Transcript of Freedman's Speech
______________________
Ladies and gentlemen, you are about to hear a very frightening speech. This
speech is an explanation of the plans now being laid to throw the United
States into a third world war. It was made
a short time ago before a large
group in the Congressional `Room of the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C.
Both the
speech and the question and answer period later so electrified the
audience that a group of patriots has transferred
it to two long-playing
records to play for friends, clubs, and your church group in your community.
The speaker
is Mr. Benjamin Freedman, noted authority on Zionism and all
of its schemes. Mr. Freedman is
a former Jew, and I mean a FORMER Jew.
He has fought the Communist
world conspiracy tooth and nail, and stands
today as a leading American patriot. We now take you to the speaker's
platform to present Benjamin Freedman.
____________________________________________
(applause)
[Freedman's speech]
"What I intend to tell you tonight is something that you have never been able
to learn from any other source,
and what I tell you now concerns not only
you, but your children and the survival of this country and Christianity. I'm
not here just to dish up a few facts to send up your blood pressure, but I'm
here to tell you things that will help
you preserve what you consider the
most sacred things in the world: the liberty, and the freedom, and the right
to
live as Christians, where you have a little dignity, and a little right to
pursue the things that your conscience tells
you are the right things, as
Christians.
Now, first of all, I'd
like to tell you that on August 25th 1960 -- that was
shortly before elections -- Senator Kennedy, who is now the President
of the
United States, went to New York, and delivered an address to the Zionist
Organization of America. In that
address, to reduce it to its briefest form,
he stated that he would use the armed forces of the United States to preserve
the existence of the regime set up in Palestine by the Zionists who are now
in occupation of that area.
In other words, Christian boys are going to be yanked out of their homes,
away from
their families, and sent abroad to fight in Palestine against the
Christian and Moslem Arabs who merely want to return
to their homes. And
these Christian boys are going to be asked to shoot to kill these innocent
[Arab Palestinians]
people who only want to follow out fifteen resolutions
passed by the United Nations in the last twelve years calling
upon the
Zionists to allow these people to return to their homes.
Now, when United States troops appear in the Middle East to fight with the
Zionists as their allies to prevent the
return of these people who were evicted
from their homes in the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists who were
transplanted
there from Eastern Europe... when that happens, the United
States will trigger World War III.
You say, when will that take place? The answer is, as soon as the difficulty
between France and Algeria
has been settled, that will take place. As soon as
France and Algeria have been settled, that will take place. As soon
as France
and Algeria have settled their difficulty, and the Arab world, or the Moslem
world, has no more war on
their hands with France, they are going to move
these people back into their homes, and when they do that and President
kennedy sends your sons to fight over there to help the crooks hold on to
what they stole from innocent men, women
and children, we will trigger
World War III; and when that starts you can be sure we cannot emerge from
that war
a victor. We are going to lose that war because there is not one
nation in the world that will let one of their sons
fight with us for such a
cause.
I know and speak to these ambassadors
in Washington and the United
Nations -- and of the ninety-nine nations there, I've consulted with maybe
seventy
of them --and when we go to war in Palestine to help the thieves
retain possession of what they have stolen from these
innocent people we're
not going to have a man there to fight with us as our ally.
And who will these people have supporting them, you ask. Well, four days
after President Kennedy -- or
he was then Senator Kennedy -- made that
statement on August 28, 1960, the Arab nations called a meeting in Lebanon
and there they decided to resurrect, or reactivate, the government of
Palestine, which has been dormant more or less,
since the 1948 armed
insurrection by the Zionists.
Not only that...
they ordered the creation of the Palestine Army, and they are
now drilling maybe a half a million soldiers in that area
of the world to lead
these people back to theirhomeland. With them, they have as their allies all
the nations of
what is termed the Bandung Conference Group. That includes
the Soviet Union and every Soviet Union satellite. It includes
Red China; it
includes every independent country in Asia and Africa; or eighty percent of
the world's total population.
Eighty percent of the world's population. Four
out of five human beings on the face of the earth will be our enemies
at war
with us. And not alone are they four out of five human beings now on the
face of this earth, but they are
the non-Christian population of the world and
they are the non-Caucasians... the non-white nations of the world, and
that's
what we face.
And what is the reason ? The reason is that
here in the United States, the
Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government.
For many
reasons too many and too complex to go into here at this -- time
I'll be glad to answer questions, however, to support
that statement -- the
Zionists and their co-religionists rule this United States as though they were
the absolute
monarchs of this country.
Now, you say, 'well, that's a very broad statement
to make', but let me show
what happened while you were -- I don't want to wear that out --- let me
show what happened
while WE were all asleep. I'm including myself with
you. We were all asleep. What happened ?
World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. Nineteen-hundred and
fourteen was the year in which World
War One broke out. There are few
people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one
side by Great
Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany,
Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. What happened ?
Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally,
but won it
actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the
world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean,
and Great Britain
stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week's
food supply facing
her -- and after that, starvation.
At that time, the French army had
mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower
of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army
was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't
want to play war anymore, they didn't like
the Czar. And the Italian army
had collapsed.
Now Germany -- not
a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an
enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was
Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated
peace on what the lawyers call a status quo
ante basis. That means: "Let's
call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started."
Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously !
They had no choice. It was either accepting
this negotiated peace that
Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and
being totally defeated.
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the
Zionists from
Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am
going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have
all the documents to
prove any statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn't believe
what I'm saying
is at all possible -- the Zionists in London went to the
British war cabinet and they said: "Look here. You can
yet win this war.
You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace
offered to you now by
Germany. You can win this war if the United States
will come in as your ally."
The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were
young; we were rich; we were
powerful. They [Zionists] told England: "We
will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally,
to fight
with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the
war."
In other words, they made this deal: " We will get the United States into this
war as your ally.
The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won
the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey."
Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the
United States would have to promise Japan to
Ireland for any reason
whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain -- that never had any
connection or
any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine --
should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for
bringing the
United States into the war.
However, they made that
promise, in October of 1916. October, nineteen
hundred and sixteen. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here
remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-German --
totally pro-German -- because the newspapers
here were controlled by Jews,
the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country
were controlled
by Jews, and they were pro-German because their people, in
the majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to
see Germany
lick the Czar.
The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they
didn't want Russia to win this war. So
the German bankers -- the German-Jews -- Kuhn Loeb and the other big
banking
firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to
the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they
said: &"As long as
France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent ! " But they poured
money
into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to
lick the Czarist regime.
Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine,
they went to England and they
made this deal. At that time, everything
changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the
newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people
of the difficulties that Germany was having
fighting Great Britain
commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no
good. They were villains.
They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross
nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. And they were no good.
Well,
shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.
The Zionists
in London sent these cables to the United States, to Justice
Brandeis: "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting
from England
what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on President
Wilson and get the United States
into the war." And that did happen. That's
how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it;
we
had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead
of in this room.
Now the war -- World War One -- in which the United States participated
had absolutely
no reason to be our war. We went in there -- we were
railroaded into it -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into
-- that war
merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is
something that the people
in the United States have never been told. They
never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what happened ?
After
we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said:
"Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in
writing that shows that you are going to
keep your bargain and give us
Palestine after you win the war." Because they didn't know whether the war
would
last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a
receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter,
and it was worded in very
cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all
about. And that
was called the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration was merely
Great Britain's promise to pay the
Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United
States
into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much
about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill.
And I don't think I could make it
more emphatic than that.
Now,
that is where all the trouble started. The United States went in the war.
The United States crushed Germany. We went
in there, and it's history. You
know what happened. Now, when the war was ended, and the Germans went
to Paris,
to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there,
as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard
Baruch. I was
there: I ought to know. Now what happened ?
The Jews
at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and
parceling out Europe to all these nations that claimed
a right to a certain part
of European territory, the Jews said, ?How about Palestine for us?? And
they produced,
for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this
Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized,
? Oh, that
was the game! That's why the United States came into the war.? And the
Germans for the first time realized
that they were defeated, they suffered this
terrific reparation that was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted
Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost.
Now, that
brings us up to another very interesting point. When the Germans
realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that
time, the Jews had never
been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany.
You had Mr.
Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in
industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You
had Mr.
Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's
and the Hamburg-American Lines. You
had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the
banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg,
who were the
big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews
were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. Now,
the
Germans felt: ?Well, that was quite a sellout.?
It was a sellout
that I can best compare -- suppose the United States was at
war today with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And
we told the
Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the
whole thing."
And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of
the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought
about our defeat.
A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination
cannot encompass.
Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in
this
country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we thought they were
loyal citizens working with us, were selling us
out to the Soviet Union and
that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us.
How would
we feel, in the United States against Chinese ? I don't think that
one of them would dare show his face on any street.
There wouldn't be
lampposts enough, convenient, to take care of them. Imagine how we would
feel.
Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. "We've been so nice
to
them"; and from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia
failed, and the Jews had to scramble out
of Russia, they all went to
Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very
nicely. And here they
sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other
than they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."
Now, Nahum Sokolow -- all the great leaders, the big names that you read
about in
connection with Zionism today -- they, in 1919, 1920, '21, '22, and
'23, they wrote in all their papers -- and the press
was filled with their
statements -- that "the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact
that they
realized that this great defeat was brought about by our intercession
and bringing the United States into the war against
them."
The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans
in 1919
discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or
Muenschner Beer. There was no religious
feeling. There was no sentiment
against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all
political.
It was economic. It was anything but religious.
Nobody cared in Germany
whether a Jew went home and pulled down the
shades and said ?Shema' Yisrael? or ?Our Father.? No one cared in
Germany
any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that
developed later in Germany was due to one thing: that
the Germans held the
Jews responsible for their crushing defeat, for no reason at all, because
World War One was
started against Germany for no reason for which they
[Germans] were responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of
being
successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade.
You must remember, Germany, at the time of Napoleon, at the time of the
French Revolution, what was the German Reich
consisted of 300 -- three
hundred ! -- small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three
hundred
little separate political entities. And between that time, between the
period of... between Napoleon and Bismarck, they
were consolidated into
one state. And within 50 years after that time they became one of the world's
great powers.
Their navy was rivalling Great Britain's, they were doing
business all over the world, they could undersell anybody and
make better
products. And what happened? What happened as a result of that ?
There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia that: "We
must slap down Germany", because there
isn't one historian in the world that
can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany
off
the map politically. Now, what happened after that ?
When Germany realized
that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they
naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was
harmed. Not
a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access
to all the secret papers
of the State Department, wrote in his book, and
quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a
Jew who Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called
camps of political prisoners. And he wrote
back that he found them in very
fine condition.
They were in excellent
shape; everybody treated well. And they were filled
with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews
happened
to be maybe 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there
were some priests there, and
ministers, and labor leaders, Masons, and others
who had international affiliations.
Now, the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn't want the
world to really understand
that they had sold out Germany, and that the
Germans resented that.
So they did take appropriate action against
them [against the Jews]. They. . .
shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could ? They shunned
them.
The same as we would the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics,
or anyone in this country who had sold us out to
an enemy and brought
about our defeat.
Now, after a while, the Jews
of the world didn't know what to do, so they
called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world
attended
in July 1933. And they said to Germany: ?You fire Hitler! And you
put every Jew back into his former position, whether
he was a Communist,
no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way! And we, the Jews of the
world, are calling
upon you, and serving this ultimatum upon you.? Well, the
Germans told them... you can imagine. So what did they [the
Jews] do?
They broke up, and Samuel Untermyer, if the name means anything to
people here... (You want to ask a question?
--- Uh, there were no
Communists in Germany at that time, they were called 'Social Democrats.)
Well, I don't want to go by what they were called. We're now using English
words, and what they were called
in Germany is not very material. . . but
they were Communists, because in 1917, the Communists took over
Germany
for a few days. Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht, and a
group of Jews in Germany took over the government for three
days. In fact,
when the Kaiser ended the war, he fled to Holland because he thought the
Communists were going to
take over Germany as they did Russia, and that
he was going to meet the same fate that the Czar did in Russia. So he
left and
went to Holland for safety and for security.
Now, at that
time, when the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, it
was quiet, the Jews were working, still trying to get back
into their former --
their status -- and the Germans fought them in every way they could, without
hurting a hair
on anyone's head. The same as one group, the Prohibitionists,
fought the people who were interested in liquor, and they
didn't fight one
another with pistols, they did it every way they could.
Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And, at that
time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million
Germans and there were only
460,000 Jews. . . less than one half of one percent of Germany were Jews.
And yet, they
controlled all of the press, they controlled most of the
economy, because they had come in and with cheap money -- you
know the
way the Mark was devalued -- they bought up practically everything.
Well, in 1933 when Germany refused to surrender, mind you, to the World
Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they broke
up and Mr. Untermeyer came
back to the United States -- who was the head of the American delegation
and the president
of the whole conference -- and he went from the steamer to
ABC and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States
in which he
said:
"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy
War against Germany. We are
now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to
starve them
into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against
them, that will destroy them because they are dependent
upon their export
business."
And it is a fact that two thirds
of Germany's food supply had to be imported,
and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. Their
labor. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population
would have to starve. There just was not
enough food for more than one
third of the population.
Now in this
declaration, which I have here, it was printed on page -- a whole
page -- in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr.
Samuel Untermyer
boldly stated that: "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense.
President Roosevelt
has advocated its use in the NRA" . [National Recovery
Administration] -- which some of you may remember, where
everybody was
to be boycotted unless they followed the rules laid down by the New Deal,
which of course was declared
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that
time.
Nevertheless,
the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and
it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in
any store anywhere in
the world with the words "made in Germany" on it.
In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to
dump millions of dollars worth
of crockery and dishes into the river; that
their stores were boycotted. If anyone came in and found a dish marked
"made in Germany," they were picketed with signs: "Hitler", "murderer",
and so forth,
and like -- something like these sit-ins that are taking place in
the South.
R. H. Macy, which is controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen
to be Jews. . . a woman found stockings
there which came from Chemnitz,
marked "made in Germany". Well, they were cotton stockings. They may
have
been there 20 years, because since I've been observing women's legs in
the last twenty years, I haven't seen a pair with
cotton stockings on them. So
Macy ! I saw Macy boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with
signs saying
"MURDERS" and "HITLERITES", and so forth.
Now up
to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in
Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation,
there was no
murder, there was nothing.
Now, that... naturally,
the Germans said, "Why, who are these people to
declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work,
and our
industries come to a standstill ? Who are they to do that to us?" They
naturally resented it. Certainly
they painted swastikas on stores owned by
Jews.
Why should a German
go in and give their money to a storekeeper who was
part of a boycott who was going to starve Germany into surrender
into the
Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor
was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.
That continued for some time, and it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew
from Poland
walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot one of the
officials [a German official] that the Germans really started
to get rough with
the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and
having street fights and so
forth.
Now, for anyone to say that -- I don't like to use the word 'anti-Semitism'
because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to
use it -- the only reason that there
was any feeling in Germany against Jews
was that they were responsible: number one, for World War One; number
two,
for this world-wide boycott, and number three -- did I say for World
War One, they were responsible? For the boycott
-- and also for World War
II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for
the Jews
and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to
survive.
In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had
decided [that] Europe is going to be Christian
or Communist: there is no in
between. It's going to be Christian or it's going to be Communist. And the
Germans
decided: "We're going to keep it Christian if possible". And they
started to re-arm.
And there intention was -- by that time the United States had recognized the
Soviet Union, which they
did in November, 1933 -- the Soviet Union was
becoming very powerful, and Germany realized: "Well, our turn is going
to
come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying
today, "Our turn is going
to come soon, unless we are strong."
And our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars of your money for
defense, they say.Defense against whom ? Defense against 40,000 little Jews
in Moscow that took over Russia, and then,
in their devious ways, took over
control of many other governments of the world.
Now, for this country to now be on the verge of a Third World War, from
which we cannot emerge a victor,
is something that staggers my
imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons.
A megaton
is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. One million
tons of TNT is a megaton. Now, our nuclear bombs have
a capacity of 10
megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT. That was when they were first
developed five or six years
ago. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being
developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many
megatons
the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
So, what do we face now ?
If we trigger a world war that may develop into a
nuclear war, humanity is finished. And why will it take place ? It
will take
place because Act III... the curtain goes up on Act III. Act I was World War
I. Act II was World War II.
Act III is going to be World War III.
The Jews of the world, the Zionists
and their co-religionists everywhere, are
determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them
permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government.
Now, that is just as true as I am standing
here, because not alone have I read
it, but many here have read it, and it's known all over the world.
Now, what are we going to do ? The life you save may be your son's. Your
boys may
be on their way to that war tonight; and you you don't know it any
more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists
made a deal with
the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it
at that time? Not a
person in the United States knew it. You weren't
permitted to know it.
Who knew it ? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other 's
knew it. Did I know it ? I had a pretty good
idea of what was going on: I was
liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President
Wilson was
elected, and there was talk around the office there.
I was 'confidential
man' to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the
Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells,
the
treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the
table, and all the others, and
I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain
the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and
also
indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.
Justice Brandeis
and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers
on this hand, and President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent
when
it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. And that's
how they got us into World War I, while
we all slept. They sent our boys
over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as
their
"commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know
whether you're coming or going.
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness that
you
find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." That is
correct. I don't know from what state
you come, but in New York state that
is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness said one lie, disregard his
testimony.
Now, what are the facts about the Jews ?
The Jews -- I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don't
call
them Jews. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they
are. If Jesus was a Jew, there isn't a Jew in
the world today, and if those
people are Jews, certainly our Lord and Savior was not one of them, and I
can prove
that.
Now what happened ? The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per
cent of
the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were
originally Khazars.
They were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were
so
warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe
-- and to reduce this so you don't get too
confused about the history of
Eastern Europe -- they set up this big Khazar kingdom: 800,000 square
miles. Only,
there was no Russia, there were no other countries, and the
Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so
big and so
powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars
would lend them 40,000 soldiers.
That's how big and powerful they were.
Now, they were phallic worshippers, which is filthy. I don't want to go into
the details of that now. It was their religion the way it was the religion of
many other Pagans or Barbarians elsewhere
in the world. The Khazar king
became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to
adopt a
so-called monotheistic faith - either Christianity, Islam -- the moslem
faith -- or what is known today as Judaism, which
is really Talmudism. By
spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out socalled
Judaism. And that became the state religion.
And he sent down to the
Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and
brought up thousands of these rabbis with their teachings, and opened up
synagogues and schools in his kingdom of 800,000 people -- 800,000
thousand square miles -- and maybe ten to twenty
million people; and they
became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them that had an ancestor
that ever put a
toe in the Holy Land, not only in Old Testament history, but
back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet
they come to the
Christians and they ask us to support their armed insurrection in Palestine by
saying:
"Well, you want to certainly help repatriate God's chosen people to their
Promised
Land, their ancestral homeland, It's your Christian duty. We gave
you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now
go to church on
Sunday, and kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."
Well, they were pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the
Irish [were converted]. And it's
just as ridiculous to call them "people of the
Holy Land," as it would be... there are 54 million Chinese Moslems.
Fifty
four million ! And, Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., so in that time, 54
million Chinese have accepted Islam
as their religious belief.
Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from
Arabia, where the city of
Mecca is located, where Mohammed was born... imagine if the 54 million
Chinese called
themselves 'Arabs'. Imagine ! Why, you'd say they're lunatics.
Any man that believes that those 54 million Chinese are
Arabs must be
crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith; a belief that had its origin
in Mecca, in Arabia.
The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped
them in the
ocean and imported from the Holy Land a new crop of
inhabitants that were Christians. That were christians of flesh and
blood.
They weren't different people. They were the same people, but they had
accepted Christianity as a religious
faith.
Now, these Pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns... they were
a
Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. They
likewise, because their king took the faith
-- Talmudic faith -- they had no
choice. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to
be
a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So everybody -- they lived
on the land just like the trees and the bushes;
a human being belonged to the
land under their feudal system -- so they [Khazars] all became what we call
today,
Jews !
Now imagine how silly it was for the Christians... for the great
Christian
countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power, our prestige to
help repatriate God's
chosen people to their ancestral homeland, their
Promised Land."
Now, could there be a bigger lie than that ? Could there be a bigger lie than
that ?
And because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the
television, the book publishing
business, they have the ministers in the
pulpit, they have the politicians on the soap boxes talking the same language
... so naturally you'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You
wouldn't call black black anymore --
you'd start to call black white. And
nobody could blame you.
Now,
that is one of the great lies... that is the foundation of all the misery
that has befallen the world. Because after
two wars fought in Europe --
World War I and World War II -- if it wasn't possible for them to live in
peace and
harmony with the people in Europe, like their brethren are living
in the United States, what were the two wars fought
for ? Did they have to --
like you flush the toilet -- because they couldn't get along, did they have to
say, "Well,
we're going back to our homeland and you Christians can help
us" ?
I can't understand yet how the Christians in Europe could have been that
dumb because every theologian, every history
teacher, knew the things that
I'm telling you. But, they naturally bribed them, shut them up with money,
stuffed
their mouths with money, and now... I don't care whether you know
all this or not. It doesn't make any difference to
me whether you know all
these facts or not, but it does make a difference to me. I've got, in my family,
boys that
will have to be in the next war, and I don't want them to go and
fight and die... like they died in Korea. Like they
died in Japan. Like they've
died all over the world. For what ?
To
help crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent people who had
been in peaceful possession of that land, those farms,
those homes for
hundreds and maybe thousands of years ? Is that why the United States must
go to war ? Because the
Democratic Party wants New York State -- the
electoral vote? Illinois, the electoral vote ? And Pennsylvania, the electoral
vote ?... which are controlled by the Zionists and their co-religionists ?... the
balance of power ?
In New York City there are 400,000 members of the liberal party, all
Zionists and
their co-religionists. And New York State went for Kennedy by
400,000 votes. Now, I don't blame Mr. Kennedy. I'm fond
of Mr. Kennedy. I
think he's a great man. I think he can really pull us out of this trouble if we
get the facts
to him. And I believe he knows a great deal more than his
appointments indicate he knows. He's playing with the enemy.
Like when
you go fishing, you've got to play with the fish. Let 'em out and pull 'em in.
Let 'em out and pull 'em
in. But knowing Mr. Kennedy's father, and how
well informed he is on this whole subject, and how close Kennedy is to
his
father, I don't think Mr. Kennedy is totally in the dark.
But
I do think that it is the duty of every mother, every loyal Christian ,
every person that regards the defense of this
country as a sacred right, that
they communicate -- not with their congressman, not with their senator, but
with
President Kennedy. And tell him, "I do not think you should send my
boy, or our boys, wearing the uniform of the
United States of America, and
under the flag that you see here, our red, white and blue, to fight there to
help
keep in the hands of these that which they have stolen". I think
everyone should not alone write once, but keep
writing and get your friends
to write.
Now, I could go on endlessly,
and tell you these things to support what I
have just asked you to do. But I don't think it's necessary to do that. You're
above the average group in intelligence and I don't think it's necessary to
impress this any more.
But... I want to tell you one more thing. You talk about... "Oh, the Jews.
Why
the Jews ? Christianity. Why, we got Christianity from the Jews and
the Jews gave us Jesus, and the Jews gave us our
religion". But do you know
that on the day of atonement that you think is so sacred to them, that on that
day...
and I was one of them ! This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a
rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, the very first
prayer that
you recite, you stand -- and it's the only prayer for which you
stand -- and you repeat three times a short prayer. The
Kol Nidre. In that
prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow,
or pledge that you
may make during the next twelve months -- any oath, vow
or pledge that you may take during the next twelve months shall
be null and
void.
The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not
be a vow; the pledge shall
not be a pledge. They shall have no force and effect, and so forth and so on.
And further
than that, the Talmud teaches: "Don't forget -- whenever you
take an oath, vow, and pledge -- remember the Kol Nidre
prayer that you
recited on the Day of Atonement, and that exempts you from fulfilling that".
How much can you
depend on their loyalty ? You can depend upon their
loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.
And we're going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the
same reason.
You can't depend upon something as insecure as the leadership
that is not obliged to respect an oath, vow or pledge.
Now I could go on and
recite many other things to you, but I would have a little respect for your
time, and you
want to really, uh, get through with all of this. Tomorrow's
going to be a long day.
Now I want to say one thing. You ask me... well, you think to yourself: "well
how did this fellow
get mixed up in this the way he got mixed up in it."
Well, I opened
my mouth in 1945, and I took big pages in newspapers and
tried to tell the American people what I'm telling you. And
one newspaper
after another refused the advertisement. And when I couldn't find a
newspaper to take them -- I paid
cash, not credit -- what happened ? My
lawyer told me, "There's an editor over in Jersey with a paper who will take
your announcement". So, I was brought together with Mr. McGinley, and
that's how I met him.
So somebody told me the lawyer who introduced me, who was the son of the
Dean of the Methodist Bishop,
he said: "Well, I think he's a little anti-
Semitic. I don't know whether I can get him over here. So he brought
him
over to my apartment and we hit it off wonderfully, and have since then.
Now, I say this, and I say it without
any qualifications. I say it without any
reservations. And I say it without any hesitation. . . if it wasn't for the
work
that Mr. Conley McGinley did with "Common Sense" -- he's been sending
out from 1,800,000 to 2,000,000
every year -- if it wasn't for the work he's
been doing sending those out for fifteen years now, we would already be
a
communist country. Nobody has done what he did to light fires. Many of the
other active persons in this fight
learned all about if for the first time through
"Common Sense".
Now, I have been very active in helping him all I could. I'm not as flush as I
was. I cannot go on spending the money...
I'm not going to take up a
collection. Don't worry. I see five people getting up to leave. (laughter)
I haven't
got the money that I used to spend. I used to print a quarter of a
million of them out of my own pocket and send them
out. Mr. McGinley,
when I first met him, had maybe 5,000 printed and circulated them locally.
So I said, "With
what you know and what I know, we can really do a good
job". So I started printing in outside shops of big newspaper
companies, a
quarter of a million, and paid for them. Well, there's always a bottom to the
barrel. I suppose we've
all reached that at times.
I'm not so poor that I can't live without
working and that's what worries the
Anti-Defamation League. I can just get by without going and asking for a
job
or getting on the bread line. But Mr. McGinley is working. He's sick and
he's going at this stronger than ever. And all
I want to say is that they want
to close up "Common Sense" more than any other single thing in the whole
world, as a death-blow to the fight Christians are making to survive.
So I just want to tell you this. All they do is circulate rumors: "Mr. Benjamin
H. Freedman is the wealthy backer
of 'Common Sense'." The reason they do
that is to discourage the people in the United States: don't send any money
to
Common Sense. They don't need it. The've got the wealthy Mr. Freedman as
a backer. That all has strategy. They
don't want to advertise me so that
people that have real estate or securities to sell will come and call on me.
They just want people to lay off "Common Sense". And all I'm telling you is,
I do try to help him, but I haven't been able to. And I will be very honest.
One thing I won't do is lie. In the last
year I've had so much sickness in my
family that I could not give him one dollar.
How he's managed to survive, I don't know. God alone knows. And he must
be in God's care because how he's
pulled through his sickness and with his
financial troubles, I don't know. But that press is working... and every two
weeks about a hundred or a hundred-fifty-thousand of "Common Sense" go
out with a new message. And if that
information could be multiplied... if
people that now get it could buy ten or twenty five, or fifty, give them
around.
Plow that field. Sow those seeds, you don't know which will take
root, but for God's sake, this is our last chance.
[Freedman then discusses the importance of people forgoing unnecessary
purchases
to 'buy more stuff', play golf, etc., and use the money to keep
"Common Sense" going. He explains that the
paper is going in debt; could
be closed down and he (Freedman) no longer has the funds, having spent
some $2,400,000
in his attempt to bring the information to the American
public and elected officials. He then asks for questions from
the audience.]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
{Question
inaudible]
Freedman: All right, I'll comment on that. This is rather
deep, but you all
have a very high degree of intelligence, so I'm going to make an attempt. In
the time of Bible
history, there was a geographic area known as Judea. Judea
was a province of the Roman Empire. Now, a person who lived
in Judea was
known as a Judean, and in Latin it was Judaeus; in Greek it was Judaius.
Those are the two words, in Greek and Latin, for a Judean.
Now, in Latin and Greek there is no such letter as 'j', and the first syllable of
Judaeus and Judaius starts 'ghu'.
Now, when the Bible was written, it was
first written in Greek, Latin, Panantic, Syriac, Aramaic... all those languages.
Never Was the word Jew in any of them because the word didn't exist. Judea
was the country, and the people were Judeans,
and Jesus was referred to only
as a Judean. I've seen those early... the earliest scripts available.
In 1345, a man by the name of Wycliffe in England thought that it was time
to translate
the Bible into English. There was no English edition of the Bible
because who the Devil could read ? It was only the
educated church people
who could read Latin and Greek, Syriac, Aramaic and the other languages.
Anyhow, Wycliffe
translated the Bible into English. And he did. But in it, he
had to look around for some words for Judaeas and Judaius.
There was no English word because Judea had passed out of existence.
There was no
Judea. People had long ago forgotten that. So in the first
translation he used the word, in referring to Jesus, as 'gyu',
"jew". At the
time, there was no printing press.
Now,
between 1345 and the 17th century, when the press came into use, that
word passed through so many changes... I have them
all here. If you want I
can read them to you. I will. That word 'gyu' which was in the Wycliffe
Bible became. .
. first it was ' gyu ', then ' giu ', then ' iu ' (because the ' i ' in
Latin is pronounced like the ' j '. Julius Caesar
is ' Iul ' because there is no 'j'
in Latin) then ' iuw ', then ' ieuu ', then ' ieuy ', then ' iwe ', then ' iow ',
then '
iewe ', all in Bibles as time went on. Then ' ieue ', then ' iue ', then ' ive ', and
then ' ivw ', and finally
in the 18th century... ' jew '. Jew.
All the corrupt and contracted forms
for Judaius, and Judaeas in Latin. Now,
there was no such thing as 'Jew', and any theologian -- I've lectured in maybe
20 of the most prominent theological seminaries in this country, and two in
Europe -- there was no such word as Jew.
There only was Judea, and Jesus
was a Judean and the first English use of a word in an English bible to
describe
him was 'gyu' -- Jew. A contracted and shortened form of Judaeus,
just the same as we call a laboratory a 'lab', and
gasoline 'gas'... a tendency to
short up. [A few words are missing here]
But [a few words are missing here] in England there were no public schools;
people didn't know how to read; it looked
like a scrambled alphabet so they
made a short word out of it. Now for a theologian to say that you can't harm
the
Jews, is just ridiculous. I'd like to know where in the scriptures it says
that. I'd like to know the text.
Look at what happened to Germany for touching Jews. What would you, as
a citizen
of the United States, do to people who did to you what the so-called
Jews -- the Pollacks and Litvaks and Litzianers
-- they weren't Jews, as I just
explained to you. They were Eastern Europeans who'd been converted to
Talmudism.
There was no such thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name given
in recent years to this religion known in Bible history
as Torah [inaudible].
No Jew or no educated person ever heard of Judaism. It didn't exist. They
pulled it out of
the air... a meaningless word.
Just like 'anti-Semitic'. The Arab is
a Semite. And the Christians talk about
people who don't like Jews as anti-Semites, and they call all the Arabs anti-
Semites. The only Semites in the world are the Arabs. There isn't one Jew
who's a Semite. They're all Turkothean Mongoloids.
The Eastern european
Jews. So, they brainwashed the public, and if you will invite me to meet this
reverend who
told you these things, I'll convince him and it'll be one step in
the right direction. I'll go wherever I have to go
to meet him.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, ma'am. Well... I can answer that. First of all, your first premise is
wrong. Your first premise that
all the Jews are loyal to each other is wrong.
Because, the Eastern European Jews outnumber all the rest by so many that
they create the impression that they are the Jewish 'race'; that they are the
Jewish nation; that they are the Jewish
people. . . and the Christians swallow
it like a cream puff.
But
in 1844 the German rabbis called a conference of
rabbis from all over he world
for the purpose of abolishing the Kol Nidre
from the Day of tonement religious
ceremony. In Brunswick, Germany, where that
conference was held in 1844, there was almost a terrific riot. A civil war.
The Eastern Europeans said, "What the hell. We should give up Kol Nidre ?
That gives us our grip on our people.
We give them a franchise so they can
tell the Christians, 'Go to hell. We'll make any deal you want', but they don't
have to carry it out. That gives us our grip on our people". So, they're not so
united, and if you knew the feeling
that exists.
Now, I'll also show you from an official document by the
man responsible
for. . . uh, who baptized this race. Here is a paper that we obtained from the
archives of the Zionist
organization in New York City, and in it is the
manuscript by Sir James A. Malcolm, who -- on behalf of the British
Cabinet -- negotiated the deal with these Zionists.
And in here he
says that all the jews in England were against it. The Jews
who had been there for years, the [inaudible - probably Sephardim],
those
who had Portuguese and Spanish ad Dutch ancestry... who were monotheists
and believed in that religious belief.
That was while the Eastern European
Jews were still running around in the heart of Asia and then came into
Europe.
But they had no more to do with them than. . . can we talk about a
Christian 'race' ? or a Christian religion ?... or
are the Christians united ?
So the same disunity is among the Jews. And I'll show you in this same
document that
when they went to France to try and get the French
government to back that Zionist venture, there was only one Jew in
France
who was for it. That was Rothschild, and they did it because they were
interested in the oil and the Suez
Canal.
------------------------------------------------
[Question inaudible]
Freedman: You know why ? Because if they don't,
they're decked up. They come around and they tell you how much
you must
give, and if you don't . . . oh, you're anti-Semitic. Then none of their friends
will have anything to
do with them, and they start a smear campaign... and
you have got to give.
In New York city, in the garment center, there are twelve manufacturers in
the building. And when the drive is on to
sell Israel Bonds, the United
Jewish Drive, they put a big scoreboard with the names of the firms and
opposite them,
as you make the amount they put you down for, they put a
gold star after the name. Then, the buyers are told, "When
you come into
that building to call on someone and they haven't got a gold star, tell them
that you won't buy from
them until they have the gold star". BLACKMAIL.
I don't know what else you can call it.
Then what do they do ? They tell you it's for 'humanitarian purposes' and
they send maybe $8 billion dollars
to Israel, tax exempt, tax deductible. So if
they hadn't sent that eight billion dollars to Israel, seven billion of
it would
have gone into the U.S. Treasury as income tax. So what happens ? That
seven billion dollars deficit --
that air pocket -- the gullible Christians have
to make up.
They
put a bigger tax on gas or bread or corporation tax. Somebody has to
pay the housekeeping expenses for the government.
So why do you let these
people send their money over there to buy guns to drive people out of their
ancient homeland
? And you say, "Oh, well. The poor Jews. They have no
place to go and they've been persecuted all their lives".
They've never been
persecuted for their religion. And I wish I had two rows of Rabbis here to
challenge me. Never
once, in all of history, have they been persecuted for
their religion.
Do you know why the Jews were driven out of England ? King Edward the
First in 1285 drove them out, and they never
came back until the Cromwell
Revolution which was financed by the Rothschilds. For four-hundred years
there wasn't
a Jew. But do you know why they were driven out ? Because in
the Christian faith and the Moslem faith it's a sin to charge
'rent' for the use
of money. In other words - what we call interest [usury] is a sin.
So the Jews had a monopoly in England and they charged so much interest,
and when the Lords and Dukes
couldn't pay, they [Jews] foreclosed. And
they were creating so much trouble that the king of England finally made
himself their partner, because when they they came to foreclose, some of
these dukes bumped off the Jews. . . the money-lenders.
So the king finally
said -- and this is all in history, look up Tianson [Tennyson?] or Rourke, the
History of the
Jews in England; two books you can find in your library.
When the king
found out what the trouble was all about, and how much
money they were making, he declared himself a fifty-percent partner
of the
money lenders. Edward the First. And for many years, one-third of the
revenues of the British Treasury came
from the fifty-percent interest in
money-lending by the Jews.
But
it got worse and worse. So much worse that when the Lords and Dukes
kept killing the money-lenders, the King then said,
"I declare myself the heir
of all the money-lenders. If they're killed you have to pay me, because I'm
his
sole heir". That made so much trouble, because the King had to go out
and collect the money with an army, so he
told the Jews "get the hell out of
here". There were 15,000 of them, and they had to get out, and they went
across to Ireland, and that's how Ireland got to be part of the United
Kingdom.
When King Edward found out what they were doing, he decided to take
Ireland for himself before someone
else did. He sent Robert Southgard with
a mercenary army and conquered Ireland. So, show me one time where a
Jew
was persecuted in any country because of his religion. It has never
happened. It's always their impact on the political,
social, or economic
customs and traditions of the community in which they settle.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question inaudible] Freedman:
Yes, sir. Well, they say most of those things
themselves. It was unnecessary for Benjamin Franklin to say it. Most of
those things they say themselves. But Benjamin Franklin observed, and by
hearsay understood, what was happening in
Europe.
When Russia, in 920 was formed, and gradually surrounded the
Khazar
Kingdom, and absorbed them, most of the well-to-do Khazars fled to
Western Europe and brought with them the
very things to which you object
and I object and a lot of other people object. The customs, the habits, the
instincts
with which they were endowed.
Now, when Benjamin Franklin referred to
them as Jews because that's the
name that they went by. Thats the name that they took. And the Christians,
when
they first heard that these people who were fleeing from Russia -- who
they were -- that they had practiced this Talmudic
faith -- the Christians in
Western Europe said, "They must be the remnants of the lost ten tribes!"
And
Mr. Grutz, the greatest historian amongst the Jews, said that -- and he's
probably as good an authority on that subject
as there is. So when Ben
Franklin came to Europe in the 18th century, he already saw the results of
what these people
had done after they left their homeland. And every word
of it is true... they themselves say it. I can give you half
a dozen books
they've written in which they say the same thing: When they have money
they become tyrants. And when
they become defeated, they become ruthless.
They're only barbarians. They're the descendants of Asiatic Mongols and
they will do anything to accomplish their purpose.
What right did they
have to take over Russia the way they did ? The Czar
had abdicated nine or ten months before that. There was no need
for them. . .
they were going to have a constitutional monarchy. But they didn't want that.
When the constitutional
monarchy was to assemble in November, they
mowed them all down and established the Soviet Union.
There was no need for that. But they thought, "Now is the time", and if you
you will look in
the Encyclopedia Britannica under the word 'Bolshevism',
you'll find the five laws there that Lenin put down for a successful
revolution. One of them is, "Wait for the right time, and then give them
everything you've got". It would
pay you to read that.
You'd also find that Mr. Harold Blacktree, who
wrote the article for the
Encyclopedia Britannica states that the Jews conceived and created and
cultivated the
Communist movement. And that their energy made them the
spearhead of the movement. Harold Blacktree wrote it and no one
knew
more about Communism than he. And the Encyclopedia Britannica for 25
years has been printing it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question
inaudible]
Freedman: Well, I can't advocate
that you do anything
that's criminal, but I can tell you this. You can start what I call an endless
chain. If you
can get your friends to write, objectively, here is the statement:
Mr. Kennedy's office gave me this himself. Mr. Smith,
who succeeded Mr.
Kennedy, took over his office -- was in his office -- and gave me this. He
delivered this on the
25th, and it says here:
"For release to AM (that means morning papers),
August 25th". "Israel is
here to stay. It is a national commitment, special obligation of the
Democratic
Party. The White House must take the lead. American
intervention. We will act promptly and decisively against any nation
in the
Middle East which attacks its neighbor. I propose that we make clear to both
Israel and the Arab states our
guarantee that we will act with whatever force
and speed are necessary to halt any aggression by any nation".
Well, do you call the return of people to their homeland [the Arab
Palestinians]
aggression ? Is Mr. Kennedy going to do that ? Suppose three
million Mexicans came into Texas and drove the six million
Texans into the
deserts of Arizona and New Mexico. Suppose these Mexicans were slipped
in there armed -- the Texans
were disarmed -- and one night they drove them
all out of Texas and declared themselves the Republic of the Alamo. What
would the United States say ?
Would we say it's aggression for these
Texans to try to get their homes back
from the Mexican thieves ? Suppose the Negroes in Alabama were secretly
armed
by the Soviets and overnight they rose up and drove all the whites
into the swamps of Mississippi and Georgia and Florida.
. . drove them out
completely, and declared themselves the Republic of Ham, or the Republic
of something-or-other.
Would we call it aggression if these people, the
whites of Alabama, tried to go back to their homes ?
Would we. . . what would we think if the soviet Union said, "No, those
Negroes
now occupy them ! Leave them there!", or "No, those Mexicans are
in Texas. they declared themselves a sovereign
state. Leave them there. You
have plenty of room in Utah and Nevada. Settle somewhere else".
Would we call it aggression if the Alabama whites or the Texans wanted to
go back to their homes ? So
now, you've got to write to President Kennedy
and say, "We do not consider it aggression in the sense that you use
the
word, if these people want to return to their homes as the United Nations --
fifteen times in the last twelve
years -- called upon the Zionists in occupation
of Palestine to allow the Arab Palestinians to return to their former
homes
and farms".
___________________________________________________
[End of transcript of Benjamin Freedman speech, given in 1961 at the
Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of
Conde McGinley's patriotic
newspaper of that time, Common Sense.]
_____________________________________________________________
Transcript of Samuel Untermeyer Speech / New York Times, August
7, 1933
The following is a transcript of Samuel Untermyer's speech made on WABC, declaring a 'holy war' by the
Jews against Germany, and appealing to the masses of non-Jewish humanity to boycott German-made imports and all
merchants who have German-made items in their establishments. The entire speech was published in the New York times
on the morning following the broadcast (August 7th, 1933):
Background
When
Hitler had been soundly established, Samuel Untermeyer, a New York Jewish Lawyer, called for war on Germany.
The call was made through radio station WABC on 8-7-33. He had just returned from a world conference of Jews at
The Hague. In the broadcast, he said he was calling for a "holy war", and described the Jews as "the
aristocrats of the world".
This same gentleman was connected with the Foreign Policy
Association of New York and the worldwide organisation to move Jews out of Germany, not only into the United
States, but to Palestine and other countries. These activities were tied in with the organisation known
as the "International Boycott on German Goods", of which Untermeyer was the head!
From that time
the "Hate Germany" campaign was intensified and made worldwide, with a special Jewish-organised "National
Conference of Jews and Christians" assisting! These are the hate-spreaders, but they never grow tired
of praising themselves. That marked the beginning of the Jewish exodus from Germany.
We have all, on a
world-wide scale, been sold the myth (lie) of the so-called Holocaust... "Six million Jews
killed..." Note Untermyer's mention of the "600,000 souls we must save". That
is from the horse's mouth, in 1933, during the time the Jews were leaving Germany by the thousands.
The "holocaust" lie has created a great guilt
complex in people all over the world who had nothing to do with the murder of even one Jew, never mind the fallacious
figure of six million allegedly killed in foreign countries.
The fact that more than 20 million people were killed by Joseph Stalin in the Bolshevist-controlled
USSR -- mostly Christians -- is never mentioned; nor are the tens of millions slaughtered by Mao-Tse-Tung in Communist
China. I was told several years ago by an educated and intelligent person that, "That was different. It
was their own people that they killed."
It's called brain-washing,
folks. Thought control and mind control to the max. It's okay if a despot puppet-ruler kills "his
own people". But... the holocaust myth of 6 million Jews is a crime/sin with which we must all live forever
more. And pay, and pay and pay. It is time for the lying to stop.
Why was Adolf Hitler so vilified? Because he had created a state money system,
non-gold-backed, and had negotiated trade with other nations that didn't use the International Banker's monetary
system. They were bartering! By-passing the usurers.
Hitler continued, despite the boycott, to further his barter-trading and if enough
nations had had the opportunity to participate, it would have been the end of the strangle-hold, the unbridled power
in the hands of a few creatures lusting after World Dominion. Money is the name of their deceitful and dangerous game.
Hitler called it "bogus money".
There is much about Hitler we don't know, so this is not intended to be a Hitler- apologist commentary.
I am sharing information gleaned from many and varied sources which I believe to be credible, including historian
Nesta Webster.
Mrs.
Webster, along with other writers, had also written that Hitler had kicked the International Bankers out of Germany.
In his speech, Untermyer claims that 'wealthy Jews are financing Hitler'. Untermyer was intimately connected
with the wealthy Jews. Since they are the masters of lies, perhaps the statement was made to confuse the issue.
It remains for the time being an unanswered question for me.
A thought which has been recurring for weeks now as a result of a recent reading frenzy...
a thought and a question:
Given
the Political Zionists have controlled the media for a couple of hundred years, why would we believe that everything
we've heard/read about Adolf Hitler in the Zionist-controlled media was true?
More on Samuel Untermyer in Who Was Cyrus Scofield?
_____________________________________________________
The New York Times, Monday, August 7, 1933
Text of Untermyer's Address
Following
is the text of Samuel Untermyer's address last night over Station WABC after his return from Europe:
My Friends:
What a joy and relief and sense of security to be once more on American
soil! The nightmares of horrors through which I have passed in those two weeks in Europe, listening to the
heartbreaking tales of refugee victims, beggar description.
I deeply appreciate your enthusiastic greeting on my arrival today,
which I quite understand is addressed not to me personally but to the holy war in the cause of humanity in which
we are embarked. Jews and non-Jews alike, for we are equally concerned that the work of centuries shall
not be undone, and that civilization shall not be allowed to die.
It is a war that must be waged unremittingly
until the black clouds of bigotry, race hatred and fanaticism that have descended upon what was once Germany, but
is now medieval Hitlerland, have been dispersed. If we will but enlist to a man and persist in our purpose,
the bright sun of civilization will again shine upon Germany, and the world will be a safer place in which to dwell.
As our ship sailed up the bay today
past our proud Statue of Liberty, [a gift to the U.S. from the Grand Orient - Illuminati
- Lodge of France] I breathed a prayer of gratitude and thanksgiving that this fair
land of freedom has escaped the curse that has descended upon benighted Germany, which has thereby been converted
from a nation of culture into a veritable hell of cruel and savage beasts.
The World's Concern
We owe
it not only to our persecuted brethren but to the entire world to now strike in self-defense a
blow that will free humanity from a repetition of this incredible outrage. This time the Jews are the victims,
next time it may be the Catholics or the Protestants. If we once admit, as is brazenly insisted by the German
Government, that such fiendish persecution of the people of one race or creed is an internal domestic affair and
not a world concern, how are we to know whose turn will be next?
Now or never must all the nations of the earth
make common cause against the monstrous claim that the slaughter, starvation and annihilation, by a country
that has reverted to barbarism, of its own innocent and defenseless citizens without rhyme, reason or excuse is an internal
affair against which the rest of the world must stand idly by and not lift a hand in defense.
I have seen and talked with many of these
terror-stricken refugees who have had the good fortune to escape over the border, though forced to leave their property
behind them, and I want to say to you that nothing that has seeped through to you over the rigid censorship
and lying propaganda that are at work to conceal and misrepresent the situation of the Jews in Germany
begins to tell a fraction of the frightful story of fiendish torture, cruelty and persecution that are being inflicted
day by day upon these men, women and children, of the terrors of worse than death in which they are living.
When the tale is told, as it will be some day
if the impotent League of Nations ever sufficiently awakens from its Rip Van Winkle slumbers to
the realization of its power and duty to prosecute an investigation into the facts, the world will confront a picture
so fearful in its barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities will pale into insignificance
as compared to this devilishly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for
the extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people -- a people who love and have shed their blood for
their Fatherland, and to whom Germany owes in large part its prosperity and its great scientists, educators, lawyers,
physicians, poets, musicians, diplomats and philosophers, who are the backbone of its past cultural life.
Back to Dark Ages
But why
dwell longer upon this revolting picture of the ravages wrought by these ingrates and beasts of prey, animated by
the loathsome motives of race hatred, bigotry and envy. For the Jews are the aristocrats of the world.
From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen
their persecutors come and go. They alone have survived. And so will history repeat itself, but
that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these
600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell as we can with the aid of our Christian friends, if
we have the will to act.
Protests and pleas from all corners of the earth, from the leaders of all creeds, having proven as
vain and unavailing as was the idealistic dream of our martyred President of making the world safe for democracy
and of protecting minorities, what then are to be the lines of our defensive campaign against these atrocities,
on which we are already actively embarked? Are we right in our plan? If so, what steps shall now be
prosecuted to attain success?
Our campaign is twofold -- defensive and constructive. On the defensive side will be the economic boycott
against all German goods, shipping and services. On the constructive side will be an appeal to the
League of Nations to construe and enforce the labor union provisions of the Versailles Treaty and the written
promises made by Germany, while the treaty was under negotiation, to protect its minorities, which have been flagrantly
violated by its disfranchisement and persecution of the German Jews.
What Boycott Means
As in the boycott, strange to say a mere handful
in number, but powerful in influence, of our thoughtless but doubtless well-intentioned Jews seem obsessed and frightened
at the bare mention of the word "boycott". It signifies and conjures up to them images of force
and illegality, such as have on occasions in the past characterized struggles between labor unions and their employers. As
these timid souls are capitalists and employers, the word and all that it implies are hateful to their ears.
In point of fact, it signifies nothing
of the kind. These gentlemen do not know what they are talking or thinking about. Instead of surrendering
to their vague fears and half-baked ideas, our first duty is to educate them as to what is meant by a purely defensive
economic boycott, and what we are doing and proposing.
Admittedly, the boycott is our only really effective weapon.
These gentlemen who are taking counsel of their groundless fears to the exclusion of their reason have done nothing
and have no program except to attempt to arouse world opinion, which is and has been from the outset on our side,
as it was bound to be because of this brutal, senseless, unprovoked assault upon civilization.
It is not necessary to belittle or
underrate that accomplishment, if their aimless, fruitless endeavors in that direction may be so dignified in recognition
of their good intentions, barren of results as they have been.
It is sufficient that their efforts have proven unavailing
and that the campaign of Schreckligheit not only goes on unabated in the face of unanimous world opinion; but that it is
increasing in intensity and that the masses of the German people, misled by government propaganda and suppression
of free speech and of the press, are either voluntarily, or through fear of punishment at the hands of their despotic
rulers, supporting their government in this hellish campaign.
What then have these amiable gentlemen accomplished and
what do they hope or expect to accomplish in the way of stemming this conflagration of civilization by their "feather-duster"
methods? You cannot put out a fire, and especially that kind of a fire, by just looking on until the mad flames,
fanned by the wind of hate, have destroyed everything.
What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to
prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people
to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.
"Force Them to Learn"
They have flaunted and persisted in flaunting and defying world opinion.
We propose to and are organizing world
opinion to express itself in the only way Germany can be made to understand. Hitler and his mob will
not permit their people to know how they are regarded by the outside world. We shall force them to learn in
the only way open to us.
Revolting as it is, it would be an interesting study in psychology to analyze the motives, other than
fear and cowardice, that have prompted Jewish bankers to lend money to Germany as they are now doing. It is
in part their money that is being used by the Hitler regime in its reckless, wicked campaign of propaganda to make
the world anti-Semitic; with that money they have invaded Great Britain, the United States and other countries where
they have established newspapers, subsidized agents and otherwise are spending untold millions in spreading their
infamous creed.
The suggestion that they use that money toward paying the honest debts they have repudiated is answered only by
contemptuous sneers and silence. Meantime the infamous campaign goes on unabated with ever increasing intensity
to the everlasting disgrace of the Jewish bankers who are helping to finance it and of the weaklings who are doing
nothing effective to check it.
The Hitler regime originated are fiendishly prosecuting their boycott to exterminate the Jews by placarding
Jewish shops, warning Germans against dealing with them, by imprisoning Jewish shopkeepers and parading them through
the streets by the hundreds under guard of Nazi troops for the sole crime of being Jews, by ejecting them from the
learned professions in which many of them had attained eminence, by excluding their children from the schools, their
men from the labor unions, closing against them every avenue of livelihood, locking them in vile concentration camps,
starving and torturing them, murdering and beating them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form
of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become their only means of escape, and all solely because
they are or their remote ancestors were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them.
Appeal to Mankind
As against
this, the foulest boycott in the annals of time, we are appealing to all mankind to enforce a counter-boycott. That
appeal is meeting with the conviction that idealism and justice are still alive.
There is nothing new in the use of the economic
boycott as an instrument of justice. The covenant of the League of Nations expressly provides in these identical
words for its use to bring recalcitrant nations to terms. President Roosevelt, whose wise
statesmanship and vision are the wonder of the civilized world, is invoking it in furtherance of his noble
conception for the readjustment of the relations between capital and labor under the terms of the sweeping
Industrial Recovery Act, to the end that labor shall receive a more just share of the wealth it creates.
He is about to enlist the consumers of the country in a national campaign in which they pledge themselves
to boycott all manufacturers, jobbers and retailers who fail to subscribe to the codes and to buy only from those
who have assented and who are thereby privileged to fly the blue eagle of NRA [National Recovery Act]. What
more exalted precedent do our timid friends want?
With this explanation of our aims, I appeal to the American Jewish Committee,
whose public spirit and good intentions I do not for a moment question, but the wisdom of whose judgment I challenge,
no longer to hold aloof but to rid themselves of their timid and ill-considered prejudices and join in actively
pressing this boycott as our only weapon except the appeal to the League, which I shall discuss at a later time.
I purposely refrain from including
the American Jewish Congress in this appeal because I am satisfied that 95 per cent of their members are already
with us and that they are being misrepresented by two or three men now abroad. Of them I ask that, prior to
the meeting to be held this month in Prague by their executive committee, they instruct these false leaders in no
uncertain terms as to the stand they must take on this all-important subject and demand that they shall either openly
represent their views or resign their offices. One of them, generally recognized as the kingpin of mischief
makers, is junketing around the Continent engaged in his favorite pastime of spreading discord, asserting at one
time and place that he favors and supports the boycott and at another that he is opposed or indifferent to it, all
dependent on the audience he is addressing; but always directly or indirectly delivering a stab in the dark.
Progress So Far Made
There is not time
now, but I hope and expect in the near future to be able to report to you the steps that have been taken and that
are already under way, and the surprising and gratifying progress already made in many countries toward the success
of the economic boycott in which we are engaged. Although considerable progress in that direction has already
been made in Great Britain and in the United States, you will be surprised to learn that they are the least advanced
and as yet the most inadequately organized of all the countries that were represented at the Amsterdam World
Economic Conference, where the boycott was unanimously and enthusiastically approved by formal resolution
by a rising vote.
With us in America the delay has been due in part to lack of funds and the vast territory to be covered,
but it is hoped, and expected, that this condition will soon be corrected. The object-lesson we are determined
to teach is so priceless to all humanity that we dare not fall.
Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already
enlisted in this sacred war should do so now and here. It is not sufficient that you buy no
goods made in Germany. You must refuse to deal with any merchant or shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods
or who patronizes German ships or shipping.
To our shame be it said that there are a few Jews among us, but fortunately only a
few, so wanting in dignity and self-respect that they are willing to travel on German ships where they are despised
and meet with the just contempt of the servants who wait upon them and of their fellow passengers. Their names
should be heralded far and wide. They are traitors to their race.
In conclusion, permit me again to thank you for this heartening
reception and to assure you that, with your support and that of our millions of non-Jewish friends, we will
drive the last nail in the coffin of bigotry and fanaticism that has dared raise its ugly head to slander, belie
and disgrace twentieth century civilization.
[end of New York Times article]
__________________________________________________
A Jewish Defector Warns America
Benjamin Harrison Freedman
Benjamin
Freedman’s warning is one of the most important documents of the 20th century.
by
Benjamin H. Freedman
Introductory
Note:
Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing
individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was
at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company.
He broke with organized
Jewry after World War II, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at
least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish power structure which dominates the United States.
Mr. Freedman’s testimony is especially important because
he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation.
Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph
Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.
This speech
was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley’s
patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous
speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman’s essential message to us — his warning to the West — is more urgent
than ever before. – Kevin Alfred Strom
A JEWISH DEFECTOR WARNS AMERICA
a speech by Benjamin H. Freedman
From a letter by Benjamin Freedman
in the Revilo Oliver archives
HERE IN
THE UNITED STATES, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too
many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though
they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what
happened while we were all asleep.
The First
World War
What happened? World War I broke out
in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain,
France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.
Within
two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise
to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers,
with one week’s food supply — and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had
lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were
picking up their toys and going home, they didn’t want to play war anymore, they didn’t like the Czar. And the
Italian army had collapsed.
Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy
soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated
peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let’s call the war off, and let everything
be as it was before the war started.” England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that — seriously. They had
no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with
the war and being totally defeated.
Stalemate
in 1916; Zionists Offer to get USA into the War
Benjamin Freedman was attacked
by the Jewish establishment, as in this 1955 issue of the American Jewish Committee's magazine, Commentary
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented
the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and — I am going to be brief because it’s
a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make — they said: “Look here. You can
yet win this war. You don’t have to give up. You don’t have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now
by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally.”
The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful.
They told England: “We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your
side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.”
In other words,
they made this deal: “We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine
after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.”
1955 Commentary article mentioning
Benjamin Freedman
Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan
to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It’s absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or
any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing
the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that — I
don’t know how many here remember it — the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war
as Britain’s ally.
I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German
because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this
country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come
from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn’t like the Czar, and they didn’t
want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States
refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: “As long as France
and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!” But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany
against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.
Now those same Jews, when they
saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like
a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they’d been telling
the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of
a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting
off babies’ hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.
USA Railroaded into World War I; Balfour Declaration
Arthur Balfour, author of the
infamous declaration
The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying “Go to work on President
Wilson. We’re getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States
into the war.” That’s how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right
to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War
I to be our war. We were railroaded into — if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into — that war merely so that
the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been
told. They never knew why we went into World War I.
The Balfour Declaration
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain
and they said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let’s have something in writing that shows that
you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.” They didn’t know whether the
war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter,
which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn’t know what it was all about. And that
was called the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain’s
promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So
this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don’t think
I could make it more emphatic than that.
Versailles
Propaganda to make us hate those
whom the Zionists wish us to war against did not begin with Iraq: a poster from WW1,
illustrating the common but utterly false characterization of Germans as so-called Huns threatening
women
That is where all the trouble started.
The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the
Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the
Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know.
Now what happened?
The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed
a right to a certain part of European territory, said, “How about Palestine for us?” And they produced, for the
first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, “Oh,
so that was the game! That’s why the United States came into the war.” The Germans for the first time realized
that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted
Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.
Effect
on Germans when they understood Jewish Activity
That brings us to another
very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never
been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100
times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Ballin, [Albert Ballin –
RW] who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd’s and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder,
who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers —
the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: “Well,
that was quite a sellout.”
Further demonization of those
whom the Zionists wished us to hate: World War 1 poster
It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with
the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: “Well, let’s quit. We offer you peace terms.
Let’s forget the whole thing.” And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union.
And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man’s
imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country,
our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet
Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United
States against Chinese? I don’t think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn’t
be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.
Well,
that’s how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They’d been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist
revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them
refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than
the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”
Now
Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920,
1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers — and the press was filled with their statements — that the feeling
against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession
in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn’t that the Germans in 1919
discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling.
There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic.
It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said “Shema’
Yisroel” or “Our Father.” Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this
feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.
Freedman says World War I was started against Germany
But it had nothing to do with
home and country -- just as the current wars have nothing to do with fighting terrorism.
Click to see a larger version of this WW1 poster and note the emotional triggers: the wife
fingering a cross, the child, the grisly souvenir of a dead man's helmet.
And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty
of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany
at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred
separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated
into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world’s great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain’s,
they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened
as a result of that?
There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia
to slap down Germany. There isn’t one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries
decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.
German
Camps in 1933
When Germany realized that the
Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not
a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department,
wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent
to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine
condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot
of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And
there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.
Germans fought Jewish Control
Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht
Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists
took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government
for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to
take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for
safety, for security.
After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews
were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without
hurting a single hair on anyone’s head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought
anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn’t fight one another with pistols. Well, that’s the way they were
fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000
Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and
they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically
everything.
The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn’t want the
world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.
The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they
could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this
country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.
1933: Jews Declare “Holy War” (and Trade War) on Germany
After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every
country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: “You fire Hitler, and you put every
Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can’t treat us that way.
And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you.” You can imagine what the Germans told them. So
what did the Jews do?
In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in
Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president
of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting
System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, “The Jews of the world
now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to
starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are
dependent upon their export business.”
And it is a fact that two thirds of
Germany’s food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So
if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany’s population would have to starve. There was just not enough food
for more than one third of the population.
Now in this declaration, which I have
here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that “this
economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration,”
which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal,
and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time.
Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it
was so effective that you couldn’t find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words “made in
Germany” on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth
of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked “made
in Germany,” they were picketed with signs saying “Hitler,” “murderer,” and so forth, something
like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.
At a store belonging to the
R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there
which came from Chemnitz, marked “made in Germany.” Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there
20 years, since I’ve been observing women’s legs for many years and it’s been a long time since I’ve
seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy’s boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying
“murderers,” “Hitlerites,” and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew
had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.
Naturally, the Germans said, “Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all
our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?” They naturally
resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a
storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were
going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.
“Kristallnacht” and Rearmament
The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn’t until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked
into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews
in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.
Now I don’t like to use the word “anti-Semitism” because it’s meaningless, but it means
something to you still, so I’ll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews
was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for
World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns
in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had
decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going
to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union.
The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that “Our turn was going to come soon, unless we
are strong.” The same as we in this country are saying today, “Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are
strong.” Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000
little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries
of the world.
Nuclear War for Israel?
For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from
which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms
of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons,
or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity
of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might
such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II,
Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined
that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their
world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read
it, and it is known all over the world.
Zionist
wars can happen again
What are we going to do?
The life you save may be your son’s. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don’t know it
any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to
war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren’t permitted to know
it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.
Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912
campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was “confidential man”
to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the
treasurer.
So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the
table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson’s brain the graduated income tax and what has
become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President
Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came
to determining what was going on as a newborn baby.
That is how they got us into
World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine
as their “commonwealth.” They’ve fooled you so much that you don’t know whether you’re coming
or going.
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, “Gentlemen, any witness
who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony.” I don’t know what state you come from,
but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.
History of ‘Jews’
What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known
as Jews. I don’t call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.) The eastern
European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world’s population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally
Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics
drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia
did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe — so
big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That’s
how big and powerful they were.
They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and
I do not want to go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other
pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that
he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith — either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism,
which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out “eeny, meeny, miney, moe,” he picked out so-called
Judaism. And that became the state religion.
He sent down to the Talmudic schools
of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what
we call Jews. There wasn’t one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament
history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their
armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, “You want to help repatriate God’s Chosen People to their Promised
Land, their ancestral home, don’t you? It’s your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and
Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we’re Jews.” But they are pagan
Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted.
It is as
ridiculous to call them “people of the Holy Land,” as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems “Arabs.”
Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine,
in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed’s birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided
to call themselves “Arabs.” You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese
are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The
same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new
crop of inhabitants. They hadn’t become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity
as a religious faith.
These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns,
were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they
had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not,
you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today Jews.
Now
imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, “We’re going to use our power
and prestige to repatriate God’s Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land.” Could there
be a bigger lie than that?
Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the
radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians
on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You’d believe black
is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn’t call black black anymore — you’d start to call black
white. And nobody could blame you.
That is one of the great lies of history. It
is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.
Kol Nidre: Evidence of Disloyalty
Do
you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them?
I
was one of them. This is not hearsay. I’m not here to be a rabble-rouser. I’m here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you
recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer,
you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months
shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They
shall have no force or effect.
And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you
take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you
are exempted from fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as
the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.
* * *
Subsequent research has shown that the
“Khazar hypothesis,” i.e., Freedman’s and Arthur Koestler’s idea that Ashkenazi Jews are almost
entirely of Khazar descent, is wildly exaggerated. For example, Science News for October 3, 1998 stated “Wider
genetic studies of diverse present day Jewish communities show a remarkable genetic cohesiveness. Jews from Iran, Iraq,
Yemen, North Africa and European Ashkenazim all cluster together with other Semitic groups, with their origin in the Middle
East. A common geographical origin can be seen for all mainstream Jewish groups studied. This genetic research has clearly
refuted the Khazar story — Khazars: a pre-10th century Turko-Asian empire which reportedly converted en masse to Judaism.
Researchers compared the DNA signature of the Ashkenazi Jews against those of Turkish-derived people, and found no correspondence.
…The DNA tests results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North
Africa and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities
have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora.”
The demise of the Khazar
hypothesis doesn’t much vitiate Freedman’s argument that the “blood right” of Jews — who do
show some degree of mixture with their host populations and who are probably less related to the original inhabitants of
“Israel” than are the Palestinians — to take over Palestine is a sham. And, of course, it doesn’t
at all affect his insider revelations of Zionist intrigue. – Kevin Alfred Strom
This article was transcribed and prepared for publication by Kevin Alfred Strom, with additional work by Rae West.