|
|
 "There is no physical evidence for the Holocaust. What further proof do we need
that the Holocaust occurred?" ...Ephraim Kaye
Ephraim Kaye is the director at Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum in Israel—using classic Orwellian doublethink—in which he attempts to explain how the complete lack of physical evidence to support the official Holocaust narrative is actually proof that the Holocaust happened.
  Holocaust Revisionism Articles
The Anne Frank Diary Fraud
Anne
Frank’s Diary – Some Honest Questions
As
Many as 90% of Those Claiming to Be Holocaust Survivors May Be Frauds
Australian
Man’s Holocaust Story Labelled a ‘Lie’
Brighton
Beach Holocaust Fund Scammer Jailed for Neary Two Years
Documentary
Photographs Proving the National Socialist Persecution of the Jews?
Fraudster
Gets Eight Years in $57 Million Holocaust Scheme
Holocaust
Propaganda Photographs
Holocaust
Trauma Affects Grandchildren of Survivors
How
Britain Tortured Nazi PoW’s
– How the British Obtained the Confessions of Rudolf
Höss
The
Illustrated Auschwitz Lie
Jewish
Soap
A
Prominent False Witness: Elie Wiesel
Made
in Russia: The Holocaust
Money
Running Out for Needy Holocaust Survivors
Moshe
Peer’s Astounding Holy Shoah Tale
– The Most Famous Holocaust Photo a Fraud
The
Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust
Nuremberg
Trial Proceedings Volume 1
Nuremberg
Trial Proceedings Volume 1
The Origin of the
’6 Million Jews’ Figure
Photo
Manipulations in the USSR
The
“Six Million” Myth
Soap
Story
Test
Your Holocaust Knowledge
Zyklon-B
and the German Delousing Chambers
Auschwitz –
Why the Gas Chambers are a Myth
Buchenwald
a Dumb Dumb Portrayal of Evil
David
Irving The Holocaust Truth, The Whole Truth ~ And Nothing but the Truth
David
Stein on the Holocaust
Ernst
Zundel – Holocaust Debunked
Zundel
vs. Zionist – Truth vs. Lies
The
Holocaust Big Lie
Holocaust
Faker Explains Himself
The
Holocaust Lie by David Irving
Holocaust
Revisionism: The Truth by Thomas Dalton, PhD
The
Holocaust Testimonies You Didn’t Hear
Holocaust
Hoax Exposed!
– Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax, The
Made
in Russia: The Holocaust – Carlos W. Porter
The
Montel Williams Show – David Cole and Mark Weber
Nazi
Shrunken Heads
One-Third
of the Holocaust
Six
Million Jews 1915-1938
Sylvia
Stolz – Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting Evidence in the Zundel Trial
Spielberg’s
Hoax – The Last Days of the Big Lie
The
Phil Donahue Show – Holocaust Denial
The
Truth Behind the Gates of Auschwitz
The
Truth is No Defense
Understanding
the Holocaust as a Legend
Committee
for Open Debate on the Holocaust
Committee
for Open Debate on the Holocaust – Holocaust Revisionism Books
Exposing
the Holocaust™ Hoax
Historical
Revisionism
Holocaust
Handbooks & Movies
The
Holocaust Historiography Project
Institute
for Historical Review
Historical
Revisionism
Historical
Revisionism – Holocaust Revisionism Books
Nazi
Gassings
Revisionists
Shoah
Blogger
Spielberg’s
Hoax
Zundelsite
. . . . . . Click on this text to read or copy the book "DID SIX MILLION REALLY DIE... Before and After the “Holocaust”: Jewish Population Numbers in 1933 and 1948 by The Rebel - Posted November 30, 2013 For over a century, the Jewish World Almanac has been widely regarded as the most authentic source for the world’s Jewish population numbers. Academics all over the world, including the editors of the Encyclopedia Britannica, used to rely on the accuracy of those numbers. Here is what the World Alamanacs of 1933 and 1948 had to say about the world population of Jews.World Almanac 1933 World Almanac 1948 In other words, according to the World Almanac the world population of Jews increased (!) between 1933 and 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000. If the German government under Adolf Hitler had – as alleged – murdered six million Jews those losses should have been reflected in the Jewish population numbers quoted in the World Almanac.The suspicions raised by above numbers concerning the veracity of the allegations made against the Hitler government are confirmed by the official three-volume report by the International Committee of the Red Cross, released 1948 in Geneva, according to which 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews. The following article elaborates.A Factual Appraisal Of The ‘Holocaust’ By The Red CrossThe Jews And The Concentration Camps: No Evidence Of GenocideThere is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World War Two and the conditions of Germany’s concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works: Documents sur l’activité du CICR en faveur des civils détenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frédéric Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value.The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision.The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the second type as “Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, “Schutzhäftlinge”), who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces” (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons, it continues, “were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons.” (P.74).The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and “from February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and prisons” (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programme which continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.Red Cross Recipients Were JewsThe Report states that “As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps” (Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany. The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83).In the course of the war, “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout the world, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee of New York” (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation was permitted by the German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April 1945. This camp, “where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75). According to the Report, “‘The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy. . . two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p . 642).The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.No Evidence Of GenocideOne of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp …” (Vol. III, p. 83).Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) – Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged” (Vol. III, p. 594).Not All Were InternedVolume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population,” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Höss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing “every single Jew he could lay his hands on.”In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. I, p. 645).As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the. Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States … now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I, p . 649).Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that “Did Six Million Really Die?” quoted from the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas (this includes the above material), it did so accurately.A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross’ International Tracing Service) under oath at the Zündel Trial (February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).The above is chapter nine from the book “Did Six Million Really Die?”. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Holocaust Or Holohoax? 21 Amazing Facts In British Schools, and constantly on British television, we are bombarded with the alleged murder of 6 million jews by the Germans during World War Two. This is commonly referred to as “The Holocaust”. This alleged historical event is also thrown at anyone objecting to mass immigration in to White Nations as proof of the absolute evil of White Nationalism.The alleged holocaust was also the official reason for setting up the Sate of Israel on May 14th 1948 – if the alleged holocaust was proved not to have happened then the State of Israel would have no legal basis.
 Holocaust denial in London, England during January 2015.
In most European Countries even disputing any detail of this alleged historical event is a very serious criminal offence, which can result in up to 20 years imprisonment. In France this can be served in solitary confinement if the authorities believe there is any chance of re-offending.
Even though this blog in no way denies “The Holocaust”, or disputes any of the alleged details of any of the different versions, we did list 21 amazing facts about it here:
1. International Committee of the Red Cross Records: The International Red Cross was stationed in all German labour, internment, concentration and prison camps throughout World War Two. The Red Cross were never given access to any Russian camps before, during or after World War Two. At his trials in Canada, during the 1980s and 1990s, Professor Ernst Zundel finally got the Red Cross to release their records from the German camps despite strong Israeli objections. The Red Cross records seem to suggest that there were no gas chambers, and a total of 271,301 died during World War Two in these camps, mostly from typhus. In a letter to the US State Department dated November 22nd 1944 The Red Cross, who were stationed in all the camps, stated : “We have not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners.”  Official Red Cross records. 2.United States Airforce Aerial Photos Of Camps: From 1942, until the end of World War Two, the United States Airforce performed low flying, low-speed photography of all the alleged “death camps” to obtain evidence of what was going on. This followed jewish claims in the West that a mass murder was occurring. All these photographs were released in 1979 when they were declassified. None of these photographs show any sign of mass murder or disposal of millions of bodies.  No USAF aerial photos show any mass murder in the camps. 3. Western Allies Never Liberated Any Death Camps With Gas Chambers: None of the Western Allies ( Britain, Canada, USA, Australia, France etc. ) liberated any camps that had gas chambers, or other systems of mass murder in them. All the alleged death camps with gas chambers were liberated by the Russians. Consequently any alleged evidence of death camps and/or gas chambers was forthcoming solely from Soviet Russia. The Western Allies liberated a total of 12 main camps and the Soviet Russians 8 main camps.  Western Allies never liberated or inspected any death camps or gas chambers. 4.The Leuchter Report: One of the pieces of evidence Professor Ernst Zundel produced at his trials in Canada was the “Leuchter Report” compiled by Fred Leuchter on his commission. Fred Leuchter is the World’s foremost expert on gas chambers, and holds the patents for nearly all the gas chambers used for executions in the World. He has also personally built, or supervised the building, of all gas chambers in the USA and most in the rest of the World.
5. The British Secret Service Monitored All Concentration Camp Deaths: Using some of the World’s first computers the British Secret Service had cracked the German top-secret Enigma code and had access to most German Military communications by 1942. Sir Frank H. Hinsley, in his book British Intelligence In The Second World War ; It’s Influence On Strategy And Operations, stated “The returns of Auschwitz mentioned illness as the main cause of death but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.” The numbers of dead in the decoded messages tallied exactly with Red Cross and German Military records of the time. The British Secret Service also monitored various atrocities carried out by the Germans across the rest of Europe – why would the Germans report these to Berlin but not the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz and other camps?  The British Secret Service were monitoring all German Military and Police communications by 1942. 6. The French Resistance Denied The Holocaust: During World War Two Germany invaded France and occupied Northern France
from 1940 to 1944. A secret army of French Patriots known collectively as “The French Resistance” fought the
German occupiers in various ways. A large number of French Resistance members were imprisoned, tortured and executed including
their leader, and French National hero, Jean Moulin. After World War Two French resistance members were released from various
German concentration camps, including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps. On their return to France they all gave horrific
accounts of their treatment by the Germans, and were full of hatred for them because of the events of World War Two. However
they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder programme in the concentration camps.  French Resistance leader Jean Moulin 7. The Gas Chambers Of World War One: It was widely reported during World War One ( 1914 to 1918 ) that the Germans, and their allies, were using gas chambers to kill thousands of prisoners. However after the end of the War Stanley Baldwin admitted in Parliament that it had been propaganda and no such gas chambers had existed. He also apologised publicly to the German People for this racist slur on them.  During World War One it was falsely claimed that the Germans were gassing prisoners. 8. Amounts Of Zyklon-B Used At The Camps: Zyklon-B was the trade name for of a cyanide-based pesticide invented in the early 1920s. It was used in Germany, before and during the Second World War, for disinfection and pest extermination in ships, buildings and machinery. Zyklon-B consisted of diatomite, in the form of granules the size of fine peas, saturated with prussic acid. In view of its volatility and the associated risk of accidental poisoning, it was supplied in sealed metal canisters. One of the co-inventors of Zyklon-B, the chemist and businessman Bruno Tesch, was executed by the British in 1946 for his role in the alleged Holocaust. In the concentration camps it was used for sanitation and pest control. There were disinfectant chambers, in all the camps, where inmates clothes were disinfected to combat typhus and other diseases. When you break down the amount of Zyklon-B used in all the camps, those not alleged to have gas chambers and those alleged to have gas chambers, the amount per inmate is very similar. This means the alleged death camps would have had to have had a secret supply for the “gas chambers”.  Zyklon-B granules came in sealed tins. 9. The Nuremberg Trials 1945 to 1949: The Nuremberg Trials were held in the German City of Nuremberg from 1945 to 1949. These Trials were held by the victorious Allies ( France, Britain , USA and Soviet Russia ) with the Germans as defendants. They were the worst sort of show trials with the main Judge being Nikitchenko, who had presided over Stalins’ show trials of 1936 to 1938 in the Soviet Union. The Court came up with ridiculous findings like jews being turned in to lampshades and even soap, these claims are now discredited and even the jews admit they were untrue. The Chief Justice of the United States Harlan Fiske Stone called the Nuremberg trials a fraud. He said “Chief US prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg,” he wrote. “I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a Court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.”  The Nuremberg Trials – the ultimate Soviet show trial held under the Allies. Associate Supreme Court Justice William O Douglas charged that the Allies were guilty of “substituting power for principle” at Nuremberg. “I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled,” he wrote. “Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time.” According to British General Montgomery, the Germans had only one sin : They lost the war. President John F Kennedy in his book, Profiles in Courage, criticised
Nuremberg as a show trial. Out of 139 German witnesses who testified that the Holocaust had occurred, the British Medical Officer recorded that 137 had “damage to their testicles that is beyond repair”. A number of Germans had died under interrogation by the Allies. There was also the threat of sending Peoples’ families to Soviet Gulags.  The Nuremberg prosecutors – Kempner, Rapp, Niederman – all Jews. 10. The Concentration Camp Crematorium: One of the main problems with the 6 million jews being murdered claim was disposal of the bodies. It was claimed at Nuremberg that they had been disposed of in the camp crematorium. There were crematorium in each camp, but they simply didn’t have the capacity. Each crematorium oven could burn a body in about one and a half hours, meaning a maximum capacity of 16 bodies every day or just less than 6000 bodies per year per oven. The camps had between four and twelve ovens each giving 24,000 to 72,000 bodies per year maximum at each camp – this still wouldn’t be possible as you can’t run these ovens non-stop without the metal fracturing. Even double or triple loading wouldn’t help as this increased the time to three hours for two bodies or four and a half hours for three bodies. Also bodies aren’t totally reduced by this process and usually leave the pelvis and thigh bones which need crushing with special machinery – no such machinery was found at any of the camps. There is also the problem of fuel as each body would need about 40 kilograms of coke to burn – there is no record of the massive amount of coke required being supplied.  Each oven could only burn less than 6000 bodies per year if working non-stop which isn’t possible without fracturing the metal. 11. The Liberation Of Belsen Concentration Camp Film: The whole World has probably seen the film of the liberation of Belsen concentration camp, it is horrific to say the least. Human skeletons are walking round with dead bodies covering the ground. This film was shown Worldwide at the time to show the evil of Nazi Germany. However Belsen was liberated by the Western Allies, and was never alleged to have had any gas chamber or be part of a systematic mass murder programme. The victims are in fact all dying from typhus which is confirmed by German Military, Red Cross and British Military medical records – this is never pointed out whenever this film is shown. Ironically the deaths were mostly due to a lack of Zyklon-B, at the end of the war with Germany collapsing, leading to a mass typhus outbreak in the camp.  British Military sign warning of typhus at Belsen concentration camp shortly after liberation. 12. No Film Or Photographs Of Any Gas Chambers: The Nazis were technology freaks, to say the least, and filmed and photographed virtually everything they did during World War Two. Hitler even had executions of his political enemies filmed so he could watch them with his cronies. However there has never been a single photograph or film found of any of the alleged gas chambers in operation. The Nazis did film, and photograph, themselves committing many atrocities across occupied Europe so it seems unlikely they wouldn’t film the alleged gas chambers. All the films we are shown of gas chambers are Hollywood recreations made after the war.  Hitler and his cronies demanded film of virtually everything happening in Nazi occupied territory but no film of gas chambers was ever found. 13. Sir Winston Churchill Never Mentioned The Alleged Holocaust: In his monumental six volume The Second World War Sir Winston Churchill, British
wartime Prime Minister, never makes any reference to gas chambers or a planned mass extermination of European jews. This
is despite the fact he goes in to great detail about virtually every facet of World War Two including many atrocities committed
by the Nazis. The same can be said about Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe. After the Second
World War, with the Cold War starting, Churchill stated “I think we slaughtered the wrong pig here” a clear
reference to the fact Britain would have been better helping Germany defeat Soviet Russia, or at least staying out completely.  Sir Winston Churchill – realised too late that Soviet Russia was more of a threat than Nazi Germany. 14. Star Witness To The Alleged Holocaust Elie Wiesel: One of the star witnesses to the Auschwitz allegations is Nobel Prize
winner Elie Wiesel. Wiesel was born in Sighet, Romania on September 30th, 1928. Wiesel has given evidence at various trials
around the World on his alleged experiences in German camps during World War Two. Wiesel is a well-known writer of fiction
with over 40 published books. However it is his autobiography of Auschwitz, Night ,
which has come under scrutiny. Firstly, Wiesel claims the bodies were disposed of by a secret Nazi method of using bodies
to burn bodies – if this was scientifically possible wouldn’t they just use this method to burn the bodies?
Secondly Wiesel claims that his concentration camp number A7713 was tattooed on his left arm like all inmates, however video evidence shows
no such tattoo and he has never explained where his tattoo went. Thirdly his camp number, A7713, was assigned to a different prisoner and there is no record of him at Auschwitz
despite all camp records being recovered after the War. Fourthly in all his different accounts of Auschwitz Weisel never
mentions any gas chambers. Fifthly Wiesel makes bizarre claims about mass graves that would shoot fountains of blood up
in to the air, this is also scientifically impossible. Sixthly Wiesel claims he spent three weeks in the Auschwitz Camp
hospital with an infected leg – would a death camp bother curing prisoners? There are many other major discrepancies
to his claims, and a read of his book Night is recommended. For a more precise look at Elie Wiesel and why his allegations don’t stand up to any scrutiny please visit: http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/ and https://archive.org/details/ElieWiesel-AnotherHolocaustFraud  Elie Wiesel without his tattoo. 15. Fake Photographic And Film Holocaust Evidence And The Ever Changing Numbers: The first time fake evidence was used was during the Nuremberg Trials. This however became an industry in its own right after 1945, with large rewards paid to investigators for “finding” Holocaust evidence. At the time a lot of this evidence was very cutting-edge, but under modern scrutiny it simply doesn’t stand up.  Modern forensic techniques have exposed a lot of “Holocaust” photographic evidence as faked. New systems of examining photographs and film have exposed large amounts of it as totally fake, other evidence has been exposed as coming from completely different sources e.g. The Russian Gulags. As evidence has emerged discrediting large parts, if not all, of the alleged Holocaust narrative the jews have been forced to constantly change the numbers in their claims. They have, however, constantly stuck to an overall total of 6 million jewish deaths, even though this makes no mathematical sense as the component numbers are revised downwards. This hasn’t led to a partial refund of the damages paid to Israel by Germany based on the 6 million figure. 16. The Balfour Declaration, World War One And 6 Million Jews: During World War One the British Government had agreed with leading jews that they would support a jewish homeland in Palestine in exchange for the powerful jewish lobby in America getting the USA to join the Allies. This led to the Balfour Declaration being made by the British Government promising the jews a homeland in Palestine.  After discussions in the British Cabinet, and consultation with Zionist leaders, the decision was made known in the form of a letter by Arthur James Lord Balfour to Lord Rothschild. The letter represents the first political recognition of Zionist aims by a Great Power. After World War One the British Government were unable, or unwilling, to make good on this promise. From 1919 onwards the jews claimed 6 million jews in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in Palestine. This was 14 years before the Nazis came to power and 24 years before the alleged Holocaust started.  The jews have been waving the 6 million figure around since at least 1914 and maybe even earlier – the number seems to have a special significance to them. 17. Holocaust Denial And The Holocaust Deniers: In most parts of Europe questioning any aspect of the findings of the Nuremberg Trials is a very serious criminal offence on par with rape, murder or armed robbery. In France you can receive up to 20 years in prison, which may have to be served in solitary confinement. Even where it is not illegal questioning the official Holocaust narrative will probably cost you your job, family, house etc. Despite this a lot of top writers, academics, historians and scientists have questioned the official Holocaust narrative or denied it entirely. Professor Ernst Zundel was put on numerous trials around the World, had his house firebombed, received death threats, his family broke up, was deported from several countries and eventually was imprisoned for five years in Germany. No other historical event can attract this type of punishment for questioning the official narrative. Despite these threats, the official narrative is constantly exposed as being a lie and the jews have to constantly change their claims when faced with irrefutable evidence of their lies. 18. The Main Stream Media And The Alleged Holocaust: The Main Stream Media never question the official narrative of the holocaust, and go on an all-out attack on anyone who does. They have created the term “Holocaust Denier” for anyone who doesn’t believe, or dares to question, the official narrative. “Holocaust Denier” is one of the multicultural buzz-words like “Fascist/Nazi/racist/homophobe” designed to denigrate the person described as such, and lead to “pack-attacks” by the media, politicians and the general lefty PC crowd. However bear in mind that around 96% of the Western World’s media is controlled by jews and/or zionists. You will notice that the jews/zionist are willing to keep running newspapers/TV channels and other media outlets at a financial loss simply to keep control of the MSM.  The jews and zionists control about 96% of the Western World’s media – a large part is now run at a financial loss. 19. There’s No Business Like Shoa Business: “Shoa” is the term used by jews and zionists to describe the alleged Holocaust. After the Second World War Germany was forced to pay trillions of Dollars in compensation to set up Israel, and is still paying to this day. There are now second and third generation, the children and grandchildren of alleged Holocaust victims, who receive compensation from the German Government and various German Corporations. The American Government also use this as an excuse to give billions of American taxpayers’ money to Israel, although the real reason behind these payments is the strength of the Israeli lobby in America. As early as 1941, two years before the alleged Holocaust was even meant to have started, the World Jewish Congress had been demanding that the Germans pay for the resettlement of jews in Israel as reparations. 20. The Census of Jews Worldwide Figures: Here are some census figures of jews living Worldwide to consider: World Almanac, 1925, pg. 752 — 15,630,000, “In 1925 a census of Palestine gave a total of 115,151 Jews”  World Almanac 1933  World Almanac 1948 21. Inmate Facilities At Auschwitz: With two very different witness versions of what was going on in the camps, let’s have a quick look at the facilities available to inmates to see if that can clarify matters. The jews have now admitted there wasn’t any gas chambers in Auschwitz following the two sets of scientific tests, but there were some facilities that certainly were in Auschwitz and can still be seen today.   A free dental service available to all inmates – specialist dentists were brought in for intricate work.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
The “Gas Chambers”
“No Holes, No Holocaust” Robert Faurisson first put this forth in 1994 and says his reasoning behind it was as follows:
For R. J. van Pelt, testifying against Irving at the Irving vs Lipstadt libel trial in Canada in the year 2000, it was near torture trying to find a reply to this argument. Justice [Charles] Gray as well had to acknowledge “the apparent absence of evidence of holes” (p. 490 of the verbatim transcript) and, in a more general way, he conceded that “contemporaneous documents yield little clear evidence of the existence of gas chambers designed to kill humans” (p. 489; for more details one may consult pages 458-460, 466-467, 475-478 and 490-506). In the text of his judgment, Charles Gray admitted surprise: “I have to confess that, in common I suspect with most other people, I had supposed that the evidence of mass extermination of Jews in the gas chambers at Auschwitz was compelling. I have, however, set aside this preconception when assessing the evidence adduced by the parties in these proceedings.”
The coup de grâce given, on December 27, 2009,
to the myth of the Nazi “gas chambers”
The blow was administered by a Jewish academic, Robert Jan van Pelt, whom one may consider the last person to have sought to prove scientifically that Auschwitz, the capital of “the Holocaust”, had been an “extermination camp” (an American term coined in November 1944), that is, a camp equipped with extermination “gas chambers”. The revisionists had no opponent more determined and more resolved to fight them on the historical and scientific level than this professor teaching the history of architecture at the University of Waterloo (Ontario, Canada). He defended the usual argument holding that, to gas several thousand Jews at a time, an SS man, having got up on the roof of certain “gas chambers”, poured Zyklon B pellets through four holes made in the concrete ceiling of the said “gas chambers”. Ever under the pressure of revisionist discoveries, he had been bound to concur that the holes in the small Krematorium I had been created by… the Soviets and the Polish communists. But R.J. van Pelt and his friends were sure of finding such holes in the concrete roofs, in ruins, of Krematoriums II and III [in the Birkenau camp]. However, after years of research, they proved unable to supply a single photograph of those holes or of the perforated shafts (?) that allegedly had allowed the diffusion of hydrogen cyanide gas underneath, thus failing to meet my challenge summed up in the formula: “No holes, no Holocaust”
 Crema II at Birkenau still under construction. The controversy is whether there were introduction holes in the flat roof of the partially underground section at right-foreground.
For more, see: http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/2011/09/victories-of-revisionism-continued.htm
For further study of this subject, see the following articles from The Revisionist magazine,
2004 : “The Elusive Holes of Death”, Germar Rudolf; “No Holes, No Gas Chamber(s)”, Carlo Mattogno; “The Openings For the Introduction of Zyklon B, Part 1” and “The Openings For the Introduction of Zyklon B, Part 2”, Carlo Mattogno. * *
* Wiki-Lies and Auschwitz Truth by Germar Rudolf
How to get your own Wikipedia entry. Who do you ask, if you want to find out general information about Auschwitz? How about an encyclopedia? Search engine statistics show that Wikipedia is the world’s most frequently consulted encyclopedia. The problem with this encyclopedia is, though, that sensitive entries are closely monitored by a cabal that deletes everything which does not jibe with political correctness.
Take, for instance, Wikipedia’s English language entry about me, Germar Rudolf. My name was included in Wikipedia, because I had gotten involved in a controversy in the early 1990s: I had written a chemical and technical expert report on the Auschwitz gas chambers called The Rudolf Report. This expert report was used in a number of court cases in Germany and was also published in book form in various languages. Since I concluded in this work that the generally held views about mass murders in gas chambers at Auschwitz are refuted by extant documents and material traces, I became a person of public notoriety (see the Wikipedia entry for a few more details). Hence in 2004 my name was included first in the German section and then a few months later also in the English section of Wikipedia without my knowledge and initial contribution. Most of what is written in it now about me as a person is for the most part fairly accurate, because in 2010 I got involved for a brief time and fixed several gross misrepresentations and errors of my biography, most of which were accepted by the editors in charge.
Sheer Indelible Misrepresentations
Although I managed to correct errors regarding my personal life history, I was not so fortunate about distorted claims made in that entry about my work. In the English language entry, for instance, the following can be read, among other things:
Now, if you are a novice to the issue, you would have no clue what it means that Rudolf found “only insignificant and non-reproducible traces of cyanide compounds in the samples taken from the gas chambers.” But you sure know what it means when my critics say that my “experiment was seriously flawed.” This wording gives the impression that I conducted just an “experiment” and that I am probably rather incompetent.
You don’t find a hint in this entry that my report has more than 200 pages, more than 500 footnotes, and consists of an awful lot more than just one “experiment.” To top if off, you will find no information whatsoever about my work: not a link to it, not its English title, not any bibliographic information. Nothing. And don’t try to change it, because others have tried it before (me included), but the censors in the background erased all such attempts.
For instance, a pertinent link to the Rudolf Report, which is, after all, discussed in this entry, was added by one user at 11:35am on 17 April 2013 and removed by an eager censor with the user ID “Dougweller” at 3pm that same day. This dance was repeated over the next days: re-entry at 2:15am, deletion at 5:49am, re-entry at 9:21pm, deletion at 12:30pm the next day, re-entry at 4:26am the following day, deleted at 5:47am by some other user.
The reason given for this censorship is that I and the places where my works are published have a bad reputation in the public market of ideas, whereas my slanderers have not. And disreputable sources are subject to deletion. It’s Wikipedia’s “quality” control policy. Never mind that this “disreputable source” is the main reason for this very entry to begin with. You people out there are allowed to read about it (from its opponents), but you are not allowed to read the thing itself.
Only in July of 2012 was a brief reference added and tolerated which points to my first, 1998 paper addressing some of Green’s initial deliberations. It’s outdated, to be sure, but it’s a start.
Why Wikipedia Is Wrong
But let’s get back to the above quote from Wikipedia. Let’s read that again: “Richard Green” is saying that “iron-based cyanide compounds” are not a reliable indicator of the presence of cyanide compounds.
Excuse me? Cyanide compounds do not indicate the presence of cyanide compounds???
To Richard Green’s credit must be stated that he never made such a nonsensical claim. In the paper quoted by Wikipedia, Green claims, among other things, that iron-based cyanide compounds are not a reliable indicator of past homicidal mass gassings. Whoever wrote this Wikipedia entry must therefore have had some serious mental impairment.
I tried to change that on Dec. 28 to a phrasing which would make at least some sense (“iron-based cyanide compounds, which are not a reliable indicator of homicidal mass gassings”), but that change was reversed a short while later by one of Wikipedia’s zealous editors. A day later, another attempt to have this corrected was made. It read “cyanide compounds are not a reliable indicator of past homicidal gassings”, and to make sure the censors understand that this is a correction to be taken seriously, a brief explanation was given: “How can cyanides not be a reliable indicator for the presence of cyanides? Green claims they don’t reliably indicate homicidal gassings!” But guess what! A little more than a day later that change was reversed as well. (then again: reversion reverted at 10:47 on Jan. 2, 2014, nixed not even three hours later)
What are these editors thinking, if anything?
But even if that correction were accepted, this wouldn’t change the fact that Wikipedia circulates here nothing more than the lie bandied about by Green, although he is not the inventor. That’s a strong accusation, I know, so let me explain.
Why Green & Co. Are Wrong
First a few historical basics. I’ll keep it brief.
Auschwitz was the biggest concentration camp of Third Reich Germany. It also is said to have served for the extermination of around one million people, mostly Jews. Most of them are said to have been killed in homicidal gas chambers. The poison gas allegedly used for this was hydrogen cyanide soaked on gypsum pellets, sold in Germany in those years under the trademark Zyklon B. It is actually a pesticide which has been used to kill vermin since the 1920s and is still being used today, although under different names.  Germar Rudolf in a small disinfestation chamber at Auschwitz where Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothing, leaving permanent blue staining on the wall. -ed.
Now a tiny bit of chemistry. I’ll keep it brief and simple.
Hydrogen cyanide is a poisonous chemical that can also react with rust to form a very long-term stable blue pigment known as Iron Blue. This is the most notorious of the “iron-based cyanide compounds” mentioned in the Wikipedia entry about me. Rust in turn is a natural component of all wall materials (plaster, mortar, concrete, up to 2%). Exposing walls to hydrogen cyanide (=Zyklon B) has led in numerous well-documented cases to the formation of that blue pigment, and that pigment sticks around for centuries. So if it formed in, say, 1942, it still can be found today.
Now comes the forensic part. Again, I’ll keep it brief and simple.
If the blue pigment can be found in the walls of the rooms said to have served as homicidal gas chambers, then this would prove that Zyklon B was used in these rooms. The problem is, though, that basically no such traces can be found. What do we conclude from this?
The U.S. expert for execution technology Fred A. Leuchter was the first to take samples and have them analyzed in 1988. Since he found basically no pigment traces, he concluded, succinctly put:
 Photo taken in 2005 of the back wall of the Auschwitz 1 “gas chamber” which tourists visit shows flimsy door, drains for toilets along the right wall and manhole cover in center of floor – but no blue pigment. (courtesy furtherglory.wordpress.com) -ed.  Photo taken in 2012. Notice the back door has been hidden by a partial wall, and no one is allowed past the railing because a “reverent” attitude is now demanded. No blue staining on walls, and note the floor drain in left foreground. (courtesy samarkandbound.blogspot.com) -ed.
I was the next in line with my research. Since I felt that Leuchter had jumped to conclusions, I wanted to be a bit more circumspect. But I, too, failed to find pigment traces. Hence my line of reasoning after lots of research was in 1993 something like this:
Next in line was the Auschwitz State Museum. They commissioned a local Polish institute for forensics to do their own testing. The results were published in 1994. Their line of reasoning can be summarized as follows:
Does that sound strange? Yes, but is it logical? If tests yield nothing, then ‘nothing’ proves a mass murder. So next time you do nothing, be aware that this proves that you are a mass murderer!
To put it in a nutshell: The Polish scientists excluded exactly that chemical compound (the blue pigment) which alone can be detected after so many decades. They did this due to false assumptions, and they ignored arguments refuting them, although they knew about them (since they quoted that second chemist in their paper, who happened to have been me writing under a pen name in 1993).
However:
Hence the Poles did
Three reasons why their work is the opposite of scholarly. And this paper appeared in a peer-reviewed “scientific” journal! So much about the value of the peer review process, if taboos are at stake.
In case you want to read more about these Polish frauds, feel free to read it here, on pp. 45-67.
Finally we have Richard Green and Jamie McCarthy, as quoted by Wikipedia. Since only Green is a chemist, I henceforth ignore McCarthy. Green, a self-confessed Jew (whether that indicates an agenda is up to the reader to decide), has not done any research of his own. He has merely bickered about my research results and has insulted me on numerous occasions, even in the paper linked to by Wikipedia, thus proving to be quite a Jewish political zealot indeed. Although Green had to admit that there is no evidence of any blue wall paint at Auschwitz and that the blue pigment in question can indeed form in walls as a result of being exposed to Zyklon B gas, he still backs the Polish pseudo-scientists’ fraudulent approach.
The interested reader can pursue the papers linked to here for more details about Green. Suffice it to say that Green and in extension Wikipedia rubber-stamp the Polish hoax by saying that any analysis has to “discriminate against the formation of iron-based cyanide compounds,” that is to say: has to exclude the blue pigment from the analysis. But why, if there is no blue wall paint? Because the Poles still don’t understand the chemistry involved? Then THEY and in extension Green should be excluded from the debate, not the blue pigment.
Anyway, by quoting Green as a serious critic of my work, a Polish political lie backed by a Jewish zealot becomes encyclopedic “truth.”
Needless to say that any attempt to get the facts about this swindle included in this Wikipedia entry is doomed to failure.
Why Mentioning Green on Wikipedia Is Wrong
Wikipedia has a strict policy when it comes to backing up claims with references. If science is involved, one ought to resort to peer-reviewed publications if possible, but one must not use sources published by oneself, by a mere web blog (all the more so, if it is your own blog), and also certainly not, if the source includes insults and personal attacks. All this is true for Green’s papers: They are steeped in innuendos, have not been peer-reviewed, are posted on a web blog only, which is owned or at least administated by Green himself, among others. Hence none of Green’s papers on this topic should be used as a reference to back up any factual scientific claims on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia. They are constantly asking for donations to keep it free. Although I appreciate their free encyclopedic services, I’m not going to donate a penny to an enterprise that spreads lies and vilifications about me and my work and gives frauds like Green a platform to disseminate their lies.
* * * Letter #37 by Carlos Porter
Holocaust survivors and propagandists concentrate on the “nit-picking” and forget about the cremation processes, and problems involved in determining:
Not to mention the problems involved in:
 Two of the cremation ovens that can be seen today at Auschwitz I.
Plus:
People go and visit all this junk and don’t notice that half of it is missing.
So called “hermetically-sealed gas chamber door” according to William L. Shirer and others (without “shower heads”).
Exact quote:
Where is all this junk? Let’s start with the doors, pumps and shower heads. There are drains. Shirer is referring to Auschwitz. This is Auschwitz.
 Auschwitz oven allegedly capable of burning “thousands of bodies a day.”
How stupid do the Hoaxoco$t con-artists think we are?
And I almost forgot:
At Birkenau, 2000 people are alleged to have been gassed and cremated per hour, every hour. One problem is the “gas chamber” is located in the cellar, while the crematory ovens are on the ground floor. The bodies would have to be transported up by means of freight elevator, without sides, carrying at most 3 bodies at a time. There are 5 coke-fired three-muffle ovens (equivalent to 15 ovens), designed for 4 or 5 cremations a day. So that after one hour, about 15 bodies would have been burned, and then not even completely, while about 40 or 50 might have been transported up in the freight elevator. Meanwhile, 2000 “new victims” are supposed to have been unsuspectingly waiting, to “take a shower”, although the room is empty, and is obviously not a “shower bath”.
Auschwitz I, the camp visited by the most tourists, is a reconstruction modified by the Soviets after the war, not according to the original plans. It is very easy to see that the chimney is not even connected to the building. None of these buildings had any holes in the roof (to be used as “Zyklon B introduction ports”) at the time of the alleged “mass gassings”. No holes, no Holocaust.
All doors opened inwards. So how did they get them open again with all those bodies slumped down dead inside?
And so on… and on, and on, and on…
Phony “gas chamber”, Stammlager, Auschwitz. Maximum capacity: 2,000 persons.
Real gas chamber, United States of America. Weight: 1/2 ton. Maximum capacity: 2 persons.
“There’s a sucker born every minute. A two-legged animal will believe anything, and the more preposterous the better.” For more, see: http://www.cwporter.com/letter37.htm
* * *
Court finds “gassing through fake shower heads is not possible“ by Carlo Mattogno
 “Fake” shower head from the shower room in the Dachau Crematoria.
At the Degesch trial in 1949, a witness mentioned the rumour that “at Birkenau, the gas was introduced into the chamber through fake shower heads”, but both Dr. Heli, the inventor of Zyklon B, and Dr. Ra., physicist, declared that this gassing technique was impossible, so that the High Court of Frankfurt am Main, in its judgement of 28 March 1949, acknowledged that it was incorrect:
[In other words, all the stories of gas coming through real or fake shower heads in fake shower rooms ARE FALSE … as found by the high court in Frankfurt am Main in 1949, yet such stories continue to be told by camp tour guides and accepted even by some “holocaust historians.” -ed.]
The story of the “cylinders of hydrocyanic acid” was an adaptation of the more commonly-heard version of the “bombs” containing hydrocyanic acid, which was invented towards the end of 1943 and the beginning of 1944 by Jerzy Tabeau, who was interned at Auschwitz under the name of Jerzy Wesoowski on 23 March 1942 and escaped on the night of 19-20 November 1943. In his report, which began circulating in the summer of 1944, he wrote:
A report dated 23 August 1944, by contrast, mentioned “vials”:
This fantastic story was also echoed by Kurt Gerstein, who wrote that the Degesch director had told him “that for the killing of men, he had supplied hydrocyanic acid in vials (in Ampullen)” 29.
However, according to him, at Auschwitz, these “vials” were used in a different manner:
In addition to “bombs” or “cylinders” or “vials” of hydrocyanic acid, other substances were indicated as methods of extermination: “sternutory gases” (gaz sternutatoires) 31 and a “certain substance which put the victims to sleep (einschläfern) in one minute” 32.
Ex-inmate Otto Wolken, by contrast, spoke of gassing ditches:
At the Nuremberg Trial, on 21 June 1946, the American prosecutor, [Robert H.] Jackson, mentioned another method of alleged extermination “in the vicinity of Auschwitz”: the atomic bomb!
As we may see, the Americans, to put it in a nutshell, already possessed the bad habit of imputing their own crimes to their enemies of the moment.
These fairy tales quickly fell into oblivion, being replaced by other, better organised, fairy tales […] which nonetheless also causes a certain disconcertment among Holocaust historians. The latter, after all, were then compelled to proclaim that it was not the case that these same propaganda fairy tales later developed, through a variety of literary elaborations, into the Holocaust “revealed truth” which reigns supreme for the moment. On the contrary, it was claimed that such tales were a mere “reflection” of a “truth” which was only discovered later, but which was not yet known when these fairy tales were invented.
26 C.F. Rüter, Justiz und NS-Verbrechen. Sammlung deutscher Strafurteile wegen nationalsozialisticher Tötungsverbrechen 1945-1966. Amsterdam, 1968-1981, vol. XIII, p. 134.
27 Das Lager Oswiecim (Auschwitz), in: A. Silberschein, Die Judenausrottung in Polen. Series Three, Section II.: Die Lagergruppe Oswiecim (Auschwitz). Geneva, 1944, pp. 67-68.
28 Report published at: http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=96187&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=pressac
29 German report by K. Gerstein dated 6 May 1945. PS-2170, p. 9.
30 Idem. 31 La politique pratiquée par la Suisse à l’égard des réfugiés au cours des années 1933 à 1945. Report intended for the Conseil fédéral à l’intention des conseils législatifs by Professor Carl Ludwig, Basel. Berne, 1957, p. 220.
32 Alleged report of SS-Sturmbannführer Franke-Gricksch of May 1943. Text in: J.-C. Pressac, Auschwitz: Technique and operation of the gas chambers. The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, New York, 1989, p. 238. The report consists solely of an alleged “transcription” by a certain Erich M. Lippmann, an officer in the US Army, responsible for collecting documents for purposes of evidence at the American trials at Nuremberg. The original document does not exist.
33 AGK, NTN, 88 (Höss trial), p. 45.
34 Der Prozess gegen die Hauptkriegsverbrecher vor dem internationalen Militärgerichtshof. Nuremberg 14. November 1945-1. October 1946. Nuremberg, 1948, vol. XVI, p. 580 [pp. 529-30 in English]
From AUSCHWITZ – 27 JANUARY 1945 TO 27 JANUARY 2005: SIXTY YEARS OF PROPAGANDA by Carlo Mattogno, translated into English from the original Italian for jan27.org by Carlos Porter. The entire book is archived on this site HERE.
* * * The Origin of “Special Treatment” in Auschwitz by Carlo Mattogno
The origin of ‘special treatment’ in Auschwitz occurs chronologically within the program of the deportation of Jews fit for labor into this camp as outlined in the preceding section. On March 31, 1942, Bischoff prepared a list of buildings planned as well as already constructed. BW 58 is described as follows:
In the first version of this document – it bears the same date – the existence of the BW is announced in the following handwritten memo:
These are the same barracks already mentioned in Bischoff’s explanatory report of July 15, 1942. These barracks are also mentioned in a document of March 31, 1942, together with the term ‘special treatment,’ although Pressac maintains wrongly that this term appeared “at the end of July 1942 […] for the first time.” In addition to that, March 31, 1942, was two months before the date, on which Höß [english spelling: Hoess] was supposedly summoned to Berlin in order to be informed by Himmler that “his camp was selected as the center for the mass extermination of the Jews.”
The construction of the four barracks planned for ‘special treatment’ (as noted in the March 31, 1942, document) was requested in the following letter of June 9, 1942, from Bischoff to the SS WVHA:
The economic function of the barracks for ‘special treatment’ is confirmed by another document, which preceded the ‘first selection’: The “assignment of the barracks” by the Central Construction Office, which Bischoff had outlined on June 30. In the list concerned, there are three “barracks for personal property” of type 260/9 in the construction project, besides a “personal property barrack in the women’s concentration camp” and a “barrack for accommodation, Bor” of the same type.
Another “assignment of the barracks” by the Central Construction Office enumerates the barracks needed, those already constructed, and those missing, by type. Corresponding to the term ‘special treatment’ are five barracks “needed” three “erected,” and two “missing.”
Quite obviously, this refers to the five barracks mentioned in Bischoff’s explanatory report of July 15, 1942; at the beginning of this report are mentioned the “5 barracks for special treatment of the prisoners,” which, as we have seen, correspond to the five barracks for ‘special treatment’ of the list of March 31, 1942. The two missing barracks were built before the end of October. They are mentioned in a list of November 15, 1942, under the heading “G.B. Bau VIII E Ch-m/wo 19” as “5 barracks for special treatment”; including installation, they cost a total of 90,000 RM.
Another document deals the fatal blow to Pressac’s interpretation: It is the “assignment of barracks” of December 8, 1942, which assigns the five barracks “already erected” to the “Prisoner of war camp B.A.I.,” thus to the section BAI of Birkenau, where “special treatment (old)” is stated as their purpose.
The significance of this document is the position of these five barracks: construction section 1 (B.A.I) of Birkenau. The adjective “alt” may refer to the fact that these barracks belong administratively to the earlier carrying out of ‘special treatment,’ in place of which a new ‘special treatment’ had emerged as the institutional mission of the Birkenau prisoner of war camp a few months earlier.
The function of the five “personal property barracks for special treatment” was thus closely tied up with the sorting out and storage of personal articles, which had been taken from the deported Jews. This took place within the scope of the “Operation Reinhardt” buildings planned as well as already constructed. BW 58 is described as follows:
Another “assignment of the barracks” by the Central Construction Office enumerates the barracks needed, those already constructed, and those missing, by type. Corresponding to the term ‘special treatment’ are five barracks.
When Pohl inspected Auschwitz on September 23, 1942, he visited, among others, the following facilities:
The visit had been carefully organized and followed a strictly logical program. The inspection of a disinfestation (i.e., delousing) chamber and of the personal articles confiscated during the course of Operation Reinhardt followed that of the construction depot and of the DAW (Deutsche Ausrüstungswerke, German Equipment Works), so that Pohl in any case inspected BW 28, the “Delousing and Personal Property Barracks” in the “Kanada I” depot. The visit to stage 2 of Operation Reinhardt, on the other hand, took place after that of the “Birkenau Camp,” which means that this facility was formerly part of this camp (like the “Birkenau Military Camp,” to which Pohl made a visit directly afterwards) or at least was located in its vicinity. As of the end of February 1943, 825 train cars with “old textiles,” which had been confiscated during the “resettlement of Jews”, had been sent to the Auschwitz camp and Lublin (Majdanek) within the framework of Operation Reinhardt.
This confiscation and recycling of personal property was exactly what Operation Reinhardt was all about, as can also be gathered from the following communication of SS Gruppenführer Fritz Katzmann:
In May 1944 there was still a “Reinhardt Special Unit” in Birkenau, where 287 female prisoners worked.
From Special Treatment in Auschwitz: Origin and Meaning of a Term by Carlo Mattogno, 2000, Part two, chapter two.
* * * The Auschwitz Crema 1 Hole Hoax by Eric Hunt
Figure 1 – “Reconstructed” Crematorium 1. The SS Hospital is located directly behind it.
As pointed out by many revisionists before, the four holes in the roof of the morgue of Crematorium 1 at Auschwitz 1 camp, do not “fit” the original configuration of the building. In fact, they are centered over the current post-war modified configuration of the room.
The Auschwitz Museum claims these were the locations of genuine holes, which were then filled in by the Germans when they chose to convert the crematorium to an air raid shelter for the nearby SS hospital.
Under Soviet occupation, the Auschwitz museum kindly “re-opened” the holes the Germans supposedly covered up. Revisionists deny these holes existed in the first place.
For decades, tour guides and historians insisted Crematorium 1 was in its original state. However, a modern sign acknowledges that Crematorium 1 existed in several stages throughout the war, and was modified after the war. This is thanks to Robert Faurisson who exposed the original plans of the structure.
Figure 2 – Sign acknowledges Crematorium 1 was modified post-war
On the above sign, which was only added in recent years, we can see some of the differences between the building in its original state, at the time of alleged gassings, and today.
Figure 3 The museum sign above admits “After the war, the Museum partially reconstructed the gas chamber and crematorium. The chimney and two incinerators were rebuilt, using original components, as were several of the openings in the gas chamber roof.”
A 3D representation of the important area of Crematorium 1 is useful to understand this hole hoax. For this basic 3D representation, The “roof” has been lowered so the interior walls can show through. The top half of the building is devoted to the oven room and smaller rooms and has not been represented in 3D.
This is part of Crematorium 1 at the time of alleged mass gassings. The alleged Zyklon B insertion holes are represented in the roof. The room designated as a morgue on original German plans is the alleged “gas chamber”. What was used as a morgue when the morgue was used as a gas chamber? Who knows…
As we can see, the placement of the holes looks rather odd and is not centered over the morgue, which is the long rectangular room the hole should be centered over.
The next image shows the location of an oddly placed hole, very close to the location of both an original wall dividing the morgue and wash room and the door to the oven room.
The beam coming from the left was once a wall. This wall was removed during Soviet occupation.
Crematorium 1 was converted into an air raid shelter for the SS hospital located across from it. We can see the many interior walls added, as well as an additional entrance/exit and air lock on the right. The doorway between the morgue/alleged gas chamber and the oven room was walled up.
The current configuration is revealing. The museum knocked down one wall too many – the one originally dividing the morgue and washing room. But all of a sudden those holes appear to “fit.” They’re centered over the large chamber tourists walk into.
According to Carlo Mattogno’s measurements, the holes in the upper left and lower right are 5.1 meters away from walls. However, this measurement is senseless as we’ve seen the hole in the upper left was located next to a dividing wall and its distance from the opposite wall of the washing room was irrelevant at the time.
In addition, the other two holes are 7.1 meters away from walls. One of the walls, a wall of an air lock created for the entrance for the air raid shelter, didn’t even exist at the time of alleged gassings! The other wall is the irrelevant opposite side wall of the washing room.
The placement of the holes in the roof of Auschwitz’s Crematorium 1 are centered over a building configuration which only existed after the war.
The Soviets found an air raid shelter for the SS Hospital, with an operating room and attached washing room with toilets and sinks. This served no use for propaganda.
They added a chimney on about the same spot it was located previously. They rebuilt ovens to put in the adjoining oven room.
They removed all but one of the interior walls dividing up the air raid shelter, removing one too many – the original dividing wall between the morgue and washing room which existed at the time of alleged gassings. The wash room’s toilets and a sink have been removed.
They left the air lock and second entrance, passing it off for decades as the “victim’s entrance”. Tourists would walk past the gallows allegedly used to hang Rudolf Hoess to enter this entrance, neither existed at the time of mass gassings.
These holes should never have been “re-opened” in the first place. This is tampering with the scene of a crime – mass murder!
But the placement of the four holes points to a crude mistake on the part of the hoaxers, who centered the supposedly “re-opened” holes not over the morgue, but the morgue + washing room + second entrance air lock which didn’t exist at the time of mass gassings. ~
Carlo Mattogno’s study on Auschwitz 1’s Crematorium 1 is available at holocausthandbooks.com
_________________________________________________________________________________________
I DENY NO HOLOCAUST
Many ignorant, brainwashed people have contemptuously called me a “Holocaust Denier”. The following is the response I give, to those who will listen: Excuse me, but I don’t “deny” ANY “Holocaust”… Do you?
I fully accept the account of the brave and famous Russian writer and historian, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who was often called “The Conscience of the 20th Century”; who served eight long years in the Soviet Gulag prison system, when he reports in the book he published in the year 2000 entitled “Together For Two Hundred Years” that, in the Soviet Holocaust, 66 million innocent Gentiles, mostly Christians (and it being a full ELEVEN TIMES the number of Jews claimed to have been killed by the Germans in WWII), were kidnapped, tortured, raped, and murdered in a wide variety of cruel, wanton, and horribly inhuman ways in the thousands of monstrously evil Gulag concentration camps at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevik “Ivan the Terrible” Cheka corps.
I freely acknowledge the fact that on February 13 & 14, 1945, in the quintessential Holocaust of the non-military city of Dresden, more than 700,000 phosphorus bombs were dropped on 1.2 million helpless people, which produced a firestorm that was called a “Single Column of Flame”, where the temperature in the center of the city reached 1600 degrees centigrade, and in which approximately 500,000 German women, children, elderly, wounded soldiers, random citizens, and even all of the animals in the city zoo were slaughtered by concussion and fire in a single night.
I absolutely recognize that more people died there in Dresden, in that one big flame, than the estimated total of 246,000 helpless people who died in two other quintessential Holocausts, the senseless, wantonly murderous, abominable, and unnecessary atomic attacks upon the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.
I openly avow the virtually forgotten Holocaust endured by the passengers and crew of the Wilhelm Gustloff, an unarmed German passenger liner which was torpedoed and sunk in the freezing waters of the Baltic Sea, 13 miles off the coast of Pomerania on January 30, 1945, as it carried, besides it’s men and crew, some 73 wounded soldiers, 373 members of the Womens’ Naval Auxilliary, and some 9,000 German civilian refugees – mostly women and children – who were all fleeing in terror from East Prussia in the advance of the Red Army, and where only a few hundred lived to tell the tale, making it the deadliest disaster in maritime history, killing nearly ten times the number who died on the Titanic.
And I fully admit that, as tallied and reported by the International Red Cross, a grand total of 271,304 people – not all of them Jews – died in all of the German concentration camps, combined, by the end of World War II – a Holocaust which was solely the result of typhus epidemics and starvation caused by the Zionist controlled, allied carpet bombings of supply routes and centers all over Germany that made it impossible to transport food and medical supplies to prisoners, soldiers, and civilians alike.
I certainly do not deny the Holocaust of the over 1,000,000 German post-war, non-combatants who were rounded up, detained without any food, water, shelter, or medical care, and purposely, and systematically killed through starvation and exposure in 1945-46 under the supervision of the allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, in the largest outdoor concentration camp this side of modern-day Palestine, or the concurrent Holocaust of the wholesale cold-blooded rape and murder of untold hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of women and children as the communist Red Army of the Soviets also took its “revenge” upon the defeated Germans.
I do not deny the Holocaust suffered by the good men and crew of the practically unarmed USS Liberty surveillance ship, which was deliberately attacked by air and sea, with machine gun, cannon, and torpedo fire by Israeli forces on June 8, 1967, killing 34 and wounding 174, in an attempted false flag operation which was intended to sink the ship, and murder all aboard, in order to draw the United States into the Middle East conflict on the side of Israel, and was only foiled by the ingenuity and resourcefulness of the crew in aiding the radio operator to successfully get off a call for help.
I also do not deny the Holocaust of the Jenin Refugee Camp, on April 13, 2002, where Israeli forces attacked the camp using bulldozers, tanks, and Apache helicopters, in a cruel, indiscriminate, blood-lust slaughter, which was said to be “Horrific beyond belief”, and which lasted for 13 days, flattening large areas of the town, and killing unknown hundreds of innocent men, women, and children, many of whom were buried alive; or the earlier, similar, Holocausts at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon in 1982, in which it is known that at least 800 Palestinians were killed.
Nor do I deny the wholesale slaughter and destruction perpetrated upon the sovereign nation of Iraq, in the Holocaust that was the illegal, and unjustified war of aggression that, from 2003 to the present, has resulted in the murder of over 1,000,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and children, and brought their country to ruin, as one of the first steps in Israel’s ongoing war of terror, which they have the unmitigated gall to present to the world as a war “ON” terror… for which the final tally of victims is yet to be seen.
What I do deny is the ridiculous and exaggerated claim that there is ANY evidence at all that ANY Jews at all – much less “six million” of them – died from ANY intentional gassings, or as a result of ANY kind of organized or systematic program of genocide perpetrated against Jews by Germany’s Nazi regime… and I challenge you to produce ANY evidence or “proof” that is not merely made up of either pre-war, wartime, or post-war anti-German propaganda… because none, from either then or now, actually exists.
So, if you want to talk about a “Holocaust”… and I mean a REAL, genuine, genocidal “Holocaust”, and not only the ones from the past, but one that is happening right NOW, in the present, all you need to do is to pull your brain-dead/brainwashed heads out of your collectively ignorant rear ends, and look into the current goings-on in Gaza, The West Bank, Syria, and the Middle East in general, where the racist, supremacist, Zionist, Talmudic Jews are feverishly working day and night to exterminate anyone, either Gentile or Jew, who stands in their way in their quest to build their racist, supremacist, “Kingdom of the World”… a.k.a., Eretz Israel.
And if any of you sanctimonious accusers deny any of these realities, and merely cling to the all too common view that the only “Holocaust” that really matters is one that is purported to have been suffered by the Jews, then for people like you to call anyone else a “Holocaust Denier” is one of the most laughable, and hypocritical examples of psychopathic projection I have yet seen anywhere… even as you continue to stupidly, and unashamedly, prove your ignorance and psychopathy with every ridiculous charge you make.
...ANON.
Holocaust
Remembrance: What's Behind the Campaign? ... Holocaust remembrance is not, as its supporters
claim, a noble effort motivated by sincere concern for humanity. Instead, this relentless campaign is an expression of
Jewish-Zionist power, and is designed to further Jewish-Zionist interests ... Jewish death and suffering do not deserve
to be venerated more than the death and suffering of non-Jews. The Holocaust remembrance campaign deserves scorn, not support,
because it is a one-sided effort that serves narrow Jewish and Israeli interests and bolsters Jewish-Zionist power.
  Is the Holocaust a Hoax?
Http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm A Factual Appraisal Of The 'Holocaust' By The Red Cross No Evidence Of Genocide There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World War Two and the conditions of Germany's concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948. This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works: Documents sur l'activité du CICR en faveur des civils détenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frédéric Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value. The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision. The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the second type as "Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, "Schutzhäftlinge"), who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces" (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons, it continues, "were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons." (P.74).The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and "from February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and prisons" (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programme which continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees. The Report states that "As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. >From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps" (Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. "Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany. The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews" (Vol. III, p. 83). In the course of the war, "The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout the world, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee of New York" (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation was permitted by the German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April 1945. This camp, "where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively privileged ghetto" (Vol. III, p. 75). According to the Report, "'The Committee's delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich. These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy, two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit" (Vol. I, p . 642). The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded "in sending anything whatsoever to Russia" (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their "liberation" by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.No Evidence Of Genocide One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: "In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945. In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp ..." (Vol. III, p. 83). Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against "the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies" (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. "Not only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged" (Vol. III, p. 594). Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the "aid given to the Jewish section of the free population," and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the "thoroughness" of the supposed "extermination programme", and with the claim in the forged Höss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing "every single Jew he could lay his hands on."In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann's assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that "A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market" (Vol. I, p. 646). Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. "The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries" (Vol. I, p. 645). As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. "Until March 1944," says the. Red Cross Report, "Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary" (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States "to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary," and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that "The Government of the United States ... now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave" (Vol. I, p . 649). Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that "Did Six Million Really Die?" quoted from the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas (this includes the above material), it did so accurately.A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross' International Tracing Service) under oath at the Zündel Trial (February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).The above is chapter nine from the book "Did Six Million Really Die?? __________________________________________ Sefton Delmer (Jew) was a foreign reporter for the English Beaverbrook Press, and in that capacity accompanied Hitler on many of his election tours. After Hitler came to power, Delmer was one of the most respected foreign journalists in Berlin. In 1940, Delmer was the official news announcer on the BBC and was in a position, without even consulting the British Foreign Minister, to turn down an offer of peace made by Hitler. Subsequently, he was the propaganda leader in the British Information Ministry and had a large staff. He carried out so-called “black propaganda” after the end of the war. He was sent to the British-occupied zone in order to co- ordinate the black propaganda with the French, Soviets and Americans. Delmer was the head of “black propaganda,” meaning forged documents. He managed not only groups of people working in this type of work, but also managed the relevant radio stations. He was a personal friend of the British Information Minister. In June, 1944, the Information Ministry sent out an official directive to all the higher-echelon civil servants and managers of the public media, instructing them that with the Red Army in Europe, they would have to expect incredible cruelty from which they could distract world attention only through a strengthened atrocity propaganda campaign against Germany. Sefton Delmer was the head functionary who carried out this work for the British government. His main method was to lie as exactly as possible so that the lies couldn’t be uncovered right away. After the end of the war in occupied Germany, Delmer co-ordinated the “black propaganda” campaign with the French, the Soviets and the Americans. These co- ordinated lies and inventions could not be recognized as such right away. Delmer’s work in occupied Germany lasted until 1947. During that period he and his staff forged a wealth of German documents which reached official files. He described this work to a large extent in his own book. Walendy testified that most of these forged documents had the Germans committing a large number of war crimes. Delmer provided the documents to the British Ministry of Information which in turn sent them to the Nuremberg trial as official documents. The International Military Tribunal, pursuant to the London Agreement, did not check whether the documents were true or false, but simply entered them as evidence of “generally-known facts.” Because they were considered authenticated official documents, they had now been introduced into history books. In this situation, Walendy testified, even officially published documents had to be analyzed to determine whether or not they were forgeries. Walendy did not believe the Nuremberg trials to be fair and impartial. All laws valid in Germany at that time were declared invalid and in their place were put the so-called Control Council laws. The Control Council laws as well as the London Agreement provided that war crimes could only have been committed by Germans or enemies of the Allies and that the military tribunals were not to be held to normal rules of evidence. This new law was codified in a political agreement between the major powers: the Soviet Union, the United States, France and England. The defence at Nuremberg did not have the possibilities of a normal defence in a regular legal dispute. The witnesses were usually prisoners themselves and were limited with regard to their freedom. The victor ruled in its own interest and ruled what were historical facts and what were not” “I gazed into the mirror… There, staring at me, was the pallid, flabby-mouthed face of a crook” ~ Sefton Delmer, Black Boomerang p. 218 Sefton Delmer was among the men “who were given the opportunity in 1945 of making changes in Germany” (Udo Walendy, Allied Atrocity Propaganda in WW I   Almost no one understands that the Holocaust Hoax is the indispensable Centerpiece of the New World Order. Without this lie, the Jews would have a very difficult time enslaving the population of the world through the coming One World Government. And here is why: 1) The Jews and their puppets have the ability to operate from behind the scenes (of the governments, of corporations, of foundations, etc.) and not be exposed in their secretive, destructive, criminal schemes, because, if anyone exposes them, they wail, “You are ANTI-SEMITIC!” And the exposer is branded for life! You are not allowed to expose any illegal or immoral schemes of the Jews because “they have already suffered so much"!
By playing the victim (of the “Holocaust”) and collecting billions in reparations from Germany, and billions in foreign aid from the U.S., they have been able to steal Palestine and slaughter the Palestinians, to build the Israeli state, from which they plan to take over the entire Middle East, and then the whole world.
And they also have one of the largest nuclear arsenals in the world, by infiltrating all the churches and reminding the Christians of “how much the Jews have suffered, particularly during the Holocaust,” they are now viewed as God’s “chosen people” and should never be criticized for ANYTHING, even if their actions are immoral and illegal, and because of the suffering of the Jews during the “Holocaust” they are setting themselves up to replace Jesus Christ and HIS sufferings on the cross to save the world from sin.
The “Holocaust” will become the new religion, with ‘churches’ (Holocaust museums) eventually built in every city, which the people approach with quietness, reverence and respect (far more than is found in any of today’s churches). The Jews have already stated that they will become their own Messiah.
This will bring about not only the One World Government for enslavement of the world’s population by the Jews, but it will become the basis for the coming One World Religion. Laws will be passed in every country, similar to the laws now on the books in Germany, Canada, Austria, Australia and several other countries, making it illegal to doubt the Jewish version of the “Holocaust.”
This crime will be punishable by a massive fine, and/or many years in prison. Eventually, the same penalties will be imposed for any type of “anti-Semitism” – the definition of which will be in the hands of the Jews. The only way the “suffering of the Jews during the Holocaust” can be described as “unique” is that–it didn’t happen! It’s all a LIE!
Click on this text to examine the Colchester collection of "holocaust" truth and facts books...
Jewish Propaganda Photo Fakery _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Was there Really a Holocaust?
The Holocaust has become the greatest instrument of sympathy which any nation has ever been able to use to gain support for wars, expansion and foreign-aid: This has made Israel the world’s sixth strongest military power. The gravest threat to all this wealth and influence is the growing doubt over the question of whether or not a real holocaust of 6 million Jews actually took place.
Numbers of Victims Don’t Add Up
The World Almanac for 1947 states that back in 1939 the world Jewish population was 15,688,259. The Almanac’s figures were supplied by the American Jewish Committee. Next the Jewish-owned New York Times of February 22, 1948 stated the world Jewish population for that year amounted “to 15,600,000 to 18,700,000 in addition to the 600,000 to 700,000 living in Palestine.” How could the Jewish population increase so rapidly over the war years if they had lost 6,000,000 people? (See Note 1).
Following the rise of Hitler there were no more than 4 million Jews at most living in areas occupied by the Third Reich at the height of its power. Yet on June 30, 1965, the West German government announced that some 3,375,000 Jewish holocaust “survivors” had applied for reparations money. The International Red Cross had already reported in 1946 that of registered Jewish camp inmates no more than 300,000 could have died, and their audit to December 31, 1984 records a total 282,077 registered deaths of all internees in all German Concentration Camps from all causes.
It is interesting to note that in the Jews’ real “bible”, The Talmud, it is claimed that 800,000 Jews were slaughtered by the Romans in Hadrian’s era. Yet there is no historical evidence to support this claim either. The Jewish-owned New York Times, in 1945 carried an article by the well known Jewish writer C.L. Sulzberger. It openly stated that Soviet Russia had supplied the figure of 4 million Jews having been put to death “in the gas chambers of Auschwitz.” Thus it was the Judaeo-Communists and the Jews who initially originated these figures which today are accepted as “gospel truth”. It is claimed that from 1934 to 1945 some 50,000 people died in the huge Bergen-Belsen camp. This count is considered exaggerated, still Time Magazine reports that of this figure 20,000 died of typhus during the single month of March, 1945! If nearly half died of this plague in just one month at the end of the war there is no way Bergen-Belsen could have been an “extermination camp”. (See Note 2).
Himmler – “Reduce Deaths at all Costs”
Heinrich Himmler, chief of the Concentration Camps issued orders on December 28, 1942, that “The death rate in the concentration camps must be reduced at all costs” (Reitlinger, “The Final Solution”). The camps had been hit with a deadly typhus epidemic that spread by fleas and body lice. Stomach pain, high fever, emaciation and death can quickly follow. All of the camps were factories and the loss of workers was hurting war production. Inspector of the camps, Richard Glucks responded to Himmler’s order on January 20, 1943, “Every means will be used to lower the death rates” (Nuremberg Tribunal Document No. 1523).
On April 10, 1943, Oswald Pohl, head of the Economic Administration Office of the camps issued a letter stating that persons with tuberculosis were being sent to the camps resulting in the “shockingly high mortality figures” (Nuremberg Documents). Later, on September 30, 1943, Pohl was able to show that the camp death rate had been reduced from 8.5% in July, 1942 to 2.8% in June 1943.
The German SS arrested Buchenwald Commandant, Karl Koch in 1943 for mistreating and even executing some prisoners. After an investigation Koch was found guilty by SS Judge Konrad Morgen and shot. Does this sound like a policy of “extermination?”
After the War, with suspicion rapidly rising about the holocaust claim, a committee of Jewish leaders from New York and Paris met with communist leaders in Warsaw. There they established the “Committee for the Investigation of War Crimes and War Criminals”. It was after this meeting that the announcement was made that all gas chambers were located in Poland.
The Problems of Mass Gassing
In 1945 it was announced that gas death chambers existed in all concentration camps in Poland, Germany, Austria and Alsace. Some 15 years later, in 1960, this was revised to the new claim that gas chambers existed only in camps located in Soviet held Poland. Simon Weisenthal of the Los Angeles Holocaust Center states in the paper, “Books and Bookmen”, April 1975, page 5, “No gassing took place in any camp on German soil.” The pressure had been growing since The Vatican, Red Cross, English Intelligence and German Intelligence chiefs Canaris and Oster (who collaborated with the British) either did not know or did not believe in rumors of gassings.
This brings up the following questions:
1). Germans are meticulous record keepers but there is not one order for the construction of any gas chamber, no blueprint, no photo of any gas chamber or gassed victims.
2). There have been thousands of investigations of alleged Nazi war criminals, hundreds of trials, yet not one person was ever accused of being involved with actual gassings! No reliable witness on either side has ever come forward who saw a single person gassed – AND THERE ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN OVER 10,000 MASS GASSINGS!
3). Photos of bodies at Dachau and Belsen camps are of prisoners who died of typhus and malnutrition. Many Germans also died from typhus.
4). The Vatican and Red Cross interviewed thousands of freed camp inmates at the end of the War about alleged gas chambers. The response was always the same, “The detainees themselves have not spoken of them” (Red Cross document No. 9925, June 1946).
Rudolf Hoess was the commandant of Auschwitz from 1940 to 1943. When captured by the Soviets they extracted a confession to mass gassings using Zyclon-B gas. Such “confessions” are about as reliable as any forced by Stalin from victims tortured before taking the stand to confess during the Moscow show trials of 1936. The communists wrote the “Confession’ and Hoess signed it. Later he was hanged. An assistant commandant refused to sign – he died in his cell. Hoess’ statement read, “half an hour after having released the gas, they opened the door and started the ventilation machines. They began immediately to extract the bodies while eating and smoking.”
Was Hoess trying to get a message across that there were no gassing? Zyklon-B is not “ventable”. The manufacturers state Zyklon-B adheres to surface clothing and skin. They say that only after a 24 hour period, wearing a gas mask with the strongest filter, could any bodies be removed without killing such workers.
If we believe the Hoess confession that the workers ran into the gas chamber “eating and smoking” – without gas masks – only minutes after the gassing – ALL WOULD HAVE DIED!
Gas Stories not Possible
The Jew Mosche Pearlmann in his book, “The Capture and Trial of Adolph Eichmann” states on pages 375 and 385 that Zyclon-B crystals were introduced from the ceilings of the gas chambers and “became immediately gaseous.” The American Cyanamid Co. of Linden N.J. states: “We know of no chemical process whereby HCN (Zyklon-B) may be made to become instantly gaseous upon exposure to air.” (See Note 3).
Claims of William Shirer
Shirer claims the gas was released from overhead through fake shower outlets, (page 970) and quickly killed its victims. The truth is that Zyklon-B gas is lighter than air and would rise to the ceiling so that anyone throwing themselves to the floor would be saved. Shirer also quotes the Soviet written confession signed by Hoess as stating (page 968), “We knew when the people were dead because their screaming stopped.” If anyone were actually killed with a cyanide type gas they would die instantly thus there would be no screaming at all. The truth is that Zyklon-B was used to delouse inmates’ clothing of lice and fleas which carry typhus.
The Problem of the Crematoriums
At the Auschwitz I camp there were only 6 crematory ovens. At the hospital in Auschwitz II there are 46 single cremators. In the Lubin camp there were only 6. THAT’S ALL! In these three camps 3 to 4 million Jews were supposed to have been exterminated and their bodies cremated. Furthermore, these cremation ovens were very small with only 18′ doors and required from 4 to 6 hours to burn each body using a large amount of coal. Cremation was used in the camps for those who passed away in order to prevent epidemics. No large supplies of coal were ever stored at the camps for cremations. A VERY INTERESTING NOTE appears only in the German edition of William L. Shirer’s book, “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.” It seems the Didler-Werke Company, which built the crematory ovens, sued Shirer who previously wrote that millions of people were gassed and then burned in this company’s ovens. In an out-of-court settlement of the suit Shirer agreed to add the following footnote on page 972 of the German edition: “The Didler-Werke have raised objection to the name of their firm appearing in the chapter concerning the extermination camps. Dr. S. Trastel, a professor of engineering in a statement of August 1961 established that the measurements are those which are standard for a crematory oven of not very modern design intended for small cemeteries and would be unsuitable for mass burning.”
WHY IS THIS DELETED FROM THE ENGLISH EDITION???
On the question of cremating 6,000,000 people – this would leave 15,000 tons of ashes! Such gigantic piles of ashes created over the short 2 1/2 year period the holocaust supposedly took place would have been very difficult to dispose of. No one has ever come forward to report seeing such huge piles of tons of ashes. It was not until 1960 that the Soviets opened the Auschwitz camp to tourists and independent investigators. No gas chamber could be found. The official answer was that it was “taken to another camp for gassings and then later went into oblivion!” (See Zimunism).
What Experts say about the Holocaust
Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes, eminent historian, author of 40 books, many of which are standard college texts, noted in Rampart Journal, 1967. “It has been demonstrated that there had been no systematic extermination in those camps.” Thies Christopherden, a German soldier and author wrote: “I was at Auschwitz! There was no gas chamber there.” Paul Rassiner, historian and anti-Nazi activist, who served a prison sentence in Buchenwald and the Dora camps stated in 1962. “The claim that a holocaust took place is an historic lie – the most tragic and most macabre imposture of all time.” Prof. Robert Faurisson, a specialist in Document Analysis at the University of Lyon. France, stated on April 25, 1979. “The holocaust lie, which is largely of Zionist origin, has made an enormous political and financial fraud possible, whose principal beneficiary is the state of Israel.”
Why the Holocaust Campaign
Hardly a week goes by when there are not stories in the press, on TV-News or movies about the alleged holocaust. What is the long range design for this constant attempt to fill Germans and indeed all Christians with a feeling of guilt over a holocaust which never occurred?
Bernard Postal wrote in the Jewish Week, July 14, 1979, “Not until after the holocaust, did anti-Semitism become taboo. There was a time when anti-Semitic speeches were an open factor in national campaigns. The holocaust put a taboo on overt anti-Semitism among upper-level statesmen and publicists.”
S.E.D. Brown of South Africa, a noted journalist writes, “The holocaust instills a guilt complex in those said to be guilty and spreads the demoralization, degeneration, and eventually the destruction of the natural racial elite among a people. This transfers effective political control to the lowest elements who will cowtow to the Jews.”
Zionist spokesmen often boast of: “The shattering effect of the holocaust on the Christian conscience resulting in a feeling of collective indebtedness to the Jews.”
Massive unending U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel in made possible because anyone who dares to oppose these outrageous giveaways is condemned as being “anti-Semitic” and “insensitive” to holocaust victims. The Jews hold an unnatural violent hatred for the German people. Jews seek to turn all other peoples of the world against the Germans and keep that nation divided for all time to come. That is why no peace treaty has been signed as yet with Germany and why they still live under Allied military occupation laws.
A Question of Fund-raising
The Wall Street Journal quotes a Jewish professional fund-raising consultant firm of Milton Goldin Co., as saying the main theme of Jewish fund-raising is the holocaust and has been for 38 years. When they don’t use the holocaust the money collection sharply drops off. Thus the more the Press, TV and Hollywood promotes the holocaust the more money the United Jewish Appeal and other Zionist funds can extract from gullible people (Note 4).
Holocaust Silences Opposition
Jewish leaders have discovered that by repeating holocaust stories over and over again they can instill a guilt complex within all Gentiles. This effectively silences most critics of Zionist political goals.
What about Real Holocausts?
Why doesn’t the Jewish-controlled press, TV and film industry give massive media attention to real
victims and to proven holocausts of Gentiles in recent history?
 Click on this text to see documentary: The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax... 
A Factual Appraisal
Of The 'Holocaust' By The Red Cross The Jews And The Concentration Camps: No Evidence Of Genocide 12-12-5
There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe
during World War Two and the conditions of Germany's concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and
objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the
Second World War, Geneva, 1948. This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral
source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works: Documents sur l'activité du CICR en
faveur des civils détenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter
Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frédéric
Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had
been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value. The ICRC successfully applied the
1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe
by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed
to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR, whose conditions were
known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision.
The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances
under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian
internees, the Report distinguishes the second type as "Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German,
"Schutzhäftlinge"), who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered
a danger to the State or the occupation forces" (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons, it continues, "were placed
on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons." (P.74).
The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision
by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained
important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in
Germany from August 1942, and "from February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and
prisons" (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief
programme which continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in
from Jewish internees. Red Cross Recipients Were Jews The
Report states that "As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. >From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about
1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps" (Vol. III, p.
80). In addition to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. "Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald,
Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme,
Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany.
The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews"
(Vol. III, p. 83). In the course of the war, "The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute
in the form of relief supplies over twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout
the world, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee of New York" (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter
organisation was permitted by the German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into
the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans
but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary
and Slovakia. The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions
which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April 1945. This camp, "where
there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively privileged ghetto" (Vol. III,
p. 75). According to the Report, "'The Committee's delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin)
which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information gathered by the Committee,
this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich ... These men wished to give the Jews the
means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy.
. . two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favourable impression gained
on the first visit" (Vol. I, p . 642). The ICRC also had praise
for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000
Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it
never succeeded "in sending anything whatsoever to Russia" (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied
to many of the German camps after their "liberation" by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of
mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward.
But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile.
However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald
and Oranienburg. No Evidence Of Genocide. One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report
is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war.
Says the Report: "In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war,
the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by
this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 ... In March 1945, discussions
between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could
henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp ..." (Vol. III,
p. 83). Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were
able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing
of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against "the
barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies" (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the
German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions
for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable. In dealing
with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red
Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the
Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like
many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned
extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked,
the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of
the day. So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors
from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus
epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) - Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions
were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this
allegation. "Not only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the
delegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged"
(Vol. III, p. 594). Not All Were Interned Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the "aid given to the Jewish section of the free population," and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the "thoroughness" of the supposed "extermination programme", and with the claim in the forged Höss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing "every single Jew he could lay his hands on." In
Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann's assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that "A large
proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked
upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia
seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took
place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews,
these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were
allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market" (Vol. I, p. 646).
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid
internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania
and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the
Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. "The Jews from Poland
who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the
German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to
Jews by the consulates of South American countries" (Vol. I, p. 645). As
future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration
of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. "Until
March 1944," says the. Red Cross Report, "Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free
to leave Hungary" (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its
attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of
Jews continued. The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain
and the United States "to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary," and from
the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that "The Government of the United States ... now specifically
repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances
are allowed to leave" (Vol. I, p . 649). Biedermann agreed that in
the nineteen instances that "Did Six Million Really Die?" quoted from the Report of the International Committee
of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas (this includes the above material),
it did so accurately. A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate
of the International Committee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross' International Tracing Service) under
oath at the Zündel Trial (February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988). The above is chapter nine from the
book "Did Six Million Really Die?" For the entire book "Did Six Million Really Die?",
click here. Comment From 'Interesting'
From the above account, it would appear that those in charge of the barbarous Allied civilian bombing
of Germany, thus attacking the civilian infrastructure (which is a war crime), are primarily responsible for the
murder of hundreds of thousands of gays, gypsies, political dissidents, Jews, etc. in the concentration camps of wartime
Germany due to disease and starvation. Comment
William Landsford By 1944, most of Germany was already at or near starvation, and disease among the
civilian population was a severe problem. Transportation and the food supply were in tatters from the unceasing bombing
of the US and UK on German civilian targets and infrastructure. Read some biographies of Germans who survived the
war. Many Germans died of disease...typhus was very common. One account of a young boy about age 12 at the time
described how he was so malnourished he became sickly and then infected with typhus. He was put in a hospital ward
with dozens of other typhus victims. Incredibly, he described how a cart with a gas bottle was wheeled into the
ward and zyklon gas was actually turned released in an effort to kill all lice, etc, while all the patients were in
their beds. A remarkable story of survival. It can be heard in the Rense Archives...the program date is August
1, 2005.
Click on this text to visit the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust... . . Click on this text to Become a Holocaust Denier in 14 Minutes (Youtube)....   . . . Click on this text to visit: VHO - The World's largest website for Historical Revisionism!... Tabu-Brechende Bücher und Dokumentarfilme "Aufklärung ist der Ausgang des Menschen aus seiner selbstverschuldeten Unmündigkeit. Unmündigkeit ist das Unvermögen, sich seines Verstandes ohne Leitung eines anderen zu bedienen. Selbstverschuldet ist diese Unmündigkeit, wenn die Ursache derselben nicht am Mangel des Verstandes sondern der Entschließung und des Mutes liegt, sich seiner ohne Leitung eines anderen zu bedienen. Sapere aude! [Wage zu wissen] Habe Mut, dich deines Verstandes zu bedienen! ist also der Wahlspruch der Aufklärung." Das ist der berühmte deutsche Philosoph Immanuel Kant im Jahre 1784. Bei dieser Webseite geht es um Aufklärung, um Mündigkeit und um Mut: Sie zielt darauf ab, all ihre Besucher über das einflussreichste Thema der modernen Geschichte aufzuklären: Den angeblichen vorsätzlichen Massenmord an sechs Million Juden durch Nazi-Germany hauptsächlich mittels Gaskammern während des Zweiten Weltkrieges. Sie setzt die Mündigkeit der Besucher voraus, das heißt, dass sie sich ihres Verstandes ohne die Leitung eines anderen bedienen können. Und schließlich setzt sie den Mut voraus, sich wohl-fundierten, rationalen aber zugleich auch wahrlich verblüffenden und, so würden manche sagen, frevlerischen Gedanken zu öffnen. Sind Sie bereit für Ihre eigene Aufklärungsdosis? Sehen, hören und lesen Sie und finden Sie es selbst heraus! Klicken Sie auf diesen Text um zu sehen:Holocaust Handbücher & Dokumentarfilme... __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ INTERNATIONAL
RED CROSS RECORDS RELEASED Sealed and guarded since the end of WWII at Arolsen, Germany, the Official IRC records reveal the actual Concentration Camp total death toll was 271,301
For years, people around the world – “the West” in particular – have been told that “six million Jews were systematically murdered by Germans in ‘Concentration Camps’ during World War 2.”
Thousands of honest people disputing this claim have been viciously smeared as a hateful anti-Semite. Several countries around the world have jailed and heavily fined people for disputing the claim that “6 Million” Jews were killed.
Provided here is a scanned image of an Official International Red Cross document, proving the so-called “Holocaust” [the long-and-often-claimed-6-million Jews] is just plain wrong. Jews around the world have intentionally exaggerated and perpetually lied for the purpose of gaining political, emotional and business advantages for themselves.
They committed willful, criminal FRAUD upon millions of trusting people around the world!
Please NOTE that the truth has been known since long before 1979!!! The above compiler, replying to a letter, had to rely on information that was already in existence!!!
Tax-payers of Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Latvia, Poland and other nations have had multiple Millions of dollars taken from their wages to be paid out to “holocaust survivors” and their descendants for something that DID NOT HAPPEN.
The tax-payers of these United States of America spend Billion$ each year in direct, indirect and military support of the State of Israel (which is not Biblical Israel).
This is intentional, criminal fraud on a scale so massive as to be almost incomprehensible.
Red Cross and East German government figures put the total deaths at every camp as 272.000, and 282,000 respectively which includes homosexuals, communists, gypsies, murderers, paedophiles etc. The 6 Million figure is a Kabbalist number, a magickal figure which featured in news papers in the early 1900’s
Where do the innocent Germans, Americans and others go to get a refund?
I call for criminal prosecution of individuals and groups who filed false lawsuits to obtain holocaust reparations and financial damage awards and perpetrating deliberate fraud upon Courts.
I call for the removal of Holocaust references in History books and educational materials.
I call for the removal of Holocaust Memorials worldwide.
It is long overdue that this intentional fraud be halted and those who perpetrated it be brought to justice for over 60 years of National Blood Libel against Germany and other nations through vicious lies and financial fraud.
Two of the most important surveys of the Jewish question in Europe during World War II are David Irvings examination of the Russian archives after the wall came down. Irving published his findings in his book, “Hitler’s War” and said not one word about gas chambers.
When question about this omission he said that there was no reference to gas chambers in the archives and therefore he did not discuss the question of gas chambers. Irving was arrested in several countries for hate speech for his scholarly omission.
The International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume “Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War” published in Geneva in 1948. This analysis expanded findings of two previous publications: “Sur L’activite’ du CICR en faveur des civils detencus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946) and “Inter Arma Caritas: The Work of the ICRF during the Second World War” (Geneva, 1947).
In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the German camps. They were not allowed to interview prisoners in the Russian camps which were far more harsh.
The German camps held both political prisoners (Schutzhaflinge) and those convicted of crimes. The Germans allowed the Red Cross to distribute food, medicine and clothing to the prisoners.
Grateful prisoners sent letters of thanks from Dachau, Buchenwalk, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Fibha, Ravensbruck, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen and others.
“The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83).
Regarding Theresienstadt, the Red Cross said, “”where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries, was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75).
“The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions … From information gathered by the Commmee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy … two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6, 1945.
They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p. 642).
The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation.
The aid then ceased and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians.
The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile.
However. food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.
NO MENTION OF GAS CHAMBERS
One of the most important aspects of the Report of the ICRC is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war.
Says the Report: “in the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims.
Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results.
Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp .I.”
(Vol. III, p.83).
The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Armet Caritns, p. 78). B
By October 2, 1944, the ICRC had warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.
In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatsoever of ‘gas chambers’.
The original 1946 edition did not even talk of ‘extermination’ or ‘death camps’ but after the emotional impact of the Nuremberg trials the Red Cross felt compelled to introduce into the expanded 1948 Report several, very cursory references to ‘death camps’ (Vol. 1 p. 641) and ‘extermination camps’ (Vol. I p. 645).
In all its 1,600 pages the three-volume Report does not even mention such a thing as a
NOT ALL WERE INTERNED
This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Hoess memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing every single Jew he could lay his hands on,” In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large proportian of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland.
Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation.
“The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognise the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. 1, p. 645).
As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. 1, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.
The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary, ” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States… now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. 1, p. 649).
…………
***
The Source of the six million figure is a Talmudic (Jewish Talmud) reference to a future holocaust in which six million Jews die.
The reason why they are claiming six million deaths in Nazi camps, even though that number vastly exceeds the number of Jews in Europe at the time, is because this reference in their scripture is something they fear deeply and wish to prevent at all costs.
The Ashkenazi Jews, which I have experience with honestly believe that prophecy is real, but can be manipulated.
They believe that prophets see into the future, and see what was believed and said, and then write that down as much as they reveal the word of GOD.
SO there is a group of Ashkenazi Jews who wish to make the six million figure HISTORY to prevent it from ever happening in the FUTURE by repeating this number over and over and over into the social concience, in the hope that prophets of old will also latch onto this, and report it as a factual event in the future, which would now be history.
In other words, they believe they can lie themselves a new future. I don’t think so – I think their hardest days are ahead and one thing is certain, the genie is out of the bottle and through the word, the real truth of Fukushima may be like silly putty slowly sinking into the carpet, eventually it will be TOTALLY sunk in the carpet and nothing will get it out.
THIS could cause the six million Jewish deaths the prophecy speaks of, and No, I do not believe they can lie their way out of it.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Deniers of the Holocaust, the systematic murder of around 6 million Jews in World War II, either deny that such a genocide took place or minimize its extent. These groups (and individuals) often cloak themselves in the sober language of serious scholarship, call themselves “historical revisionists” instead of deniers, and accuse their critics of trying to squelch open-minded inquiries into historical truth.
Firstly, the statement reiterates the highly problematic six million figure as fact. As I wrote in “The Shoah Must Go On: The Holocaust Story vs. Christian & Other Genocides”:
The six million number was associated with Jews in various situations prior to the claim that 6 million were killed during World War II. For example, The New York Times ran a piece on October 31, 1869 stating that, according to The Hebrew National, there were 6,000,000 Jews in the world, half of whom lived in Europe. Between 1900-45 there were (at least) 200 allegations of six million jews being in peril, persecuted and/or eliminated.
The six million number persisting as fact, despite the total Auschwitz numbers — which includes both Jews (the vast majority) and non-Jews (the minority) — having been reduced over the years from four million to 1.1 million.
Secondly, unsuspecting members of the Matrix will likely read the SPLC definition while nodding their sheeple heads in agreement, yet it’s a thoroughly disparaging and downright defamatory description, designed to cast doubt on the integrity and credibility of anyone who has either done first-hand research into the subject or who has taken the time to dig into the many books, articles, films, etc., that are the result of the work of such researchers.
In response to Monika’s arrest, (((B’nai Brith Canada)))’s CEO Michael Moyston is quoted as saying:
German officials should be commended for taking action against Holocaust denial. Antisemitism has no place in Canadian politics or Canadian universities, and we will continue to work, even across borders, to ensure that racism and bigotry find no haven in Canada.
Ah, now we’re getting somewhere: “holocaust denial” equals “anti-Semitism”, two highly weaponised terms that serve to place barriers in the brain which the vast majority of folk are unable or unwilling to break through. Also, note the trend towards removing the hyphen and making lowercase the letter ‘s’, thus creating a new word that’s two steps removed from the literal definition of anti-Semitism: being opposed to or against Semitic peoples.
“Anti-Semitism” is a nonsensical slur and a great example of Orwellian doublespeak, taking something with meaning (Semitic) and turning it on its head (the vast majority of so-called Jews are not Semitic). The term “holocaust denier” is first and foremost a fabricated label to disparage the “deniers” and deter others from crossing the uncrossable line. Just as the CIA-created, weaponised term “conspiracy theorist” was devised to keep the masses firmly in their programmed box in the immediate aftermath of the JFK assassination, the term “holocaust denier” is designed to do likewise in regard to “THE Holocaust”.
Indeed, the (((Wikipedia))) entry on “holocaust denial” quotes psychiatrist and one-time director of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, (((Walter Reich))), as directly attributing “holocaust denial” to so-called “anti-Semitism”:
The primary motivation for most deniers is anti-Semitism, and for them the Holocaust is an infuriatingly inconvenient fact of history. After all, the Holocaust has generally been recognized as one of the most terrible crimes that ever took place, and surely the very emblem of evil in the modern age. If that crime was a direct result of anti-Semitism taken to its logical end, then anti-Semitism itself, even when expressed in private conversation, is inevitably discredited among most people. What better way to rehabilitate anti-Semitism, make anti-Semitic arguments seem once again respectable in civilized discourse and even make it acceptable for governments to pursue anti-Semitic policies than by convincing the world that the great crime for which anti-Semitism was blamed simply never happened—indeed, that it was nothing more than a frame-up invented by the Jews, and propagated by them through their control of the media? What better way, in short, to make the world safe again for anti-Semitism than by denying the Holocaust?
The (((official))) bottom line, therefore, is that a “holocaust denier” is anyone who harnesses their inherent “anti-Semitism” to attack, without reason, the official holocaust narrative. Which is, of course, preposterous.
The reality is quite different. It’s a story of real men and women who’ve had the courage to look into that which is verboten — to ask legitimate questions, conduct extensive research and/or delve into the resulting research and, thereby, be in possession of highly inconvenient facts that stand in contrast to the official story.
The holocaust in context: atrocity propaganda, Dachau and Nuremberg Trials
Speaking of the official story, it’s crucial to be aware of the context in which it was formed — a combination of factors which included post-war atrocity propaganda and key “confessions” having been extracted by coercion and/or torture during both the Dachau and Nuremberg Trials.
Regarding atrocity propaganda, the British Ministry of Information sent the below letter to the higher British clergy and the BBC in February 1944. The letter was published in the 1958 book, Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland by Edward J. Rozek (bold emphasis mine).
Sir, I am directed by the Ministry to send you the following circular letter:
It is often the duty of the good citizens and of the pious Christians to turn a blind eye on the peculiarities of those associated with us.
But the time comes when such peculiarities, while still denied in public, must be taken into account when action by us is called for.
We know the methods of rule employed by the Bolshevik dictator in Russia itself from, for example, the writing and speeches of the Prime Minister himself during the last twenty years. We know how the Red Army behaved in Poland in 1920 and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia and Bessarabia only recently.
We must, therefore, take into account how the Red Army will certainly behave when it overruns Central Europe. Unless precautions are taken, the obviously inevitable horrors which will result will throw an undue strain on public opinion in this country.
We cannot reform the Bolsheviks but we can do our best to save them — and ourselves — from the consequences of their acts. The disclosures of the past quarter of a century will render mere denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject.
Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of the “Corpse Factory,” and the “Mutilated Belgian Babies,” and the “Crucified Canadians.”
Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the Ministry.
Your expression of belief in such may convince others.
I am, Sir, Your obedient servant,
(signed) H. HEWET, ASSISTANT SECRETARY
The Ministry can enter into no correspondence of any kind with regard to this communication which should only be disclosed to responsible persons.
As for the Nuremberg and Dachau “confessions”, these were foundational for the lasting success of the atrocity propaganda since they corroborated the official narrative. The Chief United States Prosecutor Robert H. Jackson stated that: “The Nuremberg Tribunal, as a military tribunal, is a continuation of the war effort of the Allied nations.” (Nuremberg Protocols, Vol. 19, p. 440)
The typical “holocaust denier”?
While so-called “holocaust deniers” come from varying backgrounds with different areas of expertise, there are common threads of sensitivity, courage, intelligence, integrity and a thirst for truth — qualities that enabled prior adherents to the holocaust story to approach the subject with an open mind and let the results of their enquiries stand for themselves. In the case of more prominent “holocaust deniers” another significant common thread is that of being subjected to defamation and persecution. In the words of Karl Schlögel (writing in defense of Gabor Tamas Rittersporn, who was accused of having lent his support to Robert Faurisson in 1980):
“Holocaust denier,” “revisionist,” “negationist”: everyone knows what such an accusation means. It effectively means exclusion from civilized humanity. Anyone who is suspected of this is finished. His public life is destroyed, his academic reputation ruined.
The qualities of courage, integrity and a thirst for truth cannot be overstated. Such qualities drive a person to follow truth wherever it leads, however much it flies in the face of everything that was once understood as fact. As Jesus says in Luke 6:43-44: “For a good tree bringeth not forth corrupt fruit; neither doth a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. For every tree is known by his own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes.” Thus, the honest mind earnestly in search of truth will deal honestly with the results of any investigation.
How “holocaust denial” is leading the one world order charge
More fundamental than disparaging and discrediting individuals, the “holocaust denial” label and associated laws are a brutal whack-a-mole style bludgeoning device designed to keep all future inquisitive moles firmly in their hole from fear of sudden death, as well as being a template for quashing dissent in any area deemed to be unacceptable to the prevailing powers-that-be that comprise the Jew World Order.
This tyrannical tool of oppression has been well used throughout history, especially against those living under the communist jackboot in the Soviet Union and China. Anyone coming close to crossing the party line, whether in thought or deed, was swiftly disposed of, resulting in up to 166 to 186 million deaths by torture, murder or deliberate starvation.
Thus, “holocaust denial” laws are at the forefront of the coming one world government, a system which will be headed up by the Antichrist as he rules from the third temple in the Jerusalem, declaring “peace and safety” while uniting all peoples of the world under a one world religion, as well as initiating and enforcing a one world currency.
But before we even get to that point of absolute tyranny, it’s clear that more and more bludgeoning devices will be wielded against those of us who refuse to blindly follow the dictates of our respective (wholly unlawful) governments.
Relatively few people are both aware of and care about every type of transgression being perpetrated against us. Thus, only those who understand the holocaust is not as reported will care to stand for those who have been bludgeoned by denial laws. Likewise, those who have a stake in one of the many other areas being subjected to societal disdain and, increasingly, tyrannical laws, are the only ones standing for others’ inherent right to think, speak and act in accordance with their understanding of that particular area.
This is hugely significant in clearing the way for the coming one world government. People are divided in their resistance — some are focused on the tyranny of compliance and others on the tyranny of “hate” crime, thought crime or some kind of “denial” crime.
The former includes but is not limited to: the push for mandatory vaccinations; compulsory education (homeschooling is illegal in approximately 30 countries); gun control (already achieved in many countries); forced medical “treatment” for children; and psychiatric “sectioning” (being committed against one’s will).
The latter includes but is not limited to: “holocaust denial”; 9/11 and 7/7 “conspiracy theories”; “climate change denial“; and “gender” theory denial; as well as standing firm to one’s beliefs about marriage by declining to bake a cake, host or photograph a “wedding” for a same-sex couple. And so on.
These transgressions against our inalienable right of autonomy are just the beginning. Which is why it’s important to see the larger picture — to understand that even when governmental or societal tyranny doesn’t directly affect us now, there will come a day when something we do or don’t do, something we say or don’t say, something we think or don’t think will be held against us — at which point we’ll be the one facing defamation, ostracisation, a fine, death threats, violent attacks on our person, our family and/or our home (essentially state-sanctioned terrorism and thuggery), a prison sentence, or even a death sentence.
Profiles of “holocaust deniers”
Here are brief summaries of a handful of “holocaust deniers”, all of whom are neither haters nor bigots but are (or were) extraordinarily courageous, principled, intelligent and articulate human beings who have taken a stand for truth in the face of overwhelming lies and deceit.
Ernst Zündel
A native German who emigrated to Canada when he was 19 years old, Ernst Zündel, a graphic artist by trade, was charged for “publishing false news” under his publishing house, Samisdat — specifically, the 1974 booklet by Richard Harwood, Did Six Million Really Die? The Truth At Last?.
Zündel was subsequently subjected to two lengthy trials (1985 and 1988). He was found guilty in 1985 but the appeals court ruled that the judge had given improper advice to the jury and excluded evidence for the defense. He was also found guilty in 1988, but his conviction was overturned by the Canadian Supreme Court on the grounds that the archaic “false news” law was a violation of Canada’s Charter of Rights.
After this, Zündel was brought before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on charges of promoting “hate” through his website “The Zundelsite” (now only available in archived form). Since the site was based in the United States the ruling that its content was unlawful was not enforceable in Canada.
Like Robert Faurisson, Zündel was subjected to violent attacks. In 1995, his house was attacked by arsonists calling themselves the “Jewish Armed Resistance Movement”, a group with affiliations to the Jewish Defence League (JDL), an FBI-listed terrorist organisation. A few days after the arson attack, Meir Weinstein (Toronto JDL leader) and Irv Rubin (American JDL leader) tried to break into his house; and a few weeks later a parcel bomb was sent to his Toronto home.
Constitutions are important! They
are not promises made to be broken! Ernst Zündel, 2004 Subsequently, Zündel moved to the United States to live with his new wife, Ingrid Rimland, who created and lovingly maintained Zündelsite. He was then arrested in 2003 on spurious grounds of not complying with immigration laws, extraordinarily renditioned to Canada where he spent two years in solitary confinement without charge, before then being deported to Germany where he was imprisoned, tried and convicted of “holocaust denial”, specifically “popular incitement”.
After his release in 2010, he remained in Germany as he was banned from entering either Canada or the United States, and as a result was never able to live with his wife again. Ernst Zündel died on August 5, 2017. Ingrid died shortly after Ernst, on October 12, 2017.
More on Ernst Zündel
The Zündel Trials (1985 and 1988) Robert Faurisson, The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1988-89 (Vol. 8, No. 4), pages 417-431 My Role in the Zündel Trial Mark Weber, The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1989-90 (Vol. 9, No. 4), pages 389-425 Off Your Knees, Germany! Zündel’s story from 1983 to 2003 (YouTube) Ernst Zündel interviewed by an Israeli journalist Toronto, 1996 (YouTube) Ernst Zündel Paintings and Drawings November 2013 (YouTube) [art created in six prisons, in three countries, on two continents] Ernst Zundel Prisoner of Conscience Victim of Thought Crime (extensive compilation of links to articles about Zündel) Robert Faurisson
A man of exactitude, Robert Faurisson of Vichy, France, employed painstaking methods of investigation into the alleged gas chambers. After publicising his findings, he’s been subjected to numerous trials and has been fined various times over the years.
In 1979, a statement was issued by 34 leading French historians in response to Robert Faurisson’s technical counter-evidence against the existence of gas chambers, which concluded as follows:
It is not necessary to ask how technically such a mass murder was possible. It was technically possible, seeing that it took place. That is the required point of departure of every historical inquiry on this subject. This truth it behooves us to remember in simple terms there is not and there cannot be a debate about the existence of the gas chambers. Le Monde, February 21, 1979
Following Faurisson’s 1983 appeal against the verdict of his 1981 trial, the court made an astounding statement:
[…] the existence of the gas chambers, such as usually described since 1945, conflict with an absolute impossibility, which suffices by itself to invalidate all the existing testimonies or, at the least, to stamp them with suspicion.
Due to the results of his work, Faurisson and his wife have been threatened by court officials, his bank account has been frozen, he’s been physically assaulted by Jewish thugs no less than ten times (between November 1978 and May 1993), the worst of which, perpetrated by the so-called “The Sons of the Memory of the Jews” in September 1989, was nearly fatal.
Faurisson had a significant role to play in the Zündel trials of 1985 and 1988, not only providing testimony on the stand in both trials but also preparing many of the technical questions for Doug Christie, Zündel’s lawyer, during the 1985 trial, as well as securing Fred Leuchter as a gas chamber expert for the 1988 trial.
More on Robert FaurissonThe Man, the Scientist, and his Method of ‘Exactitude’ Fredrick Töben, CODOH, 2004 Impact and Future of Holocaust Revisionism Robert Faurisson, Institute for Historical Review The ‘False News’ Trial of Ernst Zündel, 1988 Witness for the Defense: Robert Faurisson Witnesses to the Gas Chambers of Auschwitz Robert Faurisson, CODOH, 1993 Response to a Paper Historian Robert Faurisson, The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1986 (Vol. 7, No. 1), pages 21-72 Robert Faurisson — A Most Honorable Man Anthony Lawson, March 2014 (YouTube) Gilad Atzmon interview with Robert Faurisson June 2014 (YouTube) Jim Rizoli interviews Robert Faurisson October 2015 (YouTube) Sylvia Stolz
A German lawyer, Sylvia Stolz is a woman who has shown great courage in the face of a tyrannical legal system. For a short time, she was part of Ernst Zündel’s defence team during his 2005-2007 trial in Germany, before being barred from speaking and/or presenting evidence, and subsequently being criminally charged with contempt of court as well as inciting contempt. Stolz was charged and tried under the same section of the German Criminal Code as Ernst Zündel and received a three-and-a-half-year sentence, of which she served three years and three months. Stolz was also barred from practising law.
During the trial, Stolz witnessed the judge saying that evidence is irrelevant when it’s illegal to deny the holocaust. The Berlin newspaper, Die Tageszeitung, reported the statement by Judge Ulrich Meinerzhagen as follows:
Towards the end and much to the shocking surprise of the anti-fascist groupings present the court dismissed all the petitions for evidence for the short and simple reason that it was completely irrelevant whether the holocaust really did happen or not. It is illegal to deny it in Germany and that is all that counts in court. (TAZ, 9 Feb 2007)
In 2012, Stolz gave a presentation at the Anti-Zensur-Koalition Conference in Switzerland and, as a result, is once more facing criminal charges. It was while attending a session at Stolz’s trial in January 2018 that Monika Schaefer was arrested.
More on Sylvia StolzTalk at the 8th Anti-Zensur-Koalition Conference Chur, Switzerland, November 2012 (YouTube) Sylvia Stolz’s response to criticism of her AZK talk January 2013 (YouTube) Sylvia Stolz Sent to Prison for Criticizing German Law Roberto Hernández, CODOH, September 2015 Sylvia Stolz Bio, Anti-Zionist League Sylvia Stolz, The German Joan of Arc Carolyn Yaeger, 27 September 2011 Germar Rudolf
A German chemist, Germar Rudolf is a man of precision and rationale. While attending Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research (1990-1993), Rudolf researched and wrote a report on the chemical and technical questions of the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz. First published as The Rudolf Report, the revised and expanded version is now available as The Chemistry of Auschwitz—The Technology and Toxicology of Zyklon B and the Gas Chambers – A Crime-Scene Investigation.
In Germar’s own words, this is why he has dedicated his life to bringing forth holocaust truth:
Here then are the reasons I have dedicated myself to revisionism:
Because of my upbringing, I felt bad merely for doubting. I knew something was wrong with a society when it instills guilt-feelings in its members simply because they dissent. The Holocaust is the one area, and almost the only area, where one is admonished to accept facts blindly; not to think critically. But we are taught to question practically everything else, even that which is kept in high regard, such as the reality of God, or sexual intimacy. We are primed to be docile subjects and kept fearful of any transgressions with respect to the Holocaust. That angered me then and it angers me still.
Because of my doubts, my entire outlook on life became unstable. I was no longer certain what was correct or incorrect, who lied and who told the truth. The eternal conflict of good and evil was revived in me. The question where the truth could be found concerning the Holocaust was so important, that I knew I could only recover my peace of mind by finding out for myself, personally, where the truth lay. I wanted to rid myself of uncertainty one way or the other.
There is no scientific area in which those who hold dissident opinions are persecuted more mercilessly by the “ruling order” than that of revisionism. That is probably why most people don’t want to touch it, and most avoid it by convincing themselves that the subject is not relevant to current problems. But for me, this draconian persecution is the best proof there is that this is a crucial subject, because the powers that be regard it as most important that nobody touches this taboo. Comprehensive and critical research in this area is therefore very important for scientific, political and social reasons.
The treatment of revisionism and its proponents in areas of science, journalism, politics and law is a scandal worldwide — it demands redress.
Rudolf has had his home raided and his computer and papers seized. He has also lost three jobs and been ousted from his apartment on two occasions. He was subsequently tried for “holocaust denial” in 1994-1995 and found guilty of “stirring up the masses”, “inciting to hatred”, “libel” and “disparaging the remembrance of the dead”, which incurred a 14-month prison sentence.
In order to avoid incarceration, Rudolf fled first to England and then to the United States, however, he was arrested in 2005 and deported to Germany where he was imprisoned and subjected to further charges. In 2007, he received an additional two-and-a-half-year sentence.
While in England, Rudolf launched Castle Hill Publishers, now the foremost publisher of books on the subject of the holocaust.
More on Germar Rudolf
What Made Me a Revisionist? Germar Rudolf
Resistance Is Obligatory Germar Rudolf, Summary of his 2012 book with the same title. The book’s subtitle is: Address to the Mannheim District Court 15 November 2006 to 29 January 2007
Jim Rizoli interviews Germar Rudolf November 2015 (YouTube)
Germar Rudolf — Persecution of Revisionists & Demographic Disaster (Part 1) Red Ice Interview, August 2016 (YouTube)
Germar Rudolf — Persecution of Revisionists & Demographic Disaster (Part 2) Red Ice Interview, August 2016 (YouTube)
A few more “holocaust deniers”
Related posts on “the holocaust”The Shoah Must Go On: The Holocaust Story vs. Christian & Other Genocides Humanity, Rejoice! Sylvia Stolz Rings the Holocaust Myth’s Death Knell Lionesses of Truth: Ursula Haverbeck, Sylvia Stolz & Monika Schaefer Monika Schaefer Arrested & Indefinitely Detained in Germany Amazon’s Virtual Burnt Offering to the Jew World Order: Truth-Telling Books Banned Jewish Holocaust resources page (videos, pdf documents and links) Jews and Judaism resources page (videos, pdf documents and links) . . .   The
Holocaust is the modern religion. Those of us who question it are witches and heretics, easily able to be hunted down and
burned at the stake. None are bothered by this gross breach of our rights, after all, because religious law supersedes natural
and national laws. When it comes to our faith in the dead & holy Jews, everything else takes a backseat. As a result of this way of thinking, by extension,
we must utterly worship Israel. Israel is the embodiment of our atonement,
the guilt-construct that constantly forgives us for our transgressions. Through our ritual confessions by way of foreign
aid to Israel, we expunge our sins and once again find ourselves in good favor with God's Chosen. The ways
of God are mysterious and unknown. Why Israel should be allowed to massacre other peoples scot-free is one of the divine
mysteries. God's Chosen are immune to criticism, to censure, or any other form of critique--after all, to question the ways
of God is sheer blasphemy, that most cardinal of sins, antisemitism. Facts, after all, do not matter. We often hear of Hitler talking about "The Big Lie," and the quote is
distorted into sounding like he is talking about a lie he himself is propagating. On the contrary, The Big Lie refers to
the machinations of the Lügenpresse (lying media) to distort reality before the public. This quote is so distorted
because the Lügenpresse Hitler refers to is still very much present amongst us today. Nor does it matter that many Holocaust survivors are proven liars, admitted to writing
works of fiction (Schindler's List, by the way, is based on a work of fiction), receive money and pensions for being considered
a Holocaust survivor, and suffer from mass illusions they have been endlessly told they experienced by the media. None of
this matters. Because the Holocaust is not about
facts. It is not about what actually happened. As we have seen: nobody actually cares, and when pressed by the issue they
launch into a vicious emotional outrage that someone would dare question their religion. It just astounds me that in this age of science and reason, so many people are still
tethered by primitive superstition. Once anyone fully realizes that Jewish
Zionists control every important aspect of what is known as "America"...particularly all of the important media
and government... then you'll fully realize that most of history is a lie and completely turned around and flipped upside-down...
The
good news is that 9/11 makes exposing the Jewish-Zionist Cabal and the lies of history much easier, ...and we can thank
the Cabal for that... the God Damned arrogant fools shot themselves in their own Achilles Heel.... Holocaust Lies Debunked Once and for All ... https://youtu.be/1slx74zKQMc     The Transfer Agreement... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMbZ8alUWos&feature=youtu.be 
TRANSFER AGREEMENT The Madagascar Plan was a proposal of the NSDAP government of Germany to relocate the German-Jewish population of Europe to the island of Madagascar. Franz Rademacher, head of the Jewish Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the NSDAP government, proposed the idea in June 1940, shortly before France's defeat in the fall of France. The proposal called for the handing over of Madagascar, then a French colony, to Germany as part of the French surrender terms.
The idea of deporting Polish Jews to Madagascar was investigated by the Polish government in 1937, but the task force sent to evaluate the island's potential determined that only 5,000 to 7,000 families could be accommodated, or even as few as 500 families by some estimates. As efforts by the Nazis to encourage emigration of the Jewish population of Germany were only partially successful, the idea of deporting Jews to Madagascar was revived by the NSAP government in 1940. Rademacher recommended on 3 June 1940 that Madagascar should be made available as a destination for the Jews of Europe. With Hitler's approval, Adolf Eichmann released a memorandum on August 15th 1940 calling for the resettlement of a million Jews per year for four years, with the island governed as a police state under the SS. The plan was postponed after the Germans failed to defeat the British in the Battle of Britain later in 1940 and was permanently shelved in 1942 as the fortunes of war turned against Germany.
.
Click on this text for the HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE . .
Click on this text to see Spielberg's Hoax - The Last Days of The Big Lie... The Last Days of the Big Lie is a documentary which debunks the disgusting liars glorified
as heroes and victims in the Steven Spielberg produced, Academy Award winning "Holocaust" documentary The Last
Days. The Last Days of the Big Lie uses Spielberg's Oscar winning hoax as a jumping off point to debunk Spielberg's USC Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundation as well as the greater Holocaust Hoax. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
. .
THE FOLLOWING
LETTER WRITTEN TO STEVEN SPIELBERG FROM DR. ROGER DOMMERGUER WHO IS ALSO JEWISH CONCERNING THE FAKE HOLOCAUST OF JEWS IN
WW 2... I feel it my duty as a Jew and after 20 years study of the historical problem of the holocaust, to call your attention to the facts. Facts are very stubborn and as no one can gainsay them, our congeners have been compelled to make disgusting politicians enact stalino-orwellian laws which forbid to mention anything concerning the dogma of the’six-million-gas-chambers,’ definitively reduced to perpetual worship of this alchemy. In case of no respect of silence and worship of the myth, you suffer the penalty of fines or prison or both. Professor Faurisson who has been studying the subject for 20 years, has been practically massacred. This is utterly ridiculous but give the Police and the Justice of all countries to Mr Lévy, he will not be ridiculous any more: here is the XXth century! These laws are, accordingly, the absolute proof of the fake before we study its arithmetical and technical ineptitude. No Sir, you will not find ONE witness who saw 6 millions Jews slaughtered. You will not find ONE witness of Zyclon- B- gas chambers to exterminate 1000 or 2000 people at a time, close to the crematoria. See my ‘Shoa Sherlockholmised’ herewith: it is the summary of 20 years study on the subject. The ‘6-million-gas-chambers myth ‘is an arithmetic and technical nonsense. As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoa business, 50 years after the war, is disgusting, debasing, : it is a disgraceful shame . No people in History has ever been wailing about its losses 50 years after a war, even its true and real losses. Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would be a dishonour to make such din and pump up so much money everywhere: who were the usurers of the Weimar Republic? You know it as well as I do. It is all the more so as we know that 6.000.000 is gross exaggeration and that the zyclon B gas chambers are a technical impossibility. ( See Degesh Trial in 1949). In fact 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in the German camps of typhus or starvation. Many others died but as fighters against Germany to which we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933! ( Hitler was allergic to the hegemony of gold and of the dollar: so he could give work to six million unemployed, before the functioning of German armament factories!). Do you know the book published at this period and written by our congener Kaufmann: ‘GERMANY MUST PERISH?’ We know that 80,000,000 Goyim were slaughtered in the USSR, in a political regime which was entirely Jewish, from Marx and Warburg, to Kaganovitch, Frenkel, Yagoda, the executioners. We know that after 1945 Americans and Russians killed and raped German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to Albania. We know that 1,500,000 German war prisoners were starved to death after the war (a famous book was published a few years ago, but is ignored to day). You will find here included in French the text of a rabbi: ‘ A rabbi pleads guilty’: unfortunately I possess neither the German original nor an English translation. You should have it translated. The Rabbi condemns the Jewish behaviour in Germany 50 years before Nazism and vindicates the emergence of Hitler. As for the harm we have done to Humanity is absolutely not redeemed by your excellent films or the virtuosity of Yehudi Menuhin, or the neutron bomb of S.T. Cohen, I wrote a book about it from texts written by important Jews which are much above the most anti-Semitic text written by Goyim. Simone Weil drew a tragic summary: ‘The Jews, this handful of uprooted people, have been the cause of the uprooting of the whole mankind’. And George Steiner: ‘For 5000 years we have been talking too much: words of death for us and for the others.’ We know that all the German towns of more than 100,000 people have been destroyed during the last war, with women and children : silence about this real holocaust. If we consider the turn taken by the Shoa business, what you intend to do in Germany is actually the safest way to a heaping up of a huge amount of anti-jewism the explosion of which will be unique in History. Discretion and moderation must be our behaviour : all the rest is suicide. Neither ‘mondialism’ nor orwellian laws for ‘crime of thought’ can prevent antisemitism to explode: only OUR behaviour can. What you do and all the whining and money pumping can only egg it on. It will increase out of reasonable proportions, if there can be a reasonable proportion to antisemitism. I know that it is practically impossible to check our propensity to speculation and that only the abolition of circumcision at the 8th day could ( our particularism derives from the disturbance of the 21 days of the 1st puberty, which starts precisely at the 8th day ) but we must, at least, try to avoid such blunders as the one you intend to perform in Germany and which would be appalling. I am a great admirer of your films (except the Shindler list: ask his wife and the historical real reality, but this is a minor blunder). I hope your will scrutinise what I send you and escape the folly of the majority of our congeners . I will always answer you if you have the integrity to write to me. Thought for the Day: “We have exterminated the property owners in Russia. We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America.” (Chairman Zinoviewff - Apfelbaum of the Communist 3rd International, U.S. Congressional Record, December 13, 1923) Revisionist Germar Rudolf Website: http://germarrudolf.com/germars-views/  Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust... http://codoh.com/  |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Room | motor power | New capacity | Previous capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| B-Keller/intake | 3.5 HP | 8,000 m3/h | 4,800 m3/h |
| B-Keller/exhaust | 3.5 HP | 8,000 m3/h | 4,800 m3/h |
| L-Keller/exhaust | 7.5 HP | 13,000 m3/h | 10,000 m3/h |
| O-Raum/furnace room | 4.5 HP | 12,000 m3/h | 10,000 m3/h |
| A u. W-Räume | 1.5 HP | 4,000 m3/h | 3,000 m3/h |
Whence did Pressac deduce the alleged new capacities of the air-blowers? Apparently, he based the information on the Topf invoice no. 2134 of December 23, 1943 relative to the ventilation systems for Crematoria IV and V, to which we will return below. He refers to this document speaking about Crematoria IV and V:[32]
“For the two gas chambers and for the corridor, representing a volume of 480 m3 almost identical to the one in Morgue I of Crematoria II and III, Schultze foresaw an exhaust blower of the same power: a pump [soufflerie: air-blower] Type 450 with a 3.5 HP motor, able to exhaust 8,000 m3 per hour”.
Footnote 21 on page 120 refers indeed to the “preliminary invoice [sic] Topf of December 23rd 1943”. Here an air-blower of Type 450 with a capacity of 8,000 m3 of air per hour with a three-phase motor of 3.5 HP is mentioned. If, therefore, it could have made sense to assume this capacity for Morgue #1 (equipped with two air-blowers Type 450), for the other rooms the values given by Pressac do not have any foundation, being based solely on simple arithmetical equations between the data relative to the power output of the motor and the capacity of the air-blowers, for which the results do not match at all:
10,000 ÷ 2 = x ÷ 3.5; hence x = 8,400.
The above-mentioned document says in fact 8,000, and therefore Pressac was forced to “rectify” the results of all other equations:
10,000 ÷ 5.5 = x ÷ 7.5; result ca. 13,600, reduced to 13,000
10,000 ÷ 3.5 = x ÷ 4.5; result ca. 12,900, reduced to 12,000
3,000 ÷ 1 = x ÷ 1.5; result 4,500, reduced to 4,000.
Before examining the technical aspects of the issue, it is necessary to solve a preliminary problem, which can be summarized in this question: why was the power output of the motors increased? Once this point is clarified, the question has to be examined whether the increase of the power output of the motors really corresponded to an increase of the capacity of the air-blowers.
It can be immediately noted that, in the Holocaustic prospective, the alleged increase of the capacity of the air-blowers in no case could have had any criminal inference, or rather it could not have borne any relation to the alleged transformation of a normal morgue room into a homicidal gas chamber. This results irrefutably from the fact that the increase of the power output of the engines was foreseen by Schultze on March 10, 1942; a date preceding by many months the date of the alleged idea to transform the “B”-Raum, the future Morgue #1, into a homicidal gas chamber. It results, therefore, that the modifications concerned only a normal hygienic-sanitary facility, such as a crematorium.
The only plausible reason for the increase of the power output of the motors is the following: Schultze redacted the cost estimate based on a verbal order which was given to the Topf Company during the visit of Oberingenieur Kurt Prüfer in Auschwitz on October 21 and 22n, 1941.[33] The first drawing of the new crematorium was created on October 24, 1941.[34] Both Leichenkeller, only outlined, do not present any indication of ventilation ducts. This applies also to the plan drawn by the architect Werkmann in November 1941.[35] The first cost estimate of the ventilation system, dated November 4, 1941, was therefore created based on the first or second project, both without any indication regarding the ventilation systems. Essentially, Schultze revised the cost estimate at issue without knowing neither the structure, nor the path of the ventilation ducts; but besides this, he knew all the fundamental technical data: capacity of the air-blowers, total pressure, voltage, cycles, number of the air-blowers.
It has to be kept in mind that November 4, 1941 was also the day when the Topf Company confirmed the order by the Construction Office of Auschwitz (placed on October 22) of five furnaces with three muffles each, two devices for the introduction of a casket (Sarg-Einführungs-Vorrichtungen), three forced-draft devices (Saugzug-Anlagen), and one waste-incineration furnace (Müll-Verbrennungs-Ofen).[36]
In the letter of February 10, 1942, the Topf Company informed the Construction Office that the “necessary construction drawings for the realization of the brickwork intake and exhaust ducts” (die notwendigen Bauzeichnungen für die Ausführung der gemauerten Be- und Entlüftungs-Kanäle) would be ready within 3-4 weeks;[37] obviously they did not yet exist on November 4, 1941 and this fact confirms that Schultze, when writing the relative cost estimate, could not possibly have determine exactly the power output of the air-blower motors. When these drawings were eventually created, probably by Schultze himself, he recalculated the power output of the engines based on the passive drags of the system (length, sections, roughness of the internal walls of the ducts, change of section and direction, presence of 80 small openings inside the room) as it is indicated in Plan D 59366 of March 10, 1942. We summarize the data in the following table:
| Room | Air-blower type diameter (mm) |
Capacity (m3/h) | Output power (HP) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | 11/4/41 | 3/10/42 | 11/4/41 | 3/10/42 | 11/4/41 | 3/10/42 |
| LK 1 intake | 450 | 450 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 2 | 3.5 |
| LK 1 exhaust | 450 | 450 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 2 | 3.5 |
| Furnace room | 550 | 550 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Dissection room, etc. | 375 | 375 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 1 | 1.5 |
| LK 2 | 550 | 550 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 5.5 | 7.5 |
The letter of the Friedrich Boos Company to the Central Construction Office of May 24, 1943, which refers to the technical specifications of the Saugzuganlage Type H 13 (aspirated air-supply device Type H13) for a furnace, presents a similar case regarding the total pressure:
- volume of the gases: 13,500 m³/h
- static pressure at the exhaust of the air-blower: 40 mm water column
- increase of 10% as specified: 4 mm water column
- increase for additional drag: 55 mm water column
- difference of the static pressure: 99 mm water column
- power demand for the air-blower: 10 HP
- number of revolutions of the : 1,435 revolutions per minute.[38]
The nominal value of 40 mm of water column resulted in a real value of 99 mm, and therefore a power demand of 10 HP was calculated.
IV) Output power of the motors and capacity of the air-blowers
It remains only to determine, as Pressac claims, whether or not the increase of the output power of the engines of the air-blowers resulted also in the increase of the capacity of the air-blowers.
First of all, it has to be noted that no known document states that the capacity of the air-blowers of Morgue #1 of Crematoria II and III was increased from 4,800 to 8,000 m3 of air per hour; incontrovertible data stating exactly the opposite exists: the cost estimate of the Topf Company of November 4, 1941, claims in fact, for the two air-blowers of the room at issue, a capacity of 4,800 m3 of air per hour, and this is fully confirmed both by invoice no. 171 of February 22nd 1943 for Crematorium II, and by invoice no. 729 of May 27, 1943, for Crematorium III.
The basic technical elements relative to the two air-blowers of Morgue #1 are:
- three-phase motor
- 50 cycles (Hz)
- 380 volt
- 925 revolutions per minute
- total pressure 40 mm of water column
- capacity: 4,800 m3/h.
The three-phase motor (Document 23) is constituted by a stator, which is “the fixed part where the three main coils are inserted to which the supply voltage is applied”, and by a rotor, which is located inside the stator, which “due to the ‘activation’ by the magnetic field generated by the stator coils, starts to rotate”. In the stator more triplets of coils can be mounted, so that more magnetic fields are generated, one for each triplet.
A motor with one triple set of coils, in technical language, has one polar couple or more simply, two opposing poles.
And this is the central core of the question, the speed of rotation:[39]
“The speed of rotation of a motor depends on the Rotating Magnetic Field, which depends on the frequency of the supply voltage. In practice, for a motor with one polar couple, applying a voltage of 50 Hz, the speed of the rotor will be 50 revolutions per second, or 3,000 revolutions per minute [please see below]. When the stator is instead built with more polar couples, the rotating magnetic field does not rotate at 3,000 revolutions per minute anymore, but at lower speeds, due to the presence of other magnetic poles, which enable the rotor to cover a shorter path before finding the pole attracting it.”
In practice, the rotating speed of a three-phase motor is fixed, because it depends exclusively on the frequency and on the number of polar couples, according to the known formula:
n = ( 60 sec/min × f ) ÷ p
where
n = number of revolutions
per minute
f = frequency (50 Hz, “the standard frequency in Europe for the systems of distribution of alternating
current “)
p = number of polar couples.
In our example, we obtain:
n = (60 x 50) ÷ 1 = 3,000 revolutions per minute
Since the frequency of 50 Hz remains unchanged, the speed of rotation is fixed, and it depends solely on the number of polar couples, as explained by Dal Prà in the following table:
| Numbers of poles | Polar Couples | Speed (rpm) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 3000 |
| 4 | 2 | 1500 |
| 6 | 3 | 1000 |
| 8 | 4 | 750 |
| 10 | 5 | 600 |
| 12 | 6 | 500 |
| 20 | 10 | 300 |
| 30 | 15 | 200 |
| etc. | ... | ... |
The invoices of the Topf Company no. 171 of February 22nd 1943, and no. 729 of May 27, 1943, refer explicitly to the frequency of 50 periods or cycles, that is 50 Hz. Therefore, increasing the power output of the motor, from 2 to 3.5 HP, the number of the revolutions would have remained unchanged.
In the cost estimate of November 4, 1941, 925 revolutions per minute instead of 1,000 were indicated, because the rotor does not rotate at the same speed as the stator magnetic field, but at a speed slightly lower (due to mechanical and cooling losses); the difference between the stator speed (synchronic speed) and the speed of the rotor, known as run rate of flow, is set between 3% and 7%. The effective speed, and therefore the effective number of revolutions, results, consequently, as a little lower. In our specific case the rate of flow was calculated at 7.5%: 1000 – (0.075 x 1000) = 925 revolutions/min.
The relation between performance, total pressure and used power are explained as follows:
- the performance is directly proportional to the number of revolutions
- the total pressure is directly proportional to the square of the number of revolutions
- the used power is directly proportional to the cube of the number of revolutions.[40]
The cost estimate of November 4, 1941, as it was also stated above, indicates the number of revolutions of the three-phase motor and therefore of the air-blower as n=925 revolutions/min. If the capacity of the air-blower (intake/exhaust), somehow increases from 4,800 to 8,000 m3/h, the number of revolutions would increase proportionally from 925 to 1,540; the total pressure would also increase (1540)2 ÷ (925)2 = 2.77 times, and therefore from 40 to approx. 110 mm of water column, and finally, the used power would have increased (1540)3 ÷ (925)3 = 4.6 times, or from 2 to 9.2 HP.
This confirms that the increase of capacity, within the conditions described, was impossible.
Because after increasing the number of revolutions, the total pressure increases (to the square), it is obvious that the used power also increases (to the cube), because the friction of the air in the ventilation ducts increases at higher speeds.
This is the only reason why Engineer Schultze, after having created the project of the whole ventilation system of the new crematorium, changed the power of the motors of all air-blowers.
This has also a precise technical explanation.
The mechanical performance (Pw) of an air-blower is calculated according to the formula:
Pw = (Q · pt · 100) ÷ η,
where,
Q = air capacity in cubic meters/second (m3/s)
pt = total pressure in Pa (Pascal: 1
mm H2O = 9.8 Pa)
η = efficiency rate of the air-blower in %.
Knowing that engineer Schultze, in the cost estimate of November 4, 1941, calculated a performance at the motor shaft of the air-blower of 1.6 HP (= 1,177 W) and of 2 HP for the three-phase motor; and further knowing the capacity (4800 m3/h = 1.33 m3/s) and the total pressure (40 mm water column [H2O] = 392 Pa); and finally, knowing that the centrifugal type air-blowers had an efficiency rate of between 25 and 50%,[41] the performance of the air-blower results in 0.443:
Pw = (1.33 · 392 · 100) ÷ 44.3 = 1,177 W.
The electrical power (Pe) of the motor used from the electrical power grid is calculated according to the formula:
Pe = (Pw ÷ ηmot),
where ηmot = is the efficiency rate of the motor in %, which is set between 0.7 and 0.95.[42]
Since the output power of the motor calculated by Schultze was 2 HP, or 1,471 W, it is obvious that the efficiency rate of the motor was 0.8:
(1,177 ÷ 1,471) = 0.8,
or rather:
1,177 W (1.6 HP) ÷ 0.8 = 1,471 W (2 HP).
Applying the above-mentioned formula for the calculation of the used power of the air-blower, knowing the speed (1.33 m3/s), the performance rate of the air-blower (44.3%) and the efficiency rate of the motor (80%), results in:
3.5 HP (× 735.5 W/HP) 2,574 W; 2,574 x 0.8 = 2,059 W (used power of the motor);
1.33 x P (effective pressure) x 100] ÷ 44 = 2,072;
P = 686 Pa or (686 ÷ 9.8) 70 mm H2O.
In practice, the change of the motor was required to overcome an additional real pressure of 30 mm H2O, due to the summation of the total friction in the air ducts.
What is explained above is confirmed in a table relative to the low-pressure centrifugal air-blowers in the Manuale dell’ingegnere Colombo[43] (see Document 24) where the data of different air-blowers are indicated with intake areas of increasing dimensions, with variable numbers of revolutions, variable air flow per minute, with variable effective pressure in mm of water column and used power.
Already the first two data are significant. An air-blower with an intake area of 210 x 210 mm at 600 revolutions/min has a capacity of 18 m3/min, with a pressure of 9 mm H2O and a used power of 0.07 HP; at 1,450 revolutions, the capacity turns into 50 m3/min, the pressure to 45 mm and the used power to 1 HP. Therefore, increasing the capacity (50 ÷ 18) 4.44 times, the used power increased (1 ÷ 0.07) 14.28 times.
In conclusion, Pressac’s hypothesis is technically absurd and necessarily without any scientific foundation.
V) The air-blower Type 450 foreseen for Crematoria IV and V
The fact remains to be explained, noted by Pressac, that the invoice of the Topf Company no. 132 of December 23rd 1943, referring to “Ventilation devices for Crematoria IV and V” (Entlüftungsanlagen für die Krematorien IV und V) assigns to an air-blower Type 450 a capacity of 8,000 m3 of air per hour. First of all, the technical data written there has to be analyzed (Document 25):
“Gebläse Nr. 450 zur Förderung von stündlich etwa 8000 cbm Abluft gegen 40 mm W.S. Gesamptpressung, Drehstrommotor für 380 Volt, 50 Per. mit Doppelnutanker, Spreitzwassergeschützt [sic], N = ca. 3,5 PS. n = 925 Upm).”[44]
[“Air-Blower Type 450 with the capacity of approximately 8,000 m3 of stale air per hour against a total pressure of 40 mm of water column, three-phase motor of 380 volts, 50 cycles, with rotor with double groove bolt, protected from water against splashes, output power N = approx. 3.5 HP, n = 925 revolutions per minute” ]
The related cost estimate (Kostenanschlag) of June 6, 1943, (Document 26)[45] reports the same technical data, but it further clarifies that “das Schaufelrad, welches fliegend auf Motorwellenstumpf aufgebaut wird” [“the blower wheel was connected directly on to the motor shaft”]. In other words, this formula characterizes the direct system of coupling of the motor shaft and the blower wheel, as shown in Document 27, taken from the drawing of the Topf Company D 57999 of November 30, 1940.[46] The detail shows the project of the aspiration device of Crematorium I of Auschwitz: M is the motor directly coupled through the motor shaft MW to the air-blower G; S is the chimney.
Document 28 shows the connection of the engine to the air-blower Type 450 in the future Crematorium II.
At the time, there were three types of connections: with a belt (durch Riemen) (Document 29), with sprocket gears reducer (Zahnradvorgelege) and with direct coupling (in direkter Kupplung) (Document 30).[47]
The sprocket gears reducer was formed by two or more cog wheels. For the air-blowers a special form of this system was the so called “Zentratorkupplung,” which was designed as a reducer, but it could also be used as a multiplier. The blower wheel had on its internal part three elastic rings which were mounted on the motor shaft, from which they received the motion and transmitted it to the blower wheel circulating over a bigger ring on its inside, as is shown in Document 31.[48]
Because of its configuration, this system was also called “Planetengetriebe” (planetary gear drive) or “Umlaufrädergetriebe” (circular gear drive) which could also have cogged pinions instead of the rings as shown in Document 32.
The latter system could also be used as a multiplier of revolutions, that means that it could induce the number of revolutions of the blower wheel to be greater than that of the motor shaft; in the case at issue this is excluded since the motor of the air-blower was directly coupled to the blower wheel.
In comparison to the two air-blowers Type 450 foreseen for Morgue #1 of Crematoria II and III, the differences are twofold: the capacity (8,000 m3 instead of 4,800) and the power output of the motor (3.5 HP instead of 2 HP originally foreseen). All the other parameters are identical. Since the power output of the motor could not influence the number of revolutions, which in fact in both cases remained the same (925 revolutions per minute), there are only two explanations: either one of the two capacities is wrong (4,800 or 8,000 m3/h), or different models of air-blower Type 450 existed with different volume capacities for each revolution of the blower wheel.
However, the first option of the dilemma is untenable, because another cost estimate of the Topf Company, the one of December 9, 1940, referring to a “Ventilation device for corpse cubicles and dissection room” (Entlüftungs-Anlage für Leichenzellen und Sezierraum) – the first facility foreseen for the crematorium of the main camp in Auschwitz – refers to an air-blower of Type 450 with a capacity of 6,000 m3 of stale air per hour against a total pressure of 25 mm of water column, powered by a three-phase motor of 1.5 HP for 220/380 volts, 50 cycles, at 720 revolutions per minute.[49]
The total pressure is related to the number of revolutions, and therefore to the capacity of the air-blower, and therefore 25 mm of water column is linked to the 720 revolutions. In practice this fan no. 450, at 720 revolutions per minute, had a capacity of 6,000 m3 of air per hour.
The alternative remaining (the second option above) is that different models of air-blower Type 450 existed, with a different volume capacity, as we will show below.
Returning to the air-blowers Type 450 foreseen for Morgue #1 and for Crematoria IV and V, it results in fact that the former had a volume capacity of
1) 4,800 ÷ 60 = 80 m3/min;
80 ÷ 925 = 0.086 m3 (of air passing through the air-blower for each revolution of the motor wheel);
while for the second, the capacity was instead:
2) 8,000 ÷ 60 = 133.3 m3/min
133.3 ÷ 925 = 0.144 m3;
for air-blower Type 450 of the crematorium of the main camp the capacity was:
3) 6,000 ÷ 60 = 100 m3/min
100 ÷ 720 = 0.139 m3.
At 925 revolutions this air-blower would have had a capacity of ([925 x 6,000] ÷ 720 =) approximately 7,700 m3/h.
This value can be considered identical to Case 2, because the capacity of 8,000 m3/h was rounded off (“etwa”, approximately) and probably also the capacity of 6,000 m3/h was rounded off.
Since the capacity – as explained above – is directly proportional to the number of revolutions, it is impossible that two identical air-blowers both running at 925 revolutions per minute could have had different capacities; one of 4,800 m3/h, and the other of 8,000 m3/h; a fact that only enhances the explanation made above.
The only possible explanation is that the air-blower Type 450, while assuming both the total volume of the casing and the diameter of the intake and exhaust tubes as equal, appeared in at least two different variants regarding the position of the vanes (concave or convex) and/or their angulation; this produced a different volume of air movement for each revolution of the blower wheel.
From the documents, it can be deduced that these models, running at the same numbers of revolutions, were distinguishable only by the diameters of the casings and by the capacities of the air-blower:
- 450/4,800 and
- 450/8,000.
VI) The deceptions of Richard Green-Jamie McCarthy and the tacit approval of Robert Jan van Pelt
In any case, it is certain that the increase in power of the motor of air-blower Type 450 from 2 to 3.5 HP does not equate to an increase in the capacity of the air-blower from 4,800 to 8,000 m3/h. On the contrary, this appears patently absurd, because – from Pressac’s perspective – the increase of power should have induced an increase in the number of revolutions per minute of the motor (the capacity being conditioned by this factor), but Topf’s invoice no. 132 of December 23, 1943 mentions clearly the same number of revolutions in the cost estimate of November 4, 1941 (925 rpm), which relates to the same capacity in both invoices no. 171 of February 22 and no. 729 of May 27, 1943 (4.800 m3/h).
The significance of the issue discussed above lies in the fact that Robert Jan van Pelt repeated the error of Pressac, in writing:[50]
“However, Richard Green and Jamie McCarthy have shown that the ventilation system of the crematoria was able to quickly remove the gas. The gas chambers of the Crematoria 2 and 3 were 30 m long by 7 m wide and 2.4 m high, which resulted in a volume of 504 cubic meters. They were equipped with a ventilation system with both intake and exhaust fans that were capable of cycling 8000 cubic meters [of air] per hour through the room. In other words, the system was able to create 8,000 : 604 = 15.8 air exchanges per hour.”
Van Pelt referred to an article by Richard J. Green and Jamie McCarthy with the title Chemistry is not the science: Rudolf, Rhetoric & Reduction.[51] The copyright is from 1999, but the last revision of the article was done on July 28, 2000.
The two authors write:
“The gas chambers were 30 m long by 7 m wide: 210 sq m. They were 2.4 m high, for a volume of 504 cubic meters.[52] Those same chambers had a ventilation system with both intake and exhaust fans, capable of cycling 8000 cu m through the room each hour. This is commonly referred to as 8000 ÷ 504 = 15.8 ‘air exchanges per hour.’ Note that the Holocaust-denier, Carlo Mattogno, has misrepresented these figures in his essay, Auschwitz: The End of a Legend”.
In the footnote, they explain:
“Mattogno, Carlo, Auschwitz: The End of a Legend, Newport Beach: IHR, 1994, pp. 60-62. Available in German translation as ‘Auschwitz: das Ende einer Legende’ at www.codoh.com/inter/intnackt/intnackausch3.html
[now at http://holocausthandbuecher.com/dl/14d-anf.pdf; English: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/14-apf.pdf].
Mattogno misrepresents the planned ventilation capacity that was at one point planned as if it were real:
Consequently, for the supposed homicidal gas chamber, the SS had foreseen 4,800 ÷ 506 = 9.48 air exchanges per hour, while in the supposed changing room 10,000 ÷ 902.7 = 11 air exchanges per hour: thus the gas chamber was less ventilated than the changing room!
However, he is at least honest enough to point out (two pages earlier) that a larger capacity ended up being used:
Pressac states that Leichenkeller 1 of Crematories II and III was actually equipped with ventilators with a capacity of 8000 m³/h of air (p. 74 and 118), and even mentions the invoice of the ventilation system for Crematory III: invoice No. 729 of 27 March 1943 (p. 105, note 184).”
Mattogno would also have misrepresented the capacity foreseen in the planned project (4,800 m3/h) with the alleged one, of the realization of the project (8,000 m3/h) and this would be the base of his “misrepresentation”.
In reality, a veritable misrepresentation was actually performed by Green and McCarthy. In the above-mentioned book Auschwitz: The End of a Legend. Critique of Jean-Claude Pressac[53] (the English translation of Auschwitz. Fine di una leggenda[54]) the facsimile copies of the Topf invoices no. 171 of February 22nd, and no. 729 of May 27, 1943, are shown,[55] which both, we repeat, mention a capacity of 4,800 m3/h. Now a high degree of brazenness is needed to pretend that invoices, which by definition correspond to items actually delivered, referred instead to a mere design specification!
What concerns the alleged admission of Mattogno that the effective capacity of the air-blowers was of 8,000 m3/h, the two authors maliciously pretended not to understand that Mattogno simply explained the hypothesis of Pressac, only to later refute it based precisely on the above-mentioned invoices.[56]
In fact, writing that Pressac “mentions even the invoice of the ventilation device for Crematorium III: invoice no. 729 of May 27, 1943”, which states a capacity of 4,800 m3/h, Mattogno only intended to underline the simple fact that Pressac was refuting himself.
In his report, written in 2001 as an expertise for the appeal trial of Irving-Lipstadt, Green returned to the question in these terms:[57]
“Holocaust-denier Carlo Mattogno claims in his essay, "Auschwitz: The End of a Legend" that the ventilation capacity is 4,800 ÷ 506 = 9.48 air exchanges per hour based upon what the SS planned to use originally.[58] Pressac claims that although the SS planned for only 4,800 cu m/hour, they eventually installed ventilation capable of 8000 cu m/hour. John Zimmerman has recently researched, 502-1-327, a Topf bill dated May 27, 1943, which may refer to Crematorium II (however, the first page in his copy is missing so he cannot yet be sure); it may indicate that the 4800 cu m/hour figure is correct”.
Therefore “recently”, that is, allegedly after July 28, 2000, the date of the last revision of the article mentioned above, Zimmermann found one page only of the invoice no. 729 of May 27, 1943, for which Mattogno published in facsimile the complete text already in 1994! This document is kept in the Museum of Auschwitz (Documents 21c-d). The other document kept in the Russian State Archive of War in Moscow with the reference number 502-1-327, pages 16 and 16a, is shown in Documents 21a-b. However, here the date of May 27, 1943, appears on the first page only; therefore, if the first page was really missing in the copy found by Zimmermann, how could Green claim that the invoice was “dated May 27, 1943”? And moreover: how could he mention the capacity of 4,800 m3/h, since this value is reported only in the first page of the invoice?
It is clear that Zimmermann also found the first page, and he transferred it to Green (who also stated that it may “refer to Crematory II” only to create further deception). All these deceptions were needed to avoid public admission that the capacity indicated by Mattogno was the correct one, and only reluctantly did Green concede that it “may” (!) be correct.
This excursus shows the incompetence and the dishonesty of the most acclaimed orthodox holocaust experts regarding the ventilation in the crematoria of Birkenau.
From the revisionist point of view, the significance of the issue relating to the capacity of the air-blowers remains intact, that after the alleged transformation of Morgue #1 of Crematorium II into a gas chamber working with hydrogen cyanide (Zyklon B), the capacity of both air-blowers, the intake and exhaust, still conformed to a normal morgue. The number of air exchanges foreseen, approx. 9.5 per hour, was in fact the one prescribed by the technical manuals of the time, like the one by engineer Wilhelm Heepke:[59]
“The supply of fresh air is carried out from above. An air exchange rate of at least 5 times per hour has to be taken into consideration; owing to circumstances, the figure of 10 air exchanges may be reached due to higher usage of the room, whereas the higher number of air exchanges shall be reached by means of an air-blower (Eine Zuführung frischer Luft erfolgt von oben. Man hat mindestens mit einem 5fachen stündlichen Luftwechsel zu rechnen; unter Umständen kann man sogar bei stärker Benutzung des Raumes bis auf 10fachen gehen, welch hohe Luftabfuhr mit Hilfe eines Ventilators erreicht wird)”.
Paradoxically Engineer Schultze, in the above-mentioned cost estimate of December 9, 1940, stated:[60]
“Für den Sezierraum haben wir einen 10-fachen und für die Leichenzelle einen 20-fachen Luftwechsel vorgesehen.” [For the dissecting room we have foreseen 10 air exchanges and for the corpse cubicle 20 exchanges]
VII) Pressac, destroyer of the “gas chambers” of Auschwitz
1) The claim of a revisionist and Pressac’s answer
In his first book about Auschwitz, Pressac wanted to respond to the argument of a revisionist. The title of the “Attachment”, which summarized the objection, is: “GAS 3000 PEOPLE IN LEICHENKELLER I OF KREMATORIUM II? IMPOSSIBLE, THE BODIES WOULD HAVE BLOCKED THE LOWER AIR EXTRACTION ORIFICES”.
Pressac writes:[61]
“Following the exchange of letters and telephone calls with a correspondent who doubts the reality of the gas chambers, I have extracted two of his arguments that appear to me valid.
Describing the ventilation system of Leichenkeller I [of the future Krematorium II as per the cross-section on drawing 933], he pointed out to me that the air entered through the upper orifices, then was extracted through the lower ones, and concluded:
‘This arrangement is perfectly suitable if the room is used as a morgue: the air entering cools, becomes denser, and is extracted from the lower part.’
He then asked me to imagine:
‘the situation in the LK 1 after the gassing of a large number of people: the corpses are heaped on top of one another; they block most of the air extraction orifices; the room is full of warm toxic gas; how can there be rapid and efficient mechanical ventilation? I would say that it is not possible...’
These remarks mean that Leichenkeller I used as a gas chamber had a poorly designed ventilation system and in the case of large-scale gassings [3000 people in 210 m² according to Nyiszli, or 13.3 per square meter], the lower orifices being blocked ventilation would become impossible [a model visible at the Museum illustrates this ‘maximum’ case, though there are probably no more than one thousand victims depicted].
The figure of 3000 is theoretical and exaggerated, but if we take it as correct, then so is my correspondent’s hypothesis and the ventilation is blocked and cannot work.
What would the SS have done in the case of such an ‘incident’?
They would have proceeded in two stages:
1. Open wide the doors giving basement access through the north yard and those of the undressing room, whose ventilation system working at full power would prevent the basement being contaminated:
Before putting on their gas masks, the SS would have then ordered two to four members of the Sonderkommando to put on masks, open the gas chamber door and drag bodies out into the vestibule until several of the air extraction orifices had been cleared. Then the gas-tight door would have been closed again, the ventilation restarted, and to improve its efficiency all that was required was to open the Zyklon-B introduction covers, but not until that moment. After verifying by means of a gas detector that there was no longer any danger of hydrocyanic acid intoxication outside the gas chamber, operations would have resumed their ‘normal’ course.
2. Once the gas chamber had been emptied, a squad of fitters or bricklayers would have fixed at the end of the chamber, in the southeast corner a steel duct of about 20 cm diameter and 2 meters high or built a brick chimney of about the same dimensions connecting with or protecting one of the lower air extraction orifices and enabling it to take in warm contaminated air from above. The time taken for the ‘repair’ would not have been longer than an afternoon. Such an incident would not have interrupted the ‘operation’ of the Krematorium. As the documents we possess at present make no mention of such work we can assume for the moment that the case of the ‘3000’ never occurred, the number of victims from a convoy always being less than this.
The initial ventilation system of Leichenkeller I, which was designed for a basement morgue, is not a ‘definitive’ obstacle to using the room as a gas chamber.” (bold Pressac’s; underscore added here)
The anonymous revisionist was without doubt the engineer Pierre Marais, who published similar reasonings in a book in 1991.[62] However, he did not presume the impossibility of the de-aeration from the occlusion of the related openings by a certain number of victims; he spoke generally of “several hundreds, or also of several thousand.”[63] On the other hand, he constructed his argument in opposition to the explanations which were claimed by Georges Wellers in his book Les chambres à gaz ont existé,[64] in which he published the drawings of the vertical sections of Morgue #1 and 2 of the future Crematorium II. The written correspondence which Marais had with this orthodox historian shows that the case of “3,000” was completely outside his scope of contemplation.
This number was a simple ploy of Pressac in order to somehow extricate himself from a tight spot. In fact, as will be shown, such an obstacle would have been “crucial” even with half of the victims considered by Pressac: 1,500 and even less. On the other hand, Pressac himself, while discussing the claim of Nyiszli, states that 3,000 persons is an exaggerated number, and that the “real number was without doubt much lower, probably from 1,000 to 1,500”.[65]
2) An insufficient solution
Could Pressac really have believed that a single opening with a total cross-sectional area equal to 1/40 of the total planned in the ventilation system of the room, if left unobstructed, would have allowed a “normal” ventilation of Morgue #1?
Document 33 shows the “chimney” imagined by Pressac in the south-east corner of Morgue #1. The air would have entered only from above (the same as in the duct hypothesis) and would have been expelled only through a single opening. Therefore this “repair work” would have been completely insufficient.
In order to overcome the above-mentioned difficulty, it would have been necessary to keep open all the ventilation openings; the simplest system in order to achieve this would have been the installation of iron gratings, cemented at the bottom and to the wall, at an appropriate distance from the wall and to the height of a couple of meters, in order to protect all the ventilation openings on both sides of the room.
An example of such an iron grating is shown in Documents 34 and 34a.
Such work would have taken longer and also more floor space would have been lost, but – as we will prove below – without some protection devices of this kind, the homicidal gassing would have encountered a “crucial” and insurmountable obstacle, not only in the case of “3,000”, but also with 1,500 victims or 1,000 or even fewer.
The conclusion of Pressac is mind-boggling: because the documents do not mention the chimerical works imagined by himself, it follows that (!) the case of 3,000 victims never happened! Therefore the “gas chambers” always worked flawlessly!
It is obvious that, by accepting the reality of the extermination of the Hungarian Jews during Spring-Summer of 1944, due to their huge inflow in a short period, the case of 3,000 victims had to happen every day. Just to supply evidence, from May 14 to June 7, 1944, 289,357 Jews started from Hungary in the direction of Auschwitz in a period of 24 days, on average more than 12,000 per day. Taking into consideration that, from the orthodox perspective, during the period mentioned, the number of the alleged-gassed persons was around 70%, about (12,000 x 0.7 =) 8,400 Jews would have been killed every day,[66] and would have had to be gassed in the three crematoria in operation (II, III and V). Therefore, Morgue #1 of Crematoria II and III would have been crowded every day.
3) The “accident” of clogged ventilation openings
According to Pressac, Morgue #1 in the plan had the following dimensions: length: 30 m, width: 7 m; height: 2.41 m.[67] For the sake of exactitude, the most exact drawing of the Huta Company 109/13A and 109/14A of September 21st 1943, published by Pressac himself,[68] shows the presence of 7 concrete pillars to support the ceiling of 40 x 40 cm and 199 cm high, which support a concrete beam 41 cm high; the height of the room, indicated as 2.40 m in the drawing of September 21st 1943, is in fact the sum of 1.99 + 0.41.
The 7 pillars occupied a surface of (7 x 0.4 x 0.4) 1.12 m2, and had a volume of (1.12 x 1.99) = 2.22 m3; the beam had a volume of (30 x 0.41 x 0.41) = 5 m3.
In the orthodox scenario, also the surface area of 4 columns for pouring in Zyklon B (4 x 70 x 70 cm, in total 1.96 m2 and had a volume of 1.96 x 2.4 = 4.7 m3) has to be added; the dimensions thereof were given by the notorious witness Michał Kula in his first deposition[69] (he reduced the size of these column down to 24 × 24 cm in a second deposition[70]).
Therefore, the usable surface area for the victims was (30 x 7) = 210 m2, minus (1.12 + 1.96), or, approx. 3 m2; that is approximately 207 m2.
Rudolf Höss claimed that in this room, 1,500-1,600 victims were crammed (see below). In a room of 207 m2, 1,500 standing persons have a density of (1,500 ÷ 207), over 7 persons per square meter. Once dead, with no more muscular tension, the persons would have slumped to the floor, forming a heap whose height can be estimated.
Van Pelt declared during the Irving-Lipstadt trial that the median weight of a victim was 60 kg;[71] most probably he took this number from Pressac, who already earlier mentioned a median weight of 60 kg.[72] With certainty, it can be assured that the total weight of the 1,500 victims was (1,500 × 60) = 90,000 kg, which we can consider equivalent to 90,000 liters or 90 m3.
Theoretically 90 m3 distributed over a surface of 207 m2 correspond to a height of (90 ÷ 207) = 43.5 cm, and to a coverage of the floor of 100%. Obviously, the corpses are not water or sand, and between them some space would have remained, even though small. If one assumes a double height of 87 cm, the volume and the surface available in reference to the heap of corpses would also have doubled: 0.87 x 207 = 180 m3, of which 90 m3 claimed by the corpses and 90 m3 of free space between them. In this case, the free space would constitute the sum of all interspaces and of all air pockets existing among the 1,500 corpses; there are thousands of interspaces and air pockets, not necessarily communicating with each other, for a total height of 87 cm.
This height corresponds more or less to that of conscious adults prone on their knees or sitting on the floor with an erect torso, as Drawings 1 and 2 of Document 35 show.[73]
The rendering of Crematorium II displayed by the Auschwitz Museum shows the “gas chamber” full of victims (Document 36). Pressac was referring to this; according to him, “not more than a thousand victims” are depicted.
In this reconstruction, the air-extraction duct is placed too high, and also the connection opening to the “gas chamber” is placed too high. The original drawings display in fact that these openings were located almost at floor level (see Document 2, D, D1, and Document 37).
In Document 36, Rectangles A, B and C represent three openings in their correct positions. Even though the heap of corpses appears exceedingly high, it can be intuitively understood that in a real gassing, all exhaust openings would have been inevitably obstructed by the corpses to one degree or another. The real scenario would also be:
- up to 90 m3 piled on top of the openings, penetrated by thousands of interspaces and air pockets between the corpses (not necessarily communicating with each other and, if not communicating, impossible to ventilate the trapped vapors of hydrogen cyanide), which would have hugely increased the friction of the gas mixture which was supposed to pass through;
- ventilation openings physically obstructed by the corpses lying on the floor.
In these conditions, the ventilation of the room would have been totally ineffective, if not impossible.
Document 38 depicts visually the “gas chamber” with the layer of corpses of approx. 87 cm in height.
The reasoning related to the height of the corpses is obviously valid only under certain limitations; it is obvious that, by reducing the number of victims, hypothetically also the surface available on the floor would have increased. For example, if only 1,000 victims are considered over a surface of 207 m2, a density of approx. 5 standing persons per square meter would have resulted; the height of the heap would have been definitely lower, but still, the corpses would obstruct the ventilation openings. These would remain more or less unobstructed only with fewer than 1,000 victims. But the number of 1,500 victims reported is claimed even by orthodox Holocaust historians as too small. Franciszek Piper states in fact that “approximately 2,000 persons were crammed inside Morgue #1 on average”.[74]
In this perspective, from the numerical point of view, the issue would be perfectly credible. Based on the Kalendarium of Danuta Czech,[75] from March 14, 1943 (first “gassing” in the Crematorium II) to the end of the year, the 47 “gassings” numerically more important would have been distributed like this:
- from 1,000 to 1,500 persons: 9
- from 1,500 to 2,000 persons: 16
- from 2,000 to 2,500 persons: 14
- from 2,500 to 3,000 persons: 6
- from 3,500 to 4,000 persons: 2.
The case of the “gassing” of 1,500 persons and more in Crematorium II would also have happened many times more in the year 1943. The case of the Hungarian Jews’ deportation in 1944 was already mentioned earlier.
The deportation of the Jews from the ghetto of Łódź can also be mentioned. According to Franciszek Piper, 55,000-65,000 persons arrived at Auschwitz from August 15 to September 2, 1944, in 18 days;[76] this means (55,000-65,000 ÷ 18 =) 3,055-3,610 per day. Add to this the eight “gassings” of 2,000 persons and the five of 3,000 during 1944 mention in Czech’s Kalendarium.
The rendering of the Auschwitz Museum represents one of the alleged devices which allowed pouring of the Zyklon B inside the room from above. The most-acclaimed witness, Kula, painstakingly described the device, and Pressac drew it with some precision.[77] It was constituted of a kind of small metal casing of tight iron mesh, of unknown height, which ran inside a larger column made of a net of iron mesh with a square section of 70 x 70 cm; but its course stopped in the upper part of the larger column without ever reaching the floor. Zyklon B was poured from above inside the metal casing, and it remained and evaporated in the upper part of the room, we can assume between 1.90-2.00 and 2.40 meters (the ceiling height).
Van Pelt disagrees, and he presents his own drawing, in which the casing reaches the floor.[78] Such a system would have determined in any case the dissipation speed of the vapors of hydrogen cyanide into the free space above the bodies of the victims. As the execution progressed, an increasingly dense and high layer of dead bodies would have blocked the dissipation of more gas into this space.
In this scenario, a gas pocket in the free upper part of the room with an increasingly high concentration of the gas would have resulted, and it would have been challenging to remove it.
4) Pressac and van Pelt speculate on the ventilation of Morgue #1
Pressac claims that, “After 15 minutes of ventilation the air in the room would be completely renewed. A homicidal gassing (using 5 to 7 kg of Zyklon-B for 1,000 to 2,000 persons) would last about 20 minutes: 5 minutes for the action of the HCN bringing swift death (the quantity introduced being 40 times the lethal dose) and 15 minutes of ventilation BEFORE BEING ABLE TO OPEN THE GAS TIGHT DOOR. [79]
In his book of 1993, Pressac wrote that the ventilation lasted 15-20 minutes and that the air of the room was “practically exchanged every 3-4 minutes”.[80]
The prerequisite of his reasoning is that 4 air exchanges correspond to a total renewal of the air of the room (8,000 ÷ 60 x 15 =) 2,000 m3 of air in 15 minutes; 2,000 m3 ÷ approx. 500 m3 = 4 air exchanges in 15 minutes, according to the erroneous conjecture of Pressac of the increase of the air-blowers’ capacity to 8,000 m3/h; with the real capacity of 4,800 m3/h, the exchanges in 15 minutes would have been approx. 2.5.
Van Pelt presents two tables in which the residual concentration of hydrogen cyanide in the “gas chamber” is calculated in ppm (parts per million) as a function of time, as well as the median concentration to which a person would have been exposed for 15 minutes, all based on an initial concentration of 1,000 and of 10,000 ppm.
His Table 5.2 contemplates an initial concentration of 10,000 ppm of HCN,[81] which is the one more consistent with orthodox the Holocaust narrative, even though it is too low.
Rudolf Höss claimed that the gassing of 1,500-1,600 persons in Crematoria II and III took on average 7 kg of Zyklon B;[82] an amount which in the free space of the room of approx. 497 m3 (after deduction of the approximately 7 m3 occupied by the pillars and by the concrete beam) would have generated a theoretical end concentration of hydrogen cyanide of (7,000 ÷ 497 =) 14 g/m3, equivalent to 11,662 ppm.
The table at issue is as follows:
| Time [min] | HCN [ppm] | HCN [ppm] after 15 min. |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10000 | 3805 |
| 10 | 1908 | 726 |
| 20 | 364 | 138 |
| 30 | 70 | 26 |
| 40 | 13 | 5 |
| 50 | 2 | 1 |
Van Pelt limited himself to taking this data from the above-mentioned description by Richard J. Green. He used at the time a calculator available on the site of the “American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists” in which the data could be inserted in order to obtain the results. As he clearly stated and as results from the formula given by van Pelt, the value of air exchanges was 9.94 per hour, but this value corresponds to a capacity of 4,800 m3/hour; only some lines above, van Pelt claims, as we saw before, that the capacity was 8,000 m3/hour, and that the number of air exchanges was 15.8. Apparently, he did not notice this nonsense.
The reason for these calculations was to refute the statements of Germar Rudolf about the impossibility to access the “gas chambers” after a homicidal gassing.
The calculations are completely doubtful and inconsistent, because they do not take into consideration three crucial elements:
- The “gassing” times declared by the most important witnesses are by far shorter: 3 minutes (J. Weiss), 3-5 minutes (C.S. Bendel), 5 minutes (M. Nyiszli), 3-15 minutes (R. Höss), 3-10 minutes (judge J. Sehn).[83] Immediately after the “gas chamber” was opened, the removal of the corpses of the victims began.
- The evaporation of the hydrogen cyanide required extremely longer times to reach the maximum theoretical concentration, 3 hours at 15°C according to experiments performed in 1942.[84]
- The theoretical scenario envisaged by Green and van Pelt presupposes an empty room, in which nothing obstructs the ventilation. It is then clear that even with some hundreds of persons inside the “gas chamber” this model would not correspond anymore to reality, because the corpses would represent a factor of disturbance – possibly even damaging – to the ventilation.
It is further obvious that the corpses of the victims would have reduced the available volume with a theoretical increase of the hydrogen-cyanide concentration. In the case of the 1,500 victims, the concentration would have been (504 – [2.22 + 5][85] - 90[86] ) ca. 406 m3; (7,000 ÷ 406) = 17.24 g/m3, equivalent to 14,361 ppm.
This would also have affected the air exchanges per hour:
(4,800 ÷ 406 =) 11.8 per hour.
But the documents do not mention anything in this regard.
Since the “gas chambers” of Crematoria IV and V allegedly were activated without ventilation systems, one could ask how, according to van Pelt, the ventilation of the rooms was achieved, and especially how long it took. His embarrassment about such a simple question is shown by his silence, and it results even more from his pretense that Crematoria IV and V were “efficient and economical killing machines”.[87] Efficient? How could three “gas chambers” with a volume of approximately 521 m3, with 2 doors of 100 x 200 cm, and 7 small windows of 30 x 40 cm have an efficient ventilation?
The pretense of van Pelt is clearly absurd.
5) Opening the “gas chamber” door
Pressac thought that one could correct the unavoidable flow of the gas from Morgue #1 into the other rooms of the basement of the crematorium, by opening the access door from the north court and the one at the end of Morgue #2, and then activating the ventilation system of this room. This solution does not take into account the fact that the “gas chamber” with its blocked air-exhaust channels may have been in overpressure (air blown inside from the intake air-blower, heat generated by the bodies of the victims), while the furnace room was in double underpressure, both for the air draft of the chimney and for its own ventilation system; also Morgue #2 was equipped with a similar ventilation system, and was also in underpressure; in simple terms, an air flow was constantly moving towards the cremation furnaces and towards the exhaust openings located on the ceiling of the furnace room; a similar air flow moved into Morgue #2 toward the corresponding air-blower.
By opening the door of the “gas chamber” with its blocked exhaust ducts, a lethal mixture of gas would have flowed out into the next room (in the drawings “Vorraum”, vestibule) and would have spread out all over the basement and via the elevator shaft into the furnace room. As a precautionary measure, and in order to avoid the gas mixture entering the three rooms of the former Leichenkeller 3 (Cubicles X, Y and Z in Document 39), it would have been necessary to close this door (but it was not gastight). How to eliminate the gas pocket of the vapors of hydrogen cyanide? The most rational system would have been this:
- keep the door of the corpses chute open in order to let fresh air coming in dilute the air-vapor mixture coming out of Morgue #1;
- turn on the exhaust air-blower of the ventilation system of Morgue #2, and wait for the number of air exchanges necessary to purify its air;
- in order to prevent the gas mixture from seeping up the elevator shaft, it would have been necessary to deactivate the cremation furnaces and to avoid using the furnace room’s exhaust blower during the evacuation of the gas mixture.
This procedure is explained in Document 39.
How can anyone seriously believe that the engineer of the Topf Company and the Central Construction Office would have been so grossly inept as not to foresee these gross incongruities?
The danger of intoxication both for the inmates working in the crematoria and for the German guards watching over them should not be underestimated, since the lethal concentration of hydrogen cyanide by inhalation is of 300 ppm (0.36 g/m3).[88]
But the main problem is that these discrepancies, unavoidable in the absurd technical fabrication of the “gas chamber” were never raised by any “eye witness,” and they are not mentioned in any document of the concentration camp.
These drawbacks would have caused hydrogen cyanide intoxication of inmates and of SS guards practically during each gassing, but the only two known cases refer to the general matter of disinfestation; one was mentioned by Höss in the Sonderbefehl of August 12, 1942;[89] the other happened on December 9, 1943, when a civilian worker forced his way prematurely into an accommodation barrack which had been disinfested shortly before.[90]
The logical consequence to be taken from all that has been considered above is that “gassings” of 1,500 or even of 1,000 or even of some hundreds of persons never took place. However, because the reality of homicidal “gassings” is claimed only by witness statements, and these always adduce numbers well above 1,500; and because there would have been well over 1,500 gassing victims in each claimed batch due to the high number of Jewish transports arriving in Auschwitz, it can only be deduced that the claimed “gassings” described by witnesses as simple operations without dangers were impossible, and therefore they were not real.
Editor’s Remark
Typical air vents (registers)
Click on image to open large version
The screens covering the openings of a ventilation system, also called registers, usually have slits as openings as shown in the illustrations to the right. The type used in the Morgues #1 of Crematoria II & III at Auschwitz merely had very small holes, which increased the drag of the air-intake system considerably. Since these screens were made by the Auschwitz inmate work shop in early 1943, it is safe to assume that the Topf employees designing the ventilation system in November 1941 and March 1942, including its blowers and motors, did not know what these registers would look like. Rough calculations of the ventilation system’s drag indicate that these vents actually caused half of the system’s pressure loss.
If the engineers or fitters involved in installing the system wanted to reduced that drag, thus increase the air flow, the easiest way to accomplish this would have been by increasing the diameter of the holes in those screen, or by simply merging all holes of a row into a slit, rather than messing with the masonry ductd by adding additional air-intake holes.
______I DENY NO HOLOCAUST Many ignorant,
brainwashed people have contemptuously called me a “Holocaust Denier”. The following is the response I
give, to those who will listen: Excuse me, but I
don’t “deny” ANY “Holocaust”… Do you? I fully accept the account of the brave and famous Russian writer and
historian, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who was often called “The Conscience of the 20th Century”; who served eight
long years in the Soviet Gulag prison system, when he reports in the book he published in the year 2000 entitled “Together
For Two Hundred Years” that, in the Soviet Holocaust, 66 million innocent Gentiles, mostly Christians (and it being
a full ELEVEN TIMES the number of Jews claimed to have been killed by the Germans in WWII), were kidnapped, tortured, raped,
and murdered in a wide variety of cruel, wanton, and horribly inhuman ways in the thousands of monstrously evil Gulag concentration
camps at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevik “Ivan the Terrible” Cheka corps. I freely acknowledge the fact that on February 13
& 14, 1945, in the quintessential Holocaust of the non-military city of Dresden, more than 700,000 phosphorus bombs
were dropped on 1.2 million helpless people, which produced a firestorm that was called a “Single Column of Flame”,
where the temperature in the center of the city reached 1600 degrees centigrade, and in which approximately 500,000 German
women, children, elderly, wounded soldiers, random citizens, and even all of the animals in the city zoo were slaughtered
by concussion and fire in a single night. I absolutely recognize that more people died there in Dresden, in that one big flame, than
the estimated total of 246,000 helpless people who died in two other quintessential Holocausts, the senseless, wantonly
murderous, abominable, and unnecessary atomic attacks upon the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. I openly avow the virtually forgotten
Holocaust endured by the passengers and crew of the Wilhelm Gustloff, an unarmed German passenger liner which was torpedoed
and sunk in the freezing waters of the Baltic Sea, 13 miles off the coast of Pomerania on January 30, 1945, as it carried,
besides it’s men and crew, some 73 wounded soldiers, 373 members of the Womens’ Naval Auxilliary, and some 9,000
German civilian refugees – mostly women and children – who were all fleeing in terror from East Prussia in the
advance of the Red Army, and where only a few hundred lived to tell the tale, making it the deadliest disaster in maritime
history, killing nearly ten times the number who died on the Titanic. And I fully admit that, as tallied and reported by the International Red
Cross, a grand total of 271,304 people – not all of them Jews – died in all of the German concentration camps,
combined, by the end of World War II – a Holocaust which was solely the result of typhus epidemics and starvation
caused by the Zionist controlled, allied carpet bombings of supply routes and centers all over Germany that made it impossible
to transport food and medical supplies to prisoners, soldiers, and civilians alike. I certainly
do not deny the Holocaust of the over 1,000,000 German post-war, non-combatants who were rounded up, detained without any
food, water, shelter, or medical care, and purposely, and systematically killed through starvation and exposure in 1945-46
under the supervision of the allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, in the largest outdoor concentration camp this side
of modern-day Palestine, or the concurrent Holocaust of the wholesale cold-blooded rape and murder of untold hundreds of
thousands, if not millions, of women and children as the communist Red Army of the Soviets also took its “revenge”
upon the defeated Germans. I do not deny the Holocaust suffered by the good men and crew of the practically unarmed USS Liberty surveillance
ship, which was deliberately attacked by air and sea, with machine gun, cannon, and torpedo fire by Israeli forces on June
8, 1967, killing 34 and wounding 174, in an attempted false flag operation which was intended to sink the ship, and murder
all aboard, in order to draw the United States into the Middle East conflict on the side of Israel, and was only foiled
by the ingenuity and resourcefulness of the crew in aiding the radio operator to successfully get off a call for help. I also do not deny the Holocaust of the Jenin Refugee Camp, on April 13, 2002, where Israeli
forces attacked the camp using bulldozers, tanks, and Apache helicopters, in a cruel, indiscriminate, blood-lust slaughter,
which was said to be “Horrific beyond belief”, and which lasted for 13 days, flattening large areas of the town,
and killing unknown hundreds of innocent men, women, and children, many of whom were buried alive; or the earlier, similar,
Holocausts at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon in 1982, in which it is known that at least 800 Palestinians
were killed. Nor do I deny the wholesale slaughter and destruction
perpetrated upon the sovereign nation of Iraq, in the Holocaust that was the illegal, and unjustified war of aggression
that, from 2003 to the present, has resulted in the murder of over 1,000,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and children, and
brought their country to ruin, as one of the first steps in Israel’s ongoing war of terror, which they have the unmitigated
gall to present to the world as a war “ON” terror… for which the final tally of victims is yet to be
seen. What I do deny is the ridiculous and exaggerated claim that there is ANY evidence at all
that ANY Jews at all – much less “six million” of them – died from ANY intentional gassings, or as
a result of ANY kind of organized or systematic program of genocide perpetrated against Jews by Germany’s Nazi regime…
and I challenge you to produce ANY evidence or “proof” that is not merely made up of either pre-war, wartime,
or post-war anti-German propaganda… because none, from either then or now, actually exists. So, if you want to talk about a “Holocaust”… and I mean a REAL, genuine,
genocidal “Holocaust”, and not only the ones from the past, but one that is happening right NOW, in the present,
all you need to do is to pull your brain-dead/brainwashed heads out of your collectively ignorant rear ends, and look into
the current goings-on in Gaza, The West Bank, Syria, and the Middle East in general, where the racist, supremacist, Zionist,
Talmudic Jews are feverishly working day and night to exterminate anyone, either Gentile or Jew, who stands in their way
in their quest to build their racist, supremacist, “Kingdom of the World”… a.k.a., Eretz Israel. And if any of you sanctimonious accusers deny any of these realities, and merely cling to
the all too common view that the only “Holocaust” that really matters is one that is purported to have been suffered
by the Jews, then for people like you to call anyone else a “Holocaust Denier” is one of the most laughable,
and hypocritical examples of psychopathic projection I have yet seen anywhere… even as you continue to stupidly,
and unashamedly, prove your ignorance and psychopathy with every ridiculous charge you make. ...ANON.
And I do not deny
the Holocaust of the some 3,000 people who died in a single day as a result of the false flag attack on the World Trade
Center in New York which was engineered and perpetrated by leaders of Israel in order to kick off their pre-planned “Clash
of Civilizations” which they hope will eventually cause their two sworn enemies, the Christians, and the Muslims,
to forget their historical religious commonalities, and annihilate one another in the yet to be the greatest Holocaust in
history – a third world war – as the “Chosen Ones” sit on the sidelines… and direct…
and watch… and profit… while gleefully rubbing their hands as even more untold millions of innocents die.
And while I’m at it, let me just note here that I fully acknowledge the fact that the perpetrators
of the above mentioned, and relatively recent Holocausts have a very long history of either directly, or indirectly committing
numerous other such atrocities against many peoples over many millenia, even since ancient Biblical times – from the
slaughter of the Midianites to the African slave trade – a number of which being the basis of, and celebrated during
various Jewish holidays. And though I do not particularly describe them here, I don’t deny any of them either.
__________________________________________________
BOOKS
DISSECTING THE HOLOCAUST BY GERMAR RUDOLF
Dissecting the Holocaust applies state-of-the-art scientific technique and classic methods of detection to
investigate the alleged murder of millions of Jews by Germans during World War II. In 22 contributions of each ca. 30 pages,
the 17 authors dissect generally accepted paradigms of the ‘Holocaust’. The blockbuster anthology that struck
Holocaust orthodoxy a body blow from which it has never recovered. Dissecting marshals the work of more than a dozen researchers
to subject the conventional historiography of the “gas chambers”, the “six million”, the postwar
trials, and other linchpins of the extermination story to careful, precise, methodical, and withering analysis. Germar Rudolf
on how chemical analysis gravely weakens the case for gassing in the Auschwitz-Birkenau crematoria, Carlo Mattogno and Franco
Deana on the crematory ovens of Auschwitz, Robert Faurisson, Manfred Köhler, and Claus Jordan on how testimony was
coerced and convictions manufactured, Fritz Berg, Ingrid Weckert, Carlo Mattogno, and Arnulf Neumaier on the technical and
evidentiary absurdities of gassing claims for German trucks in gas chambers and at Majdanek and Treblinka, Udo Walendy and
John Ball on analysis of photos alleged to depict the crimes or their locations, Rudolf on the evidence for Jewish losses
during WWII, Jürgen Graf on myths about the concentration camps, and more. Dissecting’s handsome design and format
lend themselves well to the numerous illustrations, charts, and diagrams with which these leading revisionists advance the
wealth of evidence the book offers against the Holocaust myth. This is a book — the book — that every revisionist
needs to own, and to read.
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1
PDF: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/01-dth.pdf
HTML: http://vho.org/dl/ENG/dth.pdf
Kindle: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/01-dth.mobi
GERMAR RUDOLF: LECTURES
ON THE HOLOCAUST: CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES CROSS EXAMINED
This book was written to fit the need of both those who have no in-depth knowledge of the Holocaust or of
revisionism, as well as for well-versed readers familiar with revisionism. Anyone who wants to bring himself up to date
on revisionist scholarship, but does not want to read all the special studies that were published during the past ten years,
needs this book! The book’s style is unique: It is a dialogue between the lecturer and the reactions of the audience.
Rudolf introduces the most important arguments and counter arguments of Holocaust revisionism. The audience reacts with
supportive, skeptical, and also hostile questions. The Lectures read like an exciting real-life exchange between persons
of various points of view. The usual moral, political, and pseudo-scientific arguments against revisionism are addressed
and refuted. This book resembles an entertaining collection of answers to frequently asked questions on the Holocaust. With
generous references to a vast bibliography, this easy-to-understand book is the best introduction into this taboo topic
for both readers unfamiliar with the topic and for those wanting to know more.
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=15
PDF: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf
Kindle: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.mobi
BREAKING THE SPELL: THE
HOLOCAUST, MYTH & REALITY
In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German “Enigma” code. This undermined the
German war effort – but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the Nazi concentration camp system. Between January
1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted and
decrypted. Oddly enough, historians have largely ignored the information furnished in these intercepts relating to “arrivals,”
“departures,” recorded deaths and other events at these camps. The only reasonable explanation for this embarrassing
omission is that the intercepted data seriously contradicts, even refutes, the orthodox “Holocaust” narrative.
The revealed information does not expose a program of mass murder and racial genocide. Quite the opposite: it reveals that
the Germans were determined, desperate even, to reduce the death rate in their work camps, which was caused by catastrophic
typhus epidemics. Were the British here hoodwinked by the Nazis, as some historians to this day try to claim—or is
the truth both simpler and more shocking? In 1988 and 1991 forensic studies threw light on the question of whether or not
the claimed gas chambers at Auschwitz had served as slaughter houses for hundreds of thousands of people. Both studies had
concluded that the only facilities where Zyklon B gas had been used were hygienic rather than homicidal, killing bugs rather
than Jews. Needless to say that these iconoclastic studies were ignored or in some countries even outlawed, and that their
authors were ostracized and even imprisoned. Dr. Kollerstrom, a science historian, has taken these studies, which are in
obvious, stark contrast to the widely accepted narrative, as a starting point for his own endeavour into the land of taboo.
After he had published a brief paper summarizing what he thought the data forced him to conclude, he was thrown out of his
College where he had been a member of staff for eleven years. In his new book Breaking the Spell, Dr. Kollerstrom shows
that “witness statements” supporting the human gas chamber narrative clearly clash with the available scientific
data. He juxtaposes the commonly accepted ideas about a Nazi extermination policy toward the Jews with a wide array of mostly
unchallenged, but usually unmentioned evidence pointing in a quite different direction, for instance: Zyklon B is a buzz
word for the claimed Nazi mass murder, but all non-anecdotal evidence proves that this chemical was merely used as a pesticide
in order to improve the inmates’ health and reduce, not increase, camp mortality. Zyklon B applied in delousing chambers
formed chemical compounds detectable to this day. No such compounds can be found, but ought to be expected, in the claimed
homicidal gas chambers. The UK’s intelligence decrypts prove that the German camp authorities were desperately trying
to save their inmates’ lives. “Six Million Jews threatened or killed”: read 167 quotes from newspapers
with that “news” spanning from 1900 to 1945, with a peak after World War ONE! Yes, one, not two! Germany has
paid compensation to millions of Nazi victims, and Israel has implicitly admitted that many million Jews survived the Holocaust.
A British archaeological team looked for traces of the claimed 800,000 victims of the Treblinka camp—and came back
empty-handed. Dr. Kollerstrom concludes that the history of the Nazi “Holocaust” has been written by the victors
with ulterior motives and that this history is distorted, exaggerated and largely wrong. He asserts that this history is,
in truth, a great lie that distorts our common perceived reality and misdirects human history to this very day.
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=31
Kindle & Paperback: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Breaking-Spell-Holocaust-Myth-Reality-ebook/dp/B00Q8UK8BM/
CARLO MATTOGNO: CURATED
LIES — THE AUSCHWITZ MUSEUM’S MISREPRESENTATIONS, DISTORTIONS AND DECEPTIONS
Since the early 1990s, revisionist historians have published an increasing amount of research about the infamous
German facility at Auschwitz in what is now Poland. This research surpasses the work of the Auschwitz Museum’s
own research department in both quantity and quality while failing to find in the tens of thousands of available wartime
documents any trace of plans for gas chambers for executing people at Auschwitz or any of its satellite camps.
Because these facts contradict a great body of
the history of World War II, Polish researchers at the Auschwitz Museum have been under enormous pressure to respond to
this revisionist challenge. In 2014, the museum researchers issued a book, The Beginnings of the Extermination of Jews in
KL Auschwitz in the Light of the Source Materials, reprinting 74 original German wartime documents which they claim prove
the construction and use of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz by the German government and the German civilian and military
forces who ran the camp. However, upon examination of the book, none of the “new” evidence or analysis holds
water. In its main section, Curated Lies is therefore a point by point refutation of the Auschwitz Museum’s book.
This main section is preceded by a section focusing on the Auschwitz Museum’s most coveted asset: the alleged gas chamber
inside the Old Crematorium, toured every year by well over a million visitors. We begin Curated Lies therefore by exposing
the many ways in which visitors have been deceived and misled by forgeries and misrepresentations committed by the Auschwitz
Museum, some of which are maintained to this day.
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=38
Kindle & Paperback: https://www.amazon.com/Curated-Lies-Misrepresentations-Distortions-Deceptions-ebook/dp/B01EZFN4TO
CARLO MATTOGNO: INSIDE
THE GAS CHAMBERS — THE EXTERMINATION OF MAINSTREAM HOLOCAUST HISTORIOGRAPHY
Since the early 1990s, critical historians have published a steadily growing number of carefully investigated studies
on the so-called “Holocaust.” Hence the orthodox historians, usually paid by the government, were compelled
to do something against the rising tide of revisionist arguments. Therefore, after a conference had been held in Germany
to discuss the matter, an anthology appeared in early 2011 under the aegis of the German historians Günter Morsch and
Bertrand Perz. It claims to refute the arguments of critical historians.
Indicative for this study is, however, that revisionist arguments are basically not addressed at all. Hardly any of the many revisionist works which have appeared over the past 20 years is even mentioned.
In the present book, Italian scholar Mattogno mercilessly exposes the embarrassing superficiality and dogmatic ignorance of these historians. Over and over again it becomes clear that their claims are in part utterly unfounded or are frequently based on the distorted and disfigured use of sources. Based on his unparalleled knowledge of the source material, Mattogno aptly reduces the theses of the court historians to absurdity. This book summarizes the arguments for and against every single gas chamber claim made for any of the German war time camps: Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Dachau, Majdanek, Mauthausen, Natzweiler, Neuengamme, Ravensbrück, Sachsenhausen, Sobibor, Stutthof and Treblinka. Even the mystical “Gas Vans” are covered plus the euthanasia centers at Bernburg, Brandenburg, Grafeneck, Hadamar, Hartheim and Sonnenstein. This is the most comprehensive and up-to-date summary of revisionist knowledge.
By means of this book,
mainstream Holocaust historiography has suffered a defeat which comes close to its intellectual extermination.
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=26
PDF: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/25-itgc.pdf
Kindle: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/25-itgc.mobi
ARTHUR R. BUTZ: THE HOAX
OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY
First published in 1976, this slightly revised and enhanced edition of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century
is the seminal work of “Holocaust” revisionism and still the most widely read on the subject. In 502 pages of
penetrating study and lucid commentary, Dr. Butz gives the reader a graduate course on the subject of the Jews of World War
Two Europe – concluding not only that they were not virtually wiped out, but what’s more, that no evidence exists
to date to confirm that there was ever any attempt to do so.
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=7
PDF: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/07-thottc.pdf
HTML: http://vho.org/GB/Books/thottc/
Kindle: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/07-thottc.mobi
JÜRGEN GRAF: THE
GIANT WITH FEET OF CLAY — RAUL HILBERG AND HIS STANDARD WORK ON THE ‘HOLOCAUST’
This outstanding short study provides a merciless demolition of the central claims of the Holocaust thesis
by way of a probing examination of Raul Hilberg’s canonical The Destruction of the European Jews. By narrowing his
focus to those pages in Destruction that deal directly with the plans, program, method, and numerical results of the alleged
Nazi mass murder of the Jews, Swiss researcher Graf relentlessly exposes the weakness and, often, absurdity of the best evidence
for the extermination program, the gas chambers, and anything like the six million death toll. Giant can be devastatingly
funny in its deconstruction of Hilberg’s flimsy attempts to portray mass gassing and cremation at Auschwitz and Treblinka;
its focused brevity makes this book both an excellent introduction and a fine refresher course on the essentials of the
revisionist case.
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=3
PDF: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/03-tgwfoc.pdf
Kindle: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/03-tgwfoc.mobi
THE FIRST HOLOCAUST:
HOLOCAUST CLAIMS DURING AND AFTER WORLD WAR ONE
“The First Holocaust” by Don Heddesheimer is a critical work documenting the continuous Jewish
attempts at floating out Holocaust propaganda before, during and after World War One, often invoking the magical “6,000,000”
figure and using the term “Holocaust”. Of course, these clever propagandists have since accomplished their goal
of establishing the outrageous myth of the Jewish Holocaust™ in the public consciousness following the end of WW2.
In large part due to fictional Hollywood movies like “Shindler’s List”.
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=6
PDF: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/06-tfh.pdf
HTML: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/tfh/
Kindle: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/06-tfh.mobi
THE HOLOCAUST DOGMA OF
JUDAISM BY BEN WEINTRAUB
The book “The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism” describes how the 6 million
number is kabbalistically derived. 600,000 souls leaving Egypt multiplied by the 10 sephiroth. The number 6 million is a
symbolic number with a religious meaning and the Holocaust is part of the religious dogma of Judaism. The symbolic 6,000,000
and the special term, holocaust, were carefully created, crafted and fabricated by those who follow undeniably Talmudic-Kabalistic
doctrines. Jewish author, Benjamen Blech, confirmed this reality in his book “The Secrets of Hebrew Words”.
PDF: http://www.infiniteabundance.us/images/Holocaust_Dogma_of_Judaism_by_Weintraub.pdf
THE MYTH OF THE SIX MILLION
BY PROF. DAVID HOGGAN
This book was published anonymously in 1969, but it is now a common knowledge that the author of this pioneering
little book was Prof. David L. Hoggan, a history professor at Stanford University. It almost seems a precursor to the explosive
report Did Six Million Really Die? as it lays out common-sense and little known facts about the real policies of Third Reich
Germany and its policies towards repatriating Jews out of Germany.
PDF: http://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres/hoggan2.pdf
HTML: http://www.ihr.org/books/hoggan/Myth_TOC.html
DEBUNKING THE GENOCIDE
MYTH BY PAUL RASSINIER
(THE HOLOCAUST STORY AND THE LIES OF ULYSSES)
Paul Rassinier was arrested by the Gestapo in October 1943 and deported to Germany, where he was held prisoner
until the end of the war in Buchenwald and Dora concentration camps. Rassinier was profoundly distressed by the many lies
and myths about the concentration camps that were being circulated. He wrote: “Then one day I realized that a false
picture of the German camps had been created and that the problem of the concentration camps was a universal one, not just
one that could be disposed of by placing it on the doorstep of the National Socialists. The deportees — many of whom
were Communists — had been largely responsible for leading international political thinking to such an erroneous conclusion.
I suddenly felt that by remaining silent I was an accomplice to a dangerous influence. With regard to gas chambers, the
almost endless procession of false witnesses and of falsified documents to which I have invited the reader’s attention
during this long study, proves, nevertheless, only one thing: never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the
Third Reich intend to order — or, in fact, order — the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner.”
Paul Rassinier, the “father of revisionism” wrote 6 revisionist books between 1949 and 1967.
PDF: http://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres/debunk.pdf
HTML: http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking.html
DID SIX MILLION REALLY
DIE?
Did Six Million Really Die? was originally published by the Historical Review Press in England in 1974. It
was an immediate success and even though no bookshop would stock it, word spread fast. Did Six Million Really Die? is the
book for which Ernst Zündel was taken to court in Canada for merely reprinting; leading to the two great Holocaust trials
of 1985 and 1988 in which the Holocaust was fully exposed in court by Ernst Zündel and his excellent defence team represented
by distinguished attorney Doug Christie. Did Six Million Really Die? is also the book for which gifted French teacher François
Duprat was murdered in 1978 for publishing the first French translation.
PDF: http://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres5/harwoodeng.pdf
HTML: http://www.zundelsite.org/harwood/didsix00.html
THE GREAT HOLOCAUST TRIAL:
The Landmark Battle for Freedom of Speech
The record of the persecution of German-Canadian heretic Ernst Zündel by a de facto Sanhedrin, for publishing
the book, Did Six Million Really Die? is almost too fantastic to countenance. Zündel faced two years in prison if convicted.
His defense was initially regarded by the press and public as preposterous. “How can anyone deny the Holocaust?”
was the incredulous response to the news that Zündel would vigorously defend himself and the free speech rights of
all Canadians. The trial was expected to be a quick and ignominious rout of Zündel and his supporters. But in a startling
reversal, the “survivors” who had appeared in court in order to send him to jail, had to submit their “testimony”
to scrutiny, the rules of evidence and cross-examination, something that had never happened before and has never happened
since. Canadians grew ever more surprised and shocked at the amazing admissions which the defense team elicited from the
supposed “eyewitnesses” to the homicidal gas chambers. As a result, television reporters and print journalists
who covered the trial for more than eight weeks in 1985 produced broadcasts and news reports that turned Canada upside down.
Zündel was tried again in 1988. This time he assembled the ‘Leutcher Report,’ an on-site forensic examination
of Auschwitz by ‘Mr. Death,’ Fred Leutcher, capital punishment engineer for the U.S. prison system. When Zundel
could not be silenced by the Canadian courts, his enemies turned to bombs, arson and the dungeons of Zionist Germany.
The Great Holocaust Trial is the only revisionist
account of Ernst Zündel’s first trial, one of the few times in history when so-called “Holocaust survivors”
were subjected to cross-examination by a counsel for the defense as astute, fearless and well-informed as Douglas Christie.
PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/248474654/THE-GREAT-HOLOCAUST-TRIAL-The-Landmark-Battle-for-Freedom-of-Speech
https://archive.org/details/MichaelHoffmanTheGreatHolocaustTrial
ROBERT FAURISSON: WITNESSES
TO THE GAS CHAMBERS OF AUSCHWITZ
Eyewitness testimony must always be verified. There are two essential means
of verifying such testimony in criminal cases: confronting the account with the material elements (in particular, with expertise
as to the crime weapon), and the detailed cross-examination of the witness on what he/she purports to have seen. Thus, in
the proceedings where it had been a question of the homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz, no judge nor any attorney was able
to claim any kind of expertise regarding the weapon of the crime; moreover, no lawyer ever cross-examined the witnesses
by asking them to describe with precision even one of these chemical slaughter-houses. That is, up until 1985. When witnesses
that year were finally cross-examined on these subjects during the first Zündel trial in Toronto, their rout was total.
Because of this resounding set-back and by reason of other calamities previous to or following 1985, the defenders of the
thesis of Jewish extermination have begun to abandon a history of Auschwitz primarily founded on testimonies and are obliging
themselves, at the present time, to replace it with a scientific basis, or, at least, one which appears scientific, founded
on factual research and proofs. The ‘testimonial history’ of Auschwitz in the manner of Elie Wiesel and Claude
Lanzmann is discredited.
HTML: http://codoh.com/library/document/935/
http://vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndwitness.html
THE GAS CHAMBER OF SHERLOCK
HOLMES BY SAMUEL CROWELL
Among scholars and the general public, the prevailing consensus holds that millions of European Jews were
sent to death in gas chambers as part of an official Nazi policy of mass extermination during the Second World War. So entrenched
is this consensus that throughout the Western world those who publicly question its accuracy are now routinely subject to
censorship, academic censure, and even criminal prosecution. In contemporary society, no other species of dissident scholarship
is met with comparably illiberal reaction.
In an intellectual atmosphere thus poisoned by acrimony and haunted by
the specter of persecution, The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes stands as a calm, deftly reasoned, and highly original affirmation
of intellectual freedom. Drawing on extensive empirical and documentary evidence as well as methods of cultural criticism
conventionally eschewed by field historians, Samuel Crowell argues that the “canonical&” Holocaust gassing
claim can be traced to a fateful crisis of modernism — a crisis revealed in popular texts and long-forgotten cultural
ephemera. Spanning from the earliest broadcast rumors to the extermination narrative that was sealed at Nuremberg, Crowell
s probing analysis permits us to consider how a grim narrative emerged and evolved in the cyclonic momentum of an era marked
by social upheaval, total war, and unprecedented technological change.
Though it has achieved the status of an underground
classic, The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes has until now been available only in samizdat editions and on the Internet.
This definitive edition has been updated and revised and includes a new introduction by the author. In addition to the title
essay, supplemental texts include an appended restatement of Crowell s important monograph, “Bomb Shelters at Birkenau,”
as well as the never-before-published essay, “The Holocaust in Retrospect.”
(2011 Edition) Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/The-Chamber-Sherlock-Holmes-Understanding/dp/1616583479
(2000 Edition) PDF: http://codoh.com/media/files/downloads/xsherlock.pdf
Review by Richard A. Widmann: http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2011/volume_3/number_2/gas_chamber_of_sherlock_holmes_1.php
DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST:
A NEW LOOK AT BOTH SIDES
This is a book about the Holocaust, and about two competing views of that event. On the one hand we have
the traditional, orthodox view: the six million Jewish casualties, the gas chambers, the cremation ovens and mass graves.
Traditional historians have thousands of surviving witnesses and the weight of history on their side. On the other hand
there is a small, renegade band of writers and researchers who refuse to accept large parts of this story. These revisionists,
as they call themselves, present counter-evidence and ask tough questions. They are beginning to outline a new and different
narrative. Thus there has emerged something of a debate — a debate of historic significance. This is no peripheral
clash between two arcane schools of thought, regarding some obscure details of World War II. It is about history, of course,
but it also speaks to fundamental issues of our time: freedom of speech and press, the operation of mass media, manipulation
of public opinion, political and economic power structures, and the coercive abilities of the State. It is an astonishingly
rancorous and controversial debate, with far-reaching implications.
http://www.debatingtheholocaust.com/
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=32
Kindle & Paperback: https://www.amazon.com/Debating-Holocaust-Look-Sides-Handbooks-ebook/dp/B013GCQ1U6
THE SIX MILLION: FACT
OR FICTION?
Just some of the amazing revelations in this book include:
– How Zionists and Nazis cooperated
before the war on writing Germany’s racial laws—and in the setting up of Jewish settlements in Palestine;
– How Zionists offered to take up arms for Nazi Germany against Britain during World War II;
-How Nazi policy
was first aimed at encouraging Jews to emigrate, and then after the war broke out, to evacuating them east of the Urals;
– How official German records shows that there were 4.5 million Jews under Nazi control, and of that number, 4.3
million lodged claims as “Holocaust victims” after the war;
– How the Soviet Union used torture to
produce the lion’s share of “confessions” extracted from Germans to support the “extermination”
allegations;
– How the Jewish lead prosecutor in the “Einsatzgruppen” trials publicly admitted to
having witnessed torture and personally used death threats to extract “confessions”;
– Exactly what
Adolf Eichmann Confessed to—and what he did not;
– The shocking lies and distortions contained in the two
John Demjanjuk trials;
– How the Auschwitz Camp Museum has formally admitted that the “gas chamber”
it has shown to millions of tourists is actually a fake;
– How original German architect plans of Auschwitz show
no “gas chambers”;
– How forensic chemical examination of Auschwitz has disproved the use of Zyklon-B
in the so-called “ruined gas chambers”;
– How official Israeli and Polish university archaeological
digs at Belzec and Sobibór have failed to find any evidence of “gas chambers”; and of how a similar dig
at Chelmno directly contradicted “eyewitness” testimony;
– How the “gas chambers” at
Majdanek have glass windows, baths, and real showers for the alleged “victims”;
– How the “carbon
monoxide” gas bottles on display at Majdanek, still connected to a “gas chamber,” are in fact engraved
and marked as “carbon dioxide!”;
– Details of the “Star of David gas chamber tile” hoax
at the 2013 Treblinka archaeological dig;
– How a delousing chamber at Dachau has been misrepresented as a homicidal
gas chamber;
– How German POWs were forced to alter a shower room at Sachenhausen to support a Soviet show trial—but
that the forgery was so crude and embarrassing that the Communists knocked down the building in 1952.
– The Bergen-Belsen
camp is also reviewed, along with an explanation of the typhus epidemic which swept the camp in the last months of the war
and created the horror images of emaciated dead bodies now associated with “the Holocaust.”
This new version also deals with the “eyewitness survivor”
memoirs and their outright lies and forgery, starting with a superbly illustrated expose of the faked memoirs of “Nazi
hunter” Simon Wiesenthal and many others.
Finally, the last section discusses the all-important question of how
and why the Holocaust storytellers have gone through so much trouble to make up the incredible story of the “Six Million.”
169 illustrations. December 2014 Third edition.
Kindle & Paperback: http://www.amazon.com/Six-Million-Fact-Fiction/dp/1499174926/
THE HOLOCAUST HOAX EXPOSED:
DEBUNKING THE 20TH CENTURY’S BIGGEST LIE
Today, if a book similar to this one were published in Europe, its author would be arrested and imprisoned.
Their crime: simply questioning the so-called holocaust where six million Jews were allegedly exterminated during WWII.
Indeed, researchers have endured solitary confinement, brutal beatings by Jewish assailants, ongoing harassment, lengthy
court battles, career suicide, and media attacks directed against their work all because they presented a revisionist history
of this pivotal event. Other writers have been the victims of hate crimes, extensive smear campaigns, fines, death threats,
and monetary rewards placed upon their heads after going into hiding. The perpetrators behind these jack-booted Thought
Police tactics are an entire Holohoax industry devoted to suppressing factual data in favor of peddling heavy-handed doses
of propaganda. Despite these obvious dangers, The Holocaust Hoax Exposed dissects every element of what has become the 20th
century s most grotesque conspiracy. Covered in jarring detail is the mythology surrounding concentration camps, the truth
about Zyklon-B, Anne Frank s fable, how the absurd six million figure has become a laughingstock, and the betrayal by maniacal
Zionists of their own Jewish people that led to their deaths (via starvation and disease) after Allied bombings cutoff supply
lines to German work camps. Yet, the only way an Israeli state could be created on stolen Palestinian land following WWII
was through the most outlandish lies imaginable. Consequently, the Holohoax industry has become a tyrannical dictatorship
that incessantly manipulates, distorts, marginalizes and manufactures false results to achieve their Machiavellian ends.
By taking their hysterical obsessions to psychopathic levels, the charlatans behind this ruse make it glaringly apparent
how weak their foundation is. To compensate, these intellectually dishonest con men (and women) continue to persecute revisionist
historians all because they re incapable of supporting their arguments through legitimate debate. The Holocaust Hoax Exposed
is the final nail in a rotting coffin that has long been buried beneath a plethora of deceit.
http://www.barnesreview.org/the-holocaust-hoax-exposed-debunking-the-20th-centurys-biggest-lie-p-552.html
CARLO MATTOGNO: THE REAL
CASE FOR AUSCHWITZ — ROBERT VAN PELT’S EVIDENCE FROM THE IRVING TRIAL CRITICALLY REVIEWED
In 1993 Jewish theologian Deborah Lipstadt called British historian David Irving a “Holocaust denier.”
Irving sued her for libel in return. Subsequently a court case unfolded in England which attracted the attention of the
world’s mass media in 2000. The sharpest weapon in Lipstadt’s defense arsenal was Jewish art historian Robert
van Pelt, who presented an expert report claiming to refute revisionist assertions about Auschwitz. Because Irving had neither
the support by any expert witnesses nor was he himself an expert on the Holocaust, he inevitably lost the case. Robert van
Pelt was therefore praised as the defeater of revisionism. When he published his revised expert report in his book The
Case for Auschwitz in 2002, he even advanced to the foremost expert on Auschwitz in the public’s eyes. Mattogno’s The
Real Case for Auschwitz is the revisionist response to Robert van Pelt. Its first revelation is that van Pelt has committed
plagiarism: he plundered and basically regurgitated the research results published in 1989 and 1993 by French researcher
Jean-Claude Pressac – yet without naming his source even once. On more than 700 pages, Mattogno thoroughly scrutinizes
van Pelt’s contorted assertions by juxtaposing them to material and documentary facts. Mattogno’s analysis is
devastating for van Pelt, as it reveals that van Pelt’s study of Auschwitz ignores crucial counter-arguments, fails
to approach pivotal technical issues with technical means, is highly inconsistent, uses deceptive methods, presents conflicting
sources without due source criticism, deforms all sources to serve the author’s perspective, and reveals a shockingly
threadbare knowledge of the history of Auschwitz. Mattogno therefore concludes: “The Case for Auschwitz is
neither a scholarly nor a historical work; it is only a biased journalistic assemblage of poorly understood and poorly interpreted
historical sources.” This is a book of prime political and scholarly importance, as it delivers the exterminationists’
case the most devastating blow ever!
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=22
PDF: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/22-atcfs.pdf
Kindle: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/22-trcfa.mobi
GERMAR RUDOLF, CARLO
MATTOGNO: AUSCHWITZ LIES — LEGENDS, LIES, AND PREJUDICES ON THE HOLOCAUST
Untruths and mainstream propaganda abound when it comes to the Auschwitz WWII German labor camp. Here are
just a few:
1. French biochemist
G. Wellers claimed he exposed The Leuchter Report as fallacious, but in truth he exposed only his own grotesque incompetence;
2. Polish researcher Prof. J. Markiewicz said he proved that Zyklon-B was used in the gas chambers of Auschwitz, but Markiewicz
was found to have fabricated his results;
3. Chemist Dr. Richard Green declared that Revisionists’ chemical
arguments were flawed, yet Green was forced to admit that Revisionists were right after all;
4. Prof. Zimmerman alleged
that the crematories in Auschwitz could cremate all victims of the claimed massmurder. But in truth, accountant Zimmerman
proved only his lack of expertise on the subject;
5. Profs. M. Shermer and A. Grobman said they could refute the entire
array of Revisionist arguments. But in reality they covered only a tiny fraction of Revisionist arguments—and botched
their attempts at refutation;
6. Keren, McCarthy and Mazal found the “Holes of Death,” saying they proved
the existence of the Auschwitz gas chambers. But no, they twisted evidence to support their case and suppressed the facts.
These and many other untruths about Auschwitz
are exposed for what they are: political lies created to ostracize dissident historians and keep the Western world in Holocaust
servitude.
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=18
PDF: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/18-al.pdf
HTML: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/al/
Kindle: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/18-al.mobi
AUSCHWITZ: THE END OF
A LEGEND: HOW WAS SUCH MASS MURDER TECHNICALLY POSSIBLE? (CRITIQUE ON PRESSAC’S AUSCHWITZ BOOKS)
In this
meticulously written work, Italian scholar Carlo Mattogno demolishes the boldest attempt yet to answer the revisionist critique
of the Auschwitz extermination story. Carlo Mattogno has performed yeoman service for the cause of truth by showing how
unjustified Jean-Claude Pressac is in reviving once more the old legend that there really were gas chambers used for the
mass annihilation of millions of Jews at Auschwitz. He shows how Pressac has misinterpreted his data and has thereby in
reality been a “crypto-revisionist,” rather than a true “exterminationist.” In his confused argumentation,
Pressac has demonstrated ignorance of the structure and functioning of both crematory ovens and gas chambers, and of the
nature and use of the disinfectant Zyklon-B. Pressac’s use of such statistics as exist is arbitrary and largely fanciful,
resulting in a down-sizing of the number of alleged victims. Where information does not exist, Pressac invents it, often
with mutually contradictory arguments in different parts of his presentation (e.g. concerning the purpose and use of the
crematoria as supposedly intended by the SS). With his relentless deconstruction of Pressac’s affirmations and interpretations,
and his demonstration of Pressac’s incompetence, Mattogno has hammered one more nail into the coffin of the old myth
of the mass murder of Jews at Auschwitz and elsewhere.
— A. Dibert, pen name of a professor emeritus at an Ivy
League university.
PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/96633790/Auschwitz-End-of-a-Legend
HTML: http://vho.org/GB/Books/anf/Mattogno.html
UDO WALENDY: FORGED WAR
CRIMES MALIGN THE GERMAN NATION
Udo Walendy examines the alleged visual documents—photographs—that are claimed to prove the atrocities
perpetrated by the National Socialists against the Jews. The question at issue is what exactly the pictures show, whether
they were retouched or whether they may even be completely fabricated, i.e., montages or drawings. A pile of dead bodies
or an open mass grave, for example, can be presented as evidence for the gas chamber murders, but what is there to prove
that the pictures do not in fact show the German victims of Allied air-raids, or the victims of starvation or epidemics
in German or Allied camps, soldiers killed in action, victims of pogroms, or even persons killed by the Soviet secret service?
Udo Walendy shows with numerous examples that the falsification of photographs for purposes of incriminating the Third Reich
is rather more the rule than the exception. It is astonishing to note that there are usually many different versions of
a forged photograph, which makes it easy to spot cases of alteration. Walendy shows that the photo documents analyzed by
him cannot be incontestable evidence for the claims usually associated with them.
Many of the Holocaust and other WWII atrocity photographs shown in Forged War
Crimes can be viewed in our public libraries, where they are presented as authentic. By comparing versions in different books
and analyzing lighting and scale, this astonishing book exposes them as forgeries. They are the product of Stalin’s
Cold War propaganda operation and many are merely photographed drawings. For exposing fraud its author, Udo Walendy, was
imprisoned in Germany. The judge told him “We are sentencing you not for what you wrote, but for what you left out.”
PDF: http://archive.org/details/ForgedWarCrimesMalignTheGermanNation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/151615857/Forged-War-Crimes-Malign-the-German-Nation
AUSCHWITZ: THE UNDERGROUND
GUIDED TOUR. WHAT THE TOUR GUIDES DON’T TELL YOU AT AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU
This remarkable study of Auschwitz is unlike anything yet published. Though it is purposely small in size
and easy to read, it carries a powerful punch. The author visited Auschwitz as a tourist armed with a broad study of the
literature surrounding the world-famous site, and from that visit has proceeded to deconstruct the Auschwitz shown to her
and others as a “death” or “extermination” camp. By taking the reader on an “underground guided
tour” around Auschwitz-Birkenau, she clearly demonstrates it to be, at varying times and locations within the perimeters,
a simple labor, concentration and transit camp for political prisoners, where the health of the inmates was a prime concern
of the camp authorities. Sound unbelievable? After reading this carefully researched book, you will see the horror stories
for so long spread about Auschwitz-Birkenau in a new, more skeptical, light, and you may very well be so impressed you’ll
want to share your new vision with others. A cautiously written work that moves toward a surprising conclusion, leaving
us pondering how so much that is not true has seeped into our consciousness as “fact.” Lavishly illustrated.
PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/89737378/Carolyn-Yeager-Auschwitz-The-Underground-Guided-Tour
INGRID WECKERT: JEWISH
EMIGRATION FROM THE THIRD REICH
Historical writings to date dealing with matters related to the Third Reich paint a grim picture. This applies
especially to writings that deal with the Jewish ethnic group. To this day there are still accounts of the Jewish emigration
that depict it as some kind of clandestine operation – as if the Jews who wished to leave Germany had to sneak over
the borders in defiance of the German authorities, and leave all their possessions and wealth behind.
The truth is that the emigration was welcomed by the German authorities, and benefitted from encouragement and assistance that increased over time. Emigration was not some kind of wild flight, but rather a lawfully conducted and regulated matter. Weckert‘s booklet elucidates the emigration process in law and policy, thereby correcting the traditionally received picture of Jewish emigration from Germany significantly.
German authorities and Jewish-Zionist agencies worked closely together
on this emigration. Jews interested in emigrating received detailed advice and offers of help from both sides. The accounts
of Jews fleeing Germany in secret by night across some border or straits are fabulous. On the contrary, the German government
wished German Jews only to live elsewhere. The myths to the contrary were contrived only to accord with the greater myth
of genocidal intent and were capitalized upon by erstwhile “smugglers” seeking sainthood.
http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=12
PDF: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/12-jefttr.pdf
Kindle: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/12-jefttr.mobi
RESISTANCE
IS OBLIGATORY BY GERMAR RUDOLF
Address to the Mannheim District Court 15 November
2006 to 29 January 2007
The uncensored inside story from the “thought criminal” himself—Germar Rudolf. Rudolf was
a highly respected chemist with a promising career—a graduate of the Max Planck Institute—who made the “mistake”
of telling the truth at a place (Germany) and time (during court) when lies are the only permissible public statements about
the holocaust. When informed he would be sent to prison for his factual testimony made during a law case involving the holocaust,
Rudolf went underground. He ended up in America, fell in love and was wed to his U.S. citizen sweetheart.
However, in late 2005, Rudolf—now a peace activist and publisher—was kidnapped by the U.S. government and deported to Germany to face charges of “holocaust denial.” There he was put on trial for his historical writings. During this trial his defense lawyers were prohibited under the threat of prosecution from filing motions in support of Rudolf’s historical views. All motions filed by Rudolf’s defense team directed at proving that his writings are scientific in nature and are therefore protected by the German constitution were rejected by the court. Academics willing to confirm as expert witnesses the scholarly nature of Rudolf’s writings were barred from testifying.
Confronted with this kafkaesque situation, yet undaunted, Rudolf gave a brilliant speech in court that lasted seven sessions. In it he elucidated what science is and how to recognize its exemplars. He proved that his writings undoubtedly qualified. He demonstrated moreover why the German laws designed to suppress peaceful dissidents are unconstitutional and in violation of human rights. Furthermore he explained in detail why it is everyone’s obligation to resist in a non-violent way a state which throws peaceful dissidents into dungeons.
The court was hardly moved by Rudolf’s arguments. It sentenced him to 30 months imprisonment and ordered Rudolf’s opus magnum, his Lectures on the Holocaust, to be confiscated and burned under police supervision. In addition, the public prosecutor initiated another criminal investigation against Rudolf, because he had tried to publish his defense speech from his prison cell.
After Rudolf had served his full prison term, he was released from prison in the summer of 2009 but also put under
a three-years lasting “conduct supervision” by the German authorities. After this restriction was rescinded
in the summer of 2011 due to his emigration to the U.S., his defense speech in support of liberty finally sees the light
of day. The book also contains, among other things, a comprehensive documentation of the motions rejected by the court as
well as two expert reports of historians who could not testify. Additionally, it is illustrated with a number of gorgeous
drawings prepared by Rudolf during his time in prison, 16 of them in full color.
http://www.barnesreview.org/resistance-is-obligatory-p-555.html
http://germarrudolf.com/2013/02/resistance-is-obligatory-online/
PDF: http://germarrudolf.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Resistance.pdf
Holocaust Handbooks
Each
book can be downloaded as a free PDF file from each book’s dedicated webpage: http://holocausthandbooks.com/
Holocaust Handbücher
Tabu-Brechende Bücher und Dokumentarfilme
http://holocausthandbuecher.com/
Free
Book Archive of VHO.ORG
Historical Revisionism – International and Independent
Scientific Historical Research http://vho.org/dl/ENG.html
The Secret Holocaust
The real holocaust was a Christian Holocaust by Jews of sixty-six million, mostly Christians.
By Eustace Mullins
The devastation of civilization to date by the rapacious hordes of Godless Communism, as well as their planned annihilation of all non-Jewish societies and political organizations, began to ravage the world in the nineteenth century. It has resulted in incredible suffering and death for many millions of Christian victims in many parts of the world.
Yet as these Christian victims lie in their graves, unmourned and unknown, a new class of international citizens, (the creators of Marxist terrorism), profess to be the only "victims" who have endured suffering in the past one hundred and fifty years. They command the world to weep for them, because they control the world.
These harbingers of terror claim to be "refugees", since they had no nation of their own, but infested the civilized societies in every part of the world for two thousand years, bringing with them, in every instance, disease and death.
They have emerged from one shattered nation after another, not as refugees, but as the final victors, bearing away their loot, and scurrying through ports which they have created and which they alone know how to follow, until they come to another host nation.
With them they bring, like the medieval Bubonic Plagues, (an infection which they were accused of spreading), a terrible contamination, an infestation which quickly spreads through the new host country, and fells all who become its victims. This plague is world Communism, and its known carriers, the furry scavengers who have found their way through the sewers into every civilized place, are the international Jews.
We are asked to weep only for the Jews, and to ignore the many millions of actual victims of world terrorism in the past one hundred and fifty years, a chronicle of such horror that one scarcely can bear to put down this bloodstained record, not merely in fear that the world might put away its business in order to mourn these countless victims of international Communist terrorism, but that the tragic fate of these innocents, most of them women and children, is one of such pathos that one's heart could break from the full impact of its terrifying implications for everyone alive today.
One of the first victims of the international financiers, shortly after publication of the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx in 1848, was the Southern civilization of the United States. White immigrants had wrested from a hostile territory the means to create a gracious culture, one which the ruder and more unlettered sections of the new Republic could only gape at in admiration, an admiration, however, which soon turned to envy and then hatred.
This hatred brought armies into the American South, bearing the terrorists who, unknown at that time, were the first Communist totalitarians determined to wreak their hatred and policies of annihilation on all civilized people.
The Southerners were unfortunate enough to be the first victims. Military governments were set up in the conquered South, operating solely on the totalitarian concepts of Godless Communism, with courts functioning under martial law. The Southerners had been robbed of their Constitution, and of their rights to property and even to existence.
Their homes were burned and looted, and savage hordes were unleashed to rape and pillage the properties which were occupied only by women and children. To deny the inherited rights of these Southerners, which were still their due under the laws of this nation, a brutal reign of terror, featuring Federal Judges, Federal Courts, and Federal Prisons, which were set up for the first time in any state of these United States. For those Southern patriots who dared to protest these outrages, Federal insane asylums were set up for those who were not executed on the spot.
From New York, Jewish carpetbaggers, the Lehmans, the Baruchs, and other special emissaries of the Rothschilds, came to seize from the widows and orphans of the Confederate dead their last savings, their last possessions, and their devastated lands. The "Federal" power was absolute, for the military Reconstruction of the South was an occupation zone, and no democratic procedures were allowed the vanquished Southerners until they had been stripped of their last holdings. The impoverished survivors were forced to make a living by whatever pitiful means left to them.
In Europe, too, the civilized nations were beset throughout the nineteenth century by successive wars and revolutions, which resulted in millions of Christian refugees. Modern history begins with the Congress of Vienna in 1815, when the Jews, unleashed from their ghettoes and bearing a tide of gold amassed by the Rothschilds through their instigation and financing of wars from 1775 to 1812, used their newly acquired wealth to subvert the established governments of Europe and to start them on their terrifying slide into oblivion.
Their victims were helpless before their Jewish onslaught because they were Christians who believed that love for one's fellow man guides the affairs of the earth. And so it does, until Satan intervenes through his people. It was impossible for any Christian to believe that such bloodthirsty savages could exist among any civilized people.
Nor could the Christians, believing in their religion of Christ's love for humanity, understand the virulent hatred which the Jew bore towards all of God's creatures and which is beyond the ken of any civilized human being. [please bear in mind that above mentioned Congress of Vienna was made possible by the house of Romanov and that German nobility of Russia which Mr. Mullins presently tells were such blessing to Russia, and mankind in general]
Only now, as the Christian peoples totter on the verge of worldwide annihilation by the Jewish master scheme, can some indication of the nature of the enemy begin to be seen.
In the New Republic, April 13, 1983, it is noted that a Polish agitator, Adam Michnik, is accused of being a Zionist who is "prepared to torture patriotic opponents". In the same issue, we find that Jerry Urban wrote in a Polish journal that "the bloodthirstiness of Zionist doctrine and practice" must be opposed.
Urban calls attention to "genocide in its Israeli edition", referring to the continued massacres of Arab women and children under the direction of fanatical Zionists in the notorious Rosh Hasahan Massacre, a religious celebration which served the dual purpose of Jewish ritual murder and the political goals of the world's most famous terrorist, Prime Minister Menachem Begin, who desires to murder every Arab man, woman and child in the territories which the Jews plan to annex and settle in the Middle East.
Urban brings up a vital point in referring to the well known genocidal practices of the Israeli Government, suggesting that the Jews are now delighting in mass murder as a compensation for the myth that they quietly went to their "deaths" in the notorious "Holocaust" fantasy without resisting their Nazi "killers".
The idea that the heretofore "passive" Jews are, for the first time in their history, learning to kill, belies the entire recorded history of this plague. There are too many well-documented massacres in history in which the Jews tortured and murdered their victims with the greatest glee, gloating in such barbaric practices of tearing out the hearts of women and children and smearing the blood on their faces, while the Jewish women ripped out the writhing entrails of their dying victims, wrapped the steaming evidences of their victory around their waists, and began the traditional Jewish dance of the Hatikvah as the celebration of their triumph over their vanquished foes.
The Book of Esther records one of many such massacres of their victims by the Jews.
ESTHER VIII:11: "Wherein the King granted the Jews which were in every city to gather themselves together, and to stand for their life, to destroy, to slay, and to cause to perish, all the power of the people and province that would assault them, both little ones and women, and to take the spoil of them for their prey."
Thus a Jewish prostitute employed her power over the King to demand that he allow the Jews to massacre "both little ones and children", not merely in one town, but throughout the Kingdom, because "the Jews which were in every city", just as they are today.
This Biblical story records the first instance of total war, in which women and children were to be slain, as opposed to the traditional military combat, in which professional soldiers, trained for this role, met on the battlefield to vie against each other, and to win or lose honorably in the field.
This image of Esther was entitled,
"A Talmudic Tale of Terror and Treachery"
The Jews, as their million dollar a week apologists, Pat Robertson and Reverend Jerry Falwell, go to great pains to explain to us, did not have to fight on the battlefield to win territory, because God had promised them the Earth, and this "Sacred Promise" is the only law in the world today. It is to be hoped that at some point Falwell and Robertson will show us the actual documents on which this historic deed was recorded.
Robertson praying, his hands in the familiar mana cornuta, international sign of Satan.
To date, they ignore all questions about any proof of their fantastic claims on behalf of the Jews, and the millions keep rolling in. Despite the flagrant efforts of Falwell and Robertson on behalf of the Jewish world murder plan, the record shows that the Jew prefers to avoid the battlefield and the hazards of face to face combat, and to stealthily set up the massacres of helpless women and children.
Such has been their history, and today, we have even seen it live on color television. It was the ingrained bloodthirstiness of the Jews which led them to select as their principal "religious" holiday, the Feast of Purim, which celebrates their massacre of the innocents.
One of the most striking parts of this well known quotation from the Book of Esther, the only genuinely Jewish book of the Bible, and, for that reason, the only one in which God is not mentioned, is the revelation that the code word of the Jews to indicate their knowledge of the Jewish World Murder Plan, is their remembrance of their massacre of the innocents by their code phrase, "had a good day".
Since that massacre, Jews have always offered this recognition phrase to each other, in Yiddish or in whatever language of the particular nation which they planned to take over, by saying, "Have a good day", meaning, of course, "We're looking forward to more massacres of the women and children of the goyim, or the gentile cattle."
Women and children, easy victims in the recent assault on Gaza, 2008-2009.
Now that the Jews have attained such enormous economic and political power in the United States, they have instructed all of their gentile employees in the vast networks of retail grocery, drug and apparel stores which they own throughout the United States that they must greet each customer by saying, "Have a good day."
This apparently friendly and supposedly meaningless salutation lets the Jew in the know be tipped off that he is in a store owned by Jews, and that the owners are anticipating "having a good day" in the future by more slaughters of the innocent and helpless gentile women and children.
The most important statement in the Book of Esther is the warning that "the fear of the Jews fell upon them."
Today, the dark shadow of imminent tragedy looms over every Christian, because of their fear of the Jews, and because of their instinctive knowledge, like penned cattle in a slaughterhouse, that the Jew intends to kill them for his profit.
Jacob Timerman, in an enlightening series of articles in the New Yorker magazine in 1982, said, "To understand the existence of the Other and then admit his existence without hatred is something new for Israel as a whole."
The Other, of course, means the non-Jew, a person whom the Jew cannot see without hatred. Because of his savage nature, the Jew wishes only to kill him and drink his blood. It is this terrible desire which bars the Jew from peaceful existence in any civilized nation, and which has been solely responsible for the occasional but ineffective resistance which the intended Christian victims have offered in opposition to his murder plans.
The Jew has only one purpose in the Middle East, and that is to murder all of the Arab inhabitants and to take their lands. The great scholar. Dr. Eric Bischoff, discovered this revelation in the official Jewish text of the Thikune Zohar, Edition Berdiwetsch, 88b, a book which, like all Jewish "religious" texts, is actually a code of cabalistic rituals detailing the instructions on how to murder the gentiles.
"Furthermore," says the Thikune Zohar, "there is a commandment pertaining to the killing of strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done in the lawful Jewish method. Those who do not bid themselves to the Jewish religious law must be offered up as sacrifices to the High God."
From the historian's point of view, the Jewish world war against all Christians proceeds in an unbroken succession of events from ancient history, when Jewish prostitutes such as Esther persuaded rulers to destroy their own people at the whim of the Jews.
Mayer Anselm Rothschild
In 1773, Mayer Anselm Rothschild met with twelve leading Jews to plot the downfall of the emerging Christian nations in both the New World and the Old World. During the American struggle for independence, Rothschild founded his fortune on the money received by the Elector of Hesse in payment for the mercenaries whom he rented to the British in their attempt to crush the American colonists.
The War of 1812 was instigated by the Rothschilds to force the renewal of their charter for the Bank of the United States. When this charter was vetoed by President Andrew Jackson in 1836, the Jews precipitated a financial panic and set up their plan to bring about the Civil War, which would simultaneously destroy the American Republic and despoil the wealthy Christian families of the South.
The Communist Manifesto of 1848 set Europe ablaze with revolutions, wars and counter-revolutions.
In August 1903, Max Nordau, in his address to the 6th Zionist Congress in Balse, Switzerland, revealed the plan for even greater conflagrations, the coming world wars:
"Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward ... The Zionist Congress; the English Uganda proposition; the future World War; the Peace Conference where, with the help of England, a free and Jewish Palestine will be created."
Max Nordau, the man who dreamt of the deaths of 50 000 000 Christians.
Onward and upward, over the bodies of fifty million more dead Christians this was Max Nordau's ecstatic vision of the coming World War, and so it came to pass. Professional historians have never been able to offer a satisfactory explanation of how the European nations became embroiled in the first World War.
Jewish Revolutionary Gavrilo Princip shown being seized by police moments after mortally wounding Archduke Ferdinand and his wife. The assassination of Catholic Monarch ~ Crown Prince Franz Ferdinand ~ heir to the Austrian throne, was carried out by the Jewish assassin Gavrilo Princip using a Browning pistol on Jun. 28, 1914. The Zionist newspaper PEIEWISCHE VORDLE wrote on Jan. 13, 1919, "The international Jewry... believed it *necessary to force Europe into the war so that a new Jewish era could begin throughout the world.
Arch-duke Ferdinand was assassinated by Gavril Princeps at Sarajevo; Austria demanded an apology from Serbia, Serbia apologized but Austria inexplicably declared war anyway.Max Warburg, Jewish advisor to the Kaiser who also helped fund the Jewish Bolshevik Revolution. He advised the Kaiser to go into WW1 so Zionists could push for an Israeli state. Both Warburg and Schiff were Rothschild agents. Warburg also arranged for Lenin to be transported through Germany to Russia in a sealed train to lead the conspirators to their Bolshevik triumph.
Three Jewish advisers to Kaiser Wilhelm, Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg, Max Warburg and Albert Ballin, then had the Kaiser declare war, and the other nations were involved.
Why ? To carry out the Zionist Jewish Plan.
On February 8, 1920, Sir Winston Churchill expressed his alarm over world developments in an interview published in the Sunday Illustrated Herald, London:
"From the days of Adam (Spartacus) Weishaupt, to those of Karl Marx to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxemburg and Emma Goldman. This worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.
"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international, and for the most part, atheistic Jews. It is certainly a very great one: it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders."
Churchill referred, of course, to the overthrow of the Christian Orthodox Church in Russia and its replacement by a hateful gang of homicidal maniacs, whose unimaginable success was accomplished by the astute financial aid of Jacob Schiff to the Jewish revolutionaries, and by Max Warburg in Germany, who, at the crucial moment of the revolution in Russia, arranged for Lenin to be transported through Germany to Russia in a sealed train to lead the conspirators to their Bolshevik triumph.
Jacob Schiff whose money bankrolled the Jewish Bolsheviks who were responsible for millions of Christian deaths and the overthrow of the Russian Christian Orthodox Church.
[Sea Lord Churchill was only too happy to perform a large scale blood-sacrifice at Gallipoli, using British soldiers as offering, so there is enough to worry about on his own plate ... had England not fomented and started that war, there would have been no reason for the German High Command to revolutionize and send Lenin and financing to Russia]
An Orgy of Murder, Extreme Torture and Pillage
The orgy of murder, torture and pillage which followed the Jewish triumph in Russia has never been equaled in the history of the world. For more than a thousand years, the White Russians, descendants of German settlers in Russia, had provided an economic climate in which Russia, the "breadbasket of Europe", had prospered.
In a few days, this stable civilization vanished, perhaps never to return. The fortunate ones were those who recognized the peril in time to flee with nothing but the clothes on their backs.
Those who dallied or sought to save others were shot down in mass executions persisting through the night, the constant rattle of machine guns muffled by the roar of truck engines raced at full throttle to drown the sound of the shots and the screams of the dying. Had you experienced the high standard of living in feudal Russia, perhaps, you would have a different opinion of this alleged prosperity.
On March 13, 1917, Jacob Schiff sent Milyukov, new Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Bolshevik Revolutionary Government, and a personal friend of Schiff, a telegram reproduced in the New York Times, April 10, 1917:
"Allow me, as the irreconcilable enemy of the tyrannical autocratic government which pitilessly persecuted our co-religionaires, to congratulate through your intermission the Russian people for what they have so brilliantly accomplished, and to wish success to your comrades in government and to yourself."
The issue also reproduces Milyukov's enthusiastic reply, "We are one with you in our hatred and antipathy for the old regime which is overthrown." [idiot ! the czar only abdicated on March 15, the Bolsheviks did not come to power until November, and Milyukov had no part in their government, but was running fast as he could]
The T'zar's exquisite daughters. At first, the girls did not die because of the jewels sewn into their corsets. These jewels were for protection but also so that the family could have some money for when they fled the country. The shooters were horrified at how the girls were able to withstand the bullets and feared that the family really was in power due to Divine Right (the idea that Kings and Queens are placed on the throne by God). To solve that problem, the shooters tried to stab them with bayonets. That failed, too, because of the jewels, so then, they were shot in the head at close range.
The key word here is "hatred". The Jews were free to indulge their most fervent fantasies of mass murder of helpless victims. Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed.
Some were actually sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain.
Others were placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies.
Some were nailed to the ceiling by their fingers or by their feet, and left hanging until they died of exhaustion.
Yakov (Yankel) Mikhailovich Yurovsky is best known as the chief executioner of Russia's last emperor, Tsar Nicholas and his family after the Russian Revolution of 1917.
Others were chained to the floor and hot lead poured into their mouths.
Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while the mob attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death.
Mothers were taken to the public square and their babies snatched from their arms. A Red terrorist would take a baby, hold it by the head, head downward, and demand that the Christian mother deny Christ. If she would not, he tossed the baby into the air, while another member of the mob rushed forward to catch it on the tip of his bayonet.
Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies.
There were many places of public execution in Russia during the days of the Revolution one of which was described by the American Rohrbach Commission, (Defender Magazine, October, 1933):
"The whole cement floor of the execution hall of the Jewish Cheka of Kiev was flooded with blood; it formed a level of several inches. It was a horrible mixture of blood, brains and pieces of skull. All the walls was bespattered with blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them. A gutter of 25 centimeters wide by 25 centimeters deep and about 10 meters long was along its length full to the top with blood.
"Some bodies were disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out the head, face and neck and trunk were covered with deep wounds. Further on, we found a corpse with a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner we discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no bodies that we could locate."
We already know of the glee with which Jacob Schiff and other Jewish bankers greeted the news that their co-religionaires in Russia were now engaged in the favorite Jewish practice of mass murder, but what of American government officials, who were well-informed by a number of intelligence sources about these atrocities?
The satanic Communist Chekists took pleasure in brutally torturing their victims- Many of who were Roman Catholics: The priests in Kherson were crucified. Archbishop Andronnikov of Perm had his eyes poked out and his ears and nose cut off. There were Chekists who cut open their victim's stomach, pulled out a length of small intestine, nailed it to a telegraph pole, and with a whip forced the victim to run circles around the pole until the whole intestine became unraveled. Eyes of Church dignitaries were poked out, their tongues cut off, and they were buried alive. The Bishop of Voronezh was boiled alive in a big pot, after which monks, revolvers at their heads, were ordered to drink. In Kharkov people were scalped. In Tsaritsyn and Kamyshin peoples hands were amputated with a saw. In Poltava and Kremchug the victims were impaled. In Odessa they were roasted alive in ovens or ripped to pieces. In Kiev, victims were placed in coffins with decomposing bodies and buried alive.
We have at least one record of a public response by a prominent government official, Woodrow Wilson, President of the United States. On April 2, 1917, Wilson, after learning of these atrocities, went before the Congress of the United States and said,
The elegant Romanov family was assassinated within minutes of this photo being taken.
"The autocracy that crowned the summit of Russia's political structure, long as it had stood and terrible as was the reality of its power, was not in fact Russian in origin, character or purpose; and now it has been shaken off and the great generous Russian people have been added in all their naive majesty and might to the forces that are fighting for freedom in the world for justice, and for peace. Here is a fit partner for a League of Honor."
Wilson's goofy reference to the "non-Russian" nature of the Czar's government referred to the fact that the Czars were descendants of Germans who had settled in Russia one thousand years earlier. The oldest dynasty in Europe, the Russian aristocracy, was denounced by the Communist propagandist Wilson as being "non-Russian!
One wonders how Wilson would have described his own origins, a President of the United States whose family had been in the United States less than a hundred years, and whose racial and geographical origins remain a matter of considerable speculation.
Wilson apparently believed that the thousand years the Romanovs had lived in Russia did not qualify them for Russian citizenship, but they were replaced by Communists who not only were Russians, but who belonged to no nation of this earth.
The Overman Committee in 1919 published a report of its findings which are pertinent to this subject. Titled, "Bolshevik Propaganda Hearing Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, 65th Congress," it records the testimony of Dr. George A. Simons, former superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, from which we briefly quote:
"We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of Trotsky-Bronstein, these men having come over from the lower east side of New York. Some of them, when they learned that I was the American pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased that there was somebody who could speak English, and their broken English showed that they had not qualified as being real Americans.
"A number of these men called on me and were impressed with the strange Yiddish element in this thing right from the beginning, and it soon became evident that more than half the agitators in the so-called Bolshevik movement were Jews. I have a firm conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that one of its bases is found in the east side of New York.
"The latest startling information, given me by someone with good authority, is this, that in December, 1918, in the northern community of Petrograd ~ that is what they call the section of the Soviet regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum (Zinoviev) ~ out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with the exception of one man, a negro from America who calls himself Professor Gordon.
"I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great revolution of the winter of 1917 there were scores of Jews standing on the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I often remarked to my sister, 'Well, what are we coming to anyway. This all looks so Yiddish.'
Up to that time we had very few Jews, because there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews in Petrograd, but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of the agitators were Jews.
"I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power, all over Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now that was to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians did not take kindly to it."
A widely known French journal, "L'Illustration", of September 14, 1918, commented, "When one lives in contact with the functionaries who are serving the Bolshevik Government, one feature strikes the attention, which, is almost all of them are Jews. I am not at all anti-Semitic; but I must state what strikes the eye: everywhere in Petrograd, in Moscow, in provincial districts, in commissariats, in district offices, in Smolny, in the Soviets, I have met nothing but Jews and again Jews.'
"The more one studies the revolution the more one is convinced that Bolshevism is a Jewish movement which can be explained by the special conditions in which the Jewish people were placed in Russia."
The Overman Report explains why Woodrow Wilson was so happy that the "non-Russian" Romanovs, intruders who had only lived in Russia for one thousand years, had been replaced by violent overthrow of their government by Yiddish speaking Jews from the lower East Side of New York, but who, being Wilson's own kind, were now to be hailed by the government of the United States as mass murderers who were "a fit partner for a League of Honor."
One can only conjecture whether Wilson, who was never examined for mental problems despite his many erratic actions culminating in his final breakdown, did not long to be there with his co-religionaires, a League of Honor which pleasured itself by ripping babies out of their mothers' wombs, walking knee deep in the blood of their victims, ripping out an eye here, a tongue there, hacking off a leg or an arm, in short, trying to be impartial in dealing out Jewish "justice" to the "non-Russian autocrats" whose only fault was that they had been too stupid and too easy-going to protect their homes and families against the invasions by the Jewish terrorist until it was too late.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn relates that some sixty-six million "real Russians" have been murdered since the Bolshevik Revolution at the hands of the Yiddish revolutionaries, and now two hundred million citizens of the United States await their turn in the abattoirs of the bloodthirsty Zionist terrorists.
Rev. Denis Fahey, in his book, "The Rulers of Russia", exposed the real names of many of the Jewish terrorists who operated the Soviet murder machine in Russia. Trotsky was Bronstein, Martov was Zederbaum, Zinoviev was Apfelbaum, Kamenev was Rosenfeld, Parvus was Helphand, Bohrin was Nathanson, and so on.
Many of the White Russians fled towards the Pacific, from Vladivostock to the Port of Dairen. The Russian women, who had presided over the most gracious palaces known to European civilization, were forced to turn to prostitution to find bread for their starving children; others, finding the degradation unbearable, committed suicide or slowly starved to death. Decades after the Russian Revolution, some of the White Russian women could still be found in houses of prostitution in Shanghai, Peking and Tokyo.
The male survivors of the Marxist Terror, many of them highly cultured scholars, philosophers and scientists, found no means of support from their highly specialized talents in the harsh Asiatic world of the refugee. One Russian General was seen pulling a rickshaw as a coolie in Shanghai for a few days; he later hung himself in his barren room.
Those who survived the initial Terror in Russia were fated for an even harsher death, a slow agonizing one as a prisoner in a Jewish operated concentration camp. For many years the Jews, through their total control of the media in Christian nations, prevented any word of the horrors which they daily perpetrated on Christians in Soviet Russia from reaching the outside world.
Finally one victim, who had survived a sentence in a concentration camp, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, reached safety. In his book, "The Gulag Archipelago", he informed an incredulous world that the blood-maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered sixty-six million victims in Russia from 1918 to 1957!
Solzhenitsyn cited Cheka Order No. 10, issued on Jan. 8, 1921: "To intensify the repression of the bourgeoisie." It was this order on which the establishment of the terrible Siberian camps, Kolyman and many others was based. Solzhenitsyn also brought to the Christian world the names of the mass murderers who ran these camps.
All of them were Jews. Typical was one Lazar Kogan, who watched thousands of slave laborers die during his stint as boss of the White Sea Canal construction. He would sometimes remark to a new prisoner, "I believe that you personally were not guilty of anything. But, as an educated person, you have to understand that social prophylaxis was being widely applied."
"Social prophylaxis" was one of the vicious Jewish phrases which they used as euphemisms for their massacre of the Christians. Their victims, once they were consigned to the camps, were no longer considered human, as the Jews considered all others to be non-human. They were known simply by the nickname of "zeks", slang for "zakluchenny", which means "prisoner" in Russian.
The Jews were given another opportunity to massacre helpless Christians during the Spanish Civil War. Ernest Elmhurst states in "World Hoax", p. 157, "Of no less significance was the transfer of Soviet Russia's former peace delegate at Geneva ~ the Jew Rosenberg (Moses Israelsohn) with his staff of 140 members to the office of Ambassador to Spain in August of 1936."
This cadre of highly trained specialists in torture and murder passed over a reign of terror which was largely ignored by the rest of the world, because the journalists covering the Spanish War, Ernest Hemingway and many others, were themselves sympathetic to the Communists and they sought only to discredit the Spanish patriots, the "Fascists" as they contemptuously termed them.
The Rosenberg murder teams were called "World Revolutionary Movement Purification Squads." Their "purification" consisted mainly of massacres of priests, nuns, choirboys and women and children as is so well described in the Book of Esther and the occasion of the Jewish celebration of the Feast of Purim.
Arthur Bryant, in his well-documented "Communist Atrocities in Spain", tells of one murder squad which went to the Dominican Convent in Barcelona and informed the Mother Superior that "because of possible mob violence" the nuns should accompany the squad to a place of safety. They were then taken to the suburbs and murdered.
Their Jewish leader commented, "We needed the building. We didn't want to muss it up before we occupied it."
E.M. Godden, in "Conflict in Spain," says on p. 72, "During the last week of July, 1936, the bodies of nuns were exhumed from their graves and propped up outside the walls of their convents. Obscene and offensive placards were attached to their bodies."
In Madrid, it was estimated that one tenth of the population of Spain was murdered by the Communist Jews by 1939. De Fonteriz in "Red Terror in Madrid" tells how Cheka crews organized by Dimitrov and Rosenberg carried out a program of torture and murder so obscene that it cannot be repeated or described.
To further their World Murder Plan, the Jews have occasionally allowed a few of their numbers to be sacrificed. This was brought out at the meeting in Rothschild's home in 1773, when it was stated, "But it has paid us even though we have sacrificed many of our own people. Each victim on our side is worth a thousand Goyim."
What the speaker meant was that if one Jew happens to be killed, he will be avenged by the death of one thousand Christians, or "cattle" as the Christians are derisively referred to by the Jewish cult.
The speaker went on to point out to his rapt listeners that "We are interested in just the opposite ... in the diminution, the killing out of the Goyim." The record of this meeting in Rothschild's house survived how?
Certainly. no murder plan had ever previously been so meticulously laid out or so precisely put into operation. The figures are in, and they are indisputable; fifty million victims in World War I; a hundred and fifty million victims in World War II; sixty-six million Christians murdered by Jewish fanatics in Russia since the success of the Bolshevik Revolution.
Many, if not the majority, of these victims of Jewish terrorism were women and children. Millions of them perished of starvation and exposure in campaigns of Communist expulsion from their homes. Typical was the expulsion of the Sudeten Germans from Czechoslovakia after World War II, during which more than one million Germans died, and the expulsion of the Germans from Poland, a horrifying trek which cost the lives of two million Germans.
The Jews especially delighted in the deaths of these millions of Christian refugees, since the manner of their death fulfilled the most cherished doctrine of the Jewish hatred of all Christians -~ that non-Jews, being considered as non-humans or cattle, in the Jewish term "Goyim", are not to be buried.
This is a violation of Jewish law, which prohibits "animals" from being buried. These millions of Christian refugees lay where they fell during their terrible Communist expulsions, and never received Christian burial.
Early in World War II, the Communist delighted in the opportunity to indulge in their favorite sport of mass murder. During the first days of the war, 15,000 Polish officers, who were the flower of the nation, were captured. They were taken to three Jewish operated Communist camps, Starobiesk, Kozielsk, and Ostashkov. Only 448 were ever seen alive again. The rest vanished, but not without trace.
The Kozielsk camp was situated in the grounds of a former Orthodox monastery, five miles from the Kozielsk railway station in this camp, about 5000, were sent away in small groups, the process continuing until April, 1940.
Parfeon Kisselev said that in the spring of 1940 prisoners were brought to Katyn Forest in three or four buses daily. >From his house he heard shots and shouts. It was rumored that 10,000 Poles were shot there. When the German Army occupied the area in 1943 an investigation was begun.
The Final Report of the German Police dated June 10, 1943, states that, "It was proved that, without exception, death was caused by a shot in the back of the neck. The seven mass graves of murdered Polish officers which have been cleared cover a relatively small area. >From the translation of diaries, of memoirs and other notes found with the bodies, it was proved that the officers who had been taken prisoner by the Soviet Army in 1939 were sent to various camps: Kozielsk, Starobielsk, Ostashkov, Putiviel, Bolotov, Pavlishcev Bor, Shepyetovka, Gorodok.
"The majority of those killed in Katyn Forest had been in the Kozielski camp. From the end of March, until the first day of May, 1940, the prisoners from Kozielsk arrived by rail. The exact dates cannot be established. A few short intervals apart, a batch left almost every day; the number of prisoners varied between 100 and 300 persons.
"Thence, in the early morning, the prisoners proceeded in special Lorries to the Katyn Forest. There the officers were immediately shot, thrown into the waiting graves and buried, as may be seen from the evidence of witness Kisselev, who has seen the ditches being prepared. That the shooting took place immediately after the arrival of a batch of prisoners is proved by witnesses who heard shots after every such arrival.
"There was no accommodation in the forest apart with the rest house, which has a limited capacity. From the position of the bodies it may be assumed that the majority were murdered outside the graves. Very many of the dead men had their hands tied behind their backs. The evidence of witnesses confirms that access to the forest was forbidden. Voss, Secretary of the Field Police." Professor Butz's Report stated, "Documents found on the victims (identity cards ~ but not military passports ~ diaries, letters, postcards, calendars, photographs, drawings, etc. gave the names, age, profession, origin and family relations of the victims. Pathetic entries in the diaries testify to the treatment of the victims by the NKVD.
"Letters and postcards from relatives in Upper Silesia, in the 'General Government' and in the Russian-occupied zone, written, to judge the post office stamps, between Autumn, 1939, and March or April, 1940, clearly point to the time of the crime (spring, 1940)."
The Katyn Case came before the Nuremberg tribunal as part of the general trial of German "war criminals", the Soviets having claimed this atrocity had been committed by the Germans. Although it was on the agenda, the Soviets omitted it from the judgment, nor was any Pole allowed to testify about it.
Mr. G.F. Hudson wrote in the quarterly, "International Affairs", "The unquiet dead of Katyn still walk the earth." In subsequent years, a number of Congressmen have sought to reopen the case, including Hon. George A. Dondero, Hon. Ray Madden and others.
A U.S. Congressional Select Committee, 2 July 1952, reported that "The committee unanimously agrees that evidence dealing with the first phase of its investigation proves conclusively and irrevocably that the Soviet NKVD (People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs) committed the massacre of Polish Army officers in the Katyn Forest near Smolensk, Russia, not later than the spring of 1940.
"The committee further concludes that the Soviets had plotted this criminal extermination of Poland's intellectual leadership as early as the fall of 1939 ~ shortly after Russia's treacherous invasion of the Polish nation's borders. There can be no doubt that this massacre was a calculated plot to eliminate all Polish leaders who subsequently would have opposed the Soviets' plan for communizing Poland."
The end of World War II gave the Communists the opportunity to wreak revenge on all who had opposed them during the war. As a result, from two to five million victims were massacred by Jewish terrorists in France, Italy, Czechoslovakia, and other countries in which the Communists were allowed by their Allies to murder at will all anti-Communists or "Fascists".
The Sunday Oklahoman shed some light on this horror, Jan. 21, 1973, "Document tells Allied Part in Deaths of Thousands": "A former White House consultant has provided the Sunday Oklahoman with a secret document exposing for the first time what appears to be Allied complicity in the deaths of thousands of unsuspecting, liberated prisoners of war and displaced persons after World War II.
"The document, a 10-page British Army report, is believed to be part of voluminous Anglo-American files on the forcible repatriation to the Soviet Union of an estimated 2 to 5 million unwilling anti-Communists between 1944 and 1948. The files, codenamed Operation Keelhaul, are still kept under tight security in London and Washington as virtually the last major secret of World War II.
"The secret British report summarizes one repatriation operation in Italy in which Russian POWs and DIs were turned over to the Red Army and almost certain execution after being duped by the British into believing they would be given asylum in the West. It tells of the agony and the horror experienced by the prisoners."
The leading criminal in this mass execution of two to five million anticommunists was ~ who else ~ our grinning Ike, head of the European sector for the Allied armies, or, as you may know him, our former President, Eisenhower. The crime of Operation Keelhaul was not on the agenda at Nuremberg.
To finance the State of Israel which was created as a direct result of the Jewish victory over the Christian nations in World War II, Jews, who had committed all the atrocities, now imposed enormous "reparations" demands on the conquered German people.
To date, they have extorted more than thirty-five billion dollars from German workers, money which has been collected at the points of bayonets, not Jewish bayonets, but the bayonets of the American Army, which has been maintained as an occupying force in West Germany for nearly four decades, solely to provide military power behind the puppet German Government, which has as its primary function the furnishing of money for the parasitic State of Israel.
Some twenty years after World War II, the Jews began to fear that scholars might focus on the terrible massacres of women and children during that war by armies directed by the Jews. The incineration of thousands of families by mass fire-bombings of the cities of Cologne, Hamburg, Berlin, Dresden and other European cultural centers; the firestorms which killed many thousands of families in Tokyo; as well as the nuclear holocausts unleashed on civilian populations at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the last days of the Japanese War, when the Imperial Staff was already suing for peace (the Jews did not want to lose this opportunity to test their new Jewish Hell-Bomb on human targets); these and their numerous other war crimes, began to concern the Jews.
Their guilt was inescapable; it seemed a mere matter of time until their crimes would call down retribution on their heads. To forestall this possibility, the Jews began a furious campaign of their own; a highly synchronized and coordinated worldwide campaign publicizing their new myth, the "Holocaust", in which six million Jews were said to have been burned.
Six million Jews were also said to have been gassed. Whether this meant there were actually twelve million Jews "killed" no one seems to know. That holocausts, or mass murders by fire, occurred during World War II was a matter of historical record.
There existed photographs of stacks of burned corpses, which had been made in Cologne, Hamburg, and Dresden after the mass fire-bombing of those cities by Allied aircraft. The problem the Jews faced was that there had been no holocausts of Jewish victims during World War II, nor were there any photographs of burned Jewish bodies.
Not to worry ~ the Jews simply appropriated the photographs of the bodies of their German victims, which are exhibited today in gruesome "museums" in Germany as exhibits of dead Jews. It was a matter of record that the Jews had actually done quite well during World War II.
In Germany, incredible sagas of bribery and corruption on the home front had secured the mass evacuation of all Jews from German cities just before the fire bombings began. When entire German families perished amid scenes of unspeakable horror, the Jews were safely ensconced in comfortable quarters in such refugee camps as Auschwitz.
The ultimate testimony as to their rescue by being segregated in these remote camps, far from the danger of the mass bombing raids, comes from ~ who else ~ the Jews themselves. As they never cease to assure us ~ they "survived".
Although they survived amid scenes of genocide or massacres of non-Jews in many countries, they realized several decades later that it was necessary for their purposes to claim that they had been "exterminated".
The protection camps in which they had been safely segregated by the Germans during World War II now became "death camps". Not only were they death camps, but they were camps such as Auschwitz, memorialized in the Atlantic Monthly, Sept. 1981, as having "its own soccer stadium, its own library, its own photo lab, and its own symphony orchestra."
The same article proudly boasts that "the hospital at Auschwitz grew to considerable size, with about twenty doctors and more than three hundred nurses." This was a "death camp?" The fact was that there was not a single German military field hospital near any combat front as sizeable or as well-equipped as the hospital at the "death camp" of Auschwitz, yet Auschwitz is always cited by the Jews as the place were millions of Jews were "put to death".
The purpose of the large modern hospital has never been satisfactorily explained, since the Jews now claim that within hours after arriving at Auschwitz, the Jews were hurried to the "gas chambers". This claim might have more validity had it not been for one unfortunate oversight by the Jews ~ they did not build the gas chambers at Auschwitz until after World War II had ended.
lmost forty years after the war, in which"six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis", as they claim, there are annual festivals, conventions, and other mass gatherings of many thousands of the "survivors of the death camps". Even more peculiar, hardly any of these prosperous, healthy and well fed "victims" claims to have been the survivor of only one "death camp".
Nearly all of them claim to have been a prisoner in five or six of the camps, this at a time when Germany, fighting a two front war, could not keep its troops supplied in the combat areas. The Jews ask us to believe that every few months they were transferred from one camp, put on a train and carried hundreds of miles to another "death camp" to be killed, and then a few months later, apparently not having been killed, they were entrained to yet another "death camp", where they remained without being harmed until the end of the war.
The reason for the otherwise inexplicable claims of the Jewish "Survivors" that they were in many different "death camps" is revealed by a simple explanation, "gelt". The "survivors" regularly receive monthly payments from the conquered Germans.
"Garfinckel" receives a monthly payment in Israel from Germany because he was a prisoner in Auschwitz.
"Rosenfeld" receives a monthly payment from Germany in Israel because he was a prisoner in Treblinka.
"Steinberg" receives a regular monthly payment in Israel from Germany because he was a prisoner in Dachau.
Garfinckel, Steinberg, and Rosenfeld ~ you don't know them? He's the same fat, grinning Jew you saw in the news coverage of the Holocaust convention.
"BEWARE OF THE FABLES OF THE JEWS". Titus 1:14. The Myth of the Holocaust or the "vanished six million Jews" is not solely a matter of collecting revenue from defeated enemies. It is also one of the most powerful weapons of propaganda in the hands of the Jews in their drive for total world power.
Today, all officials seeking to continue in office or to seek higher office in the United States must not only make a ritual pledge of eternal and unquestioning faith in the Myth of the Holocaust. To question the Myth of the Holocaust means a challenge to the Jewish world dictatorship, and it must be punished at once by the most severe sentence. Thus the most fantastic elaborations on the basic lie of the "Six million" appear regularly on American religious programs, in educational books, and in the press.
Among the rare public figures who have dared to question the Myth of the Holocaust are such individualists as the actor Robert Mitchum, who told an Esquire interviewer, in response to a question about "the six million", "So the Jews say." "So the Jews say?" shrieked the horrified interviewer. "Yeah," growled Mitchum, "so the Jews say."
Another actor, Ronald Reagan, while seeking public office, told a Jewish audience in California that "It might help your cause if you would limit your claims of victims to numbers that you could actually prove." A reporter noted that "the audience began to hiss like geese, in a rapidly rising cacophony while the aspiring politician dashed to the wings, never to reappear in the particular auditorium."
Whatever Reagan's doubts about "the six million", he has since kept them to himself. The Reagan Administration will be remembered for the ultimate enshrinement of "the final solution". Two government buildings on the Washington Mall have now been given by "our government" to the Jews for a "Holocaust Memorial".
The Washington Mall, like the Roman Forum, is the center of American aspirations for our Republic, and runs from the White House to the Capital with its principal adornment the magnificent Washington Monument. To the consternation of most Americans, the Washington Monument can now be called "Jew Alley".
Many native Washingtonians have begun to express criticism of this amazing development. In the Washington Post, April 25, 1983, William Raspberry writes on the editorial page, "I simply don't understand it." He points out that although this is to be an official American monument; neither the perpetrators nor the victims were Americans.
He quotes a Howard University professor as wondering why there shouldn't be a Slavery Memorial on the Mall to honor the memory of the slaves, or a Wounded Knee Memorial for the Indians. What he doesn't say is that the erection of a Jewish Memorial on the Washington Mall is a boast of absolute power, that the Jews have achieved absolute power over their goyim slaves in America.
We can understand that there is a huge memorial to Karl Marx erected in Red Square in Moscow. Are we incapable of understanding why a memorial to the Jews is erected on the Washington Mall?
Raspberry, who is black, goes on to tweak the big noses of his Jewish employers, the Meyer family who own the Washington Post, by saying that "a pledge that nothing of this sort will ever be permitted to happen again" worries him, because it is happening right now.
He doesn't mention the obvious example, the Rosh Hashanah Massacre of Arab women and children in Lebanon, but of course Raspberry fails to understand two crucial factors; first, that "it" never happened at all, and second, that the Jews are attempting to place the rest of the world on notice that "the Chosen People" are sacred, and that no one must ever harm a hair on their heads.
It's quite all right to massacre all the goyim or non Jewish cattle, in Cambodia, Vietnam, Africa, or Lebanon; this has nothing to do with the "sacred" presence of the Jew.
"Never Again?" the well-publicized slogan of the Jews which refers to the Myth of the Holocaust, should more properly be "Never", meaning that not only did it never happen but that it is all right for the Jews to massacre the gentile cattle whenever it suits their purposes, because the Myth of the Holocaust gives carte blanche to the Jews to kill as many gentiles as possible, "The diminution, the killing out of the Goyim," as old Anselm so lustfully put it, because it is obvious that the more gentiles that are killed, the fewer remain alive as a possible threat to the Jews.
The Myth of the Holocaust is interpreted by the Jews as giving them permission to maintain international murder squads whose assassins routinely carry out executions in every country of the world, not only against "enemies of Israel", but also against those who are merely suspected of being "potential enemies of Israel". It pays to be careful.
In no country are the murder squads of the Mossad, the Israeli Intelligence Service, given greater freedom than in the United States. Cooperation with the Jewish assassins is the first line of business for the CIA, the FBI, and the IRS.
The Mossad routinely gives these government agencies lists of American individuals on its hate lists, who are to be given "special attention". These lists comprise more than half of all the IRS "special audits" of American citizens.
Despite the frenetic cooperation of official American bureaus with the Israeli assassins, the favor is rarely returned. The Jews treat the American goyim with justifiable contempt, and rarely lose an opportunity to spit in their faces.
Our Marines soon found this out in Lebanon, when the Israeli soldiers routinely threatened them, offensively cut across Marine lines, and shot at them. Menachem Begin's political stance at the present time is to maintain a strong Israeli military presence in Lebanon, despite President Reagan's frequent whines that the Israelis really ought to pull out of that war torn country.
At these requests, the Israelis responded with the assassination of President Gemayel, and the Rosh Hashanah Massacre of women and children. The latest requests for Israeli withdrawal were met with the "mysterious" explosion which blew up the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, with great loss of life. It is confidently stated that this explosion will never be solved. As long as the Jews, Walt Rostow and Henry Kissinger (both Zionists) were selling out U.S. interests things were fine.
Secretary Shultz must wonder when Begin will order him to be murdered, and President Reagan and others as well. The Israelis are the most likely suspects in the U.S. Embassy explosion. An extremist named Abu Nidal was named in Jack Anderson's column, April 25, 1983, Washington Post, that "secret State Dept. reports quoted two highly placed intelligence sources explanation that the explosion was in Israel's interests as it aided to 'divide and conquer' to disrupt the PLO by setting one faction against the other. The sources said Israel had secretly provided funds to Abu Nidal's group."
From the outset, the Myth of the Holocaust has had its problems with "the numbers game". It has not been easy to sell the story of the "extermination" of an entire people, when that people is more numerous, more visible, more prosperous, and more powerful in more countries than at any time during its history.
It is even more difficult to sell the story of "survivors of death camps", who survived, not one year, but stays of four to six years in "death camps", in which, according to the testimony of the "Survivors", "everyone was being killed every day"; survival, not merely in one "death camp", but tours of five or six camps over a period of four to six years.
The casualty rate would be higher on a bus tour of the Bronx. It took a certain amount of raw courage to fix on the number of those "exterminated" at the magic figure of "six million" during a period when the world census of Jews showed an increase from ten million to twelve and a half million. Even the most hardened Jews shrank from the certain exposure and censure of peddling such fantastic lies to the most gullible of the goyim.
Fortunately, they did not have to. If Ronald Reagan expressed some hesitancy at accepting the magic figure of six million early in his career, other goyim, notably, the great evangelists, showed no such qualms. There is now some rivalry among the million dollars a week stooges who jumped on the Golden Bandwagon, but there seems to be little doubt that it was not Billy James Hargis, the homosexual Bible-thumper, but Billy Graham, "that nice boy from North Carolina," who first struck gold in the Myth of the Holocaust.
Graham soon proved that his loyalty to God was surpassed only by his loyalty to the State of Israel, while Billy James Hargis and Rev. Carl McIntire huffed and puffed in his well-tailored rear. In recent years, they have been surpassed by two even smoother peddlers of "fundamentalist Christianity", Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson.
Each day these servile shabez goi pay homage to the Myth of the Six Million, urging their bewitched television audience to send more money to them, and of course, to Israel. Although their cut comes off the top, Israel does get a fair share of the take, but the supposed recipient of all of their fund-raising, God, is said to get nothing at all.
Although the United States boasts of being the birthplace of "investigative journalism", where an aggressive Mike Wallace thrusts a microphone into the face of a cringing quack while denouncing him for overcharging an elderly patient for an aspirin, the Myth of the Holocaust continues to enjoy complete immunity from the prying activities of ten thousand young journalists who dream of the Pulitzer Prize, the Book of the Month Club, and the Hollywood contract.
These dreams can become reality, as Woodward and Bernstein discovered when they published their White House fantasies as fact, but the Myth of the Six Million is secure from any invasion by these "great journalists" or any of their compatriots, as none of them dare to question the sanctity of this never-to-be-questioned figure.
For years, Jews refused to provide any proof acceptable in court which would substantiate these claims, even though a $50,000 reward was offered for proof that any Jew had been gassed in any type of "Holocaust" operation during World War II, yet this astonishing offer never excited the curiosity of any "investigative journalist" in America.
In the ordinary course of events, a twenty dollar bill or a two-Martini lunch is all that is required to set them on the track. Until these highly trained professionals take up the scent along the dog-run, we continue to be plagued by the Jewish claims that six million of their brightest and their best were foully done to death during World War II.
If a $50,000 offer could not bring forth proof of even one death, how much would it cost to find proof that six million died? The record shows that only Christians have been the victims of the historic massacres. The Jews, when they did not do the killing themselves, as they always prefer to do, were always in the background as the only instigators of these crimes against humanity.
We can and we must protect ourselves against the blood-thirsty bestiality of the Jew by every possible means, and we must be aware that the Christian creed of love and mercy can be overshadowed by the Jewish obsession that all non Jews are animals to be killed.
Addendum: By Wm. S. LeGrande. The foregoing account of the Jews shows that Jews desire to destroy all non-Jews that they consider dangerous to them and to rule the others. The Christians and Arabs are high on their list for murder. The evils of the Jews are countless.
Deceit and lies are two of their best tools. They love the "God's Chosen" lie. The Jews are mostly Khazars. Khazars have no identity with Israelites at all. The Jew lie on this subject is carried by Christian churches out of ignorance or as a pay-off for favors.
During the time of Christ, the Jews were Israelite mixtures and this and the Talmudic idiocy is what Christ condemned the Pharisees for. The next lie is that Christ was a Jew.
Nowhere in the Bible is Christ referred to as a Jew. The Bible says Christ was an Israelite.
The present day Israelites are central European Christians and their descendants in accordance with Bible prophecy. To make a strong case for these Jew lies and deception we find that Jesus said that the Talmudic Jews were of their father the devil. He said they were liars, thieves, and murderers and were adulterers. The word adulterer is so wide in scope that the Jews make sure it is avoided.
The Jews even changed the commandment "Thou shalt not adulterate" to "Thou shalt not commit adultery". "Thou shalt not covet they neighbor's wife" covers the intended reference.
Adulterate takes in the total scale of evil. Adulterate means mix, make impure, change, unnatural, deceit, debase, pollute, contaminate, false, lie, corrupt, pervert, wicked, cruel, sinful and all manner of evil practiced by the Jews in their pursuit of deceit as demonstrated in the writing, "The Secret Holocaust" by Eustace Mullins.
Christ told us the Jews were adulterers. This brings us to the "Six Million Holocaust" lie that Dr. Butz's book "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century" so ably describes. Mullins explains how this was profitable to the Jews. But it was also a necessity that the World War II and the Six Million lie be kept alive. The real Holocaust is the Sixty-Six Million Holocaust that the Jews performed and engineered in Russia. The cruelties that went with it are unthinkable as explained by Mullins.
This is not like the German Six Million which is a cover-up for the Sixty-Six Million, and is a proven known truth and a dress rehearsal for the torture and death of the other world Christians and Moslems. The Arabs can tell you what they have gone through in the last few years and are still going through today. How can this be?
The Jews brag that it is "our terrible power of the purse"!
Even today, U.S. citizens don't know the Jews own the U.S. money system known as the "Federal Reserve System", and even though the U.S. Congress is able to change it, they are too cowardly in the face of death that awaits them.
Likewise, when the Jews tell Congress to send aid to brother Jews in Russia, or to the Israelis, or to send your sons to war for Jew profit, the Congress obeys without hesitation, and they do it promptly. The Jew-controlled news media sees that the citizens approve also. So when you hear the word "holocaust," remember that there is a big lie six million holocaust that the Germans were accused of, and there is a true sixty-six million holocaust that the Jews keep covered up.
It is like the first little boy who knocked the daylights out of the second little boy, and the first boy immediately started screaming, "He hit me! He hit me!" The innocent second little boy found out how shouts prevailed, as in the case of the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ. The second little boy was punished. The lying first little boy went free. So it is every day with the Jews in Russia and communism world-wide, and the Israelis in the Palestine area.
Look at Poland and all Jew-communist controlled areas of the world. Poland is 90% Catholic and anti-Jew-communist. However, they are still prisoners of the Jews. This is only one example.
The commandment says "thou shalt not murder". Death is the punishment for breaking a commandment. This addendum points out that the Jews are not chosen people.
Jesus Christ was not a Jew.
The Jews lie about Jewish extermination in a German holocaust.
The real holocaust was a Christian Holocaust by Jews of sixty-six million, mostly Christians.
.
.
.
The REAL Holocaust CAUSED by Eastern European Communism..!! https://youtu.be/YH3SRyasstc
Behind the Holocaust
By J.B. Campbell
What was
Hitler’s unforgivable sin?
Hitler resisted Judaism.
When you’re a little kid in school or at the movies, resisting Judaism can be made to seem a very wicked thing. As
an adult, you can be made to think that to resist Judaism is the very worst, the most dangerous thing. When you see what
has happened to people who have resisted Judaism, well – you certainly don’t want that to happen to you.
Adolf Hitler was, is and will always be the most dangerous character in history due to his resistance against Judaism
combined with his eloquence in explaining why Judaism must be resisted. Some of us “Jew-fighters” have a personal
motto, delenda est judaica, or Judaism must be destroyed. Or, Defense Against Jewish Aggression. When we have studied the
history of whatever period you care to name, or just looked at the news, true humans react with the natural urge to remove
this cancer from society. The most astonishing example of the Jewish mentality was last year’s murderous assault against
the humanitarians attempting to bring food, medicine and building materials to the people of Gaza. Jewish ways are repellant
to the human mind and are not examined overmuch for that reason.
Judaism can be simply described as very bad
behavior.
Hitler never attempted to destroy Judaism but rather to isolate it and perhaps remove its adherents
from Europe. This followed attempts to train Jews to be productive human beings in places such as Dachau and Theresienstadt.
As Evelyn Kaye writes in The Hole in the Sheet, orthodox Jews do not work. They are allergic to work, preferring instead
to occupy themselves by reading the Talmud and arguing endlessly with other Jews about what they read. So this is a big
problem with Jews, their refusal to work and produce something that is not based on ripping off and confounding their victims.
Hitler’s attempt to re-train Jews, which didn’t work, and then to remove Jews from Europe was a work
in progress. Since the Khazars had infiltrated Europe from the east, his plan for relocation was to put them back in the
Pale whence they came. This scheme depended upon the success of Operation Barbarossa, the great assault against the Soviet
Union which was always the ultimate and stated objective of the National Socialists. Communism had to be destroyed so that
Judaism could be re-confined to its traditional home in the Pale of Settlement. Hitler’s basic plan for Jews was somehow
to confine and isolate them in a place in which they could be prevented from doing humanity more harm. This is a very difficult
thing to do because there are so many aspects to Judaism, the most dangerous of which is banking, which is the main point
of this piece.
Because now I’m seeing that the main purpose of keeping alive the Holocaust is to protect
Jewish banking practices.
Before we get to that, let’s examine the Holocaust briefly. It’s a big
subject but the whole subject is demolished by the videotaped visit to Auschwitz by a young American Jew named David Cole,
which took place back in 1992. For example, a dozen years ago I was visited by a reporter named Dave Hendrix from the Dallas
Morning News. He was interviewing me for a big story he was writing on the militia and the general resistance movement in
America. He would spend four days interviewing me at my home in Carmel, California. When we were first introduced, no doubt
knowing my attitude, he made a disclosure: “I must tell you before we begin, that I am a believer in the Holocaust.”
I immediately responded, “Not a problem.” And nothing more was said about it for a day or so. On the second
day, before he retired to his hotel, I asked if he would be willing to look at a film? He agreed. I showed him David Cole’s
Visit to Auschwitz and when it was over said, “Well, there’s another viewpoint.” Dave, however, was speechless. He
finally said, “That was devastating to everything I’ve ever believed.”
By the fourth
day, I had persuaded Dave to drop the militia/resistance project and instead write a big piece on Oklahoma City, since my
good friend Cheri Seymour had so much primary information on the subject in her files. Reluctant at first to attack that
subject, he eventually requested and got the green light from Dallas. This nearly got him killed. Dave met with Cheri and
me a week or so later in Hermosa Beach and received his first load of documents from Cheri. He went back to his apartment
and was felled by a severe heart attack. His wife was fortunately and unusually at home and got the EMT people there in
time to save him, which he would not have been able to do for himself. When he finally recovered, the OKC story was canceled
and Dave was made a story editor, never again to investigate and write as he had been doing for many years. When we met
again, he said simply, “They got me. It was not a natural heart attack.”
As you will see in the
Cole video, the holy gas chamber is a fake. Which makes the entire Holocaust story a fake. You can study it for a day or
for a lifetime and your conclusion will be the same. There was never a plan for exterminating Jews and there was never an
instrument. As Professor Robert Faurisson has asked for years, “Show me a gas chamber. Draw for me a gas chamber.”
It can’t be done because there was never such a thing.
There is the matter of the Six Million. As we
in the anti-Jewish movement well know, the Jews were claiming years before, during and after the First World War that six
million Jews had been exterminated by the Germans. Of course, no one took this seriously. By 1943, American Jews were once
again claiming that six million Jews were in danger of annihilation or had in fact been annihilated, years before the same
wild claim would start up again around 1960. Now, why is this?
We now know that the insane Jewish liars are
guided in this by a mystical attachment to the number six, as seen with their national symbol, the six-pointed star. Six,
or six hundred, or six thousand, or six hundred thousand, or six million Jews must be removed before the messiah returns
or Israel reappears or whatever. It’s not important to us, just that this is a magic number to them. And they should
be wholly burnt in ovens. Hence, Holocaust (wholly burnt). Read >>> Jewish History and the Scriptual Orgin of the 6 Million Dollar Number
The six million Jews exterminated by the Nazis depended in large part (66%) on Auschwitz, where four million
of them were infamously done to death. Thanks to Ernst Zundel and the International Red Cross, Mikhail Gorbachev in 1989
released to the Red Cross the captured death records from Auschwitz. The forty-six volumes cover the period of May, 1940
to December, 1944 and record about 69,000 deaths, mainly from disease or natural causes. The IRC had investigated all the
German and Polish camps during and after the war and estimated about 200,000 deaths, some of them Jewish. When the US Army
liberated Dachau, for example, of the 32,000 inmates, about 1,200 were Jews. Jewish representation was so tiny during WWII
as to be insignificant, except in their minds. In their minds, the 60 million actual deaths of real people were insignificant,
not worthy of consideration. Read >>> Long-Hidden Death Certificates Discredit Extermination Claims
We can read and read and the more we read the bigger the swindle is revealed. That’s why the main thing
is to watch David Cole’s video and not get too wrapped up in the Holocaust, one way or the other. But we should understand
the real purpose of Holocaust indoctrination, which I now believe is this: our money.
Our money is our lifeblood.
Without money, of course, we die as individuals. Without a proper money system, society dies, which is pretty much what
is happening to our society now. This is due to the Jewish money system imposed on us by the aliens who own the private
money-making company they call the Federal Reserve System.
We are today witnessing the dangers of precious
metals. The only metals that are precious to me are steel, lead and brass. Gold and silver, while intoxicating in their wonderfulness,
are just as dangerous and volatile as liquid intoxicants and just as likely to make you lose your wits – and your
fortune. There is nothing righteous or magical or even necessary about a nation’s currency being “backed”
by gold or silver. This was proved by Adolf Hitler during the 1930s. It was proved so conclusively that the Jews want to
make sure that it’s never tried again. The best way to ensure this is to associate debt-free currency with mass murder!
For some reason, the Jews of the world wanted to destroy Germany. We can probably never understand their insane
drive to do this but the facts cannot be denied. They also wanted to destroy the Russian ruling class and the Russian people,
as we saw happen following their takeover of Russia in 1917. And we see that they apparently wanted to destroy the American
people from an early time, dating at least since 1913. The destruction of the Russians, Germans and Europeans in general
depended on their takeover of the American banking system in 1913, because it was followed closely by the totalitarian devastation
that began in 1914 with the assassination of the Austrian archduke by Gavrilo Princip.
World War I ended in
1918 and this began Germany’s great misery. They were blamed by the victors for starting the war and were forced to
pay “reparations” that became so extreme by the early 1920s that their money became worthless. Hundreds of thousands
of Germans starved to death because of the money and because of a blockade by England and America to prevent food from getting
in. A food convoy was organized by Henry Ford, Herbert Hoover and Norway’s Vidkun Quisling to rescue the starving people
of Germany and others in Europe. Quisling’s name has been turned into a dirty word by the Jews and is misused today
by people who should know better. He was a great humanitarian and took Germany’s side against the forces of Judaism
and Bolshevism for over twenty years.
Adolf Hitler, like Franklin Roosevelt, came to power democratically in
January, 1933, in the depths of the world depression. Both Germany and America were starving because of the actions of the
Federal Reserve System, now twenty years old. They were starving because the Fed had “deflated” the money supply,
withdrew currency from circulation and refused to issue new currency. Credit to farmers and businesses and individuals was
denied for no particular reason. Roosevelt outlawed gold and began its confiscation in April, with punishment of ten years
in prison and ten thousand dollars in fines. Once he got all of our gold, which was then priced at about twenty dollars
an ounce, he raised the price to thirty-five dollars. That made it the biggest, boldest swindle up until that time. Of course,
the Federal Reserve System swindlers got the gold – and the massive increase in value.
Hitler came to
power over a bankrupt and starving country with unemployment at roughly 50%! The Americans had stolen all Germany’s
gold by the early ‘20s, so there was no basis for a monetary system other than to keep borrowing from the Jewish crooks
on Wall Street that had given Germany the Young Plan and the Dawes Plan of perpetual indebtedness to private bankers masquerading
as the “central bank.” What to do?
Hitler and Hjalmar Schacht issued debt-free currency based on
Lincoln’s debt-free currency. What they did led to the swift regeneration of the German economy and the world’s
greatest prosperity of the working class, while the rest of the world stayed mired in the Great Depression being run by the
sadistic central bankers. This was the worst possible crime and had to be punished by the most terrible war in human history,
including fire-bombings of entire cities and deliberate mass starvations of millions following the war. Our nuclear bombs
would have dropped on Germans but they weren’t ready in time, so they were dropped on Germany’s allies who were
trying to surrender. Please refer to Theodore Kaufman’s charming little book, Germany Must Perish!, which was the
basis of the Morgenthau Plan for Germany, executed mercilessly by Dwight David Eisenhower, which resulted in the starvation
deaths of millions of Germans.
YouTube Video: The Secret of Oz
Ellen Brown and Bill Still have provided us with debt-free currency plans that
will deliver us from the Federal Reserve racketeers and eliminate our indebtedness to the pinstriped scum-rats in less than
one year, based on the Hitler model, which they don’t want to say. John F. Kennedy declared war on the Fed racketeers
by issuing four billion dollars in debt-free US Notes in April of his last year on earth. Abraham Lincoln first issued debt-free
currency when the bankers whom he’d approached for war loans wanted 34% in interest. He only survived a few days longer
than his war for crimes against the bankers.
So let’s understand what’s behind the Holocaust. Why
don’t Brown and Still, both monetary geniuses, want to credit Hitler and Schacht with the secret to economic prosperity
in the face of total meltdown? Why, because of the Holocaust! The greatest economic miracle in history occurred in Germany
under Adolf Hitler, who ignored the central bankers intent on raping the world, seizing real property, through high interest
and deflation. The Russians have recently confirmed suspicions that the American legend of the Depression (“As bad
as it was – nobody starved.”) is a lie. Russian investigators have revealed that millions of Americans actually
died of starvation and exposure during the years 1929 to 1941 but their deaths were written off to natural causes.
As Hitler remarked in his declaration of war following Pearl Harbor, he had delivered Germany from the doubly devastating
conditions of the Versailles Treaty and the general world Depression by 1935 while Roosevelt kept mighty America in abject
misery with his Federal Reserve starvation policies right to the present time (December, 1941). He stole all the people’s
gold and then increased its value by 60%. And he refused to do what Lincoln had done before him and what Kennedy would do
after him: he refused to issue debt-free currency and rescue the American people from aggravated poverty, degradation and
death by starvation.
How could that be? How could Hitler state such a thing? Because it was true. It was simple
and it was true. The secret to general and permanent prosperity is for the government of any country to issue debt-free
currency in amounts necessary for commerce and growth. That is what the founders had in mind with Article 1 Section 8 of
the Constitution. We should read that over from time to time. Clause 5 says that the “Congress shall have power To
coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures.” Clause
6 is even better: “Congress shall have the power To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and
current Coin of the United States.”
You can see where this puts the owners of the counterfeiting company
called the Federal Reserve System. The proposed punishment for counterfeiting was execution by hanging.
Anyway,
let us recognize the Holocaust for what it is, a device to make the idea of debt-free currency repellant to our minds, because
anyone who would do it really just wants to gas the Jews.
Revisionism Online Websites!
The Institute for Historical Review
Committee to Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH)
The Holocaust Historiography Project
Paul Eisen's Blog / Anti-Zionist Revisionism
David Irving / Focal Point Publications
National Journal: For the sake of knowledge and truth
 |
Criticomblog - 
WinstonSmithMinistryoftruth.blogspot.ca - 
Climategate.nl - 
Balder.org - Why the Holocaust Story Was Invented
Abstract
The genocide of European Jewry by National Socialist Germany is considered by many to be the most thoroughly documented event in human history. Tens of thousands of books, magazine, and newspaper articles have been written and numerous criminal trials have been conducted to document the mass extermination of European Jewry. The crimes of Germany against Jews are considered to be so uniquely evil that the term “the Holocaust” has been invented to describe the alleged genocide of European Jewry. I have been asked the questions: “Why was the Holocaust story invented? Who benefits from this falsification of history?” This article will answer these questions.
Justification for War with Germany
World War II was by far the bloodiest and most destructive war in human history. Many people wondered whether all of the death and destruction caused by the war had been necessary.
The so-called Holocaust was used by the Allies to demonize Germany and prove that their war effort was necessary to defeat such an evil nation.
With the liberation of Ohrdruf, Buchenwald and Dachau by the American army and the liberation of Bergen-Belsen by British troops, large groups of Western observers confronted the horrors of the German camps for the first time. The gruesome scenes of huge piles of dead bodies and emaciated and diseased surviving inmates were filmed and photographed for posterity by the U.S. Army Signal Corps. Prominent newsmen and politicians were flown in to Germany to see the harrowing evidence at the camps for themselves. The horrific scenes in the German camps were used by the Allies to justify their participation in the war.[1]
Jewish historian Robert Jan van Pelt writes:[2]
“To the Allies, the discovery of the camps proved a final justification of their war effort. In 1940, Churchill had proclaimed that a Nazi victory would bring “a new Dark Age made more sinister by perverted science.” The liberation of the camps proved that Churchill had not exaggerated the danger. And even though Auschwitz had been liberated by the Russians, the English and Americans heard many stories about that camp.”
Establishment of Israel
The Holocaust story has also been used to justify the creation of the State of Israel. Simon Wiesenthal writes:[3]
“The creation of Israel was the only possible and the only correct reaction to Auschwitz. There had to be a country in the world where the Jews were the landlords instead of tolerated guests, a place of refuge in the truest meaning of the word, even for Jews who live in other countries.”
David Ben-Gurion stated at the beginning of World War II that the war should end by giving the Zionists their own state. After the war, Ben-Gurion and other Israeli leaders said that the Holocaust had proven once again that the only solution to the Jewish problem was an independent state in Israel. David Ben-Gurion again mentioned during Adolf Eichmann’s trial that the Holocaust happened because Jews did not live in their own country.[4]
Israeli historian Tom Segev explains why the Holocaust story is so important to Israel:[5]
“Israel differs from other countries in its need to justify—to the rest of the world, and to itself—its very right to exist. Most countries need no such ideological justifications. But Israel does—because most of its Arab neighbors have not recognized it and because most of the Jews of the world prefer to live in other countries. So long as these factors remain true, Zionism will be on the defensive. As a justification for the State of Israel, the Holocaust is comparable only to the divine promise contained in the Bible: It seems to be definitive proof of the Zionist argument that Jews can live in security and with full equal rights only in their own country and that they therefore must have an autonomous and sovereign state, strong enough to defend its existence.”
Tom Segev further writes:[6]
“The demonization of Nazism and its mythologizing, in general, were also necessary since the Holocaust served as the main justification for the creation and existence of the State of Israel.”
Justification of Israeli Violence
There were at least 33 massacres of Palestinian villages during Israel’s “War of Independence.” Zionist forces were larger and better equipped than their opponents, and by the end of the war over 750,000 Palestinians were ruthlessly expelled from their homes.[7] As Tom Segev writes:[8]
“Israel was born of terror, war, and revolution, and its creation required a measure of fanaticism and of cruelty.”
Entire cities and hundreds of villages in Israel were left empty and repopulated with new Jewish immigrants. The Jewish immigrants numbered 100,000 in April 1949, most of them survivors of the so-called Holocaust. The Palestinians lost everything they had and became destitute refugees, while the Jewish immigrants to Israel stole the Palestinians’ property and confiscated everything they needed.[9]
The Holocaust story has been repeatedly used to justify Israel’s aggression against its neighbors. Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin justified the demolition of an alleged Iraqi nuclear facility in June 1981 with the words:[10]
“We must protect our nation, a million and a half of whose children were murdered by the Nazis in the gas chambers.”
Before Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in June 1982, Begin told his cabinet:[11]
“You know what I have done and what we have all done to prevent war and loss of life. But such is our fate in Israel. There is no way other than to fight selflessly. Believe me, the alternative is Treblinka, and we have decided that there will be no more Treblinkas.”
A few weeks after Israel’s invasion of Lebanon, Begin stated that after the Holocaust the international community had lost its right to demand that Israel answer for its actions. Begin declared in the Knesset, “No one, anywhere in the world, can preach morality to our people.” A similar statement was included in the resolution adopted by Begin’s cabinet after the massacres in Palestinian refugee camps on the outskirts of Beirut.[12]
By the late 1980s there was hardly a day when the Holocaust story was not mentioned in one of the Israeli newspapers. Such constant exposure encouraged many Israeli soldiers to plan ways to exterminate the Arabs. According to Israeli education-corps officer Ehud Praver, “too many soldiers were deducing that the Holocaust justifies every kind of disgraceful action.”[13]
German Guilt
The so-called Holocaust has also been effectively used to induce guilt in the German people. As British historian Ian Kershaw writes:[14]
“Decades would not fully erase the simple but compelling sentiment…‘I am ashamed to be German.’”
Friedrich Grimm, a renowned German authority on international law, was shown samples of new leaflets printed soon after the war in German to be distributed by the Allies throughout Germany. Describing German war crimes, the leaflets were the first step in the reeducation program designed for Germany. Grimm suggested to an Allied officer that since the war was over, it was time to stop the libel. The Allied officer replied:[15]
“Why no, we’re just getting started. We’ll continue this atrocity campaign, we’ll increase it till no one will want to hear a good word about the Germans anymore, till whatever sympathy there is for you in other countries is completely destroyed, and until the Germans themselves become so mixed up they won’t know what they’re doing!”
The Allied campaign to make Germans feel guilty concerning the so-called Holocaust has been highly successful. German guilt is so powerful that it has caused the German government to make enormous reparations and offer humble apologies to the Allies. Millions of German expellees have paid reparations to survivors of the German concentration camps even though these German expellees had their land and personal possessions stolen from them.
James Bacque writes in regard to German feelings of guilt:[16]
“Guilt pervades Germany like a religion. It is the ‘Canossa Republic,’ penitent in pain before its judges. Guilt is so powerful that it has caused the Canossa Republic repeatedly to deny any intention of reclaiming sovereignty over the eastern lands, although it is a well-established UN principle that no government has the right to waive the claims of individuals to their property. Nor may it impede their right of return to their former homeland.”
Allied Crimes Against Germans
The Holocaust story has also been used to cover up and ignore Allied crimes against Germans after World War II. German deaths after the war can be divided into three groups of people. The first group is the German prisoners of war (POW) in both Europe and the Soviet Union. The second group is the German expellees, and the third group is the Germans already residing in Germany. While no one will ever know exactly how many Germans died from 1945 to 1950, it is certain that the deaths far exceed most traditional estimates. The great majority of these deaths were caused by the lethal policies imposed by the Allies against Germany after the war.
A conservative estimate of German deaths in the Allied POW camps is 1.5 million. This includes over 517,000 POW deaths in the Soviet Union, 100,000 POW deaths in Yugoslavia, Poland and other countries, with the remaining POW deaths in U.S. and French camps. The Germans who died in these Allied POW camps suffered miserably from exposure, disease and slow starvation. This well-documented Allied atrocity is still denied by most historians today.
Probably a minimum of 2.1 million German expellees died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” transfer. The estimate of 2.1 million German expellee deaths is acknowledged to be valid by most traditional historians. Notable authorities have estimated a much higher number of German expellee deaths.[17]
An estimated 5.7 million Germans already residing in Germany died from the starvation policies implemented by the Allies after the war. James Bacque details how this 5.7 million death total is calculated:
The population of all occupied Germany in October 1946 was 65,000,000, according to the census prepared under the ACC. The returning prisoners who were added to the population in the period October 1946-September 1950 numbered 2,600,000 (rounded), according to records in the archives of the four principal Allies. Births according to the official German statistical agency, Statistisches Bundesamt, added another 4,176,430 newcomers to Germany. The expellees arriving totaled 6,000,000. Thus, the total population in 1950 before losses would have been 77,776,430, according to the Allies themselves. Deaths officially recorded in the period 1946-50 were 3,235,539, according to the UN Yearbook and the German government. Emigration was about 600,000, according to the German government. Thus, the population found should have been 73,940,891. But the census of 1950 done by the German government under Allied supervision found only 68,230,796. There was a shortage of 5,710,095 people, according to the official Allied figures (rounded to 5,700,000).[18]
The sum of 1.5 million German POWs, 2.1 million German expellees, and 5.7 million German residents equals the minimum estimate of 9.3 million Germans who died needlessly after the war. This is far more Germans than died during the Second World War. Millions of these Germans slowly starved to death while the Allies withheld available food. The majority of these postwar dead Germans were women, children, and very old men. Their deaths have never been honestly reported by the Allies, the German government, or most historians. Instead, all we ever hear about is the alleged genocide of European Jewry
Allied Guilt and Apathy
The Allies have also been declared guilty of not doing more to prevent the so-called Holocaust. Jewish historian Deborah Lipstadt writes:[19]
“A real antipathy toward Jews certainly affected the Allied response. While no one among the Allies or in the press wanted to see Jews killed, virtually no one was willing to advocate that steps be taken to try to stop the carnage. Many Allied officials in positions of power in London and Washington were tired of hearing about Jews and even more tired of being asked to do something about them even though there were steps that could have been taken.”
Elie Wiesel writes in regard to the Allies’ failure to rescue European Jewry:[20]
“It almost seems as if both diplomats and statesmen spent more time inventing reasons not to save the Jews than trying to find a way to save them.”
U.S. Presidents Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, and George H. W. Bush have all made statements that the United States will never again fail to act to stop something as evil as the genocide of European Jewry. At the dedication of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, President Bill Clinton spoke in a similar vein:[21]
“For those of us here today representing the nations of the West, we must live forever with this knowledge: Even as our fragmentary awareness of crimes grew into indisputable facts, far too little was done.”
Michael Goldberg says in regard to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum:[22]
“The museum stands as a grim reminder that for all its purported ideals, America nevertheless turned its back on Jews fleeing Hitler…Hence, the museum’s recalling what happened to Jews in the past may move Americans and their national policymakers in Washington to support Israel in the present, lest in the future, the same fate lie in store for Jews again—and the same moral failure await Americans once more.”
President Barack Obama affirmed on the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Dachau:[23] “…we fervently vow that such atrocities will never happen again” and “History will not repeat itself.”
Of course, President Obama forgot to tell his audience that most of the inmates at Dachau died of natural causes. Obama also conveniently failed to mention that the single biggest atrocity that occurred at Dachau was the mass murder by American troops of 520 German guards on the day Dachau was liberated.[24]
Reparations to Jews
German guilt for the so-called Holocaust has resulted in massive reparations being paid to Holocaust survivors and the State of Israel. German reparations to Jews were discussed from the beginning of World War II. Tom Segev writes:[25]
“The idea [of reparations] seems to have been in the air from the time the war started, apparently sparked by the punitive reparations payments imposed on Germany at the end of World War I. Ben-Guiron received a memorandum on the subject as early as 1940. Berl Katznelson spoke of it publicly toward the end of that year. By December 1942, there was already a private organization in Tel Aviv called Justicia that offered to help Nazi victims draft compensation demands.”
Hatred of Germans in Israel was intense after the war. Many advocated a special law barring Israelis from all social contacts with German citizens. However, since most Israelis felt that the Germans owed them massive reparations for the so-called Holocaust, Germany and Israel began negotiating reparations on March 20, 1952. The Luxembourg Agreement was reached six months later and committed the German government to paying massive reparations to Holocaust survivors.[26]
Nahum Goldmann said in a 1976 interview that the Luxembourg Agreement “constituted an extraordinary innovation in the matter of international rights.” Goldmann also boasted that he had obtained 10 to 14 times more from the Bonn government than he had originally expected.[27]
Millions of Jews eventually received personal compensation for their pain and suffering in the so-called Holocaust. The German federal government as of 1998 had paid reparations to Israel and Third Reich victims of about $61.8 billion. In addition, Germans had paid many additional billions in private and other public funds to wartime forced laborers.[28] German reparations to Israel and Jews continue to this day.[29]
Jewish Solidarity
The Holocaust story is described by many Jewish leaders as a uniquely evil event. An example of this view was expressed by Abraham H. Foxman when he was the National Director of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith:[30]
“The Holocaust is something different. It is a singular event. It is not simply one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God’s chosen children and, thus, on God Himself. It is an event that is the antithesis of Creation as recorded in the Bible; and like its direct opposite, which is relived weekly with the Sabbath and yearly with the Torah, it must be remembered from generation to generation.”
Michael Goldberg confirms that the Holocaust story has become a religion to many Jews:[31]
“As the Holocaust has become many contemporary Jews’ master story, so, too, its perpetual observance has become their paramount Jewish practice, its veneration their religion. And as with any organized church, this Holocaust cult has its own tenets of faith, rites, and shrines."
Israelis are obsessed with the history and heritage of the Holocaust. A 1992 study of Israeli college students found that close to 80% of those asked identified with the statement, “We are all Holocaust survivors.” The so-called Holocaust has become a way for secular Jews to feel connected to their Jewish heritage.[32]
The Holocaust, which is remembered ritually through the observance of Holocaust Remembrance Day, is a major means of creating solidarity among Jews. While some Jewish communities experience conflicts among Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform Jews, they set aside their differences and join together to remember the so-called Holocaust. Any truth in Judaism’s slogan of “Jews Are One” manifests itself ritually on Holocaust Remembrance Day.[33]
Conclusion
The alleged genocide of European Jewry has been used to justify the Allied war effort, to establish the State of Israel, to justify Israeli violence against its neighbors, to induce guilt in both Germans and the Allied nations, to cover up and ignore Allied crimes against Germans, to allow Jews to receive massive reparations from Germany, and to create solidarity in the Jewish community. The extreme importance of the Holocaust story in advancing Zionist/Jewish interests ensures that this falsification of history will continue in the future.
Probing the Holocaust by Germar Rudolf, Eric Hunt
The Holocaust: A New History by Panagiotis Heliotis
The Lies and Deceptions of Deborah Lipstadt Part 2 by Germar Rudolf
Marcel Nadjari's Message in a Bottle by Hadding Scott
Some Testimonies from Thessaloniki by Panagiotis Heliotis
The Malmedy Trial: Denial of the Obvious by John Wear
The Chemistry of Auschwitz/Birkenau by John Wear
Some More Testimonies from Greece by Panagiotis Heliotis
Commandant of Auschwitz by Carlo Mattogno, Rudolf Höss
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
Holocaust Revisionist Monika Schaefer Arrested in Germany and Placed in Solitary Confinement for Thought Crime
A series of emails suddenly began entering my inbox last week, giving me the shocking news that Monika Schaefer, on a Christmas visit from Canada to Germany, the country of her ancestors, had suddenly been arrested in a courthouse in Munich. Here she had gone to attend the trial of Sylvia Stolz for alleged Holocaust denial, one of several other well-behaved citizens, sitting there quietly and not expecting any trouble.
Suddenly and unexpectedly, the sword of Damocles descended on Monika’s neck. The judge announced a short break in the trial. During this brief interval, three police officers strode up to Monika Schaefer and started manhandling her. Slipping a pair of handcuffs onto her wrists, they frogmarched her out of the courtroom and dragged her down to the basement area where she was thrown into a prison cell, there to await in solitary confinement further news of why she had been so outrageously ill-treated.
I have been unable to piece together the full details of what happened before and after Monika’s arrest, but I gather from the emails I received that the following scenario is probably an accurate one. A spiteful family member in Canada was the “Judas” traitor who informed the Canadian Jewish organization, B’nai Brith Canada, that Monika was about to fly to Munich on a Christmas holiday and attend the trial of Sylvia Stolz while she was there. B’nai Brith Canada then got in touch with B’nai B’rith Germany and tipped them off that Monika was about to touch down on German soil. The German Jews then prepared the mousetrap for Monika. Both the Canadian government and the German government, under total subjugation to their Jewish overlords, were complicit in the capture of Monika Schaefer. They decided to catch her, and Monica innocently walked into their trap.
Monika Schaefer, in other words, is the new Ernst Zundel. She will now be incarcerated in a German prison, there to be punished for the crime of telling her mother in a YouTube video that she had been wrong about the Holocaust.
This is the video you are about to see in a few minutes when you have read through the emails below. I received about 10, but I am publishing only three so as to avoid needless repetition. These emails were sent to me all last week with the suggestion that I should publish them on my site in order to alert the world to the plight of Monika Schafer. She needs our support. Today it’s Monika. Tomorrow it will be you and me.
ALFRED SCHAEFER (Monica’s brother) : Dear Friends,
Monika Schaefer was arrested on January 3 2018 in the very heart of “Holocaust country” while attending, as an observer, the bizarre inquisition hearings against the courageous Sylvia Stolz. This “trial” was for illegal words that Sylvia Stolz had spoken at the “Anti Censorship Coalition” (AZK) in Switzerland in 2012. The twisting nonsensical accusations of the inquisition was beyond bizarre. What the snake that calls itself the “State Prosecutor” did, will be something that will amuse future generations when studying the “witch” trials of 2018.
45 minutes into the inquisition the “State Prosecutor” snake called for a surprise break, which was then used to arrest my courageous sister Monika. The only thing Monika did was watch quietly as the inquisition was dealing with Sylvia Stolz. These people have us under close observation and figured it was a good opportunity to demonstrate their “power”, and intimidate us.
Another snake masquerading as a “State Prosecutor” accompanied by 3 heavily armed thugs handcuffed Monika and dragged her away. When my sister protested that she is a free person from Canada and had done nothing wrong, the “State Prosecutor” snake told her, “If you wanted to stay free you should have stayed in Canada”.
(Welcome to Holocaust country)
Now they have moved Monika Schaefer to the high security prison in Munich and will keep her there indefinitely. Monika is accused of making an apology to her own dear mother. The title of the video was “Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust”. (Video featured below)
What has angered the Jews is the fact that this one little video has undone hundreds of millions of dollars worth of their psychological warfare that most of us had become victims of. They thought that their ridiculous “Holocaust” program was now firmly wired into our brains, and then, along comes Monika and blows it out of the water with a simple apology to her Mom. That really surprised them.
This is happening at the same time that our borders are open and millions of young men from Africa and Asia are flooding into our European countries with a free pass to do whatever they want. This is something that the Jews had planned for the European countries for a very long time. In the end our cities are supposed to turn into Lagos or Calcutta type slums that can no longer resist Jewish hegemony.
The sick perverted criminals that ordered Monika arrested are people that put a pancake on their head and nibble the foreskins off of little 8 day old baby boys thinking that this odd behavior somehow gives them the privilege to rule the planet. These perverts are the same ones that tried to silence me a long time ago already, but have failed. Here they are: B’nai Brith Canada.
To put Monika Schaefer in prison because she apologized to her Mom is making many people very angry and not helping people “like” the Jews very much. In fact, this may give Jews who want to come clean and join humanity, the opportunity to help us get Monika out of prison. So, if you are a Jew, we have many JEWdicial costs to cover, and helping Monika out of prison can be used as proof that you are a “good” Jew. Just contact me and we can work together.
Alfred Schaefer
info@alfredsaws.de
Alfred
Schaefer and his sister Monika.
This photo was taken in Munich the day before
Monika’s arrest a few days ago.
GERD: My dear Y——,
while visiting an exhibition of extaordinary watches here in Nünberg, together with Raouf from Paris, I got a phone call from Alfred. He´s in München attending the trial against Sylvia Stolz, together with his sister Monika and Henry Hafenmayer. And during a break in the trial Monika was arrested by the police, handcuffed and brought to jail in Fürstenfeldbruck. We are all outraged and shocked. It was only yesterday that we waved goodbye when leaving the very, very, very kind Schaefers in Tutzing.
Our thoughts are with our DEAR, DEAR MONIKA who is in jail, inflicted on her by the hatred of the Jews, who show no mercy for those who dare expose their lies.
Gerd
DIANE K: Liebe Freunde, dear Friends, the following will give you the latest information which we have currently on hand in regards to Monika. I hope you will recognise its importance, to widely distribute this article as is, or in your own interpretation.
(German transcript)
Canadian citizen Monika Schaefer was arrested on January 3, 2018 in the Munich district court. As a spectator, she wanted to attend the public hearing against Mrs. Sylvia Stolz who is accused of alleged “Holocaust denial”. In the specially staged break, after only 30 minutes of negotiation, she was arrested in the hall, in front of the hall of the trial, and handcuffed (!) and then marched to a detention cell.
The charge is SEDITION : over the video featured below, “Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust.”
As a German-Canadian, Monika Schaefer reflects in the video on being bullied as a little girl growing up in Canada, in the aftermath of WWII, for being German.
The German Inquisitors are very angry over her video “Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust” (June 2016). Their worldwide activities in the fight for the truth disturb the ruling dark forces. Commissioned by B’nai B’rith Canada, the execution assistants have become active in the Federal Republic of Germany. The helpers of Satan want to hold Monika Schaefer in Germany until so long to be decided in an Inquisitionsveranstaltung on the further whereabouts.
Readers of this article are not supposed to philosophize about whether Monika would rather have stayed in Canada to avoid this persecution in Germany.
The noose of necessity in history draws ever closer around the neck of those who serve evil and embody it. It is not the dissidents who fear for their personal well-being because they know what they are tirelessly fighting for. You know what is right and truth on your side! And the future is only conceivable in truth. The lie means death and destruction.
Do not be sad Monika, get up and fight the lies! Recognize the connections that have led to what surrounds us today over the past 100 years. The flooding of Europe with strangers from other lands is just one of the terrible symptoms.
In Monika’s case, the devil used a family informer to do his dirty work. It has always been shown in history that these traitors are not loved by anyone, not even by the one they used as a traitor.
If you are a kind and compassionate person, drop Monika a few lines. Spread the news of her arrest and describe the injustice she has suffered at the hands of these evil hypocrites.
This is Monica’s address:
Monika Schaefer
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München
GERMANY
UPDATE: From an anonymous correspondent signing off as “German Girl”.
(This long email
has had been abridged slightly).
Dear Madam or Sir,
Today, 58-year-old Canadian Monika Schaefer visited the political show trial of Sylvia Stolz, accused of Holocaust denial. Ms. Schaefer, who lives overseas, was visiting her brother Alfred Schäefer, who lives in Germany.
For the first time, she was noticed by a video from 2016 in which she publicly apologized to her parents for not believing their stories about National Socialist Germany, which are contrary to today’s “official“ portrayal! After some research into the story, Ms Schaefer came to the conclusion that the Holocaust, in her opinion, could not have taken place, as she expressly said in her video!
Well, the sole “non-belief“ in this event is, as most people already know, a punishable offense in Germany, as long as one expresses this “non-belief“ publicly. This “crime“ is prosecuted under section 130 of the StGB “Volksverhetzung” and severely punished!
Ms. Schaefer was, until the publication of this three-minute video, a respectable woman who has no criminal record! Her only crime is to be in “doubt“ of a historical event, which is like no other, “legally“ protected by the state! She has not hounded or offended any people in this statement. I do not know if this video is still online. But for “criminal“ reasons, I will understandably not post it here!
Ladies and gentlemen, our “judiciary“ not only introduces Stasi methods, but even surpasses them, is an unspoken secret.
It is also known that disgusting show trials are held in Garmany against 90-year olds, because they worked in wartime in a concentration camp as an accountant or guard and who can not even prove the concrete participation in a crime!
Alone the above paragraph should, if you have a limited understanding of the law, freeze the blood in your veins! The Inquisition is literally chasing cavalry all over Germany to arrest even the last “Nazi“, even if he is 99 and is already on his deathbed.
It is also accepted that these people, some seriously ill, die during these nerve-wracking trials, as happened in the case of Reinhold Hannig. Later, to make matters worse, it is not regretted that the accused, who in his life did not personally harm a fly, was “legally“ tortured to death.
But now one resorts to such perfidious and disgusting means that one can say without doubt: Russian Bolshevism has finally arrived in Germany! If you do not know what that is, in Russia under Stalin harmless people were politically persecuted, tortured and murdered for the mere expression of their opinions. Stalin managed to eradicate in this way approximately a quarter of his own people.
Monika Schaefer is now in custody and will receive her detention order tomorrow!
I urge you for your help! Spread this judicial crime, because otherwise I can not label it, in your blogs and videos! The German people must learn to what means is seized here and by what standards is spoken here right!
Do not let it go so far, as the poor Russians under Stalin’s blood-soaked hands had to experience for themselves and make your contribution! If you think that’s overdone, think again. We are Germany, the land of poets and thinkers!
That much must be allowed !!!
“A german girl”.
The Trial of Monika Schaefer and Sylvia Stolz
Monika’s incarceration actually offers the Jews the opportunity to prove their possible innocence and good intentions by simply getting her out of prison
…by Jonas E. Alexis and Alfred Schaefer
JEA: You said that your sister, Monika Schaefer, whom we interviewed in the past, “was arrested on January 3, 2018, in the very heart of ‘Holocaust country’ while attending, as an observer, the bizarre inquisition hearings against the courageous Sylvia Stolz.”
Describe the situation for us here. What was the “crime” that the German lawyer Stolz committed? And how did the thought-police and what David Irving calls “the traditional enemies of the truth” recognize Monika? Did she speak during the “inquisition hearings”?
AS: We were attending, as quiet spectators, the inquisition ordeal that Sylvia Stolz was enduring.
As for the “crime” that Sylvia Stolz committed, the thought police did not approve of some of the words that she had spoken in a speech she delivered in Switzerland at the AZK (Anti-Censorship-Coalition) in 2012. It was a very eloquent speech in a crowded hall, and has garnered much attention worldwide.
Keep in mind that Sylvia Stolz was put in prison for three and a half years for defending the late Ernst Zündel at an inquisition in Mannheim Germany in 2005 – 2006. She was arrested after the inquisitor had demanded that she stop presenting further evidence during the trial. She was told that any evidence that contradicts the Holocaust narrative is illegal.
That did not stop her and she continued presenting evidence until they dragged her into the dungeon. This is not a horror movie, this is the reality of our world today, and it will continue to get worse until we stop it.
Here is an excellent link for more information about Sylvia Stolz’s case.
Sylvia Stolz Holocaust Death Knell
Back to Monika and the inquisition we were attending as quiet observers. They were talking about laws and paragraphs and interpreting them in the strangest way. For me, quite frankly, I could not make any sense out of any of it. I only noticed that whenever Sylvia Stolz and her attorney presented detailed explanations of something, that the inquisition would brush it aside and reply with some jibber jabber that made no sense.
This is what is now done to all those who have the courage to speak up about their logical conclusions after understanding the historical data and the evidence.
What the Jews fear more than anything else is people understanding the big picture. This big picture goes back several thousand years, and to understand our predicament today, we must go back at least to the French Revolution in the late 1700’s. Very important is to understand the true nature of what we call the world wars, as well as what communism and the iron curtain was all about.
The Holocaust lie has been much more than only a financial fraud. The money that the Jews extorted out of not only the German people is one of many benefits,[1] but certainly not the most important one.
The primary reason for creating this myth was to divert attention away from the genocides that the Jews had engineered, fomented, and perpetrated behind the iron curtain under the guise of communism and Bolshevism.[2]
The Iron Curtain divided our world into evil communism and sacred democracy. For the other side, it was the opposite. Sacred communism and evil imperialism.
We in the West were told only truth and we were the good people, and on the other side of this iron curtain were only bad people who were told lies. This is how the world order was interpreted for us as we were growing up in the post-World War west.
The very large land mass on the east side of the Iron Curtain had experienced a true barbarism under communism which we now know was a Jewish construct. Under that system, any mention of Jewish control was defined as anti-Semitism and carried the instant death penalty.
The photographic evidence of the genocides that took place out of our view behind the iron curtain were later interpreted for us as pictures of innocent Jews murdered by those evil Nazis. All Germans were evil Nazis with the exception of Mr. Schindler. This was taught to us in school, in the media, and was continually being ramped up.
The Jews know why they must control all the media. It is the window through which we develop our perception of the reality in the world.
It is the instrument through which everything is interpreted for us. Each population is fed the interpretation that fits the role that has been planned for them in the Jewish agenda. This is as true today as it was in the past to foment wars and revolutions.
This indoctrination was carefully seeded and ramped up long before hostilities came and went in what is now known as the big world wars. Here is a website that articulates how they react when this is exposed:
Back to Monika and her arrest:
My first thoughts about Monika being arrested in a scenario that would propel this story onto the world stage was: There were some insiders who want to finally get this lie over with, and they know that Alfred will make a big deal out of this, so we will serve this to him on a silver platter.
Reading the MSM narrative a few days later proved me wrong. They were gloating about how clever they were to spot a Holocaust denier at the trial of another notorious right wing extremist Holocaust denier, and they were patting themselves on the back at their own sneakiness and bravery in calling for a surprise break to trap and arrest Monika. They were also amusing themselves at the simple minded stupidity of one Holocaust denier coming to see another Holocaust denier and then getting arrested. Anyone that stupid deserves to be arrested. That was the tone in the Jewish controlled newspaper.
After seeing how this has now aroused indignation worldwide, they are not patting themselves on the back anymore.
The only words that Monika spoke the entire time was when she protested that she is a free person from Canada and has done nothing wrong. The inquisitions State Prosecutor told her: “If you wanted to remain free you should have stayed in Canada”.
Remember, this is not a movie about the dark middle ages, it is Jew occupied Germany today.
JEA: In his book The Jewish Century, Jewish historian Yuri Slezkine begins by saying that “The modern age is the Jewish Age, and the twentieth century, in particular, is the Jewish Century.” He adds that “Modernisation” is essentially “about everyone becoming Jewish.” Is it safe to say that when everyone becomes “Jewish,” then freedom of speech and expression invariably diminishes? Is that what’s happening to Monika and countless of others?
AS: When we become Jewish we become morally corrupt and spiritually empty. We become a total negative and destroyer of everything that is worthwhile and good. The Jews themselves are the least free of all people. If you read the late Israeli academic Israel Shahak’s works, he warns us about this.[3]
When Jews are amongst themselves they keep getting more insane, since it is the insanest of the Jews who always coerce the more moderate Jews to follow them down the path of increasing insanity. They practice ritual defamation against all those they see straying from the very narrow path laid out for them. That is how these most radical Talmudic Jews operate, they become increasingly intolerant of any and all that are not as insane as themselves. These most radical Jewish rabbis are taking their own tribe and all of humanity with them over the edge and into the abyss.
They have duped many people to swallow their Hate speech and political correctness swindle to destroy our free speech.
To put Hate Speech into context. For over one hundred years now, the Germans have been subjected to increasing and pervasive hate speech in the form of unrelenting atrocity propaganda. Now that the Jews themselves are becoming the object of hatred as general awareness rises, they think they can stop a natural response by outlawing it.
The propaganda that has destroyed our natural defence instincts has been inculcated into our minds from before we were even born. The Jews even made money doing this by making movies like “Schindlers List” or the Holocaust series, and having our children watch these. This is presented to them as historical fact, when in fact it is nothing but fantasy.
In Germany itself, the indoctrination ran under labels such as de-Nazification or re-education. In Iraq it was called de-Bathification. Parallel to this, the Jews started putting laws into place that make exposure of their re-education illegal, with Holocaust denial or Hate speech laws.
Because the Holocaust lie can no longer be maintained, the perpetrators are moving the goal posts during the game by redefining any violation of their thought laws as “incitement“ or “hurt feelings” without even mentioning their Holocaust lie.
The chutzpah of this moving of the goal posts is clear when reading the official justification for the last raid on our house here in Germany in the summer of 2017. They stated that my work is Undermining the Trust people have in our Legal system.
In this raid they stole all the video and computing equipment that they could find. All my cameras, microphones, storage devices, computers, even my wife’s computer. They also stole all of my stockpile of AE911-Truth brochures and DVD’s even though these do not mention Jews. Any description of the empirical evidence of what happened on September 11 2001 has now been defined as incitement to hatred and is thereby illegal.
They have never returned anything that they have stolen from me, ever. Not from the first raid in 2016 and not from the second raid in 2017. They are trying to silence me by making it impossible for me to make any more videos.
Freedom of speech is something we have lost. Speaking the truth is now punished more severely than if an invader rapes a German woman. In fact, the invaders are encouraged to do just that by the intimidation meted out by our system, against any German who dares complain. This is true in all white countries to all European descendants. This is fulfilling the Jewish desire to breed down or exterminate the white race.
JEA: You said that “they have moved Monika Schaefer to the high security prison in Munich and will keep her there indefinitely. Monika is accused of making an apology to her own dear mother.” You also told me: “When my sister protested that she is a free person from Canada and had done nothing wrong, the ‘State Prosecutor’ told her, ‘If you wanted to stay free you should have stayed in Canada.’” Doesn’t that tell us something about the two countries?
AS: The Jews are now demonstrating their power by openly flaunting National Sovereignty. They stand above any entity that calls itself Canada or Germany. In my video “1984” the Jews flaunt this power. For them, the world is divided into Jurisdictions. Here at minute 6:00 in this video they talk about the Jurisdictions of Canada and Germany.
JEA: I looked online to see if any of the Zionist organs out there would even remotely mention what happened to Monika Schaefer, but her name was completely blacked out. What does that tell you?
AS: The Jewish establishment is trying to hard wire their fake history into our collective memory. This is necessary for their new Jew world order where the fictitious “Holocaust” is the foundation of everything. The Holocaust is the center of the universe. They have completely blacked her out, except in the context that I described above where they gloated about having caught another of these wretched Holocaust deniers.
What the Jewish establishment has somehow overlooked is the fact that the Holocaust lie that they keep ramming down our throats is in fact the noose which is wrapped around their own neck and is tightening with every day that they continue to foist this on us. They seem not to understand what it means when people are ignoring their media, leaving them screeching hysterically to themselves their conditioned rats as the world is waking up.
JEA: I have been reading the works of Steven Pinker of Harvard for years now. He tells us in The Better Angels of our Nature in particular that violence has declined, despite the fact that Pinker never talks about the Israeli crimes in the Middle East, despite the fact that terrorist cells have increased since the invasion of Iraq,[4] despite the fact that Israel has been sterilizing Ethiopian women against their will, which resulted in a fifty percent decline in their birthrate,[5] despite the fact that Israeli authorities were engaged in systematically torturing four to six thousand Palestinian prisoners every year,[6] despite the fact that at least thirty thousand of them had gone through that new gulag process since 1987,[7] despite the fact that car bombings and explosions are killing people virtually every day in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria.[8]
Pinker has a book coming out in February titled: Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. I doubt that he will even mention the persecution of Holocaust revisionists. Do you think that these people are producing serious scholarship? Aren’t they propounding propaganda in the name of scholarship and “reason”?
AS: People like Steven Pinker are pseudo intellectuals whose mission is to mislead us, much the way Noam Chomsky did this very successfully for many years. All of these people are being exposed in shorter intervals than ever before and these people will all be held to account. Steven Pinker will never mention the role of Talmudic Judaism in any of this. He writes of 9-11 as being the worst terror attack on the USA without qualifying it as being a Jewish false flag attack on the USA. This he has written as late as 2016, when no serious intellectual would put his name on a statement like that.
He is defined as a cognitive scientist and linguist. Of course, just like Noam Chomsky is a professor of linguistics. These people specialise in linguistic manipulation to deceive us.
A great deal of today’s propaganda is focused on making sure that no group of people, in particular the white European people, are able to find any racial or national cohesion. Everything that Jews write must be seen within the context of their larger agenda, which is to transform the world from one of nations and races to one of dumbed down individuals and consumers. They want to have all people on earth being reduced to self centred consumers with no bond to any group. The purpose of human life on this planet to be reduced to being a consumer that feels bad because of the fake Holocaust. Any behaviour that deviates from this narrative is muted.
The only group this would leave is the Jews. But even here they are deluded, because a parasite, when it no longer has a host population to leach from, feeds on itself. A world of dumbed down and confused individuals will no longer be able to produce anything of value, leaving nothing to nourish the parasite.
As is described in Israel Shahak’s works, more Jews have died at the hands of other Jews, than have died at the hands of the Goyim. Steven Pinker’s title, “Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress” is typical for Jewish feel-good propaganda.
The title is the complete opposite of the actual condition and direction of our civilisation today, in 2018. How much Reason, Science, Humanism and Progress is there in not understanding which gender you are, since the physical evidence is supposedly no longer relevant?
How much Reason, Science, Humanism and Progress is there when my sister Monika gets arrested and thrown into a high security prison for apologising to her own mother in a heartfelt video with the title “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong about the Holocaust”?
The realities of Iraq, Syria, Israel, the countless false flag terror atrocities, the plight of the Palestinian peoples, all of these things do not exist in the Jewish controlled media. They interpret everything for us based on the question; “Is it good for the Jews and Israel, or not?”
As George Orwell warned in his famous novel 1984, War is Peace, Lies are Truth, Hate is Love, Enslavement is Freedom. In this context, our Hate Speech and Political Correctness hysteria all makes sense.
JEA: Why do you think the Holocaust establishment is afraid of just one person (Monika)? If she is espousing lies and fabrications, why don’t they just produce serious historical truths? Or if she is telling the truth, why are the people who keep telling us that they believe in “democracy” and “freedom” putting her in prison? Is it guilty conscience?
AS: The Holocaust establishment is not afraid of Monika, but very afraid of the message that she is articulating. In their cowardly hubris they are frantically trying to stop this message, and like a little child that covers its own eyes and then says, “Now you can’t see me,” they think that putting Monika in an isolated cell in a high security prison will stop the message.
They think they can continue to intimidate others from talking about the fact that the Holocaust is nothing but a massive Jewish scam, which every thinking person now knows anyway. They are behaving like a small child caught with its hand in the cookie jar.
The genie is out of the bottle, and by trying to get it back in by arresting innocent Monika, they have in fact amplified and increased the value of her message.
Her arrest was the most spectacular own goal I have ever seen. Many people who would have been content to keep sleeping if this did not happen have now been jolted out of their complacency. This level of advertising would have cost us many millions of dollars, so we are grateful that they have given this to us.
You ask if “guilty conscience” has anything to do with Monika’s arrest.
No, psychopaths do not have a conscience as we normal human beings do. All the talk about democracy and freedom is nothing but empty talk to keep us docile and quiet. Monika’s arrest is supposed to intimidate others from following her footsteps. We are supposed to be too afraid to think and then to speak out about what we have learned.
People are supposed to believe that Holocaust denial must be evil. Otherwise, why would someone go to prison for it? The farther the Jewish establishment takes this, the worse the outcome will be for them. This is not about Monika, or you, or I. This transcends all of us alive now, on this planet. This is about human beings being able to sustain life and civilisation on this planet.
Fortunately, we are now able to observe a very predictable natural phenomenon. This matrix of lies and intimidation coming to its inevitable end. Whether overcoming an illness ourselves, or whether a monoculture eventually suffers from a surprise scourge, the outcome is always the same.
All monocultures have short lifespans. Judaism ruling the world is a monoculture, or in this case an anti-culture.
Healing processes always begins after recognition by the host that there is in fact a problem. We now find ourselves well advanced in this phase, which is always the precursor to the actual healing. Humanity has gone through this struggle with this parasite well over one hundred times before. The event that defines the healing process is known throughout history as the expulsion of the Jews.
The only difference this time is the magnitude and the destructive potential since the parasite allegedly has hundreds of nuclear weapons and their delivery systems. And yet, humanity has no choice in the matter, as the parasite has openly declared its desire to exterminate the white race.
Your final question: Is it guilty conscience?
Again, psychopaths have no conscience. To function successfully as a parasite within our societies, one of the basic requirements is to neutralise any empathy. This mindset is a prerequisite for running the money system and doing what they have been doing since their emergence on this planet as a parasite.
To ensure that the male perpetrators never do have a conscience, or empathy, they are subjected to a painful and traumatising ordeal at the age of precisely 8 days. Metzitzah b’peh, or ritual circumcision. When a baby is born, it has just come out of a world where its entire universe has been the mother’s voice, hearing the mother’s heartbeat, everything was warm and protected. At birth, the little infant is suddenly faced with the real world of everything that it encounters outside of the mother’s womb. In a natural environment this baby would find itself in its mother’s arms, able to breast feed, and very protected.
When the male babies are then subjected to the ordeal of circumcision and a Rabbi sucking the blood off of the fresh wound, this has a very traumatising effect on the babies trust for those it trusted most.
It has been proven that this trauma has a permanent effect on the child. It does irreparable damage to the infants trust in his fellow human beings. In Israel, parents pay a fine for each day that they are late in circumcising their newborn baby boys. It appears that the 8th day is the most effective in maximising the trauma.
A proper psychopath has no trust in any other human being.
JEA: Back in 2004, flaming Neocon David Horowitz, who still believes that the US liberated Iraq in 2003, complained that there needs to be some “intellectual diversity” in academe.[9] Why do you think these people don’t say the same thing about Holocaust revisionism? E. Michael Jones has argued that academe has essentially become Talmudic.[10] I think it’s a fair assessment. Your take.
AS: Jews like Horowitz will always articulate these things with the Jewish agenda in mind. They don’t believe what they say, they know they are lying as their Talmud instructs them to. He believes what he is saying about as much as Irene Zisblatt believed the stories she told us about hiding her diamonds by eating them and finding them again in her excrement, cleaning them and eating them again so that the evil Nazis would not find them.
This was how she interpreted her “ordeal” for us, as one of the millions of Holocaust survivors. She told these stores as if she believed it, knowing all along that they were lies in the perceived interest of Judaism. Some of us were foolish enough to believe these lies.
So, no, he does not believe that the US liberated Iraq in 2003. That is what the Jewish establishment does. They lie to advance the Jewish agenda. It was the Chomsky video in an article by Kevin Barrett years ago, that made that clear to me, and set me off on my new career which has now resulted in my sister in high security detention and myself in the crosshairs.
When they see a former country lose its sovereignty and be subjugated for Jewish rule and money system, it is labeled as being liberated. Germany was “liberated” in 1945, because it then became a Jewish colony. It lost its independence and is now crippled. The once proud and independent Germans have been reduced to docile zombies, much like all the European peoples have, whether in Canada, the USA, France or the UK. When Jews exterminate a people they do it incrementally in the hopes that the victims don’t wake up in time to defend themselves. Now, all of us whites are marked for slow extermination.
The establishment always howls for diversity and tolerance, but will persecute anyone who “diverts” away from their Holocaust lie. Their tolerance for this diversity is zero. In fact, their tolerance for truth and evidence is zero.
A population that is unable to define an existential threat for what it is, has forfeited its own future and existence. If our great-grandparents could see the utter nonsense that is being taught to our children they would not believe we could have allowed this to go so far.
We have our 10 year old children being taught about anal sex. This is force-feeding pornography to the most vulnerable in our society, and there is no resistance. This is only possible because the parents of these children have already been demoralised themselves and do not feel the need to speak up. They are in a comatose state as our civilisation is sliding deeper and deeper to the point of total collapse.
Students that grow up with this level of corrupted morals will not be any threat to the new Jew world order, but they will also not be able to keep our civilisation functioning, or even prevent their very own genocide.
E. Michael Jones is spot on when he calls our Academia Talmudic. Yuri Bezmenov had articulated this very well in the interview he made in 1985 after having left the Soviet Union 12 years earlier, and assessing conditions in the United States.
Bezmenov recognized the USA as being hopelessly subverted and demoralised already in 1985, and since then the subverters have had an additional 30+ years to make us what we are today. This is alarming, and only drastic remedial action will prevent the genocidal blood baths that will be our future.
Here is the most important footage of Yuri Bezmenov’s dialog in my Pavlov’s dog and behaviour control video explaining the subversion:
It is a do or die, a them or us, situation. It makes me sad to think that it will be our generation that will have been responsible for the loss of our civilisation if we remain asleep. We need to go from fun and games mode into survival, responsibility and accountability mode.
We have thousands of generations behind us who have braved and succeeded hardships we can hardly even imagine, and now it is up to us to ensure that there will be thousands more in the future. Our failure to get this right will make us the generation that was unable to maintain what we have inherited from our ancestors. We were too busy having fun and let it all burn down.
2018 will be decisive in setting our course.
What makes me optimistic is the fact that people are waking up at an explosive rate, and people who do understand the facts have a much higher energy level and sense of purpose than do the zombies, and it will be out of this newly energised population that new leadership will emerge that will be able to rally the people behind a meaningful purpose. Our survival. Nobody goes back once they have woken up. Democracy as we know it today is dead. It has utterly failed us. The explosive awakening was a very predictable thing, a natural phenomenon. I talked about the exponential processes in my Brainwashing 3 video as you can see here.
We will reconfigure our societies with institutions and leadership that are accountable for their decisions. In today’s democracy there is no accountability, it is all anonymous and secret.
The citizens are made as dumb as possible and told what to vote. It is like asking pre-teen children at home how your home should be run. They will vote to eat chocolate pudding every day and then play.
In closing, I want to revisit the Talmudic Jew Noam Chomsky who has been thoroughly exposed here at Veterans Today. We speak about this man in this interview:
History Reviewed Alfred Schaefer Imprisonment of Germans
Here is what he has been up to in France:
Chomsky Faurisson Liberte Dexpression
These Jews seem not to understand where this is leading to. The healing process that we can observe globally will make life very uncomfortable for those Jews who have not yet spoken up about the mother of all lies. These Jews are being used by their very own people to act as a human shield when the inevitable retribution comes.
This natural phenomena is unstoppable. In my own dialog with Chomsky in 2013, which led to my first video production, I advised him to explain the difference between a Zionist and a Jew, rather than lie to his audience. He ignored my advice and called me arrogant.
Monika’s incarceration actually offers the Jews the opportunity to prove their possible innocence and good intentions by simply getting her out of prison. They may not get a better opportunity to prove their innocence as human beings.
.
Abstract
Oral Testimonies of the Jews from Thessaloniki about the Holocaust. What’s this you ask? This is the book we are going to focus on this time. As survivor testimonies are very important for the official storyline, it’s clear that the more of them we examine, the closer we get to the truth. Testimonies are also a big hurdle for many people to even consider taking a look at Holocaust revisionism, as they tend to think that so many survivors cannot possibly be lying. They can’t be blamed for that, and indeed, most of the survivors are certainly not lying. The problem is that very few people have actually read a single testimony, and those that have done so, did not do it carefully. So, let’s get down to it.
The Numbers
There are 51 interviews in the book (26 women, 25 men). Except for two, the rest have been in Auschwitz–Birkenau. Now, here is the interesting part: 39 out of these 51 never mention gas chambers. Not once. On the other hand, almost all of them know about the crematories (45 out of 51). This is quite unexpected. But let’s ignore this for now and see what the survivors have to say.
The Rumor Factory
As we know, upon arrival at the camp, there was a selection, and many would go on their separate ways. The survivors describe in detail the numerous hardships they have suffered, and how they lost their relatives. But how do they know this? When we look for an answer, we realize that they did not actually see them die. One witness puts it this way:
“I learned it in the camp. We were asking where are our moms, our dads and they were telling us: They are gone... […] Since we did not see anyone, we believed it.” (p. 58)
Another:
“We learned it at the camp from the blockälteste, who told us to look after ourselves, because our people are no longer alive.” (p. 92)
Another:
“We have not yet learned anything about our parents. We could see smoke rising from afar and were wondering what it is. Until a prisoner, Slovak or Polish, in broken French, told us: ’What are you waiting for? There are your mothers. They have burned them. There are no more.’ That’s how we learned about the great tragedy. At first we did not believe her. We thought she was crazy. But later we learned it for real!” (p. 118)
Another:
“We found out when we entered the camp. They were other older Greek women, who came before us. […] They told us that they are burning them in the crematoria. […] Since they who had been in the camp a long time were telling us this, of course I believed it.” (p. 176)
Another:
“After we went there, we were asking the Polish who were political prisoners, what is it that’s burning? For 5-10 days they were telling us it’s rye bread they are making, and then they told us it’s our families.” (p. 242)
Another:
“At first I did not believe it. ’Impossible’, I said. ’We are being duped’. But when after a week we heard other prisoners confirming it, most of them old, French, Polish, Jews from Russia, we believed it.” (p. 289)
And another:
“We were seeing the ovens and they told us that they went to the ovens. The other prisoners told us this.” (p. 271)
And on and on. Those of us who have served in the military know very well what kind of a rumor factory a camp can be. All sorts of things are spread from one person to the next. Nobody questions what he hears, and usually he asks someone else for confirmation who is just as clueless. Needless to say, the misinformation problem was much worse in a concentration camp with the crematories next door, in the middle of a war. And the prisoners had no way of knowing the truth.
Now, what is most interesting is that there are two women who actually saw their fathers after they had been told that they were dead. The first talked with him for a while and later received a note from him before eventually losing all contact (p. 27). The second found out that her father was at Buna and perished during the retreat (p. 143).
So, most of the survivors are not lying. They fell victim to the rumors that were rampant at the camps. Here is another well-known rumor:
“Then they gave us a little soap and told us it’s from the ashes of our parents. We did not even touch those soaps.” (p. 29)
The Selections
Then, we have the selections. Selections were going on all the time at the camp. The prisoners went through numerous ones, and of course they were certain that these were life-or-death situations:
“Indeed, we knew very well then that whomever they picked not for work, he was to be burned; we had understood this well. Not only had we understood it, but it was deep in our minds that whoever was not for work was for burning.” (p. 27)
Or more simply:
“If someone got sick, he was immediately sent to the crematory.” (p. 147)
And yet in the same book we read about some prisoners who got seriously sick at the camp, but they did not “burn”. For example, one woman says:
“I contracted typhus at Birkenau. The Germans came every day to take for the oven. I wasn’t the only one at the hospital. There were others...” (p. 55)
Despite that, nobody sent her to the furnace. Instead, she was later sent to Auschwitz where she spent another two months in bed. She was eventually transferred to Bergen-Belsen.
Another woman suffered from scabies. She was treated at the Auschwitz hospital and recovered. And yet she seems to believe that,
“In Birkenau they would have never given me medicine, they would have put me to the gas.” (p. 196)
Finally, a prisoner was accidentally shot in the leg by an SS man. But no gas for him. He was sent to the hospital, where they removed the bullet. He also had an operation for a hernia in his stomach. He stayed four months at the hospital (p. 392). Quite a lot of trouble the Germans went through for one man, right? But the prisoners were so convinced that their lives were constantly in danger that they misinterpreted everything:
“If the German took your card with him, tomorrow morning you were going to burn. They were saying that they will send you to a better camp to recover some of your strength. They did this once to fool us. A transport that left for the crematorium, came back after a month.” (p. 329)
So, it was all just an evil German trick! But the prisoners were too smart for that. Still, sometimes they realized they were wrong. A prisoner went voluntarily through a selection in order to be transferred to Germany. He thought that those who were left behind were going to be killed. But:
“The rest were not murdered then. Some of course died later. But some were liberated six months before me. It wasn’t a selection for the crematoria, as we thought. They wanted only the strongest to be sent to Germany, while they kept the weakest at the camp. But who knew this back then?” (p. 260)
Indeed. And this is why we should never jump to conclusions.
Summary
In the Preface, one of the editors writes:
“It was the year of 1989. Suddenly within a week two ’hostages’ had died, and the number of survivors from the Auschwitz and Birkenau camps was shrinking fast. At the same time, I was reading and hearing more and more about disputes on the number of the victims of the genocide of the Jews, and even on the events themselves. It became an obsession to me that I had to, as they were still alive, write down their testimonies. Nobody had ’talked’ by then; nobody wanted to open the ’box’ of his most terrible memories, which he had buried so deeply. And yet, while there are still those few survivors, others dare to dispute the undeniable facts of those times.” (p. 7)
So, the editors’ goal was to preserve the memories of the survivors in order to combat the growing doubt about the “undeniable facts.” They should be thanked for their efforts, of course, but despite what they believe, a critical reading reveals that these testimonies poke quite a few holes in the official version of events. The survivors suffered a lot, but when it comes to planned mass extermination, not only are there many inconsistencies, but even the infamous gas chambers very rarely appear. In time, this work might prove to be another nail in the coffin of the official storyline.
If the editors hadn't passed away, the only way to show our gratitude would be by wishing that they would not be around to see it.
Erika Kounio-Amarilio, Almpertos Nar (eds.), Prophorikes martyries Hevraiōn tēs Thessalonikēs gia to Holokautōma (Oral Testimonies of the Jews from Thesssaloniki about the Holocaust), Thessaloniki: Paratērētēs 1998, 494 pages, ISBN: 978-9602609408 (newer edition: Athens: Ekdoseis Eurasia, 2015; ISBN 9786185027506, 516 pp.)
TV HOST DEMOLISHES THE HOLOCAUST MYTH
Contrary to propaganda Adolf Hitler never proposed the ‘Big Lie Technique’. In Mein Kampf, Germany’s former Chancellor states clearly that the Jews use the big lie technique to weave the most fantastical lies in history. The German leader’s remark was an accusation, not an endorsement.
The big lie technique is used by the Western powers to justify the invasion of Iraq, Russian, Chinese, or North Korean threat. The big lie justifies the invasion of Afghanistan, the so-called ‘War or Terror’, 9/11, the overthrow of the Libyan government, Israel’s occupation of Palestine, Syrian President Assad’s use of chemical weapons.
Speaking on the Egyptian AlHadath Alyoum mainstream television channel Aahmad Suleimn said the holocaust is “a nonsense story invented by the Jews for extortion purposes.”
The mainstream journalist went on to say that “Britain and the United States spread rumours about the extent of the Nazi massacres, and about the annihilation of East European Jewry to serve their own political and economic interests.”
Speaking on January 27, the popular newsman said, “Today is the international day commemorating the greatest lie in history: the holocaust, that nonsense story invented by Jews, who have been using it for years to extort the world.
“The Jews spread this lie by using their influence and their arsenal of media outlets. They label anyone denying the story as an anti-Semite. They falsely claim that during World War II, upon a decision supposedly made by Hitler, over six million East European Jews were burned in ovens, designed especially for that purpose.”
The mainstream journalist added, “The Jews use the story about the holocaust as a means of political and material extortion and in order to gain the sympathy of the world. This is of course completely groundless. They pretend to be the victims, while they are, in fact, the number one perpetrators of genocide, robbing and plundering the rights of others.
“This led many writers and historians to doubt the story of the holocaust, first and foremost, a French researcher and historian Paul Rassinier, who wrote that ‘not a single document exists anywhere in the world about the holocaust, and there is not a single blueprint or design of the alleged gas chambers. It has been proven historically that the utilities were used to disinfect the clothes of Jewish prisoners and camp guards, due to the spread of epidemics at the time. As for the crematoria, they were regular ones, which were used to get rid of the corpses of people who died during the epidemics.
“Obviously, Hitler and the Nazis were harsh on the Jews, but they did not kill or annihilate them. They used them to build railroads and to pave roads. They worked in military factories for the sake of the arsenal of the Nazi army.
The Jews have been shouting that six million East European Jews were killed in the holocaust, but all the historians say that the number of Jews in Eastern Europe back then never exceeded five million because many of them had emigrated to America or Palestine, the so-called Promised Land.”
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
How Many Jews Died in the German Concentration Camps?
Carl O. Nordling
It is well known that the majority of those who were interned in the German concentration camps during part of the Second World War did not return to their homes after liberation. Most of these people were Jewish. It has been a common belief that about six million Jews died in these camps, intentionally killed in accordance with a grand program for the physical extermination of the entire Jewish population of Europe. Most laymen presume that this was proven by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1946. The international court did not prove anything of the sort, however, and historians who have dealt with contemporary German or Jewish history have long since modified this description in various degrees.
Recently, new light has been shed on Jewish population loss in the Second World War by the German Walter N. Sanning in his book The Dissolution of East European Jewry. This is an investigation of twentieth-century Jewish demography and migration, done with carefulness and objectivity. It is based on more than 50 publications containing statistical population data on Jews in various countries, including migrations, fertility, mortality etc. Sanning's most quoted source is, however, Gerald Reitlinger's book The Final Solution, written in the 1950's. (One could say with some justice that Reitlinger laid the foundation for Sanning's work.) The great majority of statistical data used by Sanning is taken from the American Jewish Year Book (various issues), the Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971) and the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1943). As far as I can judge, Sanning's sources appear to be the best ones obtainable.
It has been said of Sanning's work that "not one in a thousand undergraduates could find fault with it" and that "only a few more graduates would be competent to identify its flaws and to convincingly question its credibility." [1] If that be the case, I feel more or less obliged to comment. I have spent three decades working professionally with the same kind of demographic complexes and processes, and therefore I regard myself as one of the few who would be competent to identify at least the grosser flaws and mistakes in a work of this kind. After a careful reading of Sanning's book, however, I have found no mistake or misconstruction of a type that would change its conclusions to any appreciable degree. Nor am I aware of any other serious criticism of Sanning's results or methods in the eight years that have elapsed since his book first appeared in German (as Die Auflösung des osteuropäischen Judentums). As a general appraisal, I would say that as far as the book deals with Jewish population losses within the German sphere of influence, it is the most reliable investigation done in the entire post-war period. This does not mean, of course, that it is guaranteed to be faultless, nor that it answers the question of how many Jews died in the German concentration camps.
Although nobody has been able to discover any faults, the book may of course contain such. Therefore, other methods should be used to check the reliability of the significant figures. Fortunately, I possess statistical material that lends itself to a check of some of Sanning's results. Furthermore, Sanning's and my own material, taken together and compared with still a few other pieces of statistical information, might enable us to form a fairly reliable answer to the question posed in the title of this article.
The statistical material at my disposal consists of data concerning 722 identified European Jews from the German sphere of influence. The biographies of all these 722 are to be found in the Encyclopaedia Judaica, and they can be regarded as a representative sample of Jews of a certain level of culture in the late 1930's. Persons of old age are overrepresented in the group, however, and none of the 722 was born later than 1909 (according to the principle of selection that I decided upon). This should be kept in mind, since it appears that emigration was much less frequent among those born before 1880 than among the younger people. And, of course, mortality was much higher among the older group than among the rest of the population. It is also significant that a great number of distinguished Jews had already emigrated before 1938 and were therefore unable to take part in the more general emigration that seems to have occurred in the years 1939 to 1941. Distinguished Jews presumably had more foreign contacts and perhaps realized the danger of impending persecutions earlier than others. Therefore, my group of identified Jews of 1938 probably includes a relatively high proportion of persons who were prone to stay where they were, even under adverse conditions. A statistical survey of the fates of all these 722 Jews has been published in The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 10, No. 2 (Summer 1990).
Sanning has used the year 1939 as one of his "stop lines," and for this year he has found 5,044,000 Jews present in the area under consideration. [2] By means of a series of complex calculations he is able to demonstrate that no less than about 2,200,000 Jews emigrated from the area in the period between the German attacks on Poland and on the Soviet Union (that is, 1939-41). In other words, 44% of the Jewish population in what became the German sphere of influence would have left the danger zone before the real danger materialized. Although this figure took me by surprise, I cannot find that Sanning has erred on this point. Comparison with the group of 722 identified Jews shows that among them 33% (of those present in 1939) emigrated before the end of 1941. (See Table 1.)
The cause of the difference between 44% and 33% is easily explained by considering the special make-up of my sample group. For instance, if we look at the identified Jews born 1880-1909 and consider the whole period from 1938 to 1944, we find that no less than 51% emigrated. Those born after 1909 (that is, about half the population) may have been even more prone to emigrate. Besides, Jews who were not renowned or in the public sector certainly had possibilities (in many cases) to change their ethnic affiliation and (in some cases) even their names and identities. By such means ordinary Jews could slip away more easily than well-known people.
Evidently, we have to consider Sanning's number of 2,847,000 Jews present in the German sphere of influence in June 1941 as the best estimate so far (certainly with margins of error). This figure will therefore be used as the base for the following comparison. With the aid of Table 1, we are now going to compare the percentages of certain significant subgroups.
Fortunately for our purposes, the bureaucratic Germans carefully registered and numbered the detainees in the Auschwitz concentration camp and in the Theresienstadt ghetto. While the latter was solely inhabited by Jews, the former had a mixed clientele consisting of various persecuted groups of people, such as Gypsies, conscientious objectors, homosexuals, vagrants, political adversaries and hard-boiled felons. Since it is commonly held that the Jews were by far the largest group, we will assume here that they made up 60% of all Auschwitz detainees. This granted, we find that 8.6% of all the available Jews (the "basic" group) were registered, sooner or later, in the Auschwitz camp. In many cases this happened after a previous stay at Theresienstadt. The corresponding figure for the group of identified Jews is 8.5%. Pending the arbitrariness of the above-mentioned figure of 60%, no statistically significant difference can possibly be exposed in this case. According to the Encyclopaedia Judaica, 65% of the Auschwitz detainees were eventually recorded as having died within the camp, and another 20% are supposed to have died after transfer to satellite camps or during the final evacuation of the camp proper (that is, Auschwitz and Birkenau). The total number of missing Auschwitz detainees would thus be 207, 000, or 7.3% of the "basic" number. This may be compared with the confirmed proportion of 7.6% missing out of the "basic" number of identified Jews. (See Table 1.)
From the book on Theresienstadt by H.G. Adler we learn that 141,000 were registered as inhabitants, or internees, of this German-created Jewish town in Bohemia. [3] This number equals 5.0% of the "basic" number, which corresponds perfectly with the fact that 5.0% of the identified Jews (of 1941) were also brought to Theresienstadt. The majority of the internees of this ghetto, however, were sent to Auschwitz (and are thus included in the above mentioned number of registered prisoners). This fate befell only a fourth of the identified inhabitants of the ghetto probably because these contained a higher proportion of so-called "prominent" Jews who were exempt from being moved to other camps. (All the Danish Jews were for some reason placed in this category.) The group of identified Jews also suffered a much lower death rate than the rest (31% each as against 63% among the ghetto remainers in each case). It follows that the percentage of survivors was much higher in the case of the identified Jews than among the inhabitants in general.
There is hardly any reason to contest the accuracy of the camp registration numbers quoted above. If they are correct, it follows that the "basic" number of 2,847,000 Jews present in June 1941 must also be fairly accurate. This is so because we know from the sample of identified persons what percentages of camp detainees are to be expected, and we have found percentages that fit in with these expectations.
Those who died in Auschwitz and Theresienstadt represent a little less than half the total loss in all the German concentration camps as far as the identified Jews are concerned. As for the Jewish population in general, the total number of camp deaths would be contained within Sanning's category "Jews missing in the German sphere of influence." This number of "missing" turns out to be 304,000, according to Sanning's primary method of calculating. As a check, Sanning has used another method as well. This secondary calculation results in a number of 330,000 missing out of a "basic" number of 2,738,000 (within a somewhat narrower sphere of influence). The primary number of "missing" represents 10.7% of the "basic" number, the secondary 12.1% of the "basic" number. These percentages should be compared with 12.3% missing due to other causes than normal mortality among the group of identified Jews. At the first glance, this looks like a rather good agreement. But due to the coarse statistical methods used by Sanning, these figures can have "no claim to absolute certainty" - to use Sanning's own words. He says that the available data on population size, migration, flight and deportation, fertility and mortality rates, mixed marriages and assimilation tendencies are often so vague that a slight variation in the calculation procedure might well change the result by several hundreds of thousands of persons in the "missing" category. Therefore, what Sanning really has achieved is only to show that the number of missing Jews at the end of the war in the German sphere must have been between, say, 150,000 and 500,000. The lower figure can be ruled out immediately on account of the number of registered deaths in Auschwitz and Theresienstadt. The best estimate seems to be the assumption that these deaths amounted to about 51% of all Jews missing from German concentration camps, in accordance with the proportion among the groups of identified Jews. This would mean approximately 470,000 missing altogether from the camps. Since about 50,000 would have died "naturally, " according to the normal mortality rate, there would be some 420,000 "missing" from a statistical point of view. This is 14.7% of the "basic" number to be compared with 12.3% in the case of the identified Jews.
It may perhaps contribute to the check if something could be said about the number of survivors from the concentration camps. One man who should have known the number of Jewish detainees in the camps was SS leader Heinrich Himmler. Fortunately, a certain Jewish representative was in the position to interview him on this matter as late as April 1945. This was Mr. Norbert Masur from Sweden, who went to negotiate with Himmler about a possible liberation of imprisoned Jews. During these talks Himmler mentioned the number of Jews still alive in some of the camps: 25,000 in Theresienstadt, 20,000 in Ravensbrück, from 20,000 to 30,000 in Mauthausen, 50,000 in Bergen-Belsen and 6,000 in Buchenwald. Later information indicates that some of the figures were too high, and that the Buchenwald number was far too low. The sum was probably fairly correct. But Himmler intimated that 150,000 Auschwitz Jews should also be counted among the survivors. According to the SS leader, these would have been alive in the camp until its evacuation. This may be fairly true, but apparently Himmler had no count of survivors after the evacuation, and he seems to have had no ideaof what had happened to the evacuees. We know from other sources that only a minority of them survived the transport in open railroad cars in the bitterly cold winter, perhaps about 30,000 to 50,000. Then there were many other camps with Jewish detainees, not mentioned by Himmler, and it seems reasonable to assume some 30,000 or 40,000 survivors among them. That would mean around about 200,000 Jewish survivors from all the German concentration camps. A total mortality of 70% among the Jewish detainees would follow from these assumptions. This is a very high figure from other points of view. The mortality in the corresponding group of identified Jews was "only" 75%, although they were much older than inmates in general and should have been much more prone to die under the conditions. Perhaps we have estimated somewhat too high a number of deaths and/or a little too low a number of survivors, after all.
In any case, the number of Jews missing in the German sphere turns out to be very far from the "established" figure of six million. Shouldn't we expect some cardinal error in the whole reasoning just because of this great discrepancy? Certainly, some further checking seems required. But first, let us remember that we have considered here only the number of Jews who died in the German concentration camps, not all the European Jews who died in the war. Among the 5,500,000 Jews in the Soviet sphere (in 1941) more than one million died, according to Sanning's investigation. These deaths include both "normal" victims of the war and victims of German and Soviet persecution. Secondly, the Jewish "basic" population of about 2, 850, 000 couldn't possibly have suffered a loss of something like six million. This figure should have been discarded long ago, especially since Reitlinger proved it to be unrealistic nearly 40 years ago. The reasonable question to ask is rather this: In view of the proclaimed anti-Semitic policy of the National Socialists and Hitler's talk about Ausrottung, how could more than two million escape deportation? What about the famous German efficiency?
Part of the answer comes from Himmler himself, who said to Mr. Masur: "I have left 450,000 Jews in Hungary" - as if he had done it out of humanity. (The real reason probably was lack of transport facilities at the time when Hungary came under direct German rule.) Romania never came under direct German rule, and consequently very few Romanian Jews were deported to German camps. The Romanian government pursued an anti-Semitic policy of its own, and Hitler was satisfied with that. More than half a million of the "basic" number were Romanian Jews. Much the same conditions prevailed in Italy, France, Croatia and Slovakia, and the Gestapo had to be content, in most cases, with shipments of non-naturalized Jews from these countries. Naturalized Jews in Belgium, Bulgaria and Finland seem to have been entirely exempt from deportation. In Poland, hundreds of thousands of Jews were allowed to stay in the city ghettos (until they revolted as in Warsaw 1943). Most of the Jews in Denmark escaped the planned deportation by fleeing over the Sound to Sweden -- and the German Army and Navy did virtually nothing to prevent them.
The fate of the non-deported Jews was often very miserable, especially in the case of Poland, and it certainly deserves a special study.
Another problem that would deserve a special study from a statistical point of view is the alleged system of transporting old Jews incapable of work to camps in the East with the sole intention of killing them immediately upon arrival. It would be unavailing to look for such cases in the registers, since the allegation requires that the murder took place without any notice taken of the names and identities of the victims. All that can be said here is that the alleged practice could hardly have been responsible for any large number of deaths. If that had been the case, there would certainly have been many more than 32 missing after Auschwitz among all the identified Jews reported by the Encyclopaedia Judaica. And, since a quarter of the identified Jews sent to Auschwitz were aged 65-80, we would probably have seen several cases of "killed on arrival" in their biographical notices. Instead, we find two rather unexpected examples. The Encyclopaedia Judaica reports of Gisi Fleischmann (47) that she was "killed on arrival," and of Raymond Lambert (49), "gassed upon arrival." On the other hand, it says that, for example, Béla Bernstein (76) "died" in Auschwitz and Eduard Duckesz (76) "perished" within the camp. It is not even certain that the Encyclopaedia is to be relied on in the case of Fleischmann, since later information reports her as deported to Birkenau (Auschwitz) in August and murdered about 18 October (Martin Gilbert in his book The Holocaust, 1986).
Our general conclusion must be that the question posed in this article's title cannot be answered with any precision as long as we have recourse only to the above-mentioned sources. The general magnitude was certainly half a million, but the actual number of Jews who died in the German concentration camps might well have been as low as 300,000 or as high as 600,000. In order to establish a more precise answer to the question, more sample investigations should be accomplished. Any Jewish society, club, school class or small community might constitute such a sample, if only all or most of its members could be traced through the war. The study of a sufficient number of such samples would probably answer the above question and a number of other questions as well.
I shall finish this article by referring to just one small sample group of deported Jews from the Holocaust literature:
- Albert Düssel taken to Auschwitz, later to Neuengamme, died there 1945
- Mrs "van Daan" taken to Auschwitz, later to Buchenwald, died there 1945
- Peter "van Daan" taken to Auschwitz, later to Mauthausen, died there 1945
- Margot Frank taken to Auschwitz, later to Belsen, died there 1945
- Anne Frank taken to Auschwitz, later to Belsen, died there 1945
- Mrs Frank taken to Auschwitz, later to Belsen, died there 1945
- Mr "van Daan" taken to Auschwitz, last seen there in 1945
- Mr Frank taken to Auschwitz, survived in camp hospital.
This gives some idea of what can be achieved by means of the study of samples of known individuals.
Sources:
- Adler, H.G.: Theresienstadt, 1941-1945. Tübingen, 1960
- Encyclopaedia Judaica. Jerusalem, 1972.
- Sanning, W.N.: The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry. Costa Mesa, California, 1990.
- Masur, Norbert: En jude talar med Himmler. Stockholm, 1945.
| Table 1
| |||||
| TOTAL JEWISH POPULATION | IDENTIFIED PERSONS | ||||
| Category | Thousands | % |
% | Number | Category |
| Present 1939 |
5,044 |
|
| 629 | Present Jan. 1939 |
| Emigrated 1939-41 | -2,197 |
|
|
-206 | Emigrated
1939-41 |
| Present 1941 | = 2,847 | 100 | 100 |
= 423 | Present December 1941 |
| Jews registered at Auschwitz (assuming
that 60% of all registered were Jewish) | 244 | 8.5 |
8.6 | 36 |
Deported to Auschwitz |
| Missing in May 1945 (85% of all according to Enc. Judaica) |
-207 | 7.3 |
7.6 | -32 |
Missing in May 1945 |
| Survived Auschwitz | = 37 | 1.3 |
0.9 | = 4 |
Survived Auschwitz |
| Registered at Theresienstadt | 141 | 5.0 |
5.0 | 21 |
Deported to Theresienstadt |
| Forwarded from Theresienstadt |
-88 | 3.1 |
1.2 | -5 |
Forwarded from Theresienstadt |
| Died in Theresienstadt |
-33.5 | 1.2 |
1.2 | -5 |
Died in Theresienstadt |
| Survived Theresienstadt |
=19.5 | 0.7 |
2.6 | =11 |
Survived Theresienstadt |
|
|
|
| 17.0 | 72 |
Missing adter deport. to concentration camps |
| Missing not due to emigration or normal mortality | 304 |
10.7 | 12.3 |
52 | Missing not due to normal mortality (72-20) |
| Alive in
conc. camps April 1945 according to Himmler | 275 | 9.6 |
5.7 | 24 |
Alive in conc. camps May 1945 |
| Note: All figures refer to Jews living in the countries under German control in June 1941. | |||||
From The Journal of Historical Review, Fall 1991 (Vol. 11, No. 3), pages 335-344.
About the Author
Carl O. Nordling (1919-2007) was a Finnish-born architect, urban planner and historian. He graduated as an architect from the Helsinki University of Technology in 1939, and migrated to Sweden in 1944. As a statistician, he applied statistical methods to a number of scientific problems and published a large number of articles, mainly in his native Swedish. Internationally he is perhaps best known for papers he published in English-language peer-reviewed scientific journals.
_______________________________________________________________________________
1946 US report said ‘Poles persecuted the Jews as vigorously as did the Germans’
Post-war declassified State Department document found long history of Polish anti-Semitism before, during and after Holocaust
The file picture taken just after the liberation by the Soviet army in January
1945, shows a group of children wearing concentration camp uniforms behind barbed wire fencing in the Oswiecim (Auschwitz)
Nazi concentration camp. (AP Photo)
A US State Department report from May 15, 1946, found “evidence that Poles persecuted the Jews as vigorously as did the Germans” during the World War II Nazi occupation of Poland.
The declassified report was distributed Thursday by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the same day that a Polish law making it a crime to accuse the Polish nation of Nazi-era atrocities took effect. Also Thursday, senior Israeli and Polish diplomats met in Jerusalem in a bid to resolve differences over the law.
The report highlights Polish anti-Semitism and persecution of Jews in the immediate aftermath of the Holocaust, and traces it back to a long history of Polish anti-Jewish legislation before World War II and anti-Jewish activities by Poles during the Holocaust.
The 1946 document “analyzes the policies of the Polish Government, the current anti-Semitic manifestations, and the possibilities for Jewish survival in Poland” in the immediate aftermath of the Holocaust.
The report found that “native Poles” abetted the activities of the Germans during World War II.
The report, which was declassified in August 1983, speaks of anti-Semitism as “a traditional feature of Polish political and economic life,” saying that “the continuance of the conflict between the Government and the opposition in Poland is conducive to a resurgence of anti-Semitism, which is easily employed as a weapon in this conflict.”
The State Department conceded that following the Holocaust, “the government has made anti-Semitism a crime,” but, it said, “the outrages continue, although on a somewhat reduced scale.”
During a 2001 memorial service in the Polish town Jedwabne, Jews commemorate
the WWII murder of its Jewish community by Polish neighbors. (Wikimedia Commons)
The document says that since the early nineteenth century, life for the Polish Jewish community — the largest in Western Europe — was made difficult by anti-Semitism.
“Religious and economic in its origins, Polish anti-Semitism was preached by political parties and church heads and practiced by officials high and low,” according to the report. By 1939, on the eve of the Nazi occupation of Poland, “it was one of the distinguishing factors of the country’s political, social and economic life.”
“Because anti-Semitism had already become so ingrained in Polish thought, it is not altogether surprising that it still manifests itself in post-war Poland, although common suffering at the hand of the Germans might have been expected to bring the Poles and the Jews closer together.”
After World War I, Poland became an independent nation which “adopted discriminatory policies towards its Jewish citizens,” including a ban on ritual slaughter, limits on the number of Jewish university students, and discriminatory taxation.
“When Hitler came to power… anti-Semitic elements in Polish political life became more aggressive,” and “by mid-1936 the Government itself… gave approval to the economic boycott of the Jews.”
As a result of this legislation, by 1939, most of the Jews in Poland lived as “second-class citizens” despite having token representation in parliament.
This undated World War II photo released by the Yad Vashem Holocaust
memorial shows a group of Polish gendarmes. (Yad Vashem via AP)
The Provisional Polish Government in the immediate aftermath of the war was “devoid of the anti-Semitism which had characterized pro-war governments and had marked some elements in the former Government-in-Exile in London.” Still, the government struggled to contain the “hostility toward the Jews [which] is widespread.”
“By mid-1944, widespread anti-Semitism was reported in Lublin and other parts of Poland, attributable at this time to the departing Germans. By April 1945, more reports were current and a dozen Polish towns were named as places where Jews had been killed, allegedly by members of the Polish Home Guard (Armia Krajowa), the armed forces formed by and loyal to the Government-in-Exile. These sporadic instances finally culminated in two fairly large-scale anti-Semitic incidents: at Rzoszov on June 11 and at Cracow on August 11, 1945.” According to official figures, “fascist gangsters” had killed 352 Jews in Poland since the liberation.
The Polish legislation enacted Thursday calls for prison terms of up to three years for attributing the crimes of the Nazis to the Polish state or nation. The bill would also set fines or a maximum three-year jail term for anyone who refers to Nazi German death camps as Polish.
One key paragraph of the law states: “Whoever claims, publicly and contrary to the facts, that the Polish Nation or the Republic of Poland is responsible or co-responsible for Nazi crimes committed by the Third Reich… or for other felonies that constitute crimes against peace, crimes against humanity or war crimes, or whoever otherwise grossly diminishes the responsibility of the true perpetrators of said crimes – shall be liable to a fine or imprisonment for up to three years.”
The legislation, proposed by Poland’s conservative ruling party, has sparked a bitter dispute with Israel, which says it will inhibit free speech about the Holocaust. The United States also strongly opposes the legislation, warning it could hurt Poland’s strategic relations with Israel and the US.
Jewish groups, Holocaust survivors and Israeli officials fear its true aim is to repress research on Poles who killed Jews during World War II. The law and subsequent backlash to it have unleashed a wave of anti-Semitism in Poland.
The Lost Story of German Latin Americans Interned During WW2
After Pearl Harbor, the US state department strong-armed Latin American allies like Costa Rica into dispossessing, and often deporting, German immigrants.
With the Statue of Liberty looming overhead, an 11-year-old boy named Jurgen sat huddled in his coat, alongside his family and few pieces of luggage, as a cold wind blew off the Hudson River.
Ellis Island is best known as the former gateway for millions of immigrants entering the US, but in the winter of 1944, the boy – Jurgen – and his family were about to be deported to Germany.
“We were processed on Ellis Island as illegal immigrants,” said Jurgen, now 82. “In reality, we were kidnapped by the US government.”
Jurgen and his family were among thousands of Latin Americans of German origin who were rounded up by their respective governments on orders from the US following the bombing of Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941.
They were detained in accordance with a little-known US state department program. The Special War Problems Division would orchestrate the detention of more than 4,000 Latin Americans from Germany, Japan and Italy in internment camps in Texas and elsewhere, as well as localized detention centers in Latin America.
In all, 15 Latin American countries would deport residents and citizens of German ancestry to detention centers in the United States, often without legal recourse, according to a statement from the National Archives.
The internment of more than 120,000 Japanese Americans in camps has been recognized by the US Congress, but the story of Latin Americans with origins in axis countries has been largely lost to history.
As the 73rd anniversary of the US entry into the second world war approaches, fewer and fewer people remain who experienced firsthand the Immigration and Naturalization Service internment camps in the US.
The second world war arrived swiftly for Jurgen’s family and other Germans living in Costa Rica. Less than a month after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, Jurgen’s father was arrested by Costa Rican police on 2 January 1942.
By the late 1930s,the FBI had begun to identify possible Nazi sympathizers, fearing Axis forces would establish a foothold in Latin America. In the case of Costa Rica, the US Embassy in San José submitted a list of names to be deported to the government, a move acknowledged in a State Department memo dated 15 November 1943.
Larger countries like Mexico, Chile and Argentina resisted the demand to deport their citizens, but that was not an option for the small Central American nation. In 1942, the US state department announced that it would boycott all Costa Rican products from German-owned companies. Coffee accounted for more than half of the country’s exports between 1938 and 1945 – and the coffee business was dominated by German firms, according to Gertrud Peters, an economic historian at the National University of Costa Rica.
Unable to ship goods to Germany because of the allied blockade, Costa Rica – among many other Latin American nations – was forced to comply.
Two weeks after Jurgen’s father was detained, a letter arrived from the police informing his family that he had been deported to the US, where he was being held in the country’s largest internment camp, in Crystal City, Texas.
The dusty Texas town could not have been more different from the mild climate and green mountains of San José.
The 500-acre internment camp, which at its peak would house nearly 3,400 detainees, was still largely under construction when Jurgen arrived in late 1943.
“The camp was built on an old spinach field,” Jurgen said. “There was a statue of Popeye in the town.” The statue still stands in Crystal City today.
After rain the unpaved roads would become thick with mud, and Jurgen and the other children took to walking to the latrines on short stilts to protect their shoes.
Jurgen said that the camp provided all the basics for his family, including simple accommodation in three-unit row houses, communal latrines and food. His father, a businessman, found work laying asphalt for the camp’s roads and, briefly, plucking feathers off turkeys.
Jurgen and his younger brother cut beet greens with a knife to earn $1 an hour, which the family could use to order goods from the Montgomery Ward Catalog. The family was already saving up to buy coats for the next leg of their journey back to Germany.
Besides keeping axis nationals from supposedly impeding the US war effort at home, Crystal City served an important role for the US abroad: providing the country with a grab-bag of prisoners who could be traded for Americans held by the Third Reich.
Faced with the prospect of spending the remaining years of the war in detention, Jurgen’s family volunteered for deportation.
The family traveled by train to Ellis Island before they boarded a Red Cross ship and sailed back to Europe. Allied and Russian forces were beginning to close in on Germany. As Jurgen and his family filed off the boat in Lisbon, a line of American prisoners waited to board, bound back to the United States.
Jurgen’s family eventually returned to Costa Rica in 1948. They were able to recover their properties, but the same could not be said for many German families, whose businesses and land were seized by the government and sold to pay down the national debt and subsidize populist land reforms.
After years in war-torn Germany, what they found in Costa Rica was yet more conflict: following a disputed election in 1948, the country fell into a brief civil war. That war brought about the rise of President José Figueres, the leader who abolished Costa Rica’s army in 1948. The following year, Costa Rica declared its political neutrality.
Holocaust Handbooks & Documentaries
Presented
by Castle Hill Publishers and CODOH
ISSN 1529-7748 (books) & 2059-3872 (documentaries)
Groundbreaking Documentaries on the Biggest Taboo of the Western World
In 1992, Jewish filmmaker David Cole went to Auschwitz to make a documentary, in which he exposed the lies, distortions and outright falsifications committed by the local Polish Museum. His movie made him famous—or infamous, some contend. With this courageous young Jewish man's deed, critical Holocaust research entered a new era: that of well-researched documentaries bringing to light the incongruencies of the orthodox Holocaust narrative.
Copyright Notice: The following movies have been released to the public domain for educational purposes only. They can be copied and distributed free of charge only. No commercial use is permitted. If copied and distributed, no changes to the movies are permitted without the prior written consent of the author/director of the movie.
So far, the following 17 documentaries are available for free download:
To learn more about them, click on their respective links.
Dean Irebodd: Auschwitz—The Surprising Hidden Truth
Auschwitz—where the Germans killed the Jews. But when you look at the details of what is claimed about Auschwitz and what was physically possible, strange, even incredible discrepancies turn up. This video describes some of the most glaring facts which don't jibe with the usual narrative. Learn more
Dean Irebodd: Buchenwald—A Dumb Dumb Portrayal Of Evil.; 2nd, revised edition
The German wartime concentration camp at Buchenwald became one of the center stages of Allied post-war propaganda depicting Germans as profoundly evil and justifying not only the slaughters going in during WWII, but also many of the wars to come in the future. This documentary shows how the Powers That Be manipulate the gullible American public and much of the rest of the world for pro-war purposes. Learn more
Germar Rudolf: Curated Lies—The Auschwitz Museum’s Misrepresentations, Distortions and Deceptions
On May 9, 2016, Dr. James Fetzer, retired professor of philosophy of science, hosted Germar Rudolf during Episode 198 of his internet broadcast The Real Deal. Rudolf presented an overview of the recently released study CURATED LIES: The Auschwitz Museum's Misrepresentations & Deceptions by Italian Holocaust Historian Carlo Mattogno. Learn more
David Cole: David Cole in Auschwitz—David Cole Interviews Dr. Franciszek Piper, Director, Auschwitz State Museum; slightly shortened, sound-remastered edition
A young Jewish holocaust revisionist puts some hard questions to a museum tour guide and to the senior curator of the Auschwitz State Museum… Learn more
Anthony Lawson: Holocaust, Hate Speech & Were the Germans so Stupid?; 2nd, revised edition
This video discusses the social and judicial persecution of individuals voicing dissident opinions on the historical event usually referred to as the Holocaust. It castigates that persecution and lays bare the illegality and amorality of such activities. It also presents a number of striking arguments showing that revisionists just may be right. Learn more
Dean Irebodd: Nazi Shrunken Heads—A 24-minute free video about lies which justify war; 2nd, revised edition
The German wartime concentration camp at Buchenwald became one of the center stages of Allied post-war propaganda depicting Germans as profoundly evil and justifying not only the slaughters going in during WWII, but also many of the wars to come in the future. This documentary shows how the Powers That Be manipulate the gullible American public and much of the rest of the world for pro-war purposes. Learn more
Dean Irebodd: One Third of the Holocaust—A holocaust denial movie on the subject of Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec
This documentary explains how Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec were not death camps, thereby debunking 1/3 of the holocaust. It asks questions like, "Would the Germans have really put a fence made out of tree branches around a deathcamp?" Answer: "Uh, no, that's silly." And would they have then conducted a huge burning operation inside this flammable fence? Learn more
Germar Rudolf: Probing the Holocaust: The Horror Explained (Part 1); 2nd edition
With horrific images of corpses strewn on the ground and in trains at the Bergen-Belsen, Nordhausen and Dachau concentration camps, the Allies convinced the world that six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis. This documentary analyzes this imagery. Learn more
Germar Rudolf: The Chemistry of Auschwitz—Buna Rubber, Zyklon B, Prussian Blue and the Gas Chambers; 3rd edition
Auschwitz was a center of chemistry. The German chemical industry built gigantic factories for rubber and fuel. But that's not what we associate with the name "Auschwitz." We think of gas chambers and Zyklon B, two chemical things as well. How did the gas chambers of Auschwitz look like? How did they operate? And Zyklon B: what is it? How does it kill? Does it leave traces that can be found still today? These and other questions are thoroughly examined in this documentary. The horror of Auschwitz is meticulously dissected, and thus, for the first time, it really becomes comprehensible. This video documentary accompanies the book of the same title, which is Volume 2 of the series "Holocaust Handbooks." Learn more
Germar Rudolf: The Day Amazon Murdered History
In March 2017, Amazon banned all revisionist books from its online stores worldwide. This documentary tells the inside story of what exactly happened and why… Learn more
Germar Rudolf: The First Holocaust—The Surprising Origin of the Six-Million Figure
A documentary on the surprising origin of the six-million figure. Germar Rudolf takes the reader on a time travel back until 1850 while tracing back the origin and various usages of the claim that six million Jews were suffering and in danger of being exterminated in a "holocaust." Learn more
Eric Hunt: The Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax
Since its inception in 1994, Steven Spielberg's "Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundation" has recorded numerous testimonies of "Holocaust survivors." The present documentary uses some of them to prove that the orthodox tale about the alleged extermination camp at Treblinka is untenable. Learn more
Eric Hunt: The Last Days of the Big Lie; 2nd revised edition
The Last Days of the Big Lie is a documentary which debunks the repulsive liars glorified as victims and heroes in the Steven Spielberg produced, Academy Award winning Holocaust “documentary” fraud "The Last Days." Learn more
Germar Rudolf: The Lies and Deceptions of Deborah Lipstadt—Part 1; 2nd edition
On April 7th of 2017, Deborah Lipstadt appeared in Oxford, England, where she related her experiences surrounding her courtroom battle against British historian David Irving. This presentation discusses some of the claims she made during that speech. It is demonstrated that many of her claims are not only false, but are actually deeply rooted in prejudice and a profoundly anti-academic attitude. Learn more
Germar Rudolf: The Lies and Deceptions of Deborah Lipstadt—Part 2
Deborah Lipstadt's claim to fame is her 1993 book Denying the Holocaust and the events it triggered. This video exposes her book as a collection of lies and deceptions.
Learn more
Eric Hunt: The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth
This documentary debunks the “Gas Chambers Disguised as Shower Rooms” propaganda coup staged by the Soviets in August 1944 when they occupied the Lublin-Majdanek camp. Back then Allied Holocaust propaganda took flight, and with this documentary it finds it Nemesis.
Learn more
Eric Hunt: The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax; 2nd, revised edition
The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax debunks Zionist British Archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls’ fraudulent “investigation” of Treblinka, which included digging near clearly marked Christian graves claiming to have found new “hidden mass graves”, falsely assigning homicidal intent to a normal life-saving shower room at Majdanek, and misidentifying a terra-cotta tile excavated at Treblinka as belonging to the floor of a homicidal “gas chamber.” Learn more
_________________________________________________________
Eyewitnesses to the Treblinka “Gas Chambers”
Traditional Holocaust historians state that Treblinka was a pure extermination camp in which approximately 870,000 Jews were murdered. The number of Jewish survivors of Treblinka is generally thought to have been between 40 and 70, and probably closer to the lower figure. This article will examine the credibility of several Jewish survivors of Treblinka.
CHIL RAJCHMAN
Chil Rajchman was a Jewish survivor of Treblinka who was interviewed by the US Office of Special Investigations in 1980. He later traveled to the United States to appear as a witness for the prosecution in the extradition trial of John Demjanjuk. Rajchman also took the witness stand in Jerusalem where Demjanjuk was put on trial for allegedly being a murderous guard at Treblinka.[2] The Israeli Supreme Court ruled that Demjanjuk’s guilt had not been proven, and that the eyewitness testimony of Rajchman and four other witnesses failed to identify Demjanjuk credibly.[3]
Rajchman described the gas chambers at Treblinka in his memoirs:
The Schlauch road is not long. In a few minutes you find yourself in a white structure, on which a Star of David is painted. On the steps of the structure stands a German, who points to the entrance and smiles—Bitte, bitte! The steps lead to a corridor lined with flowers and with long towels hanging on the walls.
The size of the gas chamber is seven by seven meters. In the middle of the chamber there are shower-heads through which the gas is introduced. On one of the walls a thick pipe serves as an exhaust to remove the air. Thick felt around the doors of the chamber renders them airtight.
In this building there are some 10 gas chambers. At a short distance from the main structure there is a smaller one with three gas chambers. By the doors stand several Germans who shove people inside. Their hands do not rest for a moment as they scream fiendishly—Faster, faster, keep moving![4]
Rajchman wrote that exhaust gas from a Diesel engine was piped into the gas chambers.[5] However, Austrian engineer Walter Lüftl and American engineer Friedrich Paul Berg have both documented that exhaust from Diesel engines could not have been used for mass executions at Treblinka. Lüftl concludes in his report that the stories of gas chambers with Diesel engines and gas vans at places such as Treblinka can only be disinformation.[6]
Berg writes: “However, the story [of mass gassings] becomes even more incredible when one discovers that far better sources of carbon monoxide, better even than gasoline engines, were readily available to the Germans. Those other sources did not require either Diesel fuel or gasoline.”[7]
Rajchman in his memoirs also reported the following horrific incident:
It once happened that an oven was brought next to a huge grave, where perhaps a quarter of a million people were buried. As usual the oven was loaded with the proper number of bodies and in the evening it was lit. But a strong wind carried the fire over to the huge grave and engulfed it in flames. The blood of some quarter of a million people began to flare, and thus burned for a night and a day. The whole camp administration came to look upon this marvel, gazing with satisfaction at the blaze. The blood came up to the surface and burned as if it were fuel.[8]
Since blood consists mostly of water and is nonflammable, Rajchman’s story that blood burned as if it were fuel is totally absurd.[9]
Rajchman also reported other instances when the blood from gassed victims rose to the surface: “I remember that every morning when we went out to work, we would notice that the surfaces of the pits had burst in dozens of places. By day the ground was firmly trodden down, but at night the blood pressed up to the surface…The blood of tens of thousands of victims, unable to rest, thrust itself up to the surface.”[10]
Rajchman’s story that blood “pressed up to the surface” at night but was trodden down during the day is ludicrous. Rajchman’s memoirs about his stay in Treblinka are no more credible than his testimony at the John Demjanjuk trial.
RICHARD GLAZAR
Richard Glazar was a Jew sent to Treblinka at the beginning of October 1942. He said he spent 10 months in Treblinka before escaping from the camp.[11] Glazar in his memoirs also stated that exhaust gasses from motors were used in the gas chambers at Treblinka:
The gas chambers are the only brick buildings in the entire camp. Actually, they comprise two structures. At first was built—somewhat farther from the entrance—a smaller structure with three gas chambers, each about five by five meters. Sometime in the fall of 1942 the second building, containing 10 gas chambers, was completed. This building is located very close to the Pipeline, at the point where it opens into the second part of the camp. There is a hallway running all the way down the middle of the new building. One enters the gas chambers, five on either side, from this hallway. The new gas chambers measure about seven by seven meters. The motor room is built onto the back wall, where the hallway ends. The exhaust gases from the motors are pumped into the gas chambers through conduits in the ceilings of the chambers. These conduits are disguised as showers.[12]
Glazar made two major errors in his book. First, Glazar wrote that the Germans started to burn the corpses “one overcast November afternoon” in 1942.[13] This statement contradicts the standard Holocaust literature, which claims the incineration of corpses did not start until March/April 1943.[14]
Second, Glazar said that he was part of a camouflage unit that performed forestry work in the vicinity of Treblinka. Glazar wrote:
The camouflage unit is the only one of the old work squads that still has enough real work to do…Several times a day…some part of the 25-man unit has to go out into the forest, climb into the trees, harvest large branches, and carry them back into the camp, where they will be used for repairs. The other part of the unit straightens and firms up the posts, tightens the barbed wire, and weaves the new pine boughs into the fence until there are no longer any gaps in the dense green wall.[15]
Thus, according to Glazar, 25 inmates supplied Treblinka with its greenery for concealment. The “camouflage unit” would have been much larger if wood from the forest had been used to cremate the 870,000 corpses in Treblinka. The camouflage unit would also have chopped down the trees and then cut off the branches rather than engaging in tree-climbing activities. Yet Glazar apparently opines that such tree-felling never occurred during his time at Treblinka. Since historians universally state that there were no crematoria at Treblinka, this rules out the cremation of some 870,000 corpses using firewood.[16]
Air-photo evidence also indicates that the massive deforestation necessary to cremate 870,000 bodies never took place around Treblinka. Thomas Kues writes:
By comparing a detailed 1936 map of the Treblinka area with air photos taken by the Luftwaffe in May and November 1944 we are able to estimate the scope of contemporary deforestation in the area. If 870,000 bodies had really been burned at Treblinka, then the procurement of the required fuel would have denuded the entire wooded area north of the camp site. The air photos show that this is clearly not the case. Rather, the visible possibly deforested areas—amounting to less than 10 hectares—indicate the cremation of at most some ten thousands of bodies.[17
The argument that only a fraction of the corpses were burned is not valid, since the Soviet and Polish forensic examinations of Treblinka would have discovered hundreds of thousands of corpses. The Allies would have shown these corpses to the world as proof of German genocide.
The only remaining conclusion is that most Jews at Treblinka were sent somewhere else, most likely to German-occupied Soviet territory. Richard Glazar’s memoirs inadvertently confirmed the revisionist thesis that Treblinka was a transit camp.[18]
JANKIEL WIERNIK
Jankiel Wiernik escaped from Treblinka and published a document in May 1944 describing his experiences at Treblinka. Wiernik wrote:
A Jew had been selected by the Germans to function as a supposed “bath attendant.” He stood at the entrance of the building housing the chambers and urged everyone to hurry inside before the water got cold. What irony! Amidst shouts and blows, the people were chased into the chambers.
As I have already indicated, there was not much space in the gas chambers. People were smothered simply by overcrowding. The motor which generated the gas in the new chambers was defective, and so the helpless victims had to suffer for hours on end before they died. Satan himself could not have devised a more fiendish torture. When the chambers were opened again, many of the victims were only half dead and had to be finished off with rifle butts, bullets or powerful kicks.
Often people were kept in the gas chambers overnight with the motor not turned on at all. Overcrowding and lack of air killed many of them in a very painful way. However, many survived the ordeal of such nights; particularly the children showed a remarkable degree of resistance. They were still alive when they were dragged out of the chambers in the morning, but revolvers used by the Germans made short work of them…[19]
So according to Wiernik, the gas chambers at Treblinka were not very efficient. Many victims suffocated or had to be killed with bullets, rifle butts or powerful kicks.
Jankiel Wiernik wrote: “Between 10,000 and 12,000 people were gassed each day.”[20] Wiernik also wrote: “The number of transports grew daily, and there were periods when as many as 30,000 people were gassed in one day…”[21] This is an incredibly large number of people killed by a defective motor that took “hours on end” to kill the victims and which was frequently left off overnight.
Wiernik also wrote that handsome Bulgarian Jews were discriminated against: “These handsome Jews were not permitted an easy death. Only small quantities of gas were let into the chambers, so that their agony lasted through the night.”[22] This would have made the gassing process at Treblinka even more inefficient. I wonder how 870,000 Jews could have been killed by such inefficient methods.
Wiernik described the corpses of the alleged gassing victims: “All were equal. There was no longer any beauty or ugliness, for they were all yellow from the gas.”[23] Actually, victims of carbon-monoxide poisoning exhibit a cherry-red or rosy red coloring.[24] Wiernik’s statement that the victims were “all yellow from the gas” is obviously false.
Wiernik wrote in regard to the cremation of corpses: “It turned out that bodies of women burned more easily than those of men. Accordingly, the bodies of women were used for kindling the fires…When corpses of pregnant women were cremated, their bellies would burst open. The fetus would be exposed and could be seen burning inside the mother’s womb.”[25] The absurdities promulgated by Wiernik are really beyond description, yet he is probably the most prominent witness to the alleged gassings at Treblinka.[26]
ABRAHAM GOLDFARB
Abraham Goldfarb arrived in Treblinka on August 25, 1942, and escaped from Treblinka during the revolt in 1943.[27] Goldfarb described the gassings at Treblinka:
On the way to the gas chambers Germans with dogs stood along the fence on both sides. The dogs had been trained to attack people; they bit the men’s genitals and the women’s breasts, ripping off pieces of flesh. The Germans hit the people with whips and iron bars to spur them on, so that they would press forward into the “showers” as quickly as possible. The screams of the women could be heard far away, even in the other parts of the camp. The Germans drove the running victims on with shouts of “Faster, faster, the water is getting cold, and others still have to take a shower!” To escape from the blows, the victims ran to the gas chambers as quickly as they could, the stronger ones pushing the weaker ones aside. At the entrance to the gas chambers stood the two Ukrainians, Ivan Demjaniuk and Nikolai, one of them armed with an iron bar, the other with a sword. Even they drove the people inside with blows…
As soon as the gas chambers were full, the Ukrainians closed the doors and started the engine. Some 20 to 25 minutes later an SS man or a Ukrainian looked through a window in the door. When he had made sure that everyone had been asphyxiated, the Jewish prisoners had to open the doors and remove the corpses. Because the chambers were overcrowded and the victims had held onto one another, they were all standing upright and were like one single mass of flesh.[28]
Goldfarb stated that dogs at Treblinka attacked the men’s genitals and the women’s breasts while the victims ran to the gas chambers. I wonder why the other survivors failed to report these vicious dog attacks of the gassing victims. Goldfarb’s story is highly suspicious
Goldfarb’s statement that the victims “were all standing upright and were like one single mass of flesh” is also not credible. Many of the dead victims would have fallen to the floor no matter how crowded the gas chambers. The dead victims would not have been “like one single mass of flesh.”
CONCLUSION
No documentary or credible material trace exists of the alleged gas chambers at Treblinka. We would know nothing about the Treblinka gas chambers except for the testimony of a small number of eyewitnesses.
A November 15, 1942 report produced by the resistance movement of the Warsaw ghetto originally stated that steam chambers were used to kill Jews at Treblinka. In 1944, Jankiel Wiernik converted the embarrassing “steam chambers,” which characterized the first phase of the Treblinka atrocity propaganda, into “gas chambers.” Official historiography now considers the gas chambers of Treblinka as established historical fact.[29]
However, as discussed in this article, the eyewitness testimony of the Treblinka gas chambers is not credible. Such testimony cannot be used to prove that Germany mass murdered Jews at Treblinka. Germar Rudolf writes:
Thus, if 100 witnesses and 100 confessions state that the moon is made of green cheese or that 870,000 corpses can be burned within a few months without fuel and without leaving traces, both assertions being of a similar intellectual quality, then we have to conclude—in light of all the forensic evidence—that the witnesses and the defendants are wrong. Like it or not![30]
ENDNOTES
[1] Willenberg, Samuel, Surviving Treblinka, New York: Basil Blackwell Inc., 1989, p. 2.
[2] Kues, Thomas. “Chil Rajchman and His Memoirs.” Inconvenient History, Vol.2, No. 1, Spring 2010. https://inconvenienthistory.com/2/1/1916.
[3] An excellent account of John Demjanjuk’s trial is provided in Sheftel, Yoram, Defending “Ivan the Terrible”: The Conspiracy to Convict John Demjanjuk, Washington, D.C., Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1996.
[4] Rajchman, Chil, The Last Jew of Treblinka: A Survivor’s Memory 1942-1943, New York: Pegasus Books, 2011, pp. 11-12.
[5] Ibid., p. 58.
[6] Lüftl, Walter, “The Lüftl Report,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, Winter 1992-1993, pp. 391-406.
[7] Berg, Friedrich Paul, “The Diesel Gas Chamber: Ideal for Torture—Absurd for Murder,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, Ala.: Theses and Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 456.
[8] Rajchman, Chil, The Last Jew of Treblinka: A Survivor’s Memory 1942-1943, New York: Pegasus Books, 2011, pp. 91-92.
[9] https://inconvenienthistory.com/2/1/1916.
[10] Ibid., p. 79.
[11] Glazar, Richard, Trap with a Green Fence: Survival in Treblinka, Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1995, p. VIII.
[12] Ibid., p. 37.
[13] Ibid., p. 29.
[14] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes Review, 2010, p. 39.
[15] Glazar, Richard, Trap with a Green Fence: Survival in Treblinka: Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1995, pp. 127-128.
[16] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes Review, 2010, pp. 39-40.
[17] https://inconvenienthistory.com/1/2/1912.
[18] Ibid.
[19] Donat, Alexander (editor), The Death Camp Treblinka: A Documentary, New York: Holocaust Library, 1979, pp. 163-164.
[20] Ibid., p. 159.
[21] Ibid., p. 164.
[22] Ibid., p. 172.
[23] Ibid., p. 159.
[24] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes Review, 2010, p. 73.
[25] Donat, Alexander (editor), The Death Camp Treblinka: A Documentary, New York: Holocaust Library, 1979, p. 170.
[26] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes Review, 2010, p. 154.
[27] http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/ar/treblinka/treblinkarememberme.html.
[28] Kogon, Eugen, Langbein, Hermann, and Rückerl, Adalbert (editors), Nazi Mass Murder: A Documentary History of the Use of Poison Gas, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1993, pp. 126-127.
[29] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Washington, D.C., The Barnes Review, 2010, pp. 51-62, 299.
[30] Ibid., p. 307.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
