guidance in the
armed forces, he named as Chairman Frank L. Weil, of New York, a lawyer, and President of the Nation-
al Jewish Welfare Board (New York Times, October 28, 1948).

It is interesting to note the prominence of persons of Jewish Khazar or similar background or association in the
Socialist minority government of the United Kingdom, and in French polities, beginning with Leon Blum.
Among them are the Rt. Hon. Emanuel Shinwell and Minister Jules Moch archfoe of Marshal Petain –
who have recently held defense portfolios in the British and French cabinets respectively. Just as in Amer-
ica the non-Christian characteristically joins the Democratic Party, so in Britain he joins the leftist Labor
Party. Thus the British house of Commons, sitting in the summer of 1951, had 21 Jews among its Labor
members and none among its Conservative members. Whatever his racial antecedents, Mr. Clement At-
tlee, long leader of the British Labor Party and Socialist Prime Minister (1945-1951) has for many years
received international notoriety as a Communist sympathizer. For instance, he visited and praised the
English company in the international Communist force in the Spanish Civil War (see photograph and
facsimile in The International Brigades, Spanish Office of Information, Madrid, 1948, p. 134).
A few persons of Eastern European origin or background or associated with persons of such back-
ground in positions high or strategic, or both, have already been named by the author, and others, when
their prominence demands it, will be named in the pages which follow. The author hereby assures the
reader again that no reflection of any kind is intended and that he has no reason for believing that any
of these people are other than true to their convictions.

First on any list of Jewish Americans of Eastern European origin should be the Vienna-born Felix Frankfurter,
who in the middle twentieth century appears to have replaced the stock of the Puritans as the shining
light and symbol of Harvard University. After leaving his professorship in the Harvard Law School, Dr.
Frankfurter became a Supreme Court Justice and President Franklin Roosvelt‘s top-flight adviser on legal
and other matters. In the formation of our national policies his influence is almost universally rated as su-
preme. I suppose that Felix Frankfurter . . . has more influence in Washington than any other American
wrote Rev. John P. Sheerin, Editor of The Catholic World (March, 1951, p. 405), and the Chicago Tribune,
owned by the Presbyterian Colonel Robert R. McCormick, has voiced a similar opinion. In fact, Mr. Justice
Frankfurter is frequently referred to by those who know their way around Washington as the President
of the United States. In a recent gag the question Do you want to see a new picture of the President of
the United States? followed up by showing a likeness of Frankfurter.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter (Jewish) is influential not only in counsel but in furthering the appointment of favored in-
dividuals to strategic positions. The so-called Frankfurter;s boys‘ include Mr. Acheson, with whom the
justice takes daily walks, weather permitting (New York Times, January 19, 1949); Alger Hiss; Lee Press-
man; David Niles, long Counsellor of the Department of State; David Lilienthal, long Chairman of the
Atomic Energy Commission John J. McCloy, Joe Rauh, Nathan Margold; Donald Hiss, brother to Alger,
and now a member of the Acheson law firm; Milton Katz; and former Secretary of War Robert Patterson,
a hundred per cent Frankfurter employee (all names and quotes in this paragraph are from Drew Pear-
son‘s syndicated column, February 1, 1950).

A powerful government figure, the Jewish Russian-born Isador Lubin, was frequently summoned by President F.
D. Roosevelt for the interpreting of statistics (send for Lube); and was subsequently a United States rep-
resentative to the UN (article in New York Times, August 8, 1951). Leo Pasvolsky, Jewish Russian-born, was long
a power in the Department of State, being, among other things, in charge of international organization
and security affairs, 1945-1946 (Who‘s Who in America, Vol. 26, 1950-51, p. 2117). Among others very
close to Roosevelt II were Samuel Rosenman (Jewish), who as special counsel was said to write many of the Pres-
ident‘s speeches; Henry Morgenthau (Jewish), Secretary of the Treasury and sponsor of the vicious Morgenthau,
Plan; and Herbert Lehman (Jewish), Director General (1943 to 1946) of the United Nations Relief and Rehabilita-
tion Administration (UNRRA), most of whose funds principally derived from the U.S. were diverted to
countries which were soon to become Soviet satellites as a result of the Yalta and Potsdam surrenders.

Strategic positions currently or recently held by persons of Eastern European (Jews) origin, or ideological associ-
ation with such people, include a number of Assistant Secretaryships to members of the Cabinet, among
them incumbents in such sensitive spots as Defense, Justice (Customs and Solicitor General‘s Office) and
Labor; the governorships of vital outposts such as Alaska (three miles from Russia) and the Virgin Islands
(near the Panama Canal); appointments in the Executive Office of the President of the United States; posi-
tions in organizations devoted to international trade and assistance; membership on the Atomic Energy
Commission; and membership, which may best be described as wholesale, in the U.S. delegation to the
United Nations.

The number of persons of Eastern European (Jews) origin or connection in appointive positions of strategic signi-
ficance in our national government is strikingly high in proportion to the total number of such persons in
America. On the contrary, in elective positions, the proportion of such persons is strikingly below their
numerical proportion to the total population. The question arises; Does the high ratio of appointed per-
sons of Eastern European (Jews) origin or contacts in United States strategic positions reflect the will of the U.S.
people? If not, what controlling will does it reflect?







A history of how Israel out-foxed US Presidents, from Eisenhower to Obama

A history of how Israel out-foxed US Presidents, from Eisenhower to Obama




Reprinted from Consortium News

By Morgan Strong 

President Trump hosts Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu this week with the new U.S. administration

expected to fall in line as so many “out-foxed” predecessors have, as Morgan Strong described in 2010:

At the end of a news conference on April 13, 2010, President Barack Obama made the seemingly obvious point that

the continuing Middle East conflict pitting Israel against its Arab neighbors will end up “costing us significantly in

terms of both blood and treasure.” Obama’s remark followed a similar statement in congressional testimony by Gen. David Petraeus

on March 16, linking the unresolved Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the challenges that U.S. troops face in the region.


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking to a joint session of the U.S. Congress on March 3, 2015,
in opposition to President Barack Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran.

“The conflict foments anti-American sentiment, due to a perception of U.S. favoritism for Israel,” Petraeus said in

prepared testimony. “Arab anger over the Palestinian question limits the strength and depth of U.S. partnerships

with governments and peoples in the [region] and weakens the legitimacy of moderate regimes in the

Arab world. Meanwhile, al-Qaeda and other militant groups exploit that anger to mobilize support.”

[Petraeus later tried to back away from this implicit criticism of Israel, fearing that it would hurt his political standing
with his neoconservative allies. He began insisting that the analysis was only part of his written testimony, not his oral remarks.]

Yet, the truth behind the assessments from Obama and Petraeus is self-evident to anyone who has spent time

observing the Middle East for the past six decades. Even the staunchly pro-Israeli Bush administration made similar observations.


In 2007 in Jerusalem, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice termed the Israeli/Palestinian peace process of

“strategic interest” to the United States and expressed empathy for the beleaguered Palestinian people.

“The prolonged experience of deprivation and humiliation can radicalize even normal people,” Rice said,

referring to acts of Palestinian violence.


But the recent statement by Obama and Petraeus aroused alarm among some Israeli supporters who reject any

suggestion that Israel’s harsh treatment of Palestinians might be a factor in the anti-Americanism surging through

the Islamic world. After Petraeus’s comment, the pro-Israeli Anti-Defamation League said

linking the Palestinian plight and Muslim anger was “dangerous and counterproductive.”


“Gen. Petraeus has simply erred in linking the challenges faced by the U.S. and coalition forces in the region to a

solution of the Israeli-Arab conflict, and blaming extremist activities on the absence of peace

and the perceived U.S. favoritism for Israel,” ADL national director Abraham Foxman said.


However, the U.S. government’s widespread (though often unstated) recognition of the truth behind the assessment in

Petraeus’s testimony has colored how the Obama administration has reacted to the intransigence of Israel’s Likud

government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.


The U.S. government realizes how much it has done on Israel’s behalf, even to the extent of making Americans the

targets of Islamic terrorism such as the 9/11 attacks (as the 9/11 Commission discovered but played

down) and sacrificing the lives of thousands of U.S. troops fighting in Middle East conflicts.


That was the backdrop in March 2009 for President Obama’s outrage over the decision of the Netanyahu government

to continue building Jewish housing in Arab East Jerusalem despite the fact that the move complicated U.S. peace

initiatives and was announced as Vice President Joe Biden arrived to reaffirm American support for Israel.


However, another little-acknowledged truth about the U.S.-Israeli relationship is that Israeli leaders have frequently

manipulated and misled American presidents out of a confidence that U.S. politicians deeply fear the political fallout from

any public battle with Israel.


Given that history, few analysts who have followed the arc of U.S.-Israeli relations since Israel’s founding in 1948

believe that the Israeli government is likely to retreat very much in its confrontation with President Obama.

[Now, nearly seven years into Obama’s presidency after Netanyahu’s persistent obstruction of Palestinian

peace talks and his steady expansion of Jewish settlements that assessment has proved out.]


Manipulating Eisenhower

In the 1950s, President Dwight Eisenhower was a strong supporter of the fledgling Jewish state and had supplied

Israel with advanced U.S. weaponry. Yet, despite Eisenhower’s generosity and good intentions, Israel sided with the

British and French in 1956 in a conspiracy against him. Israeli leaders joined a secret arrangement that involved Israel

invading Egypt’s Sinai, which then allowed France and Great Britain to introduce their own forces and reclaim control of the Suez Canal.


In reaction to the invasion, the Soviet Union threatened to intervene on the side of Egypt by sending ground troops.

With Cold War tensions already stretched thin by the crises in Hungary and elsewhere, Eisenhower faced the possibility

of a showdown between nuclear-armed adversaries. Eisenhower demanded that the Israeli-spearheaded invasion

of the Sinai be stopped, and he brought financial and political pressures to bear on Great Britain and France.


A ceasefire soon was declared, and the British and French departed, but the Israelis dragged their heels. Eisenhower

finally presented Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion with an ultimatum, a threat to cut off all U.S. aid.

Finally, in March 1957, the Israelis withdrew. [For details, see Eisenhower and Israel by Isaac Alteras.]


Even as it backed down in the Sinai, Israel was involved in another monumental deception, a plan for building its

own nuclear arsenal. In 1956, Israel had concluded an agreement with France to build a nuclear reactor in the

Negev desert. Israel also signed a secret agreement with France to build an adjacent plutonium reprocessing plant.

Israel began constructing its nuclear plant in 1958.


However, French President Charles de Gaulle was worried about nuclear weapons destabilizing the Middle East

and insisted that Israel not develop a nuclear bomb from the plutonium processing plant. Prime

Minister Ben-Gurion assured de Gaulle that the processing plant was for peaceful purposes only.


After John F. Kennedy became President, he also wrote to Ben-Gurion explicitly calling on Israel not to join the

nuclear-weapons club, drawing another pledge from Ben-Gurion that Israel had no such intention. Nevertheless,

Kennedy continued to press, forcing the Israelis to let U.S. scientists inspect the nuclear reactor at Dimona.

But the Israelis first built a fake control room while bricking up and otherwise disguising parts of the building that housed

the plutonium processing plant.


In return for allowing inspectors into Dimona, Ben-Gurion also demanded that the United States sell Hawk surface-to-air

missiles to the Israeli military. Kennedy agreed to the sale as a show of good faith. Subsequently, however, the


CIA got wind of the Dimona deception and leaked to the press that Israel was secretly building a nuclear bomb.

After Kennedy’s assassination, President Lyndon Johnson also grew concerned over Israel’s acquiring nuclear weapons.

He asked then-Prime Minister Levi Eshkol to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Eshkol assured Johnson that

Israel was studying the matter and would sign the treaty in due course. However, Israel has never signed the treaty and never

has admitted that it developed nuclear weapons. [For details, see Israel and The Bomb by Avner Cohen.]


Trapping Johnson

As Israel grew more sophisticated and more confident in its dealings with U.S. presidents, it also sought to secure

U.S. military assistance by exaggerating its vulnerability to Arab attacks. One such case occurred after the Egyptians

closed off the Gulf of Aqaba to Israel in May 1967, denying the country its only access to the Red Sea. Israel threatened

military action against Egypt if it did not re-open the Gulf.

President Lyndon Johnson

Israel then asked President Johnson for military assistance in the event war broke out against the Egyptians. Johnson

directed Richard Helms, the newly appointed head of the CIA to evaluate Israel’s military capability in the event of war

against the surrounding Arab states.


On May 26, 1967, Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban met with Johnson, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara,

and Helms. Eban presented a Mossad estimate of the capability of the Arab armies, claiming that Israel was seriously

outgunned by the Arab armies which had been supplied with advanced Soviet weaponry. Israel believed that, owing

to its special relationship with the United States, the Mossad intelligence assessment would be taken at face value.


However, Helms was asked to present the CIA estimate of the Arabs’ military capabilities versus the Israeli army.

The CIA’s analysts concluded that Israel could “defend successfully against simultaneous Arab attacks on all fronts,

or hold on any three fronts while mounting a successful major offensive on the fourth.”

[See “C.I.A. Analysis of the 1967 Arab Israeli War,” Center for the Study of Intelligence.]


“We do not believe that the Israeli appreciation was a serious estimate of the sort they would submit to their own high

officials,” the CIA report said. “It is probably a gambit intended to influence the U.S. to provide military supplies, make

more public commitments to Israel, to approve Israeli military initiatives, and put more

pressure on Egyptian President Nasser.” [See A Look Over My Shoulder by Richard Helms.]


The CIA report stated further that the Soviet Union would probably not interfere militarily on behalf of the Arab states

and that Israel would defeat the combined Arab armies in a matter of days. As a consequence, Johnson

refused to airlift special military supplies to Israel, or to promise public support for Israel if Israel went to war.


The Six-Day Success

Despite Johnson’s resistance, Israel launched an attack on its Arab neighbors on June 5, 1967, claiming that the conflict

was provoked when Egyptian forces opened fire. (The CIA later concluded that it was Israel that had first fired upon Egyptian forces.)

USS Liberty (AGTR-5) receives assistance from units of the Sixth Fleet, after she was attacked
and seriously damaged by Israeli forces off the Sinai Peninsula on June 8, 1967. (US Navy photo)


On June 8, at the height of the conflict, which would become known as the Six-Day War, Israeli fighter/bombers attacked

the USS Liberty, a lightly armed communications vessel sent on a mission to relay information on the course of the

war to U.S. naval intelligence.


The attack killed 34 Americans sailors, and wounded 171 others. Israeli leaders have always claimed that they had

mistaken the U.S. vessel for an enemy ship, but a number of U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Dean Rusk,

believed the attack was deliberate, possibly to prevent the United States from learning about Israel’s war plans. [See As I Saw It by Dean Rusk.]


However, in deference to Israel, the U.S. government did not aggressively pursue the matter of the Liberty attack

and even issued misleading accounts in medal citations to crew members, leaving out the identity of the attackers.


Meanwhile, on land and in the air, Israel’s powerful military advanced, shredding the Arab defenses. Soon, the conflict

escalated into another potential showdown between nuclear-armed superpowers, the Soviet Union and the United States.

On June 10, President Johnson received a “Hot Line” message from Soviet Premier Alexi Kosygin. The Kremlin warned

of grave consequences if Israel continued its military campaign against Syria by entering and/or occupying that country.


Johnson dispatched the Sixth Fleet to the Mediterranean, in a move to convince the Soviets of American resolve.

But a ceasefire was declared later the same day, with Israel ending up in control of Syria’s

Golan Heights, Egypt’s Sinai, and Palestinian lands including Gaza and East Jerusalem.


But a wider war was averted. Johnson’s suspicions about Israel’s expansionist intent had kept the United States from

making an even bigger commitment that might have led to the Soviets countering with an escalation of their own.


Nixon and Yom Kippur

Israeli occupation of those additional Arab lands set the stage for a resumption of hostilities six years later, on

Oct. 6, 1973, with the Yom Kippur War, which began with a surprise attack by Egypt against Israeli forces in the Sinai.


The offensive caught Israel off guard and Arab forces were close to overrunning Israel’s outer defenses and entering

the country. According to later accounts based primarily on Israeli leaks, Prime Minister Golda Meir and her

“kitchen cabinet” ordered the arming of 13 nuclear weapons, which were aimed at Egyptian and Syrian targets.


Israeli Ambassador to the United States Simha Dintz warned President Richard Nixon that very serious repercussions

would occur if the United States did not immediately begin an airlift of military equipment and personnel to Israel.

Fearing that the Soviet Union might intervene and that nuclear war was possible, the U.S. military raised its

alert level to DEFCON-3. U.S. Airborne units in Italy were put on full alert, and military aid was rushed to Israel.


Faced with a well-supplied Israeli counteroffensive and possible nuclear annihilation, the Arab forces fell back.

The war ended on Oct. 26, 1973, but the United States had again been pushed to the brink of a possible superpower confrontation

due to the unresolved Israeli-Arab conflict.


Nuclear ‘Ambiguity’

On Sept. 22, 1979, after some clouds unexpectedly broke over the South Indian Ocean, a U.S. intelligence satellite

detected two bright flashes of light that were quickly interpreted as evidence of a nuclear test. The explosion was

apparently one of several nuclear tests that Israel had undertaken in collaboration with the white-supremacist government

of South Africa. But President Jimmy Carter at the start of his reelection bid didn’t want a showdown with Israel,

especially on a point as sensitive as its secret nuclear work with the pariah government in Pretoria


So, after news of the nuclear test leaked a month later, the Carter administration followed Israel’s longstanding policy

of “ambiguity” about the existence of its nuclear arsenal, a charade dating back to Richard Nixon’s

presidency with the United States pretending not to know for sure that Israel possessed nuclear bombs.


The Carter administration quickly claimed that there was “no confirmation” of a nuclear test, and a panel was set up

to conclude that the flashes were “probably not from a nuclear explosion.” However, as investigative reporter

Seymour Hersh and various nuclear experts later concluded, the flashes were most certainly an explosion of a low-yield nuclear weapon.

[For details, see Hersh’s Samson Option.]


Getting Carter

Despite Carter’s helpful cover-up of the Israeli-South African nuclear test, he was still viewed with disdain by Israel’s

hard-line Likud leadership. Indeed, he arguably was the target of Israel’s most audacious intervention in U.S. politics.

Prime Minister Menachem Begin was furious at Carter over the 1978 Camp David accords in which the U.S. President

pushed the Israelis into returning the Sinai to the Egyptians in exchange for a peace agreement. The next year, Carter

failed to protect the Shah of Iran, an important Israeli regional ally who was forced from power by Islamic militants.

Then, when Carter acceded to demands from the Shah’s supporters to admit him to New York for

cancer treatment, Iranian radicals seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and held 52 Americans hostage.


In 1980, as Carter focused on his reelection campaign, Begin saw both dangers and opportunities. High-ranking

Israeli diplomat/spy David Kimche described Begin’s thinking in the 1991 book, The Last Option, recounting how

Begin feared that Carter might force Israel to withdraw from the West Bank and accept a Palestinian state if he won a second term.


“Begin was being set up for diplomatic slaughter by the master butchers in Washington,” Kimche wrote. “They had,

moreover, the apparent blessing of the two presidents, Carter and [Egyptian President Anwar] Sadat, for this bizarre

and clumsy attempt at collusion designed to force Israel to abandon her refusal to withdraw from

territories occupied in 1967, including Jerusalem, and to agree to the establishment of a Palestinian state.”


Begin’s alarm was driven by the prospect of Carter being freed from

the pressure of having to face another election, according to Kimche.


“Unbeknownst to the Israeli negotiators, the Egyptians held an ace up their sleeves, and they were waiting to play it,”

Kimche wrote. “The card was President Carter’s tacit agreement that after the American presidential elections in

November 1980, when Carter expected to be re-elected for a second term, he would be free to compel Israel to

accept a settlement of the Palestinian problem on his and Egyptian terms, without having to fear the backlash of

the American Jewish lobby.”


So, by spring 1980, Begin had privately sided with Carter’s Republican rival, Ronald Reagan, a reality that Carter

soon realized. Questioned by congressional investigators in 1992 regarding allegations about Israel conspiring with

Republicans in 1980 to help unseat him, Carter said he knew by April 1980 that “Israel cast their lot with Reagan,”

according to notes found among the unpublished documents in the files of a House task force that looked into the so-called October Surprise case.

Carter traced the Israeli opposition to his reelection to a “lingering concern [among] Jewish leaders that I was too friendly with Arabs.”

[For details, see Robert Parry’s Secrecy & Privilege.]


Doing What Was Necessary

Begin was an Israeli leader committed to do whatever he felt necessary to advance Israeli security interests and the

dream of a Greater Israel with Jews controlling the ancient Biblical lands. Before Israel’s independence in 1948, he had

led a Zionist terrorist group, and he founded the right-wing Likud Party in 1973 with the goal of “changing the facts on the ground”

by placing Jewish settlements in Palestinian areas.


Begin’s anger over the Sinai deal and his fear of Carter’s reelection set the stage for secret collaboration

between Begin and the Republicans, according to another former Israeli intelligence official, Ari Ben-Menashe.

“Begin loathed Carter for the peace agreement forced upon him at Camp David,” Ben-Menashe wrote in his 1992

memoir, Profits of War. “As Begin saw it, the agreement took away Sinai from Israel, did

not create a comprehensive peace, and left the Palestinian issue hanging on Israel’s back.”


Ben-Menashe, an Iranian-born Jew who had immigrated to Israel as a teen-ager, became part of a secret Israeli

program to reestablish its Iranian intelligence network that had been decimated by the Islamic revolution. Ben-Menashe

wrote that Begin authorized shipments to Iran of small arms and some military spare parts, via South Africa, as

early as September 1979 and continued them despite Iran’s seizure of the U.S. hostages in November 1979.


Extensive evidence also exists that Begin’s preference for Reagan led the Israelis to join in a covert operation with

Republicans to contact Iranian leaders behind Carter’s back, interfering with the President’s efforts to free the 52 American

hostages before the November 1980 elections.


That evidence includes statements from senior Iranian officials, international arms dealers, intelligence operatives

(including Ben-Menashe), and Middle East political figures (including a cryptic confirmation from Begin’s successor

Yitzhak Shamir). But the truth about the October Surprise case remains in dispute to this day.

[For the latest details, see Robert Parry’s America’s Stolen Narrative.]


It is clear that after Reagan defeated Carter, and the U.S. hostages were released immediately upon Reagan being

sworn in on Jan. 20, 1981, Israeli-brokered weapons shipments flowed to Iran with the secret blessing of the new Republican administration.


Dealing with Reagan

The Israel Lobby had grown exponentially since its start in the Eisenhower years. Israel’s influential supporters were

now positioned to use every political device imaginable to lobby Congress and to get the White House to acquiesce

to whatever Israel felt it needed.

Ronald Reagan, 40th U.S. President

President Reagan also credentialed into the Executive Branch a new group of pro-Israeli American officials the

likes of Elliott Abrams, Richard Perle, Michael Ledeen and Jeane Kirkpatrick who became known as the neocons.


Yet, despite Reagan’s pro-Israel policies, the new U.S. President wasn’t immune from more Israeli deceptions and

additional pressures. Indeed, whether because of the alleged collusion with Reagan during the 1980 campaign

or because Israel sensed its greater clout within his administration, Begin demonstrated a new level of audacity.


In 1981, Israel recruited Jonathan Pollard, an American Navy intelligence analyst, as a spy to acquire American

intelligence satellite photos. Eventually, Pollard purloined massive amounts of intelligence information,

some of which was reportedly turned over to Soviet intelligence by Israel to win favors from Moscow.


Prime Minister Begin sensed, too, that the time was ripe to gain the upper hand on other Arab enemies. He turned

his attention to Lebanon, where the Palestine Liberation Organization was based. When U.S. intelligence warned Reagan

that Israel was massing troops along the border with Lebanon, Reagan sent a cable to Begin urging him not to invade.

But Begin ignored Reagan’s plea and invaded Lebanon the following day, on June 6, 1982. [See Time, Aug. 16, 1982.]


As the offensive progressed, Reagan sought a cessation of hostilities between Israel and the PLO, but Israel was

intent on killing as many PLO fighters as possible. Periodic U.S.-brokered ceasefires failed

as Israel used the slightest provocation to resume fighting, supposedly in self-defense.


“When PLO sniper fire is followed by fourteen hours of Israeli bombardment that is stretching the definition of defensive

action too far,” complained Reagan, who kept the picture of a horribly burned Lebanese child on his desk in the Oval Office as a

reminder of the tragedy of Lebanon.


The American public nightly witnessed the Israeli bombardment of Beirut on television news broadcasts. The pictures

of dead, mutilated children caught in the Israeli artillery barrages, were particularly wrenching.

Repulsed by the carnage, the U.S. public decidedly favored forcing Israel to stop.


When Reagan warned Israel of possible sanctions if its forces continued to indiscriminately attack Beirut, Israel launched

a major offensive against West Beirut the next day. In the United States, Israeli supporters demanded a meeting with

Reagan to press Israel’s case. Though Reagan declined the meeting, one was set up for 40 leaders of various Jewish

organizations with Vice President George H.W. Bush, Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger and Secretary of State George Shultz.


Reagan wrote once again to Begin, reminding him that Israel was allowed to use American weapons

only for defensive purposes. He appealed to Begin’s humanitarianism to stop the bombardment.


The next day, in a meeting with Israeli supporters from the United States, Begin fumed that he would not be instructed

by an American president or any other U.S. official. “Nobody is going to bring Israel to her knees. You must have

forgotten that Jews do not kneel but to God,” Begin said. “Nobody is going to preach to us humanitarianism.”


More Tragedy

Begin’s government also used the tragedy in Lebanon as an

opportunity to provide special favors for its American backers.

Bodies of Palestinian refugees at the Sabra camp in Lebanon, 1982.
(Photo credit: U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees)


In From Beirut to Jerusalem, New York Times correspondent Thomas L. Freidman wrote that the Israeli Army conducted

tours of the battlefront for influential U.S. donors. On one occasion, women from Hadassah were taken to the hills

surrounding Beirut and were invited to look down on the city as Israeli artillery put on a display for them. The

artillery began an enormous barrage, with shells landing throughout the densely populated city. The shells

struck and destroyed apartments, shops, homes and shacks in the squalid refugee camps of the Palestinians.


A ceasefire was finally agreed upon by Israel and the PLO, requiring Yasser Arafat and all PLO fighters to leave Lebanon.

The Palestinians were assured, as part of the agreement brokered by the United States, that their wives and children

living in Lebanese refugee camps would be safe from harm. The PLO then left Lebanon by ship in August 1982,

moving the PLO headquarters to Tunisia.


On Sept. 16, Israel’s Christian militia allies, with Israeli military support, entered the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps,

and conducted a three-day campaign of rape and murder. Most of the dead with estimates varying

from Israel’s count of 400 to a Palestinian estimate of nearly 1,000 were women and children.


American Marines, who had been dispatched to Lebanon as peacekeepers to oversee the PLO evacuation but then had

departed, hastily returned after the Sabra and Shatila massacres. They were housed in a large warehouse complex near Beirut’s airport.


Over the next year, American forces found themselves drawn into the worsening Lebanese civil war. A key moment

occurred on Sept. 18, 1983, when Reagan’s national security adviser Robert McFarlane, who was

considered a staunch supporter of Israel, ordered U.S. warships to bombard Muslim targets inside Lebanon.

As Gen. Colin Powell, then a top aide to Defense Secretary Weinberger, wrote in his memoir, “When the shells started

falling on the Shiites, they assumed the American ‘referee’ had taken sides.” [See Powell’s My American Journey.]


Muslim attacks on the Marines in Beirut soon escalated. On Oct. 23, 1983, two Shiite Muslims drove explosives-laden

trucks into two buildings in Beirut, one housing French forces and the other the Marines.

The blasts killed 241 Americans and 58 French.


Over the ensuing weeks, American forces continued to suffer losses in skirmishes with Muslim militiamen near the

Beirut airport and American civilians also became targets for execution and hostage-taking. On Feb. 7, 1984, Reagan

announced that the Marines would be redeployed from Lebanon. Within a couple of weeks,

the last of the Marines had departed Lebanon, having suffered a total of 268 killed.


However, the hostage-taking of Americans continued, ironically creating an opportunity for Israel to intercede again

through its contacts in Iran to seek the help of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s regime in getting the Lebanese Shiite

militants to release captured Americans.


Israeli arms dealers and neocon Americans, such as Michael Ledeen, were used as middlemen for the secret

arms-for-hostages deals, which Reagan approved and McFarlane oversaw. However, the arms deliveries via Israel

failed to reduce the overall number of Americans held hostage in Lebanon and were eventually exposed in November 1986, becoming

Reagan’s worst scandal, the Iran-Contra Affair.


Noriega and Harari

Though Israel’s government had created some headaches for Reagan, it also provided some help, allowing its arms

dealers and intelligence operatives to assist some of Reagan’s favorite covert operations, particularly in Central America

where the U.S. Congress had objected to military assistance going to human rights

violators, like the Guatemalan military, and to the Nicaraguan Contra rebels.


As Vice President, George H.W. Bush met with Panamanian dictator Manuel Noreiga and considered him a

compliant partner. Noriega subsequently funneled financial and other help to Reagan’s beloved Contras and

once even volunteered to arrange the assassinations of leaders of the Sandinista government in Nicaragua.

Vice President George H.W. Bush meeting with
Panamanian Gen. Manuel Noriega in the mid-1980s.

One of Noriega’s top operatives was Michael Harari, who had led Israeli assassination teams and who had served as

the Israeli Mossad station chief in Mexico. In Panama, Harari became a key intermediary for Israeli

contributions to the Contras, supplying them with arms and training, while Noriega handed over cash.


But Noriega and Harari were conducting other business in the region, allegedly working as middlemen and money

launderers for the lucrative smuggling of cocaine into the United States. When that information surfaced in the U.S.

news media and Noriega became notorious as an unstable thug George H.W. Bush as

President found himself under enormous political pressure in 1989 to remove Noriega from power.


So, Bush prepared to invade Panama in December 1989. However, the Israeli government was concerned about

the possible capture of Harari, whom U.S. prosecutors regarded as Noriega’s top co-conspirator

but who also was someone possessing sensitive information about Israeli clandestine activities.


Six hours before U.S. troops were to invade Panama, Harari was warned of the impending attack, an alert that

enabled him to flee and may have compromised the safety of American paratroopers and

Special Forces units preparing to begin the assault, units that took surprisingly heavy casualties.


Tipped off by Israeli intelligence agents, Harari was whisked away by an Israeli embassy car, flying a diplomatic flag,

with diplomatic license plates to ensure he would not be stopped and held, according to an interview

that I had in January 1990 with Col. Edward Herrera Hassen, commander of Panama Defense Forces.


Harari soon was on his way back to Israel, where the government has since rebuffed U.S. requests that Harari be

extradited to the United States to stand trial in connection with the Noriega case. For his part, Noriega was captured

and brought to the United States where he was convicted of eight drug and racketeering charges.

[Hariri died on Sept. 21, 2014, in Tel Aviv at the age of 87.]


The Lobby

The one constant in Israel’s endless maneuverings both with and against the U.S. government has been the effectiveness

of the Israel Lobby and its many allies to fend off sustained criticism of Israel, sometimes by smearing critics

as anti-Semitic or by mounting aggressive cover-ups when investigations threatened to expose ugly secrets.


Given this long record of success, U.S. presidents and other politicians have demonstrated a declining capacity to press

Israel into making concessions, the way Eisenhower, Kennedy and Carter tried to do. For instance, when President

Bill Clinton first met with Netanyahu in 1996, Clinton was surprised to find himself getting a lecture from Israel’s Likud

prime minister. “Who the f**k does he think he is? Who’s the superpower here?” a peeved Clinton was quoted as saying.

[See The Much Too Promised Land, by Aaron Miller, an aide to Clinton.]

Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton debating with President George H.W. Bush in 1992


Joe Lockhart, then White House spokesman, told Clayton Swisher, author of The Truth About Camp David, that

Netanyahu was “one of the most obnoxious individuals you’re going to come into just a liar and a cheat.

He could open his mouth and you could have no confidence that anything that came out of it was the truth.”


Faced with these difficulties and fending off Republican attempts to drive him from office Clinton put off any serious push

for a Middle East peace accord until the last part of his presidency. Clinton negotiated the Wye River memorandum with

Netanyahu and Arafat on Sept. 23, 1999, calling for reciprocal undertakings by both sides. The agreement called for the

freezing of Israeli settlements on Palestinian land, but Netanyahu failed to stop the settlement activity. Demolition

of Palestinian homes, restrictions on movement by Palestinians, and settlement building continued.


Ultimately, Clinton failed to achieve any breakthrough as his final efforts collapsed

amid finger-pointing and distrust between the Palestinians and the Israelis.


Handling Bush

Israel’s hopes were buoyed further when George W. Bush entered the White House in 2001. Unlike his father who looked

on the Israelis with suspicion and felt some kinship with the Arab oil states, the younger Bush was unabashedly pro-Israel.


Though Reagan had credentialed many young neocons in the 1980s, he had kept them mostly away from Middle East

policy, which usually fell to less ideological operatives such as Philip Habib and James Baker. However, George W. Bush

installed the neocons in key jobs for Mideast policy, with the likes of Elliott Abrams at the National Security Council,

Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith at the Pentagon, and Lewis Libby inside Vice President Dick Cheney’s office.


The neocons arrived with a plan to transform the Middle East based on a scheme prepared by a group of American

neocons, including Perle and Feith, for Netanyahu in 1996. Called “A Clean Break: A New Strategy

for Securing the Realm,” the idea was to bring to heel all the antagonistic states confronting Israel.

The “clean break” was to abandon the idea of achieving peace in the region through mutual understanding and

compromise. Instead, there would be “peace through strength,” including violent removal of leaders who were viewed

as hostile to Israel’s interests.


The plan sought the ouster of Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, which was called “an important Israeli strategic objective

in its own right.” After Hussein’s ouster, the plan envisioned destabilizing the Assad dynasty in Syria with hopes of

replacing it with regime more favorable to Israel. That, in turn, would push Lebanon into Israel’s

arms and contribute to the destruction of Hezbollah, Israel’s tenacious foe in South Lebanon.


The removal of Hezbollah in Lebanon would, in turn, weaken Iran’s influence, both in Lebanon and in the occupied

territories of Gaza and the West Bank, where Hamas and other Palestinian militants would find themselves cornered.


But what the “clean break” needed was the military might of the United States, since some of the targets like Iraq were

too far away and too powerful to be overwhelmed even by Israel’s highly efficient military. The

cost in Israeli lives and to Israel’s economy from such overreach would have been staggering.

The only way to implement the strategy was to enlist a U.S. president, his administration and the Congress to join Israel

in this audacious undertaking. That opportunity presented itself when Bush ascended to the White House

and the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, created a receptive political climate in the United States.


Turning to Iraq

After a quick strike against al-Qaeda and its allies in Afghanistan, the Bush administration turned its attention to conquering

Iraq. However, even after the 9/11 attacks, the neocons and President Bush had to come up with rationales that were

sellable to the American people, while playing down any suggestion that the coming conflicts were partially designed to advance Israel’s interests.

At the start of the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, President George W. Bush ordered the
U.S. military to conduct a devastating aerial assault on Baghdad, known as “shock and awe.”


So, the Bush administration put together tales about Iraqi stockpiles of WMD, its “reconstituted” nuclear weapons

program, and its alleged ties to al-Qaeda and other terrorists determined to strike at the United States. The PR

operation worked like a charm. Bush rallied Congress and much of the American public behind an unprovoked

invasion of Iraq, which began on March 19, 2003, and drove Saddam Hussein’s government from power three weeks later.

At the time, the joke circulating among neocons was where to go next, Syria or Iran, with the punch line: “Real men go to Tehran!”


Meanwhile, Israel continued collecting as much intelligence as possible from the United States about the next desired

target, Iran. On Aug. 27, 2004, CBS News broke a story about an FBI investigation into a possible spy working for

Israel as a policy analyst for Under Secretary of Defense Wolfowitz. The official was identified as Lawrence Franklin.

Franklin pled guilty to passing a classified Presidential Directive and other sensitive documents pertaining to U.S.

foreign policy regarding Iran to the powerful Israeli lobbying group, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee,

which shared the information with Israel.


According to FBI surveillance tapes, Franklin relayed top secret information to Steve Rosen, AIPAC’s policy director,

and Keith Weissman, a senior policy analyst with AIPAC.  On Aug. 30, 2004, Israeli officials admitted that Franklin

had met repeatedly with Naor Gilon, head of the political department at the Israeli Embassy in Washington, and a

specialist on Iran’s nuclear programs.


Franklin was sentenced to 12 years and seven months in prison for passing classified information to a pro-Israel

lobby group and an Israeli diplomat. No charges were brought against the AIPAC executives or the Israeli diplomat.


Bloody Chaos

Meanwhile, back in the Middle East, it turned out that occupying Iraq was more difficult than the Bush administration had

anticipated. Ultimately, more than 4,400 American soldiers died in the conflict along with hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.

President George W. Bush in a flight suit after landing on the USS Abraham Lincoln
to give his “Mission Accomplished” speech about the Iraq War on May 1, 2003.


The bloody chaos in Iraq also meant that the neocon “real men” couldn’t go either to Syria or Iran, at least not right away.

They were forced into a waiting game, counting on the short memories of the American people before revving up the fear machine again

to justify moving to the next phase.


When the U.S. death toll finally began to decline in Iraq, the neocons stepped up their alarms about Iran becoming a

danger to the world by developing nuclear weapons (although Iran has disavowed any desire to have nukes and

U.S. intelligence expressed confidence in 2007 that Iran had stopped work on a warhead four years earlier).


Still, while trying to keep the focus away from its own nuclear arsenal, Israel has pushed the international community

to bring pressure on Iran, in part by threatening to mount its own military attack on Iran if the U.S. government and other

leading powers don’t act aggressively.


The neocon anti-Iran plans were complicated by the victory of Barack Obama, who promised to reach out in a more

respectful way to the Muslim world. Inside Israel and in U.S. neocon circles, complaints quickly spread about Obama’s

coziness with Muslims (even claims that he was a secret Muslim or anti-Semitic). Obama further antagonized the neocons

and Israeli hardliners by suggesting a linkage between the festering Palestinian problem and dangers to U.S. national security, including

violence against U.S. troops in the Middle East.


Netanyahu, who again had assumed the post of prime minister, and the neocons wanted U.S. policy refocused on Iran,

with little attention on Israel as it continued its longstanding policy of building more and more Jewish settlements on what

was once Palestinian land.


In reaction to Netanyahu’s unwillingness to curb those settlements and with the announcement of more housing

units during Biden’s visit Obama retaliated by subjecting Netanyahu to several slights, including refusing to have

photographs taken of the two of them meeting at the White House.


Obama walked out of one meeting with Netanyahu after failing to get his written promise for a concession on halting

further settlement construction. Obama went to dinner alone, a very pointed insult to Netanyahu. As Obama left the

meeting, he said, “Let me know if there is anything new,” according to a member of Congress who was present.


Secret Pacts

For his part, Netanyahu has claimed that secret agreements with the Bush administration allow for the continued building

of settlements. However, Obama said on National Public Radio that he does not consider

himself bound by secret oral agreements that may have been made by President Bush.


Instead, Obama claims Israel is bound by the 2003 “Road Map” agreement which prohibits building more settlements.

“I’ve said clearly to the Israelis both privately and publicly that a freeze on settlements, including natural growth,

is part of these obligations,” Obama said.


Still, Obama has shied away from publicly challenging Israel on some of its most sensitive issues, such as its undeclared

nuclear-weapons arsenal. Like presidents back to Nixon, Obama has participated in the charade of “ambiguity.”

Even as he demanded “transparency” from other countries, Obama continued to dance around questions regarding

whether Israel has nuclear weapons.

President Barack Obama talking on the phone in the Oval Office , Oct. 5, 2015.
(Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Netanyahu and Israel surely have vulnerabilities. Without America’s military, diplomatic and economic support, Israel

could not exist in its present form. One-quarter of Israeli wage incomes are derived from American aid money, German

reparations and various charities. Without that outside assistance, Israel’s standard of living would sink dramatically.


According to the Congressional Research Service, Israel receives $2.4 billion a year in U.S. government grants,

military assistance, loan guarantees, and sundry other sources. The United States also pays Egypt another $2 billion

to keep the peace with Israel. The combined assistance to both countries comprises nearly one half of all U.S.

foreign aid assistance worldwide.


In a sense, Israel can’t be blamed for standing up for itself, especially given the long history of brutality and oppression

directed against Jews. However, Israeli leaders have used this tragic history to justify their own harsh treatment

of others, especially the Palestinians, many of whom were uprooted from their ancestral homes.


Over the past six decades, Israeli leaders also have refined their strategies for taking advantage of their staunchest
ally, the United States. Today, with many powerful friends inside the United States and with Obama facing intense
political pressure over his domestic and national security policies the Israeli government has plenty of reasons
to believe that it can out-fox and outlast the current U.S. president as it did many of his predecessors.

                                                                      LBJ and one of his Jew handlers David Dubinsky

How LBJ's Vietnam War Paralyzed His Mideast Policymakers

​ (And His Role in the USS LIBERTY Slaughter)​

By Grace Halsell

In the summer of 1967, Iwas a staff writer for President Lyndon B. Johnson at the White

House. I was aware of that year's Middle East crisis but, like most Americans, understood

little about it other than the fact that it involved Jews and Arabs. In that year I did not know

a single Arab, and possibly LBJ did not either. Like most Americans, I was pro-Israel,

Israel having been sold to most all of us as the underdog.


Everyone around me, without exception, was pro-Israel. Johnson had a dozen or more

close associates and aides who were both Jewish and pro-Israel. There were Walt Rostow

at the White House, his brother Eugene at State, and Arthur Goldberg, ambassador to the

United Nations. Other pro-Israel advisers included Abe Fortas, associate justice of the

Supreme Court; Democratic Party fundraiser Abraham Feinberg; White House counsels

Leo White and Jake Jacobsen; White House writers Richard Goodwin and Ben Wattenberg;

domestic affairs aide Larry Levinson; and John P. Roche, known as Johnson's

intellectual-in-residence and an avid supporter of Israel.


"Everyone around me, without exception, was pro-Israel."


I did not "know," but could sense, that events of great portent were transpiring. I heard

rumors of CIA Director Richard Helms sending a warning to LBJ that the Israelis were

about to attack, and the president getting word from Moscow that if the Israelis

attacked any Arab country, the Soviets would go to that nation's defense.


I could see the comings and goings of Abe Fortas and Arthur Goldberg, and I knew that

Walt Rostow, in particular, had close Israeli connections, and met frequently with Israeli

Embassy Minister Ephraim (Eppy) Evron.


On occasion I saw a strikingly attractive blonde woman who, I learned, was an ardent

supporter of Israel and a woman of whom the president was fond. Her background sounded

like material from a spy novel. She was born Mathilde Galland in 1927in Italy, where she was

reared as a Roman Catholic. Then, when her family returned to her father's birthplace in

Switzerland, she became a Lutheran.


While a student in Geneva, she fell in love with a young Bulgarian Jew, David Danon,

who had been brought up in Palestine and exiled by the British for his association with

the Irgun Zvai Leumi, a Jewish terrorist group led by Menachem Begin. Danon was

studying to become a medical doctor, but spent most of his time recruiting and carrying

out secret Irgun operations throughout Western Europe.


In later interviews with former Time reporter Donald Neff, Mathilde said that as a teenager

she saw Danon as a dashing and heroic figure, an activist dedicating his life to the founding

of a Jewish state in Palestine. He was a personal friend of the Stern Gang terrorists, led by

Yitzhak Shamir, who killed British resident minister Lord Walter Moyne in Cairo during

World War II, and the Irgun terrorists who blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in

1946,with heavy loss of life. As bloody as these actions were, Mathilde said, she saw them

as heroic. They represented the depth of the convictions of Danon and the Irgunists—and drew her to them.


Mathilde became so enamored of the Jewish struggle and of Danon's daring undercover

operations in Europe that she converted to Judaism and married Danon. Then she, too,

became an Irgun agent.


Reporter Neff, in his book entitled Warriors for Jerusalem: The Six Days That Changed

the Middle East, documents Mathilde's role as a young "gun-runner" for the Jewish terrorist

group. "As a seemingly innocent petite and pretty blonde out for a bicycle ride along

Switzerland's borders," wrote Neff, "she in reality was taking messages and

explosives into neighboring France and Italy—to be passed on to the Irgunists.


Five years after the creation of Israel obviated the need for pretty blonde gunrunners,

Mathilde received a Ph.D. in genetics at the University of Geneva in 1953.She and Danon

then moved to Israel, where she became a cancer researcher at the Weizmann Institute.

After the birth of a daughter, she and Danon separated. While still at Weizmann, however,

she met and later married the rich—and 20 years her senior—Arthur Krim, a motion

picture executive who became finance chairman for the Democratic National Committee.


American Jews such as Krim and Abraham Feinberg—a New York banker and the first Jew

to become a prominent moneyraiser in presidential campaigns—were by then bringing in

well over half of the Democratic Party's funds. Thus it was natural that such fund-raisers

would become very important to many Democratic candidates—and particularly to the leader

of the Democratic Party, Lyndon B. Johnson.


LBJ often invited the Krims to his Texas ranch. There also were many instances in which

Arthur and Mathilde were guests at the White House, and other times when, for many days

running, Mathilde—without her husband—was a guest there. The Krims built a house

near the LBJ ranch known as Mathilde's house, and Johnson often traveled there by helicopter.


Advice and Counsel  LBJ Part 2

The Krims, as well as other Jewish Americans who were closely associated with Johnson,

advised and counseled him on the events leading up to the Six-Day War of June 1967.

On the Memorial Day weekend in May 1967, Mathilde and her husband were guests at

the LBJ ranch. On arrival at the ranch, Johnson learned that the Soviets had warned the

U.S. that if Israel attacked an Arab state, the Soviets would go to the aid of that

state. The State Department was preparing a message for LBJ to send to Israel.


While awaiting the draft message, Johnson got behind the wheel of his Lincoln Continental

and took Mathilde and Arthur Krim for a drive over the hill country. They were at a neighbor's

house when an aide brought Johnson a message drafted by the State Department for Israeli

Prime Minister Levi Eshkol. It relayed to Israel Moscow's warning that "if Israel

starts military action, the Soviet Union will extend help to the attacked party."


After reassuring Eshkol of America's interest in Israel's safety, the draft message cautioned:

"It is essential that Israel not take any preemptive military action and thereby make itself

responsible for the initiation of hostilities." The president strengthened the warning by adding

two words so that the sentence read, "It is essential that Israel JUST MUST NOT take any

preemptive military action. . ."


On June 3, Johnson traveled to New York to deliver a speech at a Democratic Party

fund-raising dinner. He moved on to a $1,000-a-plate dinner dance, sponsored by the

President's Club of New York, whose chairman was Arthur Krim. While at the table,

fund-raiser Abe Feinberg leaned over the shoulder of Mathilde Krim, seated next to Johnson,

and whispered: "Mr. President, it [Israel's attack] can't be held any longer. It's going to be

within the next 24 hours."


On June 4, Johnson went to the home of his close adviser and friend, Justice Abe Fortas.

The following day, June 5, Rostow woke Johnson with a phone call at 4:30 a.m.

"War has broken out," Rostow said. The Israelis had attacked Egypt and Syria.


Mathilde Krim was a guest at the White House and, before going to the Oval Office,

and apparently before waking Lady Bird or notifying anyone else, Johnson dropped by

the bedroom where Mathilde was sleeping and gave her the news: "The war has started."


At 7:45 a.m., Johnson talked—for the first time—on the hot line with Moscow. Soviet Premier

Aleksi Kosygin expressed the hope that the United States would restrain Israel. Both leaders

vowed to work for a cease-fire.


On that day—June 5, 1967—I walked the White House corridors as the telephone lines

and news tickers recorded developments of the first morning of the war that would change

the Middle East. I learned that in the war's first hours, Israeli planes had destroyed the

air forces of both Egypt and Syria on the ground.


Unconcealable Glee  LBJ Part 3

Several U.S. officials in a State Department Operations Room briefing could not conceal

their glee over Israel's successes. With a wide smile, Eugene Rostow said,

"Gentlemen, gentlemen, do not forget that we are neutral in word, thought and deed."


At the State Department's noon briefing on June 5, press spokesman Robert J. McCloskey

repeated those words for reporters. (Since the U.S. was not neutral but totally supportive

of Israel, however, this statement would need—over the next several weeks—endless clarification.)


Also on June 5, Arthur Krim wrote a memo to the president saying: "Many arms shipments

are packed and ready to go to Israel, but are being held up. It would be

helpful if these could be released." Johnson got the shipments on their way.


Walt Rostow, in a memo to the president, referred to the results of Israel's surprise attack

on Egypt and Syria as "the first day's turkey shoot." On June 6, in another memo to the

president, Walt Rostow recommended that the Israelis not be forced to withdraw

from the territories they had seized—short of peace treaties with the Arab states.


"If the Israelis go fast enough and the Soviets get worried enough," he wrote, "a simple

cease-fire might be the best answer. This would mean that we could use the de facto

situation on the ground to try to negotiate not a return to armistice lines but a definitive

peace in the Middle East."


Mathilde Krim, still a guest in the White House, left for meetings in New York. Before

departing, however, she wrote out a statement supportive of Israel which she asked the

president to deliver "verbatim to the American people." Johnson was sufficiently impressed

with her comments to, later in the day, read some of them to Secretary of State Dean Rusk.

But the president did not, as she had asked, read them to the American people.


Jordan, treaty-bound to come to the aid of Egypt and Syria if either were attacked,

had done so and, on June 7, Israel captured the Old City of Jerusalem. Also on June 7,

Wattenberg and Levinson wrote in a memo to Johnson that the U.N. might attempt

"to sell Israel down the river."


They urged LBJ to support Israel's claim to the territories seized militarily. They referred to

McCloskey's statement that the U.S. was neutral, suggesting LBJ issue a statement

affirming total support for Israel which, they said, might stop American Jews

from meeting in Lafayette Square to protest the "neutrality" statement.


While Johnson never minded getting pro-Israel advice from such close friends as Mathilde

Krim or Abe Fortas, he apparently resented advice from relatively minor White

House staffers such as Wattenberg and Levinson. Seeing Levinson he stormed:


"You Zionist dupe! You and Wattenberg are Zionist dupes in the White House! Why can't

you see I'm doing all I can for Israel! That's what you should be telling people when they

ask for a message from the president for their rally." As LBJ abruptly stormed off,

Levinson reports, he stood there, "shaken to the marrow of my bones."


Meanwhile, on the night of June 7, the USS Liberty , a Navy "ferret" ship equipped to

monitor electronic communications, had approached within sight of the Gaza Strip so the

National Security Agency personnel aboard could intercept the military communications

jamming the airwaves. The president retired at 11:30 p.m., but White House logs

reported that at one minute to midnight he got a call from Mathilde Krim, still in New York.


By June 8, despite U.S. and Soviet demands for a cease-fire, the Israelis were planning

one more attack to take Syria's Golan Heights. Perhaps to prevent U.S. intelligence from

learning of their plan, despite Syria's acceptance of the cease-fire, the Israelis dispatched

planes to the USS Liberty. One roared over the Liberty so closely that the portholes of the

aircraft's reconnaissance cameras were clearly visible. Lieutenant James M. Ennes,

deck officer, saw on its wings Israel's insignia, the Star of David.


The Liberty Assault   LBJ Part 4

Ennes glanced at the U.S. flag atop his ship's tall mast. If he could see the Israeli pilots

in their cockpits, he reasoned, the pilots could certainly see the large U.S. flag. It was not

long after the last of several such Israeli reconnaissance flights, however, that an Israeli

aircraft swooped down and fired rockets directly at The Liberty. Rocket fragments and 30mm

bullets punched through the heavy deck plating—and through the flesh of the stunned crewmen.

Then more planes—with cannon and napalm—turned the Liberty into a floating hell of

flames and screaming men.


The Israeli attacks killed 34 Americans and wounded 171. The ship was partly flooded

when an Israeli torpedo boat hit the U.S. ship with a torpedo below the water line.

Another machine-gunned the ship's life rafts when the crew tried to launch them.


Only by a miracle did The Liberty remain afloat. But its threat to Israel's plans was finished.

The next day, June 9, Israeli forces attacked and captured the Golan Heights.

On Saturday, June 10, the war's sixth day, Israel agreed to a cease-fire.


It was Rostow who first notified Johnson of the assault on the Liberty. Asked who did it,

Rostow said he did not know. Later the Israelis said they had done it, by mistake.

Johnson sent an immediate report to Kosygin that the Israelis had torpedoed a U.S. ship.

Thus the Kremlin now knew about the Israeli attack, but the American people did not.

From the beginning, the Johnson administration covered it up. Surviving crew members were

separated from each other and the Navy was ordered to make certain that no survivor

talked with any reporter—or to anyone else—about the assault on the USS Liberty .


It went virtually unnoticed. Not only the crew of the USS Liberty , but all Americans were

victims. Johnson and most of those who entered and left the Oval Office were oriented

toward Israel. For that matter, I too, was ready and eager to believe in 1967 that the Arabs,

not the Israelis, had started the war and that the bombing raid on the USS Liberty was

not intentional, but a mistake.


While there can be no moral justification for the White House cover-up orders to the Navy

after the assault on the Liberty, from hindsight Johnson's political motivation is obvious.

It was the same motivation that led him subsequently to listen to the Jewish friends and

advisers who urged him not to put any pressure on the Israelis to relinquish territories

they had seized in the Six-Day War.


In 1967, President Johnson felt he needed all the support he could get to I 'win" in Vietnam.

Many American Jews were liberals outspokenly opposed to the war there. Johnson was

told if he gave all out support to Israel—which would include ignoring the Israeli attack

on the Libertyinfluential Jewish Americans would stop opposing his Vietnam policies.


In a memo to the president, Wattenberg, whose parents had moved to the U. S. from

Palestine and who was known as a strong supporter of the Jewish state, said flatly

that if the president came out with strong support for Israel, he would win American Jewish

support for the war in Vietnam. Many American Jewish leaders are "doves"

on Vietnam, Wattenberg wrote, but "hawks" on a war with Arab states.


A "Bonus" for Johnson  LBJ Part 5

"You stand to be cheered now by those (American Jewish leaders) who were jeering

last week," Wattenberg wrote the president. He added that the Mideast crisis could be

"a bonus" for Johnson. All-out support of Israel, he predicted, would "help

turn around 'the other war'—the domestic dissatisfaction about Vietnam."


The support given by the American Jewish leaders "was welcome to the president,"

as reporter Donald Neff observed, when at every turn he was being

attacked by critics, particularly in the media, of his Vietnam policy.


I was, at the time, a typical American. I was convinced back then that the Arabs had started

the war and deserved what they got. I didn't try to reason how, if the Arabs had started the

war, they were surprised with their air forces on the ground and how it was that Israel so

easily seized all of Palestine, including the rest of Jerusalem. Instead,

like millions of Americans, I was thrilled by the might of "little Israel."


Yet, despite the euphoria around me, what I saw in the White House planted questions in

my mind. As Americans we had just passed through a dangerous Middle East conflict that

threatened to explode into World War III. There were two parties to the conflict, Arabs and

Jews. But for weeks on end I had seen only one set of advisers who could call or see

Johnson whenever they pleased. The Arabs had no voice, no representation, no access, whatsoever.


It was only later that I came to reflect on how America, which devoted so much of the

efforts of its "best and brightest" to the problem of Vietnam, had in 1967 quite unwittingly

stumbled into a Middle East quagmire that, long after the fall of Saigon, would continue

to enmesh U.S. soldiers and diplomats, and project an image of double

standards and insincerity onto U.S. diplomacy all over the world.


Far more than his failed policies in Vietnam, the Middle East policies that LBJ allowed to

fall into place in the June 1967 war would remain to haunt the U.S. for decades to come.

The Rostow brothers, the sons of Jewish Russian socialists, were a big influence on LBJ.

Eugene V. Rostow was Dean of the Yale Law School when he was asked to become LBJ’s

Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. Walt Whitman Rostow had been JFK’s Deputy

National Security Advisor and became LBJ’s National Security Advisor on

April Fool’s Day (how poetic), 1966 until January 20, 1969.


Walt Rostow had served with the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), under the

"Father of American Intelligence," William "Wild Bill" Donovan, during WW II

as part of a committee that selected German targets for U.S. bombardment.


Immediately after Germany’s unconditional surrender, Walt Rostow became Assistant

Chief of the German-Austrian Economic Division in the U.S. Department of State in Washington.

He then became the Executive Secretary of the Economic Commission for Europe in

1947. We can easily deduce that Walter Rostow was one of the key players in the murderously

punitive Morgenthau Plan that was perpetrated upon the demolished and helpless German nation.


Walt Rostow was considered a staunch anti-communist, which doesn’t ring true considering

the man’s parents were Russian born socialists. He was very prominent for his role

in shaping U.S. foreign policy in Southeast Asia during the 1960s. Jewish German-born

Henry Kissinger replaced Walt Rostow as U.S. National Security Advisor beginning with

the Nixon administration.

Grace Halsell, a Washington-based writer, is the author of Journey to Jerusalem

and Prophecy and Politics, as well as several other works of nonfiction.





China, Kissinger & Tricky Dick is exactly where

the selling off of the USA began in earnest:


Poor ole "Tricky Dick" Nixon has gone down in all of our shamelessly biased, content less,

agenda driven history books as the liar whose only notable accomplishment was opening

the door to China as a trade partner.


And even his China trip from February 21st through 28th, 1972 was only a grandstanding

propaganda photo-op as far as the clueless Nixon was concerned. The real China summit

was arranged, orchestrated and presided over by Nixon’s National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger.


Kissinger hammered out trade agreement proposals and future schemes with Zhou Enlai

while Nixon and Chairman Mao went sightseeing and attended numerous banquets.

Even Secretary of State William P. Rogers was purposely left out of all the meetings

between Kissinger and Zhou Enlai… and Rogers, as Secretary of State, far outranked Kissinger!

Such is the nature of perceived power versus actual power.

TLC Book Tour Review of “On China” by Henry Kissinger ...Kissinger and Zhou Enlai


To make a long story short: The selling out of America to the Chinese began that week in

February of 1972 and it was orchestrated by the globalist-Zionist Jew, Henry Kissinger.


And here we are forty years later as the second in rank to China as the global leader in trade

and we are now heavily in debt to China. American manufacturing has been largely packed

up and literally moved to China. We aretrillions of dollars in debt to China (the balance of the

national debt is owned by the Federal Reserve Bank, or owed to Social Security and Medicare).


Wal-Mart is the all-American Chinese goods outlet franchise and China can now militarily

kick our ass much harder than they did in Korea in the early 1950s. They now make more

and better war toys than us and it appears as though they spend far less than us on

weaponry while doing it.


Independent Party presidential candidate in 1992, and 1996, Ross Perot, was absolutely

correct regarding so called "free trade" agreements that have had a devastating effect on

American manufacturing, and therefore the economy. The agreement known as NAFTA

(North American Free Trade Agreement) was correctly predicted by Perot to cause a

"a sucking sound" coming from Mexico. NAFTA was implemented,

and Mexico sucked wealth and jobs from America, and is still doing so.


Jewish Zionist and U.S. Trade Representative (1993-1996), Mickey Kantor, was the lead

negotiator for the NAFTA deal. Jewish Zionist, Charlene Barshefsky, was the U.S. Trade

Representative (1997-2001) who successfully helped establish China as a major

player in the World Trade Organization.


A puppet for the Jewish Cabal, Carla Anderson Hills, who was the U.S. Trade Representative

from 1989 until 1993 helped Kantor with the NAFTA negotiations and cut such a sweet

deal for the Mexicans that she was awarded the Order of the Aztec Eagle by Mexico in

appreciation in 2000. George H.W. Bush called upon globalist Hills to help hammer out

the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) that totally gutted any and all trade

advantages for America related to tariffs. Hills and Jewish Zionist, Robert Rubin, presently

co-chair the Council on Foreign Relations and she is a Trilateral Commission executive officer…

In summation, she is a shameless traitor to the U.S.A. along with Kantor.


BTW: Obama’s Harvard Law School classmate, Jewish Zionist Michael Froman,

has been the U.S. Trade Representative since June 21st, 2013.

The Deputy U.S. Trade Representative is Miriam Sapiro who is also Jewish.


Then we have American Zionist Jew authors such as Thomas Friedman who assures his

readers that globalization, trade agreements, and outsourcing jobs to foreign countries is

a great idea. He says so in his book, The World is Flat. But this three time Pulitzer Prize

winner is just flat wrong and should be exiled to the country where his true loyalty lays …Israel.


By the way… Joseph Pulitzer, a Jew, established the Pulitzer Prize for journalism in 1917

and is considered the "father of yellow journalism" as if that is a good thing. Yellow journalism

is a type of journalism that presents little or no legitimate well-researched

news and instead uses eye-catching headlines to sell more papers.


Eye catching techniques may include exaggerations of news events, scandal mongering,

sensationalism, scare headlines in huge print of minor news, lavish use of photos and

imaginary drawings, use of faked interviews, fake experts and witnesses and conjuring

dramatic sympathy for the underdog" against the "system." Sound familiar…?

National Inquirer comes to mind doesn’t it..?


The Inquirer’s executive editor is Jewish Zionist Barry Levine. The Inquirer is owned by

American Media Inc. which is owned by Roger Charles Altman and David J. Pecker

(both Zionist Jews… of course).


Anyway, Nixon was fully aware that a Jew could not be expected to be impartial on

Middle East policy and was proven correct in 1973 when Kissinger purposely withheld

news of Israel’s attack on Egypt and Syria during the so called "Yom Kippur War"

(aka: 1973 Arab-Israeli War, October 6 through October 25) for three and a half hours so

that Nixon would not interfere in the conflict. Kissinger then instructed Nixon’s Chief of Staff,

Alexander Haig, to lie to the media by saying that Nixon was informed of the attacks immediately.


On October 7, the day after the "Yom Kippur War" commenced, a telephone transcript

revealed that Kissinger was purposely keeping relevant information from Nixon related

to the Russian support of the Arabs. It was a possibility that the Russians might enter

the conflict, so Kissinger, without Nixon’s knowledge or approval, raised the American

military readiness to DEF CON 3 and personally drafted a letter to the Soviet Premier,

Alexei Kosygin, advising him of the American alert status without advising Nixon.


So, a Jewish Mossad asset as Secretary of State, was flirting with WWIII

without the knowledge of the President of the United States... and so it goes.

 Kissinger was Secretary of State under Nixon and then under Ford,

which is another lesson in perceived power versus actual power.



The White House Jewish Liaison

Did you know that the Director of Jewish Outreach, White House Office of Public Engagement is

a White House staff position popularly known as the White House Jewish Liaison? …me either.

The Director is presently Matt Nosanchuk whose job it is to serve as the Administration’s voice

to the American Jewish Community and gather the communities’ consensus viewpoint on issues

affecting it for the ‘benefit’ of White House policy makers. There are no White House office

liaisons for Islamists, Hindus, Catholics or Buddhists as far as I know, and

there are 78.2 million Catholics in the U.S. comprising 25% of the population!


In the past, White House Jewish Liaisons such as Mark Siegal resigned from the position under

Jimmy Carter because he became distressed with the administration’s position towards Israel

and Middle East policy, and felt unable to influence it. Jimmy Carter to this day is not a fool

regarding Israel and her designs. But the Zionist media never misses an opportunity to make Carter look like a fool.


 As Ronald Reagan’s Jewish liaison, Marshall Breger’s main task was explaining to White House

Chief of Staff, Donald Regan, why Jews were upset over Reagan’s visit to a Bitburg,

West Germany cemetery in 1985. The cemetery included the graves of Waffen SS soldiers.


 Jay Footlik was Clinton’s liaison when the position actually became an important one as the

Clinton administration became overwhelmingly "Jewed-up." Footlik was also John Kerry’s

Middle East Advisor during Kerry’s ill-fated presidential campaign and accompanied Kerry’s

Jewish convert brother, Cameron, to Israel during the campaign

to meet with then present and former Israeli heads of state.


 There were seven different Jewish liaisons during the George W. Bush Administration. The

first liaisons, including Adam Goldman and Tevi Troy (former Deputy Secretary of Health and

Human Services), angered the liberal leaders of American Jewish organizations by ignoring

their counsel. Goldman and Troy were far-right wingers who acted as gatekeepers to the sensible

left-wing school of thought. Sensibility wasn’t a Bush administration

trait; reconfiguring the Middle East to suit Israeli designs was.


 Other Bush II Jewish liaisons included researcher and schedule manager Jeff Berkowitz,

Jay Zeidman (son of U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum council chairman Fred Zeidman),

presidential speechwriter Noam Neusner (son of Rabbi Jacob Neusner who has written or

edited some 950 books on the subject of Judaism) and special policy

advisor to the POTUS Jeremy Katz. The last Bush II liaison was Scott Arogeti.


 BTW: I think it is either superhumanly astounding, or simply unbelievable, that anyone

could write or edit 950 books as Jacob Neusner supposedly has. Do the math and you’ll

see that the man has published a book every month of his life since birth (he is 81years old).

And this on top of his teaching duties as a professor at Bard College since 1994; and prior

teaching duties at Columbia University, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Brandeis University,

Dartmouth College, Brown University and the University of South Florida. This guy is

probably another one of those authors that lends his name to other people’s work to help

it sell. Neusner is evidently a franchise name in the world of books related to Judaism.


 During the Obama Administration, the First Lady’s Jewish chief of staff, Susan Sher, was co-liaison

with Jew Danielle Borrin (who is Special Assistant for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public

Engagement to Vice-President Joe Biden). Zionist Jew Jarrod Bernstein assumed the position

in 2011, then stepped down in January of 2013 to pursue a career in New York real estate.

Zach Kelley was interim liaison until Matt Nosanchuk came along. Prior to becoming the

Jewish Liaison, Nosanchuk held the position of Senior Counsel in the Civil Rights Division of

the Justice Department where he helped eviscerate the Defense of Marriage Act DOMA), an

Act that defined and defended the institution of marriage as being exclusively between a man

and a woman. Lately, it’s become politically correct to allow men

to marry men and women to marry women. Again…What’s next?


 Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). JINSA’s stated aim is to "ensure a strong and

effective U.S. national security policy and to educate American leaders on what

it views as the vital strategic relationship between the U.S. and Israel."


There is NOTHING vital to America’s interests by being allied with Israel. Quite the

opposite is true. Israel is an American liability to say the least.

Israel is America’s worst enemy says it best.


The Reagan Years

Ken Duberstein was one of Reagan’s key handlers as the Deputy White House Chief of Staff (1987-88),
and then Duberstein became the first Jewish White House Chief of Staff (1988-1989).
Duberstein had initially replaced Dennis Thomas as Deputy White House Chief of Staff,
who had replaced Michael Deaver, who had to resign to deal with Congressional perjury
charges related to his lobbying activities. Deaver was convicted and sentenced to three
years in prison; the sentence was, of course, reduced to three years’ probation and
1500 hours of community service.
Other Zionist Jews handling Reagan were:
David R. Gergen – Communications/Speechwriter/Advisor
Mark Klugman - Speechwriter
Landon Parvin - Speechwriter
Ben Jarrett- Assistant Press Secretary
Murray Weidenbaum – Chairmen, Council of Economic Advisors
Martin Feldstein – Economic Advisor
Beryl Sprinkel – Economic Advisor
Jerry L. Jordan – Economic Advisor
Benedict S. Cohen – Associate Counsel to the President
Peter D, Keisler – Assistant Counsel to the President
Chuck Greener – Special Assistant to the President
Mark Greenberg – Legislative Affairs
Mary Jo Jacoby – Assistant to the President for Women’s business affairs
Franklin L. Lavin – Political Affairs Executive Assistant
Susan Lauffer – Political Affairs Executive Assistant
Jonathan Miller – Office of Administration Director
Alan Kranowitz – Legislative Office/Assistant to the President
Charles Kupperman – Office of Administration Special Assistant to the President
Ronald B. Frankum – Policy Development
Max Friedersdorf – Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs
Eric I. Garfinkel – Policy Development/Senior Commerce & Trade Staff Member
Marshall Breger – Special Assistant to President/Liaison to Jewish Community
Max Green – Liaison to Jewish community
 Jacob Stein – Public liaison for Jewish affairs
Michael Gale – Associate Director for Jewish Affairs
Most of Reagan’s National Security Council members were Jewish including:
Douglas Feith – Near East/Far East and Political Affairs
Richard Pipes – Director of Soviet/East European Affairs
Herman Cohen – African Affairs Nicolas Rostow – Legal Advisor
Stephen Danzansky – Economic Affairs
Paula Dobriansky – Soviet/European Affairs
Eugene Ebner – Defense Policy
Phyllis Kaminsky – Public Affairs
Sydell Gold – Defense Policy
Robert Korengold – Public Affairs
Grant Green – Legal Advisor
Richard Levine – Policy Director
Michael Lazan – Near East/South Asia
Nelson Ledsky – Euro-Soviet Affairs
Allan A. Myer – Director of Defense Programs
Alison Rosenberg – African Affairs
Marilyn J. Sieber – International Economic Affairs
Seems like a lot of Zionist Jews working for Reagan, but during his eight years in the White House,
Bill Clinton appointed more Jews to high-ranking positions than any president before him,
including five Jews who were appointed to cabinet departments including:
 Robert Rubin and Laurence Summers - Treasury Secretary
Dan Glickman - Secretary of Agriculture
Robert Reich - Secretary of Labor
Mickey Kantor - Secretary of Commerce.
Madeleine Albright, who was Jewish but passed
herself off as a Catholic during her
overnment service, became Secretary of State in
1997 after having been the U.N. Ambassador.
Six Zionist Jews held portfolios with cabinet rank:

Samuel “Sandy” Berger - Special Assistant for National Security Affairs.
Charlene Barshefsky succeeded Mickey Kantor as Special Trade Representative.
Alice Rivkin and Jacob Lew were each named Directors of the Office of Management and Budget
Gene Sperling - Assistant to the President for Economic Policy.
Three Jewish attorneys - Bernard Nussbaum, Lloyd Cutler and former Federal Circuit Court Judge Abner Mikva,
served on the White House staff as special presidential counsels.
Several other Zionist Jews including Rahm Emanuel (White House Chief of Staff),
Ira Magaziner, Dick Morris, Ann Lewis, Maria Eshaveste, and
Sidney Blumenthal all served as White House advisors.

The Clinton years were the golden years for Jews in American politics and government.
During Clinton’s presidency more Jews won elections to Congress and the Senate than
any time in American history. During the first four years of the 1950s only one Jew,
Herbert Lehman of New York, was a member of the Senate (who was replaced by Jewish
Senator Jacob Javits); during the 1990s, there were eleven Jewish Senators. Clinton
Appointed three Jews to the Supreme Court, and appointed more Jews as ambassadors,
including the first non-American born Jewish ambassador to Israel, Martin Indyk, than
any prior president.

Martin Indyk was born in London, raised in Australia, and immigrated to the U.S. to
become the deputy research director for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC),
the uber-powerful and rabidly pro-Israel lobby organization in D.C. In 1985 Indyk became
the founder and Executive Director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy
(WINEP is another pressure-lobby for Israel group). He taught at the Moshe Dayan Center
for Middle Eastern and African studies at Tel Aviv University. He was the special assistant to
Clinton and the Senior Director of the Near East and South Asian Affairs at the U.S.
National Security Council. He became a U.S. citizen two year prior to becoming ambassador
to Israel from April 1995 to September 1997, and again from January 2000 to July 2001…
Now that’s what I don’t call an All-American boy.
 Indyk is an Israeli Firster and a spy.
BTW: Indyk was the first U.S. ambassador to be stripped of his security clearance while under
investigation for improperly handling sensitive material (he was a spy funneling U.S.
intelligence to Israel); but his clearance was restored a month later,
in October 2000, by fellow Jewess and Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright.
So, who the hell do you think all the Clinton appointed Jews were working for… America?
Think again! Clinton, whether he knew it or not, was a prime player in laying the groundwork
that was being done for perpetrating 9/11, the Afghan -Iraq wars, and the
Wall Street rip-off that would all occur during W. Bush’s regime.

Daniel Kurtzer, the Clinton appointed Jewish Zionist ambassador to Egypt (a mortal enemy of Israel),
replaced Indyk as ambassador to Israel from July 2001 to 2005.
Daniel Kurtzer, as ambassador to Egypt, installed a kosher kitchen in the Cairo Embassy.
The Egyptian president, Hosni Mubarak, took Kurtzer’s appointment as an insult, and rightfully so.
 Barack Obama answered the question put to him about a whether or not there would be a
9/11 Re-investigation saying, “No, let’s move on.” I was sorely disappointed
to realize that Obama was a controlled bait and switch con man after all.
 But consider that Zionist Jew David Axelrod was an Obama election campaign advisor
and an important Obama handler as Senior Advisor until January of 2011 when he
resigned to become Obama’s re-election campaign manager. Jewish uber-Zionist Rahm
Emanuel became Obama’s White House Chief of Staff. Then Rahm resigned to become
Mayor of Chicago and Zionist Jew Jack Lew became the White House Chief of Staff,
then Secretary of the Treasury. Zionist Jew David Plouffe was a Senior Advisor
during the first Obama term.
 I have no idea if Emanuel, Axelrod, Lew or Plouffe had anything at all to do with 9/11,
but they all wholeheartedly approved of going to war with Afghanistan and Iraq; especially
Iraq, that had the nerve to launch SCUD missiles at the “holy land” of Israel during
George H.W. Bush’s first Gulf War.
There was and is a Jewish Zionist White House omnipresence.
 We are supposed to believe that Rahm Emanuel was only fixing the breaks on military
trucks as a member of the Israeli Defense Forces during George H.W. Bush’s first Gulf War.
We should not question that this experience as a brake fixer for the IDF gave him the skills
to become Clinton’s Chief White House Advisor…Baloney! Rahm Emanuel became a very
valuable Mossad asset during H.W. Bush’s first Gulf War while residing in Israel and
remains so to this day. - CLINTON CHRONICLES.... which will give you
an idea about how easy it is to blackmail the Clintons to do your bidding...

 Maariv (daily paper of Israel) - 2. 9. 1994:

The Jews Who Run Clinton's Court

By Avinoam Bar-Yosef


Several weeks ago the rabbi of "Adath Ysrael" synagogue in Cleveland Park, Washington,

dedicated his Sabbath sermon to the Jewish cultural and political center which is being

formed in America:


"For the first time in American history," the rabbi said, "we no longer feel that we

live in diaspora. The U.S. has no longer a government of Goyim (Gentiles), but an

administration in which the Jews are full partners in the decision making at all

levels. Perhaps the aspects of the Jewish religious law connected with the term

'government of goyim' should be re-examined, since it is an outdated term in the U.S."


Indeed, as far as the Jews are concerned, President Bill Clinton contributed towards

a real change in the Administration's outlook, having concluded a series of changes in

enhancing Jewish power beginning during under President Reagan and his Secretary

of State, Schultz. True, the Jewish political influence was also evident in America of the

previous decades. We have already seen a Jewish Secretary of State, Kissinger, enjoying

the confidence of President Richard Nixon and there were Jewish Cabinet members under

Carter. However, they were usally the exceptions testifying to the rule. Especially, pious

Jews were hardly ever appointed to participate in political work concerning the Middle East.


The picture has now totally changed and not only about the Middle East. For example,

every morning at about 6:00 o'clock, several staff cars travel from the CIA center to the

White House with senior officers of the American intelligence community, who are about

to present to the president and to the four top staffers a PDB - President's Daily Briefing -

the term for the most exclusive report in Washington. the document, consisting of 5-7

pages, is often accompanied by top secret satellite photographs transferred by the Pentagon.

It is composed in the course of the night by the best American intelligence experts who

analyze the telegrams and reports arriving from the CIA's world-wide network of agents.

It contains the most sensitive information regarding developments around the world.

Its uniqueness, compared to other American intelligence documents, lays in the fact that

it almost always indicates the source of the information, whether the source is tapping

by means of satellite. If Clinton is in Washington, he holds a short discussion on the

contents of the document with the five other addressees: Vice-President Al Gore,

National Scurity Advisier ("Sandy") Berger, and National Security Adviser to the Vice-President,

Leon Perth. Two of the addressees, Berger and Perth, are warm Jews. They have reached

posts that are extremely sensitive for the U.S. politicies. They are by no means exceptions.


In the National Security Council, 7 out of 11 top staffers are Jews. Clinton had

especially placed them in the most sensitive junctions in the U.S. security and foreign

administrations: Sandy Berger ist the deputy chairman of the council; Martin Indyk,

the intended ambassador to Israel, is a senior director in charge of Western Europe;

Don Steinberg, the senior director and adviser to the president, is in charge of Africa;

Richard Feinberg, the senior director and adviser to the president, in charge of Latin America;

Stanley Ross, the senior director and adviser to the president, is in Charge of Asia.


The situation is not much different in the president's office which is full of warm Jews:

the new Attorney General, Aberner Mikve (now replaced the Jewess J. Reno); the president's

schedule and programs manager, Ricky Seidman; deputy chief of staff, Phil Leida;

economic adviser, Robert Rubin (now Minister of Finance); media director, David Heiser;

staff director, Alice Rubin; Ely Segall, in charge of volunteers; Ira Mezina, in charge

of the health program. Two Cabinet members, Labor Secretary Robert Reich and Micky Cantor

in charge of international trade agreements, are Jewish. They are joined by a long list of

senior Jewish officials in the State Department, headed by the head of the Middle East Peace Team,

Dennis Ross, and followed by many deputy secretaries and even more senior secretaries' chiefs of staff.


One of the most intersting Jews from the Israeli point of view, who has rarely been exposed

to view till now, is Rahm Emanuel, Clinton's senior adviser in charge of coordinating special

projects in the White House. His office is located next to the famous Oval Office ...

He has a face that is more suitable for an Israeli tourist than for a senior official in the

U.S. Administration. "You know, Rahm Emanuel is a name that would not be out of

place in the Tel-Aviv phone directory," I told him. A large warm smile spread across is face.

"Our original name was Auerbach. We opened the first pharmacies in Tel-Aviv and in Jerusalem ...

Rahm and his two brothers received a warm Jewish education ... Perhaps the most intriguing

thing that happened to me personally in the course of the past year, since I have been

posted in Washington, was the meeting with the organized American Jewry. The best place

to see them as they are, the place where I always came each year to admire them,

is the annual convention of the pro-Israel lobby, AIPAC. This is the place not only to feel

the pulse of American involvement in the Middle East, but also where I felt that somehow

it helps me to ignore the deep distress inherent in the feeling of loneliness of living in

a state located in the heart of so many hostile Arabs. I always asked myself what

was the value of the Jewish experience in America as far as Israel is concerned. Did

the identification with Israel derive from a deep sensation of a common Jewish fate or

was it one of the tools of the local community to garner power for achieving truly equal

rights in a mixed society comprised also of many emigrants and members of various

faiths? Was the Jewish power in the U.S. a phenomenon which will decrease or

to increase? Were the intermarriages of Jews with Gentiles threatening to weaken

the Jewish power in the U.S.? Or, so I was sometimes afraid, were the American

Jews building a new Jewish cultural center that would compete with Israel?


"Adat Ysrael" Synagogue in Washington is not only a place of worship. It is a Jewish

community center, with a prestigious Jewish kindergarten, a Jewish school with Judaism,

literature, culture and of course, Hebrew classes. On Saturdays there are always

two seperate prayer sessions. The first is the large one, encompassings hundreds of

worshippers, which ends in a food blessing at tables tastefully laid withJewish

delicacies. Its members belong to the creme de la creme of Washington society: senior

administration officials, successful lawyers, rich businessmen. All are wealthy people ...

The entrance fee to synagogue is 1.000 U.S. Dollar for a single holiday ... But the most

important reason for their praying is that they feel a close connection with Israel ...

The other synagogue competing for the young generation of wealthy Jews is

located in Georgetown ... Many Jewish Administration officials pray there.

They not only don't try to conceil their religious affiliations but go to a great

length to demonstrate their Judaism since it may help their careers greatly.

The enormous Jewish influence in Washington is not limited to the government.

In the popular programs on the TV are warm Jews ... Let us not forget in this

context the Jewish predominance in the Washington academical institutions.

At percentage in the population. In the fields of security and science, in the

film industry, in art and in literature, the Jewish influence can only be described

as immense, with a corresponding enhancement of the Jewish power ...


Where did they all spring from? In Israel we are already accustomed to the names of the

Jews called Dennis Ross, Dan Kurtzer and Aharon Miller, since they have taken part in each

of the Secretary of State's visits to the Middle East in the last six years. But that is a relatively

new phenomenon. When Dan Kurtzer, a pious Jew who observes the Sabbath and all

commandments of Judaism arrived at the American State Department 18 years ago with

a doctorate in Middle East studies, he was told: "You have all the qualifications to serve

in the Middle East division, but don't even think of suggesting it because of your Jewish

origin. "Today he is the boss of those who gave him that piece of advice,

so much had the Jewish power increased meantime.


I phoned the State Department ... Suddenly someone picked up the receiver and

then I heard a voice saying in perfect Israeli Hebrew: "Good Morning, how can I help you?"


Rahm Emanuel: "The Holocaust creates a sense of a destiny shared by all Jews.

The Jews must act to strenghen Israel so that the Holocaust cannot be repeated" ...

Today, when there is talk about 51 percent of interfaith marriages, the danger of assimilation

appears to be even greater, yet when examining the phenomenon from close up one finds

that the trend is opposite ... Can Israel really sense that at a distance of thousands of

miles away is a flourishing Jewish center that not only deeply admires and supports it,

but also feels a shared destiny with it? There is no doubt about it, especially in the

matters concerning its existence. All the Clinton's Administration officials dealing with

Israel; Ross, Kurtzer, Indyk and Miller being just a sample, may have different views

concerning the desired solution for the Israeli-Arab conflict but they are warm Jews

in whatever they do ... But they also firmly believe that the shared interests between

the two states (U.S.A. and Israel) are fundamental and permantly enduring. It is because

of this deeply held belief that they made a huge contribution to the fact that Clinton's

Administration has fully adopted their approach on the issue of relations between the U.S. and Israel ...


The many Jews in Clinton's Administration have not been created by a design, but their

large number is not due to chance either. The American way of life supports the achievers ...

Although the Jewish power in the current Democratic Administration is so huge,

there are also many warm Jews heading for the top position in the Republican Party...


Clinton was also made conscious by his many Jewish friends about the distressing

memory of the Holocaust, which still haunts the leaders of the U.S. Jewish community

and about its importance for the continual support of Israel which is obligatory on the U.S.











Partial list of Jews in the Bush Adminstration:
(March 26, 2003)

Richard Perle
One of Bush's foreign policy advisors, he is the chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy
Board. A very likely Israeli government agent, Perle was expelled from Senator Henry
Jackson's office in the 1970's after the National Security Agency (NSA) caught him passing
Highly-Classified (National Security) documents to the Israeli Embassy. He later worked
for the Israeli weapons firm, Soltam. Perle came from one the above mentioned pro-Israel
thinktanks, the AEI. Perle is one of the leading pro-Israeli fanatics leading
this Iraq war mongering within the administration and now in the media.

Paul Wolfowitz
Deputy Defense Secretary, and member of Perle's Defense Policy Board, in the Pentagon.
Wolfowitz is a close associate of Perle, and reportedly has close ties to the Israeli military.
His sister lives in Israel. Wolfowitz came from the above mentioned Jewish thinktank,
JINSA. Wolfowitz is the number two leader within the administration behind this Iraq war mongering.

Douglas Feith
Under Secretary of Defense and Policy Advisor at the Pentagon. He is a close associate
of Perle and served as his Special Counsel. Like Perle and the others, Feith is a pro-Israel
extremist, who has advocated anti-Arab policies in the past. He is closely associated with
the extremist group, the Zionist Organization of America, which even attacks Jews that
don't agree with its extremist views. Feith frequently speaks at ZOA conferences. Feith
runs a small law firm, Feith and Zell, which only has one International office, in Israel.
The majority of their legal work is representing Israeli interests. His firm's own website
stated, prior to his appointment, that Feith "represents Israeli Armaments Manufacturer."
Feith basically represents the Israeli War Machine. Feith also came from the Jewish thinktank
JINSA. Feith, like Perle and Wolfowitz, are campaigning hard for this Israeli proxy war against Iraq.

Edward Luttwak
Member of the National Security Study Group of the Department of Defence at the Pentagon.
Luttwak is reportedly an Israeli citizen and has taught in Israel. He frequently writes for
Israeli and pro-Israeli newspapers and journals. Luttwak is an Israeli extremist whose
main theme in many of his articles is the necessity of the U.S. waging war against Iraq.

Henry Kissinger
One of many Pentagon Advisors, Kissinger sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board
under Perle. For detailed information about Kissinger's evil past, read Seymour Hersch's
book (Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House). Kissinger likely had a part in
the Watergate crimes, Southeast Asia mass murders (Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos), Installing
Chilean mass murdering dictator Pinochet, Operation Condor's mass killings in South America,
and more recently served as Serbia's Ex-Dictator Slobodan Milosevic's Advisor. He
consistently advocates going to war against Iraq. Kissinger is the Ariel Sharon of the U.S.
Unfortunately, President Bush nominated Kissinger as chairman of the September 11
investigating commission. It's like picking a bank robber to investigate a fraud scandal.

Rabbi Dov Zakheim
Under Secretary of Defense, Comptroller, and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for the
Department of Defense. He is an ordained rabbi and reportedly holds Israeli citizenship.
Zakheim attended attended Jew’s College in London and became an ordained Orthodox
Jewish Rabbi in 1973. He was adjunct professor at New York's Jewish Yeshiva
University. Zakheim is close to the Israeli lobby.

Kenneth Adelman
One of many Pentagon Advisors, Adelman also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy
Board under Perle, and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supports going to war
against Iraq. Adelman frequently is a guest on Fox News, and often expresses extremist
and often ridiculus anti-Arab and anti-Muslim views. Through his hatred or stupidity, he actually
called Arabs "anti-Semitic" on Fox News (11/28/2001), when he could have
looked it up in the dictionary to find out that Arabs by definition are Semites.

I. Lewis Libby (Liebowitz)
Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. The chief pro-Israel Jewish advisor to Cheney,
it helps explains why Cheney is so gun-ho to invade Iraq. Libby is longtime associate of
Wolfowitz. Libby was also a lawyer for convicted felon and Israeli spy
Marc Rich, whom Clinton pardoned, in his last days as president.

Robert Satloff
U.S. National Security Council Advisor, Satloff was the executive director of the Israeli
lobby's "think tank," Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Many of
the Israeli lobby's "experts" come from this front group, like Martin Indyk.

Elliott Abrams
National Security Council Advisor. He previously worked at Washington-based "Think Tank"
Ethics and Public Policy Center. During the Reagan Adminstration, Abrams was the Assistant
Secretary of State, handling, for the most part, Latin American affairs. He played an important
role in the Iran-Contra Scandal, which involved illegally selling U.S. weapons to Iran to fight
Iraq, and illegally funding the contra rebels fighting to overthrow Nicaragua's Sandinista
government. He also actively deceived three congressional committees about his involvement
and thereby faced felony charges based on his testimony. Abrams pled guilty in 1991 to two
misdemeanors and was sentenced to a year's probation and 100 hours of community service.
A year later, former President Bush (Senior) granted Abrams a full pardon. He was one
of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Reagan Administration's State Department.

Marc Grossman
Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. He was Director General of the Foreign
Service and Director of Human Resources at the Department of State. Grossman is
one of many of the pro-Israel Jewish officials from the Clinton Administration that
Bush has promoted to higher posts.

Richard Haass
Director of Policy Planning at the State Department and Ambassador at large. He is
also Director of National Security Programs and Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR). He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the first Bush (Sr)
Administration who sat on the National Security Council, and who consistently advocates
going to war against Iraq. Haass is also a member of the Defense Department's National
Security Study Group, at the Pentagon.

Robert Zoellick
U.S. Trade Representative, a cabinet-level position. He is also one of the more hawkish
pro-Israel Jews in the Bush (Jr) Administration who advocated invading Iraq and occupying
a portion of the country in order to set up setting up a Vichy-style puppet
government. He consistently advocates going to war against Iraq.

Ari Fleischer
Official White House Spokesman for the Bush (Jr) Administration. Prominent in the Jewish
community, some reports state that he holds Israeli citizenship. Fleischer is closely connected
to the extremist Jewish group called the Chabad Lubavitch Hasidics, who follow the
Qabala, and hold very extremist and insulting views of non-Jews. Fleischer was the co-president
of Chabad's Capitol Jewish Forum. He received the Young Leadership
Award from the American Friends of Lubavitch in October, 2001.

James Schlesinger
One of many Pentagon Advisors, Schlesinger also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy
Board under Perle and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supports going to war
against Iraq. Schlesinger is also a commissioner of the Defense
Department's National Security Study Group, at the Pentagon.

David Frum
White House speechwriter behind the "Axis of Evil" label. He lumps together
all the lies and accusations against Iraq for Bush to justify the war.

Joshua Bolten
White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Bolten was previously a banker,
former legislative aide, and prominent in the Jewish community.


Click on this text to watch Senator Chuck Schumer reveal the fact that Chicago Jewish families created Barak Obama...

Who Runs the Obama White House?
The day after Barack Obama was elected president, the Israeli press proudly
proclaimed that the new president had chosen an Israeli, Rahm Emanuel, to
manage the new administration. "Obama's first pick: Israeli Rahm Emanuel
as chief of staff" was the Ha'aretz headline of November 6, 2008.  The controlled
press in the United States, however, keeps the American public unaware
that Obama's new chief of staff is an Israeli, with terrorist roots and a sworn
 loyalty to the state of Israel. 

Rahm Emanuel, first
Chief of Staff of the Obama White House, is the son
of a real Zionist terrorist and served in the Israeli army.  The late Sherman Skolnick
of Chicago called Emanuel the "Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the
Mossad -­ Israeli Intelligence." Skolnick reported that Emanuel's father Benjamin
had been "part of the Israeli assassin team that murdered Sweden's Count [Folke]
Bernadotte" in 1948. Bernadotte was the United Nations envoy who was sent to
Palestine to find a solution to the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land
to Jews from Poland and Russia.
Here are some key extracts from the Ha'aretz article:
A day after his historic election to become the first black American president,
Barack Obama stepped into the role of president-elect yesterday, inviting
Rahm Emanuel to join his administration as White House chief of staff,
Democratic officials said. Emanuel, a former Bill Clinton adviser,
is the son of a Jerusalem-born pediatrician who was a member of
the Irgun (Etzel or IZL), a militant Zionist group that operated in
Palestine between 1931 and 1948… 
Rahm Emanuel's father, Benjamin, yesterday refused to comment on the
report that his son was appointed White House chief of staff.
He told Ha'aretz that he would only comment after speaking to his son.

"Obama is a pro-Israeli leader and will be a friend to
Israel," he said, adding
that he was pleased with Obama's election. He also said his son
is the namesake of Rahamim, a Lehi combatant who was killed. 
Rahm Emanuel is named after a Zionist fighter who belonged to the Stern Gang,
which was a terrorist organization linked with the Nazis.  Before moving to
Chicago, his father was an active member of this terrorist group of assassins
and bombers, which was also known as LEHI.  This information is not discussed
on CNN.  The Zionist-controlled media censors these disturbing, but important facts.
Emanuel's father, Benjamin, told Ma'ariv, a Hebrew-language Israeli paper,
that his son's appointment would be good for Israel. "Obviously he will
influence the president to be pro-Israel," the Jerusalem Post reported.
"Why wouldn't he be? What is he, an Arab? He's not going to clean the floors of the White House." 

Rahm Emanuel with his brothers and father,
a Zionist terrorist from the Irgun and LEHI
The Obama White House chief of staff speaks Hebrew and spends most
summers in Tel Aviv, his Israeli father proudly told Ma'ariv.  After Emanuel
was named chief of staff, none of the Zionist-controlled media outlets in the
United States mentioned the Emanuel family roots with the Nazi-linked terror
gangs in Palestine in the 1930s and 1940s. Naftali Bendavid of the Zionist-owned
Chicago Tribune, for example, wrote a book about Emanuel and spent a great
deal of time with him, but completely avoided discussin Rahm's
Israeli roots in the article he wrote for the Tribune on November 6. 

Bendavid wrote that Emanuel "is best known as something of a Democratic
political assassin" who "might not appear to be the obvious choice for White
House chief of staff for a president-elect who speaks eloquently of
setting aside partisan differences and bringing the country together." 
Emanuel is known for using gangster tactics to threaten people. He once mailed
a rotting dead fish to a campaign pollster who had not produced results
to Emanuel's liking. Sending a dead fish to a person is a well-known Mafia
message, which warns the recipient that he will "sleep with the fishes"
unless he heeds the warning. 
Rolling Stone magazine revealed more of Emanuel's gangster
behavior in an article entitled "The Enforcer" on October 20, 2005: 
"The night after Clinton was elected, Emanuel was so angry at the president's
enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the
campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers,
shouting "Dead! . . . Dead! . . . Dead!" and plunging the knife into the
table after every name. "When he was done, the table looked like a lunar
landscape," one campaign veteran recalls. "It was like something out of The Godfather.
But that's Rahm for you." 

"Republicans are 'bad people who deserve
a two-by-four upside their heads.'"

- Rahm Emanuel, New York Times, January 24, 2009
Emanuel certainly seems to have a penchant for violence, which might not
seem so unusual for a person named after two Irgun terrorists: one named
Rahamim (Rahm), and the other an uncle named Emanuel.  Bendavid's book
was cited by the New York Times of January 24, 2009, as being the source of
the Emanuel quote that Republicans are "bad people who deserve a two-by-four
upside their heads."  Once again, the Times article, entitled "Obama's Partisan
, Profane Confidant Reins It In", conspicuously failed to mention Emanuel's
Israeli roots.  Obviously, the New York Times considers this information it would
prefer the reader not know. This is a perfect example how the Zionist-controlled
media controls public opinion by omitting important information.
It should come as no surprise that the New York Times article chooses not to
mention Emanuel's Israeli roots -- or the fact that his father was a member
of the Irgun, the most murderous terrorist group in Palestine in the 1930s and
40s. The New York Times is the leading Zionist-controlled newspaper in
the United States by virtue of the fact that it has been controlled by the Sulzberger
family, founding members of B'nai B'rith (secret organization of Jewish Freemasons)
Lodge No. 1 of New York, for more than one hundred years.  Likewise, the
Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times are both owned by a Chicago Zionist named Samuel Zell. 

Sam Zell's parents, named Zielonka, left Poland in 1939.
The Zionist controlled media also failed to investigate the evidence of Emanual's
involvement with the impeached Illinois governor, Rod Blagojevich, and his
role in the activity that led to Blagojevich being removed from office.
Blagojevich specifically told CNN's Larry King that he wanted the tapes of his
conversations with Rahm Emanuel released. So, why weren't they? 
Why is Emanuel being protected? 

Impeached Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich and Rahm Emanuel
Emanuel's brother, Ariel, is film-maker Michael Moore's agent. The day after
the election, Moore joked about Emanuel's appointment on the Larry King Show.
Moore made a film about 9-11, produced by the Weinstein brothers, which
completely avoided mentioning the many Israeli connections to the terror attacks.
This is a good example of how the so-called "alternative" media is just as controlled as is the
"mainstream" media – by Zionist Jews. 

Rahm and Ariel, Michael Moore's Hollywood agent
Americans should be aware of the role this violent and uncouth Israeli has
played in the Obama White House. The chief of staff controls the people around
the president - he decides who sees the president, what he hears, and what
he knows. The people surrounding the president report to the chief of staff.
Emanuel was the intellectual handler of President Obama (a continuation of the
role he has played for years) and the controller of the White House. Do you
think having an Israeli gangster with terrorist roots running the White House
affects U.S. relations with Iran, Russia, the Palestinians - and the rest of the world? 
Emanuel actually left the United States to serve in the Israeli army in 1991.
A person from any other nation would lose his U.S. citizenship for serving
in a foreign military. Why are Israelis running the U.S. government?   

Emanuel's father said Rahm is "the namesake of Rahamim, a Lehi combatant." 
LEHI, a.k.a. the Stern Gang, was the most radical Zionist terrorist group in
the 1940s.  The Stern Gang killed scores of British soldiers and assassinated
both Lord Moyne and Count Folke Bernadotte (the United Nations envoy from
Sweden).  They also killed hundreds of innocent Palestinians, such as the
civilian population of Deir Yassin.  This Zionist terror group was allied with
the Nazis in their war against the British.  Both of Emanuel's parents,
(formerly Auerbach) and Marsha Smulevitz, lived in Israel and are related to
Lehi fighters.  This is to say that Emanuel's father, a Jew, fought with the Nazis. 

Why would a dedicated Zionist, born in Jerusalem, and a dedicated member
of a Zionist terrorist organization, move to Chicago after the creation of the
state of Israel?  Had he given up on the Zionist state?  Not at all, Benjamin
Emanuel had embarked on a new mission for Israel – a mission for life. 

After the failed "Lavon Affair," a series of failed Zionist false-flag terror attacks
in Egypt, Israeli intelligence was revamped by Yossi Harel, a.k.a. Joseph Hamburger.
  Israel sent scores of high-level agents to the United States, often with an
American spouse. The Emanuel family of Chicago is one of them; the Chertoff
family of New Jersey is another; Yossi Harel went to Los Angeles. There are many more. 
Rahm Emanuel is the same Israeli who ran the White House under Bill Clinton,
as one of Clinton's senior advisors.  Emanuel is the person who
pushed through the disastrous NAFTA legislation, a bill that devastated the U.S. 
manufacturing sector.  It should be remembered that it was during the Clinton
administration, while the president dallied with his chunky Jewish girlfriend,
that the foundation of the Zionist terror network that pulled off 9-11 was laid.
In 2009, Rahm Emanuel, the son of a terrorist, was back in the Oval Office. 
Emanuel is part of the Chicago-based team of political Zionists with David Axelrod,
Obama's chief campaign strategist. Obama thanked Axelrod by name during his
November 2008 victory speech in Chicago's Grant Park.  Axelrod's father, Joseph,
a Jewish immigrant from someplace near the Black Sea, hanged himself in 1974
when David was a nineteen-year-old student at the University of
Chicago.  His mother was a communist journalist in New York.

David Axelrod - Obama's chief political strategist and handler
Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod have been working together since 1984
when they teamed up to help Paul Simon defeat Sen. Charles Percy (R-Ill.).  
These hard-core Zionists were not working for reform in Illinois; their only
agenda was to defeat the incumbent Sen. Percy because he was the chairman
of the Foreign Relations Committee and was pushing for a settlement of
the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. These Zionist agents went on to manage the
Chicago mayoral campaign of Richard M. Daley, the son of Richard J. Daley.
Finally, these two Zionists spearheaded the campaign to put Barack Obama
into the White House. Axelrod and Emanuel, however, were sponsored by a
much higher Zionist -- Bettylu Saltzman, the daughter of Chicago's
super-Zionist, Philip M. Klutznick. 

Bettylu Saltzman - daughter of Chicago's Philip M. Klutznick
Axelrod has been creating and shaping Candidate Obama since 1992.
"Axelrod met Obama when the senator was 30 years old and coordinating
a voter-registration drive in Chicago and Betty Lou Saltzman, a doyenne of
progressive politics in Chicago, suggested that the two get to know each other,"
the New York Times reported in early 2007. "In the 15 years since, Axelrod
has worked through Obama's life story again and again, scouring it for usable
political material." 
Bettylu Saltzman has been supporting and financing Obama's political career
since 1992, long before he ran for office. Saltzman is the only daughter of
the Zionist leader, Philip Morris Klutznick. In 1992, when Obama was thirty
years old, Saltzman told Axelrod and others, "He will be our first black president.''
Saltzman then commissioned Axelrod to create Obama, the presidential candidate. 

Philip M. Klutznick
Saltzman's father, Philip M. Klutznick, was Israel's biggest supporter in Chicago.
Klutznick, who passed away in August 1999, was the former president of
B'nai B'rith International (1953-59), president of the World Jewish Congress,
general chairman of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), president of the American
Friends of the Hebrew University, vice-president of the Jewish Welfare Board,
a founder of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations,
president of the Memorial Foundation for Jewish Culture, and vice president
of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, among other things. 
Axelrod and Emanuel worked together to create an image for Obama the
candidate since 2003. "For four years Axelrod has had camera crews tracking
virtually everything Obama has done in public -- chatting up World War II vets
in southern Illinois, visiting his father's ancestral village in western Kenya --
and there were days when the camera crews have outnumbered the civilians,"
Ben Wallace-Wells reported in the New York Times article of April 1, 2007. 

Obama, the politician, was primarily created by David Axelrod,
who writes his speeches and guides his political strategy.
In October 2008 I warned readers that the Obama ticket was really a hard-core
Zionist ticket in disguise.  In my article "Colin Powell: Liar & War Criminal
Endorses Obama," I advised my readers of the Israeli gangsters behind Obama:   
Powell's endorsement of Obama, a puppet of the Israeli Rahm Emanuel,
has less to do with Obama's African roots than with getting Emanuel and
his Zionist gangsters back into control of the Oval Office. Emanuel, the real
boss of the Democratic party, is the son of a real Israeli terrorist (Irgun and Lehi)
and thug-in-chief of the party.    
What can we expect from the Obama presidency?  Elected on a platform of
"Change" after eight years of a very unpopular and dictatorial Bush regime,
we would expect a substantial change from the disastrous policies of the previous
administration.  So what changes will we see?  Will we see an end to the costly
and illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?  Will the senior officials of the Bush
administration who willfully lied to start these wars of aggression be held
accountable for their war crimes?  Will we finally have a proper and independent
investigation of 9-11? Will the oppressive Department of Homeland Security be dismantled? 
If the war criminals are not held accountable and the most egregious criminal
policies of the Bush administration are not changed and reversed – what
exactly does the Obama "Change" slogan mean?  Changing the curtains? 
Changing the Israelis in the White House?
Change of Zionist Jewish "investment bankers" at the White House:  Joshua Bolten,
the son of a C.I.A. agent and second Jewish chief of staff in U.S. history, greets
Rahm Emanuel, Obama's chief of staff, erstwhile investment banker, and son
of an Israeli terrorist.  Bolten served in the administration of George H. W. Bush
(1989-93) before becoming executive director of legal and governmental affairs at
Goldman Sachs (London, 1994-1999).  He left Goldman Sachs to serve as policy
director for the presidential campaign of George W. Bush (March 1999 to
November 2000). Bolten became Deputy Chief of Staff for George W. Bush
in January 2001 and Chief of Staff in April 2006.  Bolten is credited with recruiting
Henry Paulson - CEO of Goldman Sachs - to serve as Treasury Secretary in July
2006.  Paulson crafted the disastrous A.I.G. bailout in which Goldman Sachs
became the largest single recipient of taxpayer funds ($12.9 billion), an immense
financial scam in which the profits went to private banks -- and the costs to the U.S. public.

One of the key players in the Obama administration's $900 billion economic
stimulus package in late 2008 was Obama's new budget director
Peter R. Orszag. The forty-year-old Orszag was Obama's director of the
Office of Management and Budget, the arm of the White House responsible
for crafting the federal budget and overseeing the effectiveness of federal
programs. He had worked closely with Rahm Emanuel in the Clinton
administration - when the disastrous NAFTA legislation was passed
- and was one of the first Obama appointees to be approved. 

Peter R. Orszag
"In the coming years, no bureaucrat will be as decisive as Peter Orszag,"
Ezra Klein wrote recently in The American Prospect. So, who is Peter Richard
Orszag and what kind of decisions will he make with the budget he controls?
Based on his background one would be well advised to prepare for a financial train wreck. 
Peter Orszag has an interesting resume.  He has played key roles in some
of the biggest financial scandals of our time.  Orszag was, for example,
an advisor to the Russian Finance Ministry during the reign of the Jewish
oligarchs as they plundered the wealth of Russia.  He was an advisor to
the Central Bank of Iceland before it crashed in 2008.  During the Clinton
administration, Orszag was a key advisor to Rahm Emanuel and Bill Clinton
on the disastrous NAFTA bill that devastated the U.S. manufacturing sector. 
Oddly, Orszag's background has received virtually no attention in the media.
He has a troubling background, which deserves to be looked at very carefully.
Orszag, for example, should start by explaining exactly what happened to the
Icelandic economy. Orszag was, after all, the founder and president of the
economic consultancy firm which advised the Central Bank of Iceland - before
it went bankrupt. How did Icelandic banks become so indebted? Ask Peter Orszag. 
Orszag is an economist who served six years in the Clinton administration
(1993-98) under Robert E. Rubin, the former treasury secretary who recently
resigned from his senior position at the woefully mismanaged and nearly
bankrupt Citigroup. The fact that Orszag was a protégé of the now disgraced
Rubin certainly does not bode well for the Obama administration.  Rubin strongly
opposed the regulation of derivatives when such regulation was proposed in
1997. Credit derivatives of mortgage-backed securities were the key reason for
the recent failure of a number of large financial institutions, including AIG and Citigroup. 
In 1999, Rubin joined Citigroup as a board member and a participant "in
strategic managerial and operational matters of the company." The Wall
Street Journal noted that Citigroup shareholders suffered losses of more
than 70 percent since Rubin joined the firm and that he encouraged changes
that led the firm to the brink of collapse. In December 2008, investors filed a
lawsuit contending that Citigroup executives, including Rubin,
sold shares at inflated prices while concealing the firm's risks. 
Orszag, a Jew, served on the president's Council of Economic Advisers in 1993,
under Rubin, when the Israeli Rahm Emanuel, Clinton's senior adviser, was
pushing the disastrous NAFTA legislation through Congress. Prior to joining
the Clinton team, Orszag was an economic adviser for the Russian Ministry
of Finance in Moscow from 1992-93. This was a period of rampant financial
criminality during which many Russian mineral assets came under the control
of the so-called Jewish oligarchs who became instant billionaires. Most of
these oligarchs fled Russia when their crimes were exposed and
now live in Britain or Israel, where they obtained citizenship. 
Born in Boston on December 16, 1968, Orszag graduated from Princeton University
in 1991. He then attended the London School of Economics, where he earned
a degree in 1992 and where he obtained his PhD in 1997. The London School
of Economics was established by members of the Fabian Society, who believed
in advancing socialism through gradual reforms.  The Fabian Society is a British
socialist movement, whose purpose is to advance the principles of social
democracy via gradualist and reformist, rather than revolutionary means. The
ideology of the Fabians is said to be described in the quote,
"Fabianism feeds on Capitalism, but excretes Communism." 
In 1998, after serving in the Clinton administration, Orszag co-founded an
economic consulting group company with his brother and Joseph Stiglitz called
Sebago Associates, where he served as president through 2007. The firm's
clients have included the World Bank, the Nordic Council of Ministers, and
most notably, the Central Bank of Iceland. The once prosperous economy of
Iceland has been devastated by the current economic crisis, which its citizens
say was carried out by a gang of financial criminals who followed
disastrous policies and advice - provided by Peter Orszag and Company. 
Americans would be well advised to be extremely vigilant with dangerous
"Young Turks" like Peter Orszag and Rahm Emanuel running the Obama
White House and the U.S. budget. 
The United States government today is not unlike the oil tanker Sirius Star,
hijacked by Somali pirates, except that the ship of state has been taken over
by an organized gang of Zionist pirates, an organization most people don't
even know exists. This organization was created by members of the Zionist
terror groups, the Hagana, Irgun, Lehi, and their Mossad network. Members
of these groups were sent to the United States in the 1950s to raise dedicated
Zionist agents that would look and sound like Americans - but think like Israelis.
In this way Zionists have gained control over our government and media
without the passengers even noticing. The only thing that most Americans
notice is that the voyage is not as smooth as they had expected and the ship
seems to be sinking. The Zionist-controlled media assures us, however, that
all is well.  Dream on. 
Israeli intelligence is like the criminal organization, Quantum, in the James Bond
film Quantum of Solace.  They are everywhere, supporting politicians on both
sides of the aisle, creating and running governments from the left and the right,
yet you don't even know they exist. Over the past six decades, Israeli agents
have infiltrated every agency of the U.S. government and gained access to the
most critical computer networks.  In order to understand what the Obama
administration will mean for America and the world, it is
essential to understand the Zionist agents behind Obama. 
Sources and Recommended Reading 
Bumiller, Elisabeth, "The Brothers Emanuel," New York Times, June 15, 1997
"Emanuel to be Obama's chief of staff," Jerusalem Post, November 6, 2008 
Green, Joshua, "The Enforcer," Rolling Stone, October 20, 2005 
Klutznick, Philip M., Biography from Biographical Directory of the United States
Executive Branch, 1774-1989 (1990), edited by Robert Sobel, Greenwood
Publishing Group, Westport, CT 

Wallace-Wells, Ben, "Obama's Narrator," New York Times, April 1, 2007

Click on this text to watch an ISRAEL-FIRSTER-TRAITOR, Senator Chuck Schumer, brag about his role in Congress and the two Chicago JEW families (Pritzkers & Klutzniks) who created Obama



Rahm Emanuel mulls chief of staff role in Barack Obama's administration


GOP strategist says Emanuel could moderate Obama, add tougher style to complement

boss' gentle touchNovember 06, 2008|By Naftali Bendavid, WASHINGTON BUREAU

WASHINGTON — Rep. Rahm Emanuel might not appear at first glance to be the obvious

choice to serve as White House chief of staff for a president-elect who has spoken

eloquently of setting aside partisan differences and bringing the country together.


Emanuel, after all, is best known as something of a Democratic political assassin.

From his days as a top aide to President Bill Clinton to his recent role leading the

Democrats to a House majority, Emanuel has relentlessly attacked

his foes and gone ruthlessly after anyone who stood in his way.


Yet the Illinois congressman is mulling whether to accept President-elect Barack Obama's

request that he serve as his chief of staff. That means Emanuel would manage

Obama's schedule, oversee the daily operations of the White House and serve as a

top adviser to the president.


Perhaps the possibility is not as jarring as it might seem. For one thing, precisely because

Obama seems likely to adopt a unifying posture as president,

he may need someone practiced in the art of political hardball.


Republican strategist John Feehery -- who worked for former House Speaker Dennis

Hastert and Minority Leader Bob Michel, as well as former House Majority Leader

Tom DeLay -- said Emanuel could help prevent House Democrats from overreaching.


"Rahm is really smart," Feehery said. "He understands that if Obama goes too far to

the left, it's not going to be good for the Democrats. I think he's the kind of guy who can

knock some heads and help Obama guide the Congress toward the middle. I think that

will be the goal. You will need a bad cop to Obama's good cop, and Rahm will fill that role quite nicely."


Emanuel's policies, unlike his politics, have always been centrist, very much in the mold

of Clinton. In addition, a different Emanuel has emerged in recent years, one who has

forged friendships with Republicans and shown an ability to work with them on occasion.


Emanuel is a consummate Chicagoan; he was born in the city and attended New Trier

West High School in the northern suburbs. He kicked off his political career working for

such powerhouses as Chicago Mayor Richard Daley and former Sen. Paul Simon,

before joining Clinton's 1992 presidential run.


Along the way, Emanuel earned a reputation for a colorful intensity unusual even in the

hard-hitting world of politics. His profanity is legendary and seems designed in part to

throw his interlocutors off-balance. As a young political operative, he once joined other

youthful colleagues in mailing a dead fish to a Democratic pollster with whom he'd had a falling out.


Emanuel excelled at fundraising, sometimes screaming and shouting at donors until they

agreed to contribute -- generously -- to his candidate. He threatened to tear up checks if

he considered them too small.


After his White House stint, Emanuel returned to Chicago in 1998, making several million

dollars as an investment banker. That gave him the financial

freedom to mount a hard-fought race for Congress in 2002.


When Nancy Pelosi tapped Emanuel to lead the Democratic efforts to recapture control

of the House in 2006, a certain mellowing and maturation became apparent. To be sure,

Emanuel continued to browbeat anyone he considered an obstacle -- steamrolling weaker

Democratic candidates in favor of stronger ones, for example, or engaging in legendary

battles with party Chairman Howard Dean, not to mention launching all-out war against GOP candidates.


But Emanuel also showed an ability to cajole, flatter and even stroke his stable of

Democratic hopefuls, going so far as to send them Eli's cheesecake when they'd scored

a political success. His rants became more selective, deployed as much for effect as out

of true frustration.


Leading his party to its first House majority in 12 years, Emanuel has now become the

fourth-ranking Democrat in the House. While continuing to launch cutting attacks on

Republicans, he also has formed friendships with such GOP lawmakers as Reps. Adam

Putnam of Florida, Tom Cole of Oklahoma and Ray LaHood of Illinois.

He's even become friendly with White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten.


He joined Rep. Walter Jones, a conservative North Carolina Republican, in an unsuccessful

effort to establish a memorial to the Iraq War dead in the U.S. Capitol rotunda. He also

has teamed up with Republicans in an effort to expand children's health insurance.


"Congressional Republicans respect what he has been able to do," Feehery said. "They

think he's a formidable opponent. They think he works his butt off.

They won't particularly love him, but if he's smart, they will respect him."


When Emanuel's friend Obama began closing in on the presidency, many thought Emanuel

would remain in the House. He is potentially in line to become House speaker in a few years,

and he could be of great use to his fellow Illinoisan as a sounding board on the mood of Congress.


But arguably few Democrats have Emanuel's credentials for the chief of staff job. He has

served as a top White House aide, meaning he understands how that unique place works

and where the pitfalls lie. And he holds a top leadership post

in Congress, giving him insight into that institution as well.


Obama apparently has concluded that this background, packaged

in the person of an old Chicago friend, is too valuable to pass up.


Naftali Bendavid of the Tribune's Washington Bureau is the author of "The Thumpin':

How Rahm Emanuel and the Democrats Learned to Be Ruthless and Ended the Republican Revolution"








Meet the Jews in Donald Trump’s administration

Top left, clockwise: Carl Icahn, Jared Kushner, Jason Greenblatt, Steven Mnuchin (Icahn photo: Neilson Barnard/Getty Images for New York Times; Kushner photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images; Greenblatt photo: Uriel Heilman; Mnuchin photo: Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for City Harvest)

Top left, clockwise: Carl Icahn, Jared Kushner, Jason Greenblatt, Steven Mnuchin (Icahn photo: Neilson Barnard/Getty Images for New York Times; Kushner photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images; Greenblatt photo: Uriel Heilman; Mnuchin photo: Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for City Harvest)


(JTA) — American Jews are watching the beginning of Donald Trump’s presidency with both fear and hope.


Many have expressed worries about some of his supporters’ ties to the so-called “alt-right” movement, whose

followers traffic variously in white nationalism, anti-immigration sentiment, anti-Semitism and a disdain for “political correctness.”

Those fears intensified when Trump named as his chief strategist Stephen Bannon, the former chairman of Breitbart News,

a site Bannon once referred to as a “platform” of the alt-right. Trump’s strongly conservative Cabinet picks also back

policies on health care, the environment, abortion and civil rights often diametrically opposed to the views of most Jewish voters.


Yet others have praised Trump’s stance on Israel and his nomination of David Friedman, a bankruptcy lawyer who supports

West Bank settlement construction and has expressed doubts about the two-state solution, as U.S. ambassador to Israel.

Trump won 24 percent of the Jewish vote, with especially strong support in the Orthodox community.


Here is a look at the president’s Jewish advisers who will be helping to shape U.S. policy for the next four years.


Jared Kushner


Jared Kushner is simply the controlling operative du jour in the White house.... the same way Kissinger was and the same
way Rahm Emanuel, and others, were.... Kushner isn't as bright as his predecessors (but then, he doesn't
need to be considering how dumbed-down Americans have become.... generally speaking).

All of the Jew White House controllers take their orders from intermediaries above such as Soros who takes his instructions
ultimately from the Rothschild family.... The Rothschilds have run the American and English empires for many
generations and have successfuly used these empires to dominate and exploit much of the world.

We, as Americans, have been screwed in earnest since 1913 with the establishment of the ADL that was designed to protect
the Federal Reserve Bank (which was enabled by a very compromised Woodrow Wilson - who
also gave the Rothschilds the might of America to use against Germany during WWI).

All we can do about all of this is point it out to people with an I.Q. larger than their waist size
and hope that good will somehow triumph over evil.... eventually.

Jared Kushner exiting Trump Tower in New York City, Dec. 7, 2016. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Jared Kushner exiting Trump Tower in NewYork City, Dec. 7, 2016. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)


Trump’s Orthodox son-in law is serving as a senior adviser to the president. Kushner, the 36-year-old scion of a prominent real estate family from New Jersey, will not receive a salary and will focus on the Middle East and Israel as well as partnerships with the private sector and free trade, according to The New York Times. A day before his appointment was announced, Kushner said he would step down from his role as CEO of his family firm, Kushner Properties.



Kushner, who married Trump’s daughter Ivanka in 2009, played a crucial role in the president’s campaign, especially on Israel.

He worked on Trump’s speech to the AIPAC annual policy conference that earned the real estate mogul a standing ovation,

and helped plan a trip to Israel for his father-in-law last year. (Trump canceled the trip after Prime Minister

Benjamin Netanyahu slammed his call to ban Muslim immigration to the United States.)


Trump appears to be smitten with Kushner, often referring to

his “fantastic” son-in-law when boasting of his pro-Israel credentials.


Kushner may have become a household name during the campaign, but he’s no stranger to the limelight. In 2006, at 25,

he bought the New York Observer newspaper. Two years later he became CEO of Kushner Properties, four years

after his father was sent to jail for tax evasion, illegal campaign donations and witness tampering. In 2015, Fortune

 named Kushner to its 40 Under 40 list, an “annual ranking of the most influential young people in business.”


David Friedman

Donald Trump, right, along with his attorney David Friedman, left, exiting the Federal Building following their appearance in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Camden, New Jersey, Thursday, Feb. 25, 2010. (Bradley C Bower/Bloomberg News via Getty Images)

David Friedman, left, and Donald Trump exiting the Federal Building following their appearance in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Camden, N.J., Feb. 25, 2010. (Bradley C Bower/Bloomberg News via Getty Images)


Friedman, a bankruptcy expert and longtime Trump attorney, was tapped as the U.S. ambassador to Israel. A statement by

Trump’s transition team in December said Friedman, who speaks Hebrew, would serve from Jerusalem, but White House

press secretary Sean Spicer said last week that Trump had yet to decide on moving the embassy from Tel Aviv.


Friedman, who is in his late 50s, is the son of a Conservative rabbi with a family history of ties to Republican presidential

candidates — his family hosted Ronald Reagan for a Shabbat lunch in 1984, the year he won re-election. He lives in

Woodmere, New York, in the largely Jewish area known as the Five Towns, and owns a home in Jerusalem’s

Talbiya neighborhood, according to Haaretz.


Friedman has expressed support for and funded construction in Israeli settlements, and has expressed doubt

about the future of the two-state solution, traditionally a pillar of bipartisan U.S. policy in the region.


Some of his controversial statements — including slamming backers of the liberal Israel advocacy group J Street as

 “far worse than kapos” and charging President Barack Obama with “blatant anti-Semitism” — have sparked outrage from liberal groups.


Jason Greenblatt

Greenblatt would be thrust into the post of presidential adviser on Israel if Trump wins the White House. (Uriel Heilman)

Jason Greenblatt is working as a special representative for international negotiations in the Trump White House. (Uriel Heilman)


Greenblatt, the longtime chief legal officer for the Trump Organization, is working as special representative for

international negotiations focusing on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, U.S.-Cuba relations and American trade

agreements with other countries. An Orthodox Jew and Yeshiva University graduate,

Greenblatt studied at a West Bank yeshiva in the mid-1980s and did armed guard duty there.


A father of six from Teaneck, New Jersey, Greenblatt said he speaks with people involved in the Israeli government

but has not spoken to any Palestinians since his yeshiva studies. He has cited the American Israel Public Affairs Committee

as one of his main sources for staying informed about the Jewish state, and helped

draft Trump’s speech at the lobbying group’s annual conference in March.


Greenblatt, who has said he supports the two-state solution, has

implied that Trump will take a laissez-faire approach to peace building.


“He is not going to impose any solution on Israel,” Greenblatt told Israel’s Army Radio in November.

He also said that Trump “does not view Jewish settlements as an obstacle to peace.”


Steven Mnuchin

Steven Mnuchin speaking onstage at City Harvest: An Event Of Practical Magic in New York City, April 24, 2014. (Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for City Harvest)

Steven Mnuchin speaking at City Harvest: An Event Of Practical Magic in New York City, April 24, 2014. (Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for City Harvest)


Trump picked Mnuchin, a former Goldman Sachs executive who worked as Trump’s

national finance chairman during the campaign, to serve as Treasury secretary.


Trump and Mnuchin have been friends for 15 years, and prior to being in charge of Trump’s campaign finances, Mnuchin, 54,

served as an adviser. Part of what The New York Times describes as one of Manhattan’s “most influential families,”

Mnuchin and his father — the prominent art dealer Robert Mnuchin — both became wealthy working at Goldman Sachs.

The younger Mnuchin also co-founded the entertainment company RatPac-Dune Entertainment, which has worked on

such Hollywood hits as “Avatar” and “Black Swan.”


Some saw Trump teaming up with Mnuchin as unusual, considering that the real-estate mogul had consistently

bashed Goldman Sachs during his campaign — but it doesn’t seem to have hindered a good working relationship.


Stephen Miller

Stephen Miller speaking at a Donald Trump campaign rally, in Anaheim, California, May 25, 2016. (Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images)

Stephen Miller speaking at a Donald Trump campaign rally in Anaheim, Calif. May 25, 2016. (Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images)


Trump named Miller, who has played a crucial role in his campaign by writing

speeches and warming up crowds at rallies, as senior adviser for policy.


Miller, who has described himself as “a practicing Jew,” joined the Trump campaign in early 2016, quickly rising through

the ranks to become “one of the most important people in the campaign,” as Trump’s campaign manager told The Wall Street Journal.


Previously the 31-year-old worked for seven years as an aide to Trump’s choice for attorney general, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.,

helping the lawmaker draft materials to kill a bipartisan Senate immigration reform bill. Some of Sessions’ arguments are

similar to the harsh and often controversial statements by Trump on the issue, such as calling for

building a wall on the Mexican border and banning Muslim immigration to the U.S.


Though Miller grew up in a liberal Jewish home in Southern California, he was drawn to conservative causes early.

As a high school student he wrote a letter to the editor of a local paper in which he slammed his school for providing

free condoms to students and for making announcements both in English and Spanish, among other things.


Carl Icahn

Carl Icahn participating in a panel discussion at the New York Times 2015 DealBook Conference at the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York City, Nov. 3, 2015. (Neilson Barnard/Getty Images for New York Times)

Carl Icahn participating in a panel discussion at the 2015 DealBook Conference at the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York City, Nov. 3, 2015. (Neilson Barnard/Getty Images for New York Times)


Icahn, a businessman and investor, is serving as a special adviser on regulatory reform issues.

He is working as a private citizen rather than a federal employee or special government employee.


An early supporter of Trump’s candidacy, Icahn, 80, is the founder of Icahn Enterprises, a diversified conglomerate based

in New York City formerly known as American Real Estate Partners. He has also held substantial or controlling positions

in numerous American companies over the years, including RJR Nabisco, Texaco, Philips Petroleum, Western Union,

Gulf & Western, Viacom, Revlon, Time Warner, Motorola, Chesapeake Energy, Dell, Netflix, Apple and eBay.


Icahn is a major giver to Mount Sinai hospital in New York City, among other philanthropic endeavors.

In 2012, he donated $200 million to the renamed Icahn School of Medicine there.


In addition, Icahn established seven Icahn Charter Schools in the Bronx borough of New York.


Gary Cohn

Gary Cohn speaking onstage during Fortune's Most Powerful Women Summit - Day 2 at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel in Washington, D.C., Oct. 13, 2015. (Paul Morigi/Getty Images for Fortune/Time Inc)

Gary Cohn speaking at Fortune’s Most Powerful Women Summit in Washington, D.C., Oct. 13, 2015. (Paul Morigi/Getty Images for Fortune/Time Inc)


Cohn, the outgoing president and chief operating officer at Goldman Sachs, heads the White House National Economic Council.

At Goldman Sachs, where he had worked since 1990, Cohn answered to

CEO Lloyd Blankfein and was considered a strong candidate to lead the bank.


The 56-year-old father of three has a reputation for abrasiveness, but also for getting things done, according to a

Wall Street Journal profile last year. In a 2014 New York Times op-ed, Goldman Sachs executive Greg Smith wrote

on the day he resigned that Blankfein and Cohn were responsible for a “decline in the firm’s moral fiber” that

placed its interests above those of its clients.


Cohn, a Cleveland native, in 2009 funded the Cohn Jewish Student Center

at Kent State University named for his parents.


Success wasn’t always obvious for Cohn, whose struggle with dyslexia made school difficult for him. But the

Goldman Sachs banker, who was featured in a book on underdogs by writer Malcolm Gladwell, told the author that

his learning disability also taught him how to deal with failure and that “I wouldn’t be where I am today without my dyslexia.”


Boris Epshteyn

Boris Epshteyn attending SiriusXM's "White in America"special at SiriusXM Studios in New York City, June 30, 2015. (Ilya S. Savenok/Getty Images for SiriusXM)

Boris Epshteyn attending SiriusXM’s “White in America” special at SiriusXM Studios in New York City, June 30, 2015. (Ilya S. Savenok/Getty Images for SiriusXM)


Epshteyn, a Republican political strategist who appeared as a Trump surrogate on TV, is working as a special assistant to

the president. Epshteyn, who is in his mid-30s, also is serving as assistant communications director for surrogate operations.


A New York-based investment banker and finance attorney, Epshteyn was a communications aide for Sen. John McCain’s

presidential campaign in 2008, focusing his efforts on the Arizona senator’s running mate, then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.


He defended Trump on major TV networks over 100 times, according to The New York Times. TV hosts have described

Epshteyn, who moved to the United States from his native Moscow in 1993, as “very combative” and “abrasive.”


In 2014, he was charged with misdemeanor assault after being involved in a bar tussle. The charge was

dropped after Epshteyn agreed to undergo anger management training and perform community service.


David Shulkin

Dr. David Shulkin (Wikimedia Commons, public domain)

Dr. David Shulkin is the first Trump holdover appointment from the Obama administration. (Wikimedia Commons, public domain)


Dr. David Shulkin, the undersecretary for health at the Department of Veterans Affairs, will lead the department as

secretary under Trump if confirmed by the Senate. He would be the first holdover

appointment from the Obama administration, in which he served since 2015.


Shulkin, 57, is an internist who has had several chief executive roles, including as president of hospitals, notably 

Beth Israel Medical Center in New York City. He also has held numerous physician leadership roles, including as chief

medical officer for the University of Pennsylvania Health System, and academic positions,

including as chairman of medicine and vice dean at the Drexel University School of Medicine.


As an entrepreneur, Shulkin founded and served as the chairman and CEO of DoctorQuality,

one of the first consumer-oriented sources of information for quality and safety in health care.


Reed Cordish

Reed Cordish attending the Celebration of Xfinity Live! Philadelphia, March 30, 2012. (Bill McCay/WireImage via Getty Images)

Reed Cordish attending the Celebration of Xfinity Live! Philadelphia, March 30, 2012. (Bill McCay/WireImage via Getty Images)


Trump chose Cordish, who is friends with his son-in-law Jared Kushner, to serve as assistant to the president for

intragovernmental and technology initiatives. He will be responsible for initiatives requiring

multi-agency collaboration and also focus on technological innovation and modernization.


Cordish is a partner at his family’s real estate and entertainment firm, the Baltimore-based Cordish Companies, .


Cordish’s father, David, the chairman and CEO of The Cordish Companies and an AIPAC board member, is a friend

of Trump. The two met during the mediation process of a lawsuit in which Trump sued The Cordish Companies.


And Cordish, who is in his early 40s, has another connection to the Trump family — he was introduced to his now-wife

Margaret by none other than Ivanka Trump, who attended the couple’s wedding in 2010 with husband Jared Kushner.

Cordish and his wife were listed as co-hosts for a Manhattan fundraiser for Trump’s presidential campaign in

October, Jewish Insider reported.


Avrahm Berkowitz

Berkowitz, 27, is serving as special assistant to Trump and assistant to Jared Kushner. Berkowitz and Kushner met

on the basketball court of an Arizona hotel during a Passover program, Jewish Insider reported.

 The two stayed in touch and Berkowitz went on to work with Kushner in several capacities.


After graduating from Queens College, Berkowitz worked for Kushner Companies and later went on to write for Kushner’s

paper, the New York Observer. In 2016 Berkowitz, who was then finishing up his last semester at Harvard Law School,

directed a Facebook Live talk show for the Trump campaign. Later he worked on the presidential campaign as

assistant director of data analytics.


Berkowitz’s first cousin is Howard Friedman, who served as AIPAC president in 2006-2010, according to Jewish Insider.





Last speaker before POTUS inaugurated: (((Schumer))).

First speaker after POTUS inaugurated: ((Rabbi Hier))).

Jews make up just 2 percent of the U.S. .



Here are the Jews of the Trump cabal, in order of appearance. Some are very familiar, like his daughter and son-in-law.

Others are billionaires who supported Trump’s campaign, and others yet are not so famous:

Michael Abboud (Sephardic Jew) – Communications Coordinator, Donald J. Trump for President

Paul Achleitner (Ashkenazic Jew) – Chairman, Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank (Donald Trump’s largest lender)

Sheldon Adelson (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Elliott Broidy (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

Michael Cohen (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President and Special Counsel, The Trump Organization

Gil Dezer (Ashkenazic Jew) – President, Trump Dezer Development

Michael Dezer (Ashkenazic Jew) – Founder, Trump Dezer Development

Lewis Eisenberg (Ashkenazic Jew) – Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

Boris Epshteyn (Ashkenazic Jew) – Senior Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President

Stephen Feinberg (Ashkenazic Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council; Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Alan Fishman (Ashkenazic Jew) – Chairman, Ladder Capital (Donald Trump’s second largest lender)

David Friedman (Ashkenazic Jew) – Co-Chairman, Israel Advisory Committee for Donald Trump

Samuel Fox (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

Alan Garten (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President and General Counsel, The Trump Organization

Bruce Gelb (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Michael Glassner (Ashkenazic Jew) – Deputy Campaign Manager and Former National Political Director, Donald J. Trump for President

Lawrence Glick (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President of Strategic Development, The Trump Organization

Jason Greenblatt (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, The Trump Organization; Co-Chairman, Israel Advisory Committee for Donald Trump

Vincent Harris (Ashkenazic Jew) – Former Digital Strategy Manager, Donald J. Trump for President

Carl Icahn (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Peter Kalikow (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Daniel Kowalski (Ashkenazic Jew) – Deputy Policy Director, Donald J. Trump for President

Charles Kushner (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Jared Kushner (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Yael Kushner [née Ivanka Trump] (Orthodox Jewish convert) – Executive Vice President, The Trump Organization

Bennett LeBow (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Richard LeFrak (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Corey Lewandowski (Ashkenazic Jew/East European) – Former Campaign Manager, Donald J. Trump for President

Ronald Lieberman (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President of Management & Development, The Trump Organization

Howard Lorber (Ashkenazic Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council; Donor, Trump Victory Fund

David Malpass (Ashkenazic Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council

Douglas Manchester (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Make America Great Again PAC

Bernard Marcus (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Rebekah Mercer (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Make America Number One PAC

Robert Mercer (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Make America Number One PAC

Amanda Miller (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice President of Marketing, The Trump Organization

Eli Miller (Ashkenazic Jew) – Chief Operating Officer, Donald J. Trump for President

Jason Miller (Ashkenazic Jew) – Senior Communications Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President

Stephen Miller (Ashkenazic Jew) – National Policy Director, Donald J. Trump for President

Steven Mnuchin (Ashkenazic Jew) – National Finance Chairman, Donald J. Trump for President

Samuel Nunberg (Ashkenazic Jew) – Former Policy Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President

David Orowitz (Ashkenazic Jew) – Senior Vice President of Acquisitions and Development, The Trump Organization

Geoffrey Palmer [né Weissinger] (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Rebuilding America Now PAC

John Paulson (Ashkenazic Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council

Stewart Rahr (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Richard Roberts (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice Chairman, Israel Advisory Committee for Donald Trump

George Ross (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President and Senior Counsel, The Trump Organization

Wilbur Ross (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Steven Roth (Ashkenazic Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council; Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Felix Sater (Ashkenazic Jew) – Former Senior Adviser, The Trump Organization

Keith Schiller (Ashkenazic Jew) – Director of Security, The Trump Organization

Melvin Sembler (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

Lara Trump [née Yunaska] (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Vanessa Trump [née Haydon] (Ashkenazic Jew/North European) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Ronald Weiser (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

Andrew Weiss (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President, The Trump Organization

Allen Weisselberg (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, The Trump Organization

Lawrence Weitzner (Ashkenazic Jew) – Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President

Steven Witkoff (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Stephen Wynn [né Weinberg] (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President






Politicians by John Niems

Click to watch on BitChute!
Click on the image to load the video!
Watch on

Kamala Harris' background, courtesy of General Geoffrey B. Higginbotham

Here's a timely editorial that exposes the hidden background of Kamala Harris from the Combat Veterans for Congress
Political Action Committee that is posted here with permission of the author. CVFC PAC supports
the election of US military combat veterans to the US Senate and House of Representatives.
"Kamala Harris’ father was an avowed Marxist professor in the Economics Department at Stanford University in Palo
Alto, CA. Both of Harris’ parents were active in the Berkeley based Afro- American Association;
Fidel Castro and Che Guevara were the heroes of the Afro-American Association.

The group’s leader, Donald Warden (aka Khalid al-Mansour), mentored two young Afro-American Association members,
Huey Newton and Bobby Seale; they created the Maoist inspired Black Panther Party which gained strong support from
Communist China; the Black Panther Party served as the model for creation of the Black Lives Matter Marxist organization
Khalid al-Mansour subsequently went on to arrange financing and facilitated for Barack Hussein
Obama to be accepted as a student to matriculate at Harvard Law School.

Following her graduation from college, Harris returned to California and subsequently became the mistress of the 60-year-old
married Speaker of the California Assembly, Willie Brown, Jr. Brown’s political campaigns were supported and funded by
Dr. Carlton Goodlett, the owner of The Sun Reporter and several other pro-Communist newspapers. Brown was elected as
Mayor of San Francisco, and strongly endorsed Harris’ Marxist political philosophy; he guided Harris' political rise in
California politics, leading to her election as California’s Attorney General. Willie Brown, Jr. was a well-known long-time
Communist sympathizer. Willie Brown, Jr. was initially elected to public office with the substantial help of the Communist
Party USA. Today, Willie Brown is widely regarded as one of the Chinese Communist Party’s best friends in the San Francisco Bay Area.

While serving as San Francisco District Attorney, Kamala Harris mentored a young San Francisco Radical Maoist activist,
Lateefah Simon, who was a member of the STORM Revolutionary Movement; Simon currently chairs the Bay Area Rapid
Transit (BART) Board. Simon has always been close friends with the founder of Black Lives Matter Marxist Domestic
Terrorists, Alicia Garza, as well as STORM member and avowed Communist, Van Jones. Harris has been openly and
aggressively supporting Black Lives Matter Marxists; Kamala Harris is still closely associated with Maoist Lateefah
Simon and Marxist Alicia Garza.

Kamala Harris’s sister Maya Harris was a student activist at Stanford University. She was a closely associated
with Steve Phillips, one of the leading Marxist-Leninists on campus and a long-time affiliate with the League of
Revolutionary Struggle, a pro-Chinese Communist group. Phillips came out of the Left, and in college he studied Marx,
Mao, and Lenin, and maintained close associations with fellow Communists. Phillips married into the multibillion-dollar
Sandler family of the Golden West Savings and Loan fortune. He funded many leftist political campaigns, and the voter
registration drives in the Southern and South Western states in order to help his friend, Barack Hussein Obama, defeat
Hillary Clinton. Phillips has been a major financial sponsor for Kamala Harris’s political campaigns for various California elective offices.

Harris' husband, Doug Emhoff works for the law firm DLA Piper, which “boasts nearly 30 years of experience in
Communist China with over 140 lawyers dedicated to its ‘Communist China Investment Services’ branch. He was
just appointed to Professor at Yale to school future lawyers in the fine points of Communism. When she was elected
to the US Senate, Kamala Harris appointed a Pro-Communist Senate Chief of Staff, Karine Jean-Pierre. Jean-Pierre
was active with the New York-based Haiti Support Network. The organization worked closely with the pro-Communist
China/Communist North Korea Workers World Party and supported Jean-Bertrand Aristide,
the far-left Communist former president of Haiti and the radical Lavalas movement.

Fortunately for Harris, but potentially disastrous for the Republic, elected office holders are not subject to the security
clearance process. If the FBI did a background Investigation on Kamala Harris, she never would have passed, because
of her 40-year close ties with Marxists, Communists, Maoists, and Communist China. Harris would never have been
approved for acceptance to any of the 5 Military Service Academies, been appointed to a US Government Sub-Cabinet
position, or would have been approved to fill a sensitive position for a high security defense contractor.
Yet, since Joe Biden was elected, Harris could be a heartbeat away from being President.

The US constitutional Republic is being threatened by the People’s Republic of Communist China (PPC) externally, and
by of their very active espionage operations within the United States. The People’s Republic of Communist China (PPC),
with 1.4 billion people, is governed by the 90-million-member Chinese Communist Party (CCP),
that has been working with Russia to destroy the US Constitutional Republic for over 70 years.

The CCP operates a massive global intelligence network through its Ministry of State Security. The CCP operates a
vast intelligence network in the U.S as well. It is made up, not merely of intelligence operatives working for the
Ministry of State Security, but it is also made up of a myriad of business and industry officials, Chinese scholar
associations, and 370,000 Chinese students currently attending American universities. It also operates the Confucius
Institute indoctrination and intelligence gathering centers in the US on 67 University campuses and in seventeen K-12
Public School Districts. The Confucius Centers are staffed by Communist Chinese intelligence operatives. Refer to this.

Kamala Harris is now involved with the Biden Family Business, and is supporting Joe Biden, who has worked closely
with Communist China for 12 years. Joe’s son, Hunter Biden, is the point of contact for developing the off-shore Biden
Family Businesses in Ukraine, Russia, Communist China, Iraq, Iran, etc. Hunter was provided with a $5 million non-recourse
loan for the Biden Family Business to form a partnership with the PPC; that loan was subsequently forgiven by
Communist China for one dollar.

Hunter Biden was given $1.5 billion for the Biden Family Business, to strategically purchase interests in companies
in the US Military Industrial Complex, whose technologies would enhance and improve Communist China’s defense
industry. Hunter Biden was also instructed to try to take control of US companies involved in sourcing rare earth
minerals in the United States. Hunter also received $3.5 Million from the wife of the Mayor of Moscow for some carefully hidden reason.

The Peoples Republic of Communist China has a military of two million men, including the world’s largest Navy.
The United States does not have enough ships and munitions to defeat China’s Navy, absent the use of nuclear weapons.
There is a famous book, Unrestricted Warfare, written in 1999 by two People’s Liberation Army colonels. It argues that
war between the PRC and the U.S. is inevitable, and that when it occurs China must
be prepared to use whatever means are necessary to achieve victory Refer to this.

If the American voters read the background information (in Trevor Loudon’s article) on Kamala Harris, they would
never support her election as Vice President of the United States. Joe Biden is suffering from the early onset of dementia
and will continue to decline in cerebral awareness; he will never be able to fill out a four-year term of office.
Since Biden was elected, the Socialists, Marxists, and Communist who control Kamala Harris, are planning to enact
provisions of the 25th Amendment, in order to remove Joe Biden from office, so Harris can become the first
Communist President of the United States.

Since Biden was elected, because Biden would not be up to it, Kamala Harris would lead the effort to appoint very
dangerous anti-American Leftist, Communist, Socialists, and Marxists to fill highly sensitive positions in the Washington
Deep State Bureaucracy. She would fill all appointive positions in the US Intelligence Agencies, in the Department of
Homeland Security, in the Department of Defense, in The Justice Department, the Department of State,
the FBI, the CIA, most cabinet positions, the National Security Council, and in the White House Staff.

American voters must be alert their fellow Americans that Kamala Harris is a very serious National Security
threat to the very survival of the US Constitutional Republic; she has been a fellow traveler of Marxists, Communists,
Maoists, Socialists, Progressives, and Chinese Communists for over 35 years. President Trump had much more
background information on Kamala Harris than we presented here, and he was
correct, when he accused Kamala Harris of being a Communist subverter."

Geoffrey B. Higginbotham
Major General, USMC (Ret.)





To bring about this state of affairs compliant politicians are needed,
and of them the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion say:
"The administrators whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard
to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of
government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of
men of learning and genius who will be their advisers, specialists bred
and reared from early childhood to rule the affairs of the whole world".


Let’s have a look at the so called “Special Advisors” on Mitt Romney’s
presidential advisory team during the 2012 presidential race.

Be aware that Willard Mitt Romney and the past and present Prime Minister of Israel,
Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu, are good buddies and have been for nearly 40 years going
back to when they both were consultants working at the Boston Consulting Group in the
mid-seventies. Romney does not take a stand or issue a statement even remotely related
to Israel without consulting Bibi first. Romney, as a Mormon,
could not be more on board with the Zionist Israeli agenda.
You must factor in the fact that Mormons firmly believe that they have a special covenant
with Jews. Mormons believe that they are descendants of the House of Israel and that
most Latter Day Saints are either lineally or adoptively members of the tribe of
Ephraim or Manasseh. Mormon apocalypticism holds that Jews, as a chosen
people (ethnocentricity), will ultimately accept Mormonism (See Jeremiah 31:31-34).

Mormons literally believe that there will be a physical gathering of the 10 lost tribes of Israel
after the second coming of the messiah and that they will be included. This is why the
Star of David appears prominently on the exterior stained glass windows in the Mormon
Assembly Hall in Salt Lake City. Mormons consider their doctrines as philo-Semitic (an
interest in, respect for, and appreciation of the Jewish people). Jews tend to view Mormons
more positively than any other religion and relate to the Mormon “persecution” in America.

Mitt Romney’s Special Advisors included:

– 9/11 planner and perpetraitor …Pentagon Comptroller on 9/11
…$1Trillion dollars went missing during his watch at the Pentagon. He orchestrated the
LAVI jet rip-off of American taxpayers and provided drone technology and retro-fitted
aircraft for the 9/11 false flag operation.

– The Assistant Attorney General on 9/11who obstructed justice
and aided and abetted enemies of the U.S.A. Chertoff is the seditious co-author of
the so called Patriot Act. He was the Secretary of Homeland Security/FEMA during
the Hurricane Katrina disaster causing the death of hundreds of victims through his
abject incompetence. He is the CEO of Chertoff Group that was found to be warehousing
overpriced, overstocked airport body scanners (Rapiscan scam) that they manufacture
and getting paid for them all.

– Republican Jewish Coalition …Defense Policy Advisory Board Member 2001 - 2007

– Advisor to the Republican Jewish Coalition, Chairman of the think tank American Action
Network which was founded by Jewish guy Isaac Applebaum of Opus Capital, and Fred
Malek who is a hotel magnate entering the Chinese market and is a senior advisor at the Carlyle Group.

– Member of Trilantic European Advisory Council, which is a think tank owned by Trilantic
Capital Partners (formerly Lehman Brothers Merchant Banking). Former CEO of United
Airlines, CEO of Millennium Challenge Corporation from 2005-2009 which is a U.S.
Foreign Aid Agency established by Congress in 2004 ...He was ambassador to Costa Rica 2001-2004.

– Principal Deputy Assistant to Vice President Cheney for National Security Affairs 2001-2003.

– Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs 2001-2009

– Senior Scholar at the Institute for Public Policy …
Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security.

– Syndicated Columnist …Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institute think tank.
Board member of the Foreign Policy Initiative.

– Member of the 9/11 Investigation Commission (a total fraud),
National Security Advisor for the Center for Security Policy.

– Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, Senior Advisor and Chief
Spokesman for the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq where he told Paul Bremmer what
to do from 2003 until 2004. Co-author of Startup Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic
Miracle which is no miracle at all. The Rothschild banking family bankrolled Israel in the
first place and then Israel has been skimming trillions off of the U.S. Government for decades.


– Executive Director of the Paulson Institute, which is former Jewish guy- now Christian
Scientist guy, Henry Paulson’s Reach Out to China project …
Member of East Asia Planning Staff for the Secretary of State 2001-2006.

– Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University …Deputy Assistant
for National Security Affairs and Director of Policy Planning for the office of the Vice President.

– Managing Director of Citigroup Private Bank in Boston …President of the U.S.-Asia Institute
where he and M. Marlon Young are about the only non-Asians at the Reach Out to China think tank.



– Principal of the Chertoff Group …CIA Director 2006-2009,
Director of the National Security Agency 1999-2005.


– Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense 2008-2009 … Son of Dov Zakheim.


-CEO of Vorbeck Materials which manufactures a lot of printing ink …Ambassador to
the European Union 2008-2009 …Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs 2005-2008.

– Resident Scholar and Director of Russian Studies at the American Enterprise Institute
where Jewish guys, Arthur Brooks and Norman Ornstein think of ways to manipulate the U.S. Government.

- Associate Professor of International Security Studies at the Fletcher School at Tufts University.


– Ambassador to the Netherlands 2001-2005 …Member of
the United States Holocaust Memorial Council 1994-1998.

– Senior Policy Analyst at the Heritage Foundation which touts radio propagandist gasbags
Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity as honored members …Director of the
Foreign Service Institute’s Western Hemisphere Area Studies program.
All the Romney Advisors mentioned so far are Zionist Jewish Americans with dubious
loyalty to the U.S.A. The one exception to being a Jewish American is former CIA Director
Michael Hayden who now directly works for Michael Chertoff. These people compromise
half of the Romney Advisory Team, and then half of those people are the criminals that
micro managed the 9/11 horrors and the Afghan/Iraq invasions.
(Notice where all of these people were working from around 2001 to 2005).




This is how the ‘Court Jews’ have been strategically

placed into power families over millennia.

Reflections on Jewish Intermarriage into Native Elites





“I want to thank my Jewish daughter. I have a Jewish daughter.

This wasn’t in the plan but I’m very glad it happened.” – Donald Trump, February 2015.

(ILLUSTRATION: Donald Trump’s Jewish son-in-law, Jared Kushner)


by Andrew Joyce


AS DISCUSSION CONTINUES among White advocates over the Trump candidacy, I haven’t

failed to notice that perhaps the most persistent criticism of Trump from our ranks has been

his strong links to Jews, in particular his familial ties to Jewish blood. There’s certainly some

substance to this. Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, has adopted the Jewish religion as her own and

has been married to Jewish real estate speculator Jared Kushner since 2009. Both of

Donald Trump’s grandchildren are Jewish. Looking into the situation in more detail, I was

intrigued to discover that Ivanka’s previous two significant relationships were also with Jews,

Greg Hirsch and James Gubelmann. Of further note is Ivanka’s very close friendship with

Chelsea Clinton, another progeny of the American power elite, who married the Jewish financier

Marc Mezvinsky in 2010. The Trump and Clinton situations are excellent examples of

the centuries-old practice of strategic Jewish intermarriage with native elites, and this

phenomenon deserves some focused attention.


Jewish intermarriage into non-Jewish power elites is a significant but under-researched

aspect of Jewish strategies to maintain and expand influence. At first sight, of course, it

appears paradoxical. A major part of the Jewish group evolutionary strategy is concerned

with segregation of the gene pool and preventing high levels of genetic admixture from

surrounding groups. Judaism has historically been replete with social and cultural controls

designed to minimize contact with non-Jews, and therefore greatly inhibit admixture. Additionally,

converts are dissuaded and scorned in Judaism in a manner quite without parallel in any

other religious culture. However, as Kevin MacDonald has noted in A People That Shall

Dwell Alone (2002, hereafter PTSDA), conversion and admixture were permissible, if

not eagerly sought, when such an admixture was very small and offered significant net

benefits to the group. Similarly, at the opposite end of the Jewish strategic ghetto, controls

were also far from airtight — the most sincere Jewish apostates to Christianity tended to

be overwhelmingly poor and obscure, and were little mourned by the group

at large. The eugenic benefits of pursuing such a strategy are obvious.


Even in ancient times there is evidence that “some gentile-derived genes were being selected

for their effects on resource-obtaining abilities within the Jewish community (PTSDA, 41).”

By targeting the rich and powerful for intermarriage, Jews could obtain significant and

immediate material resources, an improvement in social status, and also useful genetic

material. Though very few in number, ancient converts, and their more celebrated modern

counterparts, have been disproportionately intelligent and successful. MacDonald writes

that It is possible that even this relatively small genetic admixture from surrounding populations

could be adaptive for a strategizing group because the group would benefit from new genetic

combinations, e.g. intelligence, greater phenotypic similarity etc…Evidence in favor of this

hypothesis would be that Jewish proselytism, while highly limited and restricted, has been

more successful among wealthy, intelligent, and talented individuals and that this pattern

was actively encouraged by the Jewish community (PTSDA, Chapter 2, 41).[1]


Earlier this year Princeton University Press published Todd Endelman’s Leaving the Fold:

Conversion and Radical Assimilation in Modern Jewish History. Endelman’s work purports

to examine phenomena like intermarriage and conversion but, typically for mainstream

Jewish scholarship, it neglects to engage in any real sense with aspects of these

phenomena that reflect less favorably on Jewish culture, particularly the nature of

elite-level intermarriage. However, there are a few useful snippets of information that offer

substantiation for MacDonald’s observations. Those Jews who drifted into the non-Jewish

gene pool were indeed, according to Endelman, “swindlers, drunkards, whores, schlemiels,

schlemazels, nudniks, and no-goodniks” whose “social, cultural, and even moral level was

low.”[2] By contrast, those non-Jews welcomed into the Jewish fold were from the very highest

social levels, and the efforts taken to entice young princes, landowners, or heirs of industry

to take Jewish wives were remarkable for their long-term, premeditated nature. Endelman

remarks on census data from Berlin, covering the period 1770–1826, which indicates that

elite Berlin Jews were utilizing baptism as “a long-term strategy to make their

daughters eligible for eventual intermarriage.”[3]


Chelsea Clinton and her Jewish husband Marc Mezvinsky with Bill Clinton

Of course, the most significant barrier to Jewish attempts to intermarry with the non-Jewish

elite were the religious aspects of marriage, and the requirement that Jews convert to

Christianity before being permitted to take a Christian spouse. This barrier only began to

weaken in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, beginning in the German-speaking

lands where some of the aforementioned leading Jewish families began baptizing their

daughters in long-term strategies for intermarriage with the Prussian elite, the Junkers.

By the late 1700s many of the Junkers had fallen on hard times financially, due in large

part to Jewish predation. The same period witnessed a boom in the wealth of Jewish bankers.

Deborah Hertz writes in Jewish High Society in Old Regime Berlin that “discrete private loans

to those who could afford the high interest rates was one way that the Jewish bankers

increased the wealth they acquired in the Seven Year’s War.”[4] Indebted nobles began

frequenting the homes of their Jewish creditors, either to make payments or plead for

extensions. It was in these circumstances that the first fraternization began between the

Prussian nobility and the daughters of the Jewish elite. There is even some suggestion that

nobles were heavily pressured, via their debts, to take Jewish wives for easier terms.

For example, Hannah Arendt argued that intermarriages between the Prussian nobility

and Jewish women were simply “a continuation of the creditor-debtor exchanges of the

earlier years.”[5] Eventually this mode of contact evolved into the “salon” culture, in which

soirées were staged and hosted by Jewish financial magnates with the specific purpose

of encouraging the mixing of the Prussia nobility and selected Jewesses.[6]


Civil marriage wasn’t introduced in Prussia until 1874. Until then there were a considerable

number of insincere conversions that facilitated intermarriage but failed to disguise the fact

that the Jewish wives of the Prussian nobility continued to carry on Jewish lives. Hertz

describes the Jewish families as “socially opportunistic” strategizers who were motivated by

“status-hungry desires” and “craved the higher positions possessed by Christians.”[7] The

vast majority of Jewish women who married into the Junker class derived many of the social

benefits now attached to their status in non-Jewish society, while retaining “strong ties to

friends and relatives who remained Jewish.”[8] The flurry of Jewish intermarriages into the

Prussian elite only began to ebb away around 1813, when Prussian society witnessed

a backlash against the encroachment, and a number of “anti-Semitic” salons were established.

[9]Many of the salon women were treated with scathing disdain by those members of the

elite who resented the Jewish incursion. For example, Wilhelm von Humboldt, the Prussia

philosopher and diplomat, once described salon star Rahel Levin as a “monster.” And when

Levin married Karl August Varnhagen von Ense, the cream of the Prussian elite,

von Humboldt asked a friend whether “there was anything a Jew could not achieve.’”[10]



Although the salons of Prussia and Paris facilitated the extension and deepening of

Jewish influence, no nineteenth-century native elite was subjected to Jewish penetration

as strongly as the British aristocracy. In 1936 England’s Arnold Leese, a former military

veterinarian and leader of a small Fascist group, published a pamphlet titled 

Our Jewish Aristocracy: A Revelation.

At the outset of the publication, Leese wrote that he wished to impress upon his fellow Britons

that “their race is being displaced and replaced, and without notice to any individual.”

Compared with our contemporary situation, Leese couldn’t even imagine what genuine

displacement and replacement would actually look like. However, what Leese did manage

to produce was a valuable, though imperfect, piece of research that made a convincing

case for the argument that the British elite was being slowly displaced and replaced with

Jewish genes. My careful re-examination of his lengthy list of British nobles with Jewish

ancestry indicates that Leese made a handful of errors, but the majority of those listed

were indeed related to Jews by blood or marriage.


In his classic work, The Jews (1922), Hilaire Belloc wrote that Jewish intermarriage into

the British elite was more “subtle and penetrating” than even the Jewish

acquisition of key positions in the institutions of the State. Belloc stated that:


Marriages began to take place, wholesale, between what had once been the aristocratic

territorial families of this country and the Jewish commercial fortunes. After two generations

of this, with the opening of the twentieth century those of the great territorial English

families in which there was no Jewish blood were the exception. In nearly all of them

was the strain more or less marked, in some of them so strong that though the name

was still an English name and the traditions those of a purely English lineage of the

long past, the physique and character had become wholly Jewish and the members of

the family were taken for Jews whenever they travelled in countries where the gentry

had not yet suffered or enjoyed this admixture (223).


The two main reasons for the more extensive Jewish penetration of the British aristocracy

were the earlier introduction of civil marriage, and the admission of Jews to the hereditary

peerage on a par with the native elite (beginning with Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1884).

Endelman writes that in Britain, “marriage without a religious ceremony became legal in

1837, and in 1839 Hannah de Rothschild (1815–1864), daughter of the founder of the

English branch of the banking clan, married Henry FitzRoy, younger son of the second

Lord Southampton, at St. George’s, Hanover Square, without first becoming a Christian.”[11]

Although romantic historical renditions of the marriage portray it as a love affair between

two people whose families objected to the pairing, the ensuing scale and extent of Jewish

intermarriage into the peerage following the union suggest that the Rothschilds and the

wider Anglo-Jewish Cousinhood were very keen on the development. In fact, within a century

the scale of Jewish intermarriage with the British aristocracy was such that it led L.G. Pine,

editor of Burke’s Peerage from 1949–1959, to write in 1956 that “the Jews have made

themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely

to suffer loss which is not mutual.”


Pine’s astute comment bears some reflection because it cuts to the heart of Jewish

intermarriage with native elites. Jews historically have tirelessly engaged in efforts to

position themselves either in elite positions or in positions that place them between the

elite and the great mass of people. Jews have sought these positions of power and influence

in order to pursue their goals and interests — goals and interests which are very often at

odds with the interests of native populations. This conflict of interests is the root cause

of what has been termed “anti-Semitism,” and one of the main strategies Jews have

employed against “anti-Semitism” is that of crypsis. Cryptic strategies have involved

insincere conversions to Christianity and the abandonment of phenotypic characteristics

that provoke hostility. The argument here is that Jewish intermarriage with native elites should

be seen, partly, as a more extreme example of Jewish crypsis.  What better way for a

foreign elite to occupy powerful positions in a society than to do so in a manner which gives

the impression that the foreign elite is nothing more than the traditional, native elite?

By inter-breeding so acutely with the native elites, and blending their interests so tightly, the

strategy also places further distance between the native elite and the people it leads. As Pine

suggests, the native elite can no longer act on behalf of the people and against foreign influence

because intermarriage has ensured that any Jewish loss would in fact be “mutual.”


The Trump and Clinton intermarriages should be seen as part of this greater strategy of

expanding power and influence cryptically, and “normalizing” or blurring the image of Jews

at the top of our society. Also, in the same way that one injects small amounts of microbes

in order to immunize oneself against a disease, by taking in small amount of the “best”

genes or personalities Jewry “immunizes” itself against the threat of a reaction from the

financially and politically powerful. To be clear, although it is clearly helpful, the argument

here is not that intermarriage is any longer essential to the expansion of Jewish power and

influence. It’s continuance in the present is in part merely a symptom of the geriatric,

decayed, and increasingly alien nature of our existing elites. Our sick society has an elite

composed of media types, corporate vultures, and opportunistic politicians. And when a society

hands over the top positions of power and influence to the financially rich but morally

and ideologically bankrupt, it will not be cream that rises to the top, but scum.


Jews no longer have to reach across a cultural Rubicon in order to penetrate an exalted

native elite. They already occupy the same dubious space as it. In Diversity in the

Power Elite: How It Happened, Why It Matters (2006) G. William Domhoff and Richard

Zweigenhaft state that “Jews are overrepresented overall in the corporate elite. Jews are

also now overrepresented in both the Senate and the House.”[12] The need for the salons

has long since dissipated. The rotten elites, both foreign and domestic, can intermingle

in their board rooms and political venues, their fates and interests, as Pine stated, now

entwined. Chelsea Clinton and Marc Mezvinsky, the son of an Iowa Congressman and a

Philadelphia Congresswoman, met at a 1993 Democratic political retreat in Hilton Head,

South Carolina. Ivanka Trump met Jared Kushner in a heavily-Jewish social milieu

built around the upper echelon of corporate real estate. The social circles are mutual.


A couple of weeks ago, during a conversation with a White advocate of many years’ service,

I was asked my opinion on the monarchies of Europe and their future. I replied that although

I have a lingering respect for centuries of tradition, the time has come for the decrepit old

elites to be swept away. In the course of the ongoing invasion of foreign peoples into Europe,

the remaining aristocracies will not survive long anyway. The invaders will not respect the

history, tradition or authority of people who are no more than relics of past European glories.

The inbred, quasi-Jewish denizens of Europe’s crumbling manorial estates may lock the doors

of their palatial residences, but if push came to shove, they would be no more spared the

ravages of a racial conflict than the humblest member of society. Nor should we mourn the

passing of these people and their toppling from power and influence. These older elites

have had centuries to prove that they deserved their positions through service to the folk

and concern for the collective material well-being. Time and again they failed. Their corporate

and political successors are failing even more rapidly, and much more profoundly.


If it can be said that many White advocates are elitists in the sense that they reject

the proposition that “all men are equal,” it must be made clear that this in no way suggests

support or endorsement for the existing elite, or the qualifications by which this group

claims elite status. Quite the opposite. We are thus both elitist and “anti-elite.” In the same

way, we acknowledge the influence of genes and heredity on one’s personality, behavior,

and abilities but reject the idea that heredity alone is a qualification for individual or familial

power. One does not find hereditary elites in nature. A lion may rule a pride but none of

his cubs, talented though they may be, are necessarily destined to take his place. In the

long history of monarchy in Europe, Fate placed a crown upon a genius only once in

centuries. The remainder of these ages witnessed Europe laboring under

despots, the mediocre, the inept, the feeble, the cowardly and the venal.


One of the great lies fed to the masses is that we now live in an era of meritocracy, with

access to elite status open to anyone who is “talented” enough. But the lie doesn’t bear

up under closer scrutiny. Even if one adopts the position that successfully competing

to get into a “meritocratic” institution like an elite university is an avenue towards eventual,

wider, elite status, one is confronted with phenomena like

 Jewish overrepresentation at elite universities.


The fact remains that we live in what a January 2015 article in The Economist described

as a flawed “hereditary meritocracy.” The hereditary meritocrats who compose our modern

elites benefit from social and ethnic networking in much the same way as the hereditary

aristocrats did in earlier periods. There are gatekeepers controlling access to elite

universities, elite media positions, and elite social functions. As has been stated, Jews are

massively overrepresented across all indicators of elite power and influence. Meritocracy,

like modern democracy, is an illusion.


This discussion is aimed primarily at moving us away from references to “our” elite, as

opposed to the Jewish elite. If anything resembling the old WASP elite still exists in America,

it is either moribund, corrupted, or beyond saving. The salvation of our people will not come

from throwing our support behind an imagined non-Jewish group already possessing some

wealth and power. As discussed above, interests and bloodlines have been intertwined

enough for any such group to view a decline in Jewish power as a decline in its own.

“Our” elite isn’t really “ours” at all. There is simply one, heavily-Jewish, elite, and we are

in ideological, material, and spiritual opposition to it. How excited, then, should we

really be about Donald Trump? For all his bluster, Trump is a creation and product of the

bourgeois revolution and its materialistic liberal ideologies. We are teased and tantalized

by the fantasy that Trump is a potential “man of the people.” But I cannot escape the

impression that he is a utilitarian and primarily economic character, who seeks a social

contract based on personal convenience and material interest. In his business and political

history I see only the “distilled Jewish spirit.” In his family tree I see distilled Jewish blood.

Time will tell how useful his “drawing attention to the immigration issue” will be. Time will

also tell whether, if he is successful in reaching the White House,

he would do anything to reverse the decline of White America.


I’d love to be proven wrong.






[1] A recent paper notes that this process is quite common in nature and may well

have occurred in humans. The technical term for the spread of favorable genes from

one population to another is “adaptive introgression.” It has been proposed that human

populations settling in Eurasia acquired beneficial genes “‘for free’ at a frequency of a few

percent” from Neanderthals and other groups which then spread rapidly. The same thing

may have happened with Jewish populations in Europe, thus accounting for the superior

IQ of Ashkenazi groups compared to other Jewish groups, especially Middle Eastern Jews.


Adaptation through the acquisition of new mutations is generally a slow process: it is

rare for favourable alleles to appear, and these are often lost by chance when they

first occur in a single individual or in very few individuals. By contrast, if favourable

alleles have emerged in one group, they can spread to other groups relatively rapidly

by gene flow. This process, called ‘adaptive introgression’, is well documented in

bacteria and plants, and described in some cases in animals, but it has not previously

been considered an important factor in human adaptation. However, because

Neanderthals and Denisovans lived in Europe and Asia for hundreds of thousands

of years, they presumably carried alleles that were favourable given the conditions

where they lived. Through gene flow, modern humans spreading across Eurasia from

Africa could then acquire these alleles ‘for free’ at a frequency of a few percent, thus

ensuring that they were not lost and could be acted upon by positive selection.

(Svante Pääbo, “The diverse origins of the human gene pool,” Nature Reviews—

Genetics 16 (June, 2015), 313–314.


[2] T. Endelman, Leaving the Fold: Conversion and Radical Assimilation

in Modern Jewish History (Princeton University Press, 2015), 77.

[3] Ibid, 79.

[4] D. Hertz, Jewish High Society in Old Regime Berlin (Syracuse University Press, 2005), 214.

[5] Ibid, 215.

[6] Ibid, 207.

[7] Ibid, 210.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Ibid, 258.

[10] Ibid.

[11] Endelman, Leaving the Fold, 79.

[12] G. W. Domhoff & R. Zweigenhaft, Diversity in the Power Elite:

How It Happened, Why It Matters (Rowman and Littlefield, 2006), 38.

* * *

Source: Occidental Observer