|
|
The National Socialists Gave Rothschild Bankers The Boot by Paul Hausser The National Socialists Gave Rothschild Bankers The Boot December 5, 2013 Despite the frivolous claims of foolhardy patriotards and assorted Jew defenders who often masquerade as “anti- Zionists,” the National Socialistss were not — in any way — covertly funded by, or in cahoots with, Rothschild bankers. On the contrary, the German, French and Austrian branches of the House of Rothschild were effectively dissolved and extirpated by Hitler. Quite a bizarre and counterproductive action of a “Rothschild agent” wouldn’t you say? Niall Ferguson’s biography of the Rothschild family, The House of Rothschild: Volume 2: The World’s Banker: 1849-1999 (Penguin, 2000), although sympathetic to Jewry and the Rothschilds, outlines the reality of the National Socialists’ war against this international criminal Jewish banking cabal. Ferguson writes: “An altogether more ruthless coalition had come to power in Germany in 1933, dominated by the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Hostility to the Rothschilds’ had been a feature of National Socialist propaganda from the movement’s infancy (see introduction to volume 1) despite the fact that the Frankfurt house had been wound up when Hitler was barely twelve years old. It was a hostility that soon translated into action. At first the attacks were largely symbolic: in December 1933 the Frankfurt Rothschildallee was renamed Karolingerallee, while the Luisenplatz and Mathildenstrasse lost the plaques identifying them with members of the family. It was not until April 1938, with the “Ordinance on the Registration of Jewish Assets,” that Rothschild property came under direct attack. In the wake of the orchestrated anti-Semitic demonstrations of the following November (Reichskristallnacht), nearly all the myriad of charitable and educational foundations — of which there were around twenty — were dissolved, with the exception of the Carolinum Dental Clinic, which had become part of the Frankfurt University. The largest of these, the Baron Wilhelm Carl von Rothschild Foundation, was “Aryanised” under pressure from the city authorities, so that all references to its founder were expunged. At the same time, the Reich Association of Jews in Germany was forced to sell the Mathilde von Rothschild Paediatric Hospital, the Georgine Sara von Rothschild Foundation for Infirm Foreign Israelites and the Rothschild residence at Grosser Wollgraben 26 to the Frankfurt municipality. The Gestapo also confiscated the A.M. von Rothschild Sanatorium for Lung Diseases in the Black Forest. At least four other Rothschild-founded institutions suffered the same fate." The private property of the few family members still resident in Germany was expropriated by similar methods, though there was in fact relatively little of it left by 1938. Before the process of confiscation began, Max von-Goldscmidt-Rothschild’s son Albert, Rudolf and Erich sold the family houses at the Grüneburg and Königstein and opted to emigrate (Albert to Switzerland, where he committed suicide in 1941 when faced with the threat of expulsion). But Maximilian — now 95 — was too old to leave. He stayed on in the house in the Bockenheimer Landstrasse, with the garden which his wife’s great-uncle Amschel had acquired over a century before the earliest days of Jewish emancipation in Frankfurt. Or rather he was allowed to occupy a room in the house; for in tragic fulfilment of Amschel’s nightmare — dating back to the night in 1815 when he first slept in the “free air” of the garden — Maximilian was forced to sell the property to the city of Frankfurt for just 610,000 reichsmarks (less tax). In the aftermath of Kristallnacht he was also obliged to sell his art collection to the city for 2.3 million reichsmarks (again less tax) and to donate a further 25 percent of his remaining assets to the Reich as an “atonement payment”… … Discovered, was no longer the Vienna house by the Alliance. In addition, the Witkowitz board had safeguarded against sequestration the company’s stake in the Swedish Freya ore mines as well as £200,000 in foreign currency. Louis [Nathaniel de Rothschild of Austria] therefore had a real bargaining position. When Himmler sought to ingratiate himself by sending some ornate French furniture to the prison, he was able to send it away complaining that it made his cell look like a “Cracow Bordello.” Although Louis had to hand over most of his Austrian assets to secure his own release, the family was able to insist that a price be paid for Witkowitz (albeit a discounted price). But such legal niceties were ultimately bound to be swept aside by National Socialist force majeure. Eugene’s hopes of selling the ironworks to the Czechoslovak state for £10 million were dashed when Hitler bullied the Prague government into accepting partition in March 1939. With the works effectively under German control, Goring’s Commissioner Hans Kehrl, Rasche and Paul Pleiger (the Reichswerke’s general director). At the same time Fritz Kranefuss — Himmler ’s adjutant and a supervisory board member of the Dresdner bank — informed Rasche on the basis of Sicherheitsdienst intelligence that the transfer abroad of the ownership of Witkowitz had been illegal under currency laws. Finally, in July 1939, it was agreed to sell the plant for £2.9 million. However, the outbreak of war gave the Germans the perfect excuse not to pay. As a result, Witkowitz joined the lengthening list of Rothschild properties confiscated without compensation by the National Socialist regime. In January 1941 Goring was able to take the process a step further when 43,300 Witkowitz shares were seized from the vaults of the Paris house (though even this did not give him a technical controlling interest). (It was not until 1953 that the communist government established in Czechoslovakia in 1948 finally paid compensation to the Rothschilds — amounting to £1 millon — for the works.) Yet it was not their industrial investments which Hitler and his lackeys really coveted so much as their investments in art — the Old Masters, the Sevres, the Louis Quinze bureaus— which were the most dazzling fruits of the family’s financial success. In fleeing Austria, Alphonse had left behind one of the great European private collections; and attempts to buy it by Lord Duveen (possibly bidding on behalf of the original owners) were in vain. For the acquisition of so many old masters had given Hitler the idea of establishing a new German gallery at Linz, to give the Reich its Louvre. In 1939 he authorized Hans Posse to begin work on the project, putting the best works seized from Austrian Jews into a “Fuhrer reserve” for this purpose. … Up until the outbreak of war in 1939, the corollary of the expropriation of the Jews was their emigration from German territory. (It was significant in this respect that the Rothschild palace in the Prinz Eugenstrasse was occupied by Adolf Eichmann’s Central Office for Jewish Emigration, which worked closely with Rafelsberger ’s Asset Transactions Office.) Naturally many (though not all) German and Austrian Jews wanted to get out, while the National Socialists had no objection to their leaving, provided they could be mulcted in the process. Leading German Jewish bankers — notably Max Warburg — saw little alternative but to facilitate this process. However, for Jews like the Rothschilds who remained outside the area of German control, this created a number of acute dilemmas. … The only logical solution was therefore to find some alternative territory for the Jews to go to. The National Socialists themselves thought of Madagascar. Interestingly, Guy Burgess’s first assignment (when he was still a freelance intelligence agent) from MI6′s D section was — as he faithfully reported to Moscow in December 1938 — “to activate Lord Rothschild” in an attempt to “split the Jewish movement” and “create an opposition to Zionism and Dr Weitzmann [sic].” At around the same time, the Paris house [of the Rothschild family] forwarded to New Court a proposal to purchase 200,000 acres of Brazil’s Mato Grosso “for colonisation purposes”; and another to settle Jews in Sudan’s Upper Nile Valley between Malakhal and Bor — supposedly “a huge territory … with no population and where Jews might organize themselves an important colony.” Kenya, Northern Rhodesia and Guiana were also considered. Only at the eleventh hour, it seems, did the Rothschilds recognize the need to admit refugees into Britain and France. In March 1939 Edouard’s wife Germaine turned an old house at the edge of the Ferrieres estate into a hostel for around 150 refugee children. After the German invasion they were evacuated south and later dispersed, some escaping to the United States. … By 1939, of course, numerous members of the Rothschild family were themselves refugees. The German invasion of France in May 1940 increased their number substantially. Even before the fall of Paris, Robert had already reached the safety of Montreal, taking with him his wife Nelly and daughters Diane and Cecile. It was not until July, however, that his cousin and senior partner Edouard — now in his seventies — opted to leave France, finally reaching the United States after a circuitous journey through Spain and Portugal. (He too was accompanied by his wife Germaine and daughter Bethsabee, his eldest daughter Jacqueline having already settled in America with her second husband.) Their former partner Maurice also ended up in Canada, while his ex-wife Noemie and son Edmond took refuge at the estate at Pregny. The other French Rothschild of that generation, Henri, was already resident in Portugal. Finally, Alain’s pregnant wife reached the US via Spain and Brazil, while Guy’s wife Alix took the route through Argentina, though she later rejoined her husband. … Occupied France to confiscate “possessions of the Palais Rothschild,” including any which had been handed over to the French state. The following month, the Germans ordered that administrators be put in charge of the Jewish firms. The Luftwaffe and later a German general occupied the Rothschild house at 23 avenue de Marigny. Yet the Germans soon found themselves in competition with the puppet Vichy regime they themselves had called into being. Even before Keitel’s order, the Petain regime issued a decree which declared that all Frenchman who had left mainland France after May 10 had “removed themselves from the responsibilities and duties of members of the national community.” Accordingly, their assets were to be confiscated and sold, the proceeds going to the Vichy state. This was explicitly applied to Edouard, Robert and Henri. Soon after this, Petain laid claim to the Rothschild offices in the rue Laffitte for a government welfare agency and showed every sign of intending to treat other buildings belonging to the family in a similar fashion, putting them all in the hands of a new Public Property Office. In some ways, it made little difference to the Rothschilds whether it was the Germans or the Vichy regime which stole their property. The latter was motivated by anti-Semitism too, as evidenced by the decrees Petain issued on October 3, 1940 and June 2, 1941, which drastically restricted the rights of French Jews, and the constant vitriolic attacks on the Rothschilds in pro-German papers like Partis-Soir and Au Pilori. Nor can it be seriously argued that Vichy officials were somehow more lenient in their treatment of Rothschild property than the Germans would have been. Maurice Janicot, who ran Petain’s Public Property Office, is said to have prevented the Germans from clearing the cellars of Lafite, for example; but a lack of buyers seems the most likely explanation for his failure to sell Elie’s Neuilly stable of horses, Alain’s house on the rue du Cirque and Miriam’s houses in Boulogne and Paris. As can be seen from his statement to German authorities in May 1941 — to the effect that de Rothschild Freres now belonged to the Vichy state — the aim was to pre-empt the Germans, not to protect the Rothschilds. The attempt by Petain’s Commissariat for the Jewish Questions to convert the Institut de biologie physico-chimique founded by Edmond in 1927 into a laboratory for the eugenicist Alex Carrel says much about the fundamental compatibility of Vichy and the Third Reich. … If Hitler had successfully launched “Operation Sealion” in the summer of 1940, when Britain was at her most vulerable, a similar fate might have befallen the English Rothschilds and their remaining private collections — a worse fate probably, as the invasion of Britain would have made the ultimate defeat of Germany infinitately harder to achieve.“ The fact that the National Socialists seized and dismantled Rothschild assets and interests in Germany, France and Austria (which became part of the Third Reich after 1938′s Anschluss), as well as arrested Austrian-Jewish banking kingpin Louis von Rothschild, is not in question, despite what suspicious internet characters try to propagate. The oft-repeated claim that Hitler “didn’t go after the Rothschilds” or “left the Rothschilds alone” is, as you have just witnessed, a barefaced falsehood perpetrated by, what can only amount to, Jewish disinformation agents. A brief biography of Louis von Rothschild (1882-1955), states: “The collapse of the Creditanstalt in 1931 had an impact across Europe and caused death of a bank. Only action of the Paris and London Rothschild banks could collapse the Vienna Rothschild bank is prevented. A foreign creditor Cttee led by Lionel Rothschild / London and Lord Kindersley, the bank finally restored. But only a few years later came the final blow: 1938 Louis was arrested by the National Socialists and held for a year in jail until the complicated negotiations over his release were completed. Rothschild was allowed to leave the country only if he renounced all Austrian possessions. A truly princely ransom. The war effort Vítkovice plant, which provided 30% of crude steel, 30% coal and 40% of the pig iron was in Austria, but was previously transferred to an English company, so that the National Socialists could not confiscate the works simply. It was not until after the outbreak of the war Goering took over the works. (After the war, the Czech Communists confiscated the work and paid the Rothschilds in 1953, a compensation) The vast art collections (several 1000 objects) of the Rothschilds were also seized. This ended the presence of the Rothschilds on Austrian soil. The childless Louis went into exile in the United States.” The modern-day Rothschilds themselves are still kvetching about it on their website: “The crash of 1929 brought problems, not least in Austria where Louis von Rothschild struggled hard to shore up the Creditanstalt, Austria’s largest bank, to prevent collapse. Less than a decade later a darker tide arrived; the Austrian Rothschilds’ interests were seized in 1938 by the Nazis, bringing to an end more than a century at the heart of middle European banking. In France and Austria, the family was scattered for the duration of the war.” Several New York Times articles also refer to this event: “… The [Austrian Rothschild] family’s holdings were seized by the Nazis during the German Anschluss in 1938. [. . .] Their holdings had been vastly reduced, in part because of wartime destruction by the Nazis….” (“At $90 Million, Rothschild Sale Exceeds Goals.” New York Times. July 09, 1999.) “A year after the Austrian Government agreed to return about $40 million worth of art and objects that the Nazis confiscated from the Austrian branch of the Rothschild family, members of the 256-year-old banking dynasty have decided to sell the collection.” (“Austrian Rothschilds Decide to Sell; Sotheby’s in London Will Auction $40 Million in Art Seized by Nazis.” New York Times. April 10, 1999.) The only people in the world who foolishly allege that this didn’t happen are the lying anti-Hitler fetishists of the David Icke persuasion who dismiss and try to cast doubt upon anything and everything that doesn’t coincide with their kosher-approved “theories.” These buffoons are harboring a subversive pro-Jewish agenda. They aim at casting aspersions upon anyone who resists Jewry in word and deed, as Hitler and the National Socialists did so efficiently and courageously. In 1940, Reich Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels commissioned the production of a film exposing the criminal historical machinations of the Rothschild family entitled, The Rothschilds: Shares in Waterloo. It was the first of three counter-semitic movies made in 1940 by the National Socialist regime. The film provided a historical account of the Rothschild family’s rise to fortune, set mostly in Britain during the Napoleonic wars. An indictment of Jewish intrigue and avarice, the film aimed at illustrating the “Judafication” of British society at the hands of the Rothschilds, demonstrating that the Britons had become “the Jews among Aryans.” All of this, of course, flies in the face of the slanderous disinfo-peddlers who chant the mindless slogan: “Hitler was a Rothschild agent!” These deranged cretins will continue to infect the internet with their poisonous propaganda against Hitler and National Socialism. The crypto-Jews masquerading as “anti-Zionists” who voraciously propagate these pernicious lies about Hitler seek to demoralize us by denigrating the solutions that solved the Jewish problem in the past, and by doing so aim at derailing any future resistance to Jewry. These rotten snakes hope to smash the resolve and will power that heroic figures like Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels inspire in modern-day resistors of Jewish tyranny. As the fearless truth martyr Joseph Goebbels said in 1945: “There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph.” Sieg Heil! – ZionCrimeFactory http://zioncrimefactory.com/2013/12/05/the-nazis-g... I replaced the word "Nazis" with National Socialists for historical and political accuracy. ___________________________________________________________ How Hitler
Tackled Unemployment and Revived Germany's Economy To deal with the massive unemployment and economic paralysis of the Great Depression, both the Rooseveltgovernment in the US and Hitler's government in Germany launched innovative and ambitious programs. Although Roosevelt's "New Deal" programs helped only marginally, the Third Reich's much more focused and comprehensive policies proved remarkably successful. Within three years unemployment was banished and Germany's economy was booming. This remarkable achievement is little known and rarely acknowledged. Runtime: 35:38 mins.    . . . Click on this text to listen to: Hitler vs the Elite Cabal of International Bankers... How Hitler Defied the BankerS MANY PEOPLE take joy in saying Wall Street and Jewish bankers “financed Hitler.” There is plenty of documented evidence that Wall Street and Jewish bankers did indeed help finance Hitler at first, partly because it allowed the bankers to get rich (as I will describe below) and partly in order to control Stalin. However, when Germany broke free from the bankers, the bankers declared a world war against Germany.
When we look at all the facts, the charge that “Jews financed Hitler” becomes irrelevant. Los Angeles Attorney Ellen Brown discusses this topic in her book Web Of Debt.
When Hitler came to power, Germany was hopelessly broke. The Treaty of Versailles had imposed crushing reparations on the German people, demanding that Germans repay every nation’s costs of the war. These costs totaled three times the value of all the property in Germany.
Private currency speculators caused the German mark to plummet, precipitating one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times. A wheelbarrow full of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of bread. The national treasury was empty. Countless homes and farms were lost to speculators and to private (Jewish controlled) banks. Germans lived in hovels. They were starving.
Nothing like this had ever happened before — the total destruction of the national currency, plus the wiping out of people’s savings and businesses. On top of this came a global depression. Germany had no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international (mainly Jewish) bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came to power. At that point the German government thwarted the international banking cartels by issuing its own money. World Jewry responded by declaring a global boycott against Germany.
Hitler began a national credit program by devising a plan of public works that included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities. All these were paid for with money that no longer came from the private international bankers.
The projected cost of these various programs was fixed at one billion units of the national currency. To pay for this, the German government (not the international bankers) issued bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates. In this way the National Socialists put millions of people to work, and paid them with Treasury Certificates.
Under the National Socialists, Germany’s money wasn’t backed by gold (which was owned by the international bankers). It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, “For every mark issued, we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done, or goods produced.” The government paid workers in Certificates. Workers spent those Certificates on other goods and services, thus creating more jobs for more people. In this way the German people climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the international bankers.
Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries (controlled by international bankers) were still out of work. Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest. Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the international bankers’ denial of foreign credit to Germany, and despite the global boycott by Jewish-owned industries. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system that cut the bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits. (Venezuela does the same thing today when it trades oil for commodities, plus medical help, and so on. Hence the bankers are trying to squeeze Venezuela.) Germany’s economic freedom was short-lived; but it left several monuments, including the famous Autobahn, the world’s first extensive superhighway.
Hjalmar Schacht, a Rothschild agent who was temporarily head of the German central bank, summed it up thus: An American banker had commented, “Dr. Schacht, you should come to America. We’ve lots of money and that’s real banking.” Schacht replied, “You should come to Berlin. We don’t have money. That’s real banking.”
(Schacht, the Rothschild agent, actually supported the private international bankers against Germany, and was rewarded by having all charges against him dropped at the Nuremberg trials.)
This economic freedom made Hitler extremely popular with the German people. Germany was rescued from English economic theory, which says that all currency must be borrowed against the gold owned by a private and secretive banking cartel — such as the Federal Reserve, or the Central Bank of Europe — rather than issued by the government for the benefit of the people.
Canadian researcher Dr. Henry Makow (who is Jewish himself) says the main reason why the bankers arranged for a world war against Germany was that Hitler sidestepped the bankers by creating his own money, thereby freeing the German people. Worse, this freedom and prosperity threatened to spread to other nations. Hitler had to be stopped!
Makow quotes from the 1938 interrogation of C. G. Rakovsky, one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism and a Trotsky intimate. Rakovsky was tried in show trials in the USSR under Stalin. According to Rakovsky, Hitler was at first funded by the international bankers, through the bankers’ agent Hjalmar Schacht. The bankers financed Hitler in order to control Stalin, who had usurped power from their agent Trotsky. Then Hitler became an even bigger threat than Stalin when Hitler started printing his own money.
(Stalin came to power in 1922, which was eleven years before Hitler came to power.)
Rakovsky said:
“Hitler took over the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones. He took over the machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the people. Can you possibly imagine what would have come if this had infected a number of other states? (Henry Makow, “Hitler Did Not Want War,” www.savethemales.com March 21, 2004).
Economist Henry C K Liu writes of Germany’s remarkable transformation:
“The Nazis came to power in 1933 when the German economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began. (Henry C. K. Liu, “Nazism and the German Economic Miracle,” Asia Times (May 24, 2005).
In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry commented:
“Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.”
These facts do not appear in any textbooks today, since Jews own most publishing companies. What does appear is the disastrous runaway inflation suffered in 1923 by the Weimar Republic, which governed Germany from 1919 to 1933. Today’s textbooks use this inflation to twist truth into its opposite. They cite the radical devaluation of the German mark as an example of what goes wrong when governments print their own money, rather than borrow it from private cartels.
In reality, the Weimar financial crisis began with the impossible reparations payments imposed at the Treaty of Versailles. Hjalmar Schacht, the Rothschild agent who was currency commissioner for the Republic — opposed letting the German government print its own money… “The Treaty of Versailles is a model of ingenious measures for the economic destruction of Germany. Germany could not find any way of holding its head above the water, other than by the inflationary expedient of printing bank notes.”
Schacht echoes the textbook lie that Weimar inflation was caused when the German government printed its own money. However, in his 1967 book The Magic of Money, Schacht let the cat out of the bag by revealing that it was the PRIVATELY-OWNED Reichsbank, not the German government, that was pumping new currency into the economy. Thus, the PRIVATE BANK caused the Weimar hyper-inflation.
Like the U.S. Federal Reserve, the Reichsbank was overseen by appointed government officials, but was operated for private gain. What drove the wartime inflation into hyperinflation was speculation by foreign investors, who sold the mark short, betting on its decreasing value. In the manipulative device known as the short sale, speculators borrow something they don’t own, sell it, and then “cover” by buying it back at the lower price.
Speculation in the German mark was made possible because the PRIVATELY OWNED Reichsbank (not yet under Nazi control) made massive amounts of currency available for borrowing. This currency, like U.S. currency today, was created with accounting entries on the bank’s books. Then the funny-money was lent at compound interest. When the Reichsbank could not keep up with the voracious demand for marks, other private banks were allowed to create marks out of nothing, and to lend them at interest. The result was runaway debt and inflation.
Thus, according to Schacht himself, the German government did not cause the Weimar hyperinflation. On the contrary, the government (under the National Socialists) got hyperinflation under control. The National Socialists put the Reichsbank under strict government regulation, and took prompt corrective measures to eliminate foreign speculation. One of those measures was to eliminate easy access to funny-money loans from private banks. Then Hitler got Germany back on its feet by having the public government issue Treasury Certificates.
Schacht , the Rothschild agent, disapproved of this government fiat money, and wound up getting fired as head of the Reichsbank when he refused to issue it. Nonetheless, he acknowledged in his later memoirs that allowing the government to issue the money it needed did not produce the price inflation predicted by classical economic theory, which says that currency must be borrowed from private cartels.
What causes hyper-inflation is uncontrolled speculation. When speculation is coupled with debt (owed to private banking cartels) the result is disaster. On the other hand, when a government issues currency in carefully measured ways, it causes supply and demand to increase together, leaving prices unaffected. Hence there is no inflation, no debt, no unemployment, and no need for income taxes.
Naturally this terrifies the bankers, since it eliminates their powers. It also terrifies Jews, since their control of banking allows them to buy the media, the government, and everything else.
Therefore, to those who delight in saying “Jews financed Hitler,” I ask that they please look at all the facts. _________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation,
-
Mayer Amschel Rothschild, [quoted in Money
Creators (1935) by Gertrude Coogan, p. 329]__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ "Debt, particularly international debt, is the first and suborned,
and alien powers and influences are introduced _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ "History, as seen by a Monetary Economist, is a continuous __________________________________________________________________________ "Rothschild's ill-gotten wealth also effectively bought his family and investment- banker operations." - David Duke, "One of these means is concentrated in the world of finance. _____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________ "Thus arose the school of international finance, in which the Rothschilds
___________________________________________________________ "The notion that the level of production should be controlled In
such a simple state of society, the criminal absurdity of the many
years. Thus, of course, international finance, by restricting Since the dawn of human history, he great struggle of man has been to wrest from Nature by force and cunning the means of life and enjoyment. It was only hen the blessings of modern democracy made their appearance ne hundred and fifty years ago, that he was told, in an arbitrary anner, that his efforts must be slackened and regulated henceforth y the private interests of an infinitesimal proportion of the ______________________________________________________________ "Some people think Federal Reserve Banks are United States to buy votes to control our legislation; and there are those that Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. The Federal Reserve Board has cheated he United States out of enough money to pay the national debt...
______________________________________________________________ "Our money system is nothing better than a confidence trick...
________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________ "JEWS have no religious scruples regarding money where goyim ______________________________________________________
___________________________
German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler
Reviewed by John M. Ries
A good portion of the the accepted legacy of German big business and its alleged role in the establishment of the Third Reich rests on the authenticity of the memoirs of certain key individuals who either participated in or witnessed the rise to power of Adolf Hitler from close proximity. Perhaps the two most important were Ruhr industrialist Fritz Thyssen and Hitler's press secretary Otto Dietrich. Thyssen, whose contempt for the Weimar Republic led him to support Hitler's NSDAP as early as the fall of 1923, was long considered to be one of its most important sources of funds. His memoirs, which Turner points out were ghostwritten, have been used by historians to substantiate the close connection between big business and the Nazi movement from its earliest days.
Questions arise, however, concerning the memoirs' authenticity, one particularly interesting example being a passage where Thyssen claims that he "donated 100,000 gold marks to the NSDAP in October 1923." This was a critical period not only in the life of the NSDAP but in that of the Republic as well. Separatist movements were rampant throughout the Rhineland and Bavaria, and the Communists were threatening to take over the governments of Saxony and Thuringia. Moreover, the French occupation of the Ruhr, the industrial heart of Germany, continued to exert demoralizing effects, perhaps chief of which was the incredible hyper-inflation which threatened to wipe out what was left of the German middle class.
Given the dire situation at that time, one can well appreciate the uplifting effect a sum of 100,000 gold marks would have had on the morale of the NSDAP, then just one of many right-wing extremist groups plotting the overthrows of the tottering Weimar Republic. Yet Turner states flatly that "in light of the available evidence, it seems unlikely that Thyssen gave any such sum to the Nazis." In the same paragraph of his memoirs, Thyssen claims that he did not make the payment to Hitler himself but to General Erich Ludendorff, perhaps the most important figure in anti-Republican circles at that time, "to use it as best he could." Whether Ludendorff would have favored the NSDAP more than any of the other groups operating in Bavaria at that time remains doubtful.
Otto Dietrich's 1934 memoirs of the Kampfzeit are likewise considered by Turner to be more propagandistic than substantial. Their self-serving nature is revealed by the contradictions between them and a later version published in 1955. Over that span of time it appears that Dietrich tempered his revolutionary ardor with a more realistic assessment of the events.
This is evident when one compares the two accounts he provides of the reactions to Hitler's speech to the Düsseldorf Industry Club on January 26, 1932. In the 1934 version, Dietrich gives the following description of the impression Hitler made with the "elite of die Wirtschaft" who came to hear him speak on the remedies he would propose to heal the ailing German economy: "The effect on the businessmen [of the speech], so far as they deserved the name, was profound and became evident in the ensuing difficult months of struggle."
According to Turner, this remark has been accepted by historians as proof that big business increased its subsidies to the NSDAP as a result of the speech. However, in the 1955 version, Dietrich presents a quite different picture, saying that beyond some "well-meaning but insignificant sums [collected at the door] ... one would not speak of any support worthy of mention, much less of financing Hitler's political struggle by die Wirtschaft or heavy industry."
An "equally embellished" account in Thyssen's memoirs has served, along with Dietrich's earlier version, as a "seminal source on the Industry Club speech and its aftermath."
What to make of this contradiction? Which version is closer to the truth?
Turner compares both to outside references and decides in favor of the 1955 version. "From all indications," he says, "neither Hitler nor any other Nazis mounted any sustained follow-up from those who had been present at his Industry Club speech or otherwise to enlist them for their purposes."
He goes on to add that "Hitler's failure to follow up vigorously on the entree he had gained to the business community through his Industry Club speech tends to substantiate the hypothesis that he sought merely to neutralize big business, not to bring its leaders actively behind the NSDAP or to exploit its financial resources for his party."
From the preceding examples one can readily agree with the assessment Turner made of the task he faced in the preparation of this study when he said that it became "of necessity, a book that deals not only with the past but with myths about the past." These "myths" were found to be present not only in contemporary memoirs, but in press releases, the post-war testimony of witnesses at Nuremberg, -- and even from Hitler himself. They all contributed to the creation of a legend involving an important yet misunderstood aspect of the origins of the Third Reich; namely, from which sources the NSDAP received its funding.
The picture of the relationship between German big business and the Nazi party which Turner provides us is one that reveals how little big business had to do with the party's success. In Republican Germany, the big business community was a loosely organized, politically ineffective interest group that was held together primarily by its opposition to the growing menace of Sozialpolitik, that is, the modern welfare state. Its political dealings were mainly with the so- called bourgeois parties of the center and right the DVP (Deutsche Volkspartei), the DDP (Deutsche Demokratische Partei), and the DNVP (Deutschnationale Volkspartei). However, the general disdain big business had for the republican form of government, a government that jeopardized the privileged position it once held under the defunct Imperial order, precluded any serious attempt to use the system to its advantage, a system where "votes, not money" were the determining factor in political success.
In this milieu the NSDAP was only one of many political parties big business considered funding. However, because of the party's anti-capitalist economic policies, evident since the proclamation of the 25- point program of February 1920, the big business community was never able to reconcile itself to lending more than half-hearted support, and this was invariably of a tactical, rather than an ideological, nature. This distrust of a party that seemed more often than not ready to side with the radical left on important social and economic issues became so pervasive that not even the party's strident anti-Marxism and its desire to inculcate support for national values could overcome it.
It may be true that contributions of various sorts came from big businessmen like Fritz Thyssen, the Berlin manufacturer Ernst von Borsig, and the retired coal executive Emil Kirdorf, but despite statements to the contrary, they were never a critical source of funding. Most of the NSDAP funds were derived from membership dues, interest-free loans, and the gate receipts from the many mass rallies the party held. After the parliamentary breakthrough in September 1930, sales from Mein Kampf skyrocketed, providing Hitler himself with a steady source of income. And during the depression the volunteer labor given by party activists helped ease the effects of the increasingly austere economic conditions.
In sum, the NSDAP was a prototypical "grass-roots" political organization able to expand and prosper during a period when most of the bourgeois parties suffered a serious loss of support. Only the Communist Party could compare in this regard, and it never attracted the mass following the NSDAP did.
Turner's book provides us with a new perspective on the origins of the rise of Hitler, one based on a critical look at the role played by German big business. This is based on an examination of all the relevant documents, rather than the rather eclectic surveys currently before the public today. This will contribute, hopefully, to the encouragement of closer reading of historical accounts dealing with essential aspects of contemporary history, as well as the development of a more discriminating attitude toward the sensationalized distortions of the truth which confront us on a daily basis.From The Journal of Historical Review, Fall 1988 (Vol. 8, No. 3), pp. 369-371.
Ben Bernanke (a JEW and former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank) Says “Hitler Was the Guy Who Got Economics Right in the 1930s”
Ben Bernanke has had his finger on the pulse of macroeconomic convulsions, and many have called him the man who “doctored” the financial crisis of 2008, and brought the American economy back into good graces.
He is considered the pre-eminent living scholar of the Great Depression, and one can say he conducts himself as such. The first paragraph in the preface to Bernanke's 2004 book, Essays on the Great Depression, reads as follows:
My particular research specialty is macroeconomics, not economic history. Nevertheless, throughout my academic career, I have returned many times to the study of the vertiginous economic decline of the 1930s, now known as the Great Depression. I guess I am a Great Depression buff, the way some people are Civil War buffs. I don't know why there aren't more Depression buffs. The Depression was an incredibly dramatic episode--an era of stock market crashes, bread lines, bank runs, and wild currency speculation, with the storm clouds of war gathering ominously in the background all the while. Fascinating, and often tragic, characters abound during this period, from hapless policymakers trying to make sense of events for which their experience had not prepared them to ordinary people coping heroically with the effects of the economic catastrophe. For my money, few periods are so replete with human interest.
On one occasion, a Money, Credit, and Banking Lecture at Ohio State University in 1994, Bernanke referred to himself as "a macroeconomist rather than an historian" and that his “focus would be on broad economic issues rather than historical details."
Popular finance website Investopedia summarizes Bernanke’s background and philosophy in a brief article, noting that he “earned an impressive set of academic credentials, including a Ph.D. in economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979, and Bachelor of Arts in economics from Harvard in 1975, graduating summa cum laude. His academic prowess was apparent even in high school, where his SAT score of 1590 set a state record."
He was also a professor of economics at Princeton, Stanford, NYU, and MIT, as well as an economic advisor and served on the Fed’s Board of Governors. It is clear that he was qualified for the job as the Federal Reserve chairman.
When asked by the Wall Street Journal how Bernanke would be remembered for his performance during the recession, Michael Bordo, Professor of Economics at Rutgers University, responded that "Bernanke’s approach to these challenges was influenced by his research on the Great Contraction of 1929-33. He identified the Fed’s failure to counter the banking panics as the key factor that reduced the money supply and disrupted credit disintermediation, leading to massive deflation and high unemployment.”
Bernanke was recently interviewed on the Freakanomics podcast – a podcast for people who like economics – to promote his new memoir, The Courage to Act. During the chat, he was asked what FDR could have done differently about taxes during his presidency. In his answer he said in passing that Hitler was the guy who got economics right in the 1930s. Here’s the transcript:
I suppose he could have cut taxes, but taxes weren’t as high then as they are now. The general recollection people have, or the vision they have of the ‘30s, was that the government employment programs like the WPA and the building of the Hoover Dam and things like that were a big deal. And they were important, but relative to the size of the problem they were actually quite small. And as early as the 1950s, economists pointed out that the fiscal programs of the ’30s were actually very modest compared to the size of the problem. Ironically — and please take this the right way — the person who sort of most understood fiscal policy, in some sense, was Adolf Hitler. Because the rearming of Germany in the ’30s was so big and so extensive — of course, he had other objectives in mind — but the side effect of that re-arming, together with a big highway building program, was such that Germany, which had a very deep depression, actually came out of it much quicker than other countries, and suggested that a more aggressive fiscal program would have helped the United States as well. And of course, what ultimately brought the United States out of the Great Depression was World War II which was, unintentionally, a huge fiscal program.
Is Bernanke right?
On Reddit's Ask Historians page, this question was addressed, and the topic received 39 comments.
A simple Google search with the words “Hitler understood economics” produces a wealth of results (pun intended). The idea of tipping a hat – expressly to Hitler's economic approach, not his character or conduct as Fuhrer – isn't new.
In a research paper by Matthew F. Brown, an M.A. graduate in Historiography from the University of Sydney, entitled "How was Hitler able to affect such an economic miracle in Germany between 1933 and 1939?" Brown mentions the views of Richard Overy, a British historian who has published extensively on the history of World War II and the Third Reich.
He said: "Overy has commented that any assumption that the Nazis performed a Keynesian deficit financing ‘miracle’ is both a myth, and a product of the post-Nazi era. Further to this, Overy believes that historians have debated the issue of Hitler’s economic miracle, in an effort to demonstrate the possibility that different economic policies might have stopped Hitler."
Ian Kershaw, a historian, expanded further on the subject in a History Today article, "The Hitler Myth":
A third, extremely important, component of the perceived Fuhrer image was, therefore, that of the architect and creator of Germany's 'economic miracle' of the 1930s. Part of the apologetic of the post-war era was, of course, that despite his 'mistakes', Hitler had revamped the economy, rid Germany of unemployment, and built the motorways. This is itself testimony to the penetrating and enduring features of this aspect of the contemporary Hitler image. Certainly, by 1939 it was difficult to deny that economic conditions in Germany, for whatever reasons, had improved dramatically since the Depression era. However, more than in any other sphere, perceptions of Hitler's image in the context of economic and social policy were determined by experiences which were divided, for the most part, along class lines.
The working class remained the social grouping least impressed by the 'economic miracle' and relatively immune to the image of Hitler as the creator of Germany's striking new prosperity. After all, with their own standard of living pinned down to Depression levels in the years 1933-36, most industrial workers saw no particular reason to offer marked signs of gratitude to the Fuhrer. Through repression and intimidation, low wages, and longer hours, the 'economic miracle', as most realized, was being carried out on their own backs. Nevertheless, as the underground worker resistance was forced to admit, Hitler undoubtedly did gain some popularity among workers for 'his' work creation and the economic recovery which 'he' had brought about. And in the first years of the Third Reich in particular, the 'socialist' aspect of the Hitler image also struck a chord among many of the poorer Germans who were recipients of the 'Winter Aid'. Even so, on the whole it appears that the image of the economic miracle-worker, the restorer of Germany's prosperity, had its greatest appeal among those sectors of the population who benefited most from the economic boom of the rearmament period: the middle class, who, despite their unceasing grumbling, continued to provide the main base of support for the regime and devotion to Hitler until at least the middle of the war.
Joseph Bendersky, a specialist in German history, holds the view that "ideology played a secondary role in Hitler’s economic policies. For reasons of expediency, Hitler did not attempt to Nazify the economy. Instead, he left the actual running of the economy to experts in business and industry, while instituting a large amount of control from above to force cooperation and compliance with his economic objectives. So long as they cooperated, big business and industry profited by this relationship. In essence, the German economy under Hitler was neither totally free nor totally controlled.”
It’s a complex topic, and no conclusions can be drawn from this small bit of mentioned research. However, why would Bernanke credit Hitler and not his team of economists at the time?
During the Q&A session on the Freakanomics podcast, Bernanke cited aggressive fiscal policy as his main reason for praising Hitler’s economic performance, which included re-armament and the construction of the autobahn. The Reich Minister of Economics himself, Hjalmar Schacht, has said that: "He [Hitler] understood nothing whatever about economics. So long as I maintained the balance of trade and kept him supplied with foreign exchange, he didn't bother about how I managed it."
David Gordon of Mises.org, a libertarian website, says that under Hitler “Germany had embarked on a Keynesian policy.” He added that “government spending became increasingly important in guiding the economy into the military channels that Hitler wanted." In a study of Nazi fiscal and monetary policy, economist Albrecht Ritschl concluded in 2000 that "Nazi recovery appears less spectacular than was hitherto believed. Our results also indicate that government spending was dominated by war preparation already in a very early phase of the Nazi recovery. I find little justification for the popular interpretation that recovery was sparked off by non-military work-creation and the construction of the autobahn network."
Has Bernanke's comment from the podcast drawn any controversy?
LionsofLiberty.com seized on the topic as did the Washington Examiner. A Dutch news website also published an op-ed based on his remark. Counterpunch, a website edited by journalist Alexander Cockburn, featured an article, "Hitler vs. Bernanke."
But Bernanke largely escaped public criticism after making the statement. He was lucky. In 2003 David Raub, the president of Chicago’s Glenview State Bank, was pressured to step down after making comments in praise of Hitler’s economic policies in the bank’s online newsletter. Here’s his statement: “The Great Depression of the 1930s saw falling prices, staggering unemployment and shattered stock markets all over the world, and the world’s leading statesmen seemed helpless to defeat it. Except for one. His name was Adolf Hitler.”
That sounds like what Bernanke said.
THE REICH’S ECONOMIC MIRACLE  Following Germany’s defeat in 1918 international banking houses dictated Germany’s economy and Berlin’s chancellors merely managed it. However, Adolf Hitler, the newly elected chancellor thought it out of the question for Germany to remain indebted to usurious international finance. The incoming chancellor drove the money-lenders out of the German temple.
It isn’t rocket science: I recall a father who under circumstances he had no control over fell into debt. With a wife, two children and a mortgage, he had little choice but to borrow from credit card companies. When each month he paid the £70 minimum required his debt was reduced by just £7 whilst the bank took £67 interest. It is the same for a country’s national debt.
Hitler opted for Germany’s financial independence and therein lays his economic miracle. He wasn’t alone; other countries like Libya, Syria, Iraq, Russia, have since attempted to copy Hitler’s example. But Germany was the first country to challenge international banking usury.
In order to reduce the terrifying numbers of unemployed it was planned to provide Germany with a futuristic transport infrastructure. The construction of autobahns began using only German materials.
Roads in the West are paved with bitumen or asphalt. This petroleum-based product has to be imported and paid for in (bank borrowed) dollars. This suits the bankers as the transport infrastructure is another udder to be milked. Germany did not possess U.S. dollars; Hitler didn’t want them or the swingeing interest levies that accompanied them.
A case in point; the Mersey Tunnel linking Liverpool and Birkenhead in England was constructed in 1934 using money borrowed from the banks. In 2013 ~ 80 years later the banks were still raking in £10 million each year in interest rates and £58,000,000 is currently still owed. It is estimated that the debt will finally be settled in 2048. If you are happy with that then enjoy your ‘democracy’ and the system; you voted for it.
One now begins to realise why within 36 months of the National Socialists being elected the peoples of Germany enjoyed the best lifestyle and highest incomes in the world. Today, people in the West struggle to get by on an income that is 50% directly or indirectly taxed.
FACT: 40% of the cost of everything you or your local government, services like hospitals and schools purchase is absorbed by the banks. Your wife’s dress, your shopping bill, the industrialist’s purchases, could be near halved if the banks are cut out of the deal. Adolf Hitler’s National Socialists did cut the banks out making war inevitable.
To avoid buying oil-based asphalt, autobahns in Hitler’s Germany were constructed using concrete slabs laid together upon compacted earth. All the necessary materials were available in Germany. Unlike bitumen and asphalt surfaces concrete is far more enduring and less expensive. As a consequence, roads built in Germany more than 80 years ago need little maintenance.
The Weimar Republic also had a motor manufacturing industry. Before Hitler, this industry was financed by the banking houses. This had the effect of raising the selling price whilst reducing profitability. The price per automobile would be between 1,350 and 1,600 Reichsmarks, which Hitler considered extortionate.
Dr. Porsche and Adolf Hitler worked together on the design of the Volkswagen. This vehicle was revolutionary and innovative in every respect. The Volkswagen was so advanced that over eighty years later the vehicle retains much of its original character.
The Volkswagen at the time was far better-designed car than its British, French and American rivals. Bolshevik Russia didn’t have a domestic auto manufacturing industry. The Soviet Union’s vehicles were mostly manufactured in American plants built in the USSR ~ financed by Wall Street’s banking corporations.
The Bolsheviks were wholly dependent upon the Ford Motor Company, Caterpillar and brands such as Studebaker. Ironically, the Soviet economy (‘workers’ paradise’) was dependent upon American and European Jewish owned banking houses. Perhaps this will concentrate the mind to explain why the Capitalist / Communist alliance was formed to destroy Hitler’s Germany and later, Libya, Iraq, Syria ~ and post-Communist Russia?
Much else explains why self-reliance rather than debt reliance catapulted Hitler’s Germany into the future. It is a sobering thought that nearly 90 years after the National Socialists were elected very few people in the West enjoy a quality of life comparable to the peoples of Germany did before the bank-dependent Capitalists and Communists joined forces to destroy the only country that had defied the international banking cartels. Why the World hates Hitler? Liberalism's deadliest enemy Adolf Hitler transformed Germany into an authoritarian socialist
state advocating sovereignty of Nations advancement of labor preservation of the European ethnic groups and commerce based
on exchange of wares to replace the International gold standard. Becoming Chancellor in 1933, he tackled his country's bankruptcy massive unemployment, communist
subversion and foreign domination. His social economic programs and diplomacy restored German prosperity and independence
within three years, despite determined opposition from Western democratic leaders. Richly intriguing and not without arousing
a sense of awe, Germany exerted tremendous influence our time the antithesis of democratic values in a century witnessing
the triumph of democracy, Germany went down fighting. The task of recording the history of the period is therefore largely in the hands of the country's
former enemies. One of the flaws in their annals is a superficial assumption that National Socialism was a rootless political
program and the product of one man's worldview. There was in fact a conscious endeavor by the national socialists to align
policies with German and European customs and practices. They believed their goals correspond to the natural progression of their continent and found
the diametrical Western democratic concept to be alien and immoral. In fact National Socialism was central Europe's answer
to globalization and its dog of war democracy. During the first half of the 20th century two world wars ultimately imposed democratic governments
on European states that have been pursuing separate forms of politics. One of the most successful weapons in the arsenal
of democracy was atrocity propaganda; it demonized the enemy motivating allied armies and promoting their cause abroad. It
justified the most ruthless means to destroy him it defined the struggle as one of good versus evil, simplifying understanding
for the populations of the United States and the British Commonwealth. The atrocities at allied propagandists attribute to Germany remain lavishly publicized to
this day conducted more zealously by the entertainment industry than by historians. This is largely an emotional presentation
with little or no factual content rather it would be more useful for the authors of such legends to question for example
why: after the victorious Allies established democratic governments throughout Europe in 1919, this state formed became
practically extinct there in 20 years Russia, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Lithuania, Austria, Germany, Greece, Spain, Slovakia,
and soon thereafter France adopted authoritarian regimes. Several of these countries closed ranks with Germany as Hitler gave viable popular political
form to the growing resentment against Liberalism and its culture breaking spirit. National Socialism was not a spontaneous
phenomenon that derailed Germany's evolution and led the country astray it was a movement 200 years in the making anchored
deeply in the traditions and heritage of the German Volk and their fundamental requirements for life. Adolf Hitler gave
tangible political expression to ideas nurtured by many of his countrymen that they considered complementary to their national
character. Though his opposition party's popular support was mainly a reaction to universal economic distress, Hitler's
coming to power was nonetheless a logical consequence of this German development. While American European and Jewish financial interests continued to invest vast sums of capital
into global communism and colonialism in the West were industrially advanced societies existed, liberalism became the chief
social mechanism for controlling mass populations. By breaking down cultural norms and thereby cultural health and integrity,
the elites sought to undermine national spirit. By breaking the cohesiveness of European cultures they sought an accelerated
globalization process as a consequence. Hitler considered modern liberalism as a hijacking of European culture, therefore
he promoted Germany self-sufficiency and independence, his party advocated the sovereignty of Nations while classical liberalism
was the social mechanism by which the European people shared the feudal monarchical system that had ruled for centuries.
Its greatest legacy was making people conscious of their individual human rights, although National Socialist propagandists
publicly acknowledged the contribution of liberalism they warned that without controls the free reign of personal ambition
would always lead to abuse. And as much as liberalism was once of service in promoting the value of individual initiative
and qualities of leadership, its ideals of freedom and personality have degenerated into the concept of downright arbitrary
conduct in personal life, but even more so in economic and commercial life. Hitler argued that the absence of sufficient
state controls in a democracy enabled the wealthy class to manipulate the economy the press and elected officials for its
own gain. In other words there was practically no responsibility built into democracies: the anonymity of the majority of
the moment decided, government ministers were subject to it but there was no opportunity hold this majority responsible.
As a result, the doors opened to political carelessness and negligence to corruption and fiscal mismanagement corruption. In America had spread so
much according to him that no American citizen got upset anymore over incidents of shameless corruption and civil service
because mismanagement was regarded as a natural phenomenon of the government itself. Democracy had failed because it was
a product of liberalism. To overcome the liberal ideal, which for many was freedom personified he introduced an alternative
state form. It created opportunities for self-development but also instructed Germans in obedience. In so doing, Hitler
eventually achieved the parity between individual liberty and state obligation long contemplated by the german intellectual
movements of the previous century. National Socialism was diametrically opposed to Marxism as it emphasized national pride while
still promoting individualism property ownership was a human right and German horrible systems based on ability were simply
not part of Marxist doctrine. The incompatible nature of these philosophical systems would eventually draw Germany into a
war with the global financial forces. As it would become gradually clear, that the two largest liberal democracies in the
West namely England and the USA were financing the industrialization of the Soviet Union, this he rightly understood meant:
a military buildup that would eventually be unleashed upon Germany eastern border at some point in the future. As a side note, Hitler served
in the Bavarian army during the first world war where he fought at the battles of EEP, the Somme, Arras and Passchendaele,
earning the Iron Cross first class, the Iron Cross second class, the wounded badge, the cross of Honor, the Bavarian Cross
of Military Merit, the third class, was sorts amongst others. In other words, he understood war. In order to understand
the physical crisis which Hitler inherited we must go back to 1914. Germany's financial troubles began on the first day
of World War one, when the Western central bank simultaneously took her off of the International gold standard at the time
much of Germany's gold was stored in foreign nations as a way of doing trade foreign banking and international investing
this blow ensured that by 1918 the German gold mark would be worthless and Germany would be guaranteed to lose the war. After 1918, the deliberately
weakened rush mark was susceptible to volatility and hyperinflation with the Dawes plan enforced under 1924 the foreign
central banks made an attempt to make the Reich bank independent of German government so that international interests could
control its money supply. This led to massive overdrafts and the financial crisis of 1931 which bankrupted the country utterly.
When Hitler, Hjalmar Schacht, and Vaulter Funk reestablished government control of the Reich Bank via a law passed in the
Reichstagin 1937, all foreign control of German affairs was eliminated but World War two was also made inevitabl. The 1918 - 1919 post-war
naval blockade starved Germany into taking terms at Versailles. They lost 60% of their industry their foreign holdings and
colonies were stolen by international brokers its gold reserves disappeared and large tracts of its lands were incorporated
into surrounding countries. This taught Germany that alien and foreign interests could not be trusted. Hitler's idea to
circumvent the dependence on these interest groups was autarky or self-sufficiency. Germany would do for itself whenever
it could and trade only if the benefits were great enough similar in some aspects to the Spartan economy of old. Two days after becoming Chancellor
Hitler outlined his economic program in a national radio address quote: “within four years the German farmer must
be rescued from poverty, within four years unemployment must be finally overcome. The government enacted laws based on the
strategy conceived by Fritz Reinhardt a state secretary in the righteous Ministry of Finance this unassuming pragmatic economist
introduced a national program to create jobs on the premise that it is better to pay people to work than to award them jobless
benefits. The labor procurement law
of June the 1st 1933 allotted 1 billion rush marks to finance construction projects nationwide it focused on repair or remodeling
of buildings business structures residential housing and forms construction of subdivisions and farming communities regulating
waterways and building gas and electrical works. Men who had been out of work the longest or who were fathers of large families
received preference and hiring. None were allowed to work more than 40 hours a week and the law stipulated that German construction
materials must be used. Also past that summer the building repair law providing an additional five hundred million Reichmarks
for smaller individual projects. Home owners received a grant covering 20% of the cost of each project including repairs and
additions owners of commercial establishments became eligible for grants for conducting renovations plus for installing
elevators or ventilation systems renters could apply for grants to upgrade apartments. Under the law's provisions, property
owners receiving grants borrowed the balance of new construction costs from local banks or savings and loans. The government
provided borrowers coupons to reimburse them for the interest on the loans. The tax relief law of September 21st 1933 offered income and corporate tax credits for repairs.
The regime covered nearly 40% of the cost for each renovation the company refinancing law legislated the same day converted
short-term loans into long-term ones with lower interest. The law reduced the previous 7% interest rate to four ultimately
to 3% this did not hamper finance companies since it prevented defaults on loans. The refinancing law released businesses
from the obligation to pay their portion of unemployment benefits to former associates. The resulting available capital
enabled them to rehire employees and expand production. The labor procurement law provided newlywed loans of 1,000 Reichsmarks at 1% monthly interest.
The loans came in the form of coupons to buy furniture household appliances and clothing to be eligible the bride had to
have been employed for at least six months during the previous two years and had to agree to leave her job. Returning women
to the home vacated positions in commerce and industry creating openings for unemployed men. For each child born to a couple,
the government reduced the loan by 25% and deferred payments on the balance for one year. For larger families upon birth
of the fourth child the state forgave the loan it financed the program by imposing sur taxes on single men and women. By June 1936 the government
approved seven hundred and fifty thousand marriage loans. Reinhart described the policy of diverting women into the household
economy as steadily regrouping our German women with regard to the labor market and with respect to social policy. This
regrouping alone will in a few years be sufficient to eliminate unemployment and bring about an enormous impetus in every
branch of German economic life”. The marriage law released approximately 20,000 women per month from the workforce after September
1933. The increase in newlyweds created a corresponding need for additional housing more tradesmen found work in new home
construction. In the furniture industry manufacturing creased by 50% during 33 alone factories producing stoves and other
kitchen appliances could not keep pace with consumer demand. The state imposed no property tax on young couples purchasing
small single-family homes As Reinhardt predicted, reduced payments and jobless benefits and increased revenues through
corporate income and sales taxes largely offset the enormous cost of the program to reduce unemployment and revive the economy.
The race also focused on relieving the distressed circumstances facing the chairman farmer. The Depression had left many
farms in debt younger family members often left their homes to seek opportunity in the cities. September 1933 law established the Reich food producers, an organization to promote the interests
of people in the agrarian economy fishermen and gardeners. With 17 million members the principle objectives were to curtail
the gradual dining-out of farms in Germany and prevent migration of rural folk to concentrated population centers. Controlling the market value
of foodstuffs the organization gradually raised the purchase price of groceries by over ten percent by 1938. This measure
was not popular among the public but it ensured that Germany now created and controlled its own food supply.
Germany's economic reforms
could never been so successful without overhauling the tax structure. In the Weimar Republic state and local governments
had raised revenue for operating expenses reparation payments to the auntaunt and public aid through steadily increasing
taxation. The drain on working families’ budgets had reduced purchasing power, restricted the demand for consumer
goods, decreased production and caused layoffs. As more people lost jobs, unemployment payouts were augmented. This meant placing greater
demands on those still in the workforce municipalities collected taxes and fees according to local needs without a nationally
coordinated revenue system. Costly, inefficient and overlapping bureaucracies burden citizen and economy alike tax reform
was a major element of right arts recovery program initial measures legislated to this end demonstrate what a crippling influence
the voracious runaway Taxation had previously exercised on Commerce. The first to benefit from tax relief was Germany's
automotive industry. The motor vehicle tax law of April 1933 abolished at one stroke all operating taxes and fees for privately
purchased cars and motorcycles license after March 31st of that year. The reduction in consumer cost to own and operate
a car was so dramatic as to significantly boost sales. While the industry produced just 43,000 passenger vehicles in 1932,
the number doubled during Hitler's first year in office new car production increased annually the number of people employed
in automobile manufacture climbed and in less than four years from 1933 to 1937 the industry built 15 more assembly plants The government recovered the revenue lost from a peeled automotive taxes to reduce payments
of jobless benefits income tax from newly employed auto workers highway tolls and corporate tax. The state collected an
additional 50 million Reichmarks by offering owners of older cars the opportunity to pay a one-time reduced fee to permanently
eliminate their annual vehicle tax liability. The government devoted the entire amount to improving roads thereby hiring
more people for pavement and bridge repair. Others found work in industries that manufactured machinery. The tax law ratified on June
1st of 1933 eliminated fees for the replacement and purchase of tools and machinery as long as buyers opted for German made
articles. This measure breathed life back into industrial equipment production. In the long run Germany's policy of reducing
taxes to promote Commerce increased public revenues. In a Nuremberg speech in 1936, Reinhardt described income tax as the main source of revenue.
Income tax is measured according to the citizens’ actual income that is therefore the most socially just form of collecting
ta. The 1933 Swedish study comparing taxation among great powers established that the German people paid 23% of their income
in taxes in the u.s. the amount was 24% in Norway 25 Britain 25 and Italy 31 percent this figure did not take into account
America's numerous hidden taxes that were non-existent in Germany No program to restore German prosperity could omit international trade. Deprived of its colonies,
the Reich had to develop foreign markets to acquire raw materials for industry and a portion of the food supply. With gold reserves exhausted,
the National Socialist Administration had to create alternative source of purchasing power. Despite objections from Hjalmar
Schacht, president of the Reich bank. Hitler withdrew Germany's money system from the gold standard. Gold was the recognized
medium of exchange for international commerce over centuries that had become a commodity as well. Financier bought and sold
gold speculated on fluctuations in price and loaned it abroad at high interest. Hitler substituted a direct barter system
and foreign dealings. German currency became defined as measuring units of human productivity. The British general JFC fuller
observed Germany is already beginning to operate more on the concept of labor than on the concept of money. In January 1938 the Soviet
diplomat Christian Rockoffski commented on the German money system, Rockoffski had held posts in London and in Paris and
was acquainted with Wall Street financier he explained: “Hitler, this uneducated ordinary man as that of natural intuition
and even despite the opposition of the technician shocked created an especially dangerous economic system an illiterate
and every theory of economics driven only by necessity he has cut out international as well as high Private Finance Hitler
possesses almost no gold and so he can't endeavor to make it a basis for currency since the only available collateral for
his money is the technical aptitude and great industriousness of the German people technology and hard work have become
his gold.” Germany's withdrawal from
the gold based internationally linked monetary system in favor of a medium of exchange founded on domestic productivity
correspondent to Hitler's belief in maintaining the sovereignty of nations. This was unwelcome development in London in Paris
in New York, were cosmopolitan investment in banking institutions profited from loaning money to foreign countries. Germany
no longer had to borrow in order to trade on the world market. Foreign demand for German goods correspondingly created more
jobs within the Reich. With these economic policies in place, coupled with his focus on nativist traditional culture
as the core value system of the German nation, Hitler became a globalist nightmare. The rapid turnaround of Germany's economy,
the positive outlook of a young dragon generation and the utter disdain for progressive liberalism and media ran democracy,
all but guaranteed an international assault on the fatherland. Despite to have our agreement and many other attempts to placate observers abroad Hitler's
coup was answered in the heaviest way possible one in which the German people were made to suffer greatly. Even now they
face extermination from the abstract guilt placed upon them by the victors that very same group the Germans struggled to
throw off. We can now only watch in horror as this nation slowly drowns. Finally, Adolf Hitler was one of the great leaders in Human History in particularly the most
important leader for the White people (Ethno-Europeans worldwide). The world is being destroyed since several decades if
not centuries by those behind the curtains, the Jews. Only few people, who meditate enough and connected the dots, realize
that the Whites ethno-Europeans people were the main losers of WW2, not the Germans.. They gave the full control of
their countries to the Jews and missed the chance to be saved by the Germans. They were since then and before used by the
Jewry to wage wars against the enemies of the Jewry at some particular instance of time. They are now facing their inevitable
peaceful ethnic extinction due to their adoption of Marxism, egalitarianism, multiculturalism, feminism, anti-family propaganda,
and all other forms of social and moral corruptions promoted by Jewry. There might be no chance at all today to have such
leadership to save the West unless we re-learn History and conclude who is the great evil behind everything. Moreover most
White ethno-Europeans became too much morally corrupt and globalists to even suggest the idea that they have right to exist
peacefully on the planet. They are so afraid to speak out against their most fierce deadliest enemy, the Jews. Please do your best to
watch “Europa the Last battle” in all its parts, especially part 5, part 3 or part 7. Create DVDs from this documentary
and give it as gift to your friends. It is currently one of the most exciting educational materials. It is constantly removed
and re-uploaded on YouTube, but few clicks allows you to find it back. Stay safe J Alice. F ___________________________________________ German Big Business and the Rise
of Hitler ... The picture of the relationship between German big business and the Nazi party which Turner provides us is one that reveals how little big business had to do with the party's success ... Most of the NSDAP funds were derived from membership dues, interest-free loans, and the gate receipts from the many mass rallies the party held ... In sum, the NSDAP was a prototypical "grass-roots" political organization able to expand and prosper during a period when most of the bourgeois parties suffered a serious loss of support. _______________________________________________________________ How Once A Torn Country Liberated Itself From Debt Slavery Over the last week while discussing Trump’s Parasite Guild economic advisers, The New Nationalist (TNN) proposed the concept of debt default and repudiation and without bankster “Washington Consensus” privatization loots. This is the key step toward moving people out of the grips of the international debt-enslaver Cabal.
The hidden history is that this measure was instituted by the German National Socialists in 1933 and to the continued horror of the Parasite Guild and bankster Cabal. Germany effectively booted out the Rothschild’s privately own central bank and issued their own money. In addition, Germany repudiated the Dawes Plan Versailles reparation payment looting scheme. Then, Germany eradicated cultural Marxists and the (((Frankfurt School))) out of its educational system and media.
The following is an excerpt from Ellen Brown’s book Web of Debt and represents more suppressed, hidden history. For more on the revolt against central banking historically, see “Money Masters” in the Recommended Videos section of this website.
Issuing their own money was key thwarting the international banking cabal. Hitler and the National Socialists, who came to power in 1933, took the cue from Abraham Lincoln, who funded the American Civil War with government-issued paper money called “Greenbacks.” As Brown writes:
In addition the propaganda of the state was transformed to honor labor, and especially labor for the benefit of the country or Reich and people or Volk. In the early years, massive rallies to that end were held in Germany. The message of these rallies as shown here couldn’t be more clear. The key message (at 5:08) was the ideal that work would no longer be a dividing concept but a uniting one. No wonder this thinking is suppressed in today’s twisted, unnatural, upside-down, plantation world.
As a result of the economic and morale recovery, “Hitler was quite popular with the German people. Stephen Zarlenga suggests in The Lost Science of Money that this was because he temporarily rescued Germany from English economic theory — the theory that money must be borrowed against the gold reserves of a private banking cartel rather than issued outright by the government.3″
|
Enter supporting content here