____________________________________________
Communist infiltration of the U.S. government had occurred on a grand scale during the
reign of Franklin Roosevelt. Congressman Martin Dies, Democrat of Texas and
chairman
of the House Committee on Un-American Activities from its inception in
1938 until 1945,
had warned Roosevelt in 1940 that there were thousands
of Communists and
pro-Communists on the government payroll, but FDR refused
to take action, saying:
"I do not believe in Communism any more than you do, but there is nothing wrong with the
Communists in this country. Several of the best friends I have are Communists. . . .
I do not regard the Communists as any present or future threat
to our country; in fact,
I look upon Russia as our strongest
ally in the years to come. As I told you when
you began your
investigation, you should confine yourself to Nazis and
Fascists. While I do not believe in Communism, Russia is far better off
and the world is safer under Communism than under the Czars."
...Traitorous Fool Franklin Delano Roosevelt
(Responding
to Congressman Martin Dies, Democrat of Texas and
chairman of the House Committee on Un-American Activities)
Communism is Judaism
What all people must realize is that Communism is Judaism.
No Jews – no Communism.
Communism is a quick version
of Talmud. What Communism is all about is one thing
and
one thing only – to control the state. Once you control the state you control the
secret police and this is the key to understand how so few Jews controlled the whole Soviet.
Communist,
Jews, and non-Jews alike will tell you with tears in their eyes what a wonderful
revolution it was in Russia 1917. It was NOT a revolution, it was a well planned coup that
was planned, financed and lead by Jews. That it was a “revolution”
is the Jew
mafia propaganda lie. Never use the word
“revolution” and Russia in any context.
Many people will tell you that it was a “revolution”
and that lie is one of the major reasons
many non-Jews will tell you
that communism is a good thing. “Revolution” is Jewish
propaganda
nonsense for dimwits.
-
- Nearly all of the Project
for the New American Century signators are Jews, just as in Russia, the Jewish revolutionaries are hidden behind
a banner.
The
answer is that most people don’t understand what political power really is. Most
people think if they vote every four years, that is how political power works. We
have all been told the blessing of “Democracy” all our life so naturally most people
have never given how political power really works a second thought.
You don’t get power – you take power.
How did the Jews take power in Russia 1917?
The Jews killed the whole secret police
and replaced them with
Jews and a few trusted non-Jews. The next step is to go to all
the
military commanders and tell them that you got their entire family looked up, and if
they don’t obey the whole family will be killed. If they refuse they are shoot
on the spot and the next in line is promoted or simply replaced by a Jew.
Now
you control the secret police plus a big chunk of all the armed forces in Russia.
Now you can turn the guns at the people. Would you say you had power now? This
is exactly what the jews did, they took power by taking over the secret police. This
you will never read in any propaganda text and no communist will tell you this either.
Why? Because all the Communist Jews want people to think of
when it comes to
Soviet is the “revolution”, not
how they really did take power over
Russia and re-named her
Soviet.
To
control all the guns is priority number one. To control the secret police is everything,
once you do that you can turn the guns on the people. Every single bill on gun ban
ever written in America is written by Jews. The Jew mafia knows how you take power.
The secret police in Soviet was rank and file 80 percent Jews, and it was not
the nice
Jews, it was the scumbags of the scumbags among the Jews
who went into the secret police – and they controlled all the guns.
This is what really happened and it did not just “happened” to be Jews that controlled
the secret police. It was well planned ahead and the reason is that to control the secret
police is what made the coup possible. It’s crucial to understand this,
because to control
the secret police was the key factor to
take over Russia. When you control all the guns
what resistance could
the Russian people come up with? Nothing. The key factor is to
control
the guns and that the communist Jews did, and it didn’t just “happened” to be Jews.
The coup in Russia 1917 was well planned and it was Jews who planned the whole thing.
course there was non-Jews involved but the reason is that they bought the Jewish
fraud communism. It tells the non-Jews that they are going
to be the new rulers and
that everybody is going to be rich. A
communist will tell you any lie there is plus any
unthinkably lie.
I have studied communism all my life and I have discussed communism
with many hardcore communists and they all lie. They will tell themselves and
anyone any lie to justify any atrocity that was done in the name of Communism.
This lying is Judaism to its core. Whatever Jews did to be hated had nothing
to do with
how the Jews behaved. Most Jews will tell you any
lie to not be blamed for what they did.
Just look at Soviet communism.
Just look at ‘Gulag’ by Anna Applebaum. First a Jew
writes a book about Soviet, omitting any notion of the Jews that really controlled Soviet.
That book is one big lie, and the Jews promotes this lie in their propaganda-machine. I
remember when the book came out and it was on all front pages, they talked a lot
about
it on the radio and TV. Prime display in all the bookshop’s.
-This is the truth about Soviet,
was the message. Just another
day in the Jewish propaganda-machine.
How many people have read
Gulag and thinks this is the truth about Soviet?
You can NoT understand what communism really is without understanding that
Communism is Talmud Judaism re-written for non-Jews consumption. Every single
accusation the communist uses, bourgeois, kulak, contra-revolutionary, Nazi,
anti-Semite,
racist, bigot, white trash, etc. etc. are all code words
for anyone that opposes the Jew mafia power takeover.
When you start telling people about Jews and Communism they
will typically go into
defense mode and start saying that they
“happened” to be Jews and Communist.
That’s easy to
debunk, all you need to say is that 99 percent of all
Jews
are Communists. Just let them try to debunk that, because they can’t.
That 99 percent of all Jews are
communist is nothing that just “happened” to be so.
Talmud
tells the Jews that they are a chosen elite that one day shall rule over all
non-Jews. To do that the Jews must control the state and to control the state the Jews
must control the secret police and all the armed forces, and the propaganda-machine
– and that the Jews did in Soviet. According to Jewish yearbook there
was seven
million Jews in the Russian Empire 1913, four percent of
the total population. One
Jewish source says that one in three
Jews, or 33 percent of all the Jews in Soviet was
employed by the state
in Soviet.
That means that there was probably not one single Jewish family in Soviet that
had not at least one in the family that was employed by the state. This is nothing that
just “happens” to be so. When ex-Soviet Jews tells about life in
Soviet, they will
typically use the first or two paragraph to whine
about how the poor Jews was
persecuted in Soviet. Then they
will tell you how high education they have (they must
brag about it)
and then tell you what import and and high position she or he had in Soviet.
Persecuted and at the same time have high position in government. Any thinking person
can figure it out that something don’t add up here. They are lying and they are lying
because the non-Jews mustn’t realize that Soviet was totally controlled
by Jews.
This lie about Communist Jews and Soviet must be debunked at all cost, because only
then can you learn your true history and not the lies and fairy tale we are getting shoveled
down our throat in the Jew owned propaganda-machine.
_______________________________
COMMUNISM IS JUDAISM, PERIOD
Original Source: http://www.truthfromgod.com/articles/jews_created_communism.html
Today
there is a lot of talk about fighting Communism.
The only problem
is that the American people are not aware of
who are the true
founders and promoters of Communism.
If you had to find a Communist,
where would you look?
Would you recognize a Communist if you saw
one?
What do they look like?
This page will give you a new understanding and knowledge
about Communism.
The first place we need to go for Truth is the words
of Jesus Christ. In Matthew 23:35 He reveals that
there is a group that is guilty of “all the righteous blood shed
upon the earth.” This is also reaffirmed in Revelation 18:24.
“And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and
of all that were slain upon the earth.” Since the Communists
have shed the blood of TENS of MILLIONS, they must be
part of this same Satanic group spoken of by Jesus Christ.
In John 8:44 Jesus identifies this mystery group as the JEWS.
He says to the JEWS, “Ye are of your father the devil,
and the lusts of your father ye will do he was
a murderer
from the beginning, and abode not in
the truth, because
there is no truth in him.”
JEWS have proven the truth of
this statement by
their lying deceit and murderous activities.
This will be a bitter pill for some who
believe their hoax that
they are God’s chosen
people Israel, but facts will prove
that the JEWS
authored, created, promoted, and
perpetuated Communism.
Read the following documented
quotations from the
Jews. Out of their own mouth they
condemn themselves.
“Ye shall know a tree by its fruit.”
QUOTES FROM THE JEWS
“SOME CALL IT MARXISM –
I CALL IT JUDAISM.”
Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in the American Bulletin
of May 15, 1935
“THE REVOLUTION IN RUSSIA IS A JEWISH REVOLUTION”
The
Maccabean (New York), Nov. 1905, p, 250
“JEWRY IS THE MOTHER OF MARXISM”
Le Droit de Vivre, May 12, 1936
“JUDAISM IS MARXISM, COMMUNISM”
Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation
of the Jews, 1939), p. 64
“THE COMMUNIST SOUL IS THE SOUL OF JUDAISM.”
Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation
of the Jews, 1939), p. 143
“WE JEWS CANNOT BE CALLED
UPON TO DENOUNCE COMMUNISM.”
The American
Hebrew (New York), February 3, 1939, p. 11
“THE PICTURE WHICH THE SOVIET UNION PRESENTS TODAY
IS ONE THAT SHOULD BRING REJOICING
TO WORLD JEWRY.”
The Youngstown Jewish Times, Sept. 18,
1936, page 51
“IT WOULD BE ABSURD TO DENY THE INTENSITY OF THE JEWISH
PARTICIPATION IN THE RUSSIAN
REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENT.”
Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal
(New York) July-September 1932, p. 106
“THAT ACHIEVEMENT
– THE RUSSIAN-JEWISH REVOLUTION –
DESTINED TO FIGURE IN HISTORY AS THE OVERSHADOWING RESULT OF WORLD WAR,
WAS LARGELY THE OUTCOME OF
JEWISH THINKING, OF JEWISH DISCONTENT,
OF JEWISH EFFORT TO RECONSTRUCT.”
The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920
“THE
BOLSHEVIK GOVERNMENT OF RUSSIA IS THE KEY-STONE
OF THE ARCH OF THE PROOF OF THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY
FOR RADICALISM AND WORLD-DOMINATION.”
William Hard, The Great Jewish Conspiracy (New York: American Jewish Book Company, 1920),
p. 31
“THE JEWISH ELEMENTS PROVIDE THE DRIVING FORCES FOR COMMUNISM”
Dr. Oscar Levy, in George Pitt-Rivers, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution
(Oxford, 1920), p. ix
“THE JEWS [HAVE BEEN] FURNISHING FOR THE
BOLSHEVIKS THE MAJORITY OF THEIR LEADERS”
The Jewish World (London), April 16, 1919, p. 11
“RUSSIAN
JEWS HAVE TAKEN A PROMINENT PART IN THE BOLSHEVIST MOVEMENT”
The American Hebrew (New York), November 18, 1927, p. 20
“JEWRY HAS COME TO WIELD A
CONSIDERABLE POWER IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY.”
Dr.
Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 37
“THE EAST-SIDE JEW [TROTSKY] THAT CONQUERED EUROPE”
The liberator (New York), March 1920, pp. 26-27
“THE REAL EAST SIDER [NEW YORK JEW TROTSKY] IS AT THE HEAD OF THINGS IN RUSSIA.”
M. L. Larkin, in The Public (New York), November 23, 1918, p. 1433
“IT IS NOT AN ACCIDENT THAT JUDAISM GAVE BIRTH TO MARXISM,
AND IT
IS NOT AN ACCIDENT THAT THE JEWS READILY TOOK UP MARXISM;
ALL THIS IS IN PERFECT ACCORD WITH THE PROGRESS OF JUDAISM AND THE JEWS.”
Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee
for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 148
“KARL MARX, WHO CAME FROM AN OLD FAMILY OF RABBIS AND
BRILLIANT TALMUDIC SCHOLARS, WAS TO POINT THE PATH
OF VICTORY FOR THE PROLETARIAT.”
L. Rennap, Anti-Semitism
and the Jewish Question (London, 1942), p. 31
“THE BOLSHEVIST REVOLUTION IN RUSSIA WAS THE WORK OF
JEWISH BRAINS,
OF JEWISH DISSATISFACTION, OF JEWISH PLANNING,
WHOSE GOAL IS TO CREATE A NEW ORDER IN THE WORLD.
WHAT WAS
PERFORMED IN SO EXCELLENT A WAY IN RUSSIA, THANKS TO JEWISH BRAINS,
AND BECAUSE OF JEWISH DISSATISFACTION AND BY JEWISH PLANNING,
SHALL ALSO, THROUGH THE SAME
JEWISH MENTAL AND PHYSICAL
FORCES, BECOME A REALITY ALL OVER THE WORLD.”
The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920
“AMONG HIS [KARL MARX’S] ANCESTORS WERE RABBIS
AND TALMUDISTS, MEN OF LEARNING AND KEEN INTELLECT.”
Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206
“THE PECULIARLY JEWISH LOGIC OF HIS [KARL MARX’S]
MIND”
Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December
9, 1927, p. 206
“MR. WICKHAM STEED LAYS THE RISE OF BOLSHEVISM AT THE DOORS
OF JEWRY.”
The Jewish Guardian (London),
November 28, 1924, p. 4
“THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION HAS EMANCIPATED THE JEWS AS INDIVIDUALS”
Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 33
“THERE ARE MANY BOLSHEVIK LEADERS OF JEWISH EXTRACTION”
D. L. Sandelsan, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), February 20, 1920, p. 22
“THE COMMUNIST SOUL IS THE SOUL OF JUDAISM. HENCE IT FOLLOWS
THAT, JUST AS
IN THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION THE TRIUMPH OF COMMUNISM
WAS THE TRIUMPH OF JUDAISM, SO ALSO IN THE TRIUMPH
OF FASCISM WILL TRIUMPH JUDAISM.”
—
(A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 143-144).
Robert Wilton, a longtime Russian news correspondent
for the
London Times, said in his book, The Last Days of the Romanovs:
”OUT OF
556 IMPORTANT FUNCTIONARIES OF THE BOLSHEVIK STATE,
THERE WERE, IN 1918-1919, 17 RUSSIANS… 457 JEWS, AND 82 OTHERS.”
“WITHOUT JEWS THERE
WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN BOLSHEVISM.
FOR A JEW NOTHING IS MORE INSULTING THAN THE TRUTH. THE BLOODTHIRSTY
JEWISH TERRORISTS HAVE MURDERED SIXTY SIX MILLION IN RUSSIA
FROM 1918 TO 1957.”
Our policy is
“leading us toward a Communist state with as dreadful certainty
as though the leaders of the Kremlin themselves were charting our course.”
— Gen. Douglas MacArthur in 1952
___________________________________________________________________
Jewish Communists
Many thanks for this list of
Jewish communists
Leon
Bronstein (Trotsky): supreme commander of the Soviet Red Army.
Grigory Apfelbaum
(Zinoviev): executive, Soviet Secret Police.
Solomon Lozovsky: deputy Soviet foreign
minister.
Maxim Wallach (Litvinov): Soviet foreign minister.
Yuri Andropov: director, Soviet KGB, later supreme dictator of the Soviet Union.
Jacob Sverdlov: first president of the Soviet Union. Sverdlov ordered the massacre
of the Czar's family-women and children-in the town named after Catherine the Great,
Yekaterinburg,
(renamed Sverdlovsk in 1924 in honor of the murderer).
Jacob Yurovsky: commander,
Soviet Secret Police. Yurovsky led the death squad which
carried out Sverdlov's order for the
murder of the Czar's family, including the bayoneting
to death of the Czar's daughters. The Ipatyev
house, where, in the basement, the massacre
had occurred, stood intact until 1977, when the local
Communist party boss at that time,
Boris Yeltsin, ordered it demolished, lest it become a shrine
to anti-Jewish sentiment.
Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich: chief mass murderer for
Stalin, ordered the deaths of
millions and the wholesale destruction of Christian monuments and
churches, including
the great Cathedral of Christ the Savior. Standing amid the rubble of the
cathedral,
Kaganovich proclaimed, "Mother Russia is cast down.
We
have ripped away her skirts." (N.Y. Times, Sept. 26, 1995).
Mikhail Kaganovich:
deputy commissar of heavy industry, supervisor of slave labor, brother
of Lazar.
Rosa Kaganovich: Stalin's mistress; sister of Lazar. Paulina Zhemchuzina:
member of
the Central Committee and wife of Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov.
Olga Bronstein:
officer, Soviet Cheka Secret Police, sister of Trotsky, wife of Kamenev.
Genrikh
Yagoda: chief of Soviet Secret Police, mass murderer extraordinaire.
(Jewish poet Romain Rolland,
winner of the Nobel Prize, wrote a hymn of praise to Yagoda).
Matvei Berman and
Naftaly Frenkel: founders, the Gulag death camp system.
Lev Inzhir, commissar for
Soviet death camp transit and administration.
Boris Berman: executive officer of
the Soviet Secret Police and brother of
Matvei. K.V. Pauker: chief of operations, Soviet NKVD
Secret Police.
Firin, Rappoport, Kogan, Zhuk: commissars of death camps and slave
labor, supervised
the mass deaths of laborers during the construction of the White Sea-Baltic
Canal.
M.I. Gay: commander, Soviet Secret Police.
Slutsky and Shpiegelglas: commanders, Soviet Secret Police.
Isaac Babel:
officer, Soviet Secret Police.
Leiba Lazarevich Feldbin (Aleksandr Orlov): commander,
Soviet Red Army; officer,
Soviet Secret Police. Feldbin was chief of Soviet Security in the Spanish
Civil War.
He supervised the massacre of Catholic priests and peasants in Spain.
Yona Yakir: general, Soviet Red Army, member of the Central Committee.
Dimitri Shmidt: general, Soviet Red Army.
Yakov ("Yankel") Kreiser:
general, Soviet Red Army.
Miron Vovsi: general, Soviet Red Army.
David Dragonsky: general, Soviet Red Army, Hero of the Soviet Union.
Grigori
Shtern: general, Soviet Red Army.
Mikhail Chazkelevich: general, Soviet Red Army.
Shimon Kirvoshein: general, Soviet Red Army.
Arseni Raskin: deputy-commander,
Soviet Red Army.
Haim Fomin, commander of Brest-Litovsk, Soviet Red Army. At least
one hundred
Soviet generals were Jewish (cf. Canadian Jewish News, April 19, 1989).
Generals who were not themselves Jewish often had Jewish wives. Among these were
Marshal
Voroshilov, Marshal Bulganin, Marshal Peresypkin and General Pavel Sudoplatov
(Sudoplatov assassinated
hundreds of Christian leaders including Ukranian Catholic
Archbishop Teodor Romzha). This Jewish
wife "insurance policy" extended
to Politburo members such as Andrei Andreyev and Leonoid
Brezhnev.
Sergei Eisenstein: director of communist propaganda films which depicted
Christian
peasants (kulaks) as hideous, money-grabbing parasites. The kulaks were
subsequently massacred. (Cf. for example Eisenstein's Bezhin Meadow).
KOMZET:
commission for the settlement of Jewish Communists on land seized from
murdered Christians in
Ukraine; funded by Jewish-American financier Julius Rosenwald.
Ilya Ehrenburg, Minister
of Soviet Propaganda and disseminator of anti-German hate material
dating from the 1930s. Ehrenburg
instigated the Soviet Red Army rape and murder of German
civilians. Referring to German women,
Ehrenburg gloated to the advancing Red Army troops,
"that blonde hag is in for a bad time."
In a leaflet addressed to Soviet troops, Ehrenburg wrote: "...the Germans are not
human beings...nothing gives us so much joy as German corpses."(Anatol Goldberg,
Ilya Ehrenburg, p. 197). Goldberg concedes that Ehrenburg, "...had always disliked the
Germans...now
that there was a war on he turned his old prejudice into an asset."(Ibid., p. 193).
Another publication distributed to the Red Army, this time as the soldiers approached Danzig,
was described by a historian: "Millions of leaflets were air-dropped on the troops with a
message
composed by the propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg and signed by Stalin: 'Soldiers
of the Red Army!
Kill the Germans! Kill all Germans! Kill! Kill! Kill!" (Christopher Duffy, Red Storm on the Reich).
The Soviet leadership acknowledged that Ehrenburg sought the extermination of the entire
German people (cf. Pravda, April 14, 1945. [Pravda was also published in a Yiddish edition,
Einikeyt).
Ehrenburg won the Order of Lenin and the Stalin Prize.
He willed his papers to the Israeli Yad
Vashem 'Holocaust' Museum.
Solomon Mikhoels: commissar of Soviet propaganda.
Soviet film propagandists:
Mark Donsky,
Leonid
Lukov, Y
uli Reisman,
Vasily Grossman,
Yevgeny
Gabrilovich,
Boris Volchok
and Lillian Hellman -
(old movies written by her continue to
be broadcast on American telelvision).
Soviet propagandist: Yevgeny Khaldei who staged the photo of the raising of the hammer
and sickle flag over the Reichstag in Berlin, May 2, 1945. Afterward, a special plane was
waiting to fly Khaldei, Stalin's top Tass photographer, to a Moscow lab, where his photo
was
further doctored (loot displayed on one of the Soviet soldier's wrists was removed
in the negative
and Khaldei added clouds and smoke to the scene for dramatic effect
(see photo of Khaldei and
his beloved flag at left). Khaldei continued to work as a
premier Soviet propagandist until his
retirement from Pravda in 1972. His Communist
propaganda is proudly on display at the Jewish
Museum of New York and the Jewish
Museum of San Francisco. N.Y. Times writer Vicki Goldberg exulted
in the raising of
the blood-drenched Soviet flag, emblem of the slaughter of millions of peasants
and
Christians; describing it as, "...a national (and worldwide) symbol of triumph,
justice and revenge." (Jan. 31, 1997, p. B-26).
Jewish Anti-Fascist
Committee (JAC): new form of the Bolshevik YEVKOM, Stalin's
recruiting conduit for funding money,
supplies and political influence for Soviet Russia
from world Jewry as well as the dissemination
of gas chamber atrocity
propaganda (cf. The Black Book).
Nikolai
Bukharin: Lenin's chief theorist.
Samuel Agursky: commissar.
Karl Radek: member, Central Committee.
Mikhail Gruzenberg (Borodin)
commissar.
A.A. Yoffe: commissar.
David
Ryazanov: advisor to Lenin.
Lev Grigorievich Levin: physician, poisoner of Stalin's
enemies.
Lev Rosenfeld (Kamenev): member of the Central Committee.
Ivan Maisky: Soviet Ambassador to Britain. Itzik Solomonovich Feffer: commissar, Soviet Secret Police.
Abraham Sutskever: Soviet terrorist-partisan.
Mark Osipovich Reizen:
Soviet propagandist, winner of three Stalin Prizes.
Lev Leopold Trepper: Soviet
espionage officer.
Bela Kun (Kohen): supreme dictator of Hungary in 1919.
Kun was later Stalin's chief terrorist in the Crimea.
Zakharovich Mekhlis:
top executioner for Stalin.
Henrykas Zimanas: leader of Lithuanian communist terrorists,
butcher of Christians.
Moshe Pijade (sometimes spelled Piade): commander, Yugoslav
Communist People's Army.
Tito's top butcher of hundreds of thousands of Croatian Christians.
Pijade later served
as president of the Yugoslav Communist Parliament. At least eighteen generals
in the
Yugoslav Communist People's Army were Jewish. The Yugoslavian communist
party sent massive arms shipments to Jewish fighters in Palestine in the 1940s.
In post-war Poland that nation was completely dominated by Jewish communists: the torturer
Jacek Rozanski, head of the Secret Police; the Politboro commander Jacob Berman
and
commissars Minc, Specht (Olszewski) and Spychalski. These men murdered or
deported to Kolyma
and the other Arctic death camps, tens of thousands of Catholic Poles.
According
to Jewish researcher John Sack, "In 1945 many Poles felt (and not without reason)
that Jews
ran the Office of State Security...the chief of the Office was Jacob Berman, a Jew,
and all or
almost all the department heads were Jews." Sack reports that 75% of the officers
of the
Communist Secret Police in Silesia were Jews. He noted that many Jews in the
Communist terror
apparatus in Poland changed their names to Polish ones like General
Romkowski, Colonel Rozanski,
Capt. Studencki and Lt. Jurkowski. (cf. John Sack,
The New Republic, Feb. 14, 1994, p. 6. Sack
in this article also refutes some shoddy
research performed by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, author
of Hitler's Willing Executioners,
who, in the double standard typical of the Jewish mentality,
refuses to accept the proven
fact that Jews ran the Polish Communist secret police even as Goldhagen
asserts the racist
myth that the entire German nation was guilty of genocide.
Sack does a good job of proving Goldhagen wrong about Poland).
In Poland,
"...a disproportionate number of Communists were Jews. In 1930, at its
peak, 35% of the
members of the party were Jewish. In Communist youth organizations,
Jewish membership was even
higher, while Communists of Jewish origin occupied most
of the seats on the central committee.
Communism appealed to some Jews because it
opposed anti-Semitism more vigorously than any other
Polish party...Jewish Communists
reached their apogee in the years immediately after World War
Two, when the party
leadership was totally in the hands of the prewar Communist leadership that
abhorred
anti-Semitism." (Sheldon Kirshner, The Canadian Jewish News, Nov. 5, 1992, p. 16).
Of course when one encounters the issue of Jews, Communists and Catholics in Poland
in the Establishment media or universities today, the mass murder of the Polish Catholics
at the hands of the Jewish Communists, is never raised. Instead, a minor attack on Jews
by Polish
peasants enraged at the role of Jews in Communist terror, which occurred in
July, 1946 at Kielce
and which has come to be called the "Kielce pogrom" will be the
centerpiece of the
"discussion. " The motivation for the attack is not usually mentioned.
Rather, the
Catholic peasantry are painted in terms of "fiendish bigots" whose "blind,
irrational
hate" for the "poor, persecuted Jews" resulted in "yet another martyrdom
of God's Chosen."
But the Catholic Primate of Poland at the time, Cardinal
Hlond, a brave prelate in a
stalwart tradition of Christian resistance to Jewish tyranny in Poland,
so different from
the traitorous philo-Judaism of the current Pontiff, stated that the attack
in Kielce occurred
because of resentment 'due to the Jews who today occupy leading positions
in Poland's
(Communist) government and endeavor to introduce a governmental
structure that the majority of Poles do not wish to have." (Ibid., Kirshner).
As Piotr S. Wandycz of Yale University observes, "The average Pole could not but notice
in the Stalinist era that the two most powerful men in the country-Berman and Minc-were
both
Jewish as was the dreaded security official Rozanski." (N.Y. Review of Books,
Aug. 18, 1983,
p. 51).
With this record it is interesting to note that the Polish occupant of the
papacy, John Paul II,
consistently lent his prestige and his presence to canonizations and commemorations
of politically correct victims of the Nazis. Nowhere did this Pope breath a word about the
openly Jewish, Communist massacres of Polish Catholics, Spanish Catholics, Croatian
Catholics, Lithuanian Catholics-he was too busy, intoning the Shoah, referring to the
heirs of
the Pharisees as "our Elder Brothers in the Faith" giving official recognition to
an
Israeli state which even many orthodox, Haredi rabbis regard as a blasphemous
and abominable
entity, and attacking the German people as "the image of the beast."
Solomon
Morel : commandant of a post-war Communist concentration camp for Germans
in Poland. Stalin deliberately
put Jews in charge of such camps. Morel tortured and
murdered thousands of Germans, sometimes
with his bare hands (cf. "The Wrath of
Solomon," Village Voice, March 30, 1993 and
John Sack, An Eye for an Eye). Morel is
comfortably esconsed in Tel Aviv. German survivors of
Morel's camp have demanded
he be tried as a war criminal, but for the Establishment media and
the phony, partisan,
"human rights" groups, bringing Morel to justice is simply a non-issue.
After all, he murdered helpless Germans, so what's the problem?
Julius Hammer, M.D.: New York abortionist and co-founder of the American communist party.
Armand Hammer: fundraiser and financier for Lenin and Stalin, son of Julius.
Lev Davidovich Landau: Stalinist physicist, co-father of the Soviet atomic bomb.
Klaus Fuchs: helped steal atomic bomb secrets for Stalin.
Ruth Werner:
colonel, Red Army GRU intelligence, assisted Fuchs.
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg:
stole American atomic bomb secrets for Stalin.
Morris Cohen (Peter Kroger): assisted
the Rosenbergs.
Markus Wolf: chief of German Communist Stasi Secret Police.
Howard Fast: American communist propagandist for Stalin.
David
Dubinsky: Stalin's ally, head of the U.S. International
Ladies Garment Workers Union. Informal
"advisor" to LBJ
Nahum Goldmann: founder, World Jewish Congress,
communist propagandist.
Rabbi Moses Rosen: agent, Romanian communist party.
Victor Rothschild: top British espionage agent for Stalin.
Mark
Zborowski: "...considered by historians of Soviet terror operations to have been
the most
fearsome...(Soviet) spy of all time" (Stephen Schwartz, Forward, Jan. 26, 1996).
Zborowski,
a medical researcher, murdered a dissident with a poisoned orange at the
Soviet-run hospital
in Paris. Zborowski was implicated in several other assassinations
in 1936 and 1937. In the 1940s
worked for both the American Jewish Committee and the
KGB. In the 1960s Zborowski worked as a
medical researcher at Mount Zion Hospital
in San Francisco. He trained numerous psychiatrists
and medical specialists in the Bay Area.
He died in 1990 (cf. "The Strange Case of Doctor
Zborowski and
Monsieur Etienne" by Philippe Videlier, in Le Monde Diplomatique, Dec. 1992).
On Oct. 16, 1948, 50,000 Jewish communists turned out in Moscow's Red Square to
welcome the first Israeli delegation to Moscow. Stalin supported Zionism's 1947 Palestine
partition
plan, gave crucial recognition to the newly-created state
of Israel and voted for Israel's admission
to the United Nations.
In 1951 communist and Marxist parties had twenty-three seats
in the Israeli Knesset.
The kibbutz system was the most powerful movement in the country and
the most
powerful kibbutz leaders were nearly all Marxists. The biggest Israeli
holiday was May Day, celebrated with rallies, marches, red banners and red songs.
As recently as 1987 the Israelis were providing the KGB with American intelligence secrets
(cf. UPI dispatch by Richard Sale, Dec. 13, 1987 and The City Paper [Washington, DC],
Jan. 15,
1988). Jonathan Jay Pollard was part of one such spy ring. British traitor and
Communist spy
Kim Philby was assisted in obtaining safe haven in the Soviet Union
by the Israeli Mossad (cf.
Sunday Telegraph [England], April 16, 1989).
This was most appropriate since Philby's KGB handler
in Moscow was also Jewish.
Romania's communist regime received favorable trade deals
from the U.S. for years
due to Israeli pressure on Congress in its behalf (N.Y. Times, Jan. 18,
1992, p. 23).
The notion that the Zionist Jewish movement was anti-communist is a fallacy. The
truth
is more complex. There was a left wing and a right wing within Zionism. The rightists,
like the terrorists Jabotinsky and Stern, took a fascist approach. Leftist Zionists like David
"I am a Bolshevik" Ben-Gurion admired the Soviet model of Jewish power
and
sought to incorporate it as the political economy of the Israeli state.
"National
and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic
of the period of
cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is
the most dangerous vestige
of cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites
are liable to the death penalty." (Stalin,
Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
The African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa
was guided by two Communist Jews,
Albie Sachs, "one of its foremost intellectuals"(
London Sunday
Times, Aug. 29, 1993) and Yossel Mashel Slovo (Joe Slovo).
Slovo was born in a shtetl in Lithuania and grew up speaking Yiddish and studying the
Talmud. He joined the ANC's terrorist wing, the Umkhonto we Sizwe, in 1961 and
eventually
became its commander. He was named Secretary General of the
South African Communist Party in
1986. ("Joe Slovo," Jewish Chronicle, Jan. 13, 1995).
Slovo had been the
" planner of many of the ANC terrorist attacks, including the 1983
car bomb that killed
19 people and injured many others... Slovo, who had traveled to
the Soviet Union many times,
was awarded a Soviet medal on his 60th birthday...Slovo
is a dedicated Communist, a Marxist Leninist
without morality of any kind, for whom only
victory counts, whatever the human cost, whatever
the bloodshed...Slovo disputes little
of his image as 'the Communist mastermind' behind the ANC's
armed struggle. For him
the fears of South Africa's whites are both a measure of the ANC's growing
strength
and a crucial factor in hastening what he believes will be its ultimate victory. 'Revolutionary
violence has created the inspirational impact that we had intended, and it has won for the
ANC its leading position,' Slovo said." ("Rebel Strategist Seeks to End Apartheid,"
L.A. Times, Aug. 16, 1987, p. 14). When Nelson Mandela's ANC
took over South Africa,
Slovo was named Minister of Housing.
Nelson Mandela and Joe Slovo gave the clenched
fist salute in front
of the blood-drenched Hammer and Sickle flag of Jewish Bolshevism.
Slovo, a Yiddish-speaking Lithuanian Jew, was Secretary General of the South African
Communist Party and director of the military wing of the ANC,
which perpetrated numerous
terror bombings against white civilians.
Mandela was hailed as a great statesman
by Britain's
Queen Elizabeth II in her 1996 Christmas message to the realm.
When we look
at these gruesome personalities, who are only the tip of the Jewish
iceberg that was Soviet Communism
and who were responsible for the deaths of upwards
of thirty million people; when we realize
how little is written or filmed about their crimes,
we begin to realize that the exclusive focus
on the crimes of the Germans, real and
imagined, is a function of propaganda.
If the facts about the Jewish Communist holocaust against the peasants and Christians
of Russia and Eastern Europe were given massive publicity, the supposed
"special
evil" of the Germans would stand exposed as a racist fraud.
German actions
during World War Two must be viewed in a vacuum in
order for the New World Order to advance its
covert objective of Jewish supremacy.
When Nazi actions are placed within the context
of Jewish Communism's abominable
crimes against the Christian people of Russia and Eastern Europe,
the public will
begin to understand that Hitler and the Nazis were a reaction, however unbalanced
and
excessive, to the Jewish Communist genocide against millions of Christians and peasants in
the East.
This is why the crucial facts about Jewish Communism must never be documented
in Hollywood films, discussed in university courses or pictured in contemporary news
magazines.
This is why Malcolm Muggeridge's book, an eyewitness account of the
Jewish Communist holocaust
against Christians, Winter in Moscow, has been tightly suppressed.
In the Sunday
Telegraph (London, England: Nov. 18, 1990) the question is asked,
"Why then has it (Winter
in Moscow) never been republished? The answer may lie in
Muggeridge's handling of what was then
called the 'Jewish question.'...Winter in Moscow
is acutely concerned with Jews...It was of course
the case that a very disproportionate
number of the early Bolsheviks were Jews and thus of commissars
and apparatchiki..."
The Campaign for Radical Truth in History's documentation
of these forbidden facts
constitutes the chief motivation for the suppression attempts of such
Stalinist censorship
groups as the A.D.L. and Simon Wiesenthal Center. Both of these organizations
would,
if they could, have this writer jailed for publishing the documentation herein in Germany,
France, or Austria. They regularly supply "intelligence files" to those governments on
pro-Christian and pro-German writers. In 1995 the ADL sought to assist the prosecution
of 69 year old American writer Hans Schmidt who was imprisoned in Germany for publishing
a newsletter
in Florida. These Jewish censors would like to have similar laws passed
worldwide, resulting
in the jailing of more writers and researchers
who will not toe the party line or worship the
Golden Calf.
To give the other side of history, the revisionist side-to give voice
to the voiceless millions
of dead victims of Jewish Communism-is regarded as "hateful"
by the vain Zionists who
demand for themselves the right to vomit forth a daily barrage of
sewage upon the sacred memory of our grandparents and ancestors.
To defend
against the dishonoring of our heritage and our ancestors,
is surely not hate; it is the right
of self-defense against psychological warfare.
___________________________________
_______________________________________
The Essence of Judaism
by Dr. William L. Pierce
THE JEWISH PROBLEM is as old as the Jewish race. Over three thousand years ago the Jews were formed as a racial
and national community
in Egypt.
There the former slave Joseph had parlayed his talents for necromancy and grain-speculation into a virtual dictatorship at
the side of the Pharaoh.
“As
for the people, he reduced them to serfdom from one end of the land to the other” (Genesis 47:21). Then Joseph threw
open Egypt to
his Jewish brethren:
“You shall feed on the fat of the land” and “the best that the land of Egypt offers is yours” (Genesis
45:18, 20).
When
a more national-minded Pharaoh turned the tables on the Jews they were forced to flee, but not before relieving the Egyptians
of their gold
and silver (Exodus
12:35–36). And so the pattern of Jewish history was set: from outcasts to fellow-citizens, then trusted advisers, and
finally,
ruthless masters. Then follow
the persecutions, pogroms, and expulsions which have won for the Jews so much undeserved sympathy.
The great mass of American Whites seems indifferent to
the Jewish question. This is not to say that Americans are unmindful of the Jews — far from it.
The Jews are presently more prominent in American life than
they have ever been before, and they feel less need to dissimulate and disguise the
outward traits which have traditionally brought upon them suspicion and
dislike. A name change or a nose job is no longer the prerequisite for social
and political acceptance by Gentiles. On the contrary, to qualify as unprejudiced in
today’s America,
non-Jews must
appear amenable to Jewish jokes, Yiddish slang, kosher hotdogs, and Israel bonds.
Doubtless this increased visibility of Jews and Jewish
characteristics is a good thing, for in the long run White Americans cannot fail to be struck by
the alien nature of the Jew. Unfortunately, in the non-White
racial chaos which disfigures present-day America the fact that the Jews
are just as alien to Western society as are Negroes and Orientals tends to be lost
on all too many men and women of our race.
One important factor in the general ignorance of the Jewish problem is a widespread
misconception as to the nature of the Jewish religion. Most
Americans seem to think of Jews primarily as adherents of Judaism, the religion of the Old Testament.
For these Americans, Jewish radicals with their
beards and bombs, Jewish businessmen with their sharp practices, or Jewish Zionists with their questionable loyalties
are fair game. But the pious
Jew
of the synagogue, head bowed in prayer to the tribal god of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, is a figure all too often accorded
tolerance and even respect.
America’s — and the world’s
— Jewish problem makes it a necessity that we understand the
Jews and Judaism thoroughly.
If it is recognized that the destructive phenomena which
accompany the Jewish presence in non-Jewish
societies — Marxism, Freudianism, Zionism,
and so on — spring from the Hebrew race-soul
and are of a piece with the writings and
rituals of that quintessential manifestation of the
Jewish soul, Judaism, a great deal
of confusion about the nature of the Jewish problem will be
eliminated.
What, indeed, is Judaism? In the first place, Judaism is a system of beliefs and practices which are profoundly alien
to the spirit of our race.
Most Westerners
will have some notion of the alienness of Judaism through a superficial acquaintance with the various trappings of Jewish
ritual:
prayer shawls and phylacteries;
morbid, Levantine chants; the obligatory yarmulkas; and so forth. The
guttural sounds and mysterious script of Hebrew
will strike most Americans as strange, as will the physiognomies and modes of dress of Judaism’s more tradition-bound
adherents.
Yet even these indications
of Jewish differentness are only symbolic of the profoundly anti-Western essence of Judaism.
Contemporary Israelis immersed in the study of the Talmud, the
most authoritative collection of Jewish religious law. Blasphemous references to
Jesus in the Talmud, now cheerfully acknowledged by Jews, have
not been a bone of contention in “ecumenical” discussions in which
Jews and their fifth-columnists in the Christian clergy have
attempted to tailor traditional Christian theology and liturgy to Jewish desires.
Although the translations
of the Old Testament into Western tongues are not without evidences of Judaism’s alien essence, it is perhaps understandable
that they should have been so well received in the West. The
Old Testament took on an altogether different tone in the Latin of St. Jerome, the German
of Martin Luther, and the English of the King James Version. Not infrequently,
these translations differed even in meaning from the original
Hebrew and Aramaic. Thus, the injunction to “love thy race-kin” in the Hebrew became
“love thy neighbor” in Western Bibles.
The same impulses which led European painters and sculptors to depict Biblical
personages with Nordic rather than Semitic features led Western Christians
to ascribe their own mentality and behavior to Old Testament figures. As one Jewish
writer, Susan Taubes, observed, “The Old Testament has had the
benefit of the most sublime spiritualization through centuries of Christian interpretation.”
In fact, Jews have reacted to this Western tendency with a
certain bitter humor. As a Jewish character in a story by contemporary Jewish writer Cynthia Ozick
puts it, “Please remember that when a goy from
Columbus, Ohio, says ‘Elijah the Prophet,’ he is
not talking about Eliohu hanovi! Eliohu is one of us, a folksmensh running around in second-hand
clothes. Theirs is God knows what. The same biblical figure,
with exactly the same history, once he puts on a name from King James, comes out a different person.”
The religion of the Jews
arose among Semitic nomads in the Near East, on the desert fringes of what American Egyptologist James Breasted called
the “fertile crescent.” This area was fertile in
more than fruit and grain, for a bewildering and repellent array of orgiastic fertility cults sprouted and
flourished there, often involving ritual masturbation and sodomy.
Elements of these perverse rites inevitably found their way into the religious practices of the Jews.
The elaborate and bizarre nature
of the circumcision rite, with its oral-genital contact, as practiced by Jews through the ages makes it clear that circumcision’s
limited hygienic advantages were not
the controlling factor in its adoption by the Hebrews. Numerous sayings of the rabbis give proof of the exaggerated
regard in which Jews have always held
the rite. The Talmud boasts, “So great is circumcision that but for it the Holy One would not have created the universe.”
(Nashim:
Nedarim)
Circumcision is one present-day vestige of these phallic fertility rites. According
to the Hebrew Torah, it was instituted by Yahweh, the tribal god
of the Jews, and is at the very core of his covenant with Abraham, the mythical progenitor of the
Jews. During most of Israel’s independent political
existence, under the kings succeeding David, the Hebrew religion was probably indistinguishable from
those of the surrounding Semitic tribes. Temple
prostitution, attended to by male “dog priests” as well as by female acolytes, flourished until King Josiah
“pulled down the house of the
sacred male prostitutes which was in the Temple of Yahweh and where the women wove clothes for Asherah” (II Kings 23:7).
The conviction has been
growing among Biblical scholars unbiased by considerations of piety that the rigid strictures against unnatural sexual practices
in the Old Testament and the conception of Yahweh as a pure,
sexless desert god are an outgrowth of the situation of the Jews after the Babylonian exile
(587–538 B.C.). In line with this view, the sexual ethics of post-exile
Judaism grew out of the need for sexual self-discipline necessary to ensure national
and racial survival in a period of dispersion. Regulations against homosexuality
and birth-control inhibited any Jewish tendencies toward decline in population,
while stringent prohibitions against racial intermarriage (still enforced in
modern Israel) attempted to safeguard the Jews from assimilation.
That the prescriptions of Old Testament Judaic law on sexual
matters are strictly functional, and, indeed, are in constant tension with normal Jewish
predilections, is evident from later Jewish law. The Talmud, the most authoritative
and influential source for Jewish law, is replete with sexual considerations
of a nature repellent to Westerners. As Rabbi Adin Steinsalz, a contemporary Talmudic
scholar admits, “After you
have learned the right passages in the Talmud, you have learned about every perversion, in the greatest detail.”
The Talmud regards bestiality
as no bar to matrimony. In the section of the Talmud entitled Yabmuth (59a), a woman who has copulated with a dog is
pronounced fit for marriage to a Jewish priest. (A dog-priest,
perhaps?) Children three years and one day old are considered suitable for intercourse
(Yabmuth 57a). “Is
there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen? Unnatural intercourse is permitted to a Jew” (Sanhedrin 58b).
And so it goes, throughout the gigantic work of which Jewish law claims, “Yahweh himself studies the Talmud standing,
he has such respect for that book” (Mechillah).
Modern writers have emphasized
the vast differences between the Western ethic of courtly love and the purely pragmatic approach of contemporary
Jews in matters romantic. Psychoanalyst Ernst van den Haag
writes in The Jewish Mystique that love “as an esthetic exhilaration
and a romantic feeling
never made
much of a dent on Jewish attitudes toward the body or toward the opposite sex. Love or ‘sweet suffering’ was too
irrational. If you want her, get her . . .”
According to the American sociologist John Murray Cuddihy, Sigmund
Freud, the Jew who “invented” psychoanalysis, sensed the organic relationship
between Western concepts of love and other Western attitudes and institutions,
and he was repelled by it. Our culture’s traditional romantic attitudes
and customs have been grievously undermined by Freud’s and his Jewish followers’
insistence on the primacy of a sexuality divorced from reproduction
and even from love. In the light of the Talmud, the sexual and excretory obsessions of modern Jewish
writers and psychologists become more understandable.
An aspect of Judaism even more consistently emphasized in Jewish religious
writings than the fascination with sex is the insistence on the Jews’ privileged
status as a special people, a “chosen people.” No race, religious
group, or nation has succeeded in institutionalizing
the conception of its own superiority in its religious beliefs and practices to the extent the Jews have.
Each morning, every Orthodox
Jew in the world thanks his god “who has not made me a goy, a
slave, or a woman,” in the words of the prayer.
(Goy is a particularly slighting Jewish name for non-Jews.) According
to the Jewish conception, Yahweh, who saw fit to elevate the Jews above all
the other nations, is not merely the tribal god of the “chosen” race, but
the Lord of all creation. As they see it, their god is the God of the
Gentiles, the God for the Jews.
It must be stressed that this theological notion,
for the Jews, does not derive its importance from a heightened consciousness of an obligation to the Divinity.
The meat of the doctrine, for Jews, is Israel’s sanctity,
not God’s. Passages in the Old Testament referring to Israel’s divine election are customarily interpreted
in an allegorical sense by Christians, who take them as presentiments
of a beatitude and salvation accessible to all men. For believing Jews, however, lines
such as, “For the nation and kingdom that refuses to serve you [Israel]
shall perish, such nations
shall
be utterly ruined” (Isaiah 60:12). are justifications for a frenzied chauvinism.
The Talmudic literature abounds in legally binding
characterizations and definitions of the status of the people of Israel. “Heaven and earth were
created only for the sake of the Jewish people” (Vayikra Rabba 36). “You [the Jews] are human beings, but the nations of the
world [goyim] are not
human beings, but beasts” (Baba Mezia,
114b). “Yahweh created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by
beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form,
and condemned to serve the Jew day and night” (Midrasch Talpioth,
225-L).
To allow Jews to deceive non-Jews as to their beliefs and practices, Jewish law provides sanction for secretiveness,
perjury, and conspiracy. The Talmud
mandates that “Every goy who studies the Talmud and every Jew
who helps him in it ought to die” (Sanhedrin 59a, Aboda Zara 8–6, Szagiga
13).
The Kol Nidre (“all vows”) prayer, beloved of the Orthodox, condones violations of oaths
and vows, whenever
necessary or convenient.
Jews who testify against other Jews before non-Jewish authorities are to be executed.
Prohibition
against mesira, the cooperation of law-abiding Jews with Gentile authorities
where Jewish criminals are involved, remains in force in Jewish law.
The Talmud mandates death for moserim, or informers: “It is permitted to kill a Jewish informer everywhere!”
(Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388).
Rabbi Kahane’s condemnation
is all the more vitriolic since the Jewish religion allows Jews to lie while under oath. The Kol Nidre, recited each year by
observant Jews on the eve of Yom Kippur, sanctions oath-breaking: “All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing,
which, beginning this very
day of reconciliation until the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise,
swear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent beforehand; let them
be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished,
valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all”
(Schulchan
Aruch, Edit. 1, 136). The clipping above is from the front page of the Jewish
Press for December 24, 1976.
If one doubts that the attitudes inculcated in Jews by Judaism
regulate Jewish conduct in the present, let him look to Israel. Since the Zionist seizure of
Palestine 29 years ago, “the land flowing with milk and honey”
has once again streamed with the blood of its rightful inhabitants, the Palestinians.
While any blood-Jew on earth, Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, atheist, or
whatever, has a right to citizenship and a life of luxury
underwritten by the American taxpayer, the Arabs they have dispossessed huddle in squalid, disease-ridden
refugee camps.
Interestingly enough, the letter of Jewish law is often neglected or even violated in Israel, at least in matters not
pertaining to the determination of an
individual’s membership in the Jewish people, still firmly in the hands of the rabbis. This indifference to the observance
of
every jot and tittle of the laws
of the Sabbath is perfectly acceptable to the vast majority of the world’s religious Jews.
Besides, theologically-minded
Jews have new worlds to conquer. Not satisfied with having created and maintained Judaism as a supple tool for the
advancement of the Jewish race, they now seek to enlist Christianity
in the same cause. If it was enough for Christian clergymen to pronounce the Jews
innocent of Christ’s crucifixion ten years ago, now they must fully espouse
the aims and policies of Israel in order to avoid the stigma of “anti-Semitism.”
Ever on the lookout for new frontiers of effrontery, Jewish leaders are
increasingly demanding that Christians incorporate the idea that the Jews are
a “chosen people” in Christian theology!
The essence of Judaism should now be clear: it is
not a religion or an expression of piety in the Western sense, but a codified, formalized program of
Jewish self-promotion. In this regard perhaps it is fitting
to let a Jew, Baruch Spinoza, have the last word: “Thus the love of the Hebrews for their
country was not only patriotism but also piety and was cherished
and nurtured by daily rites until, like their hatred of other nations, it was absolutely
perverse (as it well might be, considering that they were a peculiar people
and entirely apart from the rest). Such daily reprobation naturally gave rise to
a lasting hatred, deeply implanted in the heart: for of all hatred, none is
more deep and tenacious
than that
which springs from extreme devoutness or piety, and is itself cherished as pious.”
* * *
From Attack! No.
52, 1977, transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer,
from the book The Best of Attack!
and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom
Click on this text to examine JEWISH COMMUNIST BRAIN WASHING
THE COMMUNIST GOALS ARE
THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION MANIFEST
45 Communist Goals by Dr. Cleon
Skousen (1958)
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative
to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the
illusion that total disarmament [by] the
United States would
be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist
affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American
aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red
China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite
of Khrushchev’s promise
in 1955 to settle the German question by free
elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United
States
has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations
are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in
the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten,
demand that
it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent
armed forces.
(Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken
over as easily by the U.N. as
by Moscow. Sometimes these two
centers compete with each other as they are now
doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties
in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic
American
institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current
Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control
of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs
or
organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review
assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
21. Gain
control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture
by degrading all forms of artistic expression.
An American Communist cell was
told to “eliminate all good sculpture from
parks and buildings,
substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”
23. Control art critics and directors of art
museums.
“Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive,
meaningless art.”
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them
“censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography
and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy
and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion
with “social” religion. Discredit the
Bible and
emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”
28. Eliminate prayer
or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the
ground that
it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”
29. Discredit the
American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step
with
modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the
American Founding Fathers. Present them as
selfish aristocrats
who had no concern for the “common man.”
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and
discourage the teaching of American history
on the ground that
it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give
more
emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized
control over any part of
the culture–education, social agencies,
welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere
with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate
the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big
business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat
all
behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one
but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health
laws as a
means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist
goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents.
Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American
tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and
use [“]united force[“] to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow
all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize
the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot
prevent the World Court
from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems.
Give the World Court jurisdiction] over
nations and individuals
alike.
———————————————————————————————————————————-
Communist Rules for Revolution 1919
1 Corrupt the young: get them away from
religion. Get them
interested in sex. Make them superficial; destroy
their ruggedness.
2 Get control of all means of publicity. Get peoples’ minds off their government
by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books, plays and other trivialities.
3 Divide people
into hostile groups by constantly
harping on controversial matters of
no importance.
4 Destroy the peoples’ faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter
up to contempt, ridicule and . (speak against, condemnatory utterances)
5 Always preach;true
democracy; but seize
power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible.
6 By encouraging
government extravagance, destroy its credit;
produce fear of inflation,
rising prices and general discontent.
7 Foment strikes in vital industries; encourage civil disorders and foster
a
lenient and soft attitude on the part of government toward these
disorders.
8 By special argument cause a breakdown of the old moral virtues;
honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.
9 Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext
with a
view of confiscation of them and leaving the population helpless.
———————————————————————————————————————————-
Karl Marx’s “10 Planks” to seize power
and
destroy freedom:The Communist Manifesto 1848
1 Abolition of
Property in Land and Application
of all Rents of Land to Public Purpose.
2 A Heavy Progressive
or Graduated Income Tax.
3 Abolition of All Rights of Inheritance.
4 Confiscation of the Property of All Emigrants
and Rebels.
5 Centralisation of Credit in the Hands of the State, by Means of
a
National Bank with State Capital and an Exclusive Monopoly.
6 Centralisation of the Means of Communication
and Transport in the Hands of the State.
7 Extension of Factories and Instruments of Production
Owned by the State, the
Bringing Into Cultivation of Waste
Lands, and the Improvement
of the Soil Generally in Accordance
with a Common Plan.
8 Equal Liability of All to Labor. Establishment
of Industrial
Armies, Especially for Agriculture.
9 Combination of Agriculture with Manufacturing Industries; Gradual Abolition of
the
Distinction Between Town and Country by a More
Equable Distribution of the Population over the Country.
10 Free Education for All Children in Public Schools. Abolition of
Children’s Factory
Labor in it’s Present Form. Combination
of Education with Industrial Production.
——————————————————————————
Saul Alinsky’s Rules from Rules for Radicals 1971
Saul Alinsky describes
24 rules in Rules for Radicals. Of those 24 rules, 13 are rules of “power tactics”:
1. “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”
2. “Never
go outside the experience of your people.”
3. “Wherever possible go outside of the experience
of the enemy.”
4. “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.”
5. “Ridicule is man’s most
potent weapon.”
6. “A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.”
7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”
8.
“Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions,
and utilize all
events of the period for your purpose.”
9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”
10.
“The major premise for tactics is the development of operations
that
will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”
11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough it
will break through into its counterside.”
12. “The price of a successful attack is
a constructive alternative.”
13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
The remaining 11
rules Alinsky describes are concerned with
“the ethics of means
and ends”:
1. “One’s concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one’s personal
interest in the issue … Accompanying this rule is the parallel
one that one’s concern with
the ethics of means and ends varies inversely
with one’s distance from the scene of conflict.”
2. “The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent
upon the political position of those sitting in judgment.”
3. “In war the end justifies almost
any means.”
4. “Judgement must be made in the context of the times in which the
action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point.”
5. “Concern with ethics increases
with the number of means available and vice versa.”
6. “The less important the end to be desired, the more
one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means.”
7. “Generally success or failure
is a mighty determinant of ethics.”
8. “The morality of a means depends upon whether the means is
being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.”
9. “Any effective means is automatically
judged by the opposition as being unethical.”
10. “You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with
moral garments.”
11. “Goals must be phrased in general terms like ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,’
‘Of the Common Welfare,’ ‘Pursuit of Happiness,’ or ‘Bread
and Peace.’”
__________________
Portrait of Evil: Karl Marx, a Disciple of
Hell on Earth
October 11, 2018 Russ Winter
Karl Marx Monument in
Chemnitz, in eastern Germany.
PHOTO: The Conversation/AP/Jens Meyer
In May 2018, the German postal service released a postage stamp to
commemorate the 200th birthday of Karl Marx. PHOTO: Dezeen.com
J ust like Jeremy Bentham, who we discussed yesterday, Karl Marx (1818 -1883) was yet another promoted, made man and lifetime actor.
Like Bentham, there is no other way
to analyze him other than personality, actions
and personal life history, which appears
Sabbatean and/or Luciferian.
The Marx persona
was convoluted, twisted and chameleon-like, as if someone wrote a
script and
tried to bury any aspects that didn’t fit the contrived narrative.
Incredibly,
Marx is held in relatively high esteem around the world. Why?
His
ideological socialist rival, Mikhail Bakunin, got the big picture about Marx in spades.
Once again, we see the familiar pattern of an elite group putting forth pseudo-philosophies
designed to enslave the general population so that they can be lorded over and
looted by what some call “oligarchs.” We call them “kleptocrats” or the Crime Syndicate.
‘This world is now, at least for the most part, at the
disposal of Marx on the one hand,
and of Rothschild on the other. This
may seem strange. What can there be in common
between socialism and
a leading bank? The point is that authoritarian socialism,
Marxist communism,
demands a strong centralization of the state. And where there is
centralization of the state, there must necessarily
be a central bank; and where such a
bank exists, the parasitic Jewish
nation, speculating with the Labour of the people, will be found.’
—
Profession of faith of a Russian socialist democrat preceded by a study on German Jews
(Letter to Le Réveil, Paris, 1869 )
Before his
death in 1876, Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin sounded the alarm far
and
wide about a plutocratic bankster capture of the revolutionary movement.
The 1872 Hague Congress was dominated by a struggle between Marx and his followers,
who argued
for the use of the state to bring about socialism; and the Bakunin faction,
which
argued instead for the replacement of the state by federations of self-governing
workplaces
and communes. Bakunin was expelled and smeared as an “anarchist” to
this
day. In stark contrast to Marx, those who met and knew Bakunin
separate from
the political realm had the nicest things to say about him.
So Marx’s role was to use workers as “useful idiots”
and blind tools, which they hoped to
be able to manipulate. To carry on with
their conspiracy in the name of the working class,
they had to cultivate and
shape all sorts of communist and socialist utopias. Marx hoped
to exploit the
jealousy of the stupid proletariat to enforce a hell on earth in which fear,
suffering,
terror and treason ruled supreme.
From the beginning, the Marx myth was steeped in obfuscation. His father,
Hirschel ha-Levi Marx — justice on the Supreme Court and linked to the Rothschilds —
had opportunistically converted to Christianity in 1816. What a coinkydink given
that
Hirschel’s father was a famous chief rabbi in Cologne. His father-in-law
was also a rabbi.
On May 5, 1818, in the German town of Trier, Marx was born. Despite being an alleged
Christian, he was given the Mosaic name Moses Mordecai Levi Marx. Karl was used
as a cover name for his Christian persona. He was not baptized until age 6. Feel free to
debunk it, but there is a claim that he was London-based Lionel Nathan Rothschild’s
third cousin.
Then, by sheer coinkydink, young Marx went to a Jesuit school at the same time he went
to a Talmudic school, where he learned that Jews must rule the world. Bernard Lazar [Lazana]
(1865-1903), a well-known functionary and publicist within Judaism, confirmed that Marx had
been affected by Talmudism.
Little is known of Marx’s childhood but, in college, his sullen sociopathic-side
came through.
The death of his father in May 1838 may have affected
him and made him bitter, as his
income from the family evaporated.
Marx became an
atheist and took to poetry that expressed apocalyptic hate for humanity.
Forty
poems and the verse-drama “Oulanem” written by Marx have been found to date.
In his little ditty “Der Spiel-mann” (“The Fiddler”), he admitted:
That art God neither wants
nor wists,
It leaps to the brain from Hell’s black mists.
Till heart’s bewitched, till senses reel:
With Satan I have struck my deal.
In another poem, Marx promised to lure mankind
with him into hell in the company of Satan.
In “Human Pride”
[published in “World Revolution” by Nesta Webster, p. 167], Marx told us
what he really thought and reveals himself a true psycho. Like Bentham and
ilk, nobody seemed to give a hoot about the core of these monsters.
With disdain I will
throw my gauntlet
Full in the face of the world,
And see the collapse of this pygmy giant
Whose fall will
not stifle my ardor.
Then I will be able to walk triumphantly
Like a god, through the ruins of their kingdom.
Every word of mine is fire and action.
My breast is equal to that of the Creator.
Marx
made this typical bombastic statement on April 14, 1856:
“History is the
judge, the proletariat its executioner.”
He found great pleasure in talking about terror and about houses marked
with red crosses, which indicated the inhabitants were to be killed.
These words are reminiscent of Sabbeaten Jakob
Frank’s expressions. It shows that Marx
was likely affected by Frankism.
Marx’s father had come into contact with Frankism and had
also instructed
his children in this ideology. Trier is a short distance from the Frankist
center
near Frankfurt.
At age 24, Marx the “Christian”
worked for and became influenced by Rabbi Moses Hess,
a rancorous firebrand.
Hess introduced Marx to half-Jew Frederick Engels. Hess stressed the
need to
agitate the social classes against each other and, in this way, hinder their co-operation.
He wanted to bring about a socialist revolution with the help of Judaism, racism and the class
struggle. He stressed that socialism was inseparably bound to internationalism, as the
socialists have no fatherland. The true socialist cannot have anything to do
with his nationality. He also declared: “This does not apply to Jews!”
Internationalism
served the interests of Judaism. He stressed that the Jews had been given
the
role of changing mankind into a savage animal, as described in his article
“About
the Monetary System” [“Rheinische Jahrbucher” Vol. 1, 1845].
Marx himself just blandly (always typical of
his tone) and openly admitted
to the scheme: “Behind every tyrant there
is always a Jew.”
In November 1847, he reorganized a band of revolutionaries, called The League of Just Men,
into the Communist Party. Together with Engels, Marx reorganized (Soviet term) the league
before the end of the year. Hess, Marx, Engels, Wilhelm Weitling, Hermann Kriege, Joseph
Weydemeyer, and Ernst and Ferdinand Wolf played important roles. This occurred just ahead
of the 1848 revolutions throughout Europe, which will be the subject of a future post.
Then, Marx and Engels are alleged to have made
some contrived split with Hess; but
later, Marx and Engels stated quite openly
that many of Hess’ ideas deserved wide recognition.
“The Communist Manifesto” published in London was probably
largely ghost-written. It
was a hodgepodge of previous thinking. Marx only
further developed the ideas of Illuminist
leaders Adam Weishaupt and Clinton
Roosevelt. He cut and pasted the words of utopian
communist and Illuminati
Francois Noel Babeuf (1760-1797) to show the way to the socialist
(Illuminist)
revolution. For the record, I now believe the Illuminists were defacto
Sabbeatean
Frankists. Although the term Illuminati is useful, it’s a bit of a deflection.
In the manifesto, Marx drew from his anti-social
college fantasies:
“The ruling classes shall tremble before the coming Communist Revolution!”
“We can only reach our goals by violently overthrowing the entire established order.”
“We are merciless and do not demand any clemency. When it is our turn, we will not
hide our terrorism.”
[“Karl Marx: Eine Psycho-graphie”
by Arnold Kunzli, Vienna, 1966]
In “Das Kapital” (1867), Marx argued it’s absolutely necessary
to stress the need of violence in socialist actions.
He wrote:
“Violence is the midwife
who helps a
new society struggle out from the womb of the old.”
What the spirit
of Marx really wanted was to treat their subjects with such violence that
they
eventually lost all feelings of mercy and humanity toward their fellows. The Marxists
also took all the proceeds of workers’ produce by paying them too little or nothing at all for
their work. In this manner, the Marxists developed modern slavery, which is something
Bentham could only fantasize about.
The extinction of all-profound cultural values and creations was
front and center.
Marx’s “doctrine” only concerned the way physical
work creates value. In contrast,
he did not acknowledge creative thought. It
differed from Hegel, who had thought in
idealist terms, putting ideas
in the forefront; whereas Marx sought to rewrite
dialectics in materialist terms, arguing for the primacy of matter over idea.
Certain judges of Marxism try to claim that those who can interpret
the doctrine correctly
have not yet reached power. How is it that only Marxists
who interpreted the doctrine wrongly
came into power? Sheer coinkydink? There
was certainly no way Marx had actually intended his
“teachings” to
work.
His
college poem fantasies had come to fruition:
“Lure mankind
with him into hell in the company of Satan.”
According to the most famous myth, Marx had no money and was economically
dependent on his “friend” Engels. In reality, Nathan Rothschild financed him.
Bakunin, in
his “Polemique contre les Juifs” (“Polemic Against the Jews”), again set the
matter straight, stating that Marx and his crew “had one foot in the bank and the other
foot in the socialist movement.”
Marx craved the finest foods and French wine, among other things, all of which
were imported for his family meals. His family had a weakness for expensive habits.
Marx’s uncontrolled
drinking and his wild and expensive orgies only increased his fury
at his environment.
All the meetings in Paris had to be held behind closed
doors and windows, so
that Marx’s roaring was not heard out in the street.
Then there’s Engels own comments on Marx:
“Who is chasing with wild endeavor? A black man from Trier,
a remarkable monster.
He does not walk or run,
he jumps on his heels and rages full of anger…”
“He was livid with hatred, as if 10,000 devils had caught him by the hair”.
A famous Jewish socialist, Freemason and comrade of Marx, Giuseppe
Mazzini,
who had known Marx well, wrote this about him:
“His heart bursts rather with hatred than with love toward men,”
and added Marx was “a destructive spirit.”
He had a habit of warning: “I will annihilate you!”
Fritz Joachim Raddatz, in “Karl Marx: Eine Politische Biographie,”
Hamburg, 1975:
Marx was an
unreliable egoist and a lying intriguer who only wished to exploit others,
according
to his assistant, Karl Heinzen [Karl Heinzen, “Erlebtes,” Boston, 1864].
Heinzen also thought that Marx had small, nasty eyes “which spat flames of evil fire”.
Marx was not
interested in democracy. The editorial staff of Neue Rheinische
Zeitung
was, according to Engels, organized so that Marx became its dictator.
He could not take criticism. He always became infuriated if anyone
tried to criticise him.
In 1874, when Dr. Ludwig Kugelmann merely hinted
that if Marx would organize his life
a little better he might finish
“Das Kapital”, Marx would have nothing more to do with
Kugelmann
and slandered him ruthlessly.
Marx collected information about his political rivals and opponents. He delivered
the notes he made to the police, believing it to be of advantage to him.
Karl Marx condemned
exploitation of people. He himself exploited everyone near him.
He fought
all those he could not subdue. Even as a child, he had been a real tyrant.
To
work was what Marx wanted least of all. He speculated heavily on the stock market,
however, constantly losing huge amounts of money. Neither did he show any consideration
for the work of others. Many craftsmen he hired had to wait a long time for their pay. His
housekeeper, Helen Demuth, worked like a slave in his household for 40 years without
any cash pay whatsoever.
In further reference to Marx’s housekeeper Helen Demuth,
it can be said that on J
une 23, 1851, she gave birth to a baby boy whose
father’s name was Karl Marx.
The father wanted to know nothing
about Henry Frederick Demuth, however,
so the boy was given up
to a foster home. The case of the disowned son later became
an embarrassment
for the Bolshevik leaders in Moscow, so Joseph Stalin classified
as
secret those letters between Marx and Engels, where this affair is too apparent.
(Viikkolehti, 11th of January 1992.)
Marx supported slavery in the United States of America. Like his brother
Sabattean
Illuminati Albert Pike, he vented his racist opinions
against blacks. Racism and
anti-semitic canards were used by Marx as
a gimmick of control and intimidation.
Marx preached about a better society but did not care about any
morals. Nor did he care
about cleanliness.
This had a bad effect on both his health and his
contacts
with other revolutionaries. He suffered from boils for 25 years.
In 1873 these boils
caused him a nervous breakdown leading to tremors and violent fits
of rage. He never ate fruit or vegetables. Protracted insomnia was a consequence, and
Marx used narcotics and became addicted. He liked wine and liqueurs and smoked an
enormous amount of cigars.
________________________________
Lenin's Jewish Roots
The Jewish Chronicle (Britain)
...
The leader of the Revolution and the founder of the USSR, was many parts Jewish,
through his mother. The facts came to light only after the Soviet Union collapsed
and the
Communist Party archives recently
opened ... The grandfather of Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov
- he began to take the pseudonym Lenin when he was around 30 - was born Sril Moiseyevich
(Israel Moses) Blank in Odessa in the early 1800s. Like so many
ambitious young men in
the Tsarist empire,
while studying medicine in his early twenties he converted to Russian
Orthodoxy and changed his first name and patronymic to Alexander Dimitreyevich.
He travelled widely in Europe after qualifying as a doctor and
he married the daughter
of a wealthy
German merchant ...
____________________________________________________________________________
1983 Book by Jewish Historians Celebrates Jewish Role in Mass Murder of Russians
Under Bolshevism...
Click on this text to read BOLSHEVISM FROM MOSES TO LENIN in PDF format.
__________________________________________________________
The Zionist Communist Takeover Of
America - 45 Declared
Goals
By Jeff Rense
4-24-18
On
January 10, 1963, the House of Representatives and later the Senate began
reviewing
a document entitled 'Communist Goals for Taking Over America.' It contained
an agenda of 45 separate issues (attacks and techniques) that, in hindsight,
were quite shocking then and equally stunning today.
Over the last 50 plus years since this list
was introduced in the House, many things
have changed, among them that the
Soviet Union is gone and Communism isn't
mentioned by the controlled MSM
anymore. Why? Because the founders of Communism,
World Zionism, is
now the dominant force in the Western World and controls virtually
every
major geopolitical, social, cultural and commercial aspect of our existence.
Most importantly, about
27 of the 45 Communist (Zionist) Goals on the original list
have been or
are being achieved. (History has largely retired the other 18).
These
remaining 27 items will…or should…shock you. It is essential to also understand
that world Zionism CREATED Communism, took down Russia, set up the
Soviet Union and created two World Wars in which over 100 million died. Whether
the term is ‘Communism' or 'Bolshevism' or ‘Socialism' or ‘Marxism'
they all emanate from one source - World Zionism. That must never
be forgotten.
So, as you read through this list, understand and never forget
that these goals, most now 100% implemented, are all ZIONIST goals.
Here, in part, are the most
blatant Zionist Communist achievements listed in that
original list of 45
Goals. Read this group very carefully…these are the most sweeping,
revolutionary, devastating and deadly Goals on the list from 1963.
(
I will list all original 45 further down the page.)
Here we go...
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative
to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop
the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States
would be a demonstration
of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist
affiliation
and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all
nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the
U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's
promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong
the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States
has agreed to
suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation
in the U.N.
11. Promote
the UN as the only hope for mankind.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United
States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American
institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use
them as transmission belts for socialism
and current Communist propaganda.
Soften the curriculum.
Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party
line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public
protests against programs or
organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments,
editorial
writing, policy-making positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms
of artistic
expression. An American Communist cell was told to
"eliminate all good
sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute
shapeless, awkward and meaningless
forms."
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums.
"Our
plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by
calling them "censorship"
and a violation of free speech and free
press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography
and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy
and promiscuity as
"normal, natural, healthy."
27. Discredit
the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity,
which does not need
a "religious crutch."
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools
on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned,
out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between
nations
on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish
aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
31. Belittle all forms
of American culture and discourage the teaching
of American history on the
ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture."
Give more
emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized
control over
any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs,
mental health clinics, etc.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social
agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders
which no
one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health
laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need
to raise children away from the negative
influence of parents. Attribute prejudices,
mental blocks and retarding
of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate
aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups
should
rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native
populations
are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize
the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot
prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems.
Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.
12-7-2 Jeff...adding a couple of my own numbers...
46. Import anti-white racists from
the Third World, via an open-borders policy,
then force their integration to
divide and conquer white Western civilization in North America.
47. Feminize men and disarm both the citizenry
and military; especially disarm white males.
_____________________________________
Click on this text to watch: Secret Facts - Jews & Communism...
"The Jewish doctrine of Marxism repudiates
the aristocratic principle of Nature and
substitutes for it the eternal priviledge of force and energy, numerical mass and it's
dead weight. Thus it denies the individual worth
of the human personality, impugns
the teaching that nationhood and race have a primary significance, and by doing this
it takes away the very foundation of the life of
the universe, it would lead to a
disappearance of all order that is conceivable to the human mind. And thus the
adoption of such a law would provoke chaos in the structure of the greatest
organism
that we know,
with the result that the inhabitants of this earthly planet would
finally disappear."
...Anon.
The
First Soviet Government Was Mostly Jewish, Says Russian President Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin said that at least 80 percent of the members of the first Soviet government
were
Jewish. "I thought about something
just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government,
whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish," Putin said June 13 [2013] during
a visit to Moscow's Jewish Museum and
Tolerance
Center ... According to the official transcription of Putin's speech at the museum, he went on to say that the
politicians on the predominantly Jewish Soviet government "were
guided by false ideological considerations and supported
the arrest and repression of Jews, Russian Orthodox Christians, Muslims and members of other faiths.
They grouped everyone into the same category."
____________________________________________________________________________________
Was the Bolshevik Revolution a Jewish Plot?
A. Asa-El - The Jerusalem Post (Israel)
... Lenin's
deputies Lev Kamenev (originally Rozenfeld) and Grigory Zinoviev (born Hirsch Apfelbaum) and his treasurer Grigori Sokolnikov (Girsh Yankelevich Brilliant) were all Jews,
as were Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), co-writer of the Soviet Constitution, Maxim Litvinov (Meir Henoch Wallach-Finkelstein), foreign minister of the USSR ... Most proverbially,
a Jew - Yakov Sverdlov - oversaw the
nighttime execution of Czar Nikolai, Empress Alexandra, and their five children. Jewish revolutionaries were prominent beyond Russia as well ... In Poland, two of
the three Stalinists who led its transition
to communism - Hilary Minc, who collectivized its economy, and Jakub Berman, who headed its secret police - were Jews. The revolution, in short, was so crowded
with Jews that one had to wonder whether "the Jews" were inherently revolutionary. ____________________________________________________________
|
Lenin's Jewish Roots
... The
leader of the Revolution and the founder of the USSR, was many parts Jewish, through his mother. The facts came to light only after the Soviet Union collapsed and
the Communist Party archives recently opened ... The grandfather of Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov - he began to take the pseudonym Lenin when he was around 30 - was born Sril Moiseyevich (Israel Moses) Blank in Odessa in the early
1800s. Like so many ambitious young men in the Tsarist empire, while studying medicine in his early twenties he converted to Russian Orthodoxy and changed his first
name and patronymic to Alexander Dimitreyevich.
He travelled widely in Europe after qualifying as a doctor and he married the daughter of a wealthy German merchant ... ____________________________________________________________________ |
The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution and the Early Soviet Regime
Jews played
a highly disproportionate and probably decisive role in the infant Bolshevik regime, effectively dominating
the Soviet government during its early years ... With the notable
exception of Lenin, most of the leading Communists
who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews ... The US ambassador in Russia warned in a dispatch to Washington:
"The Bolshevik leaders here, most
of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for
Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start
a worldwide social revolution."
______________________________________________________________________________________
The Vienna Jewish Museum is currently
holding a special exhibition highlighting
the Jewish role in
the creation of the Soviet Union and Communism, titled
“Comrade
Jew: We Only Wanted Paradise on Earth” (Genosse. Jude. Wir wollten
nur das Paradies auf Erden) using a Soviet era cartoon of Karl Marx in a Moses pose
holding tablets inscribed with “Das Kapital” and the “Communist Manifesto.”
According to the Museum’s official website, the exhibition marks
the 100th
anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution, and runs until May 1, 2018.
According to the
write up which accompanies the official leaflet, the exhibition focusses
on the
fact that the Communists “attracted many Jews seeking a radical break after centuries
of anti-Semitism in the Czarist empire,” and that the “utopian idea
of an egalitarian society prompted them to support the new state.”
In Austria, the museum adds in its write up,
“antisemitism in the bourgeois parties in particular
made the workers’
movement into a political option for Jews, and there were close links
between
Russian and Austrian Marxists.
“The exhibition
focuses on the failed dream of a better world. We look at the idea of an
egalitarian
society from an Austrian Jewish perspective and trace diplomatic,
political,
social, and cultural connections,” the exhibition introduction states.
A New York Times report (“The Jews who Dreamed of Utopia”)
on the exhibition provides
some additional details, telling its readers that
visitors to the exhibition are “greeted by a
bust of Karl Marx” who
is described as “wild-haired” and presiding over “the first gallery
of an ambitious, searching show on religion and revolution, uniting paintings,
posters,
propaganda, film clips, and a fair amount of Soviet kitsch.”
The display is, the NYT continues, an “extensive overview of
the dreams and nightmares
of communism and international socialism, as seen
through the lives and work of
Jewish politicians, philosophers and artists: not
just Marx, but also Leon Trotsky,
Rosa Luxemburg, El Lissitzky, and many others.”
The
NYT journalist, Jason Farago, feels obligated to tell his readers that “You don’t need
me to tell you that this is still hot stuff, a hundred years on. That many communists were
Jews has, with horrible frequency, been twisted to imply that all Jews were communists.
“The Nazis cast
‘Jewish Bolshevism’ as a single scourge, and the return this decade of
the far right has also witnessed a hideous return of anti-Semitism, not just in Europe but
in the United States as well.”
Even though
Farago has just claimed that it was not true that “all Jews were Communists”
—even though many Communists were Jews—he goes straight on to confirm the accuracy
of the Nazi allegation, saying that “Jews did make up a disproportionate percentage
of leftist utopians.
“To this show’s list, we could add Karl Kautsky, Gyorgy Lukacs,
Walter Benjamin, Isaac Deutscher, and many Americans.
And for poor East European Jews
— especially the millions in western Russia who
faced political repression and frequent pogroms —
the international workers’ movement offered a tantalizing freedom.
“A red flag in the exhibit screams
‘Down
with the Tsarist constitution!’ in Yiddish.
“Election banners advocate the Poale
Zion,
a Jewish party aligned with the Mensheviks.
“A copy of the Russian newspaper Pravda, edited by the exiled Trotsky
(born Lev Davidovich Bronstein) from Vienna, bellows for workers
of the world to unite.
“In the early days of the Soviet Union, Jews
not only held top political positions but
also occupied
central positions in the artistic avant-garde,” the article continues.
“The director
Dziga Vertov, in films like ‘Man With a Movie Camera,’
set about creating a cinematic language for a new world.
The Poale Zion banner on display at the Jewish Museum in Vienna. Poale Zion was the
communist Jewish Zionist movement, which later went on to be the movement which
founded the present day Israeli Labour Party,
and which is the ideological
grandfather
of all “socialist” parties in Europe which are pro-Zionist.
“El Lissitzky, who earlier printed folksy lithographs of Passover stories, now painted
geometric collisions such as ‘Beat the Whites with the Red Wedge’ (1920).”
The NYT article then goes on to detail the later split between Communist Jews and the
Zionist socialists, which then sped up after the establishment of the state of Israel—a
nationalist sentiment which clashed directly with the supposed international socialist
worldview of Communism.
The image of Leon Trotsky (real name Bronstein) on display in the Jewish Museum in
Vienna. Bronstein was the foremost advocate of the “world socialism”
view which is
the ideological grandfather
of present-day Trotskyites, or far left Socialists, who
tend to be anti-Zionist because of the intrinsically nationalist nature of Zionism.
The NYT
journalist of course cannot complete the article without
referring to the “danger”
of Austria’s Freedom Party. As it says:
“But downstairs, in the Jewish Museum’s permanent collection
display, I saw something
I have never before seen
in a historical museum: a screenshot of a Facebook post,
presented with the same care and regard as centuries’ worth of Judaica.
“The post features
an image of a fat, sweaty banker, with a hooked nose and stars on his
cuff links, gorging on delicacies while a starving fellow diner, labeled “the people,”
has only a bone to eat.
“The man who posted it is Heinz-Christian Strache: the leader of Austria’s far-right
Freedom Party and, since December, the country’s vice chancellor. A specter
is haunting Europe today, and it is not the one these comrades
foresaw.”
What You Need to Know About
'The Communist
Manifesto'
"The
Communist Manifesto," originally known as "The Manifesto of the Communist Party,"
was
published by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848, and is one of the most widely
taught texts within sociology.
The text was commissioned by the Communist League in
London and was originally published
there, in German. While at the time it served as a
political rally cry for the communist movement
throughout Europe, it is so widely taught
today because it offers a shrewd and early critique of capitalism and its social and cultural
implications. For students of sociology, the text is a useful
primer on Marx's critique of
capitalism, which is presented in much more depth and detail in Capital,
Volumes 1-3.
History
"The Communist Manifesto" is the product of the
joint development of ideas between
Marx and Engels, and rooted in debates held by Communist
League leaders in London;
however, the final draft was written solely by Marx. The text became
a significant
political influence in Germany and led to Marx being expelled from the country,
and his permanent move to London. It was first published in English in 1850.
Despite
its controversial reception in Germany and its pivotal role in Marx's life, the text
was paid
rather little attention until the 1870s, when Marx took a prominent role in the
International
Workingmen's Association, and publicly supported the 1871 Paris commune
and socialist movement.
The text also captured wider attention thanks to its role in a treason
trial held against German
Social Democratic Party leaders. Marx and Engels revised and
republished the text after it
became more widely known, which resulted in the text that we
know today. It has been popular
and widely read around the world since the late 19th century,
and continues to serve as a basis
for critiques of capitalism, and as a call for social, economic,
and political systems that
are organized by equality and democracy, rather than exploitation.
Introduction
to the Manifesto
"A spectre is haunting Europe—the spectre
of communism."
Marx and Engels begin the manifesto by pointing out that those in power across Europe
have identified communism as a threat, which they believe means that as a movement,
it
has the political potential to change the power structure and economic system that was
currently
in place (capitalism). They then state that the movement requires a manifesto and that
this
is what the text is meant to be.
Part 1: Bourgeois
and Proletarians
In Part 1 of the manifesto, Marx and Engels explain the evolution and functioning
of
the unequal and exploitative class structure that resulted from the rise of capitalism as
an
economic system. They explain that while political revolutions overturned the unequal
hierarchies of feudalism, in their place sprung a new class system composed primarily
of a bourgeoisie (owners of the means of production) and proletariat (wage workers).
They wrote, "The
modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal
society has not done away
with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes,
new conditions of oppression, new
forms of struggle in place of the old ones."
Marx and Engels explain that the bourgeoisie have done this not just
by control of industry,
or the economic engine of society, but also because those within this
class seized state
power by creating and controlling the post-feudal political system. Consequently,
they explain,
the state (or, government) reflects the world views and interests of the bourgeoisie
class-
-the wealthy and powerful minority--and not those of the proletariat, who are actually
the majority of society.
Next Marx and Engels explain the cruel, exploitative reality of what
happens when workers
are forced to compete with each other and sell their labor to the owners
of capital. An important
consequence, the offer, is the stripping away of other kinds of social
ties that used to
bind people together in society. Within what has come to be known as a "cash nexus,"
workers are mere commodities--expendable, and easily replaceable.
They go on to explain that because
capitalism is premised on growth, the system is gobbling
up all people and societies around
the world. As the system grows, expands, and evolves
its methods and relations of production,
ownership, and thus wealth and power are
increasingly centralized within it. (The global scale
of today's capitalist economy and the
extreme concentration of ownership and wealth among the global elite show
us that the 19th-century observations of Marx and Engels were on point.)
However,
Marx and Engels wrote, the system itself is designed for failure. Because as it grows
and ownership
and wealth concentrate, the exploitative conditions of wage laborers only
worsen over time,
and these sew the seeds of revolt. They observe that, in fact, that revolt
is already fomenting;
the rise of the Communist party is a sign of this. Marx and Engels conclude
this section with
this proclamation:
"What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers.
Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable."
It is this section
of the text that is considered the main body of the Manifesto, and is most
often quoted, and
taught as an abridged version to students. The following sections are less well-known.
Part 2: Proletarians and Communists
"In
place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we
shall
have an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for
the
free development of all."
In this section, Marx and Engels explain what it is exactly that the
Communist Party
wants for society. They begin by pointing out that the Communist Party is not
a political
workers party like any other because it does not represent a particular faction
of workers.
Rather, it represents the interests of workers (the proletariat) as a whole. These
interests
are shaped by the class antagonisms created by capitalism and
the rule of the bourgeoisie and transcend national borders.
They explain, quite plainly, that the Communist Party seeks to turn the
proletariat into
a cohesive class with clear and unified class interests, to overthrow the rule
of the bourgeoisie,
and to seize and redistribute political power. The crux of doing this, Marx
and Engels explain,
is the abolition of private property, which is the manifest of capital,
and the essence of
wealth hoarding.
Marx and Engels acknowledge that this proposition is met
with
scorn and derision on the part of the bourgeoisie. To this, they reply:
You
are horrified at our intending to do away with private property. But in your existing
society,
private property is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population;
its existence
for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the hands of those nine-tenths.
You reproach us, therefore, with intending to do away with a form of property, the
necessary condition for whose existence is the non-existence of any property for the
immense majority of society.
In other words, clinging to the importance and necessity of private
property only benefits
the bourgeoisie in a capitalist society. Everyone else has little to
no access to it and suffers
under its reign. If you question the validity of this claim in today's
context, just consider
the vastly unequal distribution of wealth in the U.S., and the mountain of
consumer, housing, and educational debt that buries
most of the population.
Then, Marx and Engels state the ten goals of the Communist Party:
- Abolition of property in land and application of all
rents of land to public purposes.
- A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
- Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
- Confiscation of the property of all emigrants
and rebels.
- Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank
with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
- Centralization of the means of communication and
transport in the hands of the State.
- Extension of factories and instruments of production owned
by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with
a common plan.
- Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially
for agriculture.
- Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition
of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
- Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form.
Combination of education with industrial production, etc.
While some of these might seem controversial and troubling, consider that
some
of them have and do exist in a variety of nations around the world.
Part 3: Socialist and Communist Literature
In Part
3 Marx and Engels present an overview of three different types of socialist
literature, or critiques
of the bourgeoisie, that existed at their time, in order to provide
context for the Manifesto.
These include reactionary socialism, conservative or bourgeois
socialism, and critical-utopian
socialism or communism. They explain that the first type
is either backward-looking and seeking
to return to some kind of feudal structure, or that
seeks to really preserve conditions as
they are and is actually opposed to the goals
of the Communist Party. The second, conservative
or bourgeois socialism, is the
product of members of the bourgeoisie savvy enough to know
that one must address
some grievances of the proletariat in order to maintain the system as it is. Marx and
Engels note that economists, philanthropists,
humanitarians, those that run charities,
and many other "do-gooders" espouse and produce
this particular ideology, which seeks
to make minor adjustments to the system rather than change
it (for a contemporary
take on this, see the differing implications of a Sanders versus a Clinton presidency).
The third type is concerned
with offering real critiques of the class structure and social
structure,
and a vision of what could be, but suggests that the goal should be to create
new and separate societies rather than fight to reform the existing one, so it too is opposed to a
collective struggle by the proletariat.
Part 4: Position of the Communists in
Relation
to the Various Existing Opposition Parties
In the final
section Marx and Engels point out that the Communist Party supports all
revolutionary movements
that challenge the existing social and political order, and
close the Manifesto with a call
for unity among the proletariat with their famous rally cry,
"Working men of all countries,
unite!"