https://d1gy5epzn1e47f.cloudfront.net/file/pic/comment/2022/01/1135_ea8d829e7542f12b0b13f8912aa49acababdc83ba5c0ccdb1974b5cbbc126633.jpg

 

Why General Patton Was Murdered


Eustice Mullins

 

In December of 1984, it will be forty years since one of

America’s greatest heroes, General George S. Patton,

was executed by his Communist foes. General Patton was

struck down the day before he was scheduled to make

a triumphant return to the United States. He had just been

removed from his command of the Third Army, which

was in charge of governing the American sector of Germany.

Because he not only opposed the dismemberment of

Germany, but also because he favored military action

against the Communists. As the most popular hero of the

Second World War, Patton would have been

unbeatable in a Presidential race. This was

the reason his skulking enemies ordered his

execution before he could leave Germany.  

 

The Patton Papers, 1940-45 recently published by

Houghton Mifflin Company in Boston, gives ample reasons for the

murder of General Patton. A few months before he was killed,

his driver for five years, Master Sergeant John L. Mims,

was replaced. Patton was asked by Major General Gay to

accompany him on an excursion for a few hours the day

before he was to return to America. At 11:45 A.M. in clear

weather and on a straight stretch of road, the driver of a

GMC military truck turned his vehicle directly into the side

of the 1938 Cadillac 75 Special limousine in which Patton

was the only person injured. He suffered some internal injuries

but did not seem to be seriously hurt. On Dec. 21, 1945,

it was announced that he had died of an “embolism”,

that is a bubble of the blood which is fatal when it reaches

a vital organ. It can be introduced into the bloodstream

with a syringe by anyone with brief medical training.

 

Patton was a vigorous sixty years old with enormous

reserves of energy, who seldom needed more than a couple

of hours sleep a night. Not only did the U.S. Army make no

investigation into the “accident” which had put him into the

hospital, but no questions were raised about his “embolism”.

On previous occasions when attempts were made to

kill him investigations were made, despite the fact that he

was one of the most popular and most powerful figures in

America’s history. He recorded in his diary that on

April 20, 1945, while observing the front in his personal plane,

which was clearly marked, an RAF Spitfire made three

passes at his plane, which attempting to shoot it down, then

went out of control and crashed. The story was later

put out that a Polish flyer had been piloting the Spitfire.

Patton was not injured.

 

Patton’s military exploits were such that he was the only

American general whom the Germans feared. They transferred

entire divisions as soon as rumors were spread that he

was on a given front. The Germans’ contempt for Patton’s

fellow generals was shared by himself, as he proves on

many pages of his diary. During much of World War II, Patton

survived repeated efforts of his fellow generals, as well

as the British leaders, to get rid of him. In 1943, when he had

turned the tide in Africa with his brilliant victories at Gafsa

and Gela, Patton was removed from command after Drew

Pearson printed a story that Patton had slapped a malingerer

at a field hospital and called him a “yellow-bellied Jew.”

Eisenhower used this incident as an excuse to refuse Patton

command of American ground troops in England, giving

the command instead to Omar Bradley, whom Patton

exposed as a cowardly dullard. We will never know

how many casualties Bradleys’ cowardice and incompetence

cost us, but it must have been many thousands.

 

Patton wrote in his Diary Jan. 18, 1944, “Bradley is a

man of great mediocrity. At Benning in command he failed to

get discipline. At Gafsa when it looked as though the

Germans might turn our right flank, he suggested we

withdraw corps headquarters to Feriana. I refused to move.”

 

Patton cited numerous other examples of Bradley’s cowardice.

As for Eisenhower, his references to him are always

contemptuous. Patton refers to Ike as “Divine Destiny”

but more customarily as “fool”. On March 1, 1944

Patton noted in his Diary, “Ike and I dined alone and

had a very pleasant time. He is drinking too much.”

 

Patton was extremely disgusted with Eisenhower’s infatuation

with his “chauffeur”, Kay Summersby, and he persuaded

Ike not to divorce Mamie in order to marry her. Kay Summersby

was a British Intelligence Officer who had been ordered

to prostitute herself to Ike so that he would send American

troops into the line instead of the British. England had

experienced such a terrible bloodletting at the hands of the

German armies in World War I that Churchill and the other

British leaders determined to sacrifice Americans wherever

possible on the Western front. Although Kay Summersby

secretly despised Eisenhower, she was a loyal British

subject, and she successfully carried off the affair. It is

estimated that she cost the United States 100,000 casualties

which otherwise would have been borne by the British.

 

Patton had noted in his Diary, July 5,

1943 before his successful African

campaign, “At no time did Ike wish us

luck and say he was back of us—fool.”

 

On July 12, 1944, Patton wrote in his Diary,

Neither Ike nor Bradley has the stuff.

Ike is bound hand and foot by the British

and doesn’t know it. Poor fool.”

 

As a result of Patton’s bold advances in France,

Field Marshall Montgomery persuaded Eisenhower to issue one

of the most amazing military orders in history. All of the

Allied Armies must advance exactly abreast, so that no one

(meaning Patton) would receive “undue credit.” Throughout

the war, Patton achieved his amazing victories by being

in the field, whereas the other generals remained far

behind the front in their dugout “headquarters” or in luxurious

villas far from the sound of gunfire.

 

During a press conference on May 8, 1945, Patton was

asked, “Would you explain why we (the Americans) didn’t

go into Prague.” “I can tell you, exactly,” Patton

replied. “We were ordered not to.” Patton

wrote to his wife on July 21, 1945. “I could have

taken it(referring to Berlin) had I been allowed.”

 

Eisenhower’s refusal to allow Patton to take Prague and

Berlin, holding him back while the Russians occupied these

critical capitals, remains one of the greatest performances

of treason since Benedict Arnold, like Eisenhower, sold

out to the British.

 

 

 

Wreckage of the vehicle Patton had been travelling in.

 

Patton apparently was writing his own death warrant

when he entered his frequently voiced opinion in his Diary on

May 18, 1945, concerning the advisability of fighting

Russians: “In my opinion the American Army as it now exists

could beat the Russians with the greatest ease, because

while the Russians have good infantry, they are lacking in

artillery, air, tanks, and in the knowledge of the

use of these combined arms; whereas we excel in

all three of these. If it should be necessary to

fight the Russians, the sooner we do it the better.”

 

The danger which Patton presented to his enemies was

not merely that he was a great American patriot; he also

was impervious to any sort of undue influence. He had married

Beatrice Ayer, one of the wealthiest women in America.

This made him financially invulnerable, and he was happily

married, which made it impossible for him to succumb

to the blandishments of foreign agents such as Kay Summersby.

He opposed Jews and Communists, not only because

they were enemies of America, but, because they were a

lower order of human beings. He refers to the fact that the

Jew is an Asiatic, devoid of feeling for human life. Shortly

before he was killed he wrote in his Diary Oct. 1, 1945,

“THE JEWISH TYPE OF DISPLACED PERSON IS,

IN THE MAJORITY OF CASES, A SUBHUMAN

SPECIES WITHOUT ANY OF THE CULTURAL

OR SOCIAL REFINEMENTS OF OUR TIME.”

 

Patton was removed from command in Germany because

he actively opposed the swarm of locusts, such as the recently

recruited Soviet agent Henry Kissinger, who fought Patton

to win control of the Military Government in Germany.

 

In his Diary, August 29, 1945, Patton wrote,

Today we received a letter in which we were told

to give the Jews special accommodations.

If for Jews, why not Catholics, Mormons, etc.

 

On August 31, 1945, Patton wrote to his wife. “THE STUFF

IN THE PAPERS ABOUT FRATERNIZATION IS ALL WET.

ALL THAT SORT OF WRITING IS DONE BY JEWS TO

GET REVENGE. ACTUALLY, THE GERMANS ARE THE

ONLY DECENT PEOPLE LEFT IN EUROPE.

 

Patton noted in his Diary on August 31, 1946,

I also wrote a letter to the Secretary of War,

Mr. Stimson on the questions of pro-Jewish

influence in the Military Government of Germany.”

 

As a result of Patton’s opposition to the Kissingers, who

believed they had won the war and should rule Europe,

a furious press campaign again was launched against him. A

pro-Patton observer named Mason wrote, “The Daniell-Bevin-Morgan

plot to destroy Patton was successful because Bernstein of

PM was the most powerful force in Germany in 1945 because

he had the support of Harry Dexter White, and Henry

Morgenthau, Laughlin Curry, David K. Nile and Alger Hiss.”

 

On Sept. 29, 1945, Patton wrote to his wife,

The noise against me is only the means by which the Jews

and Communists are attempting and with good success

to implement a further dismemberment of Germany.”

 

Removed from command by the Jewish plot against him,

General George S. Patton would have to return to the

United States to work for the good of his country. It was to

prevent this that a truck smashed in the side of his car in

one of the strangest and most-ignored event in America’s

military history. Those who fight for America are always in

danger, always thwarted by the plotting and the treachery

of the subhumans whom Patton recognized and battled

to the end of his life. His story is one which enlightens and

inspires us all, and this is why we must, after forty years,

remind the American people of the cowards who

murdered him.

 

__________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 
 

 


How did Patton Feel When He Realized We Destroyed the Wrong Enemy


 

Sometimes you look back on certain events in your life experiences or, what you have learned and, you realize that you

have been misguided or wrong in your original positions. Sometimes new evidence comes to you

that, you had previously not been privy to and, it is ok to change your mind when the evidence is evaluated.

This apparently even happens to decorated 3-star war generals who had just helped win a major war and, who was put in

charge of managing the US side of the newly demilitarized Germany. Once Patton had familiarized himself with his job

at hand and, what he was working with he started to see things in a different light. He was getting to know his

new Russian Counterparts and was supposed to help dole out “justice” and destroy the German war infrastructure.

In the interest of time I am not going to speak for this man of great stature but, let him speak for himself. Most of the following

was gathered from a book called the Patton Papers, published in 1947, which contained the diary entries, letters, and

other writings and this, in turn, was reproduced from a Rense article sourced here: https://rense.com/general92/patton.htm

 

While I would love to dive deeper into these interesting topics in history, I feel more compelled to quickly revisit and, learn

some new unlearned facts on certain subjects and, apply these lessons to today’s current events and bring these here for

us to discuss in the open. The results are staggering. Patton was correct in his views he developed after the war. Communism

was a real threat to Europe and America and, we really did fight the wrong enemy. If you are

paying attention you can see the enemy’s handy work in various shapes and forms in America

today. History really is written by the winners and it is His-Story.

 

Patton was a reputable and brave man and, his historic deeds and words will always hold more weight than some social justice

keyboard warrior calling “anti-semite” “Nazi” or “racist”. This is Real History and we shall Never Forget and it will not be Re-written!

 

On May 7, 1945, just before the German capitulation, Patton had a conference in Austria with U.S. Secretary of War Robert

Patterson. Patton was gravely concerned over the Soviet failure to respect the demarcation lines separating the Soviet and

American occupation zones. He was also alarmed by plans in Washington for the immediate partial demobilization of the U.S. Army.

 

Patton said to Patterson: “Let’s keep our boots polished, bayonets sharpened, and present a picture of

force and strength to the Red Army. This is the only language they understand and respect.

Patterson replied, “Oh, George, you have been so close to this

thing so long, you have lost sight of the big picture.

 

Patton rejoined: “I understand the situation. Their (the Soviet) supply system is inadequate to maintain them in a serious action

such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof – that’s their supply system. They could

probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for five days. After that, it would make no difference

how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down.

There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let’s not give them time to build up their supplies.

If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe;

we have lost the war!

 

Patton’s urgent and prophetic advice went unheeded by Patterson and the other politicians and only served to give a warning

about Patton’s feelings to the alien conspirators behind the scenes in New York, Washington, and Moscow. The more he saw

of the Soviets, the stronger Patton’s conviction grew that the proper course of action would be to stifle communism then and

there, while the chance existed. Later in May 1945, he attended several meetings and social affairs with top Red Army officers,

and he evaluated them carefully. He noted in his diary on May 14: “I have never seen in any army at any time, including the

German Imperial Army of 1912, as severe discipline as exists in the Russian army. The officers, with few exceptions, give

the appearance of recently civilized Mongolian bandits.” And Patton’s aide, General Hobart Gay, noted in

his own journal for May 14: “Everything they (the Russians) did impress one with the idea of virility and cruelty.

 

Nevertheless, Patton knew that the Americans could whip the Reds then – but perhaps not later. On May 18 he noted in his diary:

In my opinion, the American Army as it now exists could beat the Russians with the greatest of ease, because, while the

Russians have good infantry, they are lacking in artillery, air, tanks, and in the knowledge of the use of the combined arms,

whereas we excel in all three of these. If it should be necessary to fight the Russians, the sooner we do it the better.

 

 Two days later he repeated his concern when he wrote his wife: “If we have to

fight them, now is the time. From now on we will get weaker and they stronger.

 

 Having immediately recognized the Soviet danger and urged a course of action which would have freed all of eastern Europe

from the communist yoke with the expenditure of far less American blood that was spilled in Korea and Vietnam and would

have obviated both those later wars not to mention World War III – Patton next came to appreciate the true nature of the people

for whom World War II was fought: the Jews. Most of the Jews swarming over Germany immediately after the war came from

Poland and Russia, and Patton found their personal habits shockingly uncivilized. He was disgusted by their behavior in the

camps for Displaced Persons (DP’s) which the Americans built for them and even more disgusted by the way they behaved

when they were housed in German hospitals and private homes. He observed with horror that “these people do not understand

toilets and refuse to use them except as repositories for tin cans, garbage, and refuse . . .

They decline, where practicable, to use latrines, preferring to relieve themselves on the floor.

 

He described in his diary one DP camp, “where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling

extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews

were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know

the expression ‘lost tribes of Israel’ applied to the tribes which disappeared – not to the tribe of Judah from which the

current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe – lost to all decency.

 

Patton’s initial impressions of the Jews were not improved when he attended a Jewish religious service at Eisenhower’s

insistence. His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part: “This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were

all collected in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech

to them. We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When

we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a

surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible

that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it.

 

These experiences and a great many others firmly convinced Patton that the Jews were an especially unsavory variety

of creature and hardly deserving of all the official concern the American government was bestowing on them. Another

September diary entry, following a demand from Washington that more German housing is turned over to Jews, summed

up his feelings: “Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working.

Harrison (a U.S. State Department official) and his associates indicate that they feel German civilians should be removed from

houses for the purpose of housing Displaced Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when we remove an

individual German we punish an individual German, while the punishment is – not intended for the individual but for the race. (…) 

Furthermore, it is against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which is a punishment, without due

process of law. In the second place, Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a

human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals.

 

Patton during WWI

One of the strongest factors in straightening out General Patton’s thinking on the

conquered Germans was the behavior of America’s controlled news media toward

them. At a press conference in Regensburg, Germany, on May 8, 1945, immediately after

Germany’s surrender, Patton was asked whether he planned to treat captured SS troops

differently from other German POW’s. His answer was: “No. SS means no more in Germany

than being a Democrat in America – that is not to be quoted. I mean by that that initially,

the SS people were special sons of bitches, but as the war progressed they ran out of sons

of bitches and then they put anybody in there. Some of the top SS men will be treated as

criminals, but there is no reason for trying someone who was drafted into this outfit (…)

 

Despite Patton’s request that his remark not be quoted, the press eagerly seized on it, and Jews and their front men in America

screamed in outrage over Patton’s comparison of the SS and the Democratic Party as well as over his announced intention

of treating most SS prisoners humanely. With great reluctance, and only after repeated promptings from Eisenhower, he had

thrown German families out of their homes to make room for more than a million Jewish DP’s – part of the famous “six million”

who had supposedly been gassed – but he balked when ordered to begin blowing up German factories, in

accord with the infamous Morgenthau Plan to destroy Germany’s economic basis forever. In his diary he wrote:

 

 

I doubted the expediency of blowing up factories because the ends for which the factories are being blown up – that is,

preventing Germany from preparing for war – can be equally well attained through the destruction

of their machinery, while the buildings can be used to house thousands of homeless persons.

 

 Similarly, he expressed his doubts to his military colleagues about the overwhelming emphasis being placed on the persecution

of every German who had formerly been a member of the National Socialist party. In a letter to his wife of September 14, 1945, he said:

I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic. I am also opposed to sending

POW’s to work as slaves in foreign lands (i.e., the Soviet Union’s Gulags), where many will be starved to death.

 

Despite his disagreement with official policy, Patton followed the rules laid down by Morgenthau and others back in Washington

as closely as his conscience would allow, but he tried to moderate the effect, and this brought him into increasing conflict

with Eisenhower and the other politically ambitious generals. In another letter to his wife, he commented: “I have been at

Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we are doing (to the Germans) is ‘Liberty,

then give me death.’ I can’t see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it.

 

 

And in his diary, he noted: “Today we received orders . . . in which we were told to give the Jews special accommodations.

If for Jews, why not Catholics, Mormons, etc? We are also turning over to the French several hundred thousand prisoners

of war to be used as slave labor in France. It is amusing to recall that we fought the Revolution in defense

of the rights of man and the Civil War to abolish slavery and have now gone back on both principles.

 

His duties as military governor took Patton to all parts of Germany and intimately acquainted him with the German people and

their condition. He could not help but compare them with the French, the Italians, the Belgians, and even the British. This

comparison gradually forced him to the conclusion that World War II had been fought against the wrong people. After a visit

to ruined Berlin, he wrote his wife on July 21, 1945: “Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good

race, and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all Europe will be communist. It’s said that for the first

week after they took it (Berlin), all women who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it

(instead of the Soviets) had I been allowed.

 

This conviction, that the politicians had used him and the U.S. Army for a criminal purpose, grew in the following weeks.

During a dinner with French General Alphonse Juin in August, Patton was surprised to find the Frenchman in agreement

with him. His diary entry for August 18 quotes Gen. Juin: “It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that the English and the

Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country – and I do not mean France. Therefore, the road is

 

now open for the advent of Russian communism.

 

 

Later diary entries and letters to his wife reiterate this same conclusion. On August 31 he wrote: “Actually, the Germans are

the only decent people left in Europe. it’s a choice between them and the Russians. I prefer the Germans.” And on September 2:

“What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole.

 

By this time the Morgenthauists and media monopolists had decided that Patton was incorrigible and must be discredited.

So they began a non-stop hounding of him in the press, a la Watergate, accusing him of being “soft on Nazis” and continually

recalling an incident in which he had slapped a shirker two years previously, during the Sicily campaign. A New York newspaper

printed the completely false claim that when Patton had slapped the soldier who was Jewish, he had called him a “yellow-bellied Jew.”

 

Then, in a press conference on September 22, reporters hatched a scheme to needle Patton into losing his temper and making

statements which could be used against him. The scheme worked. The press interpreted one of Patton’s answers to their

insistent questions as to why he was not pressing the Nazi-hunt hard enough as: “The Nazi thing is just like a

Democrat-Republican fight.” The New York Times headlined this quote, and other papers all across America picked it up.

 

The unmistakable hatred which had been directed at him during this press conference finally opened Patton’s eyes fully as to

what was afoot. In his diary, that night lie wrote: “There is a very apparent Semitic influence in the press. They are trying to

do two things: first, implement communism, and second, see that all businessmen of German ancestry and non-Jewish antecedents

are thrown out of their jobs. They have utterly lost the Anglo-Saxon conception of justice and feel that a man can be kicked out

because somebody else says he is a Nazi. They were evidently quite shocked when I told them I would kick nobody out without

the successful proof of guilt before a court of law. (…)  Another point which the press harped on was the fact that we were doing

too much for the Germans to the detriment of the DP’s, most of whom are Jews. I could not give the answer to that one, because

the answer is that, in my opinion, and that of most nonpolitical officers, it is vitally necessary for us to

build Germany up now as a buffer state against Russia. In fact, I am afraid we have waited too long.

 

And in a letter of the same date to his wife: “I will probably be in the headlines before you get this, as the press is trying to quote

me as being more interested in restoring order in Germany than in catching Nazis. I can’t tell them

the truth that unless we restore Germany we will ensure that communism takes America.

 

 

Eisenhower responded immediately to the press outcry against Patton and made the decision to relieve him of his duties

as military governor and “kick him upstairs” as the commander of the Fifteenth Army. In a letter to his wife on September 29,

Patton indicated that he was, in a way, not unhappy with his new assignment, because he

“(…) would like it much better than being a sort of executioner to the best race in Europe.

 

On October 22 he wrote a long letter to Maj. Gen. James G. Harbord, who was back in the States. In the letter, Patton bitterly

condemned the Morgenthau policy; Eisenhower’s pusillanimous behavior in the face of Jewish demands; the strong pro-Soviet

bias in the press; and the politicization, corruption, degradation, and demoralization of the U.S. Army which these things

were causing. He saw the demoralization of the Army as a deliberate goal of America’s enemies: “I have been just as furious

as you at the compilation of lies which the communist and Semitic elements of our government have leveled against me and

practically every other commander. In my opinion, it is a deliberate attempt to alienate the soldier vote from the commanders,

because the communists know that soldiers are not communistic, and they fear what eleven million votes (of veterans) would do.

 

In his letter to Harbord, Patton also revealed his own plans to fight those who were destroying the morale and integrity of the

Army and endangering America’s future by not opposing the growing Soviet might: “It is my present thought . . . that when

I finish this job, which will be around the first of the year, I shall resign, not retire, because if I retire I will still have a gag in my

mouth . . . I should not start a limited counterattack, which would be contrary to my military theories, but should wait

until I can start an all-out offensive.

 

 

Click on this text to examine "The Patton Papers - 1940 - 1945" (PDF)...


Patton On Communism
And The  Jews
 
General Patton's Warning
 
Edited by Raquel Baranow
 
 
At the end of World War II, one of America's top military leaders
accurately assessed the shift in the balance of world power which that war
had produced and foresaw the enormous danger of communist aggression
against the West. Alone among U.S. leaders he warned that America
should act immediately, while her supremacy was unchallengeable, to end
that danger. Unfortunately, his warning went unheeded, and he was
quickly silenced by a convenient "accident" which took his life.
 
Thirty-two years ago, in the terrible summer of 1945, the U.S. Army had
just completed the destruction of Europe and had set up a government of
military occupation amid the ruins to rule the starving Germans and deal
out victors' justice to the vanquished. General George S. Patton,
commander of the U.S. Third Army, became military governor of the
greater portion of the American occupation zone of Germany.
 
It was only in the final days of the war and during his tenure as military
governor of Germany -- after he had gotten to know both the Germans
and America's "gallant Soviet allies" -- that Patton's understanding of the
true situation grew and his opinions changed. In his diary and in many
letters to his family, friends, various military colleagues, and government
officials, he expressed his new understanding and his apprehensions for
the future. His diary and his letters were published in 1974 by the
Houghton Mifflin Company under the title The Patton Papers.
 
Several months before the end of the war, General Patton had recognized
the fearful danger to the West posed by the Soviet Union, and he had
disagreed bitterly with the orders which he had been given to hold back
his army and wait for the Red Army to occupy vast stretches of German,
Czech, Rumanian, Hungarian, and Yugoslav territory, which the
Americans could have easily taken instead.
 
On May 7, 1945, just before the German capitulation, Patton had a
conference in Austria with U.S. Secretary of War Robert Patterson. Patton
was gravely concerned over the Soviet failure to respect the demarcation
lines separating the Soviet and American occupation zones. He was also
alarmed by plans in Washington for the immediate partial demobilization
of the U.S. Army.
 
Patton said to Patterson: "Let's keep our boots polished, bayonets
sharpened, and present a picture of force and strength to the Red Army.
This is the only language they understand and respect."
Patterson replied, "Oh, George, you have been so close to this thing so
long, you have lost sight of the big picture."
 
Patton rejoined:
 
"I understand the situation. Their (the Soviet) supply system is inadequate
to maintain them in a serious action such as I could put to them. They
have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof -- that's their supply
system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I
could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how
many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to
you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for
them to maintain themselves going back. Let's not give them time to build
up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the
Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of
Europe; we have lost the war!"
 
Patton's urgent and prophetic advice went unheeded by Patterson and the
other politicians and only served to give warning about Patton's feelings
to the alien conspirators behind the scenes in New York, Washington, and
Moscow.
 
The more he saw of the Soviets, the stronger Patton's conviction grew
that the proper course of action would be to stifle communism then and
there, while the chance existed. Later in May 1945 he attended several
meetings and social affairs with top Red Army officers, and he evaluated
them carefully.
 
He noted in his diary on May 14:
 
"I have never seen in any army at any time, including the German
Imperial Army of 1912, as severe discipline as exists in the Russian army.
The officers, with few exceptions, give the appearance of recently
civilized Mongolian bandits."
 
And Patton's aide, General Hobart Gay, noted in his own journal for May 14:
 
"Everything they (the Russians) did impressed one with the idea of
virility and cruelty."
 
Nevertheless, Patton knew that the Americans could whip the Reds then
-- but perhaps not later.
 
On May 18 he noted in his diary:
 
"In my opinion, the American Army as it now exists could beat the
Russians with the greatest of ease, because, while the Russians have good
infantry, they are lacking in artillery, air, tanks, and in the knowledge of
the use of the combined arms, whereas we excel in all three of these. If it
should be necessary to fight the Russians, the sooner we do it the better."
 
Two days later he repeated his concern when he wrote his wife:
 
"If we have to fight them, now is the time. From now on we will get weaker and
they stronger."
 
Having immediately recognized the Soviet danger and urged a course of
action which would have freed all of eastern Europe from the communist
yoke with the expenditure of far less American blood than was spilled in
Korea and Vietnam and would have obviated both those later wars not to
mention World War III -- Patton next came to appreciate the true nature of
the people for whom World War II was fought: the Jews.
 
Most of the Jews swarming over Germany immediately after the war
came from Poland and Russia, and Patton found their personal habits
shockingly uncivilized.
 
He was disgusted by their behavior in the camps for Displaced Persons
(DP's) which the Americans built for them and even more disgusted by
the way they behaved when they were housed in German hospitals and
private homes. He observed with horror that "these people do not
understand toilets and refuse to use them except as repositories for tin
cans, garbage, and refuse . . . They decline, where practicable, to use
latrines, preferring to relieve themselves on the floor."
 
He described in his diary one DP camp,
 
"where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an
appalling extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage
in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews were only forced
to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the
butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression 'lost tribes of Israel'
applied to the tribes which disappeared -- not to the tribe of Judah from
which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my
personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe -- lost to all decency."
 
Patton's initial impressions of the Jews were not improved when he
attended a Jewish religious service at Eisenhower's insistence. His diary
entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part:
 
"This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected
in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved
General Eisenhower to make a speech to them. We entered the
synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of
humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head
rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of
England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came 
down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost
fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of
remembering it."
 
These experiences and a great many others firmly convinced Patton that
the Jews were an especially unsavory variety of creature and hardly
deserving of all the official concern the American government was
bestowing on them.
 
Another September diary entry, following a demand from Washington
that more German housing be turned over to Jews, summed up his
feelings:
 
"Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic
revenge against all Germans is still working. Harrison (a U.S. State
Department official) and his associates indicate that they feel German
civilians should be removed from houses for the purpose of housing
Displaced Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when
we remove an individual German we punish an individual German, while
the punishment is -- not intended for the individual but for the race.
Furthermore, it is against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person
from a house, which is a punishment, without due process of law. In the
second place, Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a
human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews,
who are lower than animals."
 
One of the strongest factors in straightening out General Patton's thinking
on the conquered Germans was the behavior of America's controlled news
media toward them. At a press conference in Regensburg, Germany, on
May 8, 1945, immediately after Germany's surrender, Patton was asked
whether he planned to treat captured SS troops differently from other
German POW's. His answer was:
 
"No. SS means no more in Germany than being a Democrat in America --
that is not to be quoted. I mean by that that initially the SS people were
special sons of bitches, but as the war progressed they ran out of sons of
bitches and then they put anybody in there. Some of the top SS men will
be treated as criminals, but there is no reason for trying someone who was
drafted into this outfit . . ."
 
Despite Patton's request that his remark not be quoted, the press eagerly
seized on it, and Jews and their front men in America screamed in outrage
over Patton's comparison of the SS and the Democratic Party as well as 
over his announced intention of treating most SS prisoners humanely.
 
With great reluctance, and only after repeated promptings from
Eisenhower, he had thrown German families out of their homes to make
room for more than a million Jewish DP's -- part of the famous "six
million" who had supposedly been gassed -- but he balked when ordered
to begin blowing up German factories, in accord with the infamous
Morgenthau Plan to destroy Germany's economic basis forever.
 
In his diary he wrote:
 
"I doubted the expediency of blowing up factories, because the ends for
which the factories are being blown up -- that is, preventing Germany
from preparing for war -- can be equally well attained through the
destruction of their machinery, while the buildings can be used to house
thousands of homeless persons."
 
Similarly, he expressed his doubts to his military colleagues about the
overwhelming emphasis being placed on the persecution of every German
who had formerly been a member of the National Socialist party.
 
In a letter to his wife of September 14, 1945, he said:
 
"I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is
Semitic. I am also opposed to sending POW's to work as slaves in foreign
lands (i.e., the Soviet Union's Gulags), where many will be starved to
death."
 
Despite his disagreement with official policy, Patton followed the rules
laid down by Morgenthau and others back in Washington as closely as his
conscience would allow, but he tried to moderate the effect, and this
brought him into increasing conflict with Eisenhower and the other
politically ambitious generals.
 
In another letter to his wife he commented:
 
"I have been at Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we
are doing (to the Germans) is 'Liberty, then give me death.' I can't see how
Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it."
 
And in his diary he noted:,
 
"Today we received orders . . . in which we were told to give the Jews
special accommodations. If for Jews, why not Catholics, Mormons,
etc? . . . We are also turning over to the French several hundred thousand
prisoners of war to be used as slave labor in France. It is amusing to recall
that we fought the Revolution in defense of the rights of man and the
Civil War to abolish slavery and have now gone back on both principles."
 
His duties as military governor took Patton to all parts of Germany and 
intimately acquainted him with the German people and their condition.
He could not help but compare them with the French, the Italians, the
Belgians, and even the British. This comparison gradually forced him to
the conclusion that World War II had been fought against the wrong
people.
 
After a visit to ruined Berlin, he wrote his wife on July 21, 1945:
 
"Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good
race,and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all
Europe will be communist. It's said that for the first week after they took
it (Berlin), all women who ran were shot and those who did not were
raped. I could have taken it (instead of the Soviets) had I been allowed."
 
This conviction, that the politicians had used him and the U.S. Army for a
criminal purpose, grew in the following weeks. During a dinner with
French General Alphonse Juin in August, Patton was surprised to find the
Frenchman in agreement with him.
 
His diary entry for August 18 quotesGen. Juin:
 
"It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that the English and
the Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country -- and I
do not mean France. Therefore, the road is now open for the advent of
Russian communism."
 
Later diary entries and letters to his wife reiterate this same conclusion.
On August 31 he wrote:
 
"Actually, the Germans are the only decent
people left in Europe. it's a choice between them and the Russians. I
prefer the Germans."
 
And on September 2: "What we are doing is to
destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow
the whole."
 
 
By this time the Morgenthauists and media monopolists had decided that
Patton was incorrigible and must be discredited. So they began a non-stop
hounding of him in the press, a la Watergate, accusing him of being "soft
on Nazis" and continually recalling an incident in which he had slapped a
shirker two years previously, during the Sicily campaign. A New York
newspaper printed the completely false claim that when Patton had
slapped the soldier who was Jewish, he had called him a "yellow-bellied
Jew."
 
Then, in a press conference on September 22, reporters hatched a scheme
to needle Patton into losing his temper and making statements which
could be used against him. The scheme worked. The press interpreted one
of Patton's answers to their insistent questions as to why he was not
pressing the Nazi-hunt hard enough as:
 
"The Nazi thing is just like a Democrat-Republican fight."
 
The New York Times headlined this quote,
and other papers all across America picked it up.
The unmistakable hatred which had been directed at him during this press
conference finally opened Patton's eyes fully as to what was afoot.
 
In his diary that night lie wrote:
 
"There is a very apparent Semitic influence in the press. They are trying
to do two things: first, implement communism, and second, see that all
businessmen of German ancestry and non-Jewish antecedents are thrown
out of their jobs."
 
"They have utterly lost the Anglo-Saxon conception of justice and feel
that a man can be kicked out because somebody else says he is a Nazi.
They were evidently quite shocked when I told them I would kick nobody
out without the successful proof of guilt before a court of law" . . .
 
"Another point which the press harped on was the fact that we were doing
too much for the Germans to the detriment of the DP's, most of whom are
Jews. I could not give the answer to that one, because the answer is that,
in my opinion and that of most nonpolitical officers, it is vitally necessary
for us to build Germany up now as a buffer state against Russia. In fact, I
am afraid we have waited too long."
 
And in a letter of the same date to his wife:
 
"I will probably be in the headlines before you get this, as the press
is trying to quote me as being more interested in restoring order in
Germany than in catching Nazis. I can't tell them the truth that unless
we restore Germany we will insurethat communism takes America."
 
Eisenhower responded immediately to the press outcry against Patton and
made the decision to relieve him of his duties as military governor and
"kick him upstairs" as the commander of the Fifteenth Army.
 
In a letter to his wife on September 29, Patton indicated that he was, in a way, not
unhappy with his new assignment, because "I would like it much better
than being a sort of executioner to the best race in Europe."
 
On October 22 he wrote a long letter to Maj. Gen. James G. Harbord,
who was back in the States. In the letter Patton bitterly condemned the
Morgenthau policy; Eisenhower's pusillanimous behavior in the face of
Jewish demands; the strong pro-Soviet bias in the press; and the
politicization, corruption, degradation, and demoralization of the U.S.
Army which these things were causing.
 
He saw the demoralization of the Army as a deliberate goal of America's enemies:
 
"I have been just as furious as you at the compilation of lies which the
communist and Semitic elements of our government have leveled against
me and practically every other commander. In my opinion it is a
deliberate attempt to alienate the soldier vote from the commanders,
because the communists know that soldiers are not communistic, and they
fear what eleven million votes (of veterans) would do."
 
In his letter to Harbord, Patton also revealed his own plans to fight those
who were destroying the morale and integrity of the Army and
endangering America's future by not opposing the growing Soviet might:
 
"It is my present thought . . . that when I finish this job, which will be
around the first of the year, I shall resign, not retire, because if I retire I
will still have a gag in my mouth . . . I should not start a limited
counterattack, which would be contrary to my military theories, but
should wait until I can start an all- out offensive . . .
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Patton Assassinated to Suppress His Criticism of Post-War Policy

By Russ Winter

 

Before his death in 1999, an OSS special agent openly talked about his role in incapacitating

Gen. George S. Patton (1885-1945) via a staged automobile fender bender on Dec. 9, 1945.

Using the pandemonium of the traffic collision as a distraction, agent Douglas DeWitt Bazata

sniped Patton in the neck with a specially made gun firing a non-piercing bolt. Patton

survived the incident with a dislocation of a vertebrae and never knew what hit him.

 

Major Gen. William J. Donovan, head of the OSS
 

The government assassin first publicly confessed his guilt in the plot decades ago in front

of a journalist at an OSS reunion dinner in D.C. Later, Bazata also confessed his role

to author Robert K. Wilcox, who wrote the book “Target Patton.” Wilcox’s cousin and researcher

Tim Wilcox discusses the circumstances in the video below. Bazata

was an active special agent and assassin during and after WWII.

 

The assassin recounted that OSS Chief William Donovan had personally ordered the

killing on the grounds that Patton had “gone crazy” and was becoming a major threa

t to American national interests.

 

A newspaper that also carried an interview claimed that it had “a professional analyst

subject Bazata’s interview to the rigors of a content analysis using a Psychological Stress

Evaluator (P.S.E.) His report: Bazata gives no evidence of lying.” More details can

be gleaned in this article.

 


On Dec. 9, 1945, a truck swerved in front of Patton’s limo. It was driven by a corporal

who then disappeared. Patton survived with a dislocation of vertebrae from Bazata’s

weapon and was taken to a hospital in more distant Heidelberg rather than in nearby Mannheim.

 

As Patton was recovering, he held a press conference and declared he was going home.

Then, he was injected or poisoned in the hospital and died suddenly on Dec. 21, 1945.

There is a backstory that NKVD agents got to him, but that wouldn’t have been necessary.

 

Bazata claimed that he knows who killed him, and that Patton was killed by a dose of cyanide

in the hospital. No autopsy was done, which is highly suspicious. Bazata went on to say that

he met an unidentified man whom he knew only as a “Pole” (Polish extraction), who was also

ordered to kill Patton.

 

Several official reports were produced regarding the exact circumstances of the very

strange traffic accident said to be responsible for his death, but all of these reports have

completely disappeared from U.S. government files. The medical reports disappeared,

and archival records are strangely scrubbed.

 

Weak link in story? Patton stopped en route at a Roman ruin located on a hill along the

roadside. Bazata put a jam into the window of Patton’s auto that would leave a four inch

gap for a shot to the target. There are very few images of the limo online and now no accident

reports either. However this one is of interest. It shows a white colored tag sticking out of

the window, door area where Patton was seated. The window itself is blurry, but you can

see some interior detail. Was this window indeed partially open – thus confirming Bazata’s claim?

Plenty of Motive for Assassination: George Patton’s Interpretive Framework

 

Patton had planned to write his memoirs, illustrating that eastern Europe was tossed to

the Soviet Union. The reason for the hit on Patton were his views put forth on Oct. 22, 1945,

in a long letter to Maj. Gen. James G. Harbord. Once the powers that be realized Patton

would retire and be outspoken, the plan was put into place. This “car accident” took place

shortly before his scheduled departure home, and he had narrowly escaped death twice before

under very strange circumstances.

 

In the letter, Patton had bitterly condemned the Morgenthau policy; Eisenhower’s pusillanimous

behavior in the face of Jewish demands; the strong pro-Soviet bias in the press; and the

politicization, corruption, degradation and the demoralization of the U.S. Army,

from this bad policy. He saw this as a deliberate goal of America’s enemies.

 

I have been just as furious as you at the compilation of lies which the communist and

Semitic elements of our government have leveled against me and practically every

other commander. In my opinion it is a deliberate attempt to alienate the soldier

vote from the commanders, because the communists know that soldiers are not

communistic, and they fear what eleven million votes (of veterans) would do.”

 

In his letter to Harbord, Patton also revealed his own plans to fight an “all-out offensive” against

those who were destroying the morale and integrity of the Army and

endangering America’s future by not opposing the growing Soviet might.

 

It is my present thought … that when I finish this job, which will be around the first of

the year, I shall resign, not retire, because if I retire I will still have a gag in my mouth

… I should not start a limited counterattack, which would be contrary to my

military theories, but should wait until I can start an all-out offensive …”

 

Several months before the end of the war, Patton recognized the fearful danger to the

West posed by the Soviet Union, and he had disagreed bitterly with the orders given to

him in April and May, 1945 to hold back his army and wait for the Red Army to occupy

vast stretches of German, Czech, Rumanian, Hungarian and Yugoslav territory,

which the Americans could have easily taken instead.

 

The most notorious incident allegedly happened toward the end of May, when an

English-speaking Russian brigadier general arrived at Patton’s headquarters to demand

that some river boats on the Danube that had contained Germans who had surrendered

to the Third Army be returned to the Russians. Patton opened a drawer, pulled out a pistol,

slammed it down on his desk and raged, “Goddamnit! Get this son-of-a-bitch out of here!

Who in hell let him in? Don’t let any more Russian bastards into this headquarters.”

 

On July 21, he wrote to Beatrice, “We have destroyed what could have been a good race

and we [are] about to replace them with Mongolian savages. Now the horrors of peace,

pacifism and unions will have unlimited sway. I wish I were young enough to fight in the

next one [war]. It would be real fun killing Mongols …. It is hell to be old and passé and know it.”

 

Then, he was highly critical of the post-war occupation policy in Germany.

 

The noise against me is only the means by which the Jews and Communists are attempting

and with good success to implement a further dismemberment of Germany. I think that

if I resigned as I threatened to do yesterday, it would simply discredit me to no purpose.

 

We promised the Europeans freedom. It would be worse than dishonorable not to see

that they have it. This might mean war with the Russians, but what of it? They have

no air force, and their gasoline and ammunition supplies are low. I’ve seen their miserable

supply trains; mostly wagons drawn by beaten up old horses or oxen. I’ll say this; the

Third Army alone and with damned few casualties, could lick what is left of the Russians

in six weeks. You mark my words. Don’t ever forget them. Someday we will have to fight

them and it will take six years and cost us six million lives. [As quoted in the

book “The Unknown Patton” (1983) by Charles M. Province, p. 100]

 

Other notable quotes illustrate his frame mind.

 

No one gives a damn how well Bavaria is run. All they are interested in now is how

well it is ruined. [Letter to Beatrice (29 September 1945), published

in “The Patton Papers” (1996), edited by Martin Blumenson]

 

Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against

all Germans is still working. Harrison (a U.S. State Department official) and his associates

indicate that they feel German civilians should be removed from houses for the purpose

of housing Displaced Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when

we remove an individual German we punish an individual German, while the punishment

is — not intended for the individual but for the race. Furthermore, it is against my

Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which is a punishment,

without due process of law.

 

There were also running conflicts about the treatment of Axis POWs. Patton was countering

abuses. Additionally Patton was furious that Americans from POW facilities

in Soviet hands had not been immediately returned per agreement.

 

With great reluctance and only after repeated promptings from Eisenhower, he had thrown

German families out of their homes to make room for more than a million DPs, but he

balked when ordered to begin blowing up German factories in accord with the

infamous Morgenthau Plan to destroy Germany’s economic base forever.

 

In his diary he wrote:

I doubted the expediency of blowing up factories, because the ends for which the

factories are being blown up — that is, preventing Germany from preparing for war

— can be equally well attained through the destruction of their machinery,

while the buildings can be used to house thousands of homeless persons.

 

In a letter to his wife of September 14, 1945, he wrote:

I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic.

I am also opposed to sending POW’s to work as slaves in foreign lands (i.e., the Soviet

Union’s Gulags), where many will be starved to death. I have been at Frankfurt for a

civil government conference. If what we are doing (to the Germans) is ‘Liberty, then

give me death.’ I can’t see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I

am sure of it.

 

On July 21, 1945:

Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good race,

and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all Europe will be

communist. It’s said that for the first week after they took it (Berlin), all women who

ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it

(instead of the Soviets) had I been allowed.

 

On August 31 he wrote:

Actually, the Germans are the only decent people left in Europe.

It’s a choice between them and the Russians. I prefer the Germans.

 

And on September 2:

What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern

state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole.

 

Morgenthauists and media monopolists had decided that Patton was incorrigible and must

be discredited. So they began a non-stop hounding of him in the press, accusing him

of being “soft on Nazis”, Patton’s response:

 

There is a very apparent Semitic influence in the press. They are trying to do two things:

first, implement communism, and second, see that all businessmen of German

ancestry and non-Jewish antecedents are thrown out of their jobs.

 

 

 

Click on this text to see: Gen George Patton On Jews And Germans...



PATTON’S MURDER

Of the 740,000 German POWs, I mean Disarmed Enemy
Forces, which were handed over as forced slave laborers
to France in the fall of 1945, most barely weighed 100
pounds. Further starvation caused mass deaths of German
slaves in France, and German slave deaths in Soviet
controlled areas were so extreme that it prompted
General George S. Patton to comment in his diary
​:​


​"​
I’m also opposed to sending [German] POWs to
work as slaves in foreign lands (in particular, to
France) where many will be starved to death. It is
amusing to recall that we fought the [American]
revolution in defense of the rights of man, and the
Civil War to abolish slavery, and now have gone
back on both principles.
​"​


General Patton wrote a lot of things in his diary that are
not widely known... such as this September 17, 1945
entry:

​"​
The virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch
against all Germans is Semitic revenge. Now I’m
being ordered to remove German civilians from
their homes for the purpose of housing displaced
persons. It appears that this order is to punish the
German race and not individual Germans. It is
against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a
person from his house without due process of the
law.
​"​


Most of these displaced persons were Jews and Patton
did not personally think much of them as a race. He was
also considered to be “soft on Nazis” which caused him
to be smeared in the Jewish controlled press. The war
hero often expressed grave misgivings regarding the
harsh treatment of Germans by the allies and freely urged
the creation of a strong Germany to counter the advances
of Soviet Russia into Eastern Europe.

If you ever wondered how and why the slapping of a
soldier
​ (who was Jewish)​
in a field hospital incident became headlines...
now you know. It was a matter of Jewish vindictiveness.

Furthermore, there are many savvy Americans who
believe that Patton was actually murdered because of his
beliefs and attitudes. He had sealed his fate when he
publicly linked Communists and Jews (a link that could
not be more accurate).

Although Patton’s military file at the National Archives
in St. Louis has over 1,300 pages of documents, only a
few are devoted to the post-war car crash that killed him
and five separate on-the-scene military-police reports
related to the car crash disappeared shortly after being
archived.

Patton’s demise began on December 9, 1945 as he was
setting out for a pheasant hunting excursion near
Mannheim, Germany. His chauffeured Cadillac staff car
collided with a two-ton Army truck. Patton suffered a
neck injury but it was not of a serious nature, while his
driver and his hunting buddy and chief of staff, General
Hap Gay, walked away uninjured.

On the way to the hospital, Patton’s emergency rescue
vehicle was AGAIN struck by a two-ton Army truck; this
time Patton’s injuries were serious but not life-
threatening.

Neither of the two Army truck drivers were detained or
questioned. The driver of the first truck to collide with
Patton’s staff car, Robert L. Thompson, was quickly
whisked away to London and became somehow
unavailable for questioning. It was later revealed that
Thompson was not authorized to drive a two-ton Army
vehicle and no explanation was ever offered for the
presence of two mysterious passengers in the truck with
him.

When finally at a hospital, Patton was able to contact his
wife in the U.S. and sincerely urged her to have him
removed from that particular hospital because, “They’re
going to kill me here!” ...and they evidently did.

On December, 21, 1945, General George S. Patton was
pronounced dead as the result of an embolism. An
embolism being a bubble of air that is fatal if it reaches a
vital organ. An embolism can be introduced into the
bloodstream by a syringe, or intravenous feeding and
medication.

Not only did the Army not investigate the automobile
“accident” incident, but there was no autopsy performed,
and his remains were never returned to America.

Patton once said, “I have a little black book in my pocket
and when I get back home I’m going to blow the hell out
of everything.” The little black book disappeared at the
hospital where he died.

Many high-ranking American military personnel
including, O.S.S. Director General “Wild Bill Donovan,
were very sympathetic to the plight of Jews and believed
Patton to be a loose cannon. FDR’s confidant, lawyer
​,​

speech writer and Jew, Judge Samuel Irving Rosenman,
and General Donovan were quite chummy. Donovan was
even Rosenman’s go to guy between the White House
and the American judges at the Nuremberg trials.
________________________





It was only in the final days of the war and during his tenure as military governor of Germany
-- after he had gotten to know both the Germans and America's "gallant Soviet allies" -- that Patton's
understanding of the true situation grew and his opinions changed. In his diary and in many letters
to his family, friends, various military colleagues, and government officials, he expressed his new
understanding and his apprehensions for the future. His diary and his letters were published
in 1974 by the Houghton Mifflin Company under the title The Patton Papers.
Several months before the end of the war, General Patton had recognized the fearful danger to the
West posed by the Soviet Union, and he had disagreed bitterly with the orders which he had been
given to hold back his army and wait for the Red Army to occupy vast stretches of German, Czech,
Rumanian, Hungarian, and Yugoslav territory, which the Americans could have easily taken instead.

In May 7, 1945, just before the German capitulation, Patton had a conference in Austria with U.S.
Secretary of War Robert Patterson. Patton was gravely concerned over the Soviet failure to respect
the demarcation lines separating the Soviet and American occupation zones. He was also alarmed
by plans in Washington for the immediate partial demobilization of the U.S. Army.

Patton said to Patterson: "Let's keep our boots polished, bayonets sharpened, and present a picture
of force and strength to the Red Army. This is the only language they understand and respect."

Patterson replied, "Oh, George, you have been so close to this
thing so long, you have lost sight of the big picture."

  • Patton rejoined:
  • "I understand the situation. Their (the Soviet) supply system is inadequate to maintain them in
  • a serious action such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the
  • hoof -- that's their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting
  • I could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how many million men
  • they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down.
  • There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let's not give them time
  • to build up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and
  • disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe; we have lost the war!"
  • ______________________________

    ​PATTON Part 2​
     

     
    Patton's urgent and prophetic advice went unheeded by Patterson and the other politicians and only
    served to give warning about Patton's feelings to the alien conspirators behind the scenes in
    New York, Washington, and Moscow.



    The more he saw of the Soviets, the stronger Patton's conviction grew that the proper course of action
    would be to stifle communism then and there, while the chance existed. Later in May 1945 he
    attended several meetings and social affairs with top Red Army officers, and he evaluated them carefully.
    He noted in his diary on May 14:



    "I have never seen in any army at any time, including the German Imperial Army of 1912,
    as severe discipline as exists in the Russian army. The officers, with few
    exceptions, give the appearance of recently civilized Mongolian bandits."


    And Patton's aide, General Hobart Gay, noted in his own journal for May 14:
    "Everything they (the Russians) did impressed one with the idea of virility and cruelty."



    Nevertheless, Patton knew that the Americans could whip the Reds
    then -- but perhaps not later. On May 18 he noted in his diary:
    "In my opinion, the American Army as it now exists could beat the Russians with the greatest of ease,
    because, while the Russians have good infantry, they are lacking in artillery, air, tanks, and in the
    knowledge of the use of the combined arms, whereas we excel in all three of these. If it should be necessary
    to fight the Russians, the sooner we do it the better."

    Two days later he repeated his concern when he wrote his wife: "If we have to fight
    them, now is the time. From now on we will get weaker and they stronger."



    Having immediately recognized the Soviet danger and urged a course of action which would
    have freed all of eastern Europe from the communist yoke with the expenditure of far less American
    blood than was spilled in Korea and Vietnam and would have obviated both those later wars not to
    mention World War III -- Patton next came to appreciate the true nature of the people for whom
    World War II was fought: the Jews.


    Most of the Jews swarming over Germany immediately after the war came from Poland
    and Russia, and Patton found their personal habits shockingly uncivilized.

    He was disgusted by their behavior in the camps for Displaced Persons (DP's) which the Americans
    built for them and even more disgusted by the way they behaved when they were housed in German
    hospitals and private homes. He observed with horror that "these people do not understand toilets
    and refuse to use them except as repositories for tin cans, garbage, and refuse . . . They decline,
    where practicable, to use latrines, preferring to relieve themselves on the floor."

    ___________
    ​PATTON Part 3​
     


    He described in his diary one DP camp,


    "where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling extent, and in
    practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine.
    The Jews were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the
    butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression 'lost tribes of Israel' applied to the tribes which
    disappeared -- not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended.
    However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe -- lost to all decency."



    Patton's initial impressions of the Jews were not improved when he attended a Jewish religious
    service at Eisenhower's insistence. His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part:

    "This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected in a large, wooden building,
    which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech to them.
    We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have
    ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar
    to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came
    down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours
    later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it."

    These experiences and a great many others firmly convinced Patton that the Jews were an especially
    unsavory variety of creature and hardly deserving of all the official concern the American
    government was bestowing on them.

    Another September diary entry, following a demand from Washington that
    more German housing be turned over to Jews, summed up his feelings:

    Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is
    still working. Harrison (a U.S. State Department official) and his associates indicate that they
    feel German civilians should be removed from houses for the purpose of housing Displaced Persons.
    There are two errors in this assumption. First, when we remove an individual German we punish
    an individual German, while the punishment is -- not intended for the individual but for the race.



    Furthermore, it is against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which is
    a punishment, without due process of law. In the second place, Harrison and his ilk believe that the
    Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews,
    who are lower than animals."


    One of the strongest factors in straightening out General Patton's thinking on the conquered Germans
    was the behavior of America's controlled news media toward them. At a press conference in Regensburg,
    Germany, on May 8, 1945, immediately after Germany's surrender, Patton was asked whether he
    planned to treat captured SS troops differently from other German POW's. His answer was:



    "No. SS means no more in Germany than being a Democrat in America -- that is not to be quoted.
    I mean by that that initially the SS people were special sons of bitches, but as the war progressed
    they ran out of sons of bitches and then they put anybody in there. Some of the top SS men will be
    treated as criminals, but there is no reason for trying someone who was drafted into this outfit . . ."

    Despite Patton's request that his remark not be quoted, the press eagerly seized on it, and Jews and
    their front men in America screamed in outrage over Patton's comparison of the SS and the
    Democratic Party as well as over his announced intention of treating most SS prisoners humanely.

    With great reluctance, and only after repeated promptings from Eisenhower, he had thrown German
    families out of their homes to make room for more than a million Jewish DP's -- part of the famous
    "six million" who had supposedly been gassed -- but he balked when ordered to begin blowing up
    German factories, in accord with the infamous Morgenthau Plan to destroy Germany's economic basis forever.
    In his diary he wrote:

    "I doubted the expediency of blowing up factories, because the ends for which the factories are
    being blown up -- that is, preventing Germany from preparing for war -- can be equally well
    attained through the destruction of their machinery, while the buildings can be used to house thousands
    of homeless persons."



    PATTON Part 4​

    Similarly, he expressed his doubts to his military colleagues about the overwhelming emphasis
    being placed on the persecution of every German who had formerly been a member of
    the National Socialist party. In a letter to his wife of September 14, 1945, he said:


    "I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic. I am also opposed
    to sending POW's to work as slaves in foreign lands (i.e., the Soviet Union's Gulags), where many will
    be starved to death."

    Despite his disagreement with official policy, Patton followed the rules laid down by Morgenthau
    and others back in Washington as closely as his conscience would allow, but he tried to moderate
    the effect, and this brought him into increasing conflict with Eisenhower and the other
    politically ambitious generals. In another letter to his wife he commented:


    "I have been at Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we are doing (to the Germans)
    is 'Liberty, then give me death.' I can't see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it."

    And in his diary he noted:,


    "Today we received orders . . . in which we were told to give the Jews special accommodations.
    If for Jews, why not Catholics, Mormons, etc? . . . We are also turning over to the French several
    hundred thousand prisoners of war to be used as slave labor in France. It is amusing to recall that
    we fought the Revolution in defense of the rights of man and the Civil War to abolish slavery and have
    now gone back on both principles."

    His duties as military governor took Patton to all parts of Germany and intimately acquainted him
    with the German people and their condition. He could not help but compare them with the French,
    the Italians, the Belgians, and even the British. This comparison gradually forced him
    to the conclusion that World War II had been fought against the wrong people.



    After a visit to ruined Berlin, he wrote his wife on July 21, 1945: "Berlin gave me the blues.
    We have destroyed what could have been a good race, and we are about to replace them with
    Mongolian savages. And all Europe will be communist. It's said that for the first week after they
    took it (Berlin), all women who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it
    (instead of the Soviets) had I been allowed."


    This conviction, that the politicians had used him and the U.S. Army for a criminal purpose, grew
    in the following weeks. During a dinner with French General Alphonse Juin in August, Patton was
    surprised to find the Frenchman in agreement with him. His diary entry for August 18 quotes
    Gen. Juin: "It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that the English and the Americans have destroyed
    in Europe the only sound country -- and I do not mean France. Therefore, the road is now open for
    the advent of Russian communism."


    Later diary entries and letters to his wife reiterate this same conclusion. On August 31 he wrote:
    "Actually, the Germans are the only decent people left in Europe. it's a choice between them and
    the Russians. I prefer the Germans." And on September 2: "What we are doing is to
    destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole."


    _____________
    ​PATTON Part 5​


    By this time the Morgenthauists and media monopolists had decided that Patton was incorrigible
    and must be discredited. So they began a non-stop hounding of him in the press, a la Watergate,
    accusing him of being "soft on Nazis" and continually recalling an incident in which he had
    slapped a shirker two years previously, during the Sicily campaign. A New York newspaper printed
    the completely false claim that when Patton had slapped the soldier who was Jewish, he had called
    him a "yellow-bellied Jew."

    Then, in a press conference on September 22, reporters hatched a scheme to needle Patton into
    losing his temper and making statements which could be used against him. The scheme worked.
    The press interpreted one of Patton's answers to their insistent questions as to why he was not
    pressing the Nazi-hunt hard enough as: "The Nazi thing is just like a Democrat-Republican fight."
    The New York Times headlined this quote, and other papers all across America picked it up.


    The unmistakable hatred which had been directed at him during this press conference
    finally opened Patton's eyes fully as to what was afoot. In his diary that night lie wrote:

    "There is a very apparent Semitic influence in the press. They are trying to do two things: first,
    implement communism, and second, see that all businessmen of German
    ancestry and non-Jewish antecedents are thrown out of their jobs.

    "They have utterly lost the Anglo-Saxon conception of justice and feel that a man can be kicked
    out because somebody else says he is a Nazi. They were evidently quite shocked when I told
    them I would kick nobody out without the successful proof of guilt before a court of law . . .

    "Another point which the press harped on was the fact that we were doing too much for the
    Germans to the detriment of the DP's, most of whom are Jews. I could not give the answer to
    that one, because the answer is that, in my opinion and that of most nonpolitical officers, it is
    vitally necessary for us to build Germany up now as a buffer state against Russia. In fact, I am afraid
    we have waited too long."


    And in a letter of the same date to his wife: "I will probably be in the headlines before you get this,
    as the press is trying to quote me as being more interested in restoring order in Germany than in
    catching Nazis. I can't tell them the truth that unless we restore Germany we will insure that
    communism takes America."



    Eisenhower responded immediately to the press outcry against Patton and made the decision to
    relieve him of his duties as military governor and "kick him upstairs" as the commander of the
    Fifteenth Army. In a letter to his wife on September 29, Patton indicated that he was, in a way, not
    unhappy with his new assignment, because "I would like it much better than being a sort of executioner
    to the best race in Europe."



    On October 22 he wrote a long letter to Maj. Gen. James G. Harbord, who was back in the States.
    In the letter Patton bitterly condemned the Morgenthau policy; Eisenhower's pusillanimous
    behavior in the face of Jewish demands; the strong pro-Soviet bias in the press; and the politicization,
    corruption, degradation, and demoralization of the U.S. Army which these things were causing.

    He saw the demoralization of the Army as a deliberate goal of America's enemies:

    "I have been just as furious as you at the compilation of lies which the communist and Semitic
    elements of our government have leveled against me and practically every other commander.
    In my opinion it is a deliberate attempt to alienate the soldier vote from the commanders, because
    the communists know that soldiers are not communistic, and they fear what eleven million
    votes (of veterans) would do."
     
    In his letter to Harbord, Patton also revealed his own plans to fight those who were destroying
    the morale and integrity of the Army and endangering America's future by not opposing the growing Soviet might:
     
    "It is my present thought . . . that when I finish this job, which will be around the first of the year,
    I shall resign, not retire, because if I retire I will still have a gag in my mouth . . . I should not start
    a limited counterattack, which would be contrary to my military theories, but should wait until I can start
    an all- out offensive . . . ."
     
    In his letter to Harbord, Patton also revealed his own plans to fight those who were destroying
    the morale and integrity of the Army and endangering America's future by not opposing
    the growing Soviet might:



    "It is my present thought . . . that when I finish this job, which will be around the first of the year,
    I shall resign, not retire, because if I retire I will still have a gag in my mouth . . . I should not start
    a limited counterattack, which would be contrary to my military theories,
    but should wait until I can start an all- out offensive . . . ."
    ___________________


    As Secretary of State, former head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General George C. Marshall
    strongly opposed recognizing the state of Israel. Marshall felt that if the state of Israel was
    declared that a war would break out in the Middle East (which it did in 1948 one day after
    Israel declared independence). Marshall saw recognizing the Jewish state as a political
    move to gain Jewish support in the upcoming election, in which Truman was expected to
    lose to Dewey. He told President Truman in May 1948, "If you (recognize the state of Israel)
    and if I were to vote in the election, I would vote against you."

    Of course, the war that began the day after the so called United Nations recognized Israel
    as a state rages to this very day in many countries to one degree or another.

    __________________________________________________________________________

     

    How accurate is the movie Patton?

     
     
     
     

    "Patton" is a biopic of one of America’s greatest generals in World War II. The motion

    picture portrays the role of General George S. Patton, the most famous Allies tank commander

    of WW II. It concentrates on Patton’s career from 1942 to 1945. The movie begins with

    Patton's career during the North Africa campaign and his battle with Rommel, the Desert Fox.

     

    It then follows his part in the invasion of Sicily, his disgrace for striking a soldier and his role

    in the liberation of Europe after the D-Day landings and his role in the fall of the Third Reich.

    The feature also briefly deals with his role in post-war Germany and

    his death in an accidental car crash in the winter of 1945.

     

    The movie shows the strengths and weakness of this challenging and brilliant man.

    The movie Patton was released in 1970 during the midst of the Vietnam War. When it was

    released, it was both a critical and financial success. Directed by Franklin J. Schaffner, the

    movie was scripted by Francis Ford Coppola of Godfather fame and Edward Hill. [1]

    Twentieth Century Fox produced the film. The role of Patton was played by the American

    character actor George C Scott. The movie was enthusiastically received by both the public

    and the critics and won several Academy Awards. The film fairly accurately

    reflects the reality of Patton’s role in the defeat of Germany.

     

    Patton and the opening Speech

     

    The movie has one of the most memorable opening scenes in Hollywood history. George C. Scott

    emerges as Patton and gives a remarkable speech in front of a huge banner of the Stars and Stripes.

    The opening scene was written by Francis Ford Coppola and was not intended to be in the final

    cut of the movie, But, the director had second thoughts and luckily left it in.

    The speech of Patton was a unique blend of patriotism, nobility, and crudities.

     

    However, Patton never gave such a speech. It would be wrong to state that the speech was

    just a fabrication. Coppola cleverly took quotes from Patton’s speeches and interviews and

    combined them in a brilliant way.[2] The words in the speech are Patton’s apart from some

    lines used by the screenwriter to integrate the quotes into a coherent speech. The result

    was one of the most outstanding introductions in movie history, but strictly speaking,

    Patton never gave this speech.

     

    Patton in North Africa

     

    The movie after the opening credits shows the aftermath of a terrible American defeat in

    Kasserine Pass in Tunisia. Rommel had ruthlessly exposed the weakness and lack of experience

    of the Americans and inflicted a severe setback. Over 2000 American G.I.s died in the disaster.

    We first see Patton inspecting the battlefield after his appointment as commander. Patton

    was a great admirer of Rommel, and he studied his work and tactics. The movie correctly

    shows how the American general based his strategy against Rommel on the Desert Fox’s ideas.

     

    The 1970 feature shows Patton reforming the army units that were defeated at Kasserine

    Pass and imposing strict discipline on the soldiers. He was a stickler when it came to the

    rules and regulations. His attention to detail had a powerful impact on the G.Is. Patton did

    manage to transform them into a formidable fighting force. In the next battle, they did manage

    to defeat the Germans under Rommel. This victory was critical because it

    showed their allies that America could beat the Germans on their own.[3]

     

    However, the part played by Patton in the allied victory over the Afrika Korps is overstated.

    It took until 1943 for the allies to wear the Germans down in Tunisia. Patton did not play

    the decisive role in the Allied victory even though both the movie and Patton implied otherwise.

     

    Patton in Sicily

    Patton in 1944
     

    The film does accurately relate the leading role played by Patton in the liberation of Sicily.

    His daring use of armor was crucial in the defeat of the German army on the island.

    The movie does show Patton being motivated by the desire to do better than General

    Montgomery, the victor at El Alamein. There was a great personal rivalry between the two

    men. They were both driven and wildly ambitious. The movie suggests that the rivalry between

    Montgomery and Patton was a feature of the Sicilian campaign and was perhaps a factor in

    why it ended so quickly with a decisive Allied victory. The rivalry was not as intense as the

    motion picture suggests and the two men worked together when needed for the good of the

    Allied cause.[4]

     

    The movie shows Patton after visiting the wounded seeing a shell-shocked soldier.

    The G.I. was unable to continue fighting and had been sent behind the lines for treatment.

    Patton is outraged when he sees the soldier who does not have any physical wounds

    and is assumed by him to be a malingerer, and he verbally and physically assaults him.

    When a reporter saw this it was widely publicized in America and elsewhere.[5]

     

    After the incident, Patton's commander ordered to step down from his post, and he was

    not given a front-line posting for almost a year. However, what the movie failed to show

    was that Patton slapped two different soldiers who he accused of being cowards. The scene

    where Patton apologizes to the soldier was accurate. The movie accurately reflects Patton’s

    reaction to his disgrace in Sicily.

     

    The movie portrayal of Patton

     

    It is generally accepted that Patton or "Old Blood and Guts" as his men liked to call him

    was an outstanding soldier who possessed an oversized personality. Scott effectively

    captured the essence of the man and his many contradictions. Patton was a cultured man

    and believed in traditional values, yet he could also be crude and a bully.[6] The drive and

    the ambition of Patton are also brilliantly captured in the movie. He was a very ambitious man

    and believed that he was a great leader. Even from childhood, Patton believed that

    he was destined for greatness.

     

    The physical bravery of Patton is also shown several times in the movie. It also accurately

    portrays Patton's outspokenness and his love of publicity. Never shy to boast about his

    exploits, Patton was regularly in the papers and was a very well-known figure in America.

    The movie also traces the relationship between Patton and General Omar Bradley, and

    indeed the two men were close friends and colleagues. The film gets right many of the

    details of Patton’s life such as his pearl-handled revolvers and his white English bull terrier.[7]

    These were part of the public image of Old Blood and Guts, which he cultivated

    assiduously. The movie does catch the character of the General.

     

    Patton and the Phantom Army

    After his disgrace in Sicily, Patton was essentially sent out to pasture. Instead of being

    to the D-Day invastion he was placed in charge of the "Phantom Army.’ [8] In real life,

    Patton was placed in charge of a "phantom army" that was designed to deceive the Nazis

    concerning the location of the D-Day landings. Patton was part of an elaborate plan of

    misinformation that fooled the Germans into thinking that the invasion of Europe would

    happen at Calais and not in Normandy.

     

    This deception known as Operation Fortitude was very successful and helped to ensure that

    the D-Day Landings were a success. This is all accurate, and it shows Patton’s deep

    unhappiness at this time. He regarded his command of the Phantom Army as a humiliation

    and believed that he was being denied a share of the glory of D-Day. The movie also shows

    how desperate Patton was to return to combat despite General Dwight Eisenhower’s, the

    allied army’s Chief of Staff, doubts about his reliability. The film also shows Patton begging for

    his old position, but this was not the case. While he was a proud man, it had already been

    agreed that he would return to a front-line command role after D-Day.[9] The movie effectively

    portrays Patton's difficult personality.

     

    Paton and the Liberation of Europe

     

    Patton was appointed commander of the US Third Army a few weeks after Normandy.

    It was in this campaign that he displayed his greatest skills as a commander. The movie

    shows Patton brilliantly employing his tanks to break out of Normandy and allow the allied

    army to advance into the central plains of France and onwards to Paris. The movie captures

    Patton’s advance towards the German border and how the advance was halted because

    the 3rd army had run out of fuel. Patton's troops did run out of fuel and

    the movie accurately shows Patton's anger and frustration.[10]

     

    He truly believed that if he had been given more fuel that he could have ended the war

    in Europe much more quickly. The movie does not show Patton’s role in the Lorraine campaign

    on the German-French border. Here Patton defeated a counter-attack by a Panzer Army

    but was told that he could not advance into Germany. This order was a bitter disappointment

    to Patton as he once again believed that General Eisenhower was frustrating his efforts to

    bring the war in Europe to a swift conclusion. This crucial part of Patton’s story is not

    presented in the movie.

     

    The Battle of the Bulge was one of Patton’s and indeed the American army’s finest hours.

    The General led his units in a counterattack that was pivotal in driving the German

    counter-attack back. The role of Patton in the Battle is not exaggerated, and he played a

    significant role in the American victory. One famous scene in the movie is incorrect. We

    are shown Patton as praying for the weather to improve so that he and his men could

    receive air support to defeat the Nazis.[11] Patton ordered an army Chaplin to compose a

    prayer to ask God for clear weather. This order happened but it did not happen during the

    Battle of the Bulge but it was issuded during the 3rd Army’s campaign in Lorraine.

     

    Patton and Reincarnation

     

    One of the sub-themes in the movie was Patton’s belief in reincarnation. In one scene

    Patton is shown as visiting the battlefield of Zama where the Romans had defeated Hannibal.

    Patton is shown as sensing, that in a previous life he had fought in the battle, over 2000

    years earlier. This visit with Bradley was highly unlikely. The belief in reincarnation is shown

    to be very important in Patton life’s and gave him a sense of purpose and a belief that he

    was a person apart.

     

     

    The movie also has a German intelligence officer whose duty it is to monitor Patton and

    to understand him, Steiger, as he is referred to in the movie. There was no such officer,

    and the character is a pure invention. The scriptwriters created this figure to expand upon

    the theme of reincarnation in the movie epic.

     

    How accurate was Patton?

     

    Hollywood and history usually do not mix. It is quite common for filmmakers to take a

    historical subject and to distort it for their purposes and to dumb- it down for entertainment

    purposes. In the case of Patton, there was no real attempt to distort the story of Patton.

    There are glaring inaccuracies such as Patton’s opening speech in the movie, but even

    this was based on his statements and captured the character of the man, something even

    acknowledged by the Generals’ family.

     

    Much of the details of his role in the defeat of Germany are true. The only real omission was

    the lack of focus on Patton’s Lorraine Campaign, where he distinguished himself. There are

    some exaggerations in the movie and some minor distortions such as in the weather-prayer

    scene. In general, the movie managed to produce a great overview portrayal of the character and career

    of an extraordinary American leader.

     

     

    The movie did not examine his anti-Semitism, his ambition to

    expose the Jewish exploitation of the USA, nor his murder.

     

     

     

    References


  • Cousins, Mark. The Story of Film: A Worldwide History (New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, 2006), p. 213

  • Cousins, p. 214

  • D'Este, Carlo, Patton: A Genius for War (New York City: Harper Collins, 1995), p. 113

  • D’Este, p. 119

  • Lovelace, Alexander G. "The Image of a General: The Wartime Relationship between General George S. Patton Jr. and the American Media", Journalism History, 40 (no. 2 (Summer 2014)), pp. 108–120

  • Essame, H., Patton: A Study in Command (New York City: Scribner & Sons, 1995), p. 67

  • Essame, p. 203

  • D’Este, p. 2013

  • D’Este, p. 213

  • Essame, p. 203

  • Farago, Ladislas, Patton: Ordeal and Triumph (New York City: Ivan Sergeyevich Obolensky, 1964), p. 145

    1. Fargo, p. 213

    January 20, 2019

    ______________________________________________________________

     


    History or Hollywood:

    1.  Patton did bring strict discipline to II Corps
    and did give a lot of fines for uniform violations.

    2.  The strafing incident occurred during a meeting with RAF officials,
    but Coningham was not there.  Patton did not have time to fire his
    pistols, but he did make the remark about decorating the Luftwaffe pilots.

    3.  Patton did believe in reincarnation, but probably
    did not visit the Zama battlefield with Bradley.

    4.  The Steiger character was a Hollywood invention, but a good one.

    5.  The Battle of El Qatar was substantially as depicted.  The movie does
    not show that Patton was almost killed by a shell that hit where he had
    just been.  The death of Jenkins was close, but there was no funeral
    like in the movie.

    6.  The movie overdoes the race with Monty to Messina.  In fact the
    movie consistently exaggerates the animosity between the men although
    Patton had a tendency to demonize Monty in his imagination. 
    The confrontation with Truscott over the risky landing was true and the
    landing was almost a disaster (which the movie glosses over). 
    The arrival of the British army in Messina and its subsequent
    embarrassment is pure Hollywood.

    7.  The killing of the mules blocking the road did happen.

    8.  The slapping incident is well done including the dialogue.  The
    movie actually depicts the second of two slapping incidents. 
    The apologies did occur.

    9.  He did have a bull terrier named Willie.

    10.  The Knutsford Incident where he got in trouble for a speech
    to British ladies was basically true except that he did mention the Russians. 
    The press left that part out and this got Patton in hot water with Ike.

    11.  The movie has Patton visiting Bradley in Normandy and begging
    for command of the Third Army.  That is pure bull shit as Ike had
    always planned for Patton to be in command of that army for the
    Normandy breakout and Patton was not kept in the dark.

    12.  Patton had actually begun to plan for the Battle of Bulge shift a
    couple of weeks before the meeting at Verdun.  Ike was at that meeting,
    but not in the movie.

    13.  The weather prayer was originally
    to stop rain during the Lorraine campaign.

    14.  Patton’s comments about denazification were accurate .
     
     
    15. Refusing to drink with the Russian General is fiction.
     

     

     

     _____________________________________________________________________

     

     

    HOW FIELD-MARSHAL ERWIN ROMMEL REALLY DIED

     
     

    The Ethnic European REAL HISTORY survives on book royalties donated by author

    Michael Walsh and supporters of real history. OUR AIMS: To replace victor’s spin with

    real history, to enlighten, inspire and to educate, with your help to share our features

    as widely as possible.

    Rommel inspecting panzer Lehr division. Normandy 1944.

    Field-Marshall Erwin Rommel (1891 ~ 1944) was a German general and military theorist.

    Popularly known as the Desert Fox, the career serviceman served as field marshal in the 

    Wehrmacht (Defense Force) of the Third Reich during World War II, as well as earlier serving

    in the Reichswehr of the Weimar Republic, and the army of Imperial Germany (1871 ~ 1918).

     

    Rommel was a highly decorated officer in World War I and was awarded the Pour le Mérite

     for his actions on the Italian Front. In 1937 he published his classic book on military

    tactics, Infantry Attacks, drawing on his experiences from World War I.

     

    In World War II, he distinguished himself as the commander of the 7th Panzer Division

     during the 1940 invasion of France. His leadership of German and Italian forces in the North

    African campaign established his reputation as one of the ablest tank commanders of the war

    and earned him the nickname der Wüstenfuchs, the Desert Fox. Among his British adversaries,

    he earned a strong reputation for chivalry, and the North African campaign has often been

    called a “War Without Hate”. He later commanded the German forces

    opposing the Allied cross-channel invasion of Normandy in June 1944.

     

    The propaganda of the victors falsely claims that in 1944, Rommel was implicated in the 

    20 July plot to assassinate Germany’s twice-elected President-Chancellor Adolf Hitler.

    The story goes that due to Rommel’s status as a national hero, Hitler desired to eliminate

    him quietly instead of immediately executing him, as many other plotters were.

     

    Rommel was given a choice between committing suicide, in return for assurances that his

    reputation would remain intact and that his family would not be persecuted following his death,

    or facing a trial that would result in his disgrace and execution; he chose the former and

    committed suicide using a cyanide pill. Rommel was given a state funeral, and it was announced

    that “he had succumbed to his injuries from the strafing of his staff car in Normandy.” 

    This last hyphenated account is the only correct account.

     

    Rommel (2)

    The victors’ story of German General Erwin Rommel’s death was a fabricated one constructed

    by the Allies at the end of the war. Rommel was arguably Germany’s best general of World War II,

    as well as a famously humane and kind man, and a devout Christian, thus the need to fabricate

    the circumstances of what happened to him. In fact, the Field-Marshal died as a result of major

    injuries from a lowly Allied assassination attempt, not due to his being made to commit

    suicide by Adolf Hitler.

     

    The bogus official story that’s gone down as history was the result of the interrogation and

    torture (torture was a standard operating procedure with the Allies) of his captured 16-year-old son,

    Manfred, by the French in one of their camps in April 1945. Strangely, the resulting type-written

    so-called personal account was in English, which was also a language Manfred

    Rommel did not even speak.

     

    Magnaminous

     

    General Rommel passed away on the 14th October 1944 from a heart attack brought on

    by three skull fractures suffered when a Canadian Spitfire strafed his car off the road three

    months earlier. He made no apologies for his service to the Reich: “I served my Fatherland

    to the best of my ability and would do so again.” Credit The Hidden World.

     

    Ernst Rommel

     

     

    'National Narcissism': Britons, Americans and Russians All
    Think Their Country was Responsible for Winning WWII 
     

    People in Britain, America and Russia all greatly overestimate their country's contribution
    to defeating Adolf Hitler, according to new research. A survey found people from each country
    think it was responsible for contributing more than half to the victory - the UK (51%), the
    US (54%) and Russia (75%). Experts say that this is vastly more than the proportion of
    credit afforded to them by the rest of the world in a phenomenon dubbed 'national narcissism.' 
    For the UK, the average plunges to 19 per cent in the eyes of those from seven other Allied
    countries - and Germany, Italy and Japan, who fought against them. For Russia it crashes
    to 20 per cent while America enjoys a 27 per cent share of the credit US - still way below the
    country's own self-belief in victory.
     
     
     IT WAS STALIN'S SOVIET UNION THAT DEFEATED THE AXIS
     

    ... Americans and Canadians like to believe they won the war in Europe and give insufficient
    recognition to the decisive Soviet role.  Most Europeans would rather not think about the matter
    ... Were it not for the USSR's victory, Nazi Germany might be alive and well today. Let's do
    the numbers. The Soviet armed forces destroyed 507 German divisions and 100 allied
    Axis divisions (according to Soviet figures) ... The Red Army accounted for 75-80 percent
    of Axis casualties in World War II ... No one likes to admit it was Stalin who defeated
    Nazi Germany. Stalin killed far more people than Adolf Hitler ... At that time, both Roosevelt
    and Churchill lavished praise and thanks on the Soviet Union, admitting its "gigantic effort"
    in defeating Hitler's Germany. Today, however, we have chosen to forget who really
    won the war in Europe.

     

     

     


    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .