Advice and Counsel LBJ Part 2
The
Krims, as well as other Jewish Americans who were closely associated with Johnson,
advised and counseled him on the events leading up to the Six-Day War of June 1967.
On the Memorial Day weekend in May 1967, Mathilde and her husband were guests at the LBJ ranch.
On arrival at the ranch, Johnson learned that the Soviets had
warned the U.S. that if Israel attacked
an Arab state, the Soviets would go to the aid of that state. The State Department was
preparing a message for LBJ to send to Israel.
While awaiting the draft message, Johnson got behind the wheel of his Lincoln Continental and took
Mathilde and Arthur Krim
for a drive
over the hill country. They were at a neighbour's house when an aide brought Johnson a message drafted by the State
Department for Israeli Prime Minister Levi Eshkol.
It relayed to Israel Moscow's warning
that "if Israel starts military action, the Soviet Union will extend help to the attacked party."
After reassuring Eshkol of America's interest in Israel's safety, the draft message
cautioned:
"It is essential that
Israel not take any pre emptive military action
and thereby make itself responsible for the initiation of hostilities."
The president strengthened the warning by adding two words so that the sentence read,
"It is essential that Israel JUST MUST NOT
take any pre emptive military action. . ."
On
June 3, Johnson traveled to New York to deliver a speech at a Democratic Party fund-raising dinner.
He moved on to a $1,000-a-plate dinner dance, sponsored by the President's Club of New
York, whose chairman was Arthur Krim.
While at the table, fund-raiser Abe Feinberg leaned over the shoulder of Mathilde Krim, seated next to Johnson, and whispered:
"Mr. President, it [Israel's attack]
can't be held any longer. It's going to be within the next 24 hours."
On June 4, Johnson went to the home of his close adviser and friend, Justice Abe Fortas. The following
day, June 5, Rostow
woke Johnson
with a phone call at 4:30 a.m. "War has broken out," Rostow said. The Israelis had attacked Egypt and Syria.
Mathilde
Krim was a guest at the White House and, before going to the Oval Office, and apparently before waking Lady Bird
or notifying anyone else, Johnson dropped by the
bedroom where Mathilde was sleeping and gave her the news: "The war has started."
At 7:45 a.m.,
Johnson talked—for the first time—on the hot line with Moscow. Soviet Premier Aleksi Kosygin
expressed the hope that the United States would restrain Israel.
Both leaders vowed to work for a cease-fire.
On
that day—June 5, 1967—I walked the White House corridors as the telephone lines and news tickers recorded developments
of the first morning of the war that would change
the Middle East. I learned that in the war's
first hours, Israeli planes had destroyed the air forces of both Egypt and Syria on the ground.
Unconcealable Glee LBJ Part 3
Several U.S. officials in a State Department Operations Room briefing could not conceal their glee
over Israel's successes.
With a
wide smile, Eugene Rostow said, "Gentlemen, gentlemen, do not forget that we are neutral in word, thought and deed."
At the State Department's noon briefing on June 5, press spokesman
Robert J. McCloskey repeated those words for reporters.
(Since the U.S. was not neutral but totally supportive of Israel, however, this statement would need—over
the next several weeks—endless clarification.)
Also
on June 5, Arthur Krim wrote a memo to the president saying: "Many arms shipments are packed and ready to go
to Israel, but are being held up. It would be
helpful if these could be released." Johnson got the shipments on their way.
Walt Rostow, in a memo to the president, referred to the results of Israel's surprise attack on
Egypt and Syria as "the first day's turkey shoot."
On June 6, in another memo to the president, Walt Rostow recommended that the Israelis not be forced
to withdraw from the
territories
they had seized—short of peace treaties with the Arab states.
"If
the Israelis go fast enough and the Soviets get worried enough," he wrote, "a simple cease-fire might be the best
answer.
This would mean that we could
use the de facto situation on the ground to try to negotiate not a return to armistice lines
but a definitive peace in the Middle East."
Mathilde Krim, still a guest in the White House, left for meetings
in New York. Before departing, however, she wrote out a statement
supportive of Israel which she asked the president to deliver "verbatim to the American people."
Johnson was sufficiently impressed
with
her comments to, later in the day, read some of them to Secretary of State Dean Rusk. But the president did not, as she had
asked,
read them to the American
people.
Jordan, treaty-bound to come to the aid
of Egypt and Syria if either were attacked, had done so and, on June 7, Israel captured
the Old City of Jerusalem. Also on June 7, Wattenberg and Levinson wrote in a memo
to Johnson that the U.N. might attempt
"to
sell Israel down the river." They urged LBJ to support Israel's claim to the territories seized militarily. They referred
to McCloskey's
statement that the
U.S. was neutral, suggesting LBJ issue a statement affirming total support for Israel which,
they said, might stop American Jews from meeting in Lafayette
Square to protest the "neutrality" statement.
While
Johnson never minded getting pro-Israel advice from such close friends as Mathilde Krim or Abe Fortas, he apparently
resented advice from relatively minor White House
staffers such as Wattenberg and Levinson. Seeing Levinson he stormed:
"You
Zionist dupe! You and Wattenberg are Zionist dupes in the White House! Why can't you see I'm doing all I can for Israel!
That's what you should be telling people when they
ask for a message from the president for their rally." As LBJ abruptly stormed off,
Levinson reports, he stood there, "shaken to the marrow of my bones."
Meanwhile, on the night of June 7, the USS LIBERTY, a Navy
"ferret" ship equipped to monitor electronic communications,
had approached within sight of the Gaza Strip so the National Security Agency personnel aboard
could intercept the military
communications
jamming the airwaves. The president retired at 11:30 p.m., but White House
logs reported that at one minute to midnight he got a call from Mathilde Krim, still
in New York.
By June 8, despite U.S. and
Soviet demands for a cease-fire, the Israelis were planning one more attack to take Syria's Golan Heights.
Perhaps to prevent U.S. intelligence from learning of their plan,
despite Syria's acceptance of the cease-fire, the Israelis dispatched
planes to the USS LIBERTY. One roared over the LIBERTY
so closely that the
portholes
of the aircraft's reconnaissance cameras were clearly visible.
Lieutenant
James M. Ennes, deck officer, saw on its wings Israel's insignia, the Star of David.
The Liberty Assault LBJ Part 4
Ennes glanced at the U.S. flag atop his ship's tall mast. If he could see the Israeli
pilots in their cockpits, he reasoned, the pilots
could certainly see the large U.S. flag.
It
was not long after the last of several such Israeli reconnaissance flights, however, that an Israeli aircraft swooped down
and fired
rockets directly at The
LIBERTY. Rocket fragments and 30mm bullets punched
through the heavy deck plating—and through
the flesh of the stunned crewmen. Then more planes—with cannon and napalm—turned the LIBERTY
into a floating hell of
flames
and screaming men.
The Israeli attacks killed
34 Americans and wounded 171. The ship was partly flooded when an Israeli torpedo boat hit the U.S. ship
with a torpedo below the water line. Another machine-gunned the
ship's life rafts when the crew tried to launch them.
Only
by a miracle did The Liberty remain afloat. But its threat to Israel's plans was finished. The next
day, June 9, Israeli forces
attacked
and captured the Golan Heights. On Saturday, June 10, the war's sixth day, Israel agreed to a cease-fire.
It was Rostow who first notified Johnson of the assault on the Liberty.
Asked who did it,
Rostow said
he did not know. Later the Israelis said they had done it, by mistake.
Johnson
sent an immediate report to Kosygin that the Israelis had torpedoed a U.S. ship.
Thus the Kremlin now knew about the Israeli attack, but the American people did not.
From the beginning, the Johnson administration covered it up. Surviving
crew members were separated from each other and the Navy
was ordered to make certain that no survivor talked with any reporter—or to anyone else—about
the assault on the USS LIBERTY .
It
went virtually unnoticed. Not only the crew of the USS LIBERTY, but all Americans were victims. Johnson
and most of those
who entered and
left the Oval Office were oriented toward Israel. For that matter, I too, was ready and eager to believe in 1967
that the Arabs, not the Israelis, had started
the war and that the bombing raid on the USS LIBERTY was not intentional, but a mistake.
While there can be no moral justification for the White House cover-up
orders to the Navy
after the assault
on the Liberty, from hindsight Johnson's political motivation is obvious.
It was the same motivation that led him subsequently to listen to the Jewish friends
and advisers who urged
him not to
put any pressure on the Israelis to relinquish territories they had seized in the Six-Day War.
In 1967, President Johnson felt he needed all the support he could get to 'win"
in Vietnam.
Many American Jews were liberals
outspokenly opposed to the war there. Johnson was told if he gave all out support to Israel—which
would include ignoring the Israeli attack on the LIBERTY
influential Jewish Americans would stop opposing his Vietnam policies.
In a memo to the president, Wattenberg, whose parents had moved to the U. S. from Palestine and
who was known as a strong
supporter
of the Jewish state, said flatly that if the president came out with strong support for Israel, he would win American Jewish
support for the war in Vietnam. Many American
Jewish leaders are "doves" on Vietnam, Wattenberg wrote, but "hawks" on a war with Arab states.
A "Bonus" for Johnson LBJ Part 5
"You stand to be cheered now by those (American Jewish leaders) who
were jeering last week," Wattenberg wrote the president.
He added that the Mideast crisis could be "a bonus" for Johnson.
All-out support of Israel, he predicted, would "help turn around 'the other war'—
the domestic dissatisfaction about Vietnam."
The support given by the American Jewish leaders "was welcome to the president," as reporter Donald Neff observed,
when at every
turn he was being attacked by critics, particularly in the media, of his Vietnam policy.
I was, at the time, a typical American. I was convinced back then that the Arabs had started the war
and deserved what they got. I didn't try to reason how,
if the Arabs had started the war, they were surprised with their air forces
on the ground and how it was that Israel so easily seized
all of Palestine, including the rest of Jerusalem.Instead, like millions of
Americans, I was thrilled by the might of "little Israel."
Yet, despite the euphoria around me, what I saw in the White House planted questions in my mind. As
Americans we had just passed through a dangerous
Middle East conflict that threatened to explode into World War III. There were two parties
to the conflict, Arabs and Jews. But for weeks on end I had
seen only one set of advisers who could call or see Johnson whenever they
pleased. The Arabs had no voice, no representation, no access, whatsoever.
It was only later that I came to reflect on how America, which devoted so much of the efforts of its
"best and brightest" to the problem of Vietnam,
had in 1967 quite unwittingly stumbled into a Middle East quagmire that, long
after the fall of Saigon, would continue to enmesh
U.S. soldiers and diplomats, and project an image of double standards and insincerity onto
U.S. diplomacy all over the world.
Monika made a mental note to ask Ozzy who the author of this article was, or is. She copied and pasted all of the emailed
information into the designated
web pages and thought about quitting for the night, but she was too agitated to sleep. She poured herself
a glass of wine and decided to open one of
Ernie Zundel's emails for a change of topical information.
The email from Ernie began:
Hallo Monika, I have been
to the Holocaust Deprogramming website many hours looking at the information there. I don't know how
to begin giving you the information. So I
will start at the beginning of the website there. You tell to me when it is enough for you.
Thank You For Helping Me,
Ernie Zundel
THE JEW'S HOLOCAUST NARRATIVE IS THE MOST MASSIVE
CYNICAL EXPLOITIVE FRAUD IN HISTORY
The alleged genocide of European
Jewry has been used to justify the Allied war effort, to establish the State of Israel, to justify Israeli violence against
its neighbors,
to induce guilt in both Germans and the Allied nations, to cover up and ignore Allied crimes against
Germans, to allow Jews to receive massive reparations from
Germany, and to create solidarity in the Jewish
community. The extreme importance of the Holocaust story in advancing Zionist/Jewish interests ensures that
this falsification
of history will continue in the future.
No one can deny that Jews were rounded up and imprisoned by Germans in German occupied territories
after the suspension of the HAAVARA TRANSFER AGREEMENT
during WWII. Nor can anyone deny that Japanese
Americans were rounded up and imprisoned in America for the same reasons, those reasons being primarily security
issues,
and in the same fashion during WWII. And, after examining the facts, the German prisons built for Jews were far more humanely
accommodating than the
American prisons built for Japanese.
(See
World War II West Coast Camps for Japanese-Americans here: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v02/v02p-45_Weber.html
What is staunchly denied
is the existence, much less the use, of homicidal gas chambers, the manufacture of human skin lampshades, the manufacture
of human derived soap,
institutionalized torture all conducted at "death factories" where 6,000,000 Jews were
gassed and cremated and other outright lies disseminated by vindictive and vengeful Jews.
In all of German occupied Europe there were 2.4 million Jews.
After World War II, 3.8 million Jews applied for holocaust reparations.
Indeed tens of thousands of imprisoned Jews died during the last months of WWII due to disease, especially
typhus, and starvation (The International Committee
of the
Red Cross reported: 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews). After all, as the fortunes of war turn against the
losing side,
food and medicine become extremely scarce... and deadly scarce for those imprisoned by the
losing side due to the ruination of food production, medicine
manufacturing, and transportation supply lines. Germany was carpet bombed and firebombed into
the stone
age during the last year of WWII (a totally merciless war conducted by three Jewish controlled empires against a country the
size of Montana).
Indeed there were crematoriums working overtime as a means of sanitarily disposing of disease ridden corpses, but these
were built during the last year of the war and
never was a living person burned alive in one as JEWS would have you believe.
As a matter of fairness, try to imagine what would have become
of all the Japanese incarcerated in American prison camps during WWII had the fortunes of war
turned against
an America that was bombed into the stone age. I'll wager that they would have been massacred by furious Americans before
they had starved to death.
Once you fully realize that there were no "gas chambers" or such things as human skin lampshades, most of
the Jewish
narrative regarding the so called "holocaust" becomes a self-serving fabrication disseminated
by the lowest sort of scammers.
Only lies need laws for protection. There are many individuals who have been imprisoned in occupied
Germany for merely telling the truth about the holocaust scam.
These people are imprisoned for "inciting
hatred for the Jews" whereas it'sactually the JEWS incessantly inciting hatred for Germans with their holocaust LIES.
Free yourself from the power of a lie designed
to render you impotent. By instilling unwarranted guilt and shame upon humanity via the "holocaust", humanity is
rendered incapable, or at least very hesitant, to criticise, much less interfere with, any of the designs of Jews or their nation of Israel. The "holocaust"
is also an
ongoing cash cow for Jewish "holocaust survivors" through the collection of hundreds of
billions of euros from Germany, and elsewhere,
as WWII reparations that continues to this day.
Jews have made questioning the details of the so-called Holocaust
a criminal offense, with fines and imprisonment, and doing this has only hurt
their credibility and soured many against their official narrative. The truth does not need laws to enforce it, only lies
do, and the stupidest thing
the Jews could ever have done — and want
to do in America — is criminalise not believing their improbable narrative. It is their “education”
that has created doubters, which is why it continues to fail.
Holocaust Propaganda
Isn't Just a Lie, It's a
Crime Against Humanity. It is a crime because it not only justifies
innumerable
other crimes, but because it creates a huge mass of hatred, which
in turn contains the potential for new crimes.
People whose souls have been drenched in the hatred of the Holocaust
Lie must be counted among its victims. This includes the millions of twelve to
fifteen-year old school children dragged through the
memorials of former concentration camps, often weeping uncontrollably at the atrocity
stories and lies vomited up at
them.
How much suffering,
how much heartbreak, how many tragedies are due to the so called “Holocaust”, this hair-raising Lie of the Century,
which the
jews invented, crammed down our throats, and have defended tooth and nail, with fines, with abuse, with imprisonment,
for over half a century?
It
is painful to think of the thousands, indeed tens of thousands, of people who have been
humiliated, persecuted, imprisoned,
or even executed in the name of this shameless swindle.
It is pathetic to see the once-great German people, having lost its pride, its sense of direction,
its self-respect, to such an
extent that it no longer dares to defend itself against a flood of slander and is too ashamed
to look itself in the face.
One
single mention of the “gas chambers”, the extermination of the jews, was enough to justify purging entire cities
and provinces of their German
population. Almost 17 million people were driven from their homes between 1944 and 1948 in
an unbroken series of atrocities during which over two million died.
“After what they did to the jews, they had it coming to them,” is the classical justification
It is truly disgusting to think of the millions of people all over
the world watching Marvin Chomsky, Claude Lanzmann,
Steven Spielberg and all the others — Holocaust, Shoa, Schindler’s List, etc. —
in the cinemas,
on television — and taking it all seriously.
The jews invented a story which they’ve called the Shoa or the Holocaust, and which
they now claim is the history of their people.
The Holocaust money-making machine has brought them such tremendous advantages, that they can no longer live
without it. But they made one
fatal error: the Holocaust swindle is so endlessly absurd that its inventors can only take
refuge in a suicide charge; having lost all sense
of proportion, they have gone too far and will soon come crashing down.
To suppress all open debate on the subject appears an
impossibility in the long run, despite all manner of repression.
From minor explanations to wholesale re-writing, including whole new “Revised Versions”,
the profiteers of the myth
continue
to entangle themselves in increasingly greater numbers of contradictions; the fables of today contradict the fables told yesterday;
the defenders
of the official version of history are being compelled to make so many concessionsthat more and more people
are starting to wonder about it all.
Doubts expressed in private conversation
no longer shock as much as they did a few years ago; it is getting easier for revisionists to gain a hearing.
In brief: for the exterminationists, the time is running
out. Increasingly hysterical
repression is an unmistakable sign of growing panic. It is also a sign of weakness.
Instead of listening to the discussion, they simply
grab for a truncheon. But how long can they get away with it?
The revisionists must not hope for quick victory; it will not come overnight. They should
remember
the wisdom expressed in the phrase from the Czech philosopher, Karel Capek, who said:
“Truth
must be smuggled. It must be distributed in small doses.
A drop here, a drop there — until people get used to it. Not all at once.”
At a time when the Lie appears to be triumphing without
hindrance, we would like to close with an optimistic message. We wish to make the following appeal:
All of you, all friends of the truth, both known and
unknown, from many European countries, those who, like Günter Deckert and Gottfried Küssel,
sit in German
and Austrian prisons for “denying the existence of the gas chambers,” or who have been compelled to go into exile
like Remer and
Rudolf, all persecuted revisionists and nationalists — do not lose your courage, since your struggle against
state-ordained lies is not in vain. Your
courage, the sacrifice of a few, will help to free entire nations and peoples, including
the German and Russian peoples — f
rom the darkness which has so long covered them.
Jürgen Graf - Renegade Tribune
___________
I DENY NO HOLOCAUST
Many ignorant, brainwashed people have contemptuously called
me a “Holocaust Denier”.
The following is the response I give, to those who will listen:
Excuse me, but I don’t “deny” ANY “Holocaust”… Do you?
I fully accept the account of the brave and famous
Russian writer and historian, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who was often
called “The Conscience of
the 20th Century”; who served eight long years in the Soviet Gulag prison system, when he reports in the book he published in the year 2000
entitled
“Together For Two Hundred Years” that, in the Soviet Holocaust, 66 million innocent Gentiles, mostly Christians (and it being a full
ELEVEN TIMES the number of Jews claimed to have
been killed by the Germans in WWII), were kidnapped, tortured, raped,
and murdered
in a wide variety of cruel, wanton, and horribly inhuman ways in the thousands of monstrously evil
Gulag concentration camps at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevik
“Ivan the
Terrible” Cheka corps.
I freely acknowledge the fact that on February 13 & 14, 1945, in the quintessential Holocaust of the non-military
city of Dresden, more than 700,000
phosphorus bombs were dropped on 1.2 million helpless people, which produced
a fire storm that was called a “Single Column of Flame”, where
the temperature in the center of the city reached
1600 degrees centigrade, and in which approximately 500,000 German women, children,
elderly, wounded soldiers,
random citizens, and even all of the animals in the city zoo were slaughtered by concussion and fire in a single night.
I absolutely recognise that more people died there in Dresden, in that one big flame, than the estimated total of 246,000
helpless people who died in
two other quintessential Holocausts, the senseless, wantonly murderous, abominable,
and unnecessary atomic attacks upon the Japanese cities of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.
I openly avow the virtually forgotten Holocaust
endured by the passengers and crew of the Wilhelm Gustloff, an unarmed
German passenger liner
which was torpedoed and sunk in the freezing waters of the Baltic Sea, 13 miles off the coast of
Pomerania on January 30, 1945, as it carried, besides
it’s men and crew, some 73 wounded soldiers, 373 members
of the Womens’ Naval Auxilliary, and some 9,000 German civilian refugees – mostly women
and children
– who were all fleeing in terror from East Prussia in the advance of the Red Army, and where only a few hundred lived
to tell the tale, making it the deadliest disaster in maritime history, killing nearly ten times the number who died
on the Titanic.
And
I fully admit that, as tallied and reported by the International Red Cross, a grand total of 271,304 people – not all of them Jews – died in all of the
German concentration camps,
combined, by the end of World War II – a Holocaust which was solely the result of typhus epidemics and starvation
caused by
the Zionist controlled, allied carpet bombings of supply routes and centers all over Germany that made it impossible to transport
food
and medical supplies to prisoners, soldiers, and
civilians alike.
I certainly do not deny the Holocaust of the over 1,000,000 German post-war, non-combatants who were rounded up, detained
without any food,
water, shelter, or medical care, and purposely, and systematically killed through starvation and
exposure in 1945-46 under the supervision of the
allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, in the largest outdoor
concentration camp this side of modern-day Palestine, or the concurrent Holocaust
of the wholesale cold-blooded
rape and murder of untold hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of women
and children as the communist Red Army of the
Soviets also took its “revenge” upon the defeated Germans.
I do not deny the Holocaust suffered by the good men and crew of the practically unarmed USS Liberty
surveillance ship, which was deliberately
attacked by air and sea, with machine gun, cannon, and torpedo
fire by Israeli forces on June 8, 1967, killing 34 and wounding 174, in an attempted
false flag operation which
was intended to sink the ship, and murder all aboard, in order to draw the United States into the Middle East conflict on
the side
of Israel, and was only foiled by the ingenuity and resourcefulness of the crew in aiding the radio operator to successfully
get off a call for help.
And I do not deny the Holocaust of the some 3,000 people who died in a single day as a result of the false flag attack
on the World Trade Center in
New York which was engineered and perpetrated by leaders of Israel in order
to kick off their pre-planned “Clash of Civilizations” which they
hope will eventually cause
their two sworn enemies, the Christians, and the Muslims, to forget their historical religious commonalities, and annihilate
one another in the yet to be the greatest Holocaust in history
– a third world war – as the “Chosen Ones” sit on the sidelines…
and direct… and watch… and profit… while gleefully rubbing their hands as even
more untold millions of innocents die.
I also do not deny the Holocaust of the Jenin Refugee Camp, on April 13, 2002, where Israeli forces
attacked the camp using bulldozers, tanks,
and Apache helicopters, in a cruel, indiscriminate, blood-lust
slaughter, which was said to be “Horrific beyond belief”, and which lasted for
13 days, flattening large
areas of the town, and killing
unknown hundreds of innocent men, women, and
children, many of whom were buried alive; or the earlier, similar, Holocausts
at the Sabra
and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon in 1982, in which it is known that
at least 800Palestinians were killed.
Nor do I deny the wholesale slaughter and destruction perpetrated upon the sovereign nation of Iraq,
in the Holocaust that was the illegal, and
unjustified war of aggression that, from 2003 to the present,
has resulted in the murder of over 1,000,000 innocent Iraqi men, women,
and children,
and brought their country to ruin, as one of the first steps in Israel’s ongoing war of terror, which they have the
unmitigated gall to present to the world as a war “ON” terror… for which the final tally of victims is yet to be seen.
And while I’m at it, let me just note here
that I fully acknowledge the fact that the perpetrators of the above
mentioned, and relatively recent
Holocausts have a very long history of either directly, or indirectly committing
numerous other such atrocities against many peoples over many
millenia, even since ancient Biblical times –
from the slaughter of the Midianites to the African slave trade – a number of which being the
basis of,
and celebrated during various Jewish holidays. And though I do not particularly describe them here, I don’t deny any
of them either.
What
I do deny is the ridiculous and exaggerated claim that there is ANY evidence at all that ANY Jews at all – much less
“six million” of
them – died from ANY intentional gassings, or as a result of ANY kind
of organized or systematic program of genocide perpetrated against Jews
by Germany’s Nazi regime… and I
challenge you to produce ANY evidence or “proof” that is not merely made up of either pre-war,
wartime,
or post-war anti-German propaganda…
Because none, from either then or now, actually
exists.
So,
if you want to talk about a “Holocaust”… and I mean a REAL, genuine, genocidal “Holocaust”, and not only the ones
from the past, but one that
is happening right NOW, in the present, all you need to do is to pull your brain-dead/brainwashed heads out of your collectively ignorantrear ends,
and look into the current goings-on in Gaza, The
West Bank, Syria, and the Middle East in general, where the racist, supremacist, Zionist, Talmudic
Jews are
feverishly working day and night to exterminate anyone,either Gentile or Jew, who stands in
their way in their quest to build their racist, supremacist,
“Kingdom of the World”… a.k.a., Eretz Israel.
And if any of you sanctimonious accusers deny any of these realities, and merely cling to the all
too common view that the only “Holocaust” that
really matters is one that is purported to have been suffered by the Jews, then for people like you to call anyone else a “Holocaust
Denier”
is one of the most laughable, and hypocritical
examples of psychopathic projection I have yet seen anywhere…
even as
you continue to stupidly, and unashamedly, prove your ignorance and psychopathy with every ridiculous charge you make.
___________________
Monika had promised herself that she would only read one of Ernie's emails, but the other email titled A LETTER TO STEVEN
SPIELBERG inspired her
to continue. She, like most people who have seen any Spielberg movies, is a Spielberg fan.
She vowed to herself never to step foot in the ocean afte
r seeing JAWS, and she would never again watch a war movie after
seeing SAVING PRIVATE RYAN. She opened the email and began reading...
FINALLY . . PUTTING THE “HOLOCAUST” TO BED. A LETTER
TO STEVEN SPIELBERG,
FROM JEWISH FRENCH DR. ROGER DOMMERGUE POLACCO de MENASCE.
Dear Mr. Spielberg,
I wish your honesty to be equal to your very great talent. I saw
you on
TV in France. You declared that you would pour out Shoa propaganda in
German schools. You mentioned that
witnesses would be convinced
for good, as to the reality of the Shoah (6-million-gas-chambers).
I feel it my duty
as a Jew and after 20 years of study of the historical
problem of the holocaust, to call your attention to the facts.
Facts are very stubborn and as no one can gainsay them,
our congeners
have been compelled to make disgusting politicians enact Stalino –
Orwellian laws which forbid to
mention anything concerning
the dogma of the “six-million-gas-chambers”,
definitively reduced to perpetual
worship of this alchemy.
In
case of no respect of silence and worship of the myth, you suffer the penalty
of fines or prison or both. Professor Faurisson, who
has been studying
the subject for 20 years, has been practically massacred. This is utterly
ridiculous, but give the Police
and the Justice of all countries to Mr Lévy,
he will not be ridiculous any more: here is the XXth century!
These laws are, accordingly, the absolute proof of the
fake
before we study its arithmetical and technical ineptitude.
No Sir, you will not find ONE witness who saw
6 million Jews slaughtered. You will not find ONE
witness of Zyclon-B
– gas chamber’s to exterminate
1000 or 2000 people at a time, close to the crematoria.
See my “Shoa Sherlockholmized” herewith:
it is the summary
of 20 years study on the subject.
The
“6-million-gas-chambers myth “is an arithmetic and technical nonsense.
As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah business, 50 years after
the war, is disgusting,
debasing: it is a disgraceful shame. No people in
History has ever been wailing about its losses 50 years after a
war, even
its true and real losses. Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it
would be a dishonour to make such
din and pump up so much money everywhere:
who were the usurers of the Weimar Republic? You know it as well as I do.
It is all the more so as we know that 6.000.000 is gross
exaggeration and that the
Zyclon-B gas chambers are a technical impossibility. (See Degesh Trial in 1949).
In fact 150,000
or 200,000 Jews died in the German camps of typhus or
starvation. Many others died but as fighters against Germany to
which we,
the Jews, had declared war in 1933! (Herr. Hitler was allergic to
the hegemony of gold and of the dollar: so he could
give work to six
million unemployed, before the functioning of German armament factories!).
Do you know the book published at this period and written
by our congener
Kaufmann: GERMANY MUST PERISH?
We
know that 80,000,000 Goyim were slaughtered in the
USSR, in a political regime which was entirely Jewish,
from Marx and Warburg, to Kaganovitch, Frenkel, Yagoda,
the executioners.
We know that after 1945 Americans and Russians killed and raped
German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to
Albania.
We know that 1,500,000 German war prisoners were starved to death after the
war (a quite famous book was published
a few years ago, but is
ignored to day). You will find there included in French the text of a rabbi:
“A rabbi pleads guilty”:
unfortunately I possess neither the German
original nor an English translation. You should have it translated.
The Rabbi condemns the Jewish behaviour in Germany 50
years before Nazism
and vindicates the emergence of Hitler.
As for the harm we have done to Humanity absolutely not redeemed by your
excellent films or the virtuosity
of Yehudi Menuhin, or the neutron bomb
of S.T. Cohen, I wrote a book about it from texts written by important
Jews which are
much above the most anti-Semitic text written by Goyim.
Simone Weil drew a tragic summary:
“The Jews, this handful of uprooted people, have been
the cause of the uprooting
of the whole mankind”.
And George Steiner:“For 5000 years we have been
talking too much: words of death for us and for the
others”.
We know
that all the German towns of more than 100,000 people have
been destroyed during the last war, with women and children: silence
about this real
holocaust. If we consider the turn taken by the Shoah
business, what you intend to do in Germany is actually the safest
way to a
heaping up of a huge amount of anti-Jewism the explosion of which
will
be unique in History. Discretion and moderation must be our behaviour:
all the rest is suicide.
Neither “mondialism” nor Orwellian laws for “crime
of thought” can prevent
antisemitism to explode: only OUR behaviour can. What you do
and all the whining and money
pumping can only egg it on.
It will increase out of reasonable proportions, if there can be
a reasonable proportion to antisemitism.
I know that it is practically
impossible
to check our propensity to speculation and that only the abolition
of circumcision, the 8th day could (our particularism
derives from the
disturbance of the 21 days of the 1st puberty, which starts precisely at the
8th day) but we must, at least,
try to avoid such blunders as the one
you intend to perform in Germany and which would be appalling. I am a
great admirer
of your films (except the Shindler list: ask his wife and the
historical real reality, but this is a minor blunder). I hope you
will
scrutinize
what I send you and escape the folly of the majority
of our congeners. I will always answer you if you have the integrity
to write to me.
Cordialement
à vous.Signed by: Dr. Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The «Shoa» Sherlockholmised – By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce.
1.
Do we know, in the course of History, of an ethnic group which would
not rejoice
when learning that, in a war ended fifty years before, it had
suffered many
less losses than it thought? Would the discoverer of such good
piece of news,
not be rewarded, celebrated? Would he be overwhelmed
with heavy fines, would he escape
attempted murder, as such was the case with
Professor Faurisson? Do such reactions
not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy?
2. Have the live
skeletons which can be seen in such films
as “ Night and Fog”
(by Alain Resnais), have anything to
do with gassing? Are they not the result of famine in
the
camps because of the systematic bombing of German
towns containing more than 100,000 people, “holocausting”
hundreds
of thousands of women and children who are never mentioned?
3. Where would have been the 4 million Jews ( if we consider that 2
millions were killed in battlefields), when it is well known that one camp could
not contain more than 60,000 thousand people, and that except in Auschwitz, there was no
Zyclon-
B gas-chambers? ( there never was any proof of mass gassing with any other gas).
4.
Are the witnesses worth anything, when you know that torture was the
way to squeeze
out evidence. Such was the case of Commandant Hoess whose
ludicrous declaration
has become a legend . What about the 100 witnesses of
gassing in Dachau, when it is official
that there was no gas chamber in that camp?
5. 130 kilos of
coal are necessary for the cremation of one dead body.
We are told that the Germans cremated
1300 corpses a day. U.S.A aircraft took
hundreds of pictures of Auschwitz, during the supposed
period of the holocaust. (1943-44).
Why is there not a single gigantic heap of the necessary
coal?
Why not a single black coil of smoke?
6. Why do radio, films, press, T.V., continue daily to inflict upon
us the myth of the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never ending whining
and
moaning? Why is the Jewish lobby chasing, 50 years after
the end of the war, nonagenarians
who attempted to rescue Germany
from the iniquity of the Versailles treaty, from the
rot of the
Weimar Republic, from the collapse of German youth, from the
unemployment of 6 million people, who, back to work could give
bread to the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent on them?
7. Why does the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, issue 43, page 666,
inform us that in 1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?
8.
How is it possible that the gas chambers could be just near the crematoria,
when
any chemist will tell you that Zyclon-B is hyperflammable?
9.
Why are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the
hoax of the
Shoa? A scientific dialogue, a court ordered appraisal have been
demanded
since 1980 about a problem specifically arithmetic and technical.
It would seal
truth for ever. It would definitively shut the mouths.
Such was the case for Katyn, thanks
to the revisionist Gorbatchev.
10. How could Zyclon-B gas 1000 people at one
time,
when it is well known that the USA gas chamber for one
( maximum 2) persons sentenced to death, are of an
unheard of
complexity and cost? Why, at the trial of the
Degesh,
which fabricated the Zyclon-B, was it declared in 1949,
that gassing in such conditions
is impossible and unthinkable?
11. Why did Leuchter, who was in charge of the
maintenance of the USA gas
chambers, give the firm evidence that there was no gassing
in Auschwitz?
Why have Austrian and Polish reports confirmed the Leuchter report?
Why is the Rudolf report, which analyses all results, forbidden? Why are
those who divulge the Rudolf report, heavily sentenced by the law? And
yet the slightest care of the quality and accuracy of the report is not taken.
12.
Why was, for the first time in History, the doctors degree of Mr
Roques, on
the “Gerstein report” cancelled? And still, this report was not
accepted
at the Nuremberg trial! Besides the well known historian,
a socialist minister,Alain
Decaux, mentioned in the press that ” nobody
could have access to the Gerstein
report, without passing first through
the excellent thesis of M. Roques” Alain Decaux
said: “I admired the
skill and perfection of a“chartist” performed
by M.Roques in his doctors
degree on the Gerstein report” (in his book:
“la guerre absolue” 1998).
13. Why did Raymond Aron and François Furet
at a
Sorbonne seminar, (to which no revisionist was invited),
(state) that there was not the slightest trace of a
written or
oral order for the extermination of the Jews?
14. Why is it
never spoken of the planning of the
extermination of the Germans as expressed in a book
written
by the Jew Kaufmann (“Germany must perish”), by
sterilisation of German men.? It is undoubtedly a small detail?
15.
Why Zyclon-B, used by the Germans for hygiene since 1920, could
be used in
the concentration camps for other purposes than delousing
and protection
against typhus? Why large quantities of Zyclon-B could
be found in camps where it is official
that there never was any gassings???
16. Why do they harp on the “six-million-gas-chamber”
and never on
the 80 million Goyim exterminated in the USSR, by an entirely Jewish
political regime, the executioners of which bore the names of Kaganovitch,
Yagoda, Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport, and fifty other Jews?
17.
Why, during the Zundel trial in Canada,
the famous exterminationist Jews disgraced themselves
by
talking of “poetic licence” in their holocaust assertions,
and never came back when summoned by the judges?
18.
Why the Fabius-Gayssot law ? (the man of the contaminated blood
and another
man, a Communist dragging along 200,000,000 corpses).
19. Is it not
the supreme proof of the fake? Is it not casting out nines?
There is no need
of Stalino-Orwellian law “to be put in prison because
of ones beliefs”
(thought crime of ” 1984 “) as stated M. Toubon, before
he became
a minister of Justice in France, to set up truth. This law is anti
constitutional,
anti democratic, against the rights of men. Facts, proofs,
pros and cons,
are only what we need. Professor Faurisson besought for
the granting of a forum with an
unlimited number of contradictors:
he never obtained it. L’abbé Pierre did
ask for it: they pretended to grant
it but refused it almost immediately. The forum did
take place at the
television of Lugano. It was a complete success for the Revisionists
and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows it as the media at the beck and
call of the Jewish lobby, move their little finger only when authorized.
20. Why is it that when a professor declares that the holocaust is an
arithmetic
and technical ineptitude, he isforthwith dismissed! This, for the
first time
in History, sets up the insane concept of religious historical
dogma, which
in case of non perennial worship, is doomed to be
struck by the lightning of the
inquisition of a secular state.
21. Why did the EXPRESS, a famous French
newspaper, in January 1995, assert that the gas-chamber
shown
for decades in Auschwitz I, was reconstructed
after the war, and that all that
concerns it, is false?
22. There was actually a holocaust of 60 million
people in a war declared
in 1933 by the Jews against Hitler. Hitler had given
bread to 6 million
unemployed, he had rejected the dictatorship of the dollar and the
Jewish
totalitarianism which pollute man and the planet and which is called
“democracy” by semantic mystification. Only two parties
are left: the totalitarian Judeopathy, exterminating man
and the planet,
and Nationalism for the Goyim not
yet cankered by Capitalisto-Marxist Jewish influence.
In “Marianne”
Jean François Kahn expresses anger against the bureaucrats
of the Jewish World Congress about the despoilment
of Jewish property,
which ended on the 3rd of March 1998 in Washington. He writes:
“They have reduced the Shoah to a financial market.
So the typical victim of Nazi
barbarity, the archetype of the most frightful genocide of this time, is not
the exploited worker
in Cracovie, the humble artisan of Lodz, the small civil
servant of Kiev, the modest shopkeeper of la rue des Rosiers, or
the unknown
craftsman of Riga, but the cosmopolitan billionaire who collected Rembrandt
and Rubens, slept on a heap of
gold signed here and there comfortable
insurance policies, sent his children to the U.S.A in order that they should make
a
brilliant career. This mighty lobby of American oligarchs is not
ashamed of reducing the holocaust to a Shoa-business.”
If Faurisson
had written what J.F. Kahn wrote he would have had one more
trial on his shoulders ! There is not the shadow of
a doubt!
By R.Dommergue
Polacco de Ménasce.
(A Jew who strongly takes issue with the totalitarian Judeopathy)
At this point, Monika had enough. It all was too much to mentally process. If even a quarter of the information she
had examined so far was true,
it was enough to begin a campaign to rewrite every existing history book in
America... and Europe, for starters. She finished with copying and
pasting the articles into the HOLOCAUST
TRUTH & FACTS page at the site. She shut down the computer, finished the last gulp of
wine and poured
another glass from the nearby bottle.
The emails from Leon DeGrelle and Art McCollum would have to wait.
CHAPTER 11 - INFO OVERLOAD
There was nobody waiting at the door, or waiting in their vehicles,
or waiting anywhere when Grace opened the front door to
The
Bar on a warm, and about to get very hot, summer morning. This was the third morning in a row that the regular regulars were
conspicuously absent. Most of the regular regulars came in around mid-afternoon the last few days and huddled around the far table
conversing in low voices, exchanging notes, passing books around and drinking shared PBR by the pitcher. She began to think
that
these people were very serious about their undertaking
as the PAUL REVERE SOCIETY.
Monika
came in at 10:10am and proceeded to the bar. “Anybody home?” She called out.
“Back here.” Answered Grace from the kitchen. “Zat you Monika?”
“Yeah, I'm just here for a coffee to go please.”
“It'll be 'bout five minutes kiddo, can ya wait.”
“Sure.” Replied Monika. “I just got my mail, I'll have a look at it.
Where is everybody or anybody?”
“It's been like this for the las' few mornins', I think the regulars are purty serious about this researchin an' readin'
that they're up to.
Ever since them Tucson folks got everbody's shorts
ina bunch about that Navy boat thang I ain't seen a smile on nobody's face when
I do see 'em by mid-afternoon. The whole bunch of 'em has turned into a flock a old cacklin'
hens.” She then added. “They sure as hell are poundin' down the PBR by the pitchers
too.”
Monika said. “Well, I can
tell you that they indeed have been doing their homework, a lot of it. I'm the club's web master ya know
and I can-not keep up with all of the information that theses guys are forwarding to me to post at the website...
I'm overwhelmed.”
“So whaddaya mean by forwarding?”
Asked Grace. “I mean, ya say yer the web master. So what are
ya doing by bein' the
web master? Hang on, I'll be right out with yer coffee... how do ya take it?”
“Cream and honey if ya got it please.”
A minute later Grace appeared
from the kitchen with the coffee in a to go cup.
“No honey, it's either sugar or this Sweet n'
Low stuff.”
“Sugar is fine thanks.” Said Monika.
“Uhh, to answer your questions, I'm building a website for the club to store and display
all of the
information that these guys are sending me via emails. They are
sending mostly articles, photos, memes, a lot of links to other sites
and PDF sites, book information and
reviews and YouTube links that they copy and paste onto emails and then forward them to me.
I'm collecting all of this stuff, but I'll tell ya, I'm swamped already. It's like a team effort being the web master
and there is only me.”
“Well, I'd offer ta help if I could, but ta tell the truth, I got
no idea what yer talkin' about... about FPD and memes and such thangs.
Hell girl, I don't even know how to turn a computer on, much les' work the damn thang. I cain't even work my smart
TV that's smarter
than me I tell ya.” Offered Grace. “I'm
glad ta be workin' a job like this where the boss refuses ta get anything modern goin' on...
besides that high-tech juke box, an' I ain't figgered that thang out yet.”
Grace wasn't as clueless as she let people think. She learned long ago that if she
acted clueless, or offered that she
was clueless,
people tended to not ask her
to do things she didn't want to do in the first place. She now knew that she
was the very last person Monika would ever ask for help with computer related tasks... and that was fine with her.
“Thanks for the cuppa joe Grace.” Said Monika
as she placed two bills on the bar.
“I'll see ya later, and maybe I can show
you how to get around in cyber-world sometime.”
“I'd rather ya jus' poke me in the eye, I'm sure I'd enjoy that more.” Said Grace as Monika was walking away.
Monika looked back over her shoulder, winked and
said. “Right, have a good one.”
As Monika drove along on her
way home she thought about the mounting task at hand. She wanted to read everything that was forwarded
to her, but that was no longer
possible. It would be best to simply copy the emailed information and paste it on the appropriate pages.
More pages would be needed for
the sub-topics and all of the off-topic information that was piling up in her email primary inbox.
Upon checking her emails Monika took a deep breath and held it.
It was time to see what Leon and Art were finding. She opened an email titled, Treaty of
Versailles.
________________
After a Century of Chaos, Totalitarianism,
and War, Versailles Treaty Still Haunts the World
Doug Bandow - The American Spectator
https://spectator.org/after-a-century-of-chaos-totalitarianism-and-war-versailles-treaty-still-haunts-the-world/
A century ago, in July 1919, Germany began its journey to the lowest reaches of Hades ... The treaty
signed on June 28 in the famous
Hall of Mirrors at the Versailles palace, however, proved
to be but a brief interlude of peace ... Variously the Big Three or Four (U.S.,
United
Kingdom, France, and sometimes Italy) sought to remake the world. They battled each other over their respective shares of
the plunder, such as dividing Germany's colonies and one-time Ottoman possessions,
and concocting a system to hinder Berlin's recovery ...
Most wars are stupid,
unnecessary, and harmful to all sides. Some are the result of hubris ... The centennial of the Versailles Treaty
should remind us of the necessity of ending any conflict with a good peace - and, more importantly,
of not starting a bad war.
______________________ The Treaty of Versailles: Eleven Facts About the 20th Century's Most Controversial Peace Agreement
Military
History Now https://militaryhistorynow.com/2019/06/23/the-treaty-of-versailles- 11-facts-about-the-20th-centurys-most-controversial-peace-agreement/ It was June 28, 1919. Envoys, statesmen and
diplomats from the world's leading powers had gathered in Versailles Palaces' famous Hall of Mirrors to
ink the treaty that would formally end the First World War ... Millions were dead, ancient dynasties were
in ruins and political upheaval was sweeping the continent. The treaty,which was the result of six
months of peace talks in Paris, was intended to do more than just formally resolve hostilities
between the Allies and Germany, it would lay the foundation for a more peaceful and just world
... The settlement ultimately failed to live up to its more noble ambitions and helped set the stage for
a second even deadlier conflict 20 years later. To mark the 100th anniversary of the Treaty of Versailles,
here are 11 key facts about the agreement and its impact on history. |
________________
Monika clicked on the links provided to be sure that they worked.
They did. Next she opened an email titled, THE NAMELESS
WAR
It obviously was a book that Leon copied in it's entirety.
_______________________
The
Nameless War
By Archibald Maule Ramsay
Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay was educated at
Eton and the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, and served with the 2nd
Battalion Coldstream Guards in the First World War until he was severely
wounded in 1916 - thereafter at Regimental H.Q. and
the War Office and the British War Mission in Paris until the end
of the war. From 1920 he became a Member
of H.M. Scottish Bodyguard. In 1931 he was elected a Member of Parliament for Midlothian and Peeblesshire.
Arrested under Regulation 18b on the 23rd May, 1940, he was detained, without charge or trial, in a cell in Brixton Prison
until the 26th
September, 1944. On the following morning he resumed his seat in the House of Commons and remained there
until the end
of that Parliament in 1945.
Introduction
THE NAMELESS
WAR
Here is the story that people have said would never be written in our time — the true
history
of
events leading up to the Second World War, told by one who enjoyed the friendship and
confidence of Mr. Neville
Chamberlain during the critical months between Munich and September, 1939.
There has long been an unofficial ban on books dealing with what Captain Ramsay calls "The
Nameless War", the conflict which
has been waged from behind the political scene for centuries, which is still being waged and of which
very few are aware.
The publishers of
"The Nameless War" believe this latest exposure will
do more than any previous attempt to break the conspiracy of silence.
The present work, with much additional evidence and a fuller historical background,
is the outcome of the personal experiences of a public figure who
in the course of duty has discovered at first-hand the existence of
a centuries old conspiracy against Britain, Europe, and the whole of Christendom.
"The Nameless War" reveals an unsuspected link between all the major
revolutions in Europe — from King Charles I's time to the
abortive attempt against Spain in 1936. One source of inspiration, design and supply is shown
to be common to all of them.
Page-1
These revolutions
and the World War of 1939 are seen to be integral parts of one and the same master plan.
After a brief review
of the forces behind the declaration of war and the world wide arrests of many who endeavoured to oppose them,
the author describes the
anatomy of the Revolutionary International machine — the machine which today continues the
plan for supranational
world power, the age-old Messianic dream of International Jewry.
It is the author's belief that the machine
would break down without the support of its unwilling Jews
and unsuspecting Gentiles and he puts forward suggestions for detaching these elements.
Christians say . . .
"Captain Ramsay, a Christian gentleman of unflagging courage,
believed that the
war with Germany was not conceived in the interests of Britain and could lead
only to the extension of Communist and Jewish power.
Because he
warned his fellow countrymen of the forces at work, he was put in prison
without trial for four and a half years, for 'reasons' so preposterous
that those
who framed them dared not submit them to a court of law."
Truth
"For years Captain Ramsay had been
a member of the British Parliament. His book is an
analysis of the Jewish-Zionist war against Christian civilization." The Cross and the
Flag
Jews say . . .
"There is no limit to the depths of human depravity, Captain Maule Ramsay
. . . seems
to have made a very determined attempt to plumb those depths." The Jewish Chronicle
"The publication
of such a book, at this time, underlines the urgent need for the law to be reformed so as
to make it a crime to preach racial hatred or
publish libels on groups in the community." The Daily Worker
Copyright 1952; First Edition October 1952;
Second Popular Edition 1956;
Third Popular Edition 1956;
Fourth Popular Edition 1962;
Made and Printed in
Great Britain by
The B.P.S. Printing Co.
Page-2
and Published by the Britons Publishing Company
111a Westbourne Grove, London, W.2
CONTENTS
The British Revolution
The French Revolution
The Russian
Revolution
Development of Revolutionary Technique
Germany Bells The Cat
1933: Jewry Declares War
"Phoney
War" Ended by Civilian Bombing
Dunkirk and After
The Shape of Things to Come
President Roosevelt's Role
Regulation 18b
Who Dares?
Epilogue
Capt. Ramsay's Statement From Prison to Parliament
Particulars - Reasons Given For Arrest
Appendix 1 A Appendix 2 A Appendix 3 A Appendix 4 A Appendix 5 A Appendix 6
Dedication
To the memory of those
Patriots who in 1215 at Runnymede
signed Magna Carta and those who in 1320 at Arbroath
signed the Declaration of
Independence this book is
dedicated. 27th July 1952
Page-3
PROLOGUE
Edward I banished the Jews from England for many grave offences endangering the welfare of his realm and lieges, which were
to a great extent indicated
in the Statutes of Jewry*, enacted by his Parliament in 1290, the Commons playing a prominent part.
* See Appendix 2
(Appendices follow the last chapter)
The King of France very shortly followed suit, as did other Rulers in Christian Europe. So
grave did the situation for the Jews in
Europe become, that an urgent appeal for help and advice was addressed by them to the Sanhedrin,
then located at Constantinople.
This appeal was sent over the signature of Chemor, Rabbi of Arles in Provence,
on the 13th January, 1489.
The reply came in November, 1489, which was issued over the signature of V.S.S. V.F.F. Prince of the Jews.
It advised the Jews of Europe to adopt the tactics of the Trojan Horse; to make their sons
Christian priests, lawyers, doctors, etc., and
work to destroy the Christian structure from within.
The first notable repercussion to this advice occurred in Spain
in the reign of Ferdinand and Isabella. Many Jews
were by then enrolled as Christians, but remaining secretly Jews were working to destroy
the Christian church in Spain.
So grave became the menace finally, that the Inquisition was instituted in an
endeavour to cleanse the country from these
conspirators. Once again the Jews were compelled to commence an exodus from yet another country,
whose hospitality they
had abused.
Trekking eastwards, these Jews joined other Jewish communities in western
Europe; considerable numbers
flowed on to Holland and Switzerland.
From now on these two countries were to become active centres of Jewish intrigue.
Jewry, however, has
always needed a powerful seafaring nation to which to attach itself.
Great Britain, newly united under James
I, was a rising naval power, which was
already beginning to sway the four corners of the discovered world. Here
also there existed a wonderful field for disruptive
criticism; for although it was a Christian
kingdom, yet it was one most sharply divided as between Protestant and Catholic.
A campaign
for exploiting this division and fanning hatreds between the Christian
communities was soon in process of organization. How well the Jews
succeeded
in
this campaign in Britain may be judged from the fact
that one of the earliest acts of their creature and hireling
Oliver Cromwell — after executing the King
according to plan —
was to allow the Jews free access to England once more.
Monika stopped reading there, copied the entire 95 pages of the
book and pasted it on it's own page
that she had added to the WWII page. She then opened an
email from Art titled, THE BAD WAR
The Soviet Union Conspired to Foment World
War II and Infiltrate the U.S. Government
By John Wear
Stalin’s Plans
Soviet Dictator Joseph Stalin adopted three Five-Year Plans beginning in 1927
designed to make the Soviet Union the greatest military power in the
world.
Stalin also conspired to start
a major war in Europe by drawing Great Britain
and France into war against Germany and other countries. Stalin’s plan was
to eliminate one enemy with the hands of another. If Germany entered
into a war with Great Britain and France, other countries would
enter into the war and great destruction would follow.
The Soviet Union
could then invade Europe
and easily take over the entire continent.
Stalin first attempted to start a major war in Europe
during the civil war in
Spain in 1936.
Stalin’s political agents, propagandists, diplomats and spies in
Spain all screamed in outrage that children were dying in Spain while
Great Britain and France did nothing. However, Stalin’s agents
were not able
to spread the war beyond
Spain’s borders. By the end of 1938, Stalin stopped
all anti-Hitler propaganda to calm Hitler and to encourage him to attack Poland.
Stalin eventually forced war in
Europe with the signing of the
Molotov-Ribbentrop
agreement. British and French delegations had
arrived in Moscow on August 11, 1939, to discuss joint
action against Germany. During the course of these talks,
British and French delegates told
the Soviets that if Germany attacked Poland,
Great Britain and France would declare war against Germany. This was the information
Stalin needed to know. On August 19, 1939, Stalin stopped the talks with Great
Britain and France, and told the German ambassador
in Moscow that he wanted to
reach an agreement
with Germany.
On that same day, August 19, 1939, a secret meeting of the Politburo took place.
The following are some excerpts from Joseph Stalin’s speech:
If we accept Germany’s proposal
about the conclusion of a pact regarding invasion,
she
will of course attack Poland, and France and England’s involvement
in this war will be inevitable. Western Europe will be subjected to serious disorders
and disturbances. Under these conditions, we will have many chances to
stay on the sidelines of the conflict, and we will be able to count on our advantageous
entrance into the war…It is in the interest of the USSR—the motherland
of workers—that the war unfolds between the Reich and the
capitalist Anglo-French block. It is necessary to do
everything within our powers to make this war last as
long as possible, in order to exhaust the two sides.
It is precisely for this reason that we must agree to signing the pact, proposed by Germany,
and work on making this war, once declared, last a maximum amount of time.
On August 23, 1939, Germany and
the Soviet Union signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop
agreement which led to the destruction and division of Poland and the beginning
of World War II in Europe. The nations of Western Europe became mired in a
destructive war while the Soviet Union remained neutral.
Stalin’s role in unleashing
World
War II was quickly and thoroughly forgotten. Stalin even received an
historically unprecedented amount of aid from the United States and Great Britain
after Germany’s invasion of the Soviet Union.
American
historian John Mosier writes about the Allied aid given to the Soviet Union:
His resources were being augmented
daily by the vast
flow of British and American aid
coming into the USSR.
In
the first half of 1943, Stalin had received 1,775,000 tons of aid;
in the second half of the year he received 3,274,000 tons,
a considerable increase. Given that aid, and his willingness
to see his citizenry slaughtered, the struggle would be bitter…
Debates on the importance of Allied aid to Stalin have essentially been comparing
the numbers of actual working armored vehicles that the British and Americans
loaded onto ships and transported to the USSR with the theoretical numbers of
armored vehicles that the tank factories claimed they had produced in order to
satisfy Stalin’s demands. Even on that comparison, however, the shipments
were substantial: 12,575 British and American tanks were sent to the Red Army,
enough to equip 273 tank brigades based on the theoretical Soviet organizational charts
of December 1941,
an armored force substantially larger
than the one Stalin had lost in the first six months of the war.
Why Hitler Signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Agreement
The Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement
is remarkable in that Hitler repeatedly stated he hated
Communism and did not trust the leaders of the Soviet Union. Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf:
It must never be forgotten that the
present rulers of Russia are blood-stained
criminals,
that here we have the dregs of humanity which, favored by
the circumstances of a tragic moment, overran a great State, degraded and
extirpated millions of educated people out of sheer blood-lust, and that
now for nearly 10 years they have ruled with such a savage tyranny as was
never known before. It must not be forgotten that these rulers belong to
a people in whom the most bestial cruelty is allied with a capacity for artful
mendacity and believes itself today more than ever called to impose its
sanguinary despotism on the rest of the world. It must not be forgotten that
the international Jew, who is today the absolute master of Russia, does
not look upon Germany as an ally but as a State condemned to the same doom
as Russia. One does not form an alliance with a partner whose only
aim is the destruction of his fellow partner. Above all, one does not enter into
alliances with people for whom no treaty is sacred; because they do not
move about this earth as men of honor and sincerity but as the
representatives of lies and deception, thievery and plunder and robbery.
The man who thinks that he can bind himself by treaty with parasites is like the
tree that believes it can form a profitable bargain with the ivy that surrounds it.
Hitler also wrote in Mein Kampf: “Therefore
the fact of forming an alliance with
Russia would be the signal for a new war. And the result of that would be the end of Germany.”
Hitler repeated his distrust of the Soviet Union in a conversation on March 3,
1938 with British Ambassador Nevile Henderson. Hitler stated in this conversation
that any limitations on arms depended on the Soviet
Union. Hitler noted that
the problem was
rendered particularly difficult “by the fact that one could place
as much confidence in the faith in treaties of a barbarous creature like the
Soviet Union as in the comprehension of mathematical
formulae by a savage.
Any agreement with the U.S.S.R. was quite worthless….” Hitler added that it
was
impossible, for example, to have faith
in any Soviet agreement not to use poison gas.
Hitler’s statements in Mein Kampf and to Nevile Henderson
were prescient. Stalin
had been planning to take over
all of Europe ever since the 1920s. Stalin and the Soviet Union could not be trusted to uphold any peace agreement.
However, Hitler entered into the Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement because Hitler was desperate to end the atrocities being
committed against the ethnic Germans in Poland. Hitler
was hoping that the Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement would prevent
Great Britain and France from declaring war against Germany.
Hitler
also signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement because the negotiations
that had been ongoing between Great Britain, France and the Soviet Union had
taken on a threatening character for Germany. Hitler was confronted
with the alternative
of being encircled
by this massive alliance coalition or ending it via diplomatic channels.
The Molotov-Ribbentrop Non-Aggression
Pact prevented Germany from being encircled by these three powers.
Stalin stayed out of the war in
Europe he had conspired to instigate.
Stalin
kept the war in Europe going by supplyingmuch needed-supplies to Germany.
However, Hitler’s swift, surgical victory over France prevented the massive
destruction in Europe Stalin had hoped for. Soviet Foreign
Affairs Minister Vyacheslav Molotov
was
sent to Germany in November 1940 to announce the Soviet Union’s new
territorial demands in Europe. These new territorial demands effectively ended the
Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement. Hitler was forced to
launch a preemptive
attack on June 22,
1941, to prevent the Soviet Union from conquering all of Europe.
The Soviet war effort in the European
theater of World War II was enormous.
Most
historians underestimate the incredible power of the Soviet military. British historian
Norman Davies writes: “…the Soviet war effort was so overwhelming that
impartial historians in the future are unlikely to rate
the British and American contribution to
the European theatre as much more than a supporting role. The proportions
were not ‘Fifty-fifty’, as many imply when talking of the final onslaught on Nazi Germany
from East and West. Sooner or later people will
have toadjust to the fact
that the Soviet role was enormous and the Western role was respectable but modest.”
A
crucial factor that prevented the Soviet takeover of Europe was the more
than 400,000 non-German Europeans who volunteered to fight on the Eastern Front.
Combined with 600,000 German troops, the 1,000,000-man
Waffen SS
represented the first truly
pan-European army ever to exist. The heroism of
these non-German volunteers who joined the Waffen SS prevented the
planned Soviet conquest of Europe. In this regard, A Waffen SS General wrote:
If the Waffen-SS
had not existed, Europe would have been overrun entirely by the
Soviets by 1944. They would have reached Paris long before the Americans.
Waffen-SS heroism stopped the Soviet juggernaut at Moscow, Cherkov,
Cherkassy and Tarnopol. The Soviets lost more than 12 months. Without SS
resistance the Soviets would have been in Normandy before Eisenhower.
The people showed deep gratitude to the young men who sacrificed their lives.
The Soviet Union
Infiltrated the U.S. Government
The Soviet Union also conspired to have Japan
attack the United States.
Harry Dexter
White, later proven to be a Soviet agent, carried out a mission to
provoke Japan into war with the United States. When Secretary of
State Cordell Hull allowed the peacemakers in Roosevelt’s administration to put together
a modus vivendi that had real potential, White drafted a 10-point
proposal that the Japanese were certain to reject.
White passed a
copy of his
proposal to Hull, and this final American offer—the so-called
“Hull Note”—was presented to the Japanese on November 26, 1941.
The Hull Note, which was based on two memoranda from White, was a
declaration of war as far as the Japanese were concerned. The Hull Note destroyed
any possible peace settlement with the Japanese, and
led to the Japanese attack
on the US fleet
at Pearl Harbor. In this regard, American historian John Koster writes:
Harry Dexter White, acting under orders of Soviet intelligence, pulled the strings
by which Cordell Hull and [State Department expert on Far Eastern Affairs]
Stanley Hornbeck handed the Japanese an ultimatum that was tantamount to
a declaration of war—when both the Japanese cabinet and the U.S. military
were desperately eager for peace.…Harry Dexter White knew exactly
what he was doing. The man himself remains a mystery, but the documents
speak for themselves. Harry Dexter White gave us Pearl Harbor.
The Soviets had also planted numerous
other agents in the Roosevelt administration.
For example, Harold Glasser, a member of Morgenthau’s Treasury staff,
provided intelligence from the War Department and the White House to the Soviets.
The Soviet NKVD deemed Glasser’s reports so important
that 74 reports
generated from his material
went directly to Stalin. American historian Robert Wilcox
writes of the Soviet infiltration of the U.S. government and its effect on Roosevelt:
These spies, plus the hundreds in
other U.S. agencies at the time, including
the military
and OSS, permeated the administration in Washington, and,
ultimately, the White House, surrounding FDR. He was basically in the
Soviets’ pocket. He admired Stalin, sought his favor. Right or wrong,
he thought the Soviet Union indispensable in the war, crucial to bringing
world peace after it, and he wanted the Soviets handled with kid gloves.
FDR was star struck. The Russians hardly could have done better if he was a Soviet spy.
The opening of the Soviet archives
in 1995 revealed that more than 300
communist
members or supporters had infiltrated the American government.
Working in Lend-Lease, the Treasury Department, the State Department, the
office of the president, the office of the vice president, and even
American intelligence
operations, these
agents constantly tried to shift U.S. policy in a pro-Soviet
direction. During World War II several of these Soviet agents were well positioned
to influence American policy. Especially at the Tehran and Yalta meetings
toward the end of World War II, the Soviet spies were able to influence
Roosevelt
to make huge concessions to
the Soviet Union.
The Soviet Union Allowed
to Control Eastern Europe
In addition to instigating the war in Europe, the Allied
leaders intentionally
allowed the Soviet
Union to take over Berlin and Eastern Europe. The Supreme Allied
Commander in the West, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower,
had no intention of occupying Berlin. According to Nikita
Khrushchev’s memoirs, “Stalin said that if it hadn’t been for
Eisenhower, we wouldn’t have succeeded in capturing
Berlin.”
Stalin wanted his troops to reach as far into Europe as possible to enable the
Soviet Union to control more of Europe after the war
was over. Stalin knew that
once Soviet
troops had a stronghold in Eastern Europe, it would be almost impossible
to dislodge them. Soviet hegemony could not be dislodged unless Roosevelt
wanted to take on the Soviet Union after fighting Germany. Stalin said
in
private: “Whoever occupies a
territory imposes on it his own social system.
Everyone imposes his own system as far as his army can reach.”
The United States could easily have
prevented the Soviet Union from marching
as far west into Europe as it did. After defeating Germany in North Africa, the
Americans and British went into Sicily and then Italy. Churchill favored an advance
up the Italian or Balkan peninsulas into central Europe.
Such a march would
be quicker in reaching
Berlin, but Roosevelt and Stalin opposed this strategy
at the Tehran Conference in November 1943. In general sessions at Tehran with
Churchill present, Roosevelt opposed strengthening the Italian campaign. Instead,
Roosevelt wanted troops in Italy to go to France for
the larger cross-Channel attack planned for 1944.
Gen. Mark Clark, the American commander in Italy, later
commented on
Roosevelt’s decision:
“The weakening of the campaign in Italy in order to invade
Southern France, instead of pushing on into the Balkans, was one of the outstanding mistakes of the
war….Stalin knew exactly what he
wanted…and the thing he wanted most was to keep us out of the Balkans.”
The Allied military leaders also
intentionally prevented Gen. George Patton from
quickly defeating Germany in Western Europe. In August 1944, Patton’s Third Army
was presented with an opportunity to encircle the Germans at Falaise,
France. However, Gens. Omar Bradley and Dwight Eisenhower
ordered Patton to stop at Argentan and
not complete the encirclement of the Germans,
which most historians agree Patton could have done.
As a result, probably 100,000 or more German
soldiers escaped to later fight U.S. troops
in December 1944 in the last-ditch counterattack known as the Battle of the Bulge.
Patton wrote in his diary concerning
the halt that prevented the encirclement of Germans at Falaise: “This halt [was]
a great mistake. [Bradley’s] motto seems to be, ‘In case of doubt, halt.’
I wish I were supreme commander.”
Maj. Gen. Richard Rohmer, who was a Canadian fighter pilot at the time,
wrote that if the gap had closed it “could have
brought the surrender of the Third Reich,
whose
senior generals were now desperately concerned about the ominous
shadow of the great Russian Bear rising on the eastern horizon of the Fatherland.”
Even Col. Ralph Ingersoll, Gen. Bradley’s own
historian, wrote, “The failure to
close
the Argentan-Falaise gap was the loss of the greatest single opportunity of the war.”
By August 31, 1944, Patton had put
Falaise behind him and quickly advanced
his tanks to the Meuse River, only 63 miles from the German border and 140 miles
from the Rhine River. The German army Patton was chasing was disorganized
and in disarray; nothing could stop Patton from roaring into Germany.
However, on
August 31, the Third Army’s
gasoline allotment was suddenly cut by 140,000 gallons
per day. This was a huge chunk of the 350,000 to 400,000 gallons per day the
Third Army had been consuming. Patton’s advance was halted even though the
way ahead was open and largely undefended by the German
army in retreat.
Siegfried Westphal, Gen. von Rundstedt’s chief of staff, later described the
condition of the German army on the day Patton was
stopped: “The overall situation in
the
West [for the Germans] was serious in the extreme. The Allies could have
punched through at any point with ease.” The halt of the Third-Army blitzkrieg allowed
the Germans to reposition and revitalize.
With the knowledge that
they were defending
their home soil, the Germans found a new purpose
for fighting. They were not just waging a war, but were defending
their families from what they regarded as revenge-seeking hordes.
Germany
took advantage of the overall Allied slowdown and reorganized her
troops into a major fighting force. Germany’s counterattack in the Battle of the
Bulge took Allied forces completely by surprise. The
Germans created a “bulge”
in
the overextended American line, and the Allies ran the risk of being cut off and
possibly annihilated or thrown back into the sea. Patton had to pull back his Third Army
in the east and begin another full-scale attack on
the southern flank of the German forces.
Patton’s
troops arrived in a matter of days and were the
crucial factor in pushing the German bulge back into Germany.
Patton was re-enthused after the Battle of the Bulge and
wanted to quickly take his Third Army into the heart of Germany.
The
German Army had no more reserves and was
definitely on its last legs. However, once again Patton was
held back by Gen Eisenhower and the Joint Chiefs of
Staff led by Gen. George Marshall. Patton was dumbfounded.
Patton wrote: “I’ll
be damned if I see why we
have divisions
if not to use them. One would think
people
would like to win a war…we will be criticized
by history, and rightly so, for having sat still so long.”
The Western Allies were still in
a position to easily capture
Berlin. However,
Eisenhower ordered a halt of American
troops at the Elbe River, thereby in effect presenting a gift
to the Soviet Union of central Germany and much of Europe.
One American staff officer bitterly
commented: “No German force could have stopped us.
The only thing that stood between [the] Ninth Army and Berlin was Eisenhower.”
On May 8, 1945, the day the war in Europe officially ended,
Patton spoke his mind in an “off-the-record” press briefing.
With
tears in his eyes, Patton recalled those “who gave their lives
in what they believed was the final fight in the cause of freedom.”
Patton
continued:
I wonder how [they] will speak today when they know that for the first
time in centuries we have opened Central and Western Europe to the forces of
Genghis Khan. I wonder how they feel now that they know there will
be no peace in our times and that Americans, some not yet born, will have to f
ight the Russians tomorrow, or 10, 15 or 20 years from tomorrow.
We have spent the last months since the Battle of the Bulge and the crossing of the
Rhine stalling; waiting for Montgomery to get ready to attack in the
North; occupying useless real estate and killing a few lousy Huns when we
should have been in Berlin and Prague.
And this Third Army could have been.
Today we should be telling the Russians to go to hell instead of hearing
them tell us to pull back. We should be telling them if they didn’t like it to go to
hell and invite them to fight. We’ve defeated one aggressor against mankind
and established a second far worse, more evil and more dedicated than the first.
A few days later Patton shocked
everyone at a Paris hotel gathering by
saying basically the same things. At a later gathering in Berlin, when asked to drink
a toast with a Soviet general, Patton told his translator,
“tell that Russian sonovabitch that from the way they’re
acting here, I regard them as enemies and I’d
rather
cut my throat than have a drink
with one of my enemies!”
Patton became known among U.S. and Soviet leaders as a bona-fide
menace and a threat to world peace. In addition, Patton was viewed
as insubordinate, uncontrollable, and, in the eyes of some,
treasonous. U.S. Maj. Douglas Bazata claims he was given the order
to assassinate Patton by the Office of Strategic Services, an
American military-espionage unit. Bazata says he shot Patton during
a planned auto wreck of Patton’s vehicle on December 9, 1945.
Patton later died in a hospital on December 21, 1945 under very
suspicious circumstances.
Conclusion
The US fought in World War II supposedly to stop fascist aggression and to
create democratic institutions in the liberated nations of Europe. However,
within a
remarkably short period after
the end of the war, the Soviet Union ruthlessly subjected
Eastern Europe to its totalitarian control. The Red Army brought Moscow-trained
secret policemen into every Soviet-occupied country, put local communists in
control of the national media, and dismantled youth
groups and other civic organizations.
The
Soviets also brutally arrested, murdered and deported people whom
they believed to be anti-Soviet, and enforced a policy of ethnic cleansing. A war
allegedly fought for democracy and freedom had turned into a totalitarian
nightmare
for the people of the Eastern
European nations. This result was not accidental.
The historical record indicates that the Soviet Union
actively conspired to
instigate World
War II. The U.S. government was also infiltrated by high-level Soviet
agents who influenced Franklin Roosevelt to make huge concessions to the
Soviet Union at the Tehran and Yalta Conferences. Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower
also prevented Gen. Patton and other U.S. forces from
taking over
Berlin and the rest of Eastern
Europe before the Soviets could do so.
The Allies had planned a long and devastating war resulting in the complete
destruction of Germany. This is indicated
by a conversation on November 21, 1938
between U.S. Ambassador to France William Bullitt and Polish Ambassador
Jerzy Potocki. According to what military experts told Bullitt during the fall crisis
of 1938, a war lasting at least six years would break
out in Europe. In the
military experts’
opinion the war would result in the complete destruction of Europe,
with communism reigning in every European state. The benefits would accrue
to the Soviet Union at the conclusion of the war. Bullitt, who enjoyed
the special
confidence of President Roosevelt,
also told Potocki that the United
States
would take part in the war after Great Britain and France had made
the first move. The complete destruction of Germany and the communist
takeover of Eastern Europe occurred exactly as Bullitt had predicted.
Also attached to this email from Art was a list of the
Jews surrounding FDR. Monika scanned the list, but she,
like most Americans did not recognise many of the names.
Such is the nature
of perceived power versus actual power.