Revisionism Online Websites!


The Institute for Historical Review


Ahmed Rami / Radio Islam


The Occidental Quarterly


The Occidental Observer


Committee to Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH)


The Barnes Review


Lady Michele Renouf's website


Inconvenient History


Air Photo Evidence


The Holocaust Historiography Project


Paul Eisen's Blog / Anti-Zionist Revisionism


Carlos W. Porter


David Duke


David Irving / Focal Point Publications


Libertad Pedro Varela


National Journal: For the sake of knowledge and truth


What Really Happened


The Rense Page


Remember Ernst Zundel

Click on this text to listen to and watch Ernst Zundel on the Predictions of a German Dictator...


August 5, 2018 marks the one year anniversary of Ernst Zündel’s passing. He was essentially kidnapped from the U.S. and forced to remain in Germany. His wife, Ingrid Rimland, was unable to leave the U.S. to be with him. She risked jail time in Germany despite having no previous criminal convictions.

His crime? Ernst Zündel was deemed a “security threat.” Not because he was ever violent or ever incited violence, but because he created a legal precedent in which:
For the first time ever, “Holocaust” survivors and “Holocaust” historians were closely and critically questioned under oath about their claims and views.
Few Canadians realize that Zündel did them “a favor by wiping off the books [the] disgraceful False News laws” strangling free-speech.

What They Do Not Tell You About The Life And Work Of Ernst Zündel
An adapted extract from Revisionists. com.

Ernst Zündel (1939-2017) was a German-born publisher, author and civil rights activist, who emigrated to Canada at the age of 19. He became a successful graphic artist, with his work appearing, for example, on the front cover of Canada’s national news magazine, Maclean’s. Setting aside his thriving career, he dedicated himself to the great task, as he saw it, of redeeming the sullied reputation of his fellow Germans.

For seven years he was held behind bars, first in Canada and then in Germany, solely for the peaceful expression of non-conformist views. For some time he was the most prominent political prisoner in the western world.

Zündel was an outgoing, good-humored man who was blessed with a rare combination of unflagging optimism and practical ability. He was perhaps best known as the defiant defendant in the much-publicized “Holocaust Trials” of 1985 and 1988. He was brought to court in Toronto on a charge of “publishing false news,” and specifically for publishing a reprint edition of a booklet entitled Did Six Million Really Die?

Zündel’s two lengthy trials were something close to full scale debates on the Holocaust issue.

For the first time ever, “Holocaust” survivors and “Holocaust” historians were closely and critically questioned under oath about their claims and views.

To wage the legal battle that was forced upon him, he brought together an impressive international team of researchers, legal specialists, scholars, and many others. From numerous libraries and archives in North America and Europe, this group assembled at the “Zündelhaus” in Toronto one of the most extensive collections of evidence anywhere on this chapter of history.

Among those who testified on Zündel’s behalf in the trials were Robert Faurisson, David Irving, Mark Weber, William Lindsey, Udo Walendy, and Bradley Smith. As a result of the two trials, an enormous quantity of evidence and testimony challenging the prevailing Holocaust narrative was presented to the court and thereby was made part of the permanent public record. Perhaps the most important evidence was the historic testimony of American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter concerning his on-site forensic examination of the alleged extermination gas chambers in Poland.

Zündel was found guilty in the 1985 trial, but the verdict was set aside by the provincial appeals court. It ruled that the judge in that trial had, among other things, given improper instructions to the jury, and had improperly excluded defense evidence. At the conclusion of the second Zündel trial in May 1988, a jury declared him guilty. A few days later, he was sentenced to nine months imprisonment.


French scholar Robert Faurisson wrote at the time:

“Zündel may once again go to prison for his research and beliefs or be threatened with deportation. All this is possible. Anything may happen when there is an intellectual crisis and a realignment of historical concepts of such a dimension. Revisionism is the great intellectual adventure of the end of this century. Whatever happens, Ernst Zündel is already the victor.”

On appeal, Canada’s Supreme Court threw out the 1988 conviction, declaring on August 27, 1992, that the archaic “false news” law under which Zündel had been tried and convicted was a violation of the country’s Charter of Rights. This was more than a personal vindication by Canada’s highest court; Ernst Zündel secured an important victory for the rights of all Canadians.

His next great legal battle was fought before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal [which operates outside of normal legal standards] in Toronto. The charges, instigated by Jewish groups, accused Zündel of promoting “hatred or contempt” against Jews through the “Zündelsite” website operated by Ingrid Rimland from the United States. In this legal action, as the Tribunal’s presiding Commissioner declared, the truth or validity of the supposedly “hateful” items was not a consideration. (Ultimately the Tribunal declared the “Zündelsite” to be unlawful, but because it is based in the U.S., the ruling has been unenforceable).

During the 42 years he lived in Canada (1958-2000), Ernst Zündel was never convicted of a crime. He was, however, repeatedly a victim of violence and hate. He survived three assassination attempts, including by arson and pipe bomb. Even Irv Rubin, the American Jewish Defence League leader was caught breaking into Zündel’s home with a member of the “Jewish Armed Resistance Movement” who had previously claimed responsibility for one of the arson attacks. He also endured years of legal harassment and repeated imprisonment.

After more than four decades in Canada, including a failed effort to acquire Canadian citizenship, Zündel moved to the United States. On February 5, 2003, Ernst Zündel was arrested at home in the mountain region of eastern Tennessee. U.S. authorities seized him on the pretext that he had violated immigration regulations, or had missed an interview date with U.S. immigration authorities, even though he had entered the U.S. legally, was married to Ingrid Rimland, an American citizen, had no criminal record, and was acting diligently, and in full accord with the law, to secure status as a permanent legal resident.

After being held for two weeks, he was deported to Canada. For two years -- from mid-February 2003 to March 1, 2005 -- he was held in solitary confinement in the Toronto West Detention Centre as a supposed threat to national security.

His arrest and detention generated wide media attention. A few Canadian newspapers and several independent analysts acknowledged the injustice of his incarceration. The country’s most prestigious daily, the Toronto Globe and Mail, affirmed in an editorial (“Zündel doesn’t warrant a security certificate,” March 6, 2004) that he posed no risk to people or property, and that he was being held unjustly on a bogus “guilt by association” pretext.

“He has never been charged with a violent crime and does not urge others to commit violence,” the editorial noted. “The real danger to Canadians,” it concluded, comes not from individuals like Zündel, “but from a government that casually discards their most precious rights.”

In another editorial (“The Zündel Case,” Oct. 23, 2004) the influential paper called Canada’s treatment of Zündel an “abuse of the secret-trial legislation.”

Bill Dunphy, a veteran investigative journalist and editor for the daily Hamilton Spectator, also protested the injustice. He spent six years probing Canada’s “white supremacist” movement, and got to know Zündel well. Although he has no sympathy for Zündel's views, in a hard-hitting column (Hamilton Spectator, May 14, 2003) he told readers:

“Our government has seized and branded Ernst Zündel, stripped him of his human rights, tried him in secret and found him wanting, and will now hand him over to a foreign government anxious to throw him in jail 

“ ... Zündel - who did this country a favor by wiping off the books our disgraceful False News laws - has never once been convicted of a criminal offense in this country, never once found to have violated the hate crime laws that rest snugly around the throat of free expression in this country.

“Calculating correctly that there was no political cost, no ‘down side’ to slipping on the jackboots to kick a reviled old man out of our country, our government cobbled together their best insults and innuendo, and Lord knows what secret ‘evidence,’ and branded Ernst Zündel a threat to national security.

“I know this man, his local and international contacts and I know this movement. And after reading the 58-page ‘unclassified’ summary of the government’s case, I can assure you there is no justice here. Their ‘evidence’ is riddled with errors and misinformation, hearsay and inflammatory innuendo. Dead men walk again, and the shattered bits of shoddy secret networks long since collapsed under the weight of their own ineptitude are made whole and menacing once again. It is a shameful piece of dishonest, unreliable tripe.”

Zündel was held in Canada not because his views are unpopular, or because he was a “security risk.” He was in prison because Jewish groups wanted him there, and because he promoted views that the Jewish-Zionist lobby considers harmful to its interests.

This lobby was the decisive, critical factor in the decades-old campaign to silence him. The only sustained and institutionalized effort in Canada to imprison Zündel came from this lobby, which includes the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Canadian Holocaust Remembrance Association, and the League for Human Rights of B’nai B’rith (Canada's counterpart to the U.S.-based “Anti-Defamation League”).

On March 1, 2005, Zündel was deported to Germany, just as Jewish groups had been demanding. Upon his arrival at Frankfurt airport, he was immediately arrested and taken to Mannheim prison to await trial for the “thought crime” of “denying the Holocaust.”

A few months later the public prosecutor in Mannheim formally charged Zündel with inciting “hatred” by having written or distributed texts that “approve, deny or play down” genocidal actions carried out by Germany’s wartime regime, and which “denigrate the memory of the [Jewish] dead.” .... The 14 specific violations cited by the court included postings on the U.S.-based “Zündelsite” website. The court thus upheld efforts by German authorities to punish individuals for writings that are legal in the country where they are published. Jewish groups quickly, and predictably, expressed approval of the verdict.

Zündel was released from prison on March 1, 2010 -- five years after his deportation to Germany, and three years after his conviction by a court in Mannheim. Banned from returning to either Canada or the U.S., he went to his family home in Germany’s Black Forest region, where he resided until his death. Unable to leave the U.S. and be with him, his wife Ingrid Rimland died two months later.

The persecution continues. Top: Ursula Haverbeck jailed in Germany at the age of 89. Bottom: Canadian Monika Schaefer held in a German prison six months without trial. She and her brother Alfred are now engaged in a trial so bizarre she had to be escorted from the court room in handcuffs because Alfred defied the judge and took a sip of water.

Click on this text to watch: Students, the Holocaust and Free Speech with Ernst Zundel part 1 of 3...

Click on this text to watch Part 2 of 3...

Click on this text to watch Part 3 of 3...



Click on this text to watch The Holocaust Debunked - Ernst Zundel ...

Click on this text to watch: German Holocaust Part 1...

German Holocaust Part 2

German Holocaust Part 3

German Holocaust Part 4

German Holocaust Part 5

In Memoriam Ernst Zundel: Christof Friedrich Zundel

I was surprised when I saw the Mike Walsh article that Ernst Zündel had died. Ernst had been the leader in so many battles for so long and was such a dedicated and determined person that I expected him to go on forever and ever. 

A Hero of Revisionism The Struggle of Ernst Zundel (Part 2)
In this two-part video, Vincent Reynouard pays tribute to Ernst Zündel, who died on 5 August. After briefly summarizing his life, he recounts his revisionist career begun in 1978 with a public protest against the spread of the "Holocaust" series.

A Hero of Revisionism The Struggle of Ernst Zundel (Part 1)
In this two-part video, Vincent Reynouard pays tribute to Ernst Zündel, who died on 5 August. After briefly summarizing his life, he recounts his revisionist career begun in 1978 with a public protest against the spread of the "Holocaust" series.

Two Jailbirds
Two jailbirds of the same feather once flocked together in a not-so-golden cage, called the Mannheim prison. Here is my story of how I got to know Ernst intimately...

Memorabilia: Auschwitz: Did 4 million really die? Ernst Zundel and David Cole
Ernest Zundel tells the story of  how he  gets to meet David Cole and how they agreed to meet and explore together the Auschwitz museum.

Ernst Zundel Passes Away Media Ignores His Arguments: Ryan Dawson
Ernst Zündel passed away ... Ryan Dawson does  his own eulogy on video

Ernst Zündel died of heart failure on August 5 at his ancestral home in the Black Forest region of southwestern Germany. He was 78. Here is Michael A. Hoffman's eulogy.



Click on this text to visit the ZUNDELSITE...



Click on this text to watch Ernst Zündel: Unbowed...

Ernst Zündel: Unbowed (35:16)... A personal Telling Films tribute by Lady Michèle Renouf to German-Canadian artist, publisher and dedicated campaigner for historical truth Ernst Zündel, born 23rd April 1939, died 5th August 2017 at his ancestral home in southern Germany. Uniquely interviewed as he was released from Mannheim Prison in 2010 and during his journey back to his childhood home in the Black Forest, and updated in this unexpurgated version after Ernst Zündel's death, this film documents his decades of legal struggle for source-critical justice in Canada and Germany, literally illustrated by Ernst's own art works created during his years of imprisonment, and includes an interview with his lawyer Dr. Herbert Schaller.


 Ernst Zündel

...and the wicked silence.

He gave his life so everyone could be free.




By John Kaminski

I can’t think of another person who has had a larger impact on the way people think than Ernst Zündel. By standing up to the powers that be, and with a lot of help from his friends, he got the Supreme Court of Canada to eventually and begrudgingly validate the truth of what he was saying.


He got Holocaust Revisionism verified as a real subject with real questions about the historical record, and about the lies that continue to be told that utterly distort the truth of the world.


Of course, the truth never matters when it opposes the designs of the ever present Deep State, that notorious Jewish succubus which sucks the life out of all states and all people.


So far from being able to celebrate his landmark legal victory with his friends, instead Zündel suffered years of imprisonment (at least seven, that we know of) and a permanent ban on public speaking that lasted right up until a few days ago when a heart attack took him away forever.


And all this because they found him innocent!


The charges were all spurious, never clearly defined. He was initially charged with a hate crime for publishing a book by Richard Harwood (a pseudonym) titled “Did Six Million Really Die?” Two trials drew Revisionist experts from all over the world, and they demolished all the fictional Jewish claims. Somewhere along the line somebody blew up Zündel’s house.


(Since that time, officials at the Auschwitz site have lowered their supposed death toll from 4 million to 1.4 million, but using Jewish mathematics, commentators on the Jewish TV networks continue to use the 6 million figure.)


So after being illegally kidnapped in Tennessee, abused for two years in Canada (they never turned out the lights in his cell and made him write with a pencil stub), they shipped him to Germany for five more years in a prison system in which the truth is no defense because it has been declared irrelevant by law. Since World War II German courts have been totally polluted by perverted Jewish logic; so unjust are they today that Zündel’s lawyer Sylvia Stolz got five years for trying to defend him.


The wicked silence.


This is the great silence, the wicked silence, where the great powers declare what can be known and what cannot.


We are not allowed to know who our government murders surreptitiously, and we may not challenge the macabre Jewish death fantasies about World War II. Some 271,000 souls was the final camp death toll compiled by the Associated Press in 1946; some $28 billion in Holocaust reparations has been collected by Jewish judges as payment for suffering by survivors of the celebrated 6 million, which is a story the Jews have used to solicit sympathy for themselves since the late 1800s.


Even the grandchildren of Holocaust relatives can collect payments for the trauma they have experienced listening to their parents bewail the suffering they have endured (which when you think about it is the perfect Jewish occupation, making a lucrative career out of complaining about misery you have caused yourself and blamed on others).


Because the Jews essentially control the media worldwide (the Rothschilds even bought the Associated Press a few years back), opposition to Jewish lies is seldom reported. The most important issues of our lifetime — 9/11 and the World Wars — were all precipitated by high powered Jewish finagling, yet virtually no reporting on this can be found in any of the mainstream newspaper archives.


What happened to Zündel and hundreds of his philosophical compatriots trying to rescue the unfairly besmirched reputation of Germany is now happening in America in Oregon and Las Vegas as people who believed they could depend on their Constitution, after more than a year in abusive solitary confinement and only doublespeak from the court, now believe otherwise.


One innocent bystander has already cleverly plea bargained his way to a life sentence, and all the others involved in the Bundy standoff of 2014 or the Oregon standoff in 2016 have undergone something truly appropriate for our new American Gulag, criminal abuse by private prison guards and preposterous restrictions by a power mad judge. Observers of this kangaroo court insist the government’s objective is to never let these people out of jail at all.


The legal situation in America now more resembles the Jewish/Soviet totalitarian model of government than a Constitutional republic, where no appeal against the lawless decisions of a criminal government is possible.


Just as Zundel and his lawyer could not argue against his sentence without breaking more German laws, the corrupt judge in the Bundy trial permits no analysis of the government’s behavior at all.


The complete takeover of Western ranchlands by the Bureau of Land Management may not be mentioned. Remember, the BLM goons were stealing and killing Cliven Bundy’s cattle over a controversial decision by the government to nationalize rangeland on which the Bundy family cattle had grazed since the 1800s.


This question has not been resolved in the courts, but for merely pointing out that BLM’s arbitrary seizures of Western lands, the Bundys and many of their faithful supporters face life in prison from a court system definitely disinterested in the welfare of ordinary people who get in the way of government corruption.


American courts are becoming more like Germany every day. And everywhere in the world free speech is disappearing if you don’t adhere to the principles of the Jewish bankers who now inarguably control every person’s destiny.


Media mindlock.


What stands out to me in both the cases of Zündel and the Bundys and their friends is the apathetic response of the public to anyone who is at least making the attempt to stand up for the rights of all of us.


If they don’t see it on TV or read it in the newspapers it’s not really real to them. But worse than that, if they do see it on TV, or read it in the newspaper, they regard it as real. And this has given rise to practically every falsehood we believe in this life.


As the best known publicist for the truth of World War II, Zündel spent the last decade of his life unable to publicly address the issues most important to him. In his absence, however, the Revisionist message has sprung up like mushrooms all across the Internet and most especially on the Jewish-controlled Facebook.


The government that controls us now demands our complete silence about the crimes it has committed and the lies it has told.


Ultimately Ernst Zündel gave his life for our freedom. He refused to be cowed by Jewish lies, and returned the abuse he got from his captors with a stoic dignity that inspired his many followers. He paid a very high price for telling the truth.


No doubt authorities are pleased by the treatment Zündel received, and hope others will be dissuaded from emulating his behavior. Unfortunately for them, the opposite has happened. Inspired by Zündel’s example, the corps of truth tellers has expanded greatly and largely perfected its analysis of World War II, which proves there were no gas chambers, that Hitler only wanted peace, and that Roosevelt strong-armed all the countries in Europe in wiping out Germany once and forever, a goal which today appears to have been achieved.


In fact the real heart of darkness in World War II belonged to the Allies, in the torture of Dresden, the phony trials at Nuremberg and the premeditated starvation of Germans after the war. This is how the Jews rewarded the Germans for their hospitality. We Americans are feeling it now.


We all failed Ernst Zündel by not protesting with sufficient loudness his unjust treatment by corrupt authorities who are enriched by putting Jewish interests above the rest of humanity’s. This includes the entire U.S. Congress.


And we are failing now as men who stood up for the Constitution remain incarcerated under duress by corrupt politicians, held without bail for only protesting federal encroachment on private lands when no-bail is by law reserved only for murderers and traitors.


For the government to call these ranchers terrorists is truly the pot calling the kettle black.


All of us who believed what Ernst Zündel said and did is the real way honest human beings should act. Today this personality type is being systematically exterminated on all levels by a vicious campaign to replace us with a population totally unable to think critically and willing to go along with the crime if the salary is adequate.


However we slice it, as long as we fail to object to the abuse of others who are assaulted for trying to help the common good, we consign ourselves to a future governed by the wicked silence of people who are afraid to speak the truth, who have been intimidated for fear of earning the wrath of the people who rule them.

File photo of Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel leaving a news conference on the steps of Parliament Hil

Click on this text to watch Ernst Zündel - in memoriam (March 1st, 1939 - August 5th, 2017) ...


Revisionism Online Websites!


The Institute for Historical Review


Ahmed Rami / Radio Islam


The Occidental Quarterly


The Occidental Observer


Committee to Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH)


The Barnes Review


Lady Michele Renouf's website


Inconvenient History


Air Photo Evidence


The Holocaust Historiography Project


Paul Eisen's Blog / Anti-Zionist Revisionism


Carlos W. Porter


David Duke


David Irving / Focal Point Publications


Libertad Pedro Varela


National Journal: For the sake of knowledge and truth


What Really Happened


The Rense Page


Anthony Lawson

Is There Life After Persecution?

The Botched Execution of Fred Leuchter

Presented at the Eleventh IHR Conference, October 1992.

by Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.



Many of you, I am sure, know who I am, where I've been, and what I've done. Today I'm here to tell you what has happened to me since I addressed the Tenth International Revisionist Conference in Washington, DC, in October 1990.


One of my jobs as an engineer of execution technology has been to "post mortem" executions from a technical standpoint, that is, to determine if anything went wrong and, if so, to determine just how the execution was botched. This normally entails reviewing eyewitness accounts of how the executees were tortured, mutilated, or otherwise dehumanized in society's name.


I will do that here today, except that, in this case, it is myself that I post mortem -- and the cadaver isn't dead! Much to the dismay of my executioners, the execution was so badly botched that I am able to stand here before you to speak the truth, and to tell the world that it is not myself, but the Holocaust story that is dead. I repeat for the record: I was condemned for maintaining that there were no execution gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Majdanek, Dachau, Mauthausen, or Hartheim Castle. There's no proof for the charge, only innuendo, lies, and half-truths. Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zündel and others said this first. They, too, live as victims of botched executions, but nevertheless free to speak the truth in a strong and growing voice that repeats: No gas chambers, no gas chambers, no damn gas chambers!


This address, then, is not a post mortem on my cadaver but rather a post mortem by my cadaver.


As you know, I was sent to Poland in 1988 by and for Mr. Ernst Zündel to investigate the alleged execution gas chamber facilities at the three concentration camps of Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek. I was chosen for this task from a field of experts numbering one, and recommended by those states in the USA where lethal gas chambers are used to execute convicted criminals. My forensic analysis and subsequent report prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that there were no gas execution facilities operated by the Nazis at these sites. I also entered these findings (which are also detailed in my published report) into the court record in sworn testimony in Toronto as a court-qualified expert.


Because I was somewhat naive at the time, I was not aware that by so testifying I was offending the organized world Jewish community. By providing final, definitive proof that there were no execution gas chamber utilized for genocidal purposes by the Germans at these wartime camps, I established the simple fact that the Holocaust story is not true. What I did not know was that anyone expressing such beliefs is guilty of a capital crime: that of thinking and telling the unspeakable truth about the greatest lie of the age.


I would have to pay for this crime. While I innocently told the truth in Toronto, plans were made, and subsequently implemented, for a major effort to destroy me. If I could be destroyed and discredited -- so the reasoning went -- no one would accept my professional findings, no matter how truthful.




Since April 1988, when I testified in the second Zündel trial in Toronto about my inspection of the alleged gas chambers in Poland, my life has been turned upside down.


I have been vilified both privately and publicly in all forms of the media. My clients have been cajoled and threatened into not dealing with me. High-level law enforcement officials, acting for personal reasons, have lied about me and have prevented clients from dealing with me. My person and reputation have been defiled by lies and innuendo. My family and I have been repeatedly threatened.


Behind this campaign to punish me and suppress the truth about the gas chambers, have been several Jewish organizations, which have publicly vowed to silence me by destroying my ability to make a living.



At the forefront of this effort has been Beate Klarsfeld of the Paris-based Klarsfeld Foundation. In the United States, the campaign has been orchestrated through the US-based "Holocaust Survivors and Friends in Pursuit of Justice." Associated with these two organizations have been the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith and the Jewish Defense League.


Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.


At Klarsfeld's initiative, these groups first carried out an extensive one year investigation. After they were unable to turn up any impropriety or wrongdoing on my part, they began to threaten prison wardens with political consequences if they dealt with me. This first came to light when the ABC television news program, "Prime Time," decided to do a network television piece on myself and my work. This involved filming at various prisons. Prison wardens advised the "Prime Time" personnel of the threats and problems that resulted from my presence at the prisons for the filming. ABC news was told not to air the program. It refused to succumb to the pressure, and consequently suffered vilification by the organizations involved.


To sum up here, this campaign has consisted of the following:


  1. Threats against prison officials who dealt with me.
  2. False and slanderous vilification through private channels, as well as publicly in newspapers and magazines.
  3. Legislation to prevent me from working at my profession.
  4. Criminal prosecution for working at my profession.
  5. Lies by public officials spread both officially and privately.
  6. Restriction of my personal freedom and right to travel by effecting my illegal arrest and imprisonment in England, from where I was finally deported.
  7. Interference with my right as an American citizen to help and protection from the US State Department, which refused to assist me during my illegal imprisonment in England.

As a result of this campaign, my livelihood has been destroyed, and my career has been ruined. All this for telling the truth under oath.


The organizations cited above also interfered with the execution in Illinois of a certain Mr. Walker by threatening to pass legislation to prevent that state from allowing me to complete an ongoing contract. As a result, Director McGinnis ultimately yielded to this pressure and proceeded with the execution using equipment known to be defective. Under pressure from these groups, and through the efforts of Alabama Deputy Attorney General, Ed Carnes, the State of Alabama did not purchase a new electric chair. Carnes wrote a lying memorandum to all Departments of Corrections around the United States claiming that I was dangerous and held unorthodox views on execution. He caused the State to breach its contract. According to his office, this means I support only humane and painless executions. Carnes actually lied to me to get me to testify that a prior execution was humane.


As a direct result of interference by these groups, at least one man was tortured to death in Virginia. Purchasing agents and wardens have been mendaciously told that my equipment failed during an execution, which is not true. It has never failed. Delaware Deputy Attorney General Silverman breached my contract, which was already underway, because I wrote the Zündel trial Leuchter Report. This contract was for maintenance on their lethal injection machine and gallows, previously fabricated by me, and for training of their execution personnel. Delaware has refused to pay me for the work I completed, and has instructed me to keep the control module of their lethal injection machine. However, the protocol I wrote for execution by hanging was submitted by them and approved by the court system. In Massachusetts, legislation specifically designed to put me out of business has been filed for four years running.


Finally, and also at the insistence of these same Jewish groups, a spurious criminal complaint was filed against me in the Massachusetts court system with the intent of destroying my reputation by putting me in prison for three months.


I was charged with practicing as an engineer without a license. In point of fact, a license is not required in Massachusetts, or any other state, unless the engineer is involved in construction of buildings, and is certifying compliance with specifications. There is also a statutory exemption for engineers who do not deal with the general public.


As confirmation of the spurious nature of this charge, it should be pointed out there are more than fifty thousand practicing engineers in Massachusetts, of whom only five thousand are licensed. Although the state's licensing law has been in effect since 1940, there has been no record of any prosecution for this offense.


The charge was improperly brought. Nevertheless, if it had been successful, and I had been convicted, I would have been imprisoned for three months.


The Massachusetts state Engineering Board, under pressure from Klarsfeld and her "Holocaust Survivors and Friends in Pursuit of Justice," filed this criminal complaint in Middlesex County. The name of the complainant was denied me, and was not made available until the matter was brought before the court. Before the complaint was issued, and several times thereafter, I was given the chance to recant in return for non-issuance or dismissal of the complaint. I also would have been obliged to give up my profession, in order to discredit my Report. I refused, and responded to the Board's threat with a denial that any law had been violated. The original clerk magistrate who issued the complaint apologized for bowing to Jewish pressure in prosecuting me under a statute that was being mis-applied. A representative of the ADL tried to force her testimony on the hearing, but was denied access because she had no evidence to offer that was pertinent to the matter. The District Court judge, in an excellent imitation of Pontius Pilate, summarily dismissed our motions for dismissal, allowed my court-appointed attorney to withdraw, and instructed Kirk Lyons, Director of the Cause Foundation and my out-of-state attorney, to re-file our motions for dismissal, because they all had merit. After it became clear that there would be no justice for us in the Malden District Court, we moved the case to Superior Court for a jury trial.


With this charge hanging over my head, it was impossible for me to consult, supply equipment, or even act as an expert witness in American courts, as I had often done.


The district attorney's office, under heavy pressure from various Jewish organizations, selected its best prosecuting attorney to handle my case. In the belief that he would be the person most likely to bring about a conviction, he was pulled from a murder trial. In June, just prior to the trial, our motions for dismissal were heard. The judge, also under heavy pressure from Jewish groups, told the district attorney that this case was not properly a criminal matter, and strongly suggested that the case be resolved short of a trial. With the ever-present possibility of conviction and jail (faced by most political prisoners) we negotiated a settlement.


A very special consent agreement was signed [on June 11, 1991] that made legal history in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The agreement was not a promise by the defendant to the court, as is normally the case, but an agreement between the State Engineering Board and myself. The board which, on two previous occasions, had refused to accept my application for registration because they do not register people who practice my discipline, was required to become a party to the agreement. [For more on this agreement, see the IHR Newsletter, July-August 1991, p. 3.]


The consent agreement requires the board to accept my application and process it with "due diligence." Until the application is approved, or until two years are up, I have agreed not to use the title "engineer" or issue an engineering opinion in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This is, in effect, a temporary gag order imposed to satisfy the interested Jewish groups.


By removing the case from consideration by criminal courts, the possibility of my imprisonment has been eliminated. If the Engineering Board fails to process and issue a license to me within a reasonable period, and in due course, the matter should then move to the civil courts. Attorney Lyons is presently preparing the necessary application. However, a new problem has arisen. All applications must be accompanied by the recommendations of three state-licensed engineers, but none is willing to risk the wrath of the Jews in my behalf.


The de facto gag order, imposed by the settlement, applies only within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and I am free to pursue my profession anywhere else.


Most of the execution equipment in the United States is either worn out, obsolete, or improperly fabricated, and is in need of repair or replacement. I am the only person who does this work, and states are being denied the right to deal with me. Although wardens and commissioners are afraid to even speak with me, they often do so anyway through intermediaries. One state has a leaking gas chamber, but will use it, endangering the lives of guards and witnesses, rather than risk discovery in dealing with me. How many more inmates will be tortured, or lives lost, through the callous interference of these Jewish groups?


Owing to the successful conspiracy of these Jewish groups, I am completely out of business, unable to find work to feed my family. In spite of everything, though, I am still here, and I am still telling the truth. Furthermore, I intend to continue to tell the truth. If the organized Jewish community wants to stop me, it will have to try much harder.


Moreover, attempts to discredit the Leuchter Report have failed, most notably with Pressac's inept analysis. Since the release of the Leuchter Report [in 1988], independent evidence has shown that the six million death figure has been grossly exaggerated, and an investigation by the Polish state forensic institute [among others] has corroborated that no gas was utilized in the alleged execution chambers at Auschwitz.




In the spring of 1991, David Irving asked me if I would consider a speaking engagement in England later that year. I said that I would, and I was advised in mid-summer that this would take place during the second week of November.


Irving apparently announced the speech sometime later. This apparently enraged Jewish groups in London which protested to UK Home Secretary Mr. Kenneth Baker in an effort to prevent me from traveling to London. This is a clear infringement of the rights of British people to hear me speak. This certainly also curtails my right to travel to England as any other American citizen.


As a result of pressure by these Jewish groups, Mr. Baker apparently promised to take action. The Jewish Chronicle, a London weekly paper, reported in its issue of October 4, 1991, that Home Secretary Baker had banned my travel to the United Kingdom. This was the only mention of the ban in the British media, and was not a particularly reliable source.


A week or so later, my father, Fred A. Leuchter, Sr., received a letter, ostensibly from the Immigration and Naturalization Department of Her Majesty's government, informing him that, by direction of the Home Secretary, he was not permitted to travel to the United Kingdom. My father communicated this letter to me.


Because my father had no such travel plans, my first assumption was that this letter was meant for me. However, a closer reading of it suggested that it might be a fraud. The signatory, Mr. "G.P.J. Catt," had no title, and part of the date was written by hand. Certainly, the Home Secretary and Her Majesty's Immigration Office would not be so sloppy and unbusinesslike as to send off an amateurishly prepared letter to the wrong person. My address is publicly known, and is easy to ascertain.


I turned the questionable document over to my attorney, Kirk Lyons, to authenticate. He, in turn, formally protested the letter to the UK Consulates in both Houston and Boston. In each case, the Consulate advised him that his protest was unfounded because there was no ban on travel to the UK by me (or my father, for that matter). He was informed that the letter must be fraudulent, and that it did not prohibit my travel to Britain in any way. Lyons was also informed that all Home Office documents must contain a reference number, which this did not. Based on all this, I confirmed my travel plans to London.


Because I also had also arranged to visit Germany, I combined that trip with my visit to London. Accordingly, my wife Carol and I left for Germany on November 2, 1991. We planned to drive to Calais and take the ferry to Dover from there on or about November 11, 1991. We also planned to return to Germany on or about November 15, immediately following my scheduled speech in London. Because our visit in Germany would be very hectic, we intended to arrive in England several days prior to my speech, giving us a few days to relax and see some of that country.


As planned, we arrived in Dover on the ferry from Calais late on November 11, and spent the night in Dover. The next morning we drove to London, where we met with Irving. We then left to see the country, leisurely driving south to Salisbury to see Stonehenge. We returned to London by way of Wimbledon on November 15.


On Friday evening, November 15, we arrived at the Town Hall in Chelsea where I was to give my speech. After Irving opened the program, Dr. Robert Faurisson spoke. I was then called to the podium, and began my presentation. At approximately 9:15 p.m., some five minutes into my speech, I was interrupted by Irving, who told me that a "gentleman" wished to speak to me in the anteroom to the stage. I did not know it then, but I would remain in illegal police custody, without interruption, until I was expelled from England, and would not see my host, Dr. Faurisson, or the audience again.


In the anteroom I was greeted by Chief Inspector Philip Selwood and three metro police officers. I was asked to identify myself, which I did by presenting my passport (which Selwood kept) and my driver's license (which he returned). I was told that two male technicians with the Thames television news team had quietly spoken with him outside, and had insisted (as citizens) that I be arrested as an illegal alien because I had sneaked into the country contrary to a ban by the Home Secretary. I responded by pointing out that my passport was properly stamped, and that, as the two British Consulates in the United States had indicated, there was no such ban.


I further informed Selwood that if it was indeed determined that was in the country illegally, I would leave immediately. I told him that I had no wish to stay where I was not wanted, and that did not want to violate the law. Selwood told me that Thames television was trying to make news instead of reporting it, and that my cooperation would be very much appreciated. He asked me to accompany him to the Chelsea police station, without talking to the media, whilst he made an investigation. If I refused, I would be arrested on suspicion of illegal entry. I agreed. After he spirited me out of the building and into an unmarked van, away we went. Selwood was also afraid of violent Jews, who might attempt to break up the speech, and that was the reason for the presence of himself and his large contingent of men. I asked him to bring my wife, who was at the back of the hall. He stopped the van, ordered his men to take me to the station, and personally returned to collect my wife. I arrived at the station, and he soon followed with Carol. We were placed in a visitors' room.


Selwood advised me that I was not under arrest, and that if the Home Office determined that I was in the country illegally I would be permitted to leave. I was told that I was free to call the American consul, if I wished. I did not.


At this point I asked to leave. I was informed that I would have to wait for my status to be determined, because it would be necessary to escort me out of the country if I was there illegally. Selwood further told me that persons who were in the country illegally must be permitted to leave, if they so wished, providing they had the means. (In fact, we had ferry tickets.) Chief Inspector Selwood and the other police personnel were cordial and accommodating, providing us with a toilet and refreshment. We advised the police that Carol was diabetic. After first introducing us to his second-incommand, and leaving instructions as to our treatment, Selwood left before midnight.


At approximately 12:05 a.m., early Saturday morning, November 16, the Deputy Chief Inspector received a call, apparently from the Home Office. We could not hear very much, but we did hear him say that we should leave by way of Dover. A few minutes later, shortly before 12:15 a.m., he again received a call, to which he replied "Yes sir." He then came to speak to me. "I'm sorry," he said. "I have been ordered to arrest you." He informed me of my rights, and told me that I could talk with the US Consul, or the Duty Solicitor (Public Defender), or both. When I asked if it had been determined that I was in the country illegally, he said that he did not know for sure. I then asked to leave, and he told me that this was not possible. At this point I asked to speak with the US Consul, and was told that this would be arranged. I was then searched, booked, and locked in a detention room with someone else, also under arrest.


About an hour later I was removed from the detention room, and told that the American Consulate was on the telephone. I spoke with Under Consul Christopher Randall who informed me that the Consular Corps was not there to help US citizens. He totally refused to help. I asked to talk with the Duty Solicitor, and was told he would be called. I was taken to a cell (instead of a detention room) for lock-up. When I asked why I was being moved to a cell, I was told that the other occupant of the detention room was there for assault, and that I was being moved for my own protection.


I now found myself in an isolation cell with one other occupant who turned out to be there for theft. Because I make execution equipment (and criminals know this), I should never have been put in a cell with others. To do so might put my life in danger.


Moreover, the cell was freezing, and I had no coat. The other inmate had a blanket and mattress. In an effort to keep warm, I wrapped my arms around myself, but this didn't work. I was unable to sleep.


Some time later I was let out to accept a phone call from the Duty solicitor, who told me he was unable to help because I had not committed a crime. He told me that I should call my Consul, who ought to be able to help. When I told him that my consul had refused to help, he urged me to call back and insist, because he was obliged by law to help. I was returned to my cell.


At approximately 3:00 a.m., I was removed from my cell for interrogation by two Immigration Department personnel. I was taken to an interrogation room with recording equipment, and advised that my statement would be taped. I was also advised that I did not have to make a statement if I chose not to. I agreed to speak with them, but they first had to give me time to warm up so that my teeth would stop chattering and I would be able to speak normally. I gave them the same information that I had given hours earlier to Chief Inspector Selwood. I affirmed that I was a legal entrant, and once again requested permission to leave. I was refused. I was told that I should call the American Consul and/or the Duty Solicitor. I was also informed that charges might be brought. At this point I was served with Immigration form IS 151-A. I was also told that I would not be allowed to leave by way of Dover, but would instead be sent out though Heathrow airport (where they were from), and that my wife and our rental car would have to stay behind.


I asked about my wife, concerned that she had not eaten in over twelve hours, which could be a problem because of her diabetes. I was told that they would make a decision later about my legal status, and that in the meantime I would have to remain in the cold cell. I asked to be allowed to warm up, and to see my wife. They agreed to this. Carol had also asked to see me.


I met with Carol. After talking with her, I once again asked to talk with my Consul. The Consulate official again gave me a hard time, but after I told him of my discussion with the Duty Solicitor he said he would at least inquire into the matter. The guard rushed me to complete my phone conversation. Carol subsequently found out that the Under Consul had inquired late that morning. Carol had been removed while I was on the telephone, and I was rushed back to my cell. I froze again, but at about 4:30 a.m. I was given a blanket.


The day shift personnel who arrived at about seven o'clock proved more difficult to deal with. At 7:00 a.m., the other inmates were awakened to be taken to court. They were given coffee; I was not. My cellmate asked the guard to give me some coffee, which he did. By 7:45 a.m., all the inmates were gone, and new inmates began to arrive.


I repeatedly asked about my wife to make sure that she was well. I inquired at 7:00, 8:00, 9:00, 10:00, 11:00, 12:00, and 1:00 o'clock, but no one would tell me how she was. Later I found out that just one officer had checked on her. She likewise had been asking about me, and was told nothing. At noon I was given a breakfast that consisted of cold eggs, sausage, and toast left over from hours earlier. It was inedible. It certainly would have made my ulcer worse. Carol had been given nothing to eat, even though she had been required to stay there by the Immigration officers who knew of her medical problem.


At about 1:20 p.m., I was again taken from my cell, this time to see Mr. Phillips of the Immigration Department. He met with Carol and me together. Phillips told us that it had been determined that I was in the country illegally, because I had entered in violation of the ban by the Home Secretary. I was told that I would be held until I was deported.


He acknowledged that he could not understand why I had been arrested and imprisoned after I had asked on three occasions to leave. Once again I asked to leave, but Mr. Phillips told me that this was now not possible because I had been formally arrested. This should not have happened, he said, but, because it did, I would now have to be deported. Carol asked how it was possible for me to be in the country illegally if I had entered legally at Dover and had a valid passport stamp. Phillips replied that I was not actually in the country illegally, but that an official determination had been made that I was, and that was the law. I asked why those immigration officials who had interviewed me had made this determination, and Phillips responded that they had not. He further said that the "decision has been made very high up in the Home Office," higher than he would ever reach in his career. He added that I could legally be held for up to five days after my arrest, even though I wanted (and should have been allowed) to leave earlier.


Phillips also told us that the Immigration Department had contacted French immigration about my possible deportation to France, but that I had been refused entry there. I responded by commenting that this is not surprising, because no country would want a deportee unless it is one of its own citizens. Phillips agreed.


He said that his next step would be to ask Belgium, and, if I was refused there, Germany. He did not expect Belgium to accept, but if Germany did, I would be sent on the Hamburg Ferry that ran only twice a week, the next time being on Tuesday [three days hence]. If I were to go this way, I would have to remain incarcerated until that time.


However, I was asked, in view of my desire to leave, would I consider going to the United States? Phillips informed me that if I officially told him that I wished to return to the United States, he could not stop me, and would put me on a flight that very evening. I then formally asked to be returned to the United States, and Phillips said that he would begin making the necessary arrangements. We would have to leave the rental car in England and make some arrangement for its return to Germany (other than by our driving it). Furthermore, we would have to forego our remaining commitments in Germany because time would not permit our return.


After taking our airline tickets, he contacted Lufthansa to reschedule our flight. The only available fight that day was at 3:30 p.m., which was too soon for us to get to the airport. He returned our tickets, and promised to make arrangements at the UK government's expense. He booked us on a British Airways flight to New York (not Boston) that departed at 6:30 p.m. We were escorted in two cars. Phillips' car went first, and we followed in another police car, under guard. We stopped for our luggage at our car which was parked behind Selfridge's [in London], at a parking meter, and proceeded to the airport in rush-hour traffic. If we did not make it on time, they would have to return me to my cell.


After a stop at the Immigration office to pick up the necessary forms, we arrived at the airport, passed through security, and reached the gate just as the plane was being loaded. The police officer had left us at the entrance to the terminal. After returning my passport (which noted my detention on form IS 151 A), Mr. Phillips watched us enplane. The people at the ticket counter had been told that I was being deported, as were the gate attendants.


We took our seats, flew to New York, and arrived at about 9:45 p.m. We had to purchase air tickets to Boston at our own expense. After barely making this flight, we arrived in Boston at approximately 11:45 p.m., exhausted and hungry.


In summary, I was detained and held in custody for some twenty one and three-quarters hours, fourteen of them in an unheated cell. I was given a breakfast at noon, and was given one cup of coffee only at my cellmate's insistence. I was given no water, and there was none in the cell. My ulcer did not fare well under these circumstances, particularly because of my anxious concern for Carol.


For her part, Carol fared even less well that I did. After my arrest, she was given no food or water, even though she was not free to leave, and the police knew that she was a diabetic. After my arrest, she was allowed to see me only once. By the time we left, we were both cold and ill. The conduct of both Chief Inspector Selwood and Mr. Phillips, as well as that of the police personnel on the evening shift, was exemplary. By contrast, the conduct of the day shift personnel was poor and careless.


During the time that I was being held, Dr. Robert Faurisson went to the US Embassy in London to see if he could obtain help for me. He was informed that neither I, nor any other American, had been arrested that evening. That the US Embassy would lie about the illegal arrest and imprisonment of an American citizen is inexcusable. Faurisson also went to the police station where I was being held. He was told there I had been arrested and was being held in a cell in the station, but that I was not permitted any visitors. The police later told Faurisson that I had been deported on Saturday at 6:30 p.m.


As shown by the statements of the two British consular officials in the United States, and the fact that my name was not on any list and was legally permitted to enter at Dover, it is clear that no order barring me from entering the UK was ever officially given.


It is likewise clear that the difficulty started only when the Thames television people lied about me to Chief Inspector Selwood, apparently in order to make a "better" news story.


It is also clear that the Home Secretary (or someone acting for him) illegally ordered my arrest, imprisonment and deportation, knowing full well that I had entered the country legally and should have been left alone or, if later determined to be there illegally, at least permitted to leave. This plain violation of international law by the Home Secretary's Office was undoubtedly done to please the complaining Jewish groups which bear the ultimate responsibility.


By failing to uphold one of the prime responsibilities of the Consular Corps -- that is, to protect the rights of Americans abroad -- the United States Embassy in London, and Under Consul Christopher Randall in particular, clearly failed in their responsibility to me as an American citizen, as well as their responsibility to the nation as a whole. It is a shameful disgrace that the British duty solicitor and UK Immigration Officer Phillips cared more for my rights than my own embassy.


A formal protest to State Department, and requests for help from our Senators and Representatives, have resulted in nothing but lip service.




Unfortunately, my clients -- the state governments -- are still intimidated by my Jewish persecutors. This continues to deprive me of my income, and it is not at all clear whether this will ever end.


I have been unable to apply for my state engineering license because no engineers have been willing to sign papers recommending me (which is a requirement), out of fear of retaliation. Without some official change in my status, such as a license, even the friendly state governments are afraid to deal with me. The major lawsuit we had planned against my persecutors is stalled, perhaps permanently, because of a lack of funds.


And, although my findings will ultimately be accepted by all, I still have no contracts, have been unable to find work and have no income. It does not seem that this will improve in the near future.


From The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1992 (Vol. 12, No. 4), pages 429-444.

8.5K views4 years ago
A rare interview with Fred Leuchter on the so called homocidal gas chambers in Auschwitz. You can download the Leuchter ...
1.9K views10 months ago
Fred Leuchter, former consulting engineer on capital punishment in the USA, compares American with so-called Nazi gas ...
136K views11 years ago
Leuchter went to Auschwitz and proved that no homicidal gas chambers existed.
1.4K views1 year ago
Fred Leuchter appears on Prime Time television and the Jerry Williams show with Bradley Smith. He is interviewed about his ...
4.3K views6 years ago
This is a short version of my film on my other channel which you can see here: ...
52 views11 months ago
Fred Leuchter exposes the fake gas chambers of Auschwitz.
4K views3 years ago
Before anyone jumps down my throat, I am aware of the Leuchter report. Fred Leuchter tested the alleged gas chambers using ...
1.1K views2 years ago
Fred A. Leuchter, Jr., has been widely acknowledged as America's leading specialist on the design and fabrication of homicidal ...
628 views6 years ago ...
Execution expert Fred Leuchter, author of the reports that scientifically proved the non-existence of Nazi gas chambers, has ...
59 views5 months ago
3K views5 years ago
A look at the evidence that the Nazis killed Jews in gas chambers.
3.1K views7 years ago
24 views11 months ago
Paul Fromm and Fred Leuchter discuss Freds findings in Auschwitz where he found NO homicidal gas chambers.
378 views3 years ago
Fred Leuchter is an engineer for the U.S. prisons who built and designed gas chambers made for execution. He is one of the few ...
1.1K views6 years ago ...
230 views6 years ago ...
855 views6 years ago ...
34K views2 years ago
documento sobre el informe leuchter,dificil de encontrar debido a la censura.
Fred Leuchter on the Phil Donahue Show Fred Leuchter is an expert on capital punishment and is the inventor of the lethal ...

Fred A. Leuchter - Topic

7 subscribers
Fred Arthur Leuchter Jr. is an American Holocaust denier who is best known as author of the Leuchter report, a ...
In March 1989, capital punishment expert Fred Leuchter went to locations in Germany and Austria to investigate rumors of ...










Click on this text to visit Germar Rudolf's Persönliche Webseite...



Click on this text to visit the COMMITTEE FOR OPEN DEBATE ON THE HOLOCAUST (CODOH)...



                                                                           The Chemistry of Auschwitz



                                                                                                                                                           By Germar Rudolf




In 1989, a graduate student in chemistry was surprised to learn that no one had ever studied the Auschwitz gas chambers from a chemical perspective. A year later, while preparing his PhD thesis in chemistry at the prestigious Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research in Stuttgart, Germany, he realized that this institute gave him access to all the resources he needed to look into this matter himself. Now, after more than two decades of continued research and archival studies, this curious scholar, Germar Rudolf, has published his findings in the form of a book and a video, both with the title “The Chemistry of Auschwitz.” Let’s see what he found out.


On June 15, 1994, David Lawson was scheduled to be killed in the execution gas chamber of the state prison of North Carolina. This is a view into this chamber. Lawson, however refused to cooperate.  Instead of breathing quickly and deeply, he repeatedly held his breath and took only short breaths in between. Again and again he called out “I am human!” For ten straight minutes, he kept on struggling against his fate. Only eighteen minutes after the beginning of the execution was he declared dead. It was the longest-lasting gas-chamber execution in the history of the United States.


The witnesses to the execution were horrified, and the prison warden supervising the execution was so shaken that he resigned.


Because of disasters like this, executions by gas chamber were eventually banned for being cruel and unusual.


And this despite the fact that executions with gas were considered swift, painless and humane when they were first introduced in the United States in the 1920s.


Here is a clip from a British documentary showing how it’s supposed to work:


“This is BBC One. And now, ‘Fourteen Days in May.’ Viewers are advised that this is a disturbing documentary about the death penalty in Mississippi. Filmed during the final days of one condemned man’s fight to save his life, it includes a sequence of the gas chamber being tested with rabbits. ‘Fourteen Days in May.’”


This test gassing occurred in the gas chamber of the state prison in Parchman, Mississippi, using two black rabbits. The poisonous cyanide powder is put into a bowl beneath the execution chair. Once the door is secured, sulfuric acid is poured over the powder. As a result, hydrogen-cyanide gas is released so violently that it rises up in a cloud of sulfuric-acid mist. The bunnies die after not even a minute.


If we look up expert literature, like Henderson & Haggard’s “Noxious Gases,” we find in them the claim that humans die very quickly, within a minute or less, when exposed to the hydrogen-cyanide concentrations as they are used during executions in the United States. But that’s apparently not true.


U.S. researcher Scott Christianson has written a study on the history of the U.S. gas chambers. He found that, during hundreds of executions over the past 90 years, it took on average some 9 minutes to kill a human. So what’s wrong here, and who is right?


Turns out, reality is right, and the scientists are wrong. In a 1976 study for the U.S. Army on the toxicity of hydrogen-cyanide gas for humans, a certain McNamara traced back what the experts quote in their books on toxicology. It turned out that directly or indirectly they all refer to a German book of 1919 that reported the results of gassing test made prior to World War One on… well, rabbits.


The study also established that gassing experiments with dogs, monkeys and humans demonstrated that humans are much less susceptible than dogs. For example, in one case a dog and a human volunteer were placed in a gas chamber and exposed to the same concentration of hydrogen cyanide. While the dog stopped breathing after just one and a half minutes and was assumed dead, the man at that time did not even show any symptoms.   


In fact, the values found by this study closely resemble the values found by Christianson in his study. Instead of killing within a minute and less, the concentrations used in the U.S. execution gas chambers would indeed not kill with certainty before some ten minutes.


This poor roofing fellow got caught on the top of the roof of the Catholic church of St. Michael at Untergriesbach in Bavaria, Germany, when the bells starting tolling frantically. This church is our next stop on our journey to the Chemistry of Auschwitz. In 1972, major renovation work was carried out on this church. Among other things, the plaster on the inside was redone, and a pest-control company was called to kill the woodworms which had infested the church’s woodwork. But replacing the plaster first and then fumigating the church with hydrogen cyanide in order to kill the bugs was a bad idea, as the church’s newsletter reports. In the church’s chronology on the church’s website we find an entry for July 1972 referring to the – quote – “fumigation of the entire church with Zyklon against woodworm infestation” – unquote. Zyklon refers to Zyklon B, the active ingredient in which is hydrogen cyanide. Further down we read that the fumigation led to blotchy discolorations of the plaster.


Not much more information can be gleaned from that website, but a similar case that occurred four years later in another church in Bavaria is more revealing. This concerns the Protestant church of the town of Wiesenfeld. Here, too, the church’s plaster was redone, and a few weeks later the whole church was fumigated using Zyklon B, that is to say, hydrogen cyanide, in order to kill woodworms. A few months later, the entire plaster started developing blotchy blue stains, as if someone had splattered blue ink everywhere onto the plaster.


This time, however, the case was properly documented, and the experts called to investigate took samples, analyzed them chemically, and determined what the problem was. The case was published as an entry in Volume 4 of the German series “Bauschäden-Sammlung”, that is, “Collection of Construction Damages.” Here are the first two pages of this article in German. The paper was also published in an English translation in this book on pages 557 to 559.


From this article, we learn that the hydrogen cyanide had been absorbed by the fresh and moist plaster, and that the small traces of rust contained in the plaster – which is a natural component of every cement and sand used to make it – had reacted with the hydrogen cyanide to slowly form a pigment called “Iron Blue” or “Prussian Blue”. Being an integral part of the plaster, the only way to remove the blue stains was by completely knocking off the new plaster and redoing the entire job, as the lead architect of the renovation project Konrad Fischer stated in an interview.


Unfortunately, there aren’t any color images of that case available. The only illustration shown in the documentation is this black-and-white image, which may have looked something like this in color, but there are other cases where the same reaction occurred. Zyklon B was used on a grand scale during World War II in Europe to combat lice which infested the clothes, bed linen and living quarters of soldiers, prisoners of war and concentration-camp inmates. Lice transmit typhus, which is a deadly disease. During WWII, hundreds of thousands of people died of it. This is a 1948 paper on that topic by Dr. John Gordon from Harvard University. I have redone the chart to improve its clarity. It shows the number of typhus cases in Germany as officially recorded and published by the German civilian authorities between 1939 and 1943, and as encountered by U.S. troops in their zone of occupation in the first half of 1945. No data is available for 1944. The numbers for the years 1939 through 1943 evidently do not include typhus cases in German labor or concentration camps. Otherwise those numbers would be vastly higher.


To prevent or stamp out typhus epidemics during World War Two, killing lice was one of the most important challenges all warring parties faced. The Germans’ chief method of killing lice was Zyklon B, deployed in fumigation gas chambers. Such chambers were built in many locations, civilian as well as military in nature, and of course in the vast German system of labor and concentration camps.


Many if not most of these fumigation chambers were destroyed after the war, but some survived. This here is the Zyklon B fumigation chamber at the former Stutthof Concentration Camp near Danzig, West Prussia, used to disinfest inmate clothing. Note the blotchy blue stains on the walls, outside as well as inside.


This is a room of one building at the former Majdanek Camp which was also used for fumigating clothes. Again, it has blue stains in many places. The same is true for another structure in that camp also used for Zyklon-B fumigations.


This is a former Zyklon-B-fumigation facility at the former Auschwitz-Birkenau Camp. It exhibits the same kind of blue stains, both on the outside walls and on the inside. That structure existed in two mirror-symmetrical units. This is the other one, only a few yards away from the first. It, too, exhibits the tell-tale blue discoloration of bricks, mortar and plaster on the inside as well as on the outside.


We may assume that the plaster of two churches fumigated with Zyklon B we just discussed looked very similar to this.


Now that we’ve arrived at Auschwitz, let’s take a look around.


This is a map of the Auschwitz region. In order to get an orientation as to where we are, here is an inset showing on the left a map of Europe. The small blue rectangle shows the area of Poland that is enlarged in the right-hand inset. In it, I have surrounded with a red rectangle the area which we see here in the large map.


Three areas on this map are of interest in the present context. First, the Auschwitz Main Camp, which was the original concentration camp opened in 1940. Most of its structures survived the war and serve today as a museum. It also includes a crematorium with a homicidal gas chamber. We’ll return to that later. Next, there is the huge Auschwitz-Birkenau Camp just a mile away, which was initially planned as a PoW camp, but ended up as the destination for roughly one million Jews deported from various European countries. Most structures of that camp have been destroyed, either by the Germans prior to their retreat, or afterwards by Poles who used the building material as fire wood or to reconstruct their homes. Finally, there is the industrial area of the German chemical trust I.G. Farbenindustrie to the east.


The Auschwitz Camp is considered the largest concentration camp of the Third Reich. At its peak in 1944, it had 48 subcamps where inmates worked in armaments industries, workshops, farming, coal mines and chemical factories. If you wish, it was Europe’s largest slave-labor enterprise ever. The most-important factories, from a strategic point of view, were the Buna plants of the German chemical trust I.G. Farbenindustrie. Planning and construction started in 1941. These photos of this plant from the German Federal Archives are from 1943 and 1944. Some of these structures still exist to this day. You can see some photographic juxtapositions on the website given. Parallel to these industrial activities, plans to increase the nearby slave-labor population were also made. For that purpose, the initially small Auschwitz Concentration Camp was turned into a huge system of camps, which at one point was planned to accommodate some 200,000 inmates as a slave-labor resource.


The background of the chemical factories was the fact that Germany, in times of war, could easily be deprived of all major imports of food and raw materials by a British blockade. Already during the First World War, Germany felt the devastating effect of being cut off from all imports, among them also rubber and petroleum, to name only the two most important raw materials for any industrialized nation. Ever since, Germany strove to became independent from natural rubber and mineral oil by exploiting its coal reserves and its chemical talents.


In fact, already prior to the First World War, in 1909, the German Chemist Fritz Hofmann invented a process for producing artificial rubber.


A process to convert nitrogen from the air into ammonia – an important first step in the production of any modern fertilizer or explosive – was first demonstrated by the German chemist Fritz Haber also in 1909. He received the Nobel Prize for it in 1918. Haber also invented the insecticide Zyklon B. Haber was Jewish.


A process to turn coal into liquid hydrocarbons was first developed by the German Friedrich Bergius starting in 1910, with a patent issued in 1913.


Hence, all the scientific pieces were in place when the First World War broke out, but turning them into an industrial-scale operation to make Germany independent from imports took a few decades. This stage was only achieved to a large degree during the later years of the Third Reich. The chemical industry near Auschwitz played a major role in this scheme.


The importance of Auschwitz in Germany’s economic plans can be derived from the summary written right after the war by some of America’s greatest experts on German industry, quote:


“Wartime Germany was a chemical empire built on coal, air, and water. Eighty-four and a half per cent of her aviation fuel, 85 per cent of her motor gasoline, all but a fraction of 1 per cent of her rubber, 100 per cent of the concentrated nitric acid, basic component of all military explosives, and 99 per cent of her equally important methanol were synthesized from these three fundamental raw materials.


[…] The body of this industrial organism was the gas-generating plants which turned coal into process gases; its arms were the many plants that used those gases and other materials drawn from the coal to produce synthetic fuels and lubricants, chemicals, rubber, and explosive products.”


Apart from Auschwitz, Germany had only three other plants producing the basic chemicals from which the vast majority of all German supplies of rubber, fuel and lubricants were synthesized. Destroying these factories should therefore have been at the very top of all Allied bombing lists – although they were placed there only in 1944. Here is an Allied air photo of the Auschwitz plant taken on January 14, 1945, barely two weeks before the area was occupied by the Red Army. In this section enlargement, you can see many bomb craters caused by a number of Allied air raids on that factory which started in mid-1944. Some of them I have marked here red.


Deportation of Jews to Auschwitz as slave laborers started in early 1942, but construction of the new camp Auschwitz-Birkenau had just begun. This here is a map showing the situation in May 1942. There actually wasn’t much of a camp in existence yet. Only in late 1942 did the first inmate showers and delousing facilities become operational in that camp, the already-mentioned hygiene Buildings 5a and 5b with their Zyklon-B fumigation chambers. As a consequence, hygienic conditions at the camp were catastrophic, and inmates started dying like flies right from the beginning. In Danuta Czech’s mainstream standard work on the chronology of events at Auschwitz, we read on page 209 in the entry for May 10, 1942 that the typhus epidemic is spreading at the Auschwitz Concentration Camp, and was even threatening the camp’s SS staff. One of the more prominent victims among them was the Auschwitz garrison physician Dr. Siegfried Schwela, who died during that month of the disease.


The entry for May 25th states that more typhus cases were reported on that day in the camp infirmary. By the summer of 1942, possibly also because there was never a proper garrison physician in charge during that time, the typhus epidemic had gotten completely out of control. Hundreds of inmates were dying every day.


On page 277 we read in the entry for August 17 that Dr. Kurt Uhlenbrock took over the post of garrison physician on that day, but a footnote explains that he, too, succumbed to typhus a few weeks later and remained in Auschwitz until October 2 of 1942 only because he was still recovering from that disease. Uhlenbrock barely survived.


The sick Uhlenbrock was replaced on September 6th by Dr. Eduard Wirths, who until then had been garrison physician at the Dachau Camp. Only after Dr. Wirths had assumed his position, did things start to change. Here is how the new garrison physician Dr. Wirths described the situation at the Auschwitz camp when he arrived there – quote:


“I discovered intolerable conditions for the prisoners. There was no running water, no proper toilets, no means of bathing. The barracks in which the prisoners were quartered were unheated, overcrowded, and beds were missing. Lice literally swarmed on the floors, clothes, bodies of the people. The walls were black with fleas. The people in an inconceivable condition, wasted to their ribs, plagued with vermin, the dead lying between the living and the dying. Every day hundreds of dead were carted off, often after lying for days among the living. I was so spiritually demoralized that I soon saw suicide as the only way out.”


Wirths, here on the left, together with, among others, camp commander Höss on the very right, subsequently went to work to improve the conditions, yet it took him a full year to get the epidemic under control. Among other things, he also saw to it that the most modern delousing technique was installed at Auschwitz: a large microwave delousing device. Here is an image of that device as installed at Auschwitz in early 1944, and this is a circuit layout. These documents are stored in the archives of the Siemens company who developed this device under the aegis of the German Army in order to keep the clothing of German soldiers clean. A shift of priorities occurred in 1943, however, as a result of which the device was used to save the lives of inmates at Auschwitz instead. Here is a blueprint from the files of the Auschwitz camp authorities showing the building where the device was installed. And this is a report by Dr. Wirths of August 1944 in which he enthusiastically praises the exceptional performance of this device. The Siemens Archives in Munich even have some film footage of the device as it is being operated at Auschwitz, but we were not allowed to make a copy of it.


Also in 1944, DDT made its first appearance in Auschwitz under the German name “Lauseto.” Nine metric tons were delivered in April 1944, fifteen tons in August, and two tons in October of that year. Together with the highly effective and efficient microwave delousing facility, Auschwitz therefore had hardly any need for Zyklon B in 1944, at least when it came to disinfestations. As a matter of fact, only a little more than one metric ton of Zyklon B was delivered to Auschwitz in 1944, and the last delivery was made in late May of that year. Since the factory buildings of the producer of Zyklon B, the Dessauer Zuckerwerke – that is: Sugar Works of Dessau, in Saxony –, were damaged in summer 1944 by an Allied air raid, Zyklon B deliveries pretty much dried up after that in general. It is important to note that the mass extermination of Hungarian Jews at Auschwitz using Zyklon B is said to have started in mid-May 1944, that is to say, around the time Zyklon-B deliveries came to an end. These are images made by the SS while these Jews were unloaded from trains at Auschwitz. There aren’t any photos showing homicidal gassings, though. There are, however, images showing inmates who have just undergone the admission procedures to the camp, which included showering and shaving to prevent the spread of lice. Having their hair shaved off was certainly humiliating for these women, but it also was a necessary, life-saving measure.


Plans for the two big Zyklon-B delousing facilities we saw earlier were drawn up in the summer of 1942. The original blueprints show that the room used for fumigating clothes was called “Gaskammer” that is, “gas chamber.” Most of these blueprints were drawn by inmates employed at the Auschwitz Construction Office. Interestingly, around the same time the blueprints for these two buildings were drawn, Polish resistance groups started reporting the existence of two homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. Some of the claimed features of these alleged homicidal gas chambers closely resemble features of these two fumigation facilities.


These fumigation rooms were not of the professional kind that had been developed by the company distributing Zyklon B, but of a rather more-basic, if not to say primitive, design. The rooms were huge, had a lot of dead space in the gable area, were not properly sealed along the roofline, had no means of either heating the Zyklon B or distributing its fumes in the chamber, and their ventilation system was rather crude as well. Here you see the two openings where once ventilators were installed. In fact, to operate this fumigation chamber, someone wearing a gas mask had to enter the room and spread out the Zyklon B pellets on the floor, then retreat and lock the door firmly.


The doors to these disinfestation rooms were of a makeshift kind as well, since they were made by inmates working in a local workshop. They consisted of wooden boards held together by iron bands, as you can see in these illustrations. The cracks between the boards were – quote-unquote – “sealed” with felt strips, which, by the way, lets hydrogen cyanide through as if it were nothing.


These doors were moreover equipped with a peephole, as was required by German law. It stipulated that the person entering such a chamber had to be observed by another person from the outside, who needed to wear a gas mask as well and had to have a first-aid kit at hand. This way he could swiftly intervene in case of an emergency, for example caused by a leaking or improperly donned gas mask.


This kind of door is the only kind that has ever been found in Auschwitz-Birkenau. Here is one currently leaning against a wall inside the former Zyklon-B-fumigation wing of Building 5a that has a proper window. It probably served as a door to a hot-air disinfestation room, though. This is a 1945 photo of another typical camp-made wooden door, this one without window or peephole, though. It was found near the ruins of Crematorium V, and is today stored in the Old Crematorium at the Main Camp.


Somewhat more-sturdy steel doors were found at the Auschwitz Camp in the old Crematorium building which is said to have had a homicidal gas chamber. However, these doors were ordered and installed only during the conversion of this building into an air-raid shelter for the SS in 1944. At that point in time, this crematorium had already been out of operation for a year. This particular door was sealing the air-raid shelter’s air lock to the outside. This one, which is currently stored in the former furnace room, might have been ordered to seal the opening between the shelter and the former furnace room, before it was decided to wall up that opening. But even those doors are made of a wooden frame and merely have a sheet metal cover to make them gastight.


There is no trace of any massive steel door ever having been ordered or installed at Auschwitz prior to mid-1944. This is what they look like. These are massive steel doors as installed at the fumigation chambers at Dachau. That one and this one sealed fumigation chambers at Majdanek, and that’s the fumigation chamber at Stutthof.


And here are some excerpts from construction drawings of such doors as offered to the Auschwitz camp in July 1942. However, they were ordered only in June 1944, and in November 1944, the vendor of these doors inquired whether the camp still had an interest in their delivery. This means that they were evidently never delivered. Auschwitz simply never felt a need to order massive steel doors…


This fact is not trivial. After all, the orthodox Holocaust narrative has it that hundreds of people were crammed into the homicidal gas chambers. Some witnesses even speak of a thousand, two thousand, like Rudolf Höss, or even three thousand people, like Charles Bendel. Let’s ignore the fact that it would have been physically impossible to press many more than a thousand people into the rooms referred to. Here is a drawing of the largest of the rooms claimed, densely packed with 1680 people (120 rows of 14 each). And such a packing density is only theoretically possible, meaning that it requires the drill and discipline of experience soldiers to line up in such a fashion. Anyway, there can be no doubt that panic would have broken out among those victims, once they realized that they had been locked up in a chemical slaughter house and were about to be poisoned.


What a panicking crowd can do can be seen from the Heysel Stadium disaster that occurred in Belgium in May 1985. Let’s watch this clip:


“Heysel Stadium, Brussels. British soccer fans fly into a frenzy, attacking rival Italian fans. The Belgian police are caught off guard, as innocent fans are pelted with bottles and rocks. British hooligans break through a fence. In a panic, the Italians make a run for the exists, but they suddenly have nowhere to go. A concrete wall blocks their escape. Fearing for their lives, a few lucky fans manage to escape over the wall, but it quickly collapses under their weight. Hundreds are now trapped under a crushing mass of humanity. Cries for help go unanswered.”


Note that the wall was pushed over by the pressure exerted by the hundreds of fans pushing against it.


The steel doors sealing U.S. execution gas chambers look like an overkill in security, for even if an inmate ever had a chance of getting out of the execution seat he is strapped into, any normal steel door would prevent him from getting out. But here, it’s not just about keeping the inmate in, but also about keeping all the witnesses absolutely safe from any leakage.


At Auschwitz, leakage would not have been the major issue. After all, all the leaky makeshift fumigation doors did their job just fine. For homicidal gas chambers designed to contain hundreds of unfettered victims, the challenge would have been to let the door open to the outside, and to secure it against a panicking crowd violently pushing and kicking against it. The door had to open to the outside, because many if not most victims, trying to escape through the door, would collapse and die right in front of it, making it impossible to open any door opening to the inside. However, a door opening to the outside is much more difficult to secure against being opened by force. Simple wooden doors held together by iron bands would never do. The flimsy iron bands would give way within seconds, and the wood would bend and splinter.


To illustrate that point, I have used Photoshop to make the latch on this gas tight door move. This was the kind of latch that was used on all the gas-tight doors at Auschwitz. Imagine hundreds of people pushing against that latch. How long would it last? These doors worked for fumigation chambers, but for homicidal gas chambers,      


Here is a scene from the 2011 movie “Auschwitz” by Uwe Boll showing a gassing scene. It shows a massive steel door, as has to be expected, even though the latch is a little flimsy. The problem is that none of the claimed homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz was ever equipped with such doors.


The situation is even worse when it comes to the room at the Auschwitz Museum which is presented every year to over a million visitors as a homicidal gas chamber. This is an original German blueprint of 1942. It clearly shows not only that the room in question, in its original layout, which is labeled as an innocuous morgue, had no door through which the claimed victims could have accessed the morgue from the outside. They actually had to enter into it either by walking through the furnace room where their already-murdered fellow inmates were just being cremated – an absurd idea. Or else they had to enter walking through the dissecting room were piles of corpses were awaiting autopsies by the camp’s physicians – a no less absurd scenario.


Worse still, the door connecting the morgue – the alleged gas chamber – to the furnace room was a swinging door, as can be seen from blueprints of 1940, here an enlargement of that door, 1942, also as an enlargement, and even 1944, when the building was converted to an air raid shelter, although here the draftsman apparently got the opening direction wrong. This proves, however, that through the entire history of that crematorium, until that door was walled up in 1944, this door was a swinging door. The question is: How do you make a swinging door gas tight? And how do you secure it against a panicking crowd?


Look at this real-world swinging door in my home. There is no way of looking it securely against a panicking crowd. And look at these gaps. By their very design, swinging doors are not even able to prevent a draft. It makes perfect sense to have such a door in a place where people constantly haul heavy loads from one room to another. The door opens with a push in either direction, and in closes by itself. But such a door is utterly inconceivable for a homicidal gas chamber. And yet, there it is.


Today, there is no door at all between these two rooms. That’s not a smart design for a homicidal gas chamber either, but reinstating the original design is apparently out of the question as well.


It goes without saying that the Auschwitz Museum hides this ugly little secret from its millions of visitors, because otherwise the entire fraud upon which this museum was built would swiftly collapse. On this chart, today located right next to the building, there is no trace of that swinging door.


There’s more to the story, but before discussing this, let’s go back to chemistry.


As mentioned before, in the case of the Bavarian church in Wiesenfeld, masonry samples were taken and analyzed in order to find out what had caused the blue stains. Similar investigations were done in Auschwitz, where a number of researchers took masonry samples of the various fumigation chambers and of rooms that are said to have used, or rather misused, at some point in time to mass murder people with hydrogen cyanide in the form of Zyklon B.


Before we can go into the details of these analyses, however, we need to address a number of questions.


First, how likely is it to find any trace of the blue chemical compounds involved in the first place? After all, several decades have passed since Zyklon B was used in those locations.


Next, what conditions are favorable to their formation?


And finally, are there any factors that could interfere with the reliability of chemical analysis?


The first question concerns the stability of the blue pigment we are analyzing. Viewed on the surface of things, it is plainly obvious that this pigment must be very stable, because it can still be found to this day in the walls of the various fumigation facilities, even on the outside where the walls have been exposed to the influence of sunshine and rain for many decades. This fact is backed up by a long-term-stability test which was performed in England starting in the late 1950s. During that test, the blue pigment was simply precipitated on an aluminum sheet, and that aluminum sheet was then exposed to rain and shine for 21 years on the rooftop of the factory building of the High Duty Alloys Company in Slough, which is a western suburb of London. During the 1950s and 1960s, at the peak of the age of coal, acidic smog was a common occurrence in and around London.


[…] this choking, eye-watering smog. Traffic in London was completely at a standstill on many occasions. In fact, the fog was the worst on record for many a year.”


Hence, the color samples used in that test were exposed to one of the most aggressive environments possible. Yet still, the results published in this paper of 1981 were astounding. They showed that this Prussian Blue pigment was one of the most stable pigments of all the pigments investigated, similar only to iron ochre, which is basically rust. Almost all of the samples used hardly lost any of their vibrancy.


Another strong indicator that the pigment in question is extremely long-lasting can be seen from the fate it suffered in the soil of former coking plants and city gas works. During the age of coal, people used to heat their homes and cook with city gas, which could be produced from coal in a number of ways. Let’s watch the following educational Australian footage from the 1950s, which I have cut down to what’s essential in the present context:


“the coal is fed from the hoppers and falls into the retorts, which are heated from the outside. As the coal is heated, coal gas is given off. […] Those dots show how the gas escapes from the retorts through pipes. What is left of the coal is called coke, and is emptied from the bottom of the retorts into steel trucks. […] Other sections of the gas works clean this gas by removing tar, ammonia and other impurities, to make it fit for our use.”


One of these impurities is a small amount of hydrogen cyanide, which gets washed out in the cleaning step mentioned next:


“and also this scrubbing plant to remove still more impurities.”


Hydrogen cyanide was removed by letting it react with a solution of iron-two and iron-three hydroxide, resulting in Prussian Blue. Because Prussian Blue was considered innocuous, many city-gas works and coking plants simply dumped the pigment on the factory grounds. As a result, the soil of thousands of coking and city gas plants all over the world contains high quantities of Prussian Blue to this day, at times even giving the soil a bluish hue.


In the 1990s, when environmentalism became fashionable, people started noticing the high quantities of cyanide in the soil of former coking plants. Ever since, a plethora of scientific papers has appeared investigating how dangerous this cyanide contamination is, if at all.


One scientist in particular built his career on pushing the panic button about that, the Dutchman Johannes Meeussen. In a number of papers which he collected in a volume he eventually submitted as his PhD thesis, he theorized that Prussian Blue from coke-gas scrubbers deposited in soil would be highly unstable and should dissolve within a short period of time, giving off toxic levels of free cyanide into the ground water. But when he tested his theory by taking soil samples and analyzing them, the results did not support his theory, which turned out to have been based on the premise that Prussian Blue is present in the soils as a microscopic mixture of iron cyanide and iron hydroxide, that is, rust – a so-called solid solution. That may in fact be the case with some of the Prussian Blue dumped on the grounds of former gas works, as this Prussian Blue formed quickly using an excess of iron hydroxide. But that is not at all what we would be dealing with in our case. The slow formation of the pigment in masonry in the absence of noticeable amounts of dissolved iron hydroxide precludes the formation of mixed crystals and supports the formation of pure Prussian Blue crystals.


Further studies revealed that Prussian Blue as such is in fact highly stable for many decades. This chart shows in purplish blue the range of stability of Prussian Blue and, in a lighter blue, of Turnbull’s Blue, which is almost identical to Prussian Blue. The acidity of the environment is plotted along the x axis, and the oxidative strength on the y axis. Actual environmental conditions in masonry and soils are located between pH 4 and pH 8. In other words, there is no way Prussian Blue could dissolve quickly under the circumstances considered here.


The actual solubility of Prussian Blue can be calculated by the upper limit of alkalinity at which it is still stable. According to this chart, that limit is somewhere between pH 9 and pH 11, depending on the oxidative strength of the environment. With the known solubility of iron(III) hydroxide, this yields a solubility product pKS for Prussian Blue of somewhere between 165 and 200.


To cut a long story short: If Prussian Blue forms in masonry as a result of exposure to hydrogen cyanide, the pigment formed is extremely stable. In fact, it is similarly stable as the main components of the wall itself, since it is an integral part of it and one of its most stable components to boot. In particular, it is less soluble than the iron hydroxide from which it formed. Hence, as long as the wall itself exists, it must be expected to contain Prussian Blue in undiminished concentrations. Therefore, taking samples and analyzing them for Prussian Blue makes sense, even if undertaken many decades after the events that led to the pigment’s formation.


Let’s now turn to the conditions that are favorable for the formation of Prussian Blue. First off, the formation of Prussian Blue in masonry exposed to hydrogen cyanide cannot be the rule, because the fumigation of buildings with Zyklon B and similar products based on hydrogen cyanide has been a common practice for more than half a century, yet reports about walls turning patchy-blue, such as the two churches I discussed earlier, are rare exceptions.


The question is: what do all the cases of wall discolorations known to us have in common that sets them apart from the rest? Well, fumigations of buildings for pest control usually take place only in older buildings, because newly erected buildings cannot be infested by pests. Such an infestation usually takes years or even decades. However, all the fumigation chambers of the Third Reich era were specifically built to be used right after they had been erected. The same instant-exposure situation was given in the case of the two churches, whose plaster had been replaced a few weeks prior to the fumigation. The same, of course, would have been true for the claimed homicidal gas chambers inside the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau, which are said to have been built for the specific purpose of being used right after these facilities had been finished.


So, what factors are favorable to the formation of Prussian Blue in masonry?


In this presentation, I will focus only on the most important aspects of the physics and chemistry of hydrogen-cyanide interaction with masonry. More details with many references to expert literature can be found in my book. Anyway, in order to find out which factors support the formation of Prussian Blue in masonry, we need to look into the various steps leading to the formation of this pigment.


First, hydrogen cyanide needs to get absorbed by the moisture contained in the wall.


Next, the hydrogen cyanide molecules must be split to form cyanide ions, because only these ions react with iron at a considerable rate.


Then, those cyanide ions must attach themselves to the iron ions contained in rust. That means that the cyanide ions displace the oxygen and hydroxide ions that, together with the iron, constitute rust.


After this, some of the iron must be reduced from the trivalent to its bivalent form, because Prussian Blue is a mixture of both, but the rust contained in masonry contains almost exclusively trivalent iron.


Finally, all components must come together so as to precipitate as the blue pigment in question.


The first step requires that the masonry contains lots of water. At low temperatures and a high relative humidity of the ambient air, such as one can find in unheated basements, up to 10% of the masonry material can consist of water. If the ambient air is warm and dry, however, this value may sink down to just 1% or even less.


The influence of moisture in the wall on the tendency to absorb hydrogen cyanide was determined during a series of tests conducted in Germany in the late 1920s. In our context, a comparison between a moist lime sandstone and one dried for half a year at 20°C, that is 68°F, is of interest. Here you can see a factor of almost 10 between moist and dry material.


In fact, a high water content is conducive to all the reactions considered, none of which can take place at a noticeable rate in the absence of water. Hence cool and thus moist walls will be more inclined to form Prussian Blue than warm and dry walls.


The second step depends on the acidity of the masonry’s capillary water. Since hydrogen cyanide is a weak acid, it forms cyanide ions to a noticeable degree only in an alkaline, or low-acidity environment. Such an environment exists in fresh lime mortars and plasters for a few weeks, and in cement mortars and concretes for many months, years or even decades, depending on their exact composition and history. It can be stated in general that a masonry material remains alkaline for a longer period of time, if it contains little lime and lots of cement. Hence, fresh and thus still-alkaline lime plaster supports this step of the formation of Prussian Blue for a number of weeks, while mortar and concrete rich in cement support it for many months, if not years or even decades.


The difference in absorption of hydrogen cyanide between fresh, hence alkaline mortar and old, well-set, hence pH-neutral mortar was also investigated in the previously mentioned study.


We derive from it that, compared to the old mortar, the fresh, alkaline mortar absorbed at least 26 times as much hydrogen cyanide, and that it released it much more-slowly, widening the gap between the two types of mortar as time went by.


Aging lime plaster turns pH-neutral after several weeks, at which point any cyanide not bound by iron will be turned back into hydrogen cyanide by the wall’s moisture. That hydrogen cyanide will slowly evaporate and vanish into thin air. Cement mortar and concrete, however, stay alkaline for much longer periods of time. Hence, these materials allow any cyanide that has accumulated in its capillary system to continue reacting for a much longer time.


The third step is the slowest of all the reactions considered. It therefore determines the rate of formation of long-lasting iron-cyanide components. While the trivalent iron of rust becomes more readily available for reactions with increasing acidity, its reaction partner, the cyanide ion, has the opposite tendency. Hence, while fresh and thus very alkaline plasters, mortars and concretes can accumulate lots of cyanide, it takes a long time for iron cyanide to form. In the cases of the two churches mentioned earlier, that process took many months up to a year.


Helpful to this slow process is the next step, the reduction of trivalent iron to bivalent iron. This reduction requires that something else gets oxidized. In our case, the oxidizing agent is an excess of cyanide itself, which also needs an alkaline environment for this reaction. The driving force behind this reaction is the energy released when trivalent iron surrounded by cyanide turns into bivalent iron. That reaction is so strong in an alkaline medium that it is even capable of turning trivalent chromium into hexavalent chromium. The energy difference ΔH between the two types of iron cyanides is some 64 kilo-Joule per mol.


Hence, even if only small amounts of iron(III) cyanide can form in a moderately alkaline environment, it gets withdrawn from the equilibrium by turning into iron(II) cyanide in the presence of excess cyanide. In the course of many days, weeks, months or even years, this can amount to considerable quantities of iron(II) cyanide.


The last step, the precipitation of Prussian Blue, can take place when the acidity sinks below the limit where this pigment is stable compared to iron hydroxide, that is, rust. As shown previously, that is somewhere between pH 9 and 11. Since the masonry’s acidity sinks with time starting at the surface, that’s where most of the Prussian Blue will show up initially. If the wall is moist, that moisture evaporates at the surface, leaving behind everything that travels along with the water but cannot evaporate. That includes any soluble iron cyanides not yet precipitated as Prussian Blue. Hence, this pigment tends to get accumulated on the surfaces, inside and outside.


The red arrow on this photo points to the spot where I took a wall sample from the inside of Building 5a in Auschwitz-Birkenau. Note that just a few millimeters beneath the surface, the plaster is considerably less blue. But even in deeper layers, the plaster still contains high concentrations of cyanide. It’s just that on the very surface, that pigment’s concentration is extremely high in certain places.


This accumulation process on a wall’s surface depends on a number of factors, starting with the kind of material that makes up the wall at any particular spot, the amount of water in its capillary system, and the water’s mobility. Last but not least, the heat conductivity of the underlying material also has an influence on this.


There are a few other factors to be considered. For instance, it goes without saying that high contents of rust in the masonry are also conducive to the formation of Prussian Blue, but since most materials have an iron content between 1 to 5 percent anyway, the difference between them is usually negligible.


Furthermore, any masonry material containing considerable amounts of cement also has the advantage that its microscopic inner surface is much larger than that of masonry consisting mainly of lime. Here is a scanning-electron microscope image of lime mortar, and here is one of cement mortar at the same magnification, although the image is much smaller. As you can see, the crystals in the cement mortar are much smaller.


Here is a series of three images showing what happens to cement and concrete after water has been added to the cement powder. The first image shows the state after 4 hours, the second after 10 hours, and the last after 21 hours. What you see growing here are needles of aluminosilicates, something that happens only in cement mortars and concretes, but never in lime mortar. These crystals are responsible for the fact that cement mortar is much firmer and longer-lasting than lime mortar. Due to this micro-crystalline structure, the inner surface of cement and concrete is much larger than that of lime mortar. The actual value, measured with water vapor, can be as high as 200 square meters per gram of material. Lime mortar has only about 10% of that value. The micro-crystalline structure of cement mortars and concretes means that the solid/liquid interface is very large. Since we are dealing here with a reaction of the mostly solid iron ions with cyanide dissolved in the capillary water, such a large surface is very conducive to this reaction.


It also means that more iron is exposed at the surface, and that it is more inclined to react, energetically speaking. The opposite is true for sintered materials, however, which do not tend to form Prussian Blue, because the sintering process drastically reduces the inner surface of such materials, hence their propensity to react in any way. Bricks are a case in point. Only on the surface, where the material has been eroded due to environmental influences, is the rust contained in them able to react to a considerable degree.


Before we turn to the actual analysis, we need to understand that analyzing a substance for a certain chemical isn’t always a straightforward process. Many methods are sensitive not just for one chemical, but for several, so a certain reading might not necessarily indicate how much of a certain chemical is in a sample, because it may give a combined reading of several chemicals.


In the present case, Johannes Meeussen determined with a series of experiments the kind of chemicals that can give false positive readings. The most common one among them is carbonate. This is very important for our case, because one of the main components of masonry is calcium carbonate. In fact, older lime plaster samples may mainly consist of it. If we extrapolate Meeussen’s data to carbonate contents in the order of several hundred grams per kilogram sample material, or several ten percent, this means that such samples can yield a reading of several milligrams of cyanide even in the total absence of any cyanide. In other words, the analytical methods used to detect cyanide traces become insensitive in the case of masonry material rich in carbonates, and readings of up to a few milligrams of cyanide per kilogram of sample material should be considered uncertain or unreliable.


Equipped with this knowledge, let’s now have a look at the analytical results of a number of researchers who took samples at Auschwitz.


To make things easier to digest, I do not give the results of individual samples in this table, but only the ranges of results. Furthermore, I have grouped the samples by the type of location they came from, and then by the individual who took the samples and had them analyzed. The first, white set of results comes from samples taken from walls which are said to have been part of homicidal gas chambers. The second, blue set of results concerns samples taken from walls of former fumigation chambers, mainly of the two buildings at Birkenau shown before. The third set of results relates to samples taken from walls of buildings which belong to neither group.


First, we see that all samples taken from structures that were not fumigation chambers exhibit results which are close to what must be considered the detection limit. To demonstrate this, I have actually retested two of the samples using a different lab. While the first one – the Institute Fresenius – found traces in the samples, the second lab did not.


This means basically that the cyanide readings in samples taken from claimed homicidal gas chambers are comparable to those taken from any other location, and that none of them contain any traces of cyanide that can be detected with any degree of reliability, if they exist at all.


The situation is different when it comes to samples taken from former fumigation chambers. Only three of the four individuals who took samples agree on the range of cyanide contents. All samples that these three samplers had taken had readings of at least a gram of cyanide per kilogram of sample material. This means that at least 0.1% of the samples consisted of cyanide, something we would expect of a sample taken from walls exhibiting a patchy blue discoloration caused by Zyklon-B fumigations. The third set of samples taken from various Auschwitz fumigation chambers and analyzed by Markiewicz and colleagues, however, didn’t result in any significant cyanide readings at all.


The reason for that is simple: Dr. Jan Markiewicz, here a portrait from the 1960s, had been commissioned by the Polish State Museum at Auschwitz, thus by the Polish government itself. Markiewicz himself was an employee of the Jan-Sehn-Institute for Forensic Research, which is run by the Polish government’s department of justice. Since denying the Auschwitz gas chambers is a crime in Poland, Markiewicz must have been under massive pressure to somehow conclude that the cyanide readings from the claimed homicidal gas chambers resemble those of fumigation chambers. To produce those results, he chose an analytic method which by design was unable to detect any Prussian Blue and similar long-term-stable iron cyanide compounds. Here is his 1994 publication of his rigged results. As a reason why he excluded all Prussian Blue from the analysis, he stated that he did not understand how Prussian Blue could possibly form in masonry as a result of Zyklon B gassings. Quote:


“It is hard to imagine the chemical reactions and physicochemical processes that could have led to the formation of Prussian Blue in that place.” – unquote


Referring to a paper by an Austrian chemist, Markiewicz then stated, quote “that the formation of Prussian blue in bricks is simply improbable,” and that the blue discoloration could instead be the result of blue wall paint. While such a hypothesis is certainly permissible, ignoring arguments to the contrary certainly is not. But that is exactly what Markiewicz and his colleagues subsequently did. Here is what they quoted in their paper in footnote 4 on the last page: Ernst Gauss, which used to be a pen name of mine, Vorlesungen über Zeitgeschichte, which means Lectures on Contemporary History. This book is the German predecessor of the currently available book Lectures on the Holocaust. Its first edition was published in early 1993. In it, I explained with the same arguments as presented here, and supported by the same sources of expert literature, how Prussian Blue can form in masonry after exposure to hydrogen cyanide, and which factors are favorable. Although he quoted the book, Markiewicz ignored those arguments completely. That book also addressed specifically the many deficiencies and fallacies of the Austrian paper quoted by Markiewicz, in particular the demonstrably false hypothesis that the blue discoloration of the Auschwitz, Stutthof and Majdanek fumigation walls could be the results of blue wall paint. Specifically, we read on page 292, quote:


“These cyanide readings can be found not only on the wall’s surface, as would have to be expected in the case of wall paint, but also deep inside the wall and on the outside of the masonry, and also on the bricks. Furthermore, the blue discoloration resembles anything else but a typical coat of paint; in fact, the patchy pattern also proves that the Prussian Blue originated from fumigation gassings.”


There are actually many more arguments clearly showing that the wall-paint hypothesis is nothing more than a red herring conjured up to conceal a fraud:


  1. First, Iron Blue as such is not even sold as wall paint at all, since it lacks sufficiently high lime fastness. It is offered only as a mixture with other blue pigments. But there is no trace of any other blue pigment on these walls.

  2. Second, if this argument were correct, it would be remarkable that the SS, of all the rooms in the concentration camps of the Third Reich, would apply blue paint only to their disinfestation chambers where no one could admire it; and, strangely, always with the same blue: Auschwitz, Birkenau, Majdanek, Stutthof…. All other rooms were merely whitewashed at best.

  3. Third, the disinfestation chambers themselves already had a coat of lime paint. Why would they cover this coat of lime paint with another paint which, in addition, is not even lime-fast? They would therefore have had to wait until the lime paint and plaster had set before one could (re‑)paint the walls. And then it would have been by no means certain that the paint would not furthermore have become stained as a result of chemical reactions.

  4. Fourth, neither would a coat of paint on the inside of the room explain the absence of blue discolorations on the interior walls which were added to the disinfestation wing of Building 5a at a later time. It is striking that only such walls have blue stains which were exposed to hydrogen cyanide.

  5. Fifth, the wall-paint argument is refuted by the fact that none of the colored walls shows any pattern of brush marks and also no identifiable coat of paint, since wall paint consists not only of pigment, but also of a considerable proportion of binding agents to hold the pigment in place and other chemicals. The blue pigment is, however, simply one component of the lime paint, plaster and mortar.

  6. Sixth, the wall-paint argument furthermore fails to explain how the artistic skills of the painters could have succeeded in imitating the brick structure lying beneath the plaster. Such a pattern, however, is fully consistent with the accumulation of cyanides and the formation of Prussian Blue as a result of fumigations, because that depends on the wall’s humidity and temperature, which in turn depends on whether there is mortar or brick behind the plaster.

  7. Seventh, the wall-paint argument does not explain the only-pale-blue tint of the interior south walls of the original disinfestation wing of Building 5a. This, too, can be explained by fumigation, because that interior wall was warmer and dryer than the exterior walls, hence less prone to form Prussian Blue.

  8. Eight, neither does this wall-paint argument explain the high cyanide content in the superficially white, iron-poor material of the walls of the disinfestation wing of Building 5b – unless one posits that these rooms were painted with an “iron white,” a wall paint that does not even exist. Here, too, the fumigation hypothesis has no trouble explaining this. Since the plaster in that building does not adhere firmly to the underlying wall, moisture cannot easily travel from the wall through the plaster into that room. Thus, accumulation processes on the plaster’s surface are impeded.

The Austrian paper quoted by Markiewicz and colleagues in order to prop up their auxiliary wall-paint hypothesis was published in this political pamphlet. It was written by Josef Bailer and stands out by not having a single reference to any literature, chemical or otherwise, regarding the formation and stability of Prussian Blue, or any other cyanide chemistry, for that matter. In his first footnote, he excuses that fact by stating that his subsequent remarks – quote – “aren’t supposed to be a treatise on the chemistry of hydrogen cyanide” – unquote. How can any researcher take such a paper seriously in the first place that is devoid of any substantiated reasoning? Well, Markiewicz didn’t back up any of his claims with any references to chemical literature either, as can be seen from his meagre footnotes. So, I guess ignorant birds of the same feather flock together. And yet, these two vacuous papers serve as the linchpin for the orthodox musings on the chemistry of Auschwitz.


Anyway, after Markiewicz and his colleagues had picked an analytical method that wouldn’t find anything anywhere, no matter how hard they looked, they found that the readings of samples taken from fumigation chambers were similar – that is to say, non-existing – to those taken from claimed homicidal gas chambers. Hence, they concluded that the history of both groups of samples must also have been similar. So, because we know that Zyklon-B gassings took place on a grand scale in the fumigation chambers, they concluded that similar Zyklon-B gassings must also have taken place in the claimed homicidal gas chambers. And Bingo! The reality of homicidal gassings at Auschwitz had been confirmed! Because the absence of any evidence proves what needs to be demonstrated!


Good job!


So, how do you prove that a civilization exists on Mars? Well, first you take a detection device that cannot detect civilizations. Then you use it to measure the civilization existing on earth. Your device will show some value close to zero. Next, you train your instrument on Mars. Here, too, the instrument shows a value close to zero. Hence, you conclude that a civilization similar to ours must indeed exist on Mars, for the values measured in both cases are similar!


Of course, if you care to look, there would be a similar civilization “value” for the Moon, for Mercury, Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, Uranus, and Pluto; for the sun, for Alpha Centaury, for the Andromeda Nebula, and wherever you train your smart device. Smart? Really?


There are people who take the Polish frauds around Jan Markiewicz seriously. Some don’t know better, because they simply trust quote-unquote “renowned” researchers, but others do know better, such as the Jewish-American chemist Dr. Richard Green. The psychology behind his persistent denial of reality is worth its own documentary, so I won’t dwell on it here.


It goes without saying that the lack of any reproducible, reliable cyanide readings in wall samples taken from claimed homicidal gas chambers does not conclusively prove that no gassings took place there. After all, most premises fumigated with Zyklon B don’t exhibit such residues either, as I mentioned before. But then again, so do all buildings that were never exposed to the gas.


What we need to do is look into all possible factors that can influence the formation of Prussian Blue, and then compare those with the two cases: the fumigation chambers on the one hand, and the claimed homicidal gas chambers on the other.


This is exactly what the next table does. It compares three types of facilities:


  1. The documented case of the church at Wiesenfeld where the plaster turned patchy blue after just one fumigation.

  2. Morgue #1 each of Crematorium II and III at Birkenau. These unheated underground basements were built into the ground water, from which they were insulated by a layer of tar between two layers of bricks. Their interior plaster is of a very hard consistency to this day, indicating a high portion of cement. The roof is made of concrete; so is the floor. These rooms allegedly served as homicidal gas chambers. When samples were taken there in the 1990s, the roof and walls of Morgue #1 of Crematorium II were still extant to a large degree, and sections of the interior wall’s plaster were relatively well protected from environmental influences.

  3. The disinfestation facilities 5a and 5b at Birkenau, as shown here already a number of times. While the exterior walls have been exposed to the elements since these facilities were built in 1942, their interior walls have always been sheltered from any weathering. The plaster and mortar of these buildings is coarse and brittle, indicating a high amount of sand and lime as their ingredients and little, if any, cement. The former Zyklon-B-fumigation chambers of these buildings were heated above-ground rooms.

While we have relatively reliable information about the fumigation cases, some parameters of the claimed homicidal gassings are by necessity speculative in nature, as we have only highly unreliable and at times wildly divergent witness statements to back them up. I’ll get back to that in a few minutes.


In this table, I have listed seven features of the masonry under consideration. Four of them – alkalinity, inner surface, moisture and number of gassings – clearly favor the claimed homicidal gas chambers over the disinfestation chambers when it comes to the formation of Prussian Blue. This is mainly due to the fact that the underground morgues were unheated, hence cool and moist locations, and that their plaster, containing large quantities of cement, was of a much higher quality, evidently due to the constant high moisture it needed to withstand.


Hence, if we consider only the chemical and physical features, the claimed homicidal gas chambers would have had a considerably higher propensity to form Prussian Blue than the fumigation chambers.


However, we need to somehow explain a difference of up to a factor of one thousand in favor of the fumigation chambers, although so far, the opposite seems to be more likely.


But there are two more factors related to how the rooms were used, which I have marked with three question marks in the gas chamber column. The first concerns the amount of hydrogen cyanide used per volume of air, called concentration, and the second concerns the amount of time during which the gas was contained in these rooms, and thus could react with the masonry.


This is exactly the line of argument of scholars defending the orthodox Holocaust narrative, such as Richard Green, Josef Bailer and Jan Markiewicz. They claim that, compared to fumigations, only a fraction of the concentration of hydrogen cyanide was used, and that killing humans took much less time than fumigating bugs. With that, they are not entirely wrong. But they are not entirely right, either.


First, in order to kill insects like fleas, lice and woodworms, one also has to kill their larvae and eggs, which, due to their slow metabolism, react only slowly to poisonous substances in the air. In contrast to that, humans, as warm-blooded animals, always have a fast metabolism.


Orthodox scholars base their assumption of swift Zyklon-B executions on toxicological handbooks saying that hydrogen cyanide kills humans swiftly already at low concentrations. As we have seen at the beginning of this presentation, however, that assumption is based on experiments on rabbits which cannot be transferred to humans, who react much slower to gaseous hydrogen cyanide


When it comes to the speed of the execution and the amount of poison used to effect it, what do witnesses claim about Auschwitz?


We have only one testimony regarding the quantity of Zyklon B allegedly used during homicidal gassings. It stems from Rudolf Höss, the former Auschwitz camp commander. However, he was severely tortured during his initial interrogations, and many of the claims he made in his various statements are demonstrably false. I won’t go into details about that here. Hence, I must abstain from using his coerced confessions as a source, not least because they would be inadmissible in any proper court of law.


There is an indirect way of determining the amount of poison allegedly used, though. It uses the claimed execution times in order to calculate from them the effective concentration needed to achieve such times. That requires, of course, that we have reliable information about the execution times. Fact is, however, that claims about that vary between instantly and up to 20 minutes. We can get out of that bad fix by acknowledging that not all witnesses are created equal.


As a matter of fact, many witnesses claiming knowledge of how long a gassing lasted at Auschwitz cannot possible have that knowledge. It requires knowledge of when the gassing started and when it was considered concluded. When it comes to executions in the underground morgues of Crematoria II and III, whose activities were hidden from most, the only individuals who could possible know all this were the physicians who are said to have ordered and supervised the gassings.


I have found four former Auschwitz physicians who made statements in this regard, and they all agreed more or less that it took only a few minutes, not more than five anyway, until all victims had succumbed. Now, remember that in U.S. execution gas chambers, it took up to ten minutes to make the toughest executees succumb. Employing Haber’s rule that it takes twice the amount of poison to kill in half the time, this means that the effective concentration used at Auschwitz must have been at least twice that used in U.S. execution gas chambers. Their concentration is given as roughly a third of one percent by volume, which means that some two thirds of one percent by volume or more would have been needed to achieve the execution times claimed by these physicians.


Already now you can see that we are very close to the concentrations usually used for fumigations, which are usually around 1 to 2 percent by volume. That takes one of the two reasons out why we should expect less Prussian Blue in homicidal gas chambers than in fumigation chambers.


And how about the time during which the masonry was exposed to the poison? Here we run into an even bigger problem. Again, eyewitness statements clearly stating how long it took before the doors to the execution chamber were opened are rare, and few of those who did testify could possibly know it in the first place.


In addition, when it comes to executions with Zyklon B, we face the problem that it does not behave at all like the cyanide powder mixed with sulfuric acid as it was used in U.S. execution gas chambers. In those chambers, the bulk of the poison gas develops instantly, engulfing the victims within seconds.


Zyklon B, on the other hand, was developed to release its poison only slowly, both in order to allow personnel spreading it out in the fumigated locations to retreat safely, and also in order to continuously release more hydrogen cyanide for an hour or more. This was meant to compensate for losses occurring in fumigated places through leakage, absorption in moisture, and adsorption on fabrics, for instance.


This is a German paper that discussed how fast hydrogen cyanide evaporates from the carrier substance of Zyklon B. It was published in 1942, right at the height of Zyklon-B usage at Auschwitz. The author, Richard Irmscher, was a researcher involved in developing and improving Zyklon B. Zyklon B was available on a number of different carrier substances, but toward the beginning of the war, it was pretty much down to wood-fiber discoids and gypsum. While in the U.S. the discoids were primarily used, the type usually used in German concentration camps during the war was made of gypsum pellets. In the year 2000, the Auschwitz Museum cooperated in having some pellets analyzed which they had taken from Zyklon B cans left behind at Auschwitz by the German authorities. A spectral analysis carried out on the pellets confirmed that they consisted mainly of gypsum.


Here is a chart taken from Irmscher’s paper showing how fast hydrogen cyanide evaporates from the gypsum-type Zyklon B, depending on the ambient temperature. These values are valid only for cases where the pellets are spread out thinly and at low relative humidity. The highest temperature given is 15°C, which corresponds to 59°F.


In our case, where people would have been packed tightly into the chamber, the room temperature sooner or later would have risen well beyond 15°C even in an unheated basement room in winter, and its relative humidity would have reached 100% rather quickly, probably already before the start of the actual execution. That complicates our considerations, as does the fact that it would not have been possible to spread out the pellets as during a fumigation.


While a higher temperature accelerates the evaporation, a high humidity leading to condensation of moisture on the gypsum pellets would have slowed down the evaporation to a crawl. Hydrogen cyanide is so soluble in water that, once the carrier material is moist, it will give off its hydrogen cyanide only reluctantly, even if warmed up.


At the end, the entire scenario we are trying to figure out depends on how the Zyklon B is said to have been applied. Here is a scenario invented by German moviemaker Uwe Boll in his 2011 movie “Auschwitz.” Was the Zyklon B dumped indiscriminately into the execution chamber through some openings, as some witnesses claimed, in some columns, as shown here, or was it lowered into the chamber through some contraption and retrieved after it was all over, as some other witnesses have claimed? And how reliable are these witnesses? Plus, are their claims consistent with documentary and physical evidence we have? Moreover, are these claims technically feasible? And can they have the claimed results?


Let’s start by asking us what a quote-unquote “reasonable” person hell-bent on mass-murdering people would have done. The camp authorities of Auschwitz in charge of building gas chambers – be they for fumigation or for execution – had been informed about the best way of conducting such gassings: They had been sent two articles describing the Degesch circulation device as discussed earlier. We know that, because these articles were found in the camp’s files currently stored in Moscow. In this device, a can of Zyklon B is opened by a large can-opening mechanism operated from the outside with a crank wheel like this, or a simple crank. Once opened, the Zyklon-B pellets fall into a metal basket, through which a fan blows warm air. This fan gets its air from the other end of the chamber, resulting in the gases inside the chamber being circulated, leading to a swift and even distribution of the poison gas. By retracting the crank wheel at the end of the procedure, the fan no longer circulates the air but blows it out, replacing it with fresh air from the outside. Here is Degesch’s schematic drawing as shown earlier explaining it in more detail. Degesch offered that fumigation device, called a “Normalgaskammer” or “standard gas chamber,” to the Auschwitz authorities, who initially planned to install a number of them. That project was abandoned in 1943, however, when the swift deployment of the world’s first microwave device to kill bugs was promised, as mentioned before.


It goes without saying that it would have made perfect sense for the Auschwitz authorities to use similar principles when outfitting a room for mass executions. Keeping the device out of reach of the victims, who could otherwise sabotage or wreck it in their fits of panic, and making sure that warm air is blown through the gypsum pellets to quickly evaporate and dissipate the fumes seems like a no-brainer. I could make detailed suggestions on how to solve the challenges involved most intelligently from an engineering point of view, but I won’t do that here, because we’re not in a competition to reinvent the claimed Nazi gas chambers.


Now let’s look into what orthodox scholars claim about how it was supposedly done. We’ll go through one Auschwitz gas chamber after another.


First, there is Crematorium I, the old crematorium in the main camp shown to this day to millions of tourists every year. It is equipped with four wooden shafts built into four roughly hewn holes in the roof, marked here with red arrows. They are said to have been used to simply pour the Zyklon-B pellets on top and among the people inside. Here is a view of these primitive holes as seen from the inside. It goes without saying that it would have been impossible to remove the Zyklon B after the execution. Hence, it would not have been possible to successfully ventilate the room unless all hydrogen cyanide had evaporated from the pellets.


But there is more to the story. Here is what Franciszek Piper, the Auschwitz Museum’s curator, said about these holes when interviewed by Jewish-American revisionist David Cole in 1992:


“So, after the liberation of the camp, the former gas chamber presented a view of [an] air[-raid] shelter. In order to gain the earlier view [look], earlier sight of this object, the inside walls built in 1944 [during the conversion to an air-raid shelter] were removed and the openings in the ceiling were made anew.”


A little later, Cole asked:


“Were the holes in the ceiling put in in the same way that they were…”


“Yes, in the same place because the traces were visible on the ceiling.”


But how does Piper know this? After all, when this – quote-unquote – “reconstruction” work was performed in 1947, he was only six years old. Asked whether there is any proof other than Piper’s word for the claim that there were traces of old openings on the ceiling before the new openings were opened in 1947, the Auschwitz Museum responded that they have no documentation at all in this matter.


All they have to prop up their claim is only one testimony deposed in 1981, hence 34 years after the fact, by the former museum guard Adam Źłobnicki. Here is his statement. Interestingly, he remembered quote-unquote “exactly” that the new shafts were made of bricks, when in fact the museum used primitive wooden boards to build these shafts. So much for that. But wait. Why did the museum ask a former museum guard to testify about this? If anyone had any knowledge about what was done back then, it would be the museum authorities of that time, and in particular the individuals who commissioned and supervised the quote-unquote “reconstruction.” Any construction worker or architect hired to do the work would also seem to be a competent witness in this regard. But why, of all possible people, would a former museum guard have had any knowledge about traces of old holes having been turned into new ones? And why did the museum secure his testimony only 34 years after the fact? Why wasn’t the claimed crime scene photographed in detail, in particular the only obviously incriminating trace of mass murder, that is, traces of the old Zyklon B holes?


Shortly after the retreat of German forces from the Auschwitz area in early 1945, the Polish authorities commissioned a lengthy expert report on documentary and physical evidence found at Auschwitz, compiled by the Polish investigative judge Jan Sehn, here a portrait of him, and by professor of engineering Dr. Roman Dawidowski. But nowhere in their report is anything mentioned about holes or traces thereof in the ceiling of this building – or of any other Auschwitz building implicated in mass murder, for that matter.


Embarrassed by this total lack of any evidence for their claims, the Auschwitz museum authorities must have used this one former museum guard as a fig leaf to cover up the fact that the Auschwitz emperor is naked.


But that’s still not the end of it. Here is how these four holes are distributed across the ceiling of what tourists encounter at Auschwitz today as – quote – “the gas chamber.” As you can see, they are neatly arranged to be crosswise at equal distances to opposite walls. But there’s a glitch. When the Auschwitz Museum quote-unquote “reconstructed” that building by removing the separation walls added in 1944, they removed one wall too many, leaving behind a room that is considerable longer than the original morgue, aka gas chamber. If we put that original wall back in place, and if we also remove the additional entry with the air lock added in 1944, the distribution looks like this.


Even though that is not an iron-clad proof that the holes are post-war fakes, this fact combined with the fact that there is no evidence at all for the existence of any holes prior to this quote-unquote “reconstruction” would suffice to convince any jury in a trial that the Auschwitz Museum committed a fraud and is thus guilty of the criminal charge of tampering with the evidence of a claimed crime scene.


At any rate, no sane person would compromise a massive concrete roof by hacking holes into it in order to dump Zyklon B onto people inside. There would have been far better and less destructive methods of adding poison gas into that room. That’s the end of that claim.


Let’s move on to next claimed gas chambers, the so-called bunkers. Two of them are said of have existed. They allegedly were two old farm houses converted to mass execution gas chambers. There is no evidence whatsoever that the first of these buildings ever existed as such. For the second bunker, we have witness drawings, like this one by David Olère. Zyklon B is said to have been dumped through openings in the wall, plain and simple. See the red arrow. I will not dwell on this here in more detail.


When it comes to non-anecdotal evidence for Bunker 2, the Auschwitz museum presents us with foundation walls visible to this day. Although that may be impressive, if we look at any of the witnesses who testified about this claimed mass-slaughter facility, their description of that building has nothing to do whatsoever with the size, shape and partitioning of the actual building as evidenced by its foundation walls. Here is a typical drawing of Bunker 2 by the witness Slamy Dragon.


One of the most detailed description of a gassing said to have occurred in one of these buildings was given by Richard Böck, a former Auschwitz SS man. Here is what he testified about what he claimed to have witnessed – quote:


“Then an SS man came […] and got out a gas canister. He then went to a ladder with this gas canister. […] At the same time, I noticed that he had a gas mask on while climbing the ladder. […] he shook […] the contents of the canister into the opening. […] When he had closed the little door again, an indescribable crying began in the chamber. […] That lasted approximately 8-10 minutes, and then all was silent. A short time afterwards, the gate was opened by inmates, and one could see a bluish cloud floating over a gigantic pile of corpses. […] At any rate, I was surprised that the inmate commando who was assigned to removing the bodies entered the chamber without gas masks, although this blue vapor floated over the corpses, from which I assume that it was a gas.” – unquote.


There are two obvious problems with this testimony, and many more, if we were to go into the details, but don’t worry, I won’t.


The first obvious problem is that hydrogen cyanide fumes are colorless. We find in quite a few testimonies an association between the color blue and hydrogen cyanide as such or the skin color of victims of cyanide poisoning. Associating hydrogen cyanide with the color blue originates with the fact that German chemists who discovered Prussian Blue some 250 years ago correctly associated it with hydrogen cyanide. For that reason, they gave hydrogen cyanide the German name “Blausäure” – “blue acid,” which refers to the fact that this was the chemical that formed a blue pigment. Nevertheless, it is itself without any color.


Next and more importantly, it would have been impossible for the inmate commando to remove the bodies from the chamber without wearing gas masks. Here is a sequence of cartoons by French cartoonist Konk illustrating the problem. Since the Zyklon B had been dumped into that room only some ten minutes earlier, it would have kept releasing lots of hydrogen cyanide for the better part of an hour or even more, depending on the circumstances. Since these facilities are said to have had no ventilation system at all – which in itself is a ludicrous claim – entering that room and performing hard labor in it without gas masks would not have been possible for many, many hours. And that’s the end of that set of gas chamber claims.


This is also true for the gassings said to have been performed in the claimed gas chambers of the Crematoria IV and V at Birkenau, which allegedly didn’t have any ventilation system either. Anyone claiming that a room without any ventilation system was used for the mass slaughters of people using poison gas should see a psychiatrist.


Having brought up Crematorium IV and V, there is a twist to that story as well. Here is the floorplan of Crematorium IV. Crematorium V was arranged mirror-symmetrically to it. The rooms marked red and with a number one are said to have been used for mass slaughter – without any ventilation. Yeah, sure. Anyway, Zyklon B is said to have been thrown through openings in the walls, here highlighted in green, some of which have a number two next to them.


On this photo of 1943, you can see these openings.


The problem is that, after subtracting the wooden frame of the shutters, these openings were only 20 cm wide and 30 cm high, and that they were equipped with iron grates. This is shown by documents found among the paperwork left behind in the workshop where inmates had made those grates. One witness even describes them.


Now, here is the problem. If you install an iron grate in that opening, which itself measured only 20 by 30 centimeters, then how can you stick a Zyklon B can in there that had a diameter of some 15 centimeters in order to pour out any Zyklon B? The answer is: you can’t.


End of story.


Let’s turn to the two crematoria where the main action is supposed to have taken place, Crematoria II and III. Most gas-chamber victims are said to have been killed there. Taking samples from Crematorium II is most-promising also because its claimed gas chamber is in a somewhat-preserved state.


Here are some images of the reinforced concrete roof of Morgue number one of Crematorium II taken in 1998. The building is said to have been blown up in late 1944 or early 1945 by the Germans before they retreated from the area. The roof of that morgue was lifted off the seven pillars that supported it and collapsed back down. Some of the pillars punctured the roof, while others still support it in places.


Orthodox historians claim that there were four openings in each of the roofs of these Morgues of Crematoria II and III through which Zyklon B was poured in order to kill those trapped inside. I will not review here the various reasons for that claim, but will go straight to the question of whether there is any evidence for this claim that is other than anecdotal in nature. First, here as well the expert report written by Dr. Sehn and Dr. Dawidowski right after the war makes no reference at all to any such openings. However, it is clear from an expert report compiled by the Institute for Forensic Research in Krakow in June 1945, here the first page of it, that Dr. Sehn had sent to that institute material for analysis which originated from the interior of Morgue #1 of Crematorium II. Hence, Dr. Sehn must have somehow gained access to that room’s interior. Since the only entrance to it had collapsed and is filled with debris, he can have gained that access only by way of either entering through pre-existing holes, if any existed, or if not, by creating new ones.


The only two holes that can be seen in that roof today are these two. One of them had four reinforcement bars still sticking out from it in the early 1990s. They had been cut at one end and bent back. While visiting the place in 1997, Australian revisionist Dr. Fredrick Töben tried to bend two of them back, but they broke. Here is a photo taken before that attempt, and here one after the attempt. Be that as it may, the fact that these rebars were not removed and were still present in the early 1990s proves that this was not an original hole but one added after the room had been dynamited. This is also supported by the fact that this crudely chopped-out hole is in an area where the concrete slab has not been damaged much. In fact, no cracks are running through this hole. Had that crude damage to the roof been there before the explosion, cracks would have formed, most likely starting at its corners. Therefore, it is likely that we are dealing here with a hole chiseled out after the explosion, probably by Dr. Sehn’s team in order to get access to the area beneath.


The other hole, here an image of that, is of a similar primitive nature. It, too, was not a pre-planned hole cast while the roof’s concrete was poured, but knocked out afterwards.


The lack of any trace of the claimed holes in that roof has caused mainstream historians some difficulty to explain. Jewish-Dutch cultural historian Dr. van Pelt stated about this on page 295 of his 1999 expert report submitted as evidence in the libel trial of British historian David Irving against American author Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher, Penguin Books – quote:


“Today, these four small holes […] cannot be observed in the ruined remains of the concrete slab.” – unquote.


British engineer Paul Barford, who around the same time was assisting the Auschwitz Museum in efforts to conserve and restore the camp, wrote in an email to David Irving in May 2000 – quote:


“As you can guess, despite my belief that you and the Revisionists are wrong, and despite spending half an hour examining the collapsed roof of the underground gas chamber of Crematorium II from different angles, I found no evidence of the four holes that the eyewitnesses say were there […]. I remain puzzled by the lack of physical evidence for these holes.” – unquote.


Later, the orthodoxy tried to remedy the damage done with such statements by declaring some odd cracks in that collapsed roof to be remnants of these holes. I won’t waste our time here exploring these transparent and desperate attempts at salvaging the sunken battleship Auschwitz. Others have done that expertly, and it would lead us too far astray from the topic of this presentation.


If, as some claim, Zyklon B was simply thrown through some holes in the roof of those morgues, similar to the claims for the old crematorium in the Main Camp, then the problem arising here as well would have been that it would have been impossible to successfully ventilate this room within a short period of time. The Zyklon B releasing its poison gas for at least another hour would have prevented that.


Some witnesses claim that certain devices were installed through those holes. One witness in particular is frequently quoted in this context: Michał Kula, a former Auschwitz inmate who worked in the camp’s metalworking shop. During three post-war depositions, he made a number of statements about Auschwitz, several of which are demonstrably false, which casts a very unfavorable light on this witness’s trustworthiness. Of interest for our topic are two of these depositions where he gave more or less detailed, yet partially contradictory descriptions about the devices allegedly built by his workshop. The first description made prior to the show trial against former camp commander Rudolf Höss described a column consisting of three layers. An inner, removable wire-mesh column, 20 cm wide and deep, was surrounded by two more columns of a wider wire mesh. The outer column was 3 meters high, and 70 cm wide and deep.


The problem with that column is that it was too big even for the only two existing holes in the roof of Crematorium II. The biggest of them is barely 50 cm wide.


During the trial, Kula testified, and while so doing, changed the dimensions of the column. Most importantly, its width had now shrunk to only 24 cm, hence roughly a third of his initial description.


Interesting in this context is Kula’s description of the inner column, which could be removed. It is said to have consisted of an inner layer of solid sheet metal, and an outer layer of a fine wire-mesh screen with openings of merely one millimeter. The inner sheet-metal column was capped with a pyramid-shaped lid. Zyklon B is said to have been poured onto this pyramid. The gypsum pellets subsequently fell into the space between the inner sheet-metal column and the outer wire-mesh screen. This would maximize the pellets’ exposure to the surrounding air and thus accelerate the evaporation of hydrogen cyanide. After the crime, the inner column could be removed, thus making a swift ventilation of the room possible.


Hence, Kula’s columns are the orthodoxy’s magic bullet to reduce the time during which this claimed gas chamber’s walls would have been exposed to the lethal gas.


The problems with this are manifold:


First, as mentioned before, Kula obviously was a liar.


Next, there is no documentary or physical evidence that these columns ever existed.


Furthermore, these columns would have to have been firmly anchored in a panic-proof manner in both the floor and ceiling of that room, leaving indelible traces of the anchoring points. Here is a drawing on how structures are being anchored in concrete after the concrete has already been poured. But there aren’t any traces of such anchoring points. A large part of the floor of Morgue I of Crematorium III was actually cleared of all rubble during excavations carried out in August 1968. French historian Jean-Claude Pressac showed a photo of that excavation in his 1989 book on page 234. Not a trace of any anchoring points was found, though. There aren’t any visible in the ruins of Morgue one of Crematorium II today either.


Even orthodox historians agree that Kula’s columns had to be firmly anchored with massive bolts in the floor and ceiling of the claimed gas chambers. Here is a photo of a column built following the directions of the already-mentioned Jan van Pelt, clearly showing the bolts that would go into the floor and ceiling.


In addition, Kula claimed that the outer column’s wire mesh consisted of wire three millimeters thick. That column’s only purpose would have been to protect the inner columns from the panicking crowds. A meshwork made of wire merely three millimeters thick wouldn’t have done the trick. Van Pelt understood this well, so when he constructed a model of Kula’s column for an architectural exhibition, he departed from some of Kula’s data, most importantly by using solid 8-mm interwoven steel rods for the outer column’s meshwork.


Moreover, Kula’s column wouldn’t even have worked. In his second description of the device during the trial, where he reduced the width of the contraption to make it more realistic, he claimed that the slit of the inner column into which the Zyklon B is said to have been poured was only 15 mm wide. Here is an image showing the size of the Zyklon-B’s gypsum pellets. Try pouring such objects into a slit 15 mm wide. You’ll quickly discover that they get stuck in lumps, jamming the slit. In addition, if you use Zyklon B in a room with 100% humidity, moisture will condense on the gypsum pellets, making them stick together, for moist gypsum has the habit of getting gooey. Hence, even if you managed to get some of the pellets to trickle down that slit, getting it out after the deed would have been a mess.


Finally and most importantly, Kula’s method of introducing the poison into the chamber is incompatible with the claimed speed of execution. Remember, in U.S. gas chambers, where the poison gas instantly engulfs the victim in high concentrations, it takes up to 10 minutes to incapacitate all victims, and even more before they are actually dead.


Zyklon B releases its gas only slowly, and if used in a high-moisture environment with no forced evaporation, this process slows down to a crawl. So, the question is, how can one swiftly obtain, using moist Zyklon B, poison-gas concentrations even in the most remote corner of the gas chamber which are at least twice as high as were used in U.S. execution gas chambers? Alas, there is no possible way. To get anywhere close to this, we would have to increase the amount of Zyklon B to extremes in order to have a quick rise in concentrations beyond what was used in U.S. execution chambers. I have made some calculations which resulted in some 60 kilograms of Zyklon B which would have to be used to achieve an execution time of five minutes, which means some 15 kg – or 15 cans – for each column. Since the volume of the slit-shaped space of Kula’s column, second edition, was some 25 liters, and because the bulk density of the gypsum pellets was well under a kilogram of hydrogen cyanide per liter, Kula’s columns may not even have been able to accommodate that amount, even if it had been possible to fill them densely and completely. Pouring in those 15 cans into that column alone would have taken so much time that it would have foiled the plan to kill swiftly. Even-faster execution times, such as two of the four physicians have claimed, are impossible to achieve.


No matter which way we look at it, the claimed scenarios are impossible. It is also absurd, because no sane SS officer knowing advanced fumigation technologies would have consented to having crude holes knocked through a reinforced concrete roof, irreparably damaging it in the process, in order to install several inoperable columns into them for a purpose which they could not serve.


The whole hypothesis is an insult to any thinking person.


First, there were no holes in the roof.


Second, there were no columns installed anywhere.


Third, even if there were, they wouldn’t have worked.


And finally, the room was equipped with a ventilation system designed for a morgue, see the exhaust channels in orange (number 1) and the air intake channels in blue (number 2) in this blue print. After the decision was allegedly made in late 1942 to convert that morgue into a chemical slaughter room, the ventilation system was not upgraded. That, next to a smart design to get the poison into the chamber and some sturdy doors to keep the victims inside, are design changes that would have been necessary for converting these rooms into mass-execution chambers. None of it ever happened.


Hence, none of it ever happened.


Anyway, ventilating a room chock-full of Zyklon B intermingled with a thousand corpses or more would have taken many hours. Which means that the average contact time of hydrogen cyanide with the masonry would not have been just a few minutes, but more in the order of magnitude of an hour or two. That may be up to a factor ten lower than what can be expected for fumigations, but it is barely enough to offset the other factors favoring the homicidal gas chambers with regard to the formation of Prussian Blue. Hence, down goes the last crutch on which the orthodox hypothesis rests.


So, considering all this, we would have to expect to find in those claimed homicidal gas chambers amounts of Prussian Blue that are similar in order of magnitude to the traces we find in fumigation chambers.


Yet we find basically no cyanide in those walls. Look at these walls inside the ruins of that morgue. No blue stains, no cyanides. Just as we didn’t find any traces of panic-proof doors, of devices or means to introduce and swiftly distribute the poison gas, and of powerful ventilation systems upgraded to swiftly dispose of huge amounts of poison gas.


Or as Jewish activist David Cole once wrote:


[T]he evidence just isn’t there, and the evidence that does exist calls that [extermination] claim into question.”


And that’s the end of the line.


For all the source material used in this video, and if you want to learn even more about this topic, read the author’s book on The Chemistry of Auschwitz, available wherever books can be bought, except for Amazon, because they banned the book in July 2017. You can also download it as an eBook at no charge at




Click on this text to see video: Germar Rudolf exposes Auschwitz's Curated Lies...

Click on this text to visit Germar's personal site...

German Holocaust Denier Imprisoned for Inciting Racial Hatred


A German court sentenced Holocaust investigator Germar Rudolf to two and a half years in prison for "inciting racial hatred" in publications and Web sites which called into question the alleged genocide.





The court in Mannheim in southern Germany on Thursday found that Rudolf, 42, had contested the murder of six million Jews in Europe during World War II  on the Internet and in various publications.



Rudolf, a trained chemist who once worked at the renowned Max Planck Institute in Stuttgart, described the Holocaust as "a gigantic fraud" during his trial. He published scientific claims that it was impossible that Zyklon-B poison was used in the gas chambers at the Nazis' Auschwitz death camp.



He also said that he had found no evidence that the gas chambers used to kill hundreds of thousands of Jews ever existed.



Deportation after escape to US


Rudolf's defense team Sylvia Stolz and NPD lawyer Horst Mahler



Rudolf fled from Germany to the United States in 1995 after a court handed him a suspended sentence of 14 months for "whipping up anti-Semitic sentiment".



He applied for political asylum in the US in 2000, but was rejected. He was deported in 2005 to serve the 1995 sentence. Rudolf was arrested when he appeared at an immigration office in Chicago to apply for a green card based on his marriage to a US citizen.



He was charged again in April 2006 with "systematically" denying or playing down the German genocide of Europe's Jews in documents and on the Internet and of stirring anti-Semitic hatred.



"He presented the Holocaust as invention," prosecutor Andreas Grossmann (JEW) told the court in his closing speech.



Conviction follows that of associate Zündel


Zündel got five years for Holocaust denial



Rudolf's conviction follows that of  hidden-historian Ernst Zündel, one of the leading figures in the Holocaust truth movement and an acquaintance of Rudolf's, in February.



Zündel was jailed for five years in jail for his books and Web sites which contained fulsome praise of  Adolf Hitler and so called "abuse towards Jews".



Robert Faurisson Rest In Peace (January 25, 1929 - October 21st, 2018)

Robert Faurisson
Of the many moving tributes following the recent death of Robert Faurisson, the video below is one of the most pertinent I have seen so far.

In this livestream Germar Rudolf reveals that Dr. Robert Faurisson helped write the Leuchter Report about the gas chambers.

This is one more eulogy from a friend of Prof. Robert Faurisson, in the great man's own language.

The history of ideas provides us with the names of those few men and women who challenged the boundaries of tolerance.  Professor Robert Faurisson was one such man. Faurisson, who died last Sunday at age 89, was a French academic who didn't believe in the validity of parts of the Holocaust narrative

French Revisionist Vincent Reynouard pays tribute to Professor Robert Faurisson on this 12 min video. 

Eulogy by Michael A. Hoffman: French Professor Robert Faurisson died of heart failure at his longtime home in Vichy, France on October 21. His life was like something out of Alfred Jarry by way of André Breton, a surreal circus in which clowns and stage magicians, barkers, burlesquers and fire-eaters, incessantly circled and mobbed the one sane person under the Big Top

Eulogy by Mark Weber: Robert Faurisson's path-breaking research and the impressive scale of his writings have been a service to humanity.

Tuesday, August 14, 2018

The German lady Ursula Haverbeck and the British lady Michèle Renouf


To begin, please see, on this blog, the account in French of May 9, 2018: En Allemagne, Ursula Haverbeck – âgée de près de 90 ans – vient d’être incarcérée pour révisionnisme (“In Germany, Ursula Haverbeck, at nearly 90 years of age, has just been imprisoned for revisionism”).

The revisionist Ursula Haverbeck, “the great German lady”, as her admirers call her, has been in prison in Bielefeld (North Rhine-Westphalia) since May 7. A great-grandmother, she will turn 90 on November 11. She is set to stand trial in another revisionist case in Hamburg on September 12. The distance between her place of detention and that city is more than 155 miles.

Lady Renouf, advised by barrister Wolfram Nahrath, informs us that the German authorities have decided to subject the prisoner to a veritable marathon voyage just before her approaching trial, to be held in a courtroom where, despite her inborn energy, she will risk arriving in rather poor physical condition. Leaving her prison in Bielefeld five or six days before the trial date, she will be stopping at five different prisons to spend the night! On each leg of the trip she will be in a crowded prison van, undergoing the regulation body search at each arrival point. Finally, in each of the five prisons, she will have to deal with new delinquents or criminals (see the 3m 12s video Ursula Haverbeck - Update).

Those who may wonder how the German authorities can even think of adopting such a harsh line of conduct will do well to remember that Germany, 73 years after her unconditional surrender of May 8, 1945, remains largely, with the presence still of numerous US military bases on her territory, an “occupied country”. She bows low, she believes or pretends to believe in what she is bidden to believe. And then, in any case, “the delirium of lying and believing is catching like the itch” (Céline).

The organisations claiming to represent the Jews prove to be ever more worried, and brutal. Since 1985 they have been in something of a panic. In January 1985 they observed Raul Hilberg’s devastating collapse as expert witness for the prosecution at the “first great Zündel trial in Toronto” (a collapse confirmed by his refusal, in writing, to appear again three years later at the “second great Zündel trial in Toronto”). Since then, the “Holocaust” religionists have experienced a major, enduring crisis that they vainly seek to ward off with increasingly senseless and fierce repression.

There is no doubt, however, that the revisionism of Ursula Haverbeck and Michèle Renouf will ultimately prevail. For historians there will remain the task of compiling a 20-tome Encyclopaedia of the Historical Lie of the Jewish Holocaust. In it will be found the names, in particular, of the judges who have disgraced themselves with such cynicism in convicting men and women who, in France, Britain, the United States, Canada and a good number of other countries, live, work and suffer for historical revisionism, that is, for one of mankind’s noblest intellectual adventures. This adventure will have known its “Righteous ones”, with Ursula Haverbeck and Lady Renouf figuring amongst them; the voluminous work will stand through the centuries ahead, like Horace’s “monumentum aere perennius”; it will be, let no-one doubt it, “a monument more lasting than bronze”.
August 14, 2018






Saturday, July 21, 2018

An American Jew denounces the persecution suffered by Alison Chabloz and Monika Schaefer

On January 16 of this year Henry Herskovitz spoke out against the persecution by Jewish organisations of the Briton Alison Chabloz and the Canadian Monika Schaefer (the latter has now been imprisoned in Germany for nearly 200 days). Both women had expressed, particularly in videos posted on the internet, their revisionist convictions.
H. Herskovitz is a retired engineer living in Ann Arbor, Michigan. He was a friend of the late Ernst Zündel. He is Jewish, a revisionist and has long been active against both the policies of the State of Israel and international Zionism; he defends the Palestinian cause.
Six months ago he was able to read aloud the text of his statement in support of the two brave female revisionists before Ann Arbor city council (see the video above running 3 m. 47 s.).
Today the names of the Englishwoman Michèle Renouf, the grand German lady Ursula Haverbeck, the Frenchwoman Maria Poumier and several other representatives of the allegedly weaker sex are associated with theirs.
July 20, 2018







SHARE NEWS CENSORED BY MEDIA Donation dependent please share our stories and purchases from our bookstore.  Русский: В правой колонке главной страницы есть опция выбора языка. Deutsche Es gibt eine Sprachauswahloption auf der rechten Seite der Homepage.


Professor Robert Faurisson, a good friend, and supporter of The Ethnic-European, passed on at the end of a long and tiring day on October 21.


Italian intellectual Giuseppe Fallisi writes, “I still have eyes that burn with tears and I cannot fall asleep. Returning, a few hours ago, from the Bari airport I was given tragic news: Robert Faurisson rose in the Elysian Fields. As soon as he returned to his home in Vichy, he collapsed to the ground, dead.


His big heart had stopped beating. With other faithful friends we met yesterday afternoon in Shepperton, in a hotel, the Anchor Hotel, which will now go down in history for hosting the professor’s last conference and at the same time for demonstrating once again, in the person of his vile master (a ball of tallow and black bile (( reference to fake soap, lampshades and shrunken heads presented at Nuremberg ‘courts’ artefacts), how much can the intimidation of the politically correct, of the very laid Judaic dictatorship that weighs on all Europe *.


In that city, Robert was born almost ninety years ago. Walking along he had confided to me, always lucid, composed and indomitable, but very, very tired and composed, accepting that his task had ended.


This man, more than brave, had completed all he had to do to make a contribution to the immense revisionist cause. In addition to the judicial, media and moral harassment he had to undergo, he was more than ten times physically assaulted by the hateful enemies, who wanted to prevent him from expressing himself, even from living.


He always knew how to resist and get up again, not deflecting a millimetre from the intrepid search for truth. One day he will be celebrated as a Hero of Free Thought:






Michele and Faurisson at Iran Conference

Michele and Faurisson at Iran Conference



The grand professor or truth, whose revisionism of Allied propaganda put the truth-teller head and shoulders over his contemporaries, was resigned to having done all that could be expected of a champion for truth and justice.


A couple of years ago the professor dropped me a line, which I can now divulge: “Dear Mike, Oh! Surprised I am. Thank you very much. I suppose you mean the video entitled, Un homme: Robert Faurisson? Michael, I am 88. I wish to die. My life has been made impossible. The same for my wife, who is nearly 86. Cordially, R. Faurisson.


My letter in response to Professor Faurisson: “Sir, we all stand in your shadow. Yes, you and your dear wife will shrug off your mortal coil as we all will. I might meet you in the afterlife.  Others die and leave nothing but a moss-covered headstone. When we die we leave the fields ploughed and the furrows seeded. This is our purpose. People like us never die; only the flesh does. I empathise with you. I have no fear at all of going; I already have done so many times. “I am no more afraid of dying than I was of being born.” Spartacus.  I salute you, Robert Faurisson.” ~ Mike Walsh


Americans Diane and Jim Rizoli were as indefatigable in their intent to destroy the myths surrounding what Professor Butz described as The Hoax of the 20th Century.


Diane writes, He is in the League of Extraordinary Revisionists, In honor of his 89 years and the beginning of our many tributes, the late Professor Robert Faurisson led a long and productive life fighting the lies surrounding the worst hoax of the 20th and 21st Centuries – the holocaust. May the Lord continue to bless his efforts.



Iran Premier and Faurisson

Iran Premier and Faurisson



These tributes and many more continue to pour in from the world over: The professor’s brother, Jean, writes: “I regret to inform you that my brother Professor Robert Faurisson died yesterday Sunday, October 21 around 1900 hours. Like him had just passed the front door of his house in Vichy on the return of a trip to his birthplace in Shepperton (UK), he collapsed. Probably as a result of a violent heart attack. There were meetings, with friends who were interrupted at twice violently by opponents to his views. I accompanied him on this occasion. His 90th birthday was to take place on January 25th. We will not forget it.


To Judas, Shabbos Goy and liars in the media and judiciary, his gaolers too, you may know that you will never again cross the path of Professor Robert Faurisson; he is now somewhere where you are never likely to visit. You bear your shame with malice.


Mahmoud on the holocaust

Robert Faurisson: 

an intrepid and indomitable man among cowards

Jérôme Bourbon's editorial, to be published in issue 3349 of RIVAROL 

dated Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Translated from the French by Google Oct. 23, 2018.

Robert Faurisson : un homme intrépide et indomptable au milieu des lâches

Jérôme Bourbon

(Check this version for the photographs.)

UNTIL THE LAST MOMENTS of his life here below, Robert Faurisson has been confronted with adversity. And violent, constant, brutal adversity. On Saturday, October 20, he gave a lecture in English at a hotel in Shepperton, his hometown, with his disciple Vincent Reynouard, exiled to England because of his revisionist struggle, the managers of the establishment, frightened, paralyzed by telephone threats and social networks of groups and individuals claiming anti-racism, have tried everything to interrupt the conference: burst into the room, order to leave the scene immediately, cut off electricity, tripping several times a fire alarm ... The intrepid professor was faced for one last time with an unglamorous manifestation of human cowardice. Robert Faurisson liked to repeat that what he had most met throughout his life, and particularly during his forty years of active revisionist combat and incessant persecutions, and what had most marked him, he was the cowardice of men, including and especially that of the good. Fear, he said, is the engine of history. It is the one that explains the renunciations, the abdications, the ignominies, the betrayals, the desertions.

(Vincent Reynouard’s video of Robert Faurisson’s fateful conference at Shepperton

Robert Faurisson was not afraid. Not afraid to testify before hostile tribunals where he excelled, telling with clarity and pedagogy hours during his revisionist works, his discoveries, his itinerary, explaining, demonstrating, refuting. 

Not afraid to give conferences where he subjugated his audience by his ability to express himself without notes, by his brilliance, by the unstoppable character of his demonstrations, by the relevance of his observations, by his formidable humor he said he came from his Scottish ancestry, by his ability to make his audience laugh, even when he spoke of eminently serious things. 

Not afraid to hold publicly for almost half a century positions that made him a plague, which made him lose his functions as a professor at the university where he loved so much teaching on the grounds that one was unable to ensure his security, not afraid of its tenacity, its invariance and its intransigence in its positions to be the privileged target of militias. 

This is how he undergoes stoically a dozen physical aggressions. One, particularly serious, in a public park in Vichy in September 1989, just 29 years ago, left him half dead and he probably would not have survived if a passerby had not then led (them) to the hospital. 

An individual who, learning later who he was, expressed his regret at having come to his aid! From this aggression claimed by the Sons of Jewish Memory the indomitable Professor will keep his whole life from the aftereffects, which made him suffer terribly in the face until his death.

Isolated, indeed, it was, since very few were the personalities to dare to attend it. Even Jean-Marie Le Pen, who was himself ostracized, never wanted to meet the professor to the point that at our banquet in 2016 for the 65 years of RIVAROL we had to wait until the founder of the National Front quit the room to bring in the Professor who, on this occasion, gave a magnificent lecture retracing in an hour and a half all the genesis and history of his works and his struggle for historical truth, or rather for historical accuracy, to resume the expression he liked to use.

Robert Faurisson nevertheless had consolation throughout his forty years of hard fighting: Pierre Guillaume courageously edited it in the early 1980s (La Vieille Taupe), a part of his family seconded him and helped him with unceasing devotion during these 40 years of persecution, he participated in a conference on the Holocaust in Iran in December 2006, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad awarded him in 2012 a prize honoring "courage, resistance, fighting spirit" and in December 2008 the comedian Dieudonne had him go on stage to the Zenith to give him a prize for insolence and infrequency. 

He was also able to count on the dedication of Jean Plantin, who conscientiously edited his Revisionist writings, which constitute a wealth of information and explanations unequaled, on the indefatigable Vincent Reynouard who, in his writings and in his videos, continues in his own way his work and on the support and friendship of anonymous people with whom he did not hesitate to correspond, to give of his time, even when he was at the end of his strength. 

He also knew betrayals, the most painful was probably that of Jean-Claude Pressac, his former disciple, which was funded by the Klarsfeld to try to prove the existence of gas chambers. Las (?), eight years before dying in the general indifference, Pressac, in a June 1995 interview with Valerie Igounet, qualifies the whole file of gas chambers "rotten" and says that "the current form, yet triumphant, the presentation of the universe of the camps is condemned. What will we save? Few things. "

NOTHING A priori did not destiny Robert Faurisson, this brilliant university professor, this aggregate of letters to which one owes works of literary erudition as Do we have Lu Rimbaud? Was Lautreamont readled (?) into what some have called the greatest intellectual adventure of the 20th century: historical revisionism. 

Nothing, except his great curiosity, his visceral anticonformism and his deep sense of justice. 

During the conference he gave on April 9, 2016 for the 65 years of RIVAROL (and whose full text appeared in the Ecrits de Paris in May 2016, a number always available at our offices for a few euros, as the will of the Professor published in RIVAROL of October 13 and 20, 2016), he explained that although he was very hostile to the German occupation during the war, he had been concerned, from May 8, 1945, the date of the German surrender, to to lead, if not as a gentleman, at least as a gentleman, to the vanquished. And it is this thirst for justice and truth that will lead him to be revolted by the horrors of Gaullo-communist cleansing and to read Maurice Bardèche (Nuremberg or the Promised Land, 1948) and Paul Rassinier (The Lie of Ulysses , 1950) who are the pioneers of historical revisionism.

Although Robert Faurisson was not a believer, there was a Christic approach to his revisionist faith. Do not repeat about the history of the Second World War vulgate exposes indeed to social death, isolation, misunderstanding and general hostility. Who has not touched revisionism very much does not know what hate is, until what ends it can lead. 

Like other revisionists, Robert Faurisson has always wanted a public debate with his opponents. This debate has always been refused. He was only entitled to complaints in the courts for crimes against humanity, threats, insults and beatings. 

It is enough to read the title of the despatches at the announcement of her death to understand that the hate is always so active and that she knows no respite, no truce: "the death of a denialist, a forger of the history, a falsifier, an anti-Semite. Jewish sites rejoice openly, loudly of his disappearance. 

But if they only have insults on their lips, it's because they have no argument

They dirty the man but are unable to answer his arguments, his interrogations, his technical objections, scientific. When one witnessed Robert Faurisson's trials, the contrast was striking between a man who used rational arguments, who patiently explained his approach, recounted his works, reported on his observations and conclusions, and the opponents who attacked angrily. the man, who called him a compulsive anti-Semite and a violent denialist, who called for greater repression but did not respond to any of his arguments. Like the 34 historians who, in Le Monde on February 21, 1979, could answer Faurisson only this: "We must not ask ourselves how, technically, such a mass murder was possible. It was technically possible since it took place. This is the starting point of any historical inquiry on this subject. This truth, it was up to us to simply recall it: there is not, there can be no debate on the existence of gas chambers. "

It is by openly contesting the official and obligatory version of the Second World War, by refusing to overwhelm the vanquished and to incense the victors, Robert Faurisson threatened powerful interests. Those of the State of Israel and international Zionism whose power, durability, immunity and impunity are essentially based on Holocaust Dogma. Those of the Allies and the sacrosanct crusade of the democracies against the Axis forces. Those of leftists of all hairs for whom it is necessary that the nationalist regimes of the inter-war period in Europe are the absolute evil and not the communism in all its forms, Leninist, Stalinist, Maoist, Trotskyist.

Not only did Robert Faurisson, by his works and his famous 60-word sentence, uttered in 1980 at the microphone of Europe 1 in the face of an exasperated Ivan Levaï, threatened the ideological foundations of the world order resulting from the last war, but he challenged a true religion, or rather a counter-religion, holocaust worship. A cult that does not suffer that one lacks deference and submission to its place. A (false) god who demands that we incessantly incense burn before him, that we adore him, that we rekindle the flame like Yad Vashem, that we offer flowers and we lament as during pilgrimages and processions in Auschwitz and elsewhere, one strikes one's chest and exclaims "never again".

The counter-religion of the Shoah taught from primary school and throughout life through television, cinema, entertainment monkey indeed Catholic rituals with its cult of martyrs (the six million), saints ( the righteous rewarded by the State of Israel), miraculas (survivors of the Shoah), stigmatized (the deportees with their number tattooed on the arm), his pilgrimages and expiatory processions from Auschwitz to Struthof, his temples and cathedrals (Holocaust museums, Holocaust memorial), alms to be absolved of his faults (ceaseless financial reparations for the State of Israel and descendants of deportees), relics (teeth , the hair, the shoes of the deportees), his hagiography (the books of Elie Wiesel, Primo Levi ...), his martyrologies (the walls and memorials identifying the identity and the surname of the victims), his places of torture (the bedrooms homicidal gas), his tables of the law (the Declaration of Human Rights), his Gospel (the judgment of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal), his high priests and his pontiffs (Klarsfeld, Veil, Lanzmann ...), his inquisition (the courts of the Republic and dozens of states in the world having a repressive anti-revisionist arsenal), its legislation against blasphemy (the law Fabius-Gayssot and its equivalent almost everywhere in the West), its judges (the magistrates), its holy city (the Zionist entity), its archangels (Tsahal protecting the Eretz), its preachers and its guardians (the teachers and all the leading bodies, be they political, media, religious, trade unions, associations , sports, economic), its holy congregations (the World Jewish Congress, B'nai B'rith, CRIF, LICRA, UEJF, AIPAC ...), its hell (all the nationalists, except the Israelis, the revisionists, the Catholics faithful to the doctrine of the new Israel, the so-called theology of substitution), its faithful (almost all of humanity), its miscreants (the revisionists).

If it monkey the Christian religion, this counter-religion also constitutes its inversion: to love it opposes hatred, in truth lies, to the forgiveness of offenses Talmudic vengeance, to the respect of the ancients stalking the old, to the remission of sins the imprescriptibility of crimes, to the spirit of poverty the lure of gain, to humility the will of domination, in the sense of sharing the spirit of profit, to charity blackmail, to respect from others, lynching, to the silence of recollection, the noise of indictment, to the discretion of the domestic virtues the noise and fury of the media, to the infinite justice of God the partiality of a tribunal of the victors judging the vanquished.

IRONIE of history, Robert Faurisson died returning home from his hometown in England on October 21 evening, a victim of a violent heart attack. Now, four days later, the judges of Cusset were to render their judgment in the so-called Struthof gas chamber case. On September 20, during his last trial, the Professor, although exhausted, made a magistral defense which can be read in large extracts in our October 3 edition ("Struthof: the LICRA pursues Faurisson"). At the end, the Professor struggled with extraordinary courage and determination which compelled admiration.

It is common to say that no one is irreplaceable. Well, yes. The death of this giant, of this monument is an irreparable loss. We have not finished measuring how much he will miss. For how many men are there today of his temper, his erudition, his talent, his bravery, his tenacity? And yet even without him the fight for historical truth must continue. Whatever the hazards and difficulties of all kinds. Whatever the torments and the obstacles. Remains indeed his example, remain his works. As long as there remain men who love justice and truth, refusing falsehood and deceit, then nothing will be lost, everything will be possible.

Jérôme BOURBON, director of RIVAROL.


Click on this text to visit RIZOLITV....







Joe Rizoli’s Free speech topics and blog links


Other topics of interest.


Voy post new and old


Old voy



Others mentioned as complained by Linda Drumback


WordPress links


Arms for Israel?



Exposing holocaust lies



Stan Rosenberg in Government ?



Boston Marathon Moronathon



The Constitution was made to fail.



Jewish resolution from hell



Catholics who don’t get it.



When bloggers censor



Armenian holocaust vs Jewish holocaust



The Israel lobby is bad for America



Who really destroyed America?



Holocaust lies, would be thrown out of court



Marathon bombing pictures please explain?



Framgov list, the hypocrisy



AF-TV the most corrupt cable station in America



Framingham Adult ESL PLUS program good at hiding criminality/



Jim Rizoli exposes a Sodomites wishes for a homosexual bondage center, gets banned for 5 years







Click on this text to listen to Fred Leuchter and Jim Rizoli Discussion, Apr 5, 2018...






Exposing a few holocaust lies….

Red Cross no extermination installations...
In a November 22, 1944 letter to U.S. State Department officials about their visits the Red Cross said: “We had NOT be able to discover ANY TRACE of installations for exterminating civilians prisoners. This corroborates a report which we had already received from other sources. . .”
USA Today, Friday, May 2, 1997 page, 14A



In truth, the “Jewish soap” story is a wartime propaganda claim that no serious historian now accepts. In 1990 it was formally repudiated by Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust center.[53] Read more at:



Exposing more holocaust lies


A list of famous Sonderkommando Jews who miraculously survived the Auschwitz “death camp” includes the following names:




Alter Shmul Fajnzylberg aka Alter Feinsilber, deported to Auschwitz in March 1942, interned there until January 1945. He therefore survived eight liquidations.



Filip Müller, deported to Auschwitz in April 1942, interned there until January 1945. Survived eight liquidations.



Abraham Dragon, deported to Auschwitz in December 1942, interned there until January 1945. Survived six liquidations.

Szlama Dragon, deported to Auschwitz in December 1942, interned there until January 1945. Survived six liquidations.

Eliezer Eisenschmidt, deported to Auschwitz in December 1942, interned there until January 1945. Survived six liquidations.

Milton Buki, deported to Auschwitz in December 1942, interned there until January 1945. Survived six liquidations.

Henryk Tauber, deported to Auschwitz in January 1943, interned there until January 1945. Survived six liquidations.

(Sources: Jürgen Graf, Auschwitz. Tätergeständnisse und Augenzeugen des Holocaust, Würenlos 1994. Gideon Greif, Wir weinten tränenlos, Cologne 2011.)










Thought and Speech Crimes:

The Disturbing Case of Revisionist Ursula Haverbeck


Ursula Haverbeck in court in October 2017. PHOTO: Der Tagesspiegel/Reuters

Forty percent of American millennials (ages 20-36) believe the government should intervene when citizens say something that might be considered offensive to minorities, a Pew Research study reveals. It is not entirely clear what is meant by “intervene” and “minorities,” and the term “offensive” is broadly defined. As usual in the world of Newspeak we go to our standby- the dictionary. Offensive: causing someone to feel resentful, upset, or annoyed. Wow, the eggshell world is here.


Intuitively, the question likely pertains to the sort of nonsense we are seeing involving censorship and public persecution of those who espouse views that are deemed “politically incorrect.”


Despite the threat of political correctness (PC) from millennials, Americans overall still put a high value on free speech, with only 28% in favor of government regulation of speech. Among respondents, 27 percent of Gen Xers (37-52), 24 percent of Baby Boomers (ages 53-71) and 12 percent of the Silent Generation (age 72 and older) believe government should control and limit offensive speech. The dwindling Greatest Generation universally defends free speech, but they are now over age 90.


In Germany, a troubling 70% are in favor of limiting free speech. That country will jail those who engage even in revisionist history involving WWII, and even debate on the Holocaust is considered taboo. In fact, it is illegal in Germany to deny or even downplay the Holocaust. The term deny is curious given that no leading revisionist on the topic actually denies atrocities or actions against Jews and others.


Understanding of the Case of Ursula Haverbeck


89 year old Ursula Haverbeck was supposed to report to prison to serve a two year sentence for “holocaust denial”. Instead she is on the run, presumably sheltered away someplace by supporters. The Jewish ‘International Auschwitz Committee’, apparently oblivious to the bad optics, is asking German police to use ‘high pressure’ to hunt down and imprison this elderly woman.


Update: Ursula apparently went back to her home after five days on the run, and police hauled her to prison.


Ursula Haverbeck was sentenced for violating section 220a [see below]. For a woman of her advanced age, this is the equivalent of a death sentence.


The following video is the interview that got her into hot water. Watch it before it’s removed from the Internet.


Apparently, “downplay” is double-speak for revisionism. Watch the interview closely, as if you were on the jury. Nowhere does Haverbeck deny that crimes or atrocities were committed against Jews (and others), nor does she refuse to accept that they were rounded up or persecuted. Rather, she speaks mostly about the nature, methods and the numbers, which is deemed “revisionism.”


The following is an excerpt from the German law, and what a broad and sweeping law it is. In essence, it demands no one disturb the public peace, ruffle feathers or challenge a history that has been deemed set in stone or static.


(3) Whoever publicly or in a meeting approves of, denies or renders harmless an act committed under the rule of National Socialism of the type indicated in Section 220a subsection (1), in a manner capable of disturbing the public peace shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine.


Please, watch Haverbeck for yourself. See if you can identify her so-called offensive words that “might disturb the public peace.” In fact, Haverbeck was remarkably well composed and was relatively careful in her word choice. Despite the news coverage on her imprisonment, I certainly didn’t hear her “approve of” atrocities or claim they didn’t happen. Do you hear her “rendering harmless” acts committed under the rule of National Socialism?


She did go into the rarely discussed — but I think much-needed — topic of the mass murder (Hellstorm) of German civilians and POWs as the war wound down and after the defeat of Germany. Basically, she is “guilty” of processing things outside of the box and not functioning under prescribed terms. Her “revisionism” only involves researching and questioning the size and degree of atrocities against Jews and the aspects of the Hellstorm.


She did suggest that truth or history on these topic has been “distorted.” She uses the term “Das Groste Problem” to define this distortion. This is problematic in her eyes because this historical distortion has been used as an agenda to kowtow Germany and promote Zionist power.


I’m sorry, but I don’t see “The Great Problem” train of thought as a jailable crime. I don’t see being an aggressive revisionist as being a jailable crime either. Nor is hurting someone’s feelings a jailable offense. Any sensible observer would say that ALL history has been distorted to one degree or another and should be subjected to frequent revision, review and question. Nothing should be set in stone.


Courageous Jewish historian Norman Finkelstein has addressed the issue of shaping history and ranking human suffering (uniqueness doctrine) to achieve questionable agendas as it relates to Palestine. This is also what Haverbeck challenged.


To help set the facts straight on this case, I believe Haverbeck essentially adopted the work of the French historian Paul Rassinier and probably also French historian Robert Faurisson. The latter focused on the so-called confessions of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Hoess under severe torture. Since his death, some of his views (such as no gassing in camps within Germany) have quietly been accepted with little notice by the mainstream Holocaust historians. Haverbeck is not an original researcher but has picked up the mantel. Incidentally, Amazon just purged the works of these historians from their online marketplace.


TNN has no intention of going into the thought police tarpit of discussion on Rassinier and Faurisson’s outlawed historical revisionism. We have no strong conviction one way or the other and, like most events, especially when the victors write the history, there are shades of grey. There is far too much false dichotomy on both sides of the issue.  We do find the notion of a court approved version of events that one could lose their liberty over beyond Orwellian. The “judge” would not permit testimony from a revisionist historian in court. It is fundamental that there should be open discussion, even of controversial views, without threat of prosecution. But if the authorities are willing to make an example out of an 89-year-old woman, well, what more is there to say.


Mind-Blowing Comments in Joseph Goebbels’ Diaries


I don’t claim to have the answers. But something popped up while reading through the Goebbels Diaries that blew my mind. In the diary there is a reference to Hungary. And it looks like Goebbels the insider and one of Hitler’s closest confidants thinks something completely different is going on. According to the official narrative the deportation of the Hungarian Jews began on April 29, 1944 when a train load of Jews were sent to Birkenau. In ten short weeks 400,000 were alleged gassed there.


Did Goebbels not get the word of such a major operation? Curious comments indeed. Some claim Goebbels was lying to avoid incrimination. But Goebbels bluntly said plenty in his diaries to incriminate himself, and had no intention of ever appearing as a defendant before a tribunal.



Apr 18, 1944 (II.12.44)
The Führer then explained to the Gauleiters the background of his campaign in Hungary, and how it was designed. He gave an amusing description of his talk with Horthy. He had to use strong-arm tactics because the old man was not comfortable with the necessary measures. The Führer left him in no doubt, that either it would be a fight to the death or that he had to submit. The Führer had so many forces to apply to this campaign that Horthy offered no serious resistance. In particular, the Führer expected contributions from Hungary of food, oil, manganese, and people. In particular, he wants the 700,000 Jews in Hungary involved in beneficial activities for our war effort.


Apr 27, 1944 (II.12.199)
300,000 Hungarian Jews have been detained and imprisoned in the concentration camps. They should come, in large part, to Germany as a workforce. Himmler will take care of this; above all, they are to be used for our difficult war production programs.


May 4, 1944 (II.12.232)
Our plenipotentiary in Hungary, Veesenmayer, gives an excellent speech on the decisive Hungarian factors. …In particular, it’s to his credit that the Hungarian potential is now in large part requisitioned for our war efforts. Also, the Jewish Question is now being handled more energetically. I insist that the measures taken against the Jews in Hungary have a factual basis. It’s not enough that one only announces in the press what happens, but one must also explain it. In Budapest the Jews are starting to be gathered into ghettos. The ghettos are built in the vicinity of the armament factories, because air attacks are likely there. It is hoped thereby to avoid British-American attacks on Budapest, if at all possible.


The notion that the vast majority of Jews sat around passively awaiting their fate is a myth. The Jewish Telegraph Agency has numerous stories of evacuations as the eastern front advanced. See: [Jewish News Archive, 7/8-1941; 45,000 Bukovina Jews Evacuated to Soviet Interior]and [Jewish News Archive 2/18/1942, Uzbekistan Becomes New Home for Hundreds of Thousands of Evacuated Jews] or fought back.


Apparently Goebbels didn’t have any idea about the scale of any killing operations against Jews either.


Apr 29, 1942 (II.4.201) **
The SD gave me a police report on conditions in the East. The danger of the Partisans continues to exist in unmitigated intensity in the occupied areas. The Partisans have, after all, caused us very great difficulties during the winter, and these difficulties have by no means ceased with the beginning of spring. Short shrift (kurzen Prozess) is made of the Jews in all eastern occupied areas. Tens of thousands must bite the dust, and the Fuhrer’s prophecy is fulfilled for them, that Jewry has to pay for inciting a new World War with the complete removal (Ausrottung) of their race..


Later, indeed these Jewish ghettos near armament factories were bombed by the Allies. One Hungarian Jew in the Yad Vashem interviews who was conscripted to work on the Carpathian fortifications stated that his grandparents and sister were killed in such a Budapest raid.



We do find it deeply disturbing that Haverbeck is to be imprisoned at all. And what of those who simply defend free speech and the right of Haverbeck to conduct this interview without prosecution and jail time? Are they, too, going to be subjected via some contorted circular logic leading to derision, ridicule or even prosecution?


Support for Ursula Haverbeck can be provided here.





Write to Ursula Haverbeck at the following address:


JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede

z. Hd. Ursula Haverbeck

Umlostraße 100

33649 Bielefeld




  1. Ursula Haverbeck The Hooton Plan And The Migrant Crisis - YouTube Proxy  Highlight

    Sep 21, 2016 ... In German with English subtitles by DIDI 18. Ursula Haverbeck, the courageous octogenarian previously imprisoned for pointing out the lack of evidence to support the holocaust delusion, here presents details of the planned genocide of the european christian peoples via The Hooten Plan.

  2. Ursula Haverbeck The Hooton Plan And The Migrant Crisis - YouTube Proxy  Highlight

    Sep 24, 2016 ... Ursula Haverbeck, the courageous octogenarian previously imprisoned for pointing out the lack of evidence to support the holocaust delusion, here presents de...

  3. Ursula Haverbeck on migrant crisis, WWI, WWII, Hooton, Nizer ... Proxy  Highlight

    Sep 24, 2016 ... Ursula Haverbeck talks about the migrant crisis in Europe, Germany, the world wars, Hooton plan, Nizer plan, Morgenthau plan, and more. c...

  4. Ursula Haverbeck: The Hooton-Plan and the Migrant Crisis | Carolyn ... Proxy  Highlight

    Sep 20, 2016 ... The Hooton Planand the Migrant Crisis SUBTITLED IN ENGLISH BY DIDI 18, this is an almost 30 minute video by Ursula Haverbeck explaining why Europe is being invaded ... it's all in the Hooton Plan! Only one book describing the Hooton Plan is still available, but only in German. Ursula tells us that four ...

  5. Ursula Haverbeck The Hooton Plan And The Migrant Crisis - EURO ... Proxy  Highlight

    Sep 21, 2016 ... In German with English subtitles by DIDI 18. Ursula Haverbeck, the courageous octogenarian previously imprisoned for pointing out the lack of evidence to support the holocaust delusion, here presents details of the planned genocide of the European christian peoples via The Hooten Plan.





Click on this text to see video: Ursula Haverbeck on The Greatest Problem of Our Time w/ Permanent Subtitles...

Ursula Haverbeck

Click on this text to visit Ursula Haverbeck's website (German language)....


'Nazi Grandma' holocaust denier Ursula Haverbeck sentenced to jail


An 87-year-old woman has been sentenced to prison after she claimed that Jews were never exterminated in Auschwitz. Her criminal record includes two fines and another sentence for sedition.


A court in Detmold on Friday sentenced Ursula Haverbeck to eight months in jail on charges of sedition. The presiding judge ruled out the possibility of parole and said that Haverbeck had a lack of "any kind of respect" and that she had made more offensive comments in the courtroom.


Haverbeck is expected to appeal against the sentencing. In Germany, anyone who publicly denies, endorses or plays down the extermination of Jews during Adolf Hitler's regime can be sentenced to a maximum of five years in jail.


Haverbeck was found guilty of writing a letter to Detmold's mayor, Rainer Heller, saying it was "clearly recognizable" that Auschwitz was nothing more than a labor camp. She wrote her message at the time when the Detmold court was trying Reinhold Hanning, a former guard who served at the Auschwitz concentration camp.



Reinhold Hanning (center) was witness to thousands of murders at Auschwitz


The 94-year-old was sentenced to five years in prison after the court found him guilty of being an accessory to the murder of 170,000 people, mostly Jews. Haverbeck spoke about Hanning's trial in her letter, alleging that the witnesses at the trial were set up to prove the existence of the concentration camp.


Ursula Haverbeck is known for her right-wing extremist views. Several courts have sentenced her and her punishments include two fines and another suspended sedition sentence. She was on trial last year for saying that the Holocaust was "the biggest and longest-lasting lie in history."

Sent: Wed, Aug 30, 2017 2:43 pm

                                                                            GERMANY SHAMED BEFORE THE WORLD
Ursula Haverbeck is tonight in a prison cell where she is to serve two years jail. In Washington Occupied Germany (WOG) it is illegal to investigate and expose holocaust fraud.
Instead of being honoured for exposing a legal loophole through which tens of millions of Euros are siphoned out of Germany the 88-year old grandmother now faces a lonely cell death.
During an arraignment, as crooked as notorious Soviet eras show trials, media hacks submissively clapped the near nonagenarian’s sentence. With breath-taking chutzpah it was the grandmother not the state that was charged with treason.
It is well to remember that the constitution and chancellorship of Occupied Germany is illegal under international law. The last legal chancellor was that of Karl Doenitz. Seized in 1945 by the Allied occupiers the Grand-Admiral and Germany´s legal legislators were seized, gaoled or hanged. Since then, WOG chancellors and politicians have first to be approved by Washington DC.
In occupied Germany it is a criminal offence to query victors’ propaganda even when the defendant´s case is proven beyond all shadow of doubt.
Frau Haverbeck's lawyer argued that the sentence violated their client´s freedom of expression and called for her to be acquitted. The court, likened to a North Korean secret chamber, dismissed the appeal.
“We are newspaper readers. Only when we share do we become newspaper publishers and editors.” ~ Michael Walsh.


German police are hunting an 89-year-old grandmother convicted on several occasions for Holocaust denial, after she failed to turn herself in to serve her prison sentence.

(Euro News)

Ursula Haverbeck, dubbed "Nazi-Oma" (Nazi grandma) by german MSM, was convicted in October on eight counts of incitement and sentenced to two years in prison.


But she did not report to prison to serve her sentence by the April 23 deadline.


After the convict failed to report to the relevant penal institution within the deadline, prosecutors in Verden on May 4, 2018 issued an order to execute the sentence and have charged police with its implementation," prosecutors said in a statement.  The convict has so far not been arrested," they added.


Haverbeck was once chairwoman of a far-right training centre shut down in 2008 for spreading "Nazi propaganda".


She has been sentenced on several occasions to jail for "Holocaust denial".


During a trial in 2015, she insisted that Auschwitz was not historically proven to be a death camp.



That is "only a belief," said Haverbeck then.


She has also gone on television to declare that "the Holocaust is the biggest and most sustainable lie in history".




Political Prisoner Monika Schaefer Is Back In Canada, but Alfred Must Serve 38 Months in A German Jail

The verdict in the German kangaroo court came down on October 19. Charged under Germany's notorious Sec. 130 "racial incitement of the masses" law, which actually criminalizes expressing doubts about the Hollywood version of World War II, the Schaefers were both found guilty. 

Monika was sentenced to 10 months, which she had already served, and was set free. Alfred was sentenced to three years and two months in a maximum security prison in Munich. Monika remained with Alfred's wife for a few days but returned to Canada early in November. 

She wrote to friends: " I am indeed back in Jasper, safe and sound. However, it is like I've gone to a backcountry (wilderness) cabin, as I do not yet have phone or internet hooked back up. My friends took good care of my house and home. It will be a busy next few days to take care of logistics. Then, I will come up for air and will be very happy to talk to the good folks out there. It was quite an adventure getting out of Germany, as it became urgently necessary to leave. Wow, what a transition that was, from prison cell to 'fugitive'. Life is never boring." -- Monika. 

The German legal system once again covered itself with barnyard excrement, imprisoning two opinionated,  truth seeking videographers for the non-violent expression of their political views.

Only lies need laws for protection. There are many individuals, including siblings Monika and Alfred Schaefer, who are on trial or have been imprisoned in occupied Germany for merely telling the truth about the holocaust scam. These people are imprisoned for "inciting hatred for the Jews" whereas it's actually the JEWS incessantly inciting hatred for Germans with their holocaust LIES.

October 26th, 2018

Alfred and Monika Schaefer, the German-Canadian siblings behind a series of Holocaust-denial videos, have received prison sentences in Germany.


B’nai Brith Canada provided detailed intelligence reports to German officials, leading to their eventual arrests. Supporters of the siblings have explicitly blamed B’nai Brith for their legal challenges.


Alfred Schaefer this week received a sentence of three years and two months. His sister was sentenced to 10 months. Both were charged with incitement to hatred under German law. [Whereas it's actually JEWS incessantly inciting hatred for Germans with their "holocaust" B.S.]


“We commend the German justice system for effectively dealing with a blatant manifestation of antisemitism,” said Michael Mostyn, Chief Executive Officer of B’nai Brith Canada. “Holocaust denial is once again on the rise, but this important court decision should help deter others from engaging in racist and hateful rhetoric."




email B'nai Brith Canada and let them know what you think of imprisoning people for NOT BELIEVING the Holocaust B.S.









Click on this text to watch The Inquisition of Alfred and Monika Schaefer - Part 1...


Monika and Alfred Schaefer

This is the transcribed letter from Alfred to us. I'm actually using it as the body of letter to be sent to our FIVE friends in prison, including Monika.  I don't know if they can write each other or not, so I'll give this try.  Diane King
October 12, 2018

Alfred Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Stadelheimer Str 12
81549, Munich (Munchen)

September 15th 2018 letter #1 from Alfred Schaefer

Dear Jim Diane and Joe thank you so much for your letter from August 25th. It arrived here on September 13th.

Yesterday, the 14th of September was a fine day in the morning as I was waiting in the holding cell with almost 12 other prisoners for the prison transport to the “Justice Palace” or Inquisition, I got a glimpse of Monica as she was herded along with a handful of other women prisoners from the women's prison. Our cell door was open as additional men were processed. Monica was one of the last prisoners to leave the woman's prison bus, and was herded into an adjacent room. I actually had a few tears of joy seeing her for 3/4 of a second through the crack in the door.

I could write an entire book after 73 days in prison. What an education. I wouldn't trade it for anything not for $6 million dollars unless of course I have to stay here for six million years. This place gives me so much hope and confidence. I know that we are going to win. Not because of me or because Monica but because of the people I have met here. Fantastic! Most are zombies and surplus Negroes and Arabs and other Asian riffraff, but it is the common sense of the few good people that gives me this confidence. Also life here is a taste of things to come if we do not win. Pure f###ing hell. But unless you experience pain and horror, we will not truly appreciate and be willing to sacrifice to have comfort and joy.

I will run a short story by you, and then return to the 3/4 of a second where I saw Monica.

We – Monika and I, now have 13 days of Inquisition behind us, and the following story happened on July 17, 2008 on Inquisition day #8. I was brought down to the holding cell, the room I was just talking about. We were about 12 or 13 people in that room and although it is supposed to be non-smoking these other prisoners always sneak some tobacco stuck to their nuts or someplace and light up as soon as they are pushed into this room. It was smoky and noisy. There was one there, a white face amongst this crowd. I asked him if he spoke German or English and in a Scottish accent so thick I could hardly understand it, he told me his story. It made me very sad, but gave me great hope, all at the same time.

He was a 20-year-old Scotsman, traveling through Europe with a couple of buddies. And at some Pub he had a few too many beers and somehow fell onto a table while the people at the table that he fell on pushed him off and he landed on his back on the floor. What did he do on his back, totally drunk, his fighting Spirit uninhibited and fierce as can be, he picked up a glass that was lying there on the floor where he lay and fired it at the people who pushed him off the table. (Hey that reminds me of my youth.) Well the glass that he threw at them hit its target and caused a slight injury. (When I was young that happened all the time, but nobody went to prison for it. Boys will be boys!) This young Scotsman was more now close to going insane with frustration. He told me that another English guy he met in prison here was trying to get sleeping pills so he could sleep away the nightmare.

What is the nightmare? The entire summer has been extremely hot this year and about 90% of the prisoners are dark-skinned Invaders. Remember they have emptied the prisons in Africa and elsewhere to enrich European countries in the biological sense. These Invaders like to communicate with each other all day and until about midnight by yelling out their cell windows to each other.  This poor Scotsman now had 2 months of nothing but the white walls of his cell to look at while being blasted by a nonstop yelling in many different languages, none of which he could understand.  This is like a prison in Africa with German prison staff.  All the few Germans that I have met here are very decent and upright people.

After listening to this young man, I told him that these conditions are not the fault of the German people. We are in occupied country. I am in prison because I showed the audience, at a political rally, how high my pet dog Paolo can jump. I told him that the reward that the UK got for bombing the living hell out of Germany in 1945 is that now London has a Pakistani mayor and brown-skinned invaders can rape white-skinned English girls with impunity and if the English want to extradite the rapists, then the English taxpayer pays millions of pounds to Jewish attorneys to prevent the brown skin from being extradited.  Remember: The Jew loves treason but hates the traitor. The successful genocide of millions of Germans is now a template for the destruction of what is left of the white race.

I told the Scotsman that we are positioned with our backs against the wall, and we stand shoulder-to-shoulder. It is do-or-die! When this young man, not even very big, rifled that glass from the floor, on his back drunk as he can be, he showed what we all have in us.  We need to get this energy and resolve channeled in the direction that will secure our homelands and our future. I wrote my name on a piece of toilet paper, that was the only available paper in that stinking room full of Invaders. He was so happy to have had that dialogue with me.

Now, back to the 3/4 second glimpse of Monica, in route to Inquisition day #13 on the 14th of September 2018. Arrival at the “Justice Palace” after waiting for whatever time we have to wait, I get called out and there in the hall is Monica attached with handcuffs to her “Beamte” (police guard), and I get attached to my Beamte, and we march off in a little procession: Beamte - Beamte/Monika - Beamte/Alfred.  We follow the hallways and staircases until we reach the courtroom. We get detached from our Beamten after the door behind us is closed and the other Beamten have their eyes on us.

On this date, the Beamten were different from the ones the days before and they were very strict - NO TALKING! NO NOTHING! But still Monica and I were the happiest people in all the room.  Previous days, the police guard was more normal and even prided himself by sharing his awareness of WTC 7 (the tower on 9-11 that wasn’t hit but fell in demolition style anyway).

Without going into all the details of the proceedings, since they make no sense anyway, I only want to summarize briefly the following. The very worst day so far was Thursday August 16th. The state prosecutor walked in with two binders and proclaimed, “We have the property investigations and financial data and we expect a multi-year  sentence for Mr. Schaefer due to the gravity of his crimes.”  They normally take everything you own and disappear you for many years. I love jews.

Friday, August 17th was a turning point. I was exhausted from the very long previous day. I had reached the sanctuary of my cell by about 9:30 p.m. The night before and I was in a state of shock from a totally helpless feeling of this insanity. On our way down after that horrible day, I told Monica, “Monica we will walk out of here as free people.”  She just roared with laughter and said to her Beamte, “Alfred's always so optimistic!” But what could I do?  It was so surreal - out of a Brave New World or George Orwell horror show. The total absurdity led me to believe that it can't be real so things have to change. And change they did.

I'm going to make it brief now.  The Friday following the day of horror, a witness was called in who had already been there earlier and we were back to “gathering evidence.”  And now we have court dates all the way to the end of October. Can you imagine grown people spending this level of resources on this kind of nonsense? Hard to believe, but that is the Muppet Show that Monica and I have the honors of having secured two important leading roles. We love it.

Okay, now a few words about the weapons being used against humanity in a last-ditch effort to keep the state of induced mental sanity locked into place. All the hype generated by talk of “Nazi war crimes,” “Holocaust,” “Syria warned of consequences for using GAS.” blah blah blah. All of those words do nothing more than rejuvenate the indoctrination of the past 80 years. These things need to all be called out as “marked cards” in a card game of All or Nothing. We must not respond to any of them, EVER, other than calling them out as marked cards ...

(Included because it was so clever) Re-edit and correct my six million spelling mistakes. I wish I could spell as good as Uncle Adolf could paint, but he was a true Man Of All Trades.  I could keep writing but if they disappear this letter it would be all for nothing. This time I told the story of the Scotsman, there is a great story about a 16-year- old Afghan Warrior who really gave me a lot of Hope ... Coming soon. I would hire that guy as my personal bodyguard, he was that good. And remember we are winning! What we are observing now are the expected symptoms of the initial phase of our healing over space and time. These are natural processes that can be observed throughout nature.

Your friend and comrade Alfred.

Monika opens by confirming the importance of receiving letters:

Dearest Alison,

I was so happy to receive your warm and loving letter – thank you!

And the lead sheets too �� 


[…] As you have seen the “verdict date” came and went. It clearly was not over. And now there are a few more dates. It gets more and more interesting by the day. I am looking forward to the continuation this Friday. For one thing I get to see my brother and that is always good. He retains his great sense of humour throughout, and his spirit is infections.


I finally figured out why I am feeling somewhat disoriented apropos the season and what month it is and that kind of thing. It's because I'm not participating (physically) in the usual seasonal activities. Growing food comes to mind. I would be in full-on harvest mode now, pickling my beets and things like that. Next year my garden will be twice as big!


I've been continuing to play my violin and I am feeling very blessed. I am still floating a few inches off the ground from last Sunday's experience. A violinist (a total pro) came in from the outside to play for us at church – such things only happen rarely. The priest who happened to be here that day – also not the usual one but often enough that he had seen me play – asked at the beginning of the service: would Frau Schaefer be willing to play a duet with the Professor? My smile went ear to ear. The best part of all was that my “prison family” erupted in applause when I agreed to play! We hadn't even played a note yet, they were just so happy for and with me. Wow. I'm feeling a lot of love around here. Anyway we played a duet at the beginning and at the end of the service, and the Professor graced us with the most beautiful Bach-unaccompanied during the service, three different movements out of various Sonatas and Partitas.


Prison life carries on. We knit and crochet and make little gifts for each other. We make the best of it. I, for one, do not feel that it is wasted time. I know that there will be life-after-prison and I can barely imagine the intensities of sensations of a walk through the forest for example, and the enjoyment of unmonitored and non-rushed communications.


Well, my dear Alison, I hope this letter finds you well and healthy and in good spirits. All the best to you.


With much love,


N.B. Certain parts of the above letter has been edited in order to avoid unnecessary personal and other information falling into the wrong hands, in particular concerning my own trial. Dates for my Appeal will be announced shortly.

Kind regards,
Alison Chabloz







From the Right End of the Horse 

Paul and John, I am here in Munich on the first day of the Schaefer trial (of the Canadian-born Monika and her German-born brother Alfred). Upon my arrival  at the Munich courthouse this morning, my attorney RA Wolfram Nahrath ( who also acts today for Monika Schaefer) warned me not to remain in the courthouse building (much less enter the courtroom ) as likely the same trick will occur upon me as played when the German police seized Monika ( while she attended the attorney Sylvia Stolz trial on January 3, 2018).  This was when the judge interrupted that hearing to have Monika dragged off from the public gallery to the cells (for these past 6 months) to the Munich Prison and likely could be repeated today once court officials spotted me, as he says they certainly would, in the public gallery.  Since February this year, I have been under criminal investigation having been charged with Volksverhetzung para 130/ populace incitement which carries a five years' custodial penalty following my ad-libbed speech at the Dresden Commemoration.  Wiser our attorney says - but my call - that I leave immediately the risky vicinity to instead make reports from a nearby cafe when they provide me with a full account during the intervals of the day's proceedings  - as a more useful option especially as I not able to comprehend German language proceedings anyway if witnessing the process behind enemy lines.

I decided to take my attorney's advice as a more effective option (than uselessly being hauled off to a prison cell ) and so am now sitting with Henry Hafenmeyer as he is not allowed inside the courtroom at this time. Henry awaits being called as a witness for the Prosecution for being considered as the video maker ( though in fact, he was not Monika's video maker). 

Though RA Sylvia Stolz warmly thanked me for coming to show "International affection for the Schaefer siblings" she agrees that my making a report to include this advice as given by my own attorney in fact serves to strengthen the drama of the situation Alfred and his sister Monika are facing in this Alice in Wonderland anti-National Socialist non-Sovereign German legal-land where - 'first we have the verdict then maybe or maybe not we hear the defendants' evidence' - is the nonsensical norm for historical sceptics. 

Alfred is set upon screening in the courthouse the full story of his awakening via the videos he has made. I am only anxious that the judge may manage to forbid this exposee by him . The great disadvantage here in Germany is that no transcripts are made of these processes. I shall do my best to give you the proceedings from the horse's mouth.

Day one began at 09.15. The following was reported to me by Attorney Sylvia Stolz. Before the entrance of the two professional judges and the two lay judges, Alfred was able to hug his handcuffed sister while the Press photographed them and while Alfred gave the Roman salute ( a harmless gesture ludicrously outlawed in still Allied / all- lies occupied Germany. Judge Hofmann and Judge Federl entered with the two lay/Schaffe judges but Alfred refused to stand in any acknowledgment of their authority. To this, the judges declared Alfred's disdain as an offence to the rules whilst Alfred declared them and the Federal Republic of Germany illegitimate since he adheres to the standing legitimacy of the German Reich.

In the "curiouser and curiouser" world of occupied-German law, the judge declared the defendants would not be allowed anything to drink, and if they insisted, the court proceedings would have be interrupted in recess while they drank water! Alfred instantly demanded a drink which resulted in Monika in handcuffs being temporarily removed from the courtroom. Truly a farcical act of "inquisitional" (as Alfred stated) power-playing to which fittingly Alfred added that the court was but a clownish "Muppet Show".

Alfred was told if he offended again he would be heavily fined for complaining that the proceedings were inaudible to him and to the public gallery because Judge Hofmann had ordered that the attorneys not press the live microphone buttons. This instruction wilfully denies due public access to hear the proceedings. When Alfred commenced to read his introductory remarks, the judge demanded he give only a summary.  At this, his attorney and Monika's called for an interruption for two hours in order to draw up a rejection of the sitting judges whom they declared patently prejudicial to the defendant's right to express his defence in full.  The "Holocaust"-denial laws adhere to those of the Queen of Hearts in Alice in Wonderland wherein these nonsensical trials precede via "first the verdict then the evidence". No wonder historical Revisionists are called religious heretics since the International Guidelines for Teaching About the Holocaust on page 11 determine that: "Care must be taken not to disprove the deniers' position with normal debate and rational argument"!

Even in the Allied occupier's land of Britain, not since  2008 has the BBC permitted another World Service  broadcast under the title" Why Can't We Question the Holocaust?" In this unique broadcast, when I and Jewish Prof Deborah Lipstadt were invited as the main guests on this hour-long worldwide phone-in radio show, has the public had the normal opportunity to hear some of the Revisionist victories presented instead of the standard Hollywood version of WW2 history. 

Ever since the German ex-Constitutional Court Judges Hassimer and Hoffman-Reim called for the repeal of the "Holocaust"-denial laws there have been numerous valiant attempts to enlighten and embolden the law-makers and law-proponents in today's Germany. Notably these valiant attempts in Germany and Austria were made by the late greats Ernst Zuendel,  Dr Herbert Schaller, RA Rieger, Gerd Honsik, - and Horst Mahler, Sylvia Stolz, Germar Rudolf, Henry Hafenmeyer, Dr Rigolf Hennig, Werner Keweloh, Dr Hans Berger, Gunter Deckert, Herr Froerlich, Ursula Haverbeck, Sven L and Christian H to name but a few.  Today's opportunity by Alfred and Monika Schaefer may justly capture the tide to call for this anti-debate law to be called into question and repealed.

Alfred Schaefer in person confirmed the report above given to me by Sylvia Stolz. At 12.30 they returned to the court which has since resumed and I await further news from the right end of the horse...

Meanwhile, persons in the public gallery (only about 6-8 which included two comrades from Japan) have recognised some of the Press as Antifa they recall from Pegida demos. There are about 6 in the Press benches, and one from Bild the popular scandal sheet.

"No surrender"!
Michele Renouf

Dear Jim and Diane, thank you so much for your letter of June 28th, which I received at lightning speed, it's all relative, -- ha ha, on July 10th. Today happens to be my 200th day of incarceration, a good day to write you a letter.... I wonder who is giving you up-to-date news now that they have imprisoned Alfred. You know that first week of Court they imprisoned three people -- Alfred and two others who were attending just to watch, for saying one wrong word at the end of day #1. Sylvia Stolz got 2 days at My Lovely Hotel. We (Alfred and I) did not see each other here of course, but we did ride the bus together, separated by Plexiglas, soundproof windows and on a door upon which we pressed our hands against each other and poured love into each other through our eyes. Another fellow got four days jail, given to him on that Thursday morning of week one, for having said something after court date 3 to the prosecutor outside of the courtroom. Something like - "shame on you. I hope you get to see the inside of a jail one day." They tacked on something more, that he did not say, but they invented it and off he goes to jail. I have not seen him since, so he may have been banned from the courthouse, I'm not sure. It is a dangerous place to be, whether you are in the dark or not.

You probably know what happened to Alfred, but in case not I'll tell you. First day he was arrested for insulting the court. Second day out on bail. Then I believe it was Friday of that week, but I'm not sure, they came and picked him up from home and he has a similar address as mine ever since. They say,  "verdunklungsgefahr," but I think they are afraid of the opposite which is "verhellungsgefahr." Gefahr means danger and Verdunklung means darkening, and other words hiding or destroying evidence. Verhellung means brightening or shedding light upon, which is what Alfred really does, so they have turned that one upside down and true Orwellian fashion.

I did not find out about his arrest until the following Thursday, the 12th, when he didn't arrive in court and they said something about forgetting to transport him. Me, toll the question mark on my face, what are they talking about? My lawyer turns to me and gasps, "What, you didn't know? Alfred has been arrested!" That was the week before!

Last time I told you a bit about the story of mail. Well I don't know if it's their revenge on me for having straight-talked with the boss here about the world watching, but now the jail boss said I needed Court approval before getting a copy of my own birth certificate, which they have right here in this building. I needed it for some other thing which is not relevant to the story here, other than to say there was a deadline which of course becomes impossible to meet as they try to make me jump through hoops like a trained monkey. She really has it out for me, the jail boss.

Most of the guards now treat me with great respect. I had to work for that though, as it was not always so. When I arrived back in January, I was the Nazi on the Block, and then subservient, condition Germany, you can imagine what that means. I got "special treatment."

The trial continues. I won't say much about it other than a couple of terms which just float right into my mind. Kafka and kangaroos. Nevertheless, we are having a good time. They seem to be eating themselves up, not just in court but in the world. Alfred mentioned an example the other day, and maybe he has already spoken with you about this, I have no idea since I am so out of off from internet. He said that more and more American universities are disallowing antisemites entry into their programs of indoctrination I mean oops, into their programs of study. Wonderful! That protects those people from indoctrination, oops, there I go again, sorry. Relating to something you said Diane, I guess those universities would have disallowed Jesus Christ entry into their hallowed institutions. (I don't have a proper a dictionary, I hope I have used the word "hallowed" appropriately.

You mentioned how appalled you are at how anemic the Canadian officials are towards me. It gets worse.  Did I tell you not only are they ignoring me, they -- as in Ottowa -- have forbidden the Canadian consulate here in Munich, to attend the trial. Did I mention that already? I mean let me be clear, their job would not entitle defending me or interfering in the laws of the land. They would simply be observers to observe if I am getting fair treatment. That's all forbidden!

Thank you for that bridge illustration. Also, thank you for the birthday greetings and all the funny jokes. I love that! I had to laugh out loud and God knows we all need laughter. I agree with you that are most dangerous adversaries are those Israel-first.  judeo-christians in the churches, that have been so ugly and completely hijacked for the very purpose of destroying us and destroying God's work. It is through the church that some of the deepest deceptions have taken root. The very concept of judeo-Christian is oxymoronic. Is that the right word? Once again, I am missing the dictionary that I can check my choice of words. I want to say opposites are put together, that's oxymoronic right? Speaking of dictionary, now there's another story, but perhaps another time, or maybe you've heard my dictionary stories already. The saga continues...

That's all for now my friends. I hope you are well and healthy and keeping your heads high. God bless you, much love, Monica.


Click on this text to watch and read Alfred Schaefers letter to the German police...


Click on this text to see: Monika Schaefer: A letter from a German Prison...

 Email  the Canadian Embassy in Berlin to demand the release of Monika Schaefer:

(GLARING HypocrisyOn June 17, 2016, Monika Schaefer, a native-born Canadian citizen of German parents, posted the above brief video to YouTube entitled “Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust”. Yesterday, January 3rd, Monika was arrested in Munich, Germany for “hate speech”. We’ve just received, via email, the below open letter from Alfred Schaefer, Monika’s brother. We’re publishing the whole of Alfred’s letter, verbatim, with his express permission.


Dear Friends,


Monika Schaefer was arrested on January 3 2018 in the very heart of “Holocaust country” while attending, as an observer, the bizarre inquisition hearings against the courageous Sylvia Stolz. This “trial” was for illegal words that Sylvia Stolz had spoken at the Anti Censorship Coalition (AZK) in Switzerland in 2012.   The twisting nonsensical accusations of the inquisition was beyond bizarre. What the snake that calls itself the “State Prosecutor” did, will be something that will amuse future generations when studying the “witch” trials of 2018.


45 minutes into the inquisition the “State Prosecutor” snake called for a surprise break, which was then used to arrest my courageous sister Monika. The only thing Monika did was watch quietly as the inquisition was dealing with Sylvia Stolz.  These people have us under close observation and figured it was a good opportunity to demonstrate their “power”, and intimidate us.


Another snake masquerading as a “State Prosecutor” accompanied by 3 heavily armed thugs handcuffed Monika and dragged her away. When my sister protested that she is a free person from Canada and had done nothing wrong, the “State Prosecutor” snake told her, “if you wanted to stay free you should have stayed in Canada”. (Welcome to Holocaust country)


Now they have moved Monika Schaefer to the high security prison in Munich and will keep her there indefinitely. Monika is accused of making an apology to her own dear mother. The title of the video was Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust.


What has angered the Jews is the fact that this one little video has undone hundreds of millions of dollars worth of their psychological warfare that most of us had become victims of. They thought that their ridiculous “Holocaust” program was now firmly wired into our brains, and then, along comes Monika and blows it out of the water with a simple apology to her Mom. That really surprised them.


This is happening at the same time that our borders are open and millions of young men from Africa and Asia are flooding into our European countries with a free pass to do whatever they want.  This is something that the Jews had planned for the European countries for a very long time. In the end our cities are supposed to turn into Lagos or Calcutta type slums that can no longer resist Jewish hegemony.



Click on this text to watch Monika's brother: Alfred Schaefer Thought Criminal- Monika Schaefer Arrested and Imprisoned in Germany





Angry German letter to Jewish Journalist hatemonger at Calgary Herald: re: Monika Schaefer & the Holocaust!

by jlamprecht



[I'm not exactly sure who the author is of this great letter. I made several excellent parts bold. Its really great to see a German standing up like this against a Jew. The Jewess is using the normal Jewish technique of lying when she refers to Revisionism as a "faith". That's your typical Jew at work undermining truths.

The only thing herein that I disagree with is that Germans were in what is Israel. This German seems to be a Christian Identity type. But other than that, the entire letter is sound.

I doubt the Calgary Herald would ever publish it, so we must publish it in our media, the media of the TRUTH and FREEDOM!

I totally agree with the ending: Heil Hitler! Heil Germany! DOWN WITH THE HOLOCAUST!! Jan]



Letter to Calgary Herald about hate articles about Monika Schaefer
endederluege General 10 July 2018
taken over from:

...Our revisionist "faith" is not "faith", but we have factual
information. It comes from many people who are legally oppressed by the
Allied occupation in Germany, which is led by the Jews...

July 8, 2018 by Paula Simons (Edmonton), The Calgary Herald

The Calgary Herald

Regarding your article "Former Jasper Park Warden on Trial for Holocaust

July 7, 2018

lie big enough holocaust

Greetings, Mrs. Simons, The Calgary Herald

I would like to say something about your article above, although I do
not have much hope that it is useful, since it seems that you belong to
the Jewish tribe. Yet there is always hope that you can join the caring

Monika Schaefer is still a musician. I don't see at all that she is a
hatemaker, nor is she against Jews, from my experience with her. When I
warned her not to trust a Jew, she began a heated debate with me. We
have dropped the argument with disagreements. Monika is a person who
loves. Truth cannot be harmful, for truth can only be truth. A fact.
However, it is harmful to inject this type of poison into your language.

Our revisionist "faith" is not "faith", but we have factual information.
It comes from many people who are legally oppressed by the Allied
occupation in Germany led by the Jews. It seems to me time and again
that people like you love the Holocaust so much that they want to
capture and perpetuate it at all costs, instead of looking at research,
alongside the Jewish lies. If you want to relieve them of this burden by
giving them the truth, they become malicious. I see your vicious streak

There were work camps for the Jews because the Jews caused the two world
wars; and they even say that proudly. In fact, all Jews in Germany
deserved the death sentence for high treason when they declared war on
Germany on March 24, 1933. Death was the law of treason. What did Adolf
Hitler do? He hung them all.

I'm just kidding. He arranged a boycott against Jewish businesses etc.
on 1 April 1933. Then it was time for the traitors to move in and leave
because the German people had had enough. And they left.... at least
most of them. No one was kicked out, as the Jewish liars say.

They know, of course, that the Jews are taught in their Talmud "to lie"
to defeat the gentiles. They are so good at lying because they lied for
a long time, at least since 2000 years, when they invaded Palestine and
murdered the Germans [with the help of a Caesar] who lived there and
seized their identity. We Germans are the Israelites! I call the Jews
the original identity thieves.

How outrageous of you, Jewess, the noble German people and their noble
leader, and the most disciplined army in the world, the SS, to accuse
such a heinous crime as genocide! How dare you, you liar! The beating of
a Jew in the concentration camps was severely punished, as the SS files
show, and the rape of an enemy woman could cost a soldier his stripes,
and he definitely had to go through court.

Adolf Hitler was aware of his position in society and in the countries
of Europe never to commit such a heinous crime as genocide, even if he
were as cold-blooded a person as he is portrayed. But he was a very
caring man and the first in Europe to make a law to protect animals from
medical experiments. But he was tough, and traitors, saboteurs and
partisans who were active in the war against Germany were shot dead
(maybe hanged-depends) after a trial if found guilty. And many Jews were
the culprits and partisans.

The Holocaust is best documented, as you say, but not by historical
facts and science, but by Hollywood giants like Steven Spielberg and
mentally ill Jewish witnesses, communists and simply evil liars. Nothing
scientific comes from liars.

Obviously we have eyes, and we can see what the Jews are doing to us
whites by flooding our once white nations with the scum of the earth of
all colours, creeds and predispositions.

I know you hate these German pigtails, they remind you of the youth of
Germany, the Hitler Youth. Monika wears them to make a point. Monika
never said on the video that her parents were indeed monsters, but she
said they should have done something to prevent what she thought was a
real genocide. She also never said that she thought her parents were
complicit. You don't take the truth very seriously.

Indeed, it is salutary for the German to understand that the Holocaust
is a fraud. I had the same experience myself. There have been many
Holocaausts, and the first great one I know is the Holocaust in Russia
overthrown by Communist Jews who were responsible for 60 to 100 million
Russian deaths, including my family members - the greatest genocide of
all time. And often in the most heinous tortures committed to the
heart's content of the Jews. Then the Chinese Jew Chairman Mao arranged
the death of 50 million Chinese. He was very tricky, the way he arranged it.

Then, because the Jews started both world wars, and they are very proud
of it and say so, 60 million people died in World War II were destroyed.
Perhaps 35,000 Jews died in all concentration camps and many died in old
age. Nobody was genocided!

Why are your tribe's death numbers so much more important? [I shouldn't
have asked her, I should have said: Their deaths are no more important
than anyone else's.] What about the 60 million gentiles who lost their
lives in World War II, many of them in terrible agony? I don't have the
numbers at hand in World War I.

After the war ended, Jude Dwight Eisenhower, Great Commander of Europe,
caused 6 million (!) Germans to die of hunger, including over 1 million
German prisoners of war on the Rhine meadows alone. These are some
holocausts we need to talk about. But they are kept hidden. Nothing is
written about DAS in the mainstream media. Never!

Yes, they threw Monika out of the Green Party because these people in
the party are controlled and called upon to do so.

Indeed, Germany has different laws. These laws were placed above the
German Basic Law and are illegal. These are Jewish laws that are not
part of our German country. These laws are a crime against humanity to
prevent people from discussing the Holohoax among historians or others.
It is a crime to forbid people to talk about historical events. Well,
what do the Jews care about gentiles if they don't serve their purpose?

We humans, who expose the Jewish lies and the deception of the
Holocaust, we are not hate rushers, as you call us. We are good people;
some of our people are very noble and we love our country Germany; and
we love the truth. And others love their own home and the truth. We
whites are all threatened by the Jews.

There is no Holocaust denial because something that does not exist
cannot be denied. There is no Holocaust of the Jewish people. But the
genocide of the Jews in Russia, which exists. It's the greatest
Holocaust of all time.

I recently published a book entitled "Understanding the Jews.
Understanding Anti-Semitism."  read. They accuse us of insidious hatred
and a permanent form of hate speech when the Jews are defaming the white
race every week in one or the other film, and especially blondes with
blue eyes. You Jews are the greatest haters and warmongers on this
earth. That's why I gave up the cinema decades ago.

It is disgusting to read as a white man all the slanders and
misrepresentations that the Jews spit out again and again in their
films, novels, news and all the other media they control.  What the Jews
are writing against us is a threat to our well-being and security. It is
the Jews who are the hate-speakers, and constantly, without end.

Germany has nothing to atone for. Germany is innocent of all
accusations. The Jews are the genocides and liars and you supported your

You are not German! You're a Jew. I am a German, a German. Jews are not
German, they have a different blood and a different genetic structure.
That's why we see things differently.

It is you, Ms. Simmons, who is delusional when you believe your tribe's

Fascism is a thousand times better than your democracy. I could tell
you, if we had a fascist leader, your nonsense wouldn't go out. A bunch
of morons can make decisions in a democracy, rather than highly
intelligent leaders with the same blood and the same interests.
Democracy only works for Jews and for parasites who brought the Jews to
our homeland.

It's the Jews who are paranoid. This emerges from their Talmud and their
genocidal god Yahweh. They hate all nations except their own. I see your
paranoia in the last paragraph of your article. Let me be clear: If you
are not a bad Jew, your own Jewish leaders are abusing you with the
horrible films and novels of a Holocaust that does not exist. That's how
bad they are. I strongly recommend that you drop Judaism. It's a
murderous, lying, paedophilic religion.

Heil Hitler! Heil Germany! Down with the Holocaust!

July 10, 2018


Enter supporting content here