ESSENTIALLY . . .

Christianity, as a slave rebellion devised and led by Jews with the aim of destroying Roman power —

and, ultimately, all European power —

was and is a doctrine aimed at converting vigorous peoples into a domesticated flock of sheep.

How the Jews Treat Christians in Israel - It's Serious!

If Israel could do this to a young American Jew, imagine what Palestinians face every day

Burning and Spitting on preacher of Jesus the Christ in Jerusalem

Furious Jews threaten to stone us for preaching Jesus Christ in Jerusalem!

Intense Hostility (spit upon like ten times) Preaching in Jerusalem

The so-called Jews hate Jesus!

America is doomed unless a resurgent Christianity can reunite the stricken White masses.

 Here Kevin MacDonald argues in support of this thesis as advocated in an impassioned new book. 

By KEVIN MACDONALD
The Occidental Observer
August 11, 2020

Abridged by Lasha Darkmoon with brief annotations

ONWARD, CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS!

“What shall it profit a man if he shall gain the whole world, but lose his own soul?” — Mark, 8:36

GILES COREY HAS WRITTEN a book that should be read by all Christians as well as White advocates of all theoretical perspectives, including especially those who are seeking a spiritual foundation that is deeply embedded in the history and culture of Europeans. 

Corey is well aware that contemporary Christianity has been massively corrupted. Mainline Protestant and Catholic Churches have become little more than appendages for the various social justice movements of the left, avidly promoting the colonization of the West by other races and cultures, even as religious fervor and church attendance dwindle and Christianity itself becomes ever more irrelevant to the national dialogue.

On the other hand, Evangelicals, a group that remains vigorously Christian, have been massively duped by the theology of Christian Zionism, their main focus being to promote Israel.

Until the twentieth century, Christianity served the West well.

One need only think of the long history of Christians battling to prevent Muslims from establishing a caliphate throughout the West—Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours, the Spanish Reconquista, the defeat of the Turks at the gates of Vienna. The era of Western expansion was accomplished by Christian explorers and colonists. Until quite recently, the flourishing of science, technology, and art occurred entirely within a Christian context.

—   §   —

MUCH OF MY SCHOLARLY INTEREST has been to attempt to understand the people and culture of the West, resulting in my book Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future. As I argue there, individualism lends itself to moral and ethical universalism which led to the religiously based eradication of slavery long before the rise of an elite hostile to Christianity itself. And White intellectuals in the nineteenth century attempting to understand their own moral universalism often attributed it to their racial origins.

Such individualism was not disastrously self-destructive. As Corey notes, “Christian universalism historically posed little to no danger to White survival because it was preached by Whites living in a world ruled by Whites; it was only in the multicultural Egalitarian Regime inseminated in the mid-twentieth century that Christian sacrifice was transformed into a call for racial suicide.” The individualist, Christian West was thus highly adaptive—until the rise of a hostile, Jewish-dominated elite bent on corrupting adaptive forms of Christian individualism in favor of a completely deracinated individualism, now accompanied by powerful religious, media, and academic voices preaching White guilt, often from a Christian perspective.

Instead, Corey advocates a revitalization of Medieval Germanic Christianity based on, in the words of Samuel Francis, “social hierarchy, loyalty to tribe and place (blood and soil), world-acceptance rather than world-rejection, and an ethic that values heroism and military sacrifice.” This medieval Christianity preserved the aristocratic, fundamentally Indo-European culture of the Germanic tribes.

This was an adaptive Christianity, a Christianity that was compatible with Western expansion, to the point that by the end of the nineteenth century, the West dominated the planet. Christianity per se is certainly not the problem.

The decline of adaptive Christianity coincides with the post-Enlightenment rise of the Jews throughout the West as an anti-Christian elite, and Corey has a great deal of very interesting material on traditional Christian views of Judaism. Traditional Christian theology viewed the Church as having superseded the Old Testament and that, by rejecting the Church, the Jews had not only rejected God, they were responsible for murdering Christ.

My view, developed in Chapter 3 of Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism is that traditional Christian theology was fundamentally anti-Jewish and was developed as a weapon which was used to lessen Jewish economic and political power in the Roman Empire. Here Corey describes the writings of the fourth-century figure, St. John Chrysostom, whose writings on Jews are nothing less than scathing.

Chrysostom was far from alone in his hatred. For example, St. Gregory of Nyssa, also writing in the fourth century, had this to say about the Jews:

“They are murderers of the Lord, assassins of the prophets, rebels against God, God haters, advocates of the devil, race of vipers, slanderers, calumniators, dark-minded people, leaven of the Pharisees, sanhedrin of demons, sinners, wicked men, stoners, and haters of righteousness.”

 

The traditional Church, in short, was certainly far from friendly toward Jews.

LD: The full quote will be found in Kevin MacDonald, Separation and its Discontents, Chapter 3.  This chapter contains a whole raft of uninhibited anti-Semitic quotes from the early Church Fathers, including St. Jerome, Hillary of Poitiers, St. Cyril, St John Chrysostom, St Gregory of Nyssa, and others. The anti-Semitism we witness today is small beer in comparison. Our Christian forebears were in no doubt as to who their most implacable enemies were and laid on their anti-Semitism with a trowel, no holds barred. For centuries the Jews remained the traditional enemies of mankind, hated with a visceral hatred.  All this has changed. Today the Jews are allegedly our best friends. And the world is becoming an altogether better place under their benign influence. Or so we are repeatedly told by the elite media.  (LD)

—   §   —

ALTHOUGH PROTESTANTISM was generally far more amenable to Jewish interests even before its current malaise, there certainly are exceptions. Here Corey emphasizes Martin Luther’s writings on Jews. Luther emphasizes Jewish hatred toward Christianity and their sense of superiority vis-à-vis Christians, seeing the latter as “not human; in fact, we hardly deserve to be considered poor worms by them.” But he is also concerned about Jewish economic exploitation and domination of Germans via usury—certainly the biggest complaint about Jews in traditional Europe. And he is repulsed by Talmudic ethics which promote very different moral codes for Jews and non-Jews.

However, much has changed since the origins of Christianity. In the contemporary United States, Christian Zionism has had a very large influence on Evangelical Protestantism whose theology departs radically from traditional Christianity, particularly with respect to the Jews. Corey has an excellent section on how Jews helped shape this new theology; it should be required reading for Christian Zionists because it would open their eyes to the sordid history of their movement. The result of such thinking is that Zionism has often become a vehicle of moral idealism in the minds of a great many gentiles, from Lloyd George to the present, who believe that the restoration of Israel is far more important than the fate of their own people.

The baleful influence of Pastor Hagee (pictured here and here), whose Zionist organization has raised over $100 million to right-wing causes in Israel over the years, has often been noted. Hagee has been well rewarded financially for his efforts and is the recipient of numerous awards from Zionist organizations. As for the dishonorable Cyrus Scofield, his tendentiously annotated Bible has become central to Christian Zionism. Here Corey discusses the role of Felix Untermeyer, a wealthy Jew, in promoting Scofield and his Bible. This was a religious ideology “with a new worship icon—the modern state of Israel.” Corey does an excellent job showing how Christian Zionism is a radical departure from traditional Christian theology. I found the following passage quite stunning:

The heresy of Christian Zionism, using an arbitrary and self-contradictory literalist and futurist hermeneutic, contends that the Jews remain God’s chosen people, separate from and superior to the Church; indeed, they believe that earthly Jewish Israel will replace the Church, and that as such, “Christians, and indeed whole nations, will be blessed through their association with, and support of, Israel.”

 

CHRIST  AND  HIS  TORMENTORS

COREY HAS GREAT MATERIAL on Jewish perceptions of Christianity in the Talmud and on negative Jewish influences on culture in the present West, including pornography and the sexual revolution generally. As is so often the case with Jewish activism, the pornography movement has been motivated not solely by money but by hatred toward Christian morality and Christian family functioning. The results have been devastating: huge increases since the 1960s—the breakthrough decade of Jewish power—in all the markers of family dysfunction and poor child outcomes: lower marriage rates, higher births out of wedlock, higher rates of teenage pregnancy, precocious sexuality, high divorce rates, and unstable pair bonds.

In other words, the Western family pattern of monogamous nuclear families based on strong husband-wife pair bonds has been under attack from Jewish dominated movements, the most noteworthy of which was psychoanalysis promising an idyllic future if only people would jettison traditional Christian constraints on sexuality. These negative trends in family functioning have been most pronounced among the lower social classes and thus have much less effect on high-IQ middle and upper income groups, including Jews as a relatively high-IQ group. The disaster in family patterns has fallen far more severely on the White working class.

Corey’s has an extended treatment of the corrosive effects of pornography, now extended to child pornography and legalized pedophilia as the “final frontier” in the sexual revolution. As Corey notes in the case of pedophilia, “We are presumably one Supreme Court ruling away from the National Review cocktail ‘conservative’ crowd celebrating pederasty as the next great achievement of individual liberty.”

Given the exhaustive summary of the negative effects of pornographyt, it is horrifying indeed that “sixty percent of boys and thirty percent of girls are exposed to pornography in early adolescence, including ‘bondage, rape, and child pornography’. Children under ten years old now account for over twenty percent of online pornographic consumption.”

This definitely was not happening when I was growing up in the 1950s, prior to the deluge.

I agree with Corey’s conclusion, “We have conclusively established that Jewish leadership and participation was instrumental in and a necessary condition of the pornographic war that has struck at the most sacred foundation of the West, the family.”

“If only Americans knew, we are bringing them the plague!”
— Sigmund Freud to Carl Jung, on the ship bringing them to America

—   §   —

Corey has an excellent and exhaustive section on Jewish ritual murder—an absolutely convincing presentation on a topic that, like so much of Jewish history, is a minefield for serious scholars. As he notes,

“There are … hundreds of accusations and cases of Jewish ritual murder, each just as sadistically depraved as the last, involving barrels of nails, crucifixion, decapitation, spit-roasting, stoning, and a litany of other barbaric evils; we could fill entire volumes with the accounts of each of these innocent lives so cruelly taken from this world.”

 

See this artist’s lurid depiction of
Jewish ritual murder of a Christian child

This is a topic that I have never written about, although I was somewhat familiar with Blood Passover, Ariel Toaff’s book on the topic. As to be expected, Toaff’s book was condemned by the activist Jewish community and he was pressured into publishing an apology, promising to prevent distribution of his book.  However, we should not be surprised to find that such practices occurred.

LD:  According to Toaff, ritual murder of Christians definitely did occur among extreme and isolated Jewish sects in the Middle Ages, and he gives documentary proof of this. (See this graphic illustration of ritual murder, euphemistically known today as “blood libel”.) 

 

Fearing for his life and safety, Toaff was forced to recant, a bit like Galileo, and agree to the suppression of his findings. Unless you can obtain a copy of Toaff’s original book, it’s hard to know what Toaff actually said. There’s not a single quote about ritual murder under “Ariel Toaff, Wikiquotes.” It’s all gone down the memory hole.

 

Here is an article by a Jewish professor of history, sneering at Toaff for “blood libel” and claiming he is “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” (LD)

 

(Kevin MacDonald continues)    

Ritual murder is an extreme manifestation of normative Jewish hostility toward the surrounding society which is an important facet of the entire subject. The eighteenth-century English historian Edward Gibbon was struck by the fanatical hatred of Jews in the ancient world:

From the reign of Nero to that of Antoninus Pius, the Jews discovered a fierce impatience of the dominion of Rome, which repeatedly broke out in the most furious massacres and insurrections. Humanity is shocked at the recital of the horrid cruelties which they committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyprus, and of Cyrene, where they dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives; and we are tempted to applaud the severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of the legions against a race of fanatics, whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind.

 

The nineteenth-century Spanish historian José Amador de los Rios wrote of the Spanish Jews who assisted the Muslim conquest of Spain that “without any love for the soil where they lived, without any of those affections that ennoble a people, and finally without sentiments of generosity, they aspired only to feed their avarice and to accomplish the ruin of the Goths; taking the opportunity to manifest their rancor, and boasting of the hatreds that they had hoarded up so many centuries.”

As I noted in an article titled Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the Soviet Union: “Hatred toward the peoples and cultures of non-Jews and the image of enslaved ancestors as victims of anti-Semitism have been the Jewish norm throughout history. Hatred and revenge were clearly on display in the early decades of the Soviet Union, a period in which around 20 million people were murdered.”

From Stalin’s Willing Executioners, a review of Yuri Slezkine’s ‘The Jewish Century’:

There can be little doubt that Lenin’s contempt for “the thick-skulled, boorish, inert, and bearishly savage Russian or Ukrainian peasant” was shared by the vast majority of shtetl Jews prior to the Revolution and after it. Those Jews who defiled the holy places of traditional Russian culture and published anti-Christian periodicals doubtless reveled in their tasks for entirely Jewish reasons, and, as Gorky worried, their activities not unreasonably stoked the anti-Semitism of the period.

 

Given the anti-Christian attitudes of traditional shtetl Jews, it is very difficult to believe that the Jews engaged in campaigns against Christianity did not have a sense of revenge against the old culture that they held in such contempt.

 

Slezkine’s argument that Jews were critically involved in destroying traditional Russian institutions, liquidating Russian nationalists, murdering the tsar and his family, dispossessing and murdering the kulaks, and destroying the Orthodox Church has been made by many other writers over the years. …

 

Kevin MacDonald’s seminal article, Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the USSR, can be read in its entirety here. (LD)

This fear and loathing of Christianity continues into the present. Susan Sontag’s “the white race is the cancer of human history,” which was published in Partisan Review, a prominent literary journal associated with the Jewish New York intelligentsia, is emblematic.

As I write this in the summer of 2020, we are experiencing what feels like the end game in the Jewish conquest of White America. This hatred won’t end if and when Whites become a minority. Jews were responsible for the 1965 immigration law that opened up the United States to immigration from all over the world, and they have energetically worked to make alliances with these immigrant groups who are encouraged to hate White America and often adopt anti-White rhetoric almost as soon as they arrive because they can see the political advantages of doing so.

This won’t end well. As I concluded in my recent book, Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition:

I agree with Enoch Powell: “as I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see ‘the River Tiber foaming with much blood’.”

 

All the utopias dreamed up by the Left inevitably lead to bloodshed—because they conflict with human nature. The classical Marxist Utopian vision of a classless society in the USSR self-destructed, but only after murdering millions of its own people. Now the multicultural utopian version that has become dominant throughout the West is showing signs of producing intense opposition and irreconcilable polarization. 

 

The left and its big business allies have created a monster.

 

Whites have to realize that if they do nothing, they will be increasingly victimized and vilified in the coming decades as the monster continues to gain power. Better that any blood be shed sooner rather than later. 

 

What happened in the early decades of the Soviet Union is a chilling reminder of what can happen when an alien hostile elite seizes control of a country.

I agree entirely with Corey’s conclusions and recommendations for a revival centered around the adaptive aspects of Christianity—the aspects that produced Western expansion, innovation, discovery, individual freedom, economic prosperity, and strong family bonds. A Christianity that is adaptive in the evolutionary sense of survival and reproduction and fundamentally cognizant of the mistakes of the past:

We must not tolerate subversion. Liberalism must go; we cannot afford to repeat the mistakes of the Enlightenment. We cannot afford to countenance any further anti-American, anti-family, anti-White speech, and this should be reflected in a new Constitution. Just as conservatism was not enough, the United States Constitution was not enough, with gaps that left it gaping wide for judicial “interpretation.”

 

For another thing, we must circle the wagons and inculcate the männerbund, restraining our individualism at least for the time being. For another, we must return to our Lord and Savior. A nation without faith can have no guiding light, no purpose, no drive, no Mission.

 

Izaak Walton, writing of his friend John Donne’s last days, described the body “which was once a temple of the Holy Ghost and is now become a small quantity of Christian dust.” His last line: “But I shall see it reanimated.”

 

LD: Conclusion. White America needs to take up arms, both spiritual and material, if it is to vanquish the traditional enemy of mankind—the deadly enemy within the gates seeking its destruction. But all conquest must begin with self-conquest. In the words of Marcus Aurelius: “Waste no more time arguing what a good man should be. Be one.” A revitalized Christianity is the answer.  

Giles Corey’s new book, The Sword of Christ,
may be purchased here. Get it before it’s banned!

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Proposed Law of the Knesset members:

Moshe Gafni Nissim Zvili P/950
Proposed Penal Law (amendment--possession, printing, reproduction, dissemination,

distribution, and importation of publications to induce [SEE FOOTNOTE #1] religious conversion). 5757--1996

1. After paragraph 174B to the Penal Law 5737--1977 [SEE FOOTNOTE #2] would come:
Prohibition of inducement for religious conversion 174C

A) Whoever possesses contrary to the law or prints or reproduces or disseminates

or distributes or imports tracts or publicizes things in which there is an

inducement to religious conversion is punishable by -- one year imprisonment.

B) Any tract or publication in which there is inducement to religious conversion will be confiscated.

The following article should be read by every pro-Israel Christian; and copied and handed to friends and family.  Grace Halsell learned by experience that what her church had taught her about Israel is a myth.

It must be mentioned here, though, that Mrs. Halsell was apparently (at least when this article was written) uninformed about the hoax of the Holocaust.  She also mentions that the Jews don't accept the Old Testament, and rely solely on the Talmud, when in fact, the first five books of the Old Testament are the Torah, which are the first five books of the Talmud.  -- Jackie -- May 26th, 2003

________________________________________________  

Washington Report on Middle Eastern Affairs

Special Report

What Christians Don’t Know About Israel

By Grace Halsell

May/June 1998, pages 112, 126

     American Jews sympathetic to Israel dominate key positions in all areas of our government where decisions are made regarding the Middle East. This being the case, is there any hope of ever changing U.S. policy? President Bill Clinton as well as most members of Congress support Israel — and they know why. U.S. Jews sympathetic to Israel donate lavishly to their campaign coffers. .

     The answer to achieving an even-handed Middle East policy might lie elsewhere — among those who support Israel but don’t really know why. This group is the vast majority of Americans. They are well-meaning, fair-minded Christians who feel bonded to Israel — and Zionism — often from atavistic feelings, in some cases dating from childhood.

     I am one of those. I grew up listening to stories of a mystical, allegorical, spiritual Israel. This was before a modern political entity with the same name appeared on our maps. I attended Sunday School and watched an instructor draw down window-type shades to show maps of the Holy Land. I imbibed stories of a Good and Chosen people who fought against their Bad “unChosen” enemies.

     In my early 20s, I began traveling the world, earning my living as a writer. I came to the subject of the Middle East rather late in my career. I was sadly lacking in knowledge regarding the area. About all I knew was what I had learned in Sunday School.

     And typical of many U.S. Christians, I somehow considered a modern state created in 1948 as a homeland for Jews persecuted under the Nazis as a replica of the spiritual, mystical Israel I heard about as a child. When in 1979 I initially went to Jerusalem, I planned to write about the three great monotheistic religions and leave out politics. “Not write about politics?” scoffed one Palestinian, smoking a waterpipe in the Old Walled City. “We eat politics, morning, noon and night!”

     As I would learn, the politics is about land, and the co-claimants to that land: the indigenous Palestinians who have lived there for 2,000 years and the Jews who started arriving in large numbers after the Second World War. By living among Israeli Jews as well as Palestinian Christians and Muslims, I saw, heard, smelled, experienced the police state tactics Israelis use against Palestinians.

     My research led to a book entitled Journey to Jerusalem. My journey not only was enlightening to me as regards Israel, but also I came to a deeper, and sadder, understanding of my own country. I say sadder understanding because I began to see that, in Middle East politics, we the people are not making the decisions, but rather that supporters of Israel are doing so. And typical of most Americans, I tended to think the U.S. media was “free” to print news impartially.

"It shouldn’t be published. It’s anti-Israel."

     In the late 1970s, when I first went to Jerusalem, I was unaware that editors could and would classify “news” depending on who was doing what to whom. On my initial visit to Israel-Palestine, I had interviewed dozens of young Palestinian men. About one in four related stories of torture.

     Israeli police had come in the night, dragged them from their beds and placed hoods over their heads. Then in jails the Israelis had kept them in isolation, besieged them with loud, incessant noises, hung them upside down and had sadistically mutilated their genitals. I had not read such stories in the U.S. media. Wasn’t it news? Obviously, I naively thought, U.S. editors simply didn’t know it was happening.

     On a trip to Washington, DC, I hand-delivered a letter to Frank Mankiewicz, then head of the public radio station WETA. I explained I had taped interviews with Palestinians who had been brutally tortured. And I’d make them available to him. I got no reply. I made several phone calls. Eventually I was put through to a public relations person, a Ms. Cohen, who said my letter had been lost. I wrote again. In time I began to realize what I hadn’t known: had it been Jews who were strung up and tortured, it would be news. But interviews with tortured Arabs were “lost” at WETA.

     The process of getting my book Journey to Jerusalem published also was a learning experience. Bill Griffin, who signed a contract with me on behalf of MacMillan Publishing Company, was a former Roman Catholic priest. He assured me that no one other than himself would edit the book. As I researched the book, making several trips to Israel and Palestine, I met frequently with Griffin, showing him sample chapters. “Terrific,” he said of my material.

     The day the book was scheduled to be published, I went to visit MacMillan’s. Checking in at a reception desk, I spotted Griffin across a room, cleaning out his desk. His secretary Margie came to greet me. In tears, she whispered for me to meet her in the ladies room. When we were alone, she confided, “He’s been fired.” She indicated it was because he had signed a contract for a book that was sympathetic to Palestinians. Griffin, she said, had no time to see me.

     Later, I met with another MacMillan official, William Curry. “I was told to take your manuscript to the Israeli Embassy, to let them read it for mistakes,” he told me. “They were not pleased. They asked me, ‘You are not going to publish this book, are you?’ I asked, ‘Were there mistakes?’ ‘Not mistakes as such. But it shouldn’t be published. It’s anti-Israel.’”

     Somehow, despite obstacles to prevent it, the presses had started rolling. After its publication in 1980, I was invited to speak in a number of churches. Christians generally reacted with disbelief. Back then, there was little or no coverage of Israeli land confiscation, demolition of Palestinian homes, wanton arrests and torture of Palestinian civilians.

The Same Question

     Speaking of these injustices, I invariably heard the same question, “How come I didn’t know this?” Or someone might ask, “But I haven’t read about that in my newspaper.” To these church audiences, I related my own learning experience, that of seeing hordes of U.S. correspondents covering a relatively tiny state. I pointed out that I had not seen so many reporters in world capitals such as Beijing, Moscow, London, Tokyo, Paris. Why, I asked, did a small state with a 1980 population of only four million warrant more reporters than China, with a billion people?

     I also linked this query with my findings that The New York Times , The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post — and most of our nation’s print media — are owned and/or controlled by Jews supportive of Israel. It was for this reason, I deduced, that they sent so many reporters to cover Israe l— and to do so largely from the Israeli point of view.

     My learning experiences also included coming to realize how easily I could lose a Jewish friend if I criticized the Jewish state. I could with impunity criticize France, England, Russia, even the United States. And any aspect of life in America. But not the Jewish state. I lost more Jewish friends than one after the publication of Journey to Jerusalem — all sad losses for me and one, perhaps, saddest of all.

     In the 1960s and 1970s, before going to the Middle East, I had written about the plight of blacks in a book entitled Soul Sister, and the plight of American Indians in a book entitled Bessie Yellowhair, and the problems endured by undocumented workers crossing from Mexico in The Illegals. These books had come to the attention of the “mother” of The New York Times, Mrs. Arthur Hays Sulzberger.

     Her father had started the newspaper, then her husband ran it, and in the years that I knew her, her son was the publisher. She invited me to her fashionable apartment on Fifth Avenue for lunches and dinner parties. And, on many occasions, I was a weekend guest at her Greenwich, Conn. home.

     She was liberal-minded and praised my efforts to speak for the underdog, even going so far in one letter to say, “You are the most remarkable woman I ever knew.” I had little concept that from being buoyed so high I could be dropped so suddenly when I discovered — from her point of view — the “wrong” underdog.

     As it happened, I was a weekend guest in her spacious Connecticut home when she read bound galleys of Journey to Jerusalem. As I was leaving, she handed the galleys back with a saddened look: “My dear, have you forgotten the Holocaust?” She felt that what happened in Nazi Germany to Jews several decades earlier should silence any criticism of the Jewish state. She could focus on a holocaust of Jews while negating a modern day holocaust of Palestinians.

     I realized, quite painfully, that our friendship was ending. Iphigene Sulzberger had not only invited me to her home to meet her famous friends but, also at her suggestion, The Times had requested articles. I wrote op-ed articles on various subjects including American blacks, American Indians as well as undocumented workers. Since Mrs. Sulzberger and other Jewish officials at the Times highly praised my efforts to help these groups of oppressed peoples, the dichotomy became apparent: most “liberal” U.S. Jews stand on the side of all poor and oppressed peoples save one — the Palestinians.

     How handily these liberal Jewish opinion-molders tend to diminish the Palestinians, to make them invisible, or to categorize them all as “terrorists.”

     Interestingly, Iphigene Sulzberger had talked to me a great deal about her father, Adolph S. Ochs. She told me that he was not one of the early Zionists. He had not favored the creation of a Jewish state.

     Yet, increasingly, American Jews have fallen victim to Zionism, a nationalistic movement that passes for many as a religion. While the ethical instructions of all great religions — including the teachings of Moses, Muhammad and Christ — stress that all human beings are equal, militant Zionists take the position that the killing of a non-Jew does not count.

     Over five decades now, Zionists have killed Palestinians with impunity. And in the 1996 shelling of a U.N. base in Qana, Lebanon, the Israelis killed more than 100 civilians sheltered there. As an Israeli journalist, Arieh Shavit, explains of the massacre,

     Israelis today, explains the anti-Zionist Jew Israel Shahak,

     In the teachings of Christ, there was a break from such Talmudic teachings. He sought to heal the wounded, to comfort the downtrodden.

     The danger, of course, for U.S. Christians is that having made an icon of Israel, we fall into a trap of condoning whatever Israel does — even wanton murder—as orchestrated by God.

     Yet, I am not alone in suggesting that the churches in the United States represent the last major organized support for Palestinian rights. This imperative is due in part to our historic links to the Land of Christ and in part to the moral issues involved with having our tax dollars fund Israeli-government-approved violations of human rights.

     While Israel and its dedicated U.S. Jewish supporters know they have the president and most of Congress in their hands, they worry about grassroots America — the well-meaning Christians who care for justice. Thus far, most Christians were unaware of what it was they didn’t know about Israel. They were indoctrinated by U.S. supporters of Israel in their own country and when they traveled to the Land of Christ most all did so under Israeli sponsorship. That being the case, it was unlikely a Christian ever met a Palestinian or learned what caused the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

     This is gradually changing, however. And this change disturbs the Israelis. As an example, delegates attending a Christian Sabeel conference in Bethlehem earlier this year said they were harassed by Israeli security at the Tel Aviv airport.

     “They asked us,” said one delegate, “‘Why did you use a Palestinian travel agency? Why didn’t you use an Israeli agency?’”

     The interrogation was so extensive and hostile that Sabeel leaders called a special session to brief the delegates on how to handle the harassment. Obviously, said one delegate,

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Washington, DC-based writer Grace Halsell is the author of 14 books, including Journey to Jerusalem and Prophecy and Politics.

At Its Core, Christian Zionism Is Anti-Semitic

By Chuck Baldwin 
July 11, 2019

Three days ago (July 8), Jewish Rabbi Lynn Gottlieb and Plymouth Congregational United Church of Christ pastor Rev. Graylan Hagler collaborated on a column that was published on the Religion News Service website entitled The anti-Semitic theology behind the Christian Zionist lobby. Although I take exception to some of what is stated in the column, it is a very good read.

Gottlieb and Hagler begin: 

This week, the largest Israel lobby group in the United States, Christians United for Israel, will hold a two-day “summit” in Washington, D.C., featuring high-profile speakers such as Vice President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Many of the event’s attendees and featured guests will profess their abiding love and support for Israel and Jewish people.

In reality, right-wing Christian supporters of Israel like CUFI pose a grave danger to the safety and well-being of both Jews and Palestinians, as well as to hopes for a true and lasting peace in the Holy Land. Anyone who actually listens to CUFI’s leader, the Rev. John Hagee, will be horrified at the meeting’s toxic blend of anti-Semitism, racism, homophobia, Islamophobia and sexism.

Hagee and his more than 5 million followers believe that the establishment of Israel in 1948 and its subsequent military occupation and colonization of Palestinian and other Arab lands are the fulfillment of biblical prophecy and the necessary precursors to the return of Jesus Christ and the coming of the apocalypse.

It is very difficult for people who have not grown up in or who do not attend churches who teach prophecy doctrines that promote Israel-based dispensational futurism to truly understand the hold—even bewitchment (to use the Apostle Paul’s word in Galatians 3:1)—that the Rothschild-created State of Israel holds over these churches. But faithful readers of this column and those who regularly watch my online messages know that I was professionally educated (in two different Christian colleges) in the doctrines of dispensational futurism and went on to teach those same doctrines for over 30 years; so I am well-versed in this teaching. 

For people who are out of the loop on this subject, most Baptist churches, charismatic churches, “Bible” churches and those that are identified as conservative evangelical churches promote the false doctrines of Israel-based dispensational futurism. The same is true for many Christian colleges and universities, such as Liberty University, Dallas Theological Seminary, etc. The vast majority of television evangelists and radio preachers in America also promote this false doctrinal system. 

So, I cannot express how pleased I am to hear a Jewish Rabbi say that instead of supporting the Jewish people, as he professes to do, John Hagee (and his fellow Christian Zionists) is actually practicing anti-Semitism. The rabbi is exactly right.

Thanks mostly to the influence of the Zionist-concocted Scofield Reference Bible, Christian Zionism is predicated upon the false presupposition that God is not finished with the Old Testament nation of Israel and that the Zionist State of Israel created in 1948 is a prophetic fulfillment of a resurrected “end times” nation of Israel. 

According to Christian Zionists, before Christ returns, the nation of Israel must be resurrected (they believe the modern State of Israel fulfills this prophecy), that a third Jewish temple must be built (they believe Donald Trump is instrumental in helping to fulfill this prophecy as we speak), that the third temple will bring the Antichrist to power and that he will proclaim himself to be the real Christ in that temple, that he will deceive the modern State of Israel and most of the world into believing that he is Christ and that he will then unleash a worldwide holocaust against, yes, the Jews and all mankind, resulting in the death of most of the world’s population. After this, they believe, Christ will come and defeat the Antichrist at Armageddon. Oh, I left out one important part: Christian Zionists believe that sometime before Antichrist begins his worldwide conquest, they will all be raptured to heaven. 

Now, stop and think this through (which Rabbi Gottlieb obviously did). John Hagee and his gaggle of Christian Zionists claim to be rabidly “pro-Israel.” Anything Israel wants, these Christian Zionists are in favor of it. They support Israel’s persecutions and acts of genocide against the Palestinian people—many of whom are Christians. They support Israel’s wars of aggression against any and all of its Arab neighbors. They support Israel’s murders, thefts, plundering, rape, torture, spying, acts of terrorism, ad infinitum, ad nauseam. They even supported (and still support) Israel’s unprovoked attack against the USS LIBERTY in 1967 that killed 34 U.S. Sailors and Marines and wounded 174, making up all kinds of outlandish excuses to justify Israel’s unconscionable attack against the American people on that day. Of course, they base all of this hate, death and destruction on God’s promise to Abraham in Genesis 12:3 (“I will bless them that bless thee….”) and erroneously apply it to the counterfeit State of Israel created in 1948. 

But applying Genesis 12:3 to the modern Zionist State of Israel is actually much more draconian than a simple misinterpretation; it is a blatant and blasphemous attack against the completed work of Christ on the Cross. Galatians 3:16 is crystal clear that God’s promise to Abraham was completely fulfilled in Jesus Christ. To apply this promise to modern Israel is a dastardly denial of God’s Word and Christ’s finished work on the Cross. 

And here is what Rabbi Gottlieb understands: According to Christian Zionist theology, the end result of all of this “support” for Israel is what? The rise of Antichrist and a global holocaust against THE JEWS (I’m using the term “Jews” as understood by Christian Zionists). Hagee even openly says that Christian Zionists are NOT trying to convert the Jewish people to Christ. That part is true. Hagee and his ilk are brazen in their position that trying to evangelize Jews is a “waste of time.” But then the charismatic John Hagee lies and says his support for Israel is NOT about “end times” prophecies. But it’s ALL about “end times” prophecies, and Rabbi Gottlieb knows it. 

If Christian Zionists truly love the Jewish people so much, and if they truly believe that a resurrected Israel and the building of a third Jewish temple will result in the advent of the Antichrist, who will inflict a holocaust upon the Jewish people—one so terrible and enormous that it will make any persecution that the Jewish people have endured before look like a Sunday School picnic—why would they not do everything in their power to RESIST this satanic conspiracy? Christians are commanded in Holy Scripture to “resist the devil” (James 4:7; I Peter 5:8, 9), not assist him. 

Does not the Scripture say that Christians are to “have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them”? (Ephesians 5:11) Tell me, what could possibly be a darker work than deliberately, willingly and happily helping to pave the way for the Antichrist to come and kill billions of people—including most of the Jews in the world? 

The hypocrisy of Christian Zionists to decry the persecution of Jews in World War II Germany and then turn around and willingly work to bring about a future holocaust—the likes of which the world has never seen—is so audacious that it’s hard to comprehend. Oh, that’s right. They won’t be here to see or experience all of this death and destruction that they so enthusiastically helped bring upon the rest of the world. 

Rabbi Gottlieb is absolutely right: By their works, John Hagee and his fellow Christian Zionists are proving themselves to be quintessential anti-Semites. 

The truth is, unlike most of our evangelical Christian pastors, there are thousands of Jewish rabbis who understand that Zionism has nothing to do with the Jewish faith system (which today is NOT Old Testament Judaism, but a mix of Talmudism, Kabbalism and mysticism) and everything to do with an atheistic, militaristic political system that cares nothing for the Jewish people—or any other people, for that matter—and whose only purpose is to advance the wealth and power of the Zionist elite through perpetual war and perpetual debt to the Zionist-controlled international banking cartel. 

If you doubt the reality of the resentment and opposition to the Zionist State of Israel among many Orthodox Jews and rabbis, I challenge you to watch this video. 

Instead of bringing God’s blessing upon America for “blessing” Zionist Israel, Hagee and the rest of these Christian Zionist preachers are bringing God’s curse on America.

In my Israel Package containing 15 messages on the Biblical truth about Israel, I bring a message entitled I Will Curse Them That Bless Thee, showing from Scripture that America’s partnership with and promotion of atheistic Zionist Israel has brought about much of our country’s moral deterioration, family disintegration, social collapse, educational crisis, political morass, etc. 

Instead of trying to hasten the rise of the Antichrist, with the resultant death and destruction of millions of Jews (and how many people of all races and nationalities in the meantime), Christians should be preaching the glorious “gospel of peace” (Romans 10:15; Ephesians 6:15) to ALL men, including Jews, Muslims, Palestinians, etc., which will bring life, liberty, peace and goodwill to ALL men equally. 

Here is the crux of the matter: Real Bible believers understand that “Christ is the end of the [Jewish] law for righteousness.” (Romans 10:4) They know that “there is neither Jew nor Greek” but that we are “all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28) They know that “he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly [in the flesh].” But “he is a Jew, which is one inwardly [in the Spirit].” (Romans 2:28, 29) And they also know that the true “Israel of God” (Galatians 6:16) is not that strip of real estate in Palestine but is the entire Body of Christ comprised of all believers in Christ, regardless of their nationality, ethnicity or race (Ephesians 2:11 – 22). 

The doctrines of Christian Zionism have spawned much evil. The promoters of this devilish dogma are partnering with the “works of darkness.” Christian Zionism is not only anti-Semitic (as Rabbi Gottlieb opines); it is anti-America, anti-freedom, anti-constitutional government, anti-peace, anti-Natural Law and, in the end, anti-Biblical truth. 

P.S. After more than 30 years teaching and preaching the doctrines of Israel-based dispensational futurism, God opened my eyes to the truth, and I now see the great error of this false theology. I have spent the past decade studying the truth of the Scriptures relative to this subject—and I am still studying. I’ve asked God to forgive me for believing and teaching error, and I am now doing my best to teach the truth about Israel.

_________________________________________

ZIONIST LIES 

By Raji Abuzalaf | Dissident Voice | August 7, 2014

“There is no such thing as Palestine”

• I am Palestinian. My ancestors have lived in Palestine and were called “Palestinians” for 100 generations. I still have my parents’ Palestine passports.

• Before history is completely rewritten by Zionists, research plainly shows that the land has been called “Palestine” and her inhabitants “Palestinians” since 500 BCE.

• The United Nations partitioned “original Palestine” into two states: Israel (55%) and Palestine (45%) – (U.N. Resolution 181 – 11/29/1947).

Conclusion: Palestine has existed (by that name) for over 2500 years. Although the Zionist state of Israel was illegitimately formed on 78% of the land (which was conveniently overlooked by the U.N.), the remaining 22% is internationally recognized as Palestine. There are millions of Palestinians living in the world:

• In Palestine (living in terror under illegal Israeli occupation)

• In Israel (living as 3rd class citizens)

• In neighboring Arab countries, Europe, Asia, and the Americas.

“Israel has the right to defend itself”

In theory, everyone has the right to self-defense. However, this right is forfeited when the party claiming that right is in the midst of an illegal or immoral act.

Example: If a criminal breaks into a home and lays siege upon it, the homeowner has the right to dispel the intruder – and in turn, any violence used by the criminal to repel the homeowner’s resistance can never be misconstrued as “self-defense” (although that ruse has been attempted many times by criminals in American courtrooms).

Fact: In 1967, Israel attacked the Palestinian Territories and began its military occupation. Both the attack and ensuing occupation were immediately condemned by the United Nations (U.N.S.C. Resolution 242 – 11/22/1967). Despite that and numerous subsequent resolutions, Israel has imposed military rule upon the Palestinians and has perpetrated a long list of crimes against humanity (also condemned by the U.N.):

• Attacks on neighboring Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq

• The prevention of medical and food supplies to Palestinians

• The control of water sources in Palestine

• The building of illegal settlements in Palestine – Gaza, West Bank, East Jerusalem

• The population of these settlements with illegal settlers – armed thugs

• The bulldozing of Palestinian homes killing people in them (or in front of them, e.g., Rachel Corrie)

• The building of the “Apartheid Wall” separating Palestinians from their families, farmlands, water sources, and medical facilities

• Collaboration with Apartheid South Africa to develop non-sanctioned nuclear weapons, along with biological and chemical weapons

• Establishment of “Administrative Detention” which subjects Palestinians – including women and children – to arrest and detention without charges, legal representation, or due process

• Attacks, arrests, and murders of international humanitarians offering assistance to Palestinians

Conclusion: Israel is in violation of a plethora of international and moral laws. Its presence in Palestine amounts to no less than illegal entry, robbery, destruction of property, assault, and murder. Since the international community has failed to enforce international law with regards to Israel’s war crimes, the Palestinians are justified in any attempt to rid themselves of their oppressor – Israel. Any devious attempt on Israel’s part to mislabel its heinous acts as “self-defense” is completely unwarranted and downright deceptive.

“Hamas is to blame! Hamas should stop bombing Israel”

Again – this is the case of the criminal pointing the finger at the victim. Israel’s brutal presence in Palestine is in violation of numerous international and moral laws. The acts of Hamas are akin to the Minutemen who did everything in their power to fight off the British forces in 18th Century America.

Conclusion: Although I am a pacifist and would opt for non-violent resistance against the criminal presence of Israel in Palestine, I must acknowledge in all good conscience that Hamas is legally and morally justified in defending the cause to free Palestine – both in Palestine and in Israel.

“Israel is friend and ally to the United States”

Israel is the United States’ daddy.

Fact: Israel perpetrates crimes against humanity with impunity and the United States not only condones these actions, it funds them.

• Our government has been infiltrated by Zionist judges, legislators, and executive administrators from both the Republican and Democratic parties. This is not to mention AIPAC and other Zionist-controlled lobbies which manipulate finances and legislation at federal, state, and local levels.

• Our financial system (banks, Wall Street, the Federal Reserve) is controlled by Zionists.

• Our entertainment industry (Hollywood, Broadway, Nashville, NBA, MLB, NFL, NHL, etc.) is predominantly owned and operated by Zionists.

• Mainstream media (all major news networks, television and radio stations, newspapers) are owned and operated by Zionists.

Conclusion: The result of all this is twofold: Zionists greatly influence and manipulate the U.S. government into enabling and funding Israel’s war crimes against Palestine and humanity.

Zionists convince the masses that Israel is the “good guy” and Muslims, Arabs, and especially Palestinians are the “bad guys”.

No true friend or ally would manipulate a friend into being complicit in a myriad of war crimes! Zionist Israel is, in fact, a devious enemy of the United States.

Epilogue

Anyone who clings to these and other Zionist myths must fall into one of three categories:

• Liar: Zionist supporter (Jewish, Christian, or other) who knows the facts and is yet involved in the scheme to mislead the public

• Ignorant: common citizen who has fallen prey to Zionist propaganda and has made little or no effort to validate the information

• Fool: one who has learned the truth, but ignores it in a vain display of “loyalty” to a political or religious position.

Raji (Roger) Abuzalaf is a Christian Palestinian (Haifa) refugee raised in Houston, now a long-term Honolulu resident and a U.S. citizen. He is a guitarist, singer, composer, and poet. Raji participates in local progressive/activist causes, at present co-producing pro-Palestine filmfare for Oahu’s main cable provider’s public-access TV network.

The War on Christianity, Part II: The Abomination and Blasphemy of Christian Zionism

by... JAMES PERLOFF

(Picture credit unknown)

Foreword: This post is long. It is long because Christian Zionism is based on a multitude of lies. The bigger the onion, the more the layers we are forced to peel off. I should also note that my paternal ancestors were Russian Jews (see photo below, taken about 1900). My great-grandfather’s name was Abraham Perlovsky. People who criticize Zionism are frequently accused of being motivated by anti-Semitism. As I’m half-Jewish myself, let me be clear that no such feelings impel me. I am unequivocally opposed to racism in any form.

Part 1 of this series explored how the Rockefellers were instrumental in orchestrating the Modernist movement, assaulting every fundamental doctrine of Christianity, for the long-range ecumenical purpose of absorbing it into a one-world religion. The Fundamentalist movement rejected Modernism, intending to stand by the faith’s original tenets.

Unfortunately, as we will now see, Fundamentalism was itself infiltrated and hijacked, consistent with the Rothschild strategy of funding both sides of wars. Fundamentalist churches were targeted to enlist their support for the Zionist agenda. The two principal agents in this scheme were John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) and Cyrus Scofield (1843-1921). What Darby planted, Scofield watered and disseminated. The theology they developed served the agenda by making several claims:

• God wanted the Jews to return to, and take over, Palestine.

• God has two plans of salvation—one through the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the other a guarantee reserved for Jews, his “Chosen People.”

• Christians should not involve themselves in politics, education, business or the arts, as these are “worldly” matters that should be left in the hands of “worldly” people. (The consequences of this doctrine are very visible in American culture today.)

• God deals with mankind differently during different historical time frames or “dispensations,” of which there are seven. The current one, “Grace” under Jesus Christ, is merely the sixth of the seven dispensations.

• The Christian Church is doomed to inevitable failure, which will bring the Dispensation of Grace to a close.

• The end of this dispensational age will be marked by the Tribulation—worldwide persecution under the Antichrist for a period of seven years; however, Christians need not concern themselves with this, since Jesus will “Rapture” believers off the Earth and they won’t be around to experience it.

• Earth will then experience a Jewish era; Jewish ritualistic animal sacrifices will be reinstituted; Jesus will reign for a thousand years from Solomon’s rebuilt temple in Jerusalem.

These doctrines, whose main outcome was “Christian Zionism,” might seem boring to atheists and agnostics, but they are nonetheless exceedingly relevant to the state of the world. They are espoused by celebrity-status theologians like Hal Lindsey, Pat Robertson and John Hagee, in the best-selling Left Behind book series, and are prevailing views in many conservative evangelical churches. Without these ideas being sweepingly disseminated, there might have been no Israeli state created in 1948, no 9/11, and no Middle East wars.

The Context

Before proceeding, I’m aware that some readers may be visiting this website for the first time, so I’ll take a moment to “begin at the beginning.” The United States, and much of the world itself, is run by an incalculably wealthy oligarchy known as, among other names, the Illuminati. The trappings of “democracy” are an illusion; the oligarchy operates behind the scenes, choosing presidents and prime ministers long before the public goes to the polls. It owns and controls the central banks, most of the ”Fortune 500” corporations, and the mainstream media (CNN, Fox, BBC, etc.), the latter being crucial to keeping the agenda, and the oligarchy itself, concealed from public awareness. It coordinates its global policies through international organizations such as the Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commission, and an upper, exclusive level of Freemasonry. The cabal’s highest identifiable human center is the Rothschild banking dynasty. But the oligarchy is not only about materialistic matters such as money and power; like the universe itself, it possesses a spiritual dimension: its outlook is satanic, which largely accounts for Western culture’s rapid moral descent.

I cannot document and prove these claims in one paragraph, but I can in a book, which is why I wrote Truth Is a Lonely Warrior. The ultimate goal of the Illuminati is a world government. Regional blocs like the European Union and NAFTA (intended to become a North American Union) are stepping stones toward this end. The world government will be ruled by a dark figure whom the Bible calls the “beast” or “Antichrist.” The book of Revelation says he will have “authority over every tribe, people, language and nation.” The capital of this evil world government will be Jerusalem, a city revered by Christians, Muslims and Jews alike, to be centered in Greater Israel. It was for this purpose that:

• the Rothschilds committed their fortune to the Zionist movement, beginning no later than 1829;

• Theodor Herzl began hosting the World Zionist congresses in Basle, Switzerland in 1897;

• the British government was persuaded to issue the Balfour Declaration to Lord Walter Rothschild in 1917, promising the Zionists “establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people” in exchange for the Zionists bringing America into World War I on Britain’s side.

However, Zionist seizure of Palestine could not have occurred without the consent and cooperation of the world’s Christian community. Given the centuries-old conflict between Jews and Christians, it was necessary to remold Christian theology to accommodate the Rothschild plan. Cyrus Scofield and his reference Bible came on the scene for this express purpose.

Darby Plants the Seeds

Before examining Scofield’s life, we should note a little about John Nelson Darby, the principle figure from whom Scofield borrowed his Biblical analysis. Darby was a Satanist, Freemason and agent of the Rothschild-owned British East India Company,¹ the latter being the most powerful multinational corporation of its day and the supplier that turned millions of Chinese into opium addicts. Darby’s family owned Leap Castle, renowned as the most sinister and occult castle in Ireland’s history.

Darby became a leader of a Christian sect called the Plymouth Brethren (named for Plymouth, England, where its most popular gatherings were held). He is generally credited with originating the “Secret Rapture” doctrine and made several trips to America to spread his ideas.

Darby used many terms in common with occult Theosophists—he referred to Jesus as “the coming one” (same term New Agers use for the Antichrist); referred to God as the “architect” (same phrase employed by Freemasons, meaning “God” for the uninitiated, “Lucifer” to true adepts); and many other occult phrases, as summarized in this article.

Darby even penned his own satanic version of the Bible. The Illuminati have always known they could not perform a wholesale transformation of the Bible, because it would be recognized as such and rejected. Therefore the approach through the centuries has been to whittle it away: a word here, a phrase there—the universal strategy of boiling the frog.

Darby slyly introduced satanic wording into the Biblical text. For example, in the King James rendering of John 6:69, Peter told Jesus: “And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God.” Darby rendered this: “And we have believed and known that thou art the holy one of God.” “Holy one of God” is a title used for Jesus only by demons in the King James. For a comprehensive review of Darby’s satanic mistranslations, see the article John Nelson Darby Version: Doctrinal Changes to the Holy Bible.

Scofield Spreads Darby Like a Virus

In 1897, Theodore Herzl began hosting the Rothschild-backed Zionist congresses in Switzerland, developing the plan for Zionist takeover of Palestine. Knowing this scheme would require Christian approval, in 1904 Herzl approached Pope Pius X, who very politely told him what he could do with his plan. After Catholic rejection, the Rothschilds knew Protestant support would be essential. But this could only be achieved by tampering with the Bible to make it appear God himself had ordained that Jews retake Palestine. Such a Bible would have to come from a non-Jew, someone with credentials as a theologian. Thus emerged Cyrus Scofield and his reference Bible.

Scofield started out as a crooked Kansas lawyer and politician, working under the auspices of John J. Ingalls, a major figure in corrupt Kansas politics. In 1881, the Atchison Globe reported:

That same year, the Topeka Daily Capital picked up the story:

However, court cases against Scofield were inexplicably dropped. As Joseph M. Canfield, who is probably Scofield’s most thorough biographer, notes: “The very sudden dropping of the criminal charges without proper adjudication suggests that Scofield’s career was in the hands of someone who had clout . . .”⁴

According to Scofield, his conversion to Christ occurred in 1879 in his “St. Louis law office.” However, he was not a member of Missouri’s bar, and no record exists of his practicing law in that state⁵—in fact, he was habitually on the run from the law.

Scofield began immersing himself in Darby’s teachings. He was mentored by Rev. James H. Brookes, whose very pulpit Darby had preached from.⁶ He made rapid ecclesiastical progress: by 1881 he was already a pastor in St. Louis, despite having no seminary training or other formal religious education.

In 1882, Scofield moved to Dallas and began an extended term as pastor of the First Congregational Church. Possibly this move was necessitated because his criminal past and familial irresponsibility were too well-known in the Kansas-Missouri region. As Rev. John S. Torell writes:

Post-Conversion Issues

I am well aware that a person redeemed by Christ receives forgiveness of sins. I am also aware that those born again remain flawed individuals. Nevertheless, a high standard is held for pastors and elders of churches. In 1883, back in Kansas, Reverend Scofield’s wife Leontine was granted a divorce on the grounds that he had long since abandoned her and their two daughters, Abigail and Helene. The court ruled that Scofield “was not a fit person to have custody of the children.”⁸ Within six months of the divorce, Scofield married a new wife, Hettie.

Here is what the Bible says (1 Timothy 5:8): “But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” Scofield’s fans give him a free pass on this teaching, and not surprisingly, the Scofield Reference Bible makes no commentary on this verse.

Scofield’s defenders have argued that he had to divorce his wife because she was Catholic, but there is no Biblical grounds for that, and Scofield had deserted his family long before his professed conversion to Christ. However, if handlers were prepping him to fulfill the role of Zionist messenger to Protestant churches, it may well be that having a Catholic wife was deemed unsuitable.

Although Scofield became quite wealthy from his reference Bible, there is no evidence that he ever shared his riches with his abandoned family, or ever made restitution to people whom he had defrauded in Kansas and Missouri.

Truthfulness is another characteristic of genuine conversion. Here is how Scofield later described his military service in his Who’s Who in America entry:

Although Scofield was in the 7th Tennessee, this little entry is full of falsehoods. Scofield did not serve until “the close of the war.” He successfully begged out of the service in 1862 on grounds that he was a Northerner (he was Michigan-born). Also, Scofield was not decorated for valor at the battle of Antietam. Decorations were a frill the Confederate army could not afford. The Cross of Honor was a postwar decoration bestowed by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, beginning in 1900, to any veteran who had provided “loyal, honorable service to the South.” As to having served “under Gen. Lee“—as Canfield notes, this was only in the same sense that “GIs in WW2 were under Eisenhower.”¹⁰

Perhaps more egregiously, by 1892 Cyrus began using the title “Dr. Scofield.” In the Scofield Reference Bible, he is “Rev. C. I. Scofield, D. D.” (Doctor of Divinity). Conveying this landmark book as a scholar’s work was, of course, vital. However, there is no evidence Scofield ever received a doctorate. He never attended a college or seminary. Some suggest he could have received an honorary doctorate, but even this seems improbable: no institution has ever claimed credit for awarding it, Scofield made no allusion to the degree’s source in his Who’s Who biography, and since Dispensationalism was still viewed as highly unorthodox in 1892, no Christian institution would have likely bestowed such an honorary degree on Scofield.

Scofield Acquires Connections and Backers

Scofield met the distinguished theologian D. L. Moody during one of the latter’s evangelical campaigns. In 1886, Moody spoke in Dallas at Scofield’s invitation. A loose association continued between them, and in 1896 Scofield moved to New England, becoming pastor of Trinitarian Congregational, Moody’s home church. It is unclear if this occurred at Moody’s request, but association with Moody gave Scofield another credential that advanced his theologian resumé. In December 1899, Moody died at 62 from an undiagnosed illness.

In 1901, Scofield became a member of New York’s exclusive, invitation-only Lotos Club, a hangout for the financial and literary elite. Members have included Mark Twain, New York Times owner Arthur Hay Sulzberger, the atheist industrialist Andrew Carnegie, and sexual revolution advocate Margaret Mead. The Lotos Club was the sort a place a Fundamentalist preacher would ordinarily be ridiculed, yet somehow Scofield joined its rolls, even though the membership fee alone equaled one-fifth of his salary as a pastor.¹¹ He remained a member until his death in 1921.

Scofield’s Lotos Club admission was approved by the ultra-Zionist attorney on the club’s Literary Committee, Samuel Untermyer. During his lifetime, Untermyer served as President of Keren Hayesod (Zionism’s chief financial angel), played a major role in drafting the Federal Reserve Act, was notorious for blackmailing Woodrow Wilson into appointing Louis Brandeis to the Supreme Court, and spearheaded the Jewish “declaration of war” boycott against Germany in 1933. Is it surprising that someone who might be called America’s leading Zionist would sponsor, at the Lotos Club, the theologian who produced the book which birthed “Christian Zionism”?

Samuel Untermyer

According to some sources (e.g., this article), Untermyer introduced Scofield to other leading Zionist financiers, such as Jacob Schiff and Bernard Baruch. This is credible, since Untermyer was close to these individuals, and Scofield’s finances took a turn for the better—he was suddenly able to afford extended trips to Europe in pursuit of producing his reference Bible.

Scofield and his wife Hettie traveled to England in 1904. According to Charles Trumbull’s official, laudatory biography of Scofield, he told a London acquaintance, Robert Scott, that he planned writing a reference Bible, but had no idea who might publish it. As luck would have it, Scott was able to introduce him to Henry Frowde, head of Oxford University Press. Quoting Trumbull:

This story is as preposterous as Scofield’s Lotos Club admission. Major publishing houses don’t assure publication of manuscripts they haven’t even seen yet, unless the author has a proven track record of bestsellers (e.g., a Stephen King). Scofield had never written a book before, with the exception of Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth (which was actually self-described as a “pamphlet”). He had no academic background qualifying him to edit a reference Bible.

Furthermore, Oxford University Press was owned by Zionist Jews and run by Fabian Socialists. It was primarily devoted to publishing literary and scholarly books, not Bibles, and like the Lotos Club, was a venue normally hostile to evangelical Fundamentalists.

It is rather apparent that Scofield’s Zionist connections, who got him into the Lotos Club and provided travel funding, also arranged for Oxford’s up-front publication agreement. Is it only coincidence that Scofield’s trip to England came on the heels of the Pope’s rejection (January 26, 1904) of Herzl’s plea to support a Zionist state in Palestine? With the Catholics out, rallying Protestants had become imperative. Oxford University Press, with offices on both sides of the Atlantic, could ensure Scofield’s work would receive the publicity and distribution the Zionists desired.

When the Scofields left England, they moved to Switzerland, where, according to Trumbull, Scofield did nine months of “solid work” on his reference Bible. But why Switzerland? Although John Calvin’s library was there, it was not a very logical place to research and write a reference Bible. It was, however, a center of Freemasonic and covert banking activities, and, perhaps most importantly, where Theodor Herzl hosted the early Zionist congresses.

Scofield came back to America in 1905. In 1906 he returned to England (and according to some sources, Switzerland again). In 1907, Scofield signed his publishing contract at the New York City office of Oxford University Press, and his reference Bible was first published in January 1909.

One immediately notices the volume was produced with astonishing swiftness. For most men, a reference Bible would have required a lifetime’s work. All the more remarkable: Scofield had no seminary or university training, and was not formally schooled in the languages that ancient Biblical texts are written in—Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic.

The Scofield Bible’s Strategy

Were, then, some of Scofield’s notes dictated to him by other parties? Even if not, reviewing the Bible makes it evident that Scofield borrowed heavily from John Nelson Darby, James Brookes, and other early proponents of Plymouth Brethren-Dispensational theology. Scofield would undoubtedly have preferred to use Darby’s satanic Bible version, or a Hort-Westcott modernized translation. But since the Zionists wanted to reach the largest cross-section of Fundamentalists, the King James was employed. As James Whisler notes:

Although his reference Bible was first published in 1909, that edition is virtually impossible to find today. It was the revised 1917 edition that was hyper-marketed, with limitless advertising, by Oxford University Press, selling millions of copies. Is it only coincidence that 1917 was also the year of the Balfour Declaration, by which Britain’s government pledged to Lord Walter Rothschild and the Zionist Federation to establish a “national home” for the Jews in Palestine? The simultaneous mass-marketing of Scofield’s Bible would make it appear that God himself had cosigned the Declaration, and “prophecy was being fulfilled” before believers’ eyes.

Why was Scofield’s work so effectual at changing people’s understanding of the Bible? Before this, most commentaries were published separately from the Scriptures themselves. Earlier expositors had regarded the Bible as the sacred Word of God, and that its text should not be adulterated by their unworthy human words. Scofield scorned this tradition, placing his comments right on the Bible’s pages. While this was done under the pretext of reader convenience, its subliminal impact was to give Scofield’s views status competing with the Scriptures. When a reader recalled a specific Bible verse, he was apt to remember Scofield’s words along with it, or even in its place.

Some were not fooled. As Philip Mauro commented in 1927:

With Oxford’s intense marketing, people who simply wanted a Bible often found themselves holding a Scofield Bible, and thus became unwitting recipients of “Scofieldism.” To help ensure the Bible sold well, Oxford produced it in beautifully printed cloth and leather editions. To the unsuspecting, this appeared “God-honoring.”

I know some will argue that Scofield’s notes include many theologically sound remarks. Of course they do, because lies are far more effective when mingled with truths. The Bible warns us that “A little yeast works through the whole batch of dough” (Galatians 5:9) and to “Beware of the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees!” (Matthew 16:6). Scofield’s foremost mission was to harmonize his Bible with Zionism. Central to this was distorting the promises God had made to Abraham (the ancestor of both the ancient Hebrews and Arabs) in Genesis 12:1-3:

Although the word “thee” is singular in the Hebrew,¹⁵ Scofield pulled a fast one, made it plural, and applied the blessing to modern Jews. He wrote in his notes:

The Scofield Reference Bible was copyrighted by Oxford University Press, not Scofield. This gave the publishing house license to change his words in subsequent printings. Oxford issued a revised edition in 1967 (coinciding with the Six Day War and Israel’s seizure of Jerusalem). That version put Scofield’s Zionism on steroids, adding, for example, this phrase to the above words: “For a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgement.” The Bible, of course, never refers to “the sin of anti-Semitism.”

In Genesis 15:18, God described the land He was giving Abraham and his seed:

At Herzl’s Zionist congresses, plans were made to claim all land from the Nile to the Euphrates.

This demarks “Greater Israel”; the Euphrates and Nile rivers are the two blue stripes displayed on the Israeli flag. They enclose a star traditionally used in Satanism, with six points, six triangles, and a hexagon (six-sided) in the middle—666.

To convince Christians that Zionists remained entitled to this land, Scofield made God’s promise “unconditional.” He wrote:

But as any Bible student knows—or should know—God’s promises to the Hebrews were always conditional upon their faith. When Moses brought the Hebrews out of Egypt, God did not even permit them to enter the land due to lack of faith. Instead, they were compelled to first wander in the wilderness for forty years. Do you think today’s “Israelites” are more faithful to God than those of Moses’ days?

Tel Aviv’s 2016 Gay Pride Parade. Tel Aviv has been voted the world’s number one gay city. Look like Biblical holiness?

Anyone who believes God’s promises to Israel were “unconditional” should read Deuteronomy 28, which clearly enumerates blessings for obedience, counterbalanced by curses for disobedience. What did John the Baptist think about claims of “unconditional” heritage? He told the Pharisees: “And do not think you can say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham.” (Matthew 3:9). Jesus said: “Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.” (Matthew 21:43)

Scofield also made it appear that the Bible prophesied a future return of the Jews to Palestine, in order to give the Balfour Declaration, and Israel’s eventual statehood, the illusion of “fulfilled prophecies.” His notes proclaimed:

Scofield’s claim of three restorations is unscriptural. The Bible prophesies only two restorations: the Hebrews’ original journey from Egypt to the Promised Land under Moses; and the return from the exile in Babylon described in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah. To support his claim, Scofield used verses referring to the Ezra-Nehemiah return, or to the coming of Christ, but nowhere does the Bible forecast a third return of the Jews to Palestine, unless ones uses (as Scofield did) imaginative leaps of logic.

A cardinal rule of Scofield Dispensationalism: claim that if any Biblical prophecy was not fulfilled in the past, it still awaits future fulfillment. Of God’s promise to give Abraham’s seed the land from the Nile to the Euphrates, Scofield wrote: “It is important to see that the nation has never as yet taken the land under the unconditional Abrahamic Covenant, nor has it ever possessed the whole land.”¹⁹

“Important,” Scofield? Important to whom? Only to your Zionist masters. Although it is claimed that the conquests described in the book of Joshua did not give the Hebrews the whole land, and thus left God’s promise to Abraham “unfulfilled” until the future, a careful reading of the Bible disproves this. Joshua 21:43-45 declares:

Kings 4:21 testifies that the Israelites ruled the entire area Herzl envisioned as “Greater Israel”:

Thus the Bible itself refutes Scofield’s claim that the promise was never fulfilled, allegedly justifying the modern Zionist takeover of Palestine.

Scofield’s Legacy: The Damage that Has Been Done

Scofield’s Bible birthed “Christian Zionism,” and with it, untold sorrows over the past century:

• Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. In the 1948 Nakba, the Zionists murderously drove 750,000 Palestinians from their homes at gunpoint. Quoting If Americans Knew:

Victims of 1948 Deir Yassin Massacre

The ethnic cleansing of Palestinians has continued to this day.

Israeli settlers abuse a Palestinian 

For those Christians who think the book of Joshua somehow still justifies this, I wish to point out that the Canaanites whom Joshua and the Hebrews fought against were giants; satanically transhumanized beings and worshippers of Satan. (See my article “Making Sense of the Supernatural.”) Today’s Palestinians do not equate to the ancient Canaanites, and contrary to what “Christian Zionists” typically believe, many Palestinians are Christians.

Israel destroys a Gaza town, 2014:

Israelis celebrate their bombs:

Christian Zionists have bought into the myth that Israel is only “defending its right to exist” and that Palestinians are “terrorists.” The Israelis have over 4,000 tanks and over 400 combat aircraft, thanks to a steady flow of about $3 billion annually from American taxpayers. The unarmed Palestinians have not one tank or plane; they fight their illegal occupiers primarily with stones.

George W. Bush invaded Iraq in 2003 on the pretext that it was avoiding UN inspections of weapons of mass destruction (which, it turned out, didn’t even exist). Israel, on the other hand, has hundreds of nuclear weapons which it refuses to let the UN inspect; the United States grants it a free pass, and has even given Israel the hydrogen bomb.

• False-flag Terrorism and War for the Rest of the World. Contrary to the Zionist media’s spin, Israel has been the world’s number-one sponsor of terrorism, implemented “by way of deception”—the motto of Mossad, Israel’s intelligence service. This has included, for example, the 1946 King David Hotel bombing, the 1954 Lavon Affair, the vicious 1967 attack on the USS Liberty, the 1986 “Trojan” deception that led Reagan to bomb Libya (scroll down a little if clicking link), and of course, the mother of them all, 9/11, covered with Zionist-Israeli fingerprints. 9/11 led to the countless and unnecessary Middle East wars which were already foreknown in 2001. Those wars in turn produced the refugee crisis ravaging Europe today.

• Provoking Hostility of Muslims toward Christianity. Christian Aid is a leading Christian charity and missionary organization, founded in 1945. Here is an informative 2003 quote from Bob Finley, Christian Aid’s founder and CEO:

I do wish to point out: the great majority of Christian Zionists have endorsed Zionism without conscious knowledge of the atrocities in Palestine, which the U.S. media has suppressed. Most American evangelicals and dispensationalists are good-hearted people, who have unfortunately been led astray about Israel.

Why So Many Christians Buy the Nonsense

Besides Scofield’s distortion of the Abrahamic covenant to mean an “unconditional” real-estate promise to the Jews, and his invention of a third prophesied homecoming, the following reasons stand out:

• The “chosen people” myth. In keeping with Zionist preferences, Scofield ignored the New Testament’s clear explanation: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” (Galatians 3:28-29). Scofield instead reverted the promise to an Old Testament context, a misinterpreted one at that.

Moreover, we now know that most people identifying as Jews are probably (as Finley noted above) not descendants of Abraham, but of the Khazars, a Turkic people who made Judaism their state religion in the eighth century AD. Jewish author Arthur Koestler pioneered historical evidence for this in his 1976 book The Thirteenth Tribe, research since affirmed by DNA evidence. The significance? If most “Jewish” occupiers of Palestine aren’t Abraham’s descendants, then they are not his seed, and thus not entitled to the land, even under the terms of Scofield’s twisted theology.

• The “Judeo-Christian” myth. Most evangelical Christians harbor the illusion that religious Jews today are adherents of the Old Testament. They believe they as Christians live in “Judeo-Christian” harmony with Jews who share the same essential values.

Of course, one cannot stereotype Jews, many of whom (like my late father) are non-religious, have no interest in Zionism, and assimilate into other cultures. However, when referring to organized Judaism, it is important to understand that religious Jews follow the Talmud, which rabbis consider senior to the Tanakh (Old Testament of the Christian Bible). Jesus consistently directed his most severe censures against the Pharisees, the teachers of the oral law, which they used to nullify the laws of God. After the Romans destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD, dispersed Jews continued teaching the oral law, eventually written down as the Talmud. Over the centuries it evolved, becoming many times more evil than in Jesus’s day.

The Talmud decrees that:

—Jesus is in hell, being boiled in feces; Gittin 57a.²²

—Jesus’s mother Mary was a whore; Babylonian Talmud (BT), Sanhedrin 106a.²³

—Gentiles are donkeys; BT Berakoth 58a.²⁴

—All gentile children are animals; Yebamoth 98a.²⁵

—If a gentile hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed; BT Sanhedrin 58b.²⁶

—Gentiles who study the Law deserve death; BT Sanhedrin 59a.²⁷

—A Jew may lie to a gentile; Tractate Baba Kamma 113a.²⁸

—A Jew need not pay a gentile wages owed for work; BT Sanhedrin 57A.²⁹

—It is permissible to cheat a gentile in court; BT Baba Kamma.³⁰

—If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile, it does not have to be returned; BT Baba Kamma 113b.³¹

—When the Messiah comes, he will destroy the Christians; BT Sanhedrin 99a.³²

It is not just ancient texts that disdain non-Jews, but modern rabbis as well.

—Rabbi Kook the Elder, first Ashkenazi chief rabbi of the British Mandatory Palestine, said: “The difference between a Jewish soul and the souls of non-Jews—all of them in all different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.”³³

—Israeli Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said in 1994: “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.”³⁴

—In his 2003 book Jewish Superiority and the Question of Exile, Rabbi Saadya Grama of Beth Medrash Govoha wrote: “The Jew by his source and his very essence is entirely good. The goy, by his source and in his very essence, is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but rather of two completely different species.”³⁵

—Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef said in a 2010 sermon:

Talmudic Judaism is inherently racist, not rooted in Biblical values. The behavior of Jews, not some sort of universal “anti-Semitism,” caused them to be expelled from more than 100 countries over the past two millennia. Martin Luther, well aware of their views and activities, denounced them.

Judaism regards non-Jews as animals. This is why Israel’s heavily-armed IDF soldiers regularly abuse Palestinians as though they were not humans. A booklet, written by the IDF’s chief rabbi and published by its Central Regional Command, indoctrinated soldiers with Talmudic outlook in proclaiming:

The IDF’s new chief rabbi, Eyal Karim, has even said IDF soldiers may rape Arab women to boost their morale.

Judaism regards Christians with contempt, and only tolerates them for the time being because they represent a powerful pro-Israel voting bloc. The Jerusalem Post observed in 1983:

Many Christians are duped into the illusion of “Judeo-Christianity” because Israel permits American church groups to visit ancient holy sites in Israel. But as Jack Bernstein, an American Jew who lived in Israel, wrote:

Check out Israeli television mocking Christianity:

Christian Zionism Degenerates into Complete Idiocy

Today’s Christian Zionists do not just fail to discern the Luciferian nature of Judaism; they treat Jews and Israel with veneration bordering on idolatry. Texe Marrs highlights an example caught on film:

A church I once attended invited a “Messianic Jew” to deliver a Sunday sermon. He told us it was very important for our church to show solidarity with the Jewish community. He announced that, to express this solidarity, we would pretend we were a synagogue today, and celebrate Purim (the holiday on which Jews celebrate being saved from their enemies—and slaughtering them). He distributed noisemakers to the congregation. As the rest of the church played along, noisily acting out Purim, I stood in silence. I looked across the aisle at another parishioner who felt as I did, and we shook our heads.

At the time, I was not yet schooled in Christian Zionism’s deplorable history. But I knew from the Bible’s clear instructions (book of Hebrews) that we, as Christians, are not to engage in Jewish ceremonies. Furthermore, the alleged purpose of the “pretend we’re a synagogue” service—to show solidarity to the Jewish community—made no sense, as no synagogue Jews were present to witness the event. In retrospect, I believe the “Messianic Jew” was simply trying to Judaize Christians, and for I all know, was snickering under his breath at the sight of us observing Purim; for given the Talmud’s remarks about Christians, the church was ghoulishly celebrating what was tantamount to its own funeral.

Brother Nathanael Kapner, who was Jewish-born-and-raised, and is now an Orthodox Christian, says this about Christian Zionists:

While some of Brother Nathanael’s remarks may bore agnostics, and anger Christians with differing theological views, his comments on the Rapture and “Messianic age” bring us to Zionism’s ultimate deception:

The Final Insult: Persuading Christians to Worship the Antichrist

There is nothing the Rothschilds would savor more than seeing the Christian church bow down and worship the beast, or Antichrist, whom they wish to rule their coming world government. This necessitates that when the Antichrist appears, he initially presents himself as the Second Coming of Christ.

When I was a young Christian, I was struck by a particular distinction in Bible translations. Older versions, such as the King James and Geneva Bibles, always said Jesus would return at the end of the “world” (e.g., Matthew 24:3). But modern versions (NIV, West-Horcott, Darby, etc.) said He would return at the end of the “age.” In the Scofield Reference Bible, Scofield begrudgingly used the King James Version, but always added notes clarifying that “world” was properly translated “age.”

This may seem only a nuance, but is vital to the Zionists. Dispensationalism says history divides into seven “ages,” and that we are currently only in the sixth. (These ages are artificial constructs; for a refutation, see this post by a former dispensational minister.)

By claiming Jesus shall return at the end of the current age, instead of the end of the world, Scofield and his cohorts created a scenario by which the Antichrist could proclaim himself Christ,  then rule the Earth during the next “age,” through the very world government the Illuminati have been building.

Scofield wrote in his reference Bible: “Upon His return the King will restore the Davidic monarchy in His own person, re-gather dispersed Israel, establish His power over all the earth, and reign one thousand years.”⁴¹

But could Lucifer really arrive in a way that would persuade Christians he was Jesus? Certainly. The apostle Paul, when describing false apostles, wrote: “And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.” (2 Corinthians 11:14). Can he appear to do miracles? The Bible says, “Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders.” (2 Thessalonians 2:9). This would be especially easy with the high tech now available, such as the capacity to project holograms, which can be fashioned in the image of angels as easily as anything else.

As Emma Moore Weston notes:

The Israelites of Jesus’s day wanted a political Messiah, a king who would liberate them from Rome. Jesus rejected it:

Scofield and “Christian Zionists” reject both the character of Jesus and the Bible’s clear teaching by anticipating Him as an earthly king. They repeat the exact same error people in Israel made two thousand years ago.

Most Christians today believe that when they die, they will dwell in heaven with Jesus forever. But if Jesus is to rule on Earth for a thousand years, while they were in heaven they would be separated from their Savior all that time. Yes, Scofieldism=confusion.

Many churches today affirm, in their “what we believe” statements, that Jesus will return to rule Earth for a millennium. Yet only one passage in the entire Bible refers to Jesus reigning a thousand years: Revelation 20:1-6. I think it dangerous for any church to base a core doctrine on a single scripture passage, especially given the general consensus that the book of Revelation contains considerable symbolic language. As this post is already very long, I won’t elaborate here on Revelation 20, but I refer the reader to Appendix IV, “The Millennium,” of my book Truth Is a Lonely Warrior.

The Temple Trick

For a number of years, I attended a fundamentalist church. One day, the associate pastor was teaching from the Old-Testament book of Ezekiel (in which God gave the prophet Ezekiel instructions on the building of a temple). The teacher told us that, since Ezekiel’s temple was never built, it must be constructed in the future, and that Jewish animal sacrifices would be restored. He said that after Jesus returned, he would reign from this temple for 1,000 years.

I was amazed at this teaching, because the New Testament unequivocally declares that the Cross of Christ did away with the temple and sacrifices. Much of the book of Hebrews is devoted to this point, telling us that “Jesus has become the guarantor of a better covenant,” and that “Unlike the other high priests, he does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all when he offered himself.” (Hebrews 7:22, 27)

The Book of Ezekiel, however, prescribed animal sacrifices:

Jesus will not require us to make such offerings; the Cross eliminated them. The Book of Ezekiel further proclaims:

Would Jesus exclude foreigners? The Bible says the Gospel is for all peoples. Would he reinstitute the Jewish custom of physical circumcision? The Apostle Paul said:

How had my church’s teacher become so blind to the Bible’s clear message? I later found the answer when he proudly displayed his Scofield Reference Bible.

Although Christian Zionists say the Jewish temple must be rebuilt, Jesus prophesied only its destruction:

Never did Jesus ordain the Temple’s rebuilding, or state that He would rule from it. Here is what Jesus said about His return:

Who will rule from a temple in Jerusalem? The Antichrist. Jesus warned the End Times would occur “when you see the standing in the holy temple the abomination that causes desolation, spoken of through the prophet Daniel.” (Matt 24:15). Paul, speaking of the End Times, wrote:

Thus, Christian Zionists teach the opposite of Scripture and prepare their congregations to worship the Antichrist himself. And make no mistake, Israel is preparing to rebuild the Temple, and to pay the costs gullible Christian congregations are being milked for donations, by some estimates up to $100 million annually.⁴³

Why the Rapture Had to Be Taught

I now broach a subject guaranteed to incite fury, because it is so widely believed among evangelical churches. Darby and Scofield expounded that Christians would not face the Antichrist’s persecution because the Rapture would remove them from the planet. They thus asserted that Jesus would return twice: once for the Rapture, and later again for His Second Coming. Here is the verse dispensationalists most heavily rely on for Rapture doctrine:

I will let Carl E. Olson elucidate:

Furthermore, Scripture plainly teaches that believers will not be “gathered unto the Lord” until after the Antichrist has been revealed (excuse the following redundant quotation):

By believing they will be spared persecution, Christians are preparing themselves for disappointment and even shattered faith. Fritz Springmeier relates:

Why did the Illuminati want the Rapture doctrine introduced? It emasculated the church as an opponent of the New World Order. Why fight something you won’t be around to experience?

Conclusion

Today, many Christians are perplexed as to why their congregations are shrinking. The reasons, of course, are multidimensional, and include numerous factors outside the church itself, such as inculcation of Darwinism in public schools, and Hollywood’s stereotyping of Christians as repugnant.

But much of the problem lies within the churches. Today, many truths about world events are freely available through alternative media. When informed newcomers come to a Sunday service, and see that a pastor, whose brain is hardwired to mainstream media, knows less about geopolitical truths than they do, will they trust that pastor to edify them about eternal truths? When they hear a pastor praising Israel despite decades of atrocities, and that the pastor thus excuses murder and theft, unable to distinguish fundamental right from wrong, will they trust this pastor to lead them toward righteousness? And when see that a pastor cannot understand clear Bible lessons, but instead teaches their opposite, based on regurgitation of Scofield’s Orwellian Scripture-twisting, will they want to return for another sermon?

I think not.

Picture credit: David Dees, http://ddees.com/.

For Further Reading and Viewing

Videos:

Marching to Zion

The Roots of Christian Zionism: How Scofield Sowed Seeds of Apostasy

Blog Posts:

“Seven Biblical Answers to Christian Zionism,” by Rev. Stephen Sizer

“Truth about the Talmud”

“Why I Left Scofieldism,” by Rev. William E. Cox

“The Folly of Dispensationalism,” by Dr. Allen M. Barber (former Dispensational minister)

Books available on Amazon:

The Incredible Scofield and His Book by Joseph M. Canfield

Judaism’s Strange Gods by Michael Hoffman (excellent resource for Christians on the Talmud)

Christian Zionism and the Scofield Reference Bible: A Critical Evaluation of Dispensational Theology by David Lance Dean

Holy Serpent of the Jews by Texe Marrs

Zion’s Christian Soldiers? by Rev. Stephen Sizer

Notes

1. John Coleman, How Conspirators Misuse Christian Fundamentalists (white paper) (Carson City, Nev.: World in Review, 2003), 4.
2. As quoted, “C. I. Scofield: Scoundrel, Shyster, and Scalawag,” Heresy in the Heartland, January 13, 2014, http://heresyintheheartland.blogspot.com/2014/01/c-i-scofield-scoundrel-shyster-and.html.
3. “Cyrus I. Schofield in the Role of a Congregational Minister,” Topeka Daily Capital, August 27, 1881, as quoted, Joseph M. Canfield, The Incredible Scofield and His Book (Vallecito, Calif.: Ross House Books, 2004), 99-100.
4. Canfield, 80.
5. Ibid., 83.
6. Ibid., 94.
7. John S. Torell, “Dancing around the Golden Calf, Part 5,” European-American Evangelistic Crusades, January-March 2007, http://www.eaec.org/newsletters/2007/Jan-Mar/NL2007Jan-Mar2.htm.
8. Canfield, 114.
9. Who’s Who in America (1912-1913), 1856, as quoted in Canfield, 290.
10. Canfield, 290.
11. Ibid., 218.
12. Charles Trumbull, The Life Story of C. I. Scofield (New York: Oxford University Press, 1920), 89-90.
13. James Whisler, “Dispensationalism Timeline,” http://poweredbychrist.homestead.com/files/history/Timeline.htm.
14. Philip Mauro, The Gospel of the Kingdom (1927), http://www.preteristarchive.com/Books/1927_mauro_gospel-kingdom.html.
15. Thomas Williamson, “Zionism Verses the Bible,” http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Doctrines/Zionism/zionism.htm.
16. C. I. Scofield, ed., The Scofield Reference Bible (New York: Oxford University Press, 1917), 25.
17. Ibid., 20.
18. Ibid., 25.
19. Ibid., 250.
20. “The Catastrophe, Al Nakba: How Palestine Became Israel,“ If Americans Knew (April 2013), http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/ref-nakba.html.
21. Bob Finley, “Why Christian Aid Is Speaking Out about Zionism and Islam,” Christian News, May 5, 2003, 13.
22. Michael Hoffman, “Jesus and the Talmud,” The Hoffman Wire (2003), http://www.revisionisthistory.org/wire1.html.
23. Michael Hoffman, Judaism’s Strange Gods (Coeur d’Alene, Idaho: Independent History and Research, 2011), 240.
24. Ibid., 184.
25. Ibid., 196.
26. Ibid., 182.
27. Ibid., 185.
28. Hoffman, “Jesus and the Talmud.”
29. Hoffman, Judaism’s Strange Gods, 182.
30. Ibid., 185.
31. Ibid.
32. Ibid., 239.
33. Ibid., 189-90.
34. Clyde Haberman, “West Bank Massacre,” New York Times, Feb. 28, 1994, http://www.nytimes.com/1994/02/28/world/west-bank-massacre-israel-orders-tough-measures-against-militant-settlers.html?pagewanted=all.
35. Hoffman, Judaism’s Strange Gods, 188.
36. Marcy Oster, “Sephardi Leader Yosef: Non-Jews Exist to Serve Jews,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, October 18, 2010, http://www.jta.org/2010/10/18/news-opinion/israel-middle-east/sephardi-leader-yosef-non-jews-exist-to-serve-jews.
37. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years (London: Pluto Press, 1994), 76.
38. Jerusalem Post, March 6, 1983, as quoted in Coleman, How Conspirators Misuse Christian Fundamentalists, 7.
39. Jack Bernstein, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel (1985) (online edition), http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/israel.htm.
40. Texe Marrs, DNA Science and the Jewish Bloodline (Austin, Texas: RiverCrest Publishing, 2015), 165-66.
41. Scofield, 1227.
42. Emma Moore Weston, “Origin of Scofield Heresies,” Analyzing Scofield, http://www.gospeltruth.net/scofield.htm.
43. Stephen Sizer, “Will the Jewish Temple Be Rebuilt?” (February 27, 2014), http://stephensizer.com/2014/02/will-the-jewish-temple-be-rebuilt/#more-4966.
44. Carl E. Olson, “Five Myths about the Rapture,” November 2003, http://web.archive.org/web/20041217140003/http:/www.originaldissent.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-11538.html.
45. Fritz Springmeier,” The Armageddon Plot,” http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/armageddon_plot.htm.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

"All you pious Christians who think you can go to heaven while supporting a government that has become the hired killer doing the dirty work of homicidal Jewish tyrants should be excluded from serious conversations about anything, for it is your delusion that you could support Israel which has created this hell on Earth and still go to heaven when you die. God knows there is no chance of that happening."

                                                                                 ...John Kaminski

_____________________________________________________________________________

VERY IMPORTANT: Jews want the Bible & Koran changed in order to stop “anti-semitism” – My Analysis

[One of my most faithful South African supporters in the "diaspora" sent me this. Here are his remarks:

 

This is rich coming from the 'chosen'... If any holy books need censoring, the talmud and torah will be at the top of the list. Jews don't seem to realise that anti-semitism is a result of their behaviour.... Just as Apartheid was implemented as a result of 'black' behaviour.

 

What my supporter says is true. If you want to get rid of RACISM, then start with the Talmud, and also BAN JUDAISM FROM BEING PRACTISED IN ANY COUNTRY! The root of Jewish hatred of whites (Loxism), is created by the Rabbinical scum who are busy in every country where the Jews live! BAN JUDAISM!

 

BAN THE TALMUD! BAN RABBIS! Then you'll get rid of LOTS of JEWISH RACISM and also the hideous Jewish cruelty to animals.

 

Here, yet again, we see clearly that Jews are NOT the freaking "victims" they continually claim they are. Instead, Jews are offered opportunities and truly SPECIAL JEWISH PRIVILEGES that NO GROUP OR RACE ON EARTH EVEN COMES CLOSE TO GETTING!!!

 

The more I study history and these Jewish scum, the more convinced I am that everyone, I mean EVERYONE, of EVERY RACE, EVERYWHERE ON EARTH, treats Jews FAR FAR BETTER than this race of pure scum deserve. Everyone bends over backwards for this race of lying, ambitious, back-stabbing filth. They are accorded privileges, especially in WHITE SOCIETY, in Europe, the USA, the UK, beyond imagination.

 

So the Jewish scum now want to insert their words into the Bible and the Koran!

 

When I did a video about how the Jews infiltrated the Vatican and changed the Roman Catholic Church, you would have noticed that the JEWS, yes, the JEWS, were getting the opportunity by the Vatican to actually read and CENSOR Roman Catholic writings about the JEWS! Yes, Jews were telling the Vatican what they can and cannot publish about the Jews!

 

Now we see the Jews, boldly sticking their noses into Christianity and Islam. Soon they will be telling Christians and Muslims how to behave. Heck, the other day I posted an article about how the CIA is being changed! We are at the epitome of sheer madness, where Jews anywhere on the planet can do anything the hell they please in any country in any way. Jews can have British thrown in jails, they can have Germans thrown in jails ... in fact this happens across Europe!

 

I honestly don't know how much more is left that Jews do NOT have a say in? It seems they run or can get involved in, ALMOST ANYTHING, ANYWHERE? They had 255 technical holocaust books removed from Amazon! They've had whites thrown off Facebook, Twitter, Gab and every other social media.

 

Jews did 911 and sent America, Britain and even European troops to go and kill Muslims by the million!!!

 

Is there ANYTHING LEFT FOR WHITES? Is there ANY FREEDOM LEFT FOR CHRISTIANS OR MUSLIMS?

 

The problem is NOT the whites, NOT the "racists", NOT the "NAZIS", NOT the Christians, NOT the Muslims ... the problem is Super-duper Jewish privilege to every corner and inch of this planet! THAT'S THE PROBLEM! Jan]

 

Jewish leaders call for new editions of the Bible and the Koran to carry trigger warnings highlighting anti-Semitic passages

 

• A Catalogue of Policies to Combat Antisemitism outlines numerous suggestions
• 
  
• It was produced after a conference organised by the European Jewish Congress
• 
  
• The conference discussed anti-Semitism online and in various religious texts
• 
  
• Leaders met earlier this week in Vienna to discuss the new policy suggestions
• 
  

By JAMES WOOD FOR MAILONLINE

 

PUBLISHED: 13:38 GMT, 23 November 2018 | UPDATED: 13:40 GMT, 23 November 2018

 

Jewish leaders are calling for new editions of the Bible and Koran to carry warning messages which highlight anti-Semitic passages in the holy texts.

 

The recommendations have been made in a new document called ‘An End to Antisemitism! A Catalogue of Policies to Combat Antisemitism’.

 

It was produced following an international conference organised by the European Jewish Congress, at which academics gathered to discuss how prejudice and discrimination can be tackled.

 

 

Among the policies mentioned in the document was the idea of warning messages in holy texts, a topic discussed in a chapter entitled 'recommendations regarding Religious Groups and Institutions'.

The document reads: 'Translations of the New Testament, the Qur’an and other Christian or Muslim literatures need marginal glosses, and introductions that emphasize continuity with Jewish heritage of both Christianity and Islam and warn readers about antisemitic passages in them.

'While some efforts have been made in this direction in the case of Christianity, these efforts need to be extended and made consistent in both religions.'

These include the blame of Jews for the death of Jesus and the seemingly stubborn nature of the Jewish people and their disloyalty to God.

While there are some negative remarks about Jews in the Koran, and negative portrayals of the people.

The Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has previously spoken of how religious texts can be exploited or misinterpreted to promote discriminatory attitudes.

Writing in a collection of essays published in 2016, he said: 'It is a shameful truth that, through its theological teachings, the church, which should have offered an antidote, compounded the spread of this virus.

'The fact that anti-Semitism has infected the body of the Church is something of which we as Christians must be deeply repentant. We live with the consequences of our history of denial and complicity.'

The document, which was produced by academics including Dina Porat and Lawrence H. Schiffman, also calls on all antisemitic texts and passages in the heritage of Christianity and Islam 'to be identified and rejected'.

Other recommendations include religious leaders and thinkers 'publicly denouncing as unholy writ' canonical or quasi-canonical writings of religious anti-Semites.

The justification for these changes, the documents states, is because divine messages are always communicated through human beings and therefore subject to error.

It reads: 'God’s revelation is thus marred by human fallibility. Beginning with the New Testament, divine revelation expresses itself in Christian holy texts that also express a form of hatred.

'The manifestations of this hatred resulted in a tradition of antisemitism that gave moral legitimacy to crimes against the Jewish people, the epitome of which is the Shoah.'

 __________________________________________________________________________________________________

.

.

The #3 largest TV broadcasting network in America is Trinity
Broadcasting of Garden Grove, California. It was founded by

shyster-for-God guy, Paul Crouch (died 2013), and his laughably

ridiculous looking ex-wife Jan (died in 2017). See photo

of her below to get an idea of my idea of ridiculous.

.

. 

Zionism and Christianity

What is Zionism? Judaism Versus Zionism
http://www.nkusa.org/aboutus/whatzionism.cfm

Christian Zionism: The Tragedy and The Turning - Part I (Full Documentary)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sMzmL1U0_Q

The Myth of the Chosen People
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLPH4YslYD8

Zionism and Christianity: Unholy Alliance by Ted Pike (Full Length Documentary)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L4UvkoSqR8

The Roots of Christian Zionism: How Scofield Sowed Seeds of Apostasy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO6VpMYAVms

"Jews" Are Not "God's Chosen People"
http://bethelministries.com/jews_are_not_gods_chosen_people…

State of Israel: Not Biblical Prophecy!
http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=65

American Protestant Christianity as the enabler for Judaic world domination and quite possibly for the end of the world...

"I refuse to argue any longer with any of you out there. Don’t even call me if you want to argue doctrine, if you want to straighten somebody out over here, if you want to criticize Kenneth Copeland for his preaching on faith of Dad Hagin, get out of my life. I don’t ever want to talk to you or hear, I don’t want to see your ugly face."

 

"I think they are damned and on their way to hell and I don’t think there is any redemption for them. I say, ‘to hell with you’."

 

"I say, ‘Get out of God’s way, quit blocking God’s bridges (Apparently, he defines God’s bridges as the One World Church and ecumenism.); or God is going to shoot you if I don’t.’"

 

Pray earnestly for the Crouches and others that truth will prevail in their lives. Millions are being led into deeper and deeper error and everyone of us has an obligation to help them learn the truth. Share this information with everybody in your sphere of influence.

[Source: Paw Creek Ministries - 5110 Tuckaseegee Road - Charlotte, NC 28208 - (704) 391-0588 - http://www.pawcreek.org/mainpage.htm

______________________________________________

How Americans Were Manipulated into Loving Israel